Bupropion poisoning: a case series

The predictive value of heart rate in determining clinical course after a bupropion overdose

INTRODUCTION

Bupropion is a popular antidepressant due to its favorable side effect profile and indications for smoking cessation and weight loss. Due to the possibility of delayed onset seizure and other adverse outcomes after bupropion overdose, patients are often observed for periods of 12-24 hours following suspected ingestion. Tachycardia is a clinical predictor that holds promise in differentiating cases at risk for seizures from low-risk cases that do not require prolonged observation. This study assessed whether heart rate within the first eight hours of presentation can identify cases that do not require extended observation.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of all supra-therapeutic bupropion cases from two hospital systems between 2010 and 2022.

RESULTS

Data from 216 charts were included. Seizures, hypotension, and dysrhythmias occurred in 19 percent (n = 41), 1.4 percent (n = 3), 0.9 percent (n = 2) respectively. One patient died. Delayed adverse effects were rare (n = 4); they occurred from 14 hours to 28 hours post-ingestion. Maximum heart rate in eight hours was associated with a risk of adverse outcomes. (odds ratio, 1.07; 95 percent confidence interval: 1.05 to 1.09; P < 0.001). An eight hour maximum heart rate threshold of 104 beats/minute had a negative predictive value of 100 percent (95 percent confidence interval: 96.7 percent to 100 percent) for the occurrence of delayed adverse effects. All patients with delayed effects had tachycardia within five hours of emergency department arrival.

DISCUSSION

Delayed adverse outcomes of seizures, hypotension, dysrhythmia, and death were uncommon in this cohort. Heart rate during the first eight hours of observation performs reliably as a screening test to identify patients at low risk for delayed adverse outcomes. This study is limited by its retrospective nature, the inability to ascertain time of ingestion for most cases and the lack of confirmatory laboratory testing.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the use of an eight hour observation period when there are no other clinical signs of toxicity to warrant admission and if no co-ingestion or administration of substances that mask tachycardia are present.

The effects of bupropion alone and combined with naltrexone on blood pressure and CRP concentration: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Considering the conflicting effects of bupropion on parameters related to cardiovascular system including blood pressure and inflammation, in this meta-analysis study, we investigated the effects of this drug alone or in combination with naltrexone on systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and C-reactive protein (CRP).

METHODS

Scopus, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science and Embase databases were searched using standard keywords to identify all controlled trials investigating effects of bupropion alone and combined with naltrexone on the BP and CRP. Pooled weighted mean difference and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were achieved by random-effects model analysis for the best estimation of outcomes.

RESULTS

The pooled findings showed that that bupropion alone or in combination with naltrexone would significantly increase SBP (weighted mean difference (WMD): 1.34 mmHg, 95% CI: 0.38-2.29) and DBP (WMD: 0.93 mmHg, 95% CI 0.88-0.99) as well as decrease CRP (WMD: -0.89 mg/L, 95% CI -1.09 to -0.70). The findings of the subgroup also show the greater effect of bupropion on blood pressure (SBP and DBP) increase in a dose greater than 360 mg and a duration of intervention less equal to 26 weeks. In addition, the subgroup analysis showed that changes in SBP after receiving bupropion together with naltrexone were more compared to bupropion alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of combination therapies such as bupropion and naltrexone can significantly improve CRP levels. However, its effect on blood pressure requires proper management of this drug.

Psychological and Psychopharmacological Interventions in Psychocardiology

Patients with mental disorders have an increased risk to develop cardiovascular disease (CVD), and CVD are frequently comorbid with especially adjustment, anxiety and depressive disorders. Therefore, clinicians need to be aware of effective and safe psychological and pharmacological treatment strategies for patients with comorbid CVD and mental disorders. Cognitive behavioral therapy and third-wave of cognitive-behavioral therapy are effective for patients with CVD and mental disorders. Internet-based psychological treatments may also be considered. In more severe cases, psychopharmacological drugs are frequently used. Although generally well tolerated and efficacious, drug- and dose-dependent side effects require consideration. Among antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, selective serotonin and noradrenalin reuptake inhibitors, and newer antidepressants, such as mirtazapine, bupropion, agomelatine, and vortioxetine, can be considered, while tricyclic antidepressants should be avoided due to their cardiac side effects. Mood stabilizers have been associated with arrhythmias, and some first- and second-generation antipsychotics can increase QTc and metabolic side effects, although substantial differences exist between drugs. Benzodiazepines are generally safe in patients with CVD when administered short-term, and may mitigate symptoms of acute coronary syndrome. Laboratory and ECG monitoring is always recommended in psychopharmacological drug-treated patients with CVD. Presence of a heart disease should not exclude patients from necessary interventions, but may require careful risk-benefit evaluations. Effectively and safely addressing mental disorders in patients with CVD helps to improve both conditions. Since CVD increase the risk for mental disorders and vice versa, care providers need to screen for these common comorbidities to comprehensively address the patients' needs.

The Timing of Clinical Effects of Bupropion Misuse Via Insufflation Reported to a Regional Poison Center

BACKGROUND

Bupropion is an antidepressant medication with expanding indications including smoking cessation, weight loss, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, seasonal affective disorder, and amphetamine dependence. Despite its increasing popularity among providers, it has a well-known narrow therapeutic window that can lead to delayed onset of symptoms with extended-release formulations and devastating consequences in overdose. We have noticed some patients misusing bupropion via insufflation, which added a layer of complexity with regards to the therapeutic application of the drug. This route of use created difficult decisions regarding clinical monitoring in these patients.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if prolonged observation is required after insufflation of bupropion and to further describe effects from this route of use.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study reviewing all the cases of insufflated bupropion use reported to a single poison center without any other coingestants.

RESULTS

The majority (85.7%) of patients had mild or moderate effects, and seizures occurred in 19.6% of cases; and the vast majority of patients were symptomatic by the time of the initial call to the poison center. We did not encounter any delayed effects after this route of use.

CONCLUSIONS

This report describes the clinical effects reported, and the timing of these effects, after insufflation of bupropion.

Antidepressant Drugs Effects on Blood Pressure

Individuals suffering from depressive disorders display a greater incidence of hypertension compared with the general population, despite reports of the association between depression and hypotension. This phenomenon may depend, at least in part, on the use of antidepressant drugs, which may influence blood pressure through different effects on adrenergic and serotoninergic pathways, as well as on histaminergic, dopaminergic, and cholinergic systems. This review summarizes extant literature on the effect of antidepressant drugs on blood pressure. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are characterized by limited effects on autonomic system activity and a lower impact on blood pressure. Thus, they represent the safest class—particularly among elderly and cardiovascular patients. Serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, particularly venlafaxine, carry a greater risk of hypertension, possibly related to greater effects on the sympathetic nervous system. The norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor reboxetine is considered a safe option because of its neutral effects on blood pressure in long-term studies, even if both hypotensive and hypertensive effects are reported. The dopamine–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor bupropion can lead to blood pressure increases, usually at high doses, but may also cause orthostatic hypotension, especially in patients with cardiovascular diseases. The norepinephrine–serotonin modulators, mirtazapine and mianserin, have minimal effects on blood pressure but may rarely lead to orthostatic hypotension and falls. These adverse effects are also observed with the serotonin-reuptake modulators, nefazodone and trazodone, but seldomly with vortioxetine and vilazodone. Agomelatine, the only melatonergic antidepressant drug, may also have limited effects on blood pressure. Tricyclic antidepressants have been associated with increases in blood pressure, as well as orthostatic hypotension, particularly imipramine. Oral monoamine–oxidase inhibitors, less frequently skin patch formulations, have been associated with orthostatic hypotension or, conversely, with hypertensive crisis due to ingestion of tyramine-containing food (i.e., cheese reaction). Lastly, a hypertensive crisis may complicate antidepressant treatment as a part of the serotonin syndrome, also including neuromuscular, cognitive, and autonomic dysfunctions. Clinicians treating depressive patients should carefully consider their blood pressure status and cardiovascular comorbidities because of the effects of antidepressant drugs on blood pressure profiles and potential interactions with antihypertensive treatments.

A 19-Year-Old Woman with a History of Depression and Fatal Cardiorespiratory Failure Following an Overdose of Prescribed Bupropion

BACKGROUND Bupropion is a norepinephrine/dopamine-reuptake inhibitor (NDRI) that has been reported to increase the risk of suicide attempts in some patients. This report is of a case of a 19-year-old woman with a history of depression who suffered fatal cardiorespiratory failure following an overdose of prescribed bupropion. CASE REPORT A 19-year-old woman presented to the Emergency Department with an estimated bupropion overdose of 28.2 g and possible oxcarbazepine co-ingestion. This serum level was estimated based on the patient's history of medication reconciliation and number of pills remaining in the prescription bottle at presentation. The patient was unresponsive on arrival to the Emergency Department and was treated for intermittent seizures and shock. Despite aggressive medical interventions, her condition progressed to cardiogenic shock and eventually cardiac arrest, from which she could not be resuscitated. Several existing reports regarding bupropion overdose describe sinus tachycardia and seizures corrected by symptomatic treatment. This case may document the highest reported ingestion of bupropion recorded thus far in the literature and demonstrates the rapid onset of cardiac dysfunction and cardiogenic shock. CONCLUSIONS In the context of this case, we discuss the clinical manifestations of bupropion overdose and the rapid progression to cardiogenic shock. By examining the pathophysiology of overdose in an adolescent who consumed an extremely high dose of bupropion, we hope this information can be helpful to clinicians who are managing similarly challenging critical cases.

Factors associated with seizure development after bupropion overdose: a review of the toxicology investigators consortium

BACKGROUND

Bupropion is an aminoketone antidepressant. A major concern in bupropion toxicity is seizure activity, which can occur up to 24 h from ingestion. It is difficult to predict which patients will have seizures. The purpose of this study is to identify clinical features associate with seizure after bupropion overdose.

METHODS

We searched the Toxicology Investigators Consortium registry for a cases of poisoning by bupropion between January 1, 2014 and January 1, 2017 in patients aged 13-65. Demographic variables and clinical features were compared between patients who did and did not experience a seizure and presented as unadjusted odds ratios (OR). Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) between clinical features and seizures.

RESULTS

There were 256 cases of bupropion overdose remaining after inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied. Clinical features associated with seizure were QTc >500 (OR = 3.4, 95% CI: 1.3-8.8, p = 0.012), tachycardia (p > 140) (OR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1-3.561, p = 0.05), and age 13-18 years (2.4, 95% CI: 1.3-4.3, p = 0.005). The mean QTc value for patients experiencing a seizure was 482 ms (N = 95 IQR: 59 ms) versus 454 ms (N = 103, IQR: 43) in patients who did not experience seizure, however, it was not possible to identify a QTc cutoff with sensitivity or specificity to predict seizures.

CONCLUSION

Based on our analysis of data from the ToxIC registry, age (13-18), tachycardia (p > 140) and QTc >500 ms are associated with seizures in bupropion overdose; however, a specific QTc value may not be a useful predictor of seizures.

Clinical effects of intravenous bupropion misuse reported to a regional poison center

Bupropion is an antidepressant medication with expanding indications including smoking cessation, weight loss, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, seasonal affective disorder, and amphetamine dependence. Despite its increasing popularity among providers, it has a well-known narrow therapeutic window which can lead to delayed onset of symptoms with extended-release formulations and devastating consequences in overdose. We have noticed some patients misusing bupropion via intravenous use and had difficulty guiding decisions regarding clinical monitoring in these patients. As this route entirely changes the kinetics of bupropion, this has caused concern within our group. We reviewed all the cases of intravenous bupropion use reported to a single poison center without any other coingestants. The majority (66.7%) of patients had moderate effects and one patient had a seizure. No deaths were reported. All patients were symptomatic by the time of initial call to the poison center if they had any reported symptoms due to bupropion. This case series describes the clinical effects reported, and the timing of these effects, after intravenous bupropion use.

Consensus statements on the clinical understanding and use of bupropion in Hong Kong

OBJECTIVES

To develop a local consensus to guide medical practitioners and psychiatrists on the use of bupropion in different psychiatric conditions in Hong Kong.

METHODS

By utilizing the modified Delphi technique, a group of 10 local physicians with extensive experience in the management of major depressive disorder (MDD) developed and voted (using an anonymous, electronic voting system) on the practicality of recommendation of a set of consensus statements on the clinical use and understanding of bupropion in Hong Kong.

RESULTS

There was a very high degree of agreement among the panelists on the 11 finalized consensus statements.

CONCLUSIONS

The present consensus statements are developed as general recommendations for medical practitioners and psychiatrists to be practically referred to in clinical settings.

Cardiovascular effects of antiobesity drugs: are the new medicines all the same?

Waiting for a definite answer from well-designed randomized prospective clinical trials, the impact of the new antiobesity drugs -liraglutide, bupropion/naltrexone, phentermine/topiramate and lorcaserin- on cardiovascular outcomes remains uncertain. What has been learned from previous experience with older medicines is that antiobesity drugs may influence cardiovascular health not only causing weight reduction but also through direct actions on the cardiovascular system. Therefore, in the present review, we examine what is known, mainly from preclinical investigations, about the cardiovascular pharmacology of the new antiobesity medicines with the aim of highlighting potential mechanistic differences. We will show that the two active substances of the bupropion/naltrexone combination both exert beneficial and unwanted cardiovascular effects. Indeed, bupropion exerts anti-inflammatory effects but at the same time it does increase heart rate and blood pressure by potentiating catecholaminergic neurotransmission, whereas naltrexone reduces TLR4-dependent inflammation and has potential protective effects in stroke but also impairs cardiac adaption to ischemia and the beneficial opioid protective effects mediated in the endothelium. On the contrary, with the only exception of a small increase in heat rate, liraglutide only exerts favorable cardiovascular effects by protecting myocardium and brain from ischemic damage, improving heart contractility, lowering blood pressure and reducing atherogenesis. As far as the phentermine/topiramate combination is concerned, no direct cardiovascular beneficial effect is expected for phentermine (as this drug is an amphetamine derivative), whereas topiramate may exert cardioprotective and neuroprotective effects in ischemia and anti-inflammatory and antiatherogenic actions. Finally, lorcaserin, a selective 5HT_2C receptor agonist, does not seem to exert significant direct effects on the cardiovascular system though at very high concentrations this drug may also interact with other serotonin receptor subtypes and exert unwanted cardiovascular effects. In conclusion, the final effect of the new antiobesity drugs on cardiovascular outcomes will be a balance between possible (but still unproved) beneficial effects of weight loss and "mixed" weight-independent drug-specific effects. Therefore comparative studies will be required to establish which one of the new medicines is more appropriate in patients with specific cardiovascular diseases.

Bupropion Overdose Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Vasopressor Support and Lipid Emulsion Therapy

BACKGROUND

Bupropion overdose is a commonly encountered presentation in the emergency department (ED). While the majority of cases resolve with supportive care, serious adverse effects, including seizures, cardiogenic shock, and death, can occur. Intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) therapy has been utilized for a multitude of poisonings with varying levels of success. Although a number of cases suggest the value of ILE therapy in cases of bupropion overdose, more recent data propose that its role may be overstated.

CASE REPORT

A young woman presented to the ED with altered mental status complicated by seizure after bupropion overdose. She subsequently developed cardiogenic shock requiring vasopressor support. Bedside echocardiogram revealed a decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). She received ILE therapy with significant improvement in both hemodynamic status and LVEF by bedside ultrasound. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Although the majority of patients presenting with bupropion overdose improve with supportive care, life-threatening sequelae are possible. ILE therapy has shown promise in a variety of different overdose situations, although the evidence in cases of bupropion poisoning has been varied, and it has traditionally been utilized as a last-line rescue modality. Based on hemodynamic parameters and bedside ultrasound, this case suggests that early initiation of ILE therapy should be considered in these cases, as the potential benefits likely outweigh the theoretical risks.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with bupropion overdose: a Canadian perspective

Background: Therapeutic use, overdose and recreational abuse of bupropion are increasing. The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence and outcomes of bupropion exposures reported to the Ontario Poison Centre in Canada, and to identify predictors of seizures.Methods: This was a retrospective, chart review of bupropion exposures reported to the Ontario Poison Centre between 2013 and 2015. Extracted variables included demographics, formulation and dose of bupropion ingested, co-ingestants, timing of exposure, provided treatments, clinical characteristics on presentation (i.e. tachycardia, ECG changes), onset of seizures following exposure, and clinical outcomes (i.e. admission to hospital, ICU admission, intubation, death). Data were compared between patients who had a benzodiazepine co-ingestion and those that had a seizure using descriptive statistics. A multivariable logistic regression was then conducted to determine predictors of seizure.Results: In this study, there were 1,065 reported bupropion overdoses. Among patients with reported outcomes, 51.9% of patients had episodes of tachycardia, (23.9% of patients had ECG changes, and 17.3% of patients experienced a seizure. The dose of bupropion ingested was significantly associated with the odds of seizure, with a 13% increased odds of seizure for every 20 mg/kg increase in bupropion dose (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.05-1.21). Co-ingestion of benzodiazepines reduced the odds of seizure by over 60% (OR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.15-0.69).Conclusion: Our findings contribute to the existing clinical toxicology literature by describing specific characteristics and outcomes of patients with acute bupropion overdoses. Patients were less likely to experience a seizure if they had co-ingested benzodiazepines.

Management of severe bupropion poisoning with intravenous lipid emulsion

BACKGROUND

Bupropion toxicity is characterized by central nervous system and cardiovascular toxicity. Intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) has been suggested as a treatment by some for the treatment of refractory bupropion toxicity. This recommendation is based largely on published case reports and cases presented at scientific meetings. The objective of this study is to characterize the outcomes of patients with suspected bupropion toxicity in which ILE was administered and the indications for its use.

METHODS

Electronic records from one regional poison center were searched for intentional bupropion ingestions from 1 January 2009 through 31 December 2015. Cases in which ILE was administered or death was listed as the outcome were further analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 1274 cases of suspected bupropion ingestion reported during the study period with 14 reported deaths. Nine cases of ILE administration were identified. Of these, four patients expired and five survived. One of the survivors had neurologic sequelae necessitating placement in a long-term care facility. Patient complications after ILE administration were common and included continued hypotension in 7 cases, recurrent seizures in 3 patients, ARDS in two patients, and renal failure in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The high mortality and complication rate after ILE in this study sample does not reflect the positive outcome benefit seen in previous published case reports. Further characterization of the efficacy and complications of ILE in bupropion toxicity is needed.

Bupropion Overdose Presenting as Status Epilepticus in an Infant

BACKGROUND

Bupropion is a monocyclic antidepressant in the aminoketone class, structurally related to amphetamines. The Food and Drug Administration withdrew this product from the market in 1986 after seizures were reported in bulimic patients. It was later reintroduced in 1989 when the incidence of seizures was shown to be dose-related in the immediate release preparation. Massive bupropion ingestion has been associated with status epilepticus and cardiogenic shock in adults. Seizures have been reported in children, but not status epilepticus. This report highlights a patient who presented with status epilepticus and developed cardiopulmonary arrest after bupropion ingestion. False-positive amphetamine diagnosis from urine drug screen on presentation was reported.

METHOD

We review the presentation, clinical course, diagnostic studies, and outcome of this patient. We then review the literature regarding bupropion overdose in children.

RESULT

Symptoms of bupropion toxicity and risk for seizures are dose-dependent and fatalities have been reported. Our patient developed status epilepticus and cardiopulmonary arrest and then progressed to have a hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy and refractory symptomatic partial seizures.

CONCLUSION

Our report highlights the need to keep this medication away from children in order to prevent accidental overdose.

Seizures after single-agent overdose with pharmaceutical drugs: analysis of cases reported to a poison center

CONTEXT

Seizures during intoxications with pharmaceuticals are a well-known complication. However, only a few studies report on drugs commonly involved and calculate the seizure potential of these drugs.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the pharmaceutical drugs most commonly associated with seizures after single-agent overdose, the seizure potential of these pharmaceuticals, the age-distribution of the cases with seizures and the ingested doses.

METHODS

A retrospective review of acute single-agent exposures to pharmaceuticals reported to the Swiss Toxicological Information Centre (STIC) between January 1997 and December 2010 was conducted. Exposures which resulted in at least one seizure were identified. The seizure potential of a pharmaceutical was calculated by dividing the number of cases with seizures by the number of all cases recorded with that pharmaceutical. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

We identified 15,441 single-agent exposures. Seizures occurred in 313 cases. The most prevalent pharmaceuticals were mefenamic acid (51 of the 313 cases), citalopram (34), trimipramine (27), venlafaxine (23), tramadol (15), diphenhydramine (14), amitriptyline (12), carbamazepine (11), maprotiline (10), and quetiapine (10). Antidepressants were involved in 136 cases. Drugs with a high seizure potential were bupropion (31.6%, seizures in 6 of 19 cases, 95% CI: 15.4-50.0%), maprotiline (17.5%, 10/57, 95% CI: 9.8-29.4%), venlafaxine (13.7%, 23/168, 95% CI: 9.3-19.7%), citalopram (13.1%, 34/259, 95% CI: 9.5-17.8%), and mefenamic acid (10.9%, 51/470, 95% CI: 8.4-14.0%). In adolescents (15-19y/o) 23.9% (95% CI: 17.6-31.7%) of the cases involving mefenamic acid resulted in seizures, but only 5.7% (95% CI: 3.3-9.7%) in adults (≥ 20y/o; p < 0.001). For citalopram these numbers were 22.0% (95% CI: 12.8-35.2%) and 10.9% (95% CI: 7.1-16.4%), respectively (p = 0.058). The probability of seizures with mefenamic acid, citalopram, trimipramine, and venlafaxine increased as the ingested dose increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Antidepressants were frequently associated with seizures in overdose, but other pharmaceuticals, as mefenamic acid, were also associated with seizures in a considerable number of cases. Bupropion was the pharmaceutical with the highest seizure potential even if overdose with bupropion was uncommon in our sample. Adolescents might be more susceptible to seizures after mefenamic acid overdose than adults. "Part of this work is already published as a conference abstract for the XXXIV International Congress of the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists (EAPCCT) 27-30 May 2014, Brussels, Belgium." Abstract 8, Clin Toxicol 2014;52(4):298.

Cardiovascular stimulant actions of bupropion in comparison to cocaine in the rat

Stimulants are banned in competition by the World Anti-Doping Agency, except for a small number of therapeutic agents subject to monitoring, including bupropion. We have examined the potency of bupropion in comparison with two agents banned in competition, adrafinil and modafinil, and with cocaine and desipramine as blockers of the noradrenaline re-uptake transporter in peripheral tissues of the rat. For studies in vivo, the pressor response to noradrenaline in the anaesthetized rat was studied. Cocaine, desipramine and bupropion at doses of 0.1, 0.3 and 1mg/kg, respectively, significantly increased the pressor response to noradrenaline. Overall, cocaine and desipramine were approximately 2-5 times more potent than bupropion in vivo in the rat. Adrafinil and modafinil (both 3mg/kg) did not significantly affect the pressor response. Bupropion was chosen for further study. In 1Hz paced rat right ventricular strips, bupropion (30μM) significantly increased the potency of noradrenaline at increasing the force of contraction. In rat vas deferens, bupropion and cocaine produced concentration-dependent increases in the contractile response to nerve stimulation, and cocaine was 11 times more potent than bupropion. Since bupropion is used clinically in doses of up to 300mg, it is likely that bupropion has actions at the noradrenaline transporter, and thus cardiovascular stimulant actions, in clinical doses. This may explain findings of increased exercise performance with bupropion.

Seizures after overdoses of bupropion intake

BACKGROUND

Bupropion is a new-generation monocyclic antidepressant that has been accidentally found to have potential effects on reducing nicotine addiction. It is structurally similar to stimulants such as amphetamine and inhibits dopamine and noradrenalin reuptake selectively.

CASE REPORTS

We report two cases with no history of epilepsy who took oral bupropion for depression and had generalised tonic-clonic type of seizures in their follow-ups.

CONCLUSION

After an overdose of bupropion, clinical effects are seen primarily on the neurological, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal systems. Neurological effects can include tremor, confusion, agitation, hallucinations, coma, and seizures.

Miscellaneous central nervous system intoxicants

The topic of central nervous system intoxicants encompasses a multitude of agents. This article focuses on three classes of therapeutic drugs, with specific examples in which overdoses require admission to the intensive care unit. Included are some of the newer antidepressants, the atypical neuroleptic agents, and selected anticonvulsant drugs. The importance of understanding pertinent physiology and applicable supportive care is emphasized.

A dopamine/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor improves performance in the heat, but only at the maximum therapeutic dose

A maximal dose of bupropion has enabled subjects to maintain a higher power output than reported during the placebo session in the heat. Because this drug is taken in different doses it is important to know if there is a dose-response relationship with regard to exercise at high ambient temperature. Ten well-trained male cyclists ingested placebo (pla; 200 mg) or bupropion (50%, 75%, 100% of maximal dose: bup50: 150 mg; bup75: 225 mg; bup100: 300 mg) the evening before and morning of the experimental trial. Trials were conducted in 30 °C (humidity 48%). Subjects cycled for 60 min at 55% W (max) , immediately followed by a time trial to measure performance. Bup100 improved performance (pla: 33'42" ± 2'06"; bup100: 32'06" ± 1'54"; P = 0.035). Bupropion increased core temperature at the end of exercise, while heart rate was higher only in the bup100 trial (P < 0.05). No changes in rating of perceived exertion (RPE) or thermal sensation were found. Lower doses of bupropion were not ergogenic, indicating there was no dose-response effect. Interestingly, despite an increase in core temperature and improved performance in the maximal dose, there was no change in RPE and thermal sensation, suggesting an altered motivation or drive to continue exercise.

QRS widening and QT prolongation under bupropion: a unique cardiac electrophysiological profile

QRS widening and QT prolongation are associated with bupropion. The objectives were to elucidate its cardiac electrophysiological properties. Patch-clamp technique was used to assess the I(Kr) -, I(Ks) -, and I(Na) -blocking effects of bupropion. Langendorff retroperfusion technique on isolated guinea-pig hearts was used to evaluate the MAPD(90) -, MAP amplitude-, phase 0 dV/dt-, and ECG-modulating effects of bupropion and of two gap junction intercellular communication inhibitors: glycyrrhetinic acid and heptanol. To evaluate their effects on cardiac intercellular communication, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) technique was used. Bupropion is an I(Kr) blocker. IC(50) was estimated at 34 μm. In contrast, bupropion had hardly any effect on I(Ks) and I(Na) . Bupropion had no significant MAPD(90) -modulating effect. However, as glycyrrhetinic acid and heptanol, bupropion caused important reductions in MAP amplitude and phase 0 dV/dt. A modest but significant QRS-widening effect of bupropion was also observed. FRAP experiments confirmed that bupropion inhibits gap junctional intercellular communication. QT prolongation during bupropion overdosage is due to its I(Kr) -blocking effect. QRS widening with bupropion is not related to cardiac sodium channel block. Bupropion rather mimics the QRS-widening, MAP amplitude- and phase 0 dV/dt -reducing effect of glycyrrhetinic acid and heptanol. Unlike class I anti-arrhythmics, bupropion causes cardiac conduction disturbances by reducing cardiac intercellular coupling.

Refractory hypotension from massive bupropion overdose successfully treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

An 11-month-old male infant presented with history of bupropion ingestion (750 mg/kg). He developed seizures, respiratory failure, and severe hypotension with metabolic acidosis refractory to inotropic support. The patient received mechanical ventilation, intralipids, phenytoin, inotropic support (dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Inotropes were weaned upon initiation of ECMO and discontinued 66 hours after ingestion. Total ECMO duration was 71 hours. The patient was extubated on hospital day 8 and has not had any neurological sequelae upon 12-month follow-up examinations. We report for the first time successful use of ECMO after ingestion of a potentially fatal dose of bupropion.

Toxin-related seizures

Toxin-related seizures result from an imbalance in the brain's equilibrium of excitation-inhibition. Fortunately, most toxin-related seizures respond to standard therapy using benzodiazepines. However, a few alterations in the standard approach are recommended to ensure optimal care and expedient termination of seizure activity. If 2 doses of a benzodiazepine do not terminate the seizure activity, a therapeutic dose of pyridoxine (5 g intravenously in an adult and 70 mg/kg intravenously in a child) should be considered. Phenytoin should be avoided because it is ineffective for many toxin-induced seizures and is potentially harmful when used to treat seizures induced by theophylline or cyclic antidepressants.

The outcome of unintentional pediatric bupropion ingestions: a NPDS database review

Unintentional bupropion pediatric exposures uncommonly report severe clinical effects such as seizures. We sought to determine the clinical effects and case outcomes for unintentional bupropion ingestions in children age </=6 years. The National Poison Data System was queried for unintentional, acute, single substance bupropion ingestions in children age </=6 years for the time period January 1, 2000 to February 27, 2007 for cases followed to a known outcome. If exposure amount was reported, a mg/kg dose was determined; when weight was absent, it was interpolated from the available data set. An adverse neurological effect (ANE) was defined as seizure (single, multi/discrete, and status) or coma. For analysis, the outcomes of no effect and mild outcome were grouped, and the outcomes of moderate outcome, major outcome, and death were grouped. A subset of case notes were reviewed for accuracy. Seven thousand one hundred eighteen cases met the inclusion criteria, with 1,154 cases excluded because of multiple substances and coding errors, resulting in 5,964 cases. A total of 4,557 cases (76.4%) were managed at or sent to a HCF. The most common clinical effects reported were nausea/vomiting (4.3%), tachycardia (3.9%), agitated/irritable (3.1%), drowsiness/lethargy (2.4%), and seizure (1.4%). There were no deaths. Overall, there was a 3.3% rate of moderate/major outcomes. A mg/kg dose was calculable in 76.1% of cases; the average amount for the no effect/minor cases and moderate/major effect was 13.8 +/- 18.8 and 38.8 +/- 44.0 mg/kg, respectively (p < 0.0001). Average time until development of seizures was 4.2 +/- 3.2 h with a maximum of 14 h. Few children develop toxicity from unintentional reported bupropion ingestions, with about 1.5% of patients developing an ANE.

Bupropion induced serotonin syndrome: a case report

Although there are no documented cases of serotonin syndrome (SS) following bupropion ingestion alone in the literature, the ability of bupropion to potentiate serotonin levels and lead to SS is known. A 15-year-old boy was found at home hallucinating. He then developed tonic-clonic activity. Upon arrival in the emergency department, he was confused and restless. On exam, he had tachycardia, hypertension, dilated pupils and dry oral mucosa, normal tone and reflexes in his arms, but rigidity and +4 reflexes in his legs with sustained clonus at his ankles. He was admitted and treated with intravenous fluids and lorazepam for his agitation. A urine drug screen (via gas chromatography/mass spectrometry) was positive only for naproxen and bupropion. Serum bupropion and hydroxybupropion levels drawn 17 h after his reported ingestion were 280 (therapeutic range 50-100) and 3,100 ng/mL (therapeutic range <485), respectively. Within 24 h of his admission, the patient was awake with normal vital signs and neurologic exam. To our knowledge, there are only three reported cases demonstrating SS in conjunction with bupropion toxicity; however, none of these were secondary to bupropion alone.

Convulsive liability of bupropion hydrochloride metabolites in Swiss albino mice

BACKGROUND

It is known that following chronic dosing with bupropion HCl active metabolites are present in plasma at levels that are several times higher than that of the parent drug, but the possible convulsive effects of the major metabolites are not known.

METHODS

We investigated the convulsive liability and dose-response of the three major bupropion metabolites following intraperitoneal administration of single doses in female Swiss albino mice, namely erythrohydrobupropion HCl, threohydrobupropion HCl, and hydroxybupropion HCl. We compared these to bupropion HCl. The actual doses of the metabolites administered to mice (n = 120; 10 per dose group) were equimolar equivalents of bupropion HCl 25, 50 and 75 mg/kg. Post treatment, all animals were observed continuously for 2 h during which the number, time of onset, duration and intensity of convulsions were recorded. The primary outcome variable was the percentage of mice in each group who had a convulsion at each dose. Other outcome measures were the time to onset of convulsions, mean convulsions per mouse, and the duration and intensity of convulsions.

RESULTS

All metabolites were associated with a greater percentage of seizures compared to bupropion, but the percentage of convulsions differed between metabolites. Hydroxybupropion HCl treatment induced the largest percentage of convulsing mice (100% at both 50 and 75 mg/kg) followed by threohydrobupropion HCl (50% and 100%), and then erythrohydrobupropion HCl (10% and 90%), compared to bupropion HCl (0% and 10%). Probit analysis also revealed the dose-response curves were significantly different (p < 0.0001) with CD50 values of 35, 50, 61 and 82 mg/kg, respectively for the four different treatments. Cox proportional hazards model results showed that bupropion HCl, erythrohydrobupropion HCl, and threohydrobupropion HCl were significantly less likely to induce convulsions within the 2-h post treatment observation period compared to hydroxybupropion HCl. The mean convulsions per mouse also showed the same dose-dependent and metabolite-dependent trends.

CONCLUSION

The demonstration of the dose-dependent and metabolite-dependent convulsive effects of bupropion metabolites is a novelty.

Alcohol significantly lowers the seizure threshold in mice when co-administered with bupropion hydrochloride

BACKGROUND

Bupropion HCl is a widely used antidepressant that is known to cause seizures in a dose-dependent manner. Many patients taking antidepressants will consume alcohol, even when advised not to. Previous studies have not shown any interactions between bupropion HCl and alcohol. However, there have been no previous studies examining possible changes in seizure threshold induced by a combination of alcohol and bupropion HCl.

METHODS

Experimentally naïve female Swiss albino mice (10 per group) received either single doses of bupropion HCl (ranging from 100 mg/kg to 120 mg/kg) or vehicle (0.9% NaCl) by intraperitoneal (IP) injection in a dose volume of 10 ml/kg, and single-dose ethanol alone (2.5 g/kg), or vehicle, 5 min prior to bupropion dosing. The presence or absence of seizures, the number of seizures, the onset, duration and the intensity of seizures were all recorded for 5 h following the administration of ethanol.

RESULTS

The results show that administration of IP bupropion HCl alone induced seizures in mice in a dose-dependent manner, with the 120 mg/kg dose having the largest effect. The percentage of convulsing mice were 0%, 20%, 30% and 60% in the 0 (vehicle), 100, 110, and 120 mg/kg dose groups, respectively. Pretreatment with ethanol produced a larger bupropion HCl-induced convulsive effect at all the doses (70% each at 100, 110 and 120 mg/kg) and a 10% effect in the ethanol + vehicle only group. The convulsive dose of bupropion HCl required to induce seizures in 50% of mice (CD50), was 116.72 mg/kg for bupropion HCl alone (CI: 107.95, 126.20) and 89.40 mg/kg for ethanol/bupropion HCl (CI: 64.92, 123.10).

CONCLUSION

These results show that in mice alcohol lowers the seizure threshold for bupropion-induced seizures. Clinical implications are firstly that there may be an increased risk of seizures in patients consuming alcohol, and secondly that formulations that can release bupropion more readily in alcohol may present additional risks to patients.

Unintentional ingestion of bupropion in children

BACKGROUND

The incidence of seizures after unintentional bupropion ingestion in children aged < 6 years has been reported as 0.2%. However, in many poison centers, > 80% of these patients are referred to the Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate if all unintentional pediatric bupropion ingestions require referral to a health care facility (HCF), or what fraction of these could be managed safely at home.

METHOD

A retrospective chart review was conducted of all bupropion ingestions in children aged < 6 years for 2000-2006 from four regional poison centers. Exclusion criteria were lack of follow-up or multiple drug ingestion.

RESULTS

Of 407 patients, 209 (51%) were male. Mean age was 2.2 years (SD +/- 1.0). There were 329 patients (81%) seen in a HCF, of which 143 (35%) were hospitalized; 77 patients (19%) were observed at home. Symptoms occurred in 73 patients (18%): sinus tachycardia (n = 50), nausea/vomiting (n = 32), hyperactivity (n = 17), seizure (n = 3), hallucinations (n = 2), and hypertension (n = 2). The mean heart rate of patients with sinus tachycardia (n = 50, 12.3%) was 137 beats/min (SD +/- 13), with a range of 112-172 beats/min. Mean dosage of those with tachycardia was 24 mg/kg. In the 2 patients with hypertension, the maximum recorded blood pressures were 145/80 mm Hg (2-year-old boy) and 137/90 mm Hg (2-year-old girl), with heart rates of 122 and 125 beats/min, respectively. Dose ingested and patient weight was known for 218 patients. Mean dosage ingested was 12.2 mg/kg, with a range of 2.6-64 mg/kg. Eighty-eight percent of patients with a known dosage ingested < 20 mg/kg.

DISCUSSION

A high percentage of children continue to be seen in a HCF. Concern from the higher incidence of severe effects seen with intentional adult exposures may be one of the reasons for this cautious approach.

CONCLUSION

Unintentional pediatric bupropion ingestions resulted in clinical effects that rarely required any HCF intervention. Isolated unintentional bupropion ingestion of <or= 10 mg/kg may not require referral to a health care facility.

Multiple seizures after bupropion overdose in a small child

Unintentional ingestion of bupropion in young children has generally resulted in limited toxicity. We report a case of pediatric bupropion ingestion resulting in multiple seizures. The patient experienced hallucinations, agitation, vomiting, tachycardia and seizures after ingestion of 1050 (48 mg/kg) of extended-release bupropion. The potential for severe toxicity in the setting of pediatric overdose should be recognized.

Consensus statement: the evaluation and treatment of people with epilepsy and affective disorders

Affective disorders in people with epilepsy (PWE) have become increasingly recognized as a primary factor in the morbidity and mortality of epilepsy. To improve the recognition and treatment of affective disorders in PWE, an expert panel comprising members from the Epilepsy Foundation's Mood Disorders Initiative have composed a Consensus Statement. This document focuses on depressive disorders in particular and reviews the appearance and treatment of the disorder in children, adolescents, and adults. Idiosyncratic aspects of the appearance of depression in this population, along with physiological and cognitive issues and barriers to treatment, are reviewed. Finally, a suggested approach to the diagnosis of affective disorders in PWE is presented in detail. This includes the use of psychometric tools for diagnosis and a stepwise algorithmic approach to treatment. Recommendations are based on the general depression literature as well as epilepsy-specific studies. It is hoped that this document will improve the overall detection and subsequent treatment of affective illnesses in PWE.

Seizure incidence in psychopharmacological clinical trials: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) summary basis of approval reports

BACKGROUND

Clinical trial data provide an approach to the investigation of the effects of psychopharmacological agents, and psychiatric disorders themselves, on seizure threshold.

METHODS

We accessed public domain data from Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Phase II and III clinical trials as Summary Basis of Approval (SBA) reports that noted seizure incidence in trials of psychotropic drugs approved in the United States between 1985 and 2004, involving a total of 75,873 patients. We compared seizure incidence among active drug and placebo groups in psychopharmacological clinical trials and the published rates of unprovoked seizures in the general population.

RESULTS

Increased seizure incidence was observed with antipsychotics that was accounted for by clozapine and olanzapine, and with drugs indicated for the treatment of OCD that was accounted for by clomipramine. Alprazolam, bupropion immediate release (IR) form, and quetiapine were also associated with higher seizure incidence. The incidence of seizures was significantly lower among patients assigned to antidepressants compared to placebo (standardized incidence ratio = .48; 95% CI, .36- .61). In patients assigned to placebo, seizure incidence was greater than the published incidence of unprovoked seizures in community nonpatient samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Proconvulsant effects are associated with a subgroup of psychotropic drugs. Second-generation antidepressants other than bupropion have an apparent anticonvulsant effect. Depression, psychotic disorders, and OCD are associated with reduced seizure threshold.

Cardiotoxicity associated with accidental bupropion ingestion in a child

Bupropion, an atypical antidepressant commonly used for depression and smoking cessation, is well known to cause seizures in both therapeutic use and overdose, but cardiac effects have been reported as minimal, usually sinus tachycardia. We describe an ingestion of bupropion estimated to be greater than 2 g by a 3-year-old boy that resulted in seizures. The child was decontaminated with whole bowel irrigation (WBI), and he experienced aspiration of polyethylene glycol and electrolyte solution used for the WBI. The patient ultimately developed hypotension and bradycardia requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation due to the effects of the bupropion combined with the complications of WBI. In contrast to previous literature, which showed few clinical effects aside from seizures from ingestion of bupropion by children, our case highlights the dangers of pediatric bupropion ingestion and highlights risks of WBI.

Review of the pharmacology and clinical profile of bupropion, an antidepressant and tobacco use cessation agent

Bupropion hydrochloride ((+/-)-2-tert-butylamino)-3'-chloropropiophenone x HCl) is a nonselective inhibitor of the dopamine transporter (DAT) and the norepinephrine transporter (NET) and is also an antagonist at neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). In animal models used commonly to screen for antidepressant activity, bupropion shows a positive response. Also using animal models, bupropion has been shown to attenuate nicotine-induced unconditioned behaviors, to share or enhance discriminative stimulus properties of nicotine and to have a complex effect on nicotine self-administration, i.e., low doses augmenting nicotine self-administration and high doses attenuating self-administration. Current studies show that bupropion facilitates the acquisition of nicotine conditioned place preference in rats, further suggesting that bupropion enhances the rewarding properties of nicotine. Bupropion has been shown to attenuate the expression of nicotine withdrawal symptoms in both animal models and human subjects. With respect to relapse, current studies show that bupropion attenuates nicotine-induced reinstatement in rats, but large individual differences are apparent. Clinically, bupropion is used as a treatment for two indications, as an antidepressant, the indication for which it was developed, and as a tobacco use cessation agent. In clinical trials, bupropion is being tested as a candidate treatment for psychostimulant drug abuse, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and obesity. Bupropion is available in three bioequivalent oral formulations, immediate release (IR), sustained release (SR), and extended release (XL). Extensive hepatic metabolism of bupropion produces three pharmacologically active metabolites, which may contribute to its clinical profile.

Adverse Effects Associated with Extra Doses of Bupropion

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of adverse effects, clinical outcomes, and possible dose-response relationships associated with inadvertent extra doses of bupropion.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

DATA SOURCE

Toxic Exposure Surveillance System of the American Association of Poison Control Centers.

SUBJECTS

Four hundred seventy-six patients who inadvertently took extra doses of bupropion.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Cases in the surveillance database were evaluated based on documented doses, treatment sites, symptoms, and clinical outcomes by using standard data-field definitions. Over a 4-year period from 2000-2003, more women than men unintentionally took extra doses of bupropion (354 [74.4%] vs 122 [25.6%]). Ingested doses ranged from 75-1500 mg with a median and mode of 300 mg. Of the 476 patients, only 127 (26.7%) had to be evaluated in an emergency department. Seizures were reported in four patients (0.8%), and one developed status epilepticus. Other prominent adverse effects were agitation (39 patients [8.2%]), dizziness (35 [7.4%]), tremor (34 [7.1%]), nausea and/or vomiting (32 [6.7%]), drowsiness (29 [6.1%]), tachycardia (26 [5.5%]), and hallucination (2 [0.4%]). Clinical outcomes were no effect (293 patients [61.6%]), minor effect (132 [27.7%]), moderate effect (49 [10.3%]), or major effect (2 [0.4%]). Overall, 183 patients (38.4%) had at least one adverse effect. Doses were higher in patients with adverse effects than in those with no effect (p = 0.045). Doses were slightly higher in those with moderate or major outcomes than in others, but the difference was not significant (p = 0.083).

CONCLUSION

Adverse effects were common with extra doses of bupropion, and clinically significant effects occurred in approximately 10% of patients. Seizures were present twice as often as reported with therapeutic dosing. Extra doses of bupropion appear to increase the risk of adverse effects. Patients should be educated about these risks to minimize them.

Intraventricular conduction delay after bupropion overdose

Bupropion overdose mainly is characterized by tachycardia, agitation, and seizures. The few reports of QRS complex widening after bupropion overdose that have been published in peer-reviewed literature are notable for failure to have confirmed elevated plasma bupropion concentrations or failure to have excluded other causes of QRS widening. We describe two patients in whom bupropion overdose was confirmed with elevated plasma bupropion concentrations and in whom other cardiotoxic ingestions were excluded with comprehensive analytical toxicology testing. Our findings are in keeping with ex vivo studies in which bupropion antagonizes cardiac voltage-gated sodium channels. Bupropion overdose should be considered in the differential diagnosis of unexpected QRS widening.

Bupropion-induced convulsions: Preclinical evaluation of antiepileptic drugs

Bupropion, a unique, non-nicotine smoking cessation aid and an effective antidepressant, is well known to produce seizures following overdosing in humans. However, the experimental background for the usefulness of antiepileptic drugs in the protection against bupropion-induced convulsions has not been established yet. Therefore, we tested if the antiepileptic drugs were able to protect mice against clonic convulsions induced by intraperitoneally (i.p.) administered bupropion in the CD97 dose (139.5 mg/kg). Among 13 tested drugs, clonazepam showed the greatest potency (dose-dependent full protection; ED50 = 0.06 mg/kg, i.p.). No signs of locomotor impairment were observed in the rotarod test after anticonvulsive doses of clonazepam, resulting in a broad therapeutic window and favorable protective index (PI) (33.3). Gabapentin produced dose-dependent protection against convulsions at nontoxic doses (up to 1000 mg/kg), having PI>29. Diazepam in a very high dose showed full protection but its PI (1.7) was much less favorable than that of clonazepam. The PI values for ethosuximide, phenobarbital and valproate were slightly higher than unity and lower than 2, and for topiramate and felbamate were lower than unity. Phenytoin, carbamazepine, and lamotrigine as well as tiagabine failed to block the convulsant effects of bupropion even at doses that caused severe motor impairment. Our results encourage clinical testing of clonazepam against seizures developing after bupropion overdose.