Programmed cell death ligand 1 expression in cytologic and surgical non-small cell lung carcinoma specimens from a single institution: Association with clinicopathologic features and molecular alterations

PD-L1 expression and its significance in advanced NSCLC: real-world experience from a tertiary care center

BACKGROUND

Targeted therapies against programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have revolutionized the management in recent years. There is paucity of data on the significance of PD-L1 expression in NSCLC from India. We aimed to study the prevalence of PD-L1 expression and its relation with different clinico-pathological parameters in advanced NSCLC from a tertiary care center in Eastern India.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC diagnosed from January 2020 to December 2021 were prospectively evaluated for PD-L1 expression in formalin fixed-paraffin embedded tumor tissue specimens using immunohistochemistry analysis. A PD-L1 expression of < 1%, 1-49%, and ≥ 50% were considered negative, low, and high expression positive respectively, and association with various parameters was performed.

RESULTS

Out of the 94 patients (mean age 59.6 ± 14 years and 63.8% males), PD-L1 positivity was seen in 42 (44.7%) patients, with low positivity (1-49%) in 29 patients and high positivity (≥ 50%) in 13 patients. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutations were seen in 28 patients (29.8%). There were no significant differences in PD-L1 positivity with respect to gender, age, and molecular mutation status. PD-L1 positivity was significantly associated with tobacco use (p = 0.04), advanced tumor stage (p < 0.001), and higher nodal stage (p < 0.001). Median overall survival in the cohort was 17 months and it was not significantly different between the PD-L1 positive and negative groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Forty-five percent of advanced NSCLC patients in our cohort showed positive PD-L1 expression and it is associated with tobacco use and aggressive tumor characteristics.

PD-L1 immunohistochemical testing: A review with reference to cytology specimens

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy based on disruption of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis is standard of care for many high stage malignancies including melanomas, non-small cell carcinomas of the lung, triple negative breast carcinomas, and squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Eligibility for immunotherapy requires immunohistochemical assessment of PD-L1 expression. Currently, many high stage malignancies are diagnosed by cytology and cytologic material is the only specimen available for ancillary testing. Formal guidelines do not currently exist defining the optimal specimen type, antibody to be used or the best scoring system for cytologic material. Significant information has been published for PD-L1 testing of pulmonary specimens but much less data exists for the reproducibility, accuracy and best practices for material obtained from other body sites and types of malignancy.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed data base for manuscripts relating to PD-L1 testing of cytologic specimens. The search period was between 2016 and 2022. The search terms used were PD-L1, cytology, FNA, immunotherapy, immunohistochemistry, immunocytochemistry, cytology-histology correlation. Cross referencing techniques were used to screen for the most relevant manuscripts. The abstracts of these were then reviewed for final data collection and analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 86 studies were identified conforming to study relevancy. These were reviewed in their entirety by two authors (LJL, TZ) for extraction of data. The majority of studies involved pulmonary specimens (79) with three relating to PD-L1 testing of head and neck cytologic specimens and one each for PD-L1 testing of cytology specimens from melanomas, pancreas, pleural fluids, and triple negative breast carcinomas. While smears could be used, most studies found cell blocks optimal for testing.

SUMMARY

Currently, four drugs are approved for immunotherapy based on PD-L1 status. These drugs require specific antibody clones as well as scoring systems. Scoring systems and cut points vary with the type of neoplasm being treated. Cytology specimens from the lung, head and neck and melanomas can all be used for PD-L1 testing with good agreement with corresponding histology specimens.

Program death ligand-1 immunocytochemistry in lung cancer cytological samples: A systematic review

In this era of personalized medicine, targeted immunotherapies like immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) blocking the programmed death‐1 (PD‐1)/program death ligand‐1 (PD‐L1) axis have become an integral part of treating advanced stage non‐small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and many other cancer types. Multiple monoclonal antibodies are available commercially to detect PD‐L1 expression in tumor cells by immunohistochemistry (IHC). As most clinical trials initially required tumor biopsy for PD‐L1 detection by IHC, many of the currently available PD‐1/PD‐L1 assays have been developed and validated on formalin fixed tissue specimens. The majority (>50%) of lung cancer cases do not have a surgical biopsy or resection specimen available for ancillary testing and instead must rely primarily on fine needle aspiration biopsy specimens for diagnosis, staging and ancillary tests. Review of the literature shows multiple studies exploring the feasibility of PD‐L1 IHC on cytological samples. In addition, there are studies addressing various aspects of IHC validation on cytology preparations including pre‐analytical (e.g., different fixatives), analytical (e.g., antibody clone, staining platforms, inter and intra‐observer agreement, cytology‐histology concordance) and post‐analytical (e.g., clinical outcome) issues. Although promising results in this field have emerged utilizing cytology samples, many important questions still need to be addressed. This review summarizes the literature of PD‐L1 IHC in lung cytology specimens and provides practical tips for optimizing analysis.

PD-L1 in Cytological Samples: A Review and a Practical Approach

With a growing number of predictive biomarkers needed to manage patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there has been a paradigm shift in care and handling of diagnostic samples. Among the various testing methods, immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the most cost- effective and widely available. Furthermore, over the past decade immunotherapy has emerged as one of the most promising cancer treatments. In this scenario IHC is the most used testing method available for PDL-1/PD1 immunotherapy. Several monoclonal antibodies targeting programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) pathways have been integrated into standard-of-care treatments of a wide range of cancer types, once provided evidence of PD-L1 expression in tumor cells by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Since currently available PD-L1 assays have been developed on formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) histological specimens, a growing body of research is being dedicated to confirm the feasibility of applying PDL-1 assays also to cytological samples. Albeit promising results have been reported, several important issues still need to be addressed. Among these are the type of cytological samples, pre-analytical issues, cyto-histological correlation, and inter-observer agreement. This review briefly summarizes the knowledge of the role of cytopathology in the analysis of PD-L1 by immunocytochemistry (ICC) and future directions of cytopathology in the immunotherapy setting.

PD-L1 and beyond: Immuno-oncology in cytopathology

Over the past decade, immunotherapy has emerged as one of the most promising cancer treatments. Several monoclonal antibodies targeting the programmed death 1 (PD-1)/ programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) pathway have been integrated into standard-of-care treatments for a wide range of cancer types. Although all the available PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays have been developed on formalin-fixed histological specimens, a growing body of research has recently suggested the feasibility of PD-L1 testing on cytological samples. Although promising results have been reported, several important issues still need to be addressed. Among these are pre-analytical issues, cyto-hystological correlation, and inter-observer agreement. This review will briefly summarise the knowledge gaps and future directions of cytopathology in the immuno-oncology scenario.

[Correlation between the Expression of PD-L1 in Pleural Effusion of Lung Adenocarcinoma and the Clinicopathological Features and Molecular Changes]

背景与目的

非小细胞肺癌的免疫治疗药物pembrolizumab需要基于包括免疫组织化学（immunohistochemistry, IHC）在内的检测结果，即通过检测程序性死亡配体1（programmed cell death protein 1, PD-L1）的表达等手段来预测治疗反应。评估肺腺癌细胞学标本免疫细胞化学（immunocytochemistry, ICC）方法检测PD-L1的可行性，并探讨PD-L1表达与临床病理及分子特征的相关性。

方法

收集60例肺腺癌胸水细胞学标本应用PD-L1 sp263试剂按照生产说明书进行免疫细胞化学染色，同时对胸水细胞学标本做高通量二代测序（next-generation sequencing, NGS），探讨PD-L1与驱动基因突变的相关性。

结果

60例肺腺癌胸水细胞块标本ICC检测中，有35例PD-L1表达阳性，阳性表达率为58.3%。本院57例组织学标本PD-L1 IHC表达的阳性率为33.3%，细胞学标本与组织学标本差异无统计学意义（P > 0.05）。60例细胞学标本中26例接受NGS检测，15例（57.7%）发现表皮生长因子受体（epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR）突变，经统计PD-L1表达与EGFR突变未发现相关性。PD-L1的阳性表达率与研究人群的年龄、性别、是否淋巴结或远处转移及是否进行放化疗或靶向治疗均未发现相关性（P > 0.05）。

结论

在无手术标本可取时，胸水细胞学细胞块标本可以对PD-L1进行免疫细胞化学检测，其结果具有可行性。

Interobserver agreement in programmed cell death-ligand 1 immunohistochemistry scoring in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma cytologic specimens

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of PD-L1 expression in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) is becoming increasingly important given the effectiveness of PD-L1 inhibitors. Although cytologic specimens have been shown to be compatible with surgical specimens to evaluate PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC), evidence of the reproducibility of PD-L1 in cytologic specimens is lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate interobserver agreement in PD-L1 IHC in cytologic specimens.

METHODS

PD-L1 IHC was performed on 86 NSCLC cytology specimens using Dako PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx. The digitally scanned whole slide images (WSI) were read by five pathologists. Each case was given a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) and the results were compared between the observers. The interobserver concordance was assessed using 1% and 50% as cutoffs.

RESULTS

TPSs were highly correlated among observers (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.86-0.94). Using greater than 1% as a cutoff, interobserver agreement measured by Fleiss Kappa was 0.74 for all pathologists and Cohen's Kappa coefficient ranged from 0.49 to 0.83, consistent with moderate to substantial agreement. With a cutoff of greater than 50%, Fleiss Kappa was 0.79 for all pathologists and the kappa values ranged from 0.63 to 0.90, consistent with substantial to almost perfect agreement. Several pitfalls were identified by reviewing discordant cases, including staining in macrophages, stromal cells, and intratumoral heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that TPS of PD-L1 IHC on cytology specimens is reproducible, with a better agreement when using 50% as the cutoff value. However, special attention is required when the TPS is near the 1% cutoff.

Implementation of PD-L1 22C3 IHC pharmDxTM in Cell Block Preparations of Lung Cancer: Concordance with Surgical Resections and Technical Validation of CytoLyt® Prefixation

BACKGROUND

Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is used as biomarker for pembrolizumab therapy in advanced stage lung cancer patients. However, data permitting direct performance comparison between cytology and surgical specimen types are limited since both specimens from a single tumor site are infrequently available. In addition, alcohol fixation used with cytology specimens requires technical validation of the PD-L1 IHC assay before clinical use. We here report our experience with implementation of the PD-L1 22C3 IHC pharmDxTM assay for cytologic samples at a large tertiary cancer center.

STUDY DESIGN

Archival formalin-fixed (FF), paraffin-embedded cell blocks (CBs) and subsequent lung tumor resections (LTRs) from the same anatomical site were used for a direct comparison of PD-L1 tumor proportion scores (TPSs). TPS values were independently determined by one surgical lung pathologist and two cytopathologists blinded to the specimen pairs. An interim analysis was performed to facilitate the pooling of expertise among observers. After PD-L1 22C3 IHC pharmDxTM implementation for FF cytology specimens, dual-processed samples were used for a prospective technical validation of CytoLyt® prefixation (CF). Digital image analysis was performed for a subset of dual-processed specimens.

RESULTS

Eighty-one CBs and LTRs were included for comparison of the specimen types. PD-L1 assessment in CBs had an accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 88.9/72.8, 66.7/73.5, 95.2/72.3, 80.0/65.8, and 90.9/79.1% for the ≥50/≥1% cutoff, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76, 0.90), and it improved after interim analysis (before: 0.79 and after: 0.92). The overall concordance between CF and FF for the categories defined by the ≥50/≥1% cutoff values was 90.4% (95% CI: 79.0, 96.8). Similar assay performance was confirmed by digital analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

PD-L1 22C3 IHC pharmDxTM shows good reliability if used with CB preparations. CF does not impact assay results significantly. Clinical validation with outcome data is needed, and digital methods of assessment should be further investigated.