1
|
Humbert-Vidan L, Castelo AH, He R, van Dijk LV, Rhee DJ, Wang C, Wang HC, Wahid KA, Joshi S, Gerafian P, West N, Kaffey Z, Mirbahaeddin S, Curiel J, Acharya S, Shekha A, Oderinde P, Ali AMS, Hope A, Watson E, Wesson-Aponte R, Frank SJ, Barbon CEA, Brock KK, Chambers MS, Walji M, Hutcheson KA, Lai SY, Fuller CD, Naser MA, Moreno AC. Image-based Mandibular and Maxillary Parcellation and Annotation using Computer Tomography (IMPACT): A Deep Learning-based Clinical Tool for Orodental Dose Estimation and Osteoradionecrosis Assessment. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2025:2025.03.18.25324199. [PMID: 40166584 PMCID: PMC11957087 DOI: 10.1101/2025.03.18.25324199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/02/2025]
Abstract
Background Accurate delineation of orodental structures on radiotherapy CT images is essential for dosimetric assessments and dental decisions. We propose a deep-learning auto-segmentation framework for individual teeth and mandible/maxilla sub-volumes aligned with the ClinRad ORN staging system. Methods Mandible and maxilla sub-volumes were manually defined, differentiating between alveolar and basal regions, and teeth were labelled individually. For each task, a DL segmentation model was independently trained. A Swin UNETR-based model was used for the mandible sub-volumes. For the smaller structures (e.g., teeth and maxilla sub-volumes) a two-stage segmentation model first used the ResUNet to segment the entire teeth and maxilla regions as a single ROI that was then used to crop the image input of the Swin UNETR. In addition to segmentation accuracy and geometric precision, a dosimetric comparison was made between manual and model-predicted segmentations. Results Segmentation performance varied across sub-volumes - mean Dice values of 0.85 (mandible basal), 0.82 (mandible alveolar), 0.78 (maxilla alveolar), 0.80 (upper central teeth), 0.69 (upper premolars), 0.76 (upper molars), 0.76 (lower central teeth), 0.70 (lower premolars), 0.71 (lower molars) - and exhibited limited applicability in segmenting teeth and sub-volumes often absent in the data. Only the maxilla alveolar central sub-volume showed a statistically significant dosimetric difference (Bonferroni-adjusted p-value = 0.02). Conclusion We present a novel DL-based auto-segmentation framework of orodental structures, enabling spatial localization of dose-related differences in the jaw. This tool enhances image-based bone injury detection, including ORN, and improves clinical decision-making in radiation oncology and dental care for head and neck cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laia Humbert-Vidan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Austin H Castelo
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Renjie He
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lisanne V van Dijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Dong Joo Rhee
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Congjun Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - He C Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kareem A Wahid
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sonali Joshi
- California University of Science and Medicine, Cerritos, California, USA
| | | | - Natalie West
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Zaphanlene Kaffey
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sarah Mirbahaeddin
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jaqueline Curiel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Samrina Acharya
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amal Shekha
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Praise Oderinde
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alaa M S Ali
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Andrew Hope
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, CA
| | - Erin Watson
- Department of Dental Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, CA
| | - Ruth Wesson-Aponte
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Carly E A Barbon
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kristy K Brock
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mark S Chambers
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Muhammad Walji
- Department of Clinical and Health Informatics, Texas Center of Oral Health Care Quality & Safety, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Katherine A Hutcheson
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Stephen Y Lai
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mohamed A Naser
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amy C Moreno
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Radiographic classification of mandibular osteoradionecrosis: A blinded prospective multi-disciplinary interobserver diagnostic performance study. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2025:2025.02.11.25322082. [PMID: 39990553 PMCID: PMC11844595 DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.11.25322082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2025]
Abstract
Background Osteoradionecrosis of the jaw (ORNJ) is a debilitating complication that affects up to 15% of head and neck cancer patients who undergo radiotherapy. The ASCO/ISOO/MASCC-endorsed ClinRad severity classification system was recently proposed (and recommended in the latest ASCO guidelines) to incorporate radiographic findings for determining ORNJ severity based on the vertical extent of bone necrosis. However, variability in imaging modalities and specialty-specific knowledge may contribute to disparities in diagnosing and classifying ORNJ. This study aims to evaluate and benchmark multi-specialty physician performance in diagnosing and severity classification of ORNJ using different radiographic imaging. Methods A single institution retrospective diagnostic validation study was conducted at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center involving 20 healthcare providers across varying specialties including oral oncology, radiation oncology, surgery, and neuroradiology. Participants reviewed 85 de-identified imaging sets including computed tomography (CT) and orthopantomogram (OPG) images from 30 patients with confirmed ORN, with blinded replicates (n=10) for assessment of intra-observer variability and asked to diagnose and stage ORNJ using the ClinRad system. Diagnostic performance was assessed using ROC curves; intra- and inter-observer agreement were measured with Cohen's and Fleiss kappa, respectively. Sub-analyses considered physician specialty, years of clinical experience and level of confidence. Results Paired CT-OPG imaging improved ORNJ diagnostic performance across all specialties, with AUC values ranging from 0.79 (residents) to 0.98 (surgeons). Inter- and intra-rater agreements for ORNJ detection were limited, with median (IQR) Fleiss and Cohen's kappa values of 0.38 (0.22) and 0.08 (0.17), respectively. Slight to fair inter-rater agreement in severity classification ORNJ was observed with median (IQR) Fleiss kappa values of 0.22, 0.13, and 0.05 for stages 0/1, 2, and 3, respectively. The most commonly reported radiographic features for confirmed ORNJ cases staged as ClinRad grade 1 or 2 were "bone necrosis confined to alveolar bone" (22.7%), "bone necrosis involving the basilar bone or maxillary sinus" (14.8%), and "bone lysis/sclerosis" (20.0%). Conclusion This study establishes an essential benchmark for physician detection of radiographic ORNJ. The significant variability in diagnostic and severity classification observed across specialties emphasizes the need for standardized imaging protocols and specialist training as well as highlights the value of multimodality imaging.
Collapse
|
3
|
Rigert J, Kaffey Z, Belal Z, Tripuraneni L, Humbert-Vidan L, Sahli A, Attia S, Hutcheson KA, Watson E, Hope A, Dede C, Kiat-Amnuay S, Walji M, Mohamed ASR, Sandulache VC, Fuller CD, Lai SY, Moreno A. Early Imaging Identification of Osteoradionecrosis and Classification Using the Novel ClinRad System: Results from A Retrospective Observational Cohort. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2025:2025.01.29.25321211. [PMID: 39974112 PMCID: PMC11838654 DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.29.25321211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/21/2025]
Abstract
Objective Osteoradionecrosis of the jaw (ORNJ) is a chronic radiation-associated toxicity that lacks standardized classification criteria and treatment guidelines. Understanding early signs of tissue injury could help us better predict, prevent, and conservatively manage ORN. Our primary aims were to identify initial clinically-detected signs of ORN, determine the frequency of imaging-detected ORNJ, and validate the ability to classify cases using the novel system, ClinRad. Study Design A retrospective electronic health record review of 91 patients treated for head and neck cancer at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center with suspected ORN was performed by an Oral Medicine specialist to identify initial signs of ORN. Patients who received reirradiation to the head and neck or did not have enough evidence of ORN were excluded. A descriptive analysis was performed. Results 51 patients met the inclusion criteria. Half (53%) presented with imaging findings and exposed bone. Imaging findings in the absence of bone exposure were identified in 37%, of which disease progression was observed in 26%. All cases were classifiable using ClinRad. Conclusion Subclinical signs of bony changes consistent with ORN may be evident on imaging without exposed bone, supporting the use of imaging surveillance. ClinRad provided a mechanism to classify all cases at early onset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jillian Rigert
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology
| | - Zaphanlene Kaffey
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology
| | - Zayne Belal
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiation Oncology
| | - Lavanya Tripuraneni
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Head and Neck Surgery
| | - Laia Humbert-Vidan
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology
| | - Ariana Sahli
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology
| | - Serageldin Attia
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology
| | - Katherine A Hutcheson
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Head and Neck Surgery
| | - Erin Watson
- Department of Dental Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON
- Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Andrew Hope
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cem Dede
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology
| | | | - Muhammad Walji
- UTHealth Houston School of Dentistry
- The University of Texas School of Biomedical Informatics
| | - Abdallah S R Mohamed
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology
| | - Vlad C Sandulache
- The Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine
- ENT Section Operative CareLine, Michel E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center
| | - Clifton David Fuller
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology
| | - Stephen Y Lai
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Head and Neck Surgery
| | - Amy Moreno
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Drayson OGG, Montay-Gruel P, Limoli CL. Radiomics approach for identifying radiation-induced normal tissue toxicity in the lung. Sci Rep 2024; 14:24256. [PMID: 39415029 PMCID: PMC11484882 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75993-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 10/09/2024] [Indexed: 10/18/2024] Open
Abstract
The rapidly evolving field of radiomics has shown that radiomic features are able to capture characteristics of both tumor and normal tissue that can be used to make accurate and clinically relevant predictions. In the present study we sought to determine if radiomic features can characterize the adverse effects caused by normal tissue injury as well as identify if human embryonic stem cell (hESC) derived extracellular vesicle (EV) treatment can resolve certain adverse complications. A cohort of 72 mice (n = 12 per treatment group) were exposed to X-ray radiation to the whole lung (3 × 8 Gy) or to the apex of the right lung (3 × 12 Gy), immediately followed by retro-orbital injection of EVs. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography images were acquired before and 2 weeks after treatment. In total, 851 radiomic features were extracted from the whole lungs and < 20 features were selected to train and validate a series of random forest classification models trained to predict radiation status, EV status and treatment group. It was found that all three classification models achieved significantly high prediction accuracies on a validation subset of the dataset (AUCs of 0.91, 0.86 and 0.80 respectively). In the locally irradiated lung, a significant difference between irradiated and unirradiated groups as well as an EV sparing effect were observed in several radiomic features that were not seen in the unirradiated lung (including wavelet-LLH Kurtosis, wavelet HLL Large Area High Gray Level Emphasis, and Gray Level Non-Uniformity). Additionally, a radiation difference was not observed in a secondary comparison cohort, but there was no impact of imaging machine parameters on the radiomic signature of unirradiated mice. Our data demonstrate that radiomics has the potential to identify radiation-induced lung injury and could be applied to predict therapeutic efficacy at early timepoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia G G Drayson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697-2695, USA.
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92617-2695, USA.
| | - Pierre Montay-Gruel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697-2695, USA
- Antwerp Research in Radiation Oncology (AReRO), Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Charles L Limoli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697-2695, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kamel S, Humbert-Vidan L, Kaffey Z, Abusaif A, Fuentes DTA, Wahid K, Dede C, Naser MA, He R, Moawad AW, Elsayes KM, Chen MM, Otun AO, Rigert J, Chambers M, Hope A, Watson E, Brock KK, Hutcheson K, van Dijk L, Moreno AC, Lai SY, Fuller CD, Mohamed ASR. Computed tomography radiomics-based cross-sectional detection of mandibular osteoradionecrosis in head and neck cancer survivors. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.09.11.24313485. [PMID: 39314948 PMCID: PMC11419222 DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.11.24313485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/25/2024]
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to identify radiomic features extracted from contrast-enhanced CT scans that differentiate osteoradionecrosis (ORN) from normal mandibular bone in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with radiotherapy (RT). Materials and Methods Contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) images were collected for 150 patients (80% train, 20% test) with confirmed ORN diagnosis at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2008 and 2018. Using PyRadiomics, radiomic features were extracted from manually segmented ORN regions and the corresponding automated control regions, the later defined as the contralateral healthy mandible region. A subset of pre-selected features was obtained based on correlation analysis (r > 0.95) and used to train a Random Forest (RF) classifier with Recursive Feature Elimination. Model explainability SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was performed on the 20 most important features identified by the trained RF classifier. Results From a total of 1316 radiomic features extracted, 810 features were excluded due to high collinearity. From a set of 506 pre-selected radiomic features, the optimal subset resulting on the best discriminative accuracy of the RF classifier consisted of 67 features. The RF classifier was well calibrated (Log Loss 0.296, ECE 0.125) and achieved an accuracy of 88% and a ROC AUC of 0.96. The SHAP analysis revealed that higher values of Wavelet-LLH First-order Mean and Median were associated with ORN of the jaw (ORNJ). Conversely, higher Exponential GLDM Dependence Entropy and lower Square First-order Kurtosis were more characteristic of normal mandibular tissue. Conclusion This study successfully developed a CECT-based radiomics model for differentiating ORNJ from healthy mandibular tissue in HNC patients after RT. Future work will focus on the detection of subclinical ORNJ regions to guide earlier interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serageldin Kamel
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA
| | - Laia Humbert-Vidan
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA
| | - Zaphanlene Kaffey
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA
| | - Abdulrahman Abusaif
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA
| | - David T A Fuentes
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Imaging Physics, Houston, USA
| | - Kareem Wahid
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Imaging Physics, Houston, USA
| | - Cem Dede
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA
| | - Mohamed A Naser
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA
| | - Renjie He
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA
| | - Ahmed W Moawad
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Radiology, Houston, USA
| | - Khaled M Elsayes
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Radiology, Houston, USA
| | - Melissa M Chen
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA
| | - Adegbenga O Otun
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA
| | - Jillian Rigert
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA
| | - Mark Chambers
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA
| | - Andrew Hope
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Erin Watson
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kristy K Brock
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Imaging Physics, Houston, USA
| | | | - Lisanne van Dijk
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Houston, USA
| | - Amy C Moreno
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA
| | - Stephen Y Lai
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA
| | - Abdallah S R Mohamed
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA
- Baylor Medical College, Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tan D, Mohamad Salleh SA, Manan HA, Yahya N. Delta-radiomics-based models for toxicity prediction in radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 67:564-579. [PMID: 37309680 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Delta-radiomics models are potentially able to improve the treatment assessment than single-time point features. The purpose of this study is to systematically synthesize the performance of delta-radiomics-based models for radiotherapy (RT)-induced toxicity. METHODS A literature search was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. Systematic searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane and Embase databases in October 2022. Retrospective and prospective studies on the delta-radiomics model for RT-induced toxicity were included based on predefined PICOS criteria. A random-effect meta-analysis of AUC was performed on the performance of delta-radiomics models, and a comparison with non-delta radiomics models was included. RESULTS Of the 563 articles retrieved, 13 selected studies of RT-treated patients on different types of cancer (HNC = 571, NPC = 186, NSCLC = 165, oesophagus = 106, prostate = 33, OPC = 21) were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review. Included studies show that morphological and dosimetric features may improve the predictive model performance for the selected toxicity. Four studies that reported both delta and non-delta radiomics features with AUC were included in the meta-analysis. The AUC random effects estimate for delta and non-delta radiomics models were 0.80 and 0.78 with heterogeneity, I2 of 73% and 27% respectively. CONCLUSION Delta-radiomics-based models were found to be promising predictors of predefined end points. Future studies should consider using standardized methods and radiomics features and external validation to the reviewed delta-radiomics model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daryl Tan
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | - Hanani Abdul Manan
- Functional Image Processing Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Noorazrul Yahya
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Current Role of Delta Radiomics in Head and Neck Oncology. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24032214. [PMID: 36768535 PMCID: PMC9916410 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24032214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The latest developments in the management of head and neck cancer show an increasing trend in the implementation of novel approaches using artificial intelligence for better patient stratification and treatment-related risk evaluation. Radiomics, or the extraction of data from various imaging modalities, is a tool often used to evaluate specific features related to the tumour or normal tissue that are not identifiable by the naked eye and which can add value to existing clinical data. Furthermore, the assessment of feature variations from one time point to another based on subsequent images, known as delta radiomics, was shown to have even higher value for treatment-outcome prediction or patient stratification into risk categories. The information gathered from delta radiomics can, further, be used for decision making regarding treatment adaptation or other interventions found to be beneficial to the patient. The aim of this work is to collate the existing studies on delta radiomics in head and neck cancer and evaluate its role in tumour response and normal-tissue toxicity predictions alike. Moreover, this work also highlights the role of holomics, which brings under the same umbrella clinical and radiomic features, for a more complex patient characterization and treatment optimisation.
Collapse
|
8
|
Xi Y, Ge X, Ji H, Wang L, Duan S, Chen H, Wang M, Hu H, Jiang F, Ding Z. Prediction of Response to Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on MRI Radiomics and Delta Radiomics: A Two-Center Retrospective Study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:824509. [PMID: 35530350 PMCID: PMC9074388 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.824509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective We aimed to establish an MRI radiomics model and a Delta radiomics model to predict tumor retraction after induction chemotherapy (IC) combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in non-endemic areas and to validate its efficacy. Methods A total of 272 patients (155 in the training set, 66 in the internal validation set, and 51 in the external validation set) with biopsy pathologically confirmed primary NPC who were screened for pretreatment MRI were retrospectively collected. The NPC tumor was delineated as a region of interest in the two sequenced images of MRI before treatment and after IC, followed by radiomics feature extraction. With the use of maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithms, logistic regression was performed to establish pretreatment MRI radiomics and pre- and post-IC Delta radiomics models. The optimal Youden’s index was taken; the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve were drawn to evaluate the predictive efficacy of different models. Results Seven optimal feature subsets were selected from the pretreatment MRI radiomics model, and twelve optimal subsets were selected from the Delta radiomics model. The area under the ROC curve, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of the MRI radiomics model were 0.865, 0.827, 0.837, 0.813, 0.776, and 0.865, respectively; the corresponding indicators of the Delta radiomics model were 0.941, 0.883, 0.793, 0.968, 0.833, and 0.958, respectively. Conclusion The pretreatment MRI radiomics model and pre- and post-IC Delta radiomics models could predict the IC-CCRT response of NPC in non-epidemic areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuzhen Xi
- Department of Radiology, Key Laboratory of Clinical Cancer Pharmacology and Toxicology Research of Zhejiang Province, Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Cancer Center, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Radiology, 903rd Hospital of PLA, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiuhong Ge
- Department of Radiology, Key Laboratory of Clinical Cancer Pharmacology and Toxicology Research of Zhejiang Province, Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Cancer Center, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Haiming Ji
- Department of Radiology, Liangzhu Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Luoyu Wang
- Department of Radiology, Key Laboratory of Clinical Cancer Pharmacology and Toxicology Research of Zhejiang Province, Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Cancer Center, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shaofeng Duan
- GE Healthcare, Precision Health Institution, Shanghai, China
| | - Haonan Chen
- Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Mengze Wang
- Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hongjie Hu
- Department of Radiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital Affiliated to Medical College Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Feng Jiang
- Department of Head and Neck Radiotherapy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital/Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Feng Jiang, ; Zhongxiang Ding,
| | - Zhongxiang Ding
- Department of Radiology, Key Laboratory of Clinical Cancer Pharmacology and Toxicology Research of Zhejiang Province, Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Cancer Center, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Feng Jiang, ; Zhongxiang Ding,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Barua S, Sabharwal A, Glantz N, Conneely C, Larez A, Bevier W, Kerr D. The northeast glucose drift: Stratification of post-breakfast dysglycemia among predominantly Hispanic/Latino adults at-risk or with type 2 diabetes. EClinicalMedicine 2022; 43:101241. [PMID: 34988413 PMCID: PMC8703234 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is minimal experience in continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) among underserved racial/ethnic minority populations with or at risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D), and therefore a lack of CGM-driven insight for these individuals. We analyzed breakfast-related CGM profiles of free-living, predominantly Hispanic/Latino individuals at-risk of T2D, with pre-T2D, or with non-insulin treated T2D. METHODS Starting February 2019, 119 participants in Santa Barbara, CA, USA, (93 female, 87% Hispanic/Latino [predominantly Mexican-American], age 54·4 [±12·1] years), stratified by HbA1c levels into (i) at-risk of T2D, (ii) with pre-T2D, and (iii) with non-insulin treated T2D, wore blinded CGMs for two weeks. We compared valid CGM profiles from 106 of these participants representing glucose response to breakfast using four parameters. FINDINGS A "northeast drift" was observed in breakfast glucose responses comparing at-risk to pre-T2D to T2D participants. T2D participants had a significantly higher pre-breakfast glucose level, glucose rise, glucose incremental area under the curve (all p < 0·0001), and time to glucose peak (p < 0·05) compared to pre-T2D and at-risk participants. After adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates, pre-breakfast glucose and time to peak (p < 0·0001) were significantly associated with HbA1c. The model predicted HbA1c within (0·55 ± 0·67)% of true laboratory HbA1c values. INTERPRETATION For predominantly Hispanic/Latino adults, the average two-week breakfast glucose response shows a progression of dysglycemia from at-risk of T2D to pre-T2D to T2D. CGM-based breakfast metrics have the potential to predict HbA1c levels and monitor diabetes progression. FUNDING US Department of Agriculture (Grant #2018-33800-28404), a seed grant from the industry board fees of the NSF Engineering Research Center for Precise Advanced Technologies and Health Systems for Underserved Populations (PATHS-UP) (Award #1648451), and the Elsevier foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Souptik Barua
- Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ashutosh Sabharwal
- Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Namino Glantz
- Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, California, United States
| | - Casey Conneely
- Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, California, United States
| | - Arianna Larez
- Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, California, United States
| | - Wendy Bevier
- Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, California, United States
| | - David Kerr
- Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, California, United States
- Corresponding author.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nardone V, Reginelli A, Grassi R, Boldrini L, Vacca G, D'Ippolito E, Annunziata S, Farchione A, Belfiore MP, Desideri I, Cappabianca S. Delta radiomics: a systematic review. Radiol Med 2021; 126:1571-1583. [PMID: 34865190 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-021-01436-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiomics can provide quantitative features from medical imaging that can be correlated with various biological features and clinical endpoints. Delta radiomics, on the other hand, consists in the analysis of feature variation at different acquisition time points, usually before and after therapy. The aim of this study was to provide a systematic review of the different delta radiomics approaches. METHODS Eligible articles were searched in Embase, PubMed, and ScienceDirect using a search string that included free text and/or Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) with three key search terms: "radiomics", "texture", and "delta". Studies were analysed using QUADAS-2 and the RQS tool. RESULTS Forty-eight studies were finally included. The studies were divided into preclinical/methodological (five studies, 10.4%); rectal cancer (six studies, 12.5%); lung cancer (twelve studies, 25%); sarcoma (five studies, 10.4%); prostate cancer (three studies, 6.3%), head and neck cancer (six studies, 12.5%); gastrointestinal malignancies excluding rectum (seven studies, 14.6%), and other disease sites (four studies, 8.3%). The median RQS of all studies was 25% (mean 21% ± 12%), with 13 studies (30.2%) achieving a quality score < 10% and 22 studies (51.2%) < 25%. CONCLUSIONS Delta radiomics shows potential benefit for several clinical endpoints in oncology (differential diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of treatment response, and evaluation of side effects). Nevertheless, the studies included in this systematic review suffer from the bias of overall low quality, so that the conclusions are currently heterogeneous, not robust, and not replicable. Further research with prospective and multicentre studies is needed for the clinical validation of delta radiomics approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerio Nardone
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Alfonso Reginelli
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy.
| | - Roberta Grassi
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Dipartimento Di Diagnostica Per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica Ed Ematologia - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanna Vacca
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Emma D'Ippolito
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Salvatore Annunziata
- Dipartimento Di Diagnostica Per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica Ed Ematologia - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Farchione
- Dipartimento Di Diagnostica Per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica Ed Ematologia - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Paola Belfiore
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Salvatore Cappabianca
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|