Surgical results of synchronous multiple primary lung cancers: similar to the stage-matched solitary primary lung cancers?

Predictors of residual simultaneous multiple ground-glass nodule progression after dominant lesion resection

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify the predictive factors for the progression of residual simultaneous multifocal ground-glass nodules (SMGGNs) after resection of the dominant lesion.

METHODS

Patients (n = 3420) with primary lung cancer who underwent lung resections at our hospital between 2006 and 2016 were screened, and the data from 82 patients who had residual SMGGNs after undergoing surgery for the dominant lesion (pathologically stage 0-IIA) were retrospectively analyzed. Clinicopathological factors that predicted the growth of residual second dominant GGNs were identified.

RESULTS

Median total tumor and solid component sizes of the residual second dominant GGNs were 1.3 cm (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.6-2.0) and 0 cm (IQR: 0-0.7), respectively. During a median follow-up period of 54 months (IQR: 37-78 months), 35 (43%) lesions progressed. Logistic regression analysis revealed that age younger than 70 (OR: 10.54, 95% CI: 1.71-65.11), a dominant lesion with pure solid appearance (reference: GGN, OR: 18.16, 95% CI: 1.66-198.60), a second dominant GGN total size larger than 1.0 cm (OR: 12.27, 95% CI: 1.85-81.17), and a second dominant GGN solid component size larger than 0.5 cm (OR: 17.59, 95% CI: 3.58-86.47) were significant predictive factors for the progression of residual GGNs (all p values < 0.03). Based on an analysis of growth patterns, rapid growth was higher in second dominant GGNs with a part-solid appearance.

CONCLUSIONS

If the resected dominant lesion or the residual second dominant GGN exhibits high-risk factors, the second dominant GGN should be meticulously observed.

A pairwise radiomics algorithm-lesion pair relation estimation model for distinguishing multiple primary lung cancer from intrapulmonary metastasis

Background

Distinguishing multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) from intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM) is critical for their disparate treatment strategy and prognosis. This study aimed to establish a non-invasive model to make the differentiation pre-operatively.

Methods

We retrospectively studied 168 patients with multiple lung cancers (307 pairs of lesions) including 118 cases for modeling and internal validation, and 50 cases for independent external validation. Radiomic features on computed tomography (CT) were extracted to calculate the absolute deviation of paired lesions. Features were then selected by correlation coefficients and random forest classifier 5-fold cross-validation, based on which the lesion pair relation estimation (PRE) model was developed. A major voting strategy was used to decide diagnosis for cases with multiple pairs of lesions. Cases from another institute were included as the external validation set for the PRE model to compete with two experienced clinicians.

Results

Seven radiomic features were selected for the PRE model construction. With major voting strategy, the mean area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the training versus internal validation versus external validation cohort to distinguish MPLC were 0.983 versus 0.844 versus 0.793, 0.942 versus 0.846 versus 0.760, 0.905 versus 0.728 versus 0.727, and 0.962 versus 0.910 versus 0.769, respectively. AUCs of the two clinicians were 0.619 and 0.580.

Conclusions

The CT radiomic feature-based lesion PRE model is potentially an accurate diagnostic tool for the differentiation of MPLC and IPM, which could help with clinical decision making.

Sublobar resection versus lobectomy in the treatment of synchronous multiple primary lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Although synchronous multiple primary lung cancers (sMPLCs) are common in clinical practice, the choice of surgical modalities for the main lesion is still at the stage of exploration. This study is designed to analyze the prognosis of sMPLCs and single primary lung cancers with similar tumor stages and to explore whether sublobar resection has a similar prognosis as lobectomy for sMPLCs.

METHODS

One-hundred forty-one cases of sMPLCs were selected, including the following: 65 cases underwent lobectomy for main lesions, and 76 cases underwent sublobar resection for main lesions. One thousand one hundred forty-four cases of single primary lung cancer were matched at 1:1 by propensity score matching. Then, the patients with sMPLCs were divided into a lobectomy group and a sublobar group according to the first tumor stage. Ninety-eight cases of patients with sMPLCs were matched. The short-term perioperative effect, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in OS between sMPLCs and single primary lung cancer after lobectomy (77.1% vs. 77.2%, P = 0.157) and sublobar resection (98.7% vs. 90.7%, P = 0.309). There was no significant difference in OS (86.7% vs. 83.9%, P = 0.482) or DFS (67.6 vs. 87.7%, P = 0.324) between the lobectomy group and sublobar group with sMPLCs. The sublobar resection group obtained a lower incidence of postoperative complications (40.8% vs. 16.3%, P = 0.007) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (11.22 vs. 9.27, P = 0.049).

CONCLUSION

The prognosis of patients with sMPLCs generally depends on the main tumor state, which has no statistical difference regardless of sublobar resection or lobectomy, and the perioperative period of sublobar resection is safer than that of lobectomy.

Evaluation of surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of second primary lung cancer based on a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although surgery has been widely applied for SPLC therapy, there is still no uniform treatment approach. Whether SPLC and primary lung cancer have similar prognostic characteristics remains controversial. Herein, based on a systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to enucleate the influences of diverse surgical strategies and underlying prognostic factors on the prognosis of patients with both the first primary lung cancer and SPLC underwent surgical resection.

METHODS

A comprehensive and systematic literature search was implemented in three databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane), and eligible studies were screened following inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meanwhile, we extracted the hazard ratios (HR) together with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each prognostic factor, either directly or indirectly, from the enrolled literature.

RESULTS

Eleven studies (published between 2000 and 2022) were included in this study, including 1,131 SPLC patients. The overall survival (OS) exhibited no difference between patients with lobectomy and sublobar resection after SPLC (HR: 0.87, 95%CI: 0.62-1.21, P = 0.41). The patients after completion pneumonectomy had a poor prognosis (HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.34-2.55, P < 0.01). Poor prognostic factors after SPLC surgery included synchronous SPLC (HR: 3.38, 95%CI: 1.53-7.46, P < 0.01), tumor diameter > 2 cm (HR: 2.44, 95%CI: 1.73-3.44, P < 0.01), solid predominant in CT morphology (HR: 3.08, 95% CI: 1.14-8.33, P = 0.03), lymph node metastasis (HR: 2.79, 95%CI: 1.40-5.56), and smoking (HR: 2.37, 95%CI: 1.08-26.82, P < 0.01). Tumor disease-free interval (DFI), tumor histological type, and gender had no impact on the prognosis of patients received SPLC surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with SPLC, especially those with poor cardiopulmonary function reserve, should be prioritized for sublobar resection for treatment. These patients should also try to avoid completion pneumonectomy. Patients with synchronous SPLC, tumor diameter > 2 cm, solid predominant in CT morphology, lymph node metastasis, and smoking had a poor prognosis. Meanwhile, SPLC has similar prognostic characteristics with single primary lung cancer. However, the study has some limitations and more evidence is warranted to verify the findings.

Association of the Extent of Resection with Survival in Multiple Primary Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The incidence of synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (SMPLC) has progressively increased, due to recent advances in imaging. To date, no guidelines defining recommendations for patients' selection and no standard treatment of cases with SMPLC have been defined.The primary aim of this systematic review was to assess survival among patients treated with lobectomy or sublobar resection MPLC.

METHODS

Comprehensive literature search of Medline, the Cochrane Library, reference lists, and ongoing studies was performed according to a prospectively registered design (PROSPERO: CRD42019115487). All studies published between 1998 and December 2020 that examined treatments with lobectomy compared to sublobar resection were included. Two double-blind investigators independently selected articles.Primary outcomes were to assess the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate among patients treated with lobectomy or sublobar resection and the impact of lymph node status on 5-year OS and 5-year disease-free survival in patients with MPLC.

RESULTS

The search yielded 424 articles; 4 observational studies met the inclusion criteria and collectively evaluated 298 patients with a mean age ranging from 61.5 to 67 years. A total of 112 patients were treated for bilateral synchronous tumors and 186 patients for unilateral multiple synchronous tumors. All included studies showed that the type of resection, lobectomy or limited resection, had no significant impact on survival.

CONCLUSION

Limited resection is a valuable treatment option for MPLC. However, the clinical level of evidence of the studies found is low and randomized studies are needed to clarify the extent of resection in MPLC.

Surgical resection versus radiotherapy for clinical stage IA lung cancer ≤1 cm in size: A population-based study

OBJECTIVE

With the increasing incidence of stage IA lung cancer ≤1 cm in size, the optimal primary treatment remains to be controversial, and thus, we compared the survival of these patients treated with radiotherapy, wedge resection, segmentectomy, or lobectomy in a large population.

METHODS

We identified patients with stage IA lung cancer ≤1 cm in size between 2004 and 2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We compared the overall survival (OS) via Kaplan-Meier analysis and conducted Cox regression analysis via propensity score matching (PSM) method to identify the relative hazard ratio (HR) and difference of OS among these treatments in the subgroup stratified by four variables (age, total number of tumors, pathological grade, and histology).

RESULTS

A total of 5435 patients were included with a median age of 68 years (range, 6-94 years), of which 2131 (39.2%) were male, and 3510 (64.6%) were adenocarcinoma. The 5-year OS rate was 67.1%, 34.5%, 61.6%, 72.1%, and 75.0% for the entire study population, radiotherapy, wedge resection, segmentectomy, and lobectomy, respectively. In PSM analysis, wedge resection and segmentectomy were all superior to radiotherapy (P < 0.001), and segmentectomy was superior to wedge resection (P = 0.043), while segmentectomy was comparable with lobectomy (P = 0.058). In patients with multiple tumors, radiotherapy brought similar survival to surgery (wedge resection versus radiotherapy, P = 0.323; segmentectomy versus radiotherapy, P = 0.170; lobectomy versus radiotherapy, P = 0.796).

CONCLUSIONS

Among stage IA lung cancer with ≤1 cm, segmentectomy and lobectomy were identified as the potential effective treatments, with segmentectomy more preferred, while radiotherapy would be recommended in those with multiple tumors, which requires further verification.

Prognostic Factors for Survival in Multiple Primary Lung Adenocarcinomas: A Retrospective Analysis of 283 Patients

Purpose: In recent years, a rising number of multiple primary lung cancers have been detected with the advancement of imaging technology. No detailed study has assessed the prognosis of multiple primary lung adenocarcinomas based on computed tomography characteristics. The present study aimed to analyze outcomes and determine valuable factors for predicting the prognosis of multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: This single-center retrospective study was performed from January 2013 to October 2021. All patients were divided into 3 groups based on tumor density as follows: multi-pure ground-glass nodules, at least one part-solid nodule without solid nodules, and at least one solid nodule. Clinicopathologic features, computed tomography signs, and survival outcomes were compared between these groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. The multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify independent predictors for recurrence-free survival and overall survival. Results: The sample included 283 patients with 623 lesions who met the inclusion criteria for multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma. Of these patients, 71 (25.1%) presented with multi-pure ground-glass nodules, 100 (35.3%) with at least one part-solid nodule without solid nodule, and 112 (39.6%) with at least one solid nodule. The 3 groups had distinguished clinicopathologic and radiological features of age, adjuvant therapy, types of tumor resection, TNM stage, pathological subtypes, pleural indentation, spicule, and vacuole (all P < .001). Multivariate analysis found that lesion number was an independent predictor for both recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 2.41; 95% confidence interval 1.12-5.19; P = .025) and overall survival (hazard ratio 4.78; 95% confidence interval 1.88-12.18; P = .001), and the at least one solid nodule was an independent predictor for overall survival (hazard ratio 5.307; 95% confidence interval 1.16-24.31; P = .032). Stage III (hazard ratio 5.71; 95% confidence interval 1.94-16.81; P = .002) and adjuvant therapy (hazard ratio 2.52; 95% confidence interval 1.24-5.13; P = .011) influenced the recurrence-free survival. Conclusions: Survival of multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma patients is strongly correlated with the lesion number and the at least one solid nodule tumors in radiological. This information may be useful for predicting survival and making clinical decisions in future studies.

The CT delta-radiomics based machine learning approach in evaluating multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma

Object

To evaluate the difference between multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma (MPLA) and solitary primary lung adenocarcinoma (SPLA) by delta-radiomics based machine learning algorithms in CT images.

Methods

A total of 1094 patients containing 268 MPLAs and 826 SPLAs were recruited for this retrospective study between 2014 to 2020. After the segmentation of volume of interest, the radiomic features were automatically calculated. The patients were categorized into the training set and testing set by a random proportion of 7:3. After feature selection, the relevant classifiers were constructed by the machine learning algorithms of Bayes, forest, k-nearest neighbor, logistic regression, support vector machine, and decision tree. The relative standard deviation (RSD) was calculated and the classification model with minimal RSD was chosen for delta-radiomics analysis to explore the variation of tumor during follow-up surveillance in the cohort of 225 MPLAs and 320 SPLAs. According to the different follow-up duration, it was divided into group A (3–12 months), group B (13–24 months), and group C (25–48 months). Then the corresponding delta-radiomics classifiers were developed to predict MPLAs. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was quantified to evaluate the efficiency of the model.

Results

To radiomics analysis, the forest classifier (FC-radio) with the minimal RSD showed the better stability with AUCs of 0.840 (95%CI, 0.810–0.867) and 0.670 (95%CI, 0.611–0.724) in the training and testing set. The AUCs of the forest classifier based on delta-radiomics (FC-delta) were higher than those of FC-radio. In addition, with the extension of follow-up duration, the performance of FC-delta in Group C were the best with AUCs of 0.998 (95%CI, 0.993–1.000) in the training set and 0.853 (95%CI, 0.752–0.940) in the testing set.

Conclusions

The machine-learning approach based on radiomics and delta-radiomics helped to differentiate SPLAs from MPLAs. The FC-delta with a longer follow-up duration could better distinguish between SPLAs and MPLAs.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10036-1.

Outcomes of patients with different lepidic percentage and tumor size of stage I lung adenocarcinoma

Background

To evaluate the long‐term outcomes after surgical resection for stage I lung adenocarcinoma based on the percentage of lepidic component (LC) and invasive tumor size (IS).

Methods

The clinicopathological characteristics of 1049 patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Tumors were categorized into groups: A (LC ≥ 50%) and B (LC < 50%). Groups A0 and A1 consisted of minimally invasive adenocarcinomas (MIA) and other lepidic‐predominant invasive adenocarcinomas, respectively. Group B was categorized into B1 (IS ≤ 1 cm), B2 (1 < IS≤2 cm), and B3 (2 < IS≤3 cm) by invasive tumor size and divided into subgroups (B1[lep+]/[lep−], B2[lep+]/[lep−], and B3[lep+]/[lep−]) according to the presence[lep+] or absence[lep−] of LCs. Cumulative incidence of recurrence (CIR) and cancer‐specific survival (CSS) were examined.

Results

LC decreased with increasing IS. Only 24 (8.5%) tumors in group A had an IS >1 cm. 10‐year CIR and CSS were 15.2% and 86.0%. LC and IS were found to be independent predictors of CSS. Patients in group A had 1.4% 10‐year CIR and 100% 10‐year CSS. In group B, a significantly higher CIR and worse CSS were observed as IS increased (p < 0.001), but LC was not a predictor for CSS (p = 0.593). No significant differences in CIR or CSS were found in presence of LC or not when LC < 50% (B1[lep+]/[lep−], B2[lep+]/[lep−], and B3[lep+]/[lep−]: p = 0.36/0.48, p = 0.82/0.94, and p = 0.90/0.37, respectively).

Conclusions

LC≥50% tumors demonstrated excellent prognosis regardless of IS. The outcomes of LC < 50% tumors were well predicted by IS, corresponding to the T‐staging system. The predictive value of LC for prognosis became insignificant.

Radiological classification, gene-mutation status, and surgical prognosis of synchronous multiple primary lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the radiological classification, gene-mutation status, and surgical prognosis of synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (sMPLC).

METHODS

From January 2013 to October 2019, 192 consecutive patients with sMPLC were investigated. The clinical, CT, molecular, and pathological features of all patients were analyzed. Furthermore, the prognosis of 89 patients who only underwent surgical resection was evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 192 patients, all lesions pathologically confirmed or highly suspected as tumors based on radiological findings were retrospectively analyzed, and the CT findings of sMPLC were classified into three types: (I) all lesions manifested as solid nodules/masses (14.06%, 27/192), (II) all lesions manifested as subsolid nodules/masses (43.23%, 83/192), and (III) tumor lesions manifested as a combination of ≥ 2 of the following patterns: solid nodules/masses, subsolid nodules/masses, cystic airspace, and focal consolidation (42.71%, 82/192). For 252 tumors undergoing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutation testing, the EGFR-mutation rate was higher in subsolid tumors than that in solid tumors (p < 0.05). Among 19 patients with all tumors undergoing surgery and driver-gene testing, genetic heterogeneity was prevalent among the multiple tumors (63.16%,12/19). The highest clinical stage of non-I, ipsilateral distribution of tumors, and CT classification of I indicated a poor prognosis for patients with sMPLC (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Subsolid lesions are the most common presentation of sMPLC. Genetic heterogeneity in driver mutations among sMPLC may be present. Prognosis in patients with sMPLC is determined by the highest clinical TNM stage, distribution, and radiological classification among the multiple tumors.

KEY POINTS

• Synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (sMPLC) has three types of CT findings. • Genetic heterogeneity may be prevalent among the multiple tumors. • Prognosis in patients with sMPLC is associated with the highest clinical TNM stage, distribution, and radiological classification among the multiple tumors.

In-depth molecular analysis of combined and co-primary pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma

Up to 14% of large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs) are diagnosed in continuity with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. In addition to these combined lesions, 1% to 7% of lung tumors present as co-primary tumors with multiple synchronous lesions. We evaluated molecular and clinicopathological characteristics of combined and co-primary LCNEC-adenocarcinoma (ADC) tumors. Ten patients with LCNEC-ADC (combined) and five patients with multiple synchronous ipsilateral LCNEC and ADC tumors (co-primary) were included. DNA was isolated from distinct tumor parts, and 65 cancer genes were analyzed by next generation sequencing. Immunohistochemistry was performed including neuroendocrine markers, pRb, Ascl1 and Rest. Pure ADC (N = 37) and LCNEC (N = 17) cases were used for reference. At least 1 shared mutation, indicating tumor clonality, was found in LCNEC- and ADC-parts of 10/10 combined tumors but only in 1/5 co-primary tumors. A range of identical mutations was observed in both parts of combined tumors: 8/10 contained ADC-related (EGFR/KRAS/STK11 and/or KEAP1), 4/10 RB1 and 9/10 TP53 mutations. Loss of pRb IHC was observed in 6/10 LCNEC- and 4/10 ADC-parts. The number and intensity of expression of Ascl1 and neuroendocrine markers increased from pure ADC (low) to combined ADC (intermediate) and combined and pure LCNEC (high). The opposite was true for Rest expression. In conclusion, all combined LCNEC-ADC tumors were clonally related indicating a common origin. A relatively high frequency of pRb inactivation was observed in both LCNEC- and ADC-parts, suggesting an underlying role in LCNEC-ADC development. Furthermore, neuroendocrine differentiation might be modulated by Ascl1(+) and Rest(-) expression.

Multiple Primary Lung Tumors of Different Pathological Types Including Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Adenocarcinoma, and Mixed Squamous Cell and Glandular Papilloma: A Case Report

Multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) is considered relatively rare. This report presents an unusual case of multiple pulmonary nodules in a 74-year-old man who presented with three independent synchronous tumors in the right upper lobe. The tumors were diagnosed as peripheral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), adenocarcinoma, and pulmonary mixed squamous cell and glandular papilloma (mixed papilloma). Mixed papilloma is an extremely rare, benign pulmonary tumor with a typical papillary appearance, showing squamous and glandular epithelial differentiation. The histological and immunohistochemical features of each tumor were analyzed. In addition, molecular pathological examination for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) showed no mutation in two primary cancers. Mixed papilloma showed no BRAF V600E mutation or HPV infection. The present case report provides a clinicopathological understanding of an instance in which three tumors of different pathological types are present in the same lung lobe. Furthermore, it provides a literature review regarding multiple lung nodules, focusing on the clinicopathological diagnosis, clinical treatment, and prognostic assessment of these nodules. This is the first case report of mixed papilloma arising in MPLC.

Recent Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Multiple Primary Lung Cancer

With the wide application of computed tomography in lung cancer screening, the incidence of multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) has been increasingly reported. Despite the established criteria, the differentiation between MPLC and intrapulmonary metastasis remains challenging. Although histologic features are helpful in some circumstances, a molecular analysis is often needed. The application of next-generation sequencing could aid in distinguishing MPLCs from intrapulmonary metastasis, decreasing ambiguity. For MPLC management, surgery with lobectomy is the main operation method. Limited resection does not appear to negatively affect survival, and it is a reasonable alternative. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has become a standard of care for patients refusing surgery or for those with medically inoperable early-stage lung cancer. However, the efficacy of SABR in MPLC management could only be found in retrospective series. Other local ablation techniques are an emerging alternative for the control of residual lesions. Furthermore, systemic therapies, such as targeted therapy for oncogene-addicted patients, and immunotherapy have shown promising results in MPLC management after resection. In this paper, the recent advances in the diagnosis and management of MPLC are reviewed.

Correlation between clinicopathological characteristics of lung adenocarcinoma and the risk of venous thromboembolism

Background

Patients with primary lung adenocarcinoma are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, lung adenocarcinoma characteristics differ across histological subtypes. Therefore, we performed comprehensive analyses on the clinicopathological characteristics of lung adenocarcinoma and risk of VTE.

Methods

A total of 952 surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma cases were reviewed and classified according to criteria of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC)/American Thoracic Society (ATS) /European Respiratory Society (ERS). The correlation between this classification and VTE risk was retrospectively analyzed. The risks of other clinicopathological features including pleural invasion, vascular invasion and associated surgical intervention risks were also assessed.

Results

Of the 952 patients, 100 (10.4%) cases experienced VTE events during the follow‐up period. Among those with VTE, 28 (28%) were found before surgery, 47 (47%) were found within 1 month after surgery, and 91 (91%) were found in hospital. Univariate analysis revealed that ages, extent of resection and presence of micropapillary features were predictive of VTE risk. Furthermore, multivariable analysis demonstrated that the presence of micropapillary features (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 1.560, 95% CI: 1.043–2.330) and age >60 (SHR: 2.270, 95% CI:1.491–3.470) were associated with increased risk of VTE. After one year, the probability of developing VTE was 13.1% and 8.3% in patients with micropapillary features and those without, respectively.

Conclusions

VTE is a common complication for lung adenocarcinoma patients who undergo surgery, especially during the perioperative process and hospitalization. Presence of micropapillary subtype and age are positively associated with VTE risk.

Surgical treatment for synchronous multiple primary lung cancer: Is it possible to achieve both curability and preservation of the pulmonary function?

BACKGROUND

With the advent of high-resolution chest imaging, the number of patients diagnosed with multiple primary lung cancers is increasing. For the treatment of multiple lung cancers, a surgical procedure that preserves pulmonary function while ensuring curability is required.

METHODS

The study population included 85 patients with synchronous multiple primary lung cancer who received surgical resection between January 2010 and September 2020. Patients with synchronous lung cancer within the same lobe were excluded, and only patients with ≥2 involved lobes were included. The postoperative pulmonary function was examined at 3-6 months after the surgery.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients had cancers within the ipsilateral lobe, and 18 patients had cancers in bilateral lobes. Seventy-six patients (89.4%) underwent combination surgery with limited resection (e.g., segmentectomy and wedge resection). The preoperative pulmonary functions (mean VC/%VC, mean FEV₁ /%FEV₁ , and mean %DLCO) were 3.06 L/100.2%, 2.23 L/96.1%, and 117.2%, respectively, and the postoperative pulmonary functions were 2.45 L/81.4%, 1.87 L/81.2%, and 102.6%. In each parameter, the predicted reductions of pulmonary function were almost the same as the predicted values. The 5-year survival rate was 85.0%. The 5-year survival rate according to the most advanced pathological stage was 94.9% for stage I disease, and 62.6% for stage ≥II, which was a significant difference (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment including limited resection, especially segmentectomy and wedge resection, for synchronous multiple primary lung cancer can preserve pulmonary function while ensuring curability.

Clinicopathological characteristics and longterm survival of patients with synchronous multiple primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumors (MGISTs) are specific and rare. Little is known about the impact of MGISTs on the survival of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). The diagnosis, treatment and follow-up strategies of MGISTs is not specifically described in guidelines.

AIM

To compare the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of MGISTs and solitary GISTs (SGISTs)

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with primary GISTs from March 2010 to January 2020 were included. Due to the inhomogeneous distribution of several baseline characteristics and uneven MGIST and SGIST group sizes, propensity score matching was performed according to comorbidities, body mass index, tumor location, mitotic index, sex, age and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Differences in clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis between patients with MGISTs and patients with SGISTs were compared.

RESULTS

Among the entire cohort of 983 patients, the incidence of MGISTs was 4.17%. Before matching, patients with MGISTs and those with SGISTs had disparities in body mass index, surgical approach, tumor size and mitotic index. After 1:4 ratio matching, the clinical baseline data were comparable. The 5-year progression-free survival rate was 52.17% in the MGIST group and 75.00% in the SGIST group (P = 0.031). On multivariate analysis, tumor location, tumor size, mitotic index, imatinib treatment and MGISTs (hazard ratio = 2.431, 95% confidence interval = 1.097-5.386, P = 0.029) were identified as independent prognostic factors of progression-free survival. However, overall survival was similar between the SGIST and MGIST groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with MGISTs had poorer progression-free survival than patients with SGISTs. Risk criteria and diagnostic and treatment strategies should be developed to achieve personalized precision therapy and maximize the survival benefit.

Preoperative non-invasive visual localization of synchronous multiple lung cancers using three-dimensional computed tomography lung reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Synchronous multiple primary lung cancers are becoming more common with increasing use of computed tomography for screening. Intraoperative localization and resection of ill-defined pulmonary ground-glass opacities during thoracoscopic resection is challenging. This study aimed to determine the clinical feasibility of non-invasive visual localization of these nodules by three-dimensional computed tomography lung reconstruction before sublobar resection.

METHODS

Forty-four patients with synchronous multiple primary lung cancers underwent thoracoscopic pulmonary resection at our institution between June 2017 and August 2019. Preadmission computed tomography images were downloaded and reconstructed into a three-dimensional model. Small nodules (< 15 mm) were localized non-invasively by three-dimensional computed tomography lung reconstruction before surgery. Patient demographics, nodule characteristics, procedural details, pathological data, and outcomes were obtained from the medical records.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-one pulmonary nodules from the 44 patients were scheduled for video-assisted thoracic surgery; 54 (44.6%) were pure ground-glass opacities and 57 (47.1%) were mixed ground-glass opacities. One hundred and seventeen nodules were localized preoperatively. The mean nodule diameter was 7.67 ± 3.87 mm. The mean distance from the nodule to the pleura was 14.84 ± 14.43 mm. All nodules were removed successfully by wedge resection (27 patients), lobectomy (26 patients), or segmentectomy (25 patients). Most lesions (85.1%) were malignant. Paraffin pathology revealed 12 cases of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (9.92%), 13 of adenocarcinoma in situ (10.74%), 16 of minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (13.22%), and 73 of invasive adenocarcinoma (60.33%).

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional computed tomography lung reconstruction is a feasible and alternative method of visual localization for small lung nodules before sublobar resection in some suitable patients.

Guiding Principles in the Management of Synchronous and Metachronous Primary Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Multiple lung cancers can be found simultaneously, with incidence ranging from 1% to 8%. Documentation of more than 1 pulmonary lesion can be challenging, because these solid, ground-glass, or mixed-density tumors may represent multicentric malignant disease or intrapulmonary metastases. If mediastinal nodal and distant deposits are excluded, surgery should be contemplated. After surgical treatment of lung cancer, patients should be followed closely for an undetermined period of time. Good clinical judgment is of outmost importance in deciding which individuals will benefit from those surgical interventions and which are candidates for alternate therapies. Every case should be discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting.

Second pulmonary resection for a second primary lung cancer: analysis of morbidity and survival

OBJECTIVES

Evaluating morbidity and survival of patients operated on for a second primary non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Retrospective collection of data from patients operated on for a second NSCLC between 2009 and 2018.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. At the time of second pulmonary resection, the median time between the 2 surgeries was 25 months (5-44.5 months). Patients' median age was 65 years (61-68 years). Median tumour size was 16 mm (10-22 mm). Thoracoscopy was used in 75% of cases. The resection was a pneumonectomy (n = 1), bilobectomy (n = 1), lobectomy (n = 15), segmentectomy (n = 32) or wedge resection (n = 3). The length of stay was 7 days (5-9 days). Mortality was null and morbidity was 36.5%, mainly from grade I-II complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. The median follow-up was 28 months (13-50 months). The median overall survival was 67 months (95% confidence interval 60.8-73.1 months). Survival at 5 years and specific survival were 71.1% and 67.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A second surgical resection of either synchronous or metachronous NSCLC has a morbidity that is not superior to the morbidity of the first operation. The new tumour is usually diagnosed at an early stage. An anatomical sublobar resection is most likely the best compromise. It might also be considered for the first operation when there is a suspicious synchronous lesion that may require surgery at a later stage.

Prognostic histologic subtyping of dominant tumor in resected synchronous multiple adenocarcinomas of lung

The prognostic role of histological patterns of dominant tumor (DT) and second dominant tumor (sDT) in synchronous multiple adenocarcinoma (SMADC) of lung remains unclear. SMADC patients diagnosed between 2003 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. DT and sDT were defined as two maximum diameters of consolidation among multiple tumors. Histological pattern was determined using IASLC/ATS/ERS classification system. DTs were divided into low- (lepidic), intermediate- (acinar, papillary) and high-grade (micropapillary, solid) subtypes, and sDTs into non-invasive predominant (lepidic) and invasive predominant (acinar, papillary, micropapillary, solid) subtypes. During mean 74-month follow-up among 149 nodal-negative patients having SMADC resected, recurrence was noted in 44 (29.5%), with significantly higher percentage in high-grade DT (p < 0.001). Five-year overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survivals in low-, intermediate- and high-grade DT were 96.9%, 94.3%, 63.3% (p < 0.001) and 100%, 87.2%, 30.0%, respectively (p < 0.001). Cox-regression multivariate analysis demonstrated high-grade DT as a significant predictor for DFS (Hazard ratio [HR] 5.324; 95% CI 2.570–11.462, p < 0.001) and OS (HR 3.287; 95% CI 1.323–8.168, p = 0.010). Analyzing DT and sDT together, we found no significant differences in DFS, either in intermediate- or high-grade DT plus invasive or non-invasive sDT. DT was histologically an independent risk factor of DFS and OS in completely resected nodal-negative SMADCs.

The surgical management of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma: is wedge resection effective?

Background

The aim of the study was to explore the outcomes of wedge resection on patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and further identify potential prognostic factors for these patients.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of 190 patients (99 solitary LUAD and 91 multifocal LUAD) undergone wedge resection from October 2014 to September 2015 was established. Cox proportional-hazards model was used to evaluate the significant clinical prognostic factors. Further, data on patients with multifocal adenocarcinoma after segmentectomy were retrieved and propensity score matching was used to compare the outcomes of patients with multiple pulmonary nodules (MPNs) after wedge resection and segmentectomy.

Results

The 5-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and lung cancer specific survival of the 190 patients after wedge resection were 95.5%, 87.9%, and 97.7%, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that MPN [hazard ratio (HR) 3.07; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05–8.98] and solid-dominant lesions (HR 15.87; 95% CI, 2.38–105.84) were independently associated with worse PFS. Further, propensity score matching analysis showed that MPN patients had better PFS after segmentectomy compared with wedge resection (94% vs. 80.9%, P=0.008). MPN patients were more likely to perform systematic mediastinal nodal sampling (95.6% vs. 59.3%, P<0.001) after segmentectomy compared to patients who underwent wedge resection.

Conclusions

Wedge resection is a practical option for appropriately selected early-stage LUAD where tumor size is less than 2 cm and has a consolidation-to-tumor ratio ≤0.5. However, for MPNs, wedge resection may be not reliable and alternative procedures such as segmentectomy should be used.

Clinical features and outcomes of patients with stage I multiple primary lung cancers

The number of patients with multiple primary lung cancers (MPLC) is rising. We studied the clinical features and factors related to outcomes of MPLC patients using the database of surgically resected lung cancer (LC) cases compiled by the Japanese Joint Committee of Lung Cancer Registry. From the 18 978 registered cases, 9689 patients with clinical stage I non‐small‐cell lung cancer who achieved complete resection were extracted. Tumors were defined as synchronous MPLC when multiple LC was simultaneously resected or treatment was carried out within 2 years after the initial surgery; metachronous MPLC was defined as second LC treated more than 2 years after the initial surgery. Of these cases, 579 (6.0%) were synchronous MPLC and 477 (5.0%) metachronous MPLC, with 51 overlapping cases. Female sex, nonsmoker, low consolidation‐tumor ratio (CTR), and adenocarcinoma were significantly more frequent in the synchronous MPLC group, whereas patients with metachronous MPLC had higher frequencies of male sex, smoker, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and nonadenocarcinoma. There was no significant difference in survival rate between patients with and without synchronous or metachronous MPLC. Age, gender, CTR for second LC, and histological combination of primary and second LC were prognostic indicators for both types of MPLC. Logistic regression analysis showed that female sex, history of malignant disease other than LC, and COPD were risk factors for MPLC incidence. The present findings could have major implications regarding MPLC diagnosis and identification of independent prognostic factors, and provide valuable information for postoperative management of patients with MPLC.

Surgical outcomes of ipsilateral metachronous second primary lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

The optimal surgical approach for metachronous second primary lung cancer (MSPLC), especially ipsilateral MSPLC, remains unclear. This study aimed to review postoperative complications and examine surgical outcomes based on the extent of resection after surgery for ipsilateral MSPLC.

METHODS

Clinical data from 61 consecutive patients who underwent pulmonary resection for ipsilateral MSPLC according to the Martini-Melamed criteria between January 2005 and December 2017 in 3 institutes were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Postoperative complications were identified in 12 patients (19.7%). Regarding the combination of initial and second surgery, intraoperative bleeding was significantly greater in patients with anatomic-anatomic resection than in others (P < 0.001). Operation time was significantly longer in patients with anatomic-anatomic resection than in others (P < 0.001). However, postoperative complications showed no significant differences based on the combination of surgeries. Five-year overall survival rates in patients with anatomic resection and wedge resection after second surgery were 75.8% and 75.8%, respectively (P = 0.738), and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 54.2% and 67.6%, respectively (P = 0.368). Cox multivariate analysis identified ever-smoker status (P = 0.029), poor performance status (P = 0.011) and tumour size >20 mm (P = 0.001) as independent predictors of poor overall survival, while ever-smoker status (P = 0.040) and tumour size >20 mm (P = 0.007) were considered independent predictors of poor recurrence-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding postoperative and long-term outcomes for patients with ipsilateral MSPLC, surgical intervention is safe and offers good long-term survival. Wedge resection is an acceptable provided tumours ≤2 cm and ground-glass opacity-predominant as a second surgery for early-stage ipsilateral MSPLC.

Significance of preoperative biopsy in radiological solid-dominant clinical stage I non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

The present study aimed to clarify the association between preoperative biopsy and surgical outcomes in clinical stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with different proportions of ground-glass opacity (GGO).

METHODS

Data on patients who underwent pulmonary resection for NSCLC from 2006 to 2016 were drawn from a prospective registered database and analysed retrospectively. Patient characteristics collected included tumour size, location and staging, surgical approach, consolidation-tumour ratio, histopathology and the presence or absence of preoperative biopsy to identify the independent prognostic factors of disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival. A 1:1 propensity score matching was conducted between the preoperative biopsy and reference groups based on their baseline characteristics measured before the decision for preoperative biopsy.

RESULTS

A total of 1427 patients were collected to achieve an overall 5-year DFS as 84.5% (median follow-up: 67.3 months), stratified to be 99.5% in the GGO-dominant group (n = 430) and 78.2% in the solid-dominant group (n = 997). Only 2 patients (0.5%) in the GGO-dominant group experienced tumour recurrence. For solid-dominant tumours matched with propensity scores (279 in preoperative biopsy vs 279 in reference group), the independent predictors of DFS included preoperative biopsy, sublobar resection, pathological staging and angiolymphatic invasion. Preoperative biopsy was a predictor of cancer-specific survival in univariable analysis but was not in multivariable analysis. Significant differences were also found between matched groups in those with late-delay surgery, but not in patients receiving preoperative biopsy with early-delay surgery (≤21 days).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative biopsy may worsen surgical outcomes in patients with clinical stage I, solid-dominant NSCLC.

Characteristics and prognosis of synchronous multiple primary lung cancer after surgical treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence

Background

This study aims to quantitatively summary the characteristics of synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (sMPLC), postoperative mortality, long‐term prognosis, and prognostic effects of potential clinical parameters in patients with sMPLC after surgery.

Methods

PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched to identify studies that explored the prognosis of patients with sMPLC after surgery.

Results

Fifty‐two studies with 3486 participants were included, and clinical characteristics were quantitatively summarized. The pooled proportion of sMPLC in lung cancer was 2.0% (95%CI, 1.6%–2.5%) with an increasing trend over time, and postoperative mortality was 1.4% (95%CI, 0.5%–2.7%) with a decreasing trend over time. The 5‐year survival rate was 44.9% (95%CI, 37.4%–52.6%) and all long‐term survival rates showed increasing trends over time. Poor long‐term prognosis was observed in both limited resection (HR = 1.357, 95%CI, 1.047–1.759, p = 0.0210) and pneumonectomy (HR = 2.643, 95%CI, 1.539–4.541, p = 0.0004) by comparison of anatomical resection. Other clinical parameters of age, gender, smoking status, FEV1, and lymph node metastasis significantly impacted the long‐term prognosis (all p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The proportion of sMPLC in lung cancer and 5‐year survival rate are increasing, while postoperative mortality is decreasing trend over time. Lobectomy should be preferred, while pneumonectomy should be avoided for sMPLC. Age, gender, FEV1, smoking, tumor size, surgical methods, and lymph node status are prognostic factors for sMPLC. Considering the heterogeneity and publication bias, these findings should be treated with caution.

Surgical Prognosis of Synchronous Multiple Primary Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the long-term prognosis of synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (SMPLC) patients after surgical treatment and explored prognostic factors for overall survival (OS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed regarding the surgical prognosis of SMPLC. A literature search was performed using online databases. All studies were rigorously categorized following the 8th edition of the tumor, node, metastasis classification (TNM) staging rules for multiple lung cancers: SMPLC and multifocal ground-glass/lepidic (GG/L) lung cancers. Five-year OS after surgery was pooled, and hazard ratios (HRs) for prognostic factors were synthesized. Specific subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted (PROSPERO registration CRD42019142420).

RESULTS

An analysis of 26 studies including 1788 patients was performed. The pooled 5-year OS was 45% (95% confidence interval [CI], 37-53) of true SMPLC patients and 62% (95% CI, 57-67) of patients with pathologic stage I disease, which was different from the 5-year OS of 93% (95% CI, 85-100) of patients with multifocal GG/L lung cancers. Poor prognostic factors for SMPLC were lymph node metastasis (HR = 2.36; 95% CI, 1.75-3.20; P < .001) and pneumonectomy (HR = 2.96; 95% CI, 1.36-6.45; P = .006], whereas histology (HR = 1.11; 95% CI, 0.82-1.50; P = .508), laterality (HR = 1.16; 95% CI, 0.93-1.44, P = .190), sublobar resection (HR = 1.29; 95% CI, 0.90-1.84; P = .159), and adjuvant therapy (HR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.64-1.80; P = .791) were not found to influence the outcome.

CONCLUSION

The long-term prognosis of SMPLC patients after surgery is acceptable, especially in patients with early-stage disease. Sublobar resection can be applied, although pneumonectomy should be avoided. Advanced criteria are needed to diagnose SMPLC and distinguish it from multifocal GG/L lung cancer to perform accurate surgical evaluation.

Risk Factors for The Growth of Residual Nodule in Surgical Patients with Adenocarcinoma Presenting as Multifocal Ground-glass Nodules

PURPOSE

We aim to investigate the risk factors influencing the growth of residual nodule (RN) in surgical patients with adenocarcinoma presenting as multifocal ground-glass nodules (GGNs).

METHOD

From January 2014 to June 2018, we enrolled 238 patients with multiple GGNs in a retrospective review. Patients were categorized into growth group 63 (26.5%), and non-growth group 175 (73.5%). The median follow-up time was 28.2 months (range, 6.3-73.0 months). To obtain the time of RN growth and find the risk factors for growth, data such as age, gender, history of smoking, history of malignancy, type of surgery, pathology and radiological characteristics were analyzed to use Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

The median growth time of RN was 56.0 months (95% CI, 45.0-67.0 months) in all 238 patients. Roundness (HR 4.62, 95% CI 2.20-9.68), part-solid nodule (CTR ≥ 50%) (HR 4.39, 95% CI 2.29-8.45), vascular convergence sign (HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.36-3.96) of RN, and age (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07) were independent predictors of further nodule growth. However, radiological characteristics and pathology of domain tumour (DT) cannot be used as indicators to predict RN growth.

CONCLUSIONS

RN showed an indolent growth pattern in surgical patients with multifocal GGNs. RN with a higher roundness, presence of vascular convergence sign, more solid component, and in the elder was likely to grow. However, the growth of RN showed no association with the radiological features and pathology of DT.

Multiple Primary Lung Cancers: A New Challenge in the Era of Precision Medicine

With the widespread implementation of lung cancer screening, more and more patients are being diagnosed with multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs). In the era of precision medicine, many controversies remain in differentiating MPLCs from intrapulmonary metastasis and the optimum treatment choice, especially in patients exhibiting similar histology. In this review, we summarize common diagnostic criteria and novel discrimination methods with a special emphasis on the emerging value of broad panel next-generation sequencing (NGS) for the diagnosis of MPLCs. We then discuss current advances regarding therapeutic approaches for MPLCs. Radical surgery is the main treatment modality, while stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is safe and feasible for early-stage MPLC patients with inoperable tumors. In addition, immunotherapy and targeted therapy, particularly epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, are emerging therapeutic strategies that are still in their infancy. Characteristics of both genomic profiles and tumor microenvironment are currently being evaluated but warrant further exploration to facilitate the application of targeted systematic therapies in MPLC patients.

Distinguishing multiple lung primaries from intra-pulmonary metastases and treatment implications

INTRODUCTION

The distinction between multiple primary lung cancers and intra-pulmonary metastases has been extensively investigated because of its important clinical and therapeutic implications.

AREAS COVERED

Rapidly improving imaging technology and genomic analysis has led to a finer discrimination between multiple primary lung tumors and pulmonary metastases. However, over the past few decades, standardized criteria for the identification of multiple lung tumors have been lacking. Therefore, in 2017 a multidisciplinary international committee composed of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC), American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) addressed this problem when drawing up the 8th edition of TMN stage classification, that now represents a specific consensus on this topic. The most advanced diagnostic strategies associated with screening allow for the detection of early stage synchronous lung cancers.

EXPERT OPINION

Although diagnostic confirmation relies on pathologic and clinical examination, new molecular analyses help in the discrimination between primary and secondary tumors. The treatment of multiple primary lung tumors remains, whenever possible, a local treatment based on surgical resection, providing the absence of distant or local (lymph node) metastases.

A comprehensive algorithm to distinguish between MPLC and IPM in multiple lung tumors patients

Background

Diagnosis of multiple lung nodules has become convenient and frequent due to the improvement of computed tomography (CT) scans. However, to distinguish intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM) from multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) remains challenging. Herein, for the accurate optimization of therapeutic options, we propose a comprehensive algorithm for multiple lung carcinomas based on a multidisciplinary approach, and investigate the prognosis of patients who underwent surgical resection.

Methods

Patients with multiple lung carcinomas who were treated at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from April, 2009 to December, 2017, were retrospectively identified. A comprehensive algorithm combining histologic assessment, molecular analysis, and imaging information was used to classify nodules as IPM or MPLC. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival rates, and the relevant factors were evaluated using the log-rank test or Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

The study included 576 patients with 1,295 lung tumors in total. Significant differences were observed between the clinical features of 171 patients with IPM and 405 patients with MPLC. The final classification consistency was 0.65 and 0.72 compared with the criteria of Martini and Melamed (MM) and the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), respectively. Patients with independent primary tumors had better overall survival (OS) than patients with intra-pulmonary metastasis (HR =3.99, 95% CI: 2.86–5.57; P<0.001). Nodal involvement and radiotherapy were independent prognostic factors.

Conclusions

The comprehensive algorithm was a relevant tool for classifying multifocal lung tumors as MPLC or IPM, and could help doctors with precise decision-making in routine clinical practice. Patients with multiple lesions without lymph node metastasis or without radiotherapy tended to have a better prognosis.

CT features associated with EGFR mutations and ALK positivity in patients with multiple primary lung adenocarcinomas

Background

In multiple primary lung adenocarcinomas (MPLAs), the relationship between imaging and gene mutations remains unclear. This retrospective study aimed to identify the correlation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) status with CT characteristics in MPLA patients.

Methods

Sixty-seven patients (135 lesions) with MPLAs confirmed by pathology were selected from our institution. All subjects were tested for EGFR mutations and ALK status and underwent chest CT prior to any treatment. The criteria for MPLA definitions closely adhered to the comprehensive histologic assessment (CHA).

Results

Among MPLA patients, EGFR mutations were more common in females (p = 0.002), in those who had never smoked (p = 0.010), and in those with less lymph node metastasis (p < 0.001), and the tumours typically presented with ground-glass opacity (GGO) (p = 0.003), especially mixed GGO (p < 0.001), and with air bronchograms (p = 0.012). Logistics regression analysis showed that GGO (OR = 6.550, p = 0.010) was correlated with EGFR mutation, while air bronchograms were not correlated with EGFR mutation (OR = 3.527, p = 0.060). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve yielded area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.647 and 0.712 for clinical-only or combined CT features, respectively, for prediction of EGFR mutations, and a significant difference was found between them (p = 0.0344). ALK-positive status was found most frequently in MPLA patients who were younger (p = 0.002) and had never smoked (p = 0.010). ALK positivity was associated with solid nodules or masses in MPLAs (p < 0.004) on CT scans. Logistics regression analysis showed that solid nodules (OR = 6.550, p = 0.010) were an independent factor predicting ALK positivity in MPLAs. For prediction of ALK positivity, the ROC curve yielded AUC values of 0.767 and 0.804 for clinical-only or combined CT features, respectively, but no significant difference was found between them (p = 0.2267).

Conclusion

Among MPLA patients, nonsmoking women with less lymph node metastasis and patients with lesions presenting GGO or mixed GGO and air bronchograms on CT were more likely to exhibit EGFR mutations. In nonsmoking patients, young patients with solid lesions on CT are recommended to undergo an ALK status test.

Impact of postoperative complications on outcomes of second surgery for second primary lung cancer

PURPOSE

The best surgical approach for second primary lung cancer remains a subject of debate. The purpose of this study was to review the postoperative complications after second surgery for second primary lung cancer and to investigate the outcomes based on these complications.

METHODS

The clinical data of 105 consecutive patients who underwent pulmonary resection for multiple primary lung cancers between January, 1996 and December, 2017, were reviewed according to the Martini-Melamed criteria.

RESULTS

After the second surgery, low body mass index (BMI) (< 18.5 kg/m²) (P = 0.004) and high Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (P = 0.002) were independent predictors of postoperative complications. Survival analysis revealed the 5-year overall survival rates of 74.5% and 61.4% for patients without postoperative complications and those with postoperative complications (P = 0.044), respectively, but the 5-year cancer-specific survival rates of 82.5% and 80.0% (P = 0.926), respectively. During this period, there were significantly more respiratory-related deaths of patients with complications than of those without complications (P = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

Surgical intervention is feasible and potentially effective for second primary lung cancer but may not achieve positive perioperative and long-term outcomes for patients with a low BMI or a high CCI. Treatment options should be considered carefully for these patients.

Impact of examined lymph node count on long-term survival of T1-2N0M0 double primary NSCLC patients after surgery: a SEER study

Purpose

The relationship between examined lymph nodes (ELN) and survival has been confirmed in several single early-stage malignancies. We studied the association between the ELN count and the long-term survival of T1-2N0M0 double primary non-small cell lung cancer (DP-NSCLC) patients after surgery, based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database.

Methods

A total of 948 patients were identified and their independent prognostic factors were analyzed. These factors included the ELN count, which related to overall survival (OS) and the cancer-specific survival (CSS) of synchronous (n = 426) and metachronous (n = 522) T1-2N0M0 DP-NSCLC patients after surgery.

Results

X-tile analysis indicated that the cutoff value for the sum of ELNs was 22 for both OS and CSS in the synchronous DP-NSCLC group. Patients with a sum of ELNs >22 were statistically more likely to survive than those with ≤22 ELNs. X-tile analysis revealed that the ELN count of the second lesion was related to both OS and CSS in the metachronous DP-NSCLC group. The optimal cutoff value was nine. These results were confirmed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that ELN count was highly correlated with the long-term survival of T1-2N0M0 double primary NSCLC patients after surgery.

Surgeons' preference sublobar resection for stage I NSCLC less than 3 cm

Background

This study aimed to compare survival between standard lobectomy and surgeons' preference sublobar resection among patients with stage I non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Medical records of patients undergoing pulmonary resection between 2006 and 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. Differences in disease‐free survival (DFS) and DFS‐associated factors between patients receiving lobectomy and surgeons' preference sublobar resection were analyzed after 1‐1 propensity score‐matching (n = 119 per group).

Results

In total, 1064 pathological stage I NSCLC patients were identified, including 816 (76.7%) who underwent lobectomy, 111 (10.4%) who underwent sublobar resection as a compromised procedure (medically unfit), and 137 (12.9%) who underwent surgeons' preference sublobar resection. Rates of five‐year DFS for patients undergoing lobectomy, medically unfit, and surgeons' preference sublobar resection were 88.7%, 71.0%, and 93.4%, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that radiological solid‐appearance (adjusted hazard [aHR] = 2.908, P = 0.003), PL2 invasion (aHR = 1.970, P = 0.024), and angiolymphatic invasion (aHR = 2.202, P = 0.005) were significantly associated with lower DFS after adjusting for surgeons' preference sublobar resection (aH = 1.031, P = 0.939). Subgroup analysis of all 403 solid‐dominant patients demonstrated equivalent five‐year DFS between surgeons' preference sublobar resection and lobectomy (87.7% and 84.1%, respectively, P = 0.721). Propensity‐matched analysis showed no differences in five‐year DFS in stage I NSCLC patients undergoing lobectomy or surgeons' preference sublobar resection (90.5% vs. 93.4% P = 0.510), and DFS for surgeons' preference sublobar resection remained an insignificant factor (aHR = 0.894, P = 0.834).

Conclusions

Carefully selected patients who have undergone surgeons' preference sublobar resection have comparable outcomes to those receiving lobectomy for stage I NSCLC <3 cm.

Key points

Significant findings of the study Intended sublobar resection has a good outcome. What this study adds Sublobar resection is applicable for stage I NSCLC <3 cm.

Preoperative biopsy and tumor recurrence of stage I adenocarcinoma of the lung

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether preoperative biopsy affects the outcomes of patients undergoing at least lobectomy for stage I lung adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent surgery for stage I lung adenocarcinoma between 2006 and 2013. Tumor recurrence and survival were compared between patients who underwent preoperative biopsy, including computed tomographic-guided needle biopsy and transbronchial biopsy, and those who underwent intraoperative frozen section.

RESULTS

Among 509 patients, 229 patients (44.9%) underwent preoperative biopsy and 280 patients had lung adenocarcinoma diagnosed by intraoperative frozen section (reference group). Recurrence developed in 65 (12.8%) patients within a median follow-up period of 54.4 months. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that preoperative biopsy (OR 1.97, p = 0.045), radiological solid appearance (OR 5.43, p < 0.001), and angiolymphatic invasion (OR 2.48, p = 0.010) were independent predictors of recurrence. In the overall cohort, preoperative biopsy appeared to worsen 5-year disease-free and overall survival significantly (76.6% vs. 93.0%, p < 0.001; and 83.8% vs. 94.5%, p = 0.002, respectively) compared with the reference group. After propensity matching, multivariable logistic regression still identified preoperative biopsy as an independent predictor of overall recurrence (OR 2.21, p = 0.048) after adjusting for tumor characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative biopsy might be considered a prognosticator of recurrence of stage I adenocarcinoma of the lungs in patients who undergo at least anatomic lobectomy without postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.

Multiple lung cancers including squamous cell carcinoma with strong PD-L1 expression and adenocarcinoma with EGFR exon 19 deletion: A case report

We herein report a non-smoking 81-year-old man with advanced synchronous multiple primary lung cancers (SMPLC), containing squamous cell carcinoma with strong programmed death-ligand 1 expression in the middle lobe and adenocarcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletion in the lower lobe. Programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors were administered as first-line chemotherapy; however, treatment response was poor response. There have been no reported SMPLC cases similar to this. During treatment, his non-smoking status and EGFR deletion might have been the cause of the patient's poor response to first-line PD-1 inhibitor treatment.

A Novel Algorithm to Differentiate Between Multiple Primary Lung Cancers and Intrapulmonary Metastasis in Multiple Lung Cancers With Multiple Pulmonary Sites of Involvement

INTRODUCTION

Differentiating between multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) and intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM) is critical for developing a therapeutic strategy to treat multiple lung cancers with multiple pulmonary sites of involvement.

METHODS

We retrospectively included 252 lesions (126 pairs) from 126 patients with surgically resected multiple lung adenocarcinomas. Each pair was classified as MPLC or IPM based on histopathologic findings as the reference standard. A novel algorithm was established with four sequential decision steps based on the combination of computed tomography (CT) lesion types (step 1), CT lesion morphology (step 2), difference of maximal standardized uptake values on positron-emission tomography/CT (step 3), and presence of N2/3 lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis (step 4). The diagnostic accuracy of the algorithm was analyzed. Performances of 11 observers were assessed without and with knowledge of algorithm.

RESULTS

Among 126 pairs, 90 (71.4%) were classified as MPLCs and 36 (28.6%) as IPMs. On applying the diagnostic algorithm, the overall accuracy for diagnosis of IPM among conclusive cases up to step 4 was 88.9%, and 65 and 44 pairs were correctly diagnosed based on step 1 and step 2, respectively. Specificity and positive predictive value for diagnosis of IPM increased significantly in all observers compared with reading rounds without the algorithm.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of the algorithm based on comprehensive information on clinical and imaging variables can allow differentiation between MPLCs and IPMs. When both of two suspected malignant lesions appear as solid predominant lesions without spiculation or air-bronchogram on CT, IPM should be considered.

Multiple primary lung cancer: a rising challenge

With the use of high-resolution chest imaging system and lung cancer screening program, patients with multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs) are becoming a growing population in clinical practice worldwide. The diagnostic criteria for MPLCs has been established and modified by three major lung cancer research institutes. However, due to the fact that the differential diagnosis between MPLCs and a recurrence, metastatic, or satellite lesion arising from the original lesion remains ambiguous and confusing, there is still insufficient evidence to support a uniform guideline. Newly developed molecular and genomic methods have the potential to better define the relationship among multiple lesions and bring the possibility of targeted therapy. Surgical resection remains the first choice for the treatment of MPLCs and detailed strategy should be carefully planned taking characteristics of the tumor and status of patients into consideration. For those who are intolerant to surgery, a new technology called stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is now an optional therapeutic strategy. Furthermore, multiple GGOs are unique MPLCs that need special attentions in the clinical practice.

Clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy for de novo pulmonary tumors in patients with completely resected early stage non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

Following surgery for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), de novo pulmonary tumors are common. This study aimed to assess the efficacy, patterns of failure, and toxicity of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the treatment of de novo pulmonary tumors following curative resection of early stage NSCLC.

Patients and methods

We reviewed the medical data of patients who had received definitive intent SBRT for small lung cancer at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, between June 2011 and December 2017. Patients who had experienced complete resection for prior early stage NSCLC before SBRT were identified for further analysis. Incidences of locoregional recurrence (LR) and distant metastasis (DM) were evaluated using the alternative cumulative incidence competing risk method. The probability of survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

A total of 33 patients with 36 lesions were eligible and included in this study. The median follow-up time was 32 months. Estimated incidences of LR and DM were 37.62% and 15.92%, respectively, at 1 year and 48.02% and 21.23%, respectively, at 2 years. The progression-free survival and overall survival of all patients were 62.40% and 90.30%, respectively, at 1 year and 52.00% and 69.90%, respectively, at 2 years. In all, 26 patients experienced grade 1 SBRT-related toxicity, 11 patients experienced grade 2 SBRT-related toxicity, and three patients experienced grade 3 toxicity. There were no grade 4/5 toxicities or SBRT-related deaths during the follow-up period.

Conclusion

SBRT appears to be a safe and potentially effective alternative therapeutic option for de novo pulmonary tumors following early stage NSCLC radical resection, despite impaired pulmonary reserve.

[Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital Experts Consensus on the Management of Ground-Glass Nodules Suspected as Lung Adenocarcinoma (Version 1)]

随着胸部计算机断层扫描（computed tomography, CT）检查，尤其是低剂量薄层CT筛查项目在中国的广泛开展，越来越多的无症状肺部磨玻璃结节（ground-glass nodules, GGNs）被发现。虽然国内及国际上已发布了一系列针对肺部GGNs的指南，但是这些指南的撰写者多来自呼吸、肿瘤及影像专业，可能缺乏对现代微创胸外科的充分认识，造成外科手术在肺部GGNs诊治中的作用不明确，甚至被低估；而且，肺部肿瘤相关的各学科对于早期肺癌，尤其是浸润前病变的处理也缺乏统一规范。因此，基于国内外现有文献及上海市肺科医院多年积累的经验，上海市肺科医院撰写了此诊疗共识。本共识推荐对于疑似肺腺癌的GGNs进行多学科评估，依据诊断，选择合理的处置方式。对于疑似原位腺癌，推荐进行胸部薄层CT随访，或在特定情况下进行不超过肺段切除的限制性肺切除；对于疑似微浸润腺癌，推荐进行限制性肺切除或肺叶切除；对于疑似浸润性腺癌，建议依据病灶是否含有磨玻璃成分、位置、大小、个数及患者躯体情况选择合理的手术方式；而肺多发结节的处理原则推荐为主病灶优先，兼顾次要病灶，综合选择治疗方案。

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic S8 segmentectomy and S1a subsegmentectomy for synchronous multiple primary lung cancers

With the increasing incidence of synchronous multiple primary lung cancers (SMPLC), difficulties in diagnosis and decision making for treating patients with SMPLC can result in clinical dilemmas for clinicians. To simplify the diagnostic and treatment course, the less-invasive technique of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) segmentectomy and subsegmentectomy can be selected preferentially. However, segmentectomy and subsegmentectomy are technically more sophisticated compared to lobectomy, and they involve the identification of the nodule locations, confirmation of the targeted structures and ensuring the surgical margin. Here, we describe the performance of uniportal VATS segmentectomy and subsegmentectomy technique in a patient with SMPLC in the right upper lobe with the assistance of three-dimensional (3D) navigation. We detected the intersegmental planes using infrared thoracoscopy with an intravenous injection of indocyanine green (ICG). The patient was discharged with no complication. We think that uniportal VATS segmentectomy is a feasible alternative and technically safe for treating patients with SMPLC.

Efficacy of repeated surgery is superior to that of non-surgery for recurrent/second primary lung cancer after initial operation for primary lung cancer

Background

The current study aimed to determine the oncological efficacy and surgical safety of multiple pulmonary resections (MPRs) after prior curative surgery for local regional recurrent or second primary lung cancers.

Methods

All cases of lung cancer included in our prospective database between January 2000 and July 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. The oncological efficacy endpoints for synchronous and metachronous MPR were five‐year overall survival (OS), disease‐free survival (DFS), and progression‐free survival (PFS) rates after the second surgery. The surgical safety endpoints were postoperative mortality and complications (Clavien‐Dindo classification) within 30 days.

Results

In total, 67 MPR cases were identified. There were no significant differences in the five‐year OS and DFS between the synchronous MPR group (n = 50) and the propensity score‐matched solitary major pulmonary resection group (n = 250) (5‐year OS 84.5% vs. 69.0%, log rank P = 0.112; DFS 64.4% vs. 58.0%, log rank P = 0.278). The five‐year OS and PFS of the metachronous MPR group (n = 17) were significantly better than those in the non‐surgical control group (n = 19) (5‐year OS 94.1% vs. 50.7%, log rank P = 0.005; 5‐year PFS 53.9% vs. 10.5%, log rank P = 0.020). No postoperative mortality or severe complications occurred in the MPR group.

Conclusion

The oncological efficacy of MPR is superior to the non‐surgical approach for the management of local regional recurrent or second primary lung cancer, with comparable postoperative mortality and complications.

Synchronous primary lung adenocarcinomas harboring distinct MET Exon 14 splice site mutations

When a patient is found to have multiple lung tumors, distinguishing whether they represent metastatic nodules or separate primary cancers is crucial for staging and therapy. We report the case of a 79-year-old patient with two surgically resected synchronous left upper lobe adenocarcinomas initially pathologically staged as T3 (IIB), indicating adjuvant chemotherapy should be recommended. However, the tumors appeared radiographically distinct, so next-generation sequencing was performed on each nodule. Each tumor harbored a different mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) exon 14 skipping mutation, an emerging targetable mutation, suggestive of distinct clonality. While the in frame protein deletion was the same in each tumor, the nucleotide base substitutions were different. Thus, the patient was down-staged to having two separate IA tumors, spared of adjuvant chemotherapy, and routine surveillance was recommended. This case highlights the utility of using molecular analysis in diagnosing and treating multifocal lung tumors, and the process of convergent molecular evolution toward a common oncogenic driver mutation. This is the first case of multiple synchronous lung tumors each harboring a distinct MET exon 14 splice site mutation.

The Value of Prognostic Factors for Survival in Synchronous Multifocal Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of 164 Patients

BACKGROUND

We reviewed patients treated for synchronous multifocal lung cancers (SMLCs) to analyze outcomes and evaluate valuable prognostic factors.

METHODS

From January 2010 to June 2016, 3,031 patients underwent lung cancer resection at Jinling Hospital and Suzhou Hospital affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, and 164 (5.4%) had SMLC. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for identification of independent survival predictors.

RESULTS

The overall survival and progression-free survival rates with SMLC were 72.6% and 61.0%, respectively. A statistically significant difference existed for overall survival and progression-free survival between synchronous multiple primary lung cancer and intrapulmonary metastases according to Martini criteria. There was no statistical difference among the subgroups categorized by the TNM classification. Furthermore, small tumor size showed a benefit for overall survival and progression-free survival. Patients whose tumors were 0.8 cm or smaller had a 5-year survival rate of 100%. Tumor size, lymphatic metastases, and histologic differentiation were identified by univariate and multivariate regression analysis as independent survival predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival of patients with SMLC is strongly correlated with the tumor size, differentiation, and lymphatic metastases but not with clinical TNM stage. The Martini criteria based on histologic subtyping has certain predictive value to survival. In comparison, tumor size is of greater value for prognosis. Both of the criteria above are much better than the TNM classification. The 5-year survival rate of 100% in patients with tumors sized 0.8 cm or smaller is extremely valuable for predicting survival after surgical resection.