Clinical and functional outcomes of tibial intercalary allografts after tumor resection

Intercalary Resection of the Tibia for Primary Bone Tumors: Are Vascularized Fibula Autografts With or Without Allografts a Durable Reconstruction?

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction with vascularized fibula grafts (VFG) after intercalary resection of sarcoma may offer longevity by providing early graft-host union and fracture healing. The ability of the fibula to hypertrophy under mechanical stress, as well as vascularized bone in the area, may also be advantageous, given that soft tissues may be compromised because of resection, chemotherapy, or radiation therapy. VFG with a massive allograft combines the primary mechanical stability of the graft with the biological potential of the vascularized fibula; however, complications and the durability of this combined reconstruction are not well described.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What was the proportion of complications after reconstruction with VFG, with or without allografts? (2) What was the functional result after surgical treatment as assessed by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score? (3) What was the survivorship of these grafts free from revision and graft removal?

METHODS

Between 1988 and 2021, 219 patients were treated at our institution for a primary malignant or aggressive benign bone tumor of the tibia with en bloc resection. Of those, 54% (119 of 219) had proximal tibial tumors with epiphyseal involvement and were treated with either intra-articular resection and reconstruction with an osteoarticular allograft, allograft-prosthesis composite (APC), or modular prosthesis according to age, diagnosis, and preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy. Nine percent (20) of patients had distal tibial tumors that were treated with intra-articular resection and reconstruction with ankle arthrodesis using allogenic or autologous grafts, and 0.5% (1 patient) underwent total tibial resection for extensive tumoral involvement of the tibia and reconstruction with an APC. Thirty-six percent (79) of patients had a metadiaphyseal bone tumor of the tibia and were treated with intercalary joint-sparing resection. We routinely use reconstruction with VFG after intercalary tibial resection for primary malignant or aggressive benign bone tumors in patients with long life expectancy and high functional demands and in whom at least 1 cm of residual bone stock of the proximal or distal epiphysis can be preserved. By contrast, we routinely use intercalary massive allograft reconstruction in short resections or in patients with metastatic disease who do not have long life expectancy. We avoid VFG in patients with tibial bone metastasis, patients older than 70 years, or primary bone tumors in patients who may undergo postoperative radiotherapy; in these patients, we use alternative reconstructive methods such as intercalary prostheses, plate and cement, or intramedullary nailing with cement augmentation. According to the above-mentioned indications, 6% (5 of 79) of patients underwent massive allograft reconstruction because they were young and had intercalary resections shorter than 7 cm or had metastatic disease at diagnosis without long life expectancy, whereas 94% (74) of patients underwent VFG reconstruction. The median age at operation was 16 years (range 5 to 68 years). The diagnosis was high-grade osteosarcoma in 22 patients, Ewing sarcoma in 19, adamantinoma in 16, low-grade osteosarcoma in five, fibrosarcoma in three, malignant fibrous histiocytoma and Grade 2 chondrosarcoma in two, and malignant myoepitelioma, angiosarcoma of bone, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor of bone, squamous cell carcinoma secondary to chronic osteomyelitis, and desmoplastic fibroma in one patient each. Median follow-up was 12.3 years (range 2 to 35 years). The median tibial resection length was 15 cm (range 7 to 27 cm), and the median fibular resection length was 18 cm (range 10 to 29 cm). VFG was used with a massive allograft in 55 patients, alone in 12 patients, and combined with allogenic cortical bone struts in seven patients. We used VFG combined with a massive allograft in patients undergoing juxta-articular, joint-sparing resections that left less than 3 cm of residual epiphyseal bone, for intra-epiphyseal resections, or for long intercalary resections wherein the allograft can provide better mechanical stability. In these clinical situations, the combination of a VFG and massive allograft allows more stable fixation and better tendinous reattachment of the patellar tendon. VFG was used with cortical bone struts in distal tibia intercalary resections where the narrow diameter of the allograft did not allow concentric assembling with the fibula. Finally, VFG alone was often used after mid- or distal tibia intercalary resection in patients with critical soft tissue conditions because of previous surgery, in whom the combination with massive allograft would result in a bulkier reconstruction. We ascertained complications and MSTS scores by chart review, and survivorship free from revision and graft removal was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. In our study, however, the occurrence of death as a competing event was observed in a relatively low proportion of patients, and only occurred after the primary event of interest had already occurred. Considering the nature of our data, we did not consider death after the primary event of interest as a competing event.

RESULTS

In all, 49% (36 of 74) of patients experienced complications and underwent operative treatment. There were 45 complications in 36 patients. There was one instance of footdrop secondary to common peroneal nerve palsy, four wound problems, one acute vein thrombosis of the VFG pedicle and one necrosis of the skin island, two episodes of implant-related pain, 10 nonunions, six fractures, six deep infections, nine local recurrences, one Achilles tendon retraction, one varus deformity of the proximal tibia with postoperative tibial apophysis detachment, one knee osteoarthritis, and one hypometria. The median MSTS score was 30 (range 23 to 30); the MSTS score was assessed only in patients in whom the VFG was retained at the final clinical visit, although if we had considered those who had an amputation, the overall score would be lower. Revision-free survival of the reconstructions was 58% (95% confidence interval 47% to 70%) at 5 years, 52% (95% CI 41% to 65%) at 10 and 15 years, and 49% (95% CI 38% to 63%) at 20 and 30 years. Eight patients underwent VFG removal because of complications, with an overall reconstruction survival of 91% (95% CI 84% to 98%) at 5 years and 89% (95% CI 82% to 97%) at 10 to 30 years.

CONCLUSION

VFG, alone or combined with an allograft, could be considered in reconstructing a lower extremity after intercalary resections of the tibia for primary bone tumors, and it avoids the use of a large endoprosthesis. However, this procedure was associated with frequent, often severe complications during the first postoperative years and complication-free survival of 58% at 5 years. Nearly 10% of patients ultimately had an amputation. For patients whose reconstruction succeeded, the technique provides a durable reconstruction with good MSTS scores, and we believe it is useful for active patients with long life expectancy. Fractures, frequently observed in the first 5 years postoperatively, might be reduced using long-spanning plate fixation, and that appeared to be the case in our study. Nonbridging fixation can be an option in intraepiphyseal resection when a spanning plate cannot be used or in pediatric patients to enhance fibula hypertrophy and remodeling. We did not directly compare VFG with or without allografts to other reconstruction options, so the decision to use this approach should be made thoughtfully and only after considering the potential serious risks.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Limb salvage surgery reconstructive techniques following long-bone lower limb oncological resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Limb salvage surgery (LSS) is now considered the gold standard surgical treatment for lower limb bone sarcomas. However, there is a paucity of literature comparing the various LSS reconstructive options. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare functional outcomes and complications of LSS reconstructive techniques.

METHODS

The primary aim of the meta-analysis was to determine functional outcomes from the pooled data utilizing the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score (MSTS). Comparisons could then made for this outcome between biological and prosthetic, vascularised and non-vascularised, and prosthetic and composite reconstructions. The secondary aim was to compare complication outcomes of each reconstruction. Standardized mean difference (Cohen's d) and odds ratios were estimated using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with a total of 785 patients were included. We found structural failure was 75% less likely to occur in prosthetic reconstruction compared to biological (OR = 0.24; 95% CI: 0.07-0.79; P = 0.02). We did not find any evidence of difference in function (MSTS score) between vascularised verses non-vascularised reconstructions (Cohen's d = -1.14; 95% CI = -3.06 to 0.78; I2  = 87%). Other analyses comparing complications found no difference between the reconstructive groups.

CONCLUSION

The study found no correlation between functional outcomes and the type of LSS reconstruction. Structural failure was more likely to occur in biological when compared with prosthetic reconstruction. There was no correlation between the incidence of other complications and the type of LSS technique. This suggests a role for improved approaches to reconstruction methods including bioprinting and bioresorbable devices.

Union, complication, reintervention and failure rates of surgical techniques for large diaphyseal defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To understand the potential and limitations of the different available surgical techniques used to treat large, long-bone diaphyseal defects by focusing on union, complication, re-intervention, and failure rates, summarizing the pros and cons of each technique. A literature search was performed on PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to March 16th, 2022; Inclusion criteria were clinical studies written in English, of any level of evidence, with more than five patients, describing the treatment of diaphyseal bone defects. The primary outcome was the analysis of results in terms of primary union, complication, reintervention, and failure rate of the four major groups of techniques: bone allograft and autograft, bone transport, vascularized and non-vascularized fibular graft, and endoprosthesis. The statistical analysis was carried out according to Neyeloff et al., and the Mantel–Haenszel method was used to provide pooled rates across the studies. The influence of the various techniques on union rates, complication rates, and reintervention rates was assessed by a z test on the pooled rates with their corresponding 95% CIs. Assessment of risk of bias and quality of evidence was based on Downs and Black’s “Checklist for Measuring Quality” and Rob 2.0 tool. Certainty of yielded evidence was evaluated with the GRADE system. Seventy-four articles were included on 1781 patients treated for the reconstruction of diaphyseal bone defects, 1496 cases in the inferior limb, and 285 in the upper limb, with trauma being the main cause of bone defect. The meta-analysis identified different outcomes in terms of results and risks. Primary union, complications, and reinterventions were 75%, 26% and 23% for bone allografts and autografts, 91%, 62% and 19% for the bone transport group, and 78%, 38% and 23% for fibular grafts; mean time to union was between 7.8 and 8.9 months in all these groups. Results varied according to the different aetiologies, endoprosthesis was the best solution for tumour, although with a 22% failure rate, while trauma presented a more composite outcome, with fibular grafts providing a faster time to union (6.9 months), while cancellous and cortical-cancellous grafts caused less complications, reinterventions, and failures. The literature about this topic has overall limited quality. However, important conclusions can be made: Many options are available to treat critical-size defects of the diaphysis, but no one appears to be an optimal solution in terms of a safe, satisfactory, and long-lasting outcome. Regardless of the bone defect cause, bone transport techniques showed a better primary union rate, but bone allograft and autograft had fewer complication, reintervention, and failure rates than the other techniques. The specific lesion aetiology represents a critical aspect influencing potential and limitations and therefore the choice of the most suitable technique to address the challenging large diaphyseal defects.

3D-Printed Cutting Guides for Resection of Long Bone Sarcoma and Intercalary Allograft Reconstruction

The use of 3-dimensional (3D)-printed cutting guides for resection of long bone sarcoma is a novel technique. These 3D-printed guides provide a potential benefit over navigational or freehand osteotomy. We evaluated whether the use of 3D-printed cutting guides in the resection of long bone sarcoma affects margin status and rates of union compared with historical controls. In this study, we performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained surgical database and reviewed 6 patients who underwent limb salvage for long bone sarcoma. We collected and analyzed clinicopathologic and surgical data. Six (100%) cases recorded negative margins, with mean postoperative follow-up of 108 weeks (range, 8-211 weeks). Time (mean±SD) to bony union was 20.5±10.5 weeks. Nine of 12 (75%) cumulative (proximal and distal) osteotomy sites went on to achieve union, with a nonunion rate of 25% per osteotomy. One (33%) nonunion occurred after adjuvant radiation therapy. Long-term complications were limited to 2 (33.3%) patients overall who had implant failure according to the Henderson classification system, and there were zero local recurrences at the conclusion of the study. Our institution has successfully performed limb salvage surgery with patient-specific 3D-printed technology. We show high rates of negative margin resection and junctional union that align with and improve on earlier findings. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(1):e35-e41.].

How the Choice of Osteosynthesis Affects the Complication Rate of Intercalary Allograft Reconstruction? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is no clear consensus on the optimal type of fixation in intercalary allograft reconstruction. In this study, we aimed to compare the rate of most common complications following the plate and nail fixation of the intercalary allograft.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Studies in which the complication rate of the single bridging plate and intramedullary nail fixation was extractable were included. Studies that used extra procedures such as cementation and fibular vascular graft augmentation were excluded. The primary outcome was the fixation-specific rate of nonunion. Secondary outcomes were the fixation-specific rate of fracture, infection, and local recurrence.

RESULTS

In total, 13 studies with 431 reconstructions (352 reconstructions in the plate group and 79 reconstructions in the intramedullary nailing group) were included in this study. In the plate fixation, the rate of nonunion, fracture, infection and local recurrence was 12%, 11%, 11%, and 3%, respectively. In the intramedullary nail fixation, the rate of nonunion, fracture, infection, and local recurrence was 37%, 5%, 4%, and 0%, respectively. The rate of nonunion was significantly higher in the intramedullary nail group (OR = 6.34; 95% CI 2.98-13.49, P < 0.001). The rate of fracture, infection, and local recurrence was not significantly different between the two fixation methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Intramedullary nail is associated with a significantly higher rate of nonunion. Since the rate of other complications was not significantly different between the two osteosynthesis types, plate fixation could be considered as a better type of fixation.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-021-00563-7.

Intercalary bone graft of the tibia: case series and review of the literature

AIMS

We report a series of patients treated with intercalary bone graft (IBG) of the tibia diaphysis (TD) after resection of primary bone tumors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mid- and long-term survival of TD IBG reconstruction in children and adults, characterizing patterns of success and failure.

METHODS

A total of 35 patients were included in this retrospective study. Median age was 22 years (range, 8-57). This series included 19 patients (54.3%) treated with homologous bone graft alone and 16 patients (45.7%) treated combining intercalary allograft with fibular autograft. Complications were recorded according to Henderson classification.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 36 months (range, 1-165). Local recurrence occurred in 2 patients (5.7%) after 12 and 60 months, respectively. Major complications included graft fracture (9 cases), non-union (5 cases) and infection (4 cases). Other complications were axial deformity (2 cases), superficial infection (2 cases), compartmental syndrome (1 case).

CONCLUSION

Intercalary bone grafts of TD have been recommended as a reliable solution with long-term success rates and good functional outcome in more than 80% of patients. However, approximately half of the patients may require further surgeries to treat major complications (deep infection, delayed or non-union and graft fracture). Additional vascularized fibula graft may ameliorate final result.

Do Massive Allograft Reconstructions for Tumors of the Femur and Tibia Survive 10 or More Years after Implantation?

BACKGROUND

Massive bone allografts have been used for limb salvage in patients undergoing bone tumor resections as an alternative to endoprostheses. Although several studies on massive allograft reconstructions for bone tumors reported that most complications occur in the first 3 years after surgery, there are no long-term reports on complications to substantiate this contention. We believe such information is important so that surgeons and patients can make more informed decisions when choosing a reconstructive method after tumor resection.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the survival of allografts free from removal, amputation, or joint replacement in patients treated for bone tumors in the lower limb with a minimum of 10 years of followup? (2) What complications occur after 10 or more years of followup? (3) Are there factors associated with allograft survival, such as age, sex, the affected bone, reconstruction type (intercalary or osteoarticular allograft), tumor type (malignant or benign), failure type, and chemotherapy use?

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the records of 398 patients treated in one center with benign or malignant bone tumors in the femur or tibia between 1986 and 2007. During the period in question, our general indications for using allografts (354 patients) included patients with benign or low-grade sarcomas and patients with high-grade sarcomas with clinical and imaging response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Other approaches such as endoprostheses (44 patients) were indicated if the patient received radiotherapy, in patients with high-grade sarcomas without clinical and imaging response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or with neurovascular tumor involvement. We excluded from the analysis 53 patients treated with allograft-prosthetic composites, 46 with hemicondylar osteoarticular allografts, and 57 with intercalary hemicylindrical allografts. The study was thus performed in 198 patients treated with segmental massive allografts in the long bones of the lower extremity (132 femurs and 66 tibias) after resection of a primary bone tumor, including 120 patients treated with osteoarticular and 78 with segmental intercalary allografts. A total of 32 (16%) of the 198 patients died before 10 years, and graft status was known in all of those patients; these patients were included (mean followup, 192 months; range, 1-370 months). All remaining 166 patients who were not known to have died before 10 years were accounted for at least 10 years after the allograft procedure (mean, 222 months; range, 120-370 months). No patient was lost to followup. The mean age was 22 years (range, 2-55 years); 105 patients were male (53%) and 93 were female. The predominant diagnoses were osteosarcoma (n = 125, 63%), giant cell tumor of bone (n = 27, 14%), and Ewing's sarcoma (n = 19, 10%). In all, 146 patients (74%) underwent chemotherapy. Selected variables were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify risk factors of allograft removal, joint replacement, or amputation. We performed competitive risk analysis with allograft removal, joint replacement, or amputation as the endpoint at 5, 10, and 20 years. Patient function was evaluated using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS)-93 scoring system.

RESULTS

The risk of allograft removal, joint replacement, or amputation was 36% at 5 years (95% CI, 30-43), 40% at 10 years (95% CI, 33-47), and 44% at 20 years (95% CI, 37-51). Fractures occurred in 15% (29 patients), infection in 14% (27 patients), nonunion in 12% (23 patients) and tumor recurrence in 7% (13 patients). Thirty-two patients died of disease before 10 years; nine of these patients had a second surgery before death, eight had an amputation, and one underwent graft removal. Of the 166 patients who were still alive 10 years after the allograft procedure, 36 underwent allograft removal, six patients underwent joint replacement, and four had an amputation; however, after 10 years, six more allografts were removed (four due to fractures, one due to infection, and one due to instability), and another patient was amputated due to a second malignancy. After controlling for potentially confounding variables including death, we found that the risk of allograft removal, joint replacement, or amputation in osteoarticular tibial grafts (58% [95% CI, 43-73] at 5, 10, and 20 years) was higher than that of osteoarticular femur allografts (29% [95% CI, 18-39] at 5 years, 30% [95% CI, 19-40] at 10 years, 37% [95% CI, 25-48] at 20 years; p = 0.010) and tibia intercalary allografts (26% [95% CI, 7-45] at 5, 10 and 20 years; p = 0.020). Fractures occurred more frequently in the femur (18% [95% CI, 11-25]) than in the tibia (5% [95% CI, 0-10]; p < 0.010), and infections occurred more frequently in the tibia (24% [95% CI, 14-35]) than in the femur (4% [95% CI, 0-8]; p < 0.001). With the number of patients we had, we found no difference in the proportion of local recurrence in the tibia (12% [95% CI, 4-20]) compared with the femur (5% [95% CI, 1-9]; p < 0.053).

CONCLUSIONS

Infections were the most common complications associated with allograft removal in the first 2 to 3 years after reconstruction and were more frequently associated with tibial allograft removal. Fractures were more commonly associated with graft removal with longer term followup and were more frequently associated with femoral allograft removal. Although we cannot directly compare our results with other types of reconstructions, we believe that allografts still have a role in the reconstruction of patients with a benign or low-grade bone tumor. Future studies in femoral allograft with longer followup should be performed to analyze factors that may explain why some grafts fail, such as the percent of the length of the bone resected, type and number of plates and screws used and type of fixation (rods versus plates). There was a higher incidence of graft removal in patients with proximal tibia osteoarticular allografts, which has led us to use this type of reconstruction only in pediatric patients over the last 15 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Preclinical induced membrane model to evaluate synthetic implants for healing critical bone defects without autograft

Critical bone defects pose a formidable orthopaedic problem in patients with bone loss. We developed a preclinical model based on the induced membrane technique using a synthetic graft to replace autograft for healing critical bone defects. Additionally, we used a novel osteoconductive scaffold coupled with a synthetic membrane to evaluate the potential for single-stage bone regeneration. Three experimental conditions were investigated in critical femoral defects in rats. Group A underwent a two-stage procedure with insertion of a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) spacer followed by replacement with a 3D printed polycaprolactone(PCL)/β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) osteoconductive scaffold after 4 weeks. Group B received a single-stage PCL/β-TCP scaffold wrapped in a PCL-based microporous polymer film creating a synthetic membrane. Group C received a single-stage bare PCL/β-TCP scaffold. All groups were examined by serial radiographs for callus formation. After 12 weeks, the femurs were explanted and analyzed with micro-CT and histology. Mean callus scores tended to be higher in Group A. Group A showed statistically significant greater bone formation on micro-CT compared with other groups, although bone volume fraction was similar between groups. Histology results suggested extensive bone ingrowth and new bone formation within the macroporous scaffolds in all groups and cell infiltration into the microporous synthetic membrane. This study supports the use of a critical size femoral defect in rats as a suitable model for investigating modifications to the induced membrane technique without autograft harvest. Future investigations should focus on bioactive synthetic membranes coupled with growth factors for single-stage bone healing. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res.

Complications following allograft reconstruction for primary bone tumors: Considerations for management

Introduction

The aim of this study was to investigate complication rates and types following allograft reconstruction and discuss unique considerations for management.

Methods

Seventy-four consecutive patients underwent large segment allograft reconstruction following resection of primary musculoskeletal tumors from 1991 to 2016. Mean patient age was 32 ± 20 years (range, 5-71 years). Minimum follow-up was 2 years unless patients were lost to disease prior. Mean follow-up was 105 months.

Results

Thirty-five patients had complications requiring subsequent surgery at a mean of 30 months (range, 1-146 months) post-operatively. Individual complication rates were 29%, 50%, and 42% for Allograft Prosthetic Composite, Intercalary, and Osteoarticular allograft reconstruction, respectively. Risk factors for complication included age less than 30 (OR 4.5; p = 0.002), male gender (OR 2.8; p = 0.031), chemotherapy (OR 4.4; p = 0.003), lower extremity disease (OR 3.4; p = 0.025). In patients with complications, limb-retention rate was 91% and mean MSTS scores were 23.6.

Conclusion

Despite considerable complication rates, management with a systematic approach results in successful outcomes with limb-retention greater than 90% and mean MSTS scores of 79%. In carefully selected patients, allografts provide a reliable method of reconstruction with treatable complications occurring at a mean of 30 months.

Solitary Metastatic Lesion of the Tibia from Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma: A Case Report of Segmental Skeletal Resection, Intercalary Allograft Over Reamed Nailing and Soleus Flap Interposition

BACKGROUND Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common malignancy of the kidney, with clear cell (ccRCC) subtype identified in 85% of the cases; one-third of these patients experience synchronous metastatic disease, while 20-30% of the remaining patients develop metachronous metastatic RCC. The axial skeleton (pelvis and sacrum) is the second most common location (following the lungs), with a reported incidence of 35%. Diaphysis of the long bones is rarely involved, with the tibia being an even rarer site of metastasis. CASE REPORT We present a rare case of solitary diaphyseal tibial metachronous metastasis from RCC in a 54-year-old male that appeared 8 years after nephrectomy without any previous evidence of disease. He underwent segmental skeletal resection, intercalary allograft over locked reamed intramedullary nailing, and soleus flap coverage. Thirty months later he presented with hardware failure and nonunion at the distal part of the allograft site. He was successfully treated with exchange nailing, fibular osteotomy, and bone grafting, showing excellent clinical and radiological outcome without any evidence of recurrence 5 years after the index operation. CONCLUSIONS Wide resection and biological reconstruction using intramedullary nailing and incorporated allograft is a good option for metachronous solitary RCC tumors.

[Progress in repair and reconstruction of large segmental bone tumor defect in distal tibia]

Objective

To review the methods of repair and reconstruction of the large segmental bone tumor defect in distal tibia.

Methods

The related literature of repair and reconstruction of the large segmental bone tumor defect in disatal tibia were reviewed and analyzed from the aspects of the reserved ankle joint and the non-reserved ankle joint.

Results

The large segmental bone tumor defect in distak tibia is not rare in clinical. In addition to conventional allograft bone transplantation, vascularized autologous fibular transplantation, vascularized fibular allograft, inactivated tumor regeneration, distraction osteogenesis, and bone transport techniques; membrane-induced osteogenesis, artificial tumor stem prosthesis, three-dimensional printed metal trabecular prosthesis, ankle arthrodesis, artificial tumor ankle joint placement surgery are now gradually applied to the repair and reconstruction of large segmental bone defects in the distal tibia. Moreover, due to its long survival time, the function of reconstruction of the bone tumor defect in the distal tibia has also received increasing attention.

Conclusion

Although the ideal methods of repair and reconstruction of the large segmental bone tumor defect in the distal tibia has not yet been developed, great progress has been achieved. Recently, with the appearance of three-dimensional printing and various preoperative simulation techniques, personalized and precise therapy could become ture, but therapies for the large segmental bone tumor defect in the distal tibia still need to be further explored.

Short-term outcomes of reconstruction subsequent to intercalary resection of femoral diaphyseal metastatic tumor with pathological fracture: Comparison between segmental allograft and intercalary prosthesis

Reconstruction of bone defects following femoral diaphyseal tumor resection is challenging. Segmental allograft (SA) and intercalary prosthesis (IP) are the most common reconstruction methods for femoral diaphyseal metastatic tumors with pathological fracture. However, whether the complications and functional outcomes differ between SA and IP remains unclear. To compare the clinical outcomes and complications for patients treated with SA reconstruction or IP replacement for femoral shaft tumors, 34 patients who had undergone intercalary resection for metastatic tumor with pathological fracture in the femoral diaphysis were evaluated. Of these, 18 had received SA and 16 IP. There were 11 males, and 24 females, with a mean age of 64.5±11.3 years. The most common sites of primary metastases were lung (26.5%), breast (17.6%) and liver (14.7%). The visual analog scale (VAS), implant-related complications and the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores for each patient were collected. The follow-up period for patients ranged from 2 to 27 months. At the most recent follow-up, 28 patients had succumbed to mortality, with a mean survival time of 6.9±3.7 months for the IP group and 7.4±3.0 months for the SA group. Patients with IP had a significantly shorter time to full weight bearing and hospitalization time than those who received SA (P=0.003 and P=0.002, respectively). The rates of overall complications and implant-related complications were significantly lower for IP as compared with SA (18.8 vs. 66.7%, P=0.007; 12.5 vs. 55.6%, P=0.013). The reoperation rate of the SA group was higher than that of the IP group (38.9 vs. 12.5%), however the difference between the two groups was statistically insignificant (P=0.125). MSTS scores were significantly higher for the IP group as compared with the SA group at one month after surgery (IP, 26.7±1.6 vs. SA, 20.3±1.5; P<0.05), without a significant difference at the final follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, length of resection, follow-up time, operative time or blood loss between the two groups. In summary, IP reconstruction may provide improved early functional outcomes and fewer early complications, particularly for patients with a shorter life expectancy due to femoral metastatic tumors with pathological fracture.

The role of the periosteal sleeve in the reconstruction of bone defects using a non-vascularised fibula graft in the pediatric population

BACKGROUND

Following resection of large benign bone tumors surgeons are confronted with bone defects severely affecting the stability of a limb. To restore the mechanical continuity of the bone different treatment methods using bone grafts have been described. In pediatric patients the thick periosteal sleeve is thought to contribute to bone formation.

HYPOTHESIS

An intact periosteal sleeve is crucial in bone remodelling around a non-vascularised fibular graft used to bridge large bone defects.

METHODS

We present a treatment technique applied in 6 cases comprising of subperiosteal tumor resection at the diaphyseal or metaphyseal level of long bones followed by defect bridging with a non-vascularised fibula graft inserted into the periosteal sleeve of the resection zone. Elastic intramedullary nails or plates were used for stabilisation.

RESULTS

Due to the intact periosteum at the resection site bone integration occurred quickly and full remodelling was seen in all but one case. Tumor location in this case was at the metaphyseal level resulting in tumor resection at the growth plate. Although bone healing at the distal resection site was seen after a few weeks proximal consolidation was only partial. Full reconstitution of the fibula in the remaining periosteal sleeve was seen in 5 cases, partial reconstitution in 1 case.

DISCUSSION

In the pediatric patient, the described technique is an effective and reliable treatment method for large benign bone tumors requiring resection. However, great diameter discrepancy of the donor and recipient site and a thin periosteum can be a limiting factor for its application.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV clinical study.

Treatment of critical-sized bone defects: clinical and tissue engineering perspectives

Critical-sized bone defects are defined as those that will not heal spontaneously within a patient's lifetime. Current treatment options include vascularized bone grafts, distraction osteogenesis, and the induced membrane technique. The induced membrane technique is an increasingly utilized method with favorable results including high rates of union. Tissue engineering holds promise in the treatment of large bone defects due to advancement of stem cell biology, novel biomaterials, and 3D bioprinting. In this review, we provide an overview of the current operative treatment strategies of critical-sized bone defects as well as the current state of tissue engineering for such defects.

RECONSTRUCTION OF BONE DEFECTS AFTER TUMOR RESECTION BY AUTOAND ALLOGRAFTS (review of literature)

The problem of replacement of large bone defects resulting from segmental bone resections in patients with bone tumors is still actual in modern orthopedics. Segmental defects cause the main difficulty especially in cases of disturbance of normal biomechanics while the “gold standard” of reconstruction with bone autograft is not always possible. The reason is that the defect can be so extensive that would make it impossible to harvest necessary autobone stock. Therefore, allografts based on demineralized bone with optimal properties for osteoregeneration are used as an alternative for autograft. For certain composite materials it is possible to program the properties of future graft by changing its compound. Literature analysis revealed that the effectiveness of the allograft in combination with additional components is comparable to autograft effectiveness. Mesenchymal stem cells of both bone marrow and adipose tissue can be used as an additional component to improve osteoregeneration. It is noteworthy that the analyzed studies did not reveal the influence of stem cells on the tumor recurrence. Nevertheless, the authors support the need of further researches in this area to confirm gained results. Some authors still prefer traditional methods of bone traction despite obtaining own satisfactory results of defects reconstruction with allografts. Such opinion is based on proven effectiveness of the method, structural stability of construction during treatment period and ability to adjust the process of bone regeneration at any stage. The authors goal was to analyze publications over the recent 5 years with the results of experiments and clinical studies on the replacement of large bone defects after bone tumor resection with autoand allografts. Based on the literature analysis the authors propose a general algorithm for graft selection in replacement of large bone defects after segmental bone resections. 

Reconstruction of Large-scale Defects with a Novel Hybrid Scaffold Made from Poly(L-lactic acid)/Nanohydroxyapatite/Alendronate-loaded Chitosan Microsphere: in vitro and in vivo Studies

A chitosan-based microsphere delivery system has been fabricated for controlled release of alendronate (AL). The present study aimed to incorporate the chitosan/hydroxyapatite microspheres-loaded with AL (CH/nHA-AL) into poly(L-lactic acid)/nanohydroxyapatite (PLLA/nHA) matrix to prepare a novel microspheres-scaffold hybrid system (CM-ALs) for drug delivery and bone tissue engineering application. The characteristics of CM-ALs scaffolds containing 10% and 20% CH/nHA-AL were evaluated in vitro, including surface morphology and porosity, mechanical properties, drug release, degradation, and osteogenic differentiation. The in vivo bone repair for large segmental radius defects (1.5 cm) in a rabbit model was evaluated by radiography and histology. In vitro study showed more sustained drug release of CM-AL-containing scaffolds than these of CM/nHA-AL and PLLA/nHA/AL scaffolds, and the mechanical and degradation properties of CM-ALs (10%) scaffolds were comparable to that of PLLA/nHA control. The osteogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) was significantly enhanced as indicated by increased alkaline phosphates (ALP) activity and calcium deposition. In vivo study further showed better performance of CM-ALs (10%) scaffolds with complete repair of large-sized bone defects within 8 weeks. A microspheres-scaffold-based release system containing AL-encapsulated chitosan microspheres was successfully fabricated in this study. Our results suggested the promising application of CM-ALs (10%) scaffolds for drug delivery and bone tissue engineering.

Allograft Reconstruction for Sarcomas of the Tibia

Background:

Allograft reconstruction of oncologic resections involving the tibia can have unpredictable results. Prior studies have reported a high rate of complications and a long recovery period involving prolonged bracing, repeated procedures and extended periods of antibiotics.

Methods:

The case details of 30 tibial allografts (12 adults, 18 children; 20 intercalary, 7 hemicortical, 3 other) were reviewed retrospectively. Based on factors including function, pain, healing and infection, clinical outcomes were stratified into three categories: excellent, moderate, and poor.

Results:

The overall survival rate of the allografts was 66% at a mean follow-up of 42 mos (adults) and 63 mos (children). Healing for metaphyseal junctions was successful in 73% at a mean of 44 weeks and for diaphyseal junctions, 64% at 41 weeks. Intercalary allografts in adults (4 of 20) all became infected and none had excellent results. All hemicortical allografts were performed in adults and 6 of 7 had excellent results. Distal intercalary allografts in children (6 of 20) had either excellent or moderate results with no infections, but had 3 nonunions and 2 fractures. Proximal intercalary allografts in children (8 of 20) had 2 excellent results, but had 6 infections requiring a cement spacer. Five of the six spacers were ultimately revised to another allograft or an arthroplasty.

Conclusion:

For tibial allograft reconstruction, surgeons and patients should prepare for a prolonged treatment course that may include multiple complications and surgeries. Excellent or moderate results can be achieved eventually in most, but amputation may be necessary in 15-20% of cases.

Structural allograft reconstruction of the foot and ankle after tumor resections

BACKGROUND

Structural allografts have been used to correct deformities or to fill bone defects secondary to tumor excisions, trauma, osteochondral lesions, or intercalary arthrodesis. However, the quality of published evidence supporting the use of allograft transplantation in foot and ankle surgery has been reported as fair. The purpose of this study was to report the overall survival of structural allograft in the foot and ankle after tumor resection, and the survival according to the type of allograft and the complication rates in the medium to long term.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 1989 to June 2011, 44 structural allograft reconstructions of the foot and ankle were performed in 42 patients (28 men and 14 women) due to musculoskeletal tumor resections. Mean age at presentation was 27 years. Mean follow-up was 53 months. Demographic data, diagnosis, site of the neoplasm, operations performed, operative complications, outcomes after surgery, date of last follow-up evaluation, and local recurrences were reviewed for all patients. Regarding the type of 44 allograft reconstructions, 16 were hemicylindrical allografts (HA), 12 intercalary allografts (IA), 10 osteoarticular allografts (OA), and 6 were total calcaneal allograft (CA).

RESULTS

The overall allograft survival rate, as calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method, at 5 and 10 years was 79 % (95 % CI 64-93 %). When allocated by type of allograft reconstruction the specific allograft survival at 5 and 10 years was: 83 % for CA, 80 % for HA, 77 % for OA, and 75 % for IA. The complications rate for this series was 36 % including: articular failure, local recurrence, infection, fracture and nonunion.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that structural allograft reconstruction in the foot and ankle after tumor resection may be durable with a 79 % survival rate at 5 and 10 years. The two types of allografts that showed better survival rate were hemicylindrical allografts (80 %) and calcaneus allografts (83 %). The highest complication rates occurred after calcaneus allografts and osteoarticular allografts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Successful correction of tibial bone deformity through multiple surgical procedures, liquid nitrogen-pretreated bone tumor autograft, three-dimensional external fixation, and internal fixation in a patient with primary osteosarcoma: a case report

Background

In a previous report, we described a method of reconstruction using tumor-bearing autograft treated by liquid nitrogen for malignant bone tumor. Here we present the first case of bone deformity correction following a tumor-bearing frozen autograft via three-dimensional computerized reconstruction after multiple surgeries.

Case presentation

A 16-year-old female student presented with pain in the left lower leg and was diagnosed with a low-grade central tibial osteosarcoma. Surgical bone reconstruction was performed using a tumor-bearing frozen autograft. Bone union was achieved at 7 months after the first surgical procedure. However, local tumor recurrence and lung metastases occurred 2 years later, at which time a second surgical procedure was performed. Five years later, the patient developed a 19° varus deformity and underwent a third surgical procedure, during which an osteotomy was performed using the Taylor Spatial Frame three-dimensional external fixation technique. A fourth corrective surgical procedure was performed in which internal fixation was achieved with a locking plate. Two years later, and 10 years after the initial diagnosis of tibial osteosarcoma, the bone deformity was completely corrected, and the patient’s limb function was good.

Conclusion

We present the first report in which a bone deformity due to a primary osteosarcoma was corrected using a tumor-bearing frozen autograft, followed by multiple corrective surgical procedures that included osteotomy, three-dimensional external fixation, and internal fixation.

Should fractures in massive intercalary bone allografts of the lower limb be treated with ORIF or with a new allograft?

BACKGROUND

Massive bone allografts have been used for limb salvage of bone tumor resections as an alternative to endoprostheses, although they have different outcomes and risks. There is no general consensus about when to use these alternatives, but when it is possible to save the native joints after the resection of a long bone tumor, intercalary allografts offer some advantages despite complications, such as fracture. The management and outcomes of this complication deserve more study.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purposes of this study were to (1) analyze the fracture frequency in a group of patients treated with massive intercalary bone allografts of the femur and tibia; (2) compare the results of allografts treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with those treated with resection and repeat allograft reconstruction; and (3) determine the likelihood that treatment of a fracture resulted in a healed intercalary reconstruction.

METHODS

We reviewed patients treated with intercalary bone allografts between 1991 and 2011. During this period, patients were generally treated with intercalary allografts when after tumor resection at least 1 cm of residual epiphysis remained to allow fixation of the osteotomy junction. To obtain a homogeneous group of patients, we excluded allograft-prosthesis composites and osteoarticular and hemicylindrical intercalary allografts from this study. We analyzed the fracture rate of 135 patients reconstructed with segmental intercalary bone allografts of the lower extremities (98 femurs and 37 tibias). In patients whose grafts fractured were treated either by internal fixation or a second allograft, ORIF generally was attempted but after early failures in femur fractures, these fractures were treated with a second allograft. Using a chart review, we ascertained the frequency of osseous union, complications, and reoperations after the treatment of fractured intercalary allografts. Followup was at a mean of 101 months (range, 24-260 months); of the original 135 patients, no patient was lost to followup.

RESULTS

At latest followup, 19 patients (14%) had an allograft fracture (16 femurs [16%] and three tibias [8%]). Six patients were treated with internal fixation and addition of autologous graft (three femurs and three tibias) and 13 patients were treated with a second intercalary allograft (13 femurs). The three patients with femoral allograft fractures treated with internal fixation and autologous grafts failed and were treated with a second allograft, whereas those patients with tibia allograft fractures treated by the same procedure healed without secondary complications. When we analyzed the 16 patients with a second intercalary allograft (13 as primary treatment of the fracture and three as secondary treatment of the fracture), five failed (31%) and were treated with resection of the allograft and reconstructed with an endoprosthesis (four patients) or an osteoarticular allograft (one patient).

CONCLUSIONS

Fractures of intercalary allografts of the tibia could successfully be treated with internal fixation and autologous iliac crest bone graft; however, this treatment failed when used for femur allograft fractures. Femoral fractures could be treated with resection and repeat allograft reconstruction, however, with a higher refracture frequency. The addition of a vascularized fibular graft in the second attempt should be considered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The principles and applications of fresh frozen allografts to bone and joint reconstruction

Fresh frozen allograft reconstruction has been used for a long time in massive bone loss in orthopedic surgery. Allografts have the advantage of being biologic reconstructions, which gives them durability. Despite a greater number of complications in the short term, after 5 years these stabilize with high rates of survival after 10 years. The rate of early complications and the need for careful management in the first years has led the orthopedic surgeon to the use of other options. However, the potential durability of this reconstruction makes this one of the best options for younger patients with high life expectancy.

The effect of mesenchymal stem cells delivered via hydrogel-based tissue engineered periosteum on bone allograft healing

Allografts remain the clinical "gold standard" for treatment of critical sized bone defects despite minimal engraftment and ∼60% long-term failure rates. Therefore, the development of strategies to improve allograft healing and integration are necessary. The periosteum and its associated stem cell population, which are lacking in allografts, coordinate autograft healing. Herein we utilized hydrolytically degradable hydrogels to transplant and localize mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to allograft surfaces, creating a periosteum mimetic, termed a 'tissue engineered periosteum'. Our results demonstrated that this tissue engineering approach resulted in increased graft vascularization (∼2.4-fold), endochondral bone formation (∼2.8-fold), and biomechanical strength (1.8-fold), as compared to untreated allografts, over 16 weeks of healing. Despite this enhancement in healing, the process of endochondral ossification was delayed compared to autografts, requiring further modifications for this approach to be clinically acceptable. However, this bottom-up biomaterials approach, the engineered periosteum, can be augmented with alternative cell types, matrix cues, growth factors, and/or other small molecule drugs to expedite the process of ossification.