2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Position Statement on the Management of Ventricular Tachycardia and Fibrillation in Patients With Structural Heart Disease

Relevance of mexiletine in the era of evolving antiarrhythmic therapy of ventricular arrhythmias

Despite impressive developments in the field of ventricular arrhythmias, there is still a relevant number of patients with ventricular arrhythmias who require antiarrhythmic drug therapy and may, e.g., in otherwise drug and/or ablation refractory situations, benefit from agents known for decades, such as mexiletine. Through its capability of blocking fast sodium channels in cardiomyocytes, it has played a minor to moderate antiarrhythmic role throughout the recent decades. Nevertheless, certain patients with structural heart disease suffering from drug-refractory, i.e., mainly amiodarone refractory ventricular arrhythmias, as well as those with selected forms of congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) may nowadays still benefit from mexiletine. Here, we outline mexiletine's cellular and clinical electrophysiological properties. In addition, the application of mexiletine may be accompanied by various potential side effects, e.g., nausea and tremor, and is limited by several drug-drug interactions. Thus, we shed light on the current therapeutic role of mexiletine for therapy of ventricular arrhythmias and discuss clinically relevant aspects of its indications based on current evidence.

Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy for sustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is the primary cause of sudden cardiac death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, the strategy for VT treatment in HCM patients remains unclear. This study is aimed to compare the effectiveness of catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy for sustained VT in patients with HCM.

METHODS

A total of 28 HCM patients with sustained VT at 4 different centers between December 2012 and December 2021 were enrolled. Twelve underwent catheter ablation (ablation group) and sixteen received AAD therapy (AAD group). The primary outcome was VT recurrence during follow-up.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were comparable between two groups. After a mean follow-up of 31.4 ± 17.5 months, the primary outcome occurred in 35.7% of the ablation group and 90.6% of the AAD group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.29 [95%CI, 0.10-0.89]; P = 0.021). No differences in hospital admission due to cardiovascular cause (25.0% vs. 71.0%; P = 0.138) and cardiovascular cause-related mortality/heart transplantation (9.1% vs. 50.6%; P = 0.551) were observed. However, there was a significant reduction in the composite endpoint of VT recurrence, hospital admission due to cardiovascular cause, cardiovascular cause-related mortality, or heart transplantation in ablation group as compared to that of AAD group (42.9% vs. 93.7%; HR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.12-0.95]; P = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

In HCM patients with sustained VT, catheter ablation reduced the VT recurrence, and the composite endpoint of VT recurrence, hospital admission due to cardiovascular cause, cardiovascular cause-related mortality, or heart transplantation as compared to AAD.

Role of Nuclear Imaging in Cardiac Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a life-threatening arrhythmia common in patients with structural heart disease or nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Many VTs originate from regions of fibrotic scar tissue, where delayed electrical signals exit scar and re-enter viable myocardium. Cardiac stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a completely noninvasive alternative to catheter ablation for the treatment of recurrent or refractory ventricular tachycardia. While there is no common consensus on the ideal imaging workflow, therapy planning for cardiac SBRT often combines information from a plurality of imaging modalities including MRI, CT, electroanatomic mapping and nuclear imaging. MRI and CT provide detailed anatomic information, and late enhancement contrast imaging can indicate regions of fibrosis. Electroanatomic maps indicate regions of heterogenous conduction voltage or early activation which are indicative of arrhythmogenic tissue. Some early clinical adopters performing cardiac SBRT report the use of myocardial perfusion and viability nuclear imaging to identify regions of scar. Nuclear imaging of hibernating myocardium, inflammation and sympathetic innervation have been studied for ventricular arrhythmia prognosis and in research relating to catheter ablation of VT but have yet to be studied in their potential applications for cardiac SBRT. The integration of information from these many imaging modalities to identify a target for ablation can be challenging. Multimodality image registration and dedicated therapy planning tools may enable higher target accuracy, accelerate therapy planning workflows and improve patient outcomes. Understanding the pathophysiology of ventricular arrhythmias, and localizing the arrhythmogenic tissues, is vital for successful ablation with cardiac SBRT. Nuclear imaging provides an arsenal of imaging strategies to identify regional scar, hibernation, inflammation, and sympathetic denervation with some advantages over alternative imaging strategies.

A randomized clinical trial of catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drug therapy for suppression of ventricular tachycardia in ischemic cardiomyopathy: The VANISH2 trial

BACKGROUND

Recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with prior myocardial infarction is associated with adverse quality of life and clinical outcomes, despite the presence of implanted defibrillators (ICDs). Suppression of recurrent VT can be accomplished with antiarrhythmic drug therapy or catheter ablation. The Ventricular Tachycardia Antiarrhythmics or Ablation In Structural Heart Disease 2 (VANISH2) trial is designed to determine whether ablation is superior to antiarrhythmic drug therapy as first line therapy for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and VT.

METHODS

The VANISH2 trial enrolls patients with prior myocardial infarction and VT (with one of: ≥1 ICD shock; ≥3 episodes treated with antitachycardia pacing (ATP) and symptoms; ≥5 episodes treated with ATP regardless of symptoms; ≥3 episodes within 24 hours; or sustained VT treated with electrical cardioversion or pharmacologic conversion). Enrolled patients are classified as either sotalol-eligible, or amiodarone-eligible, and then are randomized to either catheter ablation or to that antiarrhythmic drug therapy, with randomization stratified by drug-eligibility group. Drug therapy, catheter ablation procedures and ICD programming are standardized. All patients will be followed until two years after randomization. The primary endpoint is a composite of mortality at any time, appropriate ICD shock after 14 days, VT storm after 14 days, and treated sustained VT below detection of the ICD after 14 days. The outcomes will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle using survival analysis techniques RESULTS: The results of the VANISH2 trial are intended to provide data to support clinical decisions on how to suppress VT for patients with prior myocardial infarction.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov registration NCT02830360.

Ultra-Low-Temperature Cryoablation for Ventricular Tachycardia: An Early Single-Centre Report of Acute Results

Background

Endocardial catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) may fail because of the inability to deliver transmural lesions. Ultra-low-temperature cryoablation (ULTC) uses near-critical nitrogen and can generate temperatures as low as -196 °C. We report a series of 18 patients who underwent ULTC at the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), representing the largest single-centre experience to date.

Methods

Eighteen patients with monomorphic drug-refractory VT underwent VT ablation with ULTC at our institution as part of the first-in-human CryoCure-VT trial (NCT04893317). After voltage map, the mapping catheter was replaced with the ULTC catheter, and lesions were applied over a fixed duration of time (60-180 seconds), followed by a 60-second thaw and another application at the original duration (freeze-thaw-freeze). Duration of ablation time was selected depending on the wall thickness of the left ventricle monitored with intracardiac echo to achieve tissue depths of 4.5 to 7.5 mm.

Results

Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction was 32%, mean age 71 years, 94% were male. A total of 32 sustained VTs were induced in 16 of 18 patients. A total of 177 cryoablation lesions were delivered (9.8 lesions per patient). Of the 16 patients with inducible VT, 15 (94%) were rendered noninducible postablation, and 1 was inducible only for a nonclinical VT. Complications included 1 pericardial effusion that required drainage. From 18 patients, 16 (89%) were discharged within the first 24 hours postablation.

Conclusions

ULTC is feasible and permits acute control of monomorphic VT during VT ablation procedures in drug-refractory patients.

Ventricular Tachycardia Catheter Ablation: Retrospective Analysis and Prospective Outlooks-A Comprehensive Review

Ventricular tachycardia is a potentially life-threatening arrhythmia associated with an overall high morbi-mortality, particularly in patients with structural heart disease. Despite their pivotal role in preventing sudden cardiac death, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, although a guideline-based class I recommendation, are unable to prevent arrhythmic episodes and significantly alter the quality of life by delivering recurrent therapies. From open-heart surgical ablation to the currently widely used percutaneous approach, catheter ablation is a safe and effective procedure able to target the responsible re-entry myocardial circuit from both the endocardium and the epicardium. There are four main mapping strategies, activation, entrainment, pace, and substrate mapping, each of them with their own advantages and limitations. The contemporary guideline-based recommendations for VT ablation primarily apply to patients experiencing antiarrhythmic drug ineffectiveness or those intolerant to the pharmacological treatment. Although highly effective in most cases of scar-related VTs, the traditional approach may sometimes be insufficient, especially in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathies, where circuits may be unmappable using the classic techniques. Alternative methods have been proposed, such as stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation or radiotherapy ablation, surgical ablation, needle ablation, transarterial coronary ethanol ablation, and retrograde coronary venous ethanol ablation, with promising results. Further studies are needed in order to prove the overall efficacy of these methods in comparison to standard radiofrequency delivery. Nevertheless, as the field of cardiac electrophysiology continues to evolve, it is important to acknowledge the role of artificial intelligence in both the pre-procedural planning and the intervention itself.

Lidocaine as an anti-arrhythmic drug: Are there any indications left?

Lidocaine is classified as a class Ib anti-arrhythmic that blocks voltage- and pH-dependent sodium channels. It exhibits well investigated anti-arrhythmic effects and has been the anti-arrhythmic of choice for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias for several decades. Lidocaine binds primarily to inactivated sodium channels, decreases the action potential duration, and increases the refractory period. It increases the ventricular fibrillatory threshold and can interrupt life-threatening tachycardias caused by re-entrant mechanisms, especially in ischemic tissue. Its use was pushed into the background in the era of amiodarone and modern electric device therapy. Recently, lidocaine has come back into focus for the treatment of acute sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. In this brief overview, we review the clinical pharmacology including possible side effects, the historical course, possible indications, and current Guideline recommendations for the use of lidocaine.

Early ganglion stellate blockade as part of two-step treatment algorithm suppresses electrical storm and need for intubation

BACKGROUND

For the treatment of patients with electrical storm (ES), we established a two-step algorithm comprising standard anti-arrhythmic measures and early ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion blockade (SGB). In this single-center study, we evaluated the short-term efficacy of the algorithm and tested the hypothesis that early SGB might prevent the need for intubations.

METHODS

Overall, we analyzed data for 70 ES events in 59 patients requiring SGB (mean age 67.7 ± 12.4 years, 80% males, left ventricular ejection fraction 30.0% ± 9.1%), all with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs).

RESULTS

The mean time from ES onset to SGB was 13.2 ± 12.3 hours. Percentage and mean absolute reduction in shocks at 48 hours after SGB reached 86.8% (-6.3 shocks), and anti-tachycardiac pacing (ATP) declined by 65.9% (-51.1 ATPs; all P < 0.001). Patients with the highest sustained ventricular arrhythmia (VA) burden (shocks ≥10/48 h; ATPs 10-99/48 h and ≥100/48 h) experienced the highest percentage decrease in ICD therapy (shocks -99.1%; ATPs -92.1% and -100.0%, respectively). For clinical response by defined criteria and two outcome periods (1/no sustained VA ≤48 hours post SGB, and 2/no ICD shock or <3 ATPs/day from day 3 to discharge/catheter ablation/day 8), 75.7% and 76.1% experienced complete response, respectively. Catecholamine support, no/low-dose β-blocker therapy, polymorphic/mixed-type VA, and baseline sinus rhythm versus atrial fibrillation were more frequent in patients with early arrhythmia recurrence. Temporary Horner's syndrome occurred in 67.1%, and no other adverse events were recorded. Intubation and general anesthesia during and after SGB were not needed.

CONCLUSION

The presented two-step algorithm for treating ES proved efficacious and safe. The results support implementation of early SGB in routine ES management.

Ventricular Tachycardia and ICD Therapy Burden With Catheter Ablation Versus Escalated Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation improves ventricular tachycardia (VT) event-free (time to event) survival in patients with antiarrhythmic drug (AAD)-refractory VT and previous myocardial infarction (MI). The effects of ablation on recurrent VT and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy (burden) have yet to be investigated.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare the VT and ICD therapy burden following treatment with either ablation or escalated AAD therapy among patients with VT and previous MI in the VANISH (Ventricular tachycardia AblatioN versus escalated antiarrhythmic drug therapy in ISchemic Heart disease) trial.

METHODS

The VANISH trial randomized patients with previous MI and VT despite initial AAD therapy to either escalated AAD treatment or catheter ablation. VT burden was defined as the total number of VT events treated with ≥1 appropriate ICD therapy. Appropriate ICD therapy burden was defined as the total number of appropriate shocks or antitachycardia pacing therapies (ATPs) delivered. The Anderson-Gill recurrent event model was used to compare burden between the treatment arms.

RESULTS

Of the 259 enrolled patients (median age, 69.8 years; 7.0% women), 132 patients were randomized to ablation and 129 patients were randomized to escalated AAD therapy. Over 23.4 months of follow-up, ablation-treated patients had a 40% lower shock-treated VT event burden and a 39% lower appropriate shock burden compared with patients who received escalated AAD therapy (P <0.05 for all). A reduction in VT burden, ATP-treated VT event burden, and appropriate ATP burden among ablation patients was only demonstrated in the stratum of patients with amiodarone-refractory VT (P <0.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with AAD-refractory VT and a previous MI, catheter ablation reduced shock-treated VT event burden and appropriate shock burden compared with escalated AAD therapy. There was also lower VT burden, ATP-treated VT event burden, and appropriate ATP burden among ablation-treated patients; however, the effect was limited to patients with amiodarone-refractory VT.

Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmia in Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks are associated with higher rates of mortality and reduced quality of life. In this study we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular tachycardia in patients with an ICD.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials that compared CA vs control. The primary outcomes were recurrence of ventricular arrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation) and mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves for these outcomes were digitized to obtain individual patient data, which were pooled in a 1-stage meta-analysis to determine hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Secondary outcomes included cardiac hospitalization, electrical storm, syncope, appropriate ICD therapies, appropriate ICD shocks, and inappropriate shocks. For these, study-level HRs or risk ratios were obtained and pooled in random effects meta-analyses. Subgroup analysis was performed for trials that investigated prophylactic CA (before or during ICD implantation).

RESULTS

Data on 9 studies and 1103 patients were retrieved. CA significantly reduced ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation recurrence compared with control (shared frailty HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.49-0.81; P < 0.001) but not mortality (shared frailty HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.57-1.23; P = 0.361). CA was associated with significantly lower rates of cardiac hospitalization, electrical storm, appropriate ICD therapies and shocks, but not syncope or inappropriate shocks. Subgroup analysis showed similar results for prophylactic CA except that no significant difference was observed for cardiac hospitalizations.

CONCLUSIONS

CA is associated with reduced ventricular arrhythmia recurrence, appropriate ICD therapies/shocks, electrical storm, and cardiac hospitalization, and might be effective in preventing future morbidity. Future trials are needed to support the continued benefit of these promising results, and to investigate the optimal timing of ablation.

Management of hemodynamically stable wide QRS complex tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators

Management of hemodynamically stable, incessant wide QRS complex tachycardia (WCT) in patients who already have an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is challenging. First-line treatment is performed by medical staff who have no knowledge on programmed ICD therapy settings and there is always some concern for unexpected ICD shock. In these patients, a structured approach is necessary from presentation to therapy. The present review provides a systematic approach in four distinct phases to guide any physician involved in the management of these patients: PHASE I: assessment of hemodynamic status and use of the magnet to temporarily suspend ICD therapies, especially shocks; identification of possible arrhythmia triggers; risk stratification in case of electrical storm (ES).

PHASE II

The preparation phase includes reversal of potential arrhythmia "triggers", mild patient sedation, and patient monitoring for therapy delivery. Based on resource availability and competences, the most adequate therapeutic approach is chosen. This choice depends on whether a device specialist is readily available or not. In the case of ES in a "high-risk" patient an accelerated patient management protocol is advocated, which considers urgent ventricular tachycardia transcatheter ablation with or without mechanical cardiocirculatory support.

PHASE III

Therapeutic phase is based on the use of intravenous anti-arrhythmic drugs mostly indicated in this clinical context are presented. Device interrogation is very important in this phase when sustained monomorphic VT diagnosis is confirmed, then ICD ATP algorithms, based on underlying VT cycle length, are proposed. In high-risk patients with intractable ES, intensive patient management considers MCS and transcatheter ablation.

PHASE IV

The patient is hospitalized for further diagnostics and management aimed at preventing arrhythmia recurrences.

Mapping the research trends and hot topics of ventricular arrhythmia: A bibliometric analysis from 2001 to 2020

BACKGROUND

Studies of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) have drawn much scholarly attention over the past two decades. Our study aimed to assess the current situation and detect the changing research trends of VA quantitatively and qualitatively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All the information used in our statistical and bibliometric analysis were collected and summarized from papers retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database on December 22, 2021 using certain criteria. Visual analytics were realized using CiteSpace, VOSviewer, the bibliometrix R package, and the bibliometric online analysis platform.

RESULTS

A total of 6,897 papers (6,711 original articles, 182 proceedings papers, three book chapters, and one data paper) were published in 796 journals that concentrated on the research areas of cardiovascular and critical care medicine. The most productive country and influential institution was the USA and the Mayo Clinic, respectively. Heart Rhythm (551 articles and 8,342 local citations) published the most manuscripts. The keyword co-occurrence and co-citation network of references analyses revealed that the most popular terms were ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, catheter ablation, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Further, the burst detection analysis demonstrated that topics strongly associated with clinical prognosis, such as meta-analysis, long-term outcomes, and impact, were new concerns.

CONCLUSION

Our study offers a comprehensive picture of VA research and provides profound insights into the current research status. Moreover, we show that new topics within the VA research field have focused more on prognosis and evidence-based clinical guidelines.

Evaluation of Saline-Enhanced Radiofrequency Needle-Tip Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia (SERF VT CANADA Trial)

BACKGROUND

Endocardial catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) may fail owing to the inability to deliver transmural lesions. Saline-enhanced radiofrequency (SERF) ablation uses a needle-tip catheter that is placed at varying depths into the myocardial tissue and heated saline solution is injected along with radiofrequency power (RF), creating fully transmural lesions. We report the first in-human SERF ablation for VT in Canada.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy, with recurrent monomorphic drug-refractory VT who had failed a prior catheter ablation underwent SERF ablation in 3 different centres in Canada. After a voltage map, the mapping catheter was replaced with the needle-tipped ablation catheter, which was located perpendicular to the myocardium and extended either 6 or 8 mm into the tissue. Sterile saline solution was infused at a flow rate of 10 mL/min and at 60 °C, and 20-50 W RF was used.

RESULTS

Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction was 33.3 ± 8.6%, mean age was 69.5 ± 6.4 years; 92% were male. From 43 clinical VTs induced, 42 were ablated and 266 SERF lesions were delivered (10.6 ± 4.9 per patient). Of the 42 treated clinical VTs, 41 VTs (98%) were noninducible and 24 patients (96%) had their VT eliminated. At 6 months' follow-up, 42% of patients were free from VT and there was a 73% reduction in shocks.

CONCLUSIONS

SERF ablation is feasible and permits control of symptomatic monomorphic VT in drug-refractory patients with a prior failed ablation.

Clinical electrophysiology of the aging heart

INTRODUCTION

Advancements in medical and consumer-grade technologies have made it easier than ever to monitor a patient's heart rhythm and to diagnose arrhythmias. Octogenarians with symptomatic arrhythmias have unique management challenges due to their frailty, complex drug interactions, cognitive impairment, and competing comorbidities. The management decisions are further complicated by the lack of randomized evidence to guide treatment.

AREAS COVERED

A comprehensive literature review was undertaken to outline various tachyarrhythmias and bradyarrhythmias and their management, the role of cardiac implantable electronic devices, cardiac ablations, and specific geriatric arrhythmia considerations as recommended in international guidelines.

EXPERT OPINION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is arguably the most important arrhythmia in the elderly and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis of AF, potentially with smart devices (wearables), has the potential to reduce the incidence of stroke, systemic emboli, and the risk of dementia. Bradyarrhythmias have a high incidence in the elderly as well, often requiring implantation of a permanent pacemaker. Leadless pacemakers implanted directly into the right ventricle are great options for gaining traction in elderly patients.

Effect of Time to Treatment With Antiarrhythmic Drugs on Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Shock-Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background

The effects of amiodarone and lidocaine on the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in relation to time to treatment in patients with out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest is not known. We conducted a post hoc analysis of the ROC ALPS (Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Amiodarone, Lidocaine, Placebo) randomized controlled trial examining the association of time to treatment (drug or placebo) with ROSC at hospital arrival.

Methods and Results

In the trial, adults with nontraumatic out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest with initial refractory ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia after at least 1 defibrillation were randomly assigned to receive amiodarone, lidocaine, or placebo. We used logistic regression to examine the association of time to treatment (911 call to study drug administration) with ROSC. An interaction term between treatment and time to treatment was included to determine the potential effect of time on treatment effects. Overall, 1112 (36.7%) patients had ROSC at hospital arrival (350 in the amiodarone arm, 396 in the lidocaine arm, and 366 in the placebo arm). The proportion of patients who had ROSC decreased as time to drug administration increased, in patients treated with amiodarone (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.90–0.94 per minute increase), lidocaine (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93–0.96), and placebo (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93–0.96). With shorter times to drug administration, the proportion with ROSC was higher in amiodarone versus placebo recipients.

Conclusions

The probability of ROSC decreased as time to drug administration increased. The effect of amiodarone but not lidocaine to restore ROSC declined with longer times to drug administration, potentially attributable to its adverse hemodynamic effects.

Ventricular tachycardia characteristics and outcomes with catheter ablation vs. antiarrhythmic therapy: insights from the VANISH trial

AIMS

Catheter ablation is superior to escalated antiarrhythmic drugs among patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) and prior myocardial infarction (MI). However, it is uncertain whether clinical VT characteristics, should influence choice of therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether presentation with electrical storm and the clinical VT cycle length predicted response to ablation vs. escalated antiarrhythmic therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All patients enrolled in the Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation vs. Escalated Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Ischaemic Heart Disease (VANISH) trial were included. The association between VT cycle length and presentation with electrical storm and the primary outcome of death, subsequent VT storm or appropriate ICD shock was evaluated. Among the study population of 259 patients, escalated antiarrhythmic drug therapy had worse outcomes for those presenting with a VT cycle length >400 ms [<150 b.p.m., 89/259, hazard ratio (HR) 1.7 (1.02-3.13)]. This effect was more pronounced among those taking amiodarone at baseline [HR of 2.22 (1.19-4.16)]. Presentation with VT storm (32/259) did not affect the primary outcome between groups. However, those presenting with VT storm on amiodarone had a trend towards worse outcomes with escalated antiarrhythmic therapy [HR 4.31 (0.55-33.93)].

CONCLUSION

The VT cycle length can influence response to either ablation or escalated drug therapy in patients with VT and prior MI. Those with slow VT had improved outcomes with ablation. Patients presenting with electrical storm demonstrated similar outcomes to the overall trial population, with a trend to benefit of catheter ablation, particularly in those on amiodarone.

Comparative effectiveness of ventricular tachycardia ablation vs. escalated antiarrhythmic drug therapy by location of myocardial infarction: a sub-study of the VANISH trial

AIMS

Complexity of the ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate and the size and thickness of infarction area border zones differ based on location of myocardial infarctions (MIs). These differences may translate into heterogeneity in the effectiveness of treatments. This study aims to examine the influence of infarct location on the effectiveness of VT ablation in comparison with escalated pharmacological therapy in patients with prior MI and antiarrhythmic drug (AAD)-refractory VT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

VANISH trial participants were categorized based on the presence or absence of an inferior MI scar. Inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox models were calculated for each subgroup. Of 259 randomized patients (median age 69.8 years, 7.0% women), 135 had an inferior MI and 124 had a non-inferior MI. Among patients with an inferior MI, no statistically significant difference in the composite primary outcome of all-cause mortality, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock, and VT storm was detected between treatment arms [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-1.20]. In contrast, patients with non-inferior MIs had a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of the primary outcome with ablation (aHR 0.48, 95% CI 0.27-0.86). In a sensitivity analysis of anterior MI patients (n = 83), a trend towards a reduction in the primary outcome with ablation was detected (aHR 0.50, 95% CI 0.23-1.09).

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of VT ablation versus escalated AADs varies based on the location of the MI. Patients with MI scars located only in non-inferior regions of the ventricles derive greater benefit from VT ablation in comparison to escalation of AADs in reducing VT-related events.

Newer Methods for VT Ablation and When to Use Them

Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation has long been an important therapy for ventricular tachycardia and frequent symptomatic premature ventricular beats and nonsustained arrhythmias when antiarrhythmic drugs fail to suppress the arrhythmias. It is increasingly used in preference to antiarrhythmic drugs, sparing the patient drug adverse effects. Ablation success varies with the underlying heart disease and type of arrhythmia, being very effective for patients without structural heart disease, less in structural heart disease. Failure occurs when a target for ablation cannot be identified, or ablation lesions fail to reach and abolish the arrhythmia substrate that may be extensive, intramural or subepicardial in location. Approaches to improving ablation lesion creation are modifications to RF ablation and emerging investigational techniques. Easily implemented modifications to RF methods include manipulating the size and location of the cutaneous dispersive electrode, increasing RF delivery duration, and use of lower tonicity catheter irrigation (usually 0.45% saline). When catheters can be placed on either side of culprit substrate RF can be delivered in a bipolar or simultaneous unipolar configuration that can be successful. Catheters with extendable/retractable irrigated needles for RF delivery are under investigation in clinical trials. Cryoablation is potentially useful in specific situations when maintaining contact is difficult. Transvascular ethanol ablation and stereotactic radioablation have both shown promise for arrhythmias that fail other ablation strategies. Although substantial clinical progress has been achieved, further improvement is clearly needed. With ability to increase ablation lesion size, continued careful evaluation of safety, which has been excellent for standard RF ablation, remains important.

Electrical storm: Prognosis and management

Electrical storm is present when a cluster of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) occurs within a short time frame. The most widely accepted definition is 3 or more episodes of VA within a 24-h period, although prognostic risk begins to rise when 2 or more events occur within 3months. Electrical storm often presents as a medical emergency in the form of recurrent implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) shocks, recurrent syncope in patients with no ICD or low cardiac output symptoms. Management often requires a multimodality approach including ICD management, pharmacologic therapy, catheter ablation and modulations of the autonomic nervous system. In this article, we review the definition, prognosis and management of electrical storm.

Management of ventricular tachycardia in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disease with 2 different phases (inflammation and scar). In the current era of targeted use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and modern heart failure therapy, recent data indicate the prognosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is much improved, and hence more patients are presenting with recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT). This review highlights our current understanding of the pathophysiology and management of ventricular arrhythmias in CS with the major focus on indications, techniques, and outcomes of ablation. It is likely macroreentry phenomena around areas of fibrosis is the most frequent mechanism of ventricular arrhythmia in CS. It is also possible that inflammation may play a role in initiating reentry with ventricular ectopy in CS patients, or by slowing conduction in diseased tissue. The best available data would suggest annual rates of VT of perhaps 1%-2% and 10%-15% in patients with initially clinically silent and clinically manifest disease, respectively. Current guidelines recommend a stepwise approach to VT management. The first suggested step is treatment with immunosuppression if there is evidence of active inflammation. Antiarrhythmic medications are often started at the same time, with catheter ablation considered if VT cannot be controlled. Activation and entrainment mapping and ablation are favored in the setting of hemodynamically tolerated VT. Substrate ablation targets areas of abnormal electrogram and favorable pace mapping using linear and/or cluster lesion sets with the goal of abolishing critical isthmuses and/or blocking VT exit sites. Epicardial mapping ablation is required in 20%-35% of cases. In general, more morphologies of VT are induced (often 3-4) and subsequent outcomes (recurrence rates 40%-50%) are less favorable than in other forms of nonischemic cardiomyopathy. The prognosis of CS is much improved and, as a result, more patients are developing VT during follow-up. Likely principally related to the complex disease substrate, VT ablation is technically challenging, with moderate outcomes, and much remains to be learned.

Electrical storm after correction of an uncomplicated congenital atrial septal defect in an adult: a case report

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of published literature describing electrical storm after the correction of uncomplicated atrial septal defect (ASD) in an adult.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a 49-year-old woman with a congenital ASD combined with mild tricuspid regurgitation who denied any history of arrhythmia or other medical history. She suffered from electrical storm (≥ 3 episodes of ventricular tachycardias or ventricular fibrillations) in the early stage after ASD repair with combined tricuspid valvuloplasty. During electrical storm, her electrolytes were within normal ranges and no ischemic electrocardiographic changes were detected, which suggested that retained air embolism or acute coronary thrombosis were unlikely. Additionally, echocardiographic findings and her central venous pressure (5-8 mmHg during the interval between attacks) failed to support the diagnosis of pericardial tamponade. After a thorough discussion, the surgeons conducted an emergent re-exploration and repeated closure of the ASD with combined DeVega's annuloplasty. Eventually, the patient recovered uneventfully, without reoccurring arrhythmias during follow-up. Although we fail to determine the definite cause, we speculate that the causes probably are iatrogenic injury of the conduction system due to a rare anatomic variation, poor intraoperative protection, latent coronary distortion during tricuspid valvuloplasty, or idiopathic or secondary abnormalities of the conduction system.

CONCLUSIONS

For most surgeons, performing re-exploration without a known etiology is a difficult decision to make. This case illustrates that re-exploration could be an option when electrical storm occurs in the early stage postoperatively. Nevertheless, surgeons should assess the benefit-risk ratio when taking this unconventional measure.