Cost-Effectiveness of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Anti-TNF Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review

Annual Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease During Infliximab Maintenance Therapy: Balancing Efficacy with Risk of Pharmacokinetic Failure

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Recent studies indicate that proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can improve clinical outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with infliximab. Repetitive infliximab trough level (IFX TL) measurements for proactive TDM may increase patient inconvenience and medical costs. Therefore, we aimed to determine the optimal interval for TDM during infliximab maintenance therapy in patients with IBD.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was performed on the patients with IBD who were in clinical remission on infliximab maintenance therapy and had IFX TL ≥ 3 μg/mL after one-time dose optimization. Infliximab TL were measured before each infliximab infusion to identify the pharmacokinetic (PK) relapse (two consecutive IFX TL < 3 μg/mL). Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the time to PK relapse.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients were enrolled and followed for a median of 18.5 months. PK relapse occurred in 19 patients (18.5%), with a higher rate of PK relapse in patients with IFX TL 3-5 μg/mL (16/60, 26.7%) compared to those with IFX TL ≥ 5 μg/mL (3/43, 7.0%). Kaplan-Meier survival time to maintain 95%, 90%, 85%, 80%, and 75% therapeutic IFX TL persistence rate without PK relapse was 4.1, 10.3, 13.3, 14.3, and 19.8 months, respectively. Log-rank test showed that therapeutic IFX TL persistence rates were significantly lower in patients with IFX TL 3-5 μg/mL group compared to those with IFX TL ≥ 5 μg/mL group (p = 0.010). Kaplan-Meier retention time to maintain 85% therapeutic IFX TL persistence rate without PK relapse was 10.3 months in IFX TL 3-5 μg/mL group and 20.2 months in IFX TL ≥ 5 μg/mL group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Proactive TDM measuring with IFX TL annually may be helpful in maintaining therapeutic IFX TL ≥ 3 μg/mL in 85% of patients with IBD and clinical remission on infliximab maintenance therapy.

Laboratory Tests in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Evidence-Based Approach to Daily Practice

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) comprise a group of chronic gastrointestinal disorders characterized by periods of relapse and remission. The mainstay of treatment is medical, involving medications such as steroids, immune modulators, monoclonal antibodies (categorized as biologics), and small molecules. These medications can provide profound therapeutic benefits, but they can also cause severe and irreversible toxicities. Clinicians may utilize laboratory tests in the diagnosis and management of IBD including assessment of disease activity, monitoring medication response or toxicity, surveillance of infectious complications, and detection of nutritional deficiencies. Routine use of laboratory tests may help clinicians avoid reactivation of life-threatening infections such as tuberculosis or hepatitis B virus upon initiation of immune suppressive therapy. They can also be used to detect vitamin deficiencies such as B12 deficiency, which has the potential to cause irreversible neurologic damage. While some laboratory tests constitute established practices, the utility of newer tests such therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in the era of biologics is an evolving topic. Although clinical assessment with imaging, endoscopic, and histopathological examination is standard practice, laboratory tests serve as valuable adjuncts. We aim to explore the broad range of laboratory tests available to clinicians and to summarize their application in the current management of IBD in daily clinical practice, with special attention to updates in therapeutic drug monitoring.

Proactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Is Associated With Increased Drug Persistence in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treated With Intravenous Vedolizumab

BACKGROUND

There are limited data regarding therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of non-anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of proactive TDM in IBD patients treated with intravenous (iv) vedolizumab (VDZ).

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study included consecutive IBD patients treated with maintenance iv VDZ therapy undergoing TDM from November 2016 to March 2023. Patients were followed through June 2023 and were divided in to 2 groups: those who had at least 1 proactive TDM vs those who underwent only reactive TDM. A survival analysis was performed to evaluate drug persistence, defined as no need for drug discontinuation due to loss of response, serious adverse event, or an IBD-related surgery.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 94 patients (proactive TDM, n = 72) with IBD (ulcerative colitis, n = 53). Patients undergoing at least 1 proactive TDM compared with patients having only reactive TDM demonstrated a higher cumulative probability of drug persistence (Log-rank P < .001). In multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, at least 1 proactive TDM was the only factor associated with drug persistence (hazard ratio, 14.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8-50; P < .001). A ROC analysis identified a VDZ concentration of 12.5 µg/mL as the optimal drug concentration threshold associated with drug persistence (area under the ROC curve: 0.691; 95% CI, 0.517-0.865; P = .049).

CONCLUSION

In this single-center retrospective study reflecting real-life clinical practice, proactive TDM was associated with increased drug persistence in patients with IBD treated with iv VDZ.

Understanding the therapeutic toolkit for inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, is a group of chronic, immune-mediated disorders of the gastrointestinal tract that present substantial clinical challenges owing to their complex pathophysiology and tendency to relapse. A treat-to-target approach is recommended, involving iterative treatment adjustments to achieve clinical response, reduce inflammatory markers and achieve long-term goals such as mucosal healing. Lifelong medication is often necessary to manage the disease, maintain remission and prevent complications. The therapeutic landscape for IBD has evolved substantially; however, a ceiling on therapeutic efficacy remains and surgery is sometimes required (owing to uncontrolled disease activity or complications). Effective IBD management involves comprehensive care, including medication adherence and a collaborative clinician-patient relationship. This Review discusses current therapeutic options for IBD, detailing mechanisms of action, efficacy, safety profiles and guidelines for use of each drug class. We also explore emerging therapies and the role of surgery. Additionally, the importance of a multidisciplinary team and personalized care in managing IBD is emphasized, advocating for patient empowerment and involvement in treatment decisions. By synthesizing current knowledge and emerging trends, this Review aims to equip healthcare professionals with a thorough understanding of therapeutic options for IBD, enhancing informed, evidence-based decisions in clinical practice.

Ustekinumab Drug Levels and Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Data regarding the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring with ustekinumab (UST) are sparse. Our aim was to determine the correlation of UST levels with outcomes in a cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective study of all patients with IBD who received UST from January 1, 2014 to March 1, 2022. The primary outcomes were the correlation of UST level with clinical remission (per physician global assessment), endoscopic healing [the absence of ulcers/erosions in Crohn's disease (CD) and Mayo endoscopic score ≤1 for ulcerative colitis (UC)], and normal serum C-reactive protein (CRP) (≤5 mg/L). Secondary outcomes included defining optimal UST trough levels associated with favorable outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 71 patients (74.6% with CD; 57.7% female) were included. The median age was 39.5 years [interquartile range (IQR): 26 to 52] and 12.6% were on combination therapy with immunomodulators. Median UST trough levels were significantly higher in patients who achieved endoscopic healing at 5.4 µg/mL versus 3.5 µg/mL ( P =0.035) and normal CRP at 5.5 µg/mL versus. 3.1 µg/mL ( P =0.002). A cutoff UST level of 4.8 µg/mL yielded the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.61-0.80) to predict a normal CRP followed by a cutoff of 3.5 µg/mL which yielded an AUC of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.52-0.81) to predict endoscopic healing.

CONCLUSIONS

UST trough levels were significantly higher in patients who achieved a normal CRP and endoscopic healing. A cutoff UST level of 4.8 µg/mL reliably predicted CRP normalization.

State of the art of real-life concentration monitoring of rifampicin and its implementation contextualized in resource-limited settings: the Tanzanian case

The unique medical and socio-economic situation in each country affected by TB creates different epidemiological contexts, thus providing exploitable loopholes for the spread of the disease. Country-specific factors such as comorbidities, health insurance, social stigma or the rigidity of the health system complicate the management of TB and the overall outcome of each patient. First-line TB drugs are administered in a standardized manner, regardless of patient characteristics other than weight. This approach does not consider patient-specific conditions such as HIV infection, diabetes mellitus and malnutrition, which can affect the pharmacokinetics of TB drugs, their overall exposure and response to treatment. Therefore, the 'one-size-fits-all' approach is suboptimal for dealing with the underlying inter-subject variability in the pharmacokinetics of anti-TB drugs, further complicated by the recent increased dosing regimen of rifampicin strategies, calling for a patient-specific methodology. In this context, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), which allows personalized drug dosing based on blood drug concentrations, may be a legitimate solution to address treatment failure. This review focuses on rifampicin, a critical anti-TB drug, and examines its suitability for TDM and the socio-economic factors that may influence the implementation of TDM in clinical practice in resource-limited settings, illustrated by Tanzania, thereby contributing to the advancement of personalized TB treatment.

Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring of biologic drugs in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, inflammatory arthritis, and psoriasis: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To address the efficacy and safety of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring of biologic drugs for patients with inflammatory bowel disease, inflammatory arthritis, and psoriasis.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources

Medline, Embase, Central, and CINAHL, from database inception to 23 May 2024.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies

Trials including people with inflammatory bowel disease, inflammatory arthritis, and psoriasis were selected. Selected trials also randomly assigned people to either proactive therapeutic drug monitoring of tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors or other biologic drugs in the intervention group, and to either no therapeutic drug monitoring or standard care in the control group. Reviewers worked independently and in duplicate to screen search records and collect data from eligible trials. For each outcome, a frequentist, pairwise, random effects meta-analysis was done and the certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluations).

Results

Of 10 eligible trials identified, reporting on 2383 patients, two investigated induction with infliximab (533 patients), four assessed maintenance with infliximab (901 patients), and three assessed maintenance with adalimumab (710 patients). One trial was of maintenance with infliximab, adalimumab, and etanercept (239 patients). For patients who had induction with infliximab, the effects of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring on remission and adverse events were uncertain. Low certainty evidence suggested that proactive therapeutic drug monitoring may have little or no effect on disease activity, physical function, mental health, and quality of life. For patients who had maintenance with infliximab, low certainty evidence suggested that proactive therapeutic drug monitoring may increase the proportion of patients who had sustained disease control or remission (relative risk 1.26 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14 to 1.40), absolute risk difference of 146 more per 1000 patients treated for one year (95% CI 78 to 224). Additionally, this treatment and monitoring may reduce disease worsening, and may have little or no effect on disease activity, physical function, mental health, and quality of life. The effects of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab on adverse events and formation of anti-drug antibodies were uncertain. For patients who had maintenance with adalimumab, the effects of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring were uncertain.

Conclusion

Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab during maintenance may help patients to have sustained disease control or remission. No compelling evidence supported the effectiveness of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab during induction or proactive therapeutic drug monitoring of adalimumab during maintenance.

Systematic review registration

https://osf.io/x4m28/.

Is therapeutic drug monitoring a dancing partner for TNF-α inhibitors in real-world practice? Answers from an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

This systematic review aimed to determine the effect of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNF-αI) in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) based on real-world evidence, as results from published meta-analyses based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) may not fully capture the nuances of clinical practice due to strict criteria.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to 1 August 2023. Cohort studies comparing TDM (proactive and reactive) with empirical management were included. Primary outcome was effectiveness [for IBDs: clinical remission; for rheumatic diseases: clinical remission or low disease activity], with certainty of evidence appraised using the GRADE approach. Secondary outcomes included treatment failure, serious adverse events (SAEs), IMIDs-related surgeries or hospitalizations, and anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) development risk.

RESULTS

Twenty-four cohort studies were included and almost all were on infliximab. For IBDs, compared with empirical management, proactive TDM significantly improved clinical remission (RR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.04-1.28), reduced IBDs-related surgeries (RR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.26-0.81), hospitalizations (RR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.43-0.83), SAEs (RR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.07-0.76), and ADAs development risk (RR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.19-0.60). Reactive TDM significantly lowered hospitalization rates and might be cost-effective. Proactive TDM outperformed reactive TDM in secondary outcomes. For rheumatic diseases, benefits of TDM were inconclusive due to limited evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world evidence supports proactive TDM of TNF-αI (particularly infliximab) in IBDs to improve effectiveness, safety, and immunogenicity. However, benefits of TDM for different TNF-αI in other IMIDs remain uncertain.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

www.crd.york.ac.uk/ PROSPERO identifier is CRD42022370846.

Different infliximab induction dosing regimens do not affect remission rates up to 1 year in children with Crohn's disease

OBJECTIVES

Multiple studies in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents have shown that proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) during the maintenance phase leads to improved outcomes. We aimed to assess whether accelerated (IFX) administration during induction resulted in improved outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective study included CD patients aged 5-17.9 years that were treated with IFX. We compared outcomes of patients treated during induction with 5-8 mg/kg dosing at Weeks 0, 2, 6, and 14 (Group 1), versus accelerated dosing (≥8 mg/kg and/or >4 infusions until Week 14, Group 2) of IFX. Primary outcome was steroid-free clinical remission by Week 52.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients were included, of whom seven discontinued IFX before Week 14, due to infusion reactions, immunogenic failure, or primary nonresponse. Comparison of Group 1 (n = 25) and Group 2 (n = 36) showed similar clinical characteristics, as well as inflammatory markers, at IFX initiation. Despite receiving significantly more IFX, and reaching a higher trough level by Week 14 (10.3 ± 1.2 vs. 3.3 ± 0.7, p < 0.001), the median Pediatric Crohn's disease Activity Index (PCDAI) was slightly higher in Group 2 versus Group 1 (14 [5-20] vs. 5 [0-15], p = 0.02). However, at Weeks 26 and 52 the PCDAI and inflammatory markers were comparable between the groups. Moreover, about 70% in both groups achieved the desirable trough IFX levels by Week 52.

CONCLUSION

Accelerated IFX dosing during induction did not result in improved outcomes up to 12 months follow-up. Prospective studies are required to determine the exact timing in which proactive TDM should be applied.

Attitudes, perceptions and barriers in implementing therapeutic drug monitoring for anti-TNFs in inflammatory bowel disease: a survey from the Middle East

BACKGROUND

A growing body of evidence underscores the beneficial impact of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

OBJECTIVES

We surveyed clinician attitudes, perceptions and barriers related to TDM in IBD in the Middle East.

DESIGN

A 15-question survey was distributed through national gastroenterological societies in five Middle Eastern countries (UAE, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Lebanon and Egypt).

METHODS

Data on clinician characteristics, demographics, utilization patterns and obstacles related to the adoption of TDM with anti-TNFs were gathered. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict factors influencing the utilization of TDM.

RESULTS

Among 211 respondents (82% male), 82% were consultants, 8% were physicians with an interest in gastroenterology (GI), and 6% were GI trainees. Of these, 152 met inclusion criteria, treating >5 IBD patients per month and ⩾1 with an anti-TNF per month. TDM was used in clinical practice by 78% (95% CI: 71-85) of respondents. TDM was utilized following the loss of response (LOR) in 93%, for primary non-response (PNR) in 40% and before restarting anti-TNF therapy after a drug holiday in 33% of respondents, while 34% used TDM proactively. No specific factors were associated with the use of TDM. Barriers to TDM use included cost (85%), time lag to results (71%) and lack of insurance reimbursement (65%). Overall knowledge of TDM (70%), interpretation and actioning of results (76%) or awareness of clinical guidelines (57%) were not perceived as barriers. If barriers were removed, 95% would use TDM more frequently; 93% for LOR, 60% for PNR, 50% when restarting after a drug holiday, and 54% would use TDM proactively.

CONCLUSION

Most gastroenterologists use TDM for LOR, with cost, time lag and insurance reimbursement being significant barriers. Addressing these barriers would increase the judicious use of reactive and proactive TDM to optimize anti-TNF therapy in IBD.

Timing of proper introduction, optimization and maintenance of anti-TNF therapy in IBD: Results from a Delphi consensus

BACKGROUND

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) with a rapidly growing worldwide incidence. The last decades presented rapid progress in pharmacological treatment leading in many cases to clinical and endoscopic remission, including biological treatment with anti-TNF agents.

AIM

The exact timing of introduction, optimization and maintenance of anti-TNF therapy in IBDs is not thoroughly covered in current guidelines.

METHODS

We used the Delphi panel methodology to gather the IBD experts' views and achieve consensus for clinical recommendations on introducing and maintaining anti-TNF therapy for patients with IBDs.

RESULTS

Twelve recommendations achieved a high level of consensus in two assessment rounds by 52 (1st round) and 47 (2nd round) IBD experts.

CONCLUSION

In many clinical situations, the early use of anti-TNF therapy is recommended. Nowadays, the cost-efficacy profile of anti-TNF biosimilars makes them the first-line drug in a substantial proportion of patients, thus providing the opportunity to increase access to biological therapy.

Four-year review of New Zealand laboratory infliximab and adalimumab concentration results indicating potential for improved dosing

A review of laboratory results across New Zealand for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab and adalimumab concentrations and antidrug antibodies (ADAs) over 4 years was completed. Of 6591 results, the median serum concentration for infliximab was 5.7 mg/L and for adalimumab was 5.5 mg/L. Subtherapeutic drug concentrations (<7 mg/L) were measured in 54% of samples. Drug concentrations <2 mg/L were measured in 23% of samples, with ADAs detected in 51% of these. The high number of samples with subtherapeutic drug concentrations and common ADA detection is consistent with failing therapy but could also suggest that standard dosing is frequently too low for patients. These results reinforce the value of antitumour necrosis factor drug TDM in making decisions to adjust dosing or switch agents in patients taking infliximab and adalimumab.

A Review of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Receiving Combination Therapy

Background: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) impacts millions worldwide, presenting a major challenge to healthcare providers and patients. The advent of biologic therapies has enhanced the prognosis, but many patients exhibit primary or secondary non-response, underscoring the need for rigorous monitoring and therapy optimization to improve outcomes. Objective: This narrative review seeks to understand the role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in optimizing treatment for IBD patients, especially for those on combination therapies of biologics and immunomodulators. Methods: A comprehensive synthesis of the current literature was undertaken, focusing on the application, benefits, limitations, and future directions of TDM in patients receiving a combination of biologic therapies and immunomodulators. Results: While biological therapies have improved outcomes, rigorous monitoring and therapy optimization are needed. TDM has emerged as a pivotal strategy, enhancing outcomes cost-effectively while reducing adverse events. While most data pertain to monotherapies, TDM's applicability also extends to combination therapy. Conclusion: TDM plays a crucial role in the treatment optimization of IBD patients on combination therapies. Further research is needed to fully understand its potential and limitations in the broader context of IBD management.

The 2023 Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Canada: Treatment Landscape

The therapeutic landscape for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has changed considerably over the past two decades, owing to the development and widespread penetration of targeted therapies, including biologics and small molecules. While some conventional treatments continue to have an important role in the management of IBD, treatment of IBD is increasingly moving towards targeted therapies given their greater efficacy and safety in comparison to conventional agents. Early introduction of these therapies-particularly in persons with Crohn's disease-combining targeted therapies with traditional anti-metabolite immunomodulators and targeting objective markers of disease activity (in addition to symptoms), have been shown to improve health outcomes and will be increasingly adopted over time. The substantially increased costs associated with targeted therapies has led to a ballooning of healthcare expenditure to treat IBD over the past 15 years. The introduction of less expensive biosimilar anti-tumour necrosis factor therapies may bend this cost curve downwards, potentially allowing for more widespread access to these medications. Newer therapies targeting different inflammatory pathways and complementary and alternative therapies (including novel diets) will continue to shape the IBD treatment landscape. More precise use of a growing number of targeted therapies in the right individuals at the right time will help minimize the development of expensive and disabling complications, which has the potential to further reduce costs and improve outcomes.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) Implementation in Public Hospitals in Greece in 2003 and 2021: A Comparative Analysis of TDM Evolution over the Years

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is the clinical practice of measuring drug concentrations. TDM can be used to determine treatment efficacy and to prevent the occurrence or reduce the risk of drug-induced side effects, being, thus, a tool of personalized medicine. Drugs for which TDM is applied should have a narrow therapeutic range and exhibit both significant pharmacokinetic variability and a predefined target concentration range. The aim of our study was to assess the current status of TDM in Greek public hospitals and estimate its progress over the last 20 years. All Greek public hospitals were contacted to provide data and details on the clinical uptake of TDM in Greece for the years 2003 and 2021 through a structured questionnaire. Data from 113 out of 132 Greek hospitals were collected in 2003, whereas for 2021, we have collected data from 98 out of 122 hospitals. Among these, in 2003 and 2021, 64 and 51 hospitals, respectively, performed TDM. Antiepileptics and antibiotics were the most common drug categories monitored in both years. The total number of drug measurement assays decreased from 2003 to 2021 (153,313 ± 7794 vs. 90,065 ± 5698; p = 0.043). In direct comparisons between hospitals where TDM was performed both in 2003 and 2021 (n = 35), the mean number of measurements was found to decrease for most drugs, including carbamazepine (198.8 ± 46.6 vs. 46.6 ± 10.1, p < 0.001), phenytoin (253.6 ± 59 vs. 120 ± 34.3; p = 0.001), amikacin (147.3 ± 65.2 vs. 91.1 ± 71.4; p = 0.033), digoxin (783.2 ± 226.70 vs. 165.9 ± 28.9; p < 0.001), and theophylline (71.5 ± 28.7 vs. 11.9 ± 6.4; p = 0.004). Only for vancomycin, a significant increase in measurements was recorded (206.1 ± 96.1 vs. 789.1 ± 282.8; p = 0.012). In conclusion, our findings show that TDM clinical implementation is losing ground in Greek hospitals. Efforts and initiatives to reverse this trend are urgently needed.

Predictors and optimal management of tumor necrosis factor antagonist nonresponse in inflammatory bowel disease: A literature review

Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) antagonists, the first biologics approved for treating patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), are effective for the induction and maintenance of remission and significantly improving prognosis. However, up to one-third of treated patients show primary nonresponse (PNR) to anti-TNF-α therapies, and 23%-50% of IBD patients experience loss of response (LOR) to these biologics during subsequent treatment. There is still no recognized predictor for evaluating the efficacy of anti-TNF drugs. This review summarizes the existing predictors of PNR and LOR to anti-TNF in IBD patients. Most predictors remain controversial, and only previous surgical history, disease manifestations, drug concentrations, antidrug antibodies, serum albumin, some biologic markers, and some genetic markers may be potentially predictive. In addition, we also discuss the next steps of treatment for patients with PNR or LOR to TNF antagonists. Therapeutic drug monitoring plays an important role in treatment selection. Dose escalation, combination therapy, switching to a different anti-TNF drug, or switching to a biologic with a different mechanism of action can be selected based on the concentration of the drug and/or antidrug antibodies.

Reversing the Inflammatory Process-25 Years of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Inhibitors

Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, peripheral and/or axial spondyloarthritis, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis, are characterized by molecular and cellular changes in the immune system. Due to the systemic nature of these diseases, organs such as the liver or cardiovascular system are often affected by the inflammatory process. Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor therapy reduces the activation of pro-inflammatory signaling cascades, mitigates the chronic inflammatory process by restoring cellular balance, and alleviates clinical consequences, such as pain and tissue damage.

Optimization of a Quantitative Anti-Drug Antibodies against Infliximab Assay with the Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry: A Method Validation Study and Future Perspectives

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), such as infliximab, are important treatment options for different diseases. Immunogenicity is a major risk, resulting in anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), being associated with adverse events and loss of response, influencing long-term outcomes. The development of ADAs against infliximab is primarily measured by immunoassays like radioimmunoassay (RIA). Although liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is increasingly utilized across different fields, this technique is currently not used for ADAs against infliximab measurements. Therefore, we developed the first LC-MS/MS method. Stable isotopically labeled infliximab antigen-binding fragments (SIL IFX F(ab')₂) were used to bind and measure ADAs indirectly. Protein A magnetic beads were used to capture IgG, including ADAs, whereafter SIL IFX F(ab')₂ was added for labeling. After washing, internal standard addition, elution, denaturation and digestion samples were measured by LC-MS/MS. Internal validation showed good linearity between 0.1 and 16 mg/L (R² > 0.998). Sixty samples were used for cross-validation with RIA, and no significant difference between ADA concentrations was found. The methods had high correlation (R = 0.94, p < 0.001) and excellent agreement, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.912 (95% confidence interval 0.858-0.947, p < 0.001). We present the first ADA against the infliximab LC-MS/MS method. The method is amendable for quantifying other ADAs, making it applicable as a template for future ADA methods.

90K/Mac-2 BP Is a New Predictive Biomarker of Response to Infliximab Therapy in IBD Patients

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), comprising Crohn's disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC), are multifactorial disorders characterized by a chronic inflammatory status with the secretion of cytokines and immune mediators. Biologic drugs targeting pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as infliximab, are broadly used in the treatment of IBD patients, but some patients lose responsiveness after an initial success. The research into new biomarkers is crucial for advancing personalized therapies and monitoring the response to biologics. The aim of this single center, observational study is to analyze the relationship between serum levels of 90K/Mac-2 BP and the response to infliximab, in a cohort of 48 IBD patients (30 CD and 18 UC), enrolled from February 2017 to December 2018. In our IBD cohort, high 90K serum levels were found at baseline in patients who then developed anti-infliximab antibodies at the fifth infusion (22 weeks after the first), becoming non-responders (9.76 ± 4.65 µg/mL compared to 6.53 ± 3.29 µg/mL in responder patients, p = 0.005). This difference was significant in the total cohort and in CD, but not significant in UC. We then analyzed the relationship between serum levels of 90K, C-reactive protein (CRP), and Fecal calprotectin. A significant positive correlation was found at baseline between 90K and CRP, the most common serum inflammation marker (R = 0.42, p = 0.0032). We concluded that circulating 90K could be considered a new non-invasive biomarker for monitoring the response to infliximab. Furthermore, 90K serum level determination, before the first infliximab infusion, in association with other inflammatory markers such as CRP, could assist in the choice of biologics for the treatment of IBD patients, thereby obviating the need for a drug switch due to loss of response, and so improving clinical practice and patient care.