Maternal superobesity and perinatal outcomes

Obesity at term: What to consider? How to deliver?

Obesity presents significant challenges during pregnancy, increasing the risk of complications and adverse outcomes for both mother and baby. With the rising prevalence of obesity among pregnant women, questions arise regarding optimal management, including timing of delivery and choice of delivery mode. Labour induction in obese women may require a combination of mechanical and pharmacological methods due to increased risk of failed induction. Caesarean section in obese women presents unique challenges, requiring comprehensive perioperative planning and specialized care to optimize outcomes. However, specific guidelines tailored to obese patients undergoing caesarean sections are lacking. Postpartum care should include vigilant monitoring for complications. Addressing obesity in pregnancy necessitates a multidisciplinary approach and specialized care to ensure the best outcomes.

Peripartum interventions for people with class III obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify evidence-based peripartum interventions for people with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to 2022 without date, publication type, or language restrictions.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Cohort and randomized controlled trials that implemented an intervention and evaluated peripartum outcomes of people with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 were included. The primary outcome depended on the intervention but was commonly related to wound morbidity after cesarean delivery (ie, infection, separation, hematoma).

METHODS

Meta-analysis was completed for interventions with at least 2 studies. Pooled risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals and heterogeneity (I2 statistics) were reported.

RESULTS

Of 20,301 studies screened, 30 studies (17 cohort and 13 randomized controlled trials) encompassing 10 types of interventions were included. The interventions included delivery planning (induction of labor, planned cesarean delivery), antibiotics during labor induction or for surgical prophylaxis, 6 types of cesarean delivery techniques, and anticoagulation dosing after a cesarean delivery. Planned cesarean delivery compared with planned vaginal delivery did not improve outcomes according to 3 cohort studies. One cohort study compared 3 g with 2 g of cephazolin prophylaxis for cesarean delivery and found no differences in surgical site infections. According to 3 cohort studies and 2 randomized controlled trials, there was no improvement in outcomes with a non-low transverse skin incision. Ten studies (4 cohort and 6 randomized controlled trials) met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. Two randomized controlled trials compared subcuticular closure with suture vs staples after cesarean delivery and found no differences in wound morbidity within 6 weeks of cesarean delivery (n=422; risk ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.59; I2=9%). Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy was compared with standard dressing in 4 cohort and 4 randomized controlled trials, which found no differences in wound morbidity (cohort n=2200; risk ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-1.63; I2=66.1%) or surgical site infections (randomized controlled trial n=1262; risk ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.29; I2=0).

CONCLUSION

Few studies address interventions in people with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2, and most studies did not demonstrate a benefit. Either staples or suture are recommended for subcuticular closure, but available data do not support prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy after cesarean delivery for people with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2.

Perinatal outcomes in women with class IV obesity compared to women in the normal or overweight body mass index categories: A population-based cohort study in Qatar

Background

The prevalence of childhood and adult obesity is rising exponentially worldwide. Class IV obesity (body mass index, BMI ≥50 kg/m2) is associated with a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. This study compared these outcomes between women with class IV obesity and women in the normal or overweight categories during pregnancy.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed in Qatar, including women having singleton live births beyond 24 weeks of gestation, classified into two class IV obesity and normal/overweight (BMI between 18.5 and 30.0 kg/m2). The outcome measures included the mode of delivery, development of gestational diabetes and hypertension, fetal macrosomia, small for date baby, preterm birth and neonatal morbidity. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were determined using multivariable logistic regression models.

Results

A total of 247 women with class IV obesity were compared with 6797 normal/overweight women. Adjusted analysis showed that women with class IV obesity had 3.2 times higher odds of cesarean delivery (aOR: 3.19, CI: 2.26-4.50), 3.4 times higher odds of gestational diabetes (aOR: 3.39, CI: 2.55-4.50), 4.2 times higher odds of gestational hypertension (aOR: 4.18, CI: 2.45-7.13) and neonatal morbidity (aOR: 4.27, CI: 3.01-6.05), and 6.5 times higher odds of macrosomia (aOR 6.48, CI 4.22-9.99).

Conclusions

Class IV obesity is associated with more adverse perinatal outcomes compared with the normal or overweight BMI categories. The study results emphasized the need for specialized antenatal obesity clinics to address the associated risks and reduce complications.

Comparison of perioperative outcomes and anesthetic-related complications of morbidly obese and super-obese parturients delivering by cesarean section

OBJECTIVE

To compare the perioperative outcomes and anesthetic-related complications of morbidly obese and super-obese parturients delivering by cesarean section.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 6 years of data was performed. Exclusions were cases with gestational ages <24 weeks, placenta accreta spectrum, polyhydramnios, or multiple gestations.

RESULTS

The study included 494 patients whose body mass index (BMI) exceeded 40 kg/m² at delivery. Of these, 469 were morbidly obese (BMI 40-49.9; mean, 42.9 ± 2.4), and 25 were super obese (BMI >50; mean, 54.5 ± 4.2). Twenty-four (5.1%) morbidly obese women received general anesthesia. The other 445 patients (94.9%) in the morbid obesity group underwent cesarean delivery under regional anesthesia; however, some (2.2%; 10/445) received general anesthesia after regional anesthesia failed. In the super-obesity group, 23 patients (92.0%) received regional anesthesia, while two patients (8.0%) received general anesthesia. There were no cases of pulmonary aspiration, maternal deaths, or difficult or failed intubation. There was one episode of cardiac arrest in a patient with a BMI of 47.9. Among the morbidly obese and super-obese women given regional anesthesia, the super-obese patients had significantly greater volumes of ephedrine and norepinephrine consumption (p = 0.027 and 0.030), intravenous fluids (p = 0.006), and bleeding during surgery (p = 0.017). They also had more hypotensive episodes (p = 0.038). The two groups' incidences of neonatal birth asphyxia, postpartum hemorrhage, blood transfusion, and uterine atony did not differ significantly. The lengths of stay in the hospital were also comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the women receiving regional anesthesia, the super-obese parturients had greater intraoperative bleeding, a higher proportion of hypotensive episodes, and a greater vasopressor requirement than the morbidly obese parturients. Anesthesiologists must prepare for the adverse perioperative events that such women risk experiencing during a delivery by cesarean section.

www.clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT04657692.

Prediction of cesarean delivery in class III obese nulliparous women: An externally validated model using machine learning

BACKGROUND

class III obese women, are at a higher risk of cesarean section during labor, and cesarean section is responsible for increased maternal and neonatal morbidity in this population.

OBJECTIVE

the objective of this project was to develop a method with which to quantify cesarean section risk before labor.

METHODS

this is a multicentric retrospective cohort study conducted on 410 nulliparous class III obese pregnant women who attempted vaginal delivery in two French university hospitals. We developed two predictive algorithms (a logistic regression and a random forest models) and assessed performance levels and compared them.

RESULTS

the logistic regression model found that only initial weight and labor induction were significant in the prediction of unplanned cesarean section. The probability forest was able to predict cesarean section probability using only two pre-labor characteristics: initial weight and labor induction. Its performances were higher and were calculated for a cut-point of 49.5% risk and the results were (with 95% confidence intervals): area under the curve 0.70 (0.62,0.78), accuracy 0.66 (0.58, 0.73), specificity 0.87 (0.77, 0.93), and sensitivity 0.44 (0.32, 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

this is an innovative and effective approach to predicting unplanned CS risk in this population and could play a role in the choice of a trial of labor versus planned cesarean section. Further studies are needed, especially a prospective clinical trial.

FUNDING

French state funds "Plan Investissements d'Avenir" and Agence Nationale de la Recherche.

Short-term neonatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by maternal obesity

BACKGROUND

Maternal obesity complicates a high number of pregnancies. The degree to which neonatal outcomes are adversely affected is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate neonatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by maternal obesity.

STUDY DESIGN

This study was a secondary analysis of a cohort of deliveries occurring on randomly selected days at 25 hospitals from 2008 to 2011. Data were collected by certified abstractors. This analysis included singleton deliveries between 24 and 42 weeks of gestation. Body mass index was calculated on the basis of maternal height and most recent weight before delivery. Normal and overweight (reference group; body mass index, 18.5-29.9 kg/m2), obese (body mass index, 30.0-39.9 kg/m2), morbidly obese (body mass index, 40.0-49.9 kg/m2), and super morbidly obese (body mass index, ≥50 kg/m2) patients were compared. Patients in the reference group were matched in a 1:1 ratio with those in all other groups with obesity using the baseline characteristics of age, race and ethnicity, previous cesarean delivery, preexisting diabetes mellitus, chronic hypertension, parity, cigarette use, and insurance status. The primary outcome was composite neonatal morbidity, including fetal or neonatal death, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3 or 4, necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, birth injury, seizures, or ventilator use. We used a modified Poisson regression to examine the associations between body mass index and composite neonatal outcome. Preterm delivery at <37 weeks of gestation and the presence of maternal preeclampsia or eclampsia were included in the final model because of their known associations with neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 52,162 patients and their neonates were included after propensity score matching. Of these, 21,704 (41.6%) were obese, 3787 (7.3%) were morbidly obese, and 590 (1.1%) were super morbidly obese. A total of 2103 neonates (4.0%) had the composite outcome. Neonates born to pregnant people with morbid obesity had a 33% increased risk of composite neonatal morbidity compared with those in the reference group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.52), but no significant association was observed for persons with obesity (adjusted odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.14) or with super morbid obesity (adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-1.64).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the reference group, gravidas with morbid obesity were at higher risk of composite neonatal morbidity.

Peripartum care of persons with obesity: a scoping review of recommendations and practical tools for implementation

OBJECTIVE

Despite the growing prevalence of obesity among reproductive aged persons in the USA, evidence-based guidelines for peripartum care are lacking. The objective of this scoping review is to identify obesity-related recommendations for peripartum care, evaluate grades of evidence for each recommendation, and identify practical tools (eg, checklists, toolkits, care pathways and bundles) to support their implementation in clinical practice.

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to December 2020 for eligible studies addressing peripartum care in persons with obesity.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Inclusion criteria were published evidence-rated recommendations and practical tools for peripartum care of persons with obesity.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Pairs of independent reviewers extracted data (source, publication year, content and number of recommendations, level and grade of evidence, description of tool) and identified similarities and differences among the articles.

RESULTS

Of 18 315 screened articles, 18 were included including 7 articles with evidence-rated recommendations and 11 practical tools (3 checklists, 3 guidelines, 1 care bundle, 1 flowchart, 1 care pathway, 1 care map and 1 protocol). Thirteen of 39 evidence-rated recommendations were based on expert opinion. Recommendations related to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis and subcutaneous tissue closure at caesarean delivery received the highest grade of evidence. Some of the practical tools included a checklist from the USA regarding anticoagulation after caesarean delivery (evidence-supported recommendation), a bundle for surgical site infections after caesarean delivery in Australia (evidence did not support recommendation) and a checklist with content for several aspects of peripartum care from Canada (evidence supported seven of nine definitive recommendations).

CONCLUSION

The recommendations for peripartum care for persons with obesity are based on limited evidence and few practical tools for implementation exist. Future work should focus on developing practical tools based on high-quality studies.

Association of Maternal Body Mass Index and Maternal Morbidity And Mortality

OBJECTIVE

 This study aimed to assess the association of maternal body mass index (BMI) with a composite of severe maternal outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

 Secondary analysis of a cohort of deliveries on randomly selected days at 25 hospitals from 2008 to 2011. Data on comorbid conditions, intrapartum events, and postpartum course were collected. The reference group (REF, BMI: 18.5-29.9kg/m2), obese (OB; BMI: 30-39.9kg/m2), morbidly obese (MO; BMI: 40-49.9kg/m2), and super morbidly obese (SMO; BMI ≥ 50kg/m2) women were compared. The composite of severe maternal outcomes was defined as death, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ventilator use, deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolus (DVT/PE), sepsis, hemorrhage, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), unplanned operative procedure, or stroke. Patients in the REF group were matched 1:1 with those in all other obesity groups based on propensity score using the baseline characteristics of age, race/ethnicity, previous cesarean, preexisting diabetes, chronic hypertension, parity, cigarette use, and insurance status. Multivariable Poisson's regression was used to estimate adjusted relative risks (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between BMI and the composite outcome. Because cesarean delivery may be in the causal pathway between obesity and adverse maternal outcomes, models were then adjusted for mode of delivery to evaluate potential mediation.

RESULTS

 A total of 52,162 pregnant patients are included in the analysis. Risk of composite maternal outcomes was increased for SMO compared with REF but not for OB and MO [OB: aRR=1.06, 95% CI: 0.99-1.14; MO: aRR=1.10, 95% CI: 0.97-1.25; SMO: aRR=1.32, 95% CI: 1.02-1.70]. However, in the mediation analysis, cesarean appears to mediate 46% (95% CI: 31-50%) of the risk of severe morbidity for SMO compared with REF.

CONCLUSION

 Super morbid obesity is significantly associated with increased serious maternal morbidity and mortality; however, cesarean appears to mediate this association. Obesity and morbid obesity are not associated with maternal morbidity and mortality.

KEY POINTS

· Super morbid obesity is associated with increased morbidity.. · Cesarean appears to mediate the association between super morbid obesity and morbidity.. · Obesity and morbid maternal obesity are not associated with morbidity..

The association of maternal obesity with fetal pH in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between maternal obesity and fetal umbilical arterial pH in a cohort of parturients that received a prophylactic phenylephrine infusion for management of spinal anesthesia induced hypotension during cesarean delivery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of cesarean deliveries at a single academic tertiary care institution between January 2012 and March 2019. All scheduled nonlaboring cesarean deliveries of singleton live neonate performed under spinal anesthesia between 37 and 41 weeks gestational age were included. The primary outcome was umbilical arterial pH. Multiple regression models were used to test the relationship between umbilical arterial pH, and maternal body mass index (BMI), race, dose of phenylephrine, baseline systolic blood pressure, maximum decrease in systolic blood pressure, induction of anesthesia to delivery time and uterine incision to delivery time.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and sixty-one mother neonate pairs were included in the study. The univariate analysis showed a decrease in mean umbilical arterial pH with increasing maternal BMI (p = <.01). A multivariate regression model indicated that maximum decrease in systolic blood pressure, induction of anesthesia to delivery time, and uterine incision to delivery time accounted for 11% of the variance in the outcome, R² = 0.11. BMI was not a significant predictor of low umbilical arterial pH (p = .36). The significant predictors of low umbilical arterial pH in the model were maximum decrease in systolic blood pressure (p < .001), induction of anesthesia to delivery time (p = .04), and uterine incision to delivery time (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Maternal BMI is not associated with lower umbilical arterial pH in women having scheduled cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Severity of spinal anesthesia induced hypotension is greater with increasing BMI and may be responsible for the observed decrease in umbilical arterial pH.

Maternal Pre-pregnancy Body Mass Index Categories and Infant Birth Outcomes: A Population-Based Study of 9 Million Mother–Infant Pairs

Background and Aims

Infant adverse birth outcomes have been suggested to contribute to neonatal morbidity and mortality and may cause long-term health consequences. Although evidence suggests maternal prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) categories associate with some birth outcomes, there is no consensus on these associations. We aimed to examine the associations of maternal prepregnancy BMI categories with a wide range of adverse birth outcomes.

Methods

Data were from a population-based retrospective cohort study of 9,282,486 eligible mother–infant pairs in the U.S. between 2016 and 2018. Maternal prepregnancy BMI was classified as: underweight (<18.5 kg/m²); normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m²); overweight (25.0–29.9 kg/m²); obesity grade 1 (30–34.9 kg/m²); obesity grade 2 (35.0–39.9 kg/m²); and obesity grade 3 (≥40 kg/m²). A total of six birth outcomes of the newborn included preterm birth, low birthweight, macrosomia, small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age (LGA), and low Apgar score (5-min score <7).

Results

Maternal prepregnancy overweight and obesity increased the likelihood of infant preterm birth, with odds ratios (ORs) (95% CIs) of 1.04 (1.04–1.05) for overweight, 1.18 (1.17–1.19) for obesity grade 1, 1.31 (1.29–1.32) for obesity grade 2, and 1.47 (1.45–1.48) for obesity grade 3, and also for prepregnancy underweight (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.30–1.34) after adjusting for all potential covariates. Prepregnancy overweight and obesity were associated with higher odds of macrosomia, with ORs (95% CIs) of 1.53 (1.52–1.54) for overweight, 1.92 (1.90–1.93) for obesity grade 1, 2.33 (2.31–2.35) for obesity grade 2, and 2.87 (2.84–2.90) for obesity grade 3. Prepregnancy overweight and obesity was associated with higher odds of LGA, with ORs (95% CIs) of 1.58 (1.57–1.59) for overweight, 2.05 (2.03–2.06) for obesity grade 1, 2.54 (2.52–2.56) for obesity grade 2, and 3.17 (3.14–3.21) for obesity grade 3. Prepregnancy overweight and obesity were also associated with higher odds of low Apgar score, with ORs (95% CIs) of 1.12 (1.11–1.14) for overweight, 1.21 (1.19–1.23) for obesity grade 1, 1.34 (1.31–1.36) for obesity grade 2, and 1.55 (1.51–1.58) for obesity grade 3.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest maintaining or obtaining a healthy body weight for prepregnancy women could substantially reduce the likelihood of important infant adverse birth outcomes.

Risk of Cesarean Delivery for Women with Obesity Using a Standardized Labor Induction Protocol

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the risk of cesarean among women with obesity undergoing labor induction within a prospective trial that utilized a standardized labor protocol.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a secondary analysis of a randomized trial of induction methods. Term (≥37 weeks) women with intact membranes undergoing induction with an unfavorable cervix (Bishop's score ≤6 and dilation ≤2 cm) were included. The trial utilized a labor protocol that standardized induction and active labor management, with recommendations for interventions at particular time points. Only women with a recorded body mass index (BMI) at prenatal care start were included in this analysis. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery compared between obese (≥30 kg/m²) and nonobese (<30 kg/m²) women. Indication for cesarean was also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 465 women were included: 207 (44.5%) obese and 258 (55.5%) nonobese. Women with obesity had a higher risk of cesarean compared with women without obesity (33.3 vs. 23.3%, p = 0.02), even when adjusting for parity, weight change over pregnancy, and indication for induction (adjusted relative risk [aRR] = 1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.34-2.39]). Compared with women without obesity, women with obesity had a higher risk of failed induction (47.8 vs. 26.7%, p = 0.01) without a difference in arrest of active phase (p = 0.39), arrest of descent (p = 0.95) or fetal indication (p = 0.32), despite adherence to a standardized labor protocol.

CONCLUSION

Compared with women without obesity, women with obesity undergoing an induction are at increased risk of cesarean, in particular a failed induction, even within the context of standardized induction management. As standardized practices limit provider variation in labor management, this study may support physiologic differences in labor processes secondary to obesity.

KEY POINTS

· Even with a standardized induction protocol, women with obesity are at higher risk of cesarean.. · In particular, women with obesity are at increased risk of cesarean for failed induction.. · These findings support a possible biologic relationship between obesity and failed induction..

Dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and impairment of placental metabolism in the offspring of obese mothers

Obesity is a chronic condition associated with dyslipidemia and insulin resistance. Here, we show that the offspring of obese mothers are dyslipidemic and insulin resistant from the outset.Maternal and cord blood and placental tissues were collected following C-section at term. Patients were grouped as being normal weight (NW, BMI = 18-24.9) or obese (OB, BMI ≥ 30), and separated by fetal sex. We measured plasma lipids, insulin, and glucose in maternal and cord blood. Insulin resistance was quantified using the HOMA-IR. Placental markers of lipid and energy metabolism and relevant metabolites were measured by western blot and metabolomics, respectively.For OB women, total cholesterol was decreased in both maternal and cord blood, while HDL was decreased only in cord blood, independent of sex. In babies born to OB women, cord blood insulin and insulin resistance were increased. Placental protein expression of the energy and lipid metabolism regulators PGC1α, and SIRT3, ERRα, CPT1α, and CPT2 decreased with maternal obesity in a sex-dependent manner (P < 0.05). Metabolomics showed lower levels of acylcarnitines C16:0, C18:2, and C20:4 in OB women's placentas, suggesting a decrease in β-oxidation. Glutamine, glutamate, alpha-ketoglutarate (αKG), and 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG) were increased, and the glutamine-to-glutamate ratio decreased (P < 0.05), in OB placentas, suggesting induction of glutamate into αKG conversion to maintain a normal metabolic flux.Newly-born offspring of obese mothers begin their lives dyslipidemic and insulin resistant. If not inherited genetically, such major metabolic perturbations might be explained by abnormal placental metabolism with potential long-term adverse consequences for the offspring's health and wellbeing.

Early pregnancy body mass index, gestational weight gain and perinatal outcome in an obstetric population in Lagos, Nigeria

Introduction

the burden of overweight and obesity is rapidly increasing worldwide with significant health and social consequences. We determined the prevalence of overweight and obesity, pattern of gestational weight gain (GWG) and the associations of these with perinatal outcome among pregnant women in Lagos, Nigeria.

Methods

this was a retrospective review of case records of all deliveries in Lagos State University Teaching Hospital (LASUTH) over a period of two years. Case records of women with singleton pregnancies who registered for antenatal care at or below 20 weeks gestation were retrieved and reviewed to extract information on demography, anthropometrics, composites of pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. World Health Organization classification of BMI and the United States Institute of Medicine categorization of GWG were used to stratify subjects.

Results

out of 4,512 deliveries, 365 (8.1%) met our criteria. The prevalence of overweight and obesity in early pregnancy was 34.6% and 25.6% respectively while 2.9% were underweight. Thirty-seven (11.1%) pregnant women gained more than the recommended weight while 77.8% of underweight pregnant women gained less than the recommended weight. Following multiple logistic regression analysis, obesity in early pregnancy was significantly related to hypertensive pregnancy disorder (AOR 2.2; 95% CI, 1.08-4.32, p = 0.030), gestational diabetes mellitus (AOR 14.4; 95% CI, 4.85-42.6, p = < 0.001), caesarean section (AOR 2.7; 95% CI, 1.51-4.87, p = 0.001) and infections (AOR 4.9; 95% CI, 1.93-12.62, p = 0.001) while excessive GWG was significantly associated with gestational diabetes mellitus (AOR 4.8; 95% CI, 1.63-14.12, p = 0.004).

Conclusion

prevalence of early pregnancy overweight, obesity and excessive GWG were high among pregnant women in Nigeria and were associated with significant adverse consequences.

Severe maternal morbidity and mortality during delivery hospitalization of class I, II, III, and super obese women

BACKGROUND

Previous studies show that obesity predisposes patients to higher risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Data on the relationship between increasing degrees of obesity and risks of severe maternal morbidity, including mortality, are limited.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the association of increasing classes of obesity, especially super obesity, with the risk of severe maternal morbidity and mortality at the time of delivery hospitalization.

STUDY DESIGN

Using New York City linked birth certificates and hospital discharge data, we conducted a retrospective cohort study. This study identified delivery hospitalizations for singleton, live births in 2008-2012. Women were classified as having obesity (class I, II, III, or super obesity), as opposed to normal weight or overweight, based on prepregnancy body mass index. Cases of severe maternal morbidity were identified based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis and procedure codes according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between obesity classes and severe maternal morbidity, adjusting for maternal sociodemographic characteristics.

RESULTS

During 2008-2012, there were 570,997 live singleton births with available information on prepregnancy body mass index that met all inclusion criteria. After adjusting for maternal characteristics, women with class II (adjusted odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.23), class III (adjusted odds ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.49), and super obesity (adjusted odds ratio, 1.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.57-2.54) were all significantly more likely to have severe maternal morbidity than normal and overweight women. Super obesity was associated with specific severe maternal morbidity indicators, including renal failure, air and thrombotic embolism, blood transfusion, heart failure, and the need for mechanical ventilation.

CONCLUSION

There is a significant dose-response relationship between increasing obesity class and the risk of severe maternal morbidity at delivery hospitalization. The risks of severe maternal morbidity are highest for women with super obesity. Given that this is a modifiable risk factor, women with prepregnancy obesity should be counseled on the specific risks associated with pregnancy before conception to optimize their pregnancy outcomes.

Neuraxial labor analgesia failure rates in women with a body mass index ≥50 kg/m2: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The failure rate of neuraxial labor analgesia has not been investigated in super-obese women (body mass index ≥50 kg/m²).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of neuraxial labor analgesia in super-obese women (January 2012 to August 2019). The primary outcome was the failure rate of the first neuraxial catheter. Secondary outcomes were failure rates by neuraxial technique, at cesarean delivery, and rate of catheter replacement.

RESULTS

Neuraxial labor analgesia was used by 233 super-obese women: 153 epidural catheters placed using a combined spinal-epidural (CSE) or dural puncture epidural techniques with visualization of cerebrospinal fluid; 63 placed without dural puncture (including procedures without attempted dural puncture or attempted CSE or dural puncture epidural); and 17 intrathecal catheters (seven intentional). Thirty-two of 233 neuraxial catheters failed (13.7%, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 9.9 to 18.7%). Epidural catheters placed using CSE or dural puncture epidural had a lower failure rate than those placed without dural puncture (9.2% [95% CI 5.5% to 14.7%] vs 28.6% [95% CI 18.9 to 40.7%]; P<0.001). Catheter migration was documented for 29.4% (95% CI 16.8 to 46.2%) of catheters that failed.

CONCLUSIONS

Epidural catheters placed using CSE or dural puncture epidural techniques were more reliable than those placed without dural puncture in super-obese parturients. It is unclear whether the result was driven by grouping procedures without attempted dural puncture with those in which dural puncture was attempted but cerebrospinal fluid was not obtained. Catheter migration was a major source of failure.

Impact of Early Nutrition, Physical Activity and Sleep on the Fetal Programming of Disease in the Pregnancy: A Narrative Review

Early programming is the adaptation process by which nutrition and environmental factors alter development pathways during prenatal growth, inducing changes in postnatal metabolism and diseases. The aim of this narrative review, is evaluating the current knowledge in the scientific literature on the effects of nutrition, environmental factors, physical activity and sleep on development pathways. If in utero adaptations were incorrect, this would cause a mismatch between prenatal programming and adulthood. Adequate caloric intake, protein, mineral, vitamin, and long-chain fatty acids, have been noted for their relevance in the offspring brain functions and behavior. Fetus undernutrition/malnutrition causes a delay in growth and have detrimental effects on the development and subsequent functioning of the organs. Pregnancy is a particularly vulnerable period for the development of food preferences and for modifications in the emotional response. Maternal obesity increases the risk of developing perinatal complications and delivery by cesarean section and has long-term implications in the development of metabolic diseases. Physical exercise during pregnancy contributes to overall improved health post-partum. It is also interesting to highlight the relevance of sleep problems during pregnancy, which influence adequate growth and fetal development. Taking into account these considerations, we conclude that nutrition and metabolic factors during early life play a key role of health promotion and public health nutrition programs worldwide to improve the health of the offspring and the health costs of hospitalization.

Maternal and infant hospitalization costs associated with maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index in California, 2007-2011

BACKGROUND

In the United States, the number of pregnant women who are overweight or obese is increasing. While such individuals are at increased risk of pregnancy complications, data regarding costs associated with pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and maternal and infant outcomes are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate maternal and infant costs associated with pre-pregnancy BMI in a large cohort of pregnant women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women with singleton, non-anomalous births in California from 2007 to 2011. Women with preexisting diabetes mellitus and chronic hypertension were excluded. Hospitalization costs were estimated separately for women and infants using hospital charges adjusted using a cost-to-charge ratio. These costs included hospitalization costs for admission for delivery only. We estimated the differences in median costs between seven categories of pre-pregnancy BMIs, including underweight (BMI <18.5), normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9), overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9), class I obesity (BMI 30.0-34.9), class II obesity (BMI 35.0-39.9), class III obesity (BMI 40.0-49.9) and obesity with BMI ≥50.0. We also performed stratified analyses by mode of delivery and gestational age at delivery. We examined the length of stay for women and infants and estimated the gestational age at delivery. Analyses were conducted utilizing Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank tests with a significance cutoff of 0.05.

RESULTS

In a California cohort of 1,722,840 women, 787,790 (45.7%) had a pre-pregnancy BMI that was considered overweight or obese. The median maternal and infant costs of each pre-pregnancy BMI strata were significantly different when compared to other strata, with underweight and normal weight women having the lowest median costs ($11,581 and $11,721, respectively) and the most obese category (BMI ≥50) having the highest costs ($15,808). When stratified by mode of delivery and gestational age at delivery, this remained true. Hospitalization costs for women and infants with severe maternal morbidity were also significantly different based on maternal BMI.

COMMENT

The hospitalization costs associated with each strata of BMI were significantly different when compared to each other and when stratified by mode of delivery and prematurity. This analysis allows for a greater understanding of the health care costs associated with different maternal pre-pregnancy BMI classes.

Anesthetic Management of a Super Morbidly Obese Obstetric Patient With a Body Mass Index of 109 kg/m2 Presenting for Her Fourth Caesarean Delivery

Morbidly obese obstetric patients undergoing anesthesia present many unique challenges. Previous caesarean sections (CSs) further complicate their management. We present the successful anesthetic management of a super morbidly obese obstetric patient with body mass index (BMI) of 109 kg/m² who underwent her fourth CS. As per our review, this patient has the highest recorded BMI in the obstetric anesthesia literature.

A 27-year-old female, G4P3003, presented for fourth repeat CS at 38 weeks’ gestation. She had obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and type 2 diabetes. Her first CS was emergent under general anesthesia (GA), and the other two were performed under neuraxial anesthesia, with the most recent one complicated by intraoperative cardiac arrest requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Preoperative preparation involved multidisciplinary preparation, planning, and risk stratification. Although neuraxial anesthesia is preferred over GA for CS, she refused neuraxial anesthesia due to her prior traumatic experience and the potential that it caused her prior cardiac arrest. In addition, her inability to position for a block or lay flat, poor anatomical landmarks, unknown length of surgery, plan for periumbilical incision, uncertain placental status, and risk of massive hemorrhage convinced us to consider GA. Surprisingly, her airway examination was reassuring. Two 18G peripheral intravenous lines and an arterial line were obtained prior to induction. With optimum patient positioning and preoxygenation, modified rapid sequence induction with mask ventilation and endotracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy were performed. A healthy baby was delivered without significant intraoperative complications. Intraoperative lung-protective strategy with recruitment maneuvers, multimodal analgesia, and elective postoperative continuous positive airway pressure aided in successful extubation. Postoperatively, pulmonary toilet, early mobilization, physical therapy, and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis were employed. Her postoperative course was complicated by severe preeclampsia and pulmonary embolism, which were managed successfully in the intensive care unit. She was discharged initially to outpatient rehabilitation followed by home. This case highlights the complexities and significance of an individualized approach in managing super morbidly obese obstetric patients.

Cesarean wound closure in body mass index 40 or greater comparing suture to staples: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Cesarean delivery is the most common major surgical procedure performed in the United States. Women with class III obesity have an increased risk of cesarean delivery and have wound complication rates higher than healthy body mass index counterparts. Available evidence regarding optimal wound closure is lacking specific to the population of women with class III obesity despite a known increased rate of wound complications.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare rates of postoperative wound complications among women with class III obesity (body mass index of ≥40 kg/m²) undergoing cesarean delivery with skin closure by either subcuticular suture or surgical staples.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients were randomly assigned to skin closure by nonabsorbable stainless steel surgical staples or subcuticular suture of the surgeon's choice at the time of cesarean delivery at 2 university hospitals. Randomization was stratified for scheduled vs unscheduled cesarean delivery and for the 2 study sites. The primary outcome was the rate of any documented wound complication during the first 6 weeks after delivery. Any predictors of the composite outcome that in univariate analysis had a P<.20 were entered into a forward logistic regression. Sample size was calculated based on published literature and estimating the rate of wound complications within 6 weeks of follow-up at 20% with staples and 10% with sutures. For a power of 0.80 with a 2-tailed of 0.05, a total of 199 participants per group were required.

RESULTS

From September 2015 to May 2019, 232 women were randomized to staples (n=117) or sutures (n=115). Nearing the planned interim analysis, enrollment in the study was concluded administratively owing to low enrollment. With loss to follow-up and exclusions, a total of 90 women were analyzed in each group. In the suture group, one-third was closed with braided suture and two-thirds were closed with monofilament suture. Median staple removal was 5 days postoperatively. Fewer composite wound complications were noted in the surgical staples group than the subcuticular suture group (20.0% vs 27.6%), although this difference was not statistically significant (P≥.5). The rate of surgical site infection was significantly lower in the staples group (10.5% vs 22.7%; P=.041). In the multiple logistic regression, the 3 significant independent predictors of the outcome were body mass index (odds ratio, 1.08; P=.004), scheduled vs unscheduled cesarean delivery (odds ratio, 0.40; P=.018), and study site (odds ratio, 0.36; P=.028).

CONCLUSION

Surgical staples or subcuticular suture for skin closure at the time of cesarean delivery in women with a body mass index of ≥40 kg/m² resulted in similar composite wound complication rates; however, lower cesarean wound infection rates were noted among wounds closed with staples.

[Caesarean risk factors during labor for a class III obese nulliparous]

OBJECTIVES

Obesity is a well-known caesarean and obstetrical risk factor. However, the number of obese nulliparous women is increasing worldwide, creating an urgent need for research into the impact of obesity on the mode of delivery. Our objective was to identify caesarean risk factors in obese nulliparous women with a BMI (body mass index) greater than 40kg/m².

METHODS

A literature review was conducted on PubMed; including articles published between 2009 and 2019 in French and English, on caesarean risk during labor among class III obese nulliparous women.

RESULTS

One prospective study, and 6 retrospective analyses were included. Their results suggest that the rate of caesarean delivery increases with the BMI. Maternal age, particularly after 35 years, as well as induced labor and the use of oxytocin during labor, were positively associated with cesarean delivery. Moreover, maternal BMI was linked to an increased risk of non-elective caesarean section due to non-reassuring fetal heart tracing.

CONCLUSION

Extreme BMI, age, induced labor and oxytocin use are associated with caesarean delivery in nulliparous women with BMI≥40kg/m². Further research are needed to estimate the best candidates for elective cesarean delivery.

Neonatal outcome by planned mode of delivery in women with a body mass index of 35 or more: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To compare neonatal outcomes of women with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥35 kg/m² who underwent a trial of labour with those of women who underwent a planned primary caesarean section (CS).

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study of births between April 2012 and March 2014.

SETTING

A provincial database: Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Canada.

POPULATION

A cohort of 8752 women with a BMI of ≥35 kg/m² who had a singleton birth at 38-42 weeks of gestation.

METHODS

Neonatal outcomes were compared between women who underwent a trial of labour (with either a successful vaginal birth or intrapartum CS) and those who underwent a planned CS.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

A composite of any of the following outcomes: intrapartum neonatal death, neonatal intensive care unit admission, 5-minute Apgar score of <7 or umbilical artery pH of <7.1.

RESULTS

During the study period, 8433 (96.4%) women had a trial of labour and 319 (3.6%) had a planned CS. Intrapartum CS was performed in 1644 (19.5%) cases. There was no association between planned mode of delivery and the primary outcome (aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.59-1.07). The primary outcome was lower among women who had a successful trial of labour (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50-0.91) and was higher among women who had a failed trial of labour (aOR 1.74, 95% CI 1.21-2.48), compared with women who underwent a planned CS.

CONCLUSIONS

In women with a BMI of ≥35 kg/m² at a gestational age of 38-42 weeks, neonatal outcomes are comparable between planned vaginal delivery and planned CS, although a failed trial of labour is at risk of adverse neonatal outcome.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Neonatal outcomes are not affected by planned mode of delivery in women who are obese, with a BMI of ≥35 kg/m² .

Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in a super morbidly obese parturient: A case report

INTRODUCTION

The population of obese individuals is increasing worldwide, and as a result, the number of mothers with super morbid obesity undergoing cesarean sections is also increasing. However, little is known about which anesthetic technique is appropriate for cesarean sections of super morbidly obese parturients.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 35-year-old woman with body mass index 61.3 kg/m at a gestational age of 37 weeks.

DIAGNOSIS

The patient was super morbidly obese parturient.

INTERVENTIONS

Spinal anesthesia was performed. A spinal needle was inserted into the L4-5 interspinous space in the sitting position. After confirmation of cerebrospinal fluid, 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 9 mg and fentanyl 20 μg were injected into the subarachnoid space.

OUTCOMES

After the administration of spinal anesthetics, the nerve block to the T8 dermatome level was confirmed, surgery was performed, and the fetus was delivered. The patient's vital signs were stable until the end of the operation.

CONCLUSION

There is no established strategy for selecting a method of anesthesia in patients with morbid obesity (body mass index 40 kg/m or more). For this reason and considering the amount of bupivacaine used for spinal anesthesia, we wanted to share our experience with spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in a super morbidly obese parturients.

Periodontal status of women with excessive gestational weight gain and the association with their newborns' health

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the association between high gestational weight gain and systemic and periodontal status of women between the 32nd and 36th gestational weeks of pregnancy (T1) and after delivery (T2), and the association of these factors with newborns' health.

METHODS

The sample was divided into excessive gestational weight gain (GE = 25) and normal gestational weight gain (GN = 25) and was evaluated regarding: (i) socio-economic status; (ii) systemic and periodontal status; and (iii) newborns' health. The results were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U-test, the t-test, the Friedman test, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Cochran's Q test (P < 0.05).

RESULTS

Women with GE had lower household income (P = 0.010) and higher body mass index (BMI) at both T1 and T2. The prevalence of hypertension at T1 was higher in women with GE, but the condition resolved post-delivery (P = 0.001). Worsening in oral hygiene was observed at T2 in both groups (P < 0.001). Sixty-eight percent of women with GE and 16% of women with GN had periodontitis at T1, and 52% and 12%, respectively, had periodontitis at T2. In women with GE, the BMI of newborns was higher (P = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Women with high gestational weight gain also showed a high prevalence of hypertension and periodontitis during pregnancy, and persistent periodontitis after delivery. High gestational weight gain was related to high BMI of newborns.

Does body mass index impact assisted reproductive technology treatment outcomes in gestational carriers

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess whether increased body mass index (BMI) negatively affects assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes among gestational carriers.

METHODS

A retrospective matched case-control cohort, including all gestational carrier (GC) cycles performed at CReATe Fertility Centre (Toronto, ON, Canada) between 2003 and 2016.

SETTING

A Canadian fertility clinic, with a large surrogacy program.

PATIENTS

All gestational carriers that had undergone a cycle completed to a transfer at our clinic, and had BMI and outcome data available, were matched by BMI to infertile patients treated at our clinic during the same years provided they had undergone a cycle completed to a transfer, and had outcomes data available.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical pregnancies rates, miscarriage rates and live birth rates.

RESULTS

BMI was not a reliable prediction factor of any of the measured outcomes. Importantly, the gestational carrier population had better outcomes and a significantly lower overall incidence of maternal, fetal and neonatal complications when compared with infertile patients, treated at our clinic during the same years.

CONCLUSION

BMI is not a reliable predictor of outcomes among gestational carriers.

Health outcomes for Massachusetts infants after fresh versus frozen embryo transfer

OBJECTIVE

To compare neonatal health outcomes after fresh versus frozen ET (FET).

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of a population-based database of linked clinically assisted reproductive technology (ART) data with state vital records. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the association between deliveries from fresh versus FET and adverse health outcomes, controlling for maternal characteristics.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENT(S)

Live-born singleton infants born to Massachusetts women who conceived by fresh or FET after ART using autologous oocytes between July 1, 2004, and December 31, 2013.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Preterm birth, low birth weight, neonatal mortality, birth defects, organ system conditions.

RESULT(S)

Compared with infants conceived from fresh embryos, those born to mothers who underwent FET were less likely to be small for gestational age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.70) and low birth weight (AOR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88) but more likely to be large for gestational age (AOR = 1.47; 95% CI, 1.26-1.70) and to experience greater odds of infectious disease (AOR = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.03-2.06), respiratory (AOR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.07-1.41), and neurologic (AOR = 1.32; 95% CI, 1.04-1.68) conditions. There were no statistically significant differences in preterm birth, neonatal mortality, birth defects, cardiovascular, hematologic, and gastrointestinal/feeding conditions, and for infants ≥ 35 weeks, no statistically significant differences in prolonged hospital stay (>3 days for vaginal delivery, >5 days for cesarean).

CONCLUSION(S)

Compared with infants conceived from fresh ET, those born by FET have higher birth weight but increased odds of infectious disease, hematologic, respiratory, and neurologic abnormalities. These risks should be considered when making decisions on fresh versus FET.

Prolonged Prepregnant Maternal High-Fat Feeding Reduces Fetal and Neonatal Blood Glucose Concentrations by Enhancing Fetal β-Cell Development in C57BL/6 Mice

The main objective of this study was to investigate the effect of maternal obesity on offspring's glucose metabolism during the perinatal period. Maternal obesity was established by feeding C57BL/6 mice with a high-fat (HF) diet before or during pregnancy. Our results showed that prolonged prepregnant HF feeding but not HF feeding during pregnancy significantly reduced fetal and neonatal blood glucose concentrations. Remarkably, elevated blood insulin concentrations and increased activation of insulin signaling were observed in fetuses and neonates from prepregnant HF-fed dams. In addition, significantly larger β-cell areas were observed in pancreases of fetuses and neonates from prepregnant HF-fed dams. Although there was no significant change in placental cross-sectional area or GLUT 1 expression, prepregnant HF feeding significantly enhanced the expression of genes that control placental fatty acid supply. Interestingly, reducing fatty acid supply to the placenta and fetus by placental-specific knockout of adipose triglyceride lipase not only reduced fetal β-cell area and blood insulin concentration but also attenuated prepregnant HF feeding-induced reduction in offspring blood glucose concentrations during the perinatal period. Together, these results indicate that placental and fetal fatty acid supply plays an important role in fetal β-cell development, insulin secretion, and glucose metabolism. Prolonged prepregnant maternal HF feeding resembles pregravid maternal obesity in mice, which reduces fetal and neonatal blood glucose concentrations by enhancing fetal β-cell development and insulin secretion.

Assisted reproductive technology is associated with premature rupture of membranes

Objective: To evaluate the elements more likely to be associated with premature rupture of membrane (PROM) in patients that use assisted reproductive technology (ART).Materials and methods: A retrospective case-control study was performed from January 2014 to August 2017. We included 301 patients, 257 patients were without PROM in the non-PROM group and 44 patients with PROM in the PROM group.Results: In the PROM group, the rate of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and BMI were significantly higher than the non-PROM group. Moreover, the rate of preterm birth was significantly higher in the PROM group. When using logistic regression analysis to decrease the impact of confounding factors, it showed that overweight and ICSI were confirmed to be associated with PROM. After matching 1:2 by BMI, the process of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation was all similar in the two groups. What is more, the rate of twin pregnancies was significantly higher in the preterm PROM (PPROM) group compared with the term PROM group and twin pregnancies were associated with preterm birth.Conclusions: ART parameters ICSI may increase the risk of PROM. Single embryo transfer during ART should be supported to decrease the incidence of PPROM and losing weight is essential for patients before embarking on ART.

Maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with BMI >50: An international collaborative study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between maternal BMI>50kg/m2 during pregnancy and maternal and perinatal outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An international cohort study was conducted using data from separate national studies in the UK and Australia. Outcomes of pregnant women with BMI>50 were compared to those of pregnant women with BMI<50. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the association between BMI>50 and perinatal and maternal outcomes.

RESULTS

932 pregnant women with BMI>50 were compared with 1232 pregnant women with BMI<50. Pregnant women with BMI>50 were slightly older, more likely to be multiparous, and have pre-existing comorbidities. There were no maternal deaths, however, extremely obese women had a nine-fold increase in the odds of thrombotic events compared to those with a BMI<50 (uOR: 9.39 (95%CI:1.15-76.43)). After adjustment, a BMI>50 during pregnancy had significantly raised odds of preeclampsia/eclampsia (aOR:4.88(95%CI: 3.11-7.65)), caesarean delivery (aOR: 2.77 (95%CI: 2.31-3.32)), induction of labour (aOR: 2.45(95% CI:2.00-2.99)) post caesarean wound infection (aOR:7.25(95%CI: 3.28-16.07)), macrosomia (aOR: 8.05(95%CI: 4.70-13.78)) compared a BMI<50. Twelve of the infants born to women in the extremely obese cohort died in the early neonatal period or were stillborn.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnant women with BMI>50 have a high risk of inferior maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Associations Between Maternal Obesity and Race, with Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study

This retrospective cohort study examined associations between maternal body mass index (BMI), race, and obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) (3rd/4th degree perineal lacerations). Obstetric anal sphincter injury may lead to significant maternal morbidity, and a more thorough understanding of risk factors for this complication may guide providers in patient counseling and procedures such as episiotomy or operative vaginal delivery. Vaginal deliveries performed at Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children from 2008-2015 were included. Maternal body mass index at delivery was used and OASIs identified through International Classification of Diseases codes. Demographic/clinical variables were summarized through descriptive statistics. Adjusted odds ratios were calculated using multiple logistic regression. Of the 25,594 deliveries included, 1,198 (4.7%) involved an OASI. OASI prevalence differed by BMI (P < .0001). The prevalence was highest in women with BMI < 30 kg/m² (5.3%) and then decreased as BMI increased with women with BMI ≥ 50 demonstrating the lowest prevalence (1.7%). Compared to women with BMI < 30 kg/m², women with BMI > 50 kg/m² had a lower odds of OASI (OR 0.31 [95%CI 0.11 - 0.83]), which persisted after adjustment (aOR 0.28 [95%CI 0.08-0.96]). OASI also differed by race (P < .0001), with Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islanders (NHOPI) demonstrating the lowest prevalence (3.0%) and Asians the highest (5.6%). After adjustment, compared to White women, NHOPI women had lower OASI prevalence that met the borderline of statistical significance (aOR 0.79 [95%CI 0.62-1.01]), while Asian women continued to demonstrate increased prevalence (aOR 1.50 [95% CI 1.22-1.85]). We conclude that obese women, including those with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m², have lower OASI prevalence. Race is also a significant factor, with Asians almost double the prevalence of NHOPIs. These findings contribute to evidence-based, individualized patient counseling on OASI.

Pregnancy in Women with Obesity

Pregnancy in women with obesity is an important public health problem with short- and long-term implications for maternal and child health. Obesity complicates almost all aspects of pregnancy. Given the growing prevalence of obesity in women, obstetric providers need to understand the risks associated with obesity in pregnancy and the unique aspects of management for women with obesity. Empathic and patient-centered care, along with knowledge, can optimize outcomes for women and children.

Binational cohort study comparing the management and outcomes of pregnant women with a BMI >50-59.9 kg/m2 and those with a BMI ≥60 kg/m2

OBJECTIVES

To compare the management, maternal and perinatal outcomes of women with a body mass index (BMI) ≥60 kg/m² with women with a BMI >50-59.9 kg/m².

DESIGN

International collaborative cohort study.

SETTING

Binational study in the UK and Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

UK: all pregnant women, and Australia: women who gave birth (birth weight ≥400 g or gestation ≥20 weeks) METHODS: Data from the Australasian Maternity Outcomes Surveillance System and UK Obstetric Surveillance System. Management, maternal and infant outcomes were compared between women with a BMI ≥60 kg/m² and women with a BMI >50-59.9 kg/m², using unconditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

The sociodemographic characteristics and previous medical histories were similar between the 111 women with a BMI ≥60 kg/m² and the 821 women with a BMI >50-59.9 kg/m². Women with a BMI ≥60 kg/m² had higher odds of thromboprophylaxis usage in both the antenatal (24% vs. 12%; OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.39 to 3.64) and postpartum periods (78% vs. 66%; OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.70). Women with BMI ≥60 kg/m² had nearly double the odds of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia (adjusted OR 1.83 (95% CI 1.01 to 3.30)). No other maternal or perinatal outcomes were statistically significantly different. Severe adverse outcomes such as perinatal death were uncommon in both groups thus limiting the power of these comparisons. The rate of perinatal deaths was 18 per 1000 births for those with BMI ≥60 kg/m²; 12 per 1000 births for those with BMI >50-59.9 kg/m²; those with BMI ≥60 kg/m² had a non-significant increased odds of perinatal death (unadjusted OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.31 to 6.74).

CONCLUSIONS

Women are managed differently on the basis of BMI even at this extreme as shown by thromboprophylaxis. The pre-eclampsia result suggests that future research should examine whether weight reduction of any amount prior to pregnancy could reduce poor outcomes even if women remain extremely obese.

Health of Infants After ART-Treated, Subfertile, and Fertile Deliveries

OBJECTIVES

To assess the risk of adverse health outcomes for infants after assisted reproductive technology (ART)-treated and subfertile as compared with fertile deliveries.

METHODS

Live-born singleton infants ≥23 weeks' gestational age (GA) born in Massachusetts between July 1, 2004, and December 31, 2010, were analyzed by linking a clinical ART database with state vital records. χ² tests were used to compare the outcomes of fertile (those without ART treatment or other indicators of infertility), subfertile (indicators of infertility, no ART), and ART-treated (linked to ART deliveries) mothers, stratified by GA. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by using multivariate logistic regression within each GA stratum, controlling for maternal sociodemographic and health characteristics.

RESULTS

Compared with infants of fertile mothers (n = 336 705), infants born to subfertile (n = 5043) or ART-treated (n = 8375) mothers were more likely to be preterm (aOR 1.39 [95% CI 1.26-1.54] and aOR 1.72 [95% CI 1.60-1.85], respectively) and have respiratory and gastrointestinal and/or nutritional conditions (aOR range: 1.12-1.18). When stratified by GA, infants of subfertile or ART-treated mothers were at greater risk for congenital malformations and infectious diseases as well as cardiovascular and respiratory conditions (aOR range: 1.30-2.61; 95% CI range: 1.02-4.59). Compared with infants born to subfertile mothers, infants born to ART-treated mothers were at lower risk for being small for GA and having congenital malformations and cardiovascular conditions and at higher risk for infectious disease conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with infants born to fertile mothers, infants of subfertile and ART-treated mothers are at greater risk for adverse health outcomes at birth beyond prematurity. The occurrence and magnitude of these risks vary by GA and organ systems.

Pregnancy Intention and Contraceptive Use among Women by Class of Obesity: Results from the 2006-2010 and 2011-2013 National Survey of Family Growth

OBJECTIVE

Conflicting research findings on the association of obesity and pregnancy intention may be due to their collective definition of obesity at a body mass index of 30 kg/m² or greater. However, obese women with a BMI of 40 kg/m² or greater may be both behaviorally and clinically different from obese women with a lower BMI. This study reexamines this relationship, stratifying by class of obesity; the study also explores variations in contraceptive use by class of obesity given their potential contribution to the incidence of unintended or unwanted pregnancy.

METHODS

This study combined data from the 2006 through 2010 and 2011 through 2013 US National Survey of Family Growth. Pregnancy intention (intended, mistimed, unwanted) and current contraceptive use (no method, barrier, pill/patch/ring/injection, long-acting reversible contraceptive, sterilization) were compared across body mass index categories: normal (18.5-24.9 kg/m kg/m²), overweight (25.0-29.9), obese class 1 (30.0-34.9 kg/m²), class 2 (35.0-39.9 kg/m²), and class 3 (≥40 kg/m², severe obesity). Weighted multinomial logistic regressions were refined to determine independent associations of body mass index class and pregnancy intention, as well as contraceptive method, controlling for demographic, socioeconomic, and reproductive factors.

RESULTS

Body mass index data were available for 9,848 nonpregnant, sexually active women who reported not wanting to become pregnant. Women with class 3 obesity had significantly greater odds of mistimed (adjusted odd ratio [aOR], 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-2.75) or unwanted (aOR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.15-3.32) pregnancy compared with normal weight women. Women with class 2 or 3 obesity were more likely to not be using contraception (aOR, 1.53-1.62; 95% CI, 1.04-2.29). Although women with class 2 obesity were more likely to be using long-acting reversible contraceptive methods and sterilization over short-acting hormonal methods (aOR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.08-2.57; aOR, 2.05; 95% CI,1.44-2.91), this association was not observed among women with class 3 obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with class 3 obesity are at greater risk of unintended pregnancy and are less likely to be using contraception than normal weight women. Whether these findings are related to patient and/or provider barriers that are not as visible among women with class 1 and class 2 obesity warrants further investigation.

Maternal obesity and major intraoperative complications during cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies have demonstrated an association between maternal obesity and postoperative complications, but there is a dearth of information about the impact of obesity on intraoperative complications.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the association between maternal obesity at delivery and major intraoperative complications during cesarean delivery (CD).

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of the deidentified Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit Cesarean Registry of women with singleton pregnancies. Maternal body mass index (BMI) at delivery was categorized as BMI 18.5 to 29.9 kg/m², BMI 30 to 39.9 kg/m², BMI 40 to 49.9 kg/m², and BMI ≥ 50 kg/m². The primary outcome, any intraoperative complication, was defined as having at least 1 major intraoperative complication, including perioperative blood transfusion, intraoperative injury (bowel, bladder, ureteral injury; broad ligament hematoma), atony requiring surgical intervention, repeat laparotomy, and hysterectomy. Log-binomial models were used to estimate risk ratios of intraoperative complication in 2 models: model 1 adjusting for maternal race, and preterm delivery <37 weeks; and model 2 adjusting for confounders in Model 1 as well as emergency CD, and type of skin incision.

RESULTS

A total of 51,218 women underwent CD; 38% had BMI 18.5 to 29.9 kg/m², 47% BMI 30 to 39.9 kg/m², 12% BMI 40 to 49.9 kg/m² and 3% BMI ≥ 50 kg/m². Having at least 1 intraoperative complication was uncommon (3.4%): 3.8% for BMI 18.5 to 29.9 kg/m², 3.2% BMI 30 to 39.9 kg/m², 2.6% BMI 40 to 49.9 kg/m² and 4.3% BMI ≥ 50 kg/m² (P < .001). In the fully adjusted model 2, women with BMI 40 to 49.9 kg/m² had a lower risk of any intraoperative complication (adjusted risk ratio [ARR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.89) compared with women with BMI 18.5 to 29.9 kg/m². Women with BMI 30 to 39.9 kg/m² (ARR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.03) had a similar risk of any intraoperative complication compared with nonobese women. Among super obese women, there was evidence of effect modification by emergency CD. Compared with nonobese women, neither super obese women undergoing nonemergency CD (ARR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.52) nor those undergoing emergency CD (ARR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.32 to 1.10) had an increased risk of intraoperative complication.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to the risk for postcesarean complications, the risk of intraoperative complication does not appear to be increased in obese women, even among those with super obesity.

Maternal super obesity and risk for intensive care unit admission in the MFMU Cesarean Registry

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is a risk factor for intensive care unit (ICU) admission in nonpregnant populations. Less is known about maternal obesity and ICU admission risk. The objective of this study was to estimate the association between maternal obesity and ICU admission among women who delivered via cesarean section or vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort analysis of women who delivered via VBAC or cesarean section in the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit (MFMU) Cesarean Registry. We defined exposure as body mass index (BMI) at delivery stratified as non-obese (BMI 18.5-29.9 kg/m² ), class I or II obese (BMI 30-39.9 kg/m² ), morbidly obese (BMI 40-49.9 kg/m² ), and super obese (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m² ). The primary outcome was ICU admission. Modified Poisson regression models estimated relative risk (RR) of ICU admission by obesity strata, after adjusting for confounders. Mediation analysis was used to estimate the proportion of ICU admission risk attributable specifically to obesity.

RESULTS

We included 68 455 women; 40% non-obese, 46% class I or II obese, 12% morbidly obese, and 2% super obese. Super obese women were at higher risk for ICU admission compared with non-obese women (0.7 vs. 1.3%, adjusted RR 1.61; 95% CI 1.01-2.65), after adjusting for confounders. Among super obese women, medical comorbidities mediated 58% of ICU admission risk, suggesting that a significant proportion of ICU admission is driven by maternal obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

Super obese women who deliver by cesarean section or VBAC are at increased risk of peripartum ICU admission. Obstetricians and critical care specialists should consider possible ICU admission during delivery planning.

[Association between maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and adverse outcomes of late preterm infants]

OBJECTIVE

To study the association between maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and adverse outcomes of late preterm infants (LPI).

METHODS

A total of 367 LPI who were born from January 2011 to December 2015 and admitted to the neonatal ward were enrolled. The BMI criteria for Chinese population were used to analyze the factors for maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and its association with adverse outcomes of LPI (1 minute Apgar score ≤7, delivery room resuscitation, hospitalization days after birth >7 days, and ventilation duration ≥6 hours).

RESULTS

Of all LPIs, there were 64 LPI (17.4%) in the low maternal pre-pregnancy BMI group, 243 LPI (66.2%) in the normal maternal pre-pregnancy BMI group, and 60 LPI (16.4%) in the high maternal pre-pregnancy BMI group. Low pre-pregnancy BMI was the risk factor for 1 minute Apgar score ≤7 (OR=3.243, 95% CI: 1.102-9.546) and need for delivery room resuscitation (OR=3.492, 95%CI: 1.090-11.190), and high pre-pregnancy BMI was the risk factor for hospitalization days after birth >7 days (OR=1.992, 95%CI: 1.024-3.874).

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal maternal pre-pregnancy BMI has adverse effects on the outcomes of LPI. In order to reduce these adverse outcomes BMI should be controlled within the normal range in pregnant women.

Anaesthetic Management of Obese Parturients: What is the Evidence Supporting Practice Guidelines?

Increasing rates of obesity in western populations present management difficulties for clinicians caring for obese pregnant women. Various governing bodies have published clinical guidelines for the care of obese parturients. These guidelines refer to two components of anaesthetic care: anaesthetic consultation in the antenatal period for women with a body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m2 and the provision of early epidural analgesia in labour. These recommendations are based on the increased incidence of obstetric complications and the predicted risks and difficulties in providing anaesthetic care. The concept behind early epidural analgesia is logical—site the epidural early, use it for surgical anaesthesia and avoid general anaesthesia if surgery is required. Experts support this recommendation, but there is weak supporting evidence. It is known that the management of labour epidurals in obese women is complicated and that women with extreme obesity require higher rates of general anaesthesia. Anecdotally, anaesthetists view and apply the early epidural recommendation inconsistently and the acceptability of early epidural analgesia to pregnant women is variable. In this topic review, we critically appraise these two practice recommendations. The elements required for effective implementation in multidisciplinary maternity care are considered. We identify gaps in the current literature and suggest areas for future research. While prospective cohort studies addressing epidural extension (‘top-up’) in obese parturients would help inform practice, audit of local practice may better answer the question “is early epidural analgesia beneficial to obese women in my practice?”.

Obesity epidemic: impact from preconception to postpartum

The obesity epidemic is on the rise throughout the USA and the world. Not only does it affect the general population but it also specifically poses unique threats to a woman’s life in the antepartum, peripartum and postpartum periods. An increased BMI is associated with worse perinatal outcomes, including higher rates of preeclampsia (and other hypertensive disorders), macrosomia, other neonatal morbidities and gestational diabetes. Isolated maternal obesity and additional maternal diabetes predispose the infant to potential adult disease through fetal programming. This review of the literature examines the effects of obesity on a woman’s life, outlining complications beginning with preconception through the postpartum period.

Lay abstract: The obesity epidemic poses unique threats during the whole cycle of pregnancy. This review examines the effects of obesity on a woman’s life, outlining complications from prior to conception through the postpartum period. In addition, the contributions to adult disease of fetal exposure to this maternal risk are discussed. Future advances in nanotechnology and better understanding of placental function might allow more options in preventative and therapeutic interventions, yet with minimal fetal risk.

The Impact of maternal obesity and race/ethnicity on perinatal outcomes: Independent and joint effects

OBJECTIVE

Independent and joint impacts of maternal race/ethnicity and obesity on adverse birth outcomes, including pre-eclampsia, low birth weight, and macrosomia, were characterized.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of all 2007 California births was conducted using vital records and claims data. Maternal race/ethnicity and maternal body mass index (BMI) were the key exposures; their independent and joint impact on outcomes using regression models was analyzed.

RESULTS

Racial/ethnic minority women of normal weight generally had higher risk as compared with white women of normal weight (e.g., African-American women, pre-eclampsia adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.48-1.74 vs. white women). However, elevated BMI did not usually confer additional risk (e.g., pre-eclampsia aOR comparing African-American women with excess weight with white women with excess weight, 1.17, 95% CI: 0.89-1.54). Obesity was a risk factor for low birth weight only among white women (excess weight aOR, 1.24, 95% CI: 1.04-1.49 vs. white women of normal weight) and not among racial/ethnic minority women (e.g., African-American women, 0.95, 95% CI: 0.83-1.08).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings add nuance to our understanding of the interplay between maternal race/ethnicity, BMI, and perinatal outcomes. While the BMI/adverse outcome gradient appears weaker in racial/ethnic minority women, this reflects the overall risk increase in racial/ethnic minority women of all body sizes.

Perioperative management of a morbidly obese pregnant patient undergoing cesarean section under general anesthesia - case report

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The increased prevalence of obesity in the general population extends to women of reproductive age. The aim of this study is to report the perioperative management of a morbidly obese pregnant woman, body mass index >50kg/m(2), who underwent cesarean section under general anesthesia.

CASE REPORT

Pregnant woman in labor, 35 years of age, body mass index 59.8kg/m(2). Cesarean section was indicated due to the presumed fetal macrosomia. The patient refused spinal anesthesia. She was placed in the ramp position with cushions from back to head to facilitate tracheal intubation. Another cushion was placed on top of the right gluteus to create an angle of approximately 15° to the operating table. Immediately before induction of anesthesia, asepsis was carried out and sterile surgical fields were placed. Anesthesia was induced in rapid sequence, with Sellick maneuver and administration of remifentanil, propofol, and succinilcolina. Intubation was performed using a gum elastic bougie, and anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and remifentanil. The interval between skin incision and fetal extraction was 21min, with the use of a Simpson's forceps scoop to assist in the extraction. The patient gave birth to a newborn weighing 4850g, with Apgar scores of 2 in the 1st minute (received positive pressure ventilation by mask for about 2min) and 8 in the 5th minute. The patient was extubated uneventfully. Multimodal analgesia and prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting was performed. Mother and newborn were discharged on the 4th postoperative day.