1
|
Govier DJ, Hickok A, Niederhausen M, Rowneki M, McCready H, Mace E, McDonald KM, Perla L, Hynes DM. Intensity, Characteristics, and Factors Associated With Receipt of Care Coordination Among High-Risk Veterans in the Veterans Health Administration. Med Care 2024; 62:549-558. [PMID: 38967995 PMCID: PMC11219070 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000002020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has initiatives underway to enhance the provision of care coordination (CC), particularly among high-risk Veterans. Yet, evidence detailing the characteristics of and who receives VHA CC is limited. OBJECTIVES We examined intensity, timing, setting, and factors associated with VHA CC among high-risk Veterans. RESEARCH DESIGN We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study, following Veterans for 1 year after being identified as high-risk for hospitalization or mortality, to characterize their CC. Demographic and clinical factors predictive of CC were identified via multivariate logistic regression. SUBJECTS A total of 1,843,272 VHA-enrolled high-risk Veterans in fiscal years 2019-2021. MEASURES We measured 5 CC variables during the year after Veterans were identified as high risk: (1) receipt of any service, (2) number of services received, (3) number of days to first service, (4) number of days between services, and (5) type of visit during which services were received. RESULTS Overall, 31% of high-risk Veterans in the sample received CC during one-year follow-up. Among Veterans who received ≥1 service, a median of 2 [IQR (1, 6)] services were received. Among Veterans who received ≥2 services, there was a median of 26 [IQR (10, 57)] days between services. Most services were received during outpatient psychiatry (46%) or medicine (16%) visits. Veterans' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were associated with receipt of CC. CONCLUSIONS A minority of Veterans received CC in the year after being identified as high-risk, and there was variation in intensity, timing, and setting of CC. Research is needed to examine the fit between Veterans' CC needs and preferences and VHA CC delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana J. Govier
- VA Health Systems Research Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
- College of Health, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
| | - Alex Hickok
- VA Health Systems Research Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
| | - Meike Niederhausen
- VA Health Systems Research Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
- College of Health, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
| | - Mazhgan Rowneki
- VA Health Systems Research Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
| | - Holly McCready
- VA Health Systems Research Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
| | - Elizabeth Mace
- College of Health, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
| | | | - Lisa Perla
- College of Health, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
| | - Denise M. Hynes
- VA Health Systems Research Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
- College of Health, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reilly S, Hobson-Merrett C, Gibbons B, Jones B, Richards D, Plappert H, Gibson J, Green M, Gask L, Huxley PJ, Druss BG, Planner CL. Collaborative care approaches for people with severe mental illness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 5:CD009531. [PMID: 38712709 PMCID: PMC11075124 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009531.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Collaborative care for severe mental illness (SMI) is a community-based intervention that promotes interdisciplinary working across primary and secondary care. Collaborative care interventions aim to improve the physical and/or mental health care of individuals with SMI. This is an update of a 2013 Cochrane review, based on new searches of the literature, which includes an additional seven studies. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of collaborative care approaches in comparison with standard care (or other non-collaborative care interventions) for people with diagnoses of SMI who are living in the community. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Study-Based Register of Trials (10 February 2021). We searched the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders (CCMD) controlled trials register (all available years to 6 June 2016). Subsequent searches on Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO together with the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (with an overlap) were run on 17 December 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) where interventions described as 'collaborative care' were compared with 'standard care' for adults (18+ years) living in the community with a diagnosis of SMI. SMI was defined as schizophrenia, other types of schizophrenia-like psychosis or bipolar affective disorder. The primary outcomes of interest were: quality of life, mental state and psychiatric admissions at 12 months follow-up. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Pairs of authors independently extracted data. We assessed the quality and certainty of the evidence using RoB 2 (for the primary outcomes) and GRADE. We compared treatment effects between collaborative care and standard care. We divided outcomes into short-term (up to six months), medium-term (seven to 12 months) and long-term (over 12 months). For dichotomous data we calculated the risk ratio (RR) and for continuous data we calculated the standardised mean difference (SMD), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used random-effects meta-analyses due to substantial levels of heterogeneity across trials. We created a summary of findings table using GRADEpro. MAIN RESULTS Eight RCTs (1165 participants) are included in this review. Two met the criteria for type A collaborative care (intervention comprised of the four core components). The remaining six met the criteria for type B (described as collaborative care by the trialists, but not comprised of the four core components). The composition and purpose of the interventions varied across studies. For most outcomes there was low- or very low-certainty evidence. We found three studies that assessed the quality of life of participants at 12 months. Quality of life was measured using the SF-12 and the WHOQOL-BREF and the mean endpoint mental health component scores were reported at 12 months. Very low-certainty evidence did not show a difference in quality of life (mental health domain) between collaborative care and standard care in the medium term (at 12 months) (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.32; 3 RCTs, 227 participants). Very low-certainty evidence did not show a difference in quality of life (physical health domain) between collaborative care and standard care in the medium term (at 12 months) (SMD 0.08, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.33; 3 RCTs, 237 participants). Furthermore, in the medium term (at 12 months) low-certainty evidence did not show a difference between collaborative care and standard care in mental state (binary) (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.28; 1 RCT, 253 participants) or in the risk of being admitted to a psychiatric hospital at 12 months (RR 5.15, 95% CI 0.67 to 39.57; 1 RCT, 253 participants). One study indicated an improvement in disability (proxy for social functioning) at 12 months in the collaborative care arm compared to usual care (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.95; 1 RCT, 253 participants); we deemed this low-certainty evidence. Personal recovery and satisfaction/experience of care outcomes were not reported in any of the included studies. The data from one study indicated that the collaborative care treatment was more expensive than standard care (mean difference (MD) international dollars (Int$) 493.00, 95% CI 345.41 to 640.59) in the short term. Another study found the collaborative care intervention to be slightly less expensive at three years. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This review does not provide evidence to indicate that collaborative care is more effective than standard care in the medium term (at 12 months) in relation to our primary outcomes (quality of life, mental state and psychiatric admissions). The evidence would be improved by better reporting, higher-quality RCTs and the assessment of underlying mechanisms of collaborative care. We advise caution in utilising the information in this review to assess the effectiveness of collaborative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siobhan Reilly
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
- Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford, UK
- Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Charley Hobson-Merrett
- Primary Care Plymouth, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula, Plymouth, UK
| | | | - Ben Jones
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Debra Richards
- Primary Care Plymouth, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Humera Plappert
- Primary Care Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Maria Green
- Pennine Health Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bury, UK
| | - Linda Gask
- Health Sciences Research Group, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter J Huxley
- Centre for Mental Health and Society, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Benjamin G Druss
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Atlanta, USA
| | - Claire L Planner
- Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kilbourne A, Chinman M, Rogal S, Almirall D. Adaptive Designs in Implementation Science and Practice: Their Promise and the Need for Greater Understanding and Improved Communication. Annu Rev Public Health 2024; 45:69-88. [PMID: 37931183 PMCID: PMC11070446 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-060222-014438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
The promise of adaptation and adaptive designs in implementation science has been hindered by the lack of clarity and precision in defining what it means to adapt, especially regarding the distinction between adaptive study designs and adaptive implementation strategies. To ensure a common language for science and practice, authors reviewed the implementation science literature and found that the term adaptive was used to describe interventions, implementation strategies, and trial designs. To provide clarity and offer recommendations for reporting and strengthening study design, we propose a taxonomy that describes fixed versus adaptive implementation strategies and implementation trial designs. To improve impact, (a) futureimplementation studies should prespecify implementation strategy core functions that in turn can be taught to and replicated by health system/community partners, (b) funders should support exploratory studies that refine and specify implementation strategies, and (c) investigators should systematically address design requirements and ethical considerations (e.g., randomization, blinding/masking) with health system/community partners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Kilbourne
- Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA;
| | - Matthew Chinman
- RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Shari Rogal
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Departments of Medicine and Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Daniel Almirall
- Institute for Social Research and Department of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shao L, Zhu X, Li DL, Wu L, Lu X, Fan Y, Qiao Z, Hou L, Pan CW, Ke C. Quantifying depressive symptoms on incidence of common chronic diseases and multimorbidity patterns in middle-aged and elderly Chinese adults. J Psychiatr Res 2024; 173:340-346. [PMID: 38579479 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.03.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depressive symptoms are highly prevalent and increase risks of various morbidities. However, the extent to which depressive symptoms could account for incidence of these chronic conditions, in particular multimorbidity patterns, remains to be examined and quantified. METHODS For this cohort analysis, we included 9024-14,093 participants aged 45 years and older from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the longitudinal associations between depressive symptoms and 13 common chronic diseases and 4 multimorbidity patterns. Population attributable fractions (PAFs) combining the information on both exposure prevalence and risk association were estimated to quantify the magnitude of the burden of these conditions attributable to depressive symptoms. RESULTS Depressive symptoms were associated with increased risks of liver disease, stroke, heart problem, asthma, diabetes, arthritis, kidney disease, chronic lung disease, digestive disease, dyslipidemia, and memory-related disease, and the adjusted HRs (95% CIs) and PAFs (95% CIs) ranged from 1.15 (1.05-1.26) to 1.64 (1.38-1.96) and 5% (0-10%) to 17% (6-28%), respectively. In addition, individuals with depressive symptoms had elevated risks of the cardiometabolic-cancer pattern, the cerebrovascular-memory pattern, the articular-visceral organ pattern, and the respiratory pattern, with respective HRs (95% CIs) of 1.26 (1.11-1.42), 1.34 (1.07-1.69), 1.45 (1.29-1.63), and 2.01 (1.36-2.96), and respective PAFs (95% CIs) of 5% (0-10%), 8% (-4-21%), 12% (7-17%), and 20% (5-35%). CONCLUSION Depressive symptoms contribute substantially to the burden across a broad range of chronic diseases as well as different multimorbidity patterns in middle-aged and older Chinese.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liping Shao
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Xiaohong Zhu
- Suzhou Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Suzhou, China
| | - Dan-Lin Li
- School of Public Health, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Luying Wu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Xujia Lu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Yulong Fan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Zhengpeng Qiao
- School of Public Health, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Liying Hou
- School of Public Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.
| | - Chen-Wei Pan
- School of Public Health, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
| | - Chaofu Ke
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen P, Sajatovic M, Briggs FBS, Mulsant B, Dols AA, Gildengers A, Yala J, Beunders AJM, Blumberg HP, Rej S, Forlenza OV, Jimenez E, Schouws S, Orhan M, Sutherland AN, Vieta E, Tsai S, Sarna K, Eyler LT. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of people with oldest older age bipolar disorder in a global sample: Results from the global aging and geriatric experiments in bipolar disorder project. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2024; 39:e6073. [PMID: 38393311 DOI: 10.1002/gps.6073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTS Studies of older age bipolar disorder (OABD) have mostly focused on "younger old" individuals. Little is known about the oldest OABD (OOABD) individuals aged ≥70 years old. The Global Aging and Geriatric Experiments in Bipolar Disorder (GAGE-BD) project provides an opportunity to evaluate the OOABD group to understand their characteristics compared to younger groups. METHODS We conducted cross-sectional analyses of the GAGE-BD database, an integrated, harmonized dataset from 19 international studies. We compared the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of those aged <50 (YABD, n = 184), 50-69 (OABD, n = 881), and ≥70 (OOABD, n = 304). To standardize the comparisons between age categories and all characteristics, we used multinomial logistic regression models with age category as the dependent variable, with each characteristic as the independent variable, and clustering of standard errors to account for the correlation between observations from each of the studies. RESULTS OOABD and OABD had lower severity of manic symptoms (Mean YMRS = 3.3, 3.8 respectively) than YABD (YMRS = 7.6), and lower depressive symptoms (% of absent = 65.4%, and 59.5% respectively) than YABD (18.3%). OOABD and OABD had higher physical burden than YABD, especially in the cardiovascular domain (prevalence = 65% in OOABD, 41% in OABD and 17% in YABD); OOABD had the highest prevalence (56%) in the musculoskeletal domain (significantly differed from 39% in OABD and 31% in YABD which didn't differ from each other). Overall, OOABD had significant cumulative physical burden in numbers of domains (mean = 4) compared to both OABD (mean = 2) and YABD (mean = 1). OOABD had the lowest rates of suicidal thoughts (10%), which significantly differed from YABD (26%) though didn't differ from OABD (21%). Functional status was higher in both OOABD (GAF = 63) and OABD (GAF = 64), though only OABD had significantly higher function than YABD (GAF = 59). CONCLUSIONS OOABD have unique features, suggesting that (1) OOABD individuals may be easier to manage psychiatrically, but require more attention to comorbid physical conditions; (2) OOABD is a survivor cohort associated with resilience despite high medical burden, warranting both qualitative and quantitative methods to better understand how to advance clinical care and ways to age successfully with BD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peijun Chen
- Department of Psychiatry, Geriatric Psychiatry Division, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Martha Sajatovic
- Department of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Farren B S Briggs
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Benoit Mulsant
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Center for Addiction & Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Annemiek A Dols
- GGZ inGeest, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Psychiatry, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ariel Gildengers
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Joy Yala
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Alexandra J M Beunders
- GGZ inGeest, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Psychiatry, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hilary P Blumberg
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Soham Rej
- Department of Psychiatry, Jewish General Hospital/Lady Davis Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Orestes V Forlenza
- Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Laboratory of Neuroscience (LIM-27), HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Esther Jimenez
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Institute of Neuroscience, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitario de Alava, BIOARABA, UPV/EHU, CIBERSAM, Vitoria, Spain
| | - Sigfried Schouws
- GGZ inGeest, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Psychiatry, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Melis Orhan
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Ashley N Sutherland
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
- Desert-Pacific Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Eduard Vieta
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Hospital Clinic, Institute of Neuroscience, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Shangying Tsai
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kaylee Sarna
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Lisa T Eyler
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
- Desert-Pacific Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Iturralde E, Fazzolari L, Slama NE, Alexeeff SE, Sterling SA, Awsare S, Koshy MT, Shia M. Telehealth Collaborative Care Led by Clinical Pharmacists for People With Psychosis or Bipolar Disorder: A Propensity Weighted Comparison With Usual Psychiatric Care. J Clin Psychiatry 2024; 85:23m14917. [PMID: 38301189 PMCID: PMC10868914 DOI: 10.4088/jcp.23m14917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
Objective: People with psychosis or bipolar disorder (severe and persistent mental illness [SPMI]) are at high risk for poor psychiatric and chronic illness outcomes, which could be ameliorated through improved health care quality. This study assessed whether a telehealth, collaborative care program managed by psychiatric clinical pharmacists (SPMI Population Care) was associated with improved health care quality for adults with SPMI in a large California health system. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used electronic health record data to compare 968 program enrollees at 6 demonstration sites (Population Care) to 8,339 contemporaneous patients with SPMI at 6 non-program sites (Usual Care). SPMI diagnoses were based on ICD-10-CM diagnostic codes. Primary outcomes were optimal psychotropic medication adherence, guideline-recommended glycemic screening, annual psychiatrist visit, and emergency department use. Difference-in-difference analyses assessed change in outcomes from 12 months pre- to 12 months post-enrollment using overlap weighting with high dimensional propensity scores to balance participant characteristics across groups. Participant data were collected from January 1, 2020, to June 30, 2022. Results: From pre- to post-enrollment, Population Care was associated with greater achievement of psychotropic medication adherence and glycemic screening (+6 and +9 percentage points), but unexpectedly with a decrease in annual psychiatrist visits (-6 percentage points) and no significant change in emergency department use, relative to Usual Care. More than 75% of Population Care participants attended an intake and ≥ 1 follow-up visits. Participants with psychosis (26% of sample) had similar results as those with bipolar disorder. Conclusions: Clinical pharmacist-led telehealth collaborative care has potential to improve psychopharmacologic treatment adherence and recommended disease preventive screening for people with psychosis or bipolar disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esti Iturralde
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
- Drs Iturralde and Fazzolari are co-first authors
- Corresponding Author: Esti Iturralde, PhD, Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612
| | - Lisa Fazzolari
- Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
- Drs Iturralde and Fazzolari are co-first authors
| | - Natalie E Slama
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
| | - Stacey E Alexeeff
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
| | - Stacy A Sterling
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
| | - Sameer Awsare
- Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
| | - Maria T Koshy
- Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
| | - Macy Shia
- Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yuan CT, Daumit GL, Cooper LA, Cook C, Corches C, Dalcin AT, Eidman B, Fink T, Gennusa J, Goldsholl S, Liebrecht C, Minahan E, Osorio B, Smith SN, Wang NY, Woltmann E, Kilbourne AM. A Community-Engaged Process for Adapting a Cardiovascular Health Intervention for Persons with Serious Mental Illness. Ethn Dis 2023; DECIPHeR:27-34. [PMID: 38846722 PMCID: PMC11895542 DOI: 10.18865/ed.decipher.27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction People with serious mental illness experience grave disparities in cardiovascular disease risk factors. To promote scale-up of effective cardiovascular disease risk reduction interventions from clinical trials, it is important to involve end-users in adapting interventions to fit the needs of community-based settings. Objective We describe a novel, theory-informed process of garnering community input to adapt IDEAL Goals, an evidence-based intervention for improving cardiovascular disease risk factors in persons with serious mental illness. Setting Outpatient community mental health programs in Maryland and Michigan implementing behavioral health homes, which provide enhanced support to people living with both physical and mental illnesses. Participants Clinicians, frontline staff, and administrators from community mental health organizations and persons with serious mental illness. Methods Our approach to community engagement is based on the Replicating Effective Programs (REP) framework. During the REP preimplementation phase, we used 2 community engagement activities: (1) a "needs assessment" to identify anticipated implementation barriers and facilitators, and (2) "community working groups" to collaboratively engage with end-users in adapting the intervention and implementation strategies. Main Findings We used the Stakeholder Engagement Reporting Questionnaire to describe our processes for conducting a needs assessment, involving site-level surveys (N=26) and individual interviews (N=94), and convening a series of community working groups with clinicians and staff (mean, 24 per meeting) and persons with serious mental illness (mean, 8 per meeting). Conclusions By specifying the nature and extent of our community engagement activities, we aim to contribute to the evidence base of how to better integrate and measure community-engaged processes in the adaptation of evidence-based interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina T. Yuan
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Gail L. Daumit
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Lisa A. Cooper
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Courtney Cook
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Casey Corches
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Arlene T. Dalcin
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Benjamin Eidman
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Tyler Fink
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Joseph Gennusa
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Stacy Goldsholl
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Celeste Liebrecht
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Eva Minahan
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Brianna Osorio
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Shawna N. Smith
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Nae-Yuh Wang
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Departments of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Emily Woltmann
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Amy M. Kilbourne
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI), US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Heflin K, Rosen BJ, Costanzo R, Ballard J, Fetter JC. Psychiatric Boarding in Emergency Departments and the COVID-19 First Wave: The New Hampshire Response. Health Secur 2023. [PMID: 37184664 DOI: 10.1089/hs.2022.0127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic forced unprecedented challenges for emergency department operations during the spring of 2020. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, psychiatric boarding in emergency departments required a substantial amount of staffing and administrative resources. This case study describes one state's efforts to rapidly decrease psychiatric boarding by 93% in 2 weeks with a multipronged approach, and simultaneously minimal effects observed on outcome measures of psychiatric hospital readmissions and suicide rates. Lessons learned are discussed regarding workflow adaptations and leadership implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Heflin
- Katherine Heflin, MSPH, is a Medical Student; at the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH
| | - Brian J Rosen
- Brian J. Rosen, MD, is a Resident Physician, at the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH
| | - Rosemary Costanzo
- Rosemary Costanzo, RN, MSN, PMH-BC, is Chief Nursing Officer, New Hampshire Hospital, Concord, NH
| | - Jonathan Ballard
- Jonathan Ballard, MD, is [title], at the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH
- Jonathan Ballard is also Chief Medical Officer, New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services, Concord, NH
| | - Jeffrey C Fetter
- Jeffrey C. Fetter, MD, is Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry; at the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH
- Jeffrey C. Fetter, MD, is Chief Medical Officer, New Hampshire Hospital, Concord, NH
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Strunz M, Jiménez NP, Gregorius L, Hewer W, Pollmanns J, Viehmann K, Jacobi F. Interventions to Promote the Utilization of Physical Health Care for People with Severe Mental Illness: A Scoping Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 20:126. [PMID: 36612457 PMCID: PMC9819522 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20010126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The main contributor to excess mortality in severe mental illness (SMI) is poor physical health. Causes include unfavorable health behaviors among people with SMI, stigmatization phenomena, as well as limited access to and utilization of physical health care. Patient centered interventions to promote the utilization of and access to existing physical health care facilities may be a pragmatic and cost-effective approach to improve health equity in this vulnerable and often neglected patient population. OBJECTIVE/METHODS In this study, we systematically reviewed the international literature on such studies (sources: literature databases, trial-registries, grey literature). Empirical studies (quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods) of interventions to improve the utilization of and access to medical health care for people with a SMI, were included. RESULTS We identified 38 studies, described in 51 study publications, and summarized them in terms of type, theoretical rationale, outcome measures, and study author's interpretation of the intervention success. CONCLUSIONS Useful interventions to promote the utilization of physical health care for people with a SMI exist, but still appear to be rare, or at least not supplemented by evaluation studies. The present review provides a map of the evidence and may serve as a starting point for further quantitative effectiveness evaluations of this promising type of behavioral intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lisa Gregorius
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Walter Hewer
- Klinikum Christophsbad, 73035 Göppingen, Germany
| | | | - Kerstin Viehmann
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Frank Jacobi
- Psychologische Hochschule Berlin, 10179 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bradley T, Campbell E, Dray J, Bartlem K, Wye P, Hanly G, Gibson L, Fehily C, Bailey J, Wynne O, Colyvas K, Bowman J. Systematic review of lifestyle interventions to improve weight, physical activity and diet among people with a mental health condition. Syst Rev 2022; 11:198. [PMID: 36085250 PMCID: PMC9462072 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-022-02067-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with a mental health condition experience an elevated risk of chronic disease and greater prevalence of health and behaviours. Lifestyle interventions aim to reduce this risk by modifying health behaviours such as physical activity and diet. Previous reviews exploring the efficacy of such interventions for this group have typically limited inclusion to individuals with severe mental illness (SMI), with a focus of impact on weight. This review assessed the efficacy of lifestyle interventions delivered in community or outpatient settings to people with any mental health condition, on weight, physical activity and diet. METHODS Eligible studies were randomised or cluster-randomised controlled trials published between January 1999 and February 2019 aiming to improve weight, physical activity or diet, for people with any mental health condition. Two reviewers independently completed study screening, data extraction and assessment of methodological quality. Primary outcome measures were weight, physical activity and diet. Secondary outcome measures were body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, sedentary behaviour and mental health. Where possible, meta-analyses were conducted. Narrative synthesis using vote counting based on direction of effect was used where studies were not amenable to meta-analysis. RESULTS Fifty-seven studies were included (49 SMI only), with 46 contributing to meta-analyses. Meta-analyses revealed significant (< 0.05) effect of interventions on mean weight loss (-1.42 kg), achieving 5% weight loss (OR 2.48), weight maintenance (-2.05 kg), physical activity (IPAQ MET minutes: 226.82) and daily vegetable serves (0.51), but not on fruit serves (0.01). Significant effects were also seen for secondary outcomes of BMI (-0.48 units) and waist circumference (-0.87cm), but not mental health (depression: SMD -0.03; anxiety: SMD -0.49; severity of psychological symptoms: SMD 0.72). Studies reporting sedentary behaviour were not able to be meta-analysed. Most trials had high risk of bias, quality of evidence for weight and physical activity were moderate, while quality of evidence for diet was low. CONCLUSION Lifestyle interventions delivered to people with a mental health condition made statistically significant improvements to weight, BMI, waist circumference, vegetable serves and physical activity. Further high-quality trials with greater consistency in measurement and reporting of outcomes are needed to better understand the impact of lifestyle interventions on physical activity, diet, sedentary behaviour and mental health and to understand impact on subgroups. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42019137197.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tegan Bradley
- University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308 Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Lot 1, Kookaburra Cct, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305 Australia
| | - Elizabeth Campbell
- Hunter New England Population Health, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW 2287 Australia
| | - Julia Dray
- University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308 Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Lot 1, Kookaburra Cct, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305 Australia
| | - Kate Bartlem
- University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308 Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Lot 1, Kookaburra Cct, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305 Australia
| | - Paula Wye
- University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308 Australia
| | - Grace Hanly
- University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308 Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Lot 1, Kookaburra Cct, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305 Australia
| | - Lauren Gibson
- University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308 Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Lot 1, Kookaburra Cct, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305 Australia
| | - Caitlin Fehily
- University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308 Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Lot 1, Kookaburra Cct, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305 Australia
| | - Jacqueline Bailey
- University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308 Australia
| | - Olivia Wynne
- University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308 Australia
| | - Kim Colyvas
- University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308 Australia
| | - Jenny Bowman
- University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308 Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Lot 1, Kookaburra Cct, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
There has been an increasing emphasis on placing patients at the center of clinical care and health care research and, in particular, assessing outcomes and experiences from the patient's perspective. One of the most widely used patient-reported outcome instruments is the Veterans RAND 12-item Health Survey (VR-12). This article reviews the VR-12 development and its applications over the last 2 decades, including research and potential uses in clinical care.
Collapse
|
12
|
Kho A, Daumit GL, Truesdale KP, Brown A, Kilbourne AM, Ladapo J, Wali S, Cicutto L, Matthews AK, Smith JD, Davis PD, Schoenthaler A, Ogedegbe G, Islam N, Mills KT, He J, Watson KS, Winn RA, Stevens J, Huebschmann AG, Szefler SJ. The National Heart Lung and Blood Institute Disparities Elimination through Coordinated Interventions to Prevent and Control Heart and Lung Disease Alliance. Health Serv Res 2022; 57 Suppl 1:20-31. [PMID: 35383917 PMCID: PMC9108215 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) sponsored Disparities Elimination through Coordinated Interventions to Prevent and Control Heart and Lung Disease (DECIPHeR) Alliance to support late-stage implementation research aimed at reducing disparities in communities with high burdens of cardiovascular and/or pulmonary disease. STUDY SETTING NHBLI funded seven DECIPHeR studies and a Coordinating Center. Projects target high-risk diverse populations including racial and ethnic minorities, urban, rural, and low-income communities, disadvantaged children, and persons with serious mental illness. Two projects address multiple cardiovascular risk factors, three focus on hypertension, one on tobacco use, and one on pediatric asthma. STUDY DESIGN The initial phase supports planning activities for sustainable uptake of evidence-based interventions in targeted communities. The second phase tests late-stage evidence-based implementation strategies. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS Not applicable. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS We provide an overview of the DECIPHeR Alliance and individual study designs, populations, and settings, implementation strategies, interventions, and outcomes. We describe the Alliance's organizational structure, designed to promote cross-center partnership and collaboration. CONCLUSIONS The DECIPHeR Alliance represents an ambitious national effort to develop sustainable implementation of interventions to achieve cardiovascular and pulmonary health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abel Kho
- Center for Health Information Partnerships (CHiP)Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Gail L. Daumit
- Department of MedicineJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Kimberly P. Truesdale
- Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Arleen Brown
- Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Los Angeles School of MedicineLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Amy M. Kilbourne
- Department of Learning Health SciencesUniversity of Michigan MedicineAnn ArborMichiganUSA
- Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI)U.S. Department of Veterans AffairsWashington, D.C.USA
| | - Joseph Ladapo
- Department of MedicineUniversity of Florida College of MedicineGainesvilleFloridaUSA
| | - Soma Wali
- Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Los Angeles School of MedicineLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Lisa Cicutto
- Department of MedicineNational Jewish Health, Community Outreach and ResearchDenverColoradoUSA
| | | | - Justin D. Smith
- Department of Population Health SciencesUniversity of Utah HealthSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Paris D. Davis
- Total Resource Community Development OrganizationNorthwestern UniversityChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Antoinette Schoenthaler
- Department of Population HealthNew York University Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Gbenga Ogedegbe
- Department of Population HealthNew York University Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Nadia Islam
- Department of Population HealthNew York University Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Katherine T. Mills
- Department of EpidemiologyTulane University School of Public Health and Tropical MedicineNew OrleansLouisianaUSA
| | - Jiang He
- Department of EpidemiologyTulane University School of Public Health and Tropical MedicineNew OrleansLouisianaUSA
| | - Karriem S. Watson
- NIH All of Us Bethesda, MD; FormerlyUniversity of Illinois in Chicago Hospital and Health Sciences System, Mile Square Health Center ChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Robert A. Winn
- Massey Cancer CenterVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondVirginiaUSA
| | - June Stevens
- Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Amy G. Huebschmann
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal MedicineUniversity of Colorado Denver School of MedicineAuroraColoradoUSA
| | - Stanley J. Szefler
- Department of PediatricsUniversity of Colorado Denver School of MedicineDenverColoradoUSA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Niedens M, Yeager A, Vidoni ED, Barton K, Perales-Puchalt J, Dealey RP, Quinn D, Gage LA. A Collaborative Approach to Dementia Inclusion in Social Work Education: The Dementia Intensive. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION 2022; 59:493-505. [PMID: 37397072 PMCID: PMC10309142 DOI: 10.1080/10437797.2022.2039820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
There are 5.8 million Americans with Alzheimer's disease and this number is rising. Social Work can play a key role. Yet, like other disciplines, the field is ill prepared for the growing number of individuals and family members who are impacted physically, emotionally and financially. Compounding the challenge, the number of social work students identifying interest in the field is low. This mixed methods concurrent study assessed the preliminary efficacy of a day-long education event among social work students from eight social work programs. Pre- post-training survey included: 1) dementia knowledge, assessed with the Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale, and 2) negative attitudes towards dementia, assessed by asking students to identify three words that reflected their thoughts on dementia, which were later rated as positive, negative or neutral by three external raters. Bivariate analyses showed that dementia knowledge (mean difference= 9.9) and attitudes (10% lower) improved from pre- to post-training (p<0.05). Collaboration between social work programs can increase student access to strength-based dementia education. Such programs hold the potential of improving dementia capability within the field of Social Work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amy Yeager
- KU Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology
| | - Eric D Vidoni
- KU Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology
| | | | | | | | - Dory Quinn
- Pittsburg State University, Department of History, Philosophy & Social Sciences
| | - L Ashley Gage
- University of Central Missouri, Department of Social Work
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Iturralde E, Fazzolari L, Shia M, Slama N, Leang J, Awsare S, Nguyen LT. Closing the Care Gap for People with Severe and Persistent Mental Illness: Collaborative Care, Telehealth, and Clinical Pharmacy. NEJM CATALYST INNOVATIONS IN CARE DELIVERY 2022; 3:10.1056/CAT.21.0417. [PMID: 36569369 PMCID: PMC9788801 DOI: 10.1056/cat.21.0417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
People with severe and persistent mental illness (SPMI) frequently struggle to maintain their recovery from recurring suicidality, psychosis, and debilitating mood episodes. They also face a high risk of chronic health conditions. Traditional - often short-term - psychiatric care is ill-equipped to meet the health needs of people with SPMI. Patients often require regular and sustained follow-up to support medication effectiveness and adherence and to screen for and treat cardiovascular disease and other common health risks. Kaiser Permanente Northern California has implemented a novel telehealth-based collaborative care program, SPMI Population Care, led by advanced practice clinical pharmacists, to improve the mental and physical health of its patients with SPMI. Although the individual program components of telehealth, collaborative care, and clinical pharmacy service have been employed successfully in the past for mental health care, the SPMI Population Care model combines the components and extends this approach to individuals at the most severe end of the psychiatric illness spectrum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esti Iturralde
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Lisa Fazzolari
- The Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Macy Shia
- The Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Natalie Slama
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Jessica Leang
- Department of Psychiatry, Kaiser Permanente San Jose Medical Center, San Jose, California, USA
| | - Sameer Awsare
- The Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, USA
| | - Lily T. Nguyen
- Department of Psychiatry, Kaiser Permanente San Jose Medical Center, San Jose, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
McGinty EE, Presskreischer R, Breslau J, Brown JD, Domino ME, Druss BG, Horvitz-Lennon M, Murphy KA, Pincus HA, Daumit GL. Improving Physical Health Among People With Serious Mental Illness: The Role of the Specialty Mental Health Sector. Psychiatr Serv 2021; 72:1301-1310. [PMID: 34074150 PMCID: PMC8570967 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
People with serious mental illness die 10-20 years earlier, compared with the overall population, and the excess mortality is driven by undertreated physical health conditions. In the United States, there is growing interest in models integrating physical health care delivery, management, or coordination into specialty mental health programs, sometimes called "reverse integration." In November 2019, the Johns Hopkins ALACRITY Center for Health and Longevity in Mental Illness convened a forum of 25 experts to discuss the current state of the evidence on integrated care models based in the specialty mental health system and to identify priorities for future research, policy, and practice. This article summarizes the group's conclusions. Key research priorities include identifying the active ingredients in multicomponent integrated care models and developing and validating integration performance metrics. Key policy and practice recommendations include developing new financing mechanisms and implementing strategies to build workforce and data capacity. Forum participants also highlighted an overarching need to address socioeconomic risks contributing to excess mortality among adults with serious mental illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma E McGinty
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore (McGinty, Presskreischer); RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh (Breslau) and Boston (Horvitz-Lennon); Mathematica, Washington, D.C. (Brown); Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Domino); Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta (Druss); Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (Murphy, Daumit); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City (Pincus)
| | - Rachel Presskreischer
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore (McGinty, Presskreischer); RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh (Breslau) and Boston (Horvitz-Lennon); Mathematica, Washington, D.C. (Brown); Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Domino); Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta (Druss); Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (Murphy, Daumit); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City (Pincus)
| | - Joshua Breslau
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore (McGinty, Presskreischer); RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh (Breslau) and Boston (Horvitz-Lennon); Mathematica, Washington, D.C. (Brown); Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Domino); Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta (Druss); Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (Murphy, Daumit); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City (Pincus)
| | - Jonathan D Brown
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore (McGinty, Presskreischer); RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh (Breslau) and Boston (Horvitz-Lennon); Mathematica, Washington, D.C. (Brown); Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Domino); Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta (Druss); Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (Murphy, Daumit); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City (Pincus)
| | - Marisa Elena Domino
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore (McGinty, Presskreischer); RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh (Breslau) and Boston (Horvitz-Lennon); Mathematica, Washington, D.C. (Brown); Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Domino); Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta (Druss); Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (Murphy, Daumit); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City (Pincus)
| | - Benjamin G Druss
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore (McGinty, Presskreischer); RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh (Breslau) and Boston (Horvitz-Lennon); Mathematica, Washington, D.C. (Brown); Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Domino); Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta (Druss); Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (Murphy, Daumit); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City (Pincus)
| | - Marcela Horvitz-Lennon
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore (McGinty, Presskreischer); RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh (Breslau) and Boston (Horvitz-Lennon); Mathematica, Washington, D.C. (Brown); Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Domino); Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta (Druss); Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (Murphy, Daumit); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City (Pincus)
| | - Karly A Murphy
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore (McGinty, Presskreischer); RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh (Breslau) and Boston (Horvitz-Lennon); Mathematica, Washington, D.C. (Brown); Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Domino); Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta (Druss); Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (Murphy, Daumit); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City (Pincus)
| | - Harold Alan Pincus
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore (McGinty, Presskreischer); RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh (Breslau) and Boston (Horvitz-Lennon); Mathematica, Washington, D.C. (Brown); Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Domino); Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta (Druss); Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (Murphy, Daumit); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City (Pincus)
| | - Gail L Daumit
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore (McGinty, Presskreischer); RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh (Breslau) and Boston (Horvitz-Lennon); Mathematica, Washington, D.C. (Brown); Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Domino); Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta (Druss); Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (Murphy, Daumit); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City (Pincus)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kelly EL, Hong B, Duan L, Pancake L, Cohen H, Brekke JS. Service Use by Medicaid Recipients With Serious Mental Illness During an RCT of the Bridge Peer Health Navigator Intervention. Psychiatr Serv 2021; 72:1145-1150. [PMID: 33887952 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Integration of general medical care and mental health care is a high priority for individuals with serious mental illnesses because of their high risk of morbidity and early mortality. The Bridge is a peer-led, health navigator intervention designed to improve access to and use of health care and self-management of medical services by individuals with serious mental illnesses. This study expands on a previous study in which the authors examined participants' self-reported outcomes from a 12-month randomized controlled trial of the Bridge. In the study reported here, Medicaid data were used to assess the impact of the intervention on service use during that trial. METHODS Medicaid data on use of general medical services (emergency room, outpatient, and inpatient) for 6 months were compared for 144 individuals with serious mental illnesses-Bridge participants (N=72) and a waitlist control group (N=72). An intent-to-treat approach was used, with regression models controlling for general medical services in the 6 months before baseline. RESULTS Zero-inflated negative binomial analyses, controlling for service use 6 months before baseline, found that the intervention group used the emergency room significantly less frequently, compared with the control group (adjusted mean±SD number of visits, 0.72±0.19 versus 1.59±0.42). No between-group differences were found in use of general medical inpatient or outpatient services. CONCLUSIONS The Bridge was effective in decreasing emergency room use among individuals with serious mental illnesses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin L Kelly
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, and Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Center for Social Medicine and Humanities, University of California, Los Angeles (Kelly); Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena (Hong); Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Duan, Cohen, Brekke); Pacific Clinics, Arcadia, California (Pancake)
| | - Benjamin Hong
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, and Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Center for Social Medicine and Humanities, University of California, Los Angeles (Kelly); Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena (Hong); Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Duan, Cohen, Brekke); Pacific Clinics, Arcadia, California (Pancake)
| | - Lei Duan
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, and Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Center for Social Medicine and Humanities, University of California, Los Angeles (Kelly); Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena (Hong); Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Duan, Cohen, Brekke); Pacific Clinics, Arcadia, California (Pancake)
| | - Laura Pancake
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, and Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Center for Social Medicine and Humanities, University of California, Los Angeles (Kelly); Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena (Hong); Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Duan, Cohen, Brekke); Pacific Clinics, Arcadia, California (Pancake)
| | - Heather Cohen
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, and Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Center for Social Medicine and Humanities, University of California, Los Angeles (Kelly); Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena (Hong); Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Duan, Cohen, Brekke); Pacific Clinics, Arcadia, California (Pancake)
| | - John S Brekke
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, and Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Center for Social Medicine and Humanities, University of California, Los Angeles (Kelly); Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena (Hong); Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Duan, Cohen, Brekke); Pacific Clinics, Arcadia, California (Pancake)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fenger-Grøn M, Vestergaard CH, Ribe AR, Johnsen SP, Frost L, Sandbæk A, Davydow DS. Association Between Bipolar Disorder or Schizophrenia and Oral Anticoagulation Use in Danish Adults With Incident or Prevalent Atrial Fibrillation. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2110096. [PMID: 33999163 PMCID: PMC8129823 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Individuals with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia have a higher risk of adverse outcomes from cardiovascular diseases. Oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is needed for stroke prevention, but whether patients with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia face disparities in receiving this therapy is unknown. OBJECTIVE To assess whether bipolar disorder or schizophrenia is associated with a lower rate of OAT initiation in patients with incident AF and lower prevalence of OAT in those with prevalent AF. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A nationwide cohort study of Danish patients with AF was conducted from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2016, and data were analyzed from January 1 to June 15, 2020. Data from national registries included information on all redeemed prescriptions and all hospital contacts of all patients with incident or prevalent AF (age, 18-100 years) and increased risk status, defined by a CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes, stroke or transient ischemic attack, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, sex category) risk score greater than or equal to 2. EXPOSURES Hospital diagnosis of bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Adjusted proportion differences for OAT initiation and OAT prevalence, comparing individuals with and without bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. RESULTS Patients included with incident AF (n = 147 810) had a mean (SD) age of 76.9 (10.1) years, 78 577 (53.2%) were women, 1208 (0.8%) had bipolar disorder, and 572 (0.4%) had schizophrenia. Accounting for age, sex, and calendar time, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia were associated with significantly lower frequency of OAT initiation within 90 days after incident AF (bipolar disorder: -12.7%; 95% CI, -15.3% to -10.0%; schizophrenia: -24.5%; 95% CI, -28.3% to -20.7%) and lower OAT prevalence in patients with prevalent AF (bipolar disorder: -11.6%; 95% CI, -13.9% to -9.3% schizophrenia: -21.6%; 95% CI, -24.8% to -18.4%). Adjusting for socioeconomic factors and other comorbid conditions attenuated these associations, particularly for patients with bipolar disorder. However, schizophrenia continued to be associated with a with a lower rate of OAT initiation (-15.5%, 95% CI, -19.3% to -11.7%) and a -12.8% (95% CI, -15.9% to -9.7%) lower OAT prevalence. These associations were also present after the introduction of non-vitamin K antagonists (adjusted proportion difference in 2013-2016: -12.4%; 95% CI, -18.7% to -6.1% for initiation and -10.1%; 95% CI, -13.8% to -6.4% for prevalence). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, patients with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia were less likely to receive OAT in the setting of AF. For patients with bipolar disorder, this deficit was largely associated with socioeconomic factors and comorbidities, especially toward the end of the study period. For patients with schizophrenia, disparities in this stroke prevention therapy persistently exceeded what could be explained by other patient characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morten Fenger-Grøn
- Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus Denmark
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | - Søren Paaske Johnsen
- Danish Center for Clinical Health Services Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Lars Frost
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark
| | - Annelli Sandbæk
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Steno Diabetes Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Martens N, Destoop M, Dom G. Organization of Community Mental Health Services for Persons with a Severe Mental Illness and Comorbid Somatic Conditions: A Systematic Review on Somatic Outcomes and Health Related Quality of Life. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:E462. [PMID: 33435525 PMCID: PMC7826863 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18020462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
It is well established that persons with a severe mental illness (SMI) have a greater risk of physical comorbid conditions and premature mortality. Most studies in the field of community mental health care (CMHC) have only focused on improving cardiovascular health in people with a SMI using lifestyle approaches. Studies using organizational modifications are rather scarce. This systematic review aimed to synthesize and describe possible organizational strategies to improve physical health for persons with a SMI in CMHC. The primary outcome was Health-related Quality of Life (HR-QOL). Results suggested modest effects on quality of life and were inconsistent throughout all the included studies. Despite these findings, it appears that a more integrated approach had a positive effect on health outcomes, patient satisfaction and HR-QOL. The complexity of the processes involved in community care delivery makes it difficult to compare different models and organizational approaches. Mental health nurses were identified as possible key professionals in care organization, but no clear description of their role was found. This review could provide new insights into contributing factors for integrated care. Future research targeting the identification of the nurses' role and facilitating factors in integrated care, in order to improve treatment and follow-up of somatic comorbidities, is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolaas Martens
- Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute (CAPRI), Antwerp University, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium; (M.D.); (G.D.)
- Multiversum Mental Health Services, B-2530 Boechout, Belgium
- Department of Health and Welfare, Karel De Grote University College, B-2018 Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Marianne Destoop
- Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute (CAPRI), Antwerp University, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium; (M.D.); (G.D.)
- Multiversum Mental Health Services, B-2530 Boechout, Belgium
| | - Geert Dom
- Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute (CAPRI), Antwerp University, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium; (M.D.); (G.D.)
- Multiversum Mental Health Services, B-2530 Boechout, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
McGinty EE, Daumit GL. Integrating Mental Health and Addiction Treatment Into General Medical Care: The Role of Policy. Psychiatr Serv 2020; 71:1163-1169. [PMID: 32487007 PMCID: PMC7606646 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Interventions that integrate care for mental illness or substance use disorders into general medical care settings have been shown to improve patient outcomes in clinical trials, but efficacious models are complex and difficult to scale up in real-world practice settings. Existing payment policies have proven inadequate to facilitate adoption of effective integrated care models. This article provides an overview of evidence-based models of integrated care, discusses the key elements of such models, considers how existing policies have fallen short, and outlines future policy strategies. Priorities include payment policies that adequately support structural elements of integrated care and incentivize multidisciplinary team formation and accountability for patient outcomes, as well as policies to expand the specialty mental health and addiction treatment workforce and address the social determinants of health that disproportionately influence health and well-being among people with mental illness or substance use disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma E McGinty
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (McGinty), and Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine (Daumit), Baltimore
| | - Gail L Daumit
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (McGinty), and Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine (Daumit), Baltimore
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bessonova L, Ogden K, Doane MJ, O'Sullivan AK, Tohen M. The Economic Burden of Bipolar Disorder in the United States: A Systematic Literature Review. CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 12:481-497. [PMID: 32982338 PMCID: PMC7489939 DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s259338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Bipolar disorder (BD) is a mood disorder with subtypes characterized by episodes of mania, hypomania, and/or depression. BD is associated with substantial economic burden, and the bipolar I disorder (BD-I) subtype is associated with high medical costs. This review further evaluated the economic burden of BD and BD-I in the United States (US), describing health-care resource utilization (HCRU) and sources of direct medical and indirect costs. Data were obtained from systematic searches of MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, and National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database. Citations were screened to identify primary research studies (published 2008-2018) on the economic burden of BD/BD-I or its treatment in real-world settings. Reported costs were converted to 2018 US dollars. Of identified abstracts (N=4111), 56 studies were included. The estimated total annual national economic burden of BD/BD-I was more than $195 billion, with approximately 25% attributed to direct medical costs. Individuals with BD/BD-I used health-care services more frequently and had higher direct medical costs than matched individuals without the disease. Drivers of higher direct costs included frequent psychiatric interventions, presence of comorbid medical/psychiatric conditions, and both suboptimal medication adherence and clinical management. Indirect costs (eg, unemployment, lost work productivity for patients/caregivers) accounted for 72-80% of the national economic burden of BD/BD-I. Different definitions for study populations and cost categories limited comparisons of economic outcomes. This review builds on existing literature describing the economic burden of BD and confirmed cost drivers of BD/BD-I. Improved clinical management of BD/BD-I and associated comorbidities, together with better medication adherence, may reduce health-care costs and improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leona Bessonova
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Alkermes, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Kristine Ogden
- Evidence, Worldwide Clinical Trials, Morrisville, NC, USA
| | - Michael J Doane
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Alkermes, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Amy K O'Sullivan
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Alkermes, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Mauricio Tohen
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ralat SI, Barrios RI. THE MANAGEMENT OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE RISK FACTORS IN BIPOLAR DISORDER PATIENTS IN PRIMARY HEALTHCARE SETTINGS. REVISTA PUERTORRIQUENA DE PSICOLOGIA 2020; 31:62-78. [PMID: 34221244 PMCID: PMC8249201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Accumulating evidence supports the association between cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and bipolar disorder (BD). CVD is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with bipolar disorder. However, there is a need to study the management of the risk factors in the primary healthcare context. This narrative review aims to appraise the different approaches of care that have been used in the management of these patients to address CVD risk factors in primary care. We reviewed articles from PubMed, Science Direct and other studies cited in the articles found. The keywords used for this review included "bipolar," "bipolar disorder," "cardiovascular" or "metabolic syndrome," "screening," "primary care," and "integrative" or "integrated care model" or "collaborative care model." This review includes studies published over a period of 48 months (January 2016 through December 2019). We identified 128 articles, removing two duplicates. From them, 115 articles are excluded based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria leaving eleven relevant articles. Upon full-text review, six studies were excluded. The final studies included are five. We used the study-quality assessment tools from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to assess the quality of the articles found. CVD risk factors in patients with BD and forms of other severe mental illness (SMI) are often underdetected. Primary healthcare providers need to identify these risk factors in the management of these patients to determine and recommend appropriate strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra I. Ralat
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical Sciences Campus, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Rossana I. Barrios
- Conrado F. Asenjo Library, Medical Sciences Campus, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mucheru D, Hanlon MC, McEvoy M, MacDonald-Wicks L. An appraisal of methodology reporting in lifestyle interventions among people with psychosis: A systematic review. Health Promot J Austr 2019; 31:540-552. [PMID: 31495017 DOI: 10.1002/hpja.293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2018] [Revised: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
ISSUE ADDRESSED Lifestyle interventions use nutrition and physical activity behaviour modification techniques to decrease obesity and cardio-metabolic risk in people with psychosis. Evidence on the specific behaviour modification strategies applied to decrease obesity is weakened by inadequate methodology reporting of lifestyle interventions. A systematic review that we conducted earlier highlighted a possible deficiency in reporting; hence we aim to critically appraise lifestyle intervention studies that target weight outcomes for people with psychosis against the methods component of the CONSORT statement for randomised trials of nonpharmacologic treatments. METHODS COMPONENT We considered randomised controlled studies which delivered lifestyle interventions to community-dwelling adults with psychotic disorders, and included those with the following outcomes of interest: weight, body mass index, waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio. The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE/PREMEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus and PsycINFO were searched for English publications between 1985 and 2018. Methodology and reporting of studies were evaluated using the CONSORT statement for randomised trials of nonpharmacologic treatments. RESULTS Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Critical appraisals revealed that reporting of lifestyle intervention studies was generally incomplete. Fewer than 50% provided the recommended information on trial design, participant characteristics, detail of interventions, outcomes, sample size, randomisation, blinding and statistical methods. CONCLUSIONS Application of guidelines, like the CONSORT statement, in future publications of lifestyle interventions for people with psychosis will improve accuracy of reporting. SO WHAT?: Enhanced reporting in lifestyle intervention studies for people with psychosis will promote guideline creation and translation of research, which is likely to positively impact physical health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doreen Mucheru
- Faculty Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Mary-Claire Hanlon
- Faculty Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Brain and Mental Health Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, NSW, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Brain and Mental Health, Mater Hospital, Waratah, NSW, Australia.,Hunter Cancer Research Alliance, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark McEvoy
- Faculty Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, NSW, Australia
| | - Lesley MacDonald-Wicks
- Faculty Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Brain and Mental Health Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, NSW, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mucheru D, Hanlon MC, McEvoy M, Thakkinstian A, MacDonald-Wicks L. Comparative efficacy of lifestyle intervention strategies targeting weight outcomes in people with psychosis. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 17:1770-1825. [DOI: 10.11124/jbisrir-2017-003943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
24
|
Fiedorowicz JG. An Update on the Other Cause of Excess Death in Bipolar Disorder: Cardiovascular Disease. Psychiatr Ann 2019. [DOI: 10.3928/00485713-20190806-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
25
|
Wischik DL, Magny-Normilus C, Whittemore R. Risk Factors of Obesity in Veterans of Recent Conflicts: Need for Diabetes Prevention. Curr Diab Rep 2019; 19:70. [PMID: 31368008 PMCID: PMC7530827 DOI: 10.1007/s11892-019-1191-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To identify factors associated with obesity in veterans of the recent, Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF), and Operation New Dawn (OND) war conflicts. RECENT FINDINGS Over 44% OEF/OIF/OND veterans are obese (BMI > 30 kg/m2), which exceeds the national obesity prevalence rate of 39% in people younger than 45. Obesity increases morbidity, risk for type 2 diabetes (T2D), and mortality as well as decreases quality of life. A scoping review method was used to identify factors associated with obesity in young veterans. Military exposures, such as multiple deployments and exposure to combat, contribute to challenges in re-integration to civilian life in all veterans. Factors that contribute to increased risk for obesity include changes in eating patterns/eating disorders, changes in physical activity, physical disability, and psychological comorbidity. These conditions can contribute to a rapid weight gain trajectory, changes in metabolism, and obesity. Young veterans face considerable challenges related to obesity risk. Further research is needed to better understand young veterans' experiences and health needs in order to adapt or expand existing programs and improve access, engagement, and metabolic outcomes in this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Robin Whittemore
- Yale School of Nursing, 400 West Campus Drive, Orange, CT, 06477, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Osborn D, Burton A, Walters K, Atkins L, Barnes T, Blackburn R, Craig T, Gilbert H, Gray B, Hardoon S, Heinkel S, Holt R, Hunter R, Johnston C, King M, Leibowitz J, Marston L, Michie S, Morris R, Morris S, Nazareth I, Omar R, Petersen I, Peveler R, Pinfold V, Stevenson F, Zomer E. Primary care management of cardiovascular risk for people with severe mental illnesses: the Primrose research programme including cluster RCT. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2019. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar07020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background
Effective interventions are needed to prevent cardiovascular disease (CVD) in people with severe mental illnesses (SMI) because their risk of CVD is higher than that of the general population.
Objectives
(1) Develop and validate risk models for predicting CVD events in people with SMI and evaluate their cost-effectiveness, (2) develop an intervention to reduce levels of cholesterol and CVD risk in SMI and (3) test the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of this new intervention in primary care.
Design
Mixed methods with patient and public involvement throughout. The mixed methods were (1) a prospective cohort and risk score validation study and cost-effectiveness modelling, (2) development work (focus groups, updated systematic review of interventions, primary care database studies investigating statin prescribing and effectiveness) and (3) cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) assessing the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a new practitioner-led intervention, and fidelity assessment of audio-recorded appointments.
Setting
General practices across England.
Participants
All studies included adults with SMI (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or other non-organic psychosis). The RCT included adults with SMI and two or more CVD risk factors.
Interventions
The intervention consisted of 8–12 appointments with a practice nurse/health-care assistant over 6 months, involving collaborative behavioural approaches to CVD risk factors. The intervention was compared with routine practice with a general practitioner (GP).
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome for the risk score work was CVD events, in the cost-effectiveness modelling it was quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and in the RCT it was level of total cholesterol.
Data sources
Databases studies used The Health Improvement Network (THIN). Intervention development work included focus groups and systematic reviews. The RCT collected patient self-reported and routine NHS GP data. Intervention appointments were audio-recorded.
Results
Two CVD risk score models were developed and validated in 38,824 people with SMI in THIN: the Primrose lipid model requiring cholesterol levels, and the Primrose body mass index (BMI) model with no blood test. These models performed better than published Cox Framingham models. In health economic modelling, the Primrose BMI model was most cost-effective when used as an algorithm to drive statin prescriptions. Focus groups identified barriers to, and facilitators of, reducing CVD risk in SMI including patient engagement and motivation, staff confidence, involving supportive others, goal-setting and continuity of care. Findings were synthesised with evidence from updated systematic reviews to create the Primrose intervention and training programme. THIN cohort studies in 16,854 people with SMI demonstrated that statins effectively reduced levels of cholesterol, with similar effect sizes to those in general population studies over 12–24 months (mean decrease 1.2 mmol/l). Cluster RCT: 76 GP practices were randomised to the Primrose intervention (n = 38) or treatment as usual (TAU) (n = 38). The primary outcome (level of cholesterol) was analysed for 137 out of 155 participants in Primrose and 152 out of 172 in TAU. There was no difference in levels of cholesterol at 12 months [5.4 mmol/l Primrose vs. 5.5 mmol/l TAU; coefficient 0.03; 95% confidence interval (CI) –0.22 to 0.29], nor in secondary outcomes related to cardiometabolic parameters, well-being or medication adherence. Mean cholesterol levels decreased over 12 months in both arms (–0.22 mmol/l Primrose vs. –0.39 mmol/l TAU). There was a significant reduction in the cost of inpatient mental health attendances (–£799, 95% CI –£1480 to –£117) and total health-care costs (–£895, 95% CI –£1631 to –£160; p = 0.012) in the intervention group, but no significant difference in QALYs (–0.011, 95% CI –0.034 to 0.011). A total of 69% of patients attended two or more Primrose appointments. Audiotapes revealed moderate fidelity to intervention delivery (67.7%). Statin prescribing and adherence was rarely addressed.
Limitations
RCT participants and practices may not represent all UK practices. CVD care in the TAU arm may have been enhanced by trial procedures involving CVD risk screening and feedback.
Conclusions
SMI-specific CVD risk scores better predict new CVD if used to guide statin prescribing in SMI. Statins are effective in reducing levels of cholesterol in people with SMI in UK clinical practice. This primary care RCT evaluated an evidence-based practitioner-led intervention that was well attended by patients and intervention components were delivered. No superiority was shown for the new intervention over TAU for level of cholesterol, but cholesterol levels decreased over 12 months in both arms and the intervention showed fewer inpatient admissions. There was no difference in cholesterol levels between the intervention and TAU arms, which might reflect better than standard general practice care in TAU, heterogeneity in intervention delivery or suboptimal emphasis on statins.
Future work
The new risk score should be updated, deployed and tested in different settings and compared with the latest versions of CVD risk scores in different countries. Future research on CVD risk interventions should emphasise statin prescriptions more. The mechanism behind lower costs with the Primrose intervention needs exploring, including SMI-related training and offering frequent support to people with SMI in primary care.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN13762819.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full in Programme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 7, No. 2. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. Professor David Osborn is supported by the University College London Hospital NIHR Biomedical Research Centre and he was also in part supported by the NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) North Thames at Barts Health NHS Trust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Osborn
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital, London, UK
| | - Alexandra Burton
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kate Walters
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Lou Atkins
- Centre for Behaviour Change, Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Thomas Barnes
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ruth Blackburn
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Thomas Craig
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Hazel Gilbert
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ben Gray
- The McPin Foundation, London, UK
| | - Sarah Hardoon
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Samira Heinkel
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Richard Holt
- Human Development and Health Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Rachael Hunter
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Claire Johnston
- School of Health and Education, Faculty of Professional and Social Sciences, Middlesex University, London, UK
| | - Michael King
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital, London, UK
| | - Judy Leibowitz
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital, London, UK
| | - Louise Marston
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Susan Michie
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital, London, UK
- Centre for Behaviour Change, Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Richard Morris
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Steve Morris
- Department of Allied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Irwin Nazareth
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rumana Omar
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Irene Petersen
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Robert Peveler
- Human Development and Health Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Fiona Stevenson
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ella Zomer
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kilbourne AM, Prenovost KM, Liebrecht C, Eisenberg D, Kim HM, Un H, Bauer MS. Randomized Controlled Trial of a Collaborative Care Intervention for Mood Disorders by a National Commercial Health Plan. Psychiatr Serv 2019; 70:219-224. [PMID: 30602344 PMCID: PMC6522242 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Few individuals with mood disorders have access to evidence-based collaborative chronic care models (CCMs) because most patients are seen in small-group practices (<20 providers) with limited capacity to deliver CCMs. In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, we determined whether a CCM delivered nationally in a U.S. health plan improved 12-month outcomes among enrollees with mood disorders compared with usual care. METHODS Aetna insurance enrollees (N=238), mostly females (66.1%) with a mean age of 41.1 years, who were recently hospitalized for unipolar major depression or bipolar disorder provided informed consent, completed baseline assessments, and were randomly assigned to usual care or CCM. The CCM included 10 sessions of the Life Goals self-management program and brief contacts by phone by a care manager to determine symptom status. Primary outcomes were changes over 12 months in depression symptoms (nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]) and mental health-related quality of life (Short Form-12). RESULTS Adjusted mean PHQ-9 scores were lower by 2.34 points (95% confidence level [CL]=-4.18 to -0.50, p=0.01), indicating improved symptoms, and adjusted mean SF-12 mental health scores were higher by 3.21 points (CL=-.97 to 7.38, p=0.10), indicating better quality of life, among participants receiving CCM versus usual care. CONCLUSIONS Individuals receiving CCM compared with usual care had improved clinical outcomes, although substantial attrition may limit the impact of health plan-level delivery of CCMs. Further research on the use of health plan-level interventions, such as CCMs, as alternatives to practice-based models is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy M Kilbourne
- Center for Clinical Management Research, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan (Kilbourne, Kim); Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, North Campus, Ann Arbor (Kilbourne, Prenovost, Liebrecht); Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Eisenberg); Aetna Healthcare, Blue Bell, Pennsylvania (Un); Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, and Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Bauer)
| | - Katherine M Prenovost
- Center for Clinical Management Research, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan (Kilbourne, Kim); Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, North Campus, Ann Arbor (Kilbourne, Prenovost, Liebrecht); Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Eisenberg); Aetna Healthcare, Blue Bell, Pennsylvania (Un); Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, and Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Bauer)
| | - Celeste Liebrecht
- Center for Clinical Management Research, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan (Kilbourne, Kim); Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, North Campus, Ann Arbor (Kilbourne, Prenovost, Liebrecht); Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Eisenberg); Aetna Healthcare, Blue Bell, Pennsylvania (Un); Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, and Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Bauer)
| | - Daniel Eisenberg
- Center for Clinical Management Research, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan (Kilbourne, Kim); Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, North Campus, Ann Arbor (Kilbourne, Prenovost, Liebrecht); Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Eisenberg); Aetna Healthcare, Blue Bell, Pennsylvania (Un); Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, and Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Bauer)
| | - Hyungjin Myra Kim
- Center for Clinical Management Research, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan (Kilbourne, Kim); Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, North Campus, Ann Arbor (Kilbourne, Prenovost, Liebrecht); Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Eisenberg); Aetna Healthcare, Blue Bell, Pennsylvania (Un); Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, and Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Bauer)
| | - Hyong Un
- Center for Clinical Management Research, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan (Kilbourne, Kim); Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, North Campus, Ann Arbor (Kilbourne, Prenovost, Liebrecht); Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Eisenberg); Aetna Healthcare, Blue Bell, Pennsylvania (Un); Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, and Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Bauer)
| | - Mark S Bauer
- Center for Clinical Management Research, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan (Kilbourne, Kim); Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, North Campus, Ann Arbor (Kilbourne, Prenovost, Liebrecht); Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Eisenberg); Aetna Healthcare, Blue Bell, Pennsylvania (Un); Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, and Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Bauer)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ringen PA, Falk RS, Antonsen B, Faerden A, Mamen A, Rognli EB, Solberg DK, Martinsen EW, Andreassen OA. Using motivational techniques to reduce cardiometabolic risk factors in long term psychiatric inpatients: a naturalistic interventional study. BMC Psychiatry 2018; 18:255. [PMID: 30111298 PMCID: PMC6094458 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-018-1832-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2018] [Accepted: 07/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with severe mental illness have markedly reduced life expectancy; cardiometabolic disease is a major cause. Psychiatric hospital inpatients have elevated levels of cardiometabolic risk factors and are to a high degree dependent of the routines and facilities of the institutions. Studies of lifestyle interventions to reduce cardiometabolic risk in psychiatric inpatients are few. The current study aimed at assessing the feasibility and effects of a lifestyle intervention including Motivational Interviewing (MI) on physical activity levels, cardiometabolic risk status and mental health status in psychotic disorder inpatients. METHODS Prospective naturalistic intervention study of 83 patients at long term inpatient psychosis treatment wards in South-Eastern Norway. Patients were assessed 3-6 months prior to, at start and 6 months after a life-style intervention program including training of staff in MI, simple changes in routines and improvements of facilities for physical exercise. Assessments were done by clinical staff and included level of physical activity, motivation, life satisfaction, symptom levels (MADRS, AES-C, PANSS, and GAF) as well as anthropometric and biochemical markers of cardiometabolic risk. A mixed model was applied to analyze change over time. RESULTS A total of 88% of patients received MI interventions, with a mean of 2.5 MI interventions per week per patient. The physical activity level was not increased, but activity level was positively associated with motivation and negatively associated with positive symptoms. Triglyceride levels and number of smokers were significantly reduced and a significant decrease in symptom levels was observed. CONCLUSIONS The current results suggest that a simple, low cost life-style intervention program focusing on motivational change is feasible and may reduce symptoms and improve lifestyle habits in psychosis patients in long term treatment facilities. Similar programs may easily be implemented in other psychiatric hospitals. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov . NCT03528278 , date of registration: 05/16/2018 (retrospectively registered).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petter Andreas Ringen
- Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and NORMENT, KG Jebsen Centre, University of Oslo, Ullevål Hospital, P.O.Box 4956, 0424, Nydalen, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Ragnhild S. Falk
- 0000 0004 0389 8485grid.55325.34Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, P.O.Box 4950, 0424 Nydalen, Oslo Norway
| | - Bjørnar Antonsen
- 0000 0004 0627 3157grid.416137.6Department of Psychiatry, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, P.O.Box 4970, 0440 Nydalen, Oslo Norway
| | - Ann Faerden
- Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and NORMENT, KG Jebsen Centre, University of Oslo, Ullevål Hospital, P.O.Box 4956, 0424 Nydalen, Oslo Norway
| | - Asgeir Mamen
- grid.488488.0Kristiania University College, P.O.Box 1190, 0107 Sentrum, Oslo Norway
| | - Eline B. Rognli
- 0000 0004 0389 8485grid.55325.34Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål Hospital, P.O.Box 4956, 0424 Nydalen, Oslo Norway
| | - Dag K. Solberg
- 0000 0004 0512 8628grid.413684.cSkjelfoss Psychiatric Center, Lukas Foundation and Center for Psychopharmacology Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Postboks 23, 0319 Vinderen, Oslo Norway
| | - Egil W. Martinsen
- 0000 0004 0389 8485grid.55325.34Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Ullevål Hospital, P.O.Box 4956, 0424 Nydalen, Oslo Norway
| | - Ole A. Andreassen
- NORMENT, KG Jebsen Centre, Oslo University Hospital, and University of Oslo, Ullevål Hospital, Building 49, P.O. Box 4956, 0424 Nydalen, Oslo Norway
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Zhao S, Xia H, Mu J, Wang L, Zhu L, Wang A, Zhou X. 10-year CVD risk in Han Chinese mainland patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 2018; 264:322-326. [PMID: 29665562 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2017] [Revised: 04/02/2018] [Accepted: 04/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
People with schizophrenia have a shortened life expectancy, with cardiovascular disease (CVD) being the primary contributor to this excessive mortality. A total of 466 inpatients with schizophrenia and 507 healthy community controls in the Chinese mainland were recruited in this study. Sociodemographic information, medical history, and smoking history were recorded. In addition, total cholesterol (TC), fasting blood glucose (FBG), triglycerides (TG), and high-destiny lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were analyzed. The 10-year CVD risk was significantly higher in patients with schizophrenia compared with healthy controls. Male schizophrenia patients had significantly higher Framingham risk scores (FRS) than the females. Patients with schizophrenia carried significantly greater risk factors of CVD; body-mass index (BMI), TG and smoking prevalence were significantly higher than in the health community controls, while FBG and HDL-C were on the contrary. Smoking was significantly associated with FRS among schizophrenia inpatients. Collectively, these results suggest that Han Chinese mainland patients with schizophrenia harbor a high 10-year CVD risk when compared with healthy controls, especially in males. CVD in schizophrenia patients requires greater attention by clinicians and researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuai Zhao
- Department of Psychiatry, Anhui Psychiatric Center, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, PR China; Department of Psychiatry, Chao Hu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Chaohu, Anhui, PR China
| | - HaiLong Xia
- Department of Psychiatry, Chao Hu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Chaohu, Anhui, PR China
| | - JingJing Mu
- Department of Psychiatry, Anhui Mental Health Center, Hefei, Anhui, PR China
| | - Long Wang
- Department of Psychiatry, Anhui Mental Health Center, Hefei, Anhui, PR China
| | - Li Zhu
- Department of Psychiatry, Anhui Mental Health Center, Hefei, Anhui, PR China
| | - AnZhen Wang
- Department of Psychiatry, Anhui Mental Health Center, Hefei, Anhui, PR China
| | - XiaoQin Zhou
- Department of Psychiatry, Anhui Psychiatric Center, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, PR China; Department of Psychiatry, Chao Hu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Chaohu, Anhui, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Druss BG, Singh M, von Esenwein SA, Glick GE, Tapscott S, Tucker SJ, Lally CA, Sterling EW. Peer-Led Self-Management of General Medical Conditions for Patients With Serious Mental Illnesses: A Randomized Trial. Psychiatr Serv 2018; 69:529-535. [PMID: 29385952 PMCID: PMC5930018 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Individuals with serious mental illnesses have high rates of general medical comorbidity and challenges in managing these conditions. A growing workforce of certified peer specialists is available to help these individuals more effectively manage their health and health care. However, few studies have examined the effectiveness of peer-led programs for self-management of general medical conditions for this population. METHODS This randomized study enrolled 400 participants with a serious mental illness and one or more chronic general medical conditions across three community mental health clinics. Participants were randomly assigned to the Health and Recovery Peer (HARP) program, a self-management program for general medical conditions led by certified peer specialists (N=198), or to usual care (N=202). Assessments were conducted at baseline and three and six months. RESULTS At six months, participants in the intervention group demonstrated a significant differential improvement in the primary study outcome, health-related quality of life. Specifically, compared with the usual care group, intervention participants had greater improvement in the Short-Form Health Survey physical component summary (an increase of 2.7 versus 1.4 points, p=.046) and mental component summary (4.6 versus 2.5 points, p=.039). Significantly greater six-month improvements in mental health recovery were seen for the intervention group (p=.02), but no other between-group differences in secondary outcome measures were significant. CONCLUSIONS The HARP program was associated with improved physical health- and mental health-related quality of life among individuals with serious mental illness and comorbid general medical conditions, suggesting the potential benefits of more widespread dissemination of peer-led disease self-management in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin G Druss
- Dr. Druss, Ms. Singh, Dr. von Esenwein, Ms. Tapscott, and Ms. Lally are with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Atlanta. Ms. Glick is with J. Michael Consulting, Atlanta. Ms. Tucker is with the Georgia Mental Health Consumer Network, Atlanta. Dr. Sterling is with the Department of Sociology, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia
| | - Manasvini Singh
- Dr. Druss, Ms. Singh, Dr. von Esenwein, Ms. Tapscott, and Ms. Lally are with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Atlanta. Ms. Glick is with J. Michael Consulting, Atlanta. Ms. Tucker is with the Georgia Mental Health Consumer Network, Atlanta. Dr. Sterling is with the Department of Sociology, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia
| | - Silke A von Esenwein
- Dr. Druss, Ms. Singh, Dr. von Esenwein, Ms. Tapscott, and Ms. Lally are with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Atlanta. Ms. Glick is with J. Michael Consulting, Atlanta. Ms. Tucker is with the Georgia Mental Health Consumer Network, Atlanta. Dr. Sterling is with the Department of Sociology, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia
| | - Gretl E Glick
- Dr. Druss, Ms. Singh, Dr. von Esenwein, Ms. Tapscott, and Ms. Lally are with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Atlanta. Ms. Glick is with J. Michael Consulting, Atlanta. Ms. Tucker is with the Georgia Mental Health Consumer Network, Atlanta. Dr. Sterling is with the Department of Sociology, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia
| | - Stephanie Tapscott
- Dr. Druss, Ms. Singh, Dr. von Esenwein, Ms. Tapscott, and Ms. Lally are with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Atlanta. Ms. Glick is with J. Michael Consulting, Atlanta. Ms. Tucker is with the Georgia Mental Health Consumer Network, Atlanta. Dr. Sterling is with the Department of Sociology, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia
| | - Sherry Jenkins Tucker
- Dr. Druss, Ms. Singh, Dr. von Esenwein, Ms. Tapscott, and Ms. Lally are with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Atlanta. Ms. Glick is with J. Michael Consulting, Atlanta. Ms. Tucker is with the Georgia Mental Health Consumer Network, Atlanta. Dr. Sterling is with the Department of Sociology, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia
| | - Cathy A Lally
- Dr. Druss, Ms. Singh, Dr. von Esenwein, Ms. Tapscott, and Ms. Lally are with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Atlanta. Ms. Glick is with J. Michael Consulting, Atlanta. Ms. Tucker is with the Georgia Mental Health Consumer Network, Atlanta. Dr. Sterling is with the Department of Sociology, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia
| | - Evelina W Sterling
- Dr. Druss, Ms. Singh, Dr. von Esenwein, Ms. Tapscott, and Ms. Lally are with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Atlanta. Ms. Glick is with J. Michael Consulting, Atlanta. Ms. Tucker is with the Georgia Mental Health Consumer Network, Atlanta. Dr. Sterling is with the Department of Sociology, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Dalcin AT, Jerome GJ, Appel LJ, Dickerson FB, Wang NY, Miller ER, Young DR, Charleston JB, Gennusa JV, Goldsholl S, Heller A, Evins AE, Cather C, McGinty EE, Crum RM, Daumit GL. Need for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Persons With Serious Mental Illness: Design of a Comprehensive Intervention. Front Psychiatry 2018; 9:786. [PMID: 30800079 PMCID: PMC6375886 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2018] [Accepted: 12/31/2018] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Persons with serious mental illness (SMI) comprise a high-risk group for cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related mortality with rates at least twice those of the overall US. Potentially modifiable CVD risk behaviors (tobacco smoking, obesity, physical inactivity, unhealthy diet) and risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia) are all markedly elevated in persons with SMI. Evaluations of programs implementing integrated medical care into specialty mental health settings have not shown meaningful effects on CVD risk factor reduction. Rigorously tested, innovative interventions are needed to address the large burden of CVD risk in populations with SMI. In this article, we describe the design of a comprehensive 18-month intervention to decrease CVD risk that we are studying in a randomized clinical trial in a community mental health organization with psychiatric rehabilitation programs. The individual-level intervention incorporated health behavior coaching and care coordination/care management to address all seven CVD risk behaviors and risk factors, and is delivered by a health coach and nurse. If successful, the intervention could be adopted within current integrated care models and significantly improve the physical health of persons with SMI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arlene T Dalcin
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Gerald J Jerome
- Department of Kinesiology, Towson University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Lawrence J Appel
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | | | - Nae-Yuh Wang
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Edgar R Miller
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Deborah R Young
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Jeanne B Charleston
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Joseph V Gennusa
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Stacy Goldsholl
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Ann Heller
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - A Eden Evins
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Corinne Cather
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Emma E McGinty
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Rosa M Crum
- Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Gail L Daumit
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Gerber MR, King MW, Iverson KM, Pineles SL, Haskell SG. Association Between Mental Health Burden and Coronary Artery Disease in U.S. Women Veterans Over 45: A National Cross-Sectional Study. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2017; 27:238-244. [PMID: 28981382 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The women Veteran population accessing Veterans Health Administration (VA) care has grown rapidly. Women Veterans exhibit high rates of mental health conditions that increase coronary artery disease (CAD) risk; however, the relationship between specific conditions and increasing mental health burden to CAD in this population is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using VA National Patient Care Data for 2009, we identified women Veterans over 45 (N = 157,195). Logistic regression models examined different mental health diagnoses and increasing mental health burden (number of diagnostic clusters) as predictors of CAD. RESULTS CAD prevalence was 4.16%, and 36% of women Veterans were current smokers. Depression exhibited the strongest association with CAD (odds ratio [OR] 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.50-1.71]), similar to that of current smoking (OR 1.68 [1.58-1.78]). Controlling for demographic variables, smoking, diabetes, and obesity, each additional mental health diagnosis increased the odds of CAD by 44%. CONCLUSIONS Women Veterans over age 45 accessing VA care exhibited a high degree of mental health burden, which is associated with elevated odds of CAD; those with depression alone had 60% higher odds of CAD. For women Veterans using VA, mental health diagnoses may act as CAD risk factors that are potentially modifiable. Novel interventions in primary care and mental health are needed to address heart disease in this growing and aging population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan R Gerber
- 1 Women's Health, VA Boston Healthcare System , Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts.,2 Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine , Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matthew W King
- 3 National Center for PTSD Women's Health Sciences Division at VA Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts.,4 Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine , Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Katherine M Iverson
- 3 National Center for PTSD Women's Health Sciences Division at VA Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts.,4 Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine , Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Suzanne L Pineles
- 3 National Center for PTSD Women's Health Sciences Division at VA Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts.,4 Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine , Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sally G Haskell
- 5 Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, VA Connecticut Healthcare System , West Haven, Connecticut.,6 Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine , New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The population over age 60 is growing more rapidly than the general population. Given the projected increase and need for data that can inform treatment, this review provides a brief description of newer publications focused on mania in older-age bipolar disorder (OABD), including epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatments. RECENT FINDINGS Age cutoffs to define OABD range from 50 to 65 years. OABD clinical presentation and course of illness is highly variable, often characterized by mood episode recurrence, medical comorbidity, cognitive deficits, and impaired functioning. There is little pharmacotherapy data on mania in OABD. Lithium and valproate have been tested in a single randomized controlled trial and there is data of more limited quality with other compounds. Treating OABD is challenging due to medical complexity, comorbidity, diminished tolerance to treatment, and a limited evidence base. More data is needed to keep pace with clinical demand.
Collapse
|