Differences in binding of epidermal growth factor to liver membranes of TCDD-resistant and TCDD-sensitive rats after a single dose of TCDD

Developmental dental toxicity of dioxin and related compounds--a review

Non-halogenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons such as polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs, or dioxins), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are wide-spread environmental pollutants that have unequivocal adverse effects on different species, including humans. Accidental exposure of children to high amounts of PCDD/Fs has been found to be associated with developmental enamel defects and missing permanent teeth. An association between dioxin exposure via mother's milk and developmental mineralisation defects in permanent first molars was also found in otherwise healthy Finnish children born in the late 1980s but not in those born in the late 1990s. Results of experimental animal studies in vivo and in vitro are compatible with findings in human teeth. In addition to the dose, dental effects of the most toxic dioxin congener, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), essentially depend on the stage of tooth development at the time of exposure. Accordingly, TCDD arrests early rat and mouse molar tooth development and in more advanced teeth it interferes with mineralisation of enamel and dentine and arrests root development. Expression of the specific dioxin receptor (AhR) in dental cells at TCDD-sensitive stages of tooth development suggests that the dental, like other developmental effects of TCDD, are mediated by the AhR. Early effects also depend on the epidermal growth factor receptor and involve enhanced apoptosis. The lowest TCDD dose (30ng/kg) causing adverse dental effects in rats has been estimated to result in maternal tissue levels approaching the high end of human background range and human milk PCDD/F levels that were associated with enamel defects in children. However, because of the uniform and clear decline in background dioxin and PCB levels in mother's milk during the last twenty years, dioxins are currently likely to be of small or no account as regards developmental dental defects in children. Even so, this is not the case after heavy exposure and little is known about the possible synergistic effects of these toxicants with other chemicals interfering with tooth development.

Physicochemical differences in the AH receptors of the most TCDD-susceptible and the most TCDD-resistant rat strains

Long-Evans rats (strain Turku AB; L-E) are at least 1000-fold more sensitive (LD50 about 10 microg/kg) to the acute lethal effects of 2, 3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) than are Han/Wistar (Kuopio; H/W) rats (LD50 > 9600 microg/kg). The AH receptor (AHR) is believed to mediate the toxic effects of TCDD and related halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons. We compared the AHRs of L-E and H/W rats to determine if there were any structural or functional receptor differences that might be related to the dramatic difference in the sensitivity of these two strains to the lethal effects of TCDD. Cytosols from liver and lung of the sensitive L-E rats contained about twofold higher levels of specific binding sites for [3H]TCDD than occurred in H/W rats; the Kd for binding of [3H]TCDD to AHR in hepatic cytosols was similar between the two strains. Addition of the oxyanions, molybdate or tungstate (20 mM), had little effect upon ligand binding to AHR in hepatic cytosols from L-E rats whereas in cytosols from H/W rats these agents substantially diminished or totally abolished TCDD binding. The AHR in H/W cytosols also lost ligand-binding function when NaCl (20 to 400 mM) was added to the buffer whereas, in cytosols from L-E rats, the addition of 400 mM NaCl caused the receptor complex to shift from 9S to 6S during velocity sedimentation but did not destroy ligand binding function. AHR from hepatic cytosol of both the L-E and H/W rats could be transformed to the DNA-binding state in the presence of TCDD or other dioxin congeners as assessed by gel mobility shift assays. The most dramatic difference in AHR properties between L-E and H/W rats is molecular mass. Immunoblotting of cytosolic proteins revealed that the AHR in L-E rats has an apparent mass of approximately 106 kDa, similar to the mass of the receptor previously reported in several other common laboratory rat strains. In contrast, the mass of the AHR in H/W rats is approximately 98 kDa, significantly smaller than the mass of receptor reported in any other rat strains. F1 offspring of a cross between L-E and H/W rats expressed both the 106- and the 98-kDa protein. There was no apparent difference in the mass of the AHR nuclear translocator protein (ARNT) between the two strains, but the hepatic concentration of ARNT was about three times as high in L-E as in H/W rats. It will be interesting to find out how the altered structure of the AHR in H/W rats is related to their remarkable resistance to the lethal effects of TCDD.