Associations of sarcopenic obesity versus sarcopenia alone with functionality

Sarcopenic obesity in older adults: a clinical overview

Sarcopenic obesity is characterized by a concurrent decline in muscle mass and function, along with increased adipose tissue. Sarcopenic obesity is a growing concern in older adults owing to significant health consequences, including implications for mortality, comorbidities and risk of developing geriatric syndromes. A 2022 consensus statement established a new definition and diagnostic criteria for sarcopenic obesity. The pathophysiology of this condition involves a complex interplay between muscle, adipose tissue, hormonal changes, inflammation, oxidative stress and lifestyle factors, among others. Sarcopenic obesity is treated with a range of management approaches, such as lifestyle interventions, exercise, nutrition and medical therapies. Emerging therapies that were developed for treating other conditions may be relevant to sarcopenic obesity, including novel pharmacological agents and personalized approaches such as precision medicine. In this Review, we synthesize the current knowledge of the clinical importance of sarcopenic obesity, its assessment and diagnosis, along with current and emerging management strategies.

Body composition assessment for sarcopenic obesity and 3-year mortality in older adults: A comparison study

BACKGROUND

There is no universally accepted definition of sarcopenic obesity (SO), and its prevalence is ambiguous. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of SO in older adults based on different definitions and determine which predicts all-cause mortality.

METHODS

This prospective longitudinal follow-up study included outpatients aged ≥60 years. SO was defined by sarcopenia definition based on the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2) criteria plus obesity. Three different methods were used to define obesity. Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2, waist circumference (WC) ≥ 102 cm for men and ≥88.0 cm for women, and body fat percentage (BF%) ≥ 37.3% for men and ≥51.1% for women. Different definitions of SO and their mortality predictions were compared.

RESULTS

The median age of the 584 patients in the study was 70.0 (interquartile range, 66.0-76.0) years. The prevalence of sarcopenia was 38.5% (47.5% in men and 35.7% in women). The prevalence of SO based on BMI, WC, and BF% was 15.3%, 16.4%, and 10.5%, respectively. The mortality rate was 6.7%. SO based on BMI (odds ratio [OR], 2.73; 95% CI, 1.12-17.9; P = 0.024) and BF% (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.19-3.02; P = 0.007) were significantly associated with 3-year mortality after adjusting for the confounding variables of age, sex, and number of comorbidities. SO based on WC was not associated with mortality (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.07-1.27; P = 0.104).

CONCLUSION

The use of BF% and BMI for defining SO is appropriate in outpatient older adults.

Sarcopenic obesity and the impact on bone health

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Sarcopenic obesity is a newly identified pathological entity defined by an increase in body fat mass with an associated sarcopenia, characterized by loss of muscle mass, strength, and function. Recently, the concomitant presence of skeletal alteration with sarcopenic obesity has been described leading to a new clinical entity defined osteosarcopenic obesity (OSO). Many studies have tried to unravel the metabolic complex mechanism leading to this clinical entity in order to understand the pathophysiology of this complex condition with the aim of posing an early diagnosis to improve the therapeutic approaches. The purpose of this narrative review is to highlight and revise recent studies on this issue.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent research in the field of OSO has highlighted the role of nutrition and physical activity in the development and management of these conditions. While molecular and cellular pathways remain partially understood, there is a growing focus on lifestyle interventions as key factors in reducing the impact of OSO. These studies emphasize the need for early diagnosis and appropriate therapeutic strategies to improve quality of life and decrease morbidity and mortality associated with OSO.

SUMMARY

Although the pathophysiological pathways underlying OSO are not fully understood, the clinical implications underscore the need for expanded research in this field. This research is crucial for enabling early diagnosis and implementing effective therapeutic interventions, with the goal of reducing morbidity and mortality and enhancing quality of life.

Mortality risk relationship using standard categorized BMI or knee-height based BMI - does the overweight/lower mortality paradox hold true?

BACKGROUND

The body mass index (BMI) is prone to misclassification of obesity due to age-related height loss and resulting measurement errors. Knee-height based BMI (KH-BMI) has not been previously studied in relation to mortality risk in older adults.

AIM

To evaluate the age- and sex-specific mortality risk relationship using classic BMI and knee height predicted BMI (KH-BMI) overweight and obesity in a 15-year follow-up study including older Swedish adults aged 60-93 years.

METHODS

A 15-year follow-up study among 2,786 individuals aged ≥ 60 years. Height, weight and KH were measured. KH-predicted height was estimated using formulated gender-specific equations. Classic BMI and KH-BMI (kg/m2) were calculated. Mortality data was obtained from the Swedish death registry. Questionnaires were used to collect data on obesity-related lifestyle factors and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Cox regression revealed that using the classic BMI, when comparing with the normal/underweight reference group, there was a mortality risk among overweight men (HR = 0.67, 0.52-0.87), overweight women (HR = 0.79, 0.65-0.97), and obese men (HR = 0.60, 0.41-0.89) aged ≥ 80 years old. Using the KH-BMI, only overweight men and overweight women aged ≥ 80 years had a lower mortality risk, men (HR = 0.71, 0.55-0.92); women (HR = 0.77, 0.62-0.95) after adjusting for obesity-related lifestyle factors and comorbidities.

DISCUSSION

There is evidence that obesity is overestimated by the BMI, in comparison with the KH-BMI classification. In terms of mortality risk and after adjusting for height, there remains a paradoxical protective association between overweight and mortality.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of classic BMI or KH-BMI estimation, overweight men and women aged ≥ 80 years had a lower mortality risk compared to normal/underweight men and women ≥ 80 years.

Sarcopenia and Sarcopenic Obesity and Mortality Among Older People

Importance

Sarcopenia and obesity are 2 global concerns associated with adverse health outcomes in older people. Evidence on the population-based prevalence of the combination of sarcopenia with obesity (sarcopenic obesity [SO]) and its association with mortality are still limited.

Objective

To investigate the prevalence of sarcopenia and SO and their association with all-cause mortality.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This large-scale, population-based cohort study assessed participants from the Rotterdam Study from March 1, 2009, to June 1, 2014. Associations of sarcopenia and SO with all-cause mortality were studied using Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox proportional hazards regression, and accelerated failure time models fitted for sex, age, and body mass index (BMI). Data analysis was performed from January 1 to April 1, 2023.

Exposures

The prevalence of sarcopenia and SO, measured based on handgrip strength and body composition (BC) (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) as recommended by current consensus criteria, with probable sarcopenia defined as having low handgrip strength and confirmed sarcopenia and SO defined as altered BC (high fat percentage and/or low appendicular skeletal muscle index) in addition to low handgrip strength.

Main Outcome and Measure

The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, collected using linked mortality data from general practitioners and the central municipal records, until October 2022.

Results

In the total population of 5888 participants (mean [SD] age, 69.5 [9.1] years; mean [SD] BMI, 27.5 [4.3]; 3343 [56.8%] female), 653 (11.1%; 95% CI, 10.3%-11.9%) had probable sarcopenia and 127 (2.2%; 95% CI, 1.8%-2.6%) had confirmed sarcopenia. Sarcopenic obesity with 1 altered component of BC was present in 295 participants (5.0%; 95% CI, 4.4%-5.6%) and with 2 altered components in 44 participants (0.8%; 95% CI, 0.6%-1.0%). An increased risk of all-cause mortality was observed in participants with probable sarcopenia (hazard ratio [HR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.14-1.47) and confirmed sarcopenia (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.53-2.43). Participants with SO plus 1 altered component of BC (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.60-2.33]) or 2 altered components of BC (HR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.97-4.11) had a higher risk of mortality than those without SO. Similar results for SO were obtained for participants with a BMI of 27 or greater.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, sarcopenia and SO were found to be prevalent phenotypes in older people and were associated with all-cause mortality. Additional alterations of BC amplified this risk independently of age, sex, and BMI. The use of low muscle strength as a first step of both diagnoses may allow for early identification of individuals at risk for premature mortality.

Assessment of the performance of the body mass index in diagnosing obesity in community-dwelling older adults in Latin American and Caribbean countries

BACKGROUND

The body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 is the universally accepted cut-off point for defining obesity; however, its accuracy in classifying obesity in older adults is poorly understood.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the performance of the BMI cut-off point ≥30 kg/m2 in classifying obesity in older adults, using the fat mass index (FMI) and fat mass percentage (FM%) as reference criteria; and to establish region- and sex-specific BMI-based cut-off points to classify obesity in older adults.

METHODS

The present study is a secondary analysis derived from a cross-sectional project that included a sample of 1463 older adults from ten Latin American and Caribbean countries. Volunteers underwent total body water measurements using the deuterium dilution technique to determine FMI and FM%. Accuracy of the BMI and derived cutoff points was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The BMI cut-off point ≥30 kg/m2 had low sensitivity for classifying obesity in these older adults compared to the FMI and FM%. The AUC values for the optimal BMI-derived cut-off points showed an acceptable-to-outstanding discriminatory capacity in diagnosing obesity defined by the FMI. There was also a better balance between sensitivity and specificity than with the values obtained by a BMI ≥30 kg/m2 in older subjects in both regions.

CONCLUSION

The BMI cut-off point ≥30 kg/m2 had poor sensitivity for accurately diagnosing obesity in older adults from two regions. The region- and sex-specific BMI-derived cut-off points for defining obesity using the FMI are more accurate in classifying obesity in older men and women subjects from both regions.

Associations of EWGSOP1 and EWGSOP2 probable sarcopenia definitions with mortality: A comparative study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Sarcopenia is a well-defined geriatric syndrome and a major cause of disability and mortality. We investigate the associations of alternative sarcopenia definitions with mortality in community-dwelling older adults.

METHODS

Sarcopenia was defined based on the EWGSOP1 and EWGSOP2 probable sarcopenia criteria, with standard handgrip strength (HGS) cut-offs of 30/20 kg for an EWGSOP1 definition and 27/16 kg for an EWGSOP2 definition, or alternatively, population-specific cut-offs of 35/20 kg for a EWGSOP2 definition. The 5-year mortality rate was assessed in the accessible cases.

RESULTS

The prevalence of sarcopenia among 204 older adults [53.9% female; aged 74.5 ± 7.0] was 4.9% based on the EWGSOP1 criterion, 23.5% according to the EWGSOP2-suggested standard (British) HGS cut-offs and 50.0% based on the EWGSOP2 population-specific cut-offs. In the 103 accessible patients, the mortality rate was 30.1%. Cox-regression analyses adjusted for parameters determined through univariate analyses [age and sarcopenia definitions (in 3 different models)], showed that the EWGSOP1 definition (HR = 4.26, 95% CI = 1.45-12.42, p = 0.008) and EWGSOP2 probable sarcopenia definition with population-specific cut-offs (HR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.12-5.93, p = 0.03) were associated with a greater mortality risk, while the EWGSOP2 probable sarcopenia definition with standard-cut offs was not (p = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to investigate the associations of EWGSOP2-defined probable sarcopenia with mortality based on standard vs. population-specific HGS cut-offs. The results suggest that population-specific cut-offs should be used when available. We suggest that conducted in community-dwelling older adults, our results have implications for most of older adults.

Relationship between Lean Tissue Mass and Muscle Function in Women with Obesity

It is well documented that lean tissue mass (LTM) decreases with aging in patients with obesity, but there is no information available regarding muscle strength changes, a parameter that may be better associated with sarcopenic obesity (SO). The objectives of this study were to analyze the changes in LTM and fat mass (FM), muscle strength and muscle function with aging in women with obesity and to determine the prevalence of SO. LTM and FM were determined by DXA, muscle strength with the hand-grip test and muscle function with the 6 min walk test (6MWT) in 383 women with obesity. A redistribution of the LTM and FM occurred with age, characterized by a gain at the trunk to the detriment of the lower limbs, thus reducting in appendicular LTM indices. The physical performances evaluated by the muscle strength and muscle function decreased concomitantly, and the prevalence of low values for both these parameters was 22.8% and 13.4%, respectively, in the older patients. In summary, although a reduction in appendicular LTM and muscle performances occurred with age and resulted in an increase in the prevalence of SO, the number of women with obesity affected by SO remained low (n ≤ 15), even in those older than 60 years.

Assessing quality of life with SarQol is useful in screening for sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity in older women

BACKGROUND

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) may be impaired in the presence of sarcopenia. Since a specific quality of life questionnaire became available for sarcopenia (SarQol), cutoffs to screen for this condition have been proposed, prompting the need to assess them in different populations. Due to the lack of consensus on diagnostic criteria, the tool has not yet been analyzed in screening for sarcopenic obesity.

AIM

Our aim is to measure the SarQoL's metric properties and establish a cutoff in QoL assessments that could be used along the diagnostic pathway for sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity in community-dwelling older women.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study assessed women aged ≥ 70 years using the SarQol, sarcopenia criteria (EWGSOP2) and sarcopenic obesity criteria (ESPEN/EASO). Cutoffs for the SarQol were defined with a receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve, and sensitivity and specificity were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 95 included women (mean age 76.0 years, standard deviation [SD] 5.7), 7.3% (n = 7) were classified as having sarcopenic obesity, 22.1% (n = 21) as having sarcopenia, and 70.5% (n = 67) as not having sarcopenia. The total SarQol score was higher in women without sarcopenia (66.5 SD 16.2) versus those with sarcopenia (56.6 SD 15.6) and sarcopenic obesity (45.1 SD 7.9). A cutoff of ≤ 60 points is proposed for sarcopenia screening (area under the ROC curve [AUC] 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.80; sensitivity 61.9%; specificity 62%), and ≤ 50 points for sarcopenic obesity (AUC 0.85; 95% CI 0.74-0.95; sensitivity 71.4%; specificity 76.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Quality of life is compromised in women with sarcopenia and especially in those with sarcopenic obesity. The SarQol could be useful in screening for these conditions, providing insight into health-related quality of life in older people with sarcopenia.

A narrative review on the impact of sarcopenic obesity and its psychological consequence in quality of life

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Sarcopenia is a multifactorial metabolic-mediated complication that affects most of the geriatric population physically and mentally. In this study, we intended to study the association between sarcopenia and psychologically related symptoms. Primary objective of the study is to explore the interplay between sarcopenic obesity, psychological consequences and Quality of life in the affected population. The secondary objective is to discuss the diagnostic, treatment approaches and also the role of clinical pharmacist.

METHOD

The psychology-related complication and sarcopenia association was enumerated in this study based on previous clinical research findings.

RESULT

The clinical evidence shows a strong correlation between sarcopenia and Mental health and its health consequences and reflection on the quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Sarcopenia induced mental disturbance has been affirmed in many studies. We believe effective right pharmacological therapy and non-pharmacological therapies with respective lifestyle modification advice could be potential vital factors that can reduce further complications in geriatric populations.

Sarcopenic obesity by the ESPEN/EASO criteria for predicting mortality in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) and the European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO) recently released the first international consensus on the diagnostic criteria for sarcopenic obesity (SO), which recommended skeletal muscle mass adjusted for body weight (SMM/W) to determine low muscle mass. SMM adjusted for body mass index (SMM/BMI) appeared to be better associated with physical performance than SMM/W. Thus, we modified the ESPEN/EASO criteria by using SMM/BMI. We aimed (1) to evaluate the agreement of the ESPEN/EASO-defined SO (SO_ESPEN) and the modified ESPEN/EASO-defined SO (SO_ESPEN-M) with other commonly used SO definitions, and (2) to compare different SO definitions for predicting mortality in a prospective cohort with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This prospective study included patients with advanced NSCLC. We defined SO according to five different diagnostic criteria: SO_ESPEN, SO_ESPEN-M, Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS)-determined sarcopenia with BMI-determined obesity (SO_AWGS), computed tomography-derived sarcopenia with BMI-determined obesity (SO_CT), and fat mass to fat-free mass ratio >0.8 (SO_FM). The outcome was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 639 participants (mean age 58.6 years, 229 women) we studied, 488 (76.4%) died during the median follow-up period of 25 months. SMM/BMI was significantly lower in the death group than in the survivor group (men: p = 0.001, women: p < 0.001), but SMM/W was not. Only 3 (0.47%) participants met all five SO diagnostic criteria. SO_ESPEN showed an excellent agreement with SO_ESPEN-M (Cohen's kappa = 0.896), a moderate agreement with SO_AWGS (Cohen's kappa = 0.415), but poor agreements with SO_CT and SO_FM (Cohen's kappa = 0.078 and 0.092, respectively). After full adjustment for potential confounders, SO_ESPEN (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.26-1.89), SO_ESPEN-M (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.26-1.92), and SO_AWGS (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.14-1.78) were significantly associated with mortality. However, SO_CT (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.87-1.58) and SO_FM (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.90-1.46) showed no significant association with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

SO_ESPEN showed an excellent agreement with SO_ESPEN-M, a moderate agreement with SO_AWGS, but poor agreements with SO_CT and SO_FM. SO_ESPEN, SO_ESPEN-M, and SO_AWGS were independent prognostic factors for mortality in our study population, but SO_CT and SO_FM were not. Although SMM/BMI was better associated with survival than SMM/W, SO_ESPEN-M did not show an advantage in predicting survival over SO_ESPEN.

Consequences of applying the different criteria of the EWGSOP2 guideline for sarcopenia case-finding in Spanish community-dwelling older adults

INTRODUCTION

Sarcopenia prevalence varies according to differences in diagnostic criteria used. In order to overcome this issue, the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People-2 (EWGSOP2) published a consensus to increase harmonization for sarcopenia diagnosis. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors across the different sarcopenia diagnosis criteria recommended by EWGSOP2 and to analyze its agreement.

METHODS

A total of 699 community-dwelling older adults (median-age: 72, 60% female) were recruited in this cross-sectional study. Sarcopenia prevalence was obtained by different combinations of muscle strength (handgrip strength or 5-times sit-to-stand) and muscle quantity (appendicular skeletal mass or skeletal muscle index) as recommended by the EWGSOP2. Cohen's Kappa coefficient was calculated to analyze agreement among the four sarcopenia diagnostic criteria and logistic regressions were performed to identify risks associated to health-related outcomes for each diagnostic criterion.

RESULTS

Sarcopenia prevalence varied from 2.1% to 11.6%, depending on the diagnostic criteria used. Weak-to-moderate agreements (κ-range: 0.13-0.66) were observed among the four sarcopenia diagnosis criteria. There was scarce overlap in sarcopenic people when different diagnostic criteria were used leading to up to 10.4% of underdiagnosis. Sarcopenia defined by 5-times sit-to-stand was more associated with health-related outcomes compared to handgrip strength.

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia prevalence rates vary considerably depending on the diagnostic criteria used. These criteria should not be used in an interchangeable way due to their weak agreement. Sarcopenia diagnosis criteria defined by 5-times sit-to-stand could be more suitable in Spanish community-dwelling older adults due their associations with health-related outcomes.

Alternative skeletal muscle index for sarcopenia diagnosis in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A pilot study

PURPOSE

To determine an alternative skeletal muscle index (a-SMI), easy diagnosis of sarcopenia in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 223 inpatients with T2DM (100 males, age range 60-89; 123 females, age range 60-87). Screening for grip strength and gait speed, measuring SMI by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (d-SMI) for sarcopenia diagnosis, according to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) 2019 consensus. The a-SMI was established by binary logistic regression analysis with positive screening population. To assess the conformance of the new diagnostic approach with the AWGS 2019.

RESULTS

Sarcopenia was present in 36.3% of the study population. 59 had normal d-SMI and 81 had low d-SMI in screening patients with probable sarcopenia. In univariate analyses for all positive screening population, body mass index (BMI), 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25 - (OH) VitD), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), hypertension (HTN), and gender were correlates of d-SMI. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that male (B = 2.463, 95%CI: 3.640 ~ 37.883, p = 0.000), HTN (B = 1.404, 95%CI: 1.599 ~ 10.371, p = 0.003), BMI (B = -0.344, 95%CI: 0.598 ~ 0.839, p = 0.000), 25-(OH) VitD (B = -0.058, 95%CI: 0.907 ~ 0.982, p = 0.004) were independent factors for d-SMI detection. Based on the extracted four correlates, the a-SMI was determined. The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.842, sensitivity and specificity for the new diagnostic approach were 84.0% and 84.5%. In a statistical measure of agreement between the AWGS 2019 and the new diagnostic approach, the kappa coefficient was 0.669 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The a-SMI - based on gender, obesity status, 25-(OH) VitD, and HTN history - can be used in the absence of the d-SMI to supplement the algorithm for sarcopenia diagnosis in elderly patients with T2DM.

Recent Updates on Associations among Various Obesity Metrics and Cognitive Impairment: from Body Mass Index to Sarcopenic Obesity

Obesity and obesity-associated morbidity continues to be a major public health issue worldwide. Dementia is also a major health concern in aging societies and its prevalence has increased rapidly. Many epidemiologic studies have shown an association between obesity and cognitive impairment, but this relationship is not as well established as other comorbidities. Conflicting results related to the age and sex of participants, and the methodology used to define obesity and dementia may account for the uncertainty in whether obesity is a modifiable risk factor for dementia. More recently, sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity have been reported to be associated with cognitive impairment. In addition, new mediators such as the muscle-myokine-brain axis and gut-microbiota-brain axis have been suggested and are attracting interest. In this review, we summarize recent evidence on the link between obesity and cognitive impairment, especially dementia. In particular, we focus on various metrics of obesity, from body mass index to sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity.

Sarcopenic obesity predicts negative health outcomes among older patients with type 2 diabetes: The Ageing and Body Composition of Diabetes (ABCD) cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The definition of and diagnostic criteria for sarcopenic obesity (SO) remain unclear, hindering the assessment of its prevalence as well as its clinical relevance to negative health outcomes, especially in diabetic patients, who are more prone to body composition changes. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of SO and its impact on negative health outcomes among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) from the Ageing and Body Composition of Diabetes (ABCD) cohort.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 386 elderly patients with T2DM (177 males and 209 females, mean age of 67.91 ± 6.10 years). SO was defined as the coexistence of sarcopenia defined by the 2019 Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia up-to-date consensus and obesity identified by five alternative measurements as follows: body mass index (BMI)≥28 kg/m² (BMI28), BMI≥25 kg/m² (BMI25), body fat percentage (BF%)≥25% for men or 35% for women, visceral fat area (VFA)≥100 cm², or android fat mass (AF) higher than the sex-specific median. The primary endpoint was all-cause death or fragility fracture, and the secondary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to estimate the association between SO and negative health outcomes.

RESULTS

The prevalence of SO was 0.2% (BMI28), 2.5% (BMI25), 9.8% (AF), and 18.7% (BF% or VFA) among elderly patients with T2DM, according to the different obesity surrogate markers. During a mean follow-up period of 3.46 ± 1.15 years, 50 patients reached the primary endpoint, and 33 patients had incident CVD. SO classified using BF% was significantly associated with the primary endpoint [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.94, 95% CI = 1.25-6.92] and incident CVD (HR = 6.02, 95% CI = 1.56-23.15), even after comprehensive adjustment for bone-, comorbidity-, and diabetes-specific confounding variables. When SO was classified using BMI25, VFA and AF, similar results were found for adverse outcomes. However, SO classified using BMI25 resulted in misclassification of SO for 61 participants, 19 of whom experienced adverse events during follow-up, and SO classified using VFA or AF was not significantly associated with incident CVD.

CONCLUSIONS

SO is not uncommon in geriatric patients with T2DM, and its prevalence varies widely depending on the diverse surrogate indices of body fat excess. Furthermore, SO may be a better independent risk factor for negative health outcomes when classified using BF%.

Ultrasound Assessment of the Rectus Femoris in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Predicts Sarcopenia

PURPOSE

Sarcopenia, an age-related loss of skeletal muscle mass and function, is frequent in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and is linked to a poor prognosis. The diagnosis of sarcopenia requires specific equipment and is inconvenient to introduce into clinical practice. Ultrasound is an innovative method to assess muscle quantity. The objective of this research was to evaluate the use of ultrasound for prospectively screening for sarcopenia in COPD patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 235 stable patients with COPD were included in this observational study and divided into development and validation sets. The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia standards were used to define sarcopenia. The thickness (RF_thick) and cross-sectional area (RF_csa) of the rectus femoris were measured using ultrasound. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of RF_thick and RF_csa was used to predict sarcopenia. Nomogram models were constructed based on RF_thick, RF_csa, age and body mass index to identify sarcopenia.

RESULTS

Sarcopenia was present in 83 (35.32%) patients. Patients with sarcopenia had advanced age, decreased pulmonary function, decreased physical function and poor clinical outcomes. RF_thick and RF_csa showed good predictive ability for sarcopenia in the development and validation sets. The nomogram based on RF_thick and RF_csa could detect sarcopenia in COPD patients, and all had significant predictive performance in the development and validation sets. The calibration plot showed good agreement between the nomogram predictions and actual observations.

CONCLUSION

The ultrasound measurement of the rectus femoris has potential for the clinical assessment of sarcopenia in patients with COPD.

Sarcopenic obesity versus sarcopenia alone with the use of probable sarcopenia definition for sarcopenia: Associations with frailty and physical performance

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Ageing brings alterations in body composition, as skeletal muscle gradually declines and accumulation of adipose tissue accompanies it. Although sarcopenia (S) and obesity (O) were separately reported to be associated with frailty and poor physical performance, whether they bring more detrimental or favorable effect when they coexist (i.e. sarcopenic obesity; SO) is an issue needs clarification. We aimed to study the associations of SO and S alone with frailty and poor physical performance, by using probable S definition.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study including community dwelling older adults who were ≥60 years old and admitted to the outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital between 2012 and 2020. We measured handgrip strength via hand dynamometer and defined decreased muscle strength as probable S. We performed bioimpedance analysis to evaluate body composition and used fat percentile method to define obesity. We assessed nutritional status via Mini-Nutritional Assessment-Short Form, frailty via FRAIL scale, and physical performance via Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. We examined the associations of four body phenotypes, i.e. non-S non-O, SO, S alone and O alone with frailty and impaired TUG in univariate and multivariate analyses (Model 1). We further performed a head to head analysis of SO vs S to see if one of them was associated more with frailty and impaired TUG (Model 2).

RESULTS

There were 1366 older adults included in the study (mean age: 74.6 ± 6.9; 68.3% female). The prevalences of non-S non-O, S alone, SO and O alone were 53.5, 7.5, 2.8 and 36.2%, respectively. Multivariate analysis adjusted for age, gender and nutritional status revealed that both SO and S alone were independently associated with frailty and impaired TUG, with SO demonstrating lower odds than S alone (OR = 5.9 and 6.05 for frailty, and 3.9 and 4.4 for TUG, respectively). Head-to-head comparison between SO and S alone in Model 2 showed that two groups did not demonstrate significant difference in terms of the frailty and impaired TUG risk.

CONCLUSION

Although SO and S groups demonstrated similar risks, obesity accompanying sarcopenia might show a favorable trend in terms of frailty and poor physical performance, compared to sarcopenia alone. Longitudinal studies are needed to reveal whether an obesity paradox exists for frailty and physical performance in older adults.

Definition of an adapted cut-off for determining low lean tissue mass in older women with obesity: a comparison to current cut-offs

The prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with obesity varies according to the definition used. The purpose of our study was to: (i) determine the prevalence of sarcopenia in terms of lean tissue mass in older women with obesity using the current cut-offs, (ii) redefine a specific cut-off for low lean tissue mass (LLTM), and (iii) re-determine the prevalence of LLTM using this new cut-off. Appendicular lean mass (ALM) and the ALM index [ALM/height²: ALMI(h²)] and ALMI/body mass index [ALMI(BMI)] were determined in 791 women with or without obesity. LLMM prevalence was calculated using the current cut-offs: EWGSOP2: ALM < 15 kg and ALMI(h²) < 5.5 kg/m²; FNIH: ALM < 15.02 kg and ALMI(BMI) < 0.51; and IWGS: ALMI(h²) < 5.67 kg/m² and cut-offs newly determined from data provided from young women with obesity. ALM, ALMI(h²) and ALMI(BMI) were lower in older compared to young obese women. Using the current cut-offs, a wide distribution of LLTM prevalence (0 to 29.2%) was observed. When the newly determined cut-offs were applied – i.e., ALM < 18.51 kg; ALMI(h²) < 7.15 kg/m², ALMI(BMI) < 0.483, and T-score: [(ALMI(h²) measured)-(2.08 + 0.183*BMI)]/0.72] − the LLTM mass prevalence was 17.37%; 8.47, 14.8 and 12.71%. respectively. This study showed that the current cut-offs for LLTM as criteria for sarcopenia diagnosis are not adapted to the obese population. Although the new “static” cut-offs appeared to be more adapted, a “dynamic” cut-off for ALMI(h²) that took into account the BMI and thus the obesity severity appeared even more relevant.

Predictive Roles of Basal Metabolic Rate and Body Water Distribution in Sarcopenia and Sarcopenic Obesity: The link to Carbohydrates

Sarcopenic obesity is a new category of obesity and is a specific condition of sarcopenia. This study aimed to find the relationship of the basal metabolic rate (BMR) and body water distribution with muscle health and their prospective roles in screening for sarcopenic obesity and sarcopenia. The role of nutrients such as carbohydrates in the relationship was further detected. A total of 402 elderly subjects were recruited. Body composition was estimated by bioelectrical impedance analysis. Sarcopenia was defined by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019. The cutoff values were determined by the receiver operating characteristic curve. Mediation analyses were performed using SPSS PROCESS. Higher BMR and BMR/body surface area (BSA) were protective factors against sarcopenic obesity (OR = 0.047, p = 0.004; OR = 0.035, p = 0.002) and sarcopenia (OR = 0.085, p = 0.001; OR = 0.100, p = 0.003) in elderly people. Low extracellular water (ECW)/intracellular water (ICW) and ECW/total body water (TBW) were negatively correlated with the skeletal muscle index (SMI). The intake of dietary carbohydrates in people with sarcopenic obesity was the lowest, but in subjects with obesity, it was the highest (p = 0.023). The results of the moderated mediation model showed that BMR fully mediated the positive relationship between carbohydrates and SMI, which was more obvious in the population with an abnormal body water distribution. BMR or BMR/BSA had the potential role of predicting a higher risk of sarcopenic obesity and sarcopenia. Higher BMR and lower ECW/ICW and ECW/TBW may benefit muscle health. The overconsumption of carbohydrates (especially > AMDR) might be a risk factor for obesity. Moderate dietary carbohydrate intake might promote SMI by regulating BMR and body water distribution in the elderly.

Muscle Weakness and Walking Slowness for the Identification of Sarcopenia in the Older Adults from Northern Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: This study aimed to analyze the prevalence of sarcopenia in elderly people from Northern Brazil according to muscle weakness or walking slowness. Methods: The sample consisted of 312 elderly people (72.6 ± 7.8 years). For walking slowness, a gait speed ≤ 0.8 m/s was used as a cut-off value, and for muscle weakness the following handgrip strength criteria were used for men and women, respectively: CI: <27.0/16.0 kg; CII: <35.5/20.0 kg; CIII: grip strength corrected for body mass index (BMI) < 1.05/0.79; CIV: grip strength corrected for total fat mass: <1.66/0.65; CV: grip strength corrected for body mass: <0.45/0.34. Results: Walking speed was reduced in 27.0% of women and 15.2% of men (p < 0.05). According to grip strength criteria, 28.5% of women and 30.4% of men (CI), 58.0% of women and 75.0% of men (CII), 66.0% of women and 39.3% of men (CIII), 28.8% of women and 19.6% of men (CIV), and 56.5% of women and 50.0% of men (CV) were identified as having sarcopenia. Conclusions: Walking slowness is more prevalent in women and muscle weakness is more prevalent in men in Northern Brazil. Walking slowness proved to be more concordant with muscle weakness in both sexes when the CI for handgrip strength was adopted.

Sarcopenic obesity and therapeutic outcomes in gastrointestinal surgical oncology: A meta-analysis

Background

Sarcopenic obesity (SO) has been indicated as a scientific and clinical priority in oncology. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the impacts of preoperative SO on therapeutic outcomes in gastrointestinal surgical oncology.

Methods

We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases through March 4th 2022 to identify cohort studies. Endpoints included postoperative complications and survival outcomes. Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results

Twenty-six studies (8,729 participants) with moderate to good quality were included. The pooled average age was 65.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 63.7–67.6] years. The significant heterogeneity in SO definition and diagnosis among studies was observed. Patients with SO showed increased incidences of total complications (odds ratio 1.30, 95% CI: 1.03–1.64, P = 0.030) and major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa, odds ratio 2.15, 95% CI: 1.39–3.32, P = 0.001). SO was particularly associated with the incidence of cardiac complications, leak complications, and organ/space infection. SO was also predictive of poor overall survival (hazard ratio 1.73, 95% CI: 1.46–2.06, P &lt; 0.001) and disease-free survival (hazard ratio 1.41, 95% CI: 1.20–1.66, P &lt; 0.001). SO defined as sarcopenia in combination with obesity showed greater association with adverse outcomes than that defined as an increased ratio of fat mass to muscle mass. A low prevalence rate of SO (&lt; 10%) was associated with increased significance for adverse outcomes compared to the high prevalence rate of SO (&gt; 20%).

Conclusion

The SO was associated with increased complications and poor survival in gastrointestinal surgical oncology. Interventions aiming at SO have potentials to promote surgery benefits for patients with gastrointestinal cancers. The heterogeneity in SO definition and diagnosis among studies should be considered when interpreting these findings.

Systematic Review Registration

[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=255286], identifier [CRD42021255286].

Sarcopenia, Obesity, Sarcopenic Obesity and Risk of Poor Nutritional Status in Polish Community-Dwelling Older People Aged 60 Years and Over

Poor nutritional status (PNS) is a modifiable factor determining abnormalities in body composition-sarcopenia, obesity, and sarcopenic obesity (SO). We aimed to assess the prevalence of these conditions and their association with PNS in 211 community-dwelling older adults. Sarcopenia was diagnosed based on the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2) recommendations. Obesity was diagnosed with the Percent Body Fat (>42% in women and >30% in men). Subjects fulfilling the criteria for obesity and concomitantly with reduced lower and/or upper limbs muscle strength and muscle mass (ALM/BMI < 0.512 in women and <0.789 in men) were classified as SO phenotype. Participants without obesity and sarcopenia were categorized as ‘normal’ phenotype. Nutritional status was estimated with the Mini Nutritional Assessment, and a score of <24 indicated PNS. In total, 49.8% participants had abnormal body composition (60.7% men and 42.5% women; p = 0.001). Sarcopenia, obesity, and SO were diagnosed in 10%, 32.7%, and 7.1% of subjects. PNS was found in 31.3% of the study sample. Its prevalence differed between phenotypes: 81% in sarcopenia, 60% in SO, 14.5% in obesity, and 28.3% in the ‘normal’ phenotype group (p = 0.000). Based on the results, abnormal body composition is prevalent in elderly subjects. Sarcopenia and SO are often associated with PNS.

Sarcopenic obesity is associated with impaired physical function and mortality in older patients with heart failure: insight from FRAGILE-HF

Background

The purpose of this study was to clarify the prevalence, association with frailty and exercise capacity, and prognostic implication of sarcopenic obesity in patients with heart failure.

Methods

The present study included 779 older adults hospitalized with heart failure (median age: 81 years; 57.4% men). Sarcopenia was diagnosed based on the guidelines by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. Obesity was defined as the percentage of body fat mass (FM) obtained by bioelectrical impedance analysis. The FM cut-off points for obesity were 38% for women and 27% for men. The primary endpoint was 1-year all-cause death. We assessed the associations of sarcopenic obesity occurrence with the short physical performance battery (SPPB) score and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD).

Results

The rates of sarcopenia and obesity were 19.3 and 26.2%, respectively. The patients were classified into the following groups: non-sarcopenia/non-obesity (58.5%), non-sarcopenia/obesity (22.2%), sarcopenia/non-obesity (15.3%), and sarcopenia/obesity (4.0%). The sarcopenia/obesity group had a lower SPPB score and shorter 6MWD, which was independent of age and sex (coefficient, − 0.120; t-value, − 3.74; P < 0.001 and coefficient, − 77.42; t-value, − 3.61; P < 0.001; respectively). Ninety-six patients died during the 1-year follow-up period. In a Cox proportional hazard analysis, sarcopenia and obesity together were an independent prognostic factor even after adjusting for a coexisting prognostic factor (non-sarcopenia/non-obesity vs. sarcopenia/obesity: hazard ratio, 2.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.22–5.04; P = 0.012).

Conclusion

Sarcopenic obesity is a risk factor for all-cause death and low physical function in older adults with heart failure.

Trial registration

University Hospital Information Network (UMIN-CTR: UMIN000023929).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03168-3.

Growth Differentiation Factor-15 as a Biomarker for Sarcopenia in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Purpose

Sarcopenia is an important factor contributing to comorbidities in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and is an independent risk factor for increased mortality. The diagnostic process for sarcopenia requires specific equipment and specialized training and is difficult procedurally. A previous study found that GDF15 levels are associated with skeletal muscle mass and function in patients with COPD. However, whether circulating GDF15 levels can be used for the prediction of sarcopenia in patients with COPD is unknown.

Methods

This study included 235 patients with stable COPD who were divided into a development set (n = 117) and a validation set (n = 118), and we followed the definition of sarcopenia as defined by the guidelines from the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. Serum concentrations of GDF15 were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and construction of a nomogram and decision curve analysis were performed using the R package “rms.”

Results

In this study, serum GDF15 levels were negatively associated with skeletal muscle mass (r = –0.204, p = 0.031), handgrip strength (r = –0.274, p = 0.004), quadriceps strength (r = –0.269, p = 0.029), and the thickness (r = –0.338, p < 0.001) and area (r = –0.335, p < 0.001) of the rectus femoris muscle in patients with COPD. Furthermore, the serum levels of GDF15 in patients with sarcopenia were significantly higher than those in controls. Importantly, serum levels of GDF15 could effectively predict sarcopenia in patients with COPD based on the development set (AUC = 0.827) and validation set (AUC = 0.801). Finally, a nomogram model based on serum GDF15 levels and clinical features showed good predictive ability (AUC > 0.89) in the development and validation sets.

Conclusion

Serum GDF15 levels could be used to accurately and easily evaluate sarcopenia in patients with COPD.

Prognostic Value of Isolated Sarcopenia or Malnutrition-Sarcopenia Syndrome for Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients

Malnutrition-sarcopenia syndrome (MSS) is frequent in the hospital setting. However, data on the predictive validity of sarcopenia and MSS are scarce. We evaluated the association between sarcopenia and MSS and clinical adverse outcomes (prolonged length of hospital stay-LOS, six-month readmission, and death) using a prospective cohort study involving adult hospitalized patients (n = 550, 55.3 ± 14.9 years, 53.1% males). Sarcopenia was diagnosed according to the EWGSOP2, and malnutrition according to the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA). Around 34% were malnourished, 7% probable sarcopenic, 15% sarcopenic, and 2.5% severe sarcopenic. In-hospital death occurred in 12 patients, and the median LOS was 10.0 days. Within six months from discharge, 7.9% of patients died, and 33.8% were readmitted to the hospital. Probable sarcopenia/sarcopenia had increased 3.95 times (95% CI 1.11-13.91) the risk of in-hospital death and in 3.25 times (95% CI 1.56-6.62) the chance of mortality in six months. MSS had increased the odds of prolonged LOS (OR = 2.73; 95% CI 1.42-5.25), readmission (OR = 7.64; 95% CI 3.06-19.06), and death (OR = 1.15; 95% CI 1.08-1.21) within six months after discharge. Sarcopenia and MSS were predictors of worse clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients.

Ishii test for screening sarcopenia: performance in community-dwelling older adults

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia is associated with an increased likelihood of major adverse health outcomes. Therefore, screening and early and timely identification of sarcopenia are essential. EWGSOP2 (European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People2) suggests Ishii screening test for formal-case findings. We aimed to define the diagnostic value of the Ishii screening test, which estimates the probability of sarcopenia using an equation-derived score based on three variables (age, grip strength, and calf circumference) in Turkish older adults.

METHODS

Older adults aged >  = 60 who applied to a geriatric outpatient clinic were included in the study. The recommendation of the EWGSOP2 for the definition of sarcopenia was followed. The probability of sarcopenia was estimated by using a score chart of Ishii. Performance of Ishii screening test was analyzed by using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

We included 1635 patients with the mean age of 74.7 ± 7.0. The prevalence of probable sarcopenia was 11.9%. The prevalence of confirmed sarcopenia according to height² was 0.7%. The prevalence of severe sarcopenia was 0.3% in total. Against diagnoses of probable sarcopenia, confirmed sarcopenia, and severe sarcopenia, the sensitivity values of the Ishii screening test were 84%, 100%, and 100%; the specificity values were 86.1%, 83.9%, and 84.6%, respectively. PPV values were 44.9%, 4.2%, 2.1%; NPV were 97.6%, 100%, 100%, and the AUC values were 0.933, 0.961, and 0.959, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the Ishii screening test is a successful screening and maybe a candidate diagnostic test for sarcopenia.

Multifactorial Mechanism of Sarcopenia and Sarcopenic Obesity. Role of Physical Exercise, Microbiota and Myokines

Obesity and ageing place a tremendous strain on the global healthcare system. Age-related sarcopenia is characterized by decreased muscular strength, decreased muscle quantity, quality, and decreased functional performance. Sarcopenic obesity (SO) is a condition that combines sarcopenia and obesity and has a substantial influence on the older adults’ health. Because of the complicated pathophysiology, there are disagreements and challenges in identifying and diagnosing SO. Recently, it has become clear that dysbiosis may play a role in the onset and progression of sarcopenia and SO. Skeletal muscle secretes myokines during contraction, which play an important role in controlling muscle growth, function, and metabolic balance. Myokine dysfunction can cause and aggravate obesity, sarcopenia, and SO. The only ways to prevent and slow the progression of sarcopenia, particularly sarcopenic obesity, are physical activity and correct nutritional support. While exercise cannot completely prevent sarcopenia and age-related loss in muscular function, it can certainly delay development and slow down the rate of sarcopenia. The purpose of this review was to discuss potential pathways to muscle deterioration in obese individuals. We also want to present the current understanding of the role of various factors, including microbiota and myokines, in the process of sarcopenia and SO.

Cutoff Points for Grip Strength in Screening for Sarcopenia in Community-Dwelling Older-Adults: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Currently, different cutoff points for handgrip strength (HGS) have been used to estimate the prevalence of sarcopenia. In addition, the variability of equipment and protocols for this assessment can significantly influence the early detection of this important public health problem. Thus, this review aims to identify the different cutoff points for HGS adopted for older men and women in screening for sarcopenia.

OBJECTIVES

this review aims to identify the different cutoff points for HGS adopted for older men and women in screening for sarcopenia.

METHODS

In accordance with the PRISMA 2020 recommendations, which included published studies from the last 10 years, from 6 databases, in 3 different languages.

RESULTS

19.730 references were identified, of which 62 were included for the review. All references analyzed used algorithms and definitions of sarcopenia already known in the literature. Of the studies found, 16 chose to develop cutoff values for HGS based on their own population. The variation in cutoff points was evident when compared between gender and regions of the world.

CONCLUSION

It has become evident that there is a variability of normative values for HGS in sarcopenia screening. In addition, this systematic review shows the difference in the cutoff points used between the consensuses and those developed for each population.

The current situation in the approach to osteoporosis in older adults in Turkey: areas in need of improvement with a model for other populations

PURPOSE

The total number of older adults in Turkey is striking, amounting to around 8 million, and this translates into considerably higher numbers of cases of osteoporosis (OP) and fractures in older adults. In this article, we outlined the current situation of OP in older adults in Turkey and investigated the differences between Turkey and a representative developed European country (Belgium), in terms of the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of OP. Our intention in this regard was to identify areas in need of improvement and subsequently to make a clear call for action to address these issues.

METHODS

Herein, considering the steps related to the OP approach, we made a complete review of the studies conducted in Turkey and compared with the literature recommendations.

RESULTS

There is a need for a national osteoporotic fracture registry; measures should be taken to improve the screening and treatment of OP in older males, such as educational activities; technicians involved in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning should undergo routine periodic training; all DXA centers should identify center-specific least significant change values; all older adults should be considered for routine lateral dorsolumbar X-ray imaging for the screening of vertebral fractures while ordering DXA scans; the inclusion of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) software in DXA assessments should be considered; screening using a fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) algorithm that is specific to Turkey should be integrated; the fortification of foods with vitamin D is required; the high fracture risk by country-specific FRAX algorithm and the presence of falls/high fall risk should be integrated in reimbursement terms; and finally, more "fracture liaison services" should be established.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that the practical consideration of our suggestions will provide considerable support to the efforts for combating with the adverse consequences of OP in society. This approach can be subsequently modeled for other populations to improve the management of OP globally.

Cut-off points to screening for sarcopenia in community-dwelling older people residents in Brazil

BACKGROUND

At a time when the world's population is aging, one of the most important challenges for the healthcare field is to control the decline of the musculoskeletal system. This decline consists of a reduction in muscle mass and function, which is called sarcopenia and is associated with adverse health outcomes. Although there has been an increase in the number of publications on sarcopenia and its consequences, the reported prevalence varies widely, since these depend on the characteristics of the population studied, the definitions found in the literature and the cut-off points adopted. In this perspective, the heterogeneity in the classification and the different reference values has a critical impact on the epidemiology of sarcopenia, since neither the procedures, the components and the cut-off points are consistent.

OBJECTIVES

To develop cut-off points for the screening of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older people residents in the northeast of Brazil and compare the prevalences between the values defined by the consensus and the values of the population studied.

METHODS

Community-dwelling older men and women living in three cities in the countryside of Rio Grande do Norte were evaluated. Cutoff points were defined for the variables used to screen for sarcopenia (handgrip strength, SMI, gait speed and SPPB) using the 20th percentile of their population distributions.

RESULTS

The sample was composed of 1,290 older people (62.5% female and 37.5% male), with an average of 69.5 (± 6.05) years of age. Regarding the cutoff points, the handgrip values were defined as 25.3 kg and 16 kg for men and women, respectively. Considering the SMM adjusted according to their height, the values of 7.88 kg/m2 were adopted for men and 5.52 kg/m2 for women. When adjusting by BMI we obtained 0.73 kg/BMI for men and 0.41 kg/BMI for women. For gait speed it was defined 0.71 m/s for men and 0.63 m/s for women. In the case of SPPB, the result was the same for both genders (≤8). When applying the values found in the studied population, a variation in prevalence was observed for both men and women, depending on the cut-off points and consensus used.

CONCLUSION

The cutoff values found in our population were lower than those adopted by international consensus (EWGSOP2, IWGS and FNIH), except for HGS in woman and SMI/m2 for men. Therefore, using specific cutoff points for different populations can provide an accurate assessment of the presence of sarcopenia and better target health prevention strategies for the older people living in the community.