Efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus cisplatin in Japanese patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer: subset analyses of the AVAGAST study and the ToGA study

Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a JSMO-ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, KSMO, MOS, SSO and TOS

The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of gastric cancer (GC) was published in 2016, and covered the management and treatment of local, locoregional, locally advanced and metastatic disease. At the ESMO Asia Meeting in November 2017 it was decided by both ESMO and The Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO) to convene a special guidelines meeting immediately after the JSMO Annual Meeting in 2018. The aim was to adapt the ESMO 2016 guidelines to take into account the ethnic differences associated with the treatment of metastatic GC in Asian patients. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by experts in the treatment of patients with metastatic GC representing the oncological societies of Japan (JSMO), China (CSCO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), Singapore (SSO) and Taiwan (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of both the current treatment practices and the drug availability and reimbursement situations in the individual participating Asian countries.

Randomized, Open-Label Phase II Study Comparing Capecitabine-Cisplatin Every 3 Weeks with S-1-Cisplatin Every 5 Weeks in Chemotherapy-Naïve Patients with HER2-Negative Advanced Gastric Cancer: OGSG1105, HERBIS-4A Trial

Lessons Learned.

Evidence has suggested that capecitabine‐cisplatin is similar or possibly superior to S‐1‐cisplatin in terms of safety and efficacy for Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

As far as we are aware, our study is the first randomized trial of two regimens consisting of an oral fluoropyrimidine plus cisplatin in human epidermal growth receptor 2‐negative AGC patients with measurable lesions.

Background.

We performed a phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of capecitabine plus cisplatin in comparison with S‐1 plus cisplatin for first‐line treatment of human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2)‐negative advanced gastric cancer in Japan.

Methods.

Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either capecitabine at 1,000 mg/m² twice daily for 14 days plus cisplatin at 80 mg/m² on day 1 every 3 weeks (n = 43) or S‐1 at 40–60 mg twice daily for 21 days plus cisplatin at 60 mg/m² on day 8 every 5 weeks (n = 41). The primary endpoint of the study was response rate.

Results.

Response rate did not differ significantly between the capecitabine‐cisplatin and S‐1‐cisplatin groups (53.5% vs. 51.2%, respectively, p > .999). S‐1‐cisplatin tended to confer a better progression‐free survival (PFS; median of 5.9 vs. 4.1 months, p = .284), overall survival (OS; median of 13.5 vs. 10.0 months, p = .290), and time to treatment failure (TTF; median of 4.5 vs. 3.1 months, p = .052) compared with capecitabine‐cisplatin. Common hematologic toxicities of grade 3 or 4 included anemia and neutropenia in both groups. However, anorexia, fatigue, and hyponatremia of grade 3 or 4 occurred more frequently in the capecitabine‐cisplatin group.

Conclusion.

Capecitabine‐cisplatin failed to demonstrate superior efficacy compared with S‐1‐cisplatin. The higher incidence of severe adverse events with capecitabine‐cisplatin suggests that S‐1‐cisplatin should remain the standard first‐line chemotherapy for HER2‐negative advanced gastric cancer in Japan.

Early hypertension is associated with better clinical outcomes in gastric cancer patients treated with ramucirumab plus paclitaxel

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapeutics such as bevacizumab, which are widely used in cancer treatment, commonly leads to hypertension. Moreover, bevacizumab-induced hypertension is associated with improved clinical outcomes in several cancers. We retrospectively analyzed 89 patients with histologically confirmed advanced gastric cancer who received the human monoclonal anti-VEGF receptor-2 antibody ramucirumab plus paclitaxel at our hospital between June 2015 and October 2016 to evaluate the impact of treatment-associated hypertension occurring within the first two treatment cycles ("early hypertension") on outcome. The objective response rate was 40%, median progression-free survival was 5.4 months, and overall survival was 10.4 months, which is similar to previous reports. Early hypertension in patients who received more than two cycles of ramucirumab + paclitaxel was associated with longer progression-free and overall survival. Objective response rates were also higher in patients with early hypertension. These data indicate that early hypertension may be predictive of better outcomes in gastric cancer patients who receive ramucirumab + paclitaxel treatment.

A Phase 1/1b tolerability study of rilotumumab alone or in combination with cisplatin and capecitabine in Japanese patients with gastric cancer

Objective

To evaluate the safety (including adverse events and dose-limiting toxicities [DLTs]), tolerability, pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity of the investigational MET inhibitor rilotumumab alone in patients with advanced solid tumors (Part 1) or in combination with cisplatin plus capecitabine (CX) in patients with MET-positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (Part 2).

Methods

Adult patients received 10 or 20 mg/kg intravenous (IV) rilotumumab every 2 weeks (Part 1) or 15 mg/kg IV rilotumumab every 3 weeks plus 80 mg/m2 cisplatin on Day 1 and 1000 mg/m2 capecitabine twice daily on Days 1-14 of every 21-day cycle (Part 2).

Results

Nine patients enrolled in Part 1; 12 patients enrolled in Part 2. One DLT occurred (Grade 3 decreased appetite and stomatitis [Part 2]). Adverse events related to any treatment occurred in 17 patients (81%) and were Grade ≥3 in nine patients (43%). Rilotumumab pharmacokinetics appeared linear, and exposure was unaffected by CX. No patient who received rilotumumab monotherapy in Part 1 had a response. In Part 2, five of eight patients (63%) with measureable disease at baseline had a partial response and two patients (25%) had stable disease; median (95% CI) progression-free survival was 7.0 (2.4-15.4) months; overall survival was 18.2 (5.6-20.4) months.

Conclusions

In combination with CX, rilotumumab appeared tolerable and showed antitumor activity in Japanese patients with MET-positive gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer. However, owing to the results of recent Phase 3 trials of MET inhibitors (including rilotumumab), further development of rilotumumab in this setting is not being pursued. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01791374.

Five-weekly S-1 plus cisplatin therapy combined with trastuzumab therapy in HER2-positive gastric cancer: a phase II trial and biomarker study (WJOG7212G)

BACKGROUND

Five-weekly S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) therapy is the standard care for advanced gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer (GC/EGJC) in East Asia. However, its efficacy and safety when combined with trastuzumab therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced GC/EGJC remains unclear.

METHODS

Patients received 5-weekly SP therapy (S-1 at 40-60 mg twice daily for 21 days plus cisplatin at 60 mg/m² on day 8, every 5 weeks) plus trastuzumab therapy (first dose of 8 mg/kg, then 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks). The primary end point was the response rate, and the secondary end points included progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, and serum biomarker levels.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were enrolled. The response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 61% (95% confidence interval 46-76%), 5.9 months, and 16.5 months respectively. The commonest grade 3 or grade 4 adverse events were neutropenia (30%) and anorexia (25%). A significantly higher response rate (92% vs 43%; P = 0.008) and longer progression-free survival (median 14.5 months vs 4.2 months; P = 0.028) were observed in patients with high (n = 14) compared with low (n = 17) pretreatment serum neuregulin 1 levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Five-weekly SP therapy combined with trastuzumab therapy showed a good antitumor response and acceptable toxicity in HER2-positive advanced GC/EGJC. Serum neuregulin 1 might be associated with the efficacy of this treatment regimen.

Safety, pharmacokinetic, and clinical activity profiles of ramucirumab in combination with three platinum/fluoropyrimidine doublets in Japanese patients with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and tumor response of ramucirumab in combination with one of three platinum/fluoropyrimidine regimens in Japanese patients with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer.

METHODS

In this phase 1b study, patients received 8 mg/kg ramucirumab on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, following one of three regimens: capecitabine + cisplatin, XP; S-1 + cisplatin, SP; or S-1 + oxaliplatin, SOX. The primary objective was to assess safety and tolerability; the secondary objectives were to evaluate pharmacokinetics and tumor response.

RESULTS

Six patients were treated in each cohort. All regimens were generally well tolerated, although 1 patient in SOX was associated with grade 3 enterocolitis, which was considered a dose-limiting toxicity. Common grade 3 or higher adverse events included neutropenia (1 in XP, 3 in SP, and 2 in SOX), decreased appetite (1 in SP), and hypertension (2 in XP). The mean trough ramucirumab concentrations were consistent across all cohorts, and those of most patients exceeded target levels, which were estimated from previous studies of the approved ramucirumab dose (8 mg/kg every 2 weeks). Among the 11 patients with measurable disease, overall response rate and disease control rate were 45.5% and 100.0%, respectively. Median progression-free survival (95% CI) was 7.6 months (6.0 to not estimable).

CONCLUSION

Ramucirumab 8 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks in combination with XP, SP, or SOX was generally well tolerated and demonstrated preliminary anti-tumor activity in chemotherapy-naïve Japanese metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer patients.

Multicenter phase II study of capecitabine plus cisplatin as first-line therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced gastric cancer: Yokohama Clinical Oncology Group Study YCOG1107

PURPOSE

S-1 plus cisplatin therapy is the recommended standard first-line regimen for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-negative advanced unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer (AGC) in the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines. By contrast, capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) therapy has been second-line therapy for these patients. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of XP as a first-line regimen for HER2-negative patients with AGC.

METHODS

In this multicenter, open-label, phase II study, patients received cisplatin (80 mg/m² i.v. day 1) plus capecitabine (1000 mg/m² orally, twice daily, days 1-14) at 3 week intervals until disease progression or non-continuation for various reasons. The primary endpoint was overall response rate; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity profiles.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients with HER2-negative AGC were enrolled in this study. Of these, 16 patients with evaluable lesions were assessable for efficacy and 36 were assessable for toxicity. One patient achieved a complete response and five partial responses. The overall response rate was 37.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.7-61.2%] calculated on an intention-to-treat basis. The median PFS and median OS were 5.2 months (95% CI 4.2-6.2 months) and 16.9 months (95% CI 5.8-27.9 months), respectively. Treatment-related adverse events were generally mild; the most common grade 3/4 adverse event was neutropenia (27.8%), followed by anorexia (19.4%), leucopenia (16.7%), anemia (16.7%), and nausea (13.9%).

CONCLUSION

XP as first-line therapy is effective and well tolerated by patients with HER2-negative AGC.

Histological evaluations of primary lesions are independently associated with prognosis in patients with gastric cancer who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may improve outcomes for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). To explore useful predictive factors for the response of advanced GC to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, tumor responses were assessed using computed tomography (CT) with histological based criteria. A total of 78 patients with advanced GC undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included. CT-based response assessment was performed following 2 courses of treatment. Histological evaluation of resected specimens was also performed according to the Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. Grade 1b, 2 and 3 (viable tumor cells remaining in <2/3 of the tumorous area) were defined as histological responders. The results were associated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The majority of the cases underwent tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil based preoperative chemotherapy as the first line of treatment (n=76, 96%). A total of 25 (32%) and 29 (37%) cases were considered to be CT and histological responders, respectively. CT-based evaluation was not associated with OS or PFS, while histological evaluation was significantly associated with OS and PFS. Histological based evaluation was not associated with CT and GI X-ray or endoscopy-based evaluation of primary lesions. Multivariate survival analysis using Cox's regression model demonstrated that histological non-response was an independent prognostic factor for predicting worse OS. Histological-based evaluation of primary lesions was independently associated with prognosis in patients with GC who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Evaluations of primary lesions by endoscopy clearly distinguishes prognosis in patients with gastric cancer who receive chemotherapy

Background

Chemotherapy may improve outcomes in gastric cancer (GC), especially for the patients with advanced stage. To explore useful predictive factor for GC performing chemotherapy, we compared the tumor responses assessed using computed tomography (CT) with endoscopy based criteria.

Methods

192 GC patients performing chemotherapy were retrospectively studied. CT based response assessment was performed after 2 courses of treatment. Endoscopic evaluation according to The Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma was also performed at same period. Data were correlated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

Majority of the cases (n = 178, 93%) received S-1 based chemotherapy as the first line treatment. 55 (29%) and 91 (47%) cases were considered to be CT and endoscopic responders. Endoscopic responder was more clearly associated with better OS and PFS compared to CT based responder by the log-rank test (P<0.0001 vs. 0.01 and P<0.0001 vs. 0.008, respectively). The association was more striking among patients performing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P<0.0001 vs. 0.15 and P<0.0001 vs. 0.1, respectively). Multivariate survival analysis using Cox's regression model revealed that endoscopic non-responder was the independent predictive factor, being more strongly associated with worse OS when compared to CT non-responder (hazard ratio: 4.60 vs. 1.77, 95% confidence interval: 2.83–7.49 vs.1.08–2.89, P<0.0001 vs. 0.02). More advanced T, N stage and cases who had peritoneal dissemination were significantly associated with endoscopic non-responder (all P values <0.01).

Conclusion

Endoscopy based evaluation of primary lesions are clearly associated with prognosis in patients with GC who perform chemotherapy.

Global chemotherapy development for gastric cancer

To combat the dismal mortality rates from metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC), new drugs and treatment strategies are needed. Today, metastatic GAC is predominantly treated by empiric chemotherapy. Combination of two cytotoxic agents has become commonplace in North America, Europe, and Asia. Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) overexpression (protein or gene copy numbers) has resulted in the addition of trastuzumab in the first-line chemotherapy combination in patients whose tumor is HER2 positive. The addition of trastuzumab in this select population has provided a modest survival advantage. In this review we trace the global development of systemic therapy in patients with metastatic GAC and ponder what lies in the future.

Phase II trial of capecitabine plus modified cisplatin (mXP) as first-line therapy in Japanese patients with metastatic gastric cancer (KSCC1104)

Purpose

Capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) is a standard therapy for metastatic gastric cancer (mGC). However, while results from previous phase III trials suggested that the cisplatin dosage should be reduced in Japanese patients, no clinical data exist to support this. Here, we conducted a multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of modified XP (mXP) in Japanese patients with mGC.

Methods

Patients with previously untreated mGC received mXP (cisplatin 60 mg/m² on day 1 plus capecitabine 1000 mg/m² twice daily on days 1–14) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors-confirmed overall response rate (ORR). A sample size of 40 was planned for a threshold ORR of 30% and an expected value of 50%, with a one-sided α of 0.05 and a beta of approximately 0.2.

Results

Forty-two patients were enrolled. One patient did not fulfill the eligibility criteria; therefore, a total of 41 patients were assessed. The results were as follows: complete response in 2 patients, partial response in 16, stable disease in 14, progressive disease in 8, and no evaluation in 1. The confirmed ORR was 43.9% (95% confidence interval 28.7–59.1%). The median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 4.6 and 11.3 months, respectively. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (37.5%), anemia (24.4%), anorexia (24.4%), and nausea (12.2%).

Conclusions

First-line chemotherapy with mXP in Japanese patients with mGC did not reach its primary objective. However, it did show a promising response rate and an acceptable tolerability profile.

Is conversion therapy possible in stage IV gastric cancer: the proposal of new biological categories of classification

Conversion therapy for gastric cancer (GC) has been the subject of much recent attention. It is defined as a surgical treatment aiming at an R0 resection after chemotherapy for tumors that were originally unresectable or marginally resectable for technical and/or oncological reasons. However, the indications for resection remain to be clarified. In the present review, we focus on the biology and heterogeneous characteristics of stage IV GC and propose new categories of classification. Stage IV GC patients can be divided based on the absence (categories 1 and 2) or presence (categories 3 and 4) of macroscopically detectable peritoneal dissemination, which has a different biological outcome compared to hematological metastasis. Category 1 is defined oncologically as stage IV but the metastasis is technically resectable. Category 2 includes a marginally resectable metastasis or patients for whom the operation would not necessarily be the best choice. Category 3 includes a potentially unresectable metastasis of peritoneal dissemination that is only macroscopically detectable. Category 4 includes noncurable metastasis with peritoneal and other organ metastasis. The indications for conversion therapy might include the patients from category 2, some patients from category 3 and a very small number of patients from category 4. The longer survival can be expected for patients corresponding to categories 1, 2 and, to a lesser extent, 3, while the treatment of other patients focuses on "care." The provision of conversion therapy for stage IV GC patients might be one of the main roles of surgical oncologists in the near future.

Correlation between expression of thymidylate synthase and clinical outcome of advanced gastric cancer treated with capecitabine alone chemotherapy

Thymidylate synthase (TS) is a prognostic marker in various tumors. However, the results of previous investigations in gastric cancer (GC) were controversial. The objective of this article is to investigate whether TS expression is associated with clinical outcome in advanced GC receiving capecitabine alone chemotherapy. The study reviewed 58 cases of advanced GC in patients aged ≥65 years between December 2008 and June 2012. All patients were treated with capecitabine alone chemotherapy. Immunohistochemical staining for TS protein expression was performed. The relationships between TS expression and clinicopathological characteristics (included age, gender, number of metastatic sites, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, differentiation, and lymph node metastatic status), chemotherapy response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. There was no association between TS expression and age, gender, number of metastatic sites, ECOG score, differentiation, and lymph node metastatic status (P > 0.05). The chemotherapy response rates among patients with low- and high-level expression of TS protein were 52.0 % (13/25) and 21.2 % (7/33), respectively (χ (2) = 5.968, P = 0.015). The median PFS and OS in patients with low-level TS expression were significantly longer than those with high-level TS expression (PFS 8.0 vs 2.8 m, P = 0.001; OS 13.3 vs 7.9 m, P = 0.002, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that TS expression was independent risk factor for OS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.237; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.108 to 0.520; P = 0.000). The present study demonstrates that TS expression is associated with chemotherapy response, PFS, and OS in advanced GC patients treated with capecitabine alone chemotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of capecitabine maintenance therapy after first-line paclitaxel/capecitabine chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel plus capecitabine (PACX) with subsequent capecitabine maintenance as first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS: Seventy-six eligible patients were randomly assigned to either group A or group B. In group A, 36 patient were treated with the paclitaxel/capecitabine (PACX) regimen, with 21 days as a cycle. Patients who responded to the therapy after 4 cycles were given capecitabine maintenance (1000 mg/m2, bid, d1-14, q3w) therapy until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. In group B, 40 patients were treated with the cisplatin/capecitabine (XP) regimen. A maximum of six cycles was given.

RESULTS: There was no significant difference in remission rate (RR) or disease control rate (DCR) between groups A and B (52.78% vs 45.00%, 80.56% vs 75.00%, P = 0.42). The RR and DCR were 17.24% and 72.4% in the maintenance group, and 0.00% and 46.67% in the follow-up group (P = 0.024, 0.043). The median progression free survival time (mPFS) in the maintenance group was 1.3 mo longer than that in the follow-up group (8.10 mo vs 6.86 mo, P = 0.021). The median overall survival time (mOS) and one-year survival rate were 2.41 mo longer (14.74 mo vs 12.33 mo) and 21.08% higher (69.23% vs 48.15%) than those in the follow-up group, but the differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.081, 0.118). Compared with the XP regimen, the incidence rates of alopecia and peripheral neurotoxicity associated with the PACX regimen were significantly higher, although most of them were mild (grade Ⅰ/Ⅱ). The incidence rate of nausea and vomiting was lower in patients receiving the PACX regimen. In the maintenance group, only the incidence rate of hand-foot syndrome was raised, and the other toxicities were reduced obviously. No treatment-related death was found.

CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel plus capecitabine with subsequent capecitabine maintenance therapy can increase the RR and DCR, prolong the PFS and OS and improve one-year survival rate, with good tolerance and safety.

Normal fibroblasts induce E-cadherin loss and increase lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer

Background

A tumor is considered a heterogeneous complex in a three-dimensional environment that is flush with pathophysiological and biomechanical signals. Cell-stroma interactions guide the development and generation of tumors. Here, we evaluate the contributions of normal fibroblasts to gastric cancer.

Methodology/Principal Findings

By coculturing normal fibroblasts in monolayers of BGC-823 gastric cancer cells, tumor cells sporadically developed short, spindle-like morphological characteristics and demonstrated enhanced proliferation and invasive potential. Furthermore, the transformed tumor cells demonstrated decreased tumor formation and increased lymphomatic and intestinal metastatic potential. Non-transformed BGC-823 cells, in contrast, demonstrated primary tumor formation and delayed intestinal and lymph node invasion. We also observed E-cadherin loss and the upregulation of vimentin expression in the transformed tumor cells, which suggested that the increase in metastasis was induced by epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition.

Conclusion

Collectively, our data indicated that normal fibroblasts sufficiently induce epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cancer cells, thereby leading to metastasis.

Optimal chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: is there a global consensus?

The optimal medical treatment for advanced gastric cancer is currently the source of debate. Cytotoxic treatment has been shown to prolong survival and provide improved symptom control compared with best supportive care alone, but a global standard has not yet been defined. A literature research was undertaken. Results were evaluated by an international author team. The conclusions of this are presented in this paper. Combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil was the preferred first-line chemotherapy, but oxaliplatin has shown equivalent efficacy to cisplatin. Oral fluoropyrimidines, especially S-1 and capecitabine, can substitute for 5-fluorouracil. Modern doublet regimens are preferred in the majority of patients on the basis of a balanced benefit-to-risk ratio. In selected fit and compliant patients, especially those with a high tumor burden or potential secondary resectability, a third drug may be added because triplet chemotherapy led to higher responses rates and enhanced efficacy. However, docetaxel also adds a significant increase in side effects. Monotherapy and early dose modifications should be considered in elderly and infirm patients. Beyond that, our understanding of gastric cancer tumor biology is increasing. In HER2-positive gastric cancer, the addition of the monoclononal anti-HER2 antibody trastuzumab to cisplatin and fluoropyrimidines has prolonged survival duration. Second-line chemotherapy with single agents has now become a proven treatment option. Alternatively, anti-angiogenic treatment with ramucirumab is on the horizon. In conclusion, combination chemotherapy is regarded as the global standard of care for the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Molecularly targeted treatments are being explored, preferably in combination with a backbone of chemotherapy doublets.

Management of gastric cancer in Asia: resource-stratified guidelines

Gastric cancer is the fourth most common cancer globally, and is the second most common cause of death from cancer worldwide. About three-quarters of newly diagnosed cases in 2008 were from Asian countries. With a high mortality-to-incidence ratio, management of gastric cancer is challenging. We discuss evidence for optimum management of gastric cancer in aspects of screening and early detection, diagnosis, and staging; endoscopic and surgical intervention; and the concepts of perioperative, postoperative, and palliative chemotherapy and use of molecularly targeted therapy. Recommendations are formulated on the basis of the framework provided by the Breast Health Global Initiative, using the categories of basic, limited, enhanced, and maximum level. We aim to provide a stepwise strategy for management of gastric cancer applicable to different levels of health-care resources in Asian countries.