Modified-FOLFIRINOX in metastatic pancreatic cancer: A prospective study in Chinese population

Radical Resection Combined With Intestinal Autotransplantation for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Report of 36 Consecutive Cases

OBJECTIVE

To achieve radical resection of locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and tested the safety and benefits of intestinal autotransplantation in pancreatic surgery.

BACKGROUND

PDAC has an extremely dismal prognosis. Radical resection was proved to improve the prognosis of patients with PDAC; however, the locally advanced disease had a very low resection rate currently. We explored and evaluated whether the combination of modern advances in systemic treatment and this macroinvasive surgery was feasible in clinical practice.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed as PDAC with superior mesenteric artery involvement and with or without celiac trunk involvement were included. Patients were treated with modified-FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy with or without anti-PD-1 antibodies and were applied to tumor resection combined with intestinal autotransplantation. Data on operative parameters, pathologic results, mortality, morbidity, and survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 36 consecutive cases were applied to this strategy and underwent radical resection combined with intestinal autotransplantation. Among these patients, 24 of them received the Whipple procedure, 11 patients received total pancreatectomy, and the other 1 patient received distal pancreatectomy. The median operation time was 539 minutes. Postoperative pathology showed an R0 resection rate of 94.4%, and tumor invasion of a superior mesenteric artery or superior mesenteric vein was confirmed in 32 patients. The median number of dissected lymph nodes was 43, and 25 patients were positive for lymph node metastasis. The median time of intensive care unit stay was 4 days. Two patients died within 30 days after surgery due to multiorgan failure. The severe postoperative adverse events (equal to or higher than grade 3) were observed in 12 out of 36 patients, and diarrhea, gastroparesis, and abdominal infection were the most frequent adverse events. Postoperative hospital stay was averagely of 34 days. The recurrence-free survival is 13.6 months. The median overall survival of patients after diagnosis and after surgery was 21.4 months and 14.5 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our attempt suggests the safety of this modality and may be clinically beneficial for highly selected patients with PDAC. However, the experience in multidisciplinary pancreatic cancer care and intestinal transplantation is warranted.

Sintilimab Plus Modified FOLFIRINOX in Metastatic or Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer: The Randomized Phase II CISPD3 Trial

BACKGROUND

Folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) or modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) is the first-line standard of care for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma; effective and safe treatment strategies are needed as survival remains poor. Sintilimab, a human immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody for programmed cell death-1, has shown efficacy in various cancers. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of sintilimab with mFFX for metastatic/recurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in China.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a single-center, randomized, controlled, open-label phase II study. Patients were assigned 1:1 to sintilimab + mFFX or mFFX (n = 55, each).

RESULTS

In the intention-to-treat population, median overall survivals (primary endpoint) were similar in the sintilimab + mFFX and mFFX groups: 10.9 and 10.8 months, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-1.68]. The objective response rate was higher [50.0% (95% CI 34.6-65.4%) versus 23.9% (95% CI 11.1-36.7%)] in the sintilimab + mFFX group (P < 0.05). Median (HR, 95% CI) progression-free survival and disease control rates (95% CI) were also similar at 5.9 and 5.7 months (0.93, 0.62-1.40), and 84.1% (72.8-95.3%) and 71.7%, (58.2-85.3%), respectively. Incidences of grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events were 84.9% (45/53) and 74.1% (40/54), and that of grade ≥ 3 immune-related adverse events were 5.7% (3/53) and 0 in each group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The study did not meet its primary endpoint, no clear survival benefit was observed, and the benefit of sintilimab + mFFX for advanced pancreatic cancer was not supported; however, the findings suggest that using this regimen for pancreatic cancer is feasible, has an acceptable safety profile, and leads to an objective response rate of 50%. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.Gov; NCT03977272.

Efficacy and safety of SOXIRI versus mFOLFIRINOX in advanced pancreatic cancer

Background

Modified fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan/oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) regimen (mFOLFIRINOX), comprised of fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, is the first-line standard chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The S-1/oxaliplatin/irinotecan (SOXIRI) regimen has also been studied recently under similar conditions. This study compared its efficacy and safety.

Methods

All cases of locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with the SOXIRI or mFOLFIRINOX regimen in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre from July 2012 to June 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. The data of patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria were compared between two cohorts, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, disease control rate and safety.

Results

A total of 198 patients were enrolled in the study, including 102 patients treated with SOXIRI and 96 patients treated with mFOLFIRINOX. There was no significant difference in OS [12.1 months versus 11.2 months, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.04, p = 0.81] or PFS (6.5 months versus 6.8 months, HR = 0.99, p = 0.96) between patients treated with SOXIRI and mFOLFIRINOX. In the subgroup analysis, patients with slightly elevated baseline total bilirubin (TBIL) or underweight patients before chemotherapy were more likely to have a longer OS or PFS from SOXIRI than from mFOLFIRINOX. In addition, the carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 decline was a good predictor for the efficacy and prognosis of both chemotherapy regimens. All grade adverse events were parallel in all kinds of toxicities except that anaemia was more common in the SOXIRI group than in the mFOLFIRINOX group (41.4% versus 24%, p = 0.03). The occurrence of any grade 3 to 4 toxicity was similar in the two groups.

Conclusions

For locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer patients, the SOXIRI regimen had similar efficacy and controllable safety compared with the mFOLFIRINOX regimen.

Real-world dose reduction of standard and modified FOLFIRINOX in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a systematic review, evidence-mapping, and meta-analysis

Background

FOLFIRINOX, used in metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC), is highly efficacious but also toxic. Various dose modifications for FOLFIRINOX have been introduced to reduce toxicity. However, these studies lack a unified pattern for 'planned' dose modification, and the 'actually administered' dose varied more.

Objective

To map a 10-year trend for 'planned' and 'actual' doses of FOLFIRINOX and investigate the clinical outcomes according to dose modification.

Data sources and methods

A comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted from January 2011 to September 2021. All studies for FOLFIRINOX as first-line treatment in MPC were considered. Selected studies were firstly classified according to prospective versus retrospective research, secondly standard versus modified FOLFIRINOX, and thirdly 'planned' versus 'actual' dose. For evidence-mapping for the trend of dose modification, we developed a web-based interactive bubble-plot program (www.RDI-map.com). Objective response rate (ORR) and hematologic toxicity were set as endpoints for the comparison of clinical outcomes according to dose modification.

Results

A total of 37 studies were identified for evidence-mapping (11 prospective and 26 retrospective studies). There were 12 different types of 'planned' dose modification in FOLFIRINOX ranging 75-100% oxaliplatin, 75-100% irinotecan, 0-100% 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus, and 75-133% 5-FU continuous injection. The 'actual' dose further decreased to 54-96%, 61-88%, 0-92%, and 63-98%, respectively. For the standard versus modified FOLFIRINOX, the ORR was 28.2% (95% CI: 22.5-33.9%) and 33.8% (95% CI: 30.3-37.3%), respectively (p = 0.100), and the incidence of febrile neutropenia was 11.6% (95% CI: 0-16.0%) and 5.5% (95% CI: 0-8.9%), respectively (p = 0.030).

Conclusions

RDI-map.com enables multifactorial evidence-mapping for practical FOLFIRINOX dose reduction. The pattern of dose modification was not consistent across studies, and there was a significant gap between the 'planned' and 'actual' doses. Modified FOLFIRINOX showed similar efficacy to the standard regimen with reduced incidence of febrile neutropenia.

Combination therapies for cancer: challenges and opportunities

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal cancers represent a major challenge to public health. Pancreatic cancer is the most lethal cancer among all gastrointestinal cancers. Most patients cannot meet the criteria of resection at diagnosis, indicating these patients will have dismal prognosis.

MAIN TEXT

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy helps some patients regain the opportunity of radical resection. An optimal regimen of chemotherapy is one that maximizes the anti-tumor efficacy while maintaining a relatively manageable safety profile. The development of surgical procedures further improves the outcomes of these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapies in a multidisciplinary manner that involves modified chemotherapy regimen, radical resection, and intestine auto-transplantation may provide the currently best possible care to patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Oxaliplatin plus irinotecan vs irinotecan as second-line treatment in pancreatic cancer patients: a randomized-controlled open-label Phase II study

Background

Limited second-line therapeutic options are available for metastasis pancreatic cancer (mPC). We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin plus irinotecan (IROX) in mPC patients.

Methods

This is an open-label, Phase 2, randomized study of mPC patients (aged 18-75 years) who failed when using gemcitabine plus S-1 as first-line therapy. Block randomization with a block size of four was used to randomly assign patients (1:1) between October 2015 and December 2017 to receive either IROX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² and irinotecan 160 mg/m²) or irinotecan monotherapy (irinotecan 180 mg/m²) until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events, or consent withdrawal. The primary end point was overall survival, and the secondary end points were progression-free survival, overall response rate, and adverse event rate.

Results

A total of 74 patients were enrolled in this study, including 44 males and 30 females, with an average age of 61 years. The median overall survival was 10.2 and 6.7 months (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-1.2; P = 0.20) and the median progression-free survival was 5.1 and 2.3 months (adjusted HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6; P < 0.01) in the IROX group and irinotecan group, respectively. The overall response rates were 18.4% (7/38) in the IROX group and 5.5% (2/36) in the irinotecan group (P = 0.06). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 34% (13/38) of patients in the IROX group and 19% (7/36) of patients in the irinotecan group (P = 0.15).

Conclusions

IROX had no significant survival benefit over irinotecan monotherapy in our study. However, IROX reduced the risk of disease progression by 60%, with acceptable toxicity.

Optimizing First-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Efficacy of FOLFIRINOX versus Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most lethal tumors in Europe with an overall 5-year survival rate of 5%. Since 1992, gemcitabine (Gem) has been the treatment of choice for metastatic disease with significant improvement in median overall survival (OS) compared to fluorouracil. A good performance status (PS) at diagnosis appears to be a strong predictive factor for better survival. Overall, 50% of PC are metastatic or locally advanced at diagnosis, and more than 70% of the resected patients will experience a recurrence, with a median OS ranging from 4 to 10 months (mos). FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) and Nab-paclitaxel (Nab-p) plus Gem have recently increased survival of patients with metastatic PC, over Gem. Treatment with FOLFIRINOX is generally considered more effective with respect to the doublet, with toxicity concerns, FOLFIRINOX achieves an overall response rate (ORR) of 31.6%, while for Nab-p plus Gem ORR is 23%; however, FOLFIRINOX was associated with higher rates of grade 3 and higher adverse events. Although the international guidelines indicate that both regimens can be used as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic PC, FOLFIRINOX is the most widely used; Nab-p plus Gem is more frequently used in patients with lower PS. In this review, we critically analyze these two regimens to give a pragmatic guide to treatment options.

Safety and efficacy of S-IROX (S-1, irinotecan and oxaliplatin combination therapy) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: A multicenter phase 1b dose-escalation and dose-expansion clinical trial

BACKGROUND

This phase 1b trial evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of S-1, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combination therapy (S-IROX) as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC).

METHODS

Patients aged 20-75 years with APC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were eligible to receive escalating doses of S-1 (60 or 80 mg m²·day) on days 1-7, fixed doses of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m²) biweekly, and escalating doses of irinotecan (150, 165, or 180 mg/m²) once every 2 weeks. In the dose-escalation cohort, a 3 + 3 design was used to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and explore the recommended dose (RD). A dose-expansion cohort was added to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination. This trial was registered at UMIN-CTR (UMIN000012054).

RESULTS

Approximately 47 patients were enrolled, of whom 45 were eligible for the analysis. The MTD was not determined, but the RD was determined to be dose level 1 based on a review of data from each level. Among the 45 patients, the ORR was 51.1% [95% confidence interval (CI), 35.8-66.3%]. The median progression-free survival and median overall survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.1-8.8 months) and 15.8 months (95% CI, 9.8-20.8 months), respectively. Common adverse events included neutropenia, elevated liver enzyme levels, diarrhoea, and nausea.

CONCLUSIONS

The S-IROX regimen showed promising efficacy with manageable toxicities in Japanese patients with APC. A randomised phase 2/3 trial comparing S-IROX, mFOLFIRINOX, and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel is currently ongoing (jRCTs031190009).

Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Where Do We Go?

The incidence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been on the rise in recent years; however, its clinical diagnosis and treatment remain challenging. Although surgical resection remains the only chance for long-term patient survival, the likelihood of initial resectability is no higher than 20%. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in PDAC aims to transform the proportion of inoperable PDACs into operable cases and reduce the likelihood of recurrence to improve overall survival. Ongoing phase 3 clinical trial aims to validate the role of NAT in PDAC therapy, including prolongation of survival, increased R0 resection, and a higher proportion of negative lymph nodes. Controversies surrounding the role of NAT in PDAC treatment include applicability to different stages of PDAC, chemotherapy regimens, radiation, duration of treatment, and assessment of effect. This review aims to summarize the current progress and controversies of NAT in PDAC.

Hesperadin suppresses pancreatic cancer through ATF4/GADD45A axis at nanomolar concentrations

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a fatal disease with poor survival and limited therapeutic strategies. In this study, we identified Hesperadin as a potent anti-cancer compound against PC, from a high-throughput screening of a commercial chemical library associated with cell death. Hesperadin induced potent growth inhibition in PC cell lines and patient-derived tumor organoids in a dose- and time-dependent manner, with IC50 values in the nanomolar range. Cellular studies showed that Hesperadin caused mitochondria damage in PC cells, resulting in reactive oxygen species production, ER stress and apoptotic cell death. Transcriptomic analysis using RNA-sequencing data identified GADD45A as a potential target of Hesperadin. Mechanistic studies showed that Hesperadin could increase GADD45A expression in PC cells via ATF4, leading to apoptosis. Moreover, immunohistochemical staining of 92 PC patient samples demonstrated the correlation between ATF4 and GADD45A expression. PC xenograft studies demonstrated that Hesperadin could effectively inhibit the growth of PC cells in vivo. Together, these findings suggest that Hesperadin is a novel drug candidate for PC.

FOLFIRINOX as First-line Chemotherapy in Japanese Patients Suffering from Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer (KOBE FOLFIRINOX Study)

BACKGROUND/AIM

FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin) combination chemotherapy is the gold-standard therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer. In this study, FOLFIRINOX dosages for Japanese patients were established enabling FOLFIRINOX therapy optimization for efficient use.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were treated with varying doses of FOLFIRINOX to determine the optimum dosage for highest remission outcomes with the least post-chemotherapy toxicities.

RESULTS

Patients given 180 mg of irinotecan and a 400 mg bolus of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) showed a marked difference in outcome when compared to irinotecan 180 mg given without the 5-FU bolus, with the overall response rate being 28%, a survival time of 6.4 months and progression-free survival time of 4.5 months.

CONCLUSION

The optimum dose of FOLFIRINOX was a dosage combination of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m ² , irinotecan 180 mg/m ² , l-leucovorin 400 mg/m ²  and 5-FU 2,400 mg/m ² , administered as a continuous 46-h infusion.

AGIG Chemo-Immunotherapy in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Arm, Single-Center, Phase 2 Study

Background

To date, chemotherapy remains the only effective treatment of unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. In the past few years, the interest in immunological anticancer therapy rises sharply. AGIG is a novel chemo-immunotherapy regimen that combines nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine chemotherapy with sequential recombinant interleukin-2 (IL-2) and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) therapy. We conducted a single-arm prospective phase II study to determine the efficacy and safety of the first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer with AGIG regimen.

Methods

Nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m²) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m²) were administered intravenously to all patients on days 1 and 8 triweekly, interleukin-2 (1000000U) and GM-CSF (100 µg) were administered subcutaneously on days 3-5 after chemotherapy. The primary end point was ORR by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Secondary end points included safety profile, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS). Patients’ conditions along with the efficacy and safety were assessed every two cycles.

Results

Between 11/2018 and 01/2020, sixty-four patients were enrolled. In the sixty-four evaluable patients, the disease control rate (DCR) and overall response rate (ORR) were 76.6% and 43.75%, respectively. The median follow-up time was 12.1 (range 7.1–22.4) months. The median PFS was 5.7 (range 1.63–15.8) months. The median OS was 14.2 (range 2.9–22.0) months. The most common adverse event was fever (75%). The incidence of III/IV grade neutropenia was 4.69%. In subgroup analyses, we found that eosinophil count in the blood elevated three times higher than baseline level predicted a longer survival.

Conclusions

The AGIG chemo-immunotherapy regimen has presented favorable ORR, OS, and manageable toxicities as first-line therapeutic strategy of advanced pancreatic cancer treatment. This regimen may be a novel reliable therapeutic option for patients with preserved performance status. The improvement of treatment efficiency may be related to the activation of non-specific immune response.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/. identifier NCT03768687.

Identification of 2 Chinese Primary Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Cancer Cell Lines and Their Phenotypes

OBJECTIVES

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most lethal cancers. Currently, the most commonly used PC cell lines were all derived from White individuals, and few models can be used to study in Asian populations. In China, the incidence of PC is increasing every year, highlighting the need to develop new Chinese PC cell lines for cancer research.

METHODS

A total of 203 patients diagnosed with PC, enrolled from January 2012 to December 2017 in our hospital (Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery), had received surgery. Primary PC patient tumor samples were harvested sterilely from surgery, minced, and digested in collagenase. Cells were cultured in plates precoated with l-polylysine.

RESULTS

Two primary PC cell lines, Si-Liang 187 and Si-Liang 188, were established, both of which grew as adherent monolayers and demonstrated distinguished phenotypes. Si-Liang 187 shows the typical mesenchymal pattern, whereas Si-Liang 188 shows epithelial phenotype. Moreover, they carry different genetic backgrounds according to whole exome sequencing.

CONCLUSIONS

Two new Chinese PC cell lines were established, both of which were characterized and confirmed with high tumorigenicity. They may serve as useful tools for pathogenesis research when evaluating new treatment strategies in Asian patients.

Modified FOLFIRINOX for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gallbladder cancer, a comparison with GEMOX regimen

Background

The first-line chemotherapy regimen for advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC) is gemcitabine plus platinum (GP), despite its efficacy is limited. The current investigation is a retrospective study to compare the safety and efficacy between the modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) and gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (GEMOX) as the first-line chemotherapy for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic GBC.

Methods

The data of patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic GBC, who were treated with mFOLFIRINOX or GEMOX as the first-line therapy between April 2014 and April 2018 at Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, were retrieved. This retrospective study evaluated the clinical characteristics, survival outcomes and adverse events.

Results

A total of 44 patients (n=25 in mFOLFIRINOX, n=19 in GEMOX) were included. There were no significant differences between groups in baseline characteristics. The median progression free survival (mPFS) was 5.0 months in the mFOLFIRINOX group and 2.5 months in the GEMOX group [P=0.021; hazard ratio (HR), 0.499; 95% CI, 0.266 to 0.937]. The median overall survival (mOS) was 9.5 months in the mFOLFIRINOX group and 7.0 months in the GEMOX group (P=0.019; HR, 0.471; 95% CI, 0.239 to 0.929). Disease control rate (DCR) was 76.0% in the mFOLFIRINOX group and 47.4% in the GEMOX group (P=0.051). The rate of grade 3-4 adverse events was 48% in the mFOLFIRINOX group and 36.8% in the GEMOX group (P=0.459). The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia and diarrhea were more common in the mFOLFIRINOX group, while the incidence of grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia and peripheral neuropathy were more common in the GEMOX group.

Conclusions

mFOLFIRINOX might improve the poor prognosis of unresectable locally advanced or metastatic GBC, and the results need to be further verified by prospective clinical studies.

FOLFIRINOX relative dose intensity and disease control in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Background:

Most patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) treated with FOLFIRINOX experience adverse events requiring dose reduction. We aimed to assess the association between relative dose intensity (RDI) and disease control in a European setting.

Methods:

We retrospectively included patients with advanced PA treated with three or more cycles of FOLFIRINOX between 2011 and 2018 in six French centers. We computed the cumulative single-agent RDI (csRDI) before the first reassessment for each FOLFIRINOX agent (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5FU bolus, and 5FU intravenous infusion) and the cumulative multi-drug RDI (cmRDI) of their combination. The association between RDI and disease control or objective response at first reassessment was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression models controlling for performance status, liver metastases, and center.

Results:

We included 243 patients. Median csRDIs were 81%, 79%, 75%, and 85% for oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5FU bolus, and 5FU intravenous infusion, respectively. Median cmRDI was 80%. None of the RDIs was significantly associated with disease control or objective response. Including RDI in a clinical model did not improve its ability to predict disease control; the area under the curve was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73–0.85) with RDI versus 0.78 (95% CI: 0.72–0.85) without. Similar results were observed for the objective response.

Conclusion:

Pragmatic dose adjustments of FOLFIRINOX should be made by oncologists without considering a loss of effect.

Survival and Predictive Factors of Chemotherapy With FOLFIRINOX as First-Line Therapy in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Multicentric Analysis

OBJECTIVES

The use of FOLFIRINOX (a combination of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin) is one of the therapeutic standards in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We analyzed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and their predictive factors in patients treated with FOLFIRINOX as first-line therapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective analysis included patients treated with FOLFIRINOX between 2011 and 2015. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS and PFS. The statistical comparison for survival was performed by the log-rank test. Predictive factors were estimated in multivariate analysis with the use of a Cox model.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-six patients were included (74 men, 62 women; median age, 62 years [range, 29-74 years]). The median PFS was 5.97 months (95% confidence interval, 4.4-6.63 months). The median OS was 8.93 months (95% confidence interval, 7.4-10.07 months). Prognostic factors in multivariate analysis were the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, which appeared to be a good prognostic factor. Dose intensity of oxaliplatin (≥74.48%) and dose intensity of bolus of fluorouracil (>6.9%) appeared as pejorative factors.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with FOLFIRINOX in first line, dose modifications at the onset of adverse effects and early use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor seem to be associated with a better survival.

Mechanisms of drug resistance of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma at different levels

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, and the mortality of patients with PDAC has not significantly decreased over the last few decades. Novel strategies exhibiting promising effects in preclinical or phase I/II clinical trials are often situated in an embarrassing condition owing to the disappointing results in phase III trials. The efficacy of the current therapeutic regimens is consistently compromised by the mechanisms of drug resistance at different levels, distinctly more intractable than several other solid tumours. In this review, the main mechanisms of drug resistance clinicians and investigators are dealing with during the exploitation and exploration of the anti-tumour effects of drugs in PDAC treatment are summarized. Corresponding measures to overcome these limitations are also discussed.

Downregulation of OIP5-AS1 affects proNGF-induced pancreatic cancer metastasis by inhibiting p75NTR levels

We aimed to explore the mechanism by which long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) OIP5-AS1 affects proNGF (precursor nerve growth factor)-induced pancreatic cancer metastasis by targeting the miR-186-5p/NGFR axis. Bioinformatics was used to analyse whether OIP5-AS1 targets miR-186-5p/NGFR and their expression characteristics in pancreatic cancer. OIP5-AS1 and NGFR were overexpressed in pancreatic cancer, and their levels showed a significant positive correlation. Clinical trials also demonstrated that high expression of OIP5-AS1 and NGFR and low expression of miR-186-5p played a pro-cancer role in pancreatic cancer. MiR-186-5p inhibited the migration and invasion of colon cancer cells by targeting NGFR-regulated p75NTR. OIP5-AS1 regulated the action of miR-186-5p on NGFR mRNA and p75NTR by targeting miR-186-5p. Downregulation of NGFR inhibited the expression of p75NTR protein and blocked the role of proNGF in promoting the migration and invasion of pancreatic cancer cells. Animal experiments also showed that the knockdown of miR-186-5p promoted cancer via the expression of NGFR mRNA and p75NTR protein, while the downregulation of proNGF blocked the effects. OIP5-AS1, as a ceRNA, promotes the progression of pancreatic cancer by targeting miR-186-5p/NGFR and affecting the prognosis of patients, which may be related to the action of proNGF.

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes Between Gemcitabine With Nab-Paclitaxel and Modified FOLFIRINOX for First-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic and Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer: Propensity Score Matching

OBJECTIVES

To compare the treatment outcomes of gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel (GnP) and modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX; a combination of fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) for metastatic pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with GnP or mFFX as the first-line chemotherapy between March 2014 and December 2019 in our hospital. Treatment outcomes were compared using propensity score matching to adjust for age, sex, performance status, carcinoembryonic antigen levels, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels, and disease status (metastatic or recurrent).

RESULTS

Five hundred sixty-eight patients were included (GnP/mFFX, 456/112). After propensity score matching, 218 patients were extracted. The median age was around 61 years, and the proportion of performance status 0 was approximately 90%. The median overall survival values were 14.6 and 15.5 months (P = 0.45), and the median progression-free survival was 7.4 months (P = 0.53) for GnP and mFFX, respectively. The disease control rates were higher in the GnP group (82.6% vs 67.9%, P = 0.02). In nonhematologic adverse events, grade 3/4 anorexia and diarrhea occurred significantly more frequently in the mFFX group.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel had a higher disease control rate and lower rates of severe anorexia and diarrhea in our propensity-matched population.

Adjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs gemcitabine alone for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A single center experience in China

BACKGROUND

Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (AG) has resulted in higher tumor response and survival rates for metastatic or advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) compared with gemcitabine (GEM) alone.

AIM

To examine the feasibility and safety of AG adjuvant chemotherapy of resectable PDAC.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with resected PDAC who received AG or GEM as postoperative adjuvant treatment between January 2013 and December 2016 at the Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China. The patients adopted combined nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m²) and GEM (1 g/m²) or GEM (1 g/m²) alone treatment, on days 1 and 8 every 3 wk for six cycles, unless intolerable adverse events or disease progression occurred. The disease-free survival, overall survival (OS) and adverse events of the two groups were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared with GEM, median disease-free survival (12.2 mo vs 15.8 mo, P = 0.039) and OS (20.6 mo vs 28.3 mo, P = 0.028) were significantly improved in the AG group. The 2-year OS rates were 63.3% and 43.3% in the AG and GEM groups, respectively. However, the incidence of sensory neuropathy was increased significantly in the AG than the GEM group (53.3% vs 23.3%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In our initial experience, AG significantly improved disease-free survival and OS of patients with resected PDAC. AG may be a potential option for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy of resectable PDAC.

FOLFOXIRI vs FOLFIRINOX as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

FOLFIRINOX regimen is the first-line reference chemotherapy (L1) in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (aPDAC). FOLFOXIRI, a schedule with a lower dose of irinotecan and no bolus 5-fluorouracil, has demonstrated efficacy and feasibility in colorectal cancer.

AIM

To investigate the potential clinical value of FOLFOXIRI in patients with aPDAC in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Analyses were derived from all consecutive aPDAC patients treated in L1 between January 2011 and December 2017 in two French institutions, with either FOLFOXIRI (n = 165) or FOLFIRINOX (n = 124) regimens. FOLFOXIRI consisted of irinotecan (165 mg/m²), oxaliplatin (85 mg/m²), leucovorin (200 mg/m²) and 5-fluorouracil (3200 mg/m² as a 48-h continuous infusion) every 2 wk. Ninety-six pairs of patients were selected through propensity score matching, and clinical outcomes of the two treatment regimens were compared.

RESULTS

Median overall survival was 11.1 mo in the FOLFOXIRI and 11.6 mo in the FOLFIRINOX cohorts, respectively. After propensity score matching, survival rates remained similar between the two regimens in terms of overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.22; P = 0.219) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.27; P = 0.120). The objective response rate was 37.1% in the FOLFOXIRI group vs 47.8% in the FOLFIRINOX group (P = 0.187). Grade 3/4 toxicities occurred in 28.7% of patients in the FOLFOXIRI cohort vs 19.5% in the FOLFIRINOX cohort (P = 0.079). FOLFOXIRI was associated with a higher incidence of grade 3/4 digestive adverse events. Hematopoietic growth factors were used after each chemotherapy cycle and the low hematological toxicity rates were below 5% with both regimens.

CONCLUSION

FOLFOXIRI is feasible in L1 in patients with aPDAC but does not confer any therapeutic benefit as compared with FOLFIRINOX. The low hematological toxicity rates strengthened the relevance of primary prophylaxis with hematopoietic growth factors.

FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel for treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer: Single-center cohort study

BACKGROUND

FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (Gem + nabPTX) were recently introduced for metastatic pancreatic cancer treatment. However, studies that compared these two regimens and studies in Asian populations are lacking.

AIM

To compare the treatment outcomes of FOLFIRINOX and Gem + nabPTX regimen for metastatic pancreatic cancer treatment in Korean population.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with FOLFIRINOX (n = 86) or Gem + nabPTX (n = 81) as the first-line since January 2015 were identified using the Severance Hospital Pancreatic Cancer Cohort Registry. Treatment efficacy, treatment-related adverse events and economic aspects were compared.

RESULTS

Patients in the FOLFIRINOX group were significantly younger (54 vs 65 years; P < 0.001) and had better performance statuses at diagnosis. The median overall survival (10.7 vs 12.1 mo; P = 0.157), progression-free survival (8.0 vs 8.4 mo; P = 0.134), and objective response rates (33.7% vs 46.9%; P = 0.067) were not significantly different when compared with Gem + nabPTX group. Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and gastrointestinal adverse events were more common in the FOLFIRINOX group. The drug costs of both regimens were similar.

CONCLUSION

Treatment efficacy and economic burdens were comparable between the two regimens. But, the details of adverse event were different. Gem + nabPTX regimen might be considered preferentially in certain conditions.

Role of imaging biomarkers for prognostic prediction in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive tumours. PDAC has a poor prognosis; therefore, it is necessary to perform further risk stratification. Identifying prognostic factors before treatment might help to implement suitable and personalised treatment for individuals and avoid side effects. Conventional staging systems and tumour biomarkers are fundamental to establish prognosis; however, they have obvious limitations. Novel imaging biomarkers extracted from advanced imaging techniques offer opportunities to evaluate underlying tumour physiological characteristics, such as mutational status, cellular composition, local microenvironment, tumour metabolism, and biological behaviour. Thus, imaging biomarkers might help the decision making of oncologists and surgeons. The present review discusses the functions of imaging biomarkers for prognostic prediction in patients with PDAC and their potential value for further translation in clinical practice.

A multidisciplinary expert opinion on CINV and RINV, unmet needs and practical real-life approaches

Introduction: A range of combination chemotherapy regimens are currently used in clinical practice. However, international antiemetic guidelines often only categorize the emetogenic potential of single agents rather than the emetogenicity of combination chemotherapy regimens. To manage the nausea and vomiting induced by antineoplastic combinations, guidelines suggest antiemetics that are appropriate for the component drug with the highest emetogenic potential. Furthermore, antiemetic guidelines generally do not consider the influence of other factors, including individual patient characteristics, on the emetic effects of cancer treatments. Similarly, the emetogenic potential of radiotherapy is stratified only according to the site of radiation, while other factors contributing to emetic risk are overlooked.Areas covered: An Expert Panel was convened to examine unresolved issues and summarize the current clinical research on managing nausea and vomiting associated with combination chemotherapy and radiotherapy.Expert opinion: The panel identified the incidence of nausea and vomiting induced by multi-drug combination therapies currently used to treat cancer at different anatomic sites and by radiotherapy in the presence of other risk factors. Based on these data and the clinical experience of panel members, several suggestions are made for a practical approach to prevent or manage nausea and vomiting due to chemotherapy regimens and radiation therapy.

Clinical Assessment of 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin, Nab-Paclitaxel, and Irinotecan (FOLFIRABRAX) in Untreated Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer Using UGT1A1 Genotype-Guided Dosing

PURPOSE

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin, irinotecan, and nab-paclitaxel are all active agents in gastrointestinal cancers; the combination, FOLFIRABRAX, has not been previously evaluated. UDP Glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) clears SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. UGT1A1*28 polymorphism reduces UGT1A1 enzymatic activity and predisposes to toxicity. We performed a trial to assess the safety and tolerability of FOLFIRABRAX with UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with previously untreated, advanced gastrointestinal cancers received FOLFIRABRAX with prophylactic pegfilgrastim every 14 days. UGT1A1 *1/*1, *1/*28, and *28/*28 patients received initial irinotecan doses of 180, 135, and 90 mg/m2, respectively. 5-FU 2,400 mg/m2 over 46 hours, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, and nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 were administered. Doses were deemed tolerable if the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate during cycle 1 was ≤35% in each genotype group. DLTs were monitored using a sequential procedure.

RESULTS

Fifty patients enrolled, 30 pancreatic, 9 biliary tract, 6 gastroesophageal, and 5 others. DLTs occurred in 5 of 23 (22%) *1/*1 patients, 1 of 19 (5%) *1/*28 patients, and 0 of 7 *28/*28 patients. DLTs were all grade 3: diarrhea (3 patients), nausea (2 patients), and febrile neutropenia (1 patient). The overall response rate was 31%. Response rates in pancreatic, gastroesophageal, and biliary tract cancers were 34%, 50%, and 11%, respectively. Eighteen patients (36%) received therapy for at least 24 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

FOLFIRABRAX with genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan is tolerable in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer and UGT1A1*1*1 or UGT1A1*1*28 genotypes. Too few *28/*28 patients were enrolled to provide conclusive results. Responses occurred across multiple tumor types.

The efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy in the elderly with advanced pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVES

FOLFIRINOX (FFX) or abraxane plus gemcitabine (AG)-based chemotherapy is used widely as firstline treatment for patients with pancreatic cancer. However, their use in the elderly is discouraged because of adverse events. More clinical data about the therapeutic response and tolerability to FFX or AG in elderly patents (over 70 years old) are required.

METHODS

Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (n = 203; 131 metastatic pancreatic cancer patients (MPC) and 72 locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients (LAPC)) were treated using modified-FFX (mFFX) or AG and mFFX sequentially. The patients were grouped according to their age, patients below 70 years old and patients above 70 years old. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The ORRs in the elderly and in patients below 70 were similar (30.0% versus 32.3%). The median OS and PFS were also similar between the groups (mOS 13.3 m vs 12.7 m, p = 0.729, HR 0.874 (95% CI 0.5310 to 1.438); mPFS mPFS 10.6 m vs 10.3 m, p = 0.363, HR 0.800 (95% CI 0.4954 to 1.293)). However, the elderly patients suffered a higher incidence of severe adverse events (50% vs. 28.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

These data could provide guidance for chemotherapy use in elderly patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Age did not affect treatment outcome; however, supportive treatment is very important for elderly patients receiving chemotherapy.

Prognostic factor analysis of irreversible electroporation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer - A multi-institutional clinical study in Asia

INTRODUCTION

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a modality that utilizes high electric voltage to cause cell apoptosis. IRE has been used to treat locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). However, studies of IRE via surgical approaches for LAPC are limited. This study aims to analyse the outcomes and related prognostic factors of IRE for Asian patients with LAPC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2012 to 2017, this prospective trial for using IRE through surgical approaches for LAPC was conducted in 11 medical centres in Asia. All related and treatment outcomes were analysed from a prospective database.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients were enrolled. Thirty complications occurred in thirteen (17.6%) patients without mortality. The electrode placement direction (anteroposterior vs. craniocaudal, HR = 14.2, p < 0.01) and gastrointestinal invasion (HR = 15.7, p < 0.01) were significant factors for complications. The progression-free survival (PFS) rate in one year, three years, and five years were 69.1%, 48.7%, and 28.8%, and the overall survival (OS) rate in one year, three years, and five years were 97.2%, 53%, and 31.2%. In univariate analysis, the chemotherapy regimen, local tumour recurrence, axial tumour length, tumour volume, and serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels were all significantly associated with PFS and OS. In multivariate analysis, the chemotherapy regimen was the only significant factor associated with PFS and OS. TS-1 (Tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil) group has superior survival outcome than gemcitabine group.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that combined induction chemotherapy and surgical IRE for LAPC is safe. For well-selected patients, IRE can achieve encouraging survival outcomes.

Paradigm Shifting of Systemic Chemotherapy for Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer in Japan

Systemic chemotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of pancreatic cancer, to improve the survival of patients with pancreatic cancer. Unresectable pancreatic cancer can be classified into three categories: metastatic, locally advanced, and hereditary pancreatic cancers. Furthermore, the second-line chemotherapy is required to prolong the survival. The combined regimens of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFIRINOX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GEM plus nab-PTX) have been recognized as the standard of care for advanced pancreatic cancer. However, the consensus of selection of the first-line chemotherapy still remains. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) between FOLFIRINOX and GEM plus nab-PTX are ongoing for locally advanced and metastatic disease in Japan, respectively. Hereditary pancreatic cancer, especially associated with BRCA mutations, is responsive to platinum-containing regimens and/or poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. It is becoming more important to examine the presence/absence of BRCA mutations to select the appropriate treatment strategy for individual patients. Although some S-1-based regimens have been investigated in the second-line treatment after GEM-based chemotherapy in Japan, no regime demonstrated survival benefit. Nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus FF has been established as the standard of care in the second-line treatment in a global phase III trial (NAPOLI-1). A randomized phase II trial comparing FF plus nal-IRI with FF alone was also conducted in Japan to examine the efficacy and safety of the FF plus nal-IRI in Japanese patients.

Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Secondary Prophylactic Pegylated G-CSF in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Patients Treated with mFOLFIRINOX: A Single-center Retrospective Study

Objective Although modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX, mFFX) is widely used for patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), maintenance of the standard dose intensity is often difficult due to the high incidence of neutropenic events. Pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (Peg G) is a long-lasting G-CSF agent that is applicable for prophylaxis against neutropenic complications. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical safety and efficacy of mFFX combined with secondary prophylaxis using Peg G in advanced PDAC patients. Methods Advanced PDAC patients who had received more than two cycles of mFFX were analyzed. The clinical safety and efficacy were compared between patients in the Peg G group and those in the non-Peg G group in a retrospective manner. Results Among 45 patients treated with mFFX, 28 exhibited grade 3-4 neutropenia or febrile neutropenia. Among these 28 patients, 4 who received only 1 or 2 mFFX cycles were excluded from this study. Finally, 11 patients in the Peg G group and 13 in the non-Peg G group were enrolled. The combination therapy with Peg G and mFFX markedly prolonged the progression-free survival compared with the non-Peg G group, and its effects were associated with a reduced incidence of neutropenic events as well as lower rates of dosage reduction, delayed chemotherapy due to neutropenic events and altered blood cell counts after chemotherapy. Conclusion The scheduled administration of secondary prophylactic Peg G prolonged the progression-free survival in patients treated with mFFX. The combination therapy of Peg G and mFFX may be recommended in patients who exhibit grade 3-4 neutropenic events after prior mFFX cycles.

The efficacy and safety of modified FOLFIRINOX as first-line chemotherapy for Chinese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

Background

Oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and l-leucovorin (FOLFIRINOX) has become one of the first-line treatment options for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). However, the relatively high rate of grade 3 or 4 adverse events associated with the standard dosage of FOLFIRINOX limits its widespread use in clinical practice. In this study, we were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a modified FOLFIRINOX regimen as a first-line chemotherapy for Chinese patients with metastatic PC.

Methods

Patients with histologically confirmed primary metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0–2 were recruited to receive the modified FOLFIRINOX regimen (intravenous infusion of oxaliplatin, 65 mg/m²; irinotecan, 150 mg/m²; l-leucovorin, 200 mg/m²; and 5-fluorouracil, 2400 mg/m², repeated every 2 weeks). The treatment was continued for 12 cycles unless the patient had progressive disease (PD), stable disease (SD) with symptom deterioration, unacceptable adverse events, or requested to terminate the treatment prematurely. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR).

Results

Sixty-five patients were enrolled from July 2012 to April 2017 in three institutions, and they all received at least one cycle of chemotherapy, with a median of 8 cycles (range 1–12 cycles). No complete response was observed. Twenty-one (32.3%) patients had partial responses, and 27 (41.5%) had SD. The ORR and disease control rate of the study cohort was 32.3% and 73.8%. The estimated median overall survival and progression-free survival were 11.60 (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.76–14.44) and 5.77 (95% CI 5.00–6.54) months. Major grade 3 or 4 adverse events included neutropenia (12.3%) and diarrhea (6.2%). No treatment-related death was observed.

Conclusions

Modified FOLFIRINOX was well-tolerated and might be a promising option as first-line therapy for Chinese patients with metastatic PC.

Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02028806. Registered 7 January 2014, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02028806

Modified FOLFIRINOX for unresectable locally advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer. A real-world comparison of an attenuated with a full dose in a single center experience

Purpose: Metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma has a very poor prognosis. Although irinotecan, oxaliplatin and leucovorin-modulated fluorouracil (FOLFIRINOX) significantly increases survival in advanced pancreatic cancer, compared to employing only gemcitabine (GEM), toxicities have tempered enthusiasm for its use. Methods: This study retrospectively analyses the real-world clinical practice with full and attenuated doses of FOLFIRINOX in unselected patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer, treated at an Italian general hospital. Efficacy, tolerability, and toxicity were evaluated, and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Fifty consecutive patients with advanced (13) or metastatic (37) pancreatic adenocarcinomas were treated with FOLFIRINOX at the Medical Oncology Unit, Piacenza General Hospital, North Italy. The first enrolled consecutive 18 patients (36%) of this series started the treatment with a full dose of the regimen, while the subsequent 32 (64%) consecutive patients received dose attenuation (-20% bolus fluorouracil and -25% irinotecan). In the entire group, the response rate, median OS, and median PFS were 30%, 10.1 months, and 5.6 months, respectively, with no differences in objective response in the 32 patients that received an attenuated dose compared with the 18 patients receiving a full dose of chemotherapy. However, neutropenia, anemia, fatigue, and vomiting were statistically increased in the 18 patients receiving a full dose compared with the 32 patients receiving an attenuated dose of FOLFIRINOX (p<0.05). Conclusion: This study demonstrates the efficacy and tolerability of modified FOLFIRINOX in advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Patient-tailored FOLFIRINOX as first line treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

FOLFIRINOX is one of the most effective reference regimens in the 1st line treatment of locally advanced (LA) and metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC), despite its high toxicity. We evaluated our real-life experience with "patient-tailored intent to treat FOLFIRINOX" in patients with LA or mPC compared to other reports along with the pivotal phase III trial.We analyzed data from all consecutive patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with dose-modified FOLFIRINOX in 2016 at Paul Brousse University Hospital. Irinotecan was administered whenever initial serum bilirubin was <1.5 × upper limit of normal. Oxaliplatin was stopped for severe sensory neuropathy. Initial dose reductions were made according to patient profile (eg, age, comorbidities) and later due to toxicity. The treatment was continued until surgery or disease progression. Endpoints were time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and secondary complete resection (R0R1).Thirty-seven patients with unresectable LA or mPC received patient-tailored FOLFIRINOX as 1st line chemotherapy. There were 22 male (59%) and 15 female patients (41%) aged 44 to 81 years with LA (18 patients, 49%) and mPC (19 patients, 51%). They had World Health Organization-performance status of 0 (59%) or 1 (41%). A total of 384 cycles were administered. Median dose intensities (mg/m/w) were 28.9 for oxaliplatin, 56.8 for irinotecan, and 886.2 for 5-fluorouracil. Thirty-four patients were assessed for response; ORR and disease control rates were 47% and 85%, respectively. R0R1 rate was 30%. Median TTP and OS were 9.6 and 14.6 months. LA disease was associated with significantly longer TTP and OS (P < .001).FOLFIRINOX with patient-tailored dose adaptations seems to offer better results in patients with advanced PC. This approach in the neoadjuvant setting results in a macroscopic R0R1 in 61% of patients with initially unresectable disease. It deserves prospective evaluation to further improve outcomes in the management of advanced PC.

Modified-FOLFIRINOX combined with deep regional hyperthermia in pancreatic cancer: a retrospective study in Chinese patients

BACKGROUND

FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy displays significant survival improvements in patients with pancreatic cancer. However, toxicities have hampered enthusiasm for the use of FOLFIRINOX in full dose. In order to increase the tolerability, many researchers focused on the modification of FOLFIRINOX. On the other hand, hyperthermia (HT) has been considered as an effective ancillary treatment for cancer therapy. Up to now, there is no report evaluating combining deep regional hyperthermia (DRHT) with modified-FOLFIRINOX for pancreatic cancer patients.

METHODS

In this study, we conducted a retrospective review of pancreatic cancer patients treated with the combination of new form modified-FOLFIRINOX and DRHT (BSD2000). Patients underwent chemotherapy that included low-dose irinotecan (70-130 mg/m²), oxaliplatin (65-70 mg/m²) on day 1 and 5-FU (2400 mg/m² as a 46 h continuous infusion, no bolus) or capecitabine (CAP) (1000 mg/m² twice daily on days 1-10) or tegafur, gimeracil and oteracil potassium (TS-1) (80-120 mg/d twice daily on days 1-10), 2-week schedule. Generally, DRHT treatment was performed weekly, 45 min for each time during chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The patients receiving mFOLFIRINOX as the first line chemotherapy combining with DRHT, obtained an improvement in OS and PFS, 17 months (95% CI 1.97-32.03 months) and 4 months (95% CI 0-8.29 months) respectively. Overall, this combination regimen was safe; 17.6% patients suffered from grade 3/4 toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, we conducted a retrospective study combining mFOLFIRINOX and DRHT, which was well tolerated. The efficacy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer was encouraging, but further studies would be required to prove its merit, compared with conventional treatment.

Association of Modified-FOLFIRINOX-Regimen-Based Neoadjuvant Therapy with Outcomes of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer in Chinese Population

LESSONS LEARNED

Modification of FOLFIRINOX significantly improves safety and tolerability in Chinese patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer benefit from neoadjuvant therapy and experience a much better survival than patients with upfront surgery.

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of modified-FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) regimens in Chinese patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) and to compare outcomes between patients with LAPC treated with mFOLFIRINOX-based neoadjuvant therapy (LAPC-N) and patients with LAPC who underwent upfront surgery (LAPC-S).

METHODS

Forty-one patients with LAPC-N were enrolled prospectively. Imaging features, chemotherapy response, adverse events, perioperative complications, histology, and survival were analyzed. Seventy-four patients with resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC) (from April 2012 to November 2017) and 19 patients with LAPC-S (from April 2012 to March 2014) were set as observational cohorts, and data were collected retrospectively. LAPC-N patients with adequate response underwent surgical treatment, whereas continuous chemotherapy was given to LAPC-N patients who were not deemed resectable after treatment, and the response was re-evaluated every 2 months.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients with LAPC received mFOLFIRINOX with a response rate of 37.1%. The most common severe adverse events were neutropenia and anemia. mFOLFIRINOX-based neoadjuvant therapy contributed to a remarkable decrease in CA19-9 level and tumor diameter. Fourteen LAPC-N patients underwent surgery (LAPC-N-S) after downstaging. Compared with LAPC-N-S cases, LAPC-S patients had longer operative time, more blood loss, and a higher risk of grade 5 complications. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of LAPC-N-S patients were 27.7 months and 19.3 months, respectively, which were similar to those of patients with RPC (30.0 months and 23.0 months) and much longer than those of patients with LAPC-S (8.9 months and 7.6 months), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy such as the mFOLFIRINOX regimen can be recommended for Chinese patients with LAPC after dose modification. Patients with LAPC-N who underwent surgery obtained significantly improved survival compared with patients in the observational LAPC-S cohort, who did not undergo neoadjuvant therapy.

A UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing study of modified FOLFIRINOX in previously untreated patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies

BACKGROUND

FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil [5-FU], leucovorin, irinotecan, oxaliplatin) is an effective but toxic therapy for pancreatic cancer. UGT1A1 (UDP glucuronosyltransferase 1A1) eliminates the active metabolite of irinotecan. Polymorphisms reduce UGT1A1 activity, leading to toxicity. The primary objective was to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate in cycle 1 of modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) using genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan for the most common UGT1A1 genotypes (*1/*1, *1/*28) in advanced gastrointestinal malignancies, with expansion in pancreatic and biliary tract cancers.

METHOD

5-FU (2400 mg/m² over 46 hours), leucovorin (400 mg/m² ), oxaliplatin (85 mg/m² ), and irinotecan were given every 14 days. Irinotecan doses of 180, 135, and 90 mg/m² were administered for UGT1A1 genotypes *1/*1, *1/*28, and *28/*28, respectively. Prophylactic pegfilgrastim was omitted in cycle 1 for cohort 1 (tolerability by genotype), but was given in cohort 2 (tolerability by tumor type). Doses were tolerable if the upper limit of a 2-sided 80% confidence interval for DLT rate was ≤33%.

RESULTS

In cohort 1, DLTs (most commonly febrile neutropenia, fatigue, diarrhea) occurred in 2/15 (13%), 3/16 (19%), and 4/10 (40%) patients with *1/*1, *1/*28, and *28/*28 genotypes, respectively. In cohort 2, 6/19 (32%) pancreatic and 4/19 (21%) biliary tract cancer patients experienced DLTs (most commonly fatigue, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting). In cohort 2, upper confidence limits of DLT rates exceeded 33%. Response rates were 38% in pancreatic and 21% in biliary tract cancers.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of our prespecified criteria, tolerability of UGT1A1 genotype-guided mFOLFIRINOX was not established in pancreatic and biliary tract cancers. However, this regimen was effective.

Combination of TPF regimen and cinobufotalin inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in human hypopharyngeal and laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma cells

Background

Hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma and laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma have a potential risk of metastasis and local recurrence. It is urgent to determine novel effective therapy.

Methods

UMSCC5 and FADU cells were treated with TPF regimen (a mixture comprising paclitaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil), cinobufotalin, and combination. Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8), clone formation assays, and flow cytometry were performed to investigate whether combination of cinobufotalin and TPF can exhibit synergistic effects in reducing tumor growth.

Results

CCK-8 assay and IC₅₀ analysis showed that the TPF and cinobufotalin could suppress viability of UMSCC5 and FADU cells, implying the strong antitumor effect. The synergism between TPF and cinobufotalin was further verified by the CCK-8 and clone formation assays showing the TPF- and cinobufotalin-suppressed cell proliferation synergistically. Notably, flow cytometry showed that the combination also promoted apoptosis synergistically.

Conclusion

TPF regimen combining cinobufotalin suppressed proliferation and promoted apoptosis synergistically in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma and laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma cells.

Monitoring Tumor Burden in Response to FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy Via Profiling Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Pancreatic Cancer

We aimed to explore the application of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) profiling in monitoring tumor burden in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Thirty-eight patients with advanced PDAC receiving first-line FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy were prospectively enrolled. Next-generation sequencing for a panel of 560 genes covering a wide range of cancer-related loci was performed to profile cfDNA. In total, 25 patients (65.8%) had at least one common driver gene alterations (KRAS, TP53, SMAD4, CDKN2A) detected within cfDNA. In contrast, no above tumor-related recurrent mutations were found in plasma from 13 healthy individuals. Concordant alterations in plasma cfDNA and tumor tissue DNA was confirmed in two of three patients with available tissues. Further analysis showed that mutant allele fraction (MAF) for altered loci in cfDNA correlated with tumor stage, metastatic burden, and overall survival. Serial blood samples were collected from 17 patients after chemotherapy. We found that allele fraction for specific altered loci declined in chemotherapy-responding subjects. For cases who were resistant to this therapeutic regimen, increased ctDNA MAF was observed at the time of disease progression. Meanwhile, the dynamics of total cfDNA concentration correlated with tumor burden following chemotherapy. Collectively, we provide evidence that pretreatment ctDNA level correlates with tumor burden in PDAC, and serial cfDNA analysis is a robust tool for monitoring cancer response to chemotherapy.

Retrospective comparison of the efficacy and the toxicity of standard and modified FOLFIRINOX regimens in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

FOLFIRINOX stands a major breakthrough in the management of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (MPA). Nonetheless, significant side-effects have been reported using standard FOLFIRINOX. We aimed to compare survival outcomes, response rates and toxicity of patients treated with standard or modified FOLFIRINOX in MPA.

METHODS

We included patients aged ≥18 years old, with pathologically confirmed MPA, treated with FOLFIRINOX in the first-line setting. Patients submitted to at least one cycle of full-dose FOLFIRINOX were grouped in the standard FOLFIRINOX group.

RESULTS

Patients treated with standard FOLFIRINOX were younger and had less comorbidity. We observed no differences in overall survival or in progression-free survival between the two treatment arms. The only variable independently associated with OS was log10[neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)]. Modified FOLFIRINOX was associated with a lower dose reduction rate, but a slightly increased incidence of severe toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified FOLFIRINOX presents the same activity against MPA as standard FOLFIRINOX. We found no significant differences in toxicity, possibly due to patient selection and a higher dose reduction rate in the standard FOLFIRINOX arm. NLR stood as an important prognostic marker and further research is needed to comprehend its biological meaning in pancreatic cancer.

Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer, a single institution experience

Background

Effective treatment options for advanced pancreatic cancer are finite. NAPOLI-1, a phase III randomized trial, demonstrated the efficacy of nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil/leucovorin (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV) for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer following progression on gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. There are limited additional data on the safety and efficacy of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV following FDA approval in October 2015. We examined the post-approval safety and effectiveness of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV in advanced pancreatic cancer patients receiving treatment at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted of all patients beginning treatment with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV from October 2015 through June 2017. Using the electronic medical record and institutional database, information was extracted pertaining to demographics, performance status (ECOG), prior therapies, dose, duration of treatment, adverse events, progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment response.

Results

Fifty six patients were identified. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 2.9 months and median overall survival (OS) was 5.3 months. Patients with prior disease progression on irinotecan experienced PFS and OS of 2.2 and 3.9 mo, respectively. Patients without prior irinotecan exposure experienced significantly longer PFS (4.8 mo, p = 0.02) and OS (7.7 mo, p = 0.002), as did patients who received prior irinotecan without disease progression (PFS, 5.7 mo, p = 0.04; OS, 9.0 mo, p = .04). Progression on prior irinotecan was associated with greater lines of prior advanced disease chemotherapy (2 vs 1). Dose reductions (DR) were most frequently due to fatigue (42%) and diarrhea (37%), but were not associated with worse outcomes. In fact, patients with ≥1 DR experienced longer PFS (5.4 v 2.6 mo, p = 0.035). Sequential therapy with nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine (nab-P + Gem) followed by nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV (n = 25) resulted in OS of 23.0 mo. Mutations in TP53 were associated with shorter PFS.

Conclusions

These data support the safety and efficacy of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV, reinforcing results of NAPOLI-1. Patients without disease progression on prior irinotecan fared significantly better than patients with progression, when treated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV. Sequential therapy with nab-P + Gem followed by nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV demonstrates encouraging median OS. These findings provide guidance for patients most likely to benefit from nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4605-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The benefits of modified FOLFIRINOX for advanced pancreatic cancer and its induced adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2018;8:8666. [PMID: 29875415 PMCID: PMC5989209 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26811-9]

FOLFIRINOX has been one of the first-line options for advanced pancreatic cancer, even though it induces significant adverse effects. Several institutions have begun using modified FOLFIRINOX to decrease its side effects and increase its tolerability. We systematically investigated the outcome from patients who initially received modified FOLFIRINOX as a chemotherapy regimen for advanced pancreatic cancer. We used the random-model generic inverse variance method to analyse the binary data with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis with 563 total patients. The 6-month and 1-year overall survival (OS) rates of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) were 90.9% and 76.2%. The 6-month and 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates of LAPC were 81.5% and 48.5%. The 6-month and 1-year OS rates of metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC) were 79.7% and 47.6%. The 6-month and 1-year PFS rates of MPC were 56.3% and 20.6%. The following rates were also calculated: complete response rate (CR): 2.9%; partial response rate (PR): 35.9%; stable disease rate (SD): 41.2%; overall response rate (OR): 34.6%; disease control rate (DCR): 76.7%; progressive disease: 23.1%; and grade III/IV adverse events (AEs): neutropenia 23.1%, febrile neutropenia 4.8%, thrombocytopenia 4.8%, anaemia 5.7%, fatigue 11.5%, nausea 9.1%, diarrhoea 10.1%, vomiting 5.7%, neuropathy 3.8%, and increased ALT 5.7%. In conclusion, modified FOLFIRINOX could provide comparative survival benefits with fewer adverse events compared to the conventional dosage.

Nationwide Multicenter Observational Study of FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy in 399 Patients With Unresectable or Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer in Japan

OBJECTIVES

FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin) is the standard therapy worldwide for unresectable pancreatic cancer; however, clinical data for Japanese patients are limited. Therefore, the observational study of FOLFIRINOX for patients with pancreatic cancer was conducted.

METHODS

The study included 399 patients with unresectable or recurrent pancreatic cancer, from 27 institutions in Japan, treated with FOLFIRINOX and surveyed until December 2015.

RESULTS

The median age was 63 years; in most patients, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 1 or lower. The initial dose was reduced in 270 patients (68%). The main grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (64%), anorexia (14%), and febrile neutropenia (13%). Fatal adverse events occurred in 5 patients, 4 of whom did not satisfy the main inclusion criteria of a previous Japanese phase II FOLFIRINOX study. The median overall survival and progression-free survival times were 10.8, and 4.5 months, respectively. The objective response rate was 21%, and the disease control rate was 61%. The median overall survival times were 11.1, 18.5, and 4.9 months in chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic, locally advanced, and recurrent disease, respectively.

CONCLUSION

When carefully managed, FOLFIRINOX is acceptably safe and efficacious in Japanese patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.