Inhibition of blood-aqueous humor barrier breakdown with diclofenac. A fluorophotometric study

Diclofenac Versus Corticosteroids Following Strabismus Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The purpose of the current study was to compare outcomes of diclofenac versus corticosteroids following strabismus surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. An electronic search was performed to include comparative studies of diclofenac versus corticosteroids following strabismus surgery. The analysis was based on fixed and random effect models. Primary outcomes included discomfort, chemosis, inflammation, conjunctival gap, intraocular pressure, and conjunctival injection. Secondary outcomes were conjunctival congestion, discharge, and drop intolerance. Eight studies with a sample of 469 eyes were included. At weeks 1 and 4 postoperatively, there were no statistically significant differences between the diclofenac and corticosteroid groups, except for conjunctival injection at week 1 (mean difference [MD] = -0.21, P = .04) favoring diclofenac. Interestingly, all primary outcomes significantly favored diclofenac at week 2: discomfort (MD = -0.34, P = .03), conjunctival chemosis (MD = -0.16, P = .04), conjunctival inflammation (MD = -0.16, P = .02), conjunctival gap (MD = -0.17, P = .002), intraocular pressure (MD = -2.53, P < .00001), and conjunctival injection (MD = -0.30, P = .03). Moreover, conjunctival congestion was significantly improved for dexamethasone, whereas discharge and drop intolerance was not statistically different. Diclofenac is comparable to various corticosteroids when used following strabismus surgery. However, it is important to note that diclofenac yielded significant improvements in discomfort, conjunctival chemosis, inflammation, conjunctival gap, intraocular pressure, and conjunctival injection, mainly at 2 weeks postoperatively. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2023;60(5):312-322.].

Comparison of once daily dose of 0.3% nepafenac alone and three times dose of 0.1% nepafenac alone in pain and inflammation control after phacoemulsification

Purpose:

To compare the efficacy of a once-daily dose of 0.3% nepafenac and three times daily dose of 0.1% nepafenac in controlling pain and inflammation following phacoemulsification.

Methods:

In this prospective randomized control single-blind study. patients who underwent uneventful phacoemulsification were divided into two groups. Group A received 0.1% nepafenac eye drops three times/day for 4 weeks and group B received 0.3% nepafenac eye drops once daily for 4 weeks following phacoemulsification. All the patients received moxifloxacin 0.5% eye drops four times/day for 2 weeks. None of the patients in any group received any form of corticosteroids.

Results:

The mean age of the patients in group A was 63.55 ± 8.5 years, while in group B, it was 60.05 ± 7.76 years. There was no significant result in the preoperative baseline demographics and intraoperative parameters between both the groups. The results were statistically insignificant in terms of inflammatory markers between both groups on day 1. But, on day 7, group B showed better results in terms of lid edema, conjunctival congestion, and anterior chamber cells. The patients in group B also perceived significantly less pain on day 1 (P = 0.02) and day 7 (P < 0.001). The central macular thickness was also significantly lower in group B at day 30 (P < .001) and day 90 (P < .001), respectively.

Conclusion:

Once-daily dose of higher concentrated nepafenac (0.3%) is equally effective and shows better results than 0.1% nepafenac for pain and inflammation control.

Effect of 0.1% Bromfenac for Preventing Macular Edema after Cataract Surgery in Patients with Diabetes

Purpose

To investigate the effect of 0.1% bromfenac sodium hydrate ophthalmic solution for prevention of macular edema after cataract surgery in patients with diabetes.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 75 patients with diabetes who underwent cataract surgery was performed. Thirty-eight patients (52 eyes) were instilled with 0.1% bromfenac solution (bromfenac group) and 37 patients (46 eyes) were not (control group).

Results

There were no significant preoperative between-group differences. Compared to the control group, at 1 month after surgery, the bromfenac group showed slightly better best-corrected visual acuity (0.12 ± 0.12 vs. 0.32 ± 0.42, p = 0.142), lower central macular thickness (265.58 ± 31.28 vs. 314.15 ± 76.11 µm, p < 0.001), and lower macular volume (8.46 ± 0.60 vs. 9.14 ± 1.53 mm³, p = 0.022). There were no significant differences between the two groups at 4 and 6 months postoperatively (p > 0.05). Mean changes in central macular thickness showed significant differences at 1 and 4 months postoperatively (−1.44 ± 11.72 and 10.44 ± 22.48 µm in bromfenac group vs. 47.19 ± 70.24 and 31.69 ± 48.04 µm in control group, p < 0.001 and p = 0.016) and mean changes in macular volume showed a significant difference at 1 month postoperatively (−0.08 ± 0.47 mm³ in bromfenac group vs. 0.58 ± 1.28 mm³ in control group, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences thereafter (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Treatment with 0.1% bromfenac sodium hydrate ophthalmic solution showed good efficacy for preventing cystoid macular edema early after cataract surgery in patients with diabetes.

Comparison of topical nepafenac 0.1% with intravitreal dexamethasone implant for the treatment of Irvine-Gass syndrome

AIM

To compare safety and efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone (IVD) implant with topical nepafenac (TN) 0.1% in previously untreated Irvine-Gass syndrome (IGS) in clinical practice.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 62 eyes with IGS after phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. None of the patients used treatment before IVD or TN. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart (ETDRS), slit-lamp, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, fundus examination, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus florescein angiography were performed to all subjects at baseline, 1, 3 and 6mo.

RESULTS

The mean BCVA of the IVD group was 49.3±6.8, and the mean BCVA of the TN group was 32.9±7.3 ETDRS letters in post-treatment month 6. The mean central macular thickness (CRT) of IVD group was 266.6±53.5 µm and the mean CRT of TN group was 364.9±56.3 µm in post-treatment month 6. Baseline BCVA has correlation with final BCVA in TN group however there was no correlation between baseline BCVA and final BCVA in IVD group.

CONCLUSION

IVD is found to be better than TN in controlling pseudophakic macular edema and improving visual acuity. IVD group also has significantly lower CRT however IOP is not significantly different between two groups in post-treatment month 6.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of two Formulations of Diclofenac Sodium 0.1 % Eyedrops in Controlling Postoperative Inflammation after Cataract Surgery

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of diclofenac sodium 0.1% eyedrops packaged in an Abak multidose container without preservative (Dicloabak) with the reference product, sodium merthiolate-preserved diclofenac sodium 0.1% eyedrops, in controlling postoperative inflammation after cataract surgery.

METHODS

The multicenter, controlled, randomized, single-masked study included 194 patients (Dicloabak 96, preserved diclofenac 98) scheduled to have cataract surgery by phacoemulsification with foldable intraocular lens. All were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively after 1, 7, and 28 days. Postoperative inflammation was measured by the total score of anterior chamber cells and flare. Ocular plin, conjunctival hyperemia and ciliary flush were also assessed. Postoperative patient assessments also included visual acuity, objective tolerance by slit-lamp, fluorescein test, and subjective evaluation of local tolerance.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the total score of flare and cells or the degree of conjunctival hyperemia and ciliary flush at any study visit. Dicloabak was demonstrated to be not inferior to preserved diclofenac at all assessment times. The overall assessment of local tolerance was similar for both study medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Preservative suppression did not alter diclofenac efficacy. Results support the good safety profile of both formulations when dosed three times daily for 4 weeks in absence of concomitant use of drugs potentially toxic for cornea. Preservative-free formulations like Dicloabak should be preferred to generic diclofenac formulations including other ingredients and may improve the safety profile of this topical nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drug.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs versus corticosteroids for controlling inflammation after uncomplicated cataract surgery

BACKGROUND

Cataract is a leading cause of blindness worldwide. Cataract surgery is commonly performed but can result in postoperative inflammation of the eye. Inadequately controlled inflammation increases the risk of complications. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticosteroids are used to prevent and reduce inflammation following cataract surgery, but these two drug classes work by different mechanisms. Corticosteroids are effective, but NSAIDs may provide an additional benefit to reduce inflammation when given in combination with corticosteroids. A comparison of NSAIDs to corticosteroids alone or combination therapy with these two anti-inflammatory agents will help to determine the role of NSAIDs in controlling inflammation after routine cataract surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of topical NSAIDs (alone or in combination with topical corticosteroids) versus topical corticosteroids alone in controlling intraocular inflammation after uncomplicated phacoemulsification. To assess postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), patient-reported discomfort, symptoms, or complications (such as elevation of IOP), and cost-effectiveness with the use of postoperative NSAIDs or corticosteroids.

SEARCH METHODS

To identify studies relevant to this review, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register (2016, Issue 12), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to December 2016), Embase Ovid (1947 to 16 December 2016), PubMed (1948 to December 2016), LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database) (1982 to 16 December 2016), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com; last searched 17 June 2013), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov; searched December 2016), and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en; searched December 2016).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which participants were undergoing phacoemulsification for uncomplicated cataract extraction. We included both trials in which topical NSAIDs were compared with topical corticosteroids and trials in which combination therapy (topical NSAIDs and corticosteroids) was compared with topical corticosteroids alone. The primary outcomes for this review were inflammation and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the full-text articles, extracted data from included trials, and assessed included trials for risk of bias according to Cochrane standards. The two review authors resolved any disagreements by discussion. We graded the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

This review included 48 RCTs conducted in 17 different countries and two ongoing studies. Ten included studies had a trial registry record. Fifteen studies compared an NSAID with a corticosteroid alone, and 19 studies compared a combination of an NSAID plus a corticosteroid with a corticosteroid alone. Fourteen other studies had more than two study arms. Overall, we judged the studies to be at unclear risk of bias. NSAIDs alone versus corticosteroids aloneNone of the included studies reported postoperative intraocular inflammation in terms of cells and flare as a dichotomous variable. Inflammation was reported as a continuous variable in seven studies. There was moderate-certainty evidence of no difference in mean cell value in the participants receiving an NSAID compared with the participants receiving a corticosteroid (mean difference (MD) -0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.19 to 0.99), and there was low-certainty evidence that the mean flare value was lower in the group receiving NSAIDs (MD -13.74, 95% CI -21.45 to -6.04). Only one study reported on corneal edema at one week postoperatively and there was uncertainty as to whether the risk of edema was higher or lower in the group that received NSAIDs (risk ratio (RR) 0.77, 95% CI 0.26 to 2.29). No included studies reported BCVA as a dichotomous outcome and no study reported time to cessation of treatment. None of the included studies reported the proportion of eyes with cystoid macular edema (CME) at one week postoperatively. Based on four RCTs that reported CME at one month, we found low-certainty evidence that participants treated with an NSAID alone had a lower risk of developing CME compared with those treated with a corticosteroid alone (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.41). No studies reported on other adverse events or economic outcomes. NSAIDs plus corticosteroids versus corticosteroids aloneNo study described intraocular inflammation in terms of cells and flare as a dichotomous variable and there was not enough continuous data for anterior chamber cell and flare to perform a meta-analysis. One study reported presence of corneal edema at various times. Postoperative treatment with neither a combination treatment with a NSAID plus corticosteroid or with corticosteroid alone was favored (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.16). We judged this study to have high risk of reporting bias, and the certainty of the evidence was downgraded to moderate. No included study reported the proportion of participants with BCVA better than 20/40 at one week postoperatively or reported time to cessation of treatment. Only one included study reported on the presence of CME at one week after surgery and one study reported on CME at two weeks after surgery. After combining findings from these two studies, we estimated with low-certainty evidence that there was a lower risk of CME in the group that received NSAIDs plus corticosteroids (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.97). Seven RCTs reported the proportion of participants with CME at one month postoperatively; however there was low-certainty evidence of a lower risk of CME in participants receiving an NSAID plus a corticosteroid compared with those receiving a corticosteroid alone (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.06). The few adverse events reported were due to phacoemulsification rather than the eye drops.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found insufficient evidence from this review to inform practice for treatment of postoperative inflammation after uncomplicated phacoemulsification. Based on the RCTs included in this review, we could not conclude the equivalence or superiority of NSAIDs with or without corticosteroids versus corticosteroids alone. There may be some risk reduction of CME in the NSAID-alone group and the combination of NSAID plus corticosteroid group. Future RCTs on these interventions should standardize the type of medication used, dosing, and treatment regimen; data should be collected and presented using the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) outcome measures so that dichotomous outcomes can be analyzed.

Prophylactic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the prevention of macular oedema after cataract surgery

BACKGROUND

Macular oedema (MO) is the accumulation of extracellular fluid in the central retina (the macula). It may occur after cataract surgery and may give rise to poor visual outcome, with reduced visual acuity and distortion of the central vision. MO is often self-limiting with spontaneous resolution, but a small proportion of people with chronic persistent MO may be difficult to treat. Chronic oedema may lead to the formation of cystic spaces in the retina termed 'cystoid macular oedema' (CMO). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used in cataract surgery and may reduce the chances of developing MO.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review is to answer the question: is there evidence to support the prophylactic use of topical NSAIDs either in addition to, or instead of, topical steroids postoperatively to reduce the incidence of macular oedema (MO) and associated visual morbidity.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched a number of electronic databases including CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase. Date last searched 2 September 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which adult participants had undergone surgery for age-related cataract. We included participants irrespective of their baseline risk of MO, in particular we included people with diabetes and uveitis. We included trials of preoperative and/or postoperative topical NSAIDs in conjunction with postoperative topical steroids. The comparator was postoperative topical steroids alone. A secondary comparison was preoperative and/or postoperative topical NSAIDs alone versus postoperative topical steroids alone.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and extracted data using standard methods expected by Cochrane. We pooled data using a random-effects model. We graded the certainty of the evidence using GRADE and considered the following: risk of bias of included studies, precision of the effect estimate, consistency of effects between studies, directness of the outcome measure and publication bias.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 34 studies that were conducted in the Americas, Europe, the Eastern Mediterranean region and South-East Asia. Over 5000 people were randomised in these trials. The majority of studies enrolled one eye per participant; a small subset (4 trials) enrolled a proportion of people with bilateral surgery. Twenty-eight studies compared NSAIDs plus steroids with steroids alone. Six studies compared NSAIDs with steroids. A variety of NSAIDs were used, including ketorolac, diclofenac, nepafenac, indomethacin, bromfenac, flurbiprofen and pranopfen. Follow-up ranged from one to 12 months. In general, the studies were poorly reported. We did not judge any of the studies at low risk of bias in all domains. Six studies were funded by industry, seven studies were funded from non-industry sources, and the rest of the studies did not report the source of funding.There was low-certainty evidence that people receiving topical NSAIDs in combination with steroids may have a lower risk of poor vision due to MO at three months after cataract surgery compared with people receiving steroids alone (risk ratio (RR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23 to 0.76; eyes = 1360; studies = 5; I2 = 5%). We judged this to be low-certainty evidence because of risk of bias in the included studies and indirectness, as the extent of visual loss was not always clear. Only one study reported poor vision due to MO at 12 months and we judged this to be very low-certainty evidence as there were only two events. Quality of life was only reported in one of the 34 studies comparing NSAIDs plus steroids versus steroids alone, and it was not fully reported, other than to comment on lack of differences between groups. There was evidence of a reduced risk of MO with NSAIDs at three months after surgery, but we judged this to be low-certainty due to risk of bias and publication bias (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.49; eyes = 3638; studies = 21). There was inconsistent evidence on central retinal thickness at three months (I2 = 87%). Results ranged from -30.9 µm in favour of NSAIDs plus steroids to 7.44 µm in favour of steroids alone. Similarly, data on best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were inconsistent, but nine out of 10 trials reporting this outcome found between-group differences in visual acuity of less than 0.1 logMAR.None of the six studies comparing NSAIDs alone with steroids reported on poor vision due to MO at three or 12 months. There was low-certainty evidence that central retinal thickness was lower in the NSAIDs group at three months (mean difference (MD) -22.64 µm, 95% CI -38.86 to -6.43; eyes = 121; studies = 2). Five studies reported on MO and showed a reduced risk with NSAIDs, but we judged this evidence to be of low-certainty (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.41; eyes = 520). Three studies reported BCVA at three months and the results of these trials were inconsistent, but all three studies found differences of less than 0.1 logMAR between groups.We did not note any major adverse events - the main consistent observation was burning or stinging sensation with the use of NSAIDs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Using topical NSAIDs may reduce the risk of developing macular oedema after cataract surgery, although it is possible that current estimates as to the size of this reduction are exaggerated. It is unclear the extent to which this reduction has an impact on the visual function and quality of life of patients. There is little evidence to suggest any important effect on vision after surgery. The value of adding topical NSAIDs to steroids, or using them as an alternative to topical steroids, with a view to reducing the risk of poor visual outcome after cataract surgery is therefore uncertain. Future trials should address the remaining clinical uncertainty of whether prophylactic topical NSAIDs are of benefit, particularly with respect to longer-term follow-up (at least to 12 months), and should be large enough to detect reduction in the risk of the outcome of most interest to patients, which is chronic macular oedema leading to visual loss.

Once-daily nepafenac ophthalmic suspension 0.3% to prevent and treat ocular inflammation and pain after cataract surgery: phase 3 study

PURPOSE

To evaluate once-daily nepafenac 0.3% to prevent and treat ocular pain and inflammation after cataract surgery.

SETTING

Sixty-five centers in the United States and Europe.

DESIGN

Randomized double-masked vehicle- and active-controlled phase 3 study.

METHODS

Patients received nepafenac 0.3% once daily, nepafenac 0.1% 3 times daily, or their respective vehicles from day -1 to day 14 after cataract extraction. An additional drop of study drug was administered 30 to 120 minutes preoperatively. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with a cure for inflammation (score of 0 for both aqueous cells and flare) at day 14.

RESULTS

Of randomized patients, 817 received nepafenac 0.3%, 819 received nepafenac 0.1%, and 200 and 206 received the respective vehicles. Significantly more nepafenac 0.3% patients had no inflammation (68.4% versus 34.0%) and were pain free (91.0% versus 49.7%) at day 14 than vehicle patients (both P<.0001). Nepafenac 0.3% was noninferior to nepafenac 0.1% for inflammation (95% confidence interval [CI], -5.73% to 3.17%) and pain-free rates (95% CI, -3.08% to 2.70%). At all postoperative visits, fewer treatment failures (P≤.0012) and more clinical successes (P ≤ .0264) were observed with nepafenac 0.3% versus vehicle. Nepafenac 0.3% was well tolerated and had a safety profile comparable to that of nepafenac 0.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily nepafenac 0.3% was noninferior to nepafenac 0.1% 3 times daily for prevention and treatment of ocular inflammation and pain following cataract surgery. The safety of nepafenac 0.3% was comparable to that of nepafenac 0.1%, with the added convenience of once-daily dosing.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Drs. Modi, Lehmann, Walters, Fong, Christie, Roel, Nethery, and Reiser have been paid consultants to Alcon Research, Ltd. Ms. Sager is an employee of Alcon Research, Ltd. Drs. Tsorbatzoglou, Philipson, and Traverso have no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Efficacy and safety of indomethacin 0.1% eye drops compared with ketorolac 0.5% eye drops in the management of ocular inflammation after cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To determine whether indomethacin 0.1% eye drops are at least as effective as ketorolac 0.5% eye drops in treating ocular inflammation following cataract surgery.

METHODS

Prospective, multicenter, investigator-masked, parallel-group, randomized, active-controlled clinical trial. Cataract patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive indomethacin or ketorolac administered QID for 3 weeks beginning 1 day before surgery. The primary end-point was aqueous flare measured by laser flare meter at postoperative Days 1 and 7. Secondary end-points included retinal thickness, slit lamp and funduscopic examinations and postsurgical pain ratings. Safety and tolerability were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients were included in the per protocol population (n = 43 per treatment group). Indomethacin was found non-inferior to ketorolac for comparison of aqueous flare at postoperative Days 1 and 7 (Day 1: 95% CI: -2.37, 5.50; non-inferiority upper margin, 15 ph/ms and Day 7: 95% CI: -7.83, -0.94; non-inferiority upper margin, 8 ph/ms) and statistically better than ketorolac at Day 7 (p = 0.013). There were no significant between-group differences in aqueous flare and change from baseline in retinal thickness at postoperative Days 30 and 90. Indomethacin showed a higher subjective tolerance rating than ketorolac at postoperative Days 7 and 30 (p ≤ 0.044).

CONCLUSION

Indomethacin 0.1% was at least as effective as ketorolac 0.5% at Day 1 and more effective than ketorolac 0.5% at Day 7 in treating ocular inflammation after uncomplicated cataract surgery. Indomethacin was better tolerated than ketorolac. There were no clinically meaningful safety concerns with either treatment.

Repeated anterior chamber fluorophotometric evaluation of the eyes of ophthalmologically normal dogs

OBJECTIVE

To perform repeated anterior chamber fluorophotometry on both eyes of ophthalmologically normal dogs to measure fluorescein concentrations over a 5-day period and identify any change in the degree of anterior chamber fluorescence over time or difference between eyes.

ANIMALS

9 healthy adult dogs (18 eyes).

PROCEDURES

Each dog received an IV injection of 10% fluorescein solution, and anterior chamber fluorophotometry was performed 1 hour later on both eyes. This procedure was repeated at the same time each day for 5 consecutive days.

RESULTS

A significant increase in fluorescein concentration was evident in the anterior chamber on day 5 in the right eye and days 2, 3, 4, and 5 in the left eye. There was no significant difference in concentration between the left and the right eyes on any day.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The increase in ocular fluorescein concentration in the study dogs was unlikely to be of clinical importance and is only pertinent for subsequent research studies. This is a limitation that should be considered when reporting fluorophotometry data as fluorescein concentration or as change in fluorescein concentration from baseline.

Effect of bromfenac ophthalmic solution on ocular inflammation following cataract surgery

PURPOSE

This study compared the post-cataract surgery anti-inflammatory effects of topical treatment with 0.1% bromfenac, 0.1% betamethasone or both on postoperative anterior chamber inflammation and corneal swelling.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients with no eye disease other than cataract were enrolled in a prospective, randomized study to undergo phacoemulsification combined with intraocular lens implantation. After cataract surgery, patients were randomized to treatment with bromfenac, betamethasone or both agents. Twenty-five eyes were assigned to bromfenac, 23 to betamethasone and 24 to the combined treatment group. Inflammatory reactions in the anterior chamber were measured with laser flare photometry preoperatively and at 1 and 3 days, 1 and 2 weeks, and 1 and 2 months postoperatively. Intraocular pressure (IOP) and corneal thickness were measured at the same time-points. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured preoperatively and at 2 days, 1 and 2 weeks, and 1 and 2 months postoperatively. Specular microscope endothelial photography of the central region of the cornea was performed preoperatively and at 3 months after surgery.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences among the bromfenac, betamethasone and combined treatment groups in BCVA, IOP, aqueous flare or corneal thickness. Cystoid macular oedema was present in one eye treated with betamethasone.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in anti-inflammatory effects among the three treatments. These findings suggest that bromfenac is as effective as betamethasone in minimizing inflammatory reactions after cataract surgery.

In vitro corneal permeation of diclofenac from oil drops

In vitro transcorneal permeation of diclofenac from oil drops was studied using freshly excised goat cornea. The maximum apparent corneal permeability coefficient (Papp) was obtained with 0.2% (w/v) diclofenac drops in sesame oil followed by safflower oil, while formulation in castor oil provided minimal Papp. The addition of benzyl alcohol, a preservative, in oil drops, increased the Papp value of diclofenac. Partition experiments indicated increased partitioning of diclofenac in the aqueous phase in the presence of benzyl alcohol, and the same could be responsible for the benzyl alcohol-induced increase in Papp. The solubility of diclofenac was higher in castor, arachis, and sunflower oil. But drug permeation from 0.5-1.0% (w/v) diclofenac drops in castor oil or 0.5% (w/v) drops in arachis /sunflower oil was less than that observed with 0.2% (w/v) drops in sesame oil. Thus diclofenac 0.2% (w/v) drops in sesame oil containing 0.5% (v/v) benzyl alcohol provides maximum Papp. The formulation increased corneal hydration indicating corneal damage. Since corneal hydration is less than 83% the damage appears to be reversible. The saturation solubility of diclofenac in sesame oil at 4 degrees C is 0.33% (w/v). Hence diclofenac 0.2% (w/v) solution in sesame oil will not precipitate at 4 degrees C and therefore the chances of crystallization of diclofenac from the formulation due to climatic change leading to physical instability appear to be remote.

The role of NSAIDs in the management of postoperative ophthalmic inflammation

Recent advances in cataract surgery, such as phacoemulsification, small-incision surgery and advances in foldable intraocular lenses, have resulted in the decrease of physical trauma associated with cataract surgery. The decrease in the physical surgical trauma decreases the release of prostaglandins, which are the main players in postoperative ocular inflammation. However, postoperative inflammation continues to be a cause of patient discomfort, delayed recovery and, in some cases, suboptimal visual results. Left untreated, this inflammation might interfere with patients' rehabilitation and/or contribute to the development of other complications, such as cystoid macular oedema.NSAIDs are commercially available, in topical or systemic formulations, for the prophylaxis and treatment of ocular conditions. Topically applied NSAIDs are commonly used in the management and prevention of non-infectious ocular inflammation and cystoid macular oedema following cataract surgery. They are also used in the management of pain following refractive surgery and in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. Despite their chemical heterogeneity, all NSAIDs share the similar therapeutic property of inhibiting the cyclo-oxygenase enzyme. The appeal of using NSAIDs in the treatment of ocular inflammation hinges on the complications associated with corticosteroids, the other commonly used therapy for ophthalmic inflammation.

Effect of adjunctive diclofenac with verteporfin therapy to treat choroidal neovascularization due to age-related macular degeneration: phase II study

BACKGROUND

To determine short-term effects of topical diclofenac administered in conjunction with verteporfin therapy for predominantly classic subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

METHODS

Randomized, multicenter (14), prospective, placebo-controlled, double-masked clinical trial. Patients (n=61) were randomly assigned to treatment with diclofenac sodium ophthalmic solution 0.1% or placebo and followed for 12 weeks. Patients instilled diclofenac or placebo two drops four times daily, 2-4 days before verteporfin treatment until 2 weeks after treatment, then two drops twice daily for 10 weeks. This exploratory study was not powered to detect differences between treatment groups. Statistical analyses were conducted solely to aid interpretation of results.

RESULTS

In diclofenac-treated eyes, mean changes in visual acuity letter score from baseline in the diclofenac and placebo groups were +1.8 letters and -1.0 at week 1 (P=0.505 between groups). Mean visual acuity letter scores decreased in both groups at all subsequent visits, with a mean change at 12 weeks of -7.4 with diclofenac and -2.6 with placebo (P=0.213). Percentages of eyes with stable or improved vision (change <or=4 or increase >or=5 letters) were similar in the diclofenac and placebo groups at all study visits. No significant between-group differences in changes from baseline in lesion area, greatest linear dimension (GLD), fluorescein leakage, or retinal thickness were detected.

CONCLUSION

In patients with predominantly classic subfoveal CNV due to AMD, administration of topical diclofenac with verteporfin therapy was associated with similar vision outcomes to placebo plus verteporfin therapy.

Effect of formulation factors on in-vitro permeation of diclofenac from experimental and marketed aqueous eye drops through excised goat cornea

The effect of formulation factors on permeation of diclofenac from some experimental and marketed aqueous eye drops through excised goat cornea was evaluated. Raising the pH of formulation from 6.0 to 8.0 or diclofenac concentration from 0.05 to 0.15% (w/v) or adjusting tonicity with mannitol or addition of viscolizing agent decreased apparent permeability coefficient (Papp). Formulation (pH 7.4) containing sodium metabisulfite or EDTA or combination of methyl and propyl paraben showed significantly (p<0.05) higher Papp whereas benzalkonium chloride (BAC) had no effect and sorbic acid (SA) had reduced permeation. Surprisingly marketed drops containing BAC or SA, showed significantly (p<0.05) higher Papp and decreased in the order of Difen>Voveran>NSAID>Dicol>Diclolab. Lower pH (7.1-7.3) and surface tension of drops indicating presence of surfactant, could mediate increased permeation and presence of buffer could cause irritation on in vivo instillation. The marketed formulations showed corneal hydration >83% suggesting corneal damaging potential.

Anti-inflammatory effects of topical ocular MAXIDEX® administration to rabbits following vitrectomy or lensectomy

We conducted a series of surgical studies (n=155) to find out the possible utility of the Dutch Belted rabbits as an ocular test model. Following either vitrectomy (n=59) or lensectomy (n=96) studies using either BSS or BSS Plus, we characterized the corresponding magnitude and duration of inflammatory response of selected endpoints over a one-week period. Preoperative Dutch Belted rabbits served as controls for baseline determination (n=27). Inflammatory endpoints included clinical inflammation, blood aqueous barrier (BAB) changes measured by particle-scatter and fluorophotometry, corneal edema, and prostaglandin-E2 (PGE2). Topical ocular 0.1% dexamethasone (MAXIDEX) served as a positive treatment group. We compared the inflammatory features (treated and untreated) to determine significance. Using either irrigating solution, the endpoints (n=101) were shown increased in both models. While the clinical scores were similar following both types of surgery (ns; p=0.51), the lensectomy study caused a more marked effect on corneal edema (p=0.0004) and PGE2 production (p=0.002) compared with the vitrectomy study. After the lensectomy procedure, BSS Plus (n=52) compared with BSS (n=24) showed a significant improvement (p=0.004) of clinical score during the recovery phase. Further improvement was gained over BSS Plus (n=52) using MAXIDEX treatment. Topical MAXIDEX (lensectomy, n=20/group; vitrectomy, n=12/group) reduced clinical score (p<0.001), decreased BAB breakdown to fluorescein (p<0.01), lessened particle flare (p<0.05), inhibited aqueous PGE2 levels (p<0.001), and reduced corneal edema (p=0.01) in the lensectomy group. The use of the rabbit model offers a convenient test to identify therapeutic agents that could lessen ocular complications after these common ocular surgeries.

Intérêt d’une nouvelle formulation de diclofénac sans conservateur pour la surface oculaire

AIM

To compare the ocular tolerance of nonpreserved diclofenac versus thiomersal-preserved diclofenac in healthy volunteers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty healthy volunteers instilled Dicloabak in the randomised eye and thiomersal-preserved diclofenac in the other eye, according to a strictly identical dosing regimen, for 28 days. Each volunteer thus served as his or her own control. The dose regimen was five drops/day for 7 days followed by three drops/day for 20 days. Ocular tolerance was assessed by the discomfort upon instillation (measured on a visual analogue scale [VAS]), subjective ocular symptoms following instillation (irritation/burning/stinging, eye dryness and foreign body sensation) and finally by an objective examination of the ocular surface. These criteria were evaluated on days 0, 14, 21 and 28.

RESULTS

The subjective ocular symptoms following instillation were significantly lower in the nonpreserved group at Day 7 and nearly significantly lower until the end of the study. The biomicroscopy exam confirmed that there was better tolerance without thiomersal. There was less follicular-papillary conjunctivitis and a significantly better lissamine green score in the Dicloabak group.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study demonstrate that the nonpreserved formulation of diclofenac is better tolerated by the ocular surface and thus constitutes a therapeutic benefit.

Posterior capsule opacification after phacoemulsification in patients with postoperative steroidal and nonsteroidal treatment

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of dexamethasone, diclofenac, and a placebo given for 3 weeks after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation on the formation of posterior capsule opacification (PCO).

SETTING

St. Erik's Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

METHODS

In a 2-year prospective randomized double-blind study, a laser flare meter was used to measure aqueous flare intensity preoperatively and 3 days, 2 weeks, and 2 years after phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. Posterior capsule opacification was evaluated 2 years postoperatively using retroillumination images taken with a Scheimpflug camera. The Evaluation of Posterior Capsule Opacification system was used to score the areas of PCO density.

RESULTS

The median rate of PCO 2 years after phacoemulsification was 0.72 (range 0.32 to 1.57) in the dexamethasone group, 0.78 (range 0.19 to 2.14) in the diclofenac group, and 0.70 (range 0.35 to 1.70) in the placebo group. The differences were not statistically significant (P>.05; Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance, multiple comparisons). The rate of neodymium:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy during the 2 years after surgery was not statistically different between groups (P>.05, chi-square test). There was no correlation (Spearman rank coefficient) between laser flare measurements and PCO formation in any group during the study (P>.05).

CONCLUSION

Topical instillation of diclofenac, dexamethasone, or a placebo in the immediate period after phacoemulsification and IOL implantation did not seem to influence the formation of PCO 2 years after cataract surgery.

Effectiveness and tolerance of piroxicam 0.5% and diclofenac sodium 0.1% in controlling inflammation after cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and tolerance of piroxicam 0.5% ophthalmic solution and diclofenac sodium 0.1% ophthalmic solution in controlling inflammation after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

SETTING

Ophthalmological Department, San Donà di Piave Hospital, Venice, Italy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty consecutive patients--18 men and 22 women--between 55 and 85 years of age (mean age, 75.1 +/- 7.12 years) who were scheduled for cataract extraction with phacoemulsification and IOL implantation were randomized to receive 0.5% piroxicam ophthalmic solution (piroxicam group, 20 patients) or 0.1% diclofenac sodium ophthalmic solution (diclofenac group, 20 patients) for 1 month postoperatively. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements and slit-lamp biomicroscopy for the evaluation of corneal edema, Descemet membrane folds, Tyndall, and cells in the anterior chamber were carried out in all patients 1 day, 4 days, and 1 month postoperatively. Subjective symptoms after the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) ophthalmic solution instillation were assessed using a questionnaire.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups in postoperative IOP, BCVA, anterior chamber flare and cell levels, corneal edema, or Descemet membrane folds. Ocular discomfort, evaluated as burning or stinging sensation after NSAID ophthalmic solution instillation, was significantly more frequent and intense in the diclofenac-treated eyes. Two eyes in the diclofenac group had a mild transient punctate keratitis.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that piroxicam is as effective as diclofenac sodium in preventing inflammation after cataract surgery with IOL implantation, and its better tolerance and safety can provide higher patient compliance.

Effects of dexamethasone, diclofenac, or placebo on the inflammatory response after cataract surgery

AIM

To compare the inflammatory response after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation using postoperative treatment with dexamethasone, diclofenac, or placebo.

METHODS

A prospective, randomised, controlled double masked study including 180 patients enrolled for cataract surgery. The patients were 64-85 years old and had no eye disease other than cataract. After phacoemulsification and IOL implantation the patients were randomised to topical treatment with dexamethasone phosphate 0.1% (group I), diclofenac sodium 0.1% (group II), or placebo (saline 0.9%) (group III). The drops were administered four times daily during the first week and twice daily during the second, third, and fourth weeks. The inflammatory reaction in the anterior chamber was measured with laser flare photometry preoperatively and 1, 3, and 8 days, 2 and 4 weeks, 2 and 6 months, and 1, 2, and 4 years postoperatively. Inflammatory symptoms were registered. Biomicroscopy and visual acuity determinations were performed. The rate of Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomies after 2 and 4 years was determined.

RESULTS

After 3 and 8 days (p <0.0001), 2 weeks (p <0.0001), and 1 month (p = 0.0013) median flare was highest in group III. There were no significant differences between group I and II. Inflammatory symptoms and striate keratopathy were more common in group III.

CONCLUSION

Dexamethasone and diclofenac were equally effective in reducing postoperative inflammation after phacoemulsification and IOL implantation in eyes with no other disease than cataract. Both substances were more effective than placebo.

Prostaglandins and cystoid macular edema

This review discusses the roles and interactions of prostaglandins and other possible chemical mediators in cystoid macular edema. Prostaglandins have been studied as a potential causative factor of cystoid macular edema following cataract/intraocular lens surgery. The authors' hypothesis and data with regard to the mechanisms of postoperative cystoid macular edema and other inflammatory conditions are presented. The effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which are antagonists of prostaglandin biosynthesis, on postoperative inflammatory conditions including cystoid macular edema are also reviewed. Lastly, a mechanism for the induction of cystoid macular edema by anti-glaucoma eyedrops, including prostaglandin analogs is proposed. The results from two clinical trials recently conducted by the authors suggest that the preservative rather than the active ingredient is the causative factor.

Calorimetric studies of diclofenac sodium in aqueous solution of cyclodextrin and water-ethanol mixtures

The technique of solution calorimetry has been employed to study the interaction between diclofenac sodium and beta-cyclodextrin by determining the enthalpies of solution of the drug in water and in aqueous beta-cyclodextrin solution. Thermodynamic parameters characterizing the binding process such as enthalpy deltaH0, equilibrium constant K, free energy deltaG0 and entropy deltaS0 have been calculated to be 12.00 kJ mol(-1), 1670 dm3 mol(-1), -19.03kJ mol(-1) and 22.98 J K(-1) mol(-1), respectively. Enthalpies of solution of diclofenac sodium have also been determined in water-ethanol mixtures.

Comparative evaluation of corneal epithelial permeability after the use of diclofenac 0.1% and flurbiprofen 0.03% after phacoemulsification

PURPOSE

To assess the corneal epithelial function after prolonged topical administration of diclofenac 0.1% and flurbiprofen 0.03% single-dose eyedrops.

SETTING

University Eye Clinic of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.

METHODS

This randomized prospective study comprised 24 patients scheduled for phacoemulsification. The patients were randomly assigned to receive diclofenac or flurbiprofen eyedrops for 2 months after surgery. Corneal epithelial permeability was determined by fluorophotometry 7, 37, and 67 days after surgery.

RESULTS

An increase in corneal epithelial permeability was observed in the diclofenac group 37 and 67 days after surgery. No epithelial function alterations occurred in the flurbiprofen group.

CONCLUSIONS

Subclinical impairment of the epithelial function was observed during topical treatment with diclofenac 0.1% single-dose eyedrops after phacoemulsification. The mechanism responsible for this effect remains unknown.

Efficacy of diclofenac versus dexamethasone for treatment after strabismus surgery

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of topical diclofenac sodium 0.1% versus dexamethasone 0.1% on the conjunctival healing process and on intraocular pressure (IOP) after strabismus surgery.

DESIGN

A randomized clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty consecutive pediatric patients who underwent strabismus surgery.

INTERVENTION

The patients were assigned before surgery to receive topical diclofenac 0.1% (study group, 20 patients) or dexamethasone 0.1% (control group, 20 patients) from immediately after surgery to up to 4 weeks after surgery (both combined with chloramphenicol 0.2%, polymyxin B sulfate 2500 U).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Between-group comparison of five parameters: patient discomfort, conjunctival chemosis, inflammation, gap, and intraocular pressure (IOP) at 1, 2, and 4 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

At postoperative week 2, the diclofenac-treated group showed significantly less patient discomfort and less conjunctival inflammation, edema, and gap than the dexamethasone group (P: = 0.003, P: = 0.04, P: = 0.02, P: = 0. 001, respectively). At week 4, the study patients continued to show less discomfort and conjunctival gap (P: = 0.02). The dexamethasone group showed a significant change in IOP between the preoperative and the fourth postoperative week (P: = 0.001 in the right eye, P: = 0.0005 in the left eye) and an increased prevalence of higher IOP during the fourth postoperative week (P: = 0.01 in the right eye, P: = 0.02 in the left eye). Thirty-eight percent of the dexamethasone group showed an increase in IOP to more than 21 mmHg during the four postoperative weeks. No increase in IOP was noted in the diclofenac group.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical diclofenac is superior to dexamethasone for each of the five postoperative parameters examined. Its maximal effect occurred at 2 weeks after surgery, without an increase in IOP or in local subconjunctival hemorrhage.

Topical indomethacin solution versus dexamethasone solution for treatment of inflamed pterygium and pinguecula: a prospective randomized clinical study

PURPOSE

To compare the effect of topical indomethacin 0.1% solution with the effect of topical dexamethasone 0.1% phosphate solution on signs and symptoms of inflamed pterygium and pinguecula.

METHODS

Of 50 consecutive patients who had inflamed pterygia (n = 17) or pingueculae (n = 33), met the study criteria, and signed an informed consent, one eye of each patient was evaluated in a comparative, prospective, randomized, double-masked, controlled study. Objective signs (conjunctival congestion, redness and edema, and staining of cornea) and subjective complaints (photophobia, pain, foreign-body sensation, discomfort, and tearing) were evaluated and scored. We also evaluated "total signs," "total symptoms," and "total score." Group 1 (n = 25) received topical indomethacin 0.1% solution, and group 2 (n = 25) received a topical dexamethasone phosphate 0.1% solution six times daily for 3 days, then four times daily over the following 11 days. Patients were examined before treatment, on days 3, 7, and 14 after the treatment was initiated, and 2 and 4 weeks after the treatment was discontinued.

RESULTS

In both groups, the scores for "total signs," "total symptoms," and "total score" were significantly lower (P = .001) by day 14. There were no differences between groups 1 and 2 for "total signs," "total symptoms," and "total score" at days 3, 7, and 14 (P = .07 to P = .88). After treatment was discontinued, the dexamethasone-treated group experienced a significantly greater recurrence of "total signs" (P = .023 at day 30, P = .02 at day 45), but there was no statistically significant difference in "total symptoms" and "total score." Patients in group 2 reported more stinging after drops were administered than patients in group 1 (P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that topical indomethacin 0.1% solution is as effective as topical dexamethasone phosphate 0.1% solution for the treatment of inflamed pterygium and pinguecula and, therefore, is suggested as an effective treatment for these conditions.

Double-masked, placebo-controlled evaluation of loteprednol etabonate 0.5% for postoperative inflammation. Loteprednol Etabonate Post-operative Inflammation Study Group 1

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of loteprednol etabonate 0.5% with those of a placebo (vehicle) in controlling anterior chamber cell and flare reaction in patients having cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

METHODS

This randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-group multicenter study comprised patients who exhibited a minimum anterior chamber inflammation (ACI) score (sum of cell and flare reaction) of 3 (0 to 9 scale) on the day after cataract removal with posterior chamber IOL implantation. All 227 patients received loteprednol etabonate 0.5% or the placebo 4 times a day in the operated eye for up to 14 days after surgery. Five patients without valid on-treatment follow-up visits were not evaluated for efficacy.

RESULTS

By the final visit, the ACI had resolved in 64% (70/109) of patients in the loteprednol etabonate group and 29% (33/113) of those in the placebo group (P < .001). The resolution rate and mean change from baseline of the individual components of ACI (cell and flare), as well as other signs and symptoms, was better in the loteprednol etabonate group. Both treatments were well tolerated. Among the 53 patients who did not complete the study, 34 (29%) were placebo patients discontinued for inadequate anti-inflammatory effect. The treatment failure rate and the time course of failures were lower in the loteprednol etabonate group; the differences were clinically meaningful and statistically significant (P < .001). Three patients in the loteprednol etabonate group had an intraocular pressure elevation of 10 mm Hg or more over the preoperative screening value.

CONCLUSION

Loteprednol etabonate 0.5% led to a clinically meaningful reduction in the signs and symptoms of postoperative ACI and had an acceptable safety profile when compared with a placebo.

Corneal penetration of diclofenac from a fixed combination of diclofenac-gentamicin eyedrops

PURPOSE

To establish the corneal penetration of diclofenac in the presence of gentamicin in patients having cataract surgery.

SETTING

Kantonsspital Augenklinik, Aarau, and Hôpital Jules Gonin, Lausanne, Switzerland.

METHODS

Eligible patients having cataract surgery (39 women, 30 men) were treated with 4 drops of diclofenac 0.1%-gentamicin 0.3% (Voltamicin) instilled at 20 minute intervals. Paracentesis was performed 15, 30, or 60 minutes after the last instillation, and a sample of aqueous humor was collected for analysis of diclofenac by high-performance liquid chromatography. Blood samples of some patients were obtained before surgery for analysis.

RESULTS

Mean diclofenac levels (+/- SD) in the aqueous humor 15, 30, and 60 minutes after the last instillation were 72 +/- 84, 108 +/- 87, and 201 +/- 116 ng/mL (= 682 nMol/L), respectively. Diclofenac remained below the limit of detection (5 ng/mL) in all samples of blood serum. In general, local tolerance was good; no side effects were reported. Comparison of the data with published results of topically instilled diclofenac 0.1% suggests that the concentration of diclofenac in the aqueous humor achieved with 4 instillations of the combination product is similar to that achieved with 8 instillations of diclofenac 0.1% (Voltaren Ophtha) alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug levels of diclofenac in the aqueous humor well above IC-50 for cyclo-oxygenase were achieved with the regimen applied. No inhibitory effect by the gentamicin or vehicle was observed. Comparison of these data with published results of Voltaren Ophtha implies a 2-fold better penetration of diclofenac with the diclofenac-gentamicin combination.

A randomized clinical trial of the nonsteroidal eyedrop diclofenac after strabismus surgery

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects of topical diclofenac sodium 0.1% (Voltaren) with prednisolone sodium phosphate 1% ophthalmic solution after strabismus surgery.

DESIGN

A prospective, double-masked, randomized, two-center clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty eyes of 52 patients undergoing strabismus surgery were examined.

INTERVENTION

For 1 week after surgery, the eye that was operated on received one drop of either diclofenac or prednisolone four times a day.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The diclofenac- and prednisolone-treated eyes were compared on postoperative days 3 and 7 with respect to signs of inflammation (e.g., erythema, edema, discharge), patient comfort, and conjunctival incisional healing.

RESULTS

On postoperative day 7, in eyes that received prednisolone, the conjunctival defects were larger (P = 0.004) and more frequent (P = 0.02). For all subjects, despite adequate statistical power, there was no statistically significant difference in inflammatory scores between eyes that received diclofenac or prednisolone. In cases of bilateral surgery, however, there was less postoperative erythema and edema in the diclofenac-treated eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

In the first week after strabismus surgery, topical diclofenac proved at least as effective as prednisolone in controlling inflammation and discomfort with less delay in incisional wound healing. Topical diclofenac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent, may be considered for use after strabismus surgery in place of corticosteroids.

Systemic diclofenac sodium to maintain mydriasis during phacoemulsification

PURPOSE

To determine whether systemic diclofenac sodium affects the maintenance of mydriasis during phacoemulsification and to compare pupil diameter regression rates with those in a control group.

SETTING

An ophthalmic unit of a National Health Service Trust Hospital in the United Kingdom.

METHOD

A prospective, randomized control study of 100 patients presenting for cataract surgery was undertaken. Both groups were administered an identical mydriatic regime commencing 1 hour before surgery. In addition, the diclofenac group (n = 48) received 50 mg of oral diclofenac sodium 1 hour before surgery. Both the control (n = 52) and diclofenac groups had phacoemulsification by one experienced surgeon using a standard technique. The surgeon was masked as to which group the patient belonged. The irrigating fluid in all cases contained adrenaline. Pupil diameter was measured at five stages during surgery and recorded along with the times relative to the start of the procedure.

RESULTS

Mean pupil diameter in the diclofenac group was slightly larger than in the control group, but the difference was not significant. Although mean pupil diameter at the start of surgery was 0.4 mm greater in the diclofenac group, the slopes of regression in pupil diameters were virtually identical between the first three stages of surgery, after which a slight reversal occurred in both groups. The slope of regression of mydriasis was small in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Systemic diclofenac sodium 50 mg given orally 1 hour before surgery did not significantly inhibit miosis when compared with a control group. Regression rates of pupil mydriasis were small in both groups.

Effect of heparin in irrigating solution on inflammation following small incision cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To study the effect of heparin-sodium added to the irrigating solution on postoperative inflammation in patients having cataract surgery.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients having phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation were randomly assigned to receive regular irrigating solution or solution with heparin-sodium (final diluted concentration 10 IU/mL). In half the patients, poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) IOLs were implanted and in half, foldable silicone IOLs. The patients were examined preoperatively, on days 1 and 3, and 1 year postoperatively. Postoperative inflammation was objectively evaluated by measurement of flare and cells using laser flare-cell photometry.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative flare values were significantly lower in the groups with additional heparin-sodium at days 1 and 3 (P < . 01). Flare values were not significantly different 1 year postoperatively. Cell values for the heparin-treated groups were lower, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Flare and cells values for the two IOL materials were not significantly different during the entire follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Heparin-sodium added to the infusion solution during small incision cataract surgery reduced inflammation in the early postoperative period.

Efficacy of diclofenac eyedrops in preventing postoperative inflammation and long-term cystoid macular edema. Italian Diclofenac Study Group

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and tolerance of diclofenac 0.1% eyedrops with a regimen that included a brief course of steroids in the treatment of postoperative inflammation after extracapsular cataract surgery and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. A second objective was to compare the efficacy of diclofenac 0.1% eyedrops in the same patients and control group in preventing cystoid macular edema (CME).

SETTING

Eight university/hospital centers and one company in Italy.

METHODS

The multicenter, controlled, randomized, prospective, double-blind study included 281 patients. All were evaluated at baseline, at surgery, and after 1, 5, 36, 67, and 140 days. Postoperative inflammation was measured by the clinical assessment of inflammation: conjunctival hyperemia, ciliary flush, Tyndall effect, and cells in the anterior chamber. Fluorescein angiography was performed to evaluate the presence/absence of CME before surgery and after 36 and 140 days.

RESULTS

During follow-up, no differences in intraoperative pressure were observed within or between groups or between operated and fellow eyes. No statistically significant between-group differences in postoperative inflammation were found. After 36 days, angiographic CME was found in 9 patients (6.43%) in the diclofenac group and 20 (15.15%) in the control group (P = .033) with a relative risk for developing CME of 0.40 (CI95 0.19 to 0.84). At the end of follow-up, it was found in 4 patients in the diclofenac group (3.31%) and 10 (9.26%) in the control group (P = .05) with a relative risk of 0.36 (CI95 0.12 to 0.90).

CONCLUSION

Diclofenac sodium was as effective as the control regimen in controlling postoperative inflammation after cataract surgery. It also had a protective effect on the development of angiographic CME after 36 and 140 days.

Efficacy and safety of combined diclofenac 0.1% and gentamicin 0.3% eyedrops after phacoemulsification

PURPOSE

To study the efficacy of combined diclofenac 0.1% and gentamicin 0.3% (Digen) eyedrops to treat postoperative inflammation and prevent ocular infection in eyes having phacoemulsification.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Milan, San Paolo Hospital, Milan; Eye Clinic, University of Verona; and Department of Ophthalmology, University of Palermo, Italy.

METHODS

This double-masked, randomized, clinical trial comprised 90 patients; 45 received Digen and 45, gentamicin 0.3% eyedrops. The main outcome measure of the study was the reduction in signs and symptoms of inflammation, graded on a four-point scale. Also assessed were the presence of bacteria in the conjunctival swab and the proportion of patients requiring additional medication.

RESULTS

Digen was more effective in reducing postoperative inflammation than gentamicin alone (P < .01). No statistically significant between-group difference was found regarding antibacterial activity. Both treatments were well tolerated throughout the study.

CONCLUSION

Digen seemed to maintain the properties and activities of each individual drug, making it a promising treatment for reducing inflammation after phacoemulsification.

Comparison of the efficacy of diclofenac and betamethasone following strabismus surgery

AIMS

To compare the relative antiinflammatory potency and safety of topical diclofenac-gentamicin with betamethasone-neomycin following strabismus surgery.

METHODS

A single centre, single observer, prospective, randomised, and double masked clinical trial of 25 children undergoing bilateral symmetrical horizontal strabismus surgery was carried out. One eye received diclofenac-gentamicin and the contralateral eye received betamethasone-neomycin; both treatments were instilled four times a day for 4 weeks postoperatively. Ocular inflammation was assessed at 1 and 4 weeks postoperatively, objectively by comparison with a photographic chart and subjectively by questionnaire.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of resolution of the inflammatory response between each group at both visits.

CONCLUSION

Diclofenac appears to be as effective as betamethasone in controlling postoperative inflammation following strabismus surgery and may offer a safer alternative to the use of topical steroids.