Adding ezetimibe to statin therapy: latest evidence and clinical implications

Angiopoietin-Like 3 Antibody Therapy in Patients With Suboptimally Controlled Hyperlipidemia: A Phase 2 Study

BACKGROUND

Angiopoietin-like 3 (ANGPTL-3) inhibits the activity of lipoprotein lipase and endothelial lipase, increasing both serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglyceride (TG) levels. SHR-1918 is a fully human monoclonal antibody against ANGPTL-3.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the lipid-altering efficacy and safety of SHR-1918 in patients at moderate or higher risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) with suboptimally controlled hyperlipidemia.

METHODS

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation phase 2 study was designed to evaluate the effects of SHR-1918 in hypercholesterolemic patients, who did not achieve optimal LDL-C after 4 to 8 weeks of standard lipid-lowering therapies. A total of 333 patients were enrolled sequentially into 1 of 8 dose cohorts at a 4:1 (active/placebo) ratio. Patients received subcutaneous SHR-1918 at doses of 150, 300, or 600 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W), or SHR-1918 at a dose of 600 mg every 8 weeks (Q8W), alternating with placebo for a total treatment period of 16 weeks. The extension treatment included subcutaneous SHR-1918 at a dose of 150, 300, or 600 mg Q4W over 36 weeks, or SHR-1918 a dose of 600 mg Q8W over 40 weeks and then followed for safety. Prespecified endpoints included percentage change from baseline in LDL-C and TG. Safety was assessed with laboratory test results and by the incidence and severity of adverse events.

RESULTS

SHR-1918 demonstrated a clear dose-response relationship with respect to percentage LDL-C lowering for both Q4W and Q8W administration: 21.7%, 27.3%, and 29.9% with 150, 300, and 600 mg Q4W compared with placebo, respectively, and 22.5% with 600 mg Q8W compared with placebo. SHR-1918 also substantially reduced TG, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and apolipoprotein A1, with a better achievement of LDL-C targets. SHR-1918 was generally well-tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on standard lipid-lowering therapy, ANGPTL-3 inhibition with SHR-1918 further reduces LDL-C by 21.7% to 29.9% in patients at moderate or higher risk of ASCVD. These additional reductions are both dose and dosing frequency dependent. (Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SHR-1918 in Patients With Hyperlipidemic; NCT06109831).

Comparison of ezetimibe and atorvastatin versus atorvastatin alone on short-term major adverse cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention, a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Major cardiovascular events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are among the most common causes of death in patients. Lipid-lowering strategies seem to affect these events. Reaching the best regimen for controlling lipid abnormalities is important. This study aimed to compare the effect of ezetimibe and atorvastatin versus atorvastatin alone in short-term major cardiovascular events in patients after PCI in Bandar Abbas in 2018.

METHODS

This double-blinded randomized controlled trial was done in Bandar Abbas in 2018 on 224 patients. Patients were randomly divided into two groups either to receive ezetimibe and atorvastatin (group A) or atorvastatin alone (group B). Patients were followed for 1 month for major cardiovascular events and drug side effects. Data was analyzed using SPSS software.

RESULTS

Patients in the two groups had similar baseline characteristics. The mean low-density lipoproteins (LDL) level was 69.83 ± 28.8 in group A and 82.45 ± 29.9 in group B (P = 0.014). At the end of the study, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) values were notably lower in group A (P value = 0.005). Three (2.7%) patients in group A and 1 patient (0.9%) in group B had a myocardial infarction (P value = 0.313). Also, 11 patients (9.8%) in group A and 13 patients (11.6%) in group B had unstable angina (P value = 0.666). No patients had death, cerebrovascular event, or stent thrombosis in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Although adding ezetimibe to atorvastatin can decrease LDL and hs-CRP levels in short-term follow-up; it is not effective in lowering short-term major cardiovascular events in patients after PCI. Studies with longer-term follow-up are recommended.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

IRCT, IRCT20171028037047N1. Registered on 22 June 2018, https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/28808 .

Dual targeting PPARα and NPC1L1 metabolic vulnerabilities blocks tumorigenesis

Dysregulated lipid metabolism is linked to tumor progression. In this study, we identified Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 (NPC1L1) as a downstream effector of PKM2. In breast cancer cells, PKM2 knockout (KO) enhanced NPC1L1 expression while downregulating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) signaling pathway. PPARα and nuclear factor-E2 p45-related factor 1/2(Nrf1/2) are transcription factors regulating NPC1L1. In vitro PKM2 KO enhanced recruitment of Nrf1/2 to the NPC1L1 promoter region. Fenofibrate, a PPARα activator, promoted NPC1L1 expression; ezetimibe, an NPC1L1 inhibitor and effective Nrf2 activator, also elevated NPC1L1 expression. Combined administration of fenofibrate and ezetimibe significantly induced cytoplasmic vacuolation, and cell apoptosis. Mechanistically, this combined administration activated inositol required enzyme 1α(IRE1α) and produced the spliced form of X-box binding protein (XBP1s), which in turn enhanced lysine demethylase 6B (KDM6B) transcription. XBP1s interacts with KDM6B to activate genes involved in the unfolded protein response by demethylating di- and tri-methylated lysine 27 of histone H3 (H3K27), consequently increasing H3K27 acetylation levels in breast cancer cell lines. Fenofibrate and ezetimibe synergistically inhibited tumor growth in vivo. Our findings reveal that dual targeting of PPARα and NPC1L1 may represent a novel therapeutic regimen for breast cancer therapy.

Reduction in Remnant Cholesterol in Obese Individuals After Bariatric Surgery with Gastric Bypass or Sleeve Gastrectomy

Background: The effectiveness of bariatric surgery in reducing remnant cholesterol (RC) levels, particularly when obesity is accompanied by elevated glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), is insufficiently investigated. In this study, we aimed to examine the impacts of two common bariatric procedures, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG), as regards their effects on RC and HbA1c levels. Methods: Adult morbidly obese subjects were included and assigned to receive either RYGB or SG. The levels of RC and HbA1c were determined 6 and 12 months after surgery and compared to preoperative levels to assess the efficacy of these surgical methods. In the statistical evaluation of covariations between RC and other biomarkers, previously determined C-reactive protein (CRP), triglycerides, apolipoprotein B, apolipoprotein A1, and low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol 6 and 12 months after surgery were included. A linear mixed regression model for repeated analyses was used. Results: The RC levels were markedly reduced both after RYGB and SG but without significant differences between the RYGB and the SG surgery. Furthermore, the RC values were strongly associated with the levels of CRP and HbA1c. Conclusions: A significant lowering of RC values after bariatric surgery appeared paralleled by concomitant reductions in HbA1c values and CRP levels. Together, these effects lead to a lower risk of cardiovascular disease.

Systematic Review on Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Safety of Pitavastatin in Dyslipidemia in Asia

Objectives: Dyslipidemia, a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), is marked by abnormal lipid levels, such as the elevated lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Statins are the first-line treatment for LDL-C reduction. Pitavastatin (PIT) has shown potential in lowering LDL-C and improving high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). This review assesses pitavastatin's efficacy, effectiveness, and safety in dyslipidemia management in Asia. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases up to November 2024, adhering to Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Seventeen studies (12 RCTs and 5 non-RCTs) were analyzed, focusing on LDL-C reduction, safety profiles, and adverse events. The quality of the studies was assessed using checklists to ensure the selection of the best studies and to limit bias. Results: Pitavastatin doses (1-4 mg) reduced LDL-C by 28-47%, comparable to atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin. The 2 mg dose matched atorvastatin's 10 mg dose in efficacy for both short-term (35-42%) and long-term (28-36%) use. LDL-C target achievement rates were 75-95%. Adverse events, including mild myalgia and elevated liver enzymes, were rare, and discontinuation rates were low. Conclusions: Pitavastatin is an effective and safe alternative to traditional statins for dyslipidemia management in Asia. Further research on long-term outcomes and high-risk groups is warranted.

Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitor Eligibility and Prescription Rates in Patients Presenting With Recurrent Acute Coronary Syndromes

BACKGROUND

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are novel medications for reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. In 2020, the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) began subsidising PCSK9 inhibitors for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with LDL-C >2.6 mmol/L despite statin and ezetimibe therapy. This criterion was expanded to LDL-C >1.8 mmol/L in 2022.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients admitted to a quaternary hospital with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) between 2020-2022. PCSK9 inhibitor eligibility and prescribing patterns were compared between recurrent ACS patients (≥2 events within 5 years) and first-presentation ACS patients. Australian PBS 2020 and 2022 criteria were applied to assess eligibility.

RESULTS

Of 817 ACS patients with LDL-C >1.8 mmol/L, 118 (14.4%) were categorised as recurrent ACS (33.9% female, mean age 67 years, LDL-C 2.9 mmol/L). When compared with first-presentation ACS patients (n=699), recurrent ACS patients had significantly higher proportions already on statin therapy (49.2% vs 6.0%, p<0.001) and ezetimibe (20.3% vs 2.4%, p<0.001). Recurrent ACS patients had significantly higher proportions of 2020 PBS-eligible patients (11.0% vs 1.3%, p<0.001) and 2022 PBS-eligible patients (20.3% vs 2.2%, p<0.001). There were no significant differences in PCSK9 inhibitor prescription rates among eligible patients (four of 13, 30.8% vs four of nine, 44.4%, p=0.51). Univariate binary logistic regression demonstrated that statin intolerance was significantly associated with PCSK9 inhibitor prescription (odds ratio 10; 95% confidence interval 1.3-79.3; p=0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite significantly higher eligibility rates, PCSK9 inhibitor uptake remains low in recurrent ACS patients, demonstrating the need to raise further awareness about eligibility criteria and encourage proactive prescription to prevent recurrent cardiovascular events.

Efficacy of single-dose evolocumab injection in early-phase acute myocardial infarction: a retrospective single-center study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Achieving rapid reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels below 55 mg/dL in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can be challenging with statins alone. This single-center, retrospective study aimed to assess the impact of single-dose injection of evolocumab 140 mg on LDL-C levels during the peri-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) period in patients with AMI.

METHODS

A total of 95 patients with AMI who underwent PCI were divided into the evolocumab (n = 50) and non-evolocumab (n = 45) groups.

RESULTS

The percentage change of LDL-C level at 1-3 weeks from baseline was 78.4 ± 13.4% reduction in the evolocumab group versus 45.6 ± 22.6% in the non-evolocumab group, with a mean difference of -33.5% between the groups (95% CI: -42.6 to -24.5%; p < 0.001). The achievement rate of LDL-C levels below 55 mg/dL at 1-3 weeks was significantly higher in the evolocumab group than in the non-evolocumab group (97.7% vs. 60.0%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with AMI who received single-dose injection of evolocumab 140 mg during the peri-PCI period had a significantly greater LDL-C reduction and higher proportion of patients achieved the target LDL-C level in the early phase AMI than those who did not receive evolocumab.

Cholesin and GPR146 in Modulating Cholesterol Biosynthesis

BACKGROUND

Cholesterol homeostasis in the human body is a crucial process that involves a delicate balance between dietary cholesterol absorption in the intestine and de novo cholesterol synthesis in the liver. Both pathways contribute significantly to the overall pool of cholesterol in the body, influencing plasma cholesterol levels and impacting cardiovascular health. Elevated absorption of cholesterol in the intestines has a suppressive impact on the synthesis of cholesterol in the liver, serving to preserve cholesterol balance. Nonetheless, the precise mechanisms driving this phenomenon remain largely unclear.

SUMMARY

This review aimed to discuss the previously unrecognized role of cholesin and GPR146 in the regulation of cholesterol biosynthesis, providing a novel conceptual framework for understanding cholesterol homeostasis.

KEY MESSAGES

The discovery of cholesin, a novel protein implicated in the regulation of cholesterol homeostasis, represents a significant advancement in our understanding of cholesterol biosynthesis and its associated pathways. The cholesin-GPR146 axis could have profound implications across various therapeutic areas concerning abnormal cholesterol metabolism, offering new hope for patients and improving overall healthcare outcomes.

Increased Cardiovascular Risk in Young Patients with CKD and the Role of Lipid-Lowering Therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with a significantly increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). This review summarizes known risk factors, pathophysiological mechanisms, and current therapeutic possibilities, focusing on lipid-lowering therapy in CKD.

RECENT FINDINGS

Novel data on lipid-lowering therapy in CKD mainly stem from clinical trials and clinical studies. In addition to traditional CVD risk factors, patients with CKD often present with non-traditional risk factors that include, e.g., anemia, proteinuria, or calcium-phosphate imbalance. Dyslipidemia remains an important contributing CVD risk factor in CKD, although the mechanisms involved differ from the general population. While statins are the most commonly used lipid-lowering therapy in CKD patients, some statins may require dose reduction. Importantly, statins showed diminished beneficial effect on cardiovascular events in patients with severe CKD and hypercholesterolemia despite high CVD risk and effective reduction of LDL cholesterol. Ezetimibe enables the reduction of the dose of statins and their putative toxicity and, in combination with statins, reduces CVD endpoints in CKD patients. The use of novel drugs such as PCSK9 inhibitors is safe in CKD, but their potential to reduce cardiovascular events in CKD needs to be elucidated in future studies.

ApoB100 and Atherosclerosis: What's New in the 21st Century?

ApoB is the main protein of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and is further divided into ApoB48 in the intestine and ApoB100 in the liver. Very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) is produced by the liver, contains ApoB100, and is metabolized into its remnants, intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL). ApoB100 has been suggested to play a crucial role in the formation of the atherogenic plaque. Apart from being a biomarker of atherosclerosis, ApoB100 seems to be implicated in the inflammatory process of atherosclerosis per se. In this review, we will focus on the structure, the metabolism, and the function of ApoB100, as well as its role as a predictor biomarker of cardiovascular risk. Moreover, we will elaborate upon the molecular mechanisms regarding the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis, and we will discuss the disorders associated with the APOB gene mutations, and the potential role of various drugs as therapeutic targets.

Advances in Research on Marine-Derived Lipid-Lowering Active Substances and Their Molecular Mechanisms

Hyperlipidemia (HLP) is a metabolic disorder caused by abnormal lipid metabolism. Recently, the prevalence of HLP caused by poor dietary habits in the population has been increasing year by year. In addition, lipid-lowering drugs currently in clinical use have shown significant improvement in blood lipid levels, but are accompanied by certain side effects. However, bioactive marine substances have been shown to possess a variety of physiological activities such as hypoglycemic, antioxidant, antithrombotic and effects on blood pressure. Therefore, the hypolipidemic efficacy of marine bioactive substances with complex and diverse structures has also attracted attention. This paper focuses on the therapeutic role of marine-derived polysaccharides, unsaturated fatty acids, and bioactive peptides in HLP, and briefly discusses the main mechanisms by which these substances exert their hypolipidemic activity in vivo.

Efficacy and Safety of Single-Pill Combination of Rosuvastatin and Ezetimibe in Chinese Patients with Primary Hypercholesterolemia Inadequately Controlled by Statin Treatment (ROZEL): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Active-Controlled Phase 3 Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

Many patients with primary hypercholesterolemia do not achieve their plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals with statin alone under a recommended dose of statin (e.g., 10 mg rosuvastatin) in China. The objective of this phase III study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new single-pill combination (SPC) of rosuvastatin 10 mg/ezetimibe 10 mg (R10/E10) in this population.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled study in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia inadequately controlled with statin alone. The participants were randomized 1:1 to receive SPC R10/E10 or R10. The primary objective was to demonstrate the superiority of SPC R10/E10 vs. R10 in reducing the LDL-C levels after 8 weeks.

RESULTS

This trial randomized 305 participants to SPC R10/E10 (n = 153) and R10 (n = 152). The superiority of SPC R10/E10 over R10 was demonstrated with the least square (LS) mean difference of percent change in LDL-C from baseline to week 8: - 13.85% (95% confidence interval [CI] - 20.15% to - 7.56%, P < 0.0001). The proportion of participants who achieved the LDL-C target (< 2.6 mmol/l) at week 8 was larger with SPC R10/E10 (n = 80, 54.1%) than with R10 (n = 42, 29.2%) (Odds ratio = 2.80, 95% CI 1.70 to 4.61, P < 0.0001). No unexpected safety findings were reported.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that SPC R10/E10 improve LDL-C reduction and goal achievement in Chinese patients with primary hypercholesterolemia not adequately controlled on statin therapy, without new safety findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04669041).

Effect of Combination Therapy with Ezetimibe and Statins versus Statin Monotherapy on Carotid Intima-Media Thickness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background and Objectives: Lipid-lowering agents such as ezetimibe are recommended in uncontrolled hyperlipidemia for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) is a surrogate marker of atherosclerosis and a predictor of cardiovascular and cerebral events. The effects of ezetimibe on CIMT have been inconsistently reported. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the effects of ezetimibe/statin and statin alone therapies on CIMT reduction. Materials and Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published prior to 26 January 2023 with the MeSH keywords 'Ezetimibe' and 'Carotid Intima-Media Thickness'. The results were presented as standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals using the random-effect model method, and heterogeneity was assessed. Subgroup, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: Five RCTs with 642 participants were included. CIMT reduction was not significantly different between the ezetimibe/statin and statin alone groups. However, in subgroup analyses, CIMT in the ezetimibe/statin group was significantly reduced in patients with non-familial hypercholesterolemia (SMD: -0.34 mm and p = 0.002) and in patients with secondary prevention (SMD: -0.38 mm and p = 0.002). The low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was significantly reduced in the ezetimibe/statin group (SMD: -0.58 mg/dL and p < 0.001). Conclusions: The effect of ezetimibe on CIMT reduction was shown in non-familial hypercholesterolemia and secondary prevention. These results suggest that the efficacy of ezetimibe may vary with potential CIMT reduction benefits in certain subpopulations.

Current and future options in cholesterol lowering treatments

The relative risk reduction of cardiovascular events is proportional to the absolute reduction in LDL-C levels, the primary target of therapy, no matter the way of reduction. During the last decades, the therapeutic regimens for reducing the LDL-C levels have been immerged and improved, with favorable effects on the atherosclerotic process and clinical benefits of various cardiovascular outcomes. From a practical view of point, this review is focusing only on the current available lipid lowering agents: statins, ezetimibe, anti PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies, the small interfering RNA (siRNA) agent, Inclisiran, and Bempedoic acid. The recent changes in lipid lowering regimens, including the early combination of lipid lowering agents and "Low LDL-C" levels <30 mg/dL for high/very high cardiovascular risk patients will also be discussed.

Nonadherence to lipid-lowering therapy and strategies to improve adherence in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Despite the availability of effective therapies that lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, many eligible patients are inadequately treated and their LDL-C levels remain suboptimal. Patient nonadherence to lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) is a major contributor to the failure of LDL-C goal attainment. Several factors have been identified as contributing to LLT nonadherence, including healthcare disparities due to socioeconomic status, age, race, sex, and cost; limited access to healthcare; perceived side effects associated with LLT; health literacy; and the presence of comorbidities. Suboptimal LLT use has also been associated with clinician factors, including failure to identify patients who require LDL-C reassessment, insufficient LDL-C monitoring, and clinical inertia such as a lack of therapy intensification. Several strategies to enhance LLT adherence have been shown to be effective, including the implementation of educational initiatives and tools for both patients and physicians, the use of clinical protocols and algorithms to identify patients at risk and optimize treatment, and improvements in electronic healthcare records. Pharmacy-based programs designed to help patients with prescription refills, including reminders or the use of prescription delivery by mail, have also proven effective. Drugs requiring frequent administration can represent a barrier to treatment adherence; therefore, newer, more effective LLTs with lower frequency of administration and lower potential for polypharmacy may improve patient adherence to LLT. Implementation of strategies to identify patients at risk for LLT nonadherence and the use of flexible tools such as telemedicine to overcome geographical barriers may improve LLT adherence.

Special Considerations for Management of Diabetes in Adult Patients with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic health condition that is very prevalent worldwide. It has been demonstrated that individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) are at a disproportionately high risk for developing diabetes. Persons with IDDs are estimated to be 2-3 times more likely to develop DM compared to the general population. The elevated risk of developing diabetes within the population of adults with IDDs is multifactorial and includes contributions from genetics, lifestyle, medication use and misuse, boundaries to appropriate medical care, a higher incidence of comorbid mental health disorders, and others. Further, inadequate screening for and management of diabetes for these patients results in heightened risk for adverse cardiovascular events and inferior health care outcomes. To improve patient outcomes for this unique patient population, health care providers need to be well trained in the optimal modalities of screening, diagnosis, and management of diabetes in adults with IDDs. This requires the development of effective diabetes intervention and health promotion programs aimed at patients with IDDs, utilizing a patient-centered approach to screening and management, and conducting further research to assess the impact of these interventions.

Lowering of Blood Lipid Levels with a Combination of Pitavastatin and Ezetimibe in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Objectives: According to the findings of randomized controlled trials, blood lipid levels in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) can be significantly decreased through a combination of pitavastatin and ezetimibe; however, the effects and clinical applications of this treatment remain controversial. This meta-analysis was aimed at objectively assessing the efficacy and safety of pitavastatin and ezetimibe in lowering blood lipid levels.

Design: Relevant studies were retrieved from electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP, and WanFang Data, from database inception to June 8, 2022. The levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients’ serum after treatment were the primary endpoint.

Results: Nine randomized controlled trials (2586 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis indicated that pitavastatin plus ezetimibe resulted in significantly lower levels of LDL-C [standardized mean difference (SMD)=−0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) (−1.15 to −0.58), P<0.01], TC [SMD=−0.84, 95% CI (−1.10 to −0.59), P<0.01], and TG [SMD=−0.59, 95% CI (−0.89 to −0.28), P<0.01] than pitavastatin alone.

Conclusions: Pitavastatin plus ezetimibe significantly decreased serum LDL-C, TC, and TG levels in patients with CHD.

Combinatorial approaches for novel cardiovascular drug discovery: a review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

In this article, authors report an inclusive discussion about the combinatorial approach for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and for counteracting the cardiovascular risk factors. The mentioned strategy was demonstrated to be useful for improving the efficacy of pharmacological treatments and in CVDs showed superior efficacy with respect to the classical monotherapeutic approach.

AREAS COVERED

According to this topic, authors analyzed the combinatorial treatments that are available on the market, highlighting clinical studies that demonstrated the efficacy of combinatorial drug strategies to cure CVDs and related risk factors. Furthermore, the review gives an outlook on the future perspective of this therapeutic option, highlighting novel drug targets and disease models that could help the future cardiovascular drug discovery.

EXPERT OPINION

The use of specifically designed and increasingly rational and effective drug combination therapies can therefore be considered the evolution of polypharmacy in cardiometabolic and CVDs. This approach can allow to intervene on multiple etiopathogenetic mechanisms of the disease or to act simultaneously on different pathologies/risk factors, using the combinations most suitable from a pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and toxicological perspective, thus finding the most appropriate therapeutic option.

Pharmacotherapy for children with elevated levels of lipoprotein(a): future directions

INTRODUCTION

Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). With the advent of the antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) targeted at LPA, the gene encoding apolipoprotein(a), that are highly effective for lowering Lp(a) levels, this risk factor might be managed in the near future. Given that Lp(a) levels are mostly genetically determined and once elevated, present from early age, we have evaluated future directions for the treatment of children with high Lp(a) levels.

AREAS COVERED

In the current review, we discuss different pharmacological treatments in clinical development and provide an in-depth overview of the effects of ASOs and siRNAs targeted at LPA.

EXPERT OPINION

Since high Lp(a) is an important risk factor for ASCVD and given the promising effects of both ASOs and siRNAs targeted at apo(a), there is an urgent need for well-designed prospective studies to assess the impact of elevated Lp(a) in childhood. If the Lp(a)-hypothesis is confirmed in adults, and also in children, the rationale might arise for treating children with high Lp(a) levels. However, we feel that this should be limited to children with the highest cardiovascular risk including familial hypercholesterolemia and potentially pediatric stroke.

Effectiveness and Safety of Lipid-Lowering Drug Treatments in Japanese Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Familial Hypercholesterolemia Expert Forum (FAME) Study

AIMS

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disorder characterized by high serum levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (LDL-C), tendon and skin xanthomas, and premature coronary artery disease (CAD). In Japan, detailed information on the current status of drug therapies for patients with FH has not been reported so far, and their efficacy and safety have not been clarified. After the introduction of ezetimibe, which can further reduce serum LDL-C levels on top of statins, the changes of management for FH patients with these drugs are of particular interest. The current study aimed to evaluate the clinical status of FH heterozygotes and homozygotes, especially focusing on the real-world lipid-lowering drug therapy, attained serum LDL-C levels, and cardiovascular events at registration and during the follow-up.

METHODS

The FAME Study enrolled 762 heterozygous (including 17 newly diagnosed cases) and 7 homozygous FH patients from hospitals and clinics nationwide. Diagnosis of FH was based upon the criteria defined in the Study Report in 2008 of the Research Committee on Primary Hyperlipidemia supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. Data analysis was primarily carried on heterozygous FH patients.

RESULTS

Xanthoma or thickening of the Achilles tendon was observed in more than 80% of the patients. CAD was recorded in 23% of patients. Patients with parental and sibling CAD accounted for 47% and 24%, respectively. At baseline, patients without CAD who had LDL-C ＜100 mg/dL accounted for 12.3% and those with CAD who had attained the target (LDL-C ＜70 mg/dL) in the secondary prevention accounted for only 1.8%. In the multiple logistic analysis, male sex, age ＞40, heterozygous FH score ＞20, hypertension, and sibling CAD were significantly and positively associated with prevalent CAD, whereas serum HDL-cholesterol levels showed a significant inverse association with CAD. Patients treated with statin alone, statin＋ezetimibe, statin＋resin, or statin＋probucol accounted for 31.1%, 26.3%, 4.0%, and 3.7%, respectively. Patients treated with three-drug combination (statin＋ezetimibe＋resin or statin＋ezetimibe＋probucol) accounted for 7.5%. Statins and ezetimibe were used in 88.0% and 48.0% at the baseline, respectively. Although high-intensity statins were mainly prescribed, statin doses were much lower than those reported in Western countries. The addition of ezetimibe resulted in ~20% reduction in serum LDL-C. CAD was diagnosed in 17 patients with 21 episodes during follow-up. The Cox hazard model analysis demonstrated that male sex, CAD at the baseline, and parental CAD were related to the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events. Furthermore, an increase in serum HDL-C was associated with a significant reduction of ASCVD events, while serum LDL-C and triglyceride levels were not related to ASCVD events.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of CAD in Japanese patients with heterozygous FH is still very high. In most of the cases, the target level of serum LDL-C was not achieved for primary and secondary prevention of CAD, suggesting that a more aggressive LDL-C lowering and appropriate management of residual risks are necessary.

Preformulation Studies of Ezetimibe-Simvastatin Solid Dispersions in the Development of Fixed-Dose Combinations

Two active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) with limited solubility, simvastatin and ezetimibe, prepared as a drug-drug solid dispersion (SD) was evaluated for physicochemical, microstructural, and aqueous dissolution properties. The simvastatin-ezetimibe SD was prepared using the co-grinding method in a wide range of weight fractions and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) were used to perform the phase composition analysis. DSC studies confirmed that simvastatin and ezetimibe form a simple eutectic phase equilibrium diagram. Analysis of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) studies excluded strong interactions between the APIs. Our investigations have revealed that all studied dispersions are characterized by substantially improved ezetimibe dissolution regardless of simvastatin content, and are best when the composition oscillates near the eutectic point. Data obtained in our studies provide an opportunity for the development of well-formulated, ezetimibe-simvastatin fixed-dose combinations (for hypercholesterolemia treatment) with reduced ezetimibe dosages based on its dissolution improvement.

A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness of Non-Statin Lipid-Lowering Drugs for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Although studies of non-statin lipid-lowering therapies (NSLLTs) have demonstrated cardiovascular benefits; whether these benefits provide good value has not been evaluated in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. A systematic review was performed to include studies on the cost-effectiveness of NSLLTs in T2DM patients with/without cardiovascular disease (CVD). Thirteen studies were included; ezetimibe (n=8), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors (n=4), fenofibrate (n=2), nicotinic acid (n=1), extended-release niacin/laropiprant (ER- ERN/LRPT) (n=1), and icosapent ethyl (n=1). Six studies considered ezetimibe+statin to be a cost-effective compared to statins monotherapy, three studies suggested that PCSK9 inhibitors+statins were not cost-effective compared to statin+ezetimibe. Fenofibrate was a cost-effective either as monotherapy or combined with a statin compared to statin or fenofibrate monotherapy. Nicotinic acid and ER- ERN/LRPT compared to statin monotherapy were also cost-effective. Icosapent ethyl using the solid-state relay was cost-effective compared to standard care but not using the wholesale acquisition cost.

Control of Cholesterol Metabolism Using a Systems Approach

Simple Summary

Cholesterol is the main sterol in mammals that is essential for healthy cell functionining. It plays a key role in metabolic regulation and signaling, it is a precursor molecule of bile acids, oxysterols, and all steroid hormones. It also contributes to the structural makeup of the membranes. Its homeostasis is tightly controlled since it can harm the body if it is allowed to reach abnormal blood concentrations. One of the diseases associated with elevated cholesterol levels being the major cause of morbidities and mortalities worldwide, is atherosclerosis. In this study, we have developed a model of the cholesterol metabolism taking into account local inflammation and oxidative stress. The aim was to investigate the impact of the interplay of those processes and cholesterol metabolism disturbances on the atherosclerosis development and progression. We have also analyzed the effect of combining different classes of drugs targeting selected components of cholesterol metabolism.

Abstract

Cholesterol is an essential component of mammalian cells and is involved in many fundamental physiological processes; hence, its homeostasis in the body is tightly controlled, and any disturbance has serious consequences. Disruption of the cellular metabolism of cholesterol, accompanied by inflammation and oxidative stress, promotes the formation of atherosclerotic plaques and, consequently, is one of the leading causes of death in the Western world. Therefore, new drugs to regulate disturbed cholesterol metabolism are used and developed, which help to control cholesterol homeostasis but still do not entirely cure atherosclerosis. In this study, a Petri net-based model of human cholesterol metabolism affected by a local inflammation and oxidative stress, has been created and analyzed. The use of knockout of selected pathways allowed us to observe and study the effect of various combinations of commonly used drugs on atherosclerosis. The analysis results led to the conclusion that combination therapy, targeting multiple pathways, may be a fundamental concept in the development of more effective strategies for the treatment and prevention of atherosclerosis.

Comorbidities with Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH): A Systematic Review

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is linked to high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), atherosclerotic, and aortic stenosis to a lesser extent. We looked at the incidence of prevalent comorbid disorders other than cardiovascular disease (CVD), such as diabetes, chronic kidney disease (CKD), hypertension, and cancer in heterozygous FH (HeFH) patients. PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched systematically for studies reporting comorbidities in FH patients. Finally, 23 studies were included after excluding duplicates, papers with unrelated titles, reviews, abstracts, and papers with not sufficient data. Results showed that among the comorbidities that have been studied; FH patients had a greater prevalence of CKD. In terms of diabetes, the data are inconsistent, with some research indicating a higher prevalence of diabetes in FH patients and mostly indicating the opposite. Polymorphism study showed that hypertension has been linked to FH; however, the prevalence of the hypertensive subjects varies among FH groups. In comparison to the general population, cancer was found to have a lower or similar prevalence in FH patients. More research is needed in this area due to the variability of the results of the relationship between diabetes and FH and the small number of studies on cancer. In conclusion only CKD can be considered as an important and prevalent comorbidity in FH population after CVDs.

The Clinical Importance of Differentiating Monogenic Familial Hypercholesterolemia from Polygenic Hypercholesterolemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current review discusses the importance and significance of differentiating monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) from polygenic hypercholesterolemia for clinical purpose.

RECENT FINDINGS

Consistent scientific evidence have demonstrated that, compared to polygenic hypercholesterolemia, monogenic FH patients are at significantly higher risk for premature coronary heart disease (CHD). This is despite both disease entities having a comparable low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) level. Monogenic FH also has poorer therapeutic response compared to its polygenic counterpart. However, there are no current available clinical management guidelines that stratify hypercholesterolemia patients based on genotype. Monogenic FH patients are at higher risk for CHD with poorer therapeutic response. Thus, genotype testing should be performed when available. There is also an urgency to develop genotype-based clinical guideline that stratify patients on genotype and not only based on traditionally known cardiovascular risk factors.

Focus on the Lymphatic Route to Optimize Drug Delivery in Cardiovascular Medicine

While oral agents have been the gold standard for cardiovascular disease therapy, the new generation of treatments is switching to other administration options that offer reduced dosing frequency and more efficacy. The lymphatic network is a unidirectional and low-pressure vascular system that is responsible for the absorption of interstitial fluids, molecules, and cells from the peripheral tissue, including the skin and the intestines. Targeting the lymphatic route for drug delivery employing traditional or new technologies and drug formulations is exponentially gaining attention in the quest to avoid the hepatic first-pass effect. The present review will give an overview of the current knowledge on the involvement of the lymphatic vessels in drug delivery in the context of cardiovascular disease.

Pitavastatin Combined with Ezetimibe Treatment was an Effective Approach to Non-IRA Lesion of ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

OBJECTIVE

ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) patients with the multivessel disease have distinctive plaque characteristics in non-IRA lesions. Intensive statin therapy was a potential approach to treat STEMI patients with the non-IRA disease. However, there is still poor evidence about the therapeutic effect. In this study, we have evaluated the detailed therapeutic effect of statin plus ezetimibe intensive therapy.

METHODS

For STEMI patients with non-IRA disease undergoing primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI), 183 control STEMI patients without non-IRA disease undergoing primary PCI, and 200 STEMI patients with non-IRA disease undergoing primary PCI were introduced into this study. 200 STEMI patients with non-IRA disease undergoing primary PCI were divided into Normal group, Intensive group, Normal & Combined group, and Intensive & Combined group. The baseline information for each participant was recorded. Meanwhile, the physiological and biochemical indicators of each member with different treatments were collected after one-year follow-up.

RESULTS

For STEMI patients with non-IRA disease undergoing primary PCI, no differences could be detected in multiple indexes such as OCT examination results, age, stroke, etc. However, diabetes mellitus, smoking, and coronary Gensini score were different between different groups (P<0.05). After one year follow-up, cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, coronary Gensini score, thin-cap fibroatheroma, length of non-infarcted arterial lesions, non-infarct artery lesion range, myocardial infarction again, and revascularization again were significantly different between different groups (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results mentioned above suggested that pitavastatin combined with ezetimibe was an effective approach for STEMI patients with non-IRA disease undergoing primary PCI. The results obtained in this study have provided a novel method for the treatment of STEMI patients with non-IRA disease undergoing primary PCI.

Switching, Persistence and Adherence to Statin Therapy: a Retrospective Cohort Study Using the Australian National Pharmacy Data

BACKGROUND

Statins are widely prescribed for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD), but their effectiveness is dependent on the level of adherence and persistence.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore the patterns of switching, adherence and persistence among the Australian general population with newly dispensed statins.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a random sample of data from the Australian national prescription claims data. Switching, adherence to and persistence with statins were assessed for people starting statins from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2019. Switching was defined as either switching to another intensity of statin, to another statin or to a non-statin agent. Non-persistence to treatment was defined as discontinuation (i.e. ≥90 days with no statin) of coverage. Adherence was measured using proportion of days covered (PDC), and patients with PDC < 0.80 were considered non-adherent. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare discontinuation, switching and reinitiation between different statins.

RESULTS

A cohort of 141,062 people dispensed statins and followed over a median duration of 2.5 years were included. Of the cohort, 29.3% switched statin intensity, 28.4% switched statin type, 3.7% switched to ezetimibe and in 2.7%, ezetimibe was added as combination therapy during the study period. Overall, 58.8% discontinued statins based on the 90-day gap criteria, of whom 55.2% restarted. The proportion of people non-adherent was 24.0% at 6 months to 49.0% at 5 years. People on low and moderate intensity statins were more likely to discontinue compared to those on high-intensity statins (hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.31), (HR 1.28, 95%CI 1.14-1.42), respectively. Compared to maintaining same statin type and intensity, switching statins, which includes up-titration (HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.70 to 0.86) was associated with less likelihood of discontinuation after reinitiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term persistence and adherence to statins remains generally poor among Australians, which limits the effectiveness of these medicines and the consequent health impact they may provide for individuals (and by extension, the population impact when poor persistence and adherence is considered in the statin-taking population). Switching between statins is prevalent in one third of statin users, although any clinical benefit of the observed switching trend is unknown. This, combined with the high volume of statin prescriptions, highlights the need for better strategies to address poor persistence and adherence.

Intensive statin versus low-dose statin + ezetimibe treatment for fibrous cap thickness of coronary vulnerable plaques

BACKGROUND

Acute coronary syndromes mainly result from abrupt thrombotic occlusion caused by atherosclerotic vulnerable plaques (VPs) that suddenly rupture or erosion. Fibrous cap thickness (FCT) is a major determinant of the propensity of a VP to rupture and is recognized as a key factor. The intensive use of statins is known to have the ability to increase FCT; however, there is a risk of additional adverse effects. However, lower dose statin with ezetimibe is known to be tolerable by patients. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of intensive statin vs. low-dose stain + ezetimibe therapy on FCT, as evaluated using optical coherence tomography.

METHOD

Patients who had VPs (minimum FCT <65 μm and lipid core >90°) and deferred from intervention in our single center from January 2014 to December 2018 were included in the trial. They were divided into the following two groups: intensive statin group (rosuvastatin 15-20 mg or atorvastatin 30-40 mg) and combination therapy group (rosuvastatin 5-10 mg or atorvastatin 10-20 mg + ezetimibe 10 mg). At the 12-month follow-up, we compared the change in the FCT (ΔFCT%) between the two groups and analyzed the association of ΔFCT% with risk factors. Fisher exact test was used for all categorical variables. Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U-test was used for analyzing the continuous data. The relationship between ΔFCT% and risk factors was analyzed using linear regression analysis.

RESULT

Total 53 patients were finally enrolled, including 26 patients who were in the intensive statin group and 27 who were in the combination therapy group. At the 12-month follow-up, the serum levels of total cholesterol (TC), total triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C), hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) levels were reduced in both the groups. The ΔTC%, ΔLDL-C%, and ΔLp-PLA2% were decreased further in the combination therapy group. FCT was increased in both the groups (combination treatment group vs. intensive statin group: 128.89 ± 7.64 vs. 110.19 ± 7.00 μm, t = -9.282, P < 0.001) at the 12-month follow-up. The increase in ΔFCT% was more in the combination therapy group (123.46% ± 14.05% vs. 91.14% ± 11.68%, t = -9.085, P < 0.001). Based on the multivariate linear regression analysis, only the serum Lp-PLA2 at the 12-month follow-up (B = -0.203, t = -2.701, P = 0.010), ΔTC% (B = -0.573, t = -2.048, P = 0.046), and Δhs-CRP% (B = -0.302, t = -2.963, P = 0.005) showed an independent association with ΔFCT%.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose statin combined with ezetimibe therapy maybe provide a profound and significant increase in FCT as compared to intensive statin monotherapy. The reductions in Lp-PLA2, ΔTC%, and Δhs-CRP% are independently associated with an increase in FCT.

Trends in the Utilization of Lipid-Lowering Medications in Australia: An Analysis of National Pharmacy Claims Data

Lipid-lowering medications comprise standard of care in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. This study examined the trends in the utilization of statin and non-statin medications in the Australian general population between 2013 and 2019. Pharmacoepidemiological analyses were performed using pharmacy dispensing data from Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. One-year prevalence and incidence of statin and non-statin prescribing patterns were reported, and relative variations in prescribing examined via Poisson regression modelling. The one-year prevalence of statins' prescriptions decreased between 2013-2019 by 5.5% (from 25.0%-19.5%). Females were less likely than males to be prescribed statins (rate ratio [RR]=0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-0.91). The one-year prevalence of ezetimibe alone, and in combination with statins, increased consistently from 2013-2019 from 1.5%-3.6% (P<0.01) and 0.1%-1.1% (P<0.01), respectively. The prevalence was higher among those aged 61-80 years (RR=1.20, 95%CI 1.10-1.21) and those aged older than 80 years (RR=1.34, 95%CI 1.22-1.47), when compared to people aged <60 years. The incidence of ezetimibe prescriptions was highest in people aged 61-80 years (RR=1.36, 95%CI 1.31-1.41) compared to those aged <60 years. The one-year prevalence of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor prescriptions was highest among those aged 46-60 years (RR=1.24, 95%CI 0.97-4.97) compared to people aged <46 and >60 years. Females were less likely than males to be prescribed a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (RR=0.87, 95%CI 0.75-0.98). Statins remain the most prevalent lipid-lowering medication prescribed in Australia. The prescribing of non-statin medications remains low, but is increasing.

Bempedoic acid: Review of a novel therapy in lipid management

PURPOSE

An update on clinical development of a first-in-class oral medication for adjunctive cholesterol lowering in high-risk patients with persistent elevation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) despite statin therapy is reviewed.

SUMMARY

Despite the proven efficacy of statin therapy, many patients cannot reach LDL-C goals with statins alone, largely due to inadequate response or intolerance. Nonstatin treatment options to reduce LDL-C include ezetimibe, bile acid sequestrants, and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors; however their use has been limited by modest clinical benefit or high treatment costs. Novel nonstatin treatments are in development to further address the needs of this population. Bempedoic acid is a first-in-class oral adenosine triphosphate (ATP) citrate lyase inhibitor being evaluated as an additional treatment option for high-risk patients requiring further reduction in LDL-C. Bempedoic acid has been evaluated in multiple phase 2 and phase 3 trials as monotherapy or for use in combination with ezetimibe and/or statin therapy. Treatment with bempedoic acid has been demonstrated to result in significant reductions in LDL-C and several other cardiovascular risk markers without the myalgia associated with statin therapy.

CONCLUSION

Bempedoic acid, used alone or with ezetimibe in a fixed-dose combination formulation, may be an effective alternative to current guideline-recommended nonstatin therapies in patients who do not attain adequate LDL-C lowering with maximally tolerated statin therapy and in statin-intolerant patients at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering therapy for the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is highly prevalent and a major contributor to morbidity and mortality worldwide. Elevated blood cholesterol is a key driver of risk for atherosclerotic events, and patients with established ASCVD comprise a specific high-risk population in which low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering therapy is strongly endorsed by multiple guidelines. An increasing number of medications across several pharmacologic classes are available today in clinical practice. Therefore, guidance on the appropriate use of these interventions is necessary for cost-effective solutions to managing residual atherothrombotic risk. In this review we summarize the key evidence supporting LDL-C lowering as described in the most recent 2018 multi-society Blood Cholesterol Guidelines, and provide a framework for optimizing LDL-C lowering therapy in secondary prevention populations.

Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Electronegative Lipoproteins in Cardiovascular Diseases

Dysregulation of glucose and lipid metabolism increases plasma levels of lipoproteins and triglycerides, resulting in vascular endothelial damage. Remarkably, the oxidation of lipid and lipoprotein particles generates electronegative lipoproteins that mediate cellular deterioration of atherosclerosis. In this review, we examined the core of atherosclerotic plaque, which is enriched by byproducts of lipid metabolism and lipoproteins, such as oxidized low-density lipoproteins (oxLDL) and electronegative subfraction of LDL (LDL(−)). We also summarized the chemical properties, receptors, and molecular mechanisms of LDL(−). In combination with other well-known markers of inflammation, namely metabolic diseases, we concluded that LDL(−) can be used as a novel prognostic tool for these lipid disorders. In addition, through understanding the underlying pathophysiological molecular routes for endothelial dysfunction and inflammation, we may reassess current therapeutics and might gain a new direction to treat atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases, mainly targeting LDL(−) clearance.

Low dose of ROSuvastatin in combination with EZEtimibe effectively and permanently reduce low density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration independently of timing of administration (ROSEZE): A randomized, crossover study - preliminary results

BACKGROUND

In an attempt to improve low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) level control in patients ineffectively treated with statins, we evaluated the effectiveness of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of 10 mg rosuvastatin and ezetimibe and its relation to the timing of drug administration.

METHODS

A randomized, open label, single center, crossover study involving 83 patients with coronary artery disease and hypercholesterolemia with baseline LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dL. In arm I the FDC drug was administered in the morning for 6 weeks, then in the evening for the following 6 weeks and vice versa in arm II. The primary endpoint was the change in LDL-C after 6 and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

The median LDL-C concentration at baseline, after 6 and 12 weeks respectively was: 98.10 mg/dL (Q1;Q3: 85.10;116.80), 63.14 mg/dL (50.70;77.10) and 59.40 mg/dL (49.00;73.30); p < 0.001. LDL-C levels were similar regardless of the timing of drug administration (morning 62.50 mg/dL [50.70;76.00] vs. evening 59.70 mg/dL [48.20;73.80]; p = 0.259], in both time points: 6 week: 63.15 mg/dL (50.75;80.65) vs. 63.40 mg/dL (50.60;74.00), p = 0.775; and 12 week: 62.00 mg/dL (50.20;74.40) vs. 59.05 mg/dL (47.65;66.05), p = 0.362. The absolute change in LDL-C concentration for the morning vs. evening drug administration was - 6 week: -34.6 mg/dL (-56.55; -19.85) (-34.87%) vs. -31.10 mg/dL (-44.20; -16.00) (-35.87%) (p not significant); 12. week: -34.20 mg/dL (-47.8; -19.0) (-37.12%) vs. -37.20 mg/dL (-65.55; -23.85) (-40.06%) (p not significant). The therapy was safe and well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Fixed-dose combination of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe significantly and permanently decreases LDL-C regardless of the timing of drug administration.

Successful treatment of a patient with mitochondrial myopathy with alirocumab

A 48-year-old man presented to our lipid clinic with statin intolerance and elevated serum creatine kinase levels, being affected by mitochondrial myopathy because of heteroplasmic mitochondrial DNA missense mutation in MTCO1 gene (m.7671T>A). He had just been treated with a coronary artery bypass 4 years before because of acute coronary syndrome, and he had consistently high levels of both low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides. Dyslipidemia was successfully treated using 75 mg of alirocumab subcutaneously every 2 weeks, 10 mg of ezetimibe daily, 2 g of marine omega-3 fatty acids daily, and 145 mg of micronized fenofibrate every 2 days. Although muscle weakness persisted, myalgia did not reoccur and serum creatine kinase levels remained almost stable over the time.

Quantitative evaluation of statin effectiveness versus intolerance and strategies for management of intolerance

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There is disquiet about statin effectiveness and side effects in both the medical and lay media.

METHODS

We searched the literature for reports on the incidence of statin intolerance (SI) in which control rates of similar events were also recorded. The number of people who must receive treatment (NNT) to prevent one atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) event at 5-50% 10-year risk and LDL cholesterol 2-7 mmol/l was compared with the number of those who would experience harm attributable to statin (NNH). Using a similar method, the effectiveness of various strategies to overcome SI in preventing CVD was then compared.

RESULTS

Observational studies with non-randomised control groups report higher rates of statin adverse events than randomised trials. Overall, at least 75 patients must be treated for one to experience a side effect. In contrast, the NNT to prevent one ASCVD event with statins as monotherapy or in combination with other cholesterol-lowering medications to achieve at least 50% decrease in LDL cholesterol and <1.8 mmol/l was between 3 and 61, depending on risk and LDL cholesterol. NNH for adverse events of severity equivalent to ASCVD was >750 (<0.1333%). When SI is encountered, the most effective current management for most patients in terms of ASCVD reduction is to rechallenge with low dose potent statin and then up-titrate until the cholesterol target has been achieved with, if necessary, the addition of ezetimibe 10 mg daily.

CONCLUSIONS

The most severe complication of SI is discontinuation of effective cholesterol-lowering treatment in patients who, by virtue of their CVD risk and cholesterol level, might otherwise benefit.

Lipid-Lowering Efficacy of Ezetimibe in Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

INTRODUCTION

Patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), especially those with recent (< 1 year) acute coronary syndrome (ACS), are at high risk for recurrent cardiovascular events. This risk can be reduced by lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. A comprehensive meta-analysis on the LDL-C-lowering efficacy of ezetimibe is lacking. This study attempts to address this gap.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials evaluating the LDL-C-lowering efficacy of ezetimibe in the ASCVD population was conducted. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for publications from database inception to August 2018 and for conference abstracts from 2015 to August 2018. Meta-analyses were conducted to evaluate the LDL-C-lowering efficacy of ezetimibe in the ASCVD population and the recent ACS subgroup.

RESULTS

In total, 12 studies were eligible for the meta-analyses. Treatment with combination ezetimibe plus statin therapy showed greater absolute LDL-C reduction than statin monotherapy (mean difference - 21.86 mg/dL; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 26.56 to - 17.17; p < 0.0001) after 6 months of treatment (or at a timepoint closest to 6 months). Similarly, in patients with recent ACS, combination ezetimibe plus statin therapy was favorable compared with statin monotherapy (mean treatment difference - 19.19 mg/dL; 95% CI - 25.22 to - 13.16; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Ezetimibe, when added to statin therapy, provided a modest additional reduction in LDL-C compared with statin monotherapy. However, this may not be sufficient for some patients with ASCVD who have especially high LDL-C levels despite optimal statin therapy.

Comparative Lipid-Lowering/Increasing Efficacy of 7 Statins in Patients with Dyslipidemia, Cardiovascular Diseases, or Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analyses of 50 Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

The drug efficacy may differ among different statins, and evidence from head-to-head comparisons is sparse and inconsistent. The study is aimed at comparing the lipid-lowering/increasing effects of 7 different statins in patients with dyslipidemia, cardiovascular diseases, or diabetes mellitus by conducting systematic review and network meta-analyses (NMA) of the lipid changes after certain statins' use.

METHODS

In this study, we searched four electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published through February 25, 2020, comparing the lipid-lowering efficacy of no less than two of the included statins (or statin vs. placebo). Three reviewers independently extracted data in duplicate. Firstly, mixed treatment overall comparison analyses, in the form of frequentist NMAs, were conducted using STATA 15.0 software. Then, subgroup analyses were conducted according to different baseline diseases. At last, sensitivity analyses were conducted according to age and follow-up duration. The trial was registered with PROSPERO (number CRD42018108799).

RESULTS

As a result, seven statin monotherapy treatments in 50 studies (51956 participants) were used for the analyses. The statins included simvastatin (SIM), fluvastatin (FLU), atorvastatin (ATO), rosuvastatin (ROS), lovastatin (LOV), pravastatin (PRA), and pitavastatin (PIT). In terms of LDL-C lowering, rosuvastatin ranked 1st with a surface under cumulated ranking (SUCRA) value of 93.1%. The comparative treatment efficacy for LDL-C lowering was ROS>ATO>PIT>SIM>PRA>FLU>LOV>PLA. All of the other ranking and NMA results were reported in SUCRA plots and league tables.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the NMAs, it can be concluded that rosuvastatin ranked 1st in LDL-C, ApoB-lowering efficacy and ApoA1-increasing efficacy. Lovastatin ranked 1st in TC- and TG-lowering efficacy, and fluvastatin ranked 1st in HDL-C-increasing efficacy. The results should be interpreted with caution due to some limitations in our review. However, they can provide references and evidence-based foundation for drug selection in both statin monotherapies and statin combination therapies.

Significant effect of simvastatin and/or ezetimibe-loaded nanofibers on the healing of femoral defect: An experimental study

BACKGROUND

Fracture healing complications are associated with significant healthcare and economic burden. In this study, we aimed to investigate how the combined administration of local simvastatin and ezetimibe into the femoral defect of the animal model affects the bone-healing process in comparison with their monotherapy.

METHODS

A total of 32 four-month-old adult male Wistar rats were randomized into the four study groups: simvastatin + ezetimibe-loaded nanofibers (group 1), simvastatin-loaded nanofibers (group 2), ezetimibe-loaded nanofibers (group 3), and non-loaded nanofibers (group 4). After the generation of femoral defects, the predesigned nanofibers were locally administered into the defect site. The healing measures were serum and bone osteoprotegerin (OPG) expression, pathologic evaluation of union (Allen's fracture healing scores), and radiographic evaluation of bone density (Hounsfield scale) at weeks 2 and 4.

RESULTS

The improvement of all evaluated healing measures was remarkably superior in rats that were treated with loaded nanofibers in comparison with the control group. Also, the improvement of all evaluated healing measures was considerably more in the simvastatin-ezetimibe combination therapy group compared to their monotherapy. All the evaluated measures were superior in the ezetimibe monotherapy group compared to the simvastatin monotherapy group.

CONCLUSION

The cumulative effect of simvastatin and ezetimibe on the induction of bone healing is more significant than the individual effect of these drugs. Therefore, local administration of nanofibers loaded with simvastatin and ezetimibe could be regarded as a promising osteoinductive compound for the acceleration of bone repair.

John TJ, Alfardan S, Traina MI, Almahmeed W. Lipid Control Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: One Year Follow-Up of a Middle-Eastern Cohort

Background

Data on patient characteristics and provider practices in the management of lipids per the new guidelines in specific secondary prevention patients in the Middle East is limited.

Objective

To explore patient characteristics and lipid management practices according to the new cholesterol guidelines in secondary prevention patients, up to one year following discharge for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).

Methods

A retrospective chart review of patients discharged post CABG between February 2017 and February 2018 at a quaternary care centre in the Middle East. Patients were characterized by baseline demographics, comorbidities, and use of lipid lowering medications.

Results

189 patients were included in the analysis. Most were diabetic (70.9%) and classified as very high risk per the ACC/AHA guidelines (84.1%) and as extremely high risk per the AACE guidelines (85.2%). Most patients (93.1%) were discharged on high intensity statin. About one third (28.6%) were never seen or only followed once within the first 2 weeks post discharge. Of those who continued to follow up beyond 3 months and within 1 year of discharge (44.4%), about half (51.2%) had follow-up lipid panels performed. Patients who followed up and were seen by a cardiologist were five times more likely to have lipid panels ordered than those seen solely by a CT surgeon. Of those with follow-up lipid panels beyond 3 months: 59.3% achieved LDL goal of <70 mg/dL and 29% achieved LDL <55 mg/dL based on their respective goals.

Conclusions

Most patients undergoing CABG in a quaternary care centre in the Middle East are high risk ASCVD. Nonetheless, lipid goals are not commonly achieved nor routinely monitored. Providers will need to transition from the previous risk stratification and statin-only focused approach to adopt the most recent guidelines.

Statin-Associated Bilateral Foot Myopathy

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of statin-induced bilateral foot myopathy that resulted from 2 different statins. Case Summary: A 44-year-old Caucasian male with a history of ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest, hyperlipidemia, and coronary artery disease experienced bilateral foot pain, weakness, and soreness while taking atorvastatin 20 mg daily. The pain subsided within weeks of discontinuing atorvastatin but returned years later after the initiation of rosuvastatin. The Naranjo probability scale indicates that this is a definite association between bilateral foot myopathy and statin use.

DISCUSSION

There is an association with statin use and lowering cardiovascular risk in patients with dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease. However, statin metabolites can accumulate in the myocytes of muscle groups to cause a common side effect of myopathy. Statin myopathy typically occurs in large, bilateral, or proximal muscle groups, such as the thighs, back, calves, or buttocks. This patient was unusual in that his muscle symptoms only occurred in his feet and was severe enough to affect his ambulation.

CONCLUSION

Stain-associated muscle symptoms have been reported to lessen medication adherence. There is also a risk with muscle symptoms that the patient could develop rhabdomyolysis, a rare but serious condition. Recognizing statin-associated muscle symptoms even in uncommon locations is important, so that alternative lipid-lowering strategies can be implemented to lower cardiovascular risk.

An updated review of lipid-modifying therapy

Statin drugs reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (LDL-C) and cardiovascular risk. Ezetimibe may be used to supplement statin therapy, or used alone in cases of statin intolerance. Statin-associated side effects do occur, especially muscle symptoms and new onset diabetes, but they do not detract from the benefits of statin therapy. Inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) reduce LDL-C and cardiovascular risk. Evolocumab is subsidised in Australia for patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia when LDL-C is not adequately controlled with maximum doses of statin or ezetimibe or when statin therapy is contraindicated. Fenofibrate reduces triglycerides and cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes when triglycerides are elevated and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) is low. A role for dietary omega-3 fatty acids and esters in reducing cardiovascular risk remains controversial. All cases of secondary cardiovascular disease prevention merit intensive lipid therapy, unless a contraindication exists. Lipid therapy is justified in cases of primary prevention when absolute risk is high, especially when lipids are highly elevated or when multiple risk factors are present. Clinical management requires a focus on the predominant lipid disorder present, namely hypercholesterolaemia, hypertriglyceridaemia or combined hyperlipidaemia. There is an ongoing problem of poor long term persistence on lipid therapy, as well as reduced awareness by practitioners of poor risk factor control.