1
|
Ding J, Liu XC, Hong J, Zhang QM, Xu XW, Liu YQ, Yu CQ. Knowledge about, attitudes toward and acceptance and predictors of intention to receive the mpox vaccine among cancer patients in China: A cross-sectional survey. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2024; 20:2337157. [PMID: 38644633 PMCID: PMC11037286 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2337157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the knowledge about, attitudes toward, and acceptance and predictors of receiving the mpox vaccine among Chinese cancer patients. Patients were selected using a convenience sampling method. A web-based self-report questionnaire was developed to assess cancer patients' knowledge, attitudes, and acceptance regarding the mpox vaccine. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors of acceptance of the mpox vaccine. A total of 805 cancer patients were included in this study, with a vaccine hesitancy rate of 27.08%. Approximately 66% of the patients' information about mpox and the vaccine came from the mass media, and there was a significant bias in the hesitant group's knowledge about mpox and the vaccine. Multivariable logistic regression analysis suggested that retirement; chemotherapy; the belief that the mpox vaccine could prevent disease, that vaccination should be compulsory when appropriate and that the mpox vaccine prevents mpox and reduces complications; the willingness to pay for the mpox vaccine; the willingness to recommend that friends and family receive the mpox vaccine; and the belief that the mpox vaccine should be distributed fairly and equitably were factors that promoted vaccination. The belief that mpox worsens tumor prognosis was a driving factor for vaccine hesitancy. This study investigated the knowledge of cancer patients about mpox and the vaccine, evaluated the acceptance and hesitancy rates of the mpox vaccine and examined the predictors of vaccination intention. We suggest that the government scientifically promote the vaccine and develop policies such as free vaccination and personalized vaccination to increase the awareness and acceptance rate of the mpox vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Ding
- School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- TCM gynecology department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xing-Chen Liu
- Pathology department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing Hong
- School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Integration of Chinese and Western Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Department of Integrative Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qing-Mei Zhang
- Anesthesiology department, Chaohu Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Xiao-Wan Xu
- Department of Integrative Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi-Qun Liu
- TCM gynecology department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chao-Qin Yu
- School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- TCM gynecology department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen G, Yao Y, Zhang Y, Zhao F. The impact of risk perception and institutional trust on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in China. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2024; 20:2301793. [PMID: 38282324 PMCID: PMC10826627 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2301793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Vaccination has become the primary means for citizens to prevent severe morbidity and mortality during the pandemic. However, vaccine hesitancy poses a major threat to global public health security. Based on the data from Chinese General Social Survey in 2021, this study aims to explore the socio-political aspects of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, focusing on the relationship between COVID-19 risk perceptions, institutional trust and vaccine hesitancy. Among the samples, 39.8% of the respondents exhibited COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, 48.9% had a high awareness of the risk of COVID-19, and 74.6% presented a high level of trust in institutions. The results showed that higher risk perception and institutional trust are negatively correlated with vaccine hesitancy (p < .001). Institutional trust had no statistically significant moderating effect on the association between risk perception and vaccine hesitancy, but the role of institutional trust in influencing vaccine hesitancy is more significant at a lower level of perceptions of COVID-19 risk. Furthermore, regional variations in the factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy were demonstrated in China. These findings have important implications for developing strategies to address vaccine hesitancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guiwu Chen
- Department of Public Administration, School of Public Administration and Emergency Mangement, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yiyun Yao
- Department of Public Administration, School of Public Administration and Emergency Mangement, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yaowen Zhang
- The Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Master of Public Administration Education Center, School of Public Administration and Emergency Mangement, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Fei Zhao
- The Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Master of Public Administration Education Center, School of Public Administration and Emergency Mangement, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li X, Bai Y, Weng L, Bai Y, Gong W. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among the Chinese elderly: A multi-stakeholder qualitative study. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2024; 20:2315663. [PMID: 38439589 PMCID: PMC10936594 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2315663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
The United Nations reported that the mortality risk of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is five times higher in the elderly than the global average. Although the COVID-19 vaccine effectively prevents infections and reduce mortality among the elderly, vaccine hesitancy among the Chinese elderly poses a significant threat. This study, utilizing the "Confidence, Convenience and Complacency (3 Cs)" vaccine hesitancy model, aimed to explore factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy among the Chinese elderly and assess national countermeasures and potential improvement approaches. Thirteen elderly with vaccine hesitancy and eleven vaccine-related staff participated in semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis revealed three key determinants of vaccine hesitancy among the elderly: perceived low threat of COVID-19, lack of confidence in COVID-19 vaccine, and poor accessibility to vaccination. China has implemented strategies, including advocacy through diverse channels, joint multi-sectoral promotion vaccination, and enhancing ongoing vaccination services. Recommendations from the vaccine-related staff emphasize improving vaccine awareness among the elderly, and prioritizing the vaccination environment and process. The study underscores the importance of targeted vaccination promotion programs addressing hesitation reasons to improve vaccination rates. Furthermore, existing countermeasures can serve as a foundation for enhancing vaccination strategies, including improved publicity, administration, and management approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyu Li
- HER Team and Department of Maternal and Child Health, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yanping Bai
- HER Team and Department of Maternal and Child Health, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Lijun Weng
- HER Team and Department of Maternal and Child Health, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yunshan Bai
- Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Wenjie Gong
- HER Team and Department of Maternal and Child Health, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chicoine N, Schnipper N, Griffin J. The role of hesitancy and infrastructure in the equity and efficiency of COVID-19 vaccine administration. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0304416. [PMID: 38875217 PMCID: PMC11178164 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024] Open
Abstract
After the first COVID-19 vaccines received emergency use authorization from the U.S. FDA in December 2020, U.S. states employed vaccine eligibility and administration plans (VEAPs) that determined when subgroups of residents would become eligible to receive the vaccine while the vaccine supply was still limited. During the implementation of these plans, public concern grew over whether the VEAPs and vaccine allocations from the federal government were resulting in an equitable and efficient vaccine distribution. In this study, we collected data on five states' VEAPs, federal vaccine allocations, vaccine administration, and vaccine hesitancy to assess the equity of vaccine access and vaccine administration efficiency that manifested during the campaign. Our results suggest that residents in states which opened eligibility to the vaccine sooner had more competition among residents to receive the vaccine than occurred in other states. Regardless of states' VEAPs, there was a consistent inefficiency in vaccine administration among all five states that could be attributed to both state and federal infrastructure deficits. A closer examination revealed a misalignment between federal vaccine allocations and the total eligible population in the states throughout the campaign, even when accounting for hesitancy. We conclude that in order to maximize the efficiency of future mass-vaccination campaigns, the federal and state governments should design adaptable allocation policies and eligibility plans that better match the true, real-time supply and demand for vaccines by accounting for vaccine hesitancy and manufacturing capacity. Further, we discuss the challenges of implementing such strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah Chicoine
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Noah Schnipper
- Division of Engineering, Lafayette College, Easton, PA, United States of America
| | - Jacqueline Griffin
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bruns M, Walch T, Wagner C, Bergeron R, Kim S. Examining the role of knowledge and trust on vaccine confidence in North Dakota among university students, faculty, and staff. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:1539. [PMID: 38849753 PMCID: PMC11157701 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19056-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccination is one of the greatest tools for individuals to stay healthy. Individuals are, however, often exposed to misinformation via digital and social media, and thus, may miss the opportunity to develop scientific knowledge about vaccines and trust in relevant stakeholders. This has a damaging impact on vaccine confidence. Understanding vaccine confidence is particularly important in North Dakota, where vaccination rates are lower than national averages. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this research are to examine the association between vaccine confidence and three potential sources of it, namely, trust, vaccine knowledge, and vaccine information sources and to investigate the relative strength of three vaccine confidence sources, while accounting for covariates. METHODS Students (n = 517, 56.6%) and staff and faculty (n = 397, 43.4%) at the University of North Dakota (n = 914) completed an online survey. Logistic regressions estimated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations among trust in doctors, family/friends, government health agencies, charitable organizations, and religious organizations, vaccine knowledge, vaccine information sources as well as vaccine confidence, accounting for gender, race, marital status, age, religion, political ideology, education, and health status. RESULTS The mean age of participants was 29.43 years (SD = 13.48). Most were females (71.6%) and white (91.5%). Great trust in doctors (OR = 3.29, p < 0.001, 95%CI 1.89, 5.73) government health agencies (OR = 2.95, p < 0.001, 95%CI 2.13, 4.08) and vaccine knowledge (OR = 1.28, p < 0.001, 95%CI 1.18, 1.38) had higher odds of vaccine confidence. Using Internet Government source as the primary source of vaccine information (OR = 1.73, p < 0.05, 95%CI 1.22, 2.44) showed higher odds of vaccine confidence before all independent variables were introduced, but it became non-significant after they were introduced. Trust in government health agencies showed strongest associations with vaccine confidence. CONCLUSION Multiple stakeholders are necessary to ensure verified, accessible, and accurate information in order to advance vaccine confidence in rural, conservative areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Bruns
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, 1301 North Columbia Road Stop 9037, Grand Forks, ND, 58202, USA
| | - Tanis Walch
- Department of Education, Health & Behavior, University of North Dakota, 231 Centennial Drive Stop 7189, Grand Forks, ND, 58202, USA
| | - Claire Wagner
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, 1301 North Columbia Road Stop 9037, Grand Forks, ND, 58202, USA
| | - Rylee Bergeron
- Department of Education, Health & Behavior, University of North Dakota, 231 Centennial Drive Stop 7189, Grand Forks, ND, 58202, USA
| | - Soojung Kim
- Department of Communication, University of North Dakota, 221 Centennial Dr. Stop 7169, Grand Forks, ND, 58202-7169, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kociolek LK, Shane AL, Simonsen KA, Zerr DM. Infection Prevention and Control Implications of Special Pathogens in Children. Pediatr Clin North Am 2024; 71:431-454. [PMID: 38754934 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcl.2024.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
Special pathogens are broadly defined as highly transmissible organisms capable of causing severe disease in humans. Children's hospital healthcare personnel (HCP) should be prepared to identify patients possibly infected with a special pathogen, isolate the patient to minimize transmission, and inform key infection prevention, clinical, and public health stakeholders. Effective preparedness requires resources and practice with attention to education, policies and procedures, drills and training, and supplies. Successfully preparing for special pathogens is an important measure toward keeping communities, HCP, and patients and families safe in this global age that brings pathogens from across the world to our doorstep.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larry K Kociolek
- Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, 225 East Chicago Avenue, Box 20, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| | - Andi L Shane
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory Children's Center, 2015 Uppergate Drive Northeast, Room 504A, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Kari A Simonsen
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 982162 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA
| | - Danielle M Zerr
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle Children's Hospital, Mailstop MA7.226, 4800 Sand Point Way, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Leigland A, Arnold T, Giorlando KK, Barnett AP, Sims-Gomillia CE, Bertone Z, Edet PP, Whiteley L, Brown LK. A qualitative study evaluating COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among individuals living in Mississippi. SSM. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN HEALTH 2024; 5:100377. [PMID: 38605935 PMCID: PMC11005795 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
Background COVID-19 vaccination rates are lower in the Southern United States compared to other regions. This study investigated COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy in Mississippi (MS) to identify preferences that may boost MS vaccination strategies in areas with poor vaccine uptake. Methods Qualitative interviews were completed between April 2021 and January 2022 with staff and patients at four Federally Qualified Health Centers in MS. Interviews included the following COVID-19 vaccine topics: willingness to be vaccinated, barriers and facilitators, and methods for providing vaccine information. Data were organized with NVivo software and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results Fifteen clinic staff and 49 patients were interviewed. Barriers to vaccine uptake included a lack of knowledge and understanding of how the vaccine worked, distrust of the government, fear of side effects, and social pressure to stay unvaccinated. Vaccination facilitators included its widespread accessibility, a desire to protect themselves and vulnerable populations, and a previous unpleasant COVID-19 illness experience. Participants stated that vaccine information should be provided by health organizations and familiar, respected community members. Conclusions Results identified barriers to vaccination, such as mistrust of the government and healthcare system, and facilitators like vaccination advocacy originating from congregations and religious leaders. These findings can inform future COVID-19 vaccination efforts to increase overall immunization rates in MS. Future research in other locations could further assess commonalities and differences in the barriers and facilitators to vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avery Leigland
- Department of Psychiatry, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI 02903, USA
| | - Trisha Arnold
- Department of Psychiatry, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI 02903, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA
| | - Kayla K. Giorlando
- Department of Psychiatry, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI 02903, USA
| | - Andrew P. Barnett
- Department of Psychiatry, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI 02903, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA
| | - Courtney E. Sims-Gomillia
- Department of Population Health Science, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
| | - Zoe Bertone
- Department of Psychiatry, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI 02903, USA
| | - Precious Patrick Edet
- Department of Population Health Science, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
| | - Laura Whiteley
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA
| | - Larry K. Brown
- Department of Psychiatry, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI 02903, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vashist K, Yankey D, Elam-Evans LD, Mu Y, Valier MR, Pingali C, Hill HA, Santibanez TA, Singleton JA. Changes in vaccine hesitancy among parents of children aged 6 months - 17 Years, National Immunization Surveys, 2019-2022. Vaccine 2024:S0264-410X(24)00596-6. [PMID: 38806351 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.05.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Revised: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccine hesitancy (VH) has been a major contributor to large outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases globally, including in the United States. METHODS Data from the 2019-2022 National Immunization Surveys were analyzed to assess parental hesitancy toward routine vaccination of their children aged 6 months -17 years. Joinpoint regression was employed to investigate trends in VH from 2019 to 2022 nationally overall and among socio-demographic subgroups. Using logistic regression, the difference between the prevalence of VH before and after the authorization of the COVID-19 vaccine for children aged 6 months-4 years, 5-11 years, and 12-17 years was computed. Both unadjusted and adjusted estimates were reported. VH was also compared within each socio-demographic subgroup with a reference level, at two-time points- before and after the authorization of the COVID-19 vaccine for each age group. RESULTS Overall, VH remained around 19.0 % from Q2 2019 to Q3 2022. Parents of non-Hispanic Black children had the largest average quarterly decrease in VH (β = -0.55; p < 0.05 by test for trend). After the authorization of the COVID-19 vaccine for children aged 6 months to 4 years, the adjusted percentage of children having parents that reported VH decreased by 2.2 (95 % CI: -3.9, -0.6) percentage points (pp) from 21.6 % to 19.4 %. Conversely, for children aged 5-11 years, VH increased by 1.2 (95 % CI: 0.2, 2.3) pp, from 19.8 % to 21.0 %. VH among parents of non-Hispanic Black children decreased after the authorization of the COVID-19 vaccine for adolescents aged 12-17 years but remained significantly higher compared to parents of non-Hispanic White children before and after authorization of the COVID-19 vaccine for all age groups. DISCUSSION About 1 in 5 children had parents reporting VH from 2019 to 2022. Parental VH increased after the authorization of the COVID-19 vaccine for children aged 5-11 years and declined for children aged 6 months-4 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kushagra Vashist
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States; Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
| | - David Yankey
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Laurie D Elam-Evans
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Yi Mu
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Madeleine R Valier
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Cassandra Pingali
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Holly A Hill
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Tammy A Santibanez
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - James A Singleton
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Singh AV. Application of ChatGPT in reducing vaccine hesitancy and enhancing vaccine acceptance: hope or myth? REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA (1992) 2024; 70:e20231558. [PMID: 38775511 PMCID: PMC11110968 DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20231558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Akhilesh Vikram Singh
- Graphic Era Deemed to be University, Department of Biotechnology – Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Maraqa B, Nazzal Z, Baroud H, Douden M, El Hamshary Y, Jalamneh T. Healthcare workers' attitudes toward and factors influencing their acceptance of an annual COVID-19 booster vaccine: a cross-sectional study in Palestine. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:624. [PMID: 38745215 PMCID: PMC11092075 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11016-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The emergence of several SARS-CoV-2 variants may necessitate an annual COVID-19 booster vaccine. This study aimed to evaluate healthcare workers' (HCWs) acceptance of a COVID-19 yearly booster vaccine if recommended and its association with their attitudes and burnout levels. METHODS We used an online self-administered questionnaire to conduct a cross-sectional study of all HCWs in the West Bank and Gaza Strip of Palestine between August and September 2022. We used the Vaccination Attitudes Examination scale to assess HCWs' vaccination attitudes and the Maslach Burnout Inventory to assess work-related Burnout. In addition, we conducted logistic regression to identify factors independently associated with the acceptance of the booster vaccine. RESULTS The study included 919 HCWs; 52.4% were male, 46.5% were physicians, 30.0% were nurses, and 63.1% worked in hospitals. One-third of HCWs (95% CI: 30.5%-36.7%) said they would accept an annual COVID-19 booster vaccine if recommended. HCWs who are suspicious of vaccine benefits [aOR = .70; 95%CI: .65-.75] and those concerned about unforeseeable future effects [aOR = .90; 95%CI: .84-.95] are less likely to accept the booster vaccine if recommended, whereas those who receive annual influenza vaccine are more likely to get it [aOR = 2.9; 95%CI: 1.7-5.0]. CONCLUSION Only about a third of HCWs would agree to receive an annual COVID-19 booster vaccine if recommended. Mistrust of the vaccine's efficacy and concerns about side effects continue to drive COVID-19 vaccine reluctance. Health officials need to address HCWs' concerns to increase their acceptance of the annual vaccine if it is to be recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beesan Maraqa
- Ministry of Health, Ramallah, Palestine
- Community and Family medicine department, College of Medicine, Hebron University, Hebron, Palestine
| | - Zaher Nazzal
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
| | - Hassan Baroud
- Department of Family Medicine, Palestinian Medical Council, Gaza, Palestine
| | - Mahmoud Douden
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
| | - Yousef El Hamshary
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
- Department of Internal Medicine, An-Najah National University Hospital, Nablus, Palestine.
| | - Tala Jalamneh
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kalu K, Shah G, Tung HJ, Bland HW. Social and Structural Determinants of Health Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Older Adults in the United States. Vaccines (Basel) 2024; 12:521. [PMID: 38793773 PMCID: PMC11125749 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12050521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
State-level COVID-19 vaccination rates among older adults have been uneven in the United States. Due to the immunocompromised nature of older adults, vaccine hesitancy increases the risk of morbidity and mortality. This study aims to determine the association between the social determinants of health, the structural determinants of health, and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among older adults in the United States. Secondary data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) dataset were used. A descriptive analysis and multinomial multivariable logistic regression were performed to examine the association of the independent variables-gender, age, race, immigration status, marital status, broadband internet access, social security income, Medicare coverage, education, and frequency of religious service-with the dependent variable, vaccine hesitancy. Compared to the respondents with no vaccine hesitancy and without the specific predictor, the respondents who reported religious attendance at least once/week were more likely to be "somewhat hesitant", divorced respondents had higher odds of being "somewhat hesitant", and older adults aged 65-74 years were more likely to be "very hesitant" or "somewhat hesitant" about the COVID-19 vaccine. Compared to the respondents with no vaccine hesitancy and without the specific predictor, females had higher odds of being "very hesitant", "somewhat hesitant", or a "little hesitant", and African Americans were more likely to be "very hesitant", "somewhat hesitant", or a "little hesitant" about the COVID-19 vaccine. Addressing these factors may limit the barriers to vaccine uptake reported among older adults and improve herd immunity among the immunocompromised population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gulzar Shah
- Jian-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30458, USA; (K.K.); (H.-J.T.); (H.W.B.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Paimre M, Virkus S, Osula K. How Technology, Health Information Seeking, and Socioeconomic Factors Are Associated With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination Readiness in Estonians Over 50 Years? HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR 2024:10901981241249972. [PMID: 38712912 DOI: 10.1177/10901981241249972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
Despite the proven effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in preventing severe illness, many individuals, including older adults who are most susceptible to the virus, have opted against vaccination. Various factors could shape vaccination decisions, including seeking health information (HI). The internet is the primary source of HI today; however, older adults are often referred to as those missing out on digital benefits. The study explores the correlations between information and communication technology (ICT) use, online HI seeking, socioeconomic factors, and COVID-19 vaccination readiness among individuals aged 50 and above in Estonia. The survey data were gathered from 501 people aged 50 and older after the first lockdown in 2020. The outcomes revealed that vaccination readiness positively correlated with factors such as higher educational attainment, greater income, male gender, access to ICT, a readiness to employ digital technologies for health-related purposes, a greater demand for HI, and a higher frequency of seeking it online. There was some discrepancy in the preference of HI sources; for example, vaccination consenters preferred online versions of professional press publications and specific health portals. Based on the findings, it is advisable to encourage older adults to utilize the internet and new technology for health-related purposes. This practice expands the range of information sources available to them, ultimately enabling better decision-making regarding their health behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Paimre
- Tallinn University, Tallinn, Estonia
- Tallinn Health Care College, Tallinn, Estonia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nguyen KH, McChesney C, Patel R, Bednarczyk RA, Vasudevan L, Corlin L. Association between COVID-19 Booster Vaccination and COVID-19 Outcomes among U.S. Adults. Vaccines (Basel) 2024; 12:503. [PMID: 38793754 PMCID: PMC11125699 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12050503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Revised: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Understanding the association between booster vaccination and COVID-19 outcomes can help strengthen post-pandemic messaging and strategies to increase vaccination and reduce severe and long-term consequences of COVID-19. Using the Household Pulse Survey data collected from U.S. adults from 9 December 2022 to 13 February 2023 (n = 214,768), this study assessed the relationship between COVID-19 booster vaccination and COVID-19 outcomes (testing positive for COVID-19, moderate/severe COVID-19, and long COVID). Disparities were found in COVID-19 outcomes (e.g., testing positive for COVID-19, moderate/severe COVID-19, and long COVID) by sociodemographic characteristics, region of residence, food insecurity status, mental health status, disability status, and housing type. Receipt of a COVID-19 booster vaccination was negatively associated with testing positive for COVID-19 (aOR = 0.75, 95%CI: 0.72,0.79), having moderate/severe COVID-19 (aOR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.88, 0.97), or having long COVID (aOR = 0.86 (0.80, 0.91)). Even among those who tested positive for COVID-19, those who received the booster vaccine were less likely to have moderate/severe COVID-19 and less likely to have long COVID. Communicating the benefits of COVID-19 booster vaccination, integrating vaccination in patient visits, and reducing access barriers can increase vaccination uptake and confidence for all individuals and protect them against the severe negative outcomes of COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly H. Nguyen
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Cheyenne McChesney
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA
| | - Ruchi Patel
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA
| | - Robert A. Bednarczyk
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
- Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Lavanya Vasudevan
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Laura Corlin
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Richmond J, Anderson A, Cunningham-Erves J, Ozawa S, Wilkins CH. Conceptualizing and Measuring Trust, Mistrust, and Distrust: Implications for Advancing Health Equity and Building Trustworthiness. Annu Rev Public Health 2024; 45:465-484. [PMID: 38100649 PMCID: PMC11156570 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-061022-044737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
Trust is vital to public confidence in health and science, yet there is no consensus on the most useful way to conceptualize, define, measure, or intervene on trust and its related constructs (e.g., mistrust, distrust, and trustworthiness). In this review, we synthesize literature from this wide-ranging field that has conceptual roots in racism, marginalization, and other forms of oppression. We summarize key definitions and conceptual frameworks and offer guidance to scholars aiming to measure these constructs. We also review how trust-related constructs are associated with health outcomes, describe interventions in this field, and provide recommendations for building trust and institutional trustworthiness and advancing health equity. We ultimately call for future efforts to focus on improving the trustworthiness of public health professionals, scientists, health care providers, and systems instead of aiming to increase trust in these entities as they currently exist and behave.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Richmond
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Andrew Anderson
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Sachiko Ozawa
- Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Consuelo H Wilkins
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Huang HY, Gerend MA. The role of trust, vaccine information exposure, and Health Belief Model variables in COVID-19 vaccination intentions: Evidence from an HBCU sample. J Health Psychol 2024; 29:621-632. [PMID: 38312019 DOI: 10.1177/13591053241227388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
African Americans have been disproportionately affected by COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines were initially met with hesitancy from the African American community. This study identified predictors of COVID-19 vaccination intentions among students attending a Historically Black College and University (HBCU) when COVID-19 vaccines first became available. Unvaccinated students (N = 224) completed a survey. Path analysis modeled relationships among exogenous variables (trust, exposure to pro- and anti-vaccine information), proposed mediators (Health Belief Model variables), and COVID-19 vaccination intentions. Students reported low trust in government officials, medical professionals, and the vaccine development process. Direct predictors of vaccination intentions included trust, perceived benefits, and perceived barriers. Students with lower trust reported lower benefits, increased concerns about side effects, and were more likely to view COVID-19 vaccination as low priority, and these factors in turn predicted intentions. Findings highlight the urgent need for theory-driven, culturally sensitive, age-relevant messaging to reduce vaccine hesitancy among Black young adults.
Collapse
|
16
|
Freeman EE, Strahan AG, Smith LR, Judd AD, Samarakoon U, Chen G, King AJ, Blumenthal KG. The impact of COVID-19 vaccine reactions on secondary vaccine hesitancy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2024; 132:630-636.e1. [PMID: 38232816 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2024.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary and booster vaccinations are critical for mitigating COVID-19 transmission, morbidity, and mortality. Future booster vaccine campaigns rely on an increased understanding of vaccine hesitancy. OBJECTIVE To evaluate self-reported allergic and skin vaccine reactions as factors potentially associated with vaccine hesitancy in a nationwide vaccine allergy registry. METHODS Responses to survey questions concerning COVID-19 vaccine perceptions, coded from free text by 2 independent reviewers. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the association between changed negative perception and respondent demographics, vaccination history, and reaction characteristics. RESULTS A total of 993 individuals (median of 46 years [IQR, 36-59], 88% female, 82% White) self-reported reactions to COVID-19 vaccination. Reactions included the following: delayed large local skin reaction (40%), hives/urticaria (32%), immediate large local skin reaction (3%), swelling (3%), anaphylaxis (2%), and other or unspecified (20%). Most respondents were initially unconcerned about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines (56%). After reactions, 401 of 993 (40%) report negative change in perception of vaccination, with more than half of these respondents (n = 211, 53%) citing their reasoning as a negative experience with adverse effects. Of 102 individuals asked about future vaccination, 79 (77%) indicated that they were unlikely or very unlikely to receive future COVID-19 vaccinations. Increased negative perception after reaction was associated with younger age, later COVID-19 vaccination dose number, and reaction type. CONCLUSION Our findings reveal that an individual's experience with allergic or cutaneous adverse effects after COVID-19 vaccination affects attitudes and decision-making regarding future vaccination, even in initially non-hesitant individuals. Further investigation of secondary vaccine hesitancy is necessary for adapting public health messaging to this important population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther E Freeman
- Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; The Mongan Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alexis G Strahan
- Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Liam R Smith
- The Mongan Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Allen D Judd
- The Mongan Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Upeka Samarakoon
- The Mongan Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Andrew J King
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; The Mongan Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kimberly G Blumenthal
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; The Mongan Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kainth MK, Sembajwe GN, Ahn H, Qian M, Carrington M, Armellino D, Jan S. Despite mandated primary series, health care personnel still hesitant about COVID-19 vaccine and immunizing children. Vaccine 2024; 42:3122-3133. [PMID: 38604909 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.04.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Healthcare personnel (HCP) are important messengers for promoting vaccines, for both adults and children. Our investigation describes perceptions of fully vaccinated HCP about COVID-19 vaccine for themselves and primary series for their children. OBJECTIVE To determine associations between sociodemographic, employment characteristics and perceptions of COVID-19 vaccines among HCP overall and the subset of HCP with children, who were all mandated to receive a COVID-19 vaccine, in a large US metropolitan region. DESIGN Cross-sectional survey of fully vaccinated HCP from a large integrated health system. SETTING Participants were electronically enrolled within a multi-site NYS healthcare system from December 21, 2021, to January 21, 2022. PARTICIPANTS Of 78,000 employees, approximately one-third accessed promotional emails; 6,537 employees started surveys and 4165 completed them. Immunocompromised HCP (self-reported) were excluded. EXPOSURE(S) (FOR OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES) We conducted a survey with measures including demographic variables, employment history, booster status, child vaccination status; vaccine recommendation, confidence, and knowledge. MAIN OUTCOME(S) AND MEASURES The primary outcome was COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy for all dose types - primary series or booster doses - among HCP. RESULTS Findings from 4,165 completed surveys indicated that almost 17.2 % of all HCP, including administrative and clinical staff, were hesitant or unsure about receiving a COVID-19 vaccine booster, despite the NYS recommendation to do so. Depending on age group, between 20 % and 40 % of HCP were hesitant about having their children vaccinated for COVID-19, regardless of clinical versus non-clinical duties. In multivariable regression analyses, lack of booster dose, unvaccinated children, females, income less than $50,000, and residence in Manhattan remained significantly associated with vaccine hesitancy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Despite mandated COVID-19 vaccination, a substantial proportion of HCP remained vaccine hesitant towards adult booster doses and pediatric COVID-19 vaccination. While provider recommendation has been the mainstay of combatting COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, a gap exists between HCP-despite clinical or administrative status-and the ability to communicate the need for vaccination in a healthcare setting. While previous studies describe the HCP vaccine mandate as a positive force to overcome vaccine hesitancy, we have found that despite a mandate, there is still substantial COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, misinformation, and reluctance to vaccinate children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mundeep K Kainth
- Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Cohen Children's Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY, USA; Department of Molecular Medicine, Feinstein Institutes of Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA; Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, Hempstead, NY, USA.
| | - Grace N Sembajwe
- Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY, USA; Institute of Health System Science, Feinstein Institutes of Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA; Department of Occupational Medicine, Epidemiology, and Prevention, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Heejoon Ahn
- Institute of Health System Science, Feinstein Institutes of Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Min Qian
- Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maxine Carrington
- Center for Learning & Innovation, Human Resources, Northwell Health, USA
| | | | - Sophia Jan
- Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Cohen Children's Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY, USA; Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, Hempstead, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Turner S, Kranzler EC, Trigger S, Kearsley A, Luchman JN, Williams CJ, Denison B, Dahlen H, Kim JEC, Bennett M, Nighbor T, Beleche T, Hoffman L, Peck J. Benefit-Cost Analysis of the HHS COVID-19 Campaign: April 2021-March 2022. Am J Prev Med 2024:S0749-3797(24)00110-7. [PMID: 38713123 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study estimated the benefits and costs of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' We Can Do This COVID-19 public education campaign (the Campaign) and associated vaccination-related impacts. METHODS Weekly media market and national Campaign expenditures were used to estimate weekly first-dose vaccinations that would not have occurred absent the Campaign, weekly Campaign-attributed complete vaccinations, and corresponding COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths averted. Benefits were valued using estimated morbidity and mortality reductions and associated values of a statistical life and a statistical case. Costs were estimated using Campaign paid media expenditures and corresponding vaccination costs. The net Campaign and vaccination benefit and return on investment were calculated. Analyses were conducted from 2022 to 2024. RESULTS Between April 2021 and March 2022, an estimated 55.9 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines would not have been administered absent the Campaign. Campaign-attributed vaccinations resulted in 2,576,133 fewer mild COVID-19 cases, 243,979 fewer nonfatal COVID-19 hospitalizations, and 51,675 lives saved from COVID-19. The total Campaign benefit was $740.2 billion, and Campaign and vaccination costs totaled $8.3 billion, with net benefits of approximately $732.0 billion. For every $1 spent, the Campaign and corresponding vaccination costs resulted in benefits of approximately $89.54. CONCLUSIONS The We Can Do This COVID-19 public education campaign saved more than 50,000 lives and prevented hundreds of thousands of hospitalizations and millions of COVID-19 cases, representing hundreds of billions of dollars in benefits in less than one year. Findings suggest that public education campaigns are a cost-effective approach to reducing COVID-19 morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sarah Trigger
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Aaron Kearsley
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Washington, District of Columbia
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Morgane Bennett
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Tyler Nighbor
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Trinidad Beleche
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Washington, District of Columbia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ramey-Collier KL, Okunbor JI, Lunn SR, Feng K, Truong T, Weaver KE, Swamy GK, Wheeler SM. Prenatal Vaccination Patterns among Birthing Individuals with History of Preterm Birth in the Pre- and Post-COVID Era. Am J Perinatol 2024; 41:548-553. [PMID: 36646099 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1760432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to explore vaccination acceptance among individuals with a history of preterm birth between March and June during the pre-COVID (2019), early-COVID (2020), and late-COVID (2021) periods. STUDY DESIGN This is a cross-sectional, retrospective cohort study of pregnant individuals with a history of preterm birth (<37 weeks' gestation) who initiated care of a subsequent pregnancy during pre-COVID (March-June 2019), early-COVID (March-June 2020), or late-COVID (March-June 2021). The primary outcome of interest was vaccination status for influenza, Tdap, and COVID-19 vaccines. Fisher's exact and chi-square tests were used to investigate association between vaccination status and time periods, race/ethnicity, and insurance. RESULTS Among 293 pregnancies, influenza vaccination rate was highest in early-COVID (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in Tdap or COVID-19 vaccination between time periods. COVID-19 vaccination was highest in individuals with private insurance (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in vaccination status by race/ethnicity. CONCLUSION In this study on high-risk pregnant individuals, the majority of our cohort remained unvaccinated against COVID-19 into the late-COVID period. Additionally, their influenza vaccination rates were greater than the national average in early-COVID and substantially lower than the national average in late-COVID. This shift in influenza vaccination acceptance may have been sparked by COVID-19 vaccine distribution beginning in January 2021 leading to overall vaccination hesitancy. Standardized guidelines and counseling concerning prenatal safety in recommended immunizations may serve as important tools of reassurance and health promotion. KEY POINTS · Maternal infections during pregnancy are a risk factor for preterm birth.. · High-risk cohort had low influenza vaccination post-COVID possibly due to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.. · Vaccination education may be a uniquely important tool among high-risk pregnant patients..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Siera R Lunn
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kelvin Feng
- Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Tracy Truong
- Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kristin E Weaver
- Division of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Geeta K Swamy
- Division of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Sarahn M Wheeler
- Division of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Patel A, Puglisi JL, Patel S, Tarn DM. COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance in Pregnant Women in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2024; 33:453-466. [PMID: 38112561 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2023.0498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Pregnant women are vulnerable to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) complications, yet may hesitate to get vaccinated. It is important to identify racial/ethnic and other individual characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in the United States during pregnancy. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for articles published through January 2023 for keywords/terms related to immunization, COVID-19, and pregnancy, and performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine characteristics associated with vaccine acceptance. Results: Of 1,592 articles, 23 met inclusion criteria (focused on pregnant women in the United States, and their willingness or hesitation to vaccinate). Twenty-two of the studies examined receipt of ≥1 COVID-19 vaccine dose and/or intention to vaccinate, while one examined vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine acceptance rates ranged from 7% to 78.3%. Meta-analyses demonstrated that compared with Whites, Hispanics (odds ratios [OR] 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-0.91) and Blacks (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.30-0.63) had less COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, while Asians (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.10-2.88) had greater vaccine acceptance. College graduation or more (OR 3.25; 95% CI 2.53-4.17), receipt or intention to receive the influenza vaccine (OR 3.46; 95% CI 2.22-5.41), and at least part-time employment (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.66-2.72) were significantly associated with vaccine acceptance. Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccine nonacceptance in pregnant women is associated with Hispanic ethnicity and Black race, while acceptance is associated with Asian race, college education or more, at least part-time employment, and acceptance of the influenza vaccine. Future COVID-19 vaccination campaigns can target identified subgroups of pregnant women who are less likely to accept vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Patel
- College of Medicine, California Northstate University, Elk Grove, California, USA
| | - Jose L Puglisi
- Department of Basic Science, College of Medicine, California Northstate University, Elk Grove, California, USA
| | - Seeta Patel
- College of Letters and Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Derjung M Tarn
- Department of Family Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kwok G, Reese S, Dugad S, Donovan KA, Tsui J, Sahler OJZ, Levonyan-Radloff K, Barnett ME, Manne S, Ohman-Strickland P, Devine KA. Factors Associated with COVID‑19 Vaccine Uptake Among Adolescents and Young Adults Recently Diagnosed with Cancer. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2024; 13:352-357. [PMID: 36367717 PMCID: PMC10998015 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2022.0113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) recently diagnosed with cancer are medically vulnerable but little is known about vaccine uptake/intent in this group. AYAs reported on their COVID-19 vaccine uptake/intent. Logistic regression models examined factors associated with vaccine uptake. Higher education (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-3.5) and knowing someone diagnosed with COVID-19 (aOR = 7.2, 95% CI: 1.6-33.5) were associated with increased vaccine uptake. Prior personal diagnosis of COVID-19 (aOR = 0.1, 95% CI: 0.1-0.7) was associated with lower odds of uptake. Targeted interventions may be needed to improve uptake among this group. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04585269).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary Kwok
- Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Samantha Reese
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Sanjana Dugad
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Jennifer Tsui
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Olle Jane Z. Sahler
- Department of Pediatrics, Hematology and Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | | | - Marie E. Barnett
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sharon Manne
- Department of Medicine, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Pamela Ohman-Strickland
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers University School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Katie A. Devine
- Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sayed AA. Evaluating COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among parents in Saudi Arabia: a systematic review examining attitudes, hesitancy, and intentions. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1327944. [PMID: 38584927 PMCID: PMC10995243 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1327944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic, affecting adults and children equally, has caused significant disruption to countries worldwide, including Saudi Arabia. In Saudi Arabia, the fast preventative measures and mass vaccine enrollment were vital to contain the devastating impact of the pandemic. However, vaccine hesitancy, especially among parents toward vaccinating their children, was a significant obstacle to vaccine uptake. Methods This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines to assess parental willingness to vaccinate their children against COVID-19, determine the key determinants influencing such intention and attitudes, and underline the significant concerns and misconceptions regarding the vaccine among parents. The Joanne Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for prevalence studies was used to assess included studies for risk of bias. Results Twenty-three studies were included in this systematic review, representing a total of 20,926 participants, with over 66% of them were female. Over 37% of the participants were willing to vaccinate their children against COVID-19. Parents' age, gender, level of education, and income were the main determinants of their intention to vaccinate their children. The parents' main concerns were the potential vaccine side effects, safety, and efficacy. Major misconceptions about the COVID-19 vaccine included it being dangerous to children and that children are at lower risk of severe infection; hence, vaccines were not needed. Discussion This seminal review provides insights to public health policymakers, which should be considered and taken together in light of other studies addressing parental vaccine hesitancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anwar A. Sayed
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zhu DT, Hawken S, Serhan M, Graves F, Smith J, Wilson K. Public attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccine mandates and vaccine certificates in Canada: a time series study. Arch Public Health 2024; 82:32. [PMID: 38468303 PMCID: PMC10926625 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-024-01259-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Since the beginning of the pandemic, numerous public health measures such as COVID-19 vaccines, vaccine mandates and vaccination certificates have been introduced to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. Public opinion and attitudes towards these measures have fluctuated in response to the dynamic political, social, and cultural landscape of the pandemic. METHODS We conducted a time-series study consisting of national cross-sectional surveys between November 2021 to March 2022 to evaluate the Canadian public's attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccine mandates and vaccine certificates. RESULTS When examining public sentiment towards COVID-19 vaccine certificates and proof of vaccination measures, there was a shift in responses over time. The proportion of participants "strongly supporting" these measures decreased from 66.0 to 43.1% between W25(Capacity Limits), -W32 (Mask Mandate Removed), whereas "strongly oppose" was the second most common response and rose from 15.9 to 20.6% during this same time period. Concurrently, when examining participants views surrounding mandates, many participants believed that their province was reopening at "about the right pace", which remained relatively stable over time (33.0-35.4%) between W28 (Emergency Act)-W32 (Mask Mandate Removed). CONCLUSION Our study's findings on the public's attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccine mandates and vaccine certificates in Canada may aid to guide and streamline the implementation of future similar public health interventions. Future research should include extended follow-up and a more comprehensive examination of trust in government institutions and polarized perspectives on vaccine mandates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David T Zhu
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Virginia Commonwealth School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Steven Hawken
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Mohamed Serhan
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Frank Graves
- EKOS Research Associates Inc., Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Jeff Smith
- EKOS Research Associates Inc., Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Kumanan Wilson
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
- O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C, USA.
- Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, Administrative Services Building, 1053 Carling Avenue, Box 684, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4E9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ihongbe TO, Kim JEC, Dahlen H, Kranzler EC, Seserman K, Moffett K, Hoffman L. Trends in primary, booster, and updated COVID-19 vaccine readiness in the United States, January 2021-April 2023: Implications for 2023-2024 updated COVID-19 vaccines. Prev Med 2024; 180:107887. [PMID: 38325608 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.107887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Revised: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE COVID-19 vaccines have mitigated the severity of COVID-19 and its sequelae. The emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants and waning immunity conferred by COVID-19 vaccination have necessitated booster and updated COVID-19 vaccines. This study examined trends in vaccine readiness-a composite measure of intention and uptake-for the primary, booster, and 2022-2023 updated (bivalent) COVID-19 vaccines among U.S. adults. METHODS Data from the nationally-representative U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' COVID-19 Monthly Outcome Survey from January 2021 to April 2023 were analyzed (N = 140,180). We conducted pairwise comparisons (weighted t-tests) to assess for significant between-month differences in the proportion of participants in each vaccine-readiness category (vaccine ready, wait and see, and no vaccine intention) for the following outcomes: (1) primary; (2) booster; and (3) updated COVID-19 vaccine readiness. RESULTS From January 2021 to April 2023, significant increases in the primary vaccine ready group were accompanied by decreases in the wait and see and no vaccine intention groups (p < 0.001). From January to September 2022, the no booster intention group notably increased (p < 0.001), whereas the booster ready group decreased (p < 0.001), and the wait and see group remained stable (p = 0.116). From October 2022 to April 2023, the no updated vaccine intention group increased (p < 0.001), the wait and see group decreased (p < 0.01), and the updated vaccine ready group remained unchanged (p = 0.357). CONCLUSIONS Findings show decreased vaccine readiness for the booster and 2022-2023 updated (bivalent) COVID-19 vaccines relative to the primary COVID-19 vaccines. Implications for the 2023-2024 updated COVID-19 vaccines are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Leah Hoffman
- Fors Marsh, Arlington, VA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rothenmund H, Lambert P, Khan D, Kim C, Sharma B, Serfas K, Chodirker B, Singh H. Province-Wide Ascertainment of Lynch Syndrome in Manitoba. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22:642-652.e2. [PMID: 37879520 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS We describe the experience of Lynch syndrome (LS) diagnosis in the province of Manitoba, Canada, over the past 20 years. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of charts from the provincial Genetics Clinic from January 1, 2000, to May 31, 2023. We extracted data on individuals identified to carry a germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic LS gene variant, the mode of ascertainment, family history, and cascade genetic testing (CGT). Data were stratified and compared before and after the year of implementation (October 2013) of the provincial LS screening program (LSSP) and ascertainment by the LSSP vs clinic referrals (CRs). RESULTS Between 2014 and 2021, 50 of 101 (49.5%) index cases were identified by the LSSP compared with 51 of 101 (50.5%) from CRs. The proportion of PMS2 variants was 34% (17 of 50) for LSSP index cases compared with 21.6% (11 of 51) for CRs from 2014 to 2021 (P < .001). Among CRs from 2014 to 2021, 24 of 51 (47.1%) families met the Amsterdam criteria, compared with 11 of 50 (22.0%) for the LSSP (P = .01). CGT occurred among 46.8% (95 of 203; average, 1.9 relatives/index) of first-degree relatives of CR index cases vs 36.5% (84 of 230; average, 1.7 relatives/index) of first-degree relatives of LSSP index cases (P = .03). Daughters were most likely to undergo CGT. CONCLUSIONS A tumor screening program is more effective at detecting individuals with lower penetrant gene variants and families who do not meet traditional family history-based criteria. Cascade genetic testing is higher among clinic referrals compared with the screening program. These findings suggest a complementary role of these 2 ascertainment methods for Lynch syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi Rothenmund
- Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Pascal Lambert
- Paul Albrechtsen Research Institute CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Deirdre Khan
- Paul Albrechtsen Research Institute CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Christina Kim
- Paul Albrechtsen Research Institute CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Bhavya Sharma
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Kim Serfas
- Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Bernard Chodirker
- Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Harminder Singh
- Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Paul Albrechtsen Research Institute CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Miller MA, Raffetto ER, Lee RU. Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Following mRNA COVID-19 Booster Vaccination at a Military Academy. Mil Med 2024; 189:e911-e914. [PMID: 37725042 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usad361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Several adverse cutaneous reactions have been reported in the literature after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with emerging reports on chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). However, there is little literature of chronic urticaria after COVID-19 boosters in a military population and the impact on operational readiness. We present a retrospective case series of CSU following Moderna COVID-19 booster vaccinations at the US Naval Academy (USNA). Demographics, clinical features, and impact on readiness were evaluated. Forty-nine students from the USNA were evaluated for urticaria after their third COVID-19 booster vaccination. Seventeen individuals were diagnosed with CSU. The median age was 20 years and predominantly male; the median time interval between vaccination and the onset of urticaria was 11 days. Out of 13 referred to Allergy, 7 patients had CU index performed and 2 were positive. Four patients received a second booster vaccination subsequently and did not have any exacerbation of symptoms. Symptoms were controlled with antihistamines, and none required immunomodulator or immunosuppressive therapies. All students were able to complete their commissioning, and none were referred for a medical board. In this series, USNA students who developed CSU after the mRNA COVID-19 Moderna booster vaccine did not have limitations from commissioning, duty status, or issues with subsequent COVID-19 vaccinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mechelle A Miller
- Allergy and Immunology Department, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889-5611, USA
| | | | - Rachel U Lee
- Allergy and Immunology Department, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889-5611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Achterbergh RCA, McGovern I, Haag M. Co-Administration of Influenza and COVID-19 Vaccines: Policy Review and Vaccination Coverage Trends in the European Union, UK, US, and Canada between 2019 and 2023. Vaccines (Basel) 2024; 12:216. [PMID: 38400199 PMCID: PMC10891656 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12020216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Recommending co-administration of influenza and COVID-19 vaccines has emerged as a strategy to enhance vaccination coverage. This study describes the policy on co-administration and uptake of influenza and COVID-19 vaccination in Europe, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Canada between 2019 and 2023. We collected co-administration policy data from governmental websites, national health organizations, and newspapers. Influenza vaccination coverage among persons ≥65 years and COVID-19 vaccination coverage rates among persons ≥60 years or the general population were collected using national databases, the ECDC database, or ourworldindata.org between 2019 and 2023. Descriptive analyses were used. We collected data from 30/32 (94%) countries on vaccination policy in seasons 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, with most countries (25/30 to 30/30) having policies recommending co-administration. For influenza vaccination coverage, we collected data from 29/32 (91%, 2019-2020), 28/32 (88%, 2020-2021), 27/32 (84%, 2021-2022), and 6/32 (19%, 2022-2023) countries. COVID-19 vaccination was collected from 32/32 (2020-2021), 31/32 (97%, 2021-2022), and 24/32 (75%, 2022-2023) countries. Influenza vaccination coverage increased from 2019-2020 to 2021-2022. COVID-19 vaccination coverage was higher among countries with higher influenza vaccination coverage. By 2022-2023, all countries included implemented a policy supporting co-administration. A positive correlation existed between higher influenza vaccination coverage and higher COVID-19 vaccination rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ian McGovern
- Center for Outcomes Research and Epidemiology, CSL Seqirus, Waltham, MA 02451, USA;
| | - Mendel Haag
- Center for Outcomes Research and Epidemiology, CSL Seqirus, 1105 BJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Barros FC, Gunier RB, Rego A, Sentilhes L, Rauch S, Gandino S, Teji JS, Thornton JG, Kachikis AB, Nieto R, Craik R, Cavoretto PI, Winsey A, Roggero P, Rodriguez GB, Savasi V, Kalafat E, Giuliani F, Fabre M, Benski AC, Coronado-Zarco IA, Livio S, Ostrovska A, Maiz N, Castedo Camacho FR, Peterson A, Deruelle P, Giudice C, Casale RA, Salomon LJ, Soto Conti CP, Prefumo F, Mohamed Elbayoumy EZ, Vale M, Hernández V, Chandler K, Risso M, Marler E, Cáceres DM, Crespo GA, Ernawati E, Lipschuetz M, Ariff S, Takahashi K, Vecchiarelli C, Hubka T, Ikenoue S, Tavchioska G, Bako B, Ayede AI, Eskenazi B, Bhutta ZA, Kennedy SH, Papageorghiou AT, Villar J. Maternal vaccination against COVID-19 and neonatal outcomes during Omicron: INTERCOVID-2022 study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024:S0002-9378(24)00078-4. [PMID: 38367758 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In early 2023, when Omicron was the variant of concern, we showed that vaccinating pregnant women decreased the risk for severe COVID-19-related complications and maternal morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to analyze the impact of COVID-19 during pregnancy on newborns and the effects of maternal COVID-19 vaccination on neonatal outcomes when Omicron was the variant of concern. STUDY DESIGN INTERCOVID-2022 was a large, prospective, observational study, conducted in 40 hospitals across 18 countries, from November 27, 2021 (the day after the World Health Organization declared Omicron the variant of concern) to June 30, 2022, to assess the effect of COVID-19 in pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes and to assess vaccine effectiveness. Women diagnosed with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 during pregnancy were compared with 2 nondiagnosed, unmatched women recruited concomitantly and consecutively during pregnancy or at delivery. Mother-newborn dyads were followed until hospital discharge. The primary outcomes were a neonatal positive test for COVID-19, severe neonatal morbidity index, severe perinatal morbidity and mortality index, preterm birth, neonatal death, referral to neonatal intensive care unit, and diseases during the neonatal period. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated with adjustment for maternal risk profile. RESULTS We enrolled 4707 neonates born to 1577 (33.5%) mothers diagnosed with COVID-19 and 3130 (66.5%) nondiagnosed mothers. Among the diagnosed mothers, 642 (40.7%) were not vaccinated, 147 (9.3%) were partially vaccinated, 551 (34.9%) were completely vaccinated, and 237 (15.0%) also had a booster vaccine. Neonates of booster-vaccinated mothers had less than half (relative risk, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.91) the risk of being diagnosed with COVID-19 when compared with those of unvaccinated mothers; they also had the lowest rates of preterm birth, medically indicated preterm birth, respiratory distress syndrome, and number of days in the neonatal intensive care unit. Newborns of unvaccinated mothers had double the risk for neonatal death (relative risk, 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-4.00) when compared with those of nondiagnosed mothers. Vaccination was not associated with any congenital malformations. Although all vaccines provided protection against neonatal test positivity, newborns of booster-vaccinated mothers had the highest vaccine effectiveness (64%; 95% confidence interval, 10%-86%). Vaccine effectiveness was not as high for messenger RNA vaccines only. Vaccine effectiveness against moderate or severe neonatal outcomes was much lower, namely 13% in the booster-vaccinated group (all vaccines) and 25% and 28% in the completely and booster-vaccinated groups, respectively (messenger RNA vaccines only). Vaccines were fairly effective in protecting neonates when given to pregnant women ≤100 days (14 weeks) before birth; thereafter, the risk increased and was much higher after 200 days (29 weeks). Finally, none of the neonatal practices studied, including skin-to-skin contact and direct breastfeeding, increased the risk for infecting newborns. CONCLUSION When Omicron was the variant of concern, newborns of unvaccinated mothers had an increased risk for neonatal death. Neonates of vaccinated mothers had a decreased risk for preterm birth and adverse neonatal outcomes. Because the protective effect of COVID-19 vaccination decreases with time, to ensure that newborns are maximally protected against COVID-19, mothers should receive a vaccine or booster dose no more than 14 weeks before the expected date of delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando C Barros
- Post Graduate Program in Health in the Life Cycle, Universidade Católica de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil
| | - Robert B Gunier
- School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA
| | - Albertina Rego
- Departamento de Pediatria, Faculdade Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Loïc Sentilhes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Stephen Rauch
- School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA
| | - Serena Gandino
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Maternal and Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jagjit S Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Jim G Thornton
- University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Alisa B Kachikis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Ricardo Nieto
- Division Neonatología, Hospital Materno Infantil Ramón Sarda, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Rachel Craik
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Paolo I Cavoretto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and University, Milan, Italy
| | - Adele Winsey
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Paola Roggero
- Department of Woman, Child and Neonate, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriel B Rodriguez
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Valeria Savasi
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, L- Sacco Hospital ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy; Department of Biological and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Erkan Kalafat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Francesca Giuliani
- Neonatal Special Care Unit, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Marta Fabre
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitario de Aragón (IIS Aragon), Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | - Stefania Livio
- Hospital Buzzi, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Adela Ostrovska
- Fetal Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nerea Maiz
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Philippe Deruelle
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Carolina Giudice
- Servicio de Neonatologia, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Roberto A Casale
- Maternal and Child Department, Hospital Nacional Profesor Alejandro Posadas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | - Federico Prefumo
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Marynéa Vale
- Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, Brazil
| | | | | | - Milagros Risso
- Servicio de Neonatología del Departamento Materno Infantil, Hospital Universitario Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Emily Marler
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Ernawati Ernawati
- Medical Faculty Universitas Airlangga - Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | - Michal Lipschuetz
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Division, Hadassah Medical Center Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Shabina Ariff
- Department of Paediatrics & Child Health, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Ken Takahashi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Teresa Hubka
- AMITA Health Resurrection Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Satoru Ikenoue
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Babagana Bako
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medical Sciences, Gombe State University, Gombe, Nigeria
| | | | - Brenda Eskenazi
- School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA
| | - Zulfiqar A Bhutta
- Center for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Stephen H Kennedy
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Maternal and Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Aris T Papageorghiou
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Maternal and Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Jose Villar
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Maternal and Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Felzer JR, Montgomery A, LeMahieu AM, Finney Rutten LJ, Juhn YJ, Wi CI, Jacobson RM, Kennedy CC. Disparities in Influenza, Pneumococcal, COVID-19 Vaccine Coverage in High-Risk Adults 19 to 64 Years of Age in Southeastern Minnesota, 2010-2021. Chest 2024:S0012-3692(24)00145-4. [PMID: 38342164 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.01.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite effective vaccines against influenza, pneumococcus, and COVID-19, uptake has been suboptimal. RESEARCH QUESTION Although disparities in vaccination by race and ethnicity have been observed, what is the role of other sociodemographic in US vaccine uptake? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS We conducted a population-based study using the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP), a comprehensive medical records linkage system, to assess effects of sociodemographic factors including race, ethnicity, individual-level socioeconomic status (SES) via the housing-based socioeconomic status index, education, population density (urban or nonurban), and marital status with uptake of influenza, pneumococcal, and COVID-19 vaccination in high-risk adults. Adults at high risk of invasive pneumococcal disease residing in four counties in southeastern Minnesota who were 19 to 64 years of age were identified. Vaccination data were obtained from the Minnesota Immunization Information Connection and REP from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2021. RESULTS We identified 45,755 residents. Most were White (82%), non-Hispanic (94%), married (56%), and living in an urban setting (81%), with three-quarters obtaining at least some college education (74%). Although 45.1% were up-to-date on pneumococcal vaccines, 60.1% had completed the primary COVID-19 series. For influenza and COVID-19, higher SES, living in an urban setting, older age, and higher education positively correlated with vaccination. Magnitude of differences in race, education, and SES widened with booster vaccines. INTERPRETATION This high-risk population is undervaccinated against preventable respiratory diseases, especially influenza and pneumococcus. Although national data reported improvement of disparities in COVID-19 vaccination uptake observed early in the pandemic, our data demonstrated gaps related to race, education level, SES, and age that widened with booster vaccines. Communities with high social vulnerabilities often show increased risk of severe disease outcomes, yet demonstrate lower uptake of preventive services. This highlights the need to understand better vaccine compliance and access in rural, lower SES, less-educated, Black, Hispanic, and younger populations, each of which were associated independently with decreased vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie R Felzer
- Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Allison M LeMahieu
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Lila J Finney Rutten
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Young J Juhn
- Divisions of Community Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Chung-Il Wi
- Divisions of Community Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Robert M Jacobson
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Divisions of Community Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine
| | - Cassie C Kennedy
- Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Cénat JM, Moshirian Farahi SMM, Broussard C, Dalexis RD. The state of COVID-19 vaccine confidence and need in Black individuals in Canada: Understanding the role of sociodemographic factors, health literacy, conspiracy theories, traumatic stressors and racial discrimination. Vaccine 2024; 42:960-968. [PMID: 37891050 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.10.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Black communities in Canada have been among the most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, in terms of number of infections and deaths. They are also among those most hesitant about vaccination against COVID-19. However, while a few studies have documented the factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, those related to vaccine confidence remain unknown. To respond to this gap, this study aims to investigate factors associated to vaccine confidence in Black individuals in Canada. METHODS A total of 2002 participants (1034 women) aged 14 to 89 years old (Mean age = 29.34, SD = 10.13) completed questionnaires assessing sociodemographic information, COVID-19 vaccine confidence and need, health literacy, conspiracy beliefs, major racial discrimination, and traumatic stressors related to COVID-19. RESULTS Results showed an average score of COVID-19 vaccine confidence and need of 33.27 (SD = 7.24), with no significant difference between men (33.48; SD = 7.24) and women (33.08; SD = 7.91), t (1999) = 1.19, p = 0.234. However, there were significant differences according to employment status, migration status, age, inhabited province, spoken language, education, marital status, religion, and income. The linear regression model explained 25.8 % of the variance and showed that health literacy (B = 0.12, p < 0.001) and traumatic stressors related to COVID-19 (B = 0.21, p < .001) predicted COVID-19 vaccine confidence and need positively, while conspiracy beliefs (B = -1.14, p < 0.001) and major racial discrimination (B = -0.20, p = 0.044) predicted it negatively. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that building the confidence of Black communities in vaccines requires health education, elimination of racial discrimination in the Canadian society and a focus on certain groups (e.g., young people, those living in Quebec and Ontario). The results also argue in favor of involving community leaders and organizations in the development and implementation of vaccination-related tools, strategies and programs by city, provincial and federal public health agencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jude Mary Cénat
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Interdisciplinary Centre for Black Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; University of Ottawa Research Chair on Black Health, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | - Cathy Broussard
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rose Darly Dalexis
- Interdisciplinary School of Population Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sileo KM, Hirani IM, Luttinen RL, Hayward M, Fleming PJ. A Scoping Review on Gender/Sex Differences in COVID-19 Vaccine Intentions and Uptake in the United States. Am J Health Promot 2024; 38:242-274. [PMID: 37847250 PMCID: PMC10802093 DOI: 10.1177/08901171231200778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the empirical literature on gender/sex differences in vaccine acceptance among U.S.-based adults and adolescents in approximately the first 2 years of the pandemic. DATA SOURCE Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, EBSCO, CINAHL, Web of Science. STUDY INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA Peer-reviewed studies conducted in the U.S. with those aged 12 and older, published in English before January 12, 2022, examining the relationship between gender/sex on COVID-19 vaccine intentions and/or uptake. DATA EXTRACTION Three authors screened studies and extracted data. DATA SYNTHESIS Univariate and multivariate results are summarized. RESULTS A total of 53 studies met inclusion criteria (48 intentions, 7 uptake), using mostly cross-sectional designs (92.5%) and non-random sampling (83.0%). The majority of studies supported men's greater intentions to vaccinate compared to women, and men's greater vaccine uptake in univariate analyses, but most multivariate analyses supported no gender differences in uptake. Few studies examined gender beyond binary categories (women/men), highlighting a gap in the studies inclusive of transgender or gender-diverse populations in analyses. CONCLUSION Women may have been more hesitant to get the vaccine than men early in the pandemic, but these differences may not translate to actual behavior. Future research should include non-binary/transgender populations, explore the gender-specific reasons for hesitancy and differences by sub-populations, utilize more rigorous designs, and test gender-sensitive public health campaigns to mitigate vaccine concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katelyn M. Sileo
- The Department of Public Health, College of Health, Community, and Policy, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Inara M. Hirani
- The Department of Public Health, College of Health, Community, and Policy, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Rebecca L. Luttinen
- The Department of Demography, College of Health, Community, and Policy, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Matt Hayward
- The John Peace Library, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Paul J. Fleming
- The Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, The School of Public Health at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Geana MV, Liu P, Pei J, Anderson S, Ramaswamy M. "A Friendly Conversation." Developing an eHealth Intervention to Increase COVID-19 Testing and Vaccination Literacy Among Women with Criminal and Legal System Involvement. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2024; 29:131-142. [PMID: 38111197 PMCID: PMC10842808 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2023.2293094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
Many women leaving jails are ill-prepared to follow recommended COVID-19 mitigation practices, including testing and vaccination. Low COVID-19-related health literacy, exposure to disinformation, and mistrust in authorities put women at increased risk. Research on this population has shown significant use of mobile devices for communication and web access and public Wi-fi for the internet. Using inductive (formative empirical research with the community) and deductive (theory-based) practices, we designed, developed, and pilot-tested a multimedia, culturally tailored web-based electronic health (eHealth) application to increase COVID-19-specific health literacy and promote testing and vaccination among women with criminal and legal system involvement (CLSI). The intervention included a serialized animated multimedia component and a telenovela-style series, complementing each other and addressing knowledge needs identified in the formative research phase of the project. The eHealth intervention was pilot-tested with 13 CLSI women by using online activity logs and semi-structured telephone interviews. Findings confirmed that eHealth interventions employing multimodal information delivery had increased chances of engaging audiences, especially when developed with input from the target population and are culturally tailored. In addition, using a web-based delivery optimized for mobile made the intervention accessible on various devices and decreased the risk of technical problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mugur V. Geana
- Center for Excellence in Health Communication to Underserved Populations, School of Journalism and Mass Communications, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
| | - Pan Liu
- Department of Media, Design, and Communication, Marian University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Jun Pei
- Center for Excellence in Health Communication to Underserved Populations, School of Journalism and Mass Communications, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
| | - Sherri Anderson
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Megha Ramaswamy
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kim MJ, Ryu B, Park EG, Yi S, Kim K, Park JW, Shin K. The Risk of COVID-19 and Its Outcomes in Korean Patients With Gout: A Multicenter, Retrospective, Observational Study. J Korean Med Sci 2024; 39:e37. [PMID: 38288538 PMCID: PMC10825458 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related clinical outcomes between patients with and without gout. Electronic health record-based data from two centers (Seoul National University Hospital [SNUH] and Boramae Medical Center [BMC]), from January 2021 to April 2022, were mapped to a common data model. Patients with and without gout were matched using a large-scale propensity-score algorithm based on population-level estimation methods. At the SNUH, the risk for COVID-19 diagnosis was not significantly different between patients with and without gout (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-1.84). Within 30 days after COVID-19 diagnosis, no significant difference was observed in terms of hospitalization (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.03-3.90), severe outcomes (HR, 2.90; 95% CI, 0.54-13.71), or mortality (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.06-16.24). Similar results were obtained from the BMC database, suggesting that gout does not increase the risk for COVID-19 diagnosis or severe outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Jung Kim
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Hospital Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Borim Ryu
- Center for Data Science, Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Hospital Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun-Gee Park
- Center for Data Science, Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Hospital Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Siyeon Yi
- Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwangsoo Kim
- Department of Transdisciplinary Medicine, Institute of Convergence Medicine with Innovative Technology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Won Park
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kichul Shin
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Hospital Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Cotter LM, Yang S. Are interactive and tailored data visualizations effective in promoting flu vaccination among the elderly? Evidence from a randomized experiment. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2024; 31:317-328. [PMID: 37218375 PMCID: PMC10797269 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although interactive data visualizations are increasingly popular for health communication, it remains to be seen what design features improve psychological and behavioral targets. This study experimentally tested how interactivity and descriptive titles may influence perceived susceptibility to the flu, intention to vaccinate, and information recall, particularly among older adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS We created data visualization dashboards on flu vaccinations, tested in a 2 (explanatory text vs none) × 3 (interactive + tailored, static + tailored, static + nontailored) + questionnaire-only control randomized between-participant online experiment (N = 1378). RESULTS The flu dashboards significantly increased perceived susceptibility to the flu compared to the control: static+nontailored dashboard, b = 0.14, P = .049; static-tailored, b = 0.16, P = .028; and interactive+tailored, b = 0.15, P = .039. Interactive dashboards potentially decreased recall particularly among the elderly (moderation by age: b = -0.03, P = .073). The benefits of descriptive text on recall were larger among the elderly (interaction effects: b = 0.03, P = .025). DISCUSSION Interactive dashboards with complex statistics and limited textual information are widely used in health and public health but may be suboptimal for older individuals. We experimentally showed that adding explanatory text on visualizations can increase information recall particularly for older populations. CONCLUSION We did not find evidence to support the effectiveness of interactivity in data visualizations on flu vaccination intentions or on information recall. Future research should examine what types of explanatory text can best support improved health outcomes and intentions in other contexts. Practitioners should consider whether interactivity is optimal in data visualization dashboards for their populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynne M Cotter
- School of Journalism and Mass Communication University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Sijia Yang
- School of Journalism and Mass Communication University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Nguyen KH, Zhao R, Chen S, Vaish AK, Bednarczyk RA, Vasudevan L. Population Attributable Fraction of Nonvaccination of COVID-19 Due to Vaccine Hesitancy, United States, 2021. Am J Epidemiol 2024; 193:121-133. [PMID: 37552958 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwad167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Understanding the extent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) nonvaccination attributable to vaccine hesitancy versus other barriers can help prioritize approaches for increasing vaccination uptake. Using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Research and Development Survey, a nationally representative survey fielded from May 1 to June 30, 2021 (n = 5,458), we examined the adjusted population attribution fraction (PAF) of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy attributed to nonvaccination according to sociodemographic characteristics and health-related variables. Overall, the adjusted PAF of nonvaccination attributed to vaccine hesitancy was 76.1%. The PAF was highest among adults who were ≥50 years of age (87.9%), were non-Hispanic White (83.7%), had a bachelor's degree or higher (82.7%), had an annual household income of at least $75,000 (85.5%), were insured (82.4%), and had a usual place for health care (80.7%). The PAF was lower for those who were current smokers (65.3%) compared with never smokers (77.9%), those who had anxiety or depression (65.2%) compared with those who did not (80.1%), and those who had a disability (64.5%) compared with those who did not (79.2%). Disparities in PAF suggest areas for prioritization of efforts for intervention and development of messaging campaigns that address all barriers to uptake, including hesitancy and access, to advance health equity and protect individuals from COVID-19.
Collapse
|
36
|
Abate BB, Tilahun BD, Yayeh BM. Global COVID-19 vaccine acceptance level and its determinants: an umbrella review. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:5. [PMID: 38166750 PMCID: PMC10759439 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17497-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 vaccination is essential for reducing disease burden on a worldwide scale. The success of this strategy will largely depend on how well vaccines are received. Previous reviews had produced contradictory results, and there had been no umbrella review. Therefore, the objective of this umbrella review was to combine the contradictory data regarding the COVID-19 vaccination's global acceptance rate and its contributing factors. METHODS Using PRISMA guideline, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Sciences, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus and Google Scholar which reported COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and/or its determinants were searched. The quality of the included studies was assessed using Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). A weighted inverse variance random-effects model was applied to find the pooled estimates. The subgroup analysis, heterogeneity, publication bias and sensitivity analysis were also assessed. RESULT Twenty-two SRM with 10,433,306 study participants were included. The pooled COVID-19 vaccine acceptance rate globally is found to be 60.23 (95% CI: 58.27, 62.18). In low-income countries, the pooled level of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was found to be 54.07(50.31, 57.83) while this magnitude is 64.32 (62.24,66.40) among studies across the globe. Higher level of education (AOR =1.96; 95% CI:1.20, 2.73), good level of knowledge (2.20; 95% CI:1.36, 3.03), favourable attitude (AOR =4.50; 95% CI:2.89, 6.12), previous history of COVID-19 infection (AOR =3.41; 95% CI:1.77, 5.06), male sex (AOR =1.62; 95% CI:1.47, 1.77), and chronic disease (AOR =1.54; 95% CI:1.18, 1.90) were predictors of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. CONCLUSION The pooled level of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance highly varied and found to be unacceptably low particularly in low-income countries. Higher level of education, good level of knowledge, favourable attitude, previous history of COVID-19, male sex, and chronic disease were factors of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance rate. A collaborative effort of stakeholders such as policymakers, and vaccine campaign program planners is needed to improve the acceptance rate of COVID-19 vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biruk Beletew Abate
- Pediatrics and Child Health Nursing, College of Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
| | - Befkad Derese Tilahun
- Department of Nursing, College of Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia
| | - Berihun Mulu Yayeh
- School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Hayes E, Yogeeswaran K, Zubielevitch E, Lee CHJ, Cording J, Sibley CG. Examining age, period and cohort effects in attitude change to childhood vaccinations in a representative New Zealand survey: a multiyear cohort-sequential growth modelling study. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e075963. [PMID: 38167286 PMCID: PMC10773374 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Vaccinations are an important preventative measure in reducing the spread of infectious diseases worldwide. However, concerns of undervaccination during childhood have become increasingly common. The current study aims to investigate changes in attitudes towards childhood vaccinations prior to the COVID-19 pandemic using a national sample from New Zealand. DESIGN Age-based, period-based, and cohort-based changes were assessed using cohort-sequential latent growth modelling in 11 overlapping birth cohorts, which spanned the ages of 23-79 years. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Data were taken from the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study where 58 654 adults completed at least one wave across a 7-year period (2013 and 2015-2019). RESULTS The period-based and cohort-based models fit the data equally well (χ2(282)=8547.93, p<0.001, comparative fit index, CFI=0.894, root mean square error of approximation, (RMSEA)=0.074, standardised root mean square residual, SRMR=0.105; χ2(273)=8514.87, p<0.001, CFI=0.894, RMSEA=0.075, SRMR=0.105, respectively) suggesting societal factors contribute to childhood vaccination attitudes. Additionally, the findings suggest attitudes towards childhood vaccinations were becoming increasingly more positive in all birth cohorts (ps<0.001), with younger and older birth cohorts exhibiting even positive attitudes compared with middle-aged cohorts. CONCLUSION Overall, both the cohort-based and period-based models reveal changes in vaccination attitudes suggesting that even prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, societal influences had an impact on attitudes towards childhood vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Hayes
- School of Psychology, Speech and Hearing, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Kumar Yogeeswaran
- School of Psychology, Speech and Hearing, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | | | | | - Jacinta Cording
- School of Psychology, Speech and Hearing, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Alasagheirin M, Canales MK, Decker E. Attitudes and perceptions toward COVID-19 virus and vaccines among a Somali population in Northern Wisconsin. Public Health Nurs 2024; 41:151-163. [PMID: 37970916 DOI: 10.1111/phn.13258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The study's aim was to gain a qualitative understanding of vaccine beliefs and attitudes toward COVID-19 among Somali residents living in Northern Wisconsin (WI). While vaccination rates are significantly lower among Black and Hispanic populations, those with lower educational levels, and in rural areas, minimal is known about Somali population perspectives of COVID-19 vaccination rates. METHODS Through qualitative methodology employing focus groups for data collection and the inclusion of Somali interpreters, we explored Somali community viewpoints regarding these topics. Focus group interviews were transcribed verbatim with subsequent transcripts reviewed and analyzed by the research team to identify themes. RESULTS The overarching theme was Protecting self, others, and community. Most participants accepted vaccinations, and the COVID-19 vaccine specifically, to protect themselves, others, and their community. Factors contributing to vaccine update included trusting local messengers, including public health nurses; valuing collective memory associated with previous communicable disease outbreaks; believing religion supported vaccine protective actions; and following recommended government and media advice. CONCLUSION Study results suggest strategies for increasing community outreach to newly resettled refugee and immigrant minority groups, establishing trust between community members, nurses, and other public health personnel, and facilitators for connecting health messaging to Somali cultural and religious beliefs to promote public health and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Alasagheirin
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, Wisconsin
| | - Mary K Canales
- BSN Completion Program Director & Professor, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, Wisconsin
| | - Ellie Decker
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Barbhaiya M, Schneider B, Levine JM, Bruce O, Do H, Siegel CH, Bykerk VP, Feldman CH, Jannat-Khah D, Mandl LA. Factors Associated With COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Rheumatology Outpatients in New York City. J Clin Rheumatol 2024; 30:e1-e8. [PMID: 37946323 DOI: 10.1097/rhu.0000000000002041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to measure COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among rheumatology outpatients from an early COVID-19 "hotspot" during the initial period of vaccine availability. METHODS In March 2021, a Web-based survey was sent to 7505 adults seen at a Rheumatology Division in New York City. We evaluated characteristics associated with 3 categories of COVID-19 vaccination status: declined, undecided, and willing/already received. We used multinomial logistic regression models to calculate relative risk ratios assessing predictors of vaccination status. RESULTS Among 2384 (32%) respondents (80% female, 87% White, 59% with systemic rheumatic disease), 2240 (94.0%) were willing/already received COVID-19 vaccination, 88 (3.7%) were undecided, and 56 (2.3%) declined. Compared with those willing/already vaccinated, those declining or undecided were younger, more likely identified as Black or Hispanic/Latinx, and had lower household income and educational attainment. Immunosuppressive medication use did not differ among groups. After multivariable adjustment, every 1-year increase in age was associated with a 0.96 lower relative risk of declining or being undecided versus willing/already vaccinated. Respondents identifying as Black versus White had a higher relative risk ratio of being undecided (4.29 [95% confidence interval, 1.96-9.36]), as did those identifying as Hispanic/Latinx versus non-Hispanic/non-Latinx (2.81 [95% confidence interval, 1.29-6.09]). Those declining vaccination were least likely to believe in general vaccine importance or the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine. CONCLUSIONS Among rheumatology patients in New York City with and without systemic rheumatic disease, COVID-19 vaccine uptake was high after its initial availability. Sociodemographic but not medication-related factors were associated with vaccine hesitancy; these findings can inform future rheumatology vaccination programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Omar Bruce
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Huong Do
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Candace H Feldman
- Division of Rheumatology, Immunology, and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Razai MS, Mansour R, Goldsmith L, Freeman S, Mason-Apps C, Ravindran P, Kooner P, Berendes S, Morris J, Majeed A, Ussher M, Hargreaves S, Oakeshott P. Interventions to increase vaccination against COVID-19, influenza and pertussis during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Travel Med 2023; 30:taad138. [PMID: 37934788 PMCID: PMC10755181 DOI: 10.1093/jtm/taad138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnant women and their babies face significant risks from three vaccine-preventable diseases: COVID-19, influenza and pertussis. However, despite these vaccines' proven safety and effectiveness, uptake during pregnancy remains low. METHODS We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42023399488; January 2012-December 2022 following PRISMA guidelines) of interventions to increase COVID-19/influenza/pertussis vaccination in pregnancy. We searched nine databases, including grey literature. Two independent investigators extracted data; discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models to estimate pooled effect sizes. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistics. RESULTS From 2681 articles, we identified 39 relevant studies (n = 168 262 participants) across nine countries. Fifteen studies (39%) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs); the remainder were observational cohort, quality-improvement or cross-sectional studies. The quality of 18% (7/39) was strong. Pooled results of interventions to increase influenza vaccine uptake (18 effect estimates from 12 RCTs) showed the interventions were effective but had a small effect (risk ratio = 1.07, 95% CI 1.03, 1.13). However, pooled results of interventions to increase pertussis vaccine uptake (10 effect estimates from six RCTs) showed no clear benefit (risk ratio = 0.98, 95% CI 0.94, 1.03). There were no relevant RCTs for COVID-19. Interventions addressed the 'three Ps': patient-, provider- and policy-level strategies. At the patient level, clear recommendations from healthcare professionals backed by text reminders/written information were strongly associated with increased vaccine uptake, especially tailored face-to-face interventions, which addressed women's concerns, dispelled myths and highlighted benefits. Provider-level interventions included educating healthcare professionals about vaccines' safety and effectiveness and reminders to offer vaccinations routinely. Policy-level interventions included financial incentives, mandatory vaccination data fields in electronic health records and ensuring easy availability of vaccinations. CONCLUSIONS Interventions had a small effect on increasing influenza vaccination. Training healthcare providers to promote vaccinations during pregnancy is crucial and could be enhanced by utilizing mobile health technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad S Razai
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
| | - Rania Mansour
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
| | - Lucy Goldsmith
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
| | - Samuel Freeman
- Primary Care Unit, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Sussex, UK
| | - Charlotte Mason-Apps
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
| | - Pahalavi Ravindran
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Foundation Trust, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Sima Berendes
- Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Joan Morris
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Michael Ussher
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
- Institute of Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Sally Hargreaves
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
- The Migrant Health Research Unit, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
| | - Pippa Oakeshott
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Marshall D, McRee AL, Gower AL, Reiter PL. Views about vaccines and how views changed during the COVID-19 pandemic among a national sample of young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2281717. [PMID: 37965729 PMCID: PMC10653772 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2281717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
We examined perceptions of vaccines and changes during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. From 2019 to 2021, a national sample of young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men completed an open-ended survey item about vaccine perceptions. Analyses identified themes and polarity (negative, neutral, or positive) within responses and determined temporal changes across phases of the pandemic ("pre-pandemic," "pandemic," "initial vaccine availability," or "widespread vaccine availability"). Themes included health benefits of vaccines (53.9%), fear of shots (23.7%), COVID-19 (10.3%), vaccines being safe (5.6%), and vaccine hesitancy/misinformation (5.5%). Temporal changes existed for multiple themes (p < .05). Overall, 53.0% of responses were positive, 31.2% were negative, and 15.8% were neutral. Compared to the pre-pandemic phase, polarity was less positive for the widespread vaccine availability phase (odds ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.96). The findings provide insight into how vaccine perceptions change in concert with a public health emergency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Marshall
- Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Annie-Laurie McRee
- Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Amy L. Gower
- Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Paul L. Reiter
- Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Nguyen DA, Alagbo HO, Hassan TA, Mera-Lojano LD, Abdelaziz EO, The NPN, Makram AM, Makram OM, Elsheikh R, Huy NT. Vaccine acceptance, determinants, and attitudes toward vaccine among people experiencing homelessness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis 2023; 23:880. [PMID: 38102542 PMCID: PMC10724884 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-023-08878-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 has caused millions of deaths globally, with vulnerable populations such as people experiencing homelessness (PEH) at higher risk. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to identify the prevalence and key factors contributing to vaccine acceptance experienced by PEH. METHODS The protocol of this study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023391659). We included studies that reported relevant information about vaccine acceptance or vaccine hesitant/refusal among PEH. Eight databases were systematically searched in January 2023. Meta-analysis was conducted for the prevalence of vaccine acceptance, vaccine uptake, and factors associated with vaccine acceptance. Attitudes toward vaccines were combined into bar charts. RESULT A total of 29 papers were included in this systematic review and 19 papers were included for meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among PEH was 66% (95%CI: 58%-73%). Our meta-regression showed vaccine acceptance was significantly increased over time. Moreover, subgroup meta-analysis showed that PEH were more likely to accept the COVID-19 vaccine after June 2021 (78%, 95%CI: 65%-86%) compared with earlier period (56%, 95%CI: 54%-59%). Subgroup meta-analysis also revealed that women and participants without underlying medical condition (chronic diseases) were significantly less likely to accept the COVID-19 vaccine, compared to men and those with medical conditions, respectively. CONCLUSION The study emphasizes the need for targeted public health interventions aimed at increasing vaccine acceptance among PEH, especially at the early stage of the pandemic, among females, those without underlying medical conditions, being Black (in Canada and the USA), and young people. These interventions should address the common concerns of vaccine safety, adverse effects, effectiveness, and distrust in health care systems. In addition to offering vaccinations in different areas convenient to them, education programs could be established to increase vaccine acceptance among PEH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dung Anh Nguyen
- Health Science Department, University of The People, Pasadena, CA, USA
- Online Research Club, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Habib Olatunji Alagbo
- Online Research Club, Nagasaki, Japan.
- V.N, Karazin National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
| | - Toka Adel Hassan
- Online Research Club, Nagasaki, Japan
- Faculty of Medicine, October 6 University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Leonardo D Mera-Lojano
- Online Research Club, Nagasaki, Japan
- ASOCEM UCE - Scientific Association of Students of Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical Science, Central University of Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Esraa Osama Abdelaziz
- Online Research Club, Nagasaki, Japan
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, German University in Cairo, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Nguyen Pham Nguyen The
- Online Research Club, Nagasaki, Japan
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
| | - Abdelrahman M Makram
- Online Research Club, Nagasaki, Japan
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Omar M Makram
- Online Research Club, Nagasaki, Japan
- Center for Health & Nature, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, 77030, USA
| | - Randa Elsheikh
- Online Research Club, Nagasaki, Japan
- Deanery of Biomedical Sciences at Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Nguyen Tien Huy
- Online Research Club, Nagasaki, Japan
- School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Yang X, Chen M, Cao L, Zhao M. Bibliometric analysis of scientific papers on adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines published between 2019 and 2023. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2270194. [PMID: 37885372 PMCID: PMC10760317 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2270194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has now persisted globally for four years, resulting in a staggering death toll of over 4 million individuals. The COVID-19 vaccine has emerged as a highly effective tool in controlling the spread of this virus. However, as the number of individuals receiving COVID-19. In this context, the investigation of adverse reactions related to COVID-19 vaccines holds paramount importance in relevant research. The purpose is to evaluate the current research status regarding adverse reactions associated with COVID-19 vaccines, offering insights for future research. A total of 3,746 articles were included in this analysis, and there has been a notable upward trajectory in the volume of published articles. The CiteSpace v6.1.R6, VOSviewer, SCImago Graphica, and Excel 2019 were employed to analyze and visualize the results. The institutions, countries, journals, authors, co-cited references, and keywords of these articles were analyzed. Furthermore, this study delves into the characteristics of articles on adverse reactions associated with COVID-19 vaccines. It was observed that the number of studies on COVID-19 vaccines has increased year by year since 2019 and witnessed a surge in output in 2021. The vast majority of studies have affirmed the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccines, with adverse reactions tending to be more concentrated in specific diseases. These findings provide valuable ideas for future research in this field and suggest the importance of strengthening international cooperation on adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuan Yang
- Department of Pediatrics, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Mingcong Chen
- Department of Pediatrics, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Lin Cao
- Academician Workstation, Changsha Medical University, Changsha, China
- Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of the Research and Development of Novel Pharmaceutical Preparations, Changsha Medical University, Changsha, China
| | - Mingyi Zhao
- Department of Pediatrics, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Perkins JR, Jaqua EE, Nguyen VT, Franz DA, Elkins J, Morton KR. Optimizing Education to Improve COVID-19 Vaccination Rates in a Federally Qualified Health Center. Perm J 2023; 27:143-150. [PMID: 37908131 PMCID: PMC10723104 DOI: 10.7812/tpp/23.088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy is prevalent in underserved communities, and family medicine clinics can combat hesitancy with vaccine education. However, due to general misinformation, physicians hesitate to educate patients because doing so can create conflict. METHODS A series of resident-run, team-based quality improvement projects were conducted at a federally qualified health center every 4 months between June 2021 and May 2022. First, staff documentation of vaccine status was addressed. Second, physician and staff education about COVID-19 vaccines was completed along with motivational interview training to avoid conflict with patients. Third, patient COVID-19 vaccine education was addressed. RESULTS After Cycle 1, COVID-19 vaccine documentation status increased the number of patients who completed the vaccination series from 1% to 22%. Cycle 2 showed an increase in COVID-19 vaccination rate after health care team education. This reflected an increase from 35% to 76% of residents reporting that they discussed COVID-19 vaccines with unvaccinated patients after the intervention. Cycle 3 fought vaccine misinformation by educating patients. Most patients heard information about COVID-19 vaccines from friends and family (95%), social media (90%), and the news (80%). Physician confidence in providing COVID-19 vaccine education to patients increased from 2.8 (< somewhat confident) to 4.3 (moderately confident) out of 5 over 3 plan-do-study-act cycles. DISCUSSION Vaccination rates were tracked alongside physician surveys regarding the experience of offering the vaccine to patients. Vaccination rates steadily increased over time, and physicians became more confident in COVID-19 vaccine discussions with patients. CONCLUSION Primary care physicians are needed to approach public health concerns, such as vaccination completion, but ongoing education is also needed to promote confidence in health care pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua R Perkins
- Family Medicine Department, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Ecler E Jaqua
- Family Medicine Department, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Van T Nguyen
- Family Medicine Department, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Daniel A Franz
- Psychology Department, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Joseph Elkins
- School of Medicine, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Kelly R Morton
- Family Medicine Department, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA
- Psychology Department, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Clingan SE, Cousins SJ, Lin C, Nguyen TE, Hser YI, Mooney LJ. Perceptions of COVID-19 risk during the pandemic: perspectives from people seeking medication for opioid use disorder. Ann Med 2023; 55:480-489. [PMID: 36692029 PMCID: PMC9879168 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2169342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had devastating consequences for persons with opioid use disorder (OUD). Yet, little is known about how people seeking treatment for OUD perceive the risks of COVID-19 and how their perception interplays with their health behaviours. METHODS In-depth interviews were conducted from September 2021 to March 2022 with 32 patients seeking medication treatment for OUD (MOUD) in Southern California. All interviews were conducted virtually and lasted between one and two hours. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Two qualitative researchers independently conducted a content analysis of the transcripts to identify themes. RESULTS Three primary themes were identified: (1) perceptions and beliefs about COVID-19 susceptibility and severity; (2) perceptions of COVID-19 risk compared to substance use behaviours; and (3) vaccine hesitancy. Participants were mixed in their beliefs of susceptibility to contracting COVID-19 and the severity of the disease if contracted. Some participants reported taking precautions to mitigate their chances of acquiring COVID-19, and other participants reported that COVID was not a big concern as substance use took priority. For many of the participants, COVID-19 concerns were overshadowed by the risk of overdosing on substances and other risky substance use behaviour. Most of the participants (n = 23; 72%) had received at least one COVID-19 vaccine by the time of the interview, but over half (n = 19; 59%) expressed vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy was driven by concerns about the unknown long-term side effects and potential interactions of the vaccine with MOUD. CONCLUSIONS Our study provides insight into COVID-19 prevention measures as well as vaccination perceptions and hesitancy among people who received treatment for OUD.Key messagesParticipants expressed diverse perceptions of the seriousness of COVID-19, with some taking precautions to mitigate their chances of acquiring COVID-19 and others perceiving that the risk of contracting COVID-19 was less than the risk of overdosing.Substance use, social isolation, vaccine hesitancy and COVID-19 risk behaviours should be studied as co-occurring phenomena that have potentially overlapping relationships that can influence behaviours that impact health and well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E. Clingan
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sarah J. Cousins
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Chunqing Lin
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Tram E. Nguyen
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yih-Ing Hser
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Larissa J. Mooney
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Gadbois EA, Brazier JF, Meehan A, Madrigal C, White EM, Rafat A, Grabowski D, Shield RR. COVID-19 Vaccination Among Skilled Nursing Facility Staff: Challenges and Strategies Identified by Administrators. Med Care Res Rev 2023; 80:608-618. [PMID: 37170944 PMCID: PMC10185450 DOI: 10.1177/10775587231168435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
COVID-19 vaccinations are critical for mitigating outbreaks and reducing mortality for skilled nursing facility (SNF) residents and staff, yet uptake among SNF staff varies widely and remains suboptimal. Understanding which strategies are successful for promoting staff vaccination, and examining the relationship between vaccination policies and staff retention/turnover is key for identifying best practices. We conducted repeated interviews with SNF administrators at 3-month intervals between July 2020 and December 2021 (n = 156 interviews). We found that COVID-19 vaccines were initially met with both enthusiasm and skepticism by SNF staff. Administrators reported strategies to increase staff vaccine acceptance, including incentives, one-on-one education, and less stringent personal protective equipment requirements. Federal and state vaccination mandates further promoted vaccine uptake. This combination of mandates with prioritization of the vaccine by SNFs and their leadership was successful at increasing staff vaccination acceptance, which may be critical to increase staff booster uptake from its current suboptimal levels.
Collapse
|
47
|
Tannis A, Englund JA, Perez A, Harker EJ, Staat MA, Schlaudecker EP, Halasa NB, Stewart LS, Williams JV, Michaels MG, Selvarangan R, Schuster JE, Sahni LC, Boom JA, Weinberg GA, Szilagyi PG, Clopper BR, Zhou Y, McMorrow ML, Klein EJ, Moline HL. SARS-CoV-2 Epidemiology and COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness Among Infants and Children Aged 6 Months-4 Years - New Vaccine Surveillance Network, United States, July 2022-September 2023. MMWR. MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT 2023; 72:1300-1306. [PMID: 38032834 PMCID: PMC10718202 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7248a2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 infection in young children is often mild or asymptomatic; however, some children are at risk for severe disease. Data describing the protective effectiveness of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines against COVID-19-associated emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalization in this population are limited. Data from the New Vaccine Surveillance Network, a prospective population-based surveillance system, were used to estimate vaccine effectiveness using a test-negative, case-control design and describe the epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 in infants and children aged 6 months-4 years during July 1, 2022-September 30, 2023. Among 7,434 children included, 5% received a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result, and 95% received a negative test result; 86% were unvaccinated, 4% had received 1 dose of any vaccine product, and 10% had received ≥2 doses. When compared with receipt of no vaccines among children, receipt of ≥2 COVID-19 mRNA vaccine doses was 40% effective (95% CI = 8%-60%) in preventing ED visits and hospitalization. These findings support existing recommendations for COVID-19 vaccination of young children to reduce COVID-19-associated ED visits and hospitalization.
Collapse
|
48
|
Kiti MC, Aguolu OG, Zelaya A, Chen HY, Ahmed N, Batross J, Liu CY, Nelson KN, Jenness SM, Melegaro A, Ahmed F, Malik F, Omer SB, Lopman BA. Changing social contact patterns among US workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: April 2020 to December 2021. Epidemics 2023; 45:100727. [PMID: 37948925 PMCID: PMC10730080 DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2023.100727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-pharmaceutical interventions minimize social contacts, hence the spread of respiratory pathogens such as influenza and SARS-CoV-2. Globally, there is a paucity of social contact data from the workforce. In this study, we quantified two-day contact patterns among USA employees. Contacts were defined as face-to-face conversations, involving physical touch or proximity to another individual and were collected using electronic self-kept diaries. Data were collected over 4 rounds from 2020 to 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mean (standard deviation) contacts reported by 1456 participants were 2.5 (2.5), 8.2 (7.1), 9.2 (7.1) and 10.1 (9.5) across round 1 (April-June 2020), 2 (November 2020-January 2021), 3 (June-August 2021), and 4 (November-December 2021), respectively. Between round 1 and 2, we report a 3-fold increase in the mean number of contacts reported per participant with no major increases from round 2-4. We then modeled SARS-CoV-2 transmission at home, work, and community settings. The model revealed reduced relative transmission in all settings in round 1. Subsequently, transmission increased at home and in the community but remained exceptionally low in work settings. To accurately parameterize models of infection transmission and control, we need empirical social contact data that capture human mixing behavior across time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moses C Kiti
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, GA, USA.
| | - Obianuju G Aguolu
- Yale Institute for Global Health, Yale University, CT, USA; Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, CT, USA
| | - Alana Zelaya
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, GA, USA
| | - Holin Y Chen
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, GA, USA
| | - Noureen Ahmed
- Yale Institute for Global Health, Yale University, CT, USA
| | | | - Carol Y Liu
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, GA, USA
| | | | | | - Alessia Melegaro
- DONDENA Centre for Research in Social Dynamics and Public Policy, Bocconi University, Italy
| | - Faruque Ahmed
- Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Fauzia Malik
- Yale Institute for Global Health, Yale University, CT, USA
| | - Saad B Omer
- Yale Institute for Global Health, Yale University, CT, USA; Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, CT, USA
| | - Ben A Lopman
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Corley AMS, Gomes SM, Martin KJ, Watkins S, Lindsey K, Frenck RW, Mitchell MJ, Rule ARL, Crosby LE. Evaluation of a Community COVID-19 Vaccine Ambassador Train-the-Trainer Program. J Immigr Minor Health 2023; 25:1302-1306. [PMID: 37273119 PMCID: PMC10241117 DOI: 10.1007/s10903-023-01502-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Racially minoritized groups are more likely to experience COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and have lower vaccination rates. As part of a multi-phase community-engaged project, we developed a train-the-trainer program in response to a needs assessment. "Community vaccine ambassadors" were trained to address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. We evaluated the program's feasibility, acceptability, and impact on participant confidence for COVID-19 vaccination conversations. Of the 33 ambassadors trained, 78.8% completed the initial evaluation; nearly all reported gaining knowledge (96.8%) and reported a high confidence with discussing COVID-19 vaccines (93.5%). At two-week follow-up, all respondents reported having a COVID-19 vaccination conversation with someone in their social network, reaching an estimated 134 people. A program that trains community vaccine ambassadors to deliver accurate information about COVID-19 vaccines may be an effective strategy for addressing vaccine hesitancy in racially minoritized communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra M S Corley
- Division of General and Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave MLC 7035, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
| | - Stacey M Gomes
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science and Training, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- School of Education, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Keith J Martin
- Division of General and Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave MLC 7035, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA
- Division of General Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Centro SOL-Center for Salud/Health and Opportunity for Latinos, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | | | - Kendal Lindsey
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Robert W Frenck
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Monica J Mitchell
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Amy R L Rule
- Division of Neonatology, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lori E Crosby
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Poulimeneas D, Koniordou M, Kousi D, Merakou C, Kopsidas I, Tsopela GC, Argyropoulos CD, Themistocleous SC, Shiamakkides G, Constantinou M, Alexandrou A, Noula E, Nearchou A, Salmanton-García J, Stewart FA, Heringer S, Albus K, Álvarez-Barco E, Macken A, Di Marzo R, Luis C, Valle-Simón P, Askling HH, Hellemans M, Spivak O, Davis RJ, Azzini AM, Barta I, Součková L, Jancoriene L, Akova M, Mallon PWG, Olesen OF, Frias-Iniesta J, van Damme P, Tóth K, Cohen-Kandli M, Cox RJ, Husa P, Nauclér P, Marques L, Ochando J, Tacconelli E, Zeitlinger M, Cornely OA, Pana ZD, Zaoutis TE. The Challenges of Vaccine Trial Participation among Underserved and Hard-to-Reach Communities: An Internal Expert Consultation of the VACCELERATE Consortium. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1784. [PMID: 38140188 PMCID: PMC10747264 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11121784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Underserved and hard-to-reach population groups are under-represented in vaccine trials. Thus, we aimed to identify the challenges of vaccine trial participation of these groups in member countries of the VACCELERATE network. Seventeen National Coordinators (NC), each representing their respective country (15 European countries, Israel, and Turkey), completed an online survey. From 15 eligible groups, those that were more frequently declared underserved/hard-to-reach in vaccine research were ethnic minorities (76.5%), persons experiencing homelessness (70.6%), illegal workers and refugees (64.7%, each). When prioritization for education on vaccine trials was considered, ethnic groups, migrants, and immigrants (5/17, 29.4%) were the groups most frequently identified by the NC as top targets. The most prominent barriers in vaccine trial participation affecting all groups were low levels of health literacy, reluctance to participate in trials due to engagement level, and low levels of trust in vaccines/vaccinations. This study highlighted population groups considered underserved/hard-to-reach in countries contained within the European region, and the respective barriers these groups face when participating in clinical studies. Our findings aid with the design of tailored interventions (within-and across-countries of the European region) and with the development of strategies to overcome major barriers in phase 2 and phase 3 vaccine trial participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Poulimeneas
- Collaborative Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Outcomes Research (CLEO), 15451 Athens, Greece; (D.P.); (M.K.); (D.K.); (C.M.); (G.C.T.)
| | - Markela Koniordou
- Collaborative Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Outcomes Research (CLEO), 15451 Athens, Greece; (D.P.); (M.K.); (D.K.); (C.M.); (G.C.T.)
| | - Dimitra Kousi
- Collaborative Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Outcomes Research (CLEO), 15451 Athens, Greece; (D.P.); (M.K.); (D.K.); (C.M.); (G.C.T.)
| | - Christina Merakou
- Collaborative Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Outcomes Research (CLEO), 15451 Athens, Greece; (D.P.); (M.K.); (D.K.); (C.M.); (G.C.T.)
| | - Ioannis Kopsidas
- Collaborative Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Outcomes Research (CLEO), 15451 Athens, Greece; (D.P.); (M.K.); (D.K.); (C.M.); (G.C.T.)
| | - Grammatiki Christina Tsopela
- Collaborative Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Outcomes Research (CLEO), 15451 Athens, Greece; (D.P.); (M.K.); (D.K.); (C.M.); (G.C.T.)
| | - Christos D. Argyropoulos
- School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus; (C.D.A.); (S.C.T.); (M.C.); (A.A.); (E.N.); (A.N.); (Z.D.P.)
| | - Sophia C. Themistocleous
- School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus; (C.D.A.); (S.C.T.); (M.C.); (A.A.); (E.N.); (A.N.); (Z.D.P.)
| | - George Shiamakkides
- School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus; (C.D.A.); (S.C.T.); (M.C.); (A.A.); (E.N.); (A.N.); (Z.D.P.)
| | - Marinos Constantinou
- School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus; (C.D.A.); (S.C.T.); (M.C.); (A.A.); (E.N.); (A.N.); (Z.D.P.)
| | - Alexandra Alexandrou
- School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus; (C.D.A.); (S.C.T.); (M.C.); (A.A.); (E.N.); (A.N.); (Z.D.P.)
| | - Evgenia Noula
- School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus; (C.D.A.); (S.C.T.); (M.C.); (A.A.); (E.N.); (A.N.); (Z.D.P.)
| | - Andria Nearchou
- School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus; (C.D.A.); (S.C.T.); (M.C.); (A.A.); (E.N.); (A.N.); (Z.D.P.)
| | - Jon Salmanton-García
- Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Institute of Translational Research, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany; (J.S.-G.); (S.H.); (O.A.C.)
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, 38124 Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD) and Excellence Center for Medical Mycology (ECMM), Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Fiona A. Stewart
- Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Institute of Translational Research, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany; (J.S.-G.); (S.H.); (O.A.C.)
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, 38124 Cologne, Germany
| | - Sarah Heringer
- Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Institute of Translational Research, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany; (J.S.-G.); (S.H.); (O.A.C.)
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, 38124 Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD) and Excellence Center for Medical Mycology (ECMM), Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Albus
- Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Institute of Translational Research, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany; (J.S.-G.); (S.H.); (O.A.C.)
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD) and Excellence Center for Medical Mycology (ECMM), Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Elena Álvarez-Barco
- Centre for Experimental Pathogen Host Research, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland; (E.Á.-B.); (A.M.); (P.W.G.M.)
| | - Alan Macken
- Centre for Experimental Pathogen Host Research, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland; (E.Á.-B.); (A.M.); (P.W.G.M.)
| | - Romina Di Marzo
- European Vaccine Initiative (EVI), 69115 Heidelberg, Germany; (R.D.M.); (C.L.); (O.F.O.)
| | - Catarina Luis
- European Vaccine Initiative (EVI), 69115 Heidelberg, Germany; (R.D.M.); (C.L.); (O.F.O.)
| | - Paula Valle-Simón
- Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), 28046 Madrid, Spain; (P.V.-S.); (J.F.-I.)
- Servicio Madrileño de Salud, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| | - Helena H. Askling
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden; (H.H.A.); (P.N.)
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Margot Hellemans
- VAXINFECTIO, Centre of Evaluation of Vaccination, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiteit Antwerpen, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium; (M.H.); (P.v.D.)
| | - Orly Spivak
- Ministry of Health of Israel, Jerusalem 1176, Israel; (O.S.); (M.C.-K.)
| | - Ruth Joanna Davis
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy; (R.J.D.); (A.M.A.); (E.T.)
| | - Anna Maria Azzini
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy; (R.J.D.); (A.M.A.); (E.T.)
| | - Imre Barta
- National Koranyi Institute for Pulmonology, 1121 Budapest, Hungary (K.T.)
| | - Lenka Součková
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 60177 Brno, Czech Republic; (L.S.); (P.H.)
- University Hospital Brno, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
- Czech Clinical Research Infrastructure Network (CZECRIN), 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Ligita Jancoriene
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania;
- Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Medical Faculty, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Murat Akova
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Haceteppe University, Ankara 06230, Turkey;
| | - Patrick W. G. Mallon
- Centre for Experimental Pathogen Host Research, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland; (E.Á.-B.); (A.M.); (P.W.G.M.)
| | - Ole F. Olesen
- European Vaccine Initiative (EVI), 69115 Heidelberg, Germany; (R.D.M.); (C.L.); (O.F.O.)
| | - Jesus Frias-Iniesta
- Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), 28046 Madrid, Spain; (P.V.-S.); (J.F.-I.)
- Servicio Madrileño de Salud, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| | - Pierre van Damme
- VAXINFECTIO, Centre of Evaluation of Vaccination, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiteit Antwerpen, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium; (M.H.); (P.v.D.)
| | - Krisztina Tóth
- National Koranyi Institute for Pulmonology, 1121 Budapest, Hungary (K.T.)
| | | | - Rebecca Jane Cox
- Influenza Centre, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, 5020 Bergen, Norway;
| | - Petr Husa
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 60177 Brno, Czech Republic; (L.S.); (P.H.)
- University Hospital Brno, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
- Czech Clinical Research Infrastructure Network (CZECRIN), 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Pontus Nauclér
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden; (H.H.A.); (P.N.)
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Laura Marques
- Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal;
| | - Jordi Ochando
- Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28220 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Evelina Tacconelli
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy; (R.J.D.); (A.M.A.); (E.T.)
| | - Markus Zeitlinger
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Oliver A. Cornely
- Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Institute of Translational Research, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany; (J.S.-G.); (S.H.); (O.A.C.)
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, 38124 Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD) and Excellence Center for Medical Mycology (ECMM), Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
- Clinical Trials Centre Cologne (ZKS Köln), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Zoi Dorothea Pana
- School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus; (C.D.A.); (S.C.T.); (M.C.); (A.A.); (E.N.); (A.N.); (Z.D.P.)
| | - Theoklis E. Zaoutis
- Collaborative Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Outcomes Research (CLEO), 15451 Athens, Greece; (D.P.); (M.K.); (D.K.); (C.M.); (G.C.T.)
- 2nd Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|