Essential role of small bowel capsule endoscopy in reclassification of colonic inflammatory bowel disease type unclassified

Capsule Endoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Evolving Role and Recent Advances

Capsule endoscopy has been proven as an efficient and accurate tool in the diagnosing and monitoring patients with inflammatory bowel disease, especially Crohn's disease (CD). The current European Crohn's and Colitis Organization guidelines recommend small bowel disease assessment in newly diagnosed CD, wherein small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is of prime importance. SBCE plays an essential role in assessing mucosal healing in patients with CD, serving as a monitoring tool in a treat to target strategy, and is capable of identifying high-risk patients for future flares.

Reclassification of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Type Unclassified by Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy

Background and Objectives: Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are idiopathic inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) without a unique, gold standard diagnostic test. UC and Crohn's colitis are impossible to distinguish in approximately 10% of cases. The term IBD type unclassified (IBD-U) is recommended for cases of chronic colitis showing overlapping endoscopic, radiological, and biopsy histological features between UC and CD, while indetermined colitis is reserved for colectomy specimens. Our aim was to assess the role of small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) in the diagnostic work-up of IBD-U. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively studied the cases of IBD-U explored by SBCE in a tertiary referral gastroenterology center. Patients were investigated using SBCE after contraindications were excluded. Diagnostic criteria for small bowel CD consisted in more than three ulcerations, irregular ulcers, or stenosis, and the Lewis score was used for the quantification of inflammation. The immediate impact of reclassification and outcome data was recorded over a follow-up period of more than one year. Results: Twenty-eight patients with IBD-U were examined using SBCE. Nine patients had small bowel lesions that met the diagnostic criteria for CD, resulting in a reclassification rate of 32.1%. In five of these cases, the treatment was subsequently changed. In the remaining nineteen examinations, no significant findings were observed. There were no complications associated with SBCE. Median follow-up time was 32.5 months (range 12-60). During follow-up, twelve patients were classified as having UC, and seven remained as having an unclassified type; one case of colectomy, for medically refractory UC, was recorded. Conclusions: SBCE is a useful safe tool in the work-up of IBD-U, allowing reclassification in about one third of cases, with subsequent treatment modifications. SBCE may provide a definite diagnosis, enhance the comprehension of the disease's progression, and optimize the short- and long-term management strategy.

Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2022

MR1: ESGE recommends small-bowel capsule endoscopy as the first-line examination, before consideration of other endoscopic and radiological diagnostic tests for suspected small-bowel bleeding, given the excellent safety profile of capsule endoscopy, its patient tolerability, and its potential to visualize the entire small-bowel mucosa.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR2: ESGE recommends small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with overt suspected small-bowel bleeding as soon as possible after the bleeding episode, ideally within 48 hours, to maximize the diagnostic and subsequent therapeutic yield.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR3: ESGE does not recommend routine second-look endoscopy prior to small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding or iron-deficiency anemia.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. MR4: ESGE recommends conservative management in those patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding and high quality negative small-bowel capsule endoscopy.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR5: ESGE recommends device-assisted enteroscopy to confirm and possibly treat lesions identified by small-bowel capsule endoscopy.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR6: ESGE recommends the performance of small-bowel capsule endoscopy as a first-line examination in patients with iron-deficiency anemia when small bowel evaluation is indicated.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR7: ESGE recommends small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected Crohn's disease and negative ileocolonoscopy findings as the initial diagnostic modality for investigating the small bowel, in the absence of obstructive symptoms or known bowel stenosis.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR8: ESGE recommends, in patients with unremarkable or nondiagnostic findings from dedicated small-bowel cross-sectional imaging, small-bowel capsule endoscopy as a subsequent investigation if deemed likely to influence patient management.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. MR9: ESGE recommends, in patients with established Crohn's disease, the use of a patency capsule before small-bowel capsule endoscopy to decrease the capsule retention rate.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR10: ESGE recommends device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) as an alternative to surgery for foreign bodies retained in the small bowel requiring retrieval in patients without acute intestinal obstruction.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR11: ESGE recommends DAE-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (DAE-ERCP) as a first-line endoscopic approach to treat pancreaticobiliary diseases in patients with surgically altered anatomy (except for Billroth II patients).Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.

Saudi Arabia consensus guidance for the diagnosis and management of adults with inflammatory bowel disease

Optimal management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) relies on a clear understanding and tailoring evidence-based interventions by clinicians in partnership with patients. This article provides concise guidelines for the management of IBD in adults, based on the most up-to-date information at the time of writing and will be regularly updated. These guidelines were developed by the Saudi Ministry of Health in collaboration with the Saudi Gastroenterology Association and the Saudi Society of Clinical Pharmacy. After an extensive literature review, 78 evidence-and expert opinion-based recommendations for diagnosing and treating ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in adults were proposed and further refined by a voting process. The consensus guidelines include the finally agreed on statements with their level of evidence covering different aspects of IBD diagnosis and treatment.

Small bowel Crohn's disease: optimal modality for diagnosis and monitoring

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This paper reviews different imaging options for small bowel (SB) Crohn's disease (CD) patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

In total, 80% of patients suffering from CD have SB involvement, being the exclusive manifestation in 30% of cases. As the proximal disease is related to poor response to treatment, a higher rate of stenosis and a greater need for surgical treatment, a SB assessment should be performed. This evaluation should be done not only once the disease has been diagnosed but periodically. The former to determine the extent of the disease, and the latter according to a treat-to-target strategy. Available techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging, intestinal ultrasound and capsule endoscopy (CE) have shown good accuracy parameters in CD patients. Cross-sectional studies are superior for penetrating and stricturing disease, whereas CE is excellent for proximal involvement and mucosal healing. Local expertise and availability may lead the election between techniques, nevertheless, they should not be considered as competitors but as complementary tools.

SUMMARY

SB involvement in CD patients is frequent and related to poorer outcomes. Hence, SB evaluation should be screened after diagnosis and routinely during the follow-up.

Dysbiosis and relapse-related microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease: A shotgun metagenomic approach

•

CD more dysbiotic than UC both at the microbial taxonomic and functional level.

•

E. coli enriched in CD and almost undetected in UC.

•

Production of propionate driven by E. coli in CD and by Anaerostipes hadrus in UC and healthy controls.

•

Microbial signatures and random forest enabled discrimination of IBD vs. non-IBD and prediction of flare.

Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), the two main forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), affect several million people worldwide. CD and UC are characterized by periods of clinical remission and relapse. Although IBD patients present chronic alterations of the gut microbiome, called dysbiosis, little attention has been devoted to the relapse-related microbiome. To address this gap, we generated shotgun metagenomic data from the stools of two European cohorts—134 Spanish (followed up for one year) and 49 Belgian (followed up for 6 months) subjects—to characterize the microbial taxonomic and metabolic profiles present. To assess the predictive value of microbiome data, we added the taxonomic profiles generated from a previous study of 130 Americans. Our results revealed that CD was more dysbiotic than UC compared to healthy controls (HC) and that strategies for energy extraction and propionate production were different in CD compared to UC and HC. Remarkably, CD and UC relapses were not associated with alpha- or beta-diversity, or with a dysbiotic score. However, CD relapse was linked to alterations at the species and metabolic pathway levels, including those involved in propionate production. The random forest method using taxonomic profiles allowed the prediction of CD vs. non-CD with an AUC = 0.938, UC vs. HC with an AUC = 0.646, and CD relapse vs. remission with an AUC = 0.769. Our study validates previous taxonomic findings, points to different relapse-related growth and defence mechanisms in CD compared to UC and HC and provides biomarkers to discriminate IBD subtypes and predict disease activity.

The role of small-bowel endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease: an updated review on the state-of-the-art in 2021

The impact of small-bowel (SB) capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy on clinical practice, since their introduction 2 decades ago, has been remarkable. These disruptive technologies have transformed the investigation and management of SB pathology and now have a firmly established place in guidelines and clinical algorithms. Furthermore, recent years have witnessed innovations, driven by the demand of new goals in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), such as mucosal healing and evolving strategies based on tight monitoring and accelerated escalation of care. These developments in SB endoscopy have also been paralleled by refinement in dedicated radiological SB imaging technologies. This updated review highlights the current state of the art and more recent innovations with a focus on their role in IBD.

Role of capsule endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease: Anything new?

Capsule endoscopy (CE) is a recently developed diagnostic method for diseases of the small bowel that is non-invasive, safe, and highly tolerable. Its role in patients with inflammatory bowel disease has been widely validated in suspected and established Crohn’s disease (CD) due to its ability to assess superficial lesions not detected by cross-sectional imaging and proximal lesions of the small bowel not evaluable by ileocolonoscopy. Because CE is a highly sensitive but less specific technique, differential diagnoses that can simulate CD must be considered, and its interpretation should be supported by other clinical and laboratory indicators. The use of validated scoring systems to characterize and estimate lesion severity (Lewis score, Capsule Endoscopy Crohn’s Disease Activity Index), as well as the standardization of the language used to define the lesions (Delphi Consensus), have reduced the interobserver variability in CE reading observed in clinical practice, allowing for the optimization of diagnoses and clinical management strategies. The appearance of the panenteric CE, the incorporation of artificial intelligence, magnetically-guided capsules, and tissue biopsies are elements that contribute to CE being a promising, unique diagnostic tool in digestive tract diseases.

Non-invasive diagnosis of Crohn’s disease: All that glitters is not gold

Crohn’s disease (CD) is associated with occurrence of inflammation in the digestive tract. Diagnosing intestinal bowel diseases can be difficult because bowel disease can be tricky as it does not have unique symptoms. Endoscopy and histopathological tests play a crucial role in the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel diseases. Various techniques can be used to diagnose CD. Nevertheless, the diagnosis of CD mostly requires having patients in the hospital. During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, that might not be very feasible, as minimizing contact is essential, but can an alternative diagnosis technique be enough to provide a definitive diagnosis?

A literature-based approach for curating gene signatures in multifaceted diseases

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The task of identifying a representative and yet manageable target gene list for assessing the pathogenesis of complicated and multifaceted diseases is challenging. Using Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) as an example, we conceived a bioinformatic approach to identify novel genes associated with the various disease subtypes, in combination with known clinical control genes.

METHODS

From the available literature, we used Acumenta Literature Lab^TM (LitLab), network analyses, and LitLab Gene Retriever to assemble a gene pool that has a high likelihood of representing immunity-related subtype-specific signatures of IBD.

RESULTS

We generated six relevant gene lists and 21 intersections that contain genes with unique literature associations to Crohn's Disease (n = 60), Ulcerative Colitis (n = 17), and unclassified (n = 45) subtypes of IBD. From this gene pool, we then filtered and constructed, using network analysis, a final list of 142 genes that are the most representative of the disease and its subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

In this paper, we present the bioinformatic construction of a gene panel that putatively contains subtype signatures of IBD, a multifactorial disease. These gene signatures will be tested as biomarkers to classify patients with IBD, which has been a clinically challenging task. Such approach to diagnose and monitor complicated disease pathogenesis is a stepping-stone towards personalized care.

Pursuing therapeutic success in Crohn’s disease: A matter of definition, tools and longterm outcomes

Management of Crohn’s disease (CD) based on symptom control is a tale of the past as new treatment strategies aim toward a “treat to target” concept and to a patient-tailored approach. Defining treatment goals and assessing therapeutic success have been in the center of IBD research in the past years. Clinical remission and mucosal healing are well-established treatment goals by current recommendations, although prospective data is required to determine whether achieving these targets is enough to alter disease natural course. Furthermore, there is no standard in assessing therapeutic success. Low relapse and hospitalization rates, as well as a low need of surgery are indicators of a successful treatment. Close monitoring is part of the new therapeutic strategy. Monitoring tools are numerous, comprising clinical, biological, endoscopic and imaging scores or parameters but are far from being perfect. The traditional strategy of managing CD patients based on clinical symptoms and response to treatment did not improve the long-term outcomes. Clinical activity scores are frequently used in clinical trials and daily practice, but their use alone is not an accurate measure of inflammation. Endoscopic remission is associated with a lower risk of complications and a better long-term prognostic. Several guidelines include recommendations regarding surveillance endoscopy, but there is an open debate regarding the follow-up intervals. Cross-sectional imaging techniques play a complementary role in assessing transmural inflammation and in identifying extra-intestinal complications of CD and should be used in conjunction with endoscopy. Therapeutic drug monitoring is essential in assessing loss of response and making therapeutic decisions, although firm recommendations are not implemented into daily practice. Extraintestinal manifestations are often disregarded when discussing monitoring protocols. There is no current guideline indication for extraintestinal manifestations monitoring during remission periods.

Integrating omics for a better understanding of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a step towards personalized medicine

Background

Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is a multifactorial chronic disease. Understanding only one aspect of IBD pathogenesis does not reflect the complex nature of IBD nor will it improve its clinical management. Therefore, it is vital to dissect the interactions between the different players in IBD pathogenesis in order to understand the biology of the disease and enhance its clinical outcomes.

Aims

To provide an overview of the available omics data used to assess the potential mechanisms through which various players are contributing to IBD pathogenesis and propose a precision medicine model to fill the current knowledge gap in IBD.

Results

Several studies have reported microbial dysbiosis, immune and metabolic dysregulation in IBD patients, however, this data is not sufficient to create signatures that can differentiate between the disease subtypes or between disease relapse and remission.

Conclusions

We summarized the current knowledge in the application of omics in IBD patients, and we showed that the current knowledge gap in IBD hinders the improvements of clinical decision for treatment as well as the prediction of disease relapse. We propose one way to fill this gap by implementing integrative analysis of various omics datasets generated from one patient at a single time point.

Capsule Endoscopy and Small Bowel Enteroscopy: Have They Rendered the Radiologist Obsolete?

Capsule endoscopy (CE) provides visualization of small bowel mucosa for evidence of inflammation. Given its ability to detect subtle mucosal changes, CE is recommended in the diagnostic work-up of small bowel Crohn disease (CD) and also in monitoring mucosal response to therapy in nonstricturing CD. Patency capsule and cross-sectional imaging can reduce risk of capsule retention in patients with suspected stenotic disease. CE is complementary to magnetic resonance enterography, which can provide extraintestinal information. Device-assisted enteroscopy has limited role in CD.

Small bowel capsule endoscopy in ulcerative colitis: the capcolitis study: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Clinical phenotypes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients include ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Moreover, genetic aetiology studies suggest a continuum of phenotypes from exclusively ileal to left-sided colonic disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A nationwide registry (BioColitis Registry) prospectively recorded ∼900 UC-patients in Germany and in the CapColitis substudy, small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) was consecutively offered at participating centres. The primary objective was to investigate the presence of small bowel lesions. In total, 127 UC-patients were included.

RESULTS

SBCE was evaluable in 125 of 127 UC-patients. Small bowel lesions were found in 16/125 (13%) patients, of which nine were classified as clinically significant [backwash ileitis (n=4) or lesions suggestive of CD (n=5)], and seven were not significant [biopsy-induced lesions (n=3) or single small bowel lesions (n=4)]. The SBCE results prompted diagnostic workups in all patients with clinically relevant lesions, and all patients with lesions suggestive for CD (4%) were re-classified as CD by the treating physicians.

CONCLUSION

Systematic examination of 125 consecutive UC-patients failed to confirm a clinically important phenotype overlap with CD, as suggested by genetic aetiology studies. In five patients (4%) with small bowel lesions, the diagnosis was changed to CD.

The role of small bowel endoscopy for Crohn's disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The review discusses the roles of small bowel capsule endoscopy and deep enteroscopy in patients with Crohn's disease. It highlights recent advances in the field and identifies areas where evidence is lacking.

RECENT FINDINGS

Small bowel capsule endoscopy has an important role in the follow-up of patients with Crohn's disease after escalation of therapy and in the postoperative assessment period following surgical resection. Device-assisted enteroscopy offers the therapeutic advantage of small bowel dilatation, which may result in a reduction in the number of surgical resections required, thus avoiding long-term complications, such as short bowel syndrome and malabsorption.

SUMMARY

Capsule endoscopy has an established role in the diagnosis and management of small bowel Crohn's disease. It is used in the setting of suspected Crohn's disease when ileocolonoscopy is negative and for the assessment of extent of small bowel disease in established Crohn's disease. It is relatively well tolerated because of the provision of patency capsule endoscopy to minimize the risk of inadvertent capsule retention. Device-assisted enteroscopy aids with the diagnosis of Crohn's disease as it enables histology to be taken from inflamed areas within the small bowel. Therapeutic procedures can be carried out during device-assisted enteroscopy including dilatation of Crohn's disease-related strictures and retrieval of retained capsules.

Balloon-Assisted Enteroscopy and Capsule Endoscopy in Suspected Small Bowel Crohn's Disease

Inflammatory bowel diseases are idiopathic inflammatory diseases of two main types, Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Crohn’s disease can affect the entire gastrointestinal tract, and the distal ileum is involved in up to 70% of patients. Moreover, Crohn’s disease in one-quarter to one-third of patients involves isolation of the small bowel. Due to the nonspecific symptoms and anatomical location of the disease, small bowel Crohn’s disease is a phenotype that is particularly difficult to manage. Since the introduction of capsule endoscopy in 2000 and balloon-assisted enteroscopy in the 21st century, it is now possible to directly inspect for small bowel Crohn’s disease. However, the new modalities still have limitations, such as capsule retention and invasiveness of balloon-assisted enteroscopy. The diagnostic yields of both capsule endoscopy and balloon-assisted enteroscopy are high for patients with suspected small bowel Crohn’s disease. Therefore, earlier use of capsule endoscopy or balloon-assisted enteroscopy can help with the diagnosis and earlier treatment of these patients to avert possible disastrous outcomes.

Ischemic or toxic injury: A challenging diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced stenosis of the sigmoid colon

A 48-year-old woman was admitted with 15-mo history of abdominal pain, diarrhea and hematochezia, and 5-mo history of defecation difficulty. She had been successively admitted to nine hospitals, with an initial diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease with stenotic sigmoid colon. Findings from computed tomography virtual colonoscopy, radiography with meglumine diatrizoate, endoscopic balloon dilatation, metallic stent implantation and later overall colonoscopy, coupled with the newfound knowledge of compound Qingdai pill-taking, led to a subsequent diagnosis of ischemic or toxic bowel disease with sigmoid colon stenosis. The patient was successfully treated by laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy, and postoperative pathological examination revealed ischemic or toxic injury of the sigmoid colon, providing a final diagnosis of drug-induced sigmoid colon stenosis. This case highlights that adequate awareness of drug-induced colon stenosis has a decisive role in avoiding misdiagnosis and mistreatment. The diagnostic and therapeutic experiences learnt from this case suggest that endoscopic balloon expansion and colonic metallic stent implantation as bridge treatments were demonstrated as crucial for the differential diagnosis of benign colonic stenosis. Skillful surgical technique and appropriate perioperative management helped to ensure the safety of our patient in subsequent surgery after long-term use of glucocorticoids.