An order-to-disorder structural switch activates the FoxM1 transcription factor

Targeting m6A RNA Modification in Tumor Therapeutics

The prevalent eukaryotic RNA modification N6-methyladenosine (m6A), which is distributed in more than 50% of cases, has demonstrated significant implications in both normal development and disease progression, particularly in the context of cancer. This review aims to discuss the potential efficacy of targeting tumor cells through modulation of m6A RNA levels. Specifically, we discuss how the upregulation or downregulation of integral or specific targets is effective in treating different tumor types and patients. Additionally, we will cover the factors influencing the efficacy of m6A RNA targeting in tumor treatment. Our review will focus on the impact of targeting m6A mRNA on genes and cells and assess its potential as a therapeutic strategy for tumors. Despite the challenges involved, further research on m6A RNA in tumors and its integration with existing tumor therapy approaches is warranted.

Petricoin EF, Brown S, Purandare N, Aras S, Mikkelsen T, Poisson L, Noushmehr H, Ruden D, deCarvalho AC. Impact of developmental state, p53 status, and interferon signaling on glioblastoma cell response to radiation and temozolomide treatment

Glioblastoma (GBM) tumors exhibit extensive genomic, epigenomic, and transcriptional diversity, with significant intratumoral heterogeneity, complicating standard treatment approaches involving radiation (RT) and the DNA-alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ). In this study, we employed an integrative multi-omics approach, including targeted proteomics, transcriptomics, genomics, and DNA methylation profiling, to investigate the response of a representative panel of GBM patient-derived cancer stem cells (CSCs) to astrocytic differentiation and RT and TMZ treatments. Differentiated CSC progenies retained the expression of key stemness genes and survival pathways, while activating the BMP-Smad signaling pathway and upregulating extracellular matrix components. This was associated with increased resistance to TMZ, though not to RT, across all models. We identified TP53 status as a critical determinant of transcriptional response to both RT and TMZ, which was also modulated by the differentiation state and treatment modality in wildtype (wt) p53 GBM cells. Both mutant and wt p53 models exhibited significant activation of the DNA-damage associated interferon (IFN) response in CSCs and differentiated cells, implicating this pathway in the GBM response to therapy. We observed that activation of NF-κB was positively correlated with the levels of O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) protein, a direct DNA repair enzyme leading to TMZ resistance, regardless of MGMT promoter methylation status, further supporting the clinical potential for inhibition of NF-kB signaling in GBM treatment. Our integrative analysis of the impact of GBM cell developmental states, in the context of genomic and molecular diversity of patient-derived models, provides valuable insights for pre-clinical studies aimed at optimizing treatment strategies.

Dysregulation of the p300/CBP histone acetyltransferases in human cancer

p300 (E1A binding protein 300) and CBP (CREB-binding protein) are critical regulators of chromatin dynamics and gene expression, playing essential roles in various cellular processes, including proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and immune responses. These homologous histone acetyltransferases (HATs) function as transcriptional co-activators by acetylating histones and non-histone proteins. p300/CBP is essential for development, and dysregulation of p300 and CBP has been implicated in several human diseases, particularly cancer. Somatic mutations that inactivate p300/CBP are frequently observed across various cancer types. Additionally, other mutations leading to translocations or truncations of p300/CBP can result in enhanced catalytic activity, potentially representing novel gain-of-function mutations that promote tumor progression. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms underlying the regulation of p300/CBP HAT activity, its dysregulation in cancer, and the development of p300/CBP inhibitors and their potential in cancer therapies.

Pan-Cancer Upregulation of the FOXM1 Transcription Factor

BACKGROUND

The human FOXM1 transcription factor controls cell cycle progression and genome stability, and it has been correlated to the onset and progression of many tumor types.

METHODS

In our study, we collected all recent sequence and quantitative transcriptomics data about FOXM1, testing its presence across vertebrate evolution and its upregulation in cancer, both in bulk tissue contexts (by comparing the TCGA tumor dataset and the GTEx normal tissue dataset) and in single-cell contexts.

RESULTS

FOXM1 is significantly and consistently upregulated in all tested tumor types, as well as in tumor cells within a cancer microenvironment. Its upregulation reverberates in the upregulation of its target genes and can be used as a biomarker for poor cancer outcome in at least four tumor types.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite its lack of cancer-related mutations and amplifications, the recurring upregulation of FOXM1 in all tumors puts a focusing lens on this gene as a candidate pan-cancer master regulator.

MFIB 2.0: a major update of the database of protein complexes formed by mutual folding of the constituting protein chains

While the majority of proteins with available structures are able to fold independently and mediate interactions only after acquiring their folded state, a subset of the known protein complexes contains protein chains that are intrinsically disordered in isolation. The Mutual Folding Induced by Binding (MFIB) database collects and classifies protein complexes, wherein all constituent protein chains would be unstable/disordered in isolation but fold into a well-defined 3D complex structure upon binding. This phenomenon is often termed as cooperative folding and binding or mutual synergistic folding (MSF). Here we present a major update to the database: we collected and annotated hundreds of new protein complexes fulfilling the criteria of MSF, leading to an almost six-fold increase in the size of the database. Many novel features have also been introduced, such as clustering of the complexes based on structural similarity and domain types, assigning different evidence levels to each entry and adding the evidence coverage label that allowed us to include complexes of multi(sub)domain monomers with partial MSF. The MFIB 2.0 database is available at https://mfib.pbrg.hu.

The conformation of FOXM1 homodimers in vivo is crucial for regulating transcriptional activities

Conformational changes in a transcription factor can significantly affect its transcriptional activity. The activated form of the FOXM1 transcription factor regulates the transcriptional network of genes essential for cell cycle progression and carcinogenesis. However, the mechanism and impact of FOXM1 conformational change on its transcriptional activity in vivo throughout the cell cycle progression remain unexplored. Here, we demonstrate that FOXM1 proteins form novel intermolecular homodimerizations in vivo, and these conformational changes in FOXM1 homodimers impact activity during the cell cycle. Specifically, during the G1 phase, FOXM1 undergoes autorepressive homodimerization, wherein the αβα motif in the C-terminal transcriptional activation domain interacts with the ββαβ motif in the N-terminal repression domain, as evidenced by FRET imaging. Phosphorylation of the αβα motif by PLK1 at S715/S724 disrupts ββαβ-αβα hydrophobic interactions, thereby facilitating a conserved αβα motif switch binding partner to the novel intrinsically disordered regions, leading to FOXM1 autostimulatory homodimerization persisting from the S phase to the G2/M phase in vivo. Furthermore, we identified a minimal ββαβ motif peptide that effectively inhibits cancer cell proliferation both in cell culture and in a mouse tumor model, suggesting a promising autorepression approach for targeting FOXM1 in cancer therapy.

Computational insights into intrinsically disordered regions in protein-nucleic acid complexes

We study transitions in intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) upon complex formation, utilizing X-ray-solved structural dataset of protein-DNA and protein-RNA complexes, along with their available unbound protein forms. The identified IDRs are categorized into three classes: Disordered-to-Ordered (D-O), Disordered-to-Partial Ordered (D-PO) and Disordered-to-Disordered (D-D) after comparing them in unbound and complex forms. In the D-O class, IDRs form secondary structures like coils, helices, and strands upon binding to nucleic acids. Though a majority of these IDRs are present at the surface of the complexes, a significant number of IDRs are also observed at the interfaces and are involved in polar interactions. The hydrogen bonds made by the interface IDRs (B_IDRs) with phosphates and bases of nucleic acids are comparatively more than those formed with sugars. B_IDRs form more H-bonds with the ribose in protein-RNA than with the deoxyribose in protein-DNA. Among the B_IDRs, Arg and Lys prefer to interact with the major and minor grooves of DNA and RNA, respectively. Ser, however, prefers the minor groove in both the nucleic acids. Interestingly, we report 61 and 48 IDRs in 31 protein-DNA and 22 protein-RNA complexes, respectively, suggesting nucleic acid binding to proteins may also result in ordered-to-disordered transitions.

Impact of genomic background and developmental state on signaling pathways and response to therapy in glioblastoma patient-derived cells

Glioblastoma (GBM) tumors represents diverse genomic epigenomic, and transcriptional landscapes, with significant intratumoral heterogeneity that challenges standard of care treatments involving radiation (RT) and the DNA-alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ). In this study, we employed targeted proteomics to assess the response of a genomically-diverse panel of GBM patient-derived cancer stem cells (CSCs) to astrocytic differentiation, growth factor withdrawal and traditional high fetal bovine serum culture. Our findings revealed a complex crosstalk and co-activation of key oncogenic signaling in CSCs and diverse patterns of response to these external stimuli. Using RNA sequencing and DNA methylation, we observed common adaptations in response to astrocytic differentiation of CSCs across genomically distinct models, including BMP-Smad pathway activation, reduced cholesterol biosynthesis, and upregulation of extracellular matrix components. Notably, we observed that these differentiated CSC progenies retained a subset of stemness genes and the activation of cell survival pathways. We also examined the impact of differentiation state and genomic background on GBM cell sensitivity and transcriptional response to TMZ and RT. Differentiation of CSCs increased resistance to TMZ but not to RT. While transcriptional responses to these treatments were predominantly regulated by p53 in wild-type p53 GBM cells, its transcriptional activity was modulated by the differentiation status and treatment modality. Both mutant and wild-type p53 models exhibited significant activation of a DNA-damage associated interferon response in CSCs and differentiated cells, suggesting this pathway may play a wider role in GBM response to TMZ and RT. Our integrative analysis of the impact of GBM cell developmental states, in the context of genomic and molecular diversity of patient-derived models, provides valuable insights for pre-clinical studies aimed at optimizing treatment strategies.

Transcription factor FOXM1 specifies chromatin DNA to extracellular vesicles

Extracellular vesicle DNAs (evDNAs) hold significant diagnostic value for various diseases and facilitate transcellular transfer of genetic material. Our study identifies transcription factor FOXM1 as a mediator for directing chromatin genes or DNA fragments (termed FOXM1-chDNAs) to extracellular vesicles (EVs). FOXM1 binds to MAP1LC3/LC3 in the nucleus, and FOXM1-chDNAs, such as the DUX4 gene and telomere DNA, are designated by FOXM1 binding and translocated to the cytoplasm before being released to EVs through the secretory autophagy during lysosome inhibition (SALI) process involving LC3. Disrupting FOXM1 expression or the SALI process impairs FOXM1-chDNAs incorporation into EVs. FOXM1-chDNAs can be transmitted to recipient cells via EVs and expressed in recipient cells when they carry functional genes. This finding provides an example of how chromatin DNA fragments are specified to EVs by transcription factor FOXM1, revealing its contribution to the formation of evDNAs from nuclear chromatin. It provides a basis for further exploration of the roles of evDNAs in biological processes, such as horizontal gene transfer.Abbreviation: ATG5: autophagy related 5; CCFs: cytoplasmic chromatin fragments; ChIP: chromatin immunoprecipitation; cytoDNA: cytoplasmic DNA; CQ: chloroquine; FOXM1-DBD: FOXM1 DNA binding domain; DUX4:double homeobox 4; EVs: extracellular vesicles; evDNAs: extracellular vesicle DNAs; FOXM1: forkhead box M1; FOXM1-chDNAs: chromatin DNA fragments directed by FOXM1 to EVs; HGT: horizontal gene transfer; LC3-II: lipid modified LC3; LMNB1: lamin B1; LIR: LC3-interacting region; MAP1LC3/LC3: microtubule associated protein 1 light chain 3; MVBs: multivesicular bodies; M1-binding DNA: a linear DNA containing 72× FOXM1 binding sites; SALI: secretory autophagy during lysosome inhibition; siRNA: small interfering RNA; TetO-DUX4: TetO array-containing DUX4 DNA; TetO: tet operator; TetR: tet repressor.

Transcriptional co-activators: emerging roles in signaling pathways and potential therapeutic targets for diseases

Specific cell states in metazoans are established by the symphony of gene expression programs that necessitate intricate synergic interactions between transcription factors and the co-activators. Deregulation of these regulatory molecules is associated with cell state transitions, which in turn is accountable for diverse maladies, including developmental disorders, metabolic disorders, and most significantly, cancer. A decade back most transcription factors, the key enablers of disease development, were historically viewed as 'undruggable'; however, in the intervening years, a wealth of literature validated that they can be targeted indirectly through transcriptional co-activators, their confederates in various physiological and molecular processes. These co-activators, along with transcription factors, have the ability to initiate and modulate transcription of diverse genes necessary for normal physiological functions, whereby, deregulation of such interactions may foster tissue-specific disease phenotype. Hence, it is essential to analyze how these co-activators modulate specific multilateral processes in coordination with other factors. The proposed review attempts to elaborate an in-depth account of the transcription co-activators, their involvement in transcription regulation, and context-specific contributions to pathophysiological conditions. This review also addresses an issue that has not been dealt with in a comprehensive manner and hopes to direct attention towards future research that will encompass patient-friendly therapeutic strategies, where drugs targeting co-activators will have enhanced benefits and reduced side effects. Additional insights into currently available therapeutic interventions and the associated constraints will eventually reveal multitudes of advanced therapeutic targets aiming for disease amelioration and good patient prognosis.

FOXM1, MEK, and CDK4/6: New Targets for Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor Therapy

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are deadly sarcomas, which desperately need effective therapies. Half of all MPNSTs arise in patients with neurofibromatosis type I (NF1), a common inherited disease. NF1 patients can develop benign lesions called plexiform neurofibromas (PNFs), often in adolescence, and over time, some PNFs, but not all, will transform into MPNSTs. A deeper understanding of the molecular and genetic alterations driving PNF-MPNST transformation will guide development of more targeted and effective treatments for these patients. This review focuses on an oncogenic transcription factor, FOXM1, which is a powerful oncogene in other cancers but little studied in MPNSTs. Elevated expression of FOXM1 was seen in patient MPNSTs and correlated with poor survival, but otherwise, its role in the disease is unknown. We discuss what is known about FOXM1 in MPNSTs relative to other cancers and how FOXM1 may be regulated by and/or regulate the most commonly altered players in MPNSTs, particularly in the MEK and CDK4/6 kinase pathways. We conclude by considering FOXM1, MEK, and CDK4/6 as new, clinically relevant targets for MPNST therapy.

Development of an interfering peptide M1-20 with potent anti-cancer effects by targeting FOXM1

Disrupting protein-protein interactions (PPIs) has emerged as a promising strategy for cancer drug development. Interfering peptides disrupting PPIs can be rationally designed based on the structures of natural sequences mediating these interactions. Transcription factor FOXM1 overexpresses in multiple cancers and is considered an effective target for cancer therapeutic drug development. Using a rational design approach, we have generated a peptide library from the FOXM1 C-terminal sequence and screened FOXM1-binding peptides. Combining FOXM1 binding and cell inhibitory results, we have obtained a FOXM1-targeting interfering peptide M1-20 that is optimized from the natural parent peptide to the D-retro-inverso peptide. With improved stability characteristics, M1-20 inhibits proliferation and migration, and induces apoptosis of cancer cells. Mechanistically, M1-20 inhibits FOXM1 transcriptional activities by disrupting its interaction between the MuvB complex and the transcriptional co-activator CBP. These are consistent with the results that M1-20 suppresses cancer progression and metastasis without noticeable toxic and side effects in wild-type mice. These findings reveal that M1-20 has the potential to be developed as an anti-cancer drug candidate targeting FOXM1.

FOXM1: A small fox that makes more tracks for cancer progression and metastasis

Transcription factors (TFs) are indispensable for the modulation of various signaling pathways associated with normal cell homeostasis and disease conditions. Among cancer-related TFs, FOXM1 is a critical molecule that regulates multiple aspects of cancer cells, including growth, metastasis, recurrence, and stem cell features. FOXM1 also impact the outcomes of targeted therapies, chemotherapies, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in various cancer types. Recent advances in cancer research strengthen the cancer-specific role of FOXM1, providing a rationale to target FOXM1 for developing targeted therapies. This review compiles the recent studies describing the pivotal role of FOXM1 in promoting metastasis of various cancer types. It also implicates the contribution of FOXM1 in the modulation of chemotherapeutic resistance, antitumor immune response/immunotherapies, and the potential of small molecule inhibitors of FOXM1.

Targeting the oncogenic transcription factor FOXM1 to improve outcomes in all subtypes of breast cancer

FOXM1 (Forkhead box M1) is an oncogenic transcription factor that is greatly upregulated in breast cancer and many other cancers where it promotes tumorigenesis, and cancer growth and progression. It is expressed in all subtypes of breast cancer and is the factor most associated with risk of poor patient survival, especially so in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Thus, new approaches to inhibiting FOXM1 and its activities, and combination therapies utilizing FOXM1 inhibitors in conjunction with known cancer drugs that work together synergistically, could improve cancer treatment outcomes. Targeting FOXM1 might prove especially beneficial in TNBC where few targeted therapies currently exist, and also in suppressing recurrent advanced estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and HER2-positive breast cancers for which treatments with ER or HER2 targeted therapies that were effective initially are no longer beneficial. We present these perspectives and future directions in the context of what is known about FOXM1, its regulation, and its key roles in promoting cancer aggressiveness and metastasis, while being absent or very low in most normal non-regenerating adult tissues. We discuss new inhibitors of FOXM1 and highlight FOXM1 as an attractive target for controlling drug-resistant and difficult-to-suppress breast cancers, and how blocking FOXM1 might improve outcomes for patients with all subtypes of breast cancer.

The Role of Polo-Like Kinase 1 in Regulating the Forkhead Box Family Transcription Factors

Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) is a serine/threonine kinase with more than 600 phosphorylation substrates through which it regulates many biological processes, including mitosis, apoptosis, metabolism, RNA processing, vesicle transport, and G₂ DNA-damage checkpoint recovery, among others. Among the many PLK1 targets are members of the FOX family of transcription factors (FOX TFs), including FOXM1, FOXO1, FOXO3, and FOXK1. FOXM1 and FOXK1 have critical oncogenic roles in cancer through their antagonism of apoptotic signals and their promotion of cell proliferation, metastasis, angiogenesis, and therapeutic resistance. In contrast, FOXO1 and FOXO3 have been identified to have broad functions in maintaining cellular homeostasis. In this review, we discuss PLK1-mediated regulation of FOX TFs, highlighting the effects of PLK1 on the activity and stability of these proteins. In addition, we review the prognostic and clinical significance of these proteins in human cancers and, more importantly, the different approaches that have been used to disrupt PLK1 and FOX TF-mediated signaling networks. Furthermore, we discuss the therapeutic potential of targeting PLK1-regulated FOX TFs in human cancers.

Deciphering the multi-scale, quantitative cis-regulatory code

Uncovering the cis-regulatory code that governs when and how much each gene is transcribed in a given genome and cellular state remains a central goal of biology. Here, we discuss major layers of regulation that influence how transcriptional outputs are encoded by DNA sequence and cellular context. We first discuss how transcription factors bind specific DNA sequences in a dosage-dependent and cooperative manner and then proceed to the cofactors that facilitate transcription factor function and mediate the activity of modular cis-regulatory elements such as enhancers, silencers, and promoters. We then consider the complex and poorly understood interplay of these diverse elements within regulatory landscapes and its relationships with chromatin states and nuclear organization. We propose that a mechanistically informed, quantitative model of transcriptional regulation that integrates these multiple regulatory layers will be the key to ultimately cracking the cis-regulatory code.

Structural insights into p300 regulation and acetylation-dependent genome organisation

Histone modifications are deposited by chromatin modifying enzymes and read out by proteins that recognize the modified state. BRD4-NUT is an oncogenic fusion protein of the acetyl lysine reader BRD4 that binds to the acetylase p300 and enables formation of long-range intra- and interchromosomal interactions. We here examine how acetylation reading and writing enable formation of such interactions. We show that NUT contains an acidic transcriptional activation domain that binds to the TAZ2 domain of p300. We use NMR to investigate the structure of the complex and found that the TAZ2 domain has an autoinhibitory role for p300. NUT-TAZ2 interaction or mutations found in cancer that interfere with autoinhibition by TAZ2 allosterically activate p300. p300 activation results in a self-organizing, acetylation-dependent feed-forward reaction that enables long-range interactions by bromodomain multivalent acetyl-lysine binding. We discuss the implications for chromatin organisation, gene regulation and dysregulation in disease.

Coordinating gene expression during the cell cycle

Cell cycle-dependent gene transcription is tightly controlled by the retinoblastoma (RB):E2F and DREAM complexes, which repress all cell cycle genes during quiescence. Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) phosphorylation of RB and DREAM allows for the expression of two gene sets. The first set of genes, with peak expression in G1/S, is activated by E2F transcription factors (TFs) and is required for DNA synthesis. The second set, with maximum expression during G2/M, is required for mitosis and is coordinated by the MuvB complex, together with B-MYB and Forkhead box M1 (FOXM1). In this review, we summarize the key findings that established the distinct control mechanisms regulating G1/S and G2/M gene expression in mammals and discuss recent advances in the understanding of the temporal control of these genes.

Targetable vulnerability of deregulated FOXM1/PLK1 signaling axis in diffuse large B cell lymphoma

FOXM1 is a transcription factor that controls cell cycle regulation, cell proliferation, and differentiation. Overexpression of FOXM1 has been implicated in various cancer types. However, the activation status and functional significance of FOXM1 in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have not been well investigated. Using proteomic approaches, we discovered that the protein expression levels of FOXM1 and PLK1 were positively correlated in DLBCL cell lines and primary DLBCL. Expression levels of FOXM1 and PLK1 mRNAs were also significantly higher in DLBCL than in normal human B cells and could predict poor prognosis of DLBCL, particularly in patients with germinal center B cell-like (GCB) DLBCL. Furthermore, proteomic studies defined a FOXM1-PLK1 signature that consisted of proteins upstream and downstream of that axis involved in the p38-MAPK-AKT pathway, cell cycle, and DNA damage/repair. Further studies demonstrated a mechanistic function of the FOXM1/PLK1 axis in connection with the DNA damage response pathways regulating the S/G2 checkpoint of the cell cycle. Therapeutic targeting of FOXM1/PLK1 using a FOXM1 or PLK1 inhibitor, as well as other clinically relevant small-molecule inhibitors targeting ATR-CHK1, was highly effective in DLBCL in vitro models. These findings are instrumental for lymphoma drug discovery aiming at the FOXM1/PLK1/ATR/CHK1 axis.

FOXM1 Variant Contributes to Gefitinib Resistance via Activating Wnt/β-Catenin Signal Pathway in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Although gefitinib prolonged the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), unpredictable resistance limited its clinical efficacy. Novel predictive biomarkers with explicit mechanisms are urgently needed.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A total of 282 patients with NSCLC with gefitinib treatment were randomly assigned in a 7:3 ratio to exploratory (n = 192) and validation (n = 90) cohorts. The candidate polymorphisms were selected with Haploview4.2 in Hapmap and genotyped by a MassARRAY system, and the feature variables were identified through Randomforest Survival analysis. Tanswell and clonogenic assays, base editing and cell-derived tumor xenograft model were performed to uncover the underlying mechanism.

RESULTS

We found that the germline missense polymorphism rs3742076 (A>G, S628P), located in transactivation domain of FOXM1, was associated with PFS in exploratory (median PFS: GG vs. GA&AA, 9.20 vs. 13.37 months, P = 0.00039, HR = 2.399) and validation (median PFS: GG vs. GA&AA, 8.13 vs. 13.80 months, P = 0.048, HR = 2.628) cohorts. We elucidated that rs3742076_G conferred resistance to gefitinib by increasing protein stability of FOXM1 and facilitating an aggressive phenotype in vitro and in vivo through activating wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Meanwhile, FOXM1 level was highly associated with prognosis in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Mechanistically, FOXM1 rs3742076_G upregulated wnt/β-catenin activity by directly binding to β-catenin in cytoplasm and promoting transcription of β-catenin in nucleus. Remarkably, inhibition of β-catenin markedly reversed rs3742076_G-induced gefitinib resistance and aggressive phenotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings characterized rs3742076_G as a gain-of-function polymorphism in mediating gefitinib resistance and tumor aggressiveness, and highlighted the variant as a predictive biomarker in guiding gefitinib treatment.

An order-to-disorder structural switch regulates HIF-1 transcription through S247 phosphorylation in the HIF1α PAS-B domain

Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1), a transcriptional activator that mediates cellular responses to hypoxic stress, is essential for tumor progression. It is a heterodimer comprising HIF1α and HIF1β, with multiple interfaces among their PAS-A, PAS-B, and bHLH domains. HIF1β is also known as aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT). Casein kinase 1δ-dependent phosphorylation of the solvent-front residue S247 on the HIF1α PAS-B domain interrupts HIF1α-ARNT complex formation and reduces HIF-1 transcription activity. However, S247 is involved in neither HIF1α-ARNT complex formation nor stabilization of the relative orientation between the HIF1α PAS-A and PAS-B domains. To uncover the underlying allosteric mechanism, we conducted Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics simulations and identified two distinct conformations of the pS247-carrying HIF1α PAS-B domain: H291-in and H291-out. The H291-in structure can associate with the HIF1α PAS-A domain and form a V-shaped pouch to accommodate the ARNT PAS-A domain, but it cannot associate with the ARNT PAS-B domain. By contrast, the H291-out structure can bind to the ARNT PAS-B domain, but its association with the HIF1α PAS-A domain leads to an unsuitable relative orientation to accommodate the ARNT PAS-A domain. Both conformations were also collected in parallel simulations of the unphosphorylated PAS-B domain. Both structures manage to associate with the ARNT PAS-B and HIF1α PAS-A domains; thus, they are adequate for HIF1α-ARNT complex formation. The domain-domain contact pattern in a phosphorylated variant is shuffled by an order-to-disorder structural switch, triggered by the newly formed K251-pS247 interaction.

Cyclin-dependent kinase-mediated phosphorylation and the negative regulatory domain of transcription factor B-Myb modulate its DNA binding

B-Myb is a highly conserved member of the vertebrate Myb family of transcription factors that plays a critical role in cell-cycle progression and proliferation. Myb proteins activate Myb-dependent promoters by interacting specifically with Myb-binding site (MBS) sequences using their DNA-binding domain (DBD). Transactivation of MBS promoters by B-Myb is repressed by its negative regulatory domain (NRD), and phosphorylation of the NRD by Cdk2-CyclinA relieves the repression to activate B-Myb–dependent promoters. However, the structural mechanisms underlying autoinhibition and activation of B-Myb–mediated transcription have been poorly characterized. Here, we determined that a region in the B-Myb NRD (residues 510–600) directly associates with the DBD and inhibits binding of the DBD to the MBS DNA sequence. We demonstrate using biophysical assays that phosphorylation of the NRD at T515, T518, and T520 is sufficient to disrupt the interaction between the NRD and the DBD, which results in increased affinity for MBS DNA and increased B-Myb–dependent promoter activation in cell assays. Our biochemical characterization of B-Myb autoregulation and the activating effects of phosphorylation provide insight into how B-Myb functions as a site-specific transcription factor.

Hepatocellular carcinoma evades RB1-induced senescence by activating the FOXM1-FOXO1 axis

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the deadliest cancers. The retinoblastoma protein (RB1), a regulator of cell proliferation, is functionally inactivated in HCC by CYCLIN D/E-mediated phosphorylation. However, the mechanism of RB1-inactivation is unclear because only small percentages of HCCs exhibit amplification of CYCLIN D/E or mutations in the CDK-inhibitory genes. We show that FOXM1, which is overexpressed and critical for HCC, plays essential roles in inactivating RB1 and suppressing RB1-induced senescence of the HCC cells. Mechanistically, FOXM1 binds RB1 and DNMT3B to repress the expression of FOXO1, leading to a decrease in the levels of the CDK-inhibitors, creating an environment for phosphorylation and inactivation of RB1. Consistent with that, inhibition of FOXM1 causes increased expression of FOXO1 with consequent activation of RB1, leading to senescence of the HCC cells, in vitro and in vivo. Also, repression-deficient mutants of FOXM1 induce senescence that is blocked by depletion of RB1 or FOXO1. We provide evidence that human HCCs rely upon this FOXM1-FOXO1 axis for phosphorylation and inactivation of RB1. The observations demonstrate the existence of a new autoregulatory loop of RB1-inactivation in HCC involving a FOXM1-FOXO1 axis that is required for phosphorylation of RB1 and for aggressive progression of HCC.

Structure and function of MuvB complexes

Proper progression through the cell-division cycle is critical to normal development and homeostasis and is necessarily misregulated in cancer. The key to cell-cycle regulation is the control of two waves of transcription that occur at the onset of DNA replication (S phase) and mitosis (M phase). MuvB complexes play a central role in the regulation of these genes. When cells are not actively dividing, the MuvB complex DREAM represses G1/S and G2/M genes. Remarkably, MuvB also forms activator complexes together with the oncogenic transcription factors B-MYB and FOXM1 that are required for the expression of the mitotic genes in G2/M. Despite this essential role in the control of cell division and the relationship to cancer, it has been unclear how MuvB complexes inhibit and stimulate gene expression. Here we review recent discoveries of MuvB structure and molecular interactions, including with nucleosomes and other chromatin-binding proteins, which have led to the first mechanistic models for the biochemical function of MuvB complexes.

A Structural Perspective of Reps from CRESS-DNA Viruses and Their Bacterial Plasmid Homologues

Rolling circle replication (RCR) is ubiquitously used by cellular and viral systems for genome and plasmid replication. While the molecular mechanism of RCR has been described, the structural mechanism is desperately lacking. Circular-rep encoded single stranded DNA (CRESS-DNA) viruses employ a viral encoded replicase (Rep) to initiate RCR. The recently identified prokaryotic homologues of Reps may also be responsible for initiating RCR. Reps are composed of an endonuclease, oligomerization, and ATPase domain. Recent structural studies have provided structures for all these domains such that an overall mechanism of RCR initiation can begin to be synthesized. However, structures of Rep in complex with its various DNA substrates and/or ligands are lacking. Here we provide a 3D bioinformatic review of the current structural information available for Reps. We combine an excess of 1590 sequences with experimental and predicted structural data from 22 CRESS-DNA groups to identify similarities and differences between Reps that lead to potentially important functional sites. Experimental studies of these sites may shed light on how Reps execute their functions. Furthermore, we identify Rep-substrate or Rep-ligand structures that are urgently needed to better understand the structural mechanism of RCR.

PLK1-dependent phosphorylation restrains EBNA2 activity and lymphomagenesis in EBV-infected mice

While Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) establishes a life-long latent infection in apparently healthy human immunocompetent hosts, immunodeficient individuals are at particular risk to develop lymphoproliferative B-cell malignancies caused by EBV. A key EBV protein is the transcription factor EBV nuclear antigen 2 (EBNA2), which initiates B-cell proliferation. Here, we combine biochemical, cellular, and in vivo experiments demonstrating that the mitotic polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) binds to EBNA2, phosphorylates its transactivation domain, and thereby inhibits its biological activity. EBNA2 mutants that impair PLK1 binding or prevent EBNA2 phosphorylation are gain-of-function mutants. They exhibit enhanced transactivation capacities, accelerate the proliferation of infected B cells, and promote the development of monoclonal B-cell lymphomas in infected mice. Thus, PLK1 coordinates the activity of EBNA2 to attenuate the risk of tumor incidences in favor of the establishment of latency in the infected but healthy host.

Toward a mechanistic understanding of DNA binding by forkhead transcription factors and its perturbation by pathogenic mutations

Forkhead box (FOX) proteins are an evolutionarily conserved family of transcription factors that play numerous regulatory roles in eukaryotes during developmental and adult life. Dysfunction of FOX proteins has been implicated in a variety of human diseases, including cancer, neurodevelopment disorders and genetic diseases. The FOX family members share a highly conserved DNA-binding domain (DBD), which is essential for DNA recognition, binding and function. Since the first FOX structure was resolved in 1993, >30 FOX structures have been reported to date. It is clear now that the structure and DNA recognition mechanisms vary among FOX members; however, a systematic review on this aspect is lacking. In this manuscript, we present an overview of the mechanisms by which FOX transcription factors bind DNA, including protein structures, DNA binding properties and disease-causing mutations. This review should enable a better understanding of FOX family transcription factors for basic researchers and clinicians.

Ubiquitin Interacting Motifs: Duality Between Structured and Disordered Motifs

Ubiquitin is a small protein at the heart of many cellular processes, and several different protein domains are known to recognize and bind ubiquitin. A common motif for interaction with ubiquitin is the Ubiquitin Interacting Motif (UIM), characterized by a conserved sequence signature and often found in multi-domain proteins. Multi-domain proteins with intrinsically disordered regions mediate interactions with multiple partners, orchestrating diverse pathways. Short linear motifs for binding are often embedded in these disordered regions and play crucial roles in modulating protein function. In this work, we investigated the structural propensities of UIMs using molecular dynamics simulations and NMR chemical shifts. Despite the structural portrait depicted by X-crystallography of stable helical structures, we show that UIMs feature both helical and intrinsically disordered conformations. Our results shed light on a new class of disordered UIMs. This group is here exemplified by the C-terminal domain of one isoform of ataxin-3 and a group of ubiquitin-specific proteases. Intriguingly, UIMs not only bind ubiquitin. They can be a recruitment point for other interactors, such as parkin and the heat shock protein Hsc70-4. Disordered UIMs can provide versatility and new functions to the client proteins, opening new directions for research on their interactome.

FOXM1: A Multifunctional Oncoprotein and Emerging Therapeutic Target in Ovarian Cancer

Forkhead box M1 (FOXM1) is a member of the conserved forkhead box (FOX) transcription factor family. Over the last two decades, FOXM1 has emerged as a multifunctional oncoprotein and a robust biomarker of poor prognosis in many human malignancies. In this review article, we address the current knowledge regarding the mechanisms of regulation and oncogenic functions of FOXM1, particularly in the context of ovarian cancer. FOXM1 and its associated oncogenic transcriptional signature are enriched in >85% of ovarian cancer cases and FOXM1 expression and activity can be enhanced by a plethora of genomic, transcriptional, post-transcriptional, and post-translational mechanisms. As a master transcriptional regulator, FOXM1 promotes critical oncogenic phenotypes in ovarian cancer, including: (1) cell proliferation, (2) invasion and metastasis, (3) chemotherapy resistance, (4) cancer stem cell (CSC) properties, (5) genomic instability, and (6) altered cellular metabolism. We additionally discuss the evidence for FOXM1 as a cancer biomarker, describe the rationale for FOXM1 as a cancer therapeutic target, and provide an overview of therapeutic strategies used to target FOXM1 for cancer treatment.

Cell cycle regulation by complex nanomachines

The cell cycle is the essential biological process where one cell replicates its genome and segregates the resulting two copies into the daughter cells during mitosis. Several aspects of this process have fascinated humans since the nineteenth century. Today, the cell cycle is exhaustively investigated because of its profound connections with human diseases and cancer. At the heart of the molecular network controlling the cell cycle, we find the cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) acting as an oscillator to impose an orderly and highly regulated progression through the different cell cycle phases. This oscillator integrates both internal and external signals via a multitude of signalling pathways involving posttranslational modifications including phosphorylation, protein ubiquitination and mechanisms of transcriptional regulation. These tasks are specifically performed by multi-subunit complexes, which are intensively studied both biochemically and structurally with the aim to unveil mechanistic insights into their molecular function. The scope of this review is to summarise the structural biology of the cell cycle machinery, with specific focus on the core cell cycle machinery involving the CDK-cyclin oscillator. We highlight the contribution of cryo-electron microscopy, which has started to revolutionise our understanding of the molecular function and dynamics of the key players of the cell cycle.

foxm1 Modulates Cell Non-Autonomous Response in Zebrafish Skeletal Muscle Homeostasis

foxm1 is a master regulator of the cell cycle, contributing to cell proliferation. Recent data have shown that this transcription factor also modulates gene networks associated with other cellular mechanisms, suggesting non-proliferative functions that remain largely unexplored. In this study, we used CRISPR/Cas9 to disrupt foxm1 in the zebrafish terminally differentiated fast-twitching muscle cells. foxm1 genomic disruption increased myofiber death and clearance. Interestingly, this contributed to non-autonomous satellite cell activation and proliferation. Moreover, we observed that Cas9 expression alone was strongly deleterious to muscle cells. Our report shows that foxm1 modulates a muscle non-autonomous response to myofiber death and highlights underreported toxicity to high expression of Cas9 in vivo.

Protein self-assembly: A new frontier in cell signaling

Long viewed as paradigm-shifting, but rare, prions have recently been discovered in all domains of life. Protein sequences that can drive this form of self-assembly are strikingly common in eukaryotic proteomes, where they are enriched in proteins involved in information flow and signal transduction. Although prions were thought to be a consequence of random errors in protein folding, recent studies suggest that prion formation can be a controlled process initiated by defined cellular signals. Many are present in normal biological contexts, yet are invisible to most technologies used to interrogate the proteome. Here, we review mechanisms by which protein self-assembly can create a stable record of past stimuli, altering adaptive responses, and how prion behavior is controlled by signaling processes. We touch on the diverse implications that this has for normal biological function and regulation, ranging from drug resistance in fungi to the innate immune response in humans. Finally, we discuss the potential for prion domains in transcription factors and RNA-binding proteins to orchestrate heritable gene expression changes in response to transient signals, such as during development.

Binding and folding in transcriptional complexes

Transcription factors are among the classes of proteins with the highest levels of disorder. Investigation of these regulatory proteins is uncovering not just the mechanisms that underlie gene regulation, but relationships that apply to all intrinsically disordered proteins. Recent studies confirm that binding does not necessarily induce folding but that when it does, it tends to follow induced fit mechanisms. Other work emphasises the importance of electrostatics to interactions involving intrinsically disordered proteins, and roles of intrinsic disorder in phase transitions. All these features help direct transcription factors to target sites in the genome to upregulate or downregulate transcription.

FRET-Based Sorting of Live Cells Reveals Shifted Balance between PLK1 and CDK1 Activities During Checkpoint Recovery

Cells recovering from the G2/M DNA damage checkpoint rely more on Aurora A-PLK1 signaling than cells progressing through an unperturbed G2 phase, but the reason for this discrepancy is not known. Here, we devised a method based on a FRET reporter for PLK1 activity to sort cells in distinct populations within G2 phase. We employed mass spectroscopy to characterize changes in protein levels through an unperturbed G2 phase and validated that ATAD2 levels decrease in a proteasome-dependent manner. Comparing unperturbed cells with cells recovering from DNA damage, we note that at similar PLK1 activities, recovering cells contain higher levels of Cyclin B1 and increased phosphorylation of CDK1 targets. The increased Cyclin B1 levels are due to continuous Cyclin B1 production during a DNA damage response and are sustained until mitosis. Whereas partial inhibition of PLK1 suppresses mitotic entry more efficiently when cells recover from a checkpoint, partial inhibition of CDK1 suppresses mitotic entry more efficiently in unperturbed cells. Our findings provide a resource for proteome changes during G2 phase, show that the mitotic entry network is rewired during a DNA damage response, and suggest that the bottleneck for mitotic entry shifts from CDK1 to PLK1 after DNA damage.

The coordinate actions of calcineurin and Hog1 mediate the stress response through multiple nodes of the cell cycle network

Upon exposure to environmental stressors, cells transiently arrest the cell cycle while they adapt and restore homeostasis. A challenge for all cells is to distinguish between stress signals and coordinate the appropriate adaptive response with cell cycle arrest. Here we investigate the role of the phosphatase calcineurin (CN) in the stress response and demonstrate that CN activates the Hog1/p38 pathway in both yeast and human cells. In yeast, the MAPK Hog1 is transiently activated in response to several well-studied osmostressors. We show that when a stressor simultaneously activates CN and Hog1, CN disrupts Hog1-stimulated negative feedback to prolong Hog1 activation and the period of cell cycle arrest. Regulation of Hog1 by CN also contributes to inactivation of multiple cell cycle-regulatory transcription factors (TFs) and the decreased expression of cell cycle-regulated genes. CN-dependent downregulation of G1/S genes is dependent upon Hog1 activation, whereas CN inactivates G2/M TFs through a combination of Hog1-dependent and -independent mechanisms. These findings demonstrate that CN and Hog1 act in a coordinated manner to inhibit multiple nodes of the cell cycle-regulatory network. Our results suggest that crosstalk between CN and stress-activated MAPKs helps cells tailor their adaptive responses to specific stressors.

In order to survive exposure to environmental stress, cells transiently arrest the cell division cycle while they adapt to the stress. Several kinases and phosphatases are known to control stress adaptation programs, but the extent to which these signaling pathways work together to tune the stress response is not well understood. This study investigates the role of the phosphatase calcineurin in the stress response and shows that calcineurin inhibits the cell cycle in part by stimulating the activity of the Hog1/p-38 stress-activated MAPK in both yeast and human cells. Crosstalk between stress response pathways may help cells mount specific responses to diverse stressors and to survive changes in their environment.

Suppression of FOXM1 activities and breast cancer growth in vitro and in vivo by a new class of compounds

The transcription factor FOXM1 is upregulated and overexpressed in aggressive, therapy-resistant forms of hormone receptor-positive and triple negative breast cancers, and is associated with less good patient survival. FOXM1 signaling is also a key driver in many other cancers. Here, we identify a new class of compounds effective in suppressing FOXM1 activity in breast cancers, and displaying good potency for antitumor efficacy. The compounds bind directly to FOXM1 and alter its proteolytic sensitivity, reduce the cellular level of FOXM1 protein by a proteasome- dependent process, and suppress breast cancer cell proliferation and cell cycle progression and increase apoptosis. RNA-seq and gene set enrichment analyses indicate that the compounds decrease expression of FOXM1-regulated genes and suppress gene ontologies under FOXM1 regulation. Several compounds have favorable pharmacokinetic properties and show good tumor suppression in preclinical breast tumor models. These compounds may be suitable for further clinical evaluation in targeting aggressive breast cancers driven by FOXM1.

An order-to-disorder structural switch activates the FoxM1 transcription factor

Intrinsically disordered transcription factor transactivation domains (TADs) function through structural plasticity, adopting ordered conformations when bound to transcriptional co-regulators. Many transcription factors contain a negative regulatory domain (NRD) that suppresses recruitment of transcriptional machinery through autoregulation of the TAD. We report the solution structure of an autoinhibited NRD-TAD complex within FoxM1, a critical activator of mitotic gene expression. We observe that while both the FoxM1 NRD and TAD are primarily intrinsically disordered domains, they associate and adopt a structured conformation. We identify how Plk1 and Cdk kinases cooperate to phosphorylate FoxM1, which releases the TAD into a disordered conformation that then associates with the TAZ2 or KIX domains of the transcriptional co-activator CBP. Our results support a mechanism of FoxM1 regulation in which the TAD undergoes switching between disordered and different ordered structures.