Corrigendum to 'First-line atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel for unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: IMpassion130 final overall survival analysis': Annals of Oncology 2021; 32: 983-993

Current landscape of treating different cancers using nanomedicines: Trends and perspectives

The efforts to use novel nanotechnologies in medicine and cancer have been widespread. In order to understand better the focus areas of cancer nanomedicine research to date, we conducted a survey of nanomedicine developmental and clinical research in conjunction with treatment of various cancers. The survey has been performed based on number of publications, rate of citations, entry into clinical trials, and funding rates by the National Cancer Institute. Our survey indicates that breast and brain cancers are the most and one of the least studied by nanotechnology researchers, respectively. Breast cancer nano-therapies seem to also be most likely to achieve clinical translation as the number of publications produced, amount of funding, total citations, and clinical trials (active and completed) are the highest when compared with research in other cancers. Brain cancer, despite its low survival, has capture much less attention of nanomedicine research community as survey indicated, although nanotechnology can offer novel approaches which can address brain cancer challenges. This article is categorized under: Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Nanomedicine for Oncologic Disease.

Effects of neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiotherapy plus adebrelimab and chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer: A pilot study

Background

Emerging data have supported the immunostimulatory role of radiotherapy, which could exert a synergistic effect with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). With proven effective but suboptimal effect of ICI and chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), we designed a pilot study to explore the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plus adebrelimab and chemotherapy in TNBC patients.

Methods

Treatment-naïve TNBC patients received two cycles of intravenous adebrelimab (20 mg/kg, every 3 weeks), and SBRT (24 Gy/3 f, every other day) started at the second cycle, then followed by six cycles of adebrelimab plus nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m² on days 1 and 8) and carboplatin (area under the curve 6 mg/mL per min on day 1) every 3 weeks. The surgery was performed within 3-5 weeks after the end of neoadjuvant therapy. Primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR, ypT0/is ypN0). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), residual cancer burden (RCB) 0-I, and safety.

Results

13 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of therapy. 10 (76.9%) patients completed SBRT and were included in efficacy analysis. 90% (9/10) of patients achieved pCR, both RCB 0-I and ORR reached 100% with three patients achieved complete remission. Adverse events (AEs) of all-grade and grade 3-4 occurred in 92.3% and 53.8%, respectively. One (7.7%) patient had treatment-related serious AEs. No radiation-related dermatitis or death occurred.

Conclusions

Adding SBRT to adebrelimab and neoadjuvant chemotherapy led to a substantial proportion of pCR with acceptable toxicities, supporting further exploration of this combination in TNBC patients.

Funding

None.

Clinical trial number

NCT05132790.

Genomic alterations affecting tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and PD-L1 expression patterns in triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) remain imperfect in predicting clinical outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer because outcomes do not always correlate with the expression of these biomarkers. Genomic and transcriptomic alterations that may contribute to the expression of these biomarkers remain incompletely uncovered.

METHODS

We evaluated PD-L1 immunohistochemistry scores (SP142 and 28-8 assays) and TILs in our triple-negative breast cancer multiomics dataset and 2 immunotherapy clinical trial cohorts. Then, we analyzed genomic and transcriptomic alterations correlated with TILs, PD-L1 expression, and patient outcomes.

RESULTS

Despite TILs serving as a decent predictor for triple-negative breast cancer clinical outcomes, exceptions remained. Our study revealed that several genomic alterations were correlated with unexpected events. In particular, PD-L1 expression may cause a paradoxical relationship between TILs and prognosis in certain patients. Consequently, we classified triple-negative breast cancers into 4 groups based on PD-L1 and TIL levels. The TIL-negative PD-L1-positive and TIL-positive PD-L1-negative groups were not typical "hot" tumors; both were associated with worse prognoses and lower immunotherapy efficacy than TIL-positive PD-L1-positive tumors. Copy number variation of PD-L1 and oncogenic signaling activation were correlated with PD-L1 expression in the TIL-negative PD-L1-positive group, whereas GSK3B-induced degradation may cause undetectable PD-L1 expression in the TIL-positive PD-L1-negative group. These factors have the potential to affect the predictive function of both PD-L1 and TILs.

CONCLUSIONS

Several genomic and transcriptomic alterations may cause paradoxical effects among TILs, PD-L1 expression, and prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer. Investigating and targeting these factors will advance precision immunotherapy for patients with this disease.

Killer instincts: natural killer cells as multifactorial cancer immunotherapy

Natural killer (NK) cells integrate heterogeneous signals for activation and inhibition using germline-encoded receptors. These receptors are stochastically co-expressed, and their concurrent engagement and signaling can adjust the sensitivity of individual cells to putative targets. Against cancers, which mutate and evolve under therapeutic and immunologic pressure, the diversity for recognition provided by NK cells may be key to comprehensive cancer control. NK cells are already being trialled as adoptive cell therapy and targets for immunotherapeutic agents. However, strategies to leverage their naturally occurring diversity and agility have not yet been developed. In this review, we discuss the receptors and signaling pathways through which signals for activation or inhibition are generated in NK cells, focusing on their roles in cancer and potential as targets for immunotherapies. Finally, we consider the impacts of receptor co-expression and the potential to engage multiple pathways of NK cell reactivity to maximize the scope and strength of antitumor activities.

Systemic infusion of TLR3-ligand and IFN-α in patients with breast cancer reprograms local tumor microenvironments for selective CTL influx

BACKGROUND

Presence of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) in the tumor microenvironment (TME) predicts the effectiveness of cancer immunotherapies. The ability of toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) ligands, interferons (IFNs) and COX2 inhibitors to synergistically induce CTL-attracting chemokines (but not regulatory T cell (Treg)-attractants) in the TME, but not in healthy tissues, observed in our preclinical studies, suggested that their systemic application can reprogram local TMEs.

METHODS

Six evaluable patients (33-69 years) with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer received six doses of systemic chemokine-modulating (CKM) regimen composed of TLR3 ligand (rintatolimod; 200 mg; intravenous), IFN-α2b (20 MU/m2; intravenous) and COX2 inhibitor (celecoxib; 2×200 mg; oral) over 2 weeks. The predetermined primary endpoint was the intratumoral change in the expression of CTL marker, CD8α, in the post-CKM versus pre-CKM tumor biopsies. Patients received follow-up pembrolizumab (200 mg, intravenously, every 3 weeks), starting 3-8 days after completion of CKM.

RESULTS

Post-CKM biopsies showed selectively increased CTL markers CD8α (average 10.2-fold, median 5.5-fold, p=0.034) and granzyme B (GZMB; 6.1-fold, median 5.8-fold, p=0.02), but not FOXP3 (Treg marker) relative to HPRT1 expression, resulting in the increases in average CD8α/FOXP3 ratio and GZMB/FOXP3 ratio. CKM increased intratumoral CTL-attractants CCL5 and CXCL10, but not Treg-attractants CCL22 or CXCL12. In contrast, CD8+ T cells and their CXCR3+ subset showed transient decreases in blood. One clinical response (breast tumor autoamputation) and three stable diseases were observed. The patient with clinical response remains disease free, with a follow-up of 46 months as of data cut-off.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term systemic CKM selectively increases CTL numbers and CTL/Treg ratios in the TME, while transiently decreasing CTL numbers in the blood. Transient effects of CKM suggest that its simultaneous application with checkpoint blockade and other forms of immunotherapy may be needed for optimal outcomes.

Immunogenic Nanovesicle-Tandem-Augmented Chemoimmunotherapy via Efficient Cancer-Homing Delivery and Optimized Ordinal-Interval Regime

The strategy of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with anthracycline is recommended by clinical guidelines for the standard-of-care treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Nevertheless, several fundamental clinical principles are yet to be elucidated to achieve a great therapeutic effect, including cancer-homing delivery efficiency and ordinal-interval regime. Tumor-derived extracellular vesicles (TDEVs), as vectors for intratumoral intercellular communication, can encapsulate therapeutic agents and home tumors. However, PD-L1 overexpression in TDEVs leads to systemic immunosuppression during in vivo circulation, ultimately inhibiting intratumoral T activity. In this study, CRISPR/Cas9-edited Pd-l1KO TDEV-fusogenic anthracycline doxorubicin (DOX) liposomes with high drug encapsulation (97%) are fabricated, which homologously deliver DOX to breast cancer cells to intensify the immunogenic response and induce PD-L1 overexpression in the tumor. By setting the stage for sensitizing tumors to ICIs, sequential treatment with disulfide-linked PD1-cross-anchored TDEVs nanogels at one-day interval could sustainably release PD1 in the tumor, triggering a high proportion of effector T cell-mediated destruction of orthotopic and metastatic tumors without off-target side effects in the 4T1-bearing TNBC mouse model. Such a TDEV-tandem-augmented chemoimmunotherapeutic strategy with efficient cancer-homing delivery capacity and optimized ordinal-interval regime provides a solid foundation for developing chemoimmunotherapeutic formulations for TNBC therapy at the clinical level.

Adverse Events of PD-1 or PD-L1 Inhibitors in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

(1) Background: This study aimed to develop a comprehensive understanding of the treatment-related adverse events when using PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). (2) Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of Phase II/III randomized clinical trials. Studies were searched for using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from 1 March 1980 till 30 June 2022. Data on adverse events were mainly extracted from ClinicalTrials.gov and published articles. A generalized linear mixed model with the logit transformation was employed to obtain the overall incidence of adverse events across all studies. For serious adverse events with low incidences, the Peto method was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) in the PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors groups compared to the control groups. (3) Results: Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, including a total of 2941 TNBC patients treated with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors (including atezolizumab, pembrolizumab and durvalumab) and 2339 patients in the control groups. Chemotherapy alone was the control group in all studies. The average incidences of all serious immune-related adverse events of interest (hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, pneumonitis, pruritus, rash) were less than 1%, except for adrenal insufficiency (1.70%, 95%CI: 0.50-5.61%) in the PD-1 or PD-L1 groups. PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors significantly increased the risk of serious pneumonitis (OR = 2.52, 95%CI: 1.02-6.26), hypothyroidism (OR = 5.92, 95%CI: 1.22-28.86), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation (OR = 1.66, 95%CI: 1.12-2.45), and adrenal insufficiency (OR = 18.81, 95%CI: 3.42-103.40). For non-serious adverse events, the patients treated with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors had higher risk of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation (OR =1.26, 95%CI: 1.02-1.57), hypothyroidism (OR = 3.63, 95%CI: 2.92-4.51), pruritus (OR = 1.84, 95%CI: 1.30-2.59), rash (OR = 1.29, 95%CI: 1.08-1.55), and fever (OR = 1.77, 95%CI: 1.13-2.77), compared with chemotherapy alone. (4) Conclusions: The incidence of serious immune-related adverse events in PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors groups is low but significantly higher than in chemotherapy groups. When using PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors for the treatment of TNBC, serious pneumonitis, hypothyroidism, ALT elevation, and adrenal insufficiency should be considered. Non-serious adverse events, such as AST elevation, rash, and fever, should also be taken into consideration.

Addiction of Cancer Stem Cells to MUC1-C in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Progression

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive malignancy with limited treatment options. TNBC progression is associated with expansion of cancer stem cells (CSCs). Few insights are available regarding druggable targets that drive the TNBC CSC state. This review summarizes the literature on TNBC CSCs and the compelling evidence that they are addicted to the MUC1-C transmembrane protein. In normal epithelia, MUC1-C is activated by loss of homeostasis and induces reversible wound-healing responses of inflammation and repair. However, in settings of chronic inflammation, MUC1-C promotes carcinogenesis. MUC1-C induces EMT, epigenetic reprogramming and chromatin remodeling in TNBC CSCs, which are dependent on MUC1-C for self-renewal and tumorigenicity. MUC1-C-induced lineage plasticity in TNBC CSCs confers DNA damage resistance and immune evasion by chronic activation of inflammatory pathways and global changes in chromatin architecture. Of therapeutic significance, an antibody generated against the MUC1-C extracellular domain has been advanced in a clinical trial of anti-MUC1-C CAR T cells and in IND-enabling studies for development as an antibody–drug conjugate (ADC). Agents targeting the MUC1-C cytoplasmic domain have also entered the clinic and are undergoing further development as candidates for advancing TNBC treatment. Eliminating TNBC CSCs will be necessary for curing this recalcitrant cancer and MUC1-C represents a promising druggable target for achieving that goal.