1
|
Laurent PA, André F, Bobard A, Deandreis D, Demaria S, Depil S, Eichmüller SB, Fernandez-Palomo C, Foijer F, Galluzzi L, Galon J, Guckenberger M, Harrington KJ, Herrera FG, Huber PE, Italiano A, Karam SD, Kroemer G, Lambin P, Leuschner C, Mantovani A, Meylan E, Mondini M, Pittet MJ, Pouget JP, Remon J, Sørensen CS, Sotiriou C, Vanpouille-Box C, Weichselbaum RR, Welsh JW, Zitvogel L, Formenti SC, Deutsch E. Pushing the boundaries of radiotherapy-immunotherapy combinations: highlights from the 7 th immunorad conference. Oncoimmunology 2025; 14:2432726. [PMID: 39696783 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2024.2432726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2024] [Revised: 11/12/2024] [Accepted: 11/18/2024] [Indexed: 12/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Over the last decade, the annual Immunorad Conference, held under the joint auspicies of Gustave Roussy (Villejuif, France) and the Weill Cornell Medical College (New-York, USA) has aimed at exploring the latest advancements in the fields of tumor immunology and radiotherapy-immunotherapy combinations for the treatment of cancer. Gathering medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, physicians and researchers with esteemed expertise in these fields, the Immunorad Conference bridges the gap between preclinical outcomes and clinical opportunities. Thus, it paves a promising way toward optimizing radiotherapy-immunotherapy combinations and, from a broader perspective, improving therapeutic strategies for patients with cancer. Herein, we report on the topics developed by key-opinion leaders during the 7th Immunorad Conference held in Paris-Les Cordeliers (France) from September 27th to 29th 2023, and set the stage for the 8th edition of Immunorad which will be held at Weill Cornell Medical College (New-York, USA) in October 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre-Antoine Laurent
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- INSERM, U1030 "Molecular Radiotherapy and Therapeutic Innovations", Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Fabrice André
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- INSERM U981 "Molecular predictors and new targets in oncology", Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- IHU PRISM Precision Medicine Cancer Center, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | - Sandra Demaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New-York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New-York, NY, USA
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stephane Depil
- Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Centre Léon Bérard, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
- ErVimmune, Lyon, France
| | - Stefan B Eichmüller
- Research Group GMP & T-cell therapy, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Floris Foijer
- European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Lorenzo Galluzzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New-York, NY, USA
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Caryl and Israel Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jérôme Galon
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology; Sorbonne Université; Sorbonne Paris Cité, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France
| | | | - Kevin J Harrington
- The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Fernanda G Herrera
- Radiation Oncology Service, Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Immuno-oncology Service, Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Peter E Huber
- Department of Radio-oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Heidelberg; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Molecular and Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Antoine Italiano
- Department of therapeutic innovations (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Department of Medicine, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Sana D Karam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Guido Kroemer
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Université de Paris Cité, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- Metabolomics and Cell Biology Platforms, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Department of Biology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou AP-HP, Paris, France
- Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Lambin
- Department of Precision Medicine, GROW - Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, GROW - Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Carola Leuschner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alberto Mantovani
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, MI, Italy
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University, London, UK
| | - Etienne Meylan
- Laboratory of Immunobiology, Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
- Lung Cancer and Immuno-Oncology laboratory, Bordet Cancer Research Laboratories, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Faculty of Medicine, Université libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
- ULB Cancer Research Center (U-CRC) and ULB Center for Research in Immunology (U-CRI), Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Michele Mondini
- INSERM, U1030 "Molecular Radiotherapy and Therapeutic Innovations", Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Mikael J Pittet
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- AGORA Cancer Research Center, Lausanne, Switzerland. Swiss Cancer Center Leman, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Translational Research Center in Onco-Haematology (CRTOH), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Pierre Pouget
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM)INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Jordi Remon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Claus S Sørensen
- Biotech Research and Innovation Centre, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Claire Vanpouille-Box
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New-York, NY, USA
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ralph R Weichselbaum
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - James W Welsh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Laurence Zitvogel
- ClinicObiome, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- INSERM U1015 "Tumor Immunology and Anti-Cancer Immunotherapy Unit", Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Center of Clinical Investigations in Biotherapies of Cancer (BIOTHERIS), Villejuif, France
- Division of Medicine, Paris-Saclay University, Ile-de-France, France
| | - Silvia C Formenti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New-York, NY, USA
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric Deutsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- INSERM, U1030 "Molecular Radiotherapy and Therapeutic Innovations", Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Division of Medicine, Paris-Saclay University, Ile-de-France, France
- RHU LySAIRI "Lymphocyte-Sparing Artificial Intelligence-guided Radio-Immunotherapy", Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Acuña MI, Lamirault C, Larcher T, Brisebard E, Schneider T, Juchaux M, Iglesias-Rey R, Fernández-Rodicio S, Aguiar P, Gómez-Lado N, Martínez-Rovira I, González-Vegas R, Yousef I, Gomez-Caamano A, Pombar M, Luna V, Sanchez M, Prezado Y. Mini-GRID therapy delivers optimised spatially fractionated radiation therapy using a flattening free filter accelerator. COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE 2025; 5:101. [PMID: 40188304 PMCID: PMC11972377 DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-00809-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2025] [Indexed: 04/07/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radioresistant tumours remain a challenge for conventional radiation therapy (RT), and often, only palliative treatment can be offered. Recently developed techniques, such as spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) could potentially improve treatment. However, current clinical SFRT implementations do not allow the full potential to be exploited. We further optimize SFRT, developing mini-GRID, which uses a flattening free filter accelerator. METHODS The increase in normal tissue tolerances provided by mini-GRID compared to conventional RT and GRID therapy was validated in a rat model of brain irradiation in a longitudinal imaging study, behavioural tests and by histopathological evaluation. RESULTS The implementation optimizes mini-GRID therapy, with beam widths around 2 mm2. The peak-to-valley dose ratios and peak dose rates are around 4 and 7 Gy/min, respectively. Mini-GRID RT allows the use of high peak doses: 42 Gy in one fraction, a factor more than twice higher than the peak doses generally employed in conventional GRID therapy (20 Gy peak dose). This enables the use of more aggressive and potentially curative treatments. Infrared microspectroscopy analysis suggests different early biochemical changes in both modalities, with conventional RT leading to stronger modifications in the secondary protein structure, and higher oxidative damage than mini-GRID RT. CONCLUSIONS The possibility to treat both large and small tumours, and to perform safe and potentially curative dose escalations in previously untreatable cases, makes mini-GRID a promising approach to expand the clinical use of SFRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Isabel Acuña
- New Approaches in Radiotherapy Lab, Center for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases (CIMUS), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University of Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Charlotte Lamirault
- Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Université Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | | | | | - Tim Schneider
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Ramon Iglesias-Rey
- Neuroimaging and Biotechnology Laboratory (NOBEL), Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory (LINC), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Sabela Fernández-Rodicio
- Neuroimaging and Biotechnology Laboratory (NOBEL), Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory (LINC), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Pablo Aguiar
- Molecular Imaging and Pharmacokinetic Modelling Group, Center for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases (CiMUS), University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University Hospital Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Noemi Gómez-Lado
- Molecular Imaging and Pharmacokinetic Modelling Group, Center for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases (CiMUS), University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University Hospital Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Immaculada Martínez-Rovira
- Physics Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Roberto González-Vegas
- Physics Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ibraheem Yousef
- MIRAS Beamline, ALBA Synchrotron, 08209 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Gomez-Caamano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Miguel Pombar
- Department of Medical Physics, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Victor Luna
- Department of Medical Physics, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Manuel Sanchez
- Department of Medical Physics, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- New Approaches in Radiotherapy Lab, Center for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases (CIMUS), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University of Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain.
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France.
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France.
- Oportunius Program, Galician Agency of Innovation (GAIN), Xunta de Galicia, A Coruña, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Barnes MJ, Afshar N, Batty T, Fiala T, Cameron M, Hausermann D, Hardcastle N, Lerch M. A robotic treatment delivery system to facilitate dynamic conformal synchrotron radiotherapy. Med Phys 2025. [PMID: 40089981 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Revised: 01/15/2025] [Accepted: 02/17/2025] [Indexed: 03/18/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In clinical radiotherapy, the patient remains static during treatment and only the source is dynamically manipulated. In synchrotron radiotherapy, the beam is fixed, and is horizontally wide and vertically small, requiring the patient to be moved through the beam to ensure full target coverage, while shaping the field to conform to the target. No clinical system exists that performs both dynamic motion of the patient and dynamic shaping of the beam. PURPOSE We developed and tested a new dynamic treatment delivery system capable of delivering conformal fields with a robotic patient positioning system for use on the Imaging and Medical Beamline (IMBL) at the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Australian Synchrotron. METHODS An industrial robotic manipulator was modified to enable dynamic radiotherapy treatments on IMBL. The robot, combined with a carbon-fiber treatment couch-top and a recently developed dynamic collimator, formed the basis of the new treatment delivery system. To synchronize the motions of the robot and collimator, a real-time, hardware-based event-handling system was utilized. To test the system, a ball bearing in a medical physics phantom was treated with circular fields ranging from 5 to 40 mm in diameter and at treatment speeds from 2 to 50 mm s - 1 ${\rm s}^{-1}$ . The position of the ball bearing was compared to the center of the circular fields and the positional and temporal accuracy of the treatment delivery system was assessed, and appropriate treatment margins for the system were determined. RESULTS The vertical position of the ball bearing varied with treatment delivery speed (- 1.06 to 0.93 mm $-1.06 \, {\rm to}\, 0.93 \,\mathrm{mm}$ ) while the horizontal position remained consistent (- 0.05 to 0.09 mm $-0.05 \,{\rm to}\, 0.09 \,\mathrm{mm}$ ). The time-delay between the robot and the collimator remained consistent (- 35.5 ms to 18.5 ms $-35.5 \,\mathrm{ms}\,{\rm to}\, 18.5 \,\mathrm{ms}$ ) at treatment speeds above2 mms - 1 $2 \,\mathrm{mm s}^{-1}$ . Data at2 mm s - 1 $2 \,\mathrm{mm}\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ was right at the edge of both the robot capabilities and the analysis technique, and had larger variations in timing (0.0 ms to 57.9 ms $0.0 \,\mathrm{ms}\,{\rm to}\, 57.9 \,\mathrm{ms}$ ). Horizontal margins of0.51 mm $0.51 \,\mathrm{mm}$ and vertical margins of up to2.3 mm $2.3 \,\mathrm{mm}$ were calculated for the treatment delivery system. CONCLUSIONS We have implemented the first robotic treatment delivery system for synchrotron radiotherapy treatments. The largest errors were observed in the direction of motion of the patient through the beam and with future improvements, can be reduced. The system was both accurate and repeatable and is ready to support future treatments on IMBL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micah J Barnes
- Centre of Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
- ANSTO Australian Synchrotron, Clayton, Australia
- Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nader Afshar
- ANSTO Australian Synchrotron, Clayton, Australia
| | - Taran Batty
- ANSTO Australian Synchrotron, Clayton, Australia
| | - Tom Fiala
- ANSTO Australian Synchrotron, Clayton, Australia
| | | | | | - Nicholas Hardcastle
- Centre of Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
- Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael Lerch
- Centre of Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stolz J, Rogal K, Bicher S, Winter J, Ahmed M, Raulefs S, Combs SE, Bartzsch SH, Schmid TE. The Combination of Temporal and Spatial Dose Fractionation in Microbeam Radiation Therapy. Biomedicines 2025; 13:678. [PMID: 40149654 PMCID: PMC11940479 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13030678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2024] [Revised: 02/21/2025] [Accepted: 02/26/2025] [Indexed: 03/29/2025] Open
Abstract
Background: Microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is an advanced preclinical approach in radiotherapy that utilizes spatially fractionated dose distributions by collimating x-rays into micrometer-wide, planar beams. While the benefits of temporal fractionation are well established and widely incorporated into conventional radiotherapy protocols, the interplay between MRT and temporal dose fractionation remains largely unexplored. In this study, we investigate the effects of combining temporal and spatial dose fractionation by assessing clonogenic cell survival following temporally fractionated MRT with varying irradiation angles, compared to conventional broad-beam (BB) irradiation. Methods: A lung tumor cell line (A549) and a normal lung cell line (MRC-5) were irradiated with a total number of four fractions with a 24 h interval between each fraction. We compared a temporally fractionated BB regime to two temporally fractionated MRT schemes with either overlapping MRT fields or MRT fields with a 45° rotation per fraction. Subsequently, the clonogenic cell survival assay was used by analyzing the corresponding survival fractions (SFs). Results: The clonogenic survival of A549 tumor cells differed significantly between microbeam radiation therapy with rotation (MRT + R) and overlapping MRT. However, neither MRT + R nor overlapping MRT showed statistically significant differences compared to the broad-beam (BB) irradiation for A549. In contrast, the normal tissue cell line MRC-5 exhibited significantly higher clonogenic survival following both MRT + R and overlapping MRT compared to BB. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that combining temporal and spatial fractionation enhances normal tissue cell survival while maintaining equivalent tumor cell kill, potentially increasing the therapeutic index. Our findings support the feasibility of delivering temporally fractionated doses using different MRT modalities and provide clear evidence of the therapeutic benefits of temporally fractionated MRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Stolz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.S.); (S.R.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, 85764 Munich, Germany
| | - Kristina Rogal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.S.); (S.R.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, 85764 Munich, Germany
| | - Sandra Bicher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.S.); (S.R.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, 85764 Munich, Germany
| | - Johanna Winter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.S.); (S.R.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, 85764 Munich, Germany
| | - Mabroor Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.S.); (S.R.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, 85764 Munich, Germany
| | - Susanne Raulefs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.S.); (S.R.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, 85764 Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.S.); (S.R.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, 85764 Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan H. Bartzsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.S.); (S.R.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, 85764 Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas E. Schmid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.S.); (S.R.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, 85764 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang Y, Wang H, Hu J, Chai J, Luan J, Li J, Xu Q. FLASH radiotherapy: mechanisms, nanotherapeutic strategy and future development. NANOSCALE ADVANCES 2025; 7:711-721. [PMID: 39781242 PMCID: PMC11705069 DOI: 10.1039/d4na00753k] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2024] [Accepted: 12/21/2024] [Indexed: 01/12/2025]
Abstract
Ultra-high dose-rate (FLASH) radiotherapy serves as an ideal procedure to treat tumors efficiently without harming normal tissues and has demonstrated satisfactory antitumor effects in multiple animal tumor models. However, the biological mechanisms of FLASH radiotherapy have not yet been fully elucidated, and the small number of devices delivering FLASH dose rate has limited its wide application. This review summarizes the possible biological mechanisms and antitumor effects of FLASH radiotherapy, its application in nanotherapeutic strategy, as well as its challenges and future development. Furthermore, some valuable guidance for promoting the progress of FLASH radiotherapy in nanotherapeutic strategies are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College Wuhu China
| | - Huifang Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College Wuhu China
| | - Jiawei Hu
- Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College Wuhu China
| | - Jingjing Chai
- Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College Wuhu China
| | - Jiajie Luan
- Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College Wuhu China
| | - Jie Li
- Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Mianyang China
| | - Qingwen Xu
- Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College Wuhu China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang Y, Qi SN, Bi N, Li YX. FLASH radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy: From biological mechanisms to blockbuster therapeutics. Transl Oncol 2025; 51:102183. [PMID: 39613524 PMCID: PMC11629542 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2024] [Revised: 09/19/2024] [Accepted: 10/29/2024] [Indexed: 12/01/2024] Open
Abstract
FLASH ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy (RT) can effectively exert the protective effect on normal tissue and reduce the risk of treatment-related toxicity, without compromising the killing effect on tumor tissue, resulting in a significant differential biological effect between tumor control and normal tissue damage, namely the FLASH effect. To date, the precise biological details of the FLASH effect remain uncertain. The currently mainstream mechanisms proposed by the academic community include the transient oxygen depletion hypothesis, free radical hypothesis, immune protection hypothesis, and DNA integrity hypothesis, which have attracted increasing attention in recent years. Based on these theoretical principles and numerous investigations on the FLASH effect in vivo and in vitro, the combined application of FLASH and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been considered synergistic and potentially practical. The primary underlying basis is that FLASH might actively preserve the number and function of circulating immune cells, thereby enhancing the efficacy of immune cell-mediated immunotherapy. Meanwhile, FLASH RT could activate the tumor immune microenvironment and transform "cold'' tumors into ''hot'' ones, consequently boosting local and systemic anti-tumor immunity and expanding the therapeutic benefits of ICIs. Moreover, FLASH might attenuate immunoinflammatory responses and minimize the incidence of radiation-related adverse events, allowing for the potentially safer and promising clinical application of combing FLASH RT with ICI therapy. Nevertheless, data on this treatment modality is currently lacking, and several barriers remain to be addressed, including the logistical bottlenecks, technical hurdles, limited availability, and unclear biological mechanisms. Further research is warranted in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Shu-Nan Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, China.
| | - Nan Bi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, China; State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| | - Ye-Xiong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Engels E, Forrester H, Klein M, Bell C, Balderstone I, Brunt K, Barnes MJ, Cameron M, Crosbie JC, Middleton R, Fernandez-Palomo C, Dietler BDB, Trappetti V, Fazzari JM, Hausermann D, Anderson RL, Djonov VG, Martin OA. The Impact of Synchrotron Microbeam Radiation Therapy Combined With Broad Beam in a Preclinical Breast Cancer Model. Adv Radiat Oncol 2025; 10:101680. [PMID: 39687472 PMCID: PMC11647509 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 11/04/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Both local tumor control and distant metastasis are important indicators of the efficacy of radiation therapy treatment. Synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy (MRT), spatially fractionated radiation delivered at ultrahigh dose rates, shows remarkable normal tissue sparing with excellent local control in some models. Some MRT regimens trigger an antitumor immune response that contributes not only to the local but also to systemic treatment efficacy. Despite recent advances in the treatment of primary breast cancer, metastatic disease is still the major cause of treatment failure in the clinic. Here, in an aggressive preclinical triple-negative breast cancer model, we compared local tumor response and metastasis following different MRT treatment programs. Methods and Materials 4T1.2 mouse mammary tumors were treated with 300 Gy peak/7 Gy valley dose MRT and/or 8 Gy broad beam (BB) radiation, all delivered as daily fractionated programs (3 consecutive daily sessions of either MRT or BB or 1 MRT combined with 2 BB sessions, the first or last of the 3 fractions). The mice were euthanized on day 9 post last irradiation, when unirradiated control animals reached an ethical endpoint. Primary tumors were collected to evaluate immune cell prevalence, while lungs, spinal cords, and locoregional lymph nodes were collected to measure metastatic burden. In parallel, local tumor growth and survival were monitored. Results The combined MRT/BB treatment shifted the balance between pro- and antitumorigenic macrophages toward the accumulation of antitumorigenic macrophages in the tumor. Monitoring of the tumor volume and animal health indicated the benefit of the combined MRT/BB treatment for local control and treatment tolerance, while animal survival was only marginally longer for one combined schedule. The metastatic burden was similar for all 4 treatment schedules. Conclusions The addition of a single MRT to BB treatment improved the primary tumor response. This provides a basis for future experiments incorporating adjuvant immunotherapy or chemotherapy to improve local and systemic treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elette Engels
- Centre of Medical Radiation Physics (CMRP), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
- Australian Synchrotron, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization (ANSTO), Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helen Forrester
- Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mitzi Klein
- Australian Synchrotron, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization (ANSTO), Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Caroline Bell
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute (ONJCRI), Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Indi Balderstone
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute (ONJCRI), Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kirsty Brunt
- Australian Synchrotron, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization (ANSTO), Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Micah J. Barnes
- Centre of Medical Radiation Physics (CMRP), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
- Australian Synchrotron, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization (ANSTO), Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthew Cameron
- Australian Synchrotron, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization (ANSTO), Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jeffrey C. Crosbie
- XRV Medical Pty Ltd, Geelong North, Victoria, Australia
- Saint Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Daniel Hausermann
- Australian Synchrotron, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization (ANSTO), Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Robin L. Anderson
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute (ONJCRI), Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- School of Medicine, LaTrobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Olga A. Martin
- Centre of Medical Radiation Physics (CMRP), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Trappetti V, Fernández-Palomo C, Arora P, Potez M, Pellicioli P, Fazzari J, Shintani N, Sanchez-Gonzalez I, Wu CT, de Breuyn Dietler B, Mercader-Huber N, Martin OA, von Gunten S, Volarevic V, Djonov V. Towards melanoma in situ vaccination with multiple ultra-narrow X-ray beams. Cancer Lett 2025; 608:217326. [PMID: 39547332 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.217326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2024] [Revised: 10/23/2024] [Accepted: 11/12/2024] [Indexed: 11/17/2024]
Abstract
Despite the recent progress, current treatment modalities are not able to eradicate cancer. We show that Microbeam Radiotherapy (MRT), an innovative type of Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy, can control murine melanoma by activating the host's own immune system. The beneficial effects are very pronounced in comparison to uniform radiotherapy traditionally employed in the clinic. Our results show that MRT increased antigen presentation, activating Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes (CTLs) which are essential to MRT's treatment efficacy in melanoma. Depletion of CTLs abrogated treatment response. Multiplex nucleic acid hybridization technology revealed key features of lymphocyte populations such as proliferation, differentiation, and ligand-receptor interactions. In addition, CTLs were shown to be essential for locoregional metastatic control and systemic abscopal effects confirmed by activation of antigen presenting cells and CTL trafficking in the tumour-draining lymph nodes. MRT also showed a synergistic effect with immunotherapy. Overall, MRT induces a robust antitumour immune response, acting like an in situ vaccination, which could be exploited to treat a variety of treatment-resistant malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Prateek Arora
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Biomedical Research, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Marine Potez
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 33612, Tampa, FL, USA.
| | - Paolo Pellicioli
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland; Biomedical Beamline ID17, ESRF, The European Synchrotron, 38000, Grenoble, France.
| | - Jennifer Fazzari
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Nahoko Shintani
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
| | | | - Cheuk Ting Wu
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
| | | | - Nadia Mercader-Huber
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Biomedical Research, University of Bern, 3008, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Olga A Martin
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Radiation Physics (CMRP), University of Wollongong, 2522, NSW, Australia.
| | | | - Vladislav Volarevic
- Departments of Genetics, Microbiology and Immunology, Center for Research on Harmful Effects of Biological and Chemical Hazards, Faculty of Medical Sciences University of Kragujevac, 34000, Kragujevac, Serbia.
| | - Valentin Djonov
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Grams MP, Mateus CQ, Mashayekhi M, Mutter RW, Djonov V, Fazzari JM, Xiao H, Frechette KM, Wentworth AJ, Morris JM, Klebel B, Thull JC, Guenzel RM, Wismayer DJS, Lucien F, Park SS, Lester SC. Minibeam Radiation Therapy Treatment (MBRT): Commissioning and First Clinical Implementation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 120:1423-1434. [PMID: 39002850 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.06.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2024] [Revised: 06/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) is characterized by the delivery of submillimeter-wide regions of high "peak" and low "valley" doses throughout a tumor. Preclinical studies have long shown the promise of this technique, and we report here the first clinical implementation of MBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS A clinical orthovoltage unit was commissioned for MBRT patient treatments using 3-, 4-, 5-, 8-, and 10-cm diameter cones. The 180 kVp output was spatially separated into minibeams using a tungsten collimator with 0.5 mm wide slits spaced 1.1 mm on center. Percentage depth dose (PDD) measurements were obtained using film dosimetry and plastic water for both peak and valley doses. PDDs were measured on the central axis for offsets of 0, 0.5, and 1 cm. The peak-to-valley ratio was calculated at each depth for all cones and offsets. To mitigate the effects of patient motion on delivered dose, patient-specific 3-dimensional-printed collimator holders were created. These conformed to the unique anatomy of each patient and affixed the tungsten collimator directly to the body. Two patients were treated with MBRT; both received 2 fractions. RESULTS Peak PDDs decreased gradually with depth. Valley PDDs initially increased slightly with depth, then decreased gradually beyond 2 cm. The peak-to-valley ratios were highest at the surface for smaller cone sizes and offsets. In vivo film dosimetry confirmed a distinct delineation of peak and valley doses in both patients treated with MBRT with no dose blurring. Both patients experienced prompt improvement in symptoms and tumor response. CONCLUSIONS We report commissioning results, treatment processes, and the first 2 patients treated with MBRT using a clinical orthovoltage unit. While demonstrating the feasibility of this approach is a crucial first step toward wider translation, clinical trials are needed to further establish safety and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Grams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | | | | | - Robert W Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Huaping Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | | | - Brandon Klebel
- Division of Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jack C Thull
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Fabrice Lucien
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Division of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sean S Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Scott C Lester
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
McGarrigle JM, Long KR, Prezado Y. The FLASH effect-an evaluation of preclinical studies of ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1340190. [PMID: 38711846 PMCID: PMC11071325 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1340190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) is a novel radiotherapy approach based on the use of ultra-high dose radiation to treat malignant cells. Although tumours can be reduced or eradicated using radiotherapy, toxicities induced by radiation can compromise healthy tissues. The FLASH effect is the observation that treatment delivered at an ultra-high dose rate is able to reduce adverse toxicities present at conventional dose rates. While this novel technique may provide a turning point for clinical practice, the exact mechanisms underlying the causes or influences of the FLASH effect are not fully understood. The study presented here uses data collected from 41 experimental investigations (published before March 2024) of the FLASH effect. Searchable databases were constructed to contain the outcomes of the various experiments in addition to values of beam parameters that may have a bearing on the FLASH effect. An in-depth review of the impact of the key beam parameters on the results of the experiments was carried out. Correlations between parameter values and experimental outcomes were studied. Pulse Dose Rate had positive correlations with almost all end points, suggesting viability of FLASH-RT as a new modality of radiotherapy. The collective results of this systematic review study suggest that beam parameter qualities from both FLASH and conventional radiotherapy can be valuable for tissue sparing and effective tumour treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kenneth Richard Long
- Department of Physics, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC), Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Universite Paris-Saclay, Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, Orsay, France
- Universite Paris-Saclay, Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tang R, Yin J, Liu Y, Xue J. FLASH radiotherapy: A new milestone in the field of cancer radiotherapy. Cancer Lett 2024; 587:216651. [PMID: 38342233 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.216651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
Radiotherapy plays a pivotal role in the control and eradication of tumors, but it can also induce radiation injury to surrounding normal tissues while targeting tumor cells. In recent years, FLASH-Radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) has emerged as a cutting-edge research focus in the field of radiation therapy. By delivering high radiation doses to the treatment target in an ultra-short time, FLASH-RT produces the FLASH effect, which reduces the toxicity to normal tissues while achieving comparable tumor control efficacy to conventional radiotherapy. This review provides a brief overview of the development history of FLASH-RT and its impact on tumor control. Additionally, it focuses on introducing the protective effects and molecular mechanisms of this technology on various normal tissues, as well as exploring its synergistic effects when combined with other tumor therapies. Importantly, this review discusses the challenges faced in translating FLASH-RT into clinical practice and outlines its promising future applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Tang
- Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, China; Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, The National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Jianqiong Yin
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, The National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Yuanxin Liu
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, The National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Jianxin Xue
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, The National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China; Laboratory of Clinical Cell Therapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China; Disaster Medical Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
di Franco F, Rosuel N, Gallin-Martel L, Gallin-Martel ML, Ghafooryan-Sangchooli M, Keshmiri S, Motte JF, Muraz JF, Pellicioli P, Ruat M, Serduc R, Verry C, Dauvergne D, Adam JF. Monocrystalline diamond detector for online monitoring during synchrotron microbeam radiotherapy. JOURNAL OF SYNCHROTRON RADIATION 2023; 30:1076-1085. [PMID: 37815374 PMCID: PMC10624038 DOI: 10.1107/s160057752300752x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
Microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is a radiotherapy technique combining spatial fractionation of the dose distribution on a micrometric scale, X-rays in the 50-500 keV range and dose rates up to 16 × 103 Gy s-1. Nowadays, in vivo dosimetry remains a challenge due to the ultra-high radiation fluxes involved and the need for high-spatial-resolution detectors. The aim here was to develop a striped diamond portal detector enabling online microbeam monitoring during synchrotron MRT treatments. The detector, a 550 µm bulk monocrystalline diamond, is an eight-strip device, of height 3 mm, width 178 µm and with 60 µm spaced strips, surrounded by a guard ring. An eight-channel ASIC circuit for charge integration and digitization has been designed and tested. Characterization tests were performed at the ID17 biomedical beamline of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF). The detector measured direct and attenuated microbeams as well as interbeam fluxes with a precision level of 1%. Tests on phantoms (RW3 and anthropomorphic head phantoms) were performed and compared with simulations. Synchrotron radiation measurements were performed on an RW3 phantom for strips facing a microbeam and for strips facing an interbeam area. A 2% difference between experiments and simulations was found. In more complex geometries, a preliminary study showed that the absolute differences between simulated and recorded transmitted beams were within 2%. Obtained results showed the feasibility of performing MRT portal monitoring using a microstriped diamond detector. Online dosimetric measurements are currently ongoing during clinical veterinary trials at ESRF, and the next 153-strip detector prototype, covering the entire irradiation field, is being finalized at our institution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca di Franco
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LPSC UMR5821, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - Nicolas Rosuel
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LPSC UMR5821, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | | | | | | | - Sarvenaz Keshmiri
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, UGA/INSERM UA7 STROBE, 2280 Rue de la Piscine, 38400 Saint-Martin d’Hères, France
| | - Jean-François Motte
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, Institut Néel, CNRS, Grenoble-INP, Grenoble, France
| | - Jean-François Muraz
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LPSC UMR5821, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | | | | | - Raphael Serduc
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, UGA/INSERM UA7 STROBE, 2280 Rue de la Piscine, 38400 Saint-Martin d’Hères, France
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble-Alpes, CS10217, 38043 Grenoble, France
| | - Camille Verry
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble-Alpes, CS10217, 38043 Grenoble, France
| | - Denis Dauvergne
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LPSC UMR5821, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - Jean-François Adam
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, UGA/INSERM UA7 STROBE, 2280 Rue de la Piscine, 38400 Saint-Martin d’Hères, France
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble-Alpes, CS10217, 38043 Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Grams MP, Deufel CL, Kavanaugh JA, Corbin KS, Ahmed SK, Haddock MG, Lester SC, Ma DJ, Petersen IA, Finley RR, Lang KG, Spreiter SS, Park SS, Owen D. Clinical aspects of spatially fractionated radiation therapy treatments. Phys Med 2023; 111:102616. [PMID: 37311338 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide clinical guidance for centers wishing to implement photon spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) treatments using either a brass grid or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lattice approach. METHODS We describe in detail processes which have been developed over the course of a 3-year period during which our institution treated over 240 SFRT cases. The importance of patient selection, along with aspects of simulation, treatment planning, quality assurance, and treatment delivery are discussed. Illustrative examples involving clinical cases are shown, and we discuss safety implications relevant to the heterogeneous dose distributions. RESULTS SFRT can be an effective modality for tumors which are otherwise challenging to manage with conventional radiation therapy techniques or for patients who have limited treatment options. However, SFRT has several aspects which differ drastically from conventional radiation therapy treatments. Therefore, the successful implementation of an SFRT treatment program requires the multidisciplinary expertise and collaboration of physicians, physicists, dosimetrists, and radiation therapists. CONCLUSIONS We have described methods for patient selection, simulation, treatment planning, quality assurance and delivery of clinical SFRT treatments which were built upon our experience treating a large patient population with both a brass grid and VMAT lattice approach. Preclinical research and patient trials aimed at understanding the mechanism of action are needed to elucidate which patients may benefit most from SFRT, and ultimately expand its use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Grams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - Christopher L Deufel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - James A Kavanaugh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Kimberly S Corbin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Safia K Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Michael G Haddock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Scott C Lester
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Daniel J Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Ivy A Petersen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Randi R Finley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Karen G Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Sheri S Spreiter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Sean S Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Dawn Owen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Serduc R, Bouchet A. MRT-boost as the last fraction may be the most efficient irradiation schedule for increased survival times in a rat glioma model. JOURNAL OF SYNCHROTRON RADIATION 2023; 30:591-595. [PMID: 37067258 PMCID: PMC10161883 DOI: 10.1107/s1600577523002606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is based on the spatial fractionation of the incident synchrotron beam into arrays of parallel microbeams, typically a few tens of micrometres wide and depositing several hundred Gray. This high dose, high dose rate, spatially fractionated radiotherapy has a high therapeutic impact on tumors, especially in intracranial locations. MRT leads to better control of incurable high-grade glioma than from homogeneous radiotherapy. The schedule of MRT within a conventional irradiation protocol (three fractions of 11 Gy) of brain tumors was evaluated on the 9L glioma model in rats. MRT delivered as a first fraction increased the median survival time of the animals by four days compared with conventional radiotherapy, while the last MRT fraction improved the lifespan by 148% (+15.5 days compared with conventional radiotherapy, p < 0.0001). The most efficient radiation regimen was obtained when the MRT-boost was applied as the last fraction, following two conventional clinical exposures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphael Serduc
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, INSERM UA7 STROBE, Rue de la Piscine, 38400 Saint-Martin d’Hères, France
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble-Alpes, Maquis du Grésivaudan, 38700 La Tronche, France
| | - Audrey Bouchet
- INSERM U1296, Radiation: Defense, Health, Environment, 28 Rue Laennec, 69008 Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tubin S, Vozenin M, Prezado Y, Durante M, Prise K, Lara P, Greco C, Massaccesi M, Guha C, Wu X, Mohiuddin M, Vestergaard A, Bassler N, Gupta S, Stock M, Timmerman R. Novel unconventional radiotherapy techniques: Current status and future perspectives - Report from the 2nd international radiation oncology online seminar. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 40:100605. [PMID: 36910025 PMCID: PMC9996385 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
•Improvement of therapeutic ratio by novel unconventional radiotherapy approaches.•Immunomodulation using high-dose spatially fractionated radiotherapy.•Boosting radiation anti-tumor effects by adding an immune-mediated cell killing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Tubin
- Medaustron Center for Ion Therapy, Marie-Curie Strasse 5, Wiener Neustadt 2700, Austria
| | - M.C. Vozenin
- Radiation Oncology Laboratory, Radiation Oncology Service, Oncology Department, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Y. Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay 91400, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay 91400, France
| | - M. Durante
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Planckstraße 1, Darmstadt 64291, Germany
- Technsiche Universität Darmstadt, Institute for Condensed Matter Physics, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - K.M. Prise
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AE, United Kingdom
| | - P.C. Lara
- Canarian Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Roque University Hospital & Fernando Pessoa Canarias University, C/Dolores de la Rocha 9, Las Palmas GC 35001, Spain
| | - C. Greco
- Department of Radiation Oncology Champalimaud Foundation, Av. Brasilia, Lisbon 1400-038, Portugal
| | - M. Massaccesi
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - C. Guha
- Montefiore Medical Center Radiation Oncology, 111 E 210th St, New York, NY, United States
| | - X. Wu
- Executive Medical Physics Associates, 19470 NE 22nd Road, Miami, FL 33179, United States
| | - M.M. Mohiuddin
- Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center Warrenville and Northwestern Medicine Proton Center, 4455 Weaver Pkwy, Warrenville, IL 60555, United States
| | - A. Vestergaard
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - N. Bassler
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - S. Gupta
- The Loop Immuno-Oncology Laboratory, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - M. Stock
- Medaustron Center for Ion Therapy, Marie-Curie Strasse 5, Wiener Neustadt 2700, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Marie-Curie Strasse 5, Wiener Neustadt 2700, Austria
| | - R. Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Inwood Road Dallas, TX 2280, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Comparison of the dosimetric response of two Sr salts irradiated with 60Co γ-rays and synchrotron X-rays at ultra-high dose rate. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2023.110923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2023]
|
17
|
Microbeam Radiation Therapy controls local growth of radioresistant melanoma and treats out-of-field locoregional metastasis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:478-493. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
18
|
Jaekel F, Bräuer-Krisch E, Bartzsch S, Laissue J, Blattmann H, Scholz M, Soloviova J, Hildebrandt G, Schültke E. Microbeam Irradiation as a Simultaneously Integrated Boost in a Conventional Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Protocol. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23158319. [PMID: 35955454 PMCID: PMC9368396 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Revised: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Microbeam radiotherapy (MRT), an experimental high-dose rate concept with spatial fractionation at the micrometre range, has shown a high therapeutic potential as well as good preservation of normal tissue function in pre-clinical studies. We investigated the suitability of MRT as a simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) in conventional whole-brain irradiation (WBRT). A 174 Gy MRT SIB was administered with an array of quasi-parallel, 50 µm wide microbeams spaced at a centre-to-centre distance of 400 µm either on the first or last day of a 5 × 4 Gy radiotherapy schedule in healthy adult C57 BL/6J mice and in F98 glioma cell cultures. The animals were observed for signs of intracranial pressure and focal neurologic signs. Colony counts were conducted in F98 glioma cell cultures. No signs of acute adverse effects were observed in any of the irradiated animals within 3 days after the last irradiation fraction. The tumoricidal effect on F98 cell in vitro was higher when the MRT boost was delivered on the first day of the irradiation course, as opposed to the last day. Therefore, the MRT SIB should be integrated into a clinical radiotherapy schedule as early as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Jaekel
- Department of Radiooncology, Rostock University Medical Center, 18059 Rostock, Germany; (F.J.); (M.S.); (J.S.); (G.H.)
| | - Elke Bräuer-Krisch
- Biomedical Beamline ID 17, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), 38043 Grenoble, France;
| | - Stefan Bartzsch
- Department of Radiooncology, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany;
- Institute for Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Center Munich, 85764 Munich, Germany
| | - Jean Laissue
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland;
| | | | - Marten Scholz
- Department of Radiooncology, Rostock University Medical Center, 18059 Rostock, Germany; (F.J.); (M.S.); (J.S.); (G.H.)
| | - Julia Soloviova
- Department of Radiooncology, Rostock University Medical Center, 18059 Rostock, Germany; (F.J.); (M.S.); (J.S.); (G.H.)
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, Leipzig University Medical Centre, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Guido Hildebrandt
- Department of Radiooncology, Rostock University Medical Center, 18059 Rostock, Germany; (F.J.); (M.S.); (J.S.); (G.H.)
| | - Elisabeth Schültke
- Department of Radiooncology, Rostock University Medical Center, 18059 Rostock, Germany; (F.J.); (M.S.); (J.S.); (G.H.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Barnes MJ, Paino J, Day LR, Butler D, Häusermann D, Pelliccia D, Crosbie JC. SyncMRT: a solution to image-guided synchrotron radiotherapy for quality assurance and pre-clinical trials. JOURNAL OF SYNCHROTRON RADIATION 2022; 29:1074-1084. [PMID: 35787575 PMCID: PMC9255576 DOI: 10.1107/s1600577522004829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
In this work, a new image guidance system and protocols for delivering image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) on the Imaging and Medical Beamline (IMBL) at the ANSTO Australian Synchrotron are introduced. The image guidance methods used and the resulting accuracy of tumour alignment in in vivo experiments are often under-reported. Image guidance tasks are often complex, time-consuming and prone to errors. If unchecked, they may result in potential mis-treatments. We introduce SyncMRT, a software package that provides a simple, image guidance tool-kit for aligning samples to the synchrotron beam. We have demonstrated sub-millimetre alignment using SyncMRT and the small-animal irradiation platform (the DynamicMRT system) on the IMBL. SyncMRT has become the standard for carrying out IGRT treatments on the IMBL and has been used in all pre-clinical radiotherapy experiments since 2017. Further, we introduce two quality assurance (QA) protocols to synchrotron radiotherapy on the IMBL: the Winston-Lutz test and hidden target test. It is shown that the presented QA tests are appropriate for picking up geometrical setup errors and assessing the end-to-end accuracy of the image guidance process. Together, these tools make image guidance easier and provide a mechanism for reporting the geometric accuracy of synchrotron-based IGRT treatments. Importantly, this work is scalable to other delivery systems, and is in continual development to support the upcoming veterinary radiotherapy trials on the IMBL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. J. Barnes
- ANSTO Australian Synchrotron, Kulin Nation, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Kulin Nation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Science, RMIT Univeristy, Kulin Nation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Dharawal Nation, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - J. Paino
- Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Dharawal Nation, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Dharawal Nation, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - L. R. Day
- School of Science, RMIT Univeristy, Kulin Nation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - D. Butler
- Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA), Kulin Nation, Yallambie, Victoria, Australia
| | - D. Häusermann
- ANSTO Australian Synchrotron, Kulin Nation, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - D. Pelliccia
- Instruments and Data Tools, Kulin Nation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - J. C. Crosbie
- School of Science, RMIT Univeristy, Kulin Nation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Trappetti V, Fazzari J, Fernandez-Palomo C, Smyth L, Potez M, Shintani N, de Breuyn Dietler B, Martin OA, Djonov V. Targeted Accumulation of Macrophages Induced by Microbeam Irradiation in a Tissue-Dependent Manner. Biomedicines 2022; 10:735. [PMID: 35453485 PMCID: PMC9025837 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10040735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is a vital component of multimodal cancer treatment, and its immunomodulatory effects are a major focus of current therapeutic strategies. Macrophages are some of the first cells recruited to sites of radiation-induced injury where they can aid in tissue repair, propagate radiation-induced fibrogenesis and influence tumour dynamics. Microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is a unique, spatially fractionated radiation modality that has demonstrated exceptional tumour control and reduction in normal tissue toxicity, including fibrosis. We conducted a morphological analysis of MRT-irradiated normal liver, lung and skin tissues as well as lung and melanoma tumours. MRT induced distinct patterns of DNA damage, reflecting the geometry of the microbeam array. Macrophages infiltrated these regions of peak dose deposition at variable timepoints post-irradiation depending on the tissue type. In normal liver and lung tissue, macrophages clearly demarcated the beam path by 48 h and 7 days post-irradiation, respectively. This was not reflected, however, in normal skin tissue, despite clear DNA damage marking the beam path. Persistent DNA damage was observed in MRT-irradiated lung carcinoma, with an accompanying geometry-specific influx of mixed M1/M2-like macrophage populations. These data indicate the unique potential of MRT as a tool to induce a remarkable accumulation of macrophages in an organ/tissue-specific manner. Further characterization of these macrophage populations is warranted to identify their organ-specific roles in normal tissue sparing and anti-tumour responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verdiana Trappetti
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstarsse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; (V.T.); (J.F.); (C.F.-P.); (M.P.); (N.S.); (B.d.B.D.); (O.A.M.)
| | - Jennifer Fazzari
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstarsse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; (V.T.); (J.F.); (C.F.-P.); (M.P.); (N.S.); (B.d.B.D.); (O.A.M.)
| | - Cristian Fernandez-Palomo
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstarsse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; (V.T.); (J.F.); (C.F.-P.); (M.P.); (N.S.); (B.d.B.D.); (O.A.M.)
| | - Lloyd Smyth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women’s Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia;
| | - Marine Potez
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstarsse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; (V.T.); (J.F.); (C.F.-P.); (M.P.); (N.S.); (B.d.B.D.); (O.A.M.)
- Department of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Nahoko Shintani
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstarsse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; (V.T.); (J.F.); (C.F.-P.); (M.P.); (N.S.); (B.d.B.D.); (O.A.M.)
| | - Bettina de Breuyn Dietler
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstarsse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; (V.T.); (J.F.); (C.F.-P.); (M.P.); (N.S.); (B.d.B.D.); (O.A.M.)
| | - Olga A. Martin
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstarsse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; (V.T.); (J.F.); (C.F.-P.); (M.P.); (N.S.); (B.d.B.D.); (O.A.M.)
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St., Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
- Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Valentin Djonov
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstarsse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; (V.T.); (J.F.); (C.F.-P.); (M.P.); (N.S.); (B.d.B.D.); (O.A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Non-Targeted Effects of Synchrotron Radiation: Lessons from Experiments at the Australian and European Synchrotrons. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/app12042079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
Studies have been conducted at synchrotron facilities in Europe and Australia to explore a variety of applications of synchrotron X-rays in medicine and biology. We discuss the major technical aspects of the synchrotron irradiation setups, paying specific attention to the Australian Synchrotron (AS) and the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) as those best configured for a wide range of biomedical research involving animals and future cancer patients. Due to ultra-high dose rates, treatment doses can be delivered within milliseconds, abiding by FLASH radiotherapy principles. In addition, a homogeneous radiation field can be spatially fractionated into a geometric pattern called microbeam radiotherapy (MRT); a coplanar array of thin beams of microscopic dimensions. Both are clinically promising radiotherapy modalities because they trigger a cascade of biological effects that improve tumor control, while increasing normal tissue tolerance compared to conventional radiation. Synchrotrons can deliver high doses to a very small volume with low beam divergence, thus facilitating the study of non-targeted effects of these novel radiation modalities in both in-vitro and in-vivo models. Non-targeted radiation effects studied at the AS and ESRF include monitoring cell–cell communication after partial irradiation of a cell population (radiation-induced bystander effect, RIBE), the response of tissues outside the irradiated field (radiation-induced abscopal effect, RIAE), and the influence of irradiated animals on non-irradiated ones in close proximity (inter-animal RIBE). Here we provide a summary of these experiments and perspectives on their implications for non-targeted effects in biomedical fields.
Collapse
|
22
|
Kraus KM, Winter J, Zhang Y, Ahmed M, Combs SE, Wilkens JJ, Bartzsch S. Treatment Planning Study for Microbeam Radiotherapy Using Clinical Patient Data. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:685. [PMID: 35158953 PMCID: PMC8833598 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Microbeam radiotherapy (MRT) is a novel, still preclinical dose delivery technique. MRT has shown reduced normal tissue effects at equal tumor control rates compared to conventional radiotherapy. Treatment planning studies are required to permit clinical application. The aim of this study was to establish a dose comparison between MRT and conventional radiotherapy and to identify suitable clinical scenarios for future applications of MRT. We simulated MRT treatment scenarios for clinical patient data using an inhouse developed planning algorithm based on a hybrid Monte Carlo dose calculation and implemented the concept of equivalent uniform dose (EUD) for MRT dose evaluation. The investigated clinical scenarios comprised fractionated radiotherapy of a glioblastoma resection cavity, a lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), palliative bone metastasis irradiation, brain metastasis radiosurgery and hypofractionated breast cancer radiotherapy. Clinically acceptable treatment plans were achieved for most analyzed parameters. Lung SBRT seemed the most challenging treatment scenario. Major limitations comprised treatment plan optimization and dose calculation considering the tissue microstructure. This study presents an important step of the development towards clinical MRT. For clinical treatment scenarios using a sophisticated dose comparison concept based on EUD and EQD2, we demonstrated the capability of MRT to achieve clinically acceptable dose distributions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Melanie Kraus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.W.); (Y.Z.); (M.A.); (S.E.C.); (J.J.W.); (S.B.)
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Johanna Winter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.W.); (Y.Z.); (M.A.); (S.E.C.); (J.J.W.); (S.B.)
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Physics Department, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - Yating Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.W.); (Y.Z.); (M.A.); (S.E.C.); (J.J.W.); (S.B.)
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Mabroor Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.W.); (Y.Z.); (M.A.); (S.E.C.); (J.J.W.); (S.B.)
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Physics Department, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - Stephanie Elisabeth Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.W.); (Y.Z.); (M.A.); (S.E.C.); (J.J.W.); (S.B.)
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Partner Site Munich, Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Jan Jakob Wilkens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.W.); (Y.Z.); (M.A.); (S.E.C.); (J.J.W.); (S.B.)
- Physics Department, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - Stefan Bartzsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.W.); (Y.Z.); (M.A.); (S.E.C.); (J.J.W.); (S.B.)
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
AbstractSpatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) challenges some of the classical dogmas in conventional radiotherapy. The highly modulated spatial dose distributions in SFRT have been shown to lead, both in early clinical trials and in small animal experiments, to a significant increase in normal tissue dose tolerances. Tumour control effectiveness is maintained or even enhanced in some configurations as compared with conventional radiotherapy. SFRT seems to activate distinct radiobiological mechanisms, which have been postulated to involve bystander effects, microvascular alterations and/or immunomodulation. Currently, it is unclear which is the dosimetric parameter which correlates the most with both tumour control and normal tissue sparing in SFRT. Additional biological experiments aiming at parametrizing the relationship between the irradiation parameters (beam width, spacing, peak-to-valley dose ratio, peak and valley doses) and the radiobiology are needed. A sound knowledge of the interrelation between the physical parameters in SFRT and the biological response would expand its clinical use, with a higher level of homogenisation in the realisation of clinical trials. This manuscript reviews the state of the art of this promising therapeutic modality, the current radiobiological knowledge and elaborates on future perspectives.
Collapse
|
24
|
Laissue JA, Barré S, Bartzsch S, Blattmann H, Bouchet AM, Djonov VG, Haberthür D, Hlushchuk R, Kaser-Hotz B, Laissue PP, LeDuc G, Reding SO, Serduc R. Tolerance of Normal Rabbit Facial Bones and Teeth to Synchrotron X-Ray Microbeam Irradiation. Radiat Res 2021; 197:233-241. [PMID: 34755190 DOI: 10.1667/rade-21-00032.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Microbeam radiation therapy, an alternative radiosurgical treatment under preclinical investigation, aims to safely treat muzzle tumors in pet animals. This will require data on the largely unknown radiation toxicity of microbeam arrays for bones and teeth. To this end, the muzzle of six young adult New Zealand rabbits was irradiated by a lateral array of microplanar beamlets with peak entrance doses of 200, 330 or 500 Gy. The muzzles were examined 431 days postirradiation by computed microtomographic imaging (micro-CT) ex vivo, and extensive histopathology. The boundaries of the radiation field were identified histologically by microbeam tracks in cartilage and other tissues. There was no radionecrosis of facial bones in any rabbit. Conversely, normal incisor teeth exposed to peak entrance doses of 330 Gy or 500 Gy developed marked caries-like damage, whereas the incisors of the two rabbits exposed to 200 Gy remained unscathed. A single, unidirectional array of microbeams with a peak entrance dose ≤200 Gy (valley dose14 Gy) did not damage normal bone, teeth and soft tissues of the muzzle of normal rabbits longer than one year after irradiation. Because of that, Microbeam radiation therapy of muzzle tumors in pet animals is unlikely to cause sizeable damage to normal teeth, bone and soft tissues, if a single array as used here delivers a limited entrance dose of 200 Gy and a valley dose of ≤14 Gy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Albert Laissue
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, CH -3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sébastien Barré
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, CH -3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Bartzsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar - TU Munich, Germany
| | - Hans Blattmann
- Niederwiesstrasse 13C, CH-5417 Untersiggenthal, Switzerland
| | - Audrey M Bouchet
- INSERM UA8, "Radiations : Défense, Santé, Environnement," 69008 Lyon, France
| | | | - David Haberthür
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, CH -3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ruslan Hlushchuk
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, CH -3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bertho A, Ortiz R, Juchaux M, Gilbert C, Lamirault C, Pouzoulet F, Polledo L, Liens A, Warfving N, Sebrie C, Jourdain L, Patriarca A, de Marzi L, Prezado Y. First Evaluation of Temporal and Spatial Fractionation in Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy of Glioma-Bearing Rats. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194865. [PMID: 34638352 PMCID: PMC8507607 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel therapeutic approach based on a distinct dose delivery method: the dose distributions follow a pattern with regions of peaks (high doses) and valleys (low doses). pMBRT was shown to be able to widen the therapeutic window in glioma-bearing rats. In previous studies the irradiation was performed in one single fraction. The work reported in this manuscript is the first evaluation detailing the response of glioma-bearing rats to a temporal fractionation in proton minibeam radiation therapy, delivered under a crossfire geometry. A significant increase of the median survival time was obtained when the dose was delivered over two sessions as opposed to in a single fraction. This result could facilitate the path towards pMBRT treatments. Abstract (1) Background: Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a new radiotherapy technique using spatially modulated narrow proton beams. pMBRT results in a significantly reduced local tissue toxicity while maintaining or even increasing the tumor control efficacy as compared to conventional radiotherapy in small animal experiments. In all the experiments performed up to date in tumor bearing animals, the dose was delivered in one single fraction. This is the first assessment on the impact of a temporal fractionation scheme on the response of glioma-bearing animals to pMBRT. (2) Methods: glioma-bearing rats were irradiated with pMBRT using a crossfire geometry. The response of the irradiated animals in one and two fractions was compared. An additional group of animals was also treated with conventional broad beam irradiations. (3) Results: pMBRT delivered in two fractions at the biological equivalent dose corresponding to one fraction resulted in the highest median survival time, with 80% long-term survivors free of tumors. No increase in local toxicity was noted in this group with respect to the other pMBRT irradiated groups. Conventional broad beam irradiations resulted in the most severe local toxicity. (4) Conclusion: Temporal fractionation increases the therapeutic index in pMBRT and could ease the path towards clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annaïg Bertho
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; (A.B.); (R.O.); (M.J.); (C.G.)
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Ramon Ortiz
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; (A.B.); (R.O.); (M.J.); (C.G.)
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; (A.B.); (R.O.); (M.J.); (C.G.)
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Cristèle Gilbert
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; (A.B.); (R.O.); (M.J.); (C.G.)
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Charlotte Lamirault
- Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Université Paris Saclay, 91400 Orsay, France; (C.L.); (F.P.)
| | - Frederic Pouzoulet
- Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Université Paris Saclay, 91400 Orsay, France; (C.L.); (F.P.)
| | - Laura Polledo
- AnaPath GmbH, AnaPath Services, Hammerstrasse 49, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland; (L.P.); (A.L.); (N.W.)
| | - Alethea Liens
- AnaPath GmbH, AnaPath Services, Hammerstrasse 49, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland; (L.P.); (A.L.); (N.W.)
| | - Nils Warfving
- AnaPath GmbH, AnaPath Services, Hammerstrasse 49, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland; (L.P.); (A.L.); (N.W.)
| | - Catherine Sebrie
- CEA, CNRS, Inserm, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, BIOMAPS Université Paris-Saclay, 91401 Orsay, France; (C.S.); (L.J.)
| | - Laurène Jourdain
- CEA, CNRS, Inserm, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, BIOMAPS Université Paris-Saclay, 91401 Orsay, France; (C.S.); (L.J.)
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Centre de Protonthérapie d’Orsay, Radiation Oncology Department, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 91898 Orsay, France; (A.P.); (L.d.M.)
| | - Ludovic de Marzi
- Centre de Protonthérapie d’Orsay, Radiation Oncology Department, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 91898 Orsay, France; (A.P.); (L.d.M.)
- Institut Curie, Campus Universitaire, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, INSERM LITO, 91898 Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; (A.B.); (R.O.); (M.J.); (C.G.)
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Can Rational Combination of Ultra-high Dose Rate FLASH Radiotherapy with Immunotherapy Provide a Novel Approach to Cancer Treatment? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:713-722. [PMID: 34551871 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Revised: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) delivers radiation treatment at an ultra-high dose rate that is several orders of magnitude higher than current clinical practice. In multiple preclinical studies, FLASH-RT has shown consistent normal tissue sparing effects while preserving equivalent antitumour activity in comparison with conventional dose rate radiation treatment. This is known as the 'FLASH effect'. Given the recent research interest in combining hypofractionated radiotherapy with immunotherapy to try to improve clinical outcomes, there is an intriguing clinical question as to whether FLASH irradiation may be a rational partner to combine with immune modulating drugs? To better predict the synergistic effect of both modalities, here we review the biological mechanisms of how FLASH differentially impacts the immune landscape, including circulating immune cells, tumour microenvironment and the inflammatory response. In order to make recommendations for future research, we summarise all published studies that investigated the immune modulatory effects of FLASH-RT and further explore the scientific reasons for combining FLASH with immunotherapy for potential clinical applications.
Collapse
|
27
|
A Brief Overview of the Preclinical and Clinical Radiobiology of Microbeam Radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:705-712. [PMID: 34454806 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Microbeam radiotherapy (MRT) is the delivery of spatially fractionated beams that have the potential to offer significant improvements in the therapeutic ratio due to the delivery of micron-sized high dose and dose rate beams. They build on longstanding clinical experience of GRID radiotherapy and more recently lattice-based approaches. Here we briefly overview the preclinical evidence for MRT efficacy and highlight the challenges for bringing this to clinical utility. The biological mechanisms underpinning MRT efficacy are still unclear, but involve vascular, bystander, stem cell and potentially immune responses. There is probably significant overlap in the mechanisms underpinning MRT responses and FLASH radiotherapy that needs to be further defined.
Collapse
|
28
|
Trappetti V, Fernandez-Palomo C, Smyth L, Klein M, Haberthür D, Butler D, Barnes M, Shintani N, de Veer M, Laissue JA, Vozenin MC, Djonov V. Synchrotron Microbeam Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Lung Carcinoma: A Preclinical Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:1276-1288. [PMID: 34364976 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.1717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In the past 3 decades, synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy (S-MRT) has been shown to achieve both good tumor control and normal tissue sparing in a range of preclinical animal models. However, the use of S-MRT for the treatment of lung tumors has not yet been investigated. This study is the first to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of S-MRT for the treatment of lung carcinoma, using a new syngeneic and orthotopic mouse model. METHODS AND MATERIALS Lewis Lung carcinoma-bearing mice were irradiated with 2 cross-fired arrays of S-MRT or synchrotron broad-beam (S-BB) radiation therapy. S-MRT consisted of 17 microbeams with a width of 50 µm and center-to-center spacing of 400 µm. Each microbeam delivered a peak entrance dose of 400 Gy whereas S-BB delivered a homogeneous entrance dose of 5.16 Gy (corresponding to the S-MRT valley dose). RESULTS Both treatments prolonged the survival of mice relative to the untreated controls. However, mice in the S-MRT group developed severe pulmonary edema around the irradiated carcinomas and did not have improved survival relative to the S-BB group. Subsequent postmortem examination of tumor size revealed that the mice in the S-MRT group had notably smaller tumor volume compared with the S-BB group, despite the presence of edema. Mice that were sham-implanted did not display any decline in health after S-MRT, experiencing only mild and transient edema between 4 days and 3 months postirradiation which disappeared after 4 months. Finally, a parallel study investigating the lungs of healthy mice showed the complete absence of radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis 6 months after S-MRT. CONCLUSIONS S-MRT is a promising tool for the treatment of lung carcinoma, reducing tumor size compared with mice treated with S-BB and sparing healthy lungs from pulmonary fibrosis. Future experiments should focus on optimizing S-MRT parameters to minimize pulmonary edema and maximize the therapeutic ratio.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lloyd Smyth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mitzi Klein
- Imaging and Medical Beamline, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Australian Synchrotron, Clayton, Australia
| | | | - Duncan Butler
- Imaging and Medical Beamline, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Australian Synchrotron, Clayton, Australia
| | - Micah Barnes
- Imaging and Medical Beamline, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Australian Synchrotron, Clayton, Australia; Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Michael de Veer
- Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | | | - Marie C Vozenin
- Department of Radiation Oncology/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Trappetti V, Fazzari JM, Fernandez-Palomo C, Scheidegger M, Volarevic V, Martin OA, Djonov VG. Microbeam Radiotherapy-A Novel Therapeutic Approach to Overcome Radioresistance and Enhance Anti-Tumour Response in Melanoma. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:7755. [PMID: 34299373 PMCID: PMC8303317 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22147755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Melanoma is the deadliest type of skin cancer, due to its invasiveness and limited treatment efficacy. The main therapy for primary melanoma and solitary organ metastases is wide excision. Adjuvant therapy, such as chemotherapy and targeted therapies are mainly used for disseminated disease. Radiotherapy (RT) is a powerful treatment option used in more than 50% of cancer patients, however, conventional RT alone is unable to eradicate melanoma. Its general radioresistance is attributed to overexpression of repair genes in combination with cascades of biochemical repair mechanisms. A novel sophisticated technique based on synchrotron-generated, spatially fractionated RT, called Microbeam Radiation Therapy (MRT), has been shown to overcome these treatment limitations by allowing increased dose delivery. With MRT, a collimator subdivides the homogeneous radiation field into an array of co-planar, high-dose microbeams that are tens of micrometres wide and spaced a few hundred micrometres apart. Different preclinical models demonstrated that MRT has the potential to completely ablate tumours, or significantly improve tumour control while dramatically reducing normal tissue toxicity. Here, we discuss the role of conventional RT-induced immunity and the potential for MRT to enhance local and systemic anti-tumour immune responses. Comparative gene expression analysis from preclinical tumour models indicated a specific gene signature for an 'MRT-induced immune effect'. This focused review highlights the potential of MRT to overcome the inherent radioresistance of melanoma which could be further enhanced for future clinical use with combined treatment strategies, in particular, immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verdiana Trappetti
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; (V.T.); (J.M.F.); (C.F.-P.); (M.S.); (O.A.M.)
| | - Jennifer M. Fazzari
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; (V.T.); (J.M.F.); (C.F.-P.); (M.S.); (O.A.M.)
| | - Cristian Fernandez-Palomo
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; (V.T.); (J.M.F.); (C.F.-P.); (M.S.); (O.A.M.)
| | - Maximilian Scheidegger
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; (V.T.); (J.M.F.); (C.F.-P.); (M.S.); (O.A.M.)
| | - Vladislav Volarevic
- Department of Genetics, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia;
| | - Olga A. Martin
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; (V.T.); (J.M.F.); (C.F.-P.); (M.S.); (O.A.M.)
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Division of Radiation Oncology, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Valentin G. Djonov
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; (V.T.); (J.M.F.); (C.F.-P.); (M.S.); (O.A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Steel H, Brüningk SC, Box C, Oelfke U, Bartzsch SH. Quantification of Differential Response of Tumour and Normal Cells to Microbeam Radiation in the Absence of FLASH Effects. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:3238. [PMID: 34209502 PMCID: PMC8268803 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13133238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Microbeam radiotherapy (MRT) is a preclinical method of delivering spatially-fractionated radiotherapy aiming to improve the therapeutic window between normal tissue complication and tumour control. Previously, MRT was limited to ultra-high dose rate synchrotron facilities. The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro effects of MRT on tumour and normal cells at conventional dose rates produced by a bench-top X-ray source. Two normal and two tumour cell lines were exposed to homogeneous broad beam (BB) radiation, MRT, or were separately irradiated with peak or valley doses before being mixed. Clonogenic survival was assessed and compared to BB-estimated surviving fractions calculated by the linear-quadratic (LQ)-model. All cell lines showed similar BB sensitivity. BB LQ-model predictions exceeded the survival of cell lines following MRT or mixed beam irradiation. This effect was stronger in tumour compared to normal cell lines. Dose mixing experiments could reproduce MRT survival. We observed a differential response of tumour and normal cells to spatially fractionated irradiations in vitro, indicating increased tumour cell sensitivity. Importantly, this was observed at dose rates precluding the presence of FLASH effects. The LQ-model did not predict cell survival when the cell population received split irradiation doses, indicating that factors other than local dose influenced survival after irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harriet Steel
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP, UK; (C.B.); (U.O.)
| | - Sarah C. Brüningk
- Machine Learning & Computational Biology, Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland;
- Swiss Institute for Bioinformatics (SIB), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Carol Box
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP, UK; (C.B.); (U.O.)
| | - Uwe Oelfke
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP, UK; (C.B.); (U.O.)
| | - Stefan H. Bartzsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany;
- Helmholtz Centre Munich, Institute for Radiation Medicine, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|