Effects of coadministration of low dose cannabinoid type 2 receptor agonist and morphine on vanilloid receptor 1 expression in a rat model of cancer pain

The effect of cannabinoid type 2 receptor agonist on morphine tolerance

Pain highly impacts the quality of life of patients. Morphine is used for pain treatment; however, its side effects, especially morphine tolerance, limit its use in the clinic. The problem of morphine tolerance has plagued health workers and patients for years. Unfortunately, the exact mechanism of morphine tolerance has not been fully clarified. The mechanisms of morphine tolerance that are currently being studied may include μ-opioid receptor (MOR) desensitization and internalization, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway activation and crosstalk, the effects of microglia and the increase in inflammatory factors. Morphine tolerance can be alleviated by improving the pathophysiological changes that lead to morphine tolerance. Previous studies have shown that a cannabinoid type 2 (CB2) receptor agonist could attenuate morphine tolerance in a variety of animal models. Many studies have shown an interaction between the cannabinoid system and the opioid system. The CB2 receptor may modulate the effect of morphine through a pathway that is common to the MOR, since both receptors are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). This study introduces the potential mechanism of morphine tolerance and the effect of CB2 receptor agonists on reducing morphine tolerance, which can provide new ideas for researchers studying morphine and provide beneficial effects for patients suffering from morphine tolerance.

Cannabidiol enhances the antinociceptive effects of morphine and attenuates opioid-induced tolerance in the chronic constriction injury model

Neuropathic pain (NP) is a complex health problem that includes sensorial manifestations such as evoked and ongoing pain. Cannabidiol (CBD) has shown potential in the treatment of NP and the combination between opioids and cannabinoids has provided promising results on pain relief. Thus, our study aimed to investigate the effect of treatment combination between CBD and morphine on evoked and ongoing pain, and the effect of CBD on morphine-induced tolerance in the model of chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve in rats. Mechanical thresholds (i.e., evoked pain) were evaluated before and 7 days after surgery. We also employed a 4-day conditioned place preference (CPP) protocol, to evaluate relief of ongoing pain (6-9 days after surgery). Treatment with morphine (2 and 4 mg/kg) or CBD (30 mg/kg) induced a significant antinociceptive effect on evoked pain. The combination of CBD (30 mg/kg) and morphine (1 mg/kg) produced an enhanced antinociceptive effect, when compared to morphine alone (1 mg/Kg). Treatment with morphine (1 and 2 mg/kg) or CBD (30 mg/kg) alone failed to induce significant scores in the CPP test. However, combined treatment of CBD (30 mg/kg) and morphine (1 mg/kg) provided significant positive scores, increased the number of entrances in the drug-paired chamber in the CPP test and did not alter locomotor activity in rats. Lastly, treatment with CBD partially attenuated morphine-induced tolerance. In summary, our results support the indication of CBD as an adjuvant to opioid therapy for the attenuation of NP and opioid-induced analgesic tolerance.

Opioid-sparing effect of cannabinoids for analgesia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical and clinical studies

Cannabinoid co-administration may enable reduced opioid doses for analgesia. This updated systematic review on the opioid-sparing effects of cannabinoids considered preclinical and clinical studies where the outcome was analgesia or opioid dose requirements. We searched Scopus, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Medline, and Embase (2016 onwards). Ninety-two studies met the search criteria including 15 ongoing trials. Meta-analysis of seven preclinical studies found the median effective dose (ED₅₀) of morphine administered with delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol was 3.5 times lower (95% CI 2.04, 6.03) than the ED₅₀ of morphine alone. Six preclinical studies found no evidence of increased opioid abuse liability with cannabinoid administration. Of five healthy-volunteer experimental pain studies, two found increased pain, two found decreased pain and one found reduced pain bothersomeness with cannabinoid administration; three demonstrated that cannabinoid co-administration may increase opioid abuse liability. Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) found no evidence of opioid-sparing effects of cannabinoids in acute pain. Meta-analysis of four RCTs in patients with cancer pain found no effect of cannabinoid administration on opioid dose (mean difference -3.8 mg, 95% CI -10.97, 3.37) or percentage change in pain scores (mean difference 1.84, 95% CI -2.05, 5.72); five studies found more adverse events with cannabinoids compared with placebo (risk ratio 1.13, 95% CI 1.03, 1.24). Of five controlled chronic non-cancer pain trials; one low-quality study with no control arm, and one single-dose study reported reduced pain scores with cannabinoids. Three RCTs found no treatment effect of dronabinol. Meta-analyses of observational studies found 39% reported opioid cessation (95% CI 0.15, 0.64, I² 95.5%, eight studies), and 85% reported reduction (95% CI 0.64, 0.99, I² 92.8%, seven studies). In summary, preclinical and observational studies demonstrate the potential opioid-sparing effects of cannabinoids in the context of analgesia, in contrast to higher-quality RCTs that did not provide evidence of opioid-sparing effects.

Targeting CB2 and TRPV1: Computational Approaches for the Identification of Dual Modulators

Both metabotropic (CBRs) and ionotropic cannabinoid receptors (ICRs) have implications in a range of neurological disorders. The metabotropic canonical CBRs CB1 and CB2 are highly implicated in these pathological events. However, selective targeting at CB2 versus CB1 offers optimized pharmacology due to the absence of psychoactive outcomes. The ICR transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) has also been reported to play a role in CNS disorders. Thus, activation of both targets, CB2 and TRPV1, offers a promising polypharmacological strategy for the treatment of neurological events including analgesia and neuroprotection. This brief research report aims to identify chemotypes with a potential dual CB2/TRPV1 profile. For this purpose, we have rationalized key structural features for activation and performed virtual screening at both targets using curated chemical libraries.

Cannabinoid Receptor Type 2 Agonist Reduces Morphine Tolerance via Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase Phosphatase Induction and Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase Dephosphorylation

Morphine is an opioid drug often used in treating moderate to severe pain. However, morphine tolerance in patients limits its used in clinical settings. Our previous study showed that a cannabinoid type 2 (CB2) receptor agonist attenuated morphine tolerance. However, the exact mechanism by which CB2 agonists reduce morphine tolerance remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the effect of mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) and mitogen activated protein kinase phosphatases 1 and 3 (MKP-1 and MKP-3) on the regulation of morphine tolerance by CB2 receptor agonist. Chronic morphine treatments for 7 days reduced the protein expression of MKP-1 and MKP-3 in the spinal cord and increased the phosphorylation of p38, ERK1/2 and the level of proinflammatory mediator, such as IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α. Coadministration of CB2 receptor agonist AM1241 alleviated the inhibition of MKP-1 and MKP-3 by chronic morphine administration and reduced the expression of phosphorylated MAPK and proinflammatory factors. The effect of the CB2 receptor agonist on morphine-induced downregulation of MKP-1 and MKP-3 was reversed by the MKP-1 and MKP-3 antagonist triptolide. Our findings suggested that CB2 receptor agonist may induce the expression of MKP-1 and MKP-3 to promote MAPK dephosphorylation and reduce the production of downstream cytokine, thereby reducing morphine tolerance. This finding suggested that MKPs may serve as a new target for alleviating morphine tolerance.

TRPV1 Activation by Anandamide via a Unique Lipid Pathway

The capsaicin receptor, transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1), is a polymodal channel that has been implicated in the perception of pain and can be modulated by a variety of cannabinoid ligands. Here we report TRPV1 channel activation by the endocannabinoid, anandamide (AEA), in a unique, peripheral binding site via extended MD simulations. These results aim to expand the understanding of TRPV1 and assist in the development of new TRPV1 modulators.

Update on cannabis and cannabinoids for cancer pain

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The prevalence of cancer pain will continue to rise as pain is common among the survivorship and general cancer population. As interest in cannabis and cannabinoids for medicinal use including pain management continues to rise, there is growing need to update and review the current state of evidence for their use. The literature was searched for articles in English with key words cannabis, cannabinoids, and cancer pain. The sources of articles were PubMed, Embase, and open Google search.

RECENT FINDINGS

In a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial including a 3-week treatment period of nabiximol for advanced cancer patients with pain refractory to optimized opiate therapy, improvements in average pain were seen in the intention to treat population (P = 0.0854) and per- protocol population (P = 0.0378).

SUMMARY

To date, preclinical data has demonstrated evidence to suggest promising potential for cancer pain and the urgent need to translate this into clinical practice. Unfortunately, due to limited data, for adults with advanced cancer being treated with opiate therapy, the addition of cannabis or cannabinoids is not currently supported to address cancer pain effectively.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2017

This paper is the fortieth consecutive installment of the annual anthological review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, summarizing articles published during 2017 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides and receptors as well as effects of opioid/opiate agonists and antagonists. The review is subdivided into the following specific topics: molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors (1), the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia in animals (2) and humans (3), opioid-sensitive and opioid-insensitive effects of nonopioid analgesics (4), opioid peptide and receptor involvement in tolerance and dependence (5), stress and social status (6), learning and memory (7), eating and drinking (8), drug abuse and alcohol (9), sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (10), mental illness and mood (11), seizures and neurologic disorders (12), electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (13), general activity and locomotion (14), gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (15), cardiovascular responses (16), respiration and thermoregulation (17), and immunological responses (18).

Profiling of how nociceptor neurons detect danger - new and old foes

The host evolves redundant mechanisms to preserve physiological processing and homeostasis. These functions range from sensing internal and external threats, creating a memory of the insult and generating reflexes, which aim to resolve inflammation. Impairment in such functioning leads to chronic inflammatory diseases. By interacting through a common language of ligands and receptors, the immune and sensory nervous systems work in concert to accomplish such protective functions. Whilst this bidirectional communication helps to protect from danger, it can contribute to disease pathophysiology. Thus, the somatosensory nervous system is anatomically positioned within primary and secondary lymphoid tissues and mucosa to modulate immunity directly. Upstream of this interplay, neurons detect danger, which prompts the release of neuropeptides initiating (i) defensive reflexes (ranging from withdrawal response to coughing) and (ii) chemotaxis, adhesion and local infiltration of immune cells. The resulting outcome of such neuro-immune interplay is still ill-defined, but consensual findings start to emerge and support neuropeptides not only as blockers of T_H 1-mediated immunity but also as drivers of T_H 2 immune responses. However, the modalities detected by nociceptors revealed broader than mechanical pressure and temperature sensing and include signals as various as cytokines and pathogens to immunoglobulins and even microRNAs. Along these lines, we aggregated various dorsal root ganglion sensory neuron expression profiling datasets supporting such wide-ranging sensing capabilities to help identifying new danger detection modalities of these cells. Thus, revealing unexpected aspects of nociceptor neuron biology might prompt the identification of novel drivers of immunity, means to resolve inflammation and strategies to safeguard homeostasis.

Effects of Cannabinoid Type 2 Receptor Agonist AM1241 on Morphine-Induced Antinociception, Acute and Chronic Tolerance, and Dependence in Mice

Morphine is a potent opioid analgesic used to alleviate moderate or severe pain, but the development of drug tolerance and dependence limits its use in pain management. Previous studies showed that cannabinoid type 2 (CB₂) receptor ligands may modulate opioid effects. However, there is no report of the effect of CB₂ receptor agonist on acute morphine tolerance and physical dependence. We therefore investigated the effect of a CB₂ receptor agonist (AM1241) on morphine-induced morphine tolerance and physical dependence in mice. Repeated coadministration of AM1241 (1 or 3mg/kg intraperitoneally) and morphine (10mg/kg subcutaneously) for 7days increased the mechanical paw withdrawal threshold in mice as measured by the von Frey filament test, and 3mg/kg AM1241 in combination with morphine increased the thermal paw withdrawal latency as measured by the hot-plate test. Combination with 3mg/kg AM1241 and morphine increased acute morphine antinociception. Coadministration of 1 or 3mg/kg AM1241 and morphine reduced acute morphine tolerance, and 3mg/kg AM1241 reduced chronic morphine tolerance. Coadministration of 1 or 3mg/kg AM1241 and morphine reduced naloxone-precipitated withdrawal jumping, but not diarrhea. Coadministration of AM1241 and morphine did not inhibit spontaneous locomotor activity. Pretreatment with 3mg/kg AM1241 decreased the chronic morphine-induced Iba1 expression in spinal cord. Coadministration of AM1241 (3 mg/kg) reduced the production of interleukin-1β, tumor necrosis factor-α, and interleukin-6 induced by long-term and acute morphine treatment. Our findings suggest that the coadministration of the CB₂ receptor agonist and morphine could increase morphine antinociception and reduce morphine tolerance and physical dependence in mice.

PERSPECTIVE

The combination of a CB₂ agonist and morphine may provide a new strategy for better treatment of acute and chronic pain and prevention of opioid tolerance and dependence. This finding may also provide a clue for the treatment of opioid tolerance and dependence in clinics.

Participation of transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 in paclitaxel-induced acute visceral and peripheral nociception in rodents

The clinical use of paclitaxel as a chemotherapeutic agent is limited by the severe acute and chronic hypersensitivity caused when it is administered via intraperitoneal or intravenous routes. Thus far, evidence has suggested that transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 (TRPV1) has a key role in the chronic neuropathy induced by paclitaxel. Despite this, the role of TRPV1 in paclitaxel -related acute nociception, especially the development of visceral nociception, has not been evaluated. Thus, the goal of this study was to evaluate the participation of TRPV1 in a model of acute nociception induced by paclitaxel in rats and mice. A single intraperitoneal (i.p.) paclitaxel administration (1 mg/kg, i.p.) produced an immediate visceral nociception response 1 h after administration, caused mechanical and heat hypersensitivity, and diminished burrowing behaviour 24 h after administration. These nociceptive responses were reduced by SB-366791 treatment (0.5 mg/kg, i.p., a TRPV1 antagonist). In addition, TRPV1-positive sensory fibre ablation (using resiniferatoxin, 200 µg/kg, s.c.) reduced visceral nociception and mechanical or heat hypersensitivity caused by paclitaxel injection. Similarly, TRPV1 deficient mice showed a pronounced reduction in mechanical allodynia to paclitaxel acute injection and did not develop heat hypersensitivity. Moreover, 24 h after its injection, paclitaxel induced chemical hypersensitivity to capsaicin (a TRPV1 agonist, 0.01 nmol/site) and increased TRPV1 immunoreactivity in the dorsal root ganglion and sciatic nerve. In conclusion, TRPV1 is involved in mechanical and heat hypersensitivity and spontaneous-pain behaviour induced 24 h after a single paclitaxel injection. This receptor is also involved in visceral nociception induced immediately after paclitaxel administration.