Dehydroisoandrosterone prevention of autoimmune disease in NZB/W F1 mice: lack of an effect on associated immunological abnormalities

Dehydroepiandrosterone in systemic lupus erythematosus

Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) is a weak androgen that exerts pleomorphic effects on the immune system. The hormone has no known receptor, and consequently, its mechanism of action on immunocompetent cells remains poorly understood. Interestingly, serum levels of DHEA are decreased in patients with inflammatory diseases including lupus, and these levels seem to correlate inversely with disease activity. Following encouraging studies demonstrating beneficial effects of DHEA supplementation in murine lupus models, several clinical studies have tested the effect of DHEA in lupus patients. DHEA treatment could improve overall quality-of-life assessment measures and glucocorticoid requirements in some lupus patients with mild to moderate disease; however, DHEA's effect on disease activity in lupus patients remains controversial. Long-term safety studies are required in light of the reported effect of DHEA supplementation in lowering high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in lupus patients.

Sex hormones and systemic lupus erythematosus

The role of estrogen, prolactin, pregnancy and androgen (including DHEA) in SLE is reviewed. A comlex interaction of multiple sex hormones is involved in SLE.

Dehydroepiandrosterone suppresses interleukin 10 synthesis in women with systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

To study the effects of dehydroepiandrosterone (prasterone, DHEA) 200 mg/day on cytokine profiles in adult women with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

In a double blind, randomised, placebo controlled study conducted as part of a larger multicentre study, 30 adult women with active SLE received oral DHEA 200 mg/day or placebo for 24 weeks. Baseline prednisone (<10 mg/day) and other concomitant SLE medications were to remain constant. The levels of cytokines including interleukin (IL) 1, IL2, interferon gamma, IL4, and IL10 were determined by ELISA. The mean change from baseline to 24 weeks of therapy was analysed.

RESULTS

The two groups (DHEA n = 15; placebo n = 15) were well balanced for baseline characteristics. Only IL1beta and IL10 could be detected in the serum of lupus patients; however, there was no significant mean (SD) difference in serum IL1beta before and after treatment (9.94 (8.92) v 9.20 (6.49) pg/ml). IL10 demonstrated a greater and significant reduction from baseline (9.21 (9.66) to 1.89 (1.47) pg/ml in the DHEA treatment group).

CONCLUSIONS

In a 24 week study of adult Chinese women with mild to moderate SLE, treatment with DHEA 200 mg once daily resulted in significant reduction of serum levels of IL10. This finding may suggest why DHEA could significantly reduce lupus flares.

Effects of dehydroepiandrosterone on oleic acid accumulation in rat liver

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) affects de novo fatty acid synthesis, oleic acid formation, fatty acid oxidation, and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) secretion, in relation to the accumulation of lipid containing oleic acid, in rat liver. The rates of hepatic de novo synthesis of both fatty acid and monounsaturated fatty acid, determined by incorporation of 3H from 3H(2)O into fatty acid, were increased markedly when rats were fed a diet containing 0.5% (w/w) DHEA for 14 days. The treatment of rats with DHEA also enhanced the conversion of [14C]stearic acid into oleic acid in the liver in vivo. DHEA did not suppress fatty acid degradation in the liver. Namely, mitochondrial palmitic acid oxidation in liver homogenates and isolated hepatocytes was increased approximately 1.9- and 5-fold, respectively, in DHEA-treated rats. Peroxisomal palmitic acid oxidation in isolated hepatocytes from rats treated with DHEA, however, was not significantly different from that of the control, despite the fact that peroxisomal degradation of palmitic acid in the liver homogenates was increased markedly. The rate of hepatic VLDL secretion in DHEA-treated rats was decreased markedly. These results indicate that the elevation of the hepatic fatty acid content, especially oleic acid, by DHEA feeding is due to an increase in both de novo fatty acid synthesis and the formation of oleic acid and to a decrease in the rate of hepatic VLDL secretion. Mitochondrial and peroxisomal fatty acid degradation does not appear to play a significant role in the accumulation of hepatic lipids.

Dehydroepiandrosterone for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus

The adrenal steroidal hormone dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) has been studied as a potential pharmacological agent in the treatment of the autoimmune disease systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Both the endocrine effects (the ability to be converted peripherally to androgenic and oestrogenic sex steroids) and the immunomodulatory effects of DHEA (the production of the Th(1) cytokines, such as IL-2) suggest that this hormone could be of benefit for patients with SLE. During the past decade, five controlled clinical trials and a number of additional observational studies have been performed investigating these possibilities. The results from these studies suggest that 200 mg/day of DHEA for 7 - 12 months decreases corticosteroid requirement for the patients, the frequency of disease flares, has an anti-osteoporotic effect and has an overall beneficial effect on SLE disease activity in female patients. A small study suggested benefits for cognitive function in such patients. The side effects acne and hirsutism were seen relatively frequently (30 - 40% and 10 - 12% of patients, respectively) but in most instances were deemed mild. DHEA treatment resulted in changes in lipid profile and may have endocrine effects, the consequences of which will need to be ascertained through longer-term follow-up studies.

Dehydroepiandrosterone in systemic lupus erythematosus

DHEA has shown promise for the treatment of SLE in three controlled and several uncontrolled clinical trials, including one large multicenter study comprising nearly 200 patients. The main benefits of DHEA seem to be a decrease in corticosteroid requirements and improved overall symptomatology. Intriguing aspects of DHEA treatment in SLE that require further study are a possible bone protective effect and improvements in cognitive function. The most frequent side effect is mild acneiform dermatitis, and long-term concerns include lowered HDL cholesterol.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of dehydroepiandrosterone in severe systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

To determine if dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) is beneficial in severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

A double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial in 21 patients with severe and active SLE, manifestated primarily by nephritis, serositis or hematological abnormalities. In addition to conventional treatment with corticosteroids +/- immunosuppressives, patients received DHEA 200 mg/d vs. placebo for 6 months, followed by a 6-month open label period. The primary outcome was a prospectively defined responder analysis, based on a quantitatively specified improvement of the principal severe lupus manifestation at 6 months.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were available for evaluation at 6 months. Baseline imbalance between the groups was noted, with the DHEA group having greater disease activity at baseline (P<0.05 by physician's global assessment). Eleven patients were responders: 7/9 patients on DHEA vs. 4/10 patients on placebo (P<0.10). Of the secondary outcomes, mean improvement in SLE disease activity index (SLE-DAI) score was greater in the DHEA group (-10.3+/-3.1 vs. -3.9+/-1.4. P<0.07). Bone mineral density at the lumbo-sacral spine showed significant reduction in the placebo group, but was maintained in the DHEA group.

CONCLUSION

DHEA therapy, when added to conventional treatment for severe SLE, may at most have a small added benefit with respect to lupus outcomes, but baseline imbalances in the study population limit the generalizability of the results. DHEA appears to have a protective effect with respect to corticosteroid-induced osteopenia in such patients.

Intervention in the aging immune system: Influence of dietary restriction, dehydroepiandrosterone, melatonin, and exercise

The decline in immunologic function with age is associated with an increase in susceptibility to infections and the occurrence of autoimmune diseases and cancers. Hence, the restoration of immunologic function is expected to have a beneficial effect in reducing pathology and maintaining a healthy condition in advanced age. A number of therapeutic strategies have been employed to intervene in the aging immune system. This article reviews the effect of dietary restriction (DR), dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) treatment, melatonin (MLT) therapy, and exercise on modulating the immune responses and retarding/reducing immunosenescence. DR has been subject to intensive research and is known to be the most efficacious means of increasing longevity, reducing pathology and enhancing immune function. The circulatory levels of the androgenic hormone DHEA and the pineal hormone MLT decrease with increasing age, and this decrease has been correlated with the age-related decline in the immune system. Therefore, the observation that immunosenescence is associated with low levels of DHEA and MLT has provided a rationale for therapeutic intervention. DHEA treatment and MLT therapy both exhibit immunostimulatory actions and preliminary reports indicate that hormonal (DHEA or MLT) substitution therapy reverses immunosenescence in mice. Similarly, exercise in some studies has been shown to enhance the immune response. However, these findings have not been confirmed by other laboratories. Thus, at the present time, it is difficult to draw any definitive conclusions on the efficacy of DHEA, MLT, and exercise on reversing or restoring the aging immune system.

Perturbations of hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis and adrenal androgen (AA) functions in rheumatoid arthritis

The available evidence reviewed does not allow definitive response to the question of a primary versus secondary role of sex hormone perturbations in RA. However, this conclusion should not be discouraging in view of the relatively recent focus upon this facet of the physiopathogenesis of RA and the enormous complexities of sex hormone biology and this disease. Specifically, data on the incidence of RA as well as life cycle changes in serum androgenic-anabolic (A-A) and sex hormone levels suggest important risk correlations. Furthermore, HLA-susceptibility markers for RA, gender, menopause and older age are all factors which significantly relate to the risk of developing RA and each has been shown to associate with sex hormone status. Whether or not HPG-AA hormonal status may modulate RA risk (or its course) primarily and independently or merely be predictive markers of other biological mechanisms was critically considered and requires further study. Sex hormone influences on cellular and humoral immunological reactivity and vascular pathogenetic mechanisms in RA were summarized. Androgens generally suppress immunoreactivity and cartilage responses to inflammation-mediated injury processes and may enhance synovial macrophage-like lining cell apoptosis. Oestrogens generally enhance immunoreactivity, offer some protection to inflammation-mediated cartilage damage (but less than androgens) and may inhibit apoptosis in certain in vitro cell models. Scant information is available on the balance of sex hormones (and glucocorticoids) in RA or its presumed pathogenetic mechanisms. Data were reviewed which support the concept of a spectrum of androgenicity in the normal population, particularly among women. A simplified schema of trophic and tropic steroidogenic mechanisms was proposed which could influence androgenic-anabolic (A-A) status and might relate to RA. Serum concentrations of DHAS (mumol/l), T (nmol/l) and O2 (pmol/l) span several orders of magnitude in normal physiology. The effects of alterations in the individual levels of these sex hormones and deviations from their normal physiological balance are not well understood. Critical attention to their biological functions is needed in RA as well as in health and disease generally. Such focused clinical and experimental investigations of HPG-AA functions promise to clarify the complex physiopathology of RA and contribute to its improved long-term management.