1
|
Chaudhry D, Khandelwal S, Bahadur C, Daniels B, Bhattacharyya M, Gangakhedkar R, Desai S, Das J. Prevalence of long COVID symptoms in Haryana, India: a cross-sectional follow-up study. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. SOUTHEAST ASIA 2024; 25:100395. [PMID: 38586062 PMCID: PMC10998228 DOI: 10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
Background Emerging research indicates growing concern over long COVID globally, although there have been limited studies that estimate population burden. We aimed to estimate the burden of long COVID in three districts of Haryana, India, using an opportunity to link a seroprevalence study to follow-up survey of symptoms associated with long COVID. Methods We used a population-based seroprevalence survey for COVID-19 conducted in September 2021 across Haryana, India. Adults from three purposively selected districts (Rohtak, Gurugram, and Jhajjar) were eligible to participate; 2205 of 3213 consented to participate in a survey on health status. Trained investigators administered a structured questionnaire that included demographic characteristics, self-reported symptoms of illness in the last six months before the survey, mental health, and history of COVID-19. Findings Unadjusted regression estimates indicated positive correlations between symptomatic complaints and COVID-19 exposure, suggesting lingering effects of COVID-19 in this population. The overall physical morbidity index was higher among those who tested positive for COVID-19, as was the incidence of new cases. However, both morbidity and incidence became statistically insignificant after adjustment for multiple comparisons. Cough emerged as the only statistically significant individual persistent symptom. Sex-stratified analyses indicated significant estimates only for physical morbidity in women. Interpretation This study is one of the first from India that uses a large population-based sample to examine longer term repercussions of COVID infections. The burden of long COVID should primarily be addressed in clinical settings, where specialised treatment for individual cases continues to evolve. Our analyses also provide insight into the size and nature of studies required to assess the population-level burden of long COVID. Funding This paper was produced under the auspices of the Lancet COVID 19 Commission India Task Force, which was supported financially by the Reliance Foundation. The Lancet COVID 19 Commission was set up in July 2020 and submitted its final report by October 2022. This report by the India Task Force was prepared during the same period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dhruva Chaudhry
- Dept of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Pt BDS Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (PGIMS), Rohtak, Haryana, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jishnu Das
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Elias TP, Gebreamlak TW, Gebremeskel TT, Adde BL, Abie AS, Elias BP, Argaw AM, Tenaw AA, Belay BM. Determinants of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome among hospitalized severe COVID-19 patients: A 2-year follow-up study. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0298409. [PMID: 38728331 PMCID: PMC11086844 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome is a condition where individuals experience persistent symptoms after the acute phase of the COVID-19 infection has resolved, which lowers their quality of life and ability to return to work. This study assessed the prevalence and associated risk factors of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS) among severe COVID-19 patients who were discharged from Millennium COVID-19 Care Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. METHODS A cross-sectional study using data collected from patient charts and a follow-up telephone interview after two years of discharge. Systematic random sampling was used to select a total of 400 patients. A structured questionnaire developed from the case report form for PACS of the World Health Organization (WHO) was used. Frequency and cross-tabulation were used for descriptive statistics. Predictor variables with a p-value <0.25 in bivariate analyses were included in the logistic regression. RESULT Out of the 400 patients, 20 patients were dead, 14 patients refused to give consent, and 26 patients couldn't be reached because their phones weren't working. Finally, 340 were included in the study. The majority (68.5%) were males and the mean age was 53.9 (±13.3 SD) years. More than a third (38.1%) of the patients reported the persistence of at least one symptom after hospital discharge. The most common symptoms were fatigue (27.5%) and Cough (15.3%). Older age (AOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.07), female sex (AOR 1.82, 95% CI 1.00-3.29), presence of comorbidity (AOR 2.38, 95% CI 1.35-4.19), alcohol use (AOR 3.05, 95% CI 1.49-6.26), fatigue at presentation (AOR 2.18, 95% CI 1.21-3.95), and longer hospital stay (AOR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.10) were found to increase the odds of developing post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Higher hemoglobin level was found to decrease the risk of subsequent post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (AOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71-0.99). CONCLUSION The prevalence of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome is high, with a wide range of persistent symptoms experienced by patients. COVID-19 survivors with the identified risk factors are more susceptible to post-acute COVID-19 and require targeted monitoring and care in a multidisciplinary approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamrat Petros Elias
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | | | | | - Binyam Lukas Adde
- Department of Internal Medicine, Menelik II Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Abraham Sisay Abie
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | | | - Abel Mureja Argaw
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Addis Aschenek Tenaw
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yekatit 12 Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Biruk Mulugeta Belay
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mirza S, Arvinden VR, Rophina M, Bhawalkar J, Khan U, Chothani B, Singh S, Sharma T, Dwivedi A, Pandey E, Garg S, Mukhida SS, Sange ZSA, Bhaumik S, Varughese J, Devkar VY, Singh J, V K A, K V, Mandviwala HSH, Scaria V, Gupta A. Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on healthcare workers in a Tertiary Healthcare Center in India: a cross sectional study. Sci Rep 2024; 14:1504. [PMID: 38233495 PMCID: PMC10794462 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50317-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Numerous speculations have continually emerged, trying to explore the association between COVID-19 infection and a varied range of demographic and clinical factors. Frontline healthcare workers have been the primary group exposed to this infection, and there have been limited global research that examine this cohort. However, while there are a few large studies conducted on Indian healthcare professionals to investigate their potential risk and predisposing factors to COVID-19 infection, to our knowledge there are no studies evaluating the development of long COVID in this population. This cross-sectional study systematically utilized the demographic and clinical data of 3329 healthcare workers (HCW) from a tertiary hospital in India to gain significant insights into the associations between disease prevalence, severity of SARS-Cov-2 infection and long COVID. Most of the study population was found to be vaccinated (2,615, 78.5%), while 654 (19.65%) HCWs were found to be SARS-CoV-2 positive at least once. Of the infected HCWs, 75.1% (491) did not require hospitalization, whereas the rest were hospitalized for an average duration of 9 days. A total of 206 (6.19%) individuals were found to be suffering from long COVID. Persistent weakness/tiredness was the most experienced long-COVID symptom, while females (1.79, 1.25-2.57), individuals who consumed alcohol (1.85, 1.3-2.64) or had blood group B (1.9, 1.33-2.7) were at a significantly higher risk for developing long COVID.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahzad Mirza
- Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, 411018, India
| | - V R Arvinden
- CSIR Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology (CSIR-IGIB), Mathura Road, Delhi, 110025, India
- Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), CSIR-HRDC Campus, Sector 19, Kamla Nehru Nagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, 201002, India
| | - Mercy Rophina
- CSIR Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology (CSIR-IGIB), Mathura Road, Delhi, 110025, India
- Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), CSIR-HRDC Campus, Sector 19, Kamla Nehru Nagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, 201002, India
| | - Jitendra Bhawalkar
- Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, 411018, India
| | - Uzair Khan
- Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, 411018, India
| | - Bhavin Chothani
- Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, 411018, India
| | - Shivankur Singh
- Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, 411018, India
| | - Tanya Sharma
- Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, 411018, India
| | - Aryan Dwivedi
- Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, 411018, India
| | - Ellora Pandey
- Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, 411018, India
| | - Shivam Garg
- Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, 411018, India
| | - Sahjid Sadrudin Mukhida
- Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, 411018, India
| | - Zeeshan Shabbir Ahmed Sange
- Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, 411018, India
| | - Shalini Bhaumik
- Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, 411018, India
| | - Jessin Varughese
- Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, 411018, India
| | - Vishwamohini Yallappa Devkar
- Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, 411018, India
| | - Jyoti Singh
- Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, 411018, India
| | - AnjuMol V K
- Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, 411018, India
| | - Veena K
- Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, 411018, India
| | - Husen Shabbir Husen Mandviwala
- Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, 411018, India
| | - Vinod Scaria
- CSIR Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology (CSIR-IGIB), Mathura Road, Delhi, 110025, India
- Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), CSIR-HRDC Campus, Sector 19, Kamla Nehru Nagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, 201002, India
| | - Aayush Gupta
- Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, 411018, India.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Khan M, Majeed S, Ain Q, Nawaz A, Sumra KA, Lammi V, Nihal F, Afrah A, Khan EA, Khan MI, Sadiq F. Long COVID in Pakistan: a cross-sectional analysis of health and psychosocial outcomes. PSYCHOL HEALTH MED 2023:1-15. [PMID: 38151820 DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2023.2297748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
According to the World Health Organization-led Delphi consensus, long COVID corresponds to the occurrence of symptoms beyond twelve weeks after the onset of acute COVID-19 illness that cannot be explained by alternate diagnosis. This cross-sectional study aimed to analyse the impacts of long COVID on general health and psychosocial well-being. For this study, the participants were interviewed either face to face or via telephone, and their responses were recorded on a questionnaire capturing information on demographics, COVID-19 status, duration of symptoms and long COVID symptoms. The psychosocial impacts of the pandemic were assessed using scales like Short Mood and feeling questionnaire (sMFQ), Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7) and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Regression analysis was conducted to analyse the predictors of long COVID. A total of 300 participants were interviewed, of which 155 (52%) had COVID-19 illness. Of these 54 (35%) had persistent symptoms for a period of more than 12 weeks classified as long COVID. Muscle problems and fatigue were the most frequent (14.7%) symptoms encountered, followed by breathing problems (12.6%) and cognitive issues (12.6%). The symptoms of decrease in appetite and confusion or disorientation during the initial phase of the infection were associated with long COVID. The majority of the participants (83.3%) had moderate level of perceived stress, while moderate to severe levels of stress were observed in 17.3% of the individuals. Moreover, a high level of positive mental well-being was also observed. This study highlights the need for further research into the clinical aspects and implications of long COVID in Pakistan and emphasizes the importance of ongoing support for affected individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeeha Khan
- Directorate of Research, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Sadaf Majeed
- Department of Physiology, Shifa College of Medicine, Shifa Tameer e Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Quratul Ain
- Directorate of Research, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Amjad Nawaz
- Directorate of Research, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | | | - Vilma Lammi
- Institute for Molecular Medicine, Helsinki Institute of Life Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Faizan Nihal
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Aleena Afrah
- Department of Psychology, University of Wah, Wah Cantt, Pakistan
| | - Ejaz Ahmed Khan
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Mohammad Iqbal Khan
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Fouzia Sadiq
- Directorate of Research, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Karyakarte RP, Das R, Rajmane MV, Dudhate S, Agarasen J, Pillai P, Chandankhede PM, Labhshetwar RS, Gadiyal Y, Kulkarni PP, Nizarudeen S, Mukade S, Joshi S. The Burden and Characteristics of Post-COVID-19 Conditions Among Laboratory-Confirmed Delta and Omicron COVID-19 Cases: A Preliminary Study From Maharashtra, India. Cureus 2023; 15:e44888. [PMID: 37814744 PMCID: PMC10560400 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-COVID-19 conditions (PCC) have emerged as a significant global health concern due to their potential impact on patients' quality of life and healthcare resources. The present study aims to understand the burden and characteristics of PCC in Maharashtra, India, and compares its prevalence among cases infected with Delta and Omicron variants. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective observational study included 617 laboratory-confirmed Delta and Omicron variant cases. These cases were telephonically followed up to document persistent COVID-19 symptoms using a questionnaire based on the Post-COVID-19 Clinical Form from the Global COVID-19 Clinical Platform of the World Health Organization (WHO), and the results were analyzed. RESULTS Out of 617 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases, 82.97% and 17.03% were Omicron and Delta cases, respectively. The mean follow-up period for Delta and Omicron cases was 78.05 and 21.56 weeks, respectively. A total of 40 (6.48%) cases reported persistent symptoms at follow-up, with a higher prevalence among those infected with the Delta variant (12.38%) compared to the Omicron variant (5.27%). The most common long COVID symptoms reported were malaise (25%), dyspnea (20%), post-exertional fatigue (17.5%), joint pain (15%), and frequent episodes of cough and cold (15%). Additionally, 1.94% of participants developed a new medical condition following COVID-19 infection, most commonly hypertension (25%), lung fibrosis (16.67%), and asthma (8.33%). Factors such as more than five acute symptoms, a moderate to severe disease, the need for hospitalization, and hospitalization for more than five days were significantly associated with PCC. CONCLUSION Long COVID results in extended disability and illness. The varying impacts of different COVID-19 variants highlight the complex nature of post-COVID-19 complications. Our findings highlight the need for strategic planning of healthcare resources to ensure optimal response and preparedness to manage the burden of PCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajesh P Karyakarte
- Microbiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy (BJ) Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND
- Microbiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College (BJGMC), Pune, IND
| | - Rashmita Das
- Microbiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy (BJ) Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND
- Microbiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College (BJGMC), Pune, IND
| | - Mansi V Rajmane
- Microbiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy (BJ) Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND
| | - Sonali Dudhate
- Microbiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy (BJ) Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND
| | - Jeanne Agarasen
- Microbiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy (BJ) Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND
| | - Praveena Pillai
- Microbiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy (BJ) Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND
| | - Priyanka M Chandankhede
- Microbiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy (BJ) Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND
| | - Rutika S Labhshetwar
- Microbiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy (BJ) Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND
| | - Yogita Gadiyal
- Microbiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy (BJ) Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND
| | - Preeti P Kulkarni
- Microbiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy (BJ) Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND
| | - Safanah Nizarudeen
- Microbiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy (BJ) Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND
| | - Savita Mukade
- Microbiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy (BJ) Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND
| | - Suvarna Joshi
- Microbiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy (BJ) Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hawkings MJ, Vaselli NM, Charalampopoulos D, Brierley L, Elliot AJ, Buchan I, Hungerford D. A Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Persistent Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Incidence of New Gastrointestinal Illness after Acute SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Viruses 2023; 15:1625. [PMID: 37631968 PMCID: PMC10459193 DOI: 10.3390/v15081625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
It is known that SARS-CoV-2 infection can result in gastrointestinal symptoms. For some, these symptoms may persist beyond acute infection, in what is known as 'post-COVID syndrome'. We conducted a systematic review to examine the prevalence of persistent gastrointestinal symptoms and the incidence of new gastrointestinal illnesses following acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. We searched the scientific literature using MedLine, SCOPUS, Europe PubMed Central and medRxiv from December 2019 to July 2023. Two reviewers independently identified 45 eligible articles, which followed participants for various gastrointestinal outcomes after acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. The study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. The weighted pooled prevalence for persistent gastrointestinal symptoms of any nature and duration was 10.8% compared with 4.9% in healthy controls. For seven studies at low risk of methodological bias, the symptom prevalence ranged from 0.2% to 24.1%, with a median follow-up time of 18 weeks. We also identified a higher risk for future illnesses such as irritable bowel syndrome, dyspepsia, hepatic and biliary disease, liver disease and autoimmune-mediated illnesses such as inflammatory bowel disease and coeliac disease in historically SARS-CoV-2-exposed individuals. Our review has shown that, from a limited pool of mostly low-quality studies, previous SARS-CoV-2 exposure may be associated with ongoing gastrointestinal symptoms and the development of functional gastrointestinal illness. Furthermore, we show the need for high-quality research to better understand the SARS-CoV-2 association with gastrointestinal illness, particularly as population exposure to enteric infections returns to pre-COVID-19-restriction levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J. Hawkings
- Department of Public Health, Policy & Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GF, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit in Gastrointestinal Infections, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK; (N.M.V.)
| | - Natasha Marcella Vaselli
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit in Gastrointestinal Infections, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK; (N.M.V.)
- Department of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Infection, Veterinary & Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK
| | - Dimitrios Charalampopoulos
- Department of Public Health, Policy & Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GF, UK
| | - Liam Brierley
- Department of Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GF, UK
| | - Alex J. Elliot
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit in Gastrointestinal Infections, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK; (N.M.V.)
- Real-Time Syndromic Surveillance Team, Field Services, Health Protection Operations, UK Health Security Agency, Birmingham B2 4BH, UK
| | - Iain Buchan
- Department of Public Health, Policy & Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GF, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit in Gastrointestinal Infections, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK; (N.M.V.)
| | - Daniel Hungerford
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit in Gastrointestinal Infections, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK; (N.M.V.)
- Department of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Infection, Veterinary & Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Poole-Wright K, Guennouni I, Sterry O, Evans RA, Gaughran F, Chalder T. Fatigue outcomes following COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e063969. [PMID: 37185637 PMCID: PMC10151247 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Fatigue is a pervasive clinical symptom in coronaviruses and may continue beyond the acute phase, lasting for several months or years. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to incorporate the current evidence for postinfection fatigue among survivors of SARS-CoV-2 and investigate associated factors. METHODS Embase, PsyINFO, Medline, CINAHL, CDSR, Open Grey, BioRxiv and MedRxiv were systematically searched from January 2019 to December 2021. Eligible records included all study designs in English. Outcomes were fatigue or vitality in adults with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 measured at >30 days post infection. Non-confirmed cases were excluded. JBI risk of bias was assessed by three reviewers. Random effects model was used for the pooled proportion with 95% CIs. A mixed effects meta-regression of 35 prospective articles calculated change in fatigue overtime. Subgroup analyses explored specific group characteristics of study methodology. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q and I2 statistic. Egger's tests for publication bias. RESULTS Database searches returned 14 262 records. Following deduplication and screening, 178 records were identified. 147 (n=48 466 participants) were included for the meta-analyses. Pooled prevalence was 41% (95% CI: 37% to 45%, k=147, I2=98%). Fatigue significantly reduced over time (-0.057, 95% CI: -107 to -0.008, k=35, I2=99.3%, p=0.05). A higher proportion of fatigue was found in studies using a valid scale (51%, 95% CI: 43% to 58%, k=36, I2=96.2%, p=0.004). No significant difference was found for fatigue by study design (p=0.272). Egger's test indicated publication bias for all analyses except valid scales. Quality assessments indicated 4% at low risk of bias, 78% at moderate risk and 18% at high risk. Frequently reported associations were female gender, age, physical functioning, breathlessness and psychological distress. CONCLUSION This study revealed that a significant proportion of survivors experienced fatigue following SARS-CoV-2 and their fatigue reduced overtime. Non-modifiable factors and psychological morbidity may contribute to ongoing fatigue and impede recovery. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020201247.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Poole-Wright
- Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK
| | | | - Olivia Sterry
- Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK
| | - Rachael A Evans
- Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Fiona Gaughran
- Psychosis Studies, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK
- National Psychosis Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Trudie Chalder
- Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bowyer RCE, Huggins C, Toms R, Shaw RJ, Hou B, Thompson EJ, Kwong ASF, Williams DM, Kibble M, Ploubidis GB, Timpson NJ, Sterne JAC, Chaturvedi N, Steves CJ, Tilling K, Silverwood RJ. Characterising patterns of COVID-19 and long COVID symptoms: evidence from nine UK longitudinal studies. Eur J Epidemiol 2023; 38:199-210. [PMID: 36680646 PMCID: PMC9860244 DOI: 10.1007/s10654-022-00962-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Multiple studies across global populations have established the primary symptoms characterising Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and long COVID. However, as symptoms may also occur in the absence of COVID-19, a lack of appropriate controls has often meant that specificity of symptoms to acute COVID-19 or long COVID, and the extent and length of time for which they are elevated after COVID-19, could not be examined. We analysed individual symptom prevalences and characterised patterns of COVID-19 and long COVID symptoms across nine UK longitudinal studies, totalling over 42,000 participants. Conducting latent class analyses separately in three groups ('no COVID-19', 'COVID-19 in last 12 weeks', 'COVID-19 > 12 weeks ago'), the data did not support the presence of more than two distinct symptom patterns, representing high and low symptom burden, in each group. Comparing the high symptom burden classes between the 'COVID-19 in last 12 weeks' and 'no COVID-19' groups we identified symptoms characteristic of acute COVID-19, including loss of taste and smell, fatigue, cough, shortness of breath and muscle pains or aches. Comparing the high symptom burden classes between the 'COVID-19 > 12 weeks ago' and 'no COVID-19' groups we identified symptoms characteristic of long COVID, including fatigue, shortness of breath, muscle pain or aches, difficulty concentrating and chest tightness. The identified symptom patterns among individuals with COVID-19 > 12 weeks ago were strongly associated with self-reported length of time unable to function as normal due to COVID-19 symptoms, suggesting that the symptom pattern identified corresponds to long COVID. Building the evidence base regarding typical long COVID symptoms will improve diagnosis of this condition and the ability to elicit underlying biological mechanisms, leading to better patient access to treatment and services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth C E Bowyer
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- The Alan Turing Institute, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Huggins
- Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Renin Toms
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Population Wellbeing, School of Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Richard J Shaw
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Bo Hou
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Ellen J Thompson
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Alex S F Kwong
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Dylan M Williams
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Milla Kibble
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - George B Ploubidis
- Centre for Longitudinal Studies, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nicholas J Timpson
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jonathan A C Sterne
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK
- Health Data Research UK South West, Bristol, UK
| | - Nishi Chaturvedi
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL, University College London, London, UK
| | - Claire J Steves
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Ageing and Health, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kate Tilling
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Richard J Silverwood
- Centre for Longitudinal Studies, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Characteristics and predictors of Long COVID among diagnosed cases of COVID-19. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0278825. [PMID: 36538532 PMCID: PMC9767341 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long COVID or long-term symptoms after COVID-19 has the ability to affect health and quality of life. Knowledge about the burden and predictors could aid in their prevention and management. Most of the studies are from high-income countries and focus on severe acute COVID-19 cases. We did this study to estimate the incidence and identify the characteristics and predictors of Long COVID among our patients. METHODOLOGY We recruited adult (≥18 years) patients who were diagnosed as Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RTPCR) confirmed SARS-COV-2 infection and were either hospitalized or tested on outpatient basis. Eligible participants were followed up telephonically after four weeks and six months of diagnosis of SARS-COV-2 infection to collect data on sociodemographic, clinical history, vaccination history, Cycle threshold (Ct) values during diagnosis and other variables. Characteristics of Long COVID were elicited, and multivariable logistic regression was done to find the predictors of Long COVID. RESULTS We have analyzed 487 and 371 individual data with a median follow-up of 44 days (Inter quartile range (IQR): 39,47) and 223 days (IQR:195,251), respectively. Overall, Long COVID was reported by 29.2% (95% Confidence interval (CI): 25.3%,33.4%) and 9.4% (95% CI: 6.7%,12.9%) of participants at four weeks and six months of follow-up, respectively. Incidence of Long COVID among patients with mild/moderate disease (n = 415) was 23.4% (95% CI: 19.5%,27.7%) as compared to 62.5% (95% CI: 50.7%,73%) in severe/critical cases(n = 72) at four weeks of follow-up. At six months, the incidence among mild/moderate (n = 319) was 7.2% (95% CI:4.6%,10.6%) as compared to 23.1% (95% CI:12.5%,36.8%) in severe/critical (n = 52). The most common Long COVID symptom was fatigue. Statistically significant predictors of Long COVID at four weeks of follow-up were-Pre-existing medical conditions (Adjusted Odds ratio (aOR) = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.16,3.44), having a higher number of symptoms during acute phase of COVID-19 disease (aOR = 11.24, 95% CI: 4.00,31.51), two doses of COVID-19 vaccination (aOR = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.17,4.58), the severity of illness (aOR = 5.71, 95% CI: 3.00,10.89) and being admitted to hospital (Odds ratio (OR) = 3.89, 95% CI: 2.49,6.08). CONCLUSION A considerable proportion of COVID-19 cases reported Long COVID symptoms. More research is needed in Long COVID to objectively assess the symptoms and find the biological and radiological markers.
Collapse
|
10
|
Swarnakar R, Jenifa S, Wadhwa S. Musculoskeletal complications in long COVID-19: A systematic review. World J Virol 2022; 11:485-495. [PMID: 36483107 PMCID: PMC9724204 DOI: 10.5501/wjv.v11.i6.485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has crippled humanity since early 2020. Various sequelae of COVID-19 have been reported in different body systems. Musculoskeletal symptoms are widely reported during COVID-19 infection, but musculoskeletal complications in long COVID-19 are underreported. However, post-COVID-19 survivors have reported complaints of persisting or new-onset fatigue, myalgia, arthralgia, arthritis, muscle weakness, etc in clinical practice. The well-known detrimental effects of steroids on the musculoskeletal system coupled with their over-the-counter availability can also be anticipated since they were the cornerstone of life-saving management in this pandemic.
AIM To determine the musculoskeletal complications in long COVID.
METHODS We performed a systematic review of ‘systematic reviews and meta-analyses’.
RESULTS Of the 63 articles screened, 24 articles were included. Two articles specifically discussed children and adolescents. One article discussed rehabilitation intervention. No article addressed rehabilitation of musculoskeletal issues in long COVID-19 in particular. Fatigue was the most common musculoskeletal complication.
CONCLUSION Fatigue is found to be very common along with myalgia and arthralgia. There were no studies on rehabilitation intervention in musculoskeletal complications specifically. Considering the lacuna in literature and the needs of the current situation, further studies are warranted to standardize effective rehabilitation interventions in musculoskeletal complications. More homogenous studies are needed. Studies on functional impairment due to musculoskeletal involvement are essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raktim Swarnakar
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India
| | - Shoibam Jenifa
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India
| | - Sanjay Wadhwa
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wulf Hanson S, Abbafati C, Aerts JG, Al-Aly Z, Ashbaugh C, Ballouz T, Blyuss O, Bobkova P, Bonsel G, Borzakova S, Buonsenso D, Butnaru D, Carter A, Chu H, De Rose C, Diab MM, Ekbom E, El Tantawi M, Fomin V, Frithiof R, Gamirova A, Glybochko PV, Haagsma JA, Haghjooy Javanmard S, Hamilton EB, Harris G, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Helbok R, Hellemons ME, Hillus D, Huijts SM, Hultström M, Jassat W, Kurth F, Larsson IM, Lipcsey M, Liu C, Loflin CD, Malinovschi A, Mao W, Mazankova L, McCulloch D, Menges D, Mohammadifard N, Munblit D, Nekliudov NA, Ogbuoji O, Osmanov IM, Peñalvo JL, Petersen MS, Puhan MA, Rahman M, Rass V, Reinig N, Ribbers GM, Ricchiuto A, Rubertsson S, Samitova E, Sarrafzadegan N, Shikhaleva A, Simpson KE, Sinatti D, Soriano JB, Spiridonova E, Steinbeis F, Svistunov AA, Valentini P, van de Water BJ, van den Berg-Emons R, Wallin E, Witzenrath M, Wu Y, Xu H, Zoller T, Adolph C, Albright J, Amlag JO, Aravkin AY, Bang-Jensen BL, Bisignano C, Castellano R, Castro E, Chakrabarti S, Collins JK, Dai X, Daoud F, Dapper C, Deen A, Duncan BB, Erickson M, Ewald SB, Ferrari AJ, Flaxman AD, Fullman N, Gamkrelidze A, Giles JR, Guo G, Hay SI, He J, Helak M, Hulland EN, Kereselidze M, Krohn KJ, Lazzar-Atwood A, Lindstrom A, Lozano R, Malta DC, Månsson J, Mantilla Herrera AM, Mokdad AH, Monasta L, Nomura S, Pasovic M, Pigott DM, Reiner RC, Reinke G, Ribeiro ALP, Santomauro DF, Sholokhov A, Spurlock EE, Walcott R, Walker A, Wiysonge CS, Zheng P, Bettger JP, Murray CJL, Vos T. Estimated Global Proportions of Individuals With Persistent Fatigue, Cognitive, and Respiratory Symptom Clusters Following Symptomatic COVID-19 in 2020 and 2021. JAMA 2022; 328:1604-1615. [PMID: 36215063 PMCID: PMC9552043 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.18931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 281] [Impact Index Per Article: 140.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Importance Some individuals experience persistent symptoms after initial symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (often referred to as Long COVID). Objective To estimate the proportion of males and females with COVID-19, younger or older than 20 years of age, who had Long COVID symptoms in 2020 and 2021 and their Long COVID symptom duration. Design, Setting, and Participants Bayesian meta-regression and pooling of 54 studies and 2 medical record databases with data for 1.2 million individuals (from 22 countries) who had symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of the 54 studies, 44 were published and 10 were collaborating cohorts (conducted in Austria, the Faroe Islands, Germany, Iran, Italy, the Netherlands, Russia, Sweden, Switzerland, and the US). The participant data were derived from the 44 published studies (10 501 hospitalized individuals and 42 891 nonhospitalized individuals), the 10 collaborating cohort studies (10 526 and 1906), and the 2 US electronic medical record databases (250 928 and 846 046). Data collection spanned March 2020 to January 2022. Exposures Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Main Outcomes and Measures Proportion of individuals with at least 1 of the 3 self-reported Long COVID symptom clusters (persistent fatigue with bodily pain or mood swings; cognitive problems; or ongoing respiratory problems) 3 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2020 and 2021, estimated separately for hospitalized and nonhospitalized individuals aged 20 years or older by sex and for both sexes of nonhospitalized individuals younger than 20 years of age. Results A total of 1.2 million individuals who had symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection were included (mean age, 4-66 years; males, 26%-88%). In the modeled estimates, 6.2% (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 2.4%-13.3%) of individuals who had symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection experienced at least 1 of the 3 Long COVID symptom clusters in 2020 and 2021, including 3.2% (95% UI, 0.6%-10.0%) for persistent fatigue with bodily pain or mood swings, 3.7% (95% UI, 0.9%-9.6%) for ongoing respiratory problems, and 2.2% (95% UI, 0.3%-7.6%) for cognitive problems after adjusting for health status before COVID-19, comprising an estimated 51.0% (95% UI, 16.9%-92.4%), 60.4% (95% UI, 18.9%-89.1%), and 35.4% (95% UI, 9.4%-75.1%), respectively, of Long COVID cases. The Long COVID symptom clusters were more common in women aged 20 years or older (10.6% [95% UI, 4.3%-22.2%]) 3 months after symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection than in men aged 20 years or older (5.4% [95% UI, 2.2%-11.7%]). Both sexes younger than 20 years of age were estimated to be affected in 2.8% (95% UI, 0.9%-7.0%) of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections. The estimated mean Long COVID symptom cluster duration was 9.0 months (95% UI, 7.0-12.0 months) among hospitalized individuals and 4.0 months (95% UI, 3.6-4.6 months) among nonhospitalized individuals. Among individuals with Long COVID symptoms 3 months after symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, an estimated 15.1% (95% UI, 10.3%-21.1%) continued to experience symptoms at 12 months. Conclusions and Relevance This study presents modeled estimates of the proportion of individuals with at least 1 of 3 self-reported Long COVID symptom clusters (persistent fatigue with bodily pain or mood swings; cognitive problems; or ongoing respiratory problems) 3 months after symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Wulf Hanson
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Cristiana Abbafati
- Department of Juridical and Economic Studies, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Joachim G Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ziyad Al-Aly
- John T. Milliken Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
- Clinical Epidemiology Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Charlie Ashbaugh
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Tala Ballouz
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Prevention Institute, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Oleg Blyuss
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, England
- Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Infectious Diseases, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Polina Bobkova
- Clinical Medicine (Pediatric Profile), I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Gouke Bonsel
- EuroQol Research Foundation, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Svetlana Borzakova
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow
- Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management, Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia
| | - Danilo Buonsenso
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Global Health Research Institute, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Denis Butnaru
- I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Austin Carter
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Helen Chu
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Cristina De Rose
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Mohamed Mustafa Diab
- Center for Policy Impact in Global Health, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Emil Ekbom
- Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Maha El Tantawi
- Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Victor Fomin
- Rector's Office, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Robert Frithiof
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Anesthesiology, and Intensive Care Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Aysylu Gamirova
- Clinical Medicine (General Medicine Profile), I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Petr V Glybochko
- Administration Department, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Juanita A Haagsma
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Shaghayegh Haghjooy Javanmard
- Applied Physiology Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Erin B Hamilton
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | | | - Majanka H Heijenbrok-Kal
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Neurorehabilitation, Rijndam Rehabilitation, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Raimund Helbok
- Department of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Merel E Hellemons
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - David Hillus
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Respiratory Medicine, Charité Medical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Susanne M Huijts
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michael Hultström
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Anesthesiology, and Intensive Care Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Medical Cell Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Waasila Jassat
- Department of Public Health Surveillance and Response, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Florian Kurth
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Respiratory Medicine, Charité University Medical Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Clinical Research and Tropical Medicine, Bernhard-Nocht Institute of Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ing-Marie Larsson
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Anesthesiology, and Intensive Care Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Miklós Lipcsey
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Anesthesiology, and Intensive Care Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Chelsea Liu
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Wenhui Mao
- Center for Policy Impact in Global Health, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Lyudmila Mazankova
- Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow
| | | | - Dominik Menges
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Prevention Institute, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Noushin Mohammadifard
- Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Daniel Munblit
- Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Infectious Diseases, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, England
| | - Nikita A Nekliudov
- Clinical Medicine (General Medicine Profile), I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Osondu Ogbuoji
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ismail M Osmanov
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow
- ZA Bashlyaeva Children's Municipal Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia
| | - José L Peñalvo
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
- Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Maria Skaalum Petersen
- Department of Occupational Medicine and Public Health, Faroese Hospital System, Torshavn, Faroe Islands
- Centre of Health Science, University of Faroe Islands, Torshavn
| | - Milo A Puhan
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Prevention Institute, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Mujibur Rahman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Verena Rass
- Department of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Nickolas Reinig
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Gerard M Ribbers
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Antonia Ricchiuto
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Sten Rubertsson
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Anesthesiology, and Intensive Care Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Hedenstierna Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Elmira Samitova
- Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow
- ZA Bashlyaeva Children's Municipal Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia
| | - Nizal Sarrafzadegan
- Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Anastasia Shikhaleva
- Clinical Medicine (Pediatric Profile), I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Kyle E Simpson
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Dario Sinatti
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Joan B Soriano
- Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Respiratorias (Center for Biomedical Research in Respiratory Diseases Network), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ekaterina Spiridonova
- Clinical Medicine (General Medicine Profile), I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Fridolin Steinbeis
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Respiratory Medicine, Charité Medical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrey A Svistunov
- Administration Department, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Piero Valentini
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Brittney J van de Water
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
- Nursing and Midwifery Department, Seed Global Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rita van den Berg-Emons
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ewa Wallin
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Anesthesiology, and Intensive Care Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Martin Witzenrath
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Respiratory Medicine, Charité University Medical Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Center for Lung Research, Berlin
| | - Yifan Wu
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Hanzhang Xu
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Thomas Zoller
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Respiratory Medicine, Charité Medical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christopher Adolph
- Department of Political Science, University of Washington, Seattle
- Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - James Albright
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Joanne O Amlag
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Aleksandr Y Aravkin
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
- Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle
- Department of Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Bree L Bang-Jensen
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Catherine Bisignano
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Rachel Castellano
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Emma Castro
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Suman Chakrabarti
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - James K Collins
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Xiaochen Dai
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
- Department of Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Farah Daoud
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Carolyn Dapper
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Amanda Deen
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Bruce B Duncan
- Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Megan Erickson
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Samuel B Ewald
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Alize J Ferrari
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Abraham D Flaxman
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
- Department of Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Nancy Fullman
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | | | - John R Giles
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Gaorui Guo
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Simon I Hay
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
- Department of Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Jiawei He
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Monika Helak
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Erin N Hulland
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Maia Kereselidze
- National Center for Disease Control and Public Health, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Kris J Krohn
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Alice Lazzar-Atwood
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Akiaja Lindstrom
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Public Health, Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Wacol, Australia
| | - Rafael Lozano
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
- Department of Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Deborah Carvalho Malta
- Department of Maternal and Child Nursing and Public Health, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Johan Månsson
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Ana M Mantilla Herrera
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- West Moreton Hospital Health Services, Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Wacol, Australia
| | - Ali H Mokdad
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
- Department of Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Lorenzo Monasta
- Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health Research Unit, Burlo Garofolo Institute for Maternal and Child Health, Trieste, Italy
| | - Shuhei Nomura
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Global Health Policy, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Maja Pasovic
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - David M Pigott
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
- Department of Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Robert C Reiner
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
- Department of Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Grace Reinke
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Antonio Luiz P Ribeiro
- Department of Internal Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
- Centre of Telehealth, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Damian Francesco Santomauro
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Policy and Epidemiology Group, Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Wacol, Australia
| | - Aleksei Sholokhov
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Emma Elizabeth Spurlock
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Rebecca Walcott
- Evans School of Public Policy and Governance, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Ally Walker
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Charles Shey Wiysonge
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town
- HIV and Other Infectious Diseases Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Durban
| | - Peng Zheng
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
- Department of Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Janet Prvu Bettger
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Christopher J L Murray
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
- Department of Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Theo Vos
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
- Department of Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Global prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome among long COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Biopsychosoc Med 2022; 16:21. [PMID: 36274177 PMCID: PMC9589726 DOI: 10.1186/s13030-022-00250-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic fatigue syndrome is a persistent and debilitating disorder. According to several studies, chronic fatigue syndrome has been identified among recovered COVID-19 patients as the most common symptom of long COVID. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis study was to obtain the prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome in long COVID cases. Methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we analysed reported results of studies that assessed the occurrence of chronic fatigue syndrome among COVID-19 patients four weeks after the onset of symptoms. The study selection was commenced by searching PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, Scopus, Embase, and Google scholar using the keywords of Chronic fatigue syndrome, COVID-19, and post-COVID-19 syndrome. The searches were without a lower time limit and until April 2022. Heterogeneity of studies was assessed using the I2 index, and a random effects model was used for analysis. Data analysis was performed within the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (version 2). Results The pooled prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome four weeks after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms, in 52 studies with a sample size of 127,117, was 45.2% (95% CI: 34.1-56.9%). Meta-regression analysis in examining the effects of the two factors of sample size, and year of study on the changes in the overall prevalence, showed that with increasing sample size, and year of study, the prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome among long COVID patients (p < 0.05). Conclusion Our results show that the overall prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome as a long COVID symptom is 45.2%. Chronic fatigue after infection with COVID-19 can negatively affect personal and social lives. Given such significant negative consequences caused by the syndrome, it is recommended that health policymakers allocate funds to reduce the adverse effects of this syndrome, by creating programs to support long COVID patients.
Collapse
|
13
|
Choudhury A, Tariq R, Jena A, Vesely EK, Singh S, Khanna S, Sharma V. Gastrointestinal manifestations of long COVID: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2022; 15:17562848221118403. [PMID: 36004306 PMCID: PMC9393939 DOI: 10.1177/17562848221118403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prolonged symptoms after COVID-19 are an important concern due to the large numbers affected by the pandemic. OBJECTIVES To ascertain the frequency of gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations as part of long GI COVID. DESIGN A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting GI manifestations in long COVID was performed. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS Electronic databases (Medline, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science) were searched till 21 December 2021 to identify studies reporting frequency of GI symptoms in long COVID. We included studies reporting overall GI manifestations or individual GI symptoms as part of long COVID. We excluded pediatric studies and those not providing relevant information. We calculated the pooled frequency of various symptoms in all patients with COVID-19 and also in those with long COVID using the inverse variance approach. All analysis was done using R version 4.1.1 using packages 'meta' and 'metafor'. RESULTS A total of 50 studies were included. The frequencies of GI symptoms were 0.12 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.06-0.22, I 2 = 99%] and 0.22 (95% CI, 0.10-0.41, I 2 = 97%) in patients with COVID-19 and those with long COVID, respectively. The frequencies of abdominal pain, nausea/vomiting, loss of appetite, and loss of taste were 0.14 (95% CI, 0.04-0.38, I 2 = 96%), 0.06 (95% CI, 0.03-0.11, I 2 = 98%), 0.20 (95% CI, 0.08-0.43, I 2 = 98%), and 0.17 (95% CI, 0.10-0.27, I 2 = 95%), respectively, after COVID-19. The frequencies of diarrhea, dyspepsia, and irritable bowel syndrome were 0.10 (95% CI, 0.04-0.23, I 2 = 98%), 0.20 (95% CI, 0.06-0.50, I 2 = 97%), and 0.17 (95% CI, 0.06-0.37, I 2 = 96%), respectively. CONCLUSION GI symptoms in patients were seen in 12% after COVID-19 and 22% as part of long COVID. Loss of appetite, dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, loss of taste, and abdominal pain were the five most common GI symptoms of long COVID. Significant heterogeneity and small number of studies for some of the analyses are limitations of the systematic review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arup Choudhury
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Raseen Tariq
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Anuraag Jena
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | | | - Siddharth Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Sahil Khanna
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wulf Hanson S, Abbafati C, Aerts JG, Al-Aly Z, Ashbaugh C, Ballouz T, Blyuss O, Bobkova P, Bonsel G, Borzakova S, Buonsenso D, Butnaru D, Carter A, Chu H, De Rose C, Diab MM, Ekbom E, El Tantawi M, Fomin V, Frithiof R, Gamirova A, Glybochko PV, Haagsma JA, Javanmard SH, Hamilton EB, Harris G, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Helbok R, Hellemons ME, Hillus D, Huijts SM, Hultström M, Jassat W, Kurth F, Larsson IM, Lipcsey M, Liu C, Loflin CD, Malinovschi A, Mao W, Mazankova L, McCulloch D, Menges D, Mohammadifard N, Munblit D, Nekliudov NA, Ogbuoji O, Osmanov IM, Peñalvo JL, Petersen MS, Puhan MA, Rahman M, Rass V, Reinig N, Ribbers GM, Ricchiuto A, Rubertsson S, Samitova E, Sarrafzadegan N, Shikhaleva A, Simpson KE, Sinatti D, Soriano JB, Spiridonova E, Steinbeis F, Svistunov AA, Valentini P, van de Water BJ, van den Berg-Emons R, Wallin E, Witzenrath M, Wu Y, Xu H, Zoller T, Adolph C, Albright J, Amlag JO, Aravkin AY, Bang-Jensen BL, Bisignano C, Castellano R, Castro E, Chakrabarti S, Collins JK, Dai X, Daoud F, Dapper C, Deen A, Duncan BB, Erickson M, Ewald SB, Ferrari AJ, Flaxman AD, Fullman N, Gamkrelidze A, Giles JR, Guo G, Hay SI, He J, Helak M, Hulland EN, Kereselidze M, Krohn KJ, Lazzar-Atwood A, Lindstrom A, Lozano R, Magistro B, Malta DC, Månsson J, Mantilla Herrera AM, Mokdad AH, Monasta L, Nomura S, Pasovic M, Pigott DM, Reiner RC, Reinke G, Ribeiro ALP, Santomauro DF, Sholokhov A, Spurlock EE, Walcott R, Walker A, Wiysonge CS, Zheng P, Bettger JP, Murray CJ, Vos T. A global systematic analysis of the occurrence, severity, and recovery pattern of long COVID in 2020 and 2021. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2022. [PMID: 35664995 PMCID: PMC9164454 DOI: 10.1101/2022.05.26.22275532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Importance: While much of the attention on the COVID-19 pandemic was directed at the daily counts of cases and those with serious disease overwhelming health services, increasingly, reports have appeared of people who experience debilitating symptoms after the initial infection. This is popularly known as long COVID. Objective: To estimate by country and territory of the number of patients affected by long COVID in 2020 and 2021, the severity of their symptoms and expected pattern of recovery Design: We jointly analyzed ten ongoing cohort studies in ten countries for the occurrence of three major symptom clusters of long COVID among representative COVID cases. The defining symptoms of the three clusters (fatigue, cognitive problems, and shortness of breath) are explicitly mentioned in the WHO clinical case definition. For incidence of long COVID, we adopted the minimum duration after infection of three months from the WHO case definition. We pooled data from the contributing studies, two large medical record databases in the United States, and findings from 44 published studies using a Bayesian meta-regression tool. We separately estimated occurrence and pattern of recovery in patients with milder acute infections and those hospitalized. We estimated the incidence and prevalence of long COVID globally and by country in 2020 and 2021 as well as the severity-weighted prevalence using disability weights from the Global Burden of Disease study. Results: Analyses are based on detailed information for 1906 community infections and 10526 hospitalized patients from the ten collaborating cohorts, three of which included children. We added published data on 37262 community infections and 9540 hospitalized patients as well as ICD-coded medical record data concerning 1.3 million infections. Globally, in 2020 and 2021, 144.7 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 54.8–312.9) people suffered from any of the three symptom clusters of long COVID. This corresponds to 3.69% (1.38–7.96) of all infections. The fatigue, respiratory, and cognitive clusters occurred in 51.0% (16.9–92.4), 60.4% (18.9–89.1), and 35.4% (9.4–75.1) of long COVID cases, respectively. Those with milder acute COVID-19 cases had a quicker estimated recovery (median duration 3.99 months [IQR 3.84–4.20]) than those admitted for the acute infection (median duration 8.84 months [IQR 8.10–9.78]). At twelve months, 15.1% (10.3–21.1) continued to experience long COVID symptoms. Conclusions and relevance: The occurrence of debilitating ongoing symptoms of COVID-19 is common. Knowing how many people are affected, and for how long, is important to plan for rehabilitative services and support to return to social activities, places of learning, and the workplace when symptoms start to wane.
Collapse
|
15
|
dos Santos PK, Sigoli E, Bragança LJ, Cornachione AS. The Musculoskeletal Involvement After Mild to Moderate COVID-19 Infection. Front Physiol 2022; 13:813924. [PMID: 35492595 PMCID: PMC9040683 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.813924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
COVID-19, a disease caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, has been drastically affecting the daily lives of millions of people. COVID-19 is described as a multiorgan disease that affects not only the respiratory tract of infected individuals, but it has considerable effects on the musculoskeletal system, causing excessive fatigue, myalgia, arthralgia, muscle weakness and skeletal muscle damage. These symptoms can persist for months, decreasing the quality of life of numerous individuals. Curiously, most studies in the scientific literature focus on patients who were hospitalized due to SARS-CoV-2 infection and little is known about the mechanism of action of COVID-19 on skeletal muscles, especially of individuals who had the mild to moderate forms of the disease (non-hospitalized patients). In this review, we focus on the current knowledge about the musculoskeletal system in COVID-19, highlighting the lack of researches investigating the mild to moderate cases of infection and pointing out why it is essential to care for these patients. Also, we will comment about the need of more experimental data to assess the musculoskeletal manifestations on COVID-19-positive individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patty K. dos Santos
- Muscle Physiology and Biophysics Laboratory, Department of Physiological Sciences, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, Brazil
| | | | | | - Anabelle S. Cornachione
- Muscle Physiology and Biophysics Laboratory, Department of Physiological Sciences, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Raman B, Bluemke DA, Lüscher TF, Neubauer S. Long COVID: post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 with a cardiovascular focus. Eur Heart J 2022; 43:1157-1172. [PMID: 35176758 PMCID: PMC8903393 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 257] [Impact Index Per Article: 128.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Emerging as a new epidemic, long COVID or post-acute sequelae of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a condition characterized by the persistence of COVID-19 symptoms beyond 3 months, is anticipated to substantially alter the lives of millions of people globally. Cardiopulmonary symptoms including chest pain, shortness of breath, fatigue, and autonomic manifestations such as postural orthostatic tachycardia are common and associated with significant disability, heightened anxiety, and public awareness. A range of cardiovascular (CV) abnormalities has been reported among patients beyond the acute phase and include myocardial inflammation, myocardial infarction, right ventricular dysfunction, and arrhythmias. Pathophysiological mechanisms for delayed complications are still poorly understood, with a dissociation seen between ongoing symptoms and objective measures of cardiopulmonary health. COVID-19 is anticipated to alter the long-term trajectory of many chronic cardiac diseases which are abundant in those at risk of severe disease. In this review, we discuss the definition of long COVID and its epidemiology, with an emphasis on cardiopulmonary symptoms. We further review the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying acute and chronic CV injury, the range of post-acute CV sequelae, and impact of COVID-19 on multiorgan health. We propose a possible model for referral of post-COVID-19 patients to cardiac services and discuss future directions including research priorities and clinical trials that are currently underway to evaluate the efficacy of treatment strategies for long COVID and associated CV sequelae.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Betty Raman
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Oxford, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - David A. Bluemke
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 3252 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792, USA
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 3252 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792, USA
| | - Thomas F. Lüscher
- Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals and National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Neubauer
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Oxford, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kopanczyk R, Kumar N, Papadimos T. Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome for Anesthesiologists: A Narrative Review and a Pragmatic Approach to Clinical Care. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2021; 36:2727-2737. [PMID: 34688543 PMCID: PMC8487462 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.09.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Post-acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) syndrome is a novel, poorly understood clinical entity with life-impacting ramifications. Patients with this syndrome, also known as "COVID-19 long-haulers," often present with nonspecific ailments involving more than one body system. The most common complaints include dyspnea, fatigue, brain fog, and chest pain. There currently is no single agreed-upon definition for post-acute COVID-19 syndrome, but most agree that criterion for this syndrome is the persistence of mental and physical health consequences after initial infection. Given the millions of acute infections in the United States over the course of the pandemic, perioperative providers will encounter these patients in clinical practice in growing numbers. Symptoms of the COVID-19 long-haulers should not be minimized, as these patients are at higher risk for postoperative respiratory complications and perioperative mortality for up to seven weeks after initial illness. Instead, a cautious multidisciplinary preoperative evaluation should be performed. Perioperative care should be viewed through the prism of best practices already in use, such as avoidance of benzodiazepines in patients with cognitive impairment and use of lung-protective ventilation. Recommendations especially relevant to the COVID-19 long-haulers include assessment of critical care myopathies and neuropathies to determine suitable neuromuscular blocking agents and reversal, preoperative workup of insidious cardiac or pulmonary pathologies in previously healthy patients, and, thorough medication review, particularly of anticoagulation regimens and chronic steroid use. In this article, the authors define the syndrome, synthesize the available scientific evidence, and make pragmatic suggestions regarding the perioperative clinical care of COVID-19 long-haulers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafal Kopanczyk
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
| | - Nicolas Kumar
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Thomas Papadimos
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Jones R, Davis A, Stanley B, Julious S, Ryan D, Jackson DJ, Halpin DMG, Hickman K, Pinnock H, Quint JK, Khunti K, Heaney LG, Oliver P, Siddiqui S, Pavord I, Jones DHM, Hyland M, Ritchie L, Young P, Megaw T, Davis S, Walker S, Holgate S, Beecroft S, Kemppinen A, Appiagyei F, Roberts EJ, Preston M, Hardjojo A, Carter V, van Melle M, Price D. Risk Predictors and Symptom Features of Long COVID Within a Broad Primary Care Patient Population Including Both Tested and Untested Patients. Pragmat Obs Res 2021; 12:93-104. [PMID: 34408531 PMCID: PMC8366779 DOI: 10.2147/por.s316186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Symptoms may persist after the initial phases of COVID-19 infection, a phenomenon termed long COVID. Current knowledge on long COVID has been mostly derived from test-confirmed and hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Data are required on the burden and predictors of long COVID in a broader patient group, which includes both tested and untested COVID-19 patients in primary care. METHODS This is an observational study using data from Platform C19, a quality improvement program-derived research database linking primary care electronic health record data (EHR) with patient-reported questionnaire information. Participating general practices invited consenting patients aged 18-85 to complete an online questionnaire since 7th August 2020. COVID-19 self-diagnosis, clinician-diagnosis, testing, and the presence and duration of symptoms were assessed via the questionnaire. Patients were considered present with long COVID if they reported symptoms lasting ≥4 weeks. EHR and questionnaire data up till 22nd January 2021 were extracted for analysis. Multivariable regression analyses were conducted comparing demographics, clinical characteristics, and presence of symptoms between patients with long COVID and patients with shorter symptom duration. RESULTS Long COVID was present in 310/3151 (9.8%) patients with self-diagnosed, clinician-diagnosed, or test-confirmed COVID-19. Only 106/310 (34.2%) long COVID patients had test-confirmed COVID-19. Risk predictors of long COVID were age ≥40 years (adjusted Odds Ratio [AdjOR]=1.49 [1.05-2.17]), female sex (adjOR=1.37 [1.02-1.85]), frailty (adjOR=2.39 [1.29-4.27]), visit to A&E (adjOR=4.28 [2.31-7.78]), and hospital admission for COVID-19 symptoms (adjOR=3.22 [1.77-5.79]). Aches and pain (adjOR=1.70 [1.21-2.39]), appetite loss (adjOR=3.15 [1.78-5.92]), confusion and disorientation (adjOR=2.17 [1.57-2.99]), diarrhea (adjOR=1.4 [1.03-1.89]), and persistent dry cough (adjOR=2.77 [1.94-3.98]) were symptom features statistically more common in long COVID. CONCLUSION This study reports the factors and symptom features predicting long COVID in a broad primary care population, including both test-confirmed and the previously missed group of COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupert Jones
- Optimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
- Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Andrew Davis
- Optimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Brooklyn Stanley
- Optimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Dermot Ryan
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - David J Jackson
- Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Trust, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - David M G Halpin
- University of Exeter Medical School, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Hilary Pinnock
- Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jennifer K Quint
- National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Kamlesh Khunti
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Liam G Heaney
- Wellcome-Wolfson Centre for Experimental Medicine, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | | | - Salman Siddiqui
- Institute for Lung Health, Leicester National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Ian Pavord
- Respiratory Medicine Unit and Oxford Respiratory NIHR BRC, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Michael Hyland
- Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
- Plymouth Marjon University, Plymouth, UK
| | - Lewis Ritchie
- Centre of Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Stephen Holgate
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Anu Kemppinen
- Optimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Francis Appiagyei
- Optimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Emma-Jane Roberts
- Optimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Megan Preston
- Optimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Antony Hardjojo
- Optimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Victoria Carter
- Optimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Marije van Melle
- Optimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - David Price
- Optimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
- Centre of Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|