Prospective randomized trial to evaluate two delayed granulocyte colony stimulating factor administration schedules after high-dose cytarabine therapy in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Delayed Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Administration after Chemotherapy Reduces Total G-CSF Doses without Affecting Neutrophil Recovery in a Randomized Clinical Study in Children with Solid Tumors

The use of G-CSF after myelotoxic chemotherapy accelerates neutrophil recovery reducing the risk of febrile neutropenia. Current guidelines recommend initiating G-CSF 24 hours after myelotoxic chemotherapy. However, the optimal timing of post-chemotherapy G-CSF administration has not been elucidated. Our previous work in murine models demonstrated that the reappearance of myeloid progenitors does not occur in bone marrow until 3-4 days after completion of chemotherapy suggesting that delayed G-CSF administration may be equally efficacious compared to current practice. We conducted a prospective, randomized, crossover study to compare the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery after chemotherapy and a delayed G-CSF administration to a standard G-CSF administration schedule with early G-CSF start. A total of 21 children with solid tumors who received 2 identical cycles of myelotoxic chemotherapy were randomized to start receiving G-CSF either 24 hours after completion of chemotherapy or on the day that their ANC dropped below 1,000/mm³. There was no significant difference in the time to neutrophil recovery (ANC > 1,000/mm³ post nadir) between the two G-CSF administration schedules: 16.0 ± 0.5 days in the standard group compared to 16.7 ± 0.4 days in the delayed group (p = 0.36). The total number of G-CSF doses given, however, was significantly less in the delayed group: 6.7 ± 0.6 compared to 10.5 ± 0.6 doses in the standard group (p < 0.0001). Our data show that a delayed administration of post chemotherapy G-CSF resulted in a significant reduction in the number of G-CSF injections without compromising the G-CSF effects on neutrophil recovery.

Is pegfilgrastim appropriate for the treatment of established febrile neutropenia?

Objective. To report a case where both pegfilgrastim and filgrastim were considered in the treatment of febrile neutropenia in a hospitalized patient and assess the most cost-effective option.

Case summary. A 77-year-old white female was diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus and adjuvant chemotherapy was ordered. She subsequently developed Grade 4 neutropenia, a wound infection and her Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status declined to 4. Antibiotics were started and growth factor therapy was considered as part of her treatment. Filgrastim 480 g subcutaneously every day was chosen and her absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovered after seven days of therapy.

Discussion. This case illustrates the potential cost benefits of using filgrastim over pegfilgrastim in hospitalized patients. The choice of filgrastim in our patient resulted in only seven days of filgrastim therapy at a cost of $2205.70. A 6 mg dose of pegfilgrastim is priced similarly to 10 days of filgrastim 480 g, therefore a cost savings of $744.01 was realized in our patient.

Conclusions. Filgrastim is the most appropriate growth factor for the treatment of established high-risk febrile neutropenia given that the ANC can be monitored on a daily basis and therapy can be discontinued upon recovery.

Prophylaxis of infectious complications with colony-stimulating factors in adult cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy-evidence-based guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Working Party AGIHO of the German Society for Haematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO)

BACKGROUND

Current evidence on myelopoietic growth factors is difficult to overview for the practicing haematologist/oncologist. International guidelines are sometimes conflicting, exclude certain patient groups, or cannot directly be applied to the German health system. This guideline by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Haematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO) gives evidence-based recommendations for the use of G-CSF, pegylated G-CSF, and biosimilars to prevent infectious complications in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, including those with haematological malignancies.

METHODS

We systematically searched and evaluated current evidence. An expert panel discussed the results and recommendations. We then compared our recommendations to current international guidelines.

RESULTS

We summarised the data from eligible studies in evidence tables, developed recommendations for different entities and risk groups.

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive literature search and expert panel consensus confirmed many key recommendations given by international guidelines. Evidence for growth factors during acute myeloid leukaemia induction chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim use in haematological malignancies was rated lower compared with other guidelines.

Dose intensification of daunorubicin and cytarabine during treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 19802

BACKGROUND

Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) Study 19802, a phase 2 study, evaluated whether dose intensification of daunorubicin and cytarabine could improve disease-free survival (DFS) in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and whether high-dose systemic and intrathecal methotrexate could replace cranial radiotherapy for central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-one eligible, previously untreated patients ages 16 to 82 years (median age, 40 years) were enrolled, and 33 (20%) were aged ≥60 years.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-eight patients (80%) achieved complete remission (CR). Dose intensification of daunorubicin and cytarabine was feasible. At a median follow-up of 10.4 years for surviving patients, the 5-year DFS rate was 25% (95% confidence interval, 18%-33%), and the overall survival (OS) rate was 30% (95% confidence interval, 23%-37%). Patients aged <60 years who received the 80 mg/m(2) dose of daunorubicin had a DFS of 33% (95% confidence interval, 22%-44%) and an OS of 39% (95% confidence interval, 29%-49%) at 5 years. Eighty-four patients (52%) relapsed, including 9 patients (6%) who had isolated CNS relapses. The omission of cranial irradiation did not result in higher than historic CNS relapse rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive systemic, oral, and intrathecal methotrexate dosing permitted the omission of CNS irradiation in adult patients with ALL. This intensive approach using higher doses of daunorubicin and cytarabine failed to result in an overall improvement in DFS or OS compared with historic CALGB studies. Future therapeutic strategies for adults with ALL should be tailored to specific age and molecular genetic subsets.

Efficacy of delayed administration of post-chemotherapy granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: evidence from murine studies of bone marrow cell kinetics

The optimal schedule of post-chemotherapy granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration has not been determined. G-CSF is customarily started 24 hours after chemotherapy; however, clinical data demonstrated that delaying G-CSF until 5 days after completion of chemotherapy has not resulted in a longer duration of neutropenia. Here, we examined the optimal timing of post-chemotherapy G-CSF administration in a mouse model, to show that delayed administration does not postpone the appearance of mature granulocytes in the peripheral blood. We also investigated the mechanism of decreased efficacy of the early G-CSF application after chemotherapy by characterizing the changes in bone marrow cellular composition. To our knowledge, we demonstrate for the first time, that early after chemotherapy, the bone marrow is predominantly composed of mature residual granulocytes and very few progenitors and precursors, on which G-CSF would act to generate granulocytes. The point when immature progenitors reappear does not occur in murine bone marrow until 48 hours after a single dose of cyclophosphamide. Our results indicate that the bone marrow cellular composition early after discontinuation of chemotherapy is not optimal for G-CSF action on acceleration of myeloid recovery. Given the high cost of G-CSF prophylaxis, its delayed administration may potentially result in substantial economic benefits.

Current status of growth factors in the treatment of acute myeloid and lymphoblastic leukemia

The safety of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in patients with acute leukemia has been well established in numerous clinical trials. The primary aim of these studies was to determine whether CSFs, when used as adjuncts to intensive chemotherapy, reduced the duration of neutropenia, prevented febrile neutropenia, infections, and hospitalization rates, and improved response and overall outcome in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Despite considerable efforts in divers clinical settings, the potential advantages of hematopoietic growth factors in the management of these leukemias remain inconclusive. In general, individual published trials have shown declines in the incidence and/or duration of neutropenia but have not consistently demonstrated a reduction in the overall frequency of infectious complications or the duration of hospitalization. Most protocols also have failed to show a benefit in terms of disease-free or overall survival. Nevertheless, improvements in "soft" clinical end points, such as incidence of severe infections, may be clinically important and contribute, even if only incrementally, to the patient's quality of life. Selection of those patients likely to benefit from growth factors in a specific clinical setting is a worthwhile endeavour.

Ara-C fever and infections after high-dose ara-C treatment in pediatric lymphoid malignancies

The objective of this study was to examine the incidence and characteristics of Ara-C-related fever and the frequency and severity of infections after single-drug, high-dose Ara-C treatment (HDAC) in children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). A retrospective review was performed of 169 courses of HDAC administered to 57 patients (age 1.8-17.8 years). Procalcitonin values (PCT) were analyzed in a subgroup of 16 patients. Fever during HDAC occurred in 113 of 169 (67%) cases. C-reactive protein (CRP) was elevated in the febrile patients (median 38 mg/L [range 3-150]). PCT was elevated (>0.5 ng/mL) during HDAC in 4 of the 16 evaluated patients. Corticosteroids could inhibit fever (P < 0.001). Myelosuppression after HDAC was prominent: 99% developed neutropenia (<0.5 x 10/L) and 92% thrombocytopenia (<25 x 10/L). An early lymphopenia (median 0.1 x 10/L [range 0.01-0.68]) was seen during the first week. G-CSF was used after 12 of the 169 HDAC courses. A febrile episode occurred after 93 of the 169 (55%) HDAC courses, with no need for intensive care and no deaths. The incidence of viridans streptococcal septicemia was 2 of the 169 cases. Ara-C fever is common, and evaluation with inflammation markers is complicated by the fact that HDAC can induce a moderate release of both CRP and PCT. Profound neutropenia and lymphopenia are causative factors for the high incidence of infections, but the risk of life-threatening complications after HDAC in children in remission of lymphoid malignancies is low, even without prophylactic use of colony-stimulating factors.