Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable cages: Radiological and clinical results of banana-shaped and straight implants

Efficacy of Percutaneous Spinal Endoscopic YESS Technique in Adjacent Segmental Disease Without Severe Instability After Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Case Series

Background

The adjacent segment disease (ASD) after lumbar fusion is inherently stressed abnormally, and the destruction of bony structures in surgery can further exacerbate that abnormality. The Yeung Endoscopic Spine Surgery (YESS) technique does not destroy facet joints, and therefore it may be a good indication for ASD. However, the efficacy of the YESS technique in ASD patients have not been reported.

Patients and Methods

From January 2018 to May 2023, 13 patients with adjacent spondylolisthesis secondary to lumbar fusion were treated with endoscopic YESS technique surgery. Patients' visual analog score (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) score were analyzed preoperatively, 3 days postoperatively, and at the final follow-up. Gait analysis parameters and intervertebral height index of patients preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively were used to objectively quantify patient pain, function, and radiographic changes.

Results

A total of 13 patients, 2 females and 11 males, had single-segment adjacent spondylolisthesis. The patients' VAS and ODI scores at 3 days postoperatively decreased (P<0.05) compared to preoperatively and further decreased (P<0.05) at the final follow-up. There were no infections, wound complications or reoperations. The results of gait analysis showed no statistically significant difference in single-stance time and the gait cycle before and after the patients' surgery (P>0.05), but the patients' velocity, step length, step time, step frequency and stride length were significantly improved at 1-year postoperatively (P<0.05). Intervertebral height loss did not occur in all patients.

Conclusion

In the short term, spinal endoscopic YESS technique markedly improves clinical symptoms and gait parameters in patients with ASD without severe instability after lumbar fusion, while avoiding facet joint destruction and intervertebral height loss. Future studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up times are needed to clarify the long-term efficacy.

A single straight expandable cage via a hybrid posterior-transforaminal approach with rhBMP-2 or allograft provides high fusion rates with low risk of subsidence

Background

Due to the ongoing debate surrounding the clinical impact of surgical technique; cage type (expandable vs. static), cage shape (straight vs. banana), or technique [posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) vs. transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)], the aim of this study was to evaluate the mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who underwent a hybrid posterior-TLIF (P-TLIF) with a single straight expandable titanium cage using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) or demineralised bone allograft (DBA) bone substitute.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of data from consecutive patients who underwent a hybrid P-TLIF by a senior spine surgeon between August 2017 and May 2022. A single straight expandable interbody cage was inserted obliquely after laminectomy and bilateral facetectomies. Cages were packed with either rhBMP-2 or DBA. Consecutive patients received rhBMP-2 prior to withdrawal (Australia, March 2020), and then DBA was used. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included visual analogue scale (VAS) back and leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI) and 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) measured at preoperative, postoperative 6-week, 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month. Computed tomography (CT) imaging, assessed by an independent radiologist, was conducted postoperative day-2 for instrumentation positioning then at either 6-, 12-, or 24-month to assess subsidence and interbody/posterolateral fusion (Bridwell classification). If fusion was achieved no further CTs were undertaken.

Results

This cohort consisted of 81 (54.3% female) patients with a mean age of 57.3±12.5 years. rhBMP-2 was used in 60 (74.1%) and DBA in 21 (25.9%) patients. Total clinical complication rate was 27.2% including five patients requiring reoperation. Asymptomatic radiologic subsidence rate was 7.4% and clinical subsidence rate was 1.2%. Total (interbody and posterolateral) fusion was achieved at 6-month in 34.4% and 55.7%, 12-month in 76.8% and 88.4%, and 24-month in 86.3% and 93.2% of patients. There was a non-significant difference in fusion rates at each timepoint between rhBMP-2 and DBA. Preoperative pain, disability, and function all significantly improved postoperatively. Mean VAS back/leg (7.8±0.8, 7.7±0.9), and ODI (35.8±6.6) significantly (P<0.001) decreased (2.7±1.8, 1.9±2.3, 13.6±5.8); SF-12 physical/mental (27.4±3.8)/(38.1±8.3) showed significant improvements (P<0.001) at 12-month follow-up (47.1±8.8, 52.1±8.7). The mean follow-up time was 20.3±6.1 [12-24] months.

Conclusions

A hybrid P-TLIF with a single straight titanium expandable cage permitted safe cage insertion, guided repositioning, and controlled expansion. Patients demonstrated significant improvements in pain, disability and function with low subsidence and high CT fusion rates over 24-month follow-up. The use of DBA in this cohort showed no significant difference in fusion rates across 24-month when compared to rhBMP-2.

Definition of cage subsidence in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) approach and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approach - A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Although cage subsidence is one of the most common phenomenona associated with interbody fusions and was characterized more than 70 years ago, a standardized method for its measurement, detection, and reporting among different lumbar fusion procedures does not exist. Here, we review previously published literature on cage subsidence to present the most common methods for defining subsidence in the posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) techniques.

METHODS

A search was completed in PubMed and Embase with inclusion criteria focused on identifying any study that provided descriptions of the method, imaging modality, and subsidence threshold used to define the presence of cage subsidence in study articles published between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 54 studies were included in the final analysis. Among them, 32 (59.2 %) reported on TLIF, 20 (37.1 %) reported on PLIF, and 2 studies (3.7 %) reported on both approaches. For TLIF and PLIF procedures, the preferred method to determine subsidence was cage migration into the vertebral bodies rather than changes in disc height. In the TLIF group, the predominant criteria for defining subsidence were thresholds of ≥ 2 mm and > 2 mm utilized in each of 10 of the 34 studies (58.8 %). Similarly, in the PLIF group, the common criterion for defining subsidence was also ≥ 2 mm, observed in 5 of 22 studies (22.7 %), with > 2 mm observed in 4 studies (18.2 %). The methods for assessing cage migration or disc height change varied substantially among studies, with none of the measurements being consistently applied in more than 50 % of the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Inconsistency persists in the methods used to determine, report, or measure the degree of subsidence. Surgeons and researchers should standardize these methods to ensure consistency and generalizability in reporting and studying subsidence.

Comparison of Sagittal Plane Correction With "Bullet" Versus "Banana" Type Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) allows for direct and indirect decompression and segmental lordosis in sagittal plane correction. This study compares the effectiveness of "Bullet" type and "Banana" type devices for sagittal plane correction.

METHODS

Patients who underwent 1-level or 2-level TLIF for degenerative pathology at a single tertiary care center were identified. Details were extracted on demographics, interbody dimensions, and preoperative and postoperative lumbopelvic parameters from upright radiographs. Cages were categorized as "Bullet" or "Banana" type based on morphology and manufacturer description of optimal position. Univariable comparisons between levels treated with "Bullet" and "Banana" type interbodies were performed. Multivariable linear regression was performed to identify independent predictors of postoperative segmental lordosis and change in segmental lordosis.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety eight unique patients (median 66.6 years; [IQR 59.5, 73.7]; 56.6% female) were included with 241 levels treated, of which 114 (52.7%) were treated with "Banana" type interbodies and 127 (47.3%) with "Bullet" type. "Banana" type interbodies afforded both greater postoperative segmental lordosis (8.1 [6.2, 10.7] vs 7.5 [5.2, 9.6]; P = .048) and greater increase in segmental lordosis (3.3 [0.7, 7.0] vs 2.3 [0.1, 4.2]; P = .015). On multivariable linear regression, only preoperative segmental lordosis (β = 0.322 per degree; [0.244, 0.399]; P < .001), implant listed lordosis (β = 0.146 per degree; 95% CI [0.048, 0.244]; P = .004), preoperative pelvic incidence (0.072 per degree; [0.034, 0.111]; P < .001), and use of bilateral TLIF windows (β = 3.133; [1.213, 5.053]; P = .001) were predictive of postoperative segmental lordosis.

CONCLUSION

The present analysis suggests that baseline lumbopelvic anatomy, interbody lordosis, and the use of bilateral TLIF windows are the most important predictors of postoperative segmental lordosis. Use of "Banana" vs "Bullet" type interbodies was not predictive of segmental lordosis achieved on immediate postoperative upright radiographs. Further work is merited to determine whether the 2 interbody types demonstrate differences regarding subsidence risk or maintenance of correction.

Expandable interbody cages for lumbar spinal fusion: a systematic review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Since the early 2000s, various expandable spinal fusion cages have been developed to facilitate less invasive procedures, however, expandable cages have often been evaluated as a homogeneous group, neglecting differences in shape, size, material, expandability and lordotic adjustability. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively survey the literature on expandable spinal fusion cages, discuss their differentiating factors, and identify gaps in the literature regarding these devices.

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the range of design features included in expandable interbody devices and identify which of these features are associated with improved surgical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. An electronic search of MEDLINE and Embase using the search terms "lumbar" AND "fusion" AND ("expandable cage" OR "expandable interbody") including only English language articles that contained sufficient detail to correlate a specific expandable cage design to patient outcomes. Relevant elements, including device design parameters, patient population information, details of the intervention, comparison data, outcome variables, and the timeframe were extracted. Statistical analysis was conducted to correlate patient outcomes with different device features.

RESULTS

While 387 different articles were initially identified, 49 met all the criteria for inclusion. Design differences contributed to disparate outcomes, with rectangular titanium cages featuring medial-lateral and vertical expansion and continuous lordotic adjustability being correlated with significantly improved patient-reported outcomes. The surgical approach and location were also found to be correlated with patient outcomes, indicating that confounding factors are present.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend that expandable cage technologies not be considered a homogenous group, as long-term outcomes likely are dependent upon specific design characteristics. Categorizing devices based on design features such as material composition, shape, vertical expandability, horizontal expandability, and restoration of segmental lordosis may allow for more rapid identification of device characteristics associated with better outcomes.

Short-Term Outcomes of a Novel Non-Screw Based Expandable Posterior Interbody Fusion Cage

BACKGROUND

Lumbar interbody fusion is a well-established surgical technique for treating various lumbar degenerative pathologies. Expandable cages have been introduced to allow for insertion via the confined access and to improve disc height restoration, although concerns about the stability of the screw-based cages in the expanded state remain a concern. This study aims to evaluate the short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of a novel nonscrew-based expandable transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage.

METHODS

Adult patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion and were implanted the X-PAC transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage for degenerative lumbar conditions between September 2021 and April 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographic outcomes, including anterior disc height (ADH), posterior disc height (PDH), and segmental lordosis, were measured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at ≥6-month follow-up. Cage subsidence at follow-up was assessed according to the Marchi classification, along with cage collapse and complications requiring revision surgery. Radiographic outcomes were compared between time points using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and paired t-test depending on distribution.

RESULTS

The study included 131 patients, implanted with 160 expandable cages. Significant increases in ADH and PDH were observed postoperatively and maintained at follow-up (ADH: 9.8 mm ± 5.4 vs. 12.7 mm ± 4.0, and PDH: 3.1 mm [1.3-4.9] vs. 5.0 mm [3.6-6.9], respectively, P < 0.001). Segmental lordosis showed an initial postoperative increase but was not significantly sustained at the 6-month follow-up. Cage subsidence was seen in 9.3% of cases, with no severe subsidence or complete cage collapse. Revision surgery was required in 6.1% of patients, none due to cage-related issues.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel nonscrew-based expandable cage effectively restored and maintained disc height with a low incidence of complications, suggesting it as a safe and effective alternative for lumbar interbody fusion. Further long-term studies are needed to confirm its efficacy and safety.

Failure of an expandable lumbar interbody spacer - a critical analysis of secondary collapse, pseudoarthrosis and revision rates after thoracolumbar fusion

PURPOSE

To report on the failure rates of an expandable interbody spacer, used for spinal instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior thoracolumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center observational cohort study we reviewed consecutive PLIF/TLIF patients using the Catalyft™ PL and PL40 expandable titanium interbody implant (Medtronic, Minneapolis (USA)) between 07/2022 and 11/2023. We recorded patient demographics, surgical parameters, adverse events, radiological parameters and clinical outcomes according to the MacNab criteria.

RESULTS

We identified 53 patients (mean age 68.6 ± 11.5 years; 49.1% female; mean BMI 25.7 ± 4.4 kg/m2), in which 92 Catalyft™ spacers were implanted, mostly at L4/5 (n = 35; 38.0%) and L5/S1 (n = 31; 33.7%) for degenerative (n = 44; 83.0%), deformity (n = 7; 13.2%) or other indications (n = 2; 3.8%). We noticed secondary collapse of 20 (21.7%) spacers in 11 patients (20.7%) occurring after a mean time of 4.0 ± 4.1 months postoperatively. Age < 70 years was identified as risk factor for secondary collapse (OR 3.71, 95% CI 1.31-10.5, p = 0.014), but no association was found regarding other patient-specific or surgery-related variables. Pseudarthrosis was evident in seven patients (13.2%), of which four (7.6%) required revision surgery. Clinical outcome at last follow-up (mean 6.4 ± 4.2 months) was excellent/good in 29 (54.7%), fair in 14 (26.4%) and poor in six patients (11.3%).

CONCLUSION

We provide a critical analysis of our series of patients with use of a specific type of expandable interbody spacer. We noticed failure and secondary collapse in an unacceptably high number of implants, some of which required revision surgery.

Posterior and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Recent Advances in Technique and Technology

Posterior approach interbody fusion techniques such as posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal interbody fusion are known as the workhorse procedures for lumbar spinal fusion. Over the years, advancements in procedural steps, technique, and technology have sought to improve patient outcomes. Within the last 2 decades, considerable emphasis has been placed upon minimally invasive techniques utilizing tubular retractors and conscious sedation. Innovation in materials engineering, visualization technology such as endoscopes, and enabling technologies such as augmented reality and robotics have served to enhance the procedures and their outcomes.

Full-Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Review and Technical Note

Remarkable innovations in spinal endoscopic surgery have broadened its applications over the past 20 years. Full-endoscopic fusions have been widely reported, and several full-endoscopic approaches for interbody fusion have been published. In general, full-endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is called Endo-LIF, and facet-preserving Endo-LIF through the transforaminal route is called trans-Kambin's triangle LIF, which has a relatively longer history than facet-sacrificing Endo-LIF via the posterolateral route. Both approaches can reduce intraoperative and postoperative bleeding. However, there is a higher risk of subsidence and exit nerve root injury. There is no direct decompression in either of the interbody fusions, and additional decompression is required if there is severe lumbar bony canal stenosis. However, the posterior interlaminar approach, which is a well-known standard in full-endoscopic spine surgery, has rarely been applied in the field of endoscopic lumbar fusion surgery. Full-endoscopic posterior LIF (FE-PLIF) via an interlaminar approach can accomplish direct decompression of bony canal stenosis and safe interbody fusion. FE-PLIF via an interlaminar approach demonstrated a longer operation time, less blood loss, and shorter hospitalization duration than minimally invasive transforaminal LIF. FE-PLIF, which can accomplish direct decompression for bony spinal canal stenosis, is superior to other Endo-LIFs. However, FE-PLIF requires technical dexterity to improve efficiency and reduce technical complexity.

Advancements in Custom 3D-Printed Titanium Interbody Spinal Fusion Cages and Their Relevance in Personalized Spine Care

3D-printing technology has revolutionized spinal implant manufacturing, particularly in developing personalized and custom-fit titanium interbody fusion cages. These cages are pivotal in supporting inter-vertebral stability, promoting bone growth, and restoring spinal alignment. This article reviews the latest advancements in 3D-printed titanium interbody fusion cages, emphasizing their relevance in modern personalized surgical spine care protocols applied to common clinical scenarios. Furthermore, the authors review the various printing and post-printing processing technologies and discuss how engineering and design are deployed to tailor each type of implant to its patient-specific clinical application, highlighting how anatomical and biomechanical considerations impact their development and manufacturing processes to achieve optimum osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties. The article further examines the benefits of 3D printing, such as customizable geometry and porosity, that enhance osteointegration and mechanical compatibility, offering a leap forward in patient-specific solutions. The comparative analysis provided by the authors underscores the unique challenges and solutions in designing cervical, and lumbar spine implants, including load-bearing requirements and bioactivity with surrounding bony tissue to promote cell attachment. Additionally, the authors discuss the clinical outcomes associated with these implants, including the implications of improvements in surgical precision on patient outcomes. Lastly, they address strategies to overcome implementation challenges in healthcare facilities, which often resist new technology acquisitions due to perceived cost overruns and preconceived notions that hinder potential savings by providing customized surgical implants with the potential for lower complication and revision rates. This comprehensive review aims to provide insights into how modern 3D-printed titanium interbody fusion cages are made, explain quality standards, and how they may impact personalized surgical spine care.

Predictors of Subsidence and its Clinical Impact After Expandable Cage Insertion in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of prospectively collected multisurgeon data.

OBJECTIVE

Examine the rate, clinical impact, and predictors of subsidence after expandable minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) cage.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Expandable cage technology has been adopted in MI-TLIF to reduce the risks and optimize outcomes. Although subsidence is of particular concern when using expandable technology as the force required to expand the cage can weaken the endplates, its rates, predictors, and outcomes lack evidence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent 1 or 2-level MI-TLIF using expandable cages for degenerative lumbar conditions and had a follow-up of >1 year were included. Preoperative and immediate, early, and late postoperative radiographs were reviewed. Subsidence was determined if the average anterior/posterior disc height decreased by >25% compared with the immediate postoperative value. Patient-reported outcomes were collected and analyzed for differences at the early (<6 mo) and late (>6 mo) time points. Fusion was assessed by 1-year postoperative computed tomography.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-eight patients were included (mean age, 61 yr, 86% 1-level, 14% 2-level). Twenty-two (14.9%) demonstrated subsidence. Although statistically not significant, patients with subsidence were older, had lower bone mineral density, and had higher body mass index and comorbidity burden. Operative time was significantly higher ( P = 0.02) and implant width was lower ( P < 0.01) for subsided patients. Visual analog scale-leg was significantly lower for subsided patients compared with nonsubsided patients at a >6 months time point. Long-term (>6 mo) patient-acceptable symptom state achievement rate was lower for subsided patients (53% vs . 77%), although statistically not significant ( P = 0.065). No differences existed in complication, reoperation, or fusion rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the patients, 14.9% experienced subsidence predicted by narrower implants. Although subsidence did not have a significant impact on most patient-reported outcome measures and complication, reoperation, or fusion rates, patients had lower visual analog scale-leg and patient-acceptable symptom state achievement rates at the >6-month time point.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

Utility of Expandable Interbody Cages in Open Transforaminal Interbody Fusions: A Comparison With Static Cages

Background Expandable interbody cages, while popular in minimally invasive fusions due to their slim profile and increased ease of insertion, have not been widely explored in open surgery. The benefits of expandable cages may also extend to open fusions through their potential to achieve a greater restoration of lumbar lordosis while minimizing intraoperative complications. To highlight these benefits, we present a case series of adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients treated with an open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using expandable cages and compare outcomes to those of patients treated with static cages from the literature. Methods A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent a deformity correction procedure and TLIF with expandable interbody cages at Brigham and Women's Hospital between 2018 and 2022 was conducted. Patient demographics, complications, and pre- and postoperative radiographic parameters of spinopelvic alignment were collected. A literature search was completed to identify studies employing static cages. T-tests were performed to compare postoperative changes in radiographic parameters by cage type. Results Forty-five patients (mean age of 62.6 years) with an average of 2.1 cages placed met the inclusion criteria. Patients experienced five intraoperative complications and 23 neurologic deficits (from minor to major), while nine patients required a revision operation. Lumbar lordosis increased by 9.8° ± 14.5° (p < 0.0001), the sagittal vertical axis (SVA) decreased by 25.5 mm ± 56.7 mm (p = 0.0048), and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch decreased by 13.3° ± 17.5° (p < 0.0001) with the use of expandable cages. Expandable cages yielded similar changes in lumbar lordosis to 15° and 8° cages but improved the lumbar lordosis generated from rectangular and 4° cages. When compared to static cages, expandable cages mildly reduced intraoperative complications. Conclusions Expandable interbody cages are an effective means of restoring spinopelvic alignment in ASD that have the potential to improve patient outcomes in open fusions compared to standard static cages. Especially when compared to rectangular and 4° static cages, expandable cages provide a clear benefit in the correction of lumbar lordosis. The impact of open spinal fusions with expandable cages on outcomes should continue to be explored in other cohorts.

Does Interbody Cage Lordosis and Position Affect Radiographic Outcomes After Single-level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine if the degree of interbody cage lordosis and cage positioning are associated with changes in postoperative sagittal alignment after single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Ideal sagittal alignment and lumbopelvic alignment have been shown to correlate with postoperative clinical outcomes. TLIF is one technique that may improve these parameters, but whether the amount of cage lordosis improves either segmental or lumbar lordosis (LL) is unknown.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent single-level TLIF with either a 5-degree or a 12-degree lordotic cage. LL, segmental lordosis (SL), disk height, center point ratio, cage position, and cage subsidence were evaluated. Correlation between center point ratio and change in lordosis was assessed using the Spearman correlation coefficient. Secondary analysis included multiple linear regression to determine independent predictors of change in SL.

RESULTS

A total of 126 patients were included in the final analysis, with 51 patients receiving a 5-degree cage and 75 patients receiving a 12-degree cage. There were no differences in the postoperative minus preoperative LL (∆LL) (12-degree cage: -1.66 degrees vs. 5-degree cage: -2.88 degrees, P =0.528) or ∆SL (12-degree cage: -0.79 degrees vs. 5-degree cage: -1.68 degrees, P =0.513) at 1-month follow-up. Furthermore, no differences were found in ∆LL (12-degree cage: 2.40 degrees vs. 5-degree cage: 1.00 degrees, P =0.497) or ∆SL (12-degree cage: 1.24 degrees vs. 5-degree cage: 0.35 degrees, P =0.541) at final follow-up. Regression analysis failed to show demographic factors, cage positioning, or cage lordosis to be independent predictors of change in SL. No difference in subsidence was found between groups (12-degree cage: 25.5% vs. 5-degree cage: 32%, P =0.431).

CONCLUSION

Lordotic cage angle and cage positioning were not associated with perioperative changes in LL, SL, or cage subsidence after single-level TLIF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The Future of Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery

Strong forces are pushing minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) to the forefront of spine care. Less-invasive surgical techniques have been enabled by a variety of technical advances. Despite the promise of MISS, however, several factors, including few training opportunities, perception of a steep learning curve, and high upfront costs, have limited the adoption of these techniques. The "6 T's" is a framework highlighting key factors that must be accounted for to ensure safe and effective MISS as techniques continually evolve. Further, technological advancement in endoscopy, robotics, and augmented/virtual reality is enhancing minimally invasive surgeries to make them even less invasive and safer for patients. The evolution of these new techniques and technologies is driving the future of MISS.

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable articulating interbody spacers significantly improves radiographic outcomes compared to static interbody spacers

Background

The goal of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI TLIF) is to restore and maintain disc height and lordosis until arthrodesis occurs, while minimizing muscle disruption and improving recovery time. The purpose of this study was to compare the radiographic outcomes in patients treated with an articulating expandable spacer in MI TLIF to more traditional static spacers.

Methods

This was a multi-site, multi-surgeon, Institutional Review Board-exempt, retrospective clinical study from a prospectively collected database. It included 48 patients with a diagnosis of degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level from L2 to S1 with or without Grade 1 spondylolisthesis who underwent MI TLIF using either an articulating expandable or static interbody spacer. Twenty-seven patients were in the banana-shaped articulating expandable interbody spacer (ALTERA^®, Globus Medical, Inc., Audubon, PA, USA) group, while 21 patients were in the static interbody spacer group. Both groups had supplemental posterior pedicle screw and rod fixation. Radiographic records were assessed for disc height, neuroforaminal height, and lordosis at baseline, 3 and 6 months, and final follow-up.

Results

The articulating expandable spacer group displayed significantly greater improvement in anterior disc height from baseline compared to the static spacer group at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and final follow-up by averages of 2.6 mm (79%), 2.8 mm (92%), 3.4 mm (105%), and 3.8 mm (139%), respectively (P<0.05). Mean increases in posterior disc height were significantly greater in the expandable group compared to the static group by 1.2 mm (65%) and 1.7 mm (104%) at 6 months and final follow-up, respectively (P<0.05). Articulating expandable spacers produced significantly greater average improvement by 4.0 mm in neuroforaminal height from baseline to final follow-up compared to static spacers (P<0.05). Increases in intervertebral angle from baseline were significantly greater in the expandable group than in the static group at 3 and 6 months, and final follow-up by averages of 2.5°, 2.8°, and 3.1°, respectively (P<0.05). The articulating expandable spacer group resulted in significantly greater improvements in lumbar lordosis from baseline to 3 and 6 months than the static spacer group by 4.4° and 4.0°, respectively (P<0.05).

Conclusions

MI TLIF with articulating expandable interbody spacers provides significant restoration and maintenance of disc height, neuroforaminal height, and lordosis compared to static spacers in this comparative cohort. Long-term clinical outcomes are needed to correlate with these radiographic improvements.

Preoperative Radiographic Prediction Tool for Early Postoperative Segmental and Lumbar Lordosis Alignment After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Objective

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a common approach and results in varying degrees of lordosis correction. The purpose of this study is to determine preoperative radiographic spinopelvic parameters that predict change in postoperative segmental and lumbar lordosis after TLIF.

Materials & Methods

This study is a single surgeon retrospective review of one-level and two-level TLIFs from L3-S1. All patients underwent bilateral facetectomies, 10 mm TLIF cage (non-lordotic) insertions, and bilateral pedicle screw-rod construct placements. Pre- and post-operative X-rays were assessed for preoperative segmental lordosis (SL), lumbar lordosis (LL), and pelvic incidence (PI). Univariate and multi-predictor linear regression analyses were performed to determine the relationships between preoperative radiographic findings and change in early postoperative segmental and lumbar lordosis.

Results

Ninety-seven patients contributing 128 intervertebral segments were examined. The mean change in SL after TLIF was 7.3 (range: 0.10-28.9°, SD 6.39°). The mean change in LL after TLIF was 5.5˚ (range: -14.8-39.2°, standard deviation (SD) 7.16°). Greater preoperative LL predicted less postoperative LL correction, while greater preoperative PI predicted more postoperative SL and LL correction. Greater anterior disk height was noted to be associated with a decreased change in SL (∆SL). An annular tear on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) predicted a 2.7° decrease in ∆SL. A Schmorl's node on preoperative MRI predicted a 4.0° decrease in change in LL (∆LL).

Conclusions

A greater preoperative lordosis and a lower spinopelvic mismatch lessen the potential for an increase in the postoperative SL and LL after a TLIF, which is likely due to a ‘ceiling’ effect of an otherwise optimized spinal alignment. A greater anterior disk height and the presence of an annular tear are associated with decreased ∆SL.

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages: Increased Risk of Late Postoperative Subsidence Without a Real Improvement of Perioperative Outcomes: A Clinical Monocentric Study

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is one of several approaches to lumbar interbody fusion that has proven to be a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic lumbar degenerative disease The clinical outcomes of MIS-TLIF are generally favorable, but there is still controversy regarding its ability to restore sagittal alignment. For this reason, expandable transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cages have been developed and designed to improve ability to restore disc height and segmental lordosis. The use of expandable cages in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion has increased drastically; however, it is not clear how effective cage expansion is in regard to disc space lordosis, distraction, and long-term outcome.

METHODS

We reviewed a cohort of patients with symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc pathology who underwent MIS-TLIF at our institution. We compared clinical and radiographic outcomes of expandable versus nonexpandable cage use in MIS-TLIF focusing on mean changes in segmental lordosis, disc height, and postoperative complications. The results were compared with other studies reported in the international literature.

RESULTS

Mean change in segmental lordosis was not significantly different between the 2 groups. A significantly higher rate of postoperative subsidence was demonstrated in the expandable cage group.

CONCLUSION

This study established that expandable cage use in single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion did not reduce the rate of postoperative complications, but rather significantly increased a patient's risk of postoperative subsidence. Expandable cages do not presently demonstrate improved clinical outcomes or improved sagittal alignment compared with static cages.

Expandable Cage Technology-Transforaminal, Anterior, and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion

This review of the literature will focus on the indications, surgical techniques, and outcomes for expandable transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) operations. The expandable TLIF cage has become a workhorse for common degenerative pathology, whereas expandable ALIF cages carry the promise of greater lordotic correction while evading the diseased posterior elements. Expandable LLIF cages call upon minimally invasive techniques for a retroperitoneal, transpsoas approach to the disc space, obviating the need for an access surgeon and decreasing risk of injury to the critical neurovascular structures. Nuances between expandable and static cages for all 3 TLIF, ALIF, and LLIF operations are discussed in this review.

Static Versus Expandable Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Interbody Cages: A Comparison of One-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for One-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of static versus expandable polyether ether ketone (PEEK) cages on both clinical and radiographic outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent one-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with either a static or expandable PEEK cage. Patient outcomes were obtained from chart review and radiographic outcomes were measured using standing, lateral radiographs. Recovery ratios and the proportion of patients achieving the minimally clinically important difference were calculated for Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Physical Component Score-12, Mental Component Score-12, visual analogue scale for back, and visual analogue scale for leg at 1 year and compared between groups. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to determine the effect of cage type on the change in patient-reported outcome measures, controlling for demographic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 240 patients (137 static, 103 expandable) were included in the final analysis. ΔPhysical Component Score-12 scores at 3 months were significantly greater for the static group (16.0 vs. 10.0, P = 0.043) compared with the expandable group. Multivariate regression demonstrated that use of an expandable cage was associated with greater improvements in ΔODI (β: -7.82, P = 0.048) at 1 year. No differences were found in the perioperative change in sagittal spinal alignment within or between groups at 1 year. Subsidence rates failed to show any statistically significant difference between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with an expandable PEEK cage is an independent predictor of improved ODI scores at 1 year. Our study showed no significant differences in subsidence rates or changes in sagittal spinal alignment between static and expandable PEEK cages.

Full Endoscopic Lumbar Transforaminal Interbody Fusion in DDD Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease: A Latest Technique

BACKGROUND

Lumbar interbody fusion has long been used in the treatment of degenerative disc disease. Lumbar spinal interbody fusion surgery traditionally is an open surgical technique. Although lumbar spinal interbody fusions using endoscopy have been reported, the endoscope was used partially for the interbody fusion. We are reporting a case where lumbar interbody fusion with discectomy was entirely done through direct visualization with the endoscope.

METHODS

We report a case of a 55-year-old woman who underwent the transforaminal percutaneous full-endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion technique (FELTIF) under continuous and direct visualization at the L5-S1 level. To facilitate the interbody fusion, a foraminoplasty with complete resection of the superior articular process (SAP) and a partial pediculectomy of the S1 pedicle was performed. End plate sparing decortication techniques were used under direct video endoscopic visualization. The cage and bone graft insertion occurred through the endoscopic working cannula, thereby protecting the retracted traversing and exiting nerve roots at the surgical level. Posterior supplemental fixation with percutaneous pedicle screws was performed to complete the circumferential fusion.

RESULT

The VAS leg score was reduced to 2 from preoperative score of 7 and the VAS back score reduced 3 from preoperative score of 9. Her neurogenic symptom score improved from 8 before surgery to 1 at the last follow-up. The fusion is assessed by plain radiographs in follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that the insertion of an interbody fusion cage device directly through an endoscopic working cannula was technically feasible. Future research should focus on examining the clinical outcomes of this technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Oblique insertion of a straight cage during single level TLIF procedure proves to be non-inferior in terms of restoring segmental lordosis

Introduction

With increasing relevance of the postoperative spinopelvic alignment, achieving optimal restoration of segmental lordosis (SL) during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has become increasingly important. However, despite the easier insertion of the straight cage, its potential to restore SL is still considered inferior to the preferred insert-and-rotate technique with a banana-shaped cage.

Research question

To determine, if simple oblique insertion of a straight cage allows for an equally effective restoration of SL, but reduces risk for intraoperative cage subsidence requiring revision surgery.

Material and methods

The authors retrospectively identified 81 patients who underwent single-level TLIF between 11/2017-03/2020. 40 patients were included in the straight cage group, 41 patients in the banana cage group. The authors determined pre- and postoperative SL from plain lateral radiographs. Bone density was analyzed on computed tomographs using Hounsfield unit (HU) values.

Results

Both cage types were equally effective in restoring SL. However, 7.3% in the banana cage group, but none in the straight cage group, had to undergo revision surgery due to intraoperative cage subsidence. This was related to reduced bone density with lower HU values.

Discussion

With an extended dorsal release, the straight cage may be equally effective in restoring SL. Since no repositioning is needed after oblique insertion, the straight cage might cause less intraoperative endplate violation.

Conclusion

Provided an adequate surgical technique, both cage types might be equally effective in restoring SL after one-level TLIF surgery. However, the straight cage might represent the safer alternative in patients with reduced bone quality.

•

Straight cage in single-level TLIF equally effective in restoring segmental lordosis.

•

Straight cage might cause less revisions due to intraoperative cage subsidence.

•

Straight cage might be safer in patients with reduced bone quality.

Expandable Interbody Fusion Cages: An Editorial on the Surgeon's Perspective on Recent Technological Advances and Their Biomechanical Implications

BACKGROUND

Expandable cages have gone through several iterations since they first appeared on the market in the early 2000s. Their development was prompted by some common problems associated with static interbody cages, including migration, expulsion, dural or neural traction injury, and pseudarthrosis.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize current technological advances from earlier expandable lumbar interbody fusion devices to implants with vertical and medial-to-lateral expansion mechanisms.

METHODS

The authors review the currently available expandable cage designs, the incremental technological advances, and how these devices impact minimally invasive surgery interbody procedures and clinical outcomes. The strategic concepts intended to improve the minimally invasive application of expandable interbody fusion implants are reviewed from a surgeon's perspective in a clinical context to discuss how their use may improve patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The geometrical configuration, effective stiffness of composite multi-material cage designs may impact the bone-implant contact area with the endplates. Hybridization strategies of expandable cage technology with modern minimally invasive and endoscopic spinal surgery techniques are presented by outlining their advantages and disadvantages.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1 CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Systematic review.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion-Early Experience Using a Biplanar Expandable Cage for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) is a surgical technique frequently used to treat symptomatic lumbar spondylolisthesis. We aim to investigate the safety and efficacy of using a biplanar expandable cage in the treatment of symptomatic lumbar spondylolisthesis using a MIS TLIF approach.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patient records was performed on patients who underwent MIS TLIF for symptomatic lumbar spondylolisthesis using the FlareHawk cage over a 12-month period. Patient demographics, as well as preoperative and postoperative clinical and radiographic outcome measures were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 13 consecutive patients underwent MIS TLIF for symptomatic spondylolisthesis during the study period. The mean age was 60.2 ± 13.9 years, and 61.5% were female. The mean preoperative and postoperative slippage was 7.0 ± 3.0 mm and 1.0 ± 1.9 mm, respectively. The preoperative mean segmental lordosis was 5.1° ± 6.0°, mean anterior, posterior disc, and foraminal height were 9.1 ± 3.9 mm, 5.7 ± 1.5 mm, and 11.0 ± 2.0 mm, respectively. The postoperative mean segmental lordosis was 6.8° ± 4.7°, and mean anterior, posterior disc, and foraminal height were 11.4 ± 2.2 mm, 7.8 ± 1.0 mm, and 12.3 ± 1.3 mm. There was improvement in all radiographic parameters postoperatively. The mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) back pain, VAS leg pain improved from 7.0 ± 2.9 and 5.1 ± 3.0 preoperatively to 3.1 ± 2.9 and 1.1 ± 1.7 at the latest clinic follow-up visit, respectively (P = .0081). The mean EuroQol-Five Dimensions (EQ5D) score improved from 0.37 ± 1.7 to 0.66 ± 0.23 after surgery. There was no subsidence, endplate violation, cage migration, or other implant-related complications. No patient required reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

The biplanar expandable cage is both safe and efficacious in treating symptomatic lumbar spondylolisthesis using the MIS TLIF approach. Spine surgeons should be familiar with the biplanar expandable cage technology and keep it in their armamentarium in surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Three-level lumbar Ponte osteotomies with less invasive pelvic fixation improve spinal balance, quality of life and decrease disability in adult and elderly women with moderate adult spinal deformity

PURPOSE

To report on quality of life and radiological changes of Ponte osteotomies (POs) with long fixation for primary and revision surgery, in elderly women with adult spinal deformity (ASD).

METHODS

Sixty-seven (67) women, aged 69 ± 7 years, received 3 POs, spinopelvic fixation plus TLIFs. Forty-nine (73%) patients received primary and 18 (27%) revision surgery. Survivorship analysis was made for unplanned revision surgery for broken rods (BR); proximal junction failure (PJF); and deep wound infection (DWI). ODI and SF-36 were used for disability (ODI) and quality of life (SF-36) evaluation.

RESULTS

In total, 201 lumbar POs were made and 9.55 ± 3 levels fused. All patients were available 49 ± 11 months postoperatively. Postoperatively, SVA, CSVL, PI-LL, scoliosis, PT and T9-spinopelvic inclination were reduced, while LL and SS were increased significantly. At the final visit, PI-LL ≤ 10° was achieved in 26 (39.4%) patients; ≤ 15° in 51 (76%) patients, while all 67 patients showed a PI-LL ≤ 20°. Unplanned reoperation was performed in 11 (16.4%) patients: for BR in 5 (7.5%); for PJF in 3 (4.5%) and for DWI in 3 (4.5%) patients, respectively. With end point the reoperation for any reason the survival ± SE was 67.8% ± 0.1; for PJF 89.6 ± 0.065; and for BR 76% ± 0.1 in the final evaluation. There was no difference in survival between the primary and revision surgery groups (P = 0.568). ODI and SF-36 scores were improved postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-segment lumbar POs offered and maintained sufficient improvement of lumbar lordosis along with restoration of the sagittal and coronal spinal alignment, improvement of quality of life and disability of female adult and elderly population after primary and revision surgery for ASD.

Assessing the Difference in Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Expandable Cage and Nonexpandable Cage Among Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) has been shown to have excellent outcomes for surgical management of degenerative disc disease. However, the challenge is in addressing coronal imbalance and restoring lumbar lordosis and sagittal alignment. Use of expandable cages in MIS-TLIF has been hypothesized to circumvent this disadvantage. An indirect meta-analysis of the evidence is presented comparing outcomes from expandable cages with those from nonexpandable cages, in patients undergoing MIS-TLIF.

METHODS

PRISMA guidelines were used to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of expandable cages and nonexpandable cages in patients undergoing MIS-TLIF.

RESULTS

Twelve studies (706 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. The mean increase in disc height was found to be significantly greater for the nonexpandable cages group than for the expandable cages group (1.33 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-1.38 vs. 1.14 mm,; 95% CI, 1.06-1.23; P < 0.001). No significant difference was found regarding change in lumbar lordosis at last follow-up between the 2 groups (P = 0.34). The mean change in segmental lordosis was found to be significantly higher for the expandable cage group (5.04°, 95% CI, 3.89-6.20 vs. 2.08°, 95% CI, 1.93-2.22; P < 0.001). We did not detect any significant difference in fusion rate (P = 0.33), subsidence rate (P = 0.41) or in reoperations (P = 0.56) at last follow-up between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that there may not be a significant difference in clinical and radiologic parameters between expandable cages and nonexpandable cages among patients undergoing MIS-TLIF, and it is unclear if the higher cost of the expandable cages is justified.