1
|
Cimadamore A, Franzese C, Di Loreto C, Blanca A, Lopez-Beltran A, Crestani A, Giannarini G, Tan PH, Carneiro BA, El-Deiry WS, Montironi R, Cheng L. Predictive and prognostic biomarkers in urological tumours. Pathology 2024; 56:228-238. [PMID: 38199927 DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2023.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
Advancements in cutting-edge molecular profiling techniques, such as next-generation sequencing and bioinformatic analytic tools, have allowed researchers to examine tumour biology in detail and stratify patients based on factors linked with clinical outcome and response to therapy. This manuscript highlights the most relevant prognostic and predictive biomarkers in kidney, bladder, prostate and testicular cancers with recognised impact in clinical practice. In bladder and prostate cancer, new genetic acquisitions concerning the biology of tumours have modified the therapeutic scenario and led to the approval of target directed therapies, increasing the quality of patient care. Thus, it has become of paramount importance to choose adequate molecular tests, i.e., FGFR screening for urothelial cancer and BRCA1-2 alterations for prostate cancer, to guide the treatment plan for patients. While no tissue or blood-based biomarkers are currently used in routine clinical practice for renal cell carcinoma and testicular cancers, the field is quickly expanding. In kidney tumours, gene expression signatures might be the key to identify patients who will respond better to immunotherapy or anti-angiogenic drugs. In testicular germ cell tumours, the use of microRNA has outperformed conventional serum biomarkers in the diagnosis of primary tumours, prediction of chemoresistance, follow-up monitoring, and relapse prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Cimadamore
- Institute of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Medicine (DAME), Udine University, Udine, Italy.
| | - Carmine Franzese
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Santa Maria Della Misericordia di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Carla Di Loreto
- Institute of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Medicine (DAME), Udine University, Udine, Italy
| | - Ana Blanca
- Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba, Department of Urology, University Hospital of Reina Sofia, UCO, Cordoba, Spain
| | | | - Alessandro Crestani
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Santa Maria Della Misericordia di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Gianluca Giannarini
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Santa Maria Della Misericordia di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Benedito A Carneiro
- The Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Lifespan Academic Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Wafik S El-Deiry
- The Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Lifespan Academic Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Rodolfo Montironi
- Molecular Medicine and Cell Therapy Foundation, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy
| | - Liang Cheng
- The Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Lifespan Academic Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Coakley M, Villacampa G, Sritharan P, Swift C, Dunne K, Kilburn L, Goddard K, Pipinikas C, Rojas P, Emmett W, Hall P, Harper-Wynne C, Hickish T, Macpherson I, Okines A, Wardley A, Wheatley D, Waters S, Palmieri C, Winter M, Cutts RJ, Garcia-Murillas I, Bliss J, Turner NC. Comparison of Circulating Tumor DNA Assays for Molecular Residual Disease Detection in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:895-903. [PMID: 38078899 PMCID: PMC10870111 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-2326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients who have completed treatment for early-stage breast cancer is associated with a high risk of relapse, yet the optimal assay for ctDNA detection is unknown. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN The cTRAK-TN clinical trial prospectively used tumor-informed digital PCR (dPCR) assays for ctDNA molecular residual disease (MRD) detection in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer. We compared tumor-informed dPCR assays with tumor-informed personalized multimutation sequencing assays in 141 patients from cTRAK-TN. RESULTS MRD was first detected by personalized sequencing in 47.9% of patients, 0% first detected by dPCR, and 52.1% with both assays simultaneously (P < 0.001; Fisher exact test). The median lead time from ctDNA detection to relapse was 6.1 months with personalized sequencing and 3.9 months with dPCR (P = 0.004, mixed-effects Cox model). Detection of MRD at the first time point was associated with a shorter time to relapse compared with detection at subsequent time points (median lead time 4.2 vs. 7.1 months; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Personalized multimutation sequencing assays have potential clinically important improvements in clinical outcome in the early detection of MRD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Coakley
- Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Guillermo Villacampa
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Prithika Sritharan
- Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Claire Swift
- Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kathryn Dunne
- Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lucy Kilburn
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Katie Goddard
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Patricia Rojas
- NeoGenomics Ltd, Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Park, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Warren Emmett
- NeoGenomics Ltd, Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Park, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Hall
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | - Tamas Hickish
- University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alicia Okines
- Breast Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Wardley
- Outreach Research & Innovation Group Ltd, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Simon Waters
- Velindre Cancer Centre, Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Carlo Palmieri
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Winter
- Weston Park Cancer Centre, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Rosalind J. Cutts
- Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Isaac Garcia-Murillas
- Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Judith Bliss
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas C. Turner
- Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Breast Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yuan S, Nie R, Huang Y, Chen Y, Wang S, Sun X, Li Y, Liu Z, Chen Y, Yao Y, Xu Y, Qiu H, Liang Y, Wang W, Liu Z, Zhao Q, Xu R, Zhou Z, Wang F. Residual circulating tumor DNA after adjuvant chemotherapy effectively predicts recurrence of stage II-III gastric cancer. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2023; 43:1312-1325. [PMID: 37837629 PMCID: PMC10693304 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Revised: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising biomarker for predicting relapse in multiple solid cancers. However, the predictive value of ctDNA for disease recurrence remains indefinite in locoregional gastric cancer (GC). Here, we aimed to evaluate the predictive value of ctDNA in this context. METHODS From 2016 to 2019, 100 patients with stage II/III resectable GC were recruited in this prospective cohort study (NCT02887612). Primary tumors were collected during surgical resection, and plasma samples were collected perioperatively and within 3 months after adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). Somatic variants were captured via a targeted sequencing panel of 425 cancer-related genes. The plasma was defined as ctDNA-positive only if one or more variants detected in the plasma were presented in at least 2% of the primary tumors. RESULTS Compared with ctDNA-negative patients, patients with positive postoperative ctDNA had moderately higher risk of recurrence [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.37-5.48; P = 0.003], while patients with positive post-ACT ctDNA showed remarkably higher risk (HR = 14.99, 95% CI = 3.08-72.96; P < 0.001). Multivariate analyses indicated that both postoperative and post-ACT ctDNA positivity were independent predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS). Moreover, post-ACT ctDNA achieved better predictive performance (sensitivity, 77.8%; specificity, 90.6%) than both postoperative ctDNA and serial cancer antigen. A comprehensive model incorporating ctDNA for recurrence risk prediction showed a higher C-index (0.78; 95% CI = 0.71-0.84) than the model without ctDNA (0.71; 95% CI = 0.64-0.79; P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS Residual ctDNA after ACT effectively predicts high recurrence risk in stage II/III GC, and the combination of tissue-based and circulating tumor features could achieve better risk prediction.
Collapse
|
4
|
Nawaf C, Shiang A, Chauhan PS, Chaudhuri AA, Agarwal G, Smith ZL. Circulating tumor DNA based minimal residual disease detection and adjuvant treatment decision-making for muscle-invasive bladder cancer guided by modern clinical trials. Transl Oncol 2023; 37:101763. [PMID: 37657155 PMCID: PMC10495651 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 08/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Up to 430,000 cases of bladder cancer are diagnosed each year worldwide. A proposed method for non-invasive monitoring has been to utilize a "liquid biopsy." Liquid biopsy has been proposed as a non-invasive method of testing biomarkers in bodily fluids in order to detect and survey cancer. The liquid biopsy could be utilized to obtain information regarding circulating tumor cells, circulating cell-free tumor DNA, circulating cell-free tumor RNA, and more. It is currently being investigated to help guide adjuvant therapy and improve oncological outcomes. We highlight an array of exciting past and ongoing clinical trials regarding ctDNA and adjuvant therapy in regard to urothelial carcinoma which we believe to be amongst the leaders in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cayce Nawaf
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America; Siteman Cancer Center, Barnes Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Alexander Shiang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America; Division of Cancer Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Pradeep S Chauhan
- Division of Cancer Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Aadel A Chaudhuri
- Division of Cancer Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States of America; Siteman Cancer Center, Barnes Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States of America; Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
| | - Gautum Agarwal
- Division of Urology, David Pratt Cancer Center, Mercy Hospital, 607 S New Ballas Rd, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
| | - Zachary L Smith
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America; Siteman Cancer Center, Barnes Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Powles T, Young A, Nimeiri H, Madison RW, Fine A, Zollinger DR, Huang Y, Xu C, Gjoerup OV, Aushev VN, Wu HT, Aleshin A, Carter C, Davarpanah N, Degaonkar V, Gupta P, Mariathasan S, Schleifman E, Assaf ZJ, Oxnard G, Hegde PS. Molecular residual disease detection in resected, muscle-invasive urothelial cancer with a tissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling-informed personalized monitoring assay. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1221718. [PMID: 37601688 PMCID: PMC10433150 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1221718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection postoperatively may identify patients with urothelial cancer at a high risk of relapse. Pragmatic tools building off clinical tumor next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms could have the potential to increase assay accessibility. Methods We evaluated the widely available Foundation Medicine comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) platform as a source of variants for tracking of ctDNA when analyzing residual samples from IMvigor010 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02450331), a randomized adjuvant study comparing atezolizumab with observation after bladder cancer surgery. Current methods often involve germline sampling, which is not always feasible or practical. Rather than performing white blood cell sequencing to filter germline and clonal hematopoiesis (CH) variants, we applied a bioinformatic approach to select tumor (non-germline/CH) variants for molecular residual disease detection. Tissue-informed personalized multiplex polymerase chain reaction-NGS assay was used to detect ctDNA postsurgically (Natera). Results Across 396 analyzed patients, prevalence of potentially actionable alterations was comparable with the expected prevalence in advanced disease (13% FGFR2/3, 20% PIK3CA, 13% ERBB2, and 37% with elevated tumor mutational burden ≥10 mutations/megabase). In the observation arm, 66 of the 184 (36%) ctDNA-positive patients had shorter disease-free survival [DFS; hazard ratio (HR) = 5.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.84-8.67; P < 0.0001] and overall survival (OS; HR = 5.81; 95% CI, 3.41-9.91; P < 0.0001) compared with ctDNA-negative patients. ctDNA-positive patients had improved DFS and OS with atezolizumab compared with those in observation (DFS HR = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38-0.83; P = 0.003; OS HR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.42-1.05). Clinical sensitivity and specificity for detection of postsurgical recurrence were 58% (60/103) and 93% (75/81), respectively. Conclusion We present a personalized ctDNA monitoring assay utilizing tissue-based FoundationOne® CDx CGP, which is a pragmatic and potentially clinically scalable method that can detect low levels of residual ctDNA in patients with resected, muscle-invasive bladder cancer without germline sampling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Powles
- Barts Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London ECMC, Barts Health, London, United Kingdom
| | - Amanda Young
- Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | | | | | | | | | - Yanmei Huang
- Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Chang Xu
- Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | | | | | | | | | - Corey Carter
- Roche/Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, United States
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chhaya S, Watts I, Ng K, Mustapha R, Powles T, Sharma A, Vasdev N. Role of Perioperative Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Oncol Ther 2023; 11:49-64. [PMID: 36595203 PMCID: PMC9935774 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-022-00218-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aim to describe and highlight the current use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) treatment landscape, particularly focusing on the perioperative setting. We provide a comprehensive review of key trials of the use of ICI in the perioperative setting, discussing trial outcomes and limitations and reviewing the role of biomarkers. INTRODUCTION ICIs have recently been integrated into the treatment algorithm for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. More than 30 published studies have investigated the role of these agents in the radical treatment of MIBC. Some studies have demonstrated conflicting results, affecting widespread adoption in clinical practice. METHODS We performed a narrative overview of the literature from databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, European society of Medical Oncology/American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Proceedings, and clinicaltrials.gov databases up until December 2021. DISCUSSION We described the results of key trials in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting, some of the reasons for conflicting study results, and the implications for clinical practice. Relevant biomarkers in the field are discussed, alongside a brief overview of the immune microenvironment in bladder cancer. CONCLUSIONS Perioperative ICIs have shown promising efficacy with low toxicity in the neoadjuvant setting. The two large trials in the adjuvant setting have been contradictory. The efficacy of perioperative ICIs combined with favorable tolerability and better toxicity profile compared with chemotherapy, with the potential for biomarker-driven patient selection, may lead to a change in future practice. There is, however, a lack of long-term survival and toxicity data for those treated with ICIs, and this needs to be developed further to demonstrate an added survival benefit by using ICIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saachi Chhaya
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
| | - Isabella Watts
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Kenrick Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Rami Mustapha
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Anand Sharma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - Nikhil Vasdev
- Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vellanki PJ, Ghosh S, Pathak A, Fusco MJ, Bloomquist EW, Tang S, Singh H, Philip R, Pazdur R, Beaver JA. Regulatory implications of ctDNA in immuno-oncology for solid tumors. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:e005344. [PMID: 36796877 PMCID: PMC9936292 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
In the era of precision oncology, use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is emerging as a minimally invasive approach for the diagnosis and management of patients with cancer and as an enrichment tool in clinical trials. In recent years, the US Food and Drug Administration has approved multiple ctDNA-based companion diagnostic assays for the safe and effective use of targeted therapies and ctDNA-based assays are also being developed for use with immuno-oncology-based therapies. For early-stage solid tumor cancers, ctDNA may be particularly important to detect molecular residual disease (MRD) to support early implementation of adjuvant or escalated therapy to prevent development of metastatic disease. Clinical trials are also increasingly using ctDNA MRD for patient selection and stratification, with an ultimate goal of improving trial efficiency through use of an enriched patient population. Standardization and harmonization of ctDNA assays and methodologies, along with further clinical validation of ctDNA as a prognostic and predictive biomarker, are necessary before ctDNA may be considered as an efficacy-response biomarker to support regulatory decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paz J Vellanki
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Soma Ghosh
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Anand Pathak
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael J Fusco
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Erik W Bloomquist
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Shenghui Tang
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Harpreet Singh
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
- Oncology Center of Excellence, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Reena Philip
- Oncology Center of Excellence, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Richard Pazdur
- Oncology Center of Excellence, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Julia A Beaver
- Oncology Center of Excellence, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Grunewald CM, Niegisch G, Albers P. Using Circulating Tumor DNA To Guide Adjuvant Therapy in Bladder Cancer: IMvigor010 and IMvigor011. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 8:646-647. [PMID: 35450799 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Recent data from IMvigor010 impressively demonstrate the potential of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a prognostic and a predictive biomarker in patients with urothelial carcinoma. Although ctDNA status was prospectively assessed, the published data are only exploratory and require further prospective validation. Results from the IMvigor011 trial are therefore eagerly awaited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla M Grunewald
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Guenter Niegisch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Albers
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Division of Personalized Early Detection of Prostate Cancer, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|