Reference Intervals for Bone Impact Microindentation in Healthy Adults: A Multi-Centre International Study

The practicality of using bone impact microindentation in a population-based study of women: A Geelong-Osteoporosis Study

Impact microindentation (IMI) is a minimally invasive technique that allows the assessment of bone material strength index (BMSi) in vivo, by measuring the depth of a micron-sized, spherical tip into cortical bone that is then indexed to the depth of the tip into a reference material. In this study, we aimed to assess the practicality of its application in 99 women aged 42-84 yr from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Impact microindentation was performed in the mid-shaft of the right tibia using the OsteoProbe. Immediately following measurement, each participant was requested to rate on a Visual Analogue Scale [0-10] the level of discomfort anticipated and experienced, any initial reluctance towards the measurement and whether they were willing to repeat the measurement. Of 99 potential participants who attended this assessment phase, 55 underwent IMI measurement. Reasons for non-measurement in 44 women were existing skin conditions (n = 8, 18.2 %) and excessive soft tissue around mid-tibial region (n = 32, 72.2 %). An additional four (9.1 %) participants did not provide any reasons for declining. For 55 participants who had underwent IMI, the expectation for pain when briefed about the procedure was low (2.28 ± 2.39), as was pain experienced during the measurement (0.72 ± 1.58). Participants were not reluctant to undergo the measurement (0.83 ± 1.67), and all indicated a willingness to repeat the measurement. Results of this study showed that the IMI technique is well tolerated and accepted by women participating in the Geelong Osteoporosis Study, suggesting that the technique shows promise in a research or clinical setting.

Evaluating Osteoporosis in Chronic Kidney Disease: Both Bone Quantity and Quality Matter

Bone strength is determined not only by bone quantity [bone mineral density (BMD)] but also by bone quality, including matrix composition, collagen fiber arrangement, microarchitecture, geometry, mineralization, and bone turnover, among others. These aspects influence elasticity, the load-bearing and repair capacity of bone, and microcrack propagation and are thus key to fractures and their avoidance. In chronic kidney disease (CKD)-associated osteoporosis, factors traditionally associated with a lower bone mass (advanced age or hypogonadism) often coexist with non-traditional factors specific to CKD (uremic toxins or renal osteodystrophy, among others), which will have an impact on bone quality. The gold standard for measuring BMD is dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, which is widely accepted in the general population and is also capable of predicting fracture risk in CKD. Nevertheless, a significant number of fractures occur in the absence of densitometric World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for osteoporosis, suggesting that methods that also evaluate bone quality need to be considered in order to achieve a comprehensive assessment of fracture risk. The techniques for measuring bone quality are limited by their high cost or invasive nature, which has prevented their implementation in clinical practice. A bone biopsy, high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography, and impact microindentation are some of the methods established to assess bone quality. Herein, we review the current evidence in the literature with the aim of exploring the factors that affect both bone quality and bone quantity in CKD and describing available techniques to assess them.

Assessment of bovine cortical bone fracture behavior using impact microindentation as a surrogate of fracture toughness

The fracture behavior of bone is critically important for evaluating its mechanical competence and ability to resist fractures. Fracture toughness is an intrinsic material property that quantifies a material's ability to withstand crack propagation under controlled conditions. However, properly conducting fracture toughness testing requires the access to calibrated mechanical load frames and the destructive testing of bone samples, and therefore fracture toughness tests are clinically impractical. Impact microindentation mimicks certain aspects of fracture toughness measurements, but its relationship with fracture toughness remains unknown. In this study, we aimed to compare measurements of notched fracture toughness and impact microindentation in fresh and boiled bovine bone. Skeletally mature bovine bone specimens (n = 48) were prepared, and half of them were boiled to denature the organic matrix, while the other half remained preserved in frozen conditions. All samples underwent a notched fracture toughness test to determine their resistance to crack initiation (KIC) and an impact microindentation test using the OsteoProbe to obtain the Bone Material Strength index (BMSi). Boiling the bone samples increased the denatured collagen content, while mineral density and porosity remained unaffected. The boiled bones also showed significant reduction in both KIC (P < .0001) and the average BMSi (P < .0001), leading to impaired resistance of bone to crack propagation. Remarkably, the average BMSi exhibited a high correlation with KIC (r = 0.86; P < .001). A ranked order difference analysis confirmed the excellent agreement between the 2 measures. This study provides the first evidence that impact microindentation could serve as a surrogate measure for bone fracture behavior. The potential of impact microindentation to assess bone fracture resistance with minimal sample disruption could offer valuable insights into bone health without the need for cumbersome testing equipment and sample destruction.

For older individuals there is greater variance in low mean Bone Material Strength Index values obtained with the OsteoProbe

Purpose

Bone Material Strength Index (BMSi) quantifies the resistance of bone to a specified force in vivo at the mid tibia using impact microindentation (IMI). Anecdotal evidence suggests that within-participant variance in BMSi may be associated with the individual's mean BMSi. This study aimed to investigate associations between mean and variance of IMI measures in a population-based study.

Methods

Participants were men (n = 420) and women (n = 55) from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study who underwent BMSi measurement using the OsteoProbe at recent follow-up phases (men 2016-2022; women 2022-2023). Median age was 63.7 yr (IQR 53.0-71.8). BMSi standard deviation was skewed and therefore natural log transformed (referred to as ln-SD). Linear regression models were developed with ln-SD as the dependent variable and mean BMSi as the independent variable adjusting for sex, age, height and weight.

Results

In unadjusted models, greater BMSi was associated with lower ln-SD (β = -1.58, p = 0.042). This association was sustained after adjustment (p = 0.013), and an interaction between BMSi and age was observed (p = 0.004). In those aged 63.7 yr and over (median age), mean BMSi was inversely associated with ln-SD (β = -3.22, p = 0.002). Sex was not identified as an effect modifier. In younger participants, no BMSi*ln-SD association was observed.

Conclusion

In older men and women, there was greater variance in low BMSi values. This suggests that standard deviation of the BMSi measure may provide additional information in the assessment of bone health and is worthy of further investigation.

Mini abstract

In older men and women, greater variance is observed when BMSi values are low, reflecting potential variation in the bone surface.

Mean Bone Material Strength Index Values for Women are Lower Than Those for Men: Data from a Single Geographical Location

Bone material strength index (BMSi) values are obtained using impact microindentation, which assesses the ability of bone to resist indentation. Differences in BMSi between men and women are unclear, and to date, BMSi sex differences have not been compared for individuals from the same population. Therefore, we compared BMSi values for men and women drawn from the same geographical location in Australia. Participants (n = 220) were from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. BMSi was measured, following international published guidelines, using an OsteoProbe for participants at recent follow-up phases (women 2022-2023 and men 2016-2022). Women (n = 55) were age matched to men (n = 165) in a 1:3 ratio. A two-sample t test was used to determine the intergroup difference in mean BMSi. Linear regression was also performed, adjusting for weight and height. Median (IQR) ages for men and women were 67.0 (61.7-71.5) and 67.4 (62.0-71.2) years (p = 0.998). Men were heavier (81.0 ± 10.9 vs 71.0 ± 13.9 kg, p < 0.001) and taller (173.9 ± 6.4 vs 161.5 ± 7.5 cm, p < 0.001) than women. Mean (± SD) BMSi for women (75.7 ± 7.4) was lower than for men (82.8 ± 6.8) (p < 0.001). The difference persisted after adjustment for weight and height (mean ± SE: 76.5 ± 1.1 vs 82.5 ± 0.6, p < 0.001). Given the higher fracture risk observed for women, the higher mean BMSi values in men are consistent with cross sectional data suggesting this measure may be useful in fracture prediction.

Assessment of bovine cortical bone fracture behavior using impact microindentation as a surrogate of fracture toughness

The fracture behavior of bone is critically important for assessing its mechanical competence and ability to resist fractures. Fracture toughness, which quantifies a material's resistance to crack propagation under controlled geometry, is regarded as the gold standard for evaluating a material's resistance to fracture. However properly conducting this test requires access to calibrated mechanical load frames the destruction of the bone samples, making it impractical for obtaining clinical measurement of bone fracture. Impact microindentation offers a potential alternative by mimicking certain aspects of fracture toughness measurements, but its relationship with mechanistic fracture toughness remains unknown. In this study, we aimed to compare measurements of notched fracture toughness and impact microindentation in fresh and boiled bovine bone. Skeletally mature bovine bone specimens (n=48) were prepared, and half of them were boiled to denature the organic matrix, while the other half remained preserved in frozen conditions. Notched fracture toughness tests were conducted on all samples to determine Initiation toughness (KIC), and an impact microindentation test using the OsteoProbe was performed to obtain the Bone Material Strength index. Boiling the bone samples resulted increased the denatured collagen without affecting mineral density or porosity. The boiled bones also showed significant reduction in both KIC (p < 0.0001) and the average Bone Material Strength index (p < 0.0001), leading to impaired resistance of bone to crack propagation. Remarkably, the average Bone Material Strength index exhibited a high correlation with KIC (r = 0.86; p < 0.001). The ranked order difference analysis confirmed excellent agreement between the two measures. This study provides the first evidence that impact microindentation could serve as a surrogate measure for bone fracture behavior. The potential of impact microindentation to non-destructively assess bone fracture resistance could offer valuable insights into bone health without the need for elaborate testing equipment and sample destruction.