The Prevalence of Individual Histopathologic Features Varies according to Autoantibody Status in Muscle Biopsies from Patients with Dermatomyositis

Autoantibody evaluation in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), generally referred to as myositis is a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by muscle inflammation and/or skin involvement, diverse extramuscular manifestations with variable risk for malignancy and response to treatment. Contemporary clinico-serologic categorization identifies 5 main clinical groups which can be further stratified based on age, specific clinical manifestations and/or risk for cancer. The serological biomarkers for this classification are generally known as myositis-specific (MSAs) and myositis-associated antibodies. Based on the use of these antibodies, IIM patients are classified into anti-synthetase syndrome, dermatomyositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, inclusion body myositis, and overlap myositis. The current classification criteria for IIM requires clinical findings, laboratory measurements, and histological findings of the muscles. However, the use MSAs and myositis-associated autoantibodies as an adjunct for disease evaluation is thought to provide a cost-effective personalized approach that may not only guide diagnosis but aid in stratification and/or prognosis of patients. This review provides a comprehensive overview of contemporary autoantibodies that are specific or associated myositis. In addition, it highlights possible pathways for the detection and interpretation of these antibodies with limitations for routine clinical use.

Muscle fiber necroptosis in pathophysiology of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and its potential as target of novel treatment strategy

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs), which are a group of chronic and diverse inflammatory diseases, are primarily characterized by weakness in the proximal muscles that progressively leads to persistent disability. Current treatments of IIMs depend on nonspecific immunosuppressive agents (including glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants). However, these therapies sometimes fail to regulate muscle inflammation, and some patients suffer from infectious diseases and other adverse effects related to the treatment. Furthermore, even after inflammation has subsided, muscle weakness persists in a significant proportion of the patients. Therefore, the elucidation of pathophysiology of IIMs and development of a better therapeutic strategy that not only alleviates muscle inflammation but also improves muscle weakness without increment of opportunistic infection is awaited. Muscle fiber death, which has been formerly postulated as "necrosis", is a key histological feature of all subtypes of IIMs, however, its detailed mechanisms and contribution to the pathophysiology remained to be elucidated. Recent studies have revealed that muscle fibers of IIMs undergo necroptosis, a newly recognized form of regulated cell death, and promote muscle inflammation and dysfunction through releasing inflammatory mediators such as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). The research on murine model of polymyositis, a subtype of IIM, revealed that the inhibition of necroptosis or HMGB1, one of major DAMPs released from muscle fibers undergoing necroptosis, ameliorated muscle inflammation and recovered muscle weakness. Furthermore, not only the necroptosis-associated molecules but also PGAM5, a mitochondrial protein, and reactive oxygen species have been shown to be involved in muscle fiber necroptosis, indicating the multiple target candidates for the treatment of IIMs acting through necroptosis regulation. This article overviews the research on muscle injury mechanisms in IIMs focusing on the contribution of necroptosis in their pathophysiology and discusses the potential treatment strategy targeting muscle fiber necroptosis.

Dermatomyositis: a comprehensive review of clinical manifestations, serological features, and therapeutic approaches

Dermatomyositis (DM) is an autoimmune disorder, which belongs to a group of rare autoimmune dermatoses characterized by different skin features and variable muscle involvement. We recognize four main variants of DM: classic DM, clinically amyopathic DM, paraneoplastic DM, and juvenile DM. Clinically, patients show several skin features, but heliotrope rash, and violaceous papules located at the interphalangeal or metacarpophalangeal joints (Gottron's papules) are the most frequently observed. Together with skin features, patients show muscle involvement, most commonly with symmetrical weakness of the proximal muscles. DM belongs to the facultative paraneoplastic dermatoses and a wide range of solid or hematologic malignancies can be detected in DM patients. Serologically, a wide range of autoantibodies can be detected in patients with DM. Indeed, distinct serotypes can be related to specific phenotypes with specific clinical features, carrying a different risk for systemic involvement and for malignancies. Systemic corticosteroids are still considered the first-line approach, but several steroid-sparing agents, such as methotrexate, azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil, have been reported as effective in treating DM. Furthermore, new class of drugs, such as monoclonal antibodies, purified immunoglobulins or Janus kinase inhibitors are becoming more relevant in the clinical practice or are currently under investigation. In this work, we aim to offer a clinical overview of the diagnostic workout, the characteristics of DM variants, the role of autoantibodies in DM, and the management of this life-threatening systemic disorder.

Impaired muscle stem cell function and abnormal myogenesis in acquired myopathies

Skeletal muscle possesses a high plasticity and a remarkable regenerative capacity that relies mainly on muscle stem cells (MuSCs). Molecular and cellular components of the MuSC niche, such as immune cells, play key roles to coordinate MuSC function and to orchestrate muscle regeneration. An abnormal infiltration of immune cells and/or imbalance of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines could lead to MuSC dysfunctions that could have long lasting effects on muscle function. Different genetic variants were shown to cause muscular dystrophies that intrinsically compromise MuSC function and/or disturb their microenvironment leading to impaired muscle regeneration that contributes to disease progression. Alternatively, many acquired myopathies caused by comorbidities (e.g., cardiopulmonary or kidney diseases), chronic inflammation/infection, or side effects of different drugs can also perturb MuSC function and their microenvironment. The goal of this review is to comprehensively summarize the current knowledge on acquired myopathies and their impact on MuSC function. We further describe potential therapeutic strategies to restore MuSC regenerative capacity.

High prevalence of necrotizing myofibers in adult dermatomyositis muscle biopsies

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to analyze the presence, grade, and relevance of myofiber necrosis in the muscle tissues of patients with adult dermatomyositis. Second, these parameters were associated with the patients' demographic, clinical, and laboratory data.

METHOD

This was a retrospective study, from 2001 to 2021, which included 89 muscle biopsies of patients with definite dermatomyositis performed at the time of diagnostic investigation. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on serially frozen muscle sections. The presence and degree of endomysial/perifascicular myofiber necrosis were also analyzed. The degree of necrosis was semi-quantitatively coded as absent/mild, moderate, or severe. The presence or absence of perifascicular atrophy and also perivascular lymphomononuclear infiltration was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Muscle biopsies from 89 patients, the majority of whom were Caucasian women, were evaluated. Both perifascicular atrophy and perivascular lymphomononuclear infiltrates were observed in 76 (85.4%) samples. Moderate or intense areas of myofiber necrosis in endomysial/perifascicular areas were found in 30/89 (33.7%) and 14/89 (15.7%) muscle biopsies, respectively, with a predominance of macrophagic infiltrate in relation to lymphomononuclear cells in these regions. The degree of muscle weakness in the limbs (upper and lower) was associated only with areas of intense myofiber necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

A high prevalence of myofiber necrosis was observed, which patients resembled the initial clinical feature of patients with immune-mediated necrotizing myopathies. Key Point • A high prevalence of myofiber necrosis was observed in muscle biopsies of patients with dermatomyositis.

Muscle biopsy in myositis: What the rheumatologist needs to know

The appropriate analysis of skeletal muscle tissues is a key element in many diagnostic procedures and can deliver valuable information about the organ that is affected. Although arguably the frequency of muscle biopsy may be declining in certain domains where genetic analysis is now the first line of diagnostic evaluation, it still has an important role in assessment of patients with neuromuscular disorders such as congenital myopathies, muscular dystrophies, metabolic and inflammatory diseases. Here, we have comprehensively discussed the aspects of a modern and fruitful approach to muscle biopsy histopathological studies in rheumatological disorders. We have focussed on the neuromuscular involvement in myositis and its differential diagnoses in both adult and paediatric settings. We have also covered the clinical indications for the biopsy, technical aspects and practical points relevant for the rheumatologists. Finally, we have critically discussed the current and future opportunities that a muscle biopsy may offer and its limitations.

Is it really myositis? Mimics and pitfalls

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are a heterogeneous set of systemic inflammatory disorders primarily affecting muscle. Signs and symptoms vary greatly between and within subtypes, requiring supportive laboratory and pathologic evidence to confirm the diagnosis. Several studies are typical assessments for patients with suspected inflammatory myopathy, including muscle enzymes, autoimmune markers, imaging, and muscle biopsy. Misdiagnoses of myositis are not only related to the overlap of clinical phenotype with non-inflammatory myopathies, but also due to the limitations of diagnostic tests employed. Since many of the investigative tests are non-specific, they share features with other disorders, including muscular dystrophies, endocrine, toxic, and metabolic myopathies, and other neuromuscular or rheumatologic conditions. Recognizing the limitations of tests and understanding the shared features between inflammatory and non-inflammatory myopathies can help prevent misdiagnosing myositis with one of its several mimics.

Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Treatment of Dermatomyositis and Immune Mediated Necrotizing Myopathies: A Focused Review

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), collectively known as myositis, are a composite group of rare autoimmune diseases affecting mostly skeletal muscle, although other organs or tissues may also be involved. The main clinical feature of myositis is subacute, progressive, symmetrical muscle weakness in the proximal arms and legs, whereas subtypes of myositis may also present with extramuscular features, such as skin involvement, arthritis or interstitial lung disease (ILD). Established subgroups of IIM include dermatomyositis (DM), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), anti-synthetase syndrome (ASyS), overlap myositis (OM) and inclusion body myositis (IBM). Although these subgroups have overlapping clinical features, the widespread variation in the clinical manifestations of IIM suggests different pathophysiological mechanisms. Various components of the immune system are known to be important immunopathogenic pathways in IIM, although the exact pathophysiological mechanisms causing the muscle damage remain unknown. Current treatment, which consists of glucocorticoids and other immunosuppressive or immunomodulating agents, often fails to achieve a sustained beneficial response and is associated with various adverse effects. New therapeutic targets have been identified that may improve outcomes in patients with IIM. A better understanding of the overlapping and diverging pathophysiological mechanisms of the major subgroups of myositis is needed to optimize treatment. The aim of this review is to report on recent advancements regarding DM and IMNM.

Performance of the 2017 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies in Patients With Myositis-Specific Autoantibodies

OBJECTIVE

We undertook this study to 1) determine the sensitivity of the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) to properly classify myositis-specific autoantibody (MSA)-positive myositis patients, 2) describe the phenotype and muscle involvement over time in different MSA-positive patients, and 3) compare MSA subgroups to EULAR/ACR criteria-defined myositis subgroups for their capacity to predict clinical phenotypes in patients with IIMs.

METHODS

The study included 524 MSA-positive myositis patients from the Johns Hopkins Myositis Center. Each patient was classified using the EULAR/ACR classification criteria. Patient phenotypes were summarized using factor analysis of mixed data (FAMD). We compared the ability of MSAs to that of the EULAR/ACR classification subgroups to predict the phenotype of patients by applying the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criteria (BIC) to the linear regression models.

RESULTS

Overall, 91% of MSA-positive patients met the EULAR/ACR criteria to be classified as having myositis. However, 20% of patients with anti-hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (anti-HMGCR) and 50% of patients with anti-PL-7 were incorrectly classified as not having myositis. Furthermore, ~10% of patients with anti-signal recognition particle (anti-SRP) and patients with anti-HMGCR were misclassified as having inclusion body myositis. FAMD demonstrated that patients within each MSA-defined subgroup had similar phenotypes. Application of both the AIC and BIC to the linear regression models revealed that MSAs were better predictors of myositis phenotypes than the subgroups defined by the EULAR/ACR criteria.

CONCLUSION

Although the EULAR/ACR criteria successfully classified 91% of MSA-positive myositis patients, certain MSA-defined subgroups, including those with autoantibodies against HMGCR, SRP, and PL-7, are frequently misclassified. In myositis patients with MSAs, autoantibodies outperform the EULAR/ACR-defined myositis subgroups in predicting the clinical phenotypes of patients. These findings underscore the need to include MSAs in a revised myositis classification scheme.

An Italian Multicenter Study on Anti-NXP2 Antibodies: Clinical and Serological Associations

The identification of anti-NXP2 antibodies is considered a serological marker of dermatomyositis (DM), with calcinosis, severe myositis and, in some reports, with cancer. Historically, these associations with anti-NXP2 antibodies have been detected by immunoprecipitation (IP), but in the last few years commercial immunoblotting assays have been released. The aim of this collaborative project was to analyse the clinical features associated to anti-NXP2 antibodies, both with commercial line blot (LB) and IP. Myositis-specific and myositis-associated autoantibodies were detected in single centres by commercial line blot (LB); available sera were evaluated in a single centre by protein and RNA immunoprecipitation (IP), and IP-Western blot. Sixty patients anti-NXP2+ (NXP2+) positive by LB were compared with 211 patients anti-NXP2 negative with idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM). NXP2+ showed a younger age at IIM onset (p = 0.0014), more frequent diagnosis of dermatomyositis (p = 0.026) and inclusion-body myositis (p = 0.009), and lower rate of anti-synthetase syndrome (p < 0.0001). As for clinical features, NXP2+ more frequently develop specific skin manifestations and less frequently features related with overlap myositis and anti-synthetase syndrome. IP confirmed NXP2 positivity in 31 of 52 available sera (62%). Most clinical associations were confirmed comparing NXP2 LB+/IP+ versus NXP2-negative myositis, with the following exceptions: inclusion-body myositis diagnosis was not detected, whilst dysphagia and myositis were found more frequently in NXP2 LB+/IP+ patients. The 21 LB+ /IP-myositis patients did not show differences in clinical features when compared with the NXP2-myositis patients and more frequently displayed multiple positivity at LB. Risk of developing cancer-associated myositis was similar between NXP2-positive and NXP2-negative myositis patients, either when detected by LB or IP. Protein-IP confirmed NXP2 antibodies in nearly 60% of sera positive for the same specificity with commercial assay. Double-positive cases rarely occurred in myositis patients with a clinical diagnosis other than dermatomyositis. Patients only positive by LB (LB+/IP-) did not display clinical features typical of NXP2. NXP2 positivity by LB should be confirmed by other methods in order to correctly diagnose and characterize patients affected by idiopathic inflammatory myositis.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), also known as myositis, are a heterogeneous group of autoimmune disorders with varying clinical manifestations, treatment responses and prognoses. Muscle weakness is usually the classical clinical manifestation but other organs can be affected, including the skin, joints, lungs, heart and gastrointestinal tract, and they can even result in the predominant manifestations, supporting that IIM are systemic inflammatory disorders. Different myositis-specific auto-antibodies have been identified and, on the basis of clinical, histopathological and serological features, IIM can be classified into several subgroups - dermatomyositis (including amyopathic dermatomyositis), antisynthetase syndrome, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, inclusion body myositis, polymyositis and overlap myositis. The prognoses, treatment responses and organ manifestations vary among these groups, implicating different pathophysiological mechanisms in each subtype. A deeper understanding of the molecular pathways underlying the pathogenesis and identifying the auto-antigens of the immune reactions in these subgroups is crucial to improving outcomes. New, more homogeneous subgroups defined by auto-antibodies may help define disease mechanisms and will also be important in future clinical trials for the development of targeted therapies and in identifying biomarkers to guide treatment decisions for the individual patient.

Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM): A myopathological challenge

This review is focused on the myopathological spectrum of immune mediated necrotizing myopathies (IMNMs) and its differentiation with other, potentially mimicking, inflammatory and non-inflammatory myopathies. IMNMs are a subgroup of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) characterized by severe clinical presentation with rapidly progressive muscular weakness and creatine kinase elevation, often requiring early aggressive immunotherapy, associated to the presence of muscle specific autoantibodies (MSA) against signal recognition particle (SRP) or 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR). Muscle biopsy usually shows unspecific features consisting in prominent necrosis and regeneration of muscle fibres with mild or absent inflammatory infiltrates, inconstant and faint expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and variable deposition of C5b-9 on sarcolemma. Several conditions could present similar histopathological findings leading to possible misdiagnosis of IMNM with other IIMs or non-inflammatory myopathies (nIMs) and viceversa. This review analyses the muscle biopsy data in IMNMs through a systematic revision of the literature from the last five decades. Several histopathological variables have been considered in both SRP- and HMGCR-IMNM, and compared to other IIMs - as dermatomyositis (DM) and anti-synthethase syndrome (ASS) - or other nIMs -as toxic myopathies (TM), critical illness myopathy (CIM) and muscular dystrophy (MD) - to elucidate similarities and differences among these potentially mimicking conditions. The major histopathological findings of IMNMs were: very frequent necrosis and regeneration of muscle fibres (93%), mild inflammatory component mainly constituted by scattered isolated (65%) CD68-prevalent (68%) cells, without CD8 invading/surrounding non-necrotic fibres, variable expression of MHC-I in non-necrotic fibres (56%) and constant expression of sarcoplasmic p62, confirming those that are widely considered the major histological characteristics of IMNMs. Conversely, only 42% of biopsies showed a sarcolemmal deposition of C5b-9 component. Few differences between SRP and HMGCR IMNMs consisted in more severe necrosis and regeneration in SRP than in HMGCR (p = 0.01); more frequent inflammatory infiltrates (p = 0.007) with perivascular localization (p = 0.01) and clustered expression of MHC-I (p = 0.007) in HMGCR; very low expression of sarcolemmal C5b-9 in SRP (18%) compared to HMGCR (56%) (p = 0.0001). Milder necrosis and regeneration, detection of perifascicular pathology, presence of lymphocytic inflammatory infiltrates and myofibre expression of MxA help to distinguish DM or ASS from IMNM. nIMs can present signs of inflammation at muscle biopsy. Low fibre size variability with overexpression of both MHC-I and II, associated with C5b-9 deposition, could could be observed in CIM, while increased connective tissue should lead to consider MD, or TM in absence of C5b-9 deposition. Nevertheless, these features are not constantly detected and muscle biopsy could not be diriment. For this reason, muscle biopsy should always be critically considered in light of the clinical context before concluding for a definite diagnosis of IMNM, only based on histopathological findings. More rigorous collection and analysis of muscle biopsy is warranted to obtain a higher quality and more homogeneous histopathological data in inflammatory myopathies.

Clinical features and diagnostic tools in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are rare autoimmune disorders affecting primarily muscles, but other organs can be involved. This review describes the clinical features, diagnosis and treatment for IIMs, namely polymyositis (PM), dermatomyositis (DM), sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), and myositis associated with antisynthetase syndrome (ASS). The diagnostic approach has been updated recently based on the discovery of circulating autoantibodies, which has enhanced the management of patients. Currently, validated classification criteria for IIMs allow clinical studies with well-defined sets of patients but diagnostic criteria to guide the care of individual patients in routine clinical practice are still missing. This review analyzes the clinical manifestations and laboratory findings of IIMs, discusses the efficiency of modern and standard methods employed in their workup, and delineates optimal practice for clinical care. Α multidisciplinary diagnostic approach that combines clinical, neurologic and rheumatologic examination, evaluation of electrophysiologic and morphologic muscle characteristics, and assessment of autoantibody immunoassays has been determined to be the preferred approach for effective management of patients with suspected IIMs.

Biomarker und Histologie bei idiopathischen inflammatorischen Myopathien

Die idiopathischen inflammatorischen Myopathien (IIM) sind eine Gruppe entzündlicher Muskelerkrankungen für deren Diagnosestellung, Verlaufsbeurteilung, Prognoseabschätzung und Risikostratifizierung Biomarker eine jeweils essentielle Rolle spielen. Biomarker in diesem Kontext können sowohl „herkömmliche“ serologische Marker wie Muskelenzyme oder Autoantikörper, histologische Marker wie entitätsspezifische inflammatorische Muster, aber auch genomische und genetische Marker sein. Der vorliegende Artikel gibt einen Überblick über bewährte und innovative Marker.

Severe muscle damage with myofiber necrosis and macrophage infiltrates characterize anti-Mi2 positive dermatomyositis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to investigate clinical and histopathological findings in adult DM patients positive for anti-Mi2 (anti-Mi2+) antibodies compared with DM patients negative for anti-Mi2 (anti-Mi2-).

METHODS

Clinical data of adult DM patients, who fulfilled EULAR/ACR 2017 classification criteria, were gathered from electronic medical records of three tertiary Rheumatology Units. Histopathological study was carried out on 12 anti-Mi2+ and 14 anti-Mi2- muscle biopsies performed for diagnostic purpose. Nine biopsies from immune mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) patients were used as control group.

RESULTS

Twenty-two anti-Mi2+ DM [90.9% female, mean age 56.5 (15.7) years] were compared with 69 anti-Mi2- DM patients [71% female, mean age 52.4 (17) years]. Anti-Mi2+ patients presented higher levels of serum muscle enzymes than anti-Mi2- patients [median (IQR) creatine-kinase fold increment: 16 (7-37)vs 3.5 (1-9.9), P <0.001] before treatment initiation. Moreover, a trend towards less pulmonary involvement was detected in anti-Mi2+ DM (9.1% vs 30.4%, P =0.05), without any case of rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease. At muscle histology, anti-Mi2+ patients showed more necrotic/degenerative fibres than anti-Mi2- patients [mean 5.3% (5) vs 0.8% (1), P <0.01], but similar to IMNM [5.9% (6), P >0.05]. In addition, the endomysial macrophage score was similar between anti-Mi2+ and IMNM patients [mean 1.2 (0.9) vs 1.3 (0.5), P >0.05], whereas lower macrophage infiltration was found in anti-Mi2- DM [mean 0.4 (0.5), <0.01].

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-Mi2+ patients represent a specific DM subset with high muscle damage. Histological hallmarks were a higher prevalence of myofiber necrosis, endomysial involvement and macrophage infiltrates at muscle biopsy.

The aetiopathogenic significance, clinical relevance and therapeutic implications of vasculopathy in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy

It is 120 years since 'angiomyositis' was included alongside 'polymyositis' and 'dermatomyositis' in an attempt to propose a taxonomy that reflected the major clinical characteristics of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). Endothelial injury, perivascular inflammation and capillary loss are important histological findings in affected tissues in IIM. Overt vascular clinical features including RP and abnormal nailfold capillaroscopy (NC) are also common in IIM. Despite the presence of endothelial injury, perivascular inflammation and capillary loss in affected tissues in IIM, and the presence of clinical features such as RP and NC abnormalities, the pathogenic and therapeutic implications of vasculopathy in IIM have been somewhat overlooked. RP and NC abnormalities are not always present, providing a valuable opportunity to explore aetiopathogenic factors driving vasculopathy within autoimmune rheumatic disease. The present review examines the aetiopathogenic, prognostic and therapeutic significance of vasculopathy in IIM. We describe the prevalence and clinical relevance of vasculopathy in IIM, and consider how vasculopathy may be better utilized to support improved IIM diagnosis and disease classification. Areas of unmet research need are highlighted where relevant.

The role of interferons type I, II and III in myositis: A review

The classification of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) is based on clinical, serological and histological criteria. The identification of myositis‐specific antibodies has helped to define more homogeneous groups of myositis into four dominant subsets: dermatomyositis (DM), antisynthetase syndrome (ASyS), sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) and immune‐mediated necrotising myopathy (IMNM). sIBM and IMNM patients present predominantly with muscle involvement, whereas DM and ASyS patients present additionally with other extramuscular features, such as skin, lung and joints manifestations. Moreover, the pathophysiological mechanisms are distinct between each myositis subsets. Recently, interferon (IFN) pathways have been identified as key players implicated in the pathophysiology of myositis. In DM, the key role of IFN, especially type I IFN, has been supported by the identification of an IFN signature in muscle, blood and skin of DM patients. In addition, DM‐specific antibodies are targeting antigens involved in the IFN signalling pathways. The pathogenicity of type I IFN has been demonstrated by the identification of mutations in the IFN pathways leading to genetic diseases, the monogenic interferonopathies. This constitutive activation of IFN signalling pathways induces systemic manifestations such as interstitial lung disease, myositis and skin rashes. Since DM patients share similar features in the context of an acquired activation of the IFN signalling pathways, we may extend underlying concepts of monogenic diseases to acquired interferonopathy such as DM. Conversely, in ASyS, available data suggest a role of type II IFN in blood, muscle and lung. Indeed, transcriptomic analyses highlighted a type II IFN gene expression in ASyS muscle tissue. In sIBM, type II IFN appears to be an important cytokine involved in muscle inflammation mechanisms and potentially linked to myodegenerative features. For IMNM, currently published data are scarce, suggesting a minor implication of type II IFN. This review highlights the involvement of different IFN subtypes and their specific molecular mechanisms in each myositis subset.

Histopathological features of systemic sclerosis-associated myopathy: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Scleromyositis (SM) is an emerging subset of myositis associated with features of systemic sclerosis (SSc) but it is currently not recognized as a distinct histopathological subset by the European NeuroMuscular Center (ENMC). Our aim was to review studies reporting muscle biopsies from SSc patients with myositis and to identify unique histopathological features of SM.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted and included all studies reporting histopathological findings in SSc patients with myositis searching the following databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and EBM-Reviews. Clinical, serological, and histopathological data were extracted using a standardized protocol.

RESULTS

Out of 371 citations, 77 studies that included 559 muscle biopsies were extracted. Fifty-seven percent (n = 227/400) had inflammatory infiltrates, predominantly T cells, which were endomysial (49%), perimysial (42%) and perivascular (41%). Few studies (18%, n = 8/44) evaluated the presence of B-cells. Myofiber atrophy was present in 48% (n = 104/218) of biopsies, and was predominantly perifascicular in 19% (n = 6/31), with necrosis reported in 56% (n = 162/290) of cases. Sarcolemmal MHC-I upregulation was found in 72% (n = 64/89) of biopsies. Non-specified C5b-9 deposition was described in 39% of muscle biopsies (n = 28/72). Neurogenic features were present in 23% (n = 44/191); endomysial fibrosis was reported in 35% (n = 120/340); and rimmed vacuoles were observed in 32% (n = 11/34) of biopsies. Capillaropathy, such as capillary dropout and/or ultrastructural endothelial abnormalities, was reported in 33% (n = 43/129) of cases. Reported ENMC categories were mainly polymyositis (21%), non-specific myositis (19%), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (16%), and dermatomyositis (8%). Histopathological features were analyzed according to serological subtypes in 28 studies, including anti-PM-Scl (n = 48), -Ku (n = 23) and -U1RNP (n = 90). Most of these biopsies demonstrated inflammatory infiltrates (range 49-85%) as well as MHC-I expression (range 63-81%). Necrosis was associated with anti-Ku (85%) and anti-U1RNP (73%), while anti-Ku was also associated with neurogenic features and rimmed vacuoles in 57% and 25% of cases, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our review suggests that SM is characterized by heterogeneous pathological features using definitions included in current histopathological criteria. Whether a distinct histopathological signature exists in SM remains to be determined. SSc-specific and SSc-associated autoantibodies may help define more homogeneous histopathological subsets.

Anti-mitochondrial autoantibodies are associated with cardiomyopathy, dysphagia, and features of more severe disease in adult-onset myositis

We analyzed the prevalence of anti-mitochondrial autoantibodies (AMA) in adult- and juvenile-onset myositis longitudinal cohorts and investigated phenotypic differences in myositis patients with AMA. We screened sera from myositis patients including 619 adult- and 371 juvenile-onset dermatomyositis (DM, JDM), polymyositis (PM, JPM), inclusion body myositis (IBM), or amyopathic DM patients and from healthy controls, including 164 adults and 92 children, for AMA by ELISA. Clinical characteristics were compared between myositis patients with and without AMA. AMA were present in 5% of adult myositis patients (16 of 216 DM, 10 of 222 PM, 4 of 140 IBM, 1 of 19 amyopathic DM), 1% of juvenile myositis patients (3 of 302 JDM, 1 of 25 JPM), and 1% of both adult and juvenile healthy controls. In patients with adult-onset myositis, AMA were associated with persistent muscle weakness, Raynaud’s phenomenon, dysphagia, and cardiomyopathy. Adult myositis patients with AMA may have more severe or treatment refractory disease, as they more frequently received glucocorticoids and intravenous immunoglobulin. In juvenile myositis, children with AMA often had falling episodes and dysphagia, but no other clinical features or medications were significantly associated with AMA. AMA are present in 5% of adult myositis patients and associated with cardiomyopathy, dysphagia, and other signs of severe disease. The prevalence of AMA is not increased in patients with juvenile myositis compared to age-matched healthy controls. Our data suggest that the presence of AMA in adult myositis patients should prompt screening for cardiac and swallowing involvement.

Key Points • Approximately 5% of a large North American cohort of adult myositis patients have anti-mitochondrial autoantibodies. • Adults with anti-mitochondrial autoantibodies often have chronic weakness, Raynaud’s, dysphagia, cardiomyopathy, and more severe disease. • Anti-mitochondrial autoantibodies are rare in juvenile myositis and not associated with a specific clinical phenotype.

Real world utilization of the myositis autoantibody panel

OBJECTIVE

Myositis autoantibody panel results can offer diagnostic and prognostic information in patients with concern for idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). However, there has been widespread utilization of myositis autoantibody testing clinically, often in situations where concern for an IIM is unclear. We sought to determine ordering practices and factors predicting positive results on ordered myositis antibody panels.

METHODS

We included all patients in the Duke University Health System who had a "myositis antibody panel" ordered from October 2014 through December 2016. Retrospective chart review was performed evaluating antibody positivity, provider specialty, ordering location, demographics, medical history, review of systems (ROS), physical examination (PE), and laboratory values. Fisher's exact and t test tests and backward multivariable regression analysis were performed for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

There were 642 unique tests obtained with 114 positive autoantibodies (17.7%) over the 26-month period. Myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) were the most common and anti-Mi-2 was the most frequent (40% of MSAs). Pulmonology providers ordered the majority of tests (383; 59.6%). Adult Rheumatology had the highest antibody positivity rate (34.3%, p=0.0001) among specialties with at least 10 panels ordered. In backward multivariable regression analysis, factors independently associated with a positive myositis antibody panel were chronic corticosteroid use (OR: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.30-3.38) and sclerodermoid skin changes (OR: 6.89; 95% CI: 2.02-23.47).

CONCLUSION

The positivity rate of myositis antibody panel testing in this real-world clinical setting was 18%. Anti-Mi-2 antibody was the most frequent autoantibody present. Specific factors associated with positive results can be utilized to identify patients at higher risk for IIM.

KEY POINTS

• Only eighteen percent of all myositis antibody panel tests ordered returned positive. • Anti-Mi-2 antibody was the most frequent autoantibody in our cohort. • Specific factors associated with positive results can help identify patients at higher risk for IIM, particularly for non-rheumatologists.

Mitochondrial morphology and MAVS-IFN1 signaling pathway in muscles of anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis

Objective

This study aimed to investigate mitochondrial changes and the mitochondrial antiviral‐signaling protein (MAVS)‐type I interferon (IFN1) signaling pathway in the muscles of anti‐melanoma differentiation gene 5(MDA5) dermatomyositis (DM) patients.

Methods

Eleven anti‐MDA5 DM and ten antibody‐negative DM patients were included. Muscle biopsies were performed in all patients. Muscle pathology and mitochondrial morphology in particular were compared between two groups. The expression of MDA5, MAVS, interferon (IFN) regulatory factor 7, and IFN‐stimulated gene 15, which are components of the MAVS‐IFN1 signaling pathway, was measured in muscle specimen. The correlation between MAVS expression in muscles and disease phenotypes and muscle pathology were analyzed.

Results

Anti‐MDA5 DM showed a significantly lower incidence of the characteristic DM pathology (P < 0.05) than antibody‐negative DM, including perifascicular fiber atrophy, inflammation, and vasculopathy. Mitochondrial abnormalities in anti‐MDA5 patients revealed a high incidence of (8/11,72.7%) and different pattern from that in antibody‐negative DM. MDA5, MAVS, IFN regulatory factor 7, and IFN stimulated gene 15 expression levels in the muscles of anti‐MDA5 DM patients were higher than those of the controls (P < 0.05) but lower than those of antibody‐negative DM patients (P < 0.05). The MAVS levels negatively correlated with manual muscle test 8 scores (r = 0.701, P = 0.016).

Conclusions

Compared to antibody‐negative DM, we presented a different distribution of the mitochondrial pathology and less severe morphology in anti‐MDA5 DM. We also revealed the enhanced but less intensive MAVS‐IFN1 signaling pathway activity in muscles of anti‐MDA5 DM. Such disparity suggested the potentially different mechanism of muscle injury in two DM groups.

Pathologic Features of Anti-Mi-2 Dermatomyositis

OBJECTIVE

To identify the characteristic pathologic features of dermatomyositis (DM) associated with anti-Mi-2 autoantibodies (anti-Mi-2 DM).

METHODS

We reviewed 188 muscle biopsies from patients (1) pathologically diagnosed with DM through the sarcoplasmic expression for the myxovirus-resistant protein A and (2) serologically positive for 1 of 5 DM-specific autoantibodies (DMSAs) (anti-Mi-2, n = 30; other DMSAs, n = 152) or negative for all 5 DMSAs (n = 6). We then compared the histopathologic and immunohistochemical features of patients with anti-Mi-2 DM to those with non-Mi-2 DM and patients with anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS) (n = 212) using the t test, Fisher exact test, and a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Patients with anti-Mi-2 DM showed significantly higher severity scores in muscle fiber and inflammatory domains than non-Mi-2 DM patients. The presence of perifascicular necrosis, increased perimysial alkaline phosphatase activity, and sarcolemmal membrane attack complex deposition was more frequent in patients with anti-Mi-2 DM (p < 0.01). After Bonferroni correction, there were no significant differences in the percentages of the features mentioned above between the patients with anti-Mi-2 DM and those with ASS (p > 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Perifascicular necrosis and perimysial pathology, features previously reported in ASS, are common in patients with anti-Mi-2 DM. Our findings not only assist in differentiating anti-Mi-2 DM from other DM subtypes but also suggest the possibility of an overlapping mechanism between anti-Mi-2 DM and ASS.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that the muscle biopsies of DM patients with anti-Mi-2 autoantibodies are more likely to demonstrate higher severity scores in muscle fiber and inflammatory domains.

Machine learning algorithms reveal unique gene expression profiles in muscle biopsies from patients with different types of myositis

OBJECTIVES

Myositis is a heterogeneous family of diseases that includes dermatomyositis (DM), antisynthetase syndrome (AS), immune-mediated necrotising myopathy (IMNM), inclusion body myositis (IBM), polymyositis and overlap myositis. Additional subtypes of myositis can be defined by the presence of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs). The purpose of this study was to define unique gene expression profiles in muscle biopsies from patients with MSA-positive DM, AS and IMNM as well as IBM.

METHODS

RNA-seq was performed on muscle biopsies from 119 myositis patients with IBM or defined MSAs and 20 controls. Machine learning algorithms were trained on transcriptomic data and recursive feature elimination was used to determine which genes were most useful for classifying muscle biopsies into each type and MSA-defined subtype of myositis.

RESULTS

The support vector machine learning algorithm classified the muscle biopsies with >90% accuracy. Recursive feature elimination identified genes that are most useful to the machine learning algorithm and that are only overexpressed in one type of myositis. For example, CAMK1G (calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IG), EGR4 (early growth response protein 4) and CXCL8 (interleukin 8) are highly expressed in AS but not in DM or other types of myositis. Using the same computational approach, we also identified genes that are uniquely overexpressed in different MSA-defined subtypes. These included apolipoprotein A4 (APOA4), which is only expressed in anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) myopathy, and MADCAM1 (mucosal vascular addressin cell adhesion molecule 1), which is only expressed in anti-Mi2-positive DM.

CONCLUSIONS

Unique gene expression profiles in muscle biopsies from patients with MSA-defined subtypes of myositis and IBM suggest that different pathological mechanisms underly muscle damage in each of these diseases.

[Dermatomyositis: new antibody, new classification]

Dermatomyositis are rare chronic auto-immune diseases characterized by cutaneous involvement. Diagnosis could be made in childhood or in aldult. There are some different clinical and histological presentation associated with different myositis specific antibody. There are five dermatomyositis specific autoantibodies, anti-Mi2, anti-Tif1-γ, anti-NXP2, anti-MDA5, and anti-SAE. Anti-Mi2 are associated with "classical form" of DM with cutaneous and muscular involvement. Anti-Tif1γ and anti-NXP2 are found in juvenile and adult dermatomyositis, and are associated with recurrent diseases with cutaneous involvement at the forefront. In adults, they are associated with cancer. Anti-MDA5 antibodies are associated with a systemic involvement and an interstitial lung disease. Finally, anti-SAE have been found only in adults, with a classic form.

Clinical spectrums and outcomes of necrotizing autoimmune myopathy versus other idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a multicenter case-control study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical characteristics, laboratory features, and treatment outcomes of Thai patients compared between those with necrotizing autoimmune myopathy (NAM) and those with other idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) or non-NAM.

METHODS

This multicenter case-control study included patients aged ≥ 18 years who were diagnosed with IIMs by muscle pathology, and who had relevant clinical and laboratory data, including muscle enzymes, from at least 3 follow-up visits during a 1-year period. Baseline clinical and laboratory data were recorded. Serum myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) were obtained on the date of recruitment.

RESULTS

Of the 70 included patients, 67% had NAM, and 33% had non-NAM. The mean age of patients was 50.5 ± 15.9 years, 67% were female, and the median duration of symptoms was 2 months (IQR, 1-4). History of cancer was significantly higher in non-NAM (21.7% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.01). Gottron's papules were significantly more prevalent in non-NAM (21.7% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.04). Non-NAM had a higher prevalence of anti-Mi-2a (17.4% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.04) and Mi-2b (17.4% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.01); however, the presence of other MSAs, including anti-HMGCR and anti-SRP, was similar between groups. Improvement in motor power and treatment intensification with glucocorticoid and/or immunosuppressive agents 3 times throughout the follow-up period was similar between groups (NAM 46.8% vs. non-NAM 34.8%, p = 0.34).

CONCLUSION

NAM is indistinguishable from non-NAM by clinical manifestations, serology, or laboratory findings, except that pathognomonic skin sign of Gottron's papules and anti-Mi2 are suggestive of dermatomyositis. The integration of clinical, serological, and pathological data is essential for making a diagnosis of NAM.Key Points• NAM is indistinguishable from non-NAM by clinical manifestations, serology, or laboratory findings.• The integration of clinical, serological, and pathological data is essential for making a diagnosis of NAM.

Identification of distinctive interferon gene signatures in different types of myositis

OBJECTIVE

Activation of the type 1 interferon (IFN1) pathway is a prominent feature of dermatomyositis (DM) muscle and may play a role in the pathogenesis of this disease. However, the relevance of the IFN1 pathway in patients with other types of myositis such as the antisynthetase syndrome (AS), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), and inclusion body myositis (IBM) is largely unknown. Moreover, the activation of the type 2 interferon (IFN2) pathway has not been comprehensively explored in myositis. In this cross-sectional study, our objective was to determine whether IFN1 and IFN2 pathways are differentially activated in different types of myositis by performing RNA sequencing on muscle biopsy samples from 119 patients with DM, IMNM, AS, or IBM and on 20 normal muscle biopsies.

METHODS

The expression of IFN1- and IFN2-inducible genes was compared between the different groups.

RESULTS

The expression of IFN1-inducible genes was high in DM, moderate in AS, and low in IMNM and IBM. In contrast, the expression of IFN2-inducible genes was high in DM, IBM, and AS but low in IMNM. The expression of IFN-inducible genes correlated with the expression of genes associated with inflammation and muscle regeneration. Of note, ISG15 expression levels alone performed as well as composite scores relying on multiple genes to monitor activation of the IFN1 pathway in myositis muscle biopsies.

CONCLUSIONS

IFN1 and IFN2 pathways are differentially activated in different forms of myositis. This observation may have therapeutic implications because immunosuppressive medications may preferentially target each of these pathways.

Classification and management of adult inflammatory myopathies

Inflammatory myopathies, collectively known as myositis, are heterogeneous disorders characterised by muscle inflammation, and frequently accompanied by extramuscular manifestations that affect the skin, lung, and joints. Patients with inflammatory myopathies were previously classified as having dermatomyositis if characteristic rashes accompanied the muscle involvement, and as having polymyositis if no rashes were present. Five main types of inflammatory myopathies are now widely recognised: dermatomyositis, immune-mediated necrotising myopathy, sporadic inclusion-body myositis, overlap myositis (including antisynthetase syndrome), and polymyositis. The discovery of autoantibodies that are specifically associated with characteristic clinical phenotypes has been instrumental to the understanding of inflammatory myopathies. Treatment is still largely based on expert opinion, but several studies have shown effectiveness of different therapies in various subsets of inflammatory myopathies. These advances will undoubtedly improve the outcomes of patients with inflammatory myopathies.

Immune-mediated necrotising myopathy: A critical review of current concepts

Immune-mediated necrotising myopathy (IMNM) is a relatively recently described form of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) that is characterised by progressive proximal weakness and few extra-muscular manifestations. Prominent myonecrosis, muscle fibre regeneration and a relative paucity of intramuscular lymphocytes are seen histologically. Immunological mechanisms are believed to underpin the pathogenesis, and intense immunotherapy is frequently required. Disease is often severe and neuromuscular recovery may be poor. Recently there has been an impressive international research effort to understand and characterise this emerging condition, although much remains unknown. Significant advances in the field include the discovery of specific autoantibodies, increased understanding of the risk factors, clinical characteristics and treatment options owing to a wealth of observational studies, and the development of novel classification criteria. Herein we review the current evidence regarding the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, histological features and serological profiles associated with this condition. Diagnostic approaches are discussed, including the role of muscle MRI and antibodies targeting 3‑hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) and signal-recognition peptide (SRP), and a review of current treatment recommendations is provided.

Histological heterogeneity in a large clinical cohort of juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathy: analysis by myositis autoantibody and pathological features

Aim

Juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies have been recently reclassified into clinico‐serological subgroups. Myopathological correlates of the subgroups are incompletely understood.

Methods

We studied muscle biopsies from 101 children with clinically and serologically defined juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies from the UK JDM Cohort and Biomarker Study by applying the international JDM score tool, myopathological review and C5b‐9 complement analysis.

Results

Autoantibody data were available for 90/101 cases with 18/90 cases positive for anti‐TIF1γ, 15/90 anti‐NXP2, 11/90 anti‐MDA5, 5/90 anti‐Mi2 and 6/90 anti‐PmScl. JDM biopsy severity scores were consistently low in the anti‐MDA5 group, high in the anti‐Mi2 group, and widely distributed in the other groups. Biopsies were classified histologically as perifascicular atrophy (22/101), macrophage‐rich necrosis (6/101), scattered necrosis (2/101), clustered necrosis (2/101), inflammatory fibre invasion (2/101), chronic myopathic change (1/101), diffuse endomysial macrophage infiltrates (40/101) and minimal change (24/101). MDA5 cases segregated with the minimal change group and showed no capillary C5b‐9‐deposition. The Mi2 group displayed high severity scores and a tendency towards sarcolemmal complement deposition. NXP2 and TIF1γ groups showed a variety of pathologies with a high proportion of diffuse endomysial macrophage infiltrates and a high proportion of capillary C5b‐9 deposition.

Conclusion

We have shown that juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies have a spectrum of histopathological phenotypes and show distinct complement attack complex deposition patterns. Both correlate in some cases with the serological subtypes. Most cases do not show typical histological features associated with dermatomyositis (e.g. perifascicular atrophy). In contrast, more than half show relatively mild histopathological changes.

Autoimmune Myopathies: Updates on Evaluation and Treatment

The major forms of autoimmune myopathies include dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), myositis associated with antisynthetase syndrome (ASS), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), and inclusion body myositis (IBM). While each of these conditions has unique clinical and histopathological features, they all share an immune-mediated component. These conditions can occur in isolation or can be associated with systemic malignancies or connective tissue disorders (overlap syndromes). As more has been learned about these conditions, it has become clear that traditional classification schemes do not adequately group patients according to shared clinical features and prognosis. Newer classifications are now utilizing myositis-specific autoantibodies which correlate with clinical and histopathological phenotypes and risk of malignancy, and help in offering prognostic information with regard to treatment response. Based on observational data and expert opinion, corticosteroids are considered first-line therapy for DM, PM, ASS, and IMNM, although intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is increasingly being used as initial therapy in IMNM related to statin use. Second-line agents are often required, but further prospective investigation is required regarding the optimal choice and timing of these agents.

Dermatomyositis etiopathogenesis: a rebel soldier in the muscle

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this article is to review the etiopathogenesis of dermatomyositis, including the predisposing factors, triggers, inflammatory cells, pathways and target antigens associated with dermatomyositis.

RECENT FINDINGS

During the last few years, we have made considerable progress in unveiling the etiopathogenesis of dermatomyositis. In the first place, we have defined genes within the major histocompatibility complex locus as the greatest genetic risk factor for the disease. Second, we have demonstrated that certain environmental factors, as well as tumors, may trigger certain dermatomyositis subtypes. Moreover, we have established the importance of the interferon pathway in dermatomyositis pathogenesis compared with other myositis subtypes. But probably, the most remarkable advance has been the discovery of multiple autoantibodies that define groups of patients with characteristic clinical features, prognosis and response to treatment.

SUMMARY

Dermatomyositis cause and pathogenesis have proven to be a complex and fascinating task for the scientific community and the last decade has been full of new findings on how the disease starts and how it causes damage to different organ systems. However, we have still more questions than answers in this topic, answers that will be critical to understanding autoimmunity and finding effective therapies to dermatomyositis.

Expression of myxovirus-resistance protein A: a possible marker of muscle disease activity and autoantibody specificities in juvenile dermatomyositis

Aims

To evaluate the relationship between expression of myxovirus‐resistance protein A (MxA) protein on muscle biopsies by immunohistochemistry and disease activity in juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) patients. Also, another aim was to investigate whether the expression of MxA is related with myositis‐specific autoantibodies (MSA) status in JDM patients.

Methods

103 patients (median aged 6.3, interquartile range 0.5–15.9) enrolled in the Juvenile Dermatomyositis Cohort and Biomarker Study (JDCBS). Muscle biopsies were stained with MxA and scored. Clinical data at initial presentation were collected and autoantibodies were analysed. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to estimate the association between MxA expression on muscle fibres and muscle disease activity, and MSA status.

Results

Expression of MxA protein on JDM samples was identified in 61.2%. There was a significant association between MxA scores and Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale (CMAS) (P = 0.002), and Manual Muscle Testing of Eight Muscles (MMT8) (P = 0.026). CMAS and MMT8 scores were significantly lower in the group of patients with strong MxA expression. MxA scores differed according to MSA subgroups (P = 0.002). Patients with positive nuclear matrix protein 2 autoantibodies had strong MxA expression, whereas anti‐melanoma differentiation‐associated gene 5 positive patients had no or weak MxA expression.

Conclusions

This study reveals the significant association between level of MxA expression on muscle fibres and clinical measures of muscular disease activity in JDM patients and MSA status. This confirms type I interferonopathies in muscle fibres of JDM patients which could help with improving treatment outcome in JDM patients and underscoring the distinct pathophysiological pathways in different MSA status.

Current Classification and Management of Inflammatory Myopathies

Inflammatory disorders of the skeletal muscle include polymyositis (PM), dermatomyositis (DM), (immune mediated) necrotizing myopathy (NM), overlap syndrome with myositis (overlap myositis, OM) including anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS), and inclusion body myositis (IBM). Whereas DM occurs in children and adults, all other forms of myositis mostly develop in middle aged individuals. Apart from a slowly progressive, chronic disease course in IBM, patients with myositis typically present with a subacute onset of weakness of arms and legs, often associated with pain and clearly elevated creatine kinase in the serum. PM, DM and most patients with NM and OM usually respond to immunosuppressive therapy, whereas IBM is largely refractory to treatment. The diagnosis of myositis requires careful and combinatorial assessment of (1) clinical symptoms including pattern of weakness and paraclinical tests such as MRI of the muscle and electromyography (EMG), (2) broad analysis of auto-antibodies associated with myositis, and (3) detailed histopathological work-up of a skeletal muscle biopsy. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current classification, diagnostic pathway, treatment regimen and pathomechanistic understanding of myositis.

Muscular and extramuscular clinical features of patients with anti-PM/Scl autoantibodies

OBJECTIVE

To define the clinical features of myositis patients with anti-PM/Scl-75 and/or anti-PM/Scl-100 autoantibodies at disease onset and during the course of disease and compare them to patients with other forms of myositis.

METHODS

In this longitudinal cohort study, the prevalence and severity of clinical features at disease onset and during follow-up were compared between anti-PM/Scl-positive patients and those with the antisynthetase syndrome (AS), dermatomyositis (DM), and immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM).

RESULTS

Forty-one anti-PM/Scl-positive, 132 AS, 178 DM, and 135 IMNM patients were included. Although muscle weakness was a presenting feature in just 37% of anti-PM/Scl-positive patients, 93% eventually developed weakness. Unlike the other groups, anti-PM-Scl-positive patients had more severe weakness in arm abductors than hip flexors. Interstitial lung disease was a presenting feature in just 10% of anti-PM/Scl-positive patients, but occurred in 61% during follow-up; fewer patients with DM (13%, p < 0.001) and IMNM (6%, p < 0.001) and more patients with AS (80%, p < 0.05) developed interstitial lung disease during the course of disease. Mechanic's hands (80%), Raynaud syndrome (78%), sclerodactyly (66%), telangiectasias (66%), esophageal reflux disease (61%), subcutaneous edema (46%), puffy hands (39%), and calcinosis (39%) occurred more frequently in anti-PM/Scl-positive patients than in the other groups. Although 30% of anti-PM/Scl-positive patients met criteria for systemic sclerosis, less than 5% had renal crisis or finger ulcerations. No differences were found between patients with only anti-PM/Scl-100 or only anti-PM/Scl-75 autoantibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike patients with DM, AS, or IMNM, anti-PM/Scl-positive patients have weaker arm abductors than hip flexors. Anti-PM/Scl-positive patients also have the most extensive extramuscular features.

Sporadic inclusion body myositis - a myodegenerative disease or an inflammatory myopathy

Sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) is an insidious late-onset progressive myopathy that typically affects patients over the age of 50. Clinically, patients develop a characteristic pattern of weakness that affects the forearm flexors and knee extensors. Muscle biopsy, often utilized in the diagnosis, demonstrates a chronic myopathy with mixed pathologies harbouring intramyofiber protein inclusions and endomysial inflammation. The co-existence of these pathologic features (that is, inflammation and protein aggregation) has divided the field of sIBM research into two opposing (albeit slowly unifying) camps regarding disease pathogenesis. The present review explores the recent evidence supporting these distinct pathogenic mechanisms. Future therapies that are designed to target both aspects of sIBM pathologies will likely be necessary to treat sIBM.

Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myopathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) is a type of autoimmune myopathy characterized by relatively severe proximal weakness, myofiber necrosis with minimal inflammatory cell infiltrate on muscle biopsy, and infrequent extra-muscular involvement. Here, we will review the characteristics of patients with IMNM.

RECENT FINDINGS

Anti-signal recognition particle (SRP) and anti-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) autoantibodies are closely associated with IMNM and define unique subtypes of patients. Importantly, the new European Neuromuscular Centre criteria recognize anti-SRP myopathy, anti-HMGCR myopathy, and autoantibody-negative IMNM as three distinct subtypes of IMNM. Anti-SRP myopathy patients have more severe muscle involvement, have more common extra-muscular features, and may respond best to immunosuppressive regimens that include rituximab. In contrast, anti-HMGCR myopathy is often associated with statin exposure and intravenous immunoglobulin treatment may be an effective treatment, even as monotherapy. Both anti-SRP and anti-HMGCR myopathy tend to be most severe in younger patients. Furthermore, children with these forms of IMNM may present with dystrophy-like features which are potentially reversible with immunosuppressant treatment. IMNM patients with either autoantibody may experience fatty replacement of muscle soon after disease onset, suggesting that intense and early immunosuppressant therapy may provide the best chance to avoid long-term disability. IMNM is composed of anti-SRP myopathy, anti-HMGCR myopathy, and autoantibody-negative IMNM. Both anti-SRP and anti-HMGCR myopathy can cause severe weakness, especially in younger patients. Anti-SRP myopathy patients tend to have the most severe weakness and most prevalent extra-muscular features. Autoantibody-negative IMNM remains poorly described.

Anti-MDA5 antibody as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in patients with dermatomyositis

The presence of anti-MDA5 antibodies in serum represents an important biomarker in the diagnosis and prediction of prognosis for patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). Due to conflicting results that have been reported regarding the detection of anti-MDA5 antibodies, the goal of this study was to assess a potential association between the presence of anti-MDA5 antibodies and dermatomyositis/polymyositis (DM/PM), as well as the diagnostic and prognostic values of anti-MDA5 antibodies for DM/PM. For this, a review of literature published prior to October 15, 2016 was conducted. Eight studies with 286 PM patients and 216 healthy controls and nine studies with 628 DM patients and 221 healthy controls were selected according to specific inclusion criteria. The outcomes of these studies revealed that the presence of anti-MDA5 antibodies was associated with DM, especially CADM, and not with PM. Furthermore, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.62 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52–0.70), 1.00 (95% CI: 0.97–1.00), and 0.9381 for CADM patients versus healthy controls when an immunoprecipitation method was used. The presence of anti-MDA5 antibodies was also found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of death in DM (relative risk = 3.32, 95% CI: 1.65–6.67, P = 0.001). These findings suggest that anti-MDA5 antibodies correlate with DM and could be used as a biomarker in the clinical diagnosis of CADM. The presence of anti-MDA5 antibodies was also associated with poor prognosis regarding the overall survival of patients with DM.

Autoimmune Myopathies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article provides guidelines for diagnosing and treating the different subtypes of autoimmune myopathies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most common subtypes of autoimmune myopathies are dermatomyositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, antisynthetase syndrome, and overlap syndromes; isolated polymyositis is an exceptionally rare disease. Specific autoantibodies are associated with unique clinical phenotypes and may be used for diagnostic and prognostic purposes, such as to assess the risk of coexisting malignancy.

SUMMARY

Diagnosing the specific subtype of autoimmune myopathy can be achieved by combining relevant features of the history, neuromuscular examination, muscle biopsy, and serologic studies.

Antinuclear Matrix Protein 2 Autoantibodies and Edema, Muscle Disease, and Malignancy Risk in Dermatomyositis Patients

OBJECTIVE

Dermatomyositis (DM) patients typically present with proximal weakness and autoantibodies that are associated with distinct clinical phenotypes. We observed that DM patients with autoantibodies recognizing the nuclear matrix protein NXP-2 often presented with especially severe weakness. The aim of this study was to characterize the clinical features associated with anti-NXP-2 autoantibodies.

METHODS

There were 235 DM patients who underwent testing for anti-NXP-2 autoantibodies. Patient characteristics, including muscle strength, were compared between those with and without these autoantibodies. The number of cancer cases observed in anti-NXP-2-positive subjects was compared with the number expected in the general population.

RESULTS

Of the DM patients, 56 (23.8%) were anti-NXP-2-positive. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of proximal extremity weakness in patients with and without anti-NXP-2. In contrast, anti-NXP-2-positive patients had more prevalent weakness in the distal arms (35% versus 20%; P = 0.02), distal legs (25% versus 8%; P < 0.001), and neck (48% versus 23%; P < 0.001). Anti-NXP-2-positive subjects were also more likely to have dysphagia (62% versus 35%; P < 0.001), myalgia (46% versus 25%; P = 0.002), calcinosis (30% versus 17%; P = 0.02), and subcutaneous edema (36% versus 19%; P = 0.01) than anti-NXP-2-negative patients. Five anti-NXP-2-positive subjects (9%) had cancer-associated myositis, representing a 3.68-fold increased risk (95% confidence interval 1.2-8.6) compared to the expected prevalence in the general population.

CONCLUSION

In DM, anti-NXP-2 autoantibodies are associated with subcutaneous edema, calcinosis, and a muscle phenotype characterized by myalgia, proximal and distal weakness, and dysphagia. As anti-NXP-2-positive patients have an increased risk of cancer, we suggest that they undergo comprehensive cancer screening.

Cutaneous and Systemic Findings Associated With Nuclear Matrix Protein 2 Antibodies in Adult Dermatomyositis Patients

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the cutaneous and systemic clinical phenotype of dermatomyositis patients with antinuclear matrix protein 2 (anti-NXP-2) antibodies.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 178 dermatomyositis patients seen at the Stanford University Clinic. An electronic chart review employing a keyword search strategy was performed to collect clinical and laboratory data. Anti-NXP-2 antibodies were assayed by immunoprecipitation using NXP-2 produced by in vitro transcription/translation.

RESULTS

Antibodies to NXP-2 were detected in 20 of the 178 patients (11%). Anti-NXP-2 antibodies were associated with male sex (50% versus 25%; P = 0.02), dysphagia (74% versus 39%; P = 0.006), myalgia (89% versus 52%; P = 0.002), peripheral edema (35% versus 11%; P = 0.016), and calcinosis (37% versus 11%; P = 0.007). These patients were less likely to be clinically amyopathic (5% versus 23%; P = 0.08). Five of the 20 patients with anti-NXP-2 antibodies (25%) had an associated internal malignancy. No other cutaneous characteristics were associated with anti-NXP-2 antibodies, except a decreased frequency of Gottron's sign (44% versus 75%; P = 0.012) and a greater likelihood of having mild skin disease.

CONCLUSION

Dermatomyositis patients with anti-NXP-2 antibodies have a distinct and often severe systemic phenotype that includes myalgia, peripheral edema, and significant dysphagia, despite having milder inflammatory skin disease.