Mucositis management practices for hospitalized patients: national survey results

Pathogenesis and Amelioration of Radiation-Induced Oral Mucositis

OPINION STATEMENT

Oral mucositis (OM) causes significant detriment to patient quality of life. Despite advances in RT, chemotherapy, and surgery for HNC which have led to improved local control and survival, management of certain toxicities such as OM have not kept pace. Numerous strategies have emerged with demonstrable benefit in preventing severe OM. However, ones which are not only effective, but practical and affordable to implement are rare. For example, infusion of growth factors or free radical scavengers, and daily treatment of intra-oral sites with lasers are supported by high-quality evidence but have not become widely adopted. It falls to familiarity of the physician with the available preventative measures and ultimately, patient preference in accepting which strategies for OM amelioration are used. In this review, we present a pathophysiological-based review of prevention techniques available for reducing the incidence and duration of severe OM.

Effects of Honey on Oral Mucositis among Pediatric Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemo/Radiotherapy Treatment at King Abdulaziz University Hospital in Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

One of the most common complications of cancer chemotherapy is oral mucositis. This study evaluates the therapeutic effects of honey with the focus on grade III and IV oral mucositis, reduction of bacterial and fungal infections, duration of episodes of oral mucositis, and body weight in pediatric leukemic patients undergoing chemo/radiotherapy. This is an open labeled randomized controlled study conducted at our hospital on 40 pediatric cancer patients undergoing chemo/radiotherapy. All the 40 patients included in this study experienced a sum total of 390 episodes of fever and neutropenia associated with oral mucositis. A significant reduction of oral mucositis, associated Candida, and aerobic pathogenic bacterial infections was noted in patients in the honey treatment group. Also, there is a significant decrease in the duration of hospitalization for all those in the treatment group combined with a significant increase of body weight, delayed onset, and decreased severity of pain related to oral mucositis. Complications of oral mucositis can be tremendously reduced by the topical application of local Saudi honey and honey should be used as an integrative approach in prophylaxis and treatment of chemo/radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in pediatric cancer patients. Further research is needed to elucidate and better understand the underlying mechanism.

Survey of topical oral solutions for the treatment of chemo-induced oral mucositis

Purpose. The objectives of this study were (1) to describe the usage of topical oral solutions in patients experiencing chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (CIOM); and (2) to survey the care of oral mucositis provided to patients by clinical oncology pharmacists in institutional settings.

Methods. Surveys were distributed to institutional pharmacists in the US, who were asked to provide the components of their ‘magic mouthwash’. Other questions included whether an institutional mucositis management guideline is available and what is the involvement of clinical pharmacy in mucositis care.

Results. Forty institutions returned surveys during the study period. The top five ingredients used to compound the magic mouthwash are diphenhydramine, viscous lidocaine, magnesium hydroxide/aluminum hydroxide, nystatin and corticosteroids. Most institutions administer the mouthwash every 4 hours (36%) or every 6 hours (36%). Of the surveyed institutions, 33% currently possess guidelines for the management of CIOM.

Conclusions. Most institutions in the country formulate their topical solution, or magic mouthwash, with a variety of ingredients. There is a need to standardize the ingredients used to compound the magic mouthwash, in order to fully evaluate the efficacy of the solution to manage CIOM.

Affinity based multilayered polymeric self-assemblies for oral wound applications

Oral mucositis, a painful and debilitating ulcerative wound condition, is a frequently occurring complication following chemo- and/or radiotherapy. While the current standards of therapy (e.g., gels and mouth rinses) provide temporary relief, there is still an unmet need for a robust, long acting barrier that can provide lubricating protection in oral wounds, thereby enhancing the wound healing response. It is proposed that an affinity based layer-by-layer (LBL) self-assembly that can be administered as a series of mouth rinses could permit the formation of protective barriers, providing a modular approach to regenerative oral therapy. In this study, biotinylated poly(acrylic acid) was synthesized for developing LBL assemblies using biotin-streptavidin affinity linkages. To explore the ability of developed LBL assemblies to potentially resist the harsh intraoral environment, in vitro chemical and ex vivo mechanical tests were performed. The stability results demonstrated significant LBL barrier stability with wear resistance. From statistical analyses, it was deduced that polymer MW and the number of LBL layers contributed significantly to chemical barrier stability. Also, the extent of biotin conjugation played a key role for LBL development and in mechanical barrier stability. Thus, the proposed affinity based LBLs with their excellent barrier properties offer a modular treatment approach in oral mucosal injuries.

Cancer treatment-induced mucositis pain: strategies for assessment and management

Mucositis pain is a major clinical problem associated with cancer treatment. Mucosal tissue injury is a dose-limiting side effect and also limits nutritional intake and oral function, resulting in weight loss and nutritional deficits for many patients. The pathophysiology of mucositis is thought to be a complex array of cytokine-mediated events, which begins with mucosal atrophy and eventually leads to the painful ulceration of the mucosa. This article reviews current research related to pain management for mucositis. Effective treatment for mucositis pain must be targeted at the various factors involved in the pain experience. Although a number of interventions aimed to prevent and treat mucositis have been studied, there is little evidence to recommend any one treatment modality. While current strategies for pain management rely on general treatment for acute pain, research developments are aimed at targeting the specific receptors and enzymes involved in mucositis. As these breakthroughs become available clinically, thorough assessment and timely directed interventions must be implemented in order to limit patient distress from mucositis. This article presents an assessment tool specific to mucositis pain, including physical, functional, and pain parameters.

Implementation of an Oral Care Protocol and Its Effects on Oral Mucositis

Oral complications are commonly seen in pediatric oncology patients. Induced by chemotherapy or radiation, oral mucositis is a debilitating side effect that has much clinical significance. Oral mucositis may decrease the effectiveness of treatment as well as decrease the quality of life in the pediatric oncology patient. Therefore, it is our responsibility as health care professionals to reduce the incidence and/or severity of mucositis as much as possible. One intervention that has been proven to be successful is basic oral hygiene implemented through an oral care protocol. It is important that nurses are educated on the significance of adequate dental hygiene and the process and need for institutional change of protocols. Nurses and other health care professionals can positively influence patient care by incorporating the evidence-based practice of an oral care protocol— improving consistency of care while promoting an intervention of proven benefit against oral mucositis.

Evaluation of a mobile phone-based, advanced symptom management system (ASyMS) in the management of chemotherapy-related toxicity

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of a mobile phone-based, remote monitoring, advanced symptom management system (ASyMS) on the incidence, severity and distress of six chemotherapy-related symptoms (nausea, vomiting, fatigue, mucositis, hand-foot syndrome and diarrhoea) in patients with lung, breast or colorectal cancer.

DESIGN

A two group (intervention and control) by five time points (baseline, pre-cycle 2, pre-cycle 3, pre-cycle 4 and pre-cycle 5) randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Seven clinical sites in the UK; five specialist cancer centres and two local district hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred and twelve people with breast, lung or colorectal cancer receiving outpatient chemotherapy.

INTERVENTIONS

A mobile phone-based, remote monitoring, advanced symptom management system (ASyMS).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Chemotherapy-related morbidity of six common chemotherapy-related symptoms (nausea, vomiting, fatigue, mucositis, hand-foot syndrome and diarrhoea).

RESULTS

There were significantly higher reports of fatigue in the control group compared to the intervention group (odds ratio = 2.29, 95%CI = 1.04 to 5.05, P = 0.040) and reports of hand-foot syndrome were on average lower in the control group (odds ratio control/intervention = 0.39, 95%CI = 0.17 to 0.92, P = 0.031).

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates that ASyMS can support the management of symptoms in patients with lung, breast and colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy.

Nursing Interventions and Supportive Care for the Prevention and Treatment of Oral Mucositis Associated with Cancer Treatment

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To review novel approaches to assessing and managing patients with cancer who are at risk for oral mucositis.

DATA SOURCES

Published research and review articles, books, conference presentations, and abstracts.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Oral mucositis is a major source of clinical morbidity among patients with cancer undergoing treatment, yet definitive management strategies continue to elude practitioners. A growing body of evidence suggests that a multifaceted, innovative, targeted approach to oral care provides an important foundation with which to reduce treatment-related morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Ongoing assessment and monitoring are critical to the effective management of oral mucositis. Targeted interventions that incorporate the basic principles of wound care with current knowledge about the temporal aspects of clinical manifestations, evidence-based standardized approaches to assessment, and utilization of novel therapeutics provide an important means by which to improve patient outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Oral care protocols are essential components of oral mucositis management. Incorporating current knowledge of pathophysiology with a targeted, standardized approach may help to reduce overall morbidity and improve quality of life.

Assessing and Managing Chemotherapy-Induced Mucositis Pain

Acute pain is the major clinical problem associated with mucositis. Mucosal tissue injury is a dose-limiting toxicity of many cancer therapies. Because the number of patients treated with combinations of high-dose chemotherapy agents is likely to increase, more patients are at risk for mucositis. Currently, no consensus exists regarding mucositis prevention, assessment, or treatment. Similarly, research is needed in methods to accurately assess and manage pain for mucositis. Multiple interventional approaches are needed to decrease the emotional and physical distress caused by acute oral pain and mucositis. An assessment tool that includes physical, functional, and pain parameters is presented. Although approaches to prevent and treat mucositis are increasing, appropriate assessment and timely directed interventions can minimize patient distress.

Regional Cancer Pain Syndromes

Cancer pain often presents in a body region. This review summarizes articles from 1999-2004 relevant to cancer pain syndromes in the head and neck, chest, back, abdomen, pelvis, and limbs. Although the evidence is limited, progress is being made in further development of the evidence base to support and guide current practice.

A Pilot Study of Chlorhexidine and Benzydamine Oral Rinses for the Prevention and Treatment of Irradiation Mucositis in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

This pilot study was designed to compare the efficacy of 0.2% wt/vol chlorhexidine gluconate and 0.15% wt/vol benzydamine hydrochloride oral rinses in alleviating irradiation oropharyngeal mucositis for patients with head and neck cancer. This was a prospective, randomized, and double-blinded study. Fourteen subjects were stratified based on nasopharyngeal cancer and non-nasopharyngeal head and neck cancer, and were randomly assigned to receive oral care protocol either containing with chlorhexidine (n = 7) or benzydamine (n = 7) from the first day to 2 weeks after the completion of radiotherapy. Subjects were evaluated twice weekly through days 1 to 64 using the World Health Organization mucositis scale and the 10 cm visual analogue scale for mouth pain and dysphagia. In the chlorhexidine arm, 4 subjects (57%) had grade 2, and 3 subjects (43%) had grade 3 mucositis. In the benzydamine arm, 5 subjects (71%) had grade 2, and 2 subjects (29%) had grade 3 mucositis (P > .05). The mean area-under-the-curve values of mucositis were 26.5 +/- 13.6 (median 26) and 24.1 +/- 6.1 (median 22) in the chlorhexidine group and benzydamine group, respectively (P > .05). The mean area-under-the-curve values of pain and dysphagia were 70.8 +/- 33 (median 88.5) and 71.5 +/- 39 (median 101), and 62.1 +/- 17.2 (median 72) and 66 +/- 22.3 (median 57.5) in the chlorhexidine and benzydamine groups, respectively (P > .05). A trend has emerged of a lessening of severity of mucositis, pain, and dysphagia for patients with head and neck cancer receiving benzydamine oral rinse. The beneficial effects, however, need to be confirmed in a larger trial.

Chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis: new approaches to prevention and management

Oral mucositis is a common and significant toxicity of cancer chemotherapy. It is under-reported and not well treated, particularly in patients that receive high-dose therapy with an autologous or allogenic stem cell transplant. Two recently published retrospective analyses of patient complaints following stem cell transplantation have identified oral mucositis as the worst toxicity reported by patients, and what is more important is that patients indicated that oncology healthcare team members do a poor job of managing and providing methods of symptom relief. Twenty percent of patients surveyed indicated they received no symptom relief at all.

The role of oral microbial colonization in ventilator-associated pneumonia

The present article reviews the association between microbial colonization of the oral cavity and the lungs in critically ill patients that develop ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. The risk factors and microorganisms associated with VAP are presented. The role of oral colonization of VAP-associated pathogens (VAP-AP) in the development of VAP is examined. We explore the potential factors involved in oral colonization of VAP-AP, which are atypical bacteria for the oral cavity. Strategies for the prevention or moderation of oral colonization of VAP-AP have had limited success. We need a deeper understanding of the pathophysiology of VAP in order to reduce the morbidity, mortality, and cost from this common complication in ICU medicine and surgery.

Mucosal damage: a major risk factor for severe complications after cytotoxic therapy

The oral and gastrointestinal mucosa is frequently damaged during chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with cancer, leading to a high incidence of mucositis (ie, oral, esophageal, lower gastrointestinal tract mucositis). Patients with mucositis often experience considerable pain and discomfort. Furthermore, neutropenic patients with mucositis have an increased risk of potentially life-threatening infections as well as prolonged hospital stays. Mucositis may also require that subsequent chemotherapy or radiotherapy doses be reduced, thereby potentially compromising the efficacy of cancer therapy. Standard care for oral mucositis is based on effective oral hygiene, appropriate analgesia, infection management, and parenteral nutrition when needed; few other approaches have been shown to be effective. The evaluation of new options to treat and prevent mucositis rather than control the symptoms is therefore an urgent priority. A comprehensive understanding of the complex pathobiology of mucositis will help to identify potential targets for new drugs. Promising investigational approaches have recently emerged. These include fibroblast growth factor-20, which is effective in animal models of chemotherapy/radiation-induced mucosal toxicity, and is being investigated in clinical studies. The candidate that is most advanced in terms of drug development is recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor (rHuKGF; palifermin), which in phase III clinical trials was shown to reduce the severity and duration of oral mucositis and improve clinical sequelae.

Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of cancer therapy-induced oral and gastrointestinal mucositis

BACKGROUND

Oral and gastrointestinal (GI) mucositis can affect up to 100% of patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, 80% of patients with malignancies of the head and neck receiving radiotherapy, and a wide range of patients receiving chemotherapy. Alimentary track mucositis increases mortality and morbidity and contributes to rising health care costs. Consequently, the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and the International Society for Oral Oncology assembled an expert panel to evaluate the literature and to create evidence-based guidelines for preventing, evaluating, and treating mucositis.

METHODS

Thirty-six panelists reviewed literature published between January 1966 and May 2002. An initial meeting in January 2002 produced a preliminary draft of guidelines that was reviewed at a second meeting the same year. Thereafter, a writing committee produced a report on mucositis pathogenesis, epidemiology, and scoring (also included in this issue), as well as clinical practice guidelines.

RESULTS

Panelists created recommendations from higher levels of evidence and suggestions when evidence was of a lower level and there was a consensus regarding the interpretation of the evidence by the panel. Panelists identified gaps in evidence that made it impossible to recommend or not recommend use of specific agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral/GI mucositis is a common side effect of many anticancer therapies. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines are presented as a benchmark for clinicians to use for routine care of appropriate patients and as a springboard to challenge clinical investigators to conduct high-quality trials geared toward areas in which data are either lacking or conflicting.

Oral mucositis: a challenging complication of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and radiochemotherapy: part 1, pathogenesis and prophylaxis of mucositis

BACKGROUND

Oral mucositis is a common sequel of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and radiochemotherapy in patients with cancer or patients requiring hemopoietic stem cell transplants. Mucositis has a direct and significant impact on the duration of disease remission and cure rates, because it is a cancer treatment-limiting toxicity. Mucositis also affects survival because of the risk of infection and has a significant impact on the quality of life and cost of care.

METHODS

This article reviews publications on the etiopathogenesis and prevention of oral mucositis accessible from a MEDLINE search using as key words, mucositis, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hemopoietic stem cell transplant, and oral.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the current available products, ice chips and benzydamine have the strongest scientific evidence of support for prophylaxis of mucositis.

Oral mucositis: A challenging complication of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and radiochemotherapy. Part 2: Diagnosis and management of mucositis

BACKGROUND

Oral mucositis is a common sequel of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and radiochemotherapy in patients with cancer or patients requiring hemopoietic stem cell transplants. Mucositis has a direct and significant impact on the duration of disease remission and cure rates, because it is a treatment-limiting toxicity. Mucositis also affects survival because of the risk of infection and has a significant impact on quality of life and cost of care.

METHODS

This article reviews publications on the diagnosis and management of oral mucositis accessible from a MEDLINE search using as key words mucositis, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hemopoietic stem cell transplant, and oral.

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional care of patients with mucositis is currently essentially palliative, with good oral hygiene, narcotic analgesics, and topical palliative mouth rinses.

Palliation of Oral Mucositis Symptoms in Pediatric Patients Treated With Cancer Chemotherapy

This prospective randomized 2-period crossover study aimed at comparing the efficacy of 2 oral care protocols differing in the type of mouthwashes: chlorhexidine versus benzydamine in alleviating oral mucositis symptoms for children undergoing chemotherapy. Forty subjects were randomly allocated to receive either chlorhexidine first then benzydamine protocols or benzydamine first then chlorhexidine protocols. Each protocol was started on the first day of chemotherapy and continued for 21 days. Subjects were evaluated in intervals of 3 to 4 days using the World Health Organization (WHO) grading for mucositis and 10-cm visual analogue scale for oral symptoms evaluations. Among 34 evaluable subjects, 26% and 48% of them using chlorhexidine and benzydamine had WHO grade II mucositis, respectively (P < .05). The results revealed a significant difference in mean area under the curve (AUC) of mouth pain (1.35 +/- 2.26 versus 3.09 +/- 3.21) (P = .05), and a trend of a lessening of mean AUC of difficulty in eating/chewing (2.49 +/- 3.74 versus 2.71 +/- 4.1) (P = .82) and swallowing (1.34 +/- 3.31 versus 1.91 +/- 4.03) (P = .53) for subjects receiving chlorhexidine compared to those receiving benzydamine. In conclusion, chlorhexidine may be helpful in palliating mucositis symptoms for children in chemotherapy. The beneficial effect, however, is small and needs to be confirmed in a larger trial.

Symptom control

Symptom control has become increasingly recognized as an important goal in patient care. In this article, advances in symptom assessment, and various definitions of symptom improvement are reviewed. Theoretical concepts underlying symptom control and clinically significant change are presented, as well as the role of symptom control as an endpoint in clinical trials. Symptom control is then surveyed in two broad categories for selected symptoms. The first area is therapy related symptoms, secondary to chemotherapy, radiation, hormonal therapy, and surgery. Symptoms reviewed include chemotherapy related mucositis, emesis, fatigue; hot flashes; and radiation related dermatitis, xerostomia, and mucositis. The second area is palliative oncologic approaches to disease-related symptoms. Results in palliative chemotherapy, palliative radiation therapy, cancer pain, and lack of appetite are summarized. Areas requiring further research are noted. Findings are presented in both a clinical and research context to help guide the reader with interpreting symptom control studies.

Complications of radiation therapy for head and neck cancers. The patient's perspective

Newer treatments for head and neck cancers, including altered fractionation and the use of concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy, may provide better local-regional tumor control rates; however, patients may experience more frequent and more severe acute toxicities that result in considerable suffering. Through this study, we sought a better understanding of patients' experiences when undergoing radiotherapy. Personal interviews were conducted with 33 individuals who had received radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. These individuals described their treatment experiences and identified the most troublesome and debilitating side effects of radiotherapy. Overall, lethargy and weakness, dry mouth, mouth sores and pain, taste changes, and sore throat were the most frequently reported troublesome or debilitating side effects. The single most debilitating side effect was oropharyngeal mucositis that was characterized by patients as sore throat, and mouth sores and pain; both negatively affected the patient's ability to eat and drink, causing many patients to experience significant weight loss. Trends toward more aggressive management of head and neck cancers underscore the need for new and effective therapies for oropharyngeal mucositis occurring in patients receiving radiotherapy.

A research review of the current treatments for radiation-induced oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To review the research studies on the current treatments for radiation therapy-(RT-) induced mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE search of the literature from 1966-2001.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Four types of agents (i.e., antimicrobial, coating, anti-inflammatory, and cytokine-like agents) have been evaluated for the management of RT-induced oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer. Most of the published studies had relatively small sample sizes and used inconsistent measures to evaluate the extent and severity of oral mucositis. Therefore, definitive conclusions regarding the effectiveness of any of the agents tested in the prevention and treatment of RT-induced oral mucositis cannot be drawn.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral mucositis remains the most common complication among patients with head and neck cancer. Although a number of strategies and products are being investigated and new directions are promising, the therapies tested to date have not produced consistent results.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

The most effective measure to treat RT-induced mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer is frequent oral rinsing with a bland mouthwash, such as saline or a sodium bicarbonate rinse, to reduce the amount of oral microbial flora. Dental care, consistent oral assessments, and the initiation of a standardized oral hygiene protocol before the initiation of cancer treatment are the most effective approaches for oral mucositis.

More than a sore mouth: patients' experience of oral mucositis

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To explore patients' experience of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis.

DESIGN

Interpretive descriptive, phenomenologic.

SETTING

The cancer center of a metropolitan teaching hospital in South Australia.

SAMPLE

A purposive sample of six participants undergoing intensive cytotoxic therapy associated with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

METHODS

Patients were interviewed at different stages of their treatment trajectory and asked to relate their experience of oral mucositis as it developed and resolved.

FINDINGS

Participants' reports indicated three distinct phases representing linear time in the course of their mucositis: the preparatory phase, the peak phase, and the persisting phase. Five themes further abstracted were the presence of nurses, therapeutic interventions, manifestations of mucositis, the distress of eating (and not eating), and whether the treatment was worthwhile.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral mucositis is much more than a sore mouth. The effects of mucositis are widespread and can have a marked effect on patients' psychological well-being.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Care centers often focus on pain control through pharmacologic intervention and overlook the effects of other sequelae. Nurses' role in helping patients to cope with mucositis should encompass more than providing pharmacologic pain relief.

Exposure of oral mucosa to bioactive milk factors reduces severity of chemotherapy-induced mucositis in the hamster

A biologically active extract containing bovine whey proteins, whey growth factor extract-A (WGFE-A) was administered topically to the oral mucosa of hamsters and its ability to prevent and treat chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis investigated. Oral mucositis was induced in Syrian golden hamsters through a combination treatment of the antimetabolite chemotherapy drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and mild abrasion of the cheek pouch. WGFE-A administered to the oral mucosa via hydrogel and liquid treatments, pre and concurrent to 5-FU therapy, resulted in significantly reduced mucosal ulceration. The protective effect was dose dependent with greatest benefit from WGFE-A doses applied at 4.2 mg/ml gel and 14 mg/ml mouthwash (P<0.01). The protective activity of WGFE-A also appeared related to mode of delivery. Administration of WGFE-A from an alternate vehicle Orabase(R) did not alleviate mucositis compared to WGFE-A applied in hydrogel. When administered continuously after the chemotherapy schedule, WGFE-A failed to reduce ulcer area when applied over a 12-day period. In a separate study, cell cycle staining indicated that cheek pouch mucosal epithelial cells pre-exposed to WGFE-A in-vivo showed a reduced rate of proliferation, measured as a 21% reduction in the bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) cell labelling index (P<0.04). This was consistent with a protective mode of WGFE-A action against anti-metabolites such as 5-FU which target rapidly dividing cells. The results were also consistent with recent in vitro data showing protective properties from WGFE-A administered to epithelial cells given pre/concurrent to chemotherapy exposure. WGFE-A is known to contain mitogens which stimulate cells of mesenchymal origin and inhibit epithelial cell growth in culture. Several WGFE-A constituents are likely to confer protective effects on the cheek mucosa, including anti-proliferative, anti-apoptotic and anti-microbial factors. WGFE-A provides a potentially valuable source of topically delivered proteins for clinical application in preventing severe oral mucositis caused by chemotherapy.

Management of oral complications

OBJECTIVES

To explore what nurses were doing to prevent or treat oral complications related to cancer and cancer therapies.

DATA SOURCES

Review articles, research studies, consensus statements, and data collection.

CONCLUSIONS

Different practice patterns exist between physicians and nurses in providing oral care interventions. Nurses initiated less toxic and less costly interventions than those prescribed by physicians. Standard assessment parameters are used infrequently.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Oral mucositis can be distressing by interfering with comfort, appetite, communication, and general well-being. Nurses need to initiate appropriate therapy for patient care.

Local application of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) for the treatment of oral mucositis

The combination of radiation and chemotherapy administered for patients undergoing therapy for advanced head and neck neoplasms leads to a significant rise in toxic side-effects. Oral mucositis remains one of the most distressing factors leading to pain, impairment of oral nutrition, local and systemic infection and often cessation of the oncological treatment. The local and systemic administration of recombinant growth factors has revealed a potential benefit in the treatment of oral mucositis. Clinical data concerning the topical use of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating-factor (GM-CSF) in the prevention and therapy of mucositis in patients undergoing radiochemotherapy for advanced cancer of the head and neck are presented in this paper. A prospective, randomised, open parallel-grouped, single centre study at a university hospital was performed. 35 patients with stage III and IV carcinomas of the head and neck were included. Statistical analysis concerning the degree of oral mucositis, the perception of pain, the incidence of secondary infections and the change in haematological parameters revealed no superiority of GM-CSF in comparison to conventional mouthwash between the two groups of patients. As a result, and faced with the tremendous costs of the regular use of a recombinant cytokine, we ended the clinical trial after 35 patients. The topical administration of GM-CSF to treat oral mucositis as a result of radiochemotherapy in patients suffering from head and neck cancer cannot be recommended.

Gelclair: managing the symptoms of oral mucositis

Oral mucositis is a common side-effect of oncology therapies and other diseases. This article gives an overview of the issues associated with oral mucositis, and an outline of a new product, Gelclair, that may address some of these issues.

Factors influencing oral mucositis in patients receiving chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Oral mucositis is a painful complication of chemotherapy and can greatly affect patients' morbidity and mortality. Findings from two previous studies suggested a decrease in the prevalence of chemotherapy-induced mucositis in patients with solid tumors. The purposes of this study were to follow a large cohort of outpatients to determine the prevalence of mucositis and to identify whether certain clinical factors were significant in the development of mucositis.

DESCRIPTION OF STUDY

In this prospective study, a convenience sample of 199 outpatients was followed for three cycles or until mucositis developed. The clinical factors monitored included the following: pretreatment dental examination/repair; initial standard chemotherapy dosage; prophylactic use of colony-stimulating factors; and use of preventive mouthwashes or other prophylactic measures.

RESULTS

Oral mucositis developed in 50 patients (25.1%). Prechemotherapy dental examination/repair and initial standard chemotherapy dosage were equivalent among both groups. Of the 48 patients in whom mucositis developed, 10 (20.8%) received prophylactic colony-stimulating factors. Of 134 patients in whom mucositis did not develop, 46 (34.3%) received prophylactic colony-stimulating factors. This difference was statistically nonsignificant.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Differences in the clinical factors investigated could not explain the lower prevalence of oral mucositis among the current patient cohort. The reason for the diminishing prevalence of this side effect remains unclear, and additional parameters, particularly detailed oral hygiene practices, should be evaluated. In the meantime, oncology clinicians should consider the teaching of patients and urging them to use good oral hygiene practices as necessary and potentially preventive measures against chemotherapy-induced mucositis.

Development of protegrins for the treatment and prevention of oral mucositis: structure-activity relationships of synthetic protegrin analogues

Protegrin antimicrobial peptides possess activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria and yeasts. An extensive structure-activity relationship (SAR) study was conducted on several hundred protegrin analogues to gain understanding of the relationship between the primary and secondary structure of the protegrins and their antimicrobial activities, and to identify a protegrin analogue for clinical development. Native sequence protegrins are cationic, amphiphilic peptides that are characterized by the presence of a beta-sheet structure that is maintained by two disulfide bridges. The presence of the beta-sheet is key to the stability of the protegrin structure; linearized analogues or analogues that have amino acid substitutions that eliminate hydrogen bonding across the beta-sheet have reduced activity, especially in the presence of physiological concentrations of NaCl. Also, maintaining amphiphilicity of the beta-sheet is key; analogues with substitutions of polar amino acids in the hydrophobic face have reduced activity. Analogues with reduced positive charge tend to be less active, an observation that is more marked for gram-negative than gram-positive bacteria, and may implicate binding to lipopolysaccharide as a key mechanistic step in the killing of gram-negative bacteria. A very large number of amino acid substitutions are tolerated by the protegrin structure, implying that overall structural features such as amphiphilicity, charge, and shape are more important to activity than the presence of specific amino acids. This lack of importance of specific stereochemistry is supported by the fact that completely D-amino acid substituted protegrins are fully potent. Based on the SAR studies, and on the microbiological data from an animal model, one protegrin analogue, IB-367, was selected for clinical development as a topical agent to prevent the oral mucositis associated with cancer therapy.

IB-367, a protegrin peptide with in vitro and in vivo activities against the microflora associated with oral mucositis

Although the microflora associated with oral mucositis initiated by cytotoxic therapy is not well characterized, several studies suggest that reduction of the microbial load in the oral cavity has some clinical benefit. The MICs of IB-367, a synthetic protegrin analog, ranged from 0.13 to 64 microgram/ml for gram-positive bacteria (Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus sanguis, Streptococcus salivarius, and Staphylococcus aureus) and from 0.06 to 8 microgram/ml for gram-negative species (Klebsiella, Escherichia, and Pseudomonas). IB-367 exhibited rapid, microbicidal activity against both log- and stationary-phase cultures of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. At concentrations near the MICs for these two organisms (4 and 2 microgram/ml, respectively), IB-367 reduced viability by more than 3 logs in less than 16 min. Similarly, IB-367 effected a 4-log reduction of the endogenous microflora in pooled human saliva within 2 min at 250 microgram/ml, a concentration readily attained by local delivery. After nine serial transfers at 0.5x the MIC, the MIC of IB-367 for MRSA and P. aeruginosa increased only two to four times. In a phase I clinical study with healthy volunteers, IB-367 was well tolerated, with no detectable systemic absorption. One hour after treatment with 9 mg of IB-367, the prevalence of gram-negative bacteria and yeast was reduced, and the density of the predominant gram-positive oral flora was decreased 1,000 times. IB-367's properties (speed of killing, breadth of spectrum, and lack of resistance) make the compound a strong candidate for the prophylaxis of oral mucositis. Phase II clinical trials with IB-367 are under way for this indication in immunocompromised subjects.

Randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of 3 commonly used mouthwashes to treat chemotherapy-induced mucositis

OBJECTIVE

To test the effectiveness of 3 mouthwashes used to treat chemotherapy-induced mucositis. The mouthwashes were as follows: salt and soda, chlorhexidine, and "magic" mouthwash (lidocaine, Benadryl, and Maalox).

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized, double-blind clinical trial was implemented in 23 outpatient and office settings. Participants were monitored from the time they developed mucositis until cessation of the signs and symptoms of mucositis, or until they finished their 12-day supply of mouthwash. All participants followed a prescribed oral hygiene program and were randomly assigned a mouthwash. Nurses used the Oral Assessment Guide for initial assessment and taught patients how to assess their own mouths, then phoned the patients every other day to gather status reports.

RESULTS

In 142 of 200 patients, there was a cessation of the signs and symptoms of mucositis within 12 days. No significant differences in time for the cessation of the signs and symptoms were observed among the 3 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the comparable effectiveness of the mouthwashes, the least costly was salt and soda mouthwash.

Prevention and treatment of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis: a review

Oral mucositis is a distressing toxic effect of systemic chemotherapy with many commonly utilized drugs and of head and neck irradiation in patients with cancer. The agents and methods that have been used and studied in chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis, their mechanisms of action, and the current knowledge of their efficiency to reduce the incidence, severity or shorten the duration of oral mucositis are reviewed in this article. Oral cooling is a cheap and available method to lower the severity of bolus 5-fluorouracil-induced oral mucositis. However, more effective methods are needed. Results of studies with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor are promising. Lasers are partly beneficial, but equipment-demanding. Modification of the chemotherapy regimen resulting in shortening of the exposition time to chemotherapy agents or chronomodulation of chemotherapy has been shown to lower mucosal toxicity of some regimens. Results of animal studies with locally applied transforming growth factor beta 3 and interleukin-11 are also promising. Based on the findings of the role of the inflammatory cascade in the response of normal tissues to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, anti-inflammatory drugs might be beneficial. At the present time, no agent has been shown to be uniformly efficacious and can be accepted as standard therapy of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis. Further intensive research is needed.

Mucositis as a biological process: a new hypothesis for the development of chemotherapy-induced stomatotoxicity

Mucositis induced by antineoplastic drugs is an important, dose-limiting and costly side effect of cancer therapy. The ulcerative lesions which result are frequent systemic portals of entry for microorganisms which inhabit the mouth and consequently are often sources of systemic infection in the myelosuppressed patient. A number of clinical observations and the inconsistency of responses to a broad range of treatment modalities suggests a physiological complexity to mucositis which has not previously been comprehensively considered. We now propose a hypothesis as to the mechanism by which mucositis develops and resolves, which is based on four phases: an initial inflammatory/vascular phase; an epithelial phase; an ulcerative/bacteriological phase; and a healing phase. The role of cytokines as initiators and ampliers of the process is discussed, as is the potential influence of genetic factors in establishing risk and modifying the course of stomatotoxicity.

Effect of attitudes and subjective norms on intention to provide oral care to patients receiving antineoplastic chemotherapy

The Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) served as the conceptual framework for this study, which was designed to examine the effect of attitudes and subjective norms on intention to provide oral care for patients receiving chemotherapy. The sample, stratified by type of health care facility, consisted of staff nurses (N = 85) who work in oncology settings in New York State. Data were collected by sending 10 questionnaires to a designee at the randomly chosen facility. Both attitudes and subjective norms were significant predictors of behavioral intention, predicting 39% of the variance. Using the strategy devised by Laschinger and Goldenberg, the sample was divided into two groups: those that scored below the mean on behavioral intention (nonintenders) and those above the mean (intenders). Nonintenders scored significantly lower on attitudes and subjective norms than intenders. The TRA was not supported when examining the data of the nonintenders, whereas for the intenders the theory did operate as designed, predicting 23% of the variance in behavioral intention.