Inflammatory bowel disease and hepatitis B and C in Western Balkans: a referral centre study and review of the literature

Core indicators of an evaluation and guidance system for quality of care in inflammatory bowel disease centers: A critical review

The mission of the IBD Quality Care Evaluation Center (IBDQCC) is to establish indicators of quality of care (QoC), certify IBD units to generate a network of IBD quality care, and eventually improve the national level of IBD healthcare. The final list of 28 core and 13 secondary IBD QoC indicators suitable for the healthcare system in China were selected using a Delphi consensus methodology. Units that met all core indicators were qualified as "regional"; units that met all core indicators together with more than 50% of the secondary indicators received a rating of "excellence." Using the selected QoC core indicators for certifying IBD units, a network of IBD quality care units covering the majority of IBD patients in China was established.

FUNDING

This work was financially supported by Cultivation Funding for Clinical Scientific Research Innovation, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University (RJPY-LX-004), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81,770,545), Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Initiative (21SQBS02302), and Cultivated Funding for Clinical Research Innovation, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University (RJPY-LX-004).

Liver involvement in inflammatory bowel disease: What should the clinician know?

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may show a wide range of extraintestinal manifestations. In this context, liver involvement is a focal point for both an adequate management of the disease and its prognosis, due to possible serious comorbidity. The association between IBD and primary sclerosing cholangitis is the most known example. This association is relevant because it implies an increased risk of both colorectal cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. Additionally, drugs such as thiopurines or biologic agents can cause drug-induced liver damage; therefore, this event should be considered when planning IBD treatment. Additionally, particular consideration should be given to the evidence that IBD patients may have concomitant chronic viral hepatitis, such as hepatitis B and hepatitis C. Chronic immunosuppressive regimens may cause a hepatitis flare or reactivation of a healthy carrier state, therefore careful monitoring of these patients is necessary. Finally, the spread of obesity has involved even IBD patients, thus increasing the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, which has already proven to be more common in IBD patients than in the non-IBD population. This phenomenon is considered an emerging issue, as it will become the leading cause of liver cirrhosis.

Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline for Immunizations in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)-Part 2: Inactivated Vaccines

Background and Aims

The effectiveness and safety of vaccinations can be altered by immunosuppressive therapies, and perhaps by inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) itself. These recommendations developed by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and endorsed by the American Gastroenterological Association, aim to provide guidance on immunizations in adult and pediatric patients with IBD. This publication focused on inactivated vaccines.

Methods

Systematic reviews evaluating the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of vaccines in patients with IBD, other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, and the general population were performed. Critical outcomes included mortality, vaccine-preventable diseases, and serious adverse events. Immunogenicity was considered a surrogate outcome for vaccine efficacy. Certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations were rated according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Key questions were developed through an iterative online platform, and voted on by a multidisciplinary group. Recommendations were formulated using the Evidence-to-Decision framework. Strong recommendation means that most patients should receive the recommended course of action, whereas a conditional recommendation means that different choices will be appropriate for different patients.

Results

Consensus was reached on 15 of 20 questions. Recommendations address the following vaccines: Haemophilus influenzae type b, recombinant zoster, hepatitis B, influenza, pneumococcus, meningococcus, tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis, and human papillomavirus. Most of the recommendations for patients with IBD are congruent with the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Canada’s National Advisory Committee on Immunization recommendations for the general population, with the following exceptions. In patients with IBD, the panel suggested Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine for patients older than 5 years of age, recombinant zoster vaccine for adults younger than 50 year of age, and hepatitis B vaccine for adults without a risk factor. Consensus was not reached, and recommendations were not made for 5 statements, due largely to lack of evidence, including double-dose hepatitis B vaccine, timing of influenza immunization in patients on biologics, pneumococcal and meningococcal vaccines in adult patients without risk factors, and human papillomavirus vaccine in patients aged 27–45 years.

Conclusions

Patients with IBD may be at increased risk of some vaccine-preventable diseases. Therefore, maintaining appropriate vaccination status in these patients is critical to optimize patient outcomes. In general, IBD is not a contraindication to the use of inactivated vaccines, but immunosuppressive therapy may reduce vaccine responses.

Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline for Immunizations in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)-Part 2: Inactivated Vaccines

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The effectiveness and safety of vaccinations can be altered by immunosuppressive therapies, and perhaps by inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) itself. These recommendations developed by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and endorsed by the American Gastroenterological Association, aim to provide guidance on immunizations in adult and pediatric patients with IBD. This publication focused on inactivated vaccines.

METHODS

Systematic reviews evaluating the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of vaccines in patients with IBD, other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, and the general population were performed. Critical outcomes included mortality, vaccine-preventable diseases, and serious adverse events. Immunogenicity was considered a surrogate outcome for vaccine efficacy. Certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations were rated according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Key questions were developed through an iterative online platform, and voted on by a multidisciplinary group. Recommendations were formulated using the Evidence-to-Decision framework. Strong recommendation means that most patients should receive the recommended course of action, whereas a conditional recommendation means that different choices will be appropriate for different patients.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached on 15 of 20 questions. Recommendations address the following vaccines: Haemophilus influenzae type b, recombinant zoster, hepatitis B, influenza, pneumococcus, meningococcus, tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis, and human papillomavirus. Most of the recommendations for patients with IBD are congruent with the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Canada's National Advisory Committee on Immunization recommendations for the general population, with the following exceptions. In patients with IBD, the panel suggested Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine for patients older than 5 years of age, recombinant zoster vaccine for adults younger than 50 year of age, and hepatitis B vaccine for adults without a risk factor. Consensus was not reached, and recommendations were not made for 5 statements, due largely to lack of evidence, including double-dose hepatitis B vaccine, timing of influenza immunization in patients on biologics, pneumococcal and meningococcal vaccines in adult patients without risk factors, and human papillomavirus vaccine in patients aged 27-45 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with IBD may be at increased risk of some vaccine-preventable diseases. Therefore, maintaining appropriate vaccination status in these patients is critical to optimize patient outcomes. In general, IBD is not a contraindication to the use of inactivated vaccines, but immunosuppressive therapy may reduce vaccine responses.

Management of hepatitis B virus infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease under immunosuppressive treatment

Hepatitis B remains a significant global clinical problem, despite the implementation of safe and effective vaccination programs. The prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) largely follows the regional epidemiologic status. Serological screening with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and antibodies to hepatitis B surface (anti-HBs) and core (anti-HBc) proteins is a key element in the management of IBD patients and, ideally, should be performed at IBD diagnosis. Stratification of individual cases should be done according to the serologic profile and the IBD-specific treatment, with particular emphasis in patients receiving immunosuppressive regimens. In patients who have not contracted HBV, vaccination is indicated to accomplish protective immunity. Vaccination in immunosuppressed patients, however, is a challenging issue and several strategies for primary and revaccination have been proposed. The risk of HBV reactivation in patients with IBD should be considered in both HBsAg-positive and HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive patients, when immunosuppressive therapies are administered. HBV reactivation is preventable via the administration of prophylactic nucleot(s)ide analogues and should be the standard approach in HBsAg-positive patients. HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive patients represent a non-homogeneous group and bear a significantly lower risk of HBV reactivation. Biochemical, serological and molecular monitoring is currently the recommended approach for anti-HBc patients. Acute HBV infection is rarely reported in IBD patients. In the present review, we outline the problems associated with HBV infection in patients with IBD and present updated evidence for their management.

Interferon-Induced Crohn's Disease: An Unusual Side Effect of Interferon Therapy in a Patient With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Gastrointestinal side effects of interferon (IFN) therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are non-specific. Rarely, this therapy has been reported to induce ischemic colitis and even ulcerative colitis. However, IFN-induced Crohn's disease (CD) has previously been reported in only two individuals. We share our own experience of a patient treated for chronic HCV infection who developed CD after IFN therapy for chronic HCV infection. A 28-year-old asymptomatic man with a history only of chronic HCV infection was treated with IFN and ribavirin, which he tolerated for 18 months and achieved sustained viral response (SVR). Halfway through the IFN regimen, he noticed infrequent painful bowel movements and bloody diarrhea. Following treatment, his symptoms resolved. Six months after therapy, colonoscopy showed a normal terminal ileum and colitis with skipped lesions and rectal sparing. Pathology demonstrated spotty chronic active colitis, with diffuse cryptitis, crypt distortion, and abundant abscesses, compatible with CD. The patient declined treatment and remained asymptomatic for two years. Labs including C-​reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), fecal calprotectin, and celiac panel were normal. Upper GI endoscopy and capsule endoscopy were normal. Repeat colonoscopy showed normal terminal ileum and normal colonic mucosa, and biopsies of the terminal ileum and all segments of the colon were unremarkable. The patient was observed off treatment and has continued to remain asymptomatic, with a resolution of symptoms and disease continuing away from IFN exposure. This is a rare case of CD induced by IFN, exhibiting significant importance regarding the evaluation of new cases of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Gastroenterologists need to keep in mind that INF therapy can be an uncommon cause of IBD.

Prevalence of serological markers of hepatitis B in inflammatory bowel disease - Experience from a tertiary care centre in South India

Inflammatory bowel disease patients are at risk of hepatitis B infection. Data on this prevalence from South Asia are limited. We conducted a prospective study comprising of 76 inflammatory bowel disease patients between October 2013 and August 2014. Prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen in inflammatory bowel disease, ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease patients were 2.6%, 2.4% and 3% respectively and that of markers of hepatitis B exposure (hepatitis B surface antigen /hepatitis B core antibody) were 11.8%, 14.3% and 9.1% respectively. Risk factors found significantly more common in those positive for viral markers compared to those negative were age, non-inflammatory bowel disease related surgery and hospital admission. Only 7(9.2%) had completed hepatitis B vaccination. There is a need to create awareness among physicians regarding the importance of hepatitis B screening and vaccination in inflammatory bowel disease patients.

Hepatitis B Virus Screening and Reactivation in a National VA Cohort of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treated with Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists

BACKGROUND

Practice guidelines recommend screening for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection prior to initiating treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy. However, the adherence to these screening guidelines and the clinical outcomes of HBV reactivation following anti-TNF use are not well known.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study using the Veterans Health Administration datasets for IBD patients with filled prescriptions for anti-TNFs from 2003 to 2011. Laboratory testing was used to define HBV screening status in the 12 months preceding anti-TNF initiation. Logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of HBV screening. Cases of potential HBV reactivation were identified using ICD-9 codes for HBV infection or acute liver failure or by medications used for HBV infection treatment, and manually reviewed for verification.

RESULTS

We identified 3357 IBD patients with filled prescriptions for anti-TNF medications. The HBV testing prior to anti-TNF initiation was 8.1% in 2003 and increased to 43.2% by 2011, with an overall rate of 23.7%. In multivariate analysis, African-American race, facilities with a higher volume of IBD patients, and facilities with an academic affiliation were associated with a higher probability of HBV screening. We did not identify a single case of confirmed clinically relevant HBV reactivation after anti-TNF initiation during 7210 patient-years of medication use.

CONCLUSIONS

HBV screening rates prior to anti-TNF initiation are low among IBD patients, but have increased over time. Despite low rates of screening, clinically significant HBV reactivation after anti-TNF initiation in this US cohort was nonexistent.

Challenges in treating patients with inflammatory bowel disease and concurrent viral hepatitis infection

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) require long-term administration of immunomodulatory treatments to maintain disease remission. Due to the high worldwide prevalence of hepatitis B (HBV) or C (HCV) virus infections, presence of concurrent hepatitis can be a relevant clinical issue to manage when treating IBD. Areas covered: The paper summarizes epidemiological data about IBD and HBV/HCV infection and reviews current knowledge about the natural history of HBV and HCV in the IBD setting, concentrating on risk of hepatitis reactivation during immunosuppressive treatment. Most updated recommendations for management of HBV and HCV infections in IBD patients are discussed. Expert commentary: The development of new drugs for IBD with different molecular targets and the availability of potent and efficacious antiviral drugs for HBV and HCV will simplify management of hepatitis infection in IBD patients in the near future.

Prevalence of hepatitis B and clinical outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease patients in a viral-endemic region

Background

Little is known of the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and its effect on choice of therapy and disease course in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We assessed the prevalence of HBV in Hong Kong as well as determinants of altered transaminases, effects of HBV infection on therapeutic strategy and clinical course in IBD.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), liver function tests, and IBD disease characteristics were recorded. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with altered transaminases.

Results

Four hundred six IBD patients were recruited. HBV infection was found in 5.7 % patients in Hong Kong. The use of steroids (OR, 2.52; p = 0.010) and a previous history of surgery (OR 2.33; p = 0.026) were associated with altered transaminases in IBD. There was no significant difference in disease control and use of IBD medication between HBsAg-positive and HBsAg-negative IBD patients.

Conclusion

The prevalence of HBV among patients with IBD in Hong Kong (5.7 %) is similar to that of general population (~7 %). There was no difference in disease control and use of IBD medication between subjects with or without HBV.

Inadequate seroprotection against hepatitis B virus and one detected case of hepatitis C virus infection among patients with inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVES

The prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from central and eastern European countries is unknown. Postvaccination HBV immunity in an immunocompromised host may wane. The aims of the study were as follows: to assess the immune status for HBV and HCV among IBD patients, the level of HBV seroprotection, and to compare the immune status of patients who received mandatory versus recommended HBV vaccination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Serological markers of HBV and HCV (anti-HBs, anti-HBc, HBsAg, and anti-HCV) were determined in 147 consecutive IBD patients. An anti-HBs of 10 IU/l or more was considered as immunity to HBV infection.

RESULTS

HBV infection was detected in 21 patients, whereas 11 of them recalled previous HBV vaccination. Sixty-eight noninfected patients had a level of anti-HBs 10 IU/l or more and only 29% reached the cut-off level of 100 IU/l. Among patients vaccinated obligatorily, two patients had previous HBV infection and 15% did not have an adequate seroprotection against HBV. Patients who received a mandatory HBV vaccine more frequently had a protective anti-HBs level than those vaccinated voluntarily (P<0.001). One positive anti-HCV result was found.

CONCLUSION

A mandatory HBV vaccination significantly increased the number of patients effectively protected against HBV; however, a remarkable number of vaccinated IBD patients had inadequate HBV seroprotection. All IBD patients should be screened for HBV and HCV infections and monitored for anti-HBs titers.

Impact of immunosuppressive therapy on hepatitis B vaccination in inflammatory bowel diseases

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The vaccination rate against hepatitis B virus (HBV) is low in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. The Consensus from the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation on opportunistic infections recommends testing all IBD patients for HBV at diagnosis and vaccinating all HBV-negative patients. We compared the efficacy of HBV vaccine between IBD patients and healthy controls and investigated the impact of immunosuppressive therapy on vaccine response in IBD patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

IBD patients and healthy adult workers were vaccinated against HBV following a standard protocol (at 0, 1, and 6 months; Engerix B). The efficacy of vaccination was evaluated at 8 months by a titer of antibodies against hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs).

RESULTS

Among 164 participants (96 with IBD and 68 healthy workers), the level of anti-HBs was greater than 10 IU/l in 80.2 and 94.1% (P=0.0115) of IBD patients and healthy controls, respectively, and anti-HBs levels greater than 100 IU/l were seen in 45.8 versus 77.9% (P<0.0001) of IBD patients and healthy controls, respectively. The median level of anti-HBs was significantly higher in healthy controls (497.0±386.2) than in IBD patients (253.9±34.5) (P<0.0001). None of the baseline characteristics of IBD patients, including immunomodulators and antitumor necrosis factor therapy, influenced the vaccine response. In the multivariate analysis, ileal disease was the only factor associated with a lower response to the vaccine (odds ratio=3.2; 95% confidence interval=1.0-9.7; P=0.049).

CONCLUSION

The response rate to HBV vaccination is significantly lower in IBD patients than in the general population. Immunosuppressive therapy for IBD did not influence the vaccine response.

Hepatitis B vaccination in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

AIM: To determine the prevalence for hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HBV screening and vaccination practices for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS: This study is a retrospective, cross-sectional observational study. A retrospective chart review was performed in 500 patients who have been consecutively treated for IBD between September 2008 and January 2013 at the Rush University Medical Center Gastroenterology section. The patients were identified through the electronic medical record with the criteria that they attended the gastroenterology clinic, and that they had a diagnosis of IBD at the time of visit discharge. Once identified, each record was analyzed to determine whether the subject had been infected with HBV in the past, already been vaccinated against HBV, or advised to get vaccinated and followed through with the recommended vaccination.

RESULTS: About 254 out of 500 patients (51%) had HBV screening ordered. Among those ordered to have screening tests, 86% followed through with HBV serology. Gastroenterology physicians had significantly different screening ratios from each other (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the ratios of HBV screening when IBD specialists were compared to other gastroenterology physicians (0.505 ± 0.023 vs 0.536 ± 0.066, P = 0.66). Of those 220 patients screened, 51% of IBD patients were found not to be immune against HBV. Approximately 50% of gastroenterology physicians recommended HBV vaccinations to their patients in whom serology was negative for antibodies against HBV. IBD specialists recommended vaccinations to a higher percentage of their patients compared to other gastroenterology physicians (0.168 ± 0.019 vs 0.038 ± 0.026, P = 0.015). Present and/or past HBV infection was found in 3.6% of the patients who had serology checked. There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) between our study and that reported in previous studies done in Spain (4/220 vs 14/2076 respectively, P = 0.070); and in France (4/220 vs 3/315 respectively, P = 0.159). But, the prevalence of anti-HBcAb in this study was less than that reported in the study in Spain (7/220 vs 155/2076 respectively, P = 0.006); and was not significantly different from that reported in the study in France (7/220 vs 8/315 respectively, P = 0.313).

CONCLUSION: The prevalence of HBsAg in our IBD patients was not higher than previously reported European studies. Most IBD patients are not routinely screened or vaccinated against HBV at a tertiary referral center in the United States.

Approach and management of patients with chronic hepatitis B and C during the course of inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease and chronic viral hepatitis are 2 distinct but common conditions throughout the world. Mostly, both need life-long follow-up. Since immunosuppressive drugs remain corner stones of inflammatory bowel disease management, one should be aware of the concomitant presence of chronic viral hepatitis in such patients to prevent serious (even fatal) outcomes. Recently, new treatment options have become available in the treatment of both inflammatory bowel disease and chronic viral hepatitis. In this review, we have discussed and summarized current treatment and follow-up strategies for those 2 important public health issues in light of available literature.

Impact of surveillance of hepatitis b and hepatitis c in patients with inflammatory bowel disease under anti-TNF therapies: multicenter prospective observational study (REPENTINA 3)

AIMS

Assess IBD patients starting anti-TNF for the impact of preventive measures in HBV and/or HCV, and the predictive response factors to HBV vaccination.

METHODS

Multicenter prospective study including 389 IBD patients. Four interventions were established: I-1) anti-HBs <100IU/L: HBV vaccination with double doses at 0-1-2months, and revaccination if titres <100IU/L (seroprotection defined as anti-HBs10-100IU/L and effective vaccination anti-HBs >100IU/L); I-2) anti-HBs >100IU/L (previous effective vaccination): monitoring levels; I-3) anti-HBc and/or HCV+: analysis every two months; I-4) HBsAg+: start anti-virals.

RESULTS

I-1 and I-2) For first vaccination, effective vaccination and seroprotection were obtained in 26.4% and 43.5%, and for revaccination 31.3% and 44.4%, respectively. Predictive factors of effective vaccination were age ≤30years (OR=2.2) and being vaccinated simultaneously with anti-TNF (OR=5.2) instead of late vaccination, whereas age ≤30years (OR=2.6) and anti-TNF monotherapy (OR=2.4) were predictive for seroprotection. 80.8% of patients previously vaccinated maintained titres at 29months follow-up. The only factor related to maintaining titres was previous vaccination versus achieving effective vaccination during anti-TNF (HR=2.49); I-3 and I-4) HBV-DNA + without reactivation was detected in 7% of 29 anti-HBc. No reactivation was found in the remaining HCV (n=5) or HBsAg (n=4) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

1) Response to vaccination/revaccination is low in patients with anti-TNF. Young patients vaccinated at the beginning of anti-TNF and receiving it as a monotheraphy showed better response. 2) Long-lasting effective vaccination is greatest in patients previously vaccinated. 3) Following-up the established surveillance and/or preventive anti-viral therapy seems to be safe in HBV and HCV patients.

Systematic review: The epidemiology of the hepatobiliary manifestations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Extraintestinal manifestations are frequent in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Most studies published so far focused on viral hepatitis and liver toxicity of IBD-related drugs.

AIM

To conduct a systematic review of hepatobiliary manifestations associated with IBD. We excluded viral hepatitis and liver toxicity of IBD-related drugs.

METHODS

Studies were identified through the electronic database of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the annual meetings of Digestive Disease Week, the American College of Gastroenterology, the United European Gastroenterology Week and the European Crohn's and Colitis Organization.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty six articles were included in this systematic review. Cholelithiasis is more frequent in Crohn's disease (CD) than in general population. Prevalence of cholelithiasis in CD ranged from 11% to 34%, whereas it ranges from 5.5% to 15% in non-IBD patients. PSC is more frequent in UC than in CD. Prevalence of PSC ranges from 0.76% to 5.4% in UC and from 1.2% to 3.4% in CD. There is a male predominance when PSC is associated with UC, with a male/female ratio ranging from 65/35 to 70/30. No conclusion can be made on a possible increased risk of gall-bladder carcinoma. Mean prevalence of fatty liver is 23% (range, 1.5-55%). Hepatic amyloidosis occurs in less than 1% of IBD. Liver abscess is encountered mainly in CD. Portal vein thrombosis occurs in 39% to 45% of IBD patients undergoing proctocolectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatobiliary manifestations associated with inflammatory bowel diseases are frequent and probably underdiagnosed.

Prevalence and factors related to hepatitis B and C infection in inflammatory bowel disease patients in China: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this retrospective study were to assess the prevalence of HBV and HCV infection in Chinese IBD patients, identify potential risk factors of the infection in this population, and discuss the prevalence of HBV and HCV in the general Chinese population.

METHODS

A total of 714 IBD patients who had been investigated for HBV and/or HCV infection were consecutively enrolled in the study. Clinical and laboratory data on IBD and hepatitis infection were collected. A control group of 22,373 healthy individuals was also included in the study.

RESULTS

Present and past HBV infection was found in 40.62% of IBD patients (ulcerative colitis: HBsAg+, 5.68%; anti-HBc+, 41.64%; Crohn's disease: HBsAg+, 5.29%; anti-HBc+, 39.80%;), and 27.58% of the non-IBD group (HBsAg+, 5.52%; anti-HBc+, 27.58% [P = 0.00]). HCV infection was found in 0.42% of IBD patients and 0.36% of the non-IBD group (P=0.80). One hundred and fifty-four of the IBD patients (21.57%) had been effectively vaccinated for HBV. In a multivariate analysis, age, family history of hepatitis B, and IBD-related admission were significantly related to HBV infection in IBD patients. Potential risk factors for HCV were not analyzed due to the limited number of HCV-positive patients in the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of HBV infection in IBD patients was higher than that in the non-IBD patients, whereas prevalence of HCV infection was similar to that of the non-IBD group. Effective vaccination for HBV was present in only a small proportion of IBD patients.

Efficacy and safety of treatment of hepatitis C in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There is uncertainty about the efficacy and safety of treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBD can become exacerbated during treatment with interferon (IFN), and serious adverse events, such as pancytopenia or hepatotoxicity, can be compounded by drug interactions. We investigated the risk of exacerbation of IBD during HCV therapy and the rate of adverse effects of concomitant therapy for HCV and IBD. We also evaluated the efficacy of HCV treatment in the IBD population.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent IFN-based treatment for HCV at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota from 2001 to 2012. Exacerbation of IBD was evaluated by clinical, endoscopic, and histologic parameters during antiviral therapy and the ensuing 12 months. Hematologic toxicity was assessed by levels of all 3 cell lineages at baseline and during therapy. Efficacy of antiviral treatment was assessed by serum levels of HCV RNA until 24 weeks after completion of therapy. We also conducted a detailed MEDLINE database search and reviewed the literature on this topic.

RESULTS

We identified 15 subjects with concomitant IBD (8 with ulcerative colitis and 7 with Crohn's disease). Only 1 patient experienced exacerbation of the disease during therapy; symptoms were controlled with mesalamine enemas. Another patient developed a flare shortly after completing antiviral therapy; symptoms returned spontaneously to baseline 2 weeks later. All subjects experienced an anticipated degree of pancytopenia while on IFN-based therapy. The rate of sustained virologic response was 67%. A concise review of available literature regarding the safety and efficacy of HCV treatment in IBD patients is also presented; although limited, the published data appear to support the safety of treatment with IFN in patients whose IBD is under control.

CONCLUSIONS

In conjunction with data from the literature, our findings indicate that the efficacy and safety of HCV therapy with IFN and ribavirin for patients with IBD are comparable to those of subjects without IBD.

Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors and chronic hepatitis C: A comprehensive literature review

Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors are known to increase reactivation of concurrent chronic hepatitis B, but their impact on the hepatitis C virus (HCV) is controversial. Some conditions of immunosuppression, such as liver transplantation, typically cause an increase in the rate of HCV evolution. Inhibition of TNF-α, a cytokine involved in the apoptotic signaling pathway of hepatocytes infected by HCV, could potentially increase viral replication. Currently available clinical data appear to contradict this hypothesis. A review of medical literature revealed that a total of 216 patients with HCV were exposed to one or more treatments with TNF-α inhibitors, with a median observation time of 1.2 years and 260 cumulative patient-years of exposure. Only three cases of drug withdrawal due to suspected HCV liver disease recrudescence were reported. Treatment with TNF-α inhibitors in patients with HCV infection appears to be safe in the short term, but there are insufficient data to assess their long-term safety. Universal screening for HCV before beginning treatment with TNF-α inhibitors is currently controversial. The presence of HCV is not a contraindication to therapy with TNF-α inhibitors, with the exception of cirrhotic patients. In cases of cirrhosis, the benefit/risk ratio should be evaluated at the individual level. Prior to treatment with TNF-α inhibitors, patients with HCV should be referred to a hepatologist to determine the necessity of hepatic disease assessment, using liver biopsy or non-invasive methods, and the potential indication for antiviral therapy. In patients with HCV infection who are treated with TNF-α inhibitors, liver function monitoring every three months is advised.

The influence of anti-TNF therapy on the course of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

The immunosuppressive potential of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in exacerbating chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been a major concern. We aim to critically analyze the impact of anti-TNF on the course of chronic HCV infection in patients with concurrent inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and HCV infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with diagnosis of IBD and HCV were identified retrospectively through the University of Pennsylvania Health System electronic database. Data assessed included demographics, duration of IBD and HCV infection, HCV RNA levels, HCV genotype, liver histology, hepatic biochemical tests (HBT) and IBD disease activity index.

RESULTS

A total of 4,274 IBD and 3,523 HCV patients were identified from 10/1998 to 05/2010. Thirty-seven patients had concurrent HCV infection and IBD, of which 23 patients were eligible (61 % CD; 39 % UC). Five patients (22 %) received anti-TNF therapy (infliximab). Two patients received pegylated interferon and ribavirin (both were non-responders). Overall, three patients had clinical remission and one patient had clinical response to infliximab. When compared to baseline, one patient had HBT improvement, three patients remained stable and one patient had HBT elevation, which was likely due to progressive liver disease in view of HIV co-infection.

CONCLUSION

This represents the first critical analysis assessing the impact of anti-TNF therapy on the course of chronic HCV in IBD patients. Concurrent HCV infection in IBD patients is uncommon. Treatment of IBD with infliximab in HCV patients did not result in flares in hepatic biochemical tests while there was an improvement in the IBD disease activity score.

Prevalence and natural history of hepatitis B and C infections in a large population of IBD patients treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents

BACKGROUND

The prevalence rates of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have been reported to be higher than rates of infection among the general population. Although several cases of HBV infection reactivation in IBD patients treated with anti-TNF-α agents have been described, no evidence exists that anti-TNF-α therapy exacerbates the course of HCV. The aims of this study were to assess the prevalence of HBV and HCV and the rate of HBV vaccination in a population of IBD patients; and to investigate the long-term effects of anti-TNF-α therapy in the subgroup with HBV or HCV infections.

METHODS

301 patients were studied. Prior to the initiation of anti-TNF-α therapy, serum samples were tested for HBsAg and anti-HBc, anti-HBs and anti-HCV antibodies. During the follow-up, HBsAg and anti-HBc positive patients underwent periodic blood testing for viral markers, HBV-DNA and liver function; anti-HCV positive patients were assessed for liver function and HCV-RNA.

RESULTS

One patient was HBsAg positive (0.3%), and 22 (7.3%) tested positive for anti-HBc. Seventy-two patients (23.9%) had been vaccinated for HBV. Four patients tested positive for anti-HCV (1.3%). During anti-TNF-α therapy, none of the patients experienced HBV or HCV reactivation.

CONCLUSIONS

HBV and HCV infection rates were similar to infection rates among the general population. Less than one quarter of the patients had been vaccinated against HBV. Anti-TNF-α agents appear to be safe for patients with HBV infection; more data are needed for patients with HCV infection.

Clinical courses of chronic hepatitis B virus infection and inflammatory bowel disease in patients with both diseases

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the clinical features of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We therefore evaluated the influence of immunosuppressive treatment for IBD on the course of HBV infection and the effect of HBV infection on the therapeutic strategy and clinical course of IBD patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the incidence of and risk factors for liver dysfunction in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive IBD patients. Also, the clinical course of IBD patients with HBV infection was compared with matched IBD controls without HBV infection.

RESULTS

Of 4153 patients diagnosed with IBD between July 1989 and May 2011, 134 were HBsAg-positive, including 54 with Crohn's disease (CD) and 80 with ulcerative colitis (UC). Liver dysfunction was observed in 23 of the 134 (17.2%) HBsAg-positive patients. Prolonged immunosuppression (>3 months) was an independent predictor of liver dysfunction (odds ratio [OR] 3.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-9.16). The rate of use of immunosuppressants, including corticosteroids (P = 0.005), azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine (P < 0.001), and infliximab (P = 0.026), was significantly lower in HBsAg-positive than HBsAg-negative IBD patients. Clinical outcomes, including admission rate, mean number of admissions, total proctocolectomy in UC patients, and mortality were worse in HBsAg-positive than HBsAg-negative IBD patients during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver dysfunction in HBsAg-positive IBD patients was more frequent in those with prolonged immunosuppression. IBD patients with chronic HBV infection used immunosuppressants less frequently and had a worse prognosis than those without it.

Literature review in cases with exacerbation of ulcerative colitis induced by treatment with interferon and/or ribavirin

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an immune disorder of the gastrointestinal tract which has been reported to be precipitated by interferon (IFN) therapy. We describe the results of a literature review of cases in which the development or exacerbation of UC was coincident with IFN and/or ribavirin (RIB) treatment for chronic hepatitis C. We summarized the studies on the effectiveness of IFN for UC or Crohn's disease, which were primarily carried out in Europe and the USA. In the nine reported cases of UC exacerbation by IFN therapy in Japan, seven involved IFN-α, one involved IFN-α2b plus RIB, and the other involved IFN-β; thus cases induced by IFN-α were more common. The period between the initiation of IFN treatment and the development or exacerbation of UC varied widely among the reported cases (from 1 day to 4.5 years). The reports have all assumed a cause-and-effect correlation between IFN treatment and UC. However, although combination therapy of IFN and RIB has become widespread in Japan, UC development or exacerbation induced by IFN has not increased concurrently. Conversely, numerous studies reporting the effectiveness of IFN for treating UC and Crohn's disease have been published in Europe and the USA. One reason for this finding may be the difference in the balance of T helper cell 1 and T helper cell 2 between populations.