Effect of donor-specific antibodies and panel reactive antibodies in living donor liver transplant recipients

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is an established life-saving procedure. The field of LT has changed in the past 10 years from several perspectives, with the expansion of indications, transplantation of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure, evolution of transplant oncology, the use of donations after cardiac death, new surgical techniques, and prioritisation of recipients on the waiting list. In addition, the advent of organ perfusion machines, the recognition of new forms of rejection, and the attention paid to the transition from paediatric to adult patients, have all improved the management of LT recipients. The purpose of the EASL guidelines presented here is not to cover all aspects of LT but to focus on developments since the previous EASL guidelines published in 2016.

Human leukocyte antigen compatibility and incidence of donor-specific antibodies in pediatric liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Antibody-mediated rejection following liver transplantation (LT) has been increasingly recognized, particularly with respect to the emergence of de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and their impact on graft longevity. While substantial evidence for adult populations exists, research focusing on pediatric LT outcomes remains limited.

AIM

To investigate the prevalence of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches and DSA and evaluate their association with rejection episodes after pediatric LT.

METHODS

A cohort of pediatric LT recipients underwent HLA testing at Santa Casa de Porto Alegre, Brazil, between December 2013 and December 2023. Only patients who survived for > 30 days after LT with at least one DSA analysis were included. DSA classes I and II and cross-matches were analyzed. The presence of de novo DSA (dnDSA) was evaluated at least 3 months after LT using the Luminex® single antigen bead method, with a positive reaction threshold set at 1000 MFI. Rejection episodes were confirmed by liver biopsy.

RESULTS

Overall, 67 transplanted children were analyzed; 61 received grafts from living donors, 85% of whom were related to recipients. Pre-transplant DSA (class I or II) was detected in 28.3% of patients, and dnDSA was detected in 48.4%. The median time to DSA detection after LT was 19.7 [interquartile range (IQR): 4.3-35.6] months. Biopsy-proven rejection occurred in 13 patients at follow-up, with C4d positivity observed in 5/13 Liver biopsies. The median time to rejection was 7.8 (IQR: 5.7-12.8) months. The presence of dnDSA was significantly associated with rejection (36% vs 3%, P < 0.001). The rejection-free survival rates at 12 and 24 months were 76% vs 100% and 58% vs 95% for patients with dnDSA anti-DQ vs those without, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight the importance of incorporating DSA assessment into pre- and post-transplantation protocols for pediatric LT recipients. Future implications may include immunosuppression minimization strategies based on this analysis in pediatric LT recipients.

Clinical recommendations for posttransplant assessment of anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) donor-specific antibodies: A Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk consensus document

Although anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are commonly measured in clinical practice and their relationship with transplant outcome is well established, clinical recommendations for anti-HLA antibody assessment are sparse. Supported by a careful and critical review of the current literature performed by the Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk 2022 working group, this consensus report provides clinical practice recommendations in kidney, heart, lung, and liver transplantation based on expert assessment of quality and strength of evidence. The recommendations address 3 major clinical problems in transplantation and include guidance regarding posttransplant DSA assessment and application to diagnostics, prognostics, and therapeutics: (1) the clinical implications of positive posttransplant DSA detection according to DSA status (ie, preformed or de novo), (2) the relevance of posttransplant DSA assessment for precision diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection and for treatment management, and (3) the relevance of posttransplant DSA for allograft prognosis and risk stratification. This consensus report also highlights gaps in current knowledge and provides directions for clinical investigations and trials in the future that will further refine the clinical utility of posttransplant DSA assessment, leading to improved transplant management and patient care.

Refractory Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection in Liver Transplant After Desensitization of Preformed Donor Specific Antibody-Validity of Bortezomib and Everolimus: A Case Report

Here, we report a case of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) complicated with severe acute antibody-mediated rejection (aAMR), although desensitization was performed for preformed donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody (DSA). LDLT was performed in a 59-year-old woman with alcoholic cirrhosis with a graft from her 60-year-old husband as a living donor. She had reproductive history of 4 gravidity and parity with her husband. Preoperative serologic studies showed positive complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatch and anti-human leukocyte antigen-A26 antibody was identified as DSA. Desensitization for preformed DSA with rituximab and plasma exchange was performed before LDLT. We decided to perform LDLT using her husband right liver as living donor graft since the DSA mean fluoro-intensity was down to negative range. The immunosuppressive regimen was comprised with steroid and tacrolimus. However, the recipient developed acute cellular rejection on day 5 after LDLT, followed by severe aAMR. Re-administration of rituximab followed by 4 courses of plasma exchange failed to treat aAMR. The DSA mean fluoro-intensity was successfully suppressed after bortezomib was administered however impaired serologic liver function test and cholestasis were remained. The liver function test and cholestasis in the graft were improved after Everolimus was administered. The recipient was discharged on postoperative day 196. In conclusion, we report a case of LDLT who developed aAMR after desensitization of preformed DSA and was successfully treated with intensive therapy with bortezomib and everolimus.

Antibody-mediated rejection of the liver allograft: An update and a clinico-pathological perspective

Antibody-mediated rejection after liver transplantation is an under-recognised cause of allograft injury. While definitions of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection have increased clinical awareness, timely identification and management of antibody-mediated rejection remain difficult because of complexities in diagnosis and histopathology, lack of treatment protocols, and unclear long-term outcomes. While recent cohort studies assessing the importance of donor-specific antibodies have aided in its diagnosis, literature on the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation remain limited to case reports and small series. Further increasing the awareness and timely recognition of antibody-mediated rejection post-liver transplantation is crucial in order to stimulate future research and the development of protocols for its diagnosis and treatment. This review will summarise recent advances in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation, as well as some of the histopathologic features (on liver biopsy tissue) of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection.

Preformed donor-specific antibodies are associated with 90-day mortality in living-donor liver transplantation

AIM

The impact of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSAs) on living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between DSAs and short-term outcomes in LDLT recipients, and to clarify the clinical impact of DSAs.

METHOD

Anti-HLA antibodies were screened in preoperative serum samples taken from 40 liver transplant recipients at Ehime University (Toon, Japan) between August 2001 and July 2015. Screening was carried out using the Flow-PRA method, and DSAs were detected in anti-HLA antibody-positive recipients using the Luminex single-antigen identification test. A mean fluorescence intensity of 1000 was used as the cut-off for positivity. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical courses of patients who were DSA-positive to elucidate early clinical manifestations in LDLT recipients.

RESULTS

Fifteen (12 female and 3 male) patients (38%) had anti-HLA antibodies. Eight of the 15 anti-HLA antibody-positive patients were positive for DSAs, and all were women. The 90-day survival rate of DSA-positive patients (50%) was significantly lower than that of DSA-negative patients (84.4%) (0.0112; Wilcoxon test). On univariate analysis, the DSA-positive rate was significantly higher in the 90-day mortality group. Postoperatively, the incidence of acute cellular rejection was higher in DSA-positive than DSA-negative patients. Thrombotic microangiopathy developed only in DSA-positive patients. We found no relationship between DSA status and bile duct stricture.

CONCLUSION

Preformed DSAs could be associated with elevated 90-day mortality in LDLT recipients. Further large-scale studies are required to verify the risk associated with DSAs in LDLT.

Prevalence of pre-transplant anti-HLA antibodies and their impact on outcomes in lung transplant recipients

Background

Previous studies have suggested that antibodies against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) are associated with worse outcomes in lung transplantation. However, little is known about the factors associated with outcomes following lung transplantation in Asia. Accordingly, we investigated the prevalence of anti-HLA antibodies in recipients before transplantation and assessed their impact on outcomes in Korea.

Methods

A single-center retrospective study was conducted. The study included 76 patients who received a lung transplant at a tertiary hospital in South Korea between January 2010 and March 2015.

Results

Nine patients (11.8%) had class I and/or class II panel-reactive antibodies greater than 50%. Twelve patients (15.8%) had anti-HLA antibodies with a low mean fluorescence intensity (MFI, 1000–3000), 7 (9.2%) with a moderate MFI (3000–5000), and 12 (15.8%) with a high MFI (> 5000). Ten patients (13.2%) had suspected donor-specific antibodies (DSA), and 60% (6/10) of these patients had antibodies with a high MFI. In an analysis of outcomes, high-grade (≥2) primary graft dysfunction (PGD) was more frequent in patients with anti-HLA antibodies with moderate-to-high MFI values than in patients with low MFI values (39.4% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.011). Of 20 patients who survived longer than 2 years and evaluated for pBOS after transplant, potential bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (pBOS) or BOS was more frequent in patients with anti-HLA antibodies with moderate-to-high MFI than in patients with low MFI, although this difference was not statistically significant (50.0% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.131).

Conclusions

The prevalence of anti-HLA antibodies with high MFI was not high in Korea. However, the MFI was relatively high in patients with DSA. Anti-HLA antibodies with moderate-to-high MFI values were related to high-grade PGD. Therefore, recipients with high MFI before lung transplantation should be considered for desensitization and close monitoring.

Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Liver Transplant

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in liver transplants is a field in its infancy compared with its allograft cohorts of the kidney and lung. Acute AMR is diagnosed based on specific clinical and histopathologic criteria: serum donor specific antibodies, C4d staining, histopathologic findings on liver biopsy, and exclusion of other entities. In contrast, the histologic features of chronic AMR are not as specific and it is a more challenging diagnosis to make. Treatments of acute and chronic AMR include some combination of steroids, immune-modulating agents, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, and proteasome inhibitors.

2016 Comprehensive Update of the Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology: Introduction of Antibody-Mediated Rejection

The Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology reviewed and discussed literature evidence regarding antibody-mediated liver allograft rejection at the 11th (Paris, France, June 5-10, 2011), 12th (Comandatuba, Brazil, August 19-23, 2013), and 13th (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, October 5-10, 2015) meetings of the Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology. Discussion continued online. The primary goal was to introduce guidelines and consensus criteria for the diagnosis of liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection and provide a comprehensive update of all Banff Schema recommendations. Included are new recommendations for complement component 4d tissue staining and interpretation, staging liver allograft fibrosis, and findings related to immunosuppression minimization. In an effort to create a single reference document, previous unchanged criteria are also included.

Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies in Living Versus Deceased Donor Liver Transplant Recipients

With less ischemia, improved donor selection and controlled procedures, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) might lead to less HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA) formation or fewer adverse outcomes than deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Using the multicenter A2ALL (Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study) biorepository, we compared the incidence and outcomes of preformed and de novo DSAs between LDLT and DDLT. In total, 129 LDLT and 66 DDLT recipients were identified as having serial samples. The prevalence of preformed and de novo DSAs was not different between DDLT and LDLT recipients (p = 0.93). There was no association between patient survival and the timing (preformed vs. de novo), class (I vs. II) and relative levels of DSA between the groups; however, preformed DSA was associated with higher graft failure only in DDLT recipients (p = 0.01). De novo DSA was associated with graft failure regardless of liver transplant type (p = 0.005) but with rejection only in DDLT (p = 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, DSA was an independent risk factor for graft failure regardless of liver transplant type (p = 0.017, preformed; p = 0.002, de novo). In conclusion, although similar in prevalence, DSA may have more impact in DDLT than LDLT recipients. Although our findings need further validation, future research should more robustly test the effect of donor type and strategies to mitigate the impact of DSA.