Pollution potential leaching index as a tool to assess water leaching risk of arsenic in excavated urban soils

The Release and Migration of Cr in the Soil under Alternating Wet-Dry Conditions

In recent decades, chromium contamination in soil has emerged as a serious environmental issue, demanding an exploration of chromium's behavioral patterns in different soil conditions. This study aims to simulate the release, migration, and environmental impact of chromium (Cr) in contaminated soils under natural rainfall conditions (wet-dry cycles). Clean soils sourced from Panzhihua were used to cultivate chromium-containing soils. Simulated rainfall, prepared in the laboratory, was applied to the cultivated chromium-containing soils in indoor simulated leaching experiments. The experiments simulated three years of rainfall in Panzhihua. The results indicate that soils with higher initial Cr contents result in higher Cr concentrations in the leachate, but all soils exhibit a low cumulative Cr release. The leachate shows similar patterns in total organic carbon (TOC), pH, electrical conductivity, and Cr content changes. An analysis of the speciation of Cr in the soil after leaching reveals a significant decrease in the exchangeable fraction for each Cr species, while the residual and oxidizable Cr fractions exhibit notable increases. The wet-dry cycle has the following effects on the soil: it induces internal reduction reactions in the soil, leading to the reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III); it alters the binding of Cr ions to the soil, affecting the migration of chromium; and it involves microorganisms in chemical processes that consume organic matter in the soil. After three years of rainwater leaching, chromium-containing soils released a relatively low cumulative amount of total chromium, resulting in a reduced potential risk of groundwater system contamination. Most of the chromium in the chromium-containing soil is fixed within the soil, leading to less biotoxicity.

Management of arsenic-contaminated excavated soils: A review

Ongoing global sustainable development and underground space utilization projects have inadvertently exposed many excavated soils naturally contaminated with geogenic arsenic (As). Recent investigations have revealed that As in certain excavated soils, especially those originating from deep construction projects, has exceeded regulatory limits, threatening the environment and human health. While numerous remediation techniques exist for treating As-contaminated soil, the unique characteristics of geogenic As contamination in excavated soil require specific measures when leachable As content surpasses established regulatory limits. Consequently, several standard leaching tests have been developed globally to assess As leaching from contaminated soil. However, a comprehensive comparative analysis of these methods and their implementation in contaminated excavated soils remains lacking. Furthermore, the suitability and efficacy of most conventional and advanced techniques for remediating As-contaminated excavated soils remained unexplored. Therefore, this study critically reviews relevant literature and summarize recent research findings concerning the management and mitigation of geogenic As in naturally contaminated excavated soil. The objective of this study was to outline present status of excavated soil globally, the extent and mode of As enrichment, management and mitigation approaches for As-contaminated soil, global excavated soil recycling strategies, and relevant soil contamination countermeasure laws. Additionally, the study provides a concise overview and comparison of standard As leaching tests developed across different countries. Furthermore, this review assessed the suitability of prominent and widely accepted As remediation techniques based on their applicability, acceptability, cost-effectiveness, duration, and overall treatment efficiency. This comprehensive review contributes to a more profound comprehension of the challenges linked to geogenic As contamination in excavated soils.

Evaluation of newly designed flushing techniques for on-site remediation of arsenic-contaminated excavated debris

Excavated debris (soil and rock) contaminated with geogenic arsenic (As) is an increasing concern for regulatory organizations and construction stakeholders. Chelator-assisted soil flushing is a promising method for practical on-site remediation of As-contaminated soil, offering technical, economic, and environmental benefits. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) is the most prevalent chelator used for remediating As-contaminated soil. However, the extensive environmental persistence and potential toxicity of EDTA necessitate the exploration of eco-compliant alternatives. In this study, the feasibility of the conventional flushing method pump-and-treat and two newly designed immersion and sprinkling techniques were evaluated at the laboratory scale (small-scale laboratory experiments) for the on-site treatment of As-contaminated excavated debris. Two biodegradable chelators, L-glutamic acid-N,N'-diacetic acid (GLDA) and 3-hydroxy-2,2'-iminodisuccinic acid (HIDS), were examined as eco-friendly substitutes for EDTA. Additionally, this study highlights a useful post-treatment measure to ensure minimal mobility of residual As in the chelator-treated debris residues. The pump-and-treat method displayed rapid As-remediation (t, 3 h), but it required a substantial volume of washing solution (100 mL g-1). Conversely, the immersion technique demonstrated an excellent As-extraction rate using a relatively smaller washing solution (0.33 mL g-1) and shorter immersion time (t, 3 h). In contrast, the sprinkling technique showed an increased As-extraction rate over an extended period (t, 48 h). Among the chelators employed, the biodegradable chelator HIDS (10 mmol L-1; pH, 3) exhibited the highest As-extraction efficiency. Furthermore, the post-treatment of chelator-treated debris with FeCl3 and CaO successfully reduced the leachable As content below the permissible limit.

Enhanced remediation of arsenic-contaminated excavated soil using a binary blend of biodegradable surfactant and chelator

The reclamation of geogenic As-contaminated excavated soils as construction additives can reduce the post-disposal impact on the ecosystem and space. Although retaining soil characteristics while reducing contaminant load is a challenging task, washing remediation with biodegradable surfactants or chelators is a promising alternative to non-biodegradable counterparts. In this study, newly synthesized biodegradable surfactants (SDG: sodium N-dodecanoyl-glycinate, SDBA: sodium N-dodecanoyl-β-alaninate, SDGBH: sodium N-dodecanoyl-α,γ-glutamyl-bis-hydroxyprolinate, SDT: sodium N-dodecanoyl-taurinate, and DCPC: N-dodecyl-3-carbamoyl-pyridinium-chloride) and biodegradable chelators (EDDS: ethylenediamine N,N'-disuccinic acid, GLDA: L-glutamate-N, N'-diacetic acid, and HIDS: 3-hydroxy-2,2'-imino disuccinic acid) are evaluated for the remediation of As-contaminated soil. The operating variables, such as washing duration, solution pH, and surfactant or chelator concentration, are optimized for maximum As extraction. SDT shows the highest As-extraction efficiency irrespective of solution pH and surfactant variants, while HIDS is the superior chelator under acidic or alkaline conditions. A binary blend of SDT and HIDS is evaluated for As extraction under varying operating conditions. The SDT-HIDS binary blend demonstrates 6.9 and 1.6-times higher As-extraction rates than the SDT and HIDS-only washing, respectively, under acidic conditions. The proposed approach with a binary blend of a biodegradable surfactant and chelator is a green solution for recycling As-contaminated excavated soils for geotechnical applications.

Arsenic adsorption on layered double hydroxides biochars and their amended red and calcareous soils

Highly efficient amendments for controlling arsenic (As) pollution in soils are imperative to improve soil quality and enhance food production. In the present study, corn stalk biochar was functionalized with three kinds of layered double hydroxides (i.e., Mg-Al-LDH, Zn-Al-LDH, and Cu-Al-LDH) using a simple co-precipitation method. The synthesized LDH biochar composites (LDH@BCs) exhibited better adsorption capacity and affinity for As due to their enhanced anion exchange capacity and reactive surface hydroxyl groups identified by XRD, FTIR and XPS. Arsenic (As) bioavailability and leaching characteristics of spiked red and calcareous soils (150 mg As/kg) amended with or without LDH@BCs were investigated using soil column. The Zn-Al-LDH@BC decreased the As (V) migration and increased pak choi (Brassica chinensis L.) growth in both red and calcareous soil. These results indicated that LDH modified biochar is an effective way to overcome the shortfalls of unmodified biochar in mitigating the As contamination and provide a basis for further exploring the potential of biochar-based soil amendments for environmental remediation.

Effects of selenium on antioxidant enzyme activity and bioaccessibility of arsenic in arsenic-stressed radish

Consuming arsenic (As)-contaminated vegetables is the main route of As exposure in humans. The present study focused on the alterations in antioxidant enzymatic activities and As bioaccessibility in As-contaminated radish subjected to Se. Compared to the CK group, the total As content in raw radish was reduced by 27.5 ± 1.3%, and the bioaccessibility of As was reduced by 21.9 ± 2.3% in the 6 mg Se kg^-1 treatment group. The total As content in the treatment groups decreased first but then increased with increasing Se application in raw radish, gastric (G) fraction and gastrointestinal (GI) fraction, while the antioxidant activity exhibited the opposite trend. The results revealed that a low amount of Se effectively blocks the accumulation of As in radish, improves the antioxidant activity in radish and reduces the bioaccessibility of As. These findings provide new ideas for effectively alleviating the spread of As to the human body through the food chain.

Reducing geogenic arsenic leaching from excavated sedimentary soil using zero-valent iron amendment followed by dry magnetic separation: A case study

Although the deep-layer sedimentary soils excavated from construction sites contain low level of geogenic arsenic (As), remediation is necessary when the As leachability exceeds the environmental standard (10 μg/L) in Japan. In this study, the zero-valent iron (ZVI) amendment followed by dry magnetic separation (ZVI-DMS) was implemented for the treatment of a geogenic As-contaminated alkaline sedimentary soil (pH 8.9; 7.5 mg/kg of total As; 0.33 mg/kg of water-extractable As). This technology involves pH adjustment (adding H₂SO₄), ZVI addition, water content reduction (adding water adsorbent CaSO₄·0.5H₂O), and dry magnetic separation. The short-term and long-term As leachability before and after treatment was compared using sequential water leaching tests (SWLT). The results illustrated that As could be removed from the bulk soil through the magnetic separation of As-ZVI complexes, although the amount was limited (about 2% of total As). Moreover, immobilization played a dominant role in suppressing As leaching. The H₂SO₄ addition decreased pH to a circumneutral range and thereby suppress As release. The CaSO₄·0.5H₂O addition also contributed to the pH decrease and reduced As leachability. Besides, CaSO₄·0.5H₂O-dissolution released Ca²⁺ that favored As adsorption, and enhanced dissolved organic carbon (DOC) coagulation that decelerated As dissolution. SWLT results indicated that As leachability from remediated soil satisfied the environmental standard (10 μg/L) in both short-term and long-term perspective. However, the secular stability of treated soil deserves more attention due to the easy re-release of As caused by As-bearing framboidal pyrite oxidation. Additionally, during ZVI-DMS process, there is a need to scientifically decide the dosage of ZVI to avoid excessive addition. Our results demonstrated that ZVI-DMS technology could be a promising remediation strategy for geogenic As contaminated sedimentary soils/rocks.

Estimation of potential arsenic leaching from its phases in excavated sedimentary and metamorphic rocks

It is important that hazardous excavated sedimentary and metamorphic rocks are treated appropriately and reused without posing an environmental risk. Up-flow column leaching tests were conducted to examine whether arsenic leaching behavior varied among five hazardous excavated sedimentary and metamorphic rocks (two mudstones, clay sediment of marine origin, slate, and black schist) and to determine whether the potential amount of arsenic leaching could be estimated based on the arsenic-bearing mineral phases in the rock. Changes in arsenic concentration with pore volume (PV) showed the same pattern across all rock types, except for one that contained an extremely low amount of water-soluble arsenic, exhibiting an initial increase to reach a peak, followed by a decrease. The arsenic amounts leached before and after the PV at which the arsenic concentration peaked, corresponded to 88% ± 20% of the amount of arsenic fraction 1 obtained by sequential extraction and 76% ± 10% of the amount of arsenic fraction 2, respectively, while the potential amount of arsenic leaching corresponded to 65-89% of the summed total of arsenic fractions 1 + 2. These findings indicate that arsenic exhibits the same leaching behavior among different types of hazardous excavated sedimentary and metamorphic rocks except where extremely low amounts of water-soluble arsenic are present and that the potential amount of arsenic leaching can be approximated by calculating the summed total of arsenic fractions 1 + 2, which allows us to estimate the minimum amount of material required for treatments such as immobilization conducted to prevent arsenic leaching.

Speciation and Fractionation of Soil Arsenic from Natural and Anthropogenic Sources: Chemical Extraction, Scanning Electron Microscopy, and Micro-XRF/XAFS Investigation

A large amount of excavated soils with low-level As contamination caused by civil construction projects is of great concern in Japan. This study investigated the chemical speciation and extractability of As in 24 soil samples from the sites affected and unaffected (naturally contaminated) by anthropogenic pollution. The results of As K-edge XANES demonstrated that naturally contaminated soils were grouped into two types: (i) soils containing FeAsS-like and As₂S₃-like species (ave. 53%, hereafter As-S species) and (ii) soils with no or minor As-S species (ave. 3%). Clear differences were found in As, Fe, and S fractionations by sequential extraction. From naturally contaminated soils enriched with As-S species, more than 50% of As was extracted in the oxidizable fraction. Arsenic was mainly recovered in the reducible fraction for naturally contaminated soils with no or minor As-S species and anthropogenically contaminated soils. The μ-XRF and μ-XAFS revealed that the naturally contaminated soils containing As-S species were abundant in pyrite framboids (∼20 μm in diameter) in which As occurred as multiple oxidation states. The results suggest that framboidal pyrite becomes a source of As in naturally contaminated soils after being excavated and exposed to the surface environment.

Leaching behaviors and chemical fraction distribution of exogenous selenium in three agricultural soils through simulated rainfall

To clarify the leaching risk of selenium (Se) in agricultural soils, a laboratory column experiment was conducted to study the characteristics of leaching and chemical fractions of Se in three different soils treated with different levels of exogenous selenate under simulated local rainfall. Results demonstrated that the Se concentration in leachates of all tested soils decreased rapidly at the beginning of leaching and slowly decreased thereafter. After leaching, Se concentrations in leachates of all tested soils at 1, 3, and 6 mg/kg exogenous Se concentrations were 0.06-0.24, 0.25-0.84, and 0.60-1.65 mg/L, respectively, which exceeded the standard limit of the Chinese Environmental Quality Standards for Groundwater (<0.01 mg/L) (GB/T 14848-2017). The cumulative leached Se amount accounted for 51.27-86.22% of the total Se. Those results indicated the high risk of Se leaching in the tested soils. The Elovich model could better describe Se leaching processes in krasnozem, while the leaching processes of Se in black soil and loess soil accorded with the power function model. Se mainly existed in soluble fraction (61.33-81.05%) before leaching and residual fraction (48.91-68.04%) after leaching. The soluble and exchangeable Se fractions were the main contributors of Se in leachates. In addition, the parameters of the U_ts and I_R values could well describe the distribution of Se fractions in soil during leaching. In general, more attention should be placed on the assessment of Se leaching in soil.

Arsenic, selenium, boron, lead, cadmium, copper, and zinc in naturally contaminated rocks: A review of their sources, modes of enrichment, mechanisms of release, and mitigation strategies

Massive and ambitious underground space development projects are being undertaken by many countries around the world to decongest megacities, improve the urban landscapes, upgrade outdated transportation networks, and expand modern railway and road systems. A number of these projects, however, reported that substantial portions of the excavated debris are oftentimes naturally contaminated with hazardous elements, which are readily released in substantial amounts once exposed to the environment. These contaminated excavation debris/spoils/mucks, loosely referred to as "naturally contaminated rocks", contain various hazardous and toxic inorganic elements like arsenic (As), selenium (Se), boron (B), and heavy metals like lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), and zinc (Zn). If left untreated, these naturally contaminated rocks could pose very serious problems not only to the surrounding ecosystem but also to people living around the construction and disposal sites. Several incidents of soil and ground/surface water contamination, for example, have been documented due to the false assumption that excavated materials are non-hazardous because they only contain background levels of environmentally regulated elements. Naturally contaminated rocks are hazardous wastes, but they still remain largely unregulated. In fact, standard leaching tests for their evaluation and classification are not yet established. In this review, we summarized all available studies in the literature about the factors and processes crucial in the enrichment, release, and migration of the most commonly encountered hazardous and toxic elements in naturally contaminated geological materials. Although our focus is on naturally contaminated rocks, analogue systems like contaminated soils, sediments, and other hazardous wastes that have been more widely studied will also be discussed. Classification schemes and leaching tests to properly identify and regulate excavated rocks that may potentially pose environmental problems will be examined. Finally, management and mitigation strategies to limit the negative effects of these hazardous wastes are introduced.

Investigations of water-extractability of As in excavated urban soils using sequential leaching tests: Effect of testing parameters

Excavated soils with low-level As contamination obtained from construction projects during city development have been of great concern in Japan. Water-extractable As represents the most easily mobilized and ecotoxicologically relevant fraction in the soil environment. In the present study, the water-extractability of As in excavated alkaline urban soils was assessed using sequential leaching tests (SLTs) with a focus on the effects of test parameters. In addition, the potentially water-leachable As over an extremely long period was assessed using the pollution potential leaching index (PPLI), from which one can estimate the number of extractions required to reduce the As in the cumulative leachates to below the Japanese environmental standard (10 μg L^-1). Total As concentrations varied from 6.75 to 79.4 mg kg^-1, and As was continuously detectable among replicate SLT experiments. The water-extractable As obtained in the first step of the SLT accounted for 0.41%-7.60% of total As (average: 2.36%), while the cumulative released As in the SLTs corresponded to 1.30%-21.6% of the total (average: 10.6%). The variability of the water-soluble fractions was sensitive to the test conditions. The shaking time at each SLT step had the largest effect on the As water-extractability; followed by sample storage, shaking speed and shaking interruption. A longer shaking time in the standard leaching test of excavated soils is suggested for regulatory purposes in Japan. The use of the PPLI concept for quick estimation of the potential As leachability from excavated soils was supported by the good reproducibility of PPLI results obtained from SLTs under different test parameters.