Tumor-on-a-chip models combined with mini-tissues or organoids for engineering tumor tissues

Immunocompetent tumor-on-a-chip: A translational tool for drug screening and cancer therapy

Tumor is one of the major diseases endangering human health while establishing an efficient in vitro tumor microenvironment (TME) model, which is an effective way to reveal the nature of the tumor and develop therapeutic methods. In recent years, due to the continuous development of lab-on-a-chip technology and tumor biology, various tumor-on-a-chip models applied to oncology research have emerged. Among them, the Immunotherapy-on-a-chip (ITOC) platform stands out with its ability to reflect immunological behavior in the TME. It is a class of in vitro tumor-on-a-chip with immune activity, which has good performance and the ability to reproduce TME. It can highly simulate the complex pathophysiological characteristics of tumors and be used to study various features related to tumor biological behavior. Currently, many advantageous functions and application values of ITOC platforms have been discovered and applied to tumor drug screening and development, tumor immunotherapy, and personalized therapy. In conclusion, the tumor-on-a-chip platform is a highly promising model for medical oncology research. In this review, the background of the ITOC platform, key factors for constructing an ideal ITOC platform, and the specific applications of ITOC platforms in tumor research and treatment are introduced.

Construction of Multicellular Neural Tissue Using Three-Dimensional Printing Technology: Cell Interaction

The study of the human nervous system remains challenging due to its inherent complexity and difficulty in obtaining original samples. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is a rapidly evolving technology in the field of tissue engineering that has made significant contributions to several disciplines, including neuroscience. In order to more accurately reflect the intricate multicellular milieu of the in vivo environment, an increasing number of studies have commenced experimentation with the coprinting of diverse cell types. This article provides an overview of technical details and the application of 3D bioprinting with multiple cell types in the field of neuroscience, focusing on the challenges of coprinting and the research conducted based on multicellular printing. This review discusses cell interactions in coprinting systems, stem cell applications, the construction of brain-like organoids, the establishment of disease models, and the potential for integrating 3D bioprinting with other 3D culture techniques.

The Evolution of Anticancer 3D In Vitro Models: The Potential Role of Machine Learning and AI in the Next Generation of Animal-Free Experiments

The development of anticancer therapies has increasingly relied on advanced 3D in vitro models, which more accurately mimic the tumor microenvironment compared to traditional 2D cultures. This review describes the evolution of these 3D models, highlighting significant advancements and their impact on cancer research. We discuss the integration of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) in enhancing the predictive power and efficiency of these models, potentially reducing the dependence on animal testing. ML and AI offer innovative approaches for analyzing complex data, optimizing experimental conditions, and predicting therapeutic outcomes with higher accuracy. By leveraging these technologies, the next generation of 3D in vitro models could revolutionize anticancer drug development, offering effective alternatives to animal experiments.

Reprogrammed Lung Metastasis Immunodeficiency via Targeted Penetrated Delivery of M1 Macrophage-Wrapped NanoCubes-Mediated T Cell Infiltration

The infiltration of cytotoxic T lymphocytes holds promise for suppressing even the most resilient metastatic tumors in immunotherapy. Polarizing tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and remodeling the immune-deficient tumor microenvironment (TME) can enhance T lymphocyte recruitment and infiltration. However, the immune privilege and low immunogenic responses of these aggressive tumor clusters often limit lymphocyte recruitment. Here, an M1 macrophage membrane-coated iron oxide nanoparticle (IO@MM) double as a tumor-penetrated agent and naïve M0 macrophage to M1 polarizer is developed for lung metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) immunotherapy. At the tumor site, IO@MM combined with resiquimod (R848) increased the immune cell infiltration, turning the "Cold" TME into an immune-activating "Hot" one. Together with self-cascade immunotherapy, IO@MM with R848 promotes tumor release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). At the same time, IO@MM uses the membrane as an antigen reservoir and provides autologous DAMPs to retain dendritic cells. This IO@MM effectively inhibits tumors and improves survival rate as an immunomodulator in lung metastasis.

Hybrid-integrated devices for mimicking malignant brain tumors ("tumor-on-a-chip") for in vitro development of targeted drug delivery and personalized therapy approaches

Acute and requiring attention problem of oncotheranostics is a necessity for the urgent development of operative and precise diagnostics methods, followed by efficient therapy, to significantly reduce disability and mortality of citizens. A perspective way to achieve efficient personalized treatment is to use methods for operative evaluation of the individual drug load, properties of specific tumors and the effectiveness of selected therapy, and other actual features of pathology. Among the vast diversity of tumor types-brain tumors are the most invasive and malignant in humans with poor survival after diagnosis. Among brain tumors glioblastoma shows exceptionally high mortality. More studies are urgently needed to understand the risk factors and improve therapy approaches. One of the actively developing approaches is the tumor-on-a-chip (ToC) concept. This review examines the achievements of recent years in the field of ToC system developments. The basics of microfluidic chips technologies are considered in the context of their applications in solving oncological problems. Then the basic principles of tumors cultivation are considered to evaluate the main challengers in implementation of microfluidic devices, for growing cell cultures and possibilities of their treatment and observation. The main achievements in the culture types diversity approaches and their advantages are being analyzed. The modeling of angiogenesis and blood-brain barrier (BBB) on a chip, being a principally important elements of the life system, were considered in detail. The most interesting examples and achievements in the field of tumor-on-a-chip developments have been presented.

Targeted Cancer Therapy-on-A-Chip

Targeted cancer therapy (TCT) is gaining increased interest because it reduces the risks of adverse side effects by specifically treating tumor cells. TCT testing has traditionally been performed using two-dimensional (2D) cell culture and animal studies. Organ-on-a-chip (OoC) platforms have been developed to recapitulate cancer in vitro, as cancer-on-a-chip (CoC), and used for chemotherapeutics development and testing. This review explores the use of CoCs to both develop and test TCTs, with a focus on three main aspects, the use of CoCs to identify target biomarkers for TCT development, the use of CoCs to test free, un-encapsulated TCTs, and the use of CoCs to test encapsulated TCTs. Despite current challenges such as system scaling, and testing externally triggered TCTs, TCToC shows a promising future to serve as a supportive, pre-clinical platform to expedite TCT development and bench-to-bedside translation.

Nanomedicine for cancer patient-centered care

Cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and an increase in incidence is estimated in the next future, due to population aging, which requires the development of highly tolerable and low-toxicity cancer treatment strategies. The use of nanotechnology to tailor treatments according to the genetic and immunophenotypic characteristics of a patient's tumor, and to allow its targeted release, can meet this need, improving the efficacy of treatment and minimizing side effects. Nanomedicine-based approach for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer is a rapidly evolving field. Several nanoformulations are currently in clinical trials, and some have been approved and marketed. However, their large-scale production and use are still hindered by an in-depth debate involving ethics, intellectual property, safety and health concerns, technical issues, and costs. Here, we survey the key approaches, with specific reference to organ-on chip technology, and cutting-edge tools, such as CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, through which nanosystems can meet the needs for personalized diagnostics and therapy in cancer patients. An update is provided on the nanopharmaceuticals approved and marketed for cancer therapy and those currently undergoing clinical trials. Finally, we discuss the emerging avenues in the field and the challenges to be overcome for the transfer of nano-based precision oncology into clinical daily life.

Tumor-microenvironment-on-a-chip: the construction and application

Currently, despite the vast amounts of time and money invested in cancer treatment, cancer remains one of the primary threats to human life. The primary factor contributing to the low treatment efficacy is cancer heterogeneity. The unclear molecular mechanisms underlying tumorigenesis, coupled with the complexity of human physiology, and the inability of animal models to accurately replicate the human tumor microenvironment, pose significant hurdles in the development of novel cancer therapies. Tumor-microenvironment-on-chip (TMOC) represents a research platform that integrates three-dimensional cell culture with microfluidic systems, simulating the essential components and physiological traits of the in vivo tumor microenvironment. It offers a dynamic setting within the chip system to study tumor progression, potentially heralding a breakthrough in cancer research. In this review, we will summarize the current advancements in this platform, encompassing various types of TMOCs and their applications in different types of cancer. From our perspective, the TMOC platform necessitates enhanced integration with tissue engineering techniques and microphysiological environments before it can evolve into a more refined preclinical model for cancer research.

Bioprinting of Cells, Organoids and Organs-on-a-Chip Together with Hydrogels Improves Structural and Mechanical Cues

The 3D bioprinting technique has made enormous progress in tissue engineering, regenerative medicine and research into diseases such as cancer. Apart from individual cells, a collection of cells, such as organoids, can be printed in combination with various hydrogels. It can be hypothesized that 3D bioprinting will even become a promising tool for mechanobiological analyses of cells, organoids and their matrix environments in highly defined and precisely structured 3D environments, in which the mechanical properties of the cell environment can be individually adjusted. Mechanical obstacles or bead markers can be integrated into bioprinted samples to analyze mechanical deformations and forces within these bioprinted constructs, such as 3D organoids, and to perform biophysical analysis in complex 3D systems, which are still not standard techniques. The review highlights the advances of 3D and 4D printing technologies in integrating mechanobiological cues so that the next step will be a detailed analysis of key future biophysical research directions in organoid generation for the development of disease model systems, tissue regeneration and drug testing from a biophysical perspective. Finally, the review highlights the combination of bioprinted hydrogels, such as pure natural or synthetic hydrogels and mixtures, with organoids, organoid-cell co-cultures, organ-on-a-chip systems and organoid-organ-on-a chip combinations and introduces the use of assembloids to determine the mutual interactions of different cell types and cell-matrix interferences in specific biological and mechanical environments.

Advancements in Research and Treatment Applications of Patient-Derived Tumor Organoids in Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant health burden globally, being the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Despite significant therapeutic advancements, resistance to systemic antineoplastic agents remains an important obstacle, highlighting the need for innovative screening tools to tailor patient-specific treatment. This review explores the application of patient-derived tumor organoids (PDTOs), three-dimensional, self-organizing models derived from patient tumor samples, as screening tools for drug resistance in CRC. PDTOs offer unique advantages over traditional models by recapitulating the tumor architecture, cellular heterogeneity, and genomic landscape and are a valuable ex vivo predictive drug screening tool. This review provides an overview of the current literature surrounding the use of PDTOs as an instrument for predicting therapy responses in CRC. We also explore more complex models, such as co-cultures with important stromal cells, such as cancer-associated fibroblasts, and organ-on-a-chip models. Furthermore, we discuss the use of PDTOs for drug repurposing, offering a new approach to identify the existing drugs effective against drug-resistant CRC. Additionally, we explore how PDTOs serve as models to gain insights into drug resistance mechanisms, using newer techniques, such as single-cell RNA sequencing and CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. Through this review, we aim to highlight the potential of PDTOs in advancing our understanding of predicting therapy responses, drug resistance, and biomarker identification in CRC management.

Application of 3D, 4D, 5D, and 6D bioprinting in cancer research: what does the future look like?

The application of three- and four-dimensional (3D/4D) printing in cancer research represents a significant advancement in understanding and addressing the complexities of cancer biology. 3D/4D materials provide more physiologically relevant environments compared to traditional two-dimensional models, allowing for a more accurate representation of the tumor microenvironment that enables researchers to study tumor progression, drug responses, and interactions with surrounding tissues under conditions similar to in vivo conditions. The dynamic nature of 4D materials introduces the element of time, allowing for the observation of temporal changes in cancer behavior and response to therapeutic interventions. The use of 3D/4D printing in cancer research holds great promise for advancing our understanding of the disease and improving the translation of preclinical findings to clinical applications. Accordingly, this review aims to briefly discuss 3D and 4D printing and their advantages and limitations in the field of cancer. Moreover, new techniques such as 5D/6D printing and artificial intelligence (AI) are also introduced as methods that could be used to overcome the limitations of 3D/4D printing and opened promising ways for the fast and precise diagnosis and treatment of cancer.

Tumour organoids and assembloids: Patient-derived cancer avatars for immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Organoid technology is an emerging and rapidly growing field that shows promise in studying organ development and screening therapeutic regimens. Although organoids have been proposed for a decade, concerns exist, including batch-to-batch variations, lack of the native microenvironment and clinical applicability.

MAIN BODY

The concept of organoids has derived patient-derived tumour organoids (PDTOs) for personalized drug screening and new drug discovery, mitigating the risks of medication misuse. The greater the similarity between the PDTOs and the primary tumours, the more influential the model will be. Recently, 'tumour assembloids' inspired by cell-coculture technology have attracted attention to complement the current PDTO technology. High-quality PDTOs must reassemble critical components, including multiple cell types, tumour matrix, paracrine factors, angiogenesis and microorganisms. This review begins with a brief overview of the history of organoids and PDTOs, followed by the current approaches for generating PDTOs and tumour assembloids. Personalized drug screening has been practised; however, it remains unclear whether PDTOs can predict immunotherapies, including immune drugs (e.g. immune checkpoint inhibitors) and immune cells (e.g. tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte, T cell receptor-engineered T cell and chimeric antigen receptor-T cell). PDTOs, as cancer avatars of the patients, can be expanded and stored to form a biobank.

CONCLUSION

Fundamental research and clinical trials are ongoing, and the intention is to use these models to replace animals. Pre-clinical immunotherapy screening using PDTOs will be beneficial to cancer patients.

KEY POINTS

The current PDTO models have not yet constructed key cellular and non-cellular components. PDTOs should be expandable and editable. PDTOs are promising preclinical models for immunotherapy unless mature PDTOs can be established. PDTO biobanks with consensual standards are urgently needed.

A systematic review of patient-derived tumor organoids generation from malignant effusions

This review assesses the possibility of utilizing malignant effusions (MEs) for generating patient-derived tumor organoids (PDTOs). Obtained through minimally invasive procedures MEs broaden the spectrum of organoid sources beyond resection specimens and tissue biopsies. A systematic search yielded 11 articles, detailing the successful generation of 190 ME-PDTOs (122 pleural effusions, 54 malignant ascites). Success rates ranged from 33% to 100%, with an average of 84% and median of 92%. A broad and easily applicable array of techniques can be employed, encompassing diverse collection methods, variable centrifugation speeds, and the inclusion of approaches like RBC lysis buffer or centrifuged ME supernatants supplementation, enhancing the versatility and accessibility of the methodology. ME-PDTOs were found to recapitulate primary tumor characteristics and were primarily used for drug screening applications. Thus, MEs are a reliable source for developing PDTOs, emphasizing the need for further research to maximize their potential, validate usage, and refine culturing processes.

Decellularized extracellular matrix for organoid and engineered organ culture

The repair and regeneration of tissues and organs using engineered biomaterials has attracted great interest in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Recent advances in organoids and engineered organs technologies have enabled scientists to generate 3D tissue that recapitulate the structural and functional characteristics of native organs, opening up new avenues in regenerative medicine. The matrix is one of the most important aspects for improving organoids and engineered organs construction. However, the clinical application of these techniques remained a big challenge because current commercial matrix does not represent the complexity of native microenvironment, thereby limiting the optimal regenerative capacity. Decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) is expected to maintain key native matrix biomolecules and is believed to hold enormous potential for regenerative medicine applications. Thus, it is worth investigating whether the dECM can be used as matrix for improving organoid and engineered organs construction. In this review, the characteristics of dECM and its preparation method were summarized. In addition, the present review highlights the applications of dECM in the fabrication of organoids and engineered organs.