The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care including innovations implemented in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review

Constructing a Digital Bridge: A Systematic Review Assessing Electronic Medical Record and Telehealth Implementation for Neurosurgery in Uganda

BACKGROUND

Neurosurgical care in Uganda faces significant challenges due to workforce shortages, infrastructure limitations, and a lack of digital health tools. Implementing electronic medical records (EMRs) and telehealth could improve neurosurgical outcomes, but adoption remains low. This systematic review examines barriers and facilitators to EMR and telehealth implementation in Ugandan neurosurgery to identify opportunities for improvement.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus to identify studies published from 2007 to 2024 evaluating EMR and telehealth adoption in Uganda. Thematic analysis categorized barriers and facilitators into 10 distinct themes. Statistical analysis for frequency and correlation with technologies were performed using χ2 analysis and Pearson residual tests, with statistical significance set at P < 0.1.

RESULTS

Key barriers include technological infrastructure inefficiencies (24%), systemic and operational limitations (16%), and technical competency and training deficits (13%). Similarly, the primary facilitators include infrastructure reliability (22%), training and education investment (13%), and community engagement (13%). Notably, telehealth adoption was more significantly impacted by human resource limitations (P < 0.05), whereas EMR implementation was hindered by systemic inefficiencies (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Addressing Uganda's digital health gaps requires cost-effective and scalable strategies, including mobile-based EMRs, teleconsultation frameworks, and structured workforce training. Future research should focus on developing implementation models tailored to low-resource settings, ensuring feasibility and sustainability. This study aims to contribute to the growing discourse on digital solutions for resource-limited healthcare, with a particular emphasis on innovation in global neurosurgical care.

Catheter-Related Late Complications in Cancer Patients During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICCs) and midline catheters are crucial for chemotherapy and supportive care in cancer patients. Their use requires ongoing monitoring to prevent late complications such as infections, dislodgements, and replacements. The COVID-19 pandemic challenged healthcare systems, potentially increasing these complications due to reduced outpatient services and limited specialized personnel.

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the incidence of late complications associated with PICCs and midline catheters in cancer patients during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted at a Cancer Center in Italy from March 2020 to April 2024. Catheter-related complications were divided into two cohorts: during the pandemic (March 2020-March 2022) and post-pandemic (April 2022-April 2024). The primary outcome was the incidence of late complications requiring device removal, categorized as infections, dislodgements, and replacements. Statistical analyses included the Chi-squared test for categorical variables and the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables.

RESULTS

Of 4104 PICC and midline catheter placements, 2291 removals were recorded, with 550 (24%) due to late complications-404 during the pandemic and 146 post-pandemic (p < 0.001). Suspected infections were the most frequent complication, significantly higher during the pandemic (p < 0.001). Dislodgements and replacements also decreased markedly post-pandemic. Limited outpatient services and disrupted healthcare workflows likely contributed to higher complication rates during the pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

The COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted catheter management in cancer patients, increasing late complications. The post-pandemic decline highlights the importance of consistent care, infection prevention, remote monitoring, and stronger healthcare resilience to reduce risks in future crises.

Chemotherapy delays among cancer patients in Iran during COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Following the outbreak of COVID-19, a set of restrictions, health advice, and limitations were put in place to reduce the spread of the virus. These restrictions, together with fear and anxiety of the population, limited people's access to public services such as health care services. Cancer patients during this era are a significant concern due to being at high risk for COVID-19 infection and also being exposed to delays in their diagnosis, treatment, and follow-ups. Delays in the treatment of cancer could lead to a poorer prognosis. In this study, we attempted to determine the magnitude of delays in chemotherapy and factors associated with delays during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHOD

All patients diagnosed with colorectal, lung, gastric cancer, and lymphoma who had chemotherapy at teaching hospitals of Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS) between February 20, 2020, and March 20, 2022, were included. Age, gender, cancer type, having metastatic cancer, and date of each chemotherapy session were included for each patient individually. Every session with delays longer than two days was recorded. A three to six-day delay was considered a moderate delay, and a seven-day or longer delay was considered a severe delay in receiving each chemotherapy session. Additionally, each patient's total number of delays in the entire course was calculated. Logistic regression was used to examine the impact of pandemic waves on delays. On the other hand, Poisson regression was used to evaluate the number of delays in the entire course of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The research findings indicated an association between the male gender and having metastasis with a higher likelihood of a moderate delay in the treatment regimen. Regarding cancer type, colorectal cancer was associated with higher rates of moderate delays (IRR = 1.88, P < 0.001), but gastric (IRR = 0.75, P = 0.001) and lung cancer (IRR = 0.59, P = 0.002) were associated with reduced rates of severe and moderate delays, respectively. Compared to the COVID-19 pandemic plateau periods, the first (OR = 2.08, P < 0.001), third, and fifth waves of the pandemic were associated with increased delays.

CONCLUSION

We found an association between the male gender, colorectal cancer, metastatic disease and higher rates of moderate delays. The initial COVID-19 pandemic wave was associated with increased severe delays in the chemotherapy course. According to the findings of this study, male cancer patients and those with metastatic cancer are at risk of poorer prognosis due to lower adherence to treatment. These findings can assist policymakers in developing targeted strategies to lessen the delay rates in the more vulnerable population.

Healthcare providers' knowledge, attitude, and practice towards cervical cancer screening in Sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Cervical cancer is a prevalent cancer among women in low and middle-income countries, but it can be largely prevented through screening programs and HPV vaccination. This study aimed to determine the level of knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding cervical cancer screening among healthcare providers in Sub-Saharan African countries.

Methods

Systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Relevant databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, AJOL, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect databases were used to retrieve and search articles. The study included published and unpublished research written in English between January 2013 and May 16, 2024 for studies reporting knowledge, attitude, and practice towards cervical cancer screening among healthcare providers in Sub-Saharan Africa. This review has been registered on PROSPERO. The heterogeneity of the data was evaluated using the I2 statistic. A meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 17 software, with a 95% confidence interval. The researchers also conducted publication bias and sensitivity analysis.

Results

The review included 30 studies involving 7542 healthcare providers. The pooled magnitude of good knowledge status towards cervical cancer was 67.93% (95% CI: 53.36-82.50) whereas the pooled magnitude of positive attitude towards cervical cancer was 55.26% (95% CI: 34.28- 76.23). The results also showed that about 49.68% (95% CI: 33.18-66.17) of healthcare providers had good knowledge status about cervical cancer screening, 66.63%(95% CI: 50.36- 82.89) had a positive attitude towards it, and only 17.23% (95% CI; 6.08-28.37) had ever screened for cervical cancer.

Conclusion

The overall magnitude of knowledge and attitude of healthcare providers in Sub-Saharan Africa towards cervical cancer and its screening was suboptimal. Furthermore, a low percentage of female healthcare providers in the region had undergone screening for cervical cancer. As a result, policymakers and program administrators should focus on improving the knowledge, attitude, and practices of healthcare providers to meet the global health goal of cervical cancer screening and effectively eliminating cervical cancer. Healthcare providers must serve as role models for other women who should also undergo screening.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42023495241.

Evidence of health system resilience in primary health care for preventing under-five mortality in Rwanda and Bangladesh: Lessons from an implementation study during the Millennium Development Goal period and the early period of COVID-19

Background

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to disruptions of health service delivery in many countries; some were more resilient in either limiting or rapidly responding to the disruption than others. We used mixed methods implementation research to understand factors and strategies associated with resiliency in Rwanda and Bangladesh, focussing on how evidence-based interventions targeting amenable under-five mortality that had been used during the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) period (2000-15) were maintained during the early period of COVID-19.

Methods

We triangulated data from three sources - a desk review of available documents, existing quantitative data on evidence-based intervention coverage, and key informant interviews - to perform a comparative analysis using multiple case studies methodology, comparing contextual factors (barriers or facilitators), implementation strategies (existing from 2000-15, new, or adapted), and implementation outcomes across the two countries. We also analysed which health system resiliency capabilities were present in the two countries.

Results

Both countries experienced many of the same facilitators for resiliency of evidence-based interventions for children under five, as well as new, pandemic-specific barriers during the early COVID-19 period (March to December 2020) that required targeted implementation strategies in response. Common facilitators included leadership and governance and a culture of accountability, while common barriers included movement restrictions, workload, and staff shortages. We saw a continuity of implementation strategies that had been associated with success in care delivery during the MDG period, including data use for monitoring and decision-making, as well as building on community health worker programmes for community-based health care delivery. New or adapted strategies used in responding to new barriers included the expanded use of digital platforms. We found implementation outcomes and strong resilience capabilities, including awareness and adaptiveness, which were related to pre-existing facilitators and implementation strategies (continued and new).

Conclusions

The strategies and contextual factors Rwanda and Bangladesh leveraged to build 'everyday resilience' before COVID-19, i.e. during the MDG period, likely supported the maintained delivery of the evidence-based interventions targeting under-five mortality during the early stages of the pandemic. Expanding our understanding of pre-existing factors and strategies that contributed to resilience before and during the pandemic is important to support other countries' efforts to incorporate 'everyday resilience' into their health systems.