1
|
Hodgins S, Sivertsson F, Beckley A, Luigi M, Carlsson C. The burden for clinical services of persons with an intellectual disability or mental disorder convicted of criminal offences: A birth cohort study of 14,605 persons followed to age 64. Nord J Psychiatry 2024:1-10. [PMID: 38613517 DOI: 10.1080/08039488.2024.2337192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intellectual disability (ID), schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD), bipolar disorder (BD), substance use disorder (SUD), and other mental disorders (OMDs) are associated with increased risks of criminality relative to sex-matched individuals without these conditions (NOIDMD). To resource psychiatric, addiction, and social services so as to provide effective treatments, further information is needed about the size of sub-groups convicted of crimes, recidivism, timing of offending, antecedents, and correlates. Stigma of persons with mental disorders could potentially be dramatically reduced if violence was prevented. METHODS A birth cohort of 14,605 persons was followed to age 64 using data from Swedish national health, criminal, and social registers. RESULTS Percentages of group members convicted of violence differed significantly: males NOIDMD, 7.3%, ID 29.2%, SSD 38.6%, BD 30.7%; SUD 44.0%, and OMD 19.3%; females NOIDMD 0.8%, ID 7.7%, SSD 11.2%, BD 2.4%, SD 17.0%, and OMD 2.1%. Violent recidivism was high. Most violent offenders in the diagnostic groups were also convicted of non-violent crimes. Prior to first diagnosis, convictions (violent or non-violent) had been acquired by over 90% of the male offenders and two-thirds of the female offenders. Physical victimization, adult comorbid SUD, childhood conduct problems, and adolescent substance misuse were each associated with increased risks of offending. CONCLUSION Sub-groups of cohort members with ID or mental disorders were convicted of violent and non-violent crimes to age 64 suggesting the need for treatment of primary disorders and for antisocial/aggressive behavior. Many patients engaging in violence could be identified at first contact with clinical services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheilagh Hodgins
- Département de psychiatrie et addictologie, Université de Montréal, and Centre de Recherche Institut national de psychiatrie légale Philippe-Pinel, Centre de Recherche Institut national de psychiatrie légale Philippe-Pinel, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Amber Beckley
- School of Behavioural, Social and Legal Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Mimosa Luigi
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Christoffer Carlsson
- Department of Criminology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
- Institute for Futures Studies, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vest N, Bell JS, Nieder A, Smith R, Bannard T, Tragesser S, Hibbard P, Dick DM. Learning with conviction: Exploring the relationship between criminal legal system involvement and substance use and recovery outcomes for students in collegiate recovery programs. Drug Alcohol Depend 2024; 257:111127. [PMID: 38394814 PMCID: PMC11031344 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.111127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
This study examines the association of criminal legal system involvement and age with substance use and academic related outcomes among students involved in collegiate recovery programs in the US. We examined 435 students in collegiate recovery using a national survey of college students. We computed differences between non-system-involved, system-involved with no incarceration history, and formerly incarcerated participants on relevant substance use and recovery-related outcomes. The results provide evidence that there are significant differences between those system-involved and those who are not. Specifically, we found significant differences across the outcomes of recovery capital, quality of life, hours worked per week, and substance use disorder symptoms, but after controlling for relevant covariates, only the differences between hours worked (non-system involved and system involved < formerly incarcerated) and substance use disorder symptoms (non-system involved < system involved and formerly incarcerated) remained significant. The study contributes to the literature by demonstrating that nearly half of the collegiate students in recovery in this sample have legal system-involvement and a third have been incarcerated. Further, interventions for collegiate recovery programs may need to be adjusted to account for legal system involvement among their members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noel Vest
- Boston University, School of Public Health, Community and Health Sciences, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Boston, MA 02118, United States.
| | - Justin S Bell
- DePaul University, Center for Community Research, 990 W. Fullerton Ave, Chicago, IL 60614, USA
| | - Alexa Nieder
- DePaul University, Center for Community Research, 990 W. Fullerton Ave, Chicago, IL 60614, USA
| | - Rebecca Smith
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Psychology, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Thomas Bannard
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Psychology, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Sarah Tragesser
- Washington State University, Tri-Cities Campus, 2710 Crimson Way. Richland, WA 99354, USA
| | - Patrick Hibbard
- Chestnut Health Systems - Lighthouse Institute, 221 Walton St, Chicago, IL 60610, USA
| | - Danielle M Dick
- Rutgers University, Department of Psychiatry, 671 Hoes Lane W, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
DiRosa E, Van Deinse T, Cuddeback G, Murray-Lichtman A, Carda-Auten J, Rosen D. Mental Healthcare Practices from Entry to Release across Southeastern Jails. Res Sq 2024:rs.3.rs-4144413. [PMID: 38586059 PMCID: PMC10996800 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4144413/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
Background Individuals with mental illnesses are disproportionately incarcerated in jails, which have become de facto mental health institutions across the US. Yet there is limited research describing mental healthcare practices from entry to release among multiple jails and states. Methods We conducted 34 semi-structured interviews with jail healthcare personnel across five Southeastern states. Results We report results on challenges and practices related to mental health staffing, screening, additional evaluations and services, and discharge planning in jails. Initial mental health screenings were often restricted to the detection of suicidality and history of treatment and medications as opposed to current mental health symptoms. Use of validated mental health screening forms was uncommon. We found delays in care between the initial health screening and being evaluated by a mental health professional. Most jails reported primary responsibilities for mental health care as preventing suicides and managing psychiatric medications. Jails reported mental health care as challenging to manage, with high volumes of individuals with mental health needs, yet limited resources, especially regarding staffing. Discharge planning was limited despite reports of poor continuity of mental healthcare. Conclusions Jails have a constitutional duty and opportunity to provide adequate healthcare to individuals with mental illnesses, yet practices are insufficient and resources are limited across jails. Based on our findings, we recommend 1) greater adoption and revisions of jail health standards 2) system improvement that expands identification of mental illnesses and quicker, less variable follow-up mental health evaluations, 3) improved linkages and supports for community resources that prevent incarceration of this population.
Collapse
|
4
|
Karabulut S. A 6-Month Follow-Up Study: Cognitive Impairment May Predict More Frequent Use of Methamphetamine. Subst Abuse 2023; 17:11782218231175811. [PMID: 37216038 PMCID: PMC10192674 DOI: 10.1177/11782218231175811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Objectives Methamphetamine (METH) use has been associated with impairments in a variety of cognitive functions. In this study, it was aimed to assess the relation between cognitive measures and frequency of METH use. Methods Ninety-eight participants with methamphetamine use disorder were assessed with Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), Victoria-Stroop Word Color Test (SWCT), Trail Making Test (TMT) A and B. Participants were followed up during 6-month period with multiple urine toxicology tests (at baseline, month 1, month 2, month 3 and month 6). Results Participants who had their prescriptions regularly were more likely to have higher rates of METH-negative urine results (P = .003). Participants who had more correct numbers, completed more categories and had more conceptual level responses on WCST were more likely to use lower frequency of METH (OR = 0.006, P < .01; OR = 0.171, P < .001; OR = 0.024, P < .001; respectively). The higher error numbers and perseverative error rates on WCST were associated with more frequent METH use (OR = 0.023, P < .001; OR = 0.076, P < .001). Interference factor on SWCT was related with lower frequency of METH use whereas color naming factor on SWCT was related with higher rates of urine results (OR = 0.012, P < .001; OR = 3.628, P < .001; respectively). Higher TMT B-A score was related with more frequent METH use, although the significance disappeared after adjustment (OR = 0.002, P < .001). Having psychotic symptoms predicted less frequent use, but after adjustment for other significant variables, there was no significance. Conclusion Lower frequency of METH use in the follow-up could be predicted by neurocognitive assessments. Deficits in executive functions, attention, set-shifting and mental flexibility seems to be the most effected domains and this effect may be independent from the severity of psychotic symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sercan Karabulut
- Sercan Karabulut, Centre of Alcohol and
Substance Addiction Treatment, Ataturk State Hospital, Nebiler, 7192 Sok.,
Kepez/Döşemealtı/Antalya 07192, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Maeng D, Tsun ZY, Lesch E, Jacobowitz DB, Strawderman RL, Harrington DK, Li Y, Weisman RL, Lamberti JS. Affordability of Forensic Assertive Community Treatment Programs: A Return-on-Investment Analysis. Psychiatr Serv 2023; 74:358-364. [PMID: 36065582 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In this study, the authors assessed return on investment (ROI) associated with a forensic assertive community treatment (FACT) program. METHODS A retrospective secondary data analysis of a randomized controlled trial comprising 70 legal-involved patients with severe mental illness was conducted in Rochester, New York. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either FACT or outpatient psychiatric treatment including intensive case management. Unit of service costs associated with psychiatric emergency department visits, psychiatric inpatient days, and days in jail were obtained from records of New York State Medicaid and the Department of Corrections. The total dollar value difference between the two trial arms calculated on a per-patient-per-year (PPPY) basis constituted the return from the FACT intervention. The FACT investment cost was defined by the total additional PPPY cost associated with FACT implementation relative to the control group. ROI was calculated by dividing the return by the investment cost. RESULTS The estimated return from FACT was $27,588 PPPY (in 2019 dollars; 95% confidence interval [CI]=$3,262-$51,913), which was driven largely by reductions in psychiatric inpatient days, and the estimated investment cost was $18,440 PPPY (95% CI=$15,215-$21,665), implying an ROI of 1.50 (95% CI=0.35-2.97) for FACT. CONCLUSIONS The Rochester FACT program was associated with approximately $1.50 return for every $1 spent on its implementation, even without considering potential returns from other sources, including reductions in acute medical care, crime-related damages, and public safety costs. ROI estimates were highly dependent on context-specific factors, particularly Medicaid reimbursement rates for assertive community treatment and hospital stays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Maeng
- Departments of Psychiatry (Maeng, Tsun, Lesch, Jacobowitz, Weisman, Lamberti), Biostatistics and Computational Biology (Strawderman, Harrington), and Public Health Sciences (Li), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Zhi-Yang Tsun
- Departments of Psychiatry (Maeng, Tsun, Lesch, Jacobowitz, Weisman, Lamberti), Biostatistics and Computational Biology (Strawderman, Harrington), and Public Health Sciences (Li), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Eric Lesch
- Departments of Psychiatry (Maeng, Tsun, Lesch, Jacobowitz, Weisman, Lamberti), Biostatistics and Computational Biology (Strawderman, Harrington), and Public Health Sciences (Li), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - David B Jacobowitz
- Departments of Psychiatry (Maeng, Tsun, Lesch, Jacobowitz, Weisman, Lamberti), Biostatistics and Computational Biology (Strawderman, Harrington), and Public Health Sciences (Li), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Robert L Strawderman
- Departments of Psychiatry (Maeng, Tsun, Lesch, Jacobowitz, Weisman, Lamberti), Biostatistics and Computational Biology (Strawderman, Harrington), and Public Health Sciences (Li), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Donald K Harrington
- Departments of Psychiatry (Maeng, Tsun, Lesch, Jacobowitz, Weisman, Lamberti), Biostatistics and Computational Biology (Strawderman, Harrington), and Public Health Sciences (Li), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Yue Li
- Departments of Psychiatry (Maeng, Tsun, Lesch, Jacobowitz, Weisman, Lamberti), Biostatistics and Computational Biology (Strawderman, Harrington), and Public Health Sciences (Li), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Robert L Weisman
- Departments of Psychiatry (Maeng, Tsun, Lesch, Jacobowitz, Weisman, Lamberti), Biostatistics and Computational Biology (Strawderman, Harrington), and Public Health Sciences (Li), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - J Steven Lamberti
- Departments of Psychiatry (Maeng, Tsun, Lesch, Jacobowitz, Weisman, Lamberti), Biostatistics and Computational Biology (Strawderman, Harrington), and Public Health Sciences (Li), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Research into serious mental illness and probation is reviewed. In addition, there is a specific review of the role of specialist mental health probation staff in the United States (US). In the discussion, we compare progress with the care of the seriously mentally ill within probation in Europe and the US. We conclude that the specialist role for probation staff developed in the US has significant advantages which have been well evaluated which should be implemented, in a large multi-centre trial, across Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tonya van Deinse
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Barnett P, Steare T, Dedat Z, Pilling S, McCrone P, Knapp M, Cooke E, Lamirel D, Dawson S, Goldblatt P, Hatch S, Henderson C, Jenkins R, K T, Machin K, Simpson A, Shah P, Stevens M, Webber M, Johnson S, Lloyd-Evans B. Interventions to improve social circumstances of people with mental health conditions: a rapid evidence synthesis. BMC Psychiatry 2022; 22:302. [PMID: 35484521 PMCID: PMC9047264 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-03864-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poor social circumstances can induce, exacerbate and prolong symptoms of mental health conditions, while having a mental health condition can also lead to worse social outcomes. Many people with mental health conditions prioritise improvement in social and functional outcomes over reduction in clinical symptoms. Interventions that improve social circumstances in this population should thus be considered a priority for research and policy. METHODS This rapid evidence synthesis reports on randomised controlled trials of interventions to improve social circumstances across eight social domains (Housing and homelessness; money and basic needs; work and education; social isolation and connectedness; family, intimate and caring relationships; victimisation and exploitation; offending; and rights, inclusion and citizenship) in people with mental health conditions. Economic evaluations were also identified. A comprehensive, stepped search approach of the Cochrane library, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Scopus was conducted. RESULTS One systematic review and 102 randomised controlled trials were included. We did not find RCT evidence for interventions to improve family, intimate and caring relationships and only one or two trials for each of improving money and basic needs, victimisation and exploitation, and rights, inclusion and citizenship. Evidence from successful interventions in improving homelessness (Housing First) and employment (Individual Placement and Support) suggests that high-intensity interventions which focus on the desired social outcome and provide comprehensive multidisciplinary support could influence positive change in social circumstances of people with mental health conditions. Objective social isolation could be improved using a range of approaches such as supported socialisation and social skills training but interventions to reduce offending showed few benefits. Studies with cost and cost-effectiveness components were generally supportive of interventions to improve housing and vocational outcomes. More research is needed to ensure that social circumstances accompanied by high risks of further exacerbation of mental health conditions are adequately addressed. CONCLUSIONS Although there is a large body of literature examining how to support some aspects of life for people with mental health conditions, more high-quality evidence is required in other social domains. Integration into mental health services of interventions targeting social circumstances could significantly improve a number of social outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phoebe Barnett
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK. .,Department of Psychiatry, Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Thomas Steare
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Department of Psychiatry, Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Zainab Dedat
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Department of Psychiatry, Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen Pilling
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB UK ,grid.452735.20000 0004 0496 9767National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK ,grid.450564.60000 0000 8609 9937Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Paul McCrone
- grid.36316.310000 0001 0806 5472Institute of Lifecourse Development, University of Greenwich, London, UK
| | - Martin Knapp
- grid.13063.370000 0001 0789 5319Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Eleanor Cooke
- grid.450564.60000 0000 8609 9937Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust and MH Policy Research Unit, London, UK
| | - Daphne Lamirel
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Department of Psychiatry, Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Dawson
- grid.5337.20000 0004 1936 7603Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England
| | - Peter Goldblatt
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, Institute of Health Equity, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stephani Hatch
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychological Medicine, Kings College London, London, UK ,grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Claire Henderson
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Health Services and Population Research Department, Kings College London, London, UK ,grid.37640.360000 0000 9439 0839South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rachel Jenkins
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurology, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - T K
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Mental Health Policy Research Unit Lived Experience Working Group, Department of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Karen Machin
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Mental Health Policy Research Unit Lived Experience Working Group, Department of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alan Simpson
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Department of Psychiatry, Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK ,grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Health Services and Population Research Department, Kings College London, London, UK ,grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Kings College London, Midwifery & Palliative care, London, UK
| | - Prisha Shah
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Mental Health Policy Research Unit Lived Experience Working Group, Department of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Martin Stevens
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764NIHR Policy Research Unit On Health and Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Martin Webber
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668International Centre for Mental Health Social Research, Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York, York, England
| | - Sonia Johnson
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Department of Psychiatry, Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK ,grid.450564.60000 0000 8609 9937Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Department of Psychiatry, Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Heun-Johnson H, Zuluaga KV, Menchine M, Starkey S, David RF, Seabury S. Assessing the Use of Data Systems to Estimate Return-on-Investment of Behavioral Healthcare Interventions: Opportunities and Barriers. J Behav Health Serv Res 2022. [PMID: 35415803 DOI: 10.1007/s11414-022-09794-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/12/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
To improve access to and quality of affordable behavioral healthcare, there is a need for more research to identify which interventions can generate long-term, societal return-on-investment (ROI). Barriers to ROI studies in the behavioral health sector were explored by conducting semi-structured interviews with individuals from key stakeholder groups at state and national behavioral health-related organizations. Limited operating budgets, state-based payer systems, the lack of financial support, privacy laws, and other unique experiences of behavioral health providers and patients were identified as important factors that affect the collection and utilization of data. To comprehensively assess ROI of interventions, it is necessary to improve standardization and data infrastructure across multiple health and non-health systems and clarify or address legal, regulatory, and commercial conflicts.
Collapse
|
9
|
Costigan CL, Woodin EM, Duerksen KN, Ferguson R. Benefits and Drawbacks of Police Integration Into Assertive Community Treatment Teams. Psychiatr Serv 2022; 73:447-455. [PMID: 34615367 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Assertive community treatment (ACT) teams provide outreach services to individuals coping with severe mental illness. Because such individuals are at increased risk for involvement with law enforcement, a model that integrates police officers into ACT teams (ACT-PI) was developed for ACT teams serving clients with or without forensic involvement. The goal of this study, conducted in British Columbia, was to evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of the ACT-PI model. METHODS Qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted with 21 ACT-PI clients (in 2017) and 22 ACT-PI staff (in 2018). Thematic analyses identified key themes related to the benefits and drawbacks of officer integration into the ACT-PI model. RESULTS Perceived benefits of police integration were opportunities for relationship building between officers and clients, improved safety, more holistic care due to embeddedness (i.e., effective interagency collaboration between police and health care providers), the prevention of future problems, and police officers' authority enhancing compliance. Perceived drawbacks included risk for legal consequences, stigma from police interaction, escalating distress of clients, low officer availability, and the risk for changing the nature of ACT teams. CONCLUSIONS Participants reported that the model of officer integration into ACT-PI teams may improve both client and staff well-being. In some communities, and with certain precautions, ACT-PI may be a viable model for ACT teams serving clients with and clients without a history of forensic involvement.
Collapse
|
10
|
Misra S, Etkins OS, Yang LH, Williams DR. Structural Racism and Inequities in Incidence, Course of Illness, and Treatment of Psychotic Disorders Among Black Americans. Am J Public Health 2022; 112:624-632. [PMID: 35319958 PMCID: PMC8961835 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2021.306631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Psychotic disorders (e.g., schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder) are a leading cause of morbidity and premature mortality and an overlooked health inequity in the United States. European data indicate inequities in incidence, severity, and treatment of psychotic disorders, particularly for Black communities, that appear to be primarily attributable to social adversities. The dominant US narrative is that any observed differences are primarily a result of clinician bias and misdiagnosis. We propose that employing the framework of structural racism will prompt European and US research to converge and consider the multifaceted drivers of inequities in psychotic disorders among Black Americans. In particular, we describe how historical and contemporary practices of (1) racialized policing and incarceration, and (2) economic exploitation and disinvestment, which are already linked to other psychiatric disorders, likely contribute to risks and experiences of psychotic disorders among Black Americans. This framework can inform new strategies to (1) document the role of racism in the incidence, severity, and treatment of psychotic disorders; and (2) dismantle how racism operates in the United States, including defunding the police, abolishing carceral systems, and redirecting funds to invest in neighborhoods, housing, and community-based crisis response and mental health care. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(4):624-632. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306631).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Supriya Misra
- Supriya Misra is with the Department of Public Health, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA. Onisha S. Etkins and David R. Williams are with the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA. Lawrence H. Yang is with the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY
| | - Onisha S Etkins
- Supriya Misra is with the Department of Public Health, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA. Onisha S. Etkins and David R. Williams are with the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA. Lawrence H. Yang is with the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY
| | - Lawrence H Yang
- Supriya Misra is with the Department of Public Health, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA. Onisha S. Etkins and David R. Williams are with the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA. Lawrence H. Yang is with the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY
| | - David R Williams
- Supriya Misra is with the Department of Public Health, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA. Onisha S. Etkins and David R. Williams are with the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA. Lawrence H. Yang is with the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW We reviewed the existing and recent community models of care in schizophrenia. We examine characteristics, recent updates, evidence, cost-effectiveness, and patients' acceptance for existing and new community-based care models in high-income (HI) and low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries. RECENT FINDINGS Assertive Community Treatment (ACT), Intensive Case Management (ICM), and Crisis Intervention are cost-effective interventions for schizophrenia and time tested in the last few decades in HI countries. The growing evidence suggests that tailor-made ACTs and ICM can effectively reduce substance use, homelessness, and criminal activity in persons with schizophrenia who live in the community. Similarly, in LAMI Countries, a few community-based care models for schizophrenia have been developed and tested based on community-based rehabilitation principles. The modality of a community model of care and interventions for a person with schizophrenia should be chosen based on the person's co-existing psychosocial difficulties and challenges such as homelessness, criminal behaviour, and substance use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guru S. Gowda
- grid.416861.c0000 0001 1516 2246Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, 560029 India
| | - Mohan K. Isaac
- grid.415051.40000 0004 0402 6638Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Fremantle Hospital, Fremantle Hospital, Level 7, T Block, Fremantle, WA 6160 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Marquant T, Van Nuffel M, Sabbe B, Goethals K. Substance Use Disorders as a Critical Element for Decision-Making in Forensic Assertive Community Treatment: A Systematic Review. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:777141. [PMID: 34950071 PMCID: PMC8688775 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.777141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The prevalence of substance use disorders in forensic populations is high. They are an important factor linked to negative outcomes in mentally ill offenders and are detrimental to forensic or non-forensic outcome measures. In contrast, substance use disorders are often underdiagnosed and undertreated, especially in forensic settings. Forensic Assertive Community Treatment is a forensic adaptation of regular assertive community treatment, combined with essential elements of forensic rehabilitation theories. Little is known however on the effectivity of forensic assertive community treatment when it comes to substance use disorders or what their exact role is on the outcome measures. In this paper, we explore how SUD is treated in Forensic assertive community treatment and how it relates to the forensic and non-forensic outcome measures. Methods: We performed a systematic review (PRISMA) of forensic Assertive community treatment teams that followed the main evidence-based principles of regular assertive community treatment and added basic elements of forensic rehabilitation. We analyzed articles the Psychinfo and Medline databases dating from 2005 to 2020. Fifteen studies fit the search criteria and were included in the analysis. The Quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: SUD was highly prevalent in all studies. Patients entered FACT through two pathways, either from a care continuum or directly from prison. The severity of SUD at intake emerges as a critical element when deciding which pathway to choose, as a high severity-score at the start of FACT follow-up was linked to recidivism. While differing in method all studies offered integrated SUD treatment. These included evidence-based techniques like CBT, therapeutic communities, and Substance Abuse Management Module. Though results on SUD outcomes were mixed 4 studies mentioned abstinence in 50-75%. The severity of SUD tended to increase initially and to stabilize afterwards. Conclusion: Severity of SUD at intake emerges as a decisive element in decision-making on entering FACT teams directly from prison or through a care-continuum. The ways to provide SUD treatment varied and outcomes for SUD were mixed. SUD was found to be detrimental to forensic and non-forensic outcome measures, such as recidivism or hospitalizations during FACT treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Marquant
- Department of Psychiatry, Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Fivoor, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Justice, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Bernard Sabbe
- Department of Psychiatry, Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Psychiatry, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Psychiatry, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Kris Goethals
- Department of Psychiatry, Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Psychiatry, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Psychiatry, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University Forensic Center, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Smeekens MV, Sappelli F, de Vries MG, Bulten BH. Dutch Forensic Flexible Assertive Community Treatment: Operating on the Interface Between General Mental Health Care and Forensic Psychiatric Care. Front Psychol 2021; 12:708722. [PMID: 34630215 PMCID: PMC8492920 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In the Netherlands, Forensic Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (ForFACT) is used as a specialized form of outpatient intensive treatment. This outreaching type of treatment is aimed at patients with severe and long lasting psychiatric problems that are at risk of engaging in criminal behavior. In addition, these patients often suffer from addiction and experience problems in different areas of their life (e.g., financial debt, unemployment, or lack of daytime activities). The aim of this exploratory study was to gain more insight into the characteristics of the ForFACT patient population. More knowledge about these patients may enhance the effectiveness of ForFACT and therefore (further) reduce the risk of recidivism. Data on 132 ForFACT patients were gathered by studying electronic patient records, criminal records, and by conducting semi-structured interviews with practitioners and patients. Additionally, as part of a cognitive screening, two screening instruments were conducted to gain insight into intelligence and possible mild cognitive impairments. This article gives a broad description of the ForFACT patient population, including demographic data and context variables, diagnostics, recidivism risk and offense history, and aspects related to care. Furthermore, several recommendations are given to further improve ForFACT. Based on the results it can be concluded that the ForFACT patient population shows a high degree of diversity in complex care needs and responsivity issues. Therefore, this article highlights the necessity for ForFACT to collaborate with other mental health institutions, as well as probation officers, and forensic or criminal justice institutions. Moreover, it is important to continually check the inclusion and exclusion criteria when admitting patients to ForFACT, and to examine whether ForFACT is still the most adequate care for patients or if they need to be referred. In addition, the results emphasize the importance of cognitive screening for forensic outpatients. Finally, this study zooms in on the interface between forensic psychiatric care and general mental health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjam V Smeekens
- Department Assessment, Research and Professional Development, Pompefoundation, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Fedde Sappelli
- Department Assessment, Research and Professional Development, Pompefoundation, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Meike G de Vries
- Department Assessment, Research and Professional Development, Pompefoundation, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Berend H Bulten
- Department Assessment, Research and Professional Development, Pompefoundation, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Faculty of Social Sciences, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
LEARNING OBJECTIVE After participating in this activity, learners should be better able to:• Assess characteristics of forensic assertive community treatment programs. ABSTRACT Forensic assertive community treatment (FACT) has emerged internationally as an intervention strategy for people with serious mental disorders who are involved with the criminal justice system. Studies to date have shown marked variability, however, in FACT program design and operation. Based upon a literature review and relevant experience, the authors present their perspective on the essential elements of FACT. Given that FACT is an adaptation of the evidence-based assertive community treatment (ACT) model, it is recommended that FACT programs maintain a high-fidelity ACT component. FACT programs should also have both mental health and criminal justice admission criteria because service recipients are involved in both service systems. For optimal effectiveness, FACT team clinicians must partner with criminal justice agencies that provide community-based supervision to their patients. Prospective FACT enrollees should receive a clear explanation of the program, including how their respective mental health and criminal justice service providers will work collaboratively with them to prevent incarceration. FACT programs should also use risk/need assessment to inform treatment planning, evidence-based mental health and community correctional practices to promote both wellness and public safety, and shared training to promote effective collaboration. Additional elements to consider include housing, medical care, and transitional services. These elements are presented and discussed, including a rationale and evidence to support each component. The article concludes with introduction of a FACT fidelity scale, the Rochester Forensic Assertive Community Treatment Scale (R-FACTS). By operationalizing essential FACT elements, the R-FACTS is designed to support FACT program development, implementation, and dissemination in a more consistent and measurable manner.
Collapse
|
15
|
Galletta E, Fagan TJ, Shapiro D, Walker LE. Societal Reentry of Prison Inmates With Mental Illness: Obstacles, Programs, and Best Practices. J Correct Health Care 2021; 27:58-65. [PMID: 34232765 DOI: 10.1089/jchc.19.04.0032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Societal reentry from prison presents a wide array of extreme challenges to inmates attempting to reintegrate with society. This process is significantly more daunting for inmates suffering from mental illness for several reasons. This paper examines the reentry process for inmates with mental illness. Three sample reentry programs (Forensic Assertive Community Treatment, Critical Time Intervention, and Thresholds' Prison Aftercare Program) that were developed for inmates with mental illness are discussed along with research testifying to the effectiveness of these programs. Finally, components that would comprise an ideal prison reentry program for mentally ill inmates are outlined, which include a three-phase structure and a focus on preparing both inmates and communities for the reentry process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas J Fagan
- Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA
| | - David Shapiro
- Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Swinkels LTA, van der Pol TM, Popma A, ter Harmsel JF, Dekker JJM. Improving mental wellbeing of forensic psychiatric outpatients through the addition of an informal social network intervention to treatment as usual: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 2020; 20:418. [PMID: 32842971 PMCID: PMC7446148 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-020-02819-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Forensic psychiatric patients often suffer from a multitude of severe psychiatric and social problems. Meanwhile multimodal evidence-based interventions are scarce and treatment effectiveness is in need of improvement. The main goal of forensic psychiatric treatment is to address psychiatric and social factors and thereby mitigate criminal behaviour. Notably, a supportive social network is an important protective factor for criminal behaviour. As such, improving a poor social network may decrease the risk of criminal recidivism. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of the addition of an informal social network intervention (FNC) to treatment as usual (TAU) among forensic psychiatric outpatients. METHODS In a mono-center randomized controlled clinical trial with two parallel groups, forensic psychiatric outpatients with social network-related problems (N = 105) will be allocated to either TAU + FNC or TAU alone. The informal social network intervention consists of a 12-month coaching intervention, performed by the forensic network coach (a volunteer trained by an informal care institute). Assessments will be conducted at baseline and 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, and 18 months after baseline. The primary outcome variable is mental wellbeing. Psychiatric functioning, criminal recidivism, substance abuse, quality of life, social network, social support, loneliness and self-sufficiency are included as secondary outcomes. A variety of potential mediators and moderators of effectiveness will be explored. Additionally, a qualitative evaluation of effectiveness will be performed. DISCUSSION This study will contribute to the existing literature of forensic treatment effectiveness as it is the first RCT examining the effectiveness of adding a social network intervention in a forensic outpatient population. If effectiveness is shown, forensic mental health care could be optimized by collaborating with informal care or community initiatives aimed at improving a positive social network. In addition, results will provide insight regarding mediators and moderators of treatment effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study is registered at the Netherlands Trial Register ( NTR7163 ). Date of registration: 16 april 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. T. A. Swinkels
- Inforsa Forensic Mental Health Care, Vlaardingenlaan 5, 1059 GL Amsterdam, the Netherlands ,Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 5, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - T. M. van der Pol
- Inforsa Forensic Mental Health Care, Vlaardingenlaan 5, 1059 GL Amsterdam, the Netherlands ,Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 5, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A. Popma
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 5, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J. F. ter Harmsel
- Inforsa Forensic Mental Health Care, Vlaardingenlaan 5, 1059 GL Amsterdam, the Netherlands ,Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 5, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J. J. M. Dekker
- Department of Research, Arkin Mental Health Care, Klaprozenweg 111, 1033 NN Amsterdam, the Netherlands ,grid.12380.380000 0004 1754 9227Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University, Klaprozenweg 111, 1033 NN Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cuddeback GS, Simpson JM, Wu JC. A comprehensive literature review of Forensic Assertive Community Treatment (FACT): Directions for practice, policy and research. International Journal of Mental Health 2020. [DOI: 10.1080/00207411.2020.1717054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Gary S. Cuddeback
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Juliet C. Wu
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Loong D, Bonato S, Barnsley J, Dewa CS. The Effectiveness of Mental Health Courts in Reducing Recidivism and Police Contact: A Systematic Review. Community Ment Health J 2019; 55:1073-98. [PMID: 31175516 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-019-00421-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2018] [Accepted: 05/30/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Mental health courts were created to help criminal defendants who have a mental illness that significantly contributes to their criminal offense. The purpose of this systematic literature review is to assess the current evidence to address the question, "How effective are mental health courts in reducing recidivism and police contact?" Systematic literature searches of eight electronic databases were performed. A total of 2590 unique citations were identified. Of these, 20 studies were included in the final analysis. The results of this systematic review suggest there is some evidence to show that mental health courts help to reduce recidivism rates, but the effect on police contact is less clear. Results also suggest case managers or access to vocational and housing services may be important components of effective mental health courts.
Collapse
|
19
|
Finlay AK, Owens MD, Taylor E, Nash A, Capdarest-Arest N, Rosenthal J, Blue-Howells J, Clark S, Timko C. A scoping review of military veterans involved in the criminal justice system and their health and healthcare. Health Justice 2019; 7:6. [PMID: 30963311 PMCID: PMC6718001 DOI: 10.1186/s40352-019-0086-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the criminal justice system, special populations, such as older adults or patients with infectious diseases, have been identified as particularly vulnerable to poor health outcomes. Military veterans involved in the criminal justice system are also a vulnerable population warranting attention because of their unique healthcare needs. This review aims to provide an overview of existing literature on justice-involved veterans' health and healthcare to identify research gaps and inform policy and practice. METHODS A systematic search was conducted to identify research articles related to justice-involved veterans' health and healthcare that were published prior to December 2017. Study characteristics including healthcare category, study design, sample size, and funding source were extracted and summarized with the aim of providing an overview of extant literature. RESULTS The search strategy initially identified 1830 unique abstracts with 1387 abstracts then excluded. Full-text review of 443 articles was conducted with 252 excluded. There were 191 articles included, most related to veterans' mental health (130/191, 68%) or homelessness (24/191, 13%). Most studies used an observational design (173/191, 91%). CONCLUSIONS Knowledge gaps identified from the review provide guidance on future areas of research. Studies on different sociodemographic groups, medical conditions, and the management of multiple conditions and psychosocial challenges are needed. Developing and testing interventions, especially randomized trials, to address justice-involved veterans care needs will help to improve their health and healthcare. Finally, an integrated conceptual framework that draws from diverse disciplines, such as criminology, health services, psychology, and implementation science is needed to inform research, policy and practice focused on justice-involved veterans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea K. Finlay
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA
- Department of Veterans Affairs, National Center on Homelessness Among Veterans, 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA
| | - Mandy D. Owens
- Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, 1660 S. Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Magnuson Health Sciences Center, Room H-680, Box 357660, Seattle, WA 98195-7660 USA
| | - Emmeline Taylor
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA
| | - Amia Nash
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA
| | - Nicole Capdarest-Arest
- Blaisdell Medical Library, University of California, Davis, 4610 X St, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
| | - Joel Rosenthal
- Veterans Justice Programs, Department of Veterans Affairs, 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA
| | - Jessica Blue-Howells
- Veterans Justice Programs, Department of Veterans Affairs, 11301 Wilshire Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90073 USA
| | - Sean Clark
- Veterans Justice Programs, Department of Veterans Affairs, 2250 Leestown Road, Lexington, KY 40511 USA
| | - Christine Timko
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA 94305-5717 USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Yuan Y, Manuel JI. The Relationship Between Residential Mobility and Behavioral Health Service Use in a National Sample of Adults With Mental Health and/or Substance Abuse Problems. J Dual Diagn 2018; 14:201-210. [PMID: 30303466 DOI: 10.1080/15504263.2018.1493557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Individuals with mental health and/or substance abuse problems experience disparities in health care utilization. While previous studies have focused on individual and social determinants of health care use in these populations, few have investigated the role of residential stability, especially in relation to different types of service use (i.e., inpatient vs. outpatient treatment). The present study examined the relationship between residential mobility, defined as the number of residential relocations in the past year, and past-year use of four types of behavioral services (i.e., inpatient and outpatient mental health services, inpatient and outpatient substance abuse services) among a national sample of adults with mental health and/or substance abuse problems. METHODS Data were drawn from the 2011-2014 National Survey of Drug Use and Health (unweighted N = 43,411). Based on prior literature and theory, we hypothesized that individuals who frequently relocate are more likely to use inpatient services and are less likely to use outpatient services. Logistic regression analyses were conducted and all models controlled for predisposing, need, and enabling factors. RESULTS Compared to individuals who did not move in the past year, those who moved three or more times were more likely to report using inpatient mental health and substance abuse services. The relationship between residential mobility and outpatient mental health and substance use service use is not significant. CONCLUSIONS The findings highlight the importance of understanding housing stability as a predictor factor of service use and access. Future research is needed to shed light on the pathway through which residential mobility affects behavioral health service utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeqing Yuan
- a Silver School of Social Work , New York University , New York , NY , USA
| | - Jennifer I Manuel
- a Silver School of Social Work , New York University , New York , NY , USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Easter A, Pollock M, Pope LG, Wisdom JP, Smith TE. Perspectives of Treatment Providers and Clients with Serious Mental Illness Regarding Effective Therapeutic Relationships. J Behav Health Serv Res 2016; 43:341-53. [PMID: 26658917 DOI: 10.1007/s11414-015-9492-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
This study explores the nature of clinical therapeutic relationships between mental health treatment providers and high-need clients with serious mental illness who had recently discontinued treatment. Semi-structured qualitative interviews of 56 clients with serious mental illness who had recently discontinued care and 25 mental health treatment providers were completed. Both clients with serious mental illness and treatment providers emphasized the importance of client-focused goal setting, time and availability of treatment providers, a caring approach, and trust and honesty in the relationship. However, clients with serious mental illness placed greater emphasis on goals involving tangible services, a notable area of discord between the two groups. Individuals with serious mental illness and treatment providers agreed regarding several key elements to a positive clinical relationship. Further attention to client goals related to tangible services may serve to improve relationships between treatment providers and high-need clients with serious mental illness.
Collapse
|
22
|
Marquant T, Sabbe B, Van Nuffel M, Verelst R, Goethals K. Forensic Assertive Community Treatment in a Continuum of Care for Male Internees in Belgium: Results After 33 Months. Community Ment Health J 2018; 54:58-65. [PMID: 28791496 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-017-0153-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2016] [Accepted: 07/26/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Non-forensic or regular assertive community treatment (ACT) has positive effects on non-forensic outcomes but has poor effects on forensic outcome measures. In this study, we examined non-forensic and forensic outcome measures of a forensic adaptation of ACT (ForACT) within a continuum of care for internees. Data were collected retrospectively from files of 70 participants in the ForACT group who had been released from a forensic hospital. The control group comprised internees who had left prison and entered community-based care (n = 56). The ForACT group demonstrated significantly better outcomes on forensic measures, such as arrests and incarcerations, and had better community tenure. However, this group showed high hospitalization rates. The findings indicate that this type of community-based care can be beneficial for such internees; however, internees continue to experience difficulties reintegrating into society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Marquant
- University Hospital Antwerp (UZA) Belgium, Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research institute (CAPRI), Antwerp University (UA), Campus Drie Eiken Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium. .,UPC St Camillus Bierbeek, Krijkelberg 1, 3360, Bierbeek, Belgium.
| | - Bernard Sabbe
- University Hospital Antwerp (UZA) Belgium, Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research institute (CAPRI), Antwerp University (UA), Campus Drie Eiken Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Meike Van Nuffel
- UPC St Camillus Bierbeek, Krijkelberg 1, 3360, Bierbeek, Belgium
| | - Rudy Verelst
- Belgian Penitentiary System, Willebroekkaai 33, 1000, Brussel, Belgium
| | - Kris Goethals
- Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium, University Forensic Centre, Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute (CAPRI), University of Antwerp, Belgium, Campus Drie Eiken Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lamberti JS, Weisman RL, Cerulli C, Williams GC, Jacobowitz DB, Mueser KT, Marks PD, Strawderman RL, Harrington D, Lamberti TA, Caine ED. A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Rochester Forensic Assertive Community Treatment Model. Psychiatr Serv 2017; 68:1016-1024. [PMID: 28566028 PMCID: PMC7369621 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Forensic assertive community treatment (FACT) is an adaptation of the assertive community treatment model and is designed to serve justice-involved adults with serious mental illness. This study compared the effectiveness of a standardized FACT model and enhanced treatment as usual in reducing jail and hospital use and in promoting engagement in outpatient mental health services. METHODS Seventy adults with psychotic disorders who were arrested for misdemeanor crimes and who were eligible for conditional discharge were recruited from the Monroe County, New York, court system. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either FACT (N=35) or enhanced treatment as usual (N=35) for one year. Criminal justice and mental health service utilization outcomes were measured by using state and county databases. RESULTS Forty-nine participants (70%) completed the full one-year intervention period. Nineteen (27%) were removed early by judicial order, one was removed by county health authorities, and one died of a medical illness. Intent-to-treat analysis for all 70 participants showed that those receiving the FACT intervention had fewer mean±SD convictions (.4±.7 versus .9±1.3, p=.023), fewer mean days in jail (21.5±25.9 versus 43.5±59.2, p=.025), fewer mean days in the hospital (4.4±15.1 versus 23.8±64.2, p=.025), and more mean days in outpatient mental health treatment (305.5±92.1 versus 169.4±139.6, p<.001) compared with participants who received treatment as usual. CONCLUSIONS The Rochester FACT model was associated with fewer convictions for new crimes, less time in jail and hospitals, and more time in outpatient treatment among justice-involved adults with psychotic disorders compared with treatment as usual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Steven Lamberti
- Dr. Lamberti, Dr. Weisman, Dr. Cerulli, Mr. Jacobowitz, and Dr. Caine are with the Department of Psychiatry, Dr. Williams is with the Department of Medicine and the Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, Dr. Strawderman and Mr. Harrington are with the Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, and Ms. Lamberti is with the School of Nursing, all at the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York. Dr. Mueser is with the Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University, Boston. Judge Marks (ret.) is with the Monroe County Courts, Rochester, New York
| | - Robert L Weisman
- Dr. Lamberti, Dr. Weisman, Dr. Cerulli, Mr. Jacobowitz, and Dr. Caine are with the Department of Psychiatry, Dr. Williams is with the Department of Medicine and the Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, Dr. Strawderman and Mr. Harrington are with the Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, and Ms. Lamberti is with the School of Nursing, all at the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York. Dr. Mueser is with the Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University, Boston. Judge Marks (ret.) is with the Monroe County Courts, Rochester, New York
| | - Catherine Cerulli
- Dr. Lamberti, Dr. Weisman, Dr. Cerulli, Mr. Jacobowitz, and Dr. Caine are with the Department of Psychiatry, Dr. Williams is with the Department of Medicine and the Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, Dr. Strawderman and Mr. Harrington are with the Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, and Ms. Lamberti is with the School of Nursing, all at the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York. Dr. Mueser is with the Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University, Boston. Judge Marks (ret.) is with the Monroe County Courts, Rochester, New York
| | - Geoffrey C Williams
- Dr. Lamberti, Dr. Weisman, Dr. Cerulli, Mr. Jacobowitz, and Dr. Caine are with the Department of Psychiatry, Dr. Williams is with the Department of Medicine and the Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, Dr. Strawderman and Mr. Harrington are with the Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, and Ms. Lamberti is with the School of Nursing, all at the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York. Dr. Mueser is with the Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University, Boston. Judge Marks (ret.) is with the Monroe County Courts, Rochester, New York
| | - David B Jacobowitz
- Dr. Lamberti, Dr. Weisman, Dr. Cerulli, Mr. Jacobowitz, and Dr. Caine are with the Department of Psychiatry, Dr. Williams is with the Department of Medicine and the Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, Dr. Strawderman and Mr. Harrington are with the Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, and Ms. Lamberti is with the School of Nursing, all at the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York. Dr. Mueser is with the Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University, Boston. Judge Marks (ret.) is with the Monroe County Courts, Rochester, New York
| | - Kim T Mueser
- Dr. Lamberti, Dr. Weisman, Dr. Cerulli, Mr. Jacobowitz, and Dr. Caine are with the Department of Psychiatry, Dr. Williams is with the Department of Medicine and the Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, Dr. Strawderman and Mr. Harrington are with the Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, and Ms. Lamberti is with the School of Nursing, all at the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York. Dr. Mueser is with the Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University, Boston. Judge Marks (ret.) is with the Monroe County Courts, Rochester, New York
| | - Patricia D Marks
- Dr. Lamberti, Dr. Weisman, Dr. Cerulli, Mr. Jacobowitz, and Dr. Caine are with the Department of Psychiatry, Dr. Williams is with the Department of Medicine and the Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, Dr. Strawderman and Mr. Harrington are with the Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, and Ms. Lamberti is with the School of Nursing, all at the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York. Dr. Mueser is with the Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University, Boston. Judge Marks (ret.) is with the Monroe County Courts, Rochester, New York
| | - Robert L Strawderman
- Dr. Lamberti, Dr. Weisman, Dr. Cerulli, Mr. Jacobowitz, and Dr. Caine are with the Department of Psychiatry, Dr. Williams is with the Department of Medicine and the Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, Dr. Strawderman and Mr. Harrington are with the Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, and Ms. Lamberti is with the School of Nursing, all at the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York. Dr. Mueser is with the Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University, Boston. Judge Marks (ret.) is with the Monroe County Courts, Rochester, New York
| | - Donald Harrington
- Dr. Lamberti, Dr. Weisman, Dr. Cerulli, Mr. Jacobowitz, and Dr. Caine are with the Department of Psychiatry, Dr. Williams is with the Department of Medicine and the Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, Dr. Strawderman and Mr. Harrington are with the Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, and Ms. Lamberti is with the School of Nursing, all at the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York. Dr. Mueser is with the Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University, Boston. Judge Marks (ret.) is with the Monroe County Courts, Rochester, New York
| | - Tara A Lamberti
- Dr. Lamberti, Dr. Weisman, Dr. Cerulli, Mr. Jacobowitz, and Dr. Caine are with the Department of Psychiatry, Dr. Williams is with the Department of Medicine and the Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, Dr. Strawderman and Mr. Harrington are with the Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, and Ms. Lamberti is with the School of Nursing, all at the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York. Dr. Mueser is with the Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University, Boston. Judge Marks (ret.) is with the Monroe County Courts, Rochester, New York
| | - Eric D Caine
- Dr. Lamberti, Dr. Weisman, Dr. Cerulli, Mr. Jacobowitz, and Dr. Caine are with the Department of Psychiatry, Dr. Williams is with the Department of Medicine and the Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, Dr. Strawderman and Mr. Harrington are with the Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, and Ms. Lamberti is with the School of Nursing, all at the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York. Dr. Mueser is with the Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University, Boston. Judge Marks (ret.) is with the Monroe County Courts, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Landess J, Holoyda B. Mental health courts and forensic assertive community treatment teams as correctional diversion programs. Behav Sci Law 2017; 35:501-511. [PMID: 28891121 DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2017] [Revised: 06/25/2017] [Accepted: 06/30/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Problem-solving courts (PSCs) developed as a means of mandating treatment and judicial supervision of certain types of court participants. PSCs have rapidly expanded in number and type over several decades. Mental health courts (MHCs) are a type of PSC that arose in response to the growing number of persons with mental illness within the criminal justice system. Their primary role is to divert individuals with mental illness from incarceration into psychiatric treatment and to reduce recidivism while improving psychosocial functioning of participants. Although different in history, philosophy, and program structure, forensic assertive community treatment (FACT) programs serve a similar goal of reducing recidivism and improving functioning in persons with mental illness who are involved with the criminal justice system. FACTs may be used as a standalone diversion option or be linked with a MHC as a form of intensive treatment and monitoring. Suggestions for future research and evaluation of these programs are offered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Landess
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Division of Forensic Psychiatry, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, U.S.A
| | - Brian Holoyda
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Division of Forensic Psychiatry, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ramchand R, Ahluwalia SC, Xenakis L, Apaydin E, Raaen L, Grimm G. A systematic review of peer-supported interventions for health promotion and disease prevention. Prev Med 2017; 101:156-70. [PMID: 28601621 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2016] [Revised: 05/08/2017] [Accepted: 06/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Prior research has examined peer programs with respect to specific peer roles (e.g.; peer support) or specific health/wellness domains (e.g.; exercise/diet), or have aggregated effects across roles and domains. We sought to conduct a systematic review that categorizes and assesses the effects of peer interventions to promote health and wellness by peer role, intervention type, and outcomes. We use evidence mapping to visually catalog and synthesize the existing research. We searched PubMed and WorldCat databases (2005 to 2015) and New York Academy of Medicine Grey Literature Report (1999 to 2016) for English-language randomized control trials. We extracted study design, study participants, type of intervention(s), peer role(s), outcomes assessed and measures used, and effects from 116 randomized controlled trials. Maps were created to provide a visual display of the evidence by intervention type, peer role, outcome type, and significant vs null or negative effects. There are more null than positive effects across peer interventions, with notable exceptions: group-based interventions that use peers as educators or group facilitators commonly improve knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and perceptions; peer educators also commonly improved social health/connectedness and engagement. Dyadic peer support influenced behavior change and peer counseling shows promising effects on physical health outcomes. Programs seeking to use peers in public health campaigns can use evidence maps to identify interventions that have previously demonstrated beneficial effects. Those seeking to produce health outcomes may benefit from identifying the mechanisms by which they expect their program to produce these effects and associated proximal outcomes for future evaluations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER Although we attempted to register our protocol with PROSPERO, we did not meet eligibility criteria because we were past the data collection phase. The full PROSPERO-aligned protocol is available from the authors.
Collapse
|
26
|
Peters RH, Young MS, Rojas EC, Gorey CM. Evidence-based treatment and supervision practices for co-occurring mental and substance use disorders in the criminal justice system. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2017; 43:475-488. [PMID: 28375656 DOI: 10.1080/00952990.2017.1303838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over seven million persons in the United States are supervised by the criminal justice system, including many who have co-occurring mental and substance use disorders (CODs). This population is at high risk for recidivism and presents numerous challenges to those working in the justice system. OBJECTIVES To provide a contemporary review of the existing research and examine key issues and evidence-based treatment and supervision practices related to CODs in the justice system. METHODS We reviewed COD research involving offenders that has been conducted over the past 20 years and provide an analysis of key findings. RESULTS Several empirically supported frameworks are available to guide services for offenders who have CODs, including Integrated Dual Disorders Treatment (IDDT), the Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) model, and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT). Evidence-based services include integrated assessment that addresses both sets of disorders and the risk for criminal recidivism. Although several evidence-based COD interventions have been implemented at different points in the justice system, there remains a significant gap in services for offenders who have CODs. Existing program models include Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT), day reporting centers, specialized community supervision teams, pre- and post-booking diversion programs, and treatment-based courts (e.g., drug courts, mental health courts, COD dockets). Jail-based COD treatment programs provide stabilization of acute symptoms, medication consultation, and triage to community services, while longer-term prison COD programs feature Modified Therapeutic Communities (MTCs). CONCLUSION Despite the availability of multiple evidence-based interventions that have been implemented across diverse justice system settings, these services are not sufficiently used to address the scope of treatment and supervision needs among offenders with CODs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger H Peters
- a Department of Mental Health Law and Policy , Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida , Tampa , FL , USA
| | - M Scott Young
- a Department of Mental Health Law and Policy , Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida , Tampa , FL , USA
| | - Elizabeth C Rojas
- b Department of Psychology , University of South Florida , Tampa , FL , USA
| | - Claire M Gorey
- b Department of Psychology , University of South Florida , Tampa , FL , USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intensive Case Management (ICM) is a community-based package of care aiming to provide long-term care for severely mentally ill people who do not require immediate admission. Intensive Case Management evolved from two original community models of care, Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) and Case Management (CM), where ICM emphasises the importance of small caseload (fewer than 20) and high-intensity input. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of ICM as a means of caring for severely mentally ill people in the community in comparison with non-ICM (caseload greater than 20) and with standard community care. We did not distinguish between models of ICM. In addition, to assess whether the effect of ICM on hospitalisation (mean number of days per month in hospital) is influenced by the intervention's fidelity to the ACT model and by the rate of hospital use in the setting where the trial was conducted (baseline level of hospital use). SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Trials Register (last update search 10 April 2015). SELECTION CRITERIA All relevant randomised clinical trials focusing on people with severe mental illness, aged 18 to 65 years and treated in the community care setting, where ICM is compared to non-ICM or standard care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS At least two review authors independently selected trials, assessed quality, and extracted data. For binary outcomes, we calculated risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI), on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, we estimated mean difference (MD) between groups and its 95% CI. We employed a random-effects model for analyses.We performed a random-effects meta-regression analysis to examine the association of the intervention's fidelity to the ACT model and the rate of hospital use in the setting where the trial was conducted with the treatment effect. We assessed overall quality for clinically important outcomes using the GRADE approach and investigated possible risk of bias within included trials. MAIN RESULTS The 2016 update included two more studies (n = 196) and more publications with additional data for four already included studies. The updated review therefore includes 7524 participants from 40 randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We found data relevant to two comparisons: ICM versus standard care, and ICM versus non-ICM. The majority of studies had a high risk of selective reporting. No studies provided data for relapse or important improvement in mental state.1. ICM versus standard careWhen ICM was compared with standard care for the outcome service use, ICM slightly reduced the number of days in hospital per month (n = 3595, 24 RCTs, MD -0.86, 95% CI -1.37 to -0.34,low-quality evidence). Similarly, for the outcome global state, ICM reduced the number of people leaving the trial early (n = 1798, 13 RCTs, RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.79, low-quality evidence). For the outcome adverse events, the evidence showed that ICM may make little or no difference in reducing death by suicide (n = 1456, 9 RCTs, RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.51, low-quality evidence). In addition, for the outcome social functioning, there was uncertainty about the effect of ICM on unemployment due to very low-quality evidence (n = 1129, 4 RCTs, RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.0, very low-quality evidence).2. ICM versus non-ICMWhen ICM was compared with non-ICM for the outcome service use, there was moderate-quality evidence that ICM probably makes little or no difference in the average number of days in hospital per month (n = 2220, 21 RCTs, MD -0.08, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.21, moderate-quality evidence) or in the average number of admissions (n = 678, 1 RCT, MD -0.18, 95% CI -0.41 to 0.05, moderate-quality evidence) compared to non-ICM. Similarly, the results showed that ICM may reduce the number of participants leaving the intervention early (n = 1970, 7 RCTs, RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.95,low-quality evidence) and that ICM may make little or no difference in reducing death by suicide (n = 1152, 3 RCTs, RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.27 to 2.84, low-quality evidence). Finally, for the outcome social functioning, there was uncertainty about the effect of ICM on unemployment as compared to non-ICM (n = 73, 1 RCT, RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.45 to 4.74, very low-quality evidence).3. Fidelity to ACTWithin the meta-regression we found that i.) the more ICM is adherent to the ACT model, the better it is at decreasing time in hospital ('organisation fidelity' variable coefficient -0.36, 95% CI -0.66 to -0.07); and ii.) the higher the baseline hospital use in the population, the better ICM is at decreasing time in hospital ('baseline hospital use' variable coefficient -0.20, 95% CI -0.32 to -0.10). Combining both these variables within the model, 'organisation fidelity' is no longer significant, but the 'baseline hospital use' result still significantly influences time in hospital (regression coefficient -0.18, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.07, P = 0.0027). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Based on very low- to moderate-quality evidence, ICM is effective in ameliorating many outcomes relevant to people with severe mental illness. Compared to standard care, ICM may reduce hospitalisation and increase retention in care. It also globally improved social functioning, although ICM's effect on mental state and quality of life remains unclear. Intensive Case Management is at least valuable to people with severe mental illnesses in the subgroup of those with a high level of hospitalisation (about four days per month in past two years). Intensive Case Management models with high fidelity to the original team organisation of ACT model were more effective at reducing time in hospital.However, it is unclear what overall gain ICM provides on top of a less formal non-ICM approach.We do not think that more trials comparing current ICM with standard care or non-ICM are justified, however we currently know of no review comparing non-ICM with standard care, and this should be undertaken.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Dieterich
- Azienda USL Toscana Nord OvestDepartment of PsychiatryLivornoItaly
| | - Claire B Irving
- The University of NottinghamCochrane Schizophrenia GroupInstitute of Mental HealthUniversity of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph RoadNottinghamUKNG7 2TU
| | - Hanna Bergman
- Enhance Reviews LtdCentral Office, Cobweb buildingsThe Lane, LyfordWantageUKOX12 0EE
| | - Mariam A Khokhar
- University of SheffieldOral Health and Development15 Askham CourtGamston Radcliffe RoadNottinghamUKNG2 6NR
| | - Bert Park
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS TrustAMH Management SuiteHighbury HospitalNottinghamUKNG6 9DR
| | - Max Marshall
- The Lantern CentreUniversity of ManchesterVicarage LaneOf Watling Street Road, FulwoodPrestonLancashireUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Yoon J, Luck J. Intersystem return on investment in public mental health: Positive externality of public mental health expenditure for the jail system in the U.S. Soc Sci Med 2016; 170:133-142. [DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2016] [Revised: 08/20/2016] [Accepted: 10/17/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
29
|
Marquant T, Sabbe B, Van Nuffel M, Goethals K. Forensic Assertive Community Treatment: A Review of the Literature. Community Ment Health J 2016; 52:873-881. [PMID: 27422650 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-016-0044-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2014] [Accepted: 07/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
An extensive body of literature provides evidence supporting the effectiveness of assertive community treatment (ACT) with regard to non-forensic outcome measures, such as number of hospital admissions and length of stay. However, research findings on the effectiveness of ACT for forensic outcome measures, such as rearrests or detentions, is much less clear. The present review, therefore, focuses on the application of ACT in forensic populations, combining key elements of ACT with elements of forensic rehabilitation models. Specifically, a review of the literature was conducted using a systematic methodology in an attempt to combine evidence-based elements of 40 years of research on regular ACT with elements of forensic rehabilitation models. Results reveal limited yet promising evidence in support of the effectiveness of forensic ACT for forensic outcome measures. Implications for future research and clinical practice are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Marquant
- Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research institute (CAPRI), Campus Drie Eiken Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium.
- UPC St Camillus Bierbeek, Krijkelberg 1, 3360, Bierbeek, Belgium.
| | - Bernard Sabbe
- Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research institute (CAPRI), Campus Drie Eiken Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium
- Antwerp University (UA), Campus Drie Eiken Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium
- University Forensic Centre, University Hospital Antwerp (UZA), Campus Drie Eiken Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Meike Van Nuffel
- UPC St Camillus Bierbeek, Krijkelberg 1, 3360, Bierbeek, Belgium
| | - Kris Goethals
- Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research institute (CAPRI), Campus Drie Eiken Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium
- Antwerp University (UA), Campus Drie Eiken Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium
- University Forensic Centre, University Hospital Antwerp (UZA), Campus Drie Eiken Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Heilbrun K, Dematteo D, King C, Thornewill A, Phillips S. Risk-Reducing Interventions for Justice-Involved Individuals: A Critical Review. In: Bornstein BH, Miller MK, editors. Advances in Psychology and Law. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. pp. 271-304. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-43083-6_9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
|
31
|
|
32
|
van Vugt MD, Kroon H, Delespaul PAEG, Mulder CL. Assertive community treatment and associations with delinquency. Int J Law Psychiatry 2016; 49:93-97. [PMID: 27599432 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
This article draws on a prospective longitudinal study in which Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) model fidelity and patient outcomes were assessed in twenty outpatient treatment teams. 530 severely mentally ill patients participated in the study. Delinquency outcomes were assessed three times during a two-year follow-up period. At baseline, 49% of the patients had a recent criminal history, meaning that they had at least one reported contact with the police and/or the justice system in the past year. Patients with a recent criminal history had more serious psychosocial problems at baseline compared to those without a recent criminal history. Delinquency outcomes showed improvement over time, but this was not associated with ACT model fidelity. The study shows an association for homelessness and criminal activity. The persistent criminal activities of some of the patients showed that for this group extra interventions are needed that specifically target reduction of criminal behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maaike D van Vugt
- Department of Reintegration, Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, PO Box 725, 3500 AS Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Hans Kroon
- Department of Reintegration, Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, PO Box 725, 3500 AS Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Philippe A E G Delespaul
- Mental Health Services Research & Development, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Cornelis L Mulder
- Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Somers JM, Moniruzzaman A, Rezansoff SN, Brink J, Russolillo A. The prevalence and geographic distribution of complex co-occurring disorders: a population study. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2016; 25:267-77. [PMID: 25989819 DOI: 10.1017/S2045796015000347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS A subset of people with co-occurring substance use and mental disorders require coordinated support from health, social welfare and justice agencies to achieve diversion from homelessness, criminal recidivism and further health and social harms. Integrated models of care are typically concentrated in large urban centres. The present study aimed to empirically measure the prevalence and distribution of complex co-occurring disorders (CCD) in a large geographic region that includes urban as well as rural and remote settings. METHODS Linked data were examined in a population of roughly 3.7 million adults. Inclusion criteria for the CCD subpopulation were: physician diagnosed substance use and mental disorders; psychiatric hospitalisation; shelter assistance; and criminal convictions. Prevalence per 100 000 was calculated in 91 small areas representing urban, rural and remote settings. RESULTS 2202 individuals met our inclusion criteria for CCD. Participants had high rates of hospitalisation (8.2 admissions), criminal convictions (8.6 sentences) and social assistance payments (over $36 000 CDN) in the past 5 years. There was wide variability in the geographic distribution of people with CCD, with high prevalence rates in rural and remote settings. CONCLUSIONS People with CCD are not restricted to areas with large populations or to urban settings. The highest per capita rates of CCD were observed in relatively remote locations, where mental health and substance use services are typically in limited supply. Empirically supported interventions must be adapted to meet the needs of people living outside of urban settings with high rates of CCD.
Collapse
|
34
|
Bernacchio C, Burker EJ. Psychiatric Rehabilitation of Persons With Co-Occurring Disorders and Corrections Involvement. Rehabilitation Research Policy and Education 2016. [DOI: 10.1891/2168-6653.30.3.230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Today, the criminal justice system is annually placing more than 300,000 people with severe mental illness (SMI) in prisons and jails which are neither equipped nor staffed to respond to the unique challenges of this population. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the literature that focuses on treating inmates with psychiatric disabilities who have co-occurring substance use (CODx) histories.Method: Based on a critical analysis of the literature and theoretical integration, this article focuses on reasons for the high prevalence of SMI and CODx in corrections facilities.Results: This article highlights that research has shown that effective treatment can be provided both as an in-jail service as well as through jail diversion within the community using integrated CODx treatment (Draine, Blank, Kottsieper, & Solomon, 2005). Some models focused on moving individuals with psychiatric disabilities and CODx from prison to release have shown improved recidivism rates and increased eligibility and use of postrelease treatment services (Buck, Brown, & Hickey, 2011; Wenzlow, Ireys, Mann, Irvin, & Teich, 2011).Conclusion: National alternative and innovative models, integrated treatment of CODx treatment within corrections through jail diversion and community-based services, and reentry rehabilitation challenges and approaches are discussed.
Collapse
|
35
|
Somers JM, Rezansoff SN, Moniruzzaman A, Zabarauckas C. High-frequency use of corrections, health, and social services, and association with mental illness and substance use. Emerg Themes Epidemiol 2015; 12:17. [PMID: 26691347 PMCID: PMC4683696 DOI: 10.1186/s12982-015-0040-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2015] [Accepted: 12/04/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A subgroup of individuals becomes entrenched in a “revolving door” involving corrections, health, and social welfare services. Little research has investigated the numbers of people that are in frequent contact with multiple public agencies, the costs associated with these encounters, or the characteristics of the people concerned. The present study used linked administrative data to examine offenders who were also very frequent users of health and social services. We investigated the magnitude and distribution of costs attributable to different categories of service for those in the top 10 % of sentences to either community or custodial settings. We hypothesized that the members of these subgroups would be significantly more likely to have substance use and other mental disorders than other members of the offender population. Methods Data were linked across agencies responsible for services to the entire population of British Columbia spanning justice, health, and income assistance. Individuals were eligible for inclusion in the study if they were sentenced at least once in the Vancouver Provincial Court between 2003 and 2012. We examined the subset of participants who fell within the top 10 % of sentences and at least two of the following service categories: community physician services; hospital days; pharmaceutical costs; or income assistance between 2007 and 2012. We examined two groups of offenders separately (those in the top ten percent sentenced to community supervision or to custody) due to differences in time at risk and availability to receive community-based services. Results From more than 14,000 offenders sentenced in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside, very High Frequency service users associated with community (n = 216) and custody (n = 107) sentences incurred average attributable public service costs of $168,000 and $247,000 respectively over a 5-year period of observation. Health-related costs for both groups were over $80,000 per person, primarily associated with hospital admissions. Across both groups, 99 % had been diagnosed with at least one mental disorder and over 80 % had co-occurring substance use and another mental disorder. Conclusions A subset of offenders with concurrent psychiatric disorders receives extremely high levels of service from health, social welfare, and justice sectors in close temporal succession. Members of this subpopulation require targeted supports in order to produce positive outcomes and prevent the perpetuation of a costly and ineffective revolving door. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12982-015-0040-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian M Somers
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC Canada
| | | | - Akm Moniruzzaman
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The review represents one in a family of four reviews focusing on a range of different interventions for drug-using offenders. This specific review considers pharmacological interventions aimed at reducing drug use or criminal activity, or both, for illicit drug-using offenders. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for drug-using offenders in reducing criminal activity or drug use, or both. SEARCH METHODS We searched Fourteen electronic bibliographic databases up to May 2014 and five additional Web resources (between 2004 and November 2011). We contacted experts in the field for further information. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials assessing the efficacy of any pharmacological intervention a component of which is designed to reduce, eliminate or prevent relapse of drug use or criminal activity, or both, in drug-using offenders. We also report data on the cost and cost-effectiveness of interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures as expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS Fourteen trials with 2647 participants met the inclusion criteria. The interventions included in this review report on agonistic pharmacological interventions (buprenorphine, methadone and naltrexone) compared to no intervention, other non-pharmacological treatments (e.g. counselling) and other pharmacological drugs. The methodological trial quality was poorly described, and most studies were rated as 'unclear' by the reviewers. The biggest threats to risk of bias were generated through blinding (performance and detection bias) and incomplete outcome data (attrition bias). Studies could not be combined all together because the comparisons were too different. Only subgroup analysis for type of pharmacological treatment were done. When compared to non-pharmacological, we found low quality evidence that agonist treatments are not effective in reducing drug use or criminal activity, objective results (biological) (two studies, 237 participants (RR 0.72 (95% CI 0.51 to 1.00); subjective (self-report), (three studies, 317 participants (RR 0.61 95% CI 0.31 to 1.18); self-report drug use (three studies, 510 participants (SMD: -0.62 (95% CI -0.85 to -0.39). We found low quality of evidence that antagonist treatment was not effective in reducing drug use (one study, 63 participants (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.70) but we found moderate quality of evidence that they significantly reduced criminal activity (two studies, 114 participants, (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.74).Findings on the effects of individual pharmacological interventions on drug use and criminal activity showed mixed results. In the comparison of methadone to buprenorphine, diamorphine and naltrexone, no significant differences were displayed for either treatment for self report dichotomous drug use (two studies, 370 participants (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.55), continuous measures of drug use (one study, 81 participants, (mean difference (MD) 0.70, 95% CI -5.33 to 6.73); or criminal activity (one study, 116 participants, (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.88) between methadone and buprenorphine. Similar results were found for comparisons with diamorphine with no significant differences between the drugs for self report dichotomous drug use for arrest (one study, 825 participants, (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.51) or naltrexone for dichotomous measures of reincarceration (one study, 44 participants, (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.37 to 3.26), and continuous outcome measure of crime, (MD -0.50, 95% CI -8.04 to 7.04) or self report drug use (MD 4.60, 95% CI -3.54 to 12.74). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS When compared to non-pharmacological treatment, agonist treatments did not seem effective in reducing drug use or criminal activity. Antagonist treatments were not effective in reducing drug use but significantly reduced criminal activity. When comparing the drugs to one another we found no significant differences between the drug comparisons (methadone versus buprenorphine, diamorphine and naltrexone) on any of the outcome measures. Caution should be taken when interpreting these findings, as the conclusions are based on a small number of trials, and generalisation of these study findings should be limited mainly to male adult offenders. Additionally, many studies were rated at high risk of bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda E Perry
- University of YorkDepartment of Health SciencesHeslingtonYorkUKYO105DD
| | - Matthew Neilson
- University of YorkDepartment of Health SciencesHeslingtonYorkUKYO105DD
| | - Marrissa Martyn‐St James
- University of SheffieldSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR)Regent Court, 30 Regent StreetSheffieldSouth YorkshireUKS1 4DA
| | - Julie M Glanville
- York Health Economics ConsortiumMarket SquareUniversity of York, HeslingtonYorkUKYO10 5NH
| | - Rebecca Woodhouse
- University of YorkDepartment of Health SciencesHeslingtonYorkUKYO105DD
| | - Christine Godfrey
- University of YorkDepartment of Health SciencesHeslingtonYorkUKYO105DD
| | - Catherine Hewitt
- University of YorkDepartment of Health SciencesHeslingtonYorkUKYO105DD
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Perry AE, Neilson M, Martyn-St James M, Glanville JM, Woodhouse R, Godfrey C, Hewitt C. Interventions for drug-using offenders with co-occurring mental illness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015:CD010901. [PMID: 26034938 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010901.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is an updated version of an original Cochrane review published in Issue 3 2006 (Perry 2006). The review represents one from a family of four reviews focusing on interventions for drug-using offenders. This specific review considers interventions aimed at reducing drug use or criminal activity, or both for drug-using offenders with co-occurring mental illness. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of interventions for drug-using offenders with co-occurring mental illness in reducing criminal activity or drug use, or both. SEARCH METHODS We searched 14 electronic bibliographic databases up to May 2014 and 5 Internet resources (searched between 2004 and 11 November 2009). We contacted experts in the field for further information. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials designed to reduce, eliminate, or prevent relapse of drug use and criminal activity, or both in drug-using offenders with co-occurring mental illness. We also reported data on the cost and cost-effectiveness of interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration. MAIN RESULTS Eight trials with 2058 participants met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of the trials was generally difficult to rate due to a lack of clear reporting. On most 'Risk of bias' items, we rated the majority of studies as unclear. Overall, we could not statistically combine the results due to the heterogenous nature of the different study interventions and comparison groups. A narrative summary of the findings identified that the interventions reported limited success with reducing self report drug use, but did have some impact on re-incarceration rates, but not re-arrest. In the single comparisons, we found moderate-quality evidence that therapeutic communities determine a reduction in re-incarceration but reported less success for outcomes of re-arrest, moderate quality of evidence and self report drug use. Three single studies evaluating case management via a mental health drug court (very low quality of evidence), motivational interviewing and cognitive skills (low and very low quality of evidence) and interpersonal psychotherapy (very low quality of evidence) did not report significant reductions in criminal activity and self report drug use respectively. Quality of evidence for these three types of interventions was low to very low. The trials reported some cost information, but it was not sufficient to be able to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the interventions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Two of the five trials showed some promising results for the use of therapeutic communities and aftercare, but only in relation to reducing subsequent re-incarceration. Overall, the studies showed a high degree of variation, warranting a degree of caution in the interpretation of the magnitude of effect and direction of benefit for treatment outcomes. More evaluations are required to assess the effectiveness of interventions for drug-using offenders with co-occurring mental health problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda E Perry
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK, YO105DD
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is an updated version of a Cochrane review first published in Issue 3, 2006 (Perry 2006). The review represents one in a family of four reviews focusing on the effectiveness of interventions in reducing drug use and criminal activity for offenders. This specific review considers interventions for female drug-using offenders. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of interventions for female drug-using offenders in reducing criminal activity, or drug use, or both. SEARCH METHODS We searched 14 electronic bibliographic databases up to May 2014 and five additional Website resources (between 2004 and November 2011). We contacted experts in the field for further information. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) designed to reduce, eliminate or prevent relapse of drug use or criminal activity in female drug-using offenders. We also reported data on the cost and cost-effectiveness of interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration. MAIN RESULTS Nine trials with 1792 participants met the inclusion criteria. Trial quality and risks of bias varied across each study. We rated the majority of studies as being at 'unclear' risk of bias due to a lack of descriptive information. We divided the studies into different categories for the purpose of meta-analyses: for any psychosocial treatments in comparison to treatment as usual we found low quality evidence that there were no significant differences in arrest rates, (two studies; 489 participants; risk ratio (RR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45 to 1.52) or drug use (one study; 77 participants; RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.20 to 2.12), but we found moderate quality evidence that there was a significant reduction in reincarceration, (three studies; 630 participants; RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.64). Pharmacological intervention using buprenorphine in comparison to a placebo did not significantly reduce self reported drug use (one study; 36 participants; RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.35). No cost or cost-effectiveness evidence was reported in the studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Three of the nine trials show a positive trend towards the use of any psychosocial treatment in comparison to treatment as usual showing an overall significant reduction in subsequent reincarceration, but not arrest rates or drug use. Pharmacological interventions in comparison to a placebo did not significantly reduce drug use and did not measure criminal activity. Four different treatment comparisons showed varying results and were not combined due to differences in the intervention and comparison groups. The studies overall showed a high degree of heterogeneity for types of comparisons and outcome measures assessed, which limited the possibility to pool the data. Descriptions of treatment modalities are required to identify the important elements for treatment success in drug-using female offenders. More trials are required to increase the precision of confidence with which we can draw conclusions about the effectiveness of treatments for female drug-using offenders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda E Perry
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK, YO105DD
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kouyoumdjian FG, McIsaac KE, Liauw J, Green S, Karachiwalla F, Siu W, Burkholder K, Binswanger I, Kiefer L, Kinner SA, Korchinski M, Matheson FI, Young P, Hwang SW. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of interventions to improve the health of persons during imprisonment and in the year after release. Am J Public Health 2015; 105:e13-33. [PMID: 25713970 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2014.302498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials of interventions to improve the health of people during imprisonment or in the year after release. We searched 14 biomedical and social science databases in 2014, and identified 95 studies. Most studies involved only men or a majority of men (70/83 studies in which gender was specified); only 16 studies focused on adolescents. Most studies were conducted in the United States (n = 57). The risk of bias for outcomes in almost all studies was unclear or high (n = 91). In 59 studies, interventions led to improved mental health, substance use, infectious diseases, or health service utilization outcomes; in 42 of these studies, outcomes were measured in the community after release. Improving the health of people who experience imprisonment requires knowledge generation and knowledge translation, including implementation of effective interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona G Kouyoumdjian
- Fiona G. Kouyoumdjian, Kathryn E. McIsaac, Flora I. Matheson, and Stephen W. Hwang are with the Centre for Research on Inner City Health, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario. Jessica Liauw is with McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario. Samantha Green is with the Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto. Fareen Karachiwalla, Winnie Siu, Kaite Burkholder, and Lori Kiefer were with the Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Ontario. Ingrid Binswanger is with the School of Medicine and Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado, Aurora and Denver. Stuart A. Kinner is with the School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Australia. Mo Korchinski and Pam Young are with the School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
|
41
|
Glowa-Kollisch S, Lim S, Summers C, Cohen L, Selling D, Venters H. Beyond the bridge: evaluating a novel mental health program in the New York City jail system. Am J Public Health 2014; 104:2212-8. [PMID: 25211737 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2014.302126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We evaluated Beyond the Bridge, a novel mental health program in the New York City jail system designed to provide residentially based cognitive behavioral therapy in jail mental observation units. METHODS We used propensity score matching and a dose-response analysis. Outcome measures included reduction in violent incidents and fights, reduction in uses of force by corrections officers, reduction in time spent on suicide watch and incidents of self-injurious behavior, and increased length of community survival. RESULTS There were significant reductions in all outcomes when we compared program participants (n = 218) with an earlier cohort of patients residing on the mental observation unit before programming began (n = 413). However, when we compared program participants with a cohort of other patients residing on the units at the same time but who chose not to participate (n = 267), only time spent on suicide watch unit (rate ratio [RR] = 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.59, 0.89) and recidivism (RR = 0.70; 95% CI = 0.59,0.83) were significantly reduced. CONCLUSIONS This evaluation and the model we piloted may provide useful information for other settings contemplating similar interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Glowa-Kollisch
- Sarah Glowa-Kollisch, Daniel Selling, and Homer Venters are with the Bureau of Correctional Health Services and Sungwoo Lim is with the Bureau of Epidemiology Services, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY. Cynthia Summers is with the Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY. Louise Cohen is with Public Health Solutions, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
The first MHC was established in 1997 and now, over 15years later, there are over 300 mental health courts in the United States. In a relatively short time these courts have become an established criminal justice intervention for persons with a mental illness. However, few studies have looked at the long-term outcomes of MHCs on criminal recidivism. Of the studies evaluating the impact of MHCs on criminal recidivism, most follow defendants after entry into the court during their participation, and only a few have followed defendants after court exit for periods of one or two years. This study follows MHC defendants for a minimum of five years to examine recidivism post-exit with particular attention to MHC completion's effect. Findings show that 53.9% of all MHC defendants were rearrested in the follow-up and averaged 15months to rearrest. Defendants who completed MHC were significantly less likely to be rearrested (39.6% vs. 74.8%), and went longer before recidivating (17.15months vs. 12.27months) than those who did not complete. This study suggests that MHCs can reduce criminal recidivism among offenders with mental illness and that this effect is sustained for several years after defendants are no longer under the court's supervision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley Ray
- Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, School of Public & Environmental Affairs, Business/SPEA Building, 801 West Michigan Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Epperson MW, Wolff N, Morgan RD, Fisher WH, Frueh BC, Huening J. Envisioning the next generation of behavioral health and criminal justice interventions. Int J Law Psychiatry 2014; 37:427-38. [PMID: 24666731 PMCID: PMC4142111 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to cast a vision for the next generation of behavioral health and criminal justice interventions for persons with serious mental illnesses in the criminal justice system. The limitations of first generation interventions, including their primary focus on mental health treatment connection, are discussed. A person-place framework for understanding the complex factors that contribute to criminal justice involvement for this population is presented. We discuss practice and research recommendations for building more effective interventions to address both criminal justice and mental health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew W Epperson
- School of Social Service Administration, University of Chicago, 969 East 60th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
| | - Nancy Wolff
- Center for Behavioral Health Services & Criminal Justice Research, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 176 Ryders Lane, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Robert D Morgan
- Texas Tech University, Psychology Department, Box 42051, Lubbock, TX 79409-2051, USA
| | - William H Fisher
- University of Massachusetts-Lowell, Mahoney Hall, Room 226, Lowell, MA 01854, USA
| | - B Christopher Frueh
- Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii, 200 West Kawili Street, Hilo, HI 96720, USA; The Menninger Clinic, 12301 Main Street, Houston, TX 77035, USA
| | - Jessica Huening
- Center for Behavioral Health Services & Criminal Justice Research, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 176 Ryders Lane, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Sestoft D, Rasmussen MF, Vitus K, Kongsrud L. The police, social services and psychiatry cooperation in Denmark--a new model of working practice between governmental sectors. A description of the concept, process, practice and experience. Int J Law Psychiatry 2014; 37:370-375. [PMID: 24631524 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
In 2004 a new model of working practice between three public sectors, the local Police Department, Social Services and Psychiatry/Mental Health Services (PSP) was introduced in the municipality of Frederiksberg, Denmark. The aim of this cooperation was to enhance support to vulnerable citizens, who do not belong solely to one of the three sectors and thereby often get lost in the system. The PSP cooperation was introduced to ensure that relevant information concerning vulnerable citizens was shared between the three sectors and to improve collaboration between the sectors involved in order to provide the needed support to the individual citizen. Due to the success of the PSP cooperation in Frederiksberg, the PSP model was implemented by law in Denmark in 2009. In order to evaluate the model, a qualitative study based on structured interviews, focus group discussions and observations, was performed in four selected municipalities in Denmark: Frederiksberg, Odense, Amager and Esbjerg. The evaluation was undertaken by the Danish National Centre for Social Research. It is concluded that the PSP cooperation draws attention to marginalized groups of citizens and helps to prevent social downfall and crime. Participants of the PSP cooperations further highlight positive changes in the cooperation between the involved sectors, which is thought to further improve the support to vulnerable citizens and thereby enhance both prevention and follow up of cases. Furthermore, the recommendations drawn from the evaluation are to adapt PSP cooperations to local conditions, avoid unnecessary red-tape, keep a constant focus on citizens' ethics, as well as involve the frontline workers in the individual sectors, i.e. those who are actually in contact with marginalized citizens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Sestoft
- Ministry of Justice, Clinic of Forensic Psychiatry, Denmark.
| | | | - K Vitus
- Danish National Centre for Social Research, Denmark
| | - L Kongsrud
- Unit for Social Psychiatry, Municipal of Frederiksberg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is an updated version of a Cochrane review first published in Issue 3, 2006 (Perry 2006). The review represents one in a family of four reviews focusing on the effectiveness of interventions in reducing drug use and criminal activity for offenders. This specific review considers interventions for female drug-using offenders. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of interventions for female drug-using offenders in reducing criminal activity or drug use, or both. SEARCH METHODS We searched 14 electronic bibliographic databases (between 2004 and 21st March 2013) and five additional web resources (between 2004 and November 2011). We contacted experts in the field for further information. SELECTION CRITERIA We include randomised controlled trials designed to reduce, eliminate or prevent relapse in female drug-using offenders. We also report data on the cost and cost effectiveness of interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by the Cochrane Collaboration. MAIN RESULTS We identified 76 trials across the four reviews. Following a process of prescreening, we judged that 11 trials met the inclusion criteria of the specified review; four of the 11 trials are awaiting classification in the review. The remaining seven trials cover 1236 participants. The interventions included in this review report on therapeutic communities (TCs), gender-responsive treatment (GRT), use of case management and cognitive skills, and a pharmacological intervention using buprenorphine. Trial quality and risks of bias varied across each study. The majority of studies were rated as being at 'unclear' risk of bias due to a lack of descriptive information. Overall the interventions showed statistically significant reductions in self-reported drug use, (four studies, 734 participants, risk ratio (RR) 0.68; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 0.80) and re-incarceration, (four studies, 745 participants, RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.72). We found a statistically non-significant result for re-arrest (three studies, 803 participants, RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.53 to 1.19). Individual treatment results found that TCs and a GRT programme showed a statistically significant reduction in re-incarceration (one study, 509 participants, RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.60) but not for re-arrest, (one study, 314 participants, RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.03) and self-reported drug use (two studies, 825 participants, RR 0.47; 95% CI 0.14 to 1.53). Case management and cognitive skills programmes did not significantly reduce re-arrests, (one study, 183 participants RR 1.12; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.41) or self-reported drug use, (one study, 77 participants, RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.20 to 2.12), but did show a statistically significant reduction in re-incarceration, (three studies, 236 participants, RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.49 to 0.81). Buprenorphine did not significantly reduce self-reported drug use (RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.25 to 1.35), but this result came from a single study with only 36 participants. Due to the small number of studies we were unable to analyse the impact of treatment setting on outcome. No cost and cost effectiveness evidence was reported in the studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The seven trials show some positive results for the use of treatments to reduce self-reported drug use and subsequent re-incarceration. However, the studies overall showed a high degree of statistical variation, requiring a degree of caution in the interpretation of the magnitude of effect and direction of benefit for treatment outcomes. Descriptions of treatment modalities are required to identify the important elements for treatment success in drug-using female offenders. More trials are required to increase the confidence with which we can draw conclusions about the effectiveness of treatments for female drug-using offenders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda E Perry
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK, YO105DD
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Perry AE, Neilson M, Martyn-St James M, Glanville JM, McCool R, Duffy S, Godfrey C, Hewitt C. Interventions for drug-using offenders with co-occurring mental illness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014:CD010901. [PMID: 24385324 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is an updated version of an original Cochrane review published in Issue 3 2006 (Perry 2006). The review represents one from a family of four reviews focusing on interventions for drug-using offenders. This specific review considers interventions aimed at reducing drug use or criminal activity, or both for drug-using offenders with co-occurring mental illness. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of interventions for drug-using offenders with co-occurring mental illness in reducing criminal activity or drug use, or both. SEARCH METHODS We searched 14 electronic bibliographic databases (searched between 2004 and 21 March 2013) and five internet resources (searched between 2004 and 11 November 2009). We contacted experts in the field for further information. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials designed to reduce, eliminate or prevent relapse in drug-using offenders with co-occurring mental illness. We also reported data on the cost and cost effectiveness of interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration. MAIN RESULTS We identified 76 trials across the four reviews. Following a process of pre-screening, we judged eight trials to meet the inclusion criteria for this specific review (three of the five trials are awaiting classification). The five included 1502 participants. The interventions reported on case management via a mental health drugs court, a therapeutic community, and an evaluation of a motivational interviewing technique and cognitive skills in comparison to relaxation training. The methodological quality of the trials was generally difficult to rate due to a lack of clear reporting. On most risk of bias items, we rated the majority of studies as unclear. Overall, the combined interventions did not show a statistically significant reduction in self reported drug use (2 studies, 715 participants; risk ratio (RR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44 to 1.55). A statistically significantly reduction was shown for re-incarceration (4 studies, 627 participants; RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.67 and mean difference (MD) 28.72, 95% CI 5.89 to 51.54) but not re-arrest (2 studies, 518 participants; RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.12). A specific subgroup analysis combining studies using therapeutic community interventions showed a statistically significant reduction in re-incarceration (2 studies, 266 participants; RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.54) but not re-arrest (1 study, 428 participants; RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.33). Case management via a mental health court and motivational interviewing with cognitive skills did not show a statistically significant reduction in criminal activity (1 study, 235 participants; RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.22) or self reported drug misuse (1 study, 162 participants; MD -7.42, 95% CI -20.12 to 5.28). Due to the small number of studies, we were unable to analyse the impact of setting on outcome. Some cost information was provided in the trials but not sufficient to be able to evaluate the cost effectiveness of the interventions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This review highlights the paucity of evidence for drug misusing offenders with co-occurring mental health problems. Two of the five trials showed some promising results for the use of therapeutic communities and aftercare, but only in relation to reducing subsequent re-incarceration. The studies overall, showed a high degree of statistical variation demonstrating a degree of caution in the interpretation of the magnitude of effect and direction of benefit for treatment outcomes. More evaluations are required to assess the effectiveness of interventions for drug-using offenders with co-occurring mental health problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda E Perry
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK, YO105DD
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The review represents one in a family of four reviews focusing on a range of different interventions for drug-using offenders. This specific review considers pharmacological interventions aimed at reducing drug use and/or criminal activity for illicit drug-using offenders. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for drug-using offenders in reducing criminal activity and/or drug use. SEARCH METHODS Fourteen electronic bibliographic databases (searched between 2004 and 21 March 2013) and five additional Web resources (searched between 2004 and 11 November 2011) were searched. Experts in the field were contacted for further information. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials assessing the efficacy of any pharmacological interventions for reducing, eliminating or preventing relapse in drug-using offenders were included. Data on the cost and cost-effectiveness of interventions were reported. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures as expected by The Cochrane Collaboration. MAIN RESULTS A total of 76 trials across the four reviews were identified. After a process of prescreening had been completed, 17 trials were judged to meet the inclusion criteria for this specific review (six of the 17 trials are awaiting classification for the review). The remaining 11 trials contained a total of 2,678 participants. Nine of the eleven studies used samples with a majority of men. The interventions (buprenorphine, methadone and naltrexone) were compared to non pharmacological treatments (e.g., counselling) and other pharmacological drugs. The methodological trial quality was poorly described, and most studies were rated as 'unclear' by the reviewers. The biggest threats to risk of bias were generated through blinding (performance and detection bias) and incomplete outcome data (attrition bias). When combined, the results suggest that pharmacological interventions do significantly reduce subsequent drug use using biological measures, (three studies, 300 participants, RR 0.71 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.97)), self report dichotomous data (three studies, 317 participants, RR 0.42, (95% CI 0.22 to 0.81)) and continuous measures (one study, MD -59.66 (95% CI -120.60 to 1.28)) . In the subgroups analysis for community setting, (two studies, 99 participants: RR 0.62 (95% CI 0.35 to 1.09)) and for secure establishment setting, (one study, 201 participants: RR 0.76 (95% CI 0.52 to 1.10)), the results are no longer statistically significant. Criminal activity was significantly reduced favouring the dichotomous measures of re arrest, (one study, 62 participants, RR 0.60 (95% CI 0.32 to 1.14)), re-incarceration, (three studies, 142 participants, RR 0.33 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.56)) and continuous measures (one study, 51 participants, MD -74.21 (95% CI -133.53 to -14.89)). Findings on the effects of individual pharmacological interventions on drug use and criminal activity show mixed results. Buprenorphine in comparison to a non pharmacological treatment seemed to favour buprenorphine but not significantly with self report drug use, (one study, 36 participants, RR 0.58 (95% CI 0.25 to 1.35)). Methadone and cognitive behavioural skills in comparison to standard psychiatric services, did show a significant reduction for self report dichotomous drug use (one study, 253 participants, RR 0.43 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.56)) but not for self report continuous data (one study 51 participants) MD -0.52 (95% CI -1.09 to 0.05)), or re incarceration RR 1.23 (95% CI 0.53 to 2.87)). Naltrexone was favoured significantly over routine parole and probation for re incarceration (two studies 114 participants, RR 0.36 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.69)) but no data was available on drug use. Finally, we compared each pharmacological treatment to another. In each case we compared methadone to: buprenorphine, diamorphine and naltrexone. No significant differences were displayed for either treatment for self report dichotomous drug use (one study, 193 participants RR 1.23 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.76)), continuous measures of drug use MD 0.70 (95% CI -5.33 to 6.73) or criminal activity RR 1.25 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.88)) between methadone and buprenorphine. Similiar results were found for comparisons with Diamorphine with no significant differences between the drugs for self report dichotomous drug use for arrest (one study, 825 participants RR 1.25 (95% CI 1.03-1.51)) or Naltrexone for dichotomous measures of re incarceration (one study, 44 participants, RR 1.10 (95% CI 0.37 to 3.26)), and continuous outcome measure of crime MD -0.50 (95% CI -8.04 to 7.04)) or self report drug use MD 4.60 (95% CI -3.54 to 12.74)). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Pharmacological interventions for drug-using offenders do appear to reduce overall subsequent drug use and criminal activity (but to a lesser extent). No statistically significant differences were displayed by treatment setting. Individual differences are displayed between the three pharmacological interventions (buprenorphine, methadone and naltrexone) when compared to a non pharmacological intervention, but not when compared to each other. Caution should be taken when interpreting these findings, as the conclusions are based on a small number of trials, and generalisation of these study findings should be limited mainly to male adult offenders. Additionally, many studies were rated at high risk of bias because trial information was inadequately described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda E Perry
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK, YO105DD
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Finlay AK, Smelson D, Sawh L, McGuire J, Rosenthal J, Blue-Howells J, Timko C, Binswanger I, Frayne SM, Blodgett JC, Bowe T, Clark SC, Harris AHS. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Justice Outreach Program: Connecting Justice-Involved Veterans with Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Treatment. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013; 27. [PMID: 32180665 DOI: 10.1177/0887403414562601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The Veterans Justice Outreach (VJO) program of the U.S. Veterans Health Administration has a primary mission of linking military veterans in jails, courts, or in contact with law enforcement to mental health and substance use disorder treatment. National data of veterans with VJO contact were used to describe demographic characteristics, and mental health and substance use disorder diagnoses and treatment use and test correlates of treatment entry and engagement using multi-level logistic regression models. Of the 37,542 VJO veterans, treatment entry was associated with being homeless and having a mental health disorder or both a mental health and a substance use disorder versus a substance use disorder only. Being American Indian/Alaskan Native was associated with lower odds of treatment entry. Engagement was associated with female gender, older age, Asian race, urban residence, and homeless status. Increased utilization of substance use disorder treatment, especially pharmacotherapy, is an important quality improvement target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea K Finlay
- Veteran Affairs Substance Use Disorder Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, Department of Veterans Affairs.,Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine
| | - David Smelson
- National Center on Homelessness Among Veterans, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School
| | - Leon Sawh
- National Center on Homelessness Among Veterans, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School.,School of Criminology and Justice Studies, University of Massachusetts Lowell
| | - Jim McGuire
- Veterans Justice Programs, Department of Veterans Affairs
| | - Joel Rosenthal
- Veterans Justice Programs, Department of Veterans Affairs
| | | | - Christine Timko
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine
| | | | - Susan M Frayne
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System.,Women's Health Service, Medical Service, VA Palo Alto Health Care System.,Division of General Medical Disciplines, Stanford University School of Medicine
| | - Janet C Blodgett
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System
| | - Tom Bowe
- Veteran Affairs Substance Use Disorder Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, Department of Veterans Affairs
| | - Sean C Clark
- Veterans Justice Programs, Department of Veterans Affairs
| | - Alex H S Harris
- Veteran Affairs Substance Use Disorder Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, Department of Veterans Affairs.,Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Armijo J, Méndez E, Morales R, Schilling S, Castro A, Alvarado R, Rojas G. Efficacy of community treatments for schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders: a literature review. Front Psychiatry 2013; 4:116. [PMID: 24130534 PMCID: PMC3793168 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2012] [Accepted: 09/11/2013] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Chile, the clinical guidelines "for the treatment of people from first episode of schizophrenia" aim to support individuals with schizophrenia to live independently, establishment occupational goals, and gain an adequate quality of life and social interaction. This requires the implementation of a treatment model that integrates psychosocial and pharmacological dimensions. Community intervention strategies ensure the achievement of these goals. OBJECTIVES This study compiles and synthesizes available scientific evidence from the last 14 years on the effectiveness of community intervention strategies for schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders. METHODOLOGY An electronic search was carried out using PUBMED, LILACS, and Science Direct as databases. Criteria of inclusion: (i) randomized clinical trials, (ii) Community-based interventions, (iii) diagnosis of schizophrenia or related psychotic disorder (section F2 of ICD-10). EXCLUSION CRITERIA (i) treatments exclusively pharmacological, (ii) interventions carried out in inpatient settings, (iii) bipolar affective disorder or substance-induced psychosis (greater than 50% of sample). RESULTS Sixty-six articles were reviewed. Community strategies for integrated treatment from the first outbreak of schizophrenia significantly reduced negative and psychotic symptoms, days of hospitalization, and comorbidity with substance abuse and improved global functioning and adherence to treatment. In other stages, there were improved outcomes in negative and positive symptoms and general psychopathology. Psychoeducation for patients and families reduced the levels of self-stigma and domestic abuse, as well as improved knowledge of the disease and treatment adherence. Training focused on cognitive, social, and labor skills has been shown to improve yields in social functioning and employment status. CONCLUSION Community-based intervention strategies are widely supported in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julio Armijo
- Adult Psychiatry, José Horwitz Barak Psychiatric Hospital, Universidad de Santiago de Chile , Santiago , Chile
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Allnutt SH, Ogloff JRP, Adams J, O'Driscoll C, Daffern M, Carroll A, Nanayakkara V, Chaplow D. Managing aggression and violence: the clinician's role in contemporary mental health care. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2013; 47:728-36. [PMID: 23695380 DOI: 10.1177/0004867413484368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE From time to time misconceptions about violence risk assessment raise debate about the role mental health professionals play in managing aggression, with associated concerns about the utility of violence risk assessment. This paper will address some of the misconceptions about risk assessment in those with serious mental illness. METHODS The authors have expertise as clinicians and researchers in the field and based on their accumulated knowledge and discussion they have reviewed the literature to form their opinions. RESULTS This paper reflects the authors' views. CONCLUSION There is a modest yet statistical and clinically significant association between certain types of mental illness and violence. Debate about the appropriateness of clinician involvement in violence risk assessment is sometimes based on a misunderstanding about the central issues and the degree to which this problem can be effectively managed. The central purpose of risk assessment is the prevention rather than the prediction of violence. Violence risk assessment is a process of identifying patients who are at greater risk of violence in order to facilitate the timing and prioritisation of preventative interventions. Clinicians should base these risk assessments on empirical knowledge and consideration of case-specific factors to inform appropriate management interventions to reduce the identified risk.
Collapse
|