The immuno-oncology framework: Enabling a new era of cancer therapy

The Physiological and Therapeutic Role of CD47 in Macrophage Function and Cancer

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy is an emerging strategy in cancer therapeutics aimed at modulating the immune system to inhibit pro-tumor pathways and increase a tumor's sensitivity to chemotherapy. Several clinically approved immunotherapy treatments, such as monoclonal antibody treatments, have been successful in solid tumors such as breast, colorectal, and pancreatic. However, an outstanding challenge of these strategies is tumor cell resistance. One target of interest for immune cell modulation is targeting macrophages that enter the tumor microenvironment. More specifically, an immune checkpoint of interest is CD47. CD47 is a transmembrane protein that inhibits phagocytic activity by acting as a "don't eat me" signal. In both mice and humans, healthy cells can express CD47, while solid malignancies like colorectal and breast cancer express it most strongly.

METHODS

Analysis of literature data on the physiological and functional roles of tissue-resident macrophages, along with the structure and mechanisms of action of the CD47 pathway was explored. We also explored how CD47 can influence different aspects of the tumor microenvironment (i.e. cellular metabolism and hypoxia) in addition to current clinical strategies and challenges associated with targeting CD47.

RESULTS

Overall, it was discovered that CD47 is overexpressed in a variety of cancer types in addition to normal tissue, making it a promising treatment regimen to enhance the capability of macrophages to phagocytose tumor cells. However, treatment efficacy is varied in pre-clinical and clinical models due to various challenges such as off-target effects.

CONCLUSION

This review emphasizes the diverse functionality of macrophages in normal and cancerous tissue, while also emphasizing the importance of macrophage targeting and their clinical significance.

Dissecting the functions and regulatory mechanisms of disulfidoptosis-related RPN1 in pan-cancer: modulation of immune microenvironment and cellular senescence

Introduction

Cancer's inherent heterogeneity, marked by diverse genetic and molecular alterations, presents significant challenges for developing effective treatments. One such alteration is the regulation of disulfidoptosis, a recently discovered programmed cell death pathway. RPN1, a key regulator associated with disulfidoptosis, may influence various aspects of tumor biology, including immune evasion and cellular senescence. This study aims to dissect the role of RPN1 in pan-cancer and its potential as a therapeutic target.

Methods

We employed a pan-cancer analysis to explore RPN1 expression and its association with clinical outcomes across multiple tumor types. Immune cell infiltration and expression of immune checkpoint genes were analyzed in relation to RPN1. Additionally, cellular senescence markers were assessed in RPN1 knockdown tumor cells. Gene regulatory mechanisms were studied through gene copy number variations, DNA methylation analysis, and transcriptional regulation by SP1.

Results

RPN1 is overexpressed in a wide range of tumor types and correlates with poor clinical outcomes, including overall survival, disease-specific survival, and progression-free intervals. Our analysis shows that RPN1 is involved in immune evasion, correlating with the presence of myeloid dendritic cells, macrophages, and tumor-associated fibroblasts, and influencing T-cell activity. RPN1 knockdown led to reduced tumor cell proliferation and induced cellular senescence, marked by increased senescence-associated biomarkers and β-galactosidase activity. RPN1 expression was found to be regulated by gene copy number variations, reduced DNA methylation, and transcriptional control via SP1.

Discussion

These findings highlight RPN1 as a key pan-cancer regulator, influencing immune microenvironment interactions and cellular senescence. The regulation of disulfidoptosis by RPN1 presents a promising avenue for therapeutic intervention. Targeting RPN1 could enhance immunotherapy efficacy and help mitigate tumor progression, offering a potential strategy for cancer treatment.

The landscape of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with novel Therapies: Secret alliances against breast cancer

This review focuses on the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the context of breast cancer (BC) management. These innovative treatments, by targeting proteins expressed on both tumor and immune cells, aim to overcome tumor-induced immune suppression and reactivate the immune system. The potential of this approach is the subject of numerous clinical studies. Here, we explore the key studies and emerging therapies related to ICIs providing a detailed analysis of their specific and combined use in BC treatment.

Nanomedicine-based cancer immunotherapy: a bibliometric analysis of research progress and prospects

Despite the increasing number of studies on nanomedicine-based cancer immunotherapy, the overall research trends in this field remain inadequately characterized. This study aims to evaluate the research trends and hotspots in nanomedicine-based cancer immunotherapy through a bibliometric analysis. As of March 31, 2024, relevant publications were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. Analytical tools including VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and an online bibliometric analysis platform were employed. A total of 5,180 publications were analyzed. The study reveals geographical disparities in research output, with China and the United States being the leading contributors. Institutionally, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Sichuan University are prominent contributors. Authorship analysis identifies key researchers, with Liu Zhuang being the most prolific author. "ACS Nano" and the "Journal of Controlled Release and Biomaterials" are identified as the leading journals in the field. Frequently occurring keywords include "cancer immunotherapy" and "drug delivery." Emerging frontiers in the field, such as "mRNA vaccine," "sonodynamic therapy," "oral squamous cell carcinoma," "STING pathway,"and "cGAS-STING pathway," are experiencing rapid growth. This study aims to provide new insights to advance scientific research and clinical applications in nanomedicine-based cancer immunotherapy.

Just how transformative will AI/ML be for immuno-oncology?

Immuno-oncology involves the study of approaches which harness the patient's immune system to fight malignancies. Immuno-oncology, as with every other biomedical and clinical research field as well as clinical operations, is in the midst of technological revolutions, which vastly increase the amount of available data. Recent advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) have received much attention in terms of their potential to harness available data to improve insights and outcomes in many areas including immuno-oncology. In this review, we discuss important aspects to consider when evaluating the potential impact of AI/ML applications in the clinic. We highlight four clinical/biomedical challenges relevant to immuno-oncology and how they may be able to be addressed by the latest advancements in AI/ML. These challenges include (1) efficiency in clinical workflows, (2) curation of high-quality image data, (3) finding, extracting and synthesizing text knowledge as well as addressing, and (4) small cohort size in immunotherapeutic evaluation cohorts. Finally, we outline how advancements in reinforcement and federated learning, as well as the development of best practices for ethical and unbiased data generation, are likely to drive future innovations.

High expression of CDKN2A is associated with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer and may guide PD-1-mediated immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Immunotherapy targeting the programmed death protein 1(PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1), is a promising treatment option for many cancers, but has exhibited poor therapeutic efficacy in CRC. This study aimed to identify and validate the prognostic value of immune-related genes and PD-1-associated genes for immunotherapy treatment of CRC.

METHODS

An extensive analysis of prognostic immune-related DEGs and PD-1-related genes has highlighted CDKN2A as a vital overlapping gene. To further explore its expression in CRC and its prognostic value, we conducted qRT-PCR, Western blot experiments, and consulted various databases. Subsequently, we conducted gene expression analysis, survival and prognostic analysis, enrichment analysis, immune infiltration assessment, and TIDE analysis to assess the significance of CDKN2A.

RESULTS

In CRC, CDKN2A was highly expressed compared to normal tissue. It was found that CDKN2A expression was related to clinicopathological features such as inflammation and tumor stage. Furthermore, a significant correlation was identified between CDKN2A and immune infiltration, specifically involving CD4 T cells, CD8 T cells, and macrophages. The analysis of the GSEA of CRC samples with high CDKN2A expression identified enrichment of genes involved in MYC target-v2 and metabolism pathways. Furthermore, UBE2I, CDK4, CDK6, TP53, and CCND1 were found to be significantly coexpressed with CDKN2A, suggesting a potential role that these gene play in CRC and immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed that high CDKN2A expression in CRC is a potentially valuable prognostic biomarker, which may guide PD-1-mediated immunotherapy.

Analysis of thymic generation of shared T-cell receptor α repertoire associated with recognition of tumor antigens shows no preference for neoantigens over wild-type antigens

BACKGROUND

The number of mutations in cancer cells is an important predictor of a positive response to cancer immunotherapy. It has been suggested that the neoantigens produced by these mutations are more immunogenic than nonmutated tumor antigens, which are likely to be protected by immunological tolerance. However, the mechanisms of tolerance as regards tumor antigens are incompletely understood.

METHODS

Here, we have analyzed the impact of thymic negative selection on shared T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire associated with the recognition of either mutated or nonmutated tumor antigens by comparing previously known TCR-antigen-pairs to TCR repertoires of 21 immunologically healthy individuals.

RESULTS

Our results show that TCRα chains associated with either type of tumor antigens are readily generated in the thymus, at a frequency similar to TCRα chains associated with nonself. In the peripheral repertoire, the relative clone size of nonself-associated chains is higher than that of the tumor antigens, but importantly, there is no difference between TCRα chains associated with mutated or nonmutated tumor antigens.

CONCLUSION

This suggests that the tolerance mechanisms protecting nonmutated tumor antigens are non-deletional and therefore potentially reversible. As unmutated antigens are, unlike mutations, shared by a large number of patients, they may offer advantages in designing immunological approaches to cancer treatment.

Is the new angel better than the old devil? Challenges and opportunities in CD47- SIRPα-based cancer therapy

The efficacy of immunotherapies is limited due to the impenetrable nature of the tumor microenvironment (TME). The TME of many tumors is immune-privileged, thus allowing them to evade host immunosurveillance. One mechanism through which this occurs is via the overexpression of CD47, a 'don't eat me' protein that can interact with SIRPα on myeloid cells to suppress their phagocytic action. In recent times, many studies are focusing on CD47-SIRPα-dependent immunotherapies to incite a 'seek and eat' interaction between phagocytes and tumors. Thus, in this review, we highlight the basic molecular properties and mechanisms of CD47-SIRPα cascade. In addition, we discuss the major challenges and potential remedies associated with CD47-SIRPα-based immunotherapies.

Cancer Immunoediting in the Era of Immuno-oncology

Basic science breakthroughs in T-cell biology and immune-tumor cell interactions ushered in a new era of cancer immunotherapy. Twenty years ago, cancer immunoediting was proposed as a framework to understand the dynamic process by which the immune system can both control and shape cancer and in its most complex form occurs through three phases termed elimination, equilibrium, and escape. During cancer progression through these phases, tumors undergo immunoediting, rendering them less immunogenic and more capable of establishing an immunosuppressive microenvironment. Therefore, cancer immunoediting integrates the complex immune-tumor cell interactions occurring in the tumor microenvironment and sculpts immunogenicity beyond shaping antigenicity. However, with the success of cancer immunotherapy resulting in durable clinical responses in the last decade and subsequent emergence of immuno-oncology as a clinical subspecialty, the phrase "cancer immunoediting" has recently, at times, been inappropriately restricted to describing neoantigen loss by immunoselection. This focus has obscured other mechanisms by which cancer immunoediting modifies tumor immunogenicity. Although establishment of the concept of cancer immunoediting and definitive experimental evidence supporting its existence was initially obtained from preclinical models in the absence of immunotherapy, cancer immunoediting is a continual process that also occurs during immunotherapy in human patients with cancer. Herein, we discuss the known mechanisms of cancer immunoediting obtained from preclinical and clinical data with an emphasis on how a greater understanding of cancer immunoediting may provide insights into immunotherapy resistance and how this resistance can be overcome.

Nanoparticle-Based Therapeutics to Overcome Obstacles in the Tumor Microenvironment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still a main health concern around the world, with a rising incidence and high mortality rate. The tumor-promoting components of the tumor microenvironment (TME) play a vital role in the development and metastasis of HCC. TME-targeted therapies have recently drawn increasing interest in the treatment of HCC. However, the short medication retention time in TME limits the efficiency of TME modulating strategies. The nanoparticles can be elaborately designed as needed to specifically target the tumor-promoting components in TME. In this regard, the use of nanomedicine to modulate TME components by delivering drugs with protection and prolonged circulation time in a spatiotemporal manner has shown promising potential. In this review, we briefly introduce the obstacles of TME and highlight the updated information on nanoparticles that modulate these obstacles. Furthermore, the present challenges and future prospects of TME modulating nanomedicines will be briefly discussed.

Paradigm shift from palliation to cure in metastatic microsatellite high colorectal carcinoma with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies worldwide with a high mortality rate. CRC is often plagued with significant treatment-related morbidity and mortality, and metastatic progression is common. With the advent of immunotherapy, inoperable and advanced cancers have shown favorable response. Immunotherapy has paved the way for survival of all those with advanced metastatic disease whose treatment was limited to palliative care. We explore the case of a 28-year-old female with advanced metastatic CRC refractory to chemotherapy and targeted therapy, managed with PD-1 inhibitor with complete clinical and pathological response in a relatively short period of time. The notion of upfront immunotherapy for advanced metastatic CRC with microsatellite instability is definitely reinforced by the favorable response seen in our case, and we hope that these findings would help reduce the dependence on chemotherapy as the mainstay therapeutic for advanced CRC.

Pharmacological inhibitors of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) induce immunogenic cell death through on-target effects

Immunogenic cell death (ICD) is clinically relevant because cytotoxicants that kill malignant cells via ICD elicit anticancer immune responses that prolong the effects of chemotherapies beyond treatment discontinuation. ICD is characterized by a series of stereotyped changes that increase the immunogenicity of dying cells: exposure of calreticulin on the cell surface, release of ATP and high mobility group box 1 protein, as well as a type I interferon response. Here, we examined the possibility that inhibition of an oncogenic kinase, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), might trigger ICD in anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) in which ALK is activated due to a chromosomal translocation. Multiple lines of evidence plead in favor of specific ICD-inducing effects of crizotinib and ceritinib in ALK-dependent ALCL: (i) they induce ICD stigmata at pharmacologically relevant, low concentrations; (ii) can be mimicked in their ICD-inducing effects by ALK knockdown; (iii) lose their effects in the context of resistance-conferring ALK mutants; (iv) ICD-inducing effects are mimicked by inhibition of the signal transduction pathways operating downstream of ALK. When ceritinib-treated murine ALK-expressing ALCL cells were inoculated into the left flank of immunocompetent syngeneic mice, they induced an immune response that slowed down the growth of live ALCL cells implanted in the right flank. Although ceritinib induced a transient shrinkage of tumors in lymphoma-bearing mice, irrespective of their immunocompetence, relapses occurred more frequently in the context of immunodeficiency, reducing the effects of ceritinib on survival by approximately 50%. Complete cure only occurred in immunocompetent mice and conferred protection to rechallenge with the same ALK-expressing lymphoma but not with another unrelated lymphoma. Moreover, immunotherapy with PD-1 blockade tended to increase cure rates. Altogether, these results support the contention that specific ALK inhibition stimulates the immune system by inducing ICD in ALK-positive ALCL.

Sexual Difference Matters: Females with High Microsatellite Instability Show Increased Survival after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer

Simple Summary

Here we report a sex- and age-specific analysis of 717 patients with gastric/gastro-esophageal adenocarcinomas treated with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CTx) regarding overall survival (OS) and response to CTx. The analysis was also performed in molecular subtypes determined previously. Females demonstrated a significantly increased OS particularly in the group of patients treated with neoadjuvant CTx. Specifically in this patient group and taken into account the molecular subtypes, females with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) showed the best survival followed by the male MSI-H, the female microsatellite stable (MSS) group and the male MSS group. Thus, we show an effect of sex on OS in gastric/gastro-esophageal cancer in particular for patients treated with neoadjuvant CTx. The superior survival of women with MSI-H tumors among the CTx patients implies that the combined consideration of these factors could contribute to an individualized treatment of the patients.

Abstract

We aimed to investigate patients with gastric/gastro-esophageal adenocarcinomas for sex- and age-specific differences regarding overall survival (OS) and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CTx) under consideration of tumor specific molecular subtypes. Overall, 717 patients were analyzed, including 426 patients treated with and 291 treated without neoadjuvant CTx. Microsatellite instability (MSI) and Epstein-Barr virus positivity (EBV+) were determined previously. Females demonstrated a significantly increased OS (p = 0.035), particularly in the subgroup treated with CTx (p = 0.054). No significant differences regarding age were found. In the molecular subgroups, no sex-related differences were observed in the non-CTx group. However in the CTx group, females with MSI-high (H) tumors showed the best OS (p = 0.043), followed by the male MSI-H (p = 0.198) and female MSS (p = 0.114) compared to the male MSS group as reference. The interaction between sex and MSI in this patient group was noticeable (p = 0.053) and was included as a relevant factor in multivariable analyses. In conclusion, our results show an effect of sex on OS in gastric/gastro-esophageal cancer specifically for patients treated with neoadjuvant CTx. The superior survival of women with MSI-H tumors after neoadjuvant CTx implies that combined consideration of these factors could contribute to an individualized treatment of the patients.

The Role of Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Adrenocortical Carcinoma

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare epithelial neoplasm, with a high tendency for local invasion and distant metastases, with limited treatment options. Surgical treatment is the method of choice. For decades, the mainstay of pharmacological treatment has been the adrenolytic drug mitotane, in combination with chemotherapy. Immunotherapy is the latest revolution in cancer therapy, however preliminary data with single immune checkpoint inhibitors showed a modest activity in ACC patients. The anti-neoplastic activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte-associated-antigen 4 (anti-CTLA-4), anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD-1), and anti-PD-ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibodies in different solid tumors has aroused interest to explore the potential therapeutic effect in ACC as well. Multiple ongoing clinical trials are currently evaluating the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in ACC (pembrolizumab, combination pembrolizumab and relacorilant, nivolumab, combination nivolumab and ipilimumab). The primary and acquired resistance to immunotherapy continue to counter treatment efficacy. Therefore, attempts are made to combine therapy: anti-PD-1 antibody and anti-CTLA-4 antibody, anti-PD-1 antibody and antagonist of the glucocorticoid receptor. The inhibitors of immune checkpoints would benefit patients with antitumor immunity activated by radiotherapy. Immunotherapy is well tolerated by patients; the most frequently observed side effects are mild. The most common adverse effects of immunotherapy are skin and gastrointestinal disorders. The most common endocrinopathy during anti-CTLA treatment is pituitary inflammation and thyroid disorders.

Exploring the Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Social Media Study

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used to treat several types of tumors. Impact of this emerging therapy on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is usually collected in clinical trials through standard questionnaires. However, this might not fully reflect HRQoL of patients under real-world conditions. In parallel, users' narratives from social media represent a potential new source of research concerning HRQoL.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to assess and compare coverage of ICI-treated patients' HRQoL domains and subdomains in standard questionnaires from clinical trials and in real-world setting from social media posts.

METHODS

A retrospective study was carried out by collecting social media posts in French language written by internet users mentioning their experiences with ICIs between January 2011 and August 2018. Automatic and manual extractions were implemented to create a corpus where domains and subdomains of HRQoL were classified. These annotations were compared with domains covered by 2 standard HRQoL questionnaires, the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the FACT-G.

RESULTS

We identified 150 users who described their own experience with ICI (89/150, 59.3%) or that of their relative (61/150, 40.7%), with 137 users (91.3%) reporting at least one HRQoL domain in their social media posts. A total of 8 domains and 42 subdomains of HRQoL were identified: Global health (1 subdomain; 115 patients), Symptoms (13; 76), Emotional state (10; 49), Role (7; 22), Physical activity (4; 13), Professional situation (3; 9), Cognitive state (2; 2), and Social state (2; 2). The QLQ-C30 showed a wider global coverage of social media HRQoL subdomains than the FACT-G, 45% (19/42) and 29% (12/42), respectively. For both QLQ-C30 and FACT-G questionnaires, coverage rates were particularly suboptimal for Symptoms (68/123, 55.3% and 72/123, 58.5%, respectively), Emotional state (7/49, 14% and 24/49, 49%, respectively), and Role (17/22, 77% and 15/22, 68%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Many patients with cancer are using social media to share their experiences with immunotherapy. Collecting and analyzing their spontaneous narratives are helpful to capture and understand their HRQoL in real-world setting. New measures of HRQoL are needed to provide more in-depth evaluation of Symptoms, Emotional state, and Role among patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy.

The history and advances in cancer immunotherapy: understanding the characteristics of tumor-infiltrating immune cells and their therapeutic implications

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment and rejuvenated the field of tumor immunology. Several types of immunotherapy, including adoptive cell transfer (ACT) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have obtained durable clinical responses, but their efficacies vary, and only subsets of cancer patients can benefit from them. Immune infiltrates in the tumor microenvironment (TME) have been shown to play a key role in tumor development and will affect the clinical outcomes of cancer patients. Comprehensive profiling of tumor-infiltrating immune cells would shed light on the mechanisms of cancer-immune evasion, thus providing opportunities for the development of novel therapeutic strategies. However, the highly heterogeneous and dynamic nature of the TME impedes the precise dissection of intratumoral immune cells. With recent advances in single-cell technologies such as single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and mass cytometry, systematic interrogation of the TME is feasible and will provide insights into the functional diversities of tumor-infiltrating immune cells. In this review, we outline the recent progress in cancer immunotherapy, particularly by focusing on landmark studies and the recent single-cell characterization of tumor-associated immune cells, and we summarize the phenotypic diversities of intratumoral immune cells and their connections with cancer immunotherapy. We believe such a review could strengthen our understanding of the progress in cancer immunotherapy, facilitate the elucidation of immune cell modulation in tumor progression, and thus guide the development of novel immunotherapies for cancer treatment.

Tumour Regression via Integrative Regulation of Neurological, Inflammatory, and Hypoxic Tumour Microenvironment

Changing trends in anticancer research have altered the treatment paradigm to the extent that it is difficult to investigate any anticancer drugs without mentioning immunotherapy. Thus, we are finally contemplating tumour regression using magic bullets known as immunotherapy drugs. This review explores the possible options and pitfalls in tumour regression by first elucidating the features of cancer and the importance of tumour microenvironments. Next, we evaluated the trends of anticancer therapeutics regulating tumour microenvironment. Finally, we introduced the concept of tumour regression and various targets of tumour microenvironment, which can be used in combination with current immunotherapy for tumour regression. In particular, we emphasize the importance of regulating the neurological manifestations of tumour microenvironment (N) in addition to inflammation (I) and hypoxia (H) in cancer.

Effectiveness of durvalumab versus chemotherapy in metastatic urothelial cancer: an observational, indirect comparison

Aim: To compare the overall survival of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) who failed platinum-based chemotherapy and received durvalumab or chemotherapy. Patients & methods: In an indirect comparison of patients with mUC who failed platinum-based chemotherapy, those who received durvalumab in a single-arm study were matched to patients from the Flatiron oncology electronic medical record database who received chemotherapy (n = 158 for each cohort). Matching was based on propensity scores. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression models were utilized. Results: Median overall survival was 11.2 months (95% CI: 7.2-16.9) for durvalumab versus 8.2 months (95% CI: 6.7-9.8) for chemotherapy (hazard ratio: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.48-0.84). Conclusion: As a second-line therapy for mUC, durvalumab was associated with longer overall survival than chemotherapy.

Consensus on the use of immune-related response criteria to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Many methods used to assess the effectiveness of immune checkpoint (programmed death-ligand 1 or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4) inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are insufficient, as the therapeutic benefit of these agents is often underestimated. Consequently, immune-related evaluation criteria have been developed to better reflect their efficacy. The aim of this consensus was to obtain the opinion of lung cancer experts on the adequacy of immune-response criteria for evaluating the efficacy of these treatments.

METHODS

Through two rounds of a modified Delphi consensus, 18 Spanish lung cancer experts participated in a 15-item questionnaire regarding the use of immunotherapies for NSCLC and the assessment criteria used to evaluate their effectiveness.

RESULTS

Consensus was achieved on 80% of the items in the questionnaire. The panelists agreed that although the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) are standard for the evaluation of solid tumors, immune-related response criteria would be useful for measuring the efficacy of immunotherapy. In addition, they considered that an overall survival (OS) rate at 2-5 years is the most useful end point for assessing the benefit of immunotherapy, as clinical benefit may extend beyond the RECIST criteria-defined progression of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Although immune-related response criteria have been developed to better evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy, their use has not been validated and is restricted to investigational applications. However, they may prove to be a useful tool for measuring the efficacy of immunotherapy agents in NSCLC, especially the OS rate at 2-5 years.

Nanomaterials for modulating innate immune cells in cancer immunotherapy

Cancer immunotherapy has been intensively investigated in both preclinical and clinical studies. Whereas chemotherapies use cytotoxic drugs to kill tumor cells, cancer immunotherapy is based on the ability of the immune system to fight cancer. Tumors are intimately associated with the immune system: they can suppress the immune response and/or control immune cells to support tumor growth. Immunotherapy has yielded promising results in clinical practice, but some patients show limited responses. This may reflect the complexities of the relationship between a tumor and the immune system. In an effort to improve the current immunotherapies, researchers have exploited nanomaterials in creating new strategies to cure tumors via modulation of the immune system in tumor tissues. Although extensive studies have examined the use of immune checkpoint-based immunotherapy, rather less work has focused on manipulating the innate immune cells. This review examines the recent approaches and challenges in the use of nanomaterials to modulate innate immune cells.

Cancer Immunotherapy, Part 3: Challenges and Future Trends

Despite dramatic breakthroughs, obstacles remain for the field of immunotherapy in cancer. These include the inability to predict treatment efficacy and patient response; the need for improved biomarkers; the development of resistance to immunotherapies; the lack of optimized clinical study designs; and high costs. Are solutions in sight?

End points and statistical considerations in immuno-oncology trials: impact on multiple myeloma

Unlike conventional cancer treatment, immuno-oncology therapies are commonly associated with delayed clinical benefit and durable responses, as seen with immuno-oncology therapies for multiple myeloma (MM). Therefore, a longer-term approach to immuno-oncology data assessment is required. Appropriate study designs, end points and statistical methods are essential for evaluating immuno-oncology therapies to assess treatment outcomes, and may better accommodate immuno-oncology clinical trial data. In addition to conventional end points including median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), end points such as hazard ratios for PFS and OS over time, PFS and OS landmark analyses beyond the median, and immune-response end points might provide better indications of the efficacy of immuno-oncology therapies. Long-term data with these agents will allow better prediction of outcomes in MM.

The Safety of available immunotherapy for the treatment of glioblastoma

INTRODUCTION

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults. Current standard of care involves maximal surgical resection combined with adjuvant chemoradiation. Growing support exists for a role of immunotherapy in treating these tumors with the goal of targeted cytotoxicity. Here we review data on the safety for current immunotherapies being tested in GBM. Areas covered: Safety data from published clinical trials, including ongoing clinical trials were reviewed. Immunotherapeutic classes currently under investigation in GBM include various vaccination strategies, adoptive T cell immunotherapy, immune checkpoint blockade, monoclonal antibodies, and cytokine therapies. Trials include children, adolescents, and adults with either primary or recurrent GBM. Expert opinion: Based on the reviewed clinical trials, the current immunotherapies targeting GBM are safe and well-tolerated with minimal toxicities which should be noted. However, the gains in patient survival have been modest. A safe and well-tolerated combinatory immunotherapeutic approach may be essential for optimal efficacy towards GBM.

The Immune System in Cancer Pathogenesis: Potential Therapeutic Approaches

Interplay among immune activation and cancer pathogenesis provides the framework for a novel subspecialty known as immunooncology. In the rapidly evolving field of immunooncology, understanding the tumor-specific immune response enhances understanding of cancer resistance. This review highlights the fundamentals of incorporating precision medicine to discover new immune biomarkers and predictive signatures. Using a personalized approach may have a significant, positive impact on the use of oncolytics to better guide safer and more effective therapies.

Development of immuno-oncology drugs - from CTLA4 to PD1 to the next generations

Since the regulatory approval of ipilimumab in 2011, the field of cancer immunotherapy has been experiencing a renaissance. This success is based on progress in both preclinical and clinical science, including the development of new methods of investigation. Immuno-oncology has become a sub-specialty within oncology owing to its unique science and its potential for substantial and long-term clinical benefit. Immunotherapy agents do not directly attack the tumour but instead mobilize the immune system - this can be achieved through various approaches that utilize adaptive or innate immunity. Therefore, immuno-oncology drug development encompasses a broad range of agents, including antibodies, peptides, proteins, small molecules, adjuvants, cytokines, oncolytic viruses, bi-specific molecules and cellular therapies. This Perspective summarizes the recent history of cancer immunotherapy, including the factors that led to its success, provides an overview of novel drug-development considerations, summarizes three generations of immunotherapies that have been developed since 2011 and, thus, illustrates the breadth of opportunities these new generations of immunotherapies represent.

Enhancing the safety of antibody-based immunomodulatory cancer therapy without compromising therapeutic benefit: Can we have our cake and eat it too?

INTRODUCTION

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated clinical benefit in treating patients with cancer and have paved the way for additional immune-modulating mAbs such as those targeting costimulatory receptors. The full clinical utility of these agents, however, is hampered by immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that can occur during therapy.

AREAS COVERED

We first provide a general overview of tumor immunity, followed by a review of the two major classes of immunomodulatory mAbs being developed as cancer therapeutics: checkpoint inhibitors and costimulatory receptor agonists. We then discuss therapy-associated adverse events. Finally, we describe in detail the mechanisms driving their therapeutic activity, with an emphasis on interactions between antibody fragment crystallizable (Fc) domains and Fc receptors (FcR).

EXPERT OPINION

Given that Fc-FcR interactions appear critical in facilitating the ability of immunomodulatory mAbs to elicit both therapeutically useful as well as adverse effects, the engineering of mAbs that can effectively engage their targets while limiting interaction with FcRs might represent a promising future avenue for developing the next generation of immune-enhancing tumoricidal agents with increased safety and retention of efficacy.

A unique multiattribute method to predict success of emerging drug targets

A crucial driver for increased productivity is the identification of potential drug failures at the earliest stages of development, thereby reducing costly, large-scale clinical trials. Here, we present a multiattribute method that utilizes six key aspects of development: (i) target validation and proof-of-mechanism; (ii) target engagement and proof-of-principle; (iii) proof-of-concept; (iv) therapy characteristics such as degree of disruption; (v) stakeholder opinions; and (vi) benchmarking metrics. Through this method, attributes are weighted according to validated characteristics to predict the success of drug targets across all stages of development. Furthermore, using clinical targets for hepatitis B, we demonstrate that our methodology can be validated retrospectively.

The Concept of Hormesis in Cancer Therapy - Is Less More?

There has, in recent years, been a paradigm shift in our understanding of the role of the immune system in the development of cancers. Immune dysregulation, manifesting as chronic inflammation, not only facilitates the growth and spread of tumors but prevents the host from mounting effective immune defenses against it. Many attempts are being made to develop novel immunotherapeutic strategies, but there is growing evidence that a radical reevaluation of the mode of action of chemotherapeutic agents and ionizing radiation is required in the light of advances in immunology.

Based on the concept of hormesis – defined as the presence of different modes of action of therapeutic modalities at different doses – a ‘repositioning’ of chemotherapy and radiotherapy may be required in all aspects of cancer management. In the case of chemotherapy, this may involve a change from the maximum tolerated dose concept to low dose intermittent (‘metronomic’) therapy, whilst in radiation therapy, highly accurate stereotactic targeting enables ablative, antigen-releasing (immunogenic) doses of radiation to be delivered to the tumor with sparing of surrounding normal tissues. Coupled with emerging immunotherapeutic procedures, the future of cancer treatment may well lie in repositioned chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and more localized debulking surgery.

Identification of differences in immunotherapy knowledge and practice patterns among oncologists from six European countries

The treatment of cancer has changed significantly over the past decade, from a treatment paradigm based primarily on surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, to the development of targeted therapies involving tumor-specific signaling pathways, as well as the immune system. Recent developments have demonstrated the significant clinical benefits of immunotherapy that are quickly being established as standard treatments for certain malignancies. In this study, we demonstrated that clinical practice is not keeping pace with advancing immuno-oncology principles and research. We further demonstrated that the incorporation of immunotherapeutic approaches into the treatment of cancer patients varies widely, not only between developed and developing countries, but also between countries in specific geographical areas that have experienced similar cultural and economic development. We developed a survey to assess the deficiencies in scientific understanding, access to information and treatment options and investigated the differences in clinical practice behaviors among oncologists from six European countries: France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom. Our data demonstrated significant differences in all the categories assessed. Therefore, we concluded that there is a need to develop similar assessment tools to identify care imbalances, so that initiatives may be developed to correct care inequities that ultimately affect patient outcomes worldwide.

Challenges and opportunities for cancer vaccines in the current NSCLC clinical scenario

This review is aimed to focus on NSCLC as an emerging and promising model for active immunotherapy and the challenges for its inclusion in the current clinical scenario. Cancer vaccines for NSCLC have been focused as a therapeutic option based on the identification of a tumor hallmark and the active immunization with the related molecules that triggers cellular and/or humoral responses that consequently destroy or delay the rate of malignant progression. This therapeutic intervention in an established disease state has been aimed to impact into prolonging patient´s survival with ethically accepted quality of life. Understanding of relationship between structure and function in cancer vaccines is essential to interpret their opportunities to impact into prolonging survival and increasing quality of life in cancer patients. It is widely accepted that the failure of the cancer vaccines in the NSCLC scenario is related with its introduction in the advanced disease stages and poor performance status of the patients due to the combination of the tumor induced immunosuppression with the immune senescence. Despite first, second and emerging third line of onco-specific treatments the life expectancy for NSCLC patients diagnosed at advanced stages is surrounding the 12 months of median survival and in facts the today real circumstances are extremely demanding for the success inclusion of cancer vaccines as therapeutic choice in the clinical scenario. The kinetics of the active immunizations encompasses a sequential cascade of clinical endpoints: starting by the activation of the immune system, followed by the antitumor response and finalizing with the consequential impact on patients’ overall survival. Today this cascade of clinical endpoints is the backbone for active immunization assessment and moreover the concept of cancer vaccines, applied in the NSCLC setting, is just evolving as a complex therapeutic strategy, in which the opportunities for cancer vaccines start from the selection of the target cancer hallmark, followed by the vaccine formulation and its platforms for immune potentiating, also cover the successful insertion in the standard of care, the chronic administration beyond progression disease, the personalization based on predictors of response and the potential combination with other targeted therapies.

Comparative analysis of cancer vaccine settings for the selection of an effective protocol in mice

Background

Cancer vaccines are considered a promising therapeutic approach. However, their clinical results are not yet satisfactory. This may be due to the the difficulty of selection of an efficient tumor associated antigen (TAA) and immunization protocol. Indeed, the weak antigenicity of many TAA impairs the design of robust procedures, therefore a systematic analysis to identify the most efficient TAA is mandatory. Here, we performed a study to compare different gp100 vaccination strategies to identify the best strategy to provide a 100% protection against experimental melanoma in a reproducible manner.

Methods

C57BL/6J mice were challenged subcutaneously with B16F10 melanoma cells, after vaccination with: a) mouse or human gp100_25-33 peptide plus CpG adjuvant; b) mouse or human gp100 gene; c) mouse or human gp100_25-33 peptide-pulsed dendritic cells (DC). Alternatively, a neutralizing anti-IL-10 monoclonal antibody (mAb) was subcutaneously administered at the site of tumor challenge to counteract regulatory cells. Finally, combinatorial treatment was performed associating human gp100_25-33 peptide-pulsed DC vaccination with administration of the anti-IL-10 mAb.

Results

Vaccination with human gp100_25-33 peptide-pulsed DC was the most effective immunization protocol, although not achieving a full protection. Administration of the anti-IL-10 mAb showed also a remarkable protective effect, replicated in mice challenged with a different tumor, Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma. When immunization with gp100_25-33 peptide-pulsed DC was associated with IL-10 counteraction, a 100% protective effect was consistently achieved. The analysis on the T-cell tumor infiltrates showed an increase of CD4+granzyme+ T-cells and a decreased number of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Treg elements from mice treated with either gp100_25-33 peptide-pulsed DC vaccination or anti-IL-10 mAb administration. These data suggest that processes of intratumoral re-balance between effector and regulatory T cell subpopulations may play a critical protective role in immunotherapy protocols.

Conclusions

Here we demonstrate that, in the setting of a cancer vaccine strategy, a comparative analysis of different personalized approaches may favour the unveiling of the most effective protocol. Moreover, our findings suggest that counteraction of IL-10 activity may be critical to revert the intratumoral environment promoting Treg polarization, thus increasing the effects of a vaccination against selected TAA.

Role of immunotherapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)

Initial therapy for metastatic prostate cancer consists of androgenic suppression. However, this is only a palliative treatment with an effective duration that usually lasts 12-24 months. Historically, castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) had been considered a chemoresistant tumour. In 2004, docetaxel received USA Food and Drug Administration approval as a first-line treatment for metastatic prostate cancer, after two independent phase III trials showed an increased survival benefit. Recently, five new drugs have shown increased survival in CRPC: sipuleucel-T (assymptomatic or minimally symptomatic), abiraterone acetate (before and after docetaxel), cabazitaxel (after docetaxel), MDV3100 (after docetaxel) and radium-223 (not suitable for docetaxel or after docetaxel). The identification of antigens in normal prostate tissue or prostate cancer that are recognised by immune effectors cells has resulted in several new studies based on immunotherapy. Prostate cancer disease provides a test system to determine the efficacy of vaccines for different reasons. This cancer is a tumour that grows relatively slowly. Recurrence is often diagnosed early (with many patients presenting only with biochemical progression), there is a biological marker that can predict prognosis and outcome (PSA doubling time), various specific antigens have been identified and characterised, and vaccines can be used with a good safety profile combined with anti-androgen therapy, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. Here we provide a review of the main important immune treatments in CRPC.