Islatravir Is Not Expected to Be a Victim or Perpetrator of Drug-Drug Interactions via Major Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes or Transporters

Pharmacokinetics of Atorvastatin and Metformin after Coadministration with Islatravir in Healthy Adults

Islatravir, a deoxyadenosine analog that inhibits HIV-1 replication by multiple mechanisms of action, including reverse transcriptase translocation inhibition, is being developed for use in HIV-1 treatment. People living with HIV often have comorbidities, such as dyslipidemia or type 2 diabetes mellitus, necessitating long-term concomitant drug therapy. This nonrandomized, two-period, fixed-sequence, open-label, phase 1, drug-drug interaction study was conducted to evaluate the effects of islatravir coadministration on atorvastatin and metformin pharmacokinetics (PK) in healthy adults. In period 1, participants received a single dose of atorvastatin 20 mg and metformin 1000 mg. After a 5-day washout, participants received atorvastatin 20 mg and metformin 1000 mg coadministered with a single oral dose of islatravir 60 mg (period 2). In both periods, blood samples were collected up to 72 h post dose to characterize the plasma PK of atorvastatin and metformin. Safety was monitored throughout the study. Fourteen participants were enrolled and completed the study. Atorvastatin and metformin plasma PK were similar after administration of atorvastatin and metformin with or without islatravir. The geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence interval of the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) for atorvastatin and metformin with or without a single oral dose of islatravir were 1.04 (1.00-1.10) and 0.87 (0.79-0.96), respectively. Coadministration of islatravir with atorvastatin and metformin was well tolerated. Overall, coadministration of atorvastatin and metformin with a single oral dose of islatravir did not have a clinically meaningful effect on the PK profiles of either drug.

Pharmacokinetics of islatravir in participants with moderate hepatic impairment

Islatravir (ISL) is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor in development for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. People living with HIV are at risk of liver disease. ISL is metabolized by adenosine deaminase (ADA), which is expressed in the liver; thus, ISL pharmacokinetics (PK) may be affected by hepatic impairment. This study evaluated the effect of moderate hepatic impairment on ISL PK. This nonrandomized, open-label, phase 1 study (MK-8591-030) evaluated the effects of a single oral dose of ISL 60 mg in HIV-seronegative adults with moderate hepatic insufficiency (n = 6) and matched healthy adult participants (n = 6). Blood samples for plasma ISL and 4'-ethynyl-2-fluoro-2'deoxyinosine (M4) and peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) ISL-triphosphate (ISL-TP) were collected at multiple time points through 672 h, and safety was monitored throughout. Modest decreases in maximum measured concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of plasma ISL and AUC of PBMC ISL-TP were observed in participants with moderate hepatic impairment versus matched healthy participants, while ISL-TP Cmax was relatively unchanged. In contrast, plasma M4 was modestly increased in the moderate hepatic impairment group, suggesting that hepatic impairment may result in increased metabolism of ISL to M4 via ADA. The clinical relevance of the overall modest changes in M4, ISL, and ISL-TP levels with moderate hepatic impairment will be contextualized once exposure response data from ongoing clinical studies are available to elucidate the thresholds for clinical efficiency. A single oral dose of ISL 60 mg was generally well tolerated in both groups.CLINICAL TRIALSThis study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04515641.

Nonclinical and clinical characterization of the absorption, metabolism, and excretion of islatravir

The development of new and improved antiretroviral therapies that allow for alternative dosing schedules is needed for people living with HIV-1. Islatravir is a deoxyadenosine analog in development for the treatment of HIV-1 that suppresses HIV-1 replication via multiple mechanisms of action, including reverse transcriptase translocation inhibition and delayed chain termination. Islatravir is differentiated from other HIV-1 antiretrovirals by its high potency, long t½, broad tissue distribution, and favorable drug resistance profile. A comprehensive evaluation was performed to provide data on the mass balance, absorption, metabolism, and excretion of islatravir through studies in nonclinical species, and in adults without HIV-1 infection, using radiolabeled islatravir. Islatravir was well absorbed in both nonclinical species and humans following oral administration. The elimination of islatravir occurs primarily by a combination of oxidative deamination to 4'-ethynyl-2-fluoro-2'-deoxyinosine and renal excretion of unchanged islatravir. Islatravir and 4'-ethynyl-2-fluoro-2'-deoxyinosine are the major circulating drug components in all species assessed. Islatravir is readily taken up into cells with efficient phosphorylation to the mono-, di-, and triphosphate forms. The pharmacologically active islatravir triphosphate is the most abundant intracellular phosphorylated species, as shown by the results of ex vivo studies. This characterization of the absorption, metabolism, and elimination of islatravir in humans and nonclinical species supports its further development for the treatment of HIV-1.

A Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction Between Islatravir and Methadone in Participants on Stable Methadone Therapy

Islatravir is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor in development for the treatment of HIV-1. People living with HIV-1 receiving methadone maintenance therapy may benefit from islatravir. This study was designed to evaluate single-dose islatravir on steady-state methadone pharmacokinetics. A nonrandomized, open-label study (NCT04568603) was conducted and included adult participants receiving methadone therapy. Participants received their standard methadone therapy and a single oral dose of islatravir 60 mg concomitantly. Blood samples were collected to determine methadone and islatravir pharmacokinetics. Fourteen participants aged 26-63 years were enrolled; 13 completed the study. The geometric mean ratios for methadone area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), and concentration at 24 hours (C24) were 1.03, 1.01, and 1.07, respectively. Similar effects were seen for the R- and S-enantiomer of methadone (R-methadone: AUC0-24, 1.03; Cmax, 1.02; and C24, 1.06; S-methadone: AUC0-24, 1.03; Cmax, 1.01; and C24, 1.08). For islatravir, based on a comparison with historical data, the geometric mean ratios for AUC0-inf and Cmax were 1.18 and 0.86, respectively. Coadministration of a single dose of islatravir and methadone was generally well tolerated. Single-dose islatravir did not affect steady-state methadone pharmacokinetics in a clinically meaningful way.

Intracellular islatravir-triphosphate half-life supports extended dosing intervals

Antiretroviral therapy has substantially reduced morbidity, mortality, and disease transmission in people living with HIV. Islatravir is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor that inhibits HIV-1 replication by multiple mechanisms of action, and it is in development for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. In preclinical and clinical studies, islatravir had a long half-life (t½) of 3.0 and 8.7 days (72 and 209 hours, respectively); therefore, islatravir is being investigated as a long-acting oral antiretroviral agent. A study was conducted to definitively elucidate the terminal t½ of islatravir and its active form islatravir-triphosphate (islatravir-TP). A single-site, open-label, non-randomized, single-dose phase 1 study was performed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of islatravir in plasma and the pharmacokinetics of islatravir-TP in peripheral blood mononuclear cells after administration of a single oral dose of islatravir 30 mg. Eligible participants were healthy adult males without HIV infection between the ages of 18 and 65 years. Fourteen participants were enrolled. The median time to maximum plasma islatravir concentration was 1 hour. Plasma islatravir concentrations decreased in a biphasic manner, with a t½ of 73 hours. The t½ (percentage geometric coefficient of variation) of islatravir-TP in peripheral blood mononuclear cells through 6 weeks (~1008 hours) after dosing was 8.1 days or 195 hours (25.6%). Islatravir was generally well tolerated with no drug-related adverse events observed. Islatravir-TP has a long intracellular t½, supporting further clinical investigation of islatravir administered at an extended dosing interval.

Current status of the small molecule anti-HIV drugs in the pipeline or recently approved

Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is the causative agent of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) with high morbidity and mortality rates. Treatment of AIDS/HIV is being complicated by increasing resistance to currently used antiretroviral (ARV) drugs, mainly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to drug misuse, poor drug supply and poor treatment monitoring. However, progress has been made in the development of new ARV drugs, targeting different HIV components (Fig. 1). This review aims at presenting and discussing the progress made towards the discovery of new ARVs that are at different stages of clinical trials as of July 2024. For each compound, the mechanism of action, target biomolecule, genes associated with resistance, efficacy and safety, class, and phase of clinical trial are discussed. These compounds include analogues of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) - islatravir and censavudine; non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) - Rilpivirine, elsulfavirine and doravirine; integrase inhibitors namely cabotegravir and dolutegravir and chemokine coreceptors 5 and 2 (CC5/CCR2) antagonists for example cenicriviroc. Also, fostemsavir is being developed as an attachment inhibitor while lenacapavir, VH4004280 and VH4011499 are capsid inhibitors. Others are maturation inhibitors such as GSK-254, GSK3532795, GSK3739937, GSK2838232, and other compounds labelled as miscellaneous (do not belong to the classical groups of anti-HIV drugs or to the newer classes) such as obefazimod and BIT225. There is a considerable progress in the development of new anti-HIV drugs and the effort will continue since HIV infections has no cure or vaccine till now. Efforts are needed to reduce the toxicity of available drugs or discover new drugs with new classes which can delay the development of resistance.

Switch to fixed-dose doravirine (100 mg) with islatravir (0·75 mg) once daily in virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1 on bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide: 48-week results of a phase 3, randomised, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

Doravirine and islatravir is an investigational, once-daily regimen with high antiviral potency, favourable safety and tolerability, and a low propensity for resistance. We investigated a switch from bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) in virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1.

METHODS

We conducted a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, non-inferiority trial at 89 research, community, and hospital-based clinics in 11 countries. Adults aged 18 years or older with fewer than 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL for at least 3 months on bictegravir (50 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg) and no history of previous virological failure on any past or current regimen were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated randomisation allocation schedule, with block randomisation based on a block size of four, to switch to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) or continue bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide orally once daily, with matching placebos taken by all participants. Participants, investigators, study staff, and sponsor personnel involved in study drug administration or clinical evaluation of participants were masked to treatment assignment until week 48. Participants were instructed at each visit to take one tablet from each of the two bottles received, one of study drug and one of placebo, once daily, and participants were assessed at baseline and weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with greater than or equal to 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL at week 48 in the full analysis set (ie, all participants who received at least one dose of study drug; US Food and Drug Administration snapshot; prespecified non-inferiority margin 4%). The study is ongoing, with all remaining participants in post-treatment follow-up, and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04223791.

FINDINGS

We screened 726 individuals for eligibility between Feb 18 and Sept 3, 2020, of whom 643 (88·6%) participants were randomly assigned to a treatment group (183 [28·5%] women and 460 [71·5%] men). 322 participants were switched to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) and 321 continued bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (two participants [one with a protocol deviation and one who withdrew] assigned to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide did not receive treatment). The last follow-up visit for the week 48 analysis occurred on Aug 26, 2021. At week 48, two (0·6%) of 322 participants in the doravirine and islatravir group compared with one (0·3%) of 319 participants in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group had greater than or equal to 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL (difference 0·3%, 95% CI -1·2 to 2·0). The per-protocol analysis showed consistent results. 25 (7·8%) participants in the doravirine and islatravir group had headache compared with 23 [7·2%] participants in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group; 101 (31·4%) compared with 98 (30·7%) had infections; and eight (2·5%) participants in each group discontinued therapy due to adverse events. 32 (9·9%) participants had treatment-related adverse events in the islatravir and doravirine group comapred with 38 (11·9%) in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group. In the islatravir and doravirine group, CD4 cell counts (mean change -19·7 cells per μL) and total lymphocyte counts (mean change -0·20 × 109/L) were decreased at 48 weeks.

INTERPRETATION

Switching to daily doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) was non-inferior to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide at week 48. However, decreases in CD4 cell and total lymphocyte counts do not support the further development of once-daily doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg).

FUNDING

Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co.

Switch to fixed-dose doravirine (100 mg) with islatravir (0·75 mg) once daily in virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1 on antiretroviral therapy: 48-week results of a phase 3, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

Doravirine and islatravir is an investigational, once-daily, single-tablet regimen with high antiviral potency, favourable safety and tolerability, and low propensity for resistance. We report week 48 results from a phase 3 trial evaluating switch from stable, oral antiretroviral therapy (ART) to the fixed combination of doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg).

METHODS

This phase 3, multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial was conducted at 77 research, community, and hospital-based clinics in 15 countries. Adults aged 18 years or older with fewer than 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL on any oral, two-drug or three-drug ART regimen for at least 3 months, and no history of previous virological failure on any past or current regimen were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated randomisation schedule to switch to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) or to continue their baseline ART regimen. Block randomisation was based on a block size of four, and randomisation was stratified by baseline regimen (ie, protease inhibitor, integrase inhibitor, or other). Participants in the doravirine and islatravir group were instructed to take one tablet at approximately the same time each day, and participants in the baseline ART group continued to take the medication according to the locally approved label. HIV-1 RNA and safety evaluations were done at baseline and weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48. CD4 cell counts were measured at baseline, week 24, and week 48. The primary endpoint was proportion of participants with greater than or equal to 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL at week 48 in the full analysis set (ie, all participants who received at least one dose of study drug) using the US Food and Drug Administration snapshot approach and prespecified non-inferiority margin of 4%. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04223778) and is completed.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 18 and Oct 2, 2020, 740 individuals were screened for eligibility, of whom 672 (90·8%) participants (249 [37·1%] women and 423 [62·9%] men; median CD4 count of 678 cells per μL [IQR 496-868]) were randomly assigned to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg; n=336) or to continue baseline ART (n=336). The last follow-up visit occurred on Sept 8, 2021. At week 48, zero of 336 participants in the doravirine and islatravir group versus five (1·5%) of 336 participants in the baseline ART group had greater than or equal to 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL (difference -1·5, 95% CI -3·4 to -0·3). The per-protocol analysis showed consistent results. Headache was the most common adverse event in both groups (35 [10·4%] of 336 participants in the doravirine and islatravir group, 16 [4·8%] of 336 in the baseline ART group), infection rates were similar (113 [33·6%] in both groups), and discontinuations due to adverse events were low (seven [2·1%] vs one [0·3%]). 66 (19·6%) of 336 participants had treatment-related adverse events in the doravirine and islatravir group compared with 30 (8·9%) of 336 in the baseline ART group. In the islatravir and doravirine group, CD4 cell counts (mean change -30·3 cells per μL) and total lymphocyte counts (mean change -0·26 × 109/L) were decreased at 48 weeks.

INTERPRETATION

Switching to single-tablet doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) maintained viral suppression up to week 48 and was non-inferior to antiretroviral combinations used in clinical practice for adults with HIV-1; however, decreases in CD4 cell and total lymphocyte counts do not support further development of once-daily doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg).

FUNDING

Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co.

Intracellular Islatravir-Triphosphate in Dried Blood Spots and Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells from Pig-Tailed Macaques

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between intracellular islatravir-triphosphate (ISL-TP) in paired peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and dried blood spots (DBS). Three pig-tailed macaques (PMs) were dosed with a single intravaginal extended-release ISL-etonogestrel film for a period of 31 days. After extraction and quantification, repeated measures correlation (rrm) was assessed between log-transformed DBS and PBMC ISL-TP concentrations. Twenty-six paired PBMC/DBS samples were included. Peak ISL-TP concentrations in DBS ranged from 262 to 913 fmol/punches, PBMC Cmax ranged from 427 to 857 fmol/106 cells. Repeated measures correlation yielded an rrm value of 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.92-0.98; p < .0001). Importantly, ISL-TP was quantifiable in DBS and its pharmacokinetics were similar to PBMC in PMs. Human studies should evaluate DBS applications in clinical pharmacokinetic studies to help define ISL's place in the antiretroviral drug armamentarium.

Antiviral potency of long-acting islatravir subdermal implant in SHIV-infected macaques

Treatment nonadherence is a pressing issue in people living with HIV (PLWH), as they require lifelong therapy to maintain viral suppression. Poor adherence leads to antiretroviral (ARV) resistance, transmission to others, AIDS progression, and increased morbidity and mortality. Long-acting (LA) ARV therapy is a promising strategy to combat the clinical drawback of user-dependent dosing. Islatravir (ISL) is a promising candidate for HIV treatment given its long half-life and high potency. Here we show constant ISL release from a subdermal LA nanofluidic implant achieves viral load reduction in SHIV-infected macaques. Specifically, a mean delivery dosage of 0.21 ± 0.07 mg/kg/day yielded a mean viral load reduction of -2.30 ± 0.53 log10 copies/mL at week 2, compared to baseline. The antiviral potency of the ISL delivered from the nanofluidic implant was higher than oral ISL dosed either daily or weekly. At week 3, viral resistance to ISL emerged in 2 out of 8 macaques, attributable to M184V mutation, supporting the need of combining ISL with other ARV for HIV treatment. The ISL implant produced moderate reactivity in the surrounding tissue, indicating tolerability. Overall, we present the ISL subdermal implant as a promising approach for LA ARV treatment in PLWH.

Pharmacokinetic Study of Islatravir and Etonogestrel Implants in Macaques

The prevention of HIV and unintended pregnancies is a public health priority. Multi-purpose prevention technologies capable of long-acting HIV and pregnancy prevention are desirable for women. Here, we utilized a preclinical macaque model to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of biodegradable ε-polycaprolactone implants delivering the antiretroviral islatravir (ISL) and the contraceptive etonogestrel (ENG). Three implants were tested: ISL-62 mg, ISL-98 mg, and ENG-33 mg. Animals received one or two ISL-eluting implants, with doses of 42, 66, or 108 µg of ISL/day with or without an additional ENG-33 mg implant (31 µg/day). Drug release increased linearly with dose with median [range] plasma ISL levels of 1.3 [1.0-2.5], 1.9 [1.2-6.3] and 2.8 [2.3-11.6], respectively. The ISL-62 and 98 mg implants demonstrated stable drug release over three months with ISL-triphosphate (ISL-TP) concentr54ations in PBMCs above levels predicted to be efficacious for PrEP. Similarly, ENG implants demonstrated sustained drug release with median [range] plasma ENG levels of 495 [229-1110] pg/mL, which suppressed progesterone within two weeks and showed no evidence of altering ISL pharmacokinetics. Two of the six ISL-98 mg implants broke during the study and induced implant-site reactions, whereas no reactions were observed with intact implants. We show that ISL and ENG biodegradable implants are safe and yield sufficient drug levels to achieve prevention targets. The evaluation of optimized implants with increased mechanical robustness is underway for improved durability and vaginal efficacy in a SHIV challenge model.

Diuretic resistance in patients with kidney disease: Challenges and opportunities

Edema caused by kidney disease is called renal edema. Edema is a common symptom of many human kidney diseases. Patients with renal edema often need to take diuretics.However, After taking diuretics, patients with kidney diseases are prone to kidney congestion, decreased renal perfusion, decreased diuretics secreted by renal tubules, neuroendocrine system abnormalities, abnormal ion transporter transport, drug interaction, electrolyte disorder, and hypoproteinemia, which lead to ineffective or weakened diuretic use and increase readmission rate and mortality. The main causes and coping strategies of diuretic resistance in patients with kidney diseases were described in detail in this report. The common causes of DR included poor diet (electrolyte disturbance and hypoproteinemia due to patients' failure to limit diet according to correct sodium, chlorine, potassium, and protein level) and poor drug compliance (the patient did not take adequate doses of diuretics. true resistance occurs only if the patient takes adequate doses of diuretics, but they are not effective), changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, electrolyte disorders, changes in renal adaptation, functional nephron reduction, and decreased renal blood flow. Common treatment measures include increasing in the diuretic dose and/or frequency, sequential nephron blockade,using new diuretics, ultrafiltration treatment, etc. In clinical work, measures should be taken to prevent or delay the occurrence and development of DR in patients with kidney diseases according to the actual situation of patients and the mechanism of various causes. Currently, there are many studies on DR in patients with heart diseases. Although the phenomenon of DR in patients with kidney diseases is common, there is a relatively little overview of the mechanism and treatment strategy of DR in patients with kidney diseases. Therefore, this paper hopes to show the information on DR in patients with kidney diseases to clinicians and researchers and broaden the research direction and ideas to a certain extent.

Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Islatravir in Individuals with Severe Renal Insufficiency

Islatravir (MK-8591) is a high-potency reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor in development for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Data from preclinical and clinical studies suggest that ~30% to 60% of islatravir is excreted renally and that islatravir is not a substrate of renal transporters. To assess the impact of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of islatravir, an open-label phase 1 trial was conducted with individuals with severe renal insufficiency (RI). A single dose of islatravir 60 mg was administered orally to individuals with severe RI (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30 mL/min/1.73 m²) and to healthy individuals without renal impairment (matched control group; eGFR ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m²). Safety and tolerability were assessed, and blood samples were collected to measure the pharmacokinetics of islatravir and its major metabolite 4'-ethynyl-2-fluoro-2'deoxyinosine (M4) in plasma, as well as active islatravir-triphosphate (TP) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Plasma islatravir and M4 area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC_0-∞) were ~2-fold and ~5-fold higher, respectively, in participants with severe RI relative to controls, whereas islatravir-TP AUC_0-∞ was ~1.5-fold higher in the RI group than in the control group. The half-lives of islatravir in plasma and islatravir-TP in PBMCs were longer in participants with severe RI than in controls. These findings are consistent with renal excretion playing a major role in islatravir elimination. A single oral dose of islatravir 60 mg was generally well tolerated. These data provide guidance regarding administration of islatravir in individuals with impaired renal function. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT04303156.).

Role of islatravir in HIV treatment and prevention: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize recent updates on the potential role of islatravir for HIV treatment and prevention.

RECENT FINDINGS

Islatravir is an investigational antiretroviral agent with unique pharmacologic properties that facilitate flexible dosing regimens. Islatravir has demonstrated potent antiviral activity and a high barrier to resistance when combined with doravirine and lamivudine. A simplified two-drug HIV treatment regimen of islatravir combined with doravirine has also demonstrated comparable efficacy to standard of care three-drug regimens. The long half-life and high potency of islatravir's active metabolite may support its use as a long-acting option for HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). A once monthly oral dose of islatravir maintains effective concentrations of its active metabolite over the entire dosing interval. Furthermore, an investigational implantable formulation has been projected to provide efficacious concentrations for at least a year and exhibits comparable distribution into vaginal and rectal tissues making it a promising PrEP option for male and female individuals. Islatravir has minimal risks of drug interactions as it is not a substrate, inducer, or inhibitor of major drug metabolizers and transporters. Finally, clinical trials demonstrate islatravir's favorable safety profile revealing only mild and transient adverse events.

SUMMARY

Leveraging the unique pharmacological properties of islatravir offers opportunities for simplified HIV treatment regimens and long-acting PrEP making it a valuable addition to the antiretroviral arsenal.

HIV Prevention Utilizing Long-acting Injectables

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an essential component in ending the HIV pandemic. Unfortunately, PrEP uptake has not been optimal to date. This is due to various reasons, one of which is adherence. Long-acting injectables may help to overcome this barrier. This brief review discusses the long-acting injectables currently in use for PrEP (cabotegravir) and HIV treatment (cabotegravir and lenacapavir), as well as those currently undergoing clinical trials. Other promising agents are being studied, including islatravir and broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies. Furthermore, agents currently used for HIV treatment will likely be evaluated in preclinical and clinical studies for their use as PrEP agents.

Evaluating Islatravir Administered Via Microneedle Array Patch for Long-Acting HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Technologies for long-acting administration of antiretrovirals (ARVs) for the prevention and treatment of HIV are at the forefront of research initiatives aiming to tackle issues surrounding drug adherence with the current standard of once-daily oral administration. Islatravir (ISL) is an emerging ARV that shows promising characteristics for long-acting prevention and treatment both orally as well as through alternative routes of administration. Microneedle array patches (MAPs) are a pain-free and discreet transdermal delivery technology that offer extended-release administration of nanoparticulate drugs. This study aimed to utilise physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling to predict the pharmacokinetics resulting from ISL administered via MAP and to identify key MAP characteristics required to sustain effective concentrations over extended dosing intervals.

METHODS

A PBPK model describing the conversion of ISL to ISL-triphosphate (ISL-TP) and its whole-body disposition was developed and verified against observed clinical data for orally administered ISL in healthy adults. An intradermal PBPK model was integrated with the ISL PBPK model to predict the dose and nanoparticle release rate required for MAP administration strategies capable of achieving a minimum ISL-TP target concentration of 0.05 pmol/10⁶ PBMCs over extended dosing intervals. MAP design was limited to a maximum therapeutic area of 20 cm² with a dose loading of 4.09 mg/cm² and a minimum duration of 3 months. Due to the lack of available clinical data, a range of nanoparticle release rates and MAP bioavailability scenarios were simulated to provide an overview of potential clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The ISL PBPK model was successfully verified, with predicted vs observed ratios falling within 0.5-2-fold. ISL MAP doses ranging from 15 to 80 mg were predicted to sustain ISL-TP concentrations above the minimum target concentration at 3, 6 and 12 months after administration. Nanoparticle release rate and MAP bioavailability were found to have a major impact on whether dosing strategies achieved the criteria. Minimum doses of 15 mg and 60 mg with a nanoparticle release rate of 0.0005 h^-1 and bioavailability ranging from 25 to 100% were predicted to achieve effective ISL-TP concentrations up to 3 and 6 months, respectively. Doses of 15 mg and 30 mg with a nanoparticle release rate of 0.0005 h^-1 were also able to attain the target concentration up to 6 months after MAP administration, albeit with a minimum bioavailability of 75% and 50%, respectively. Furthermore, when simulating a bioavailability of 100%, an 80 mg ISL MAP was predicted to sustain ISL-TP concentrations above the minimum target concentration up to 12 months after administration.

CONCLUSIONS

The ISL PBPK model successfully predicted ISL and ISL-TP pharmacokinetics across a range of orally administered regimens. The integrated intradermal PBPK model outlined optimal MAP dose and nanoparticle release rates for effective ISL-TP concentrations up to 12 months, providing justification for further investigation of ISL as a candidate for MAP administration.

A phase 1, open-label study to evaluate the drug interaction between islatravir (MK-8591) and the oral contraceptive levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol in healthy adult females

Introduction

Hormonal contraceptives are among the most effective forms of reversible contraception, but many other compounds, including some antiretrovirals, have clinically meaningful drug–drug interactions (DDIs) with hormonal contraceptives. Islatravir is a novel human immunodeficiency virus nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor currently in clinical development for treatment and prevention of HIV infection. A phase 1 clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the DDI of islatravir and the combination of oral contraceptive levonorgestrel (LNG)/ethinyl estradiol (EE).

Methods

This was an open‐label, two‐period, fixed‐sequence, DDI clinical trial in healthy, postmenopausal or bilaterally oophorectomized females aged 18 through 65 years in the United States between October 2016 and January 2017. A single dose of LNG 0.15 mg/EE 0.03 mg was given followed by a 7‐day washout. Islatravir, 20 mg, was then dosed once weekly for 3 weeks; a single dose of LNG 0.15 mg/EE 0.03 mg was given concomitantly with the third dose of islatravir. Pharmacokinetic samples for plasma LNG and EE concentrations were collected pre‐dose and up to 120 hours post‐dose in each period. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the trial by clinical assessments, laboratory evaluations and examination of adverse events.

Results and Discussion

Fourteen participants were enrolled. The pharmacokinetics of LNG and EE were not meaningfully altered by co‐administration with islatravir. For the comparison of (islatravir + LNG/EE)/(LNG/EE alone), the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) (90% confidence intervals [CIs]) for LNG AUC_0–inf and C_max were 1.13 (1.06, 1.20) and 0.965 (0.881, 1.06), respectively. For EE, the GMRs (90% CI) for AUC_0–inf and C_max were 1.05 (0.981, 1.11) and 1.02 (0.971, 1.08), respectively. Co‐administration of all three drugs was generally well tolerated.

Conclusions

The results of this trial support the use of LNG/EE contraceptives in combination with islatravir without dose adjustment.

Long-Acting Injectable Antiretroviral Agents for HIV Treatment and Prevention

Current oral antiretroviral agents provide highly effective treatment for patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and can be used as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent new HIV infections. Several single-tablet regimens with excellent antiviral efficacy have dramatically improved the quality of life of patients who can adhere to daily oral therapy. However, there is increasing demand on long-acting injectable antiretroviral agents for patients who cannot take oral agents or feel fatigue related to daily pill burden. Monthly long-acting (LA) cabotegravir (CAB) combined with rilpivirine (RPV) has recently been listed as optimizing agent for maintenance of HIV suppression in treatment-experienced patients whose viral load is undetectable for 3 to 6 months. Novel agents with different mechanism of action and long half-life extending dosing interval are being tested in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. This review summarizes the data of efficacies and safety profiles of LA CAB with RPV regimen, and also new long-acting injectable antiretroviral agents in pipeline.

Lack of a Clinically Meaningful Drug Interaction Between the HIV-1 Antiretroviral Agents Islatravir, Dolutegravir, and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate

Islatravir, an investigational nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor, is in clinical development for the treatment and prevention of HIV‐1 infection. Because islatravir may be coadministered with other antiretroviral agents, assessment of potential drug‐drug interactions are warranted. This phase 1, open‐label, fixed‐sequence, 2‐period trial in adults without HIV (N = 12) assessed the safety and pharmacokinetic interactions of islatravir administered with dolutegravir and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). In period 1, participants received a single oral dose of islatravir (20 mg). In period 2, participants received oral doses of dolutegravir (50 mg) and TDF (300 mg) once daily on days 1 through 11, with a single oral dose of islatravir (20 mg) coadministered on day 8. There were no clinically significant changes in islatravir, dolutegravir, or TDF pharmacokinetics following coadministration. Islatravir was generally well tolerated when administered alone or in combination with dolutegravir and TDF. Coadministration of islatravir, dolutegravir, and TDF is supported, with no clinically meaningful effect on pharmacokinetics, safety, or tolerability in participants without HIV.