1
|
Lee Argov EJ, Rodriguez CB, Agovino M, Schmitt KM, Desperito E, Karr AG, Wei Y, Terry MB, Tehranifar P. Screening mammography frequency following dense breast notification among a predominantly Hispanic/Latina screening cohort. Cancer Causes Control 2024:10.1007/s10552-024-01871-7. [PMID: 38607569 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-024-01871-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Nationally legislated dense breast notification (DBN) informs women of their breast density (BD) and the impact of BD on breast cancer risk and detection, but consequences for screening participation are unclear. We evaluated the association of DBN in New York State (NYS) with subsequent screening mammography in a largely Hispanic/Latina cohort. METHODS Women aged 40-60 were surveyed in their preferred language (33% English, 67% Spanish) during screening mammography from 2016 to 2018. We used clinical BD classification from mammography records from 2013 (NYS DBN enactment) through enrollment (baseline) to create a 6-category variable capturing prior and new DBN receipt (sent only after clinically dense mammograms). We used this variable to compare the number of subsequent mammograms (0, 1, ≥ 2) from 10 to 30 months after baseline using ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS In a sample of 728 women (78% foreign-born, 72% Hispanic, 46% high school education or less), first-time screeners and women who received DBN for the first time after prior non-dense mammograms had significantly fewer screening mammograms within 30 months of baseline (Odds Ratios range: 0.33 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.12-0.85) to 0.38 (95% CI 0.17-0.82)) compared to women with prior mammography but no DBN. There were no differences in subsequent mammogram frequency between women with multiple DBN and those who never received DBN. Findings were consistent across age, language, health literacy, and education groups. CONCLUSION Women receiving their first DBN after previous non-dense mammograms have lower mammography participation within 2.5 years. DBN has limited influence on screening participation of first-time screeners and those with persistent dense mammograms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica J Lee Argov
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168Th St., New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Carmen B Rodriguez
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168Th St., New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Mariangela Agovino
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168Th St., New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Karen M Schmitt
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Division of Academics, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elise Desperito
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anita G Karr
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168Th St., New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Ying Wei
- Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168Th St., New York, NY, USA
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168Th St., New York, NY, 10032, USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Parisa Tehranifar
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168Th St., New York, NY, 10032, USA.
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Isautier JMJ, Wang S, Houssami N, McCaffery K, Brennan ME, Li T, Nickel B. The impact of breast density notification on psychosocial outcomes in racial and ethnic minorities: A systematic review. Breast 2024; 74:103693. [PMID: 38430905 PMCID: PMC10918326 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High breast density is an independent risk factor for breast cancer and decreases the sensitivity of mammography. This systematic review synthesizes the evidence on the impact of breast density (BD) information and/or notification on women's psychosocial outcomes among women from racial and ethnic minority groups. METHODS A systematic search was performed in March 2023, and the articles were identified using CINHAL, Embase, Medline, and PsychInfo databases. The search strategy combined the terms "breast", "density", "notification" and synonyms. The authors specifically kept the search terms broad and did not include terms related to race and ethnicity. Full-text articles were reviewed for analysis by race, ethnicity and primary language of participants. Two authors evaluated the eligibility of studies with verification from the study team, extracted and crosschecked data, and assessed the risk of bias. RESULTS Of 1784 articles, 32 articles published from 2003 to 2023 were included. Thirty-one studies were conducted in the United States and one in Australia, with 28 quantitative and four qualitative methodologies. The overall results in terms of breast density awareness, knowledge, communication with healthcare professionals, screening intentions and supplemental screening practice were heterogenous across studies. Barriers to understanding BD notifications and intentions/access to supplemental screening among racial and ethnic minorities included socioeconomic factors, language, health literacy and medical mistrust. CONCLUSIONS A one-size approach to inform women about their BD may further disadvantage racial and ethnic minority women. BD notification and accompanying information should be tailored and translated to ensure readability and understandability by all women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M J Isautier
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales Australia; Wiser Healthcare, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - S Wang
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - N Houssami
- Wiser Healthcare, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - K McCaffery
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales Australia; Wiser Healthcare, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - M E Brennan
- Westmead Breast Cancer Institute, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Sydney, Australia; National School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - T Li
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - B Nickel
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales Australia; Wiser Healthcare, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sprague BL, Ichikawa L, Eavey J, Lowry KP, Rauscher G, O’Meara ES, Miglioretti DL, Chen S, Lee JM, Stout NK, Mandelblatt JS, Alsheik N, Herschorn SD, Perry H, Weaver DL, Kerlikowske K. Breast cancer risk characteristics of women undergoing whole-breast ultrasound screening versus mammography alone. Cancer 2023; 129:2456-2468. [PMID: 37303202 PMCID: PMC10506533 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are no consensus guidelines for supplemental breast cancer screening with whole-breast ultrasound. However, criteria for women at high risk of mammography screening failures (interval invasive cancer or advanced cancer) have been identified. Mammography screening failure risk was evaluated among women undergoing supplemental ultrasound screening in clinical practice compared with women undergoing mammography alone. METHODS A total of 38,166 screening ultrasounds and 825,360 screening mammograms without supplemental screening were identified during 2014-2020 within three Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) registries. Risk of interval invasive cancer and advanced cancer were determined using BCSC prediction models. High interval invasive breast cancer risk was defined as heterogeneously dense breasts and BCSC 5-year breast cancer risk ≥2.5% or extremely dense breasts and BCSC 5-year breast cancer risk ≥1.67%. Intermediate/high advanced cancer risk was defined as BCSC 6-year advanced breast cancer risk ≥0.38%. RESULTS A total of 95.3% of 38,166 ultrasounds were among women with heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts, compared with 41.8% of 825,360 screening mammograms without supplemental screening (p < .0001). Among women with dense breasts, high interval invasive breast cancer risk was prevalent in 23.7% of screening ultrasounds compared with 18.5% of screening mammograms without supplemental imaging (adjusted odds ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.30-1.39); intermediate/high advanced cancer risk was prevalent in 32.0% of screening ultrasounds versus 30.5% of screening mammograms without supplemental screening (adjusted odds ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.89-0.94). CONCLUSIONS Ultrasound screening was highly targeted to women with dense breasts, but only a modest proportion were at high mammography screening failure risk. A clinically significant proportion of women undergoing mammography screening alone were at high mammography screening failure risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian L. Sprague
- Office of Health Promotion Research, Department of Surgery, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
- Department of Radiology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
- University of Vermont Cancer Center, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
| | - Laura Ichikawa
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente WA, Seattle, Washington
| | - Joanna Eavey
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente WA, Seattle, Washington
| | - Kathryn P. Lowry
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington and Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - Garth Rauscher
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Ellen S. O’Meara
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente WA, Seattle, Washington
| | - Diana L. Miglioretti
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente WA, Seattle, Washington
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA
| | - Shuai Chen
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA
| | - Janie M. Lee
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington and Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - Natasha K. Stout
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Jeanne S. Mandelblatt
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Nila Alsheik
- Advocate Caldwell Breast Center, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, 1700 Luther Lane, Park Ridge, IL
| | - Sally D. Herschorn
- Department of Radiology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
- University of Vermont Cancer Center, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
| | - Hannah Perry
- Department of Radiology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
- University of Vermont Cancer Center, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
| | - Donald L. Weaver
- University of Vermont Cancer Center, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
| | - Karla Kerlikowske
- Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA
- General Internal Medicine Section, Department of Veterans Affairs, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wehbe A, Gonte MR, O'Neill SC, Amit‐Yousif A, Purrington K, Manning M, Simon MS. Predictors of nonadherence to breast cancer screening guidelines in a United States urban comprehensive cancer center. Cancer Med 2023; 12:15482-15491. [PMID: 37329206 PMCID: PMC10417068 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to identify predictors of nonadherence to breast cancer screening guidelines in an urban screening clinic among high- and average-risk women in the United States. METHODS We reviewed records of 6090 women who received ≥2 screening mammograms over 2 years at the Karmanos Cancer Institute to examine how breast cancer risk and breast density were associated with guideline-concordant screening. Incongruent screening was defined as receiving supplemental imaging between screening mammograms for average-risk women, and as not receiving recommended supplemental imaging for high-risk women. We used t-tests and chi-square tests to examine bivariate associations with guideline-congruent screening, and probit regression to regress guideline-congruence unto breast cancer risk, breast density, and their interaction, controlling for age and race. RESULTS Incongruent screening was more likely among high- versus average-risk women (97.7% vs. 0.9%, p < 0.01). Among average-risk women, incongruent screening was more likely among those with dense versus nondense breasts (2.0% vs. 0.1%, p < 0.01). Among high-risk women, incongruent screening was more likely among those with nondense versus dense breasts (99.5% vs. 95.2%, p < 0.01). The significant main effects of density and high-risk on increased incongruent screening were qualified by a density by high-risk interaction, showing a weaker association between risk and incongruent screening among women with dense breasts (simple slope = 3.71, p < 0.01) versus nondense breasts (simple slope = 5.79, p < 0.01). Age and race were not associated with incongruent screening. CONCLUSIONS Lack of adherence to evidence-based screening guidelines has led to underutilization of supplementary imaging for high-risk women and potential overutilization for women with dense breasts without other risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Wehbe
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of OncologyBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMichiganUSA
- Population Studies and Disparities Research ProgramBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMichiganUSA
- Wayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMichiganUSA
| | - Madeleine R. Gonte
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Wayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMichiganUSA
| | - Suzanne C. O'Neill
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Cancer CenterGeorgetown UniversityWashingtonDCUSA
| | - Alit Amit‐Yousif
- Center for Breast HealthOakland Macomb Obstetrics and GynecologyRochester HillsMichiganUSA
| | - Kristen Purrington
- Population Studies and Disparities Research ProgramBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMichiganUSA
| | - Mark Manning
- Department of PsychologyOakland UniversityRochesterMichiganUSA
- Center for Molecular Medicine and GeneticsWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMichiganUSA
| | - Michael S. Simon
- Department of OncologyBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMichiganUSA
- Population Studies and Disparities Research ProgramBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMichiganUSA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sivanushanthan S, Wu T, Wahl A, Li T, Luta G, Song JH, O’Neill S, Conley CC. Patterns of Screening Mammography and Breast MRI During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective, Chart-Review Study. J Breast Imaging 2023; 5:277-286. [PMID: 37223455 PMCID: PMC10202024 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbad006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Objective This study examined patterns of breast cancer screening during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods This retrospective study was approved by the Georgetown University IRB. Review of electronic medical records identified screening mammograms and breast MRIs between March 13, 2018 and December 31, 2020, for female patients aged 18 to 85 years. Descriptive statistics characterized patterns of breast cancer screening before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Logistic regression analyses examined whether receipt of breast MRI differed over time and demographic and clinical factors associated with receipt of breast MRI in 2020. Results Data included 47 956 mammography visits in 32 778 patients and 407 screening breast MRI visits in 340 patients. After an initial decrease following the declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic, both screening mammograms and screening breast MRI demonstrated early recovery. Although the mammography receipt remained sustained, the receipt of screening breast MRI decreased in late 2020. Odds of having a breast MRI did not differ between 2018 and 2019 (OR = 1.07; 95% CI = 0.92%-1.25%; P = 0.384) but were significantly lower in 2020 versus 2019 (OR = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.61%-0.94%; P = 0.011). No demographic or clinical factors were associated with receipt of breast MRI during the COVID-19 pandemic (all P-values ≥0.225). Conclusion Breast cancer screening decreased following the declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic. Although both procedures demonstrated early recovery, the rebound in screening breast MRI was not sustained. Interventions promoting return to screening breast MRI may be needed for high-risk women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tianmin Wu
- Georgetown University, Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Anastacia Wahl
- Georgetown University, School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Tengfei Li
- Georgetown University, Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Washington, DC, USA
| | - George Luta
- Georgetown University, Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Judy H Song
- Georgetown University, Department of Radiology, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Suzanne O’Neill
- Georgetown University, Department of Oncology, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Claire C Conley
- Georgetown University, Department of Oncology, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Miller MM, Ganti R, Repich K, Patrie JT, Anderson RT, Harvey JA. Factors Associated With Breast Cancer Screening Behaviors Among Women With Dense Breasts. J Breast Imaging 2023; 5:125-134. [PMID: 38416932 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbac090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to identify patient factors associated with patient-reported screening behaviors in women with dense breasts. METHODS An IRB-approved survey study of women with dense breasts presenting for annual screening mammography at an outpatient imaging center was previously conducted from March 2017 to February 2018. The survey included questions regarding mammographic screening frequency and recent participation in supplemental screening. These survey data were combined post hoc with clinical and demographic data and socioeconomic data imputed from census data. Logistic regression was used to identify patient factors associated with reported screening behaviors. RESULTS Surveys were completed by 508 women (median age, 59.0 years; range, 31.0-86.0 years) with dense breasts. Multivariable analysis demonstrated an independent association of undergoing mammographic screening annually with a history of discussing breast density with a doctor (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.60; P = 0.019). Undergoing supplemental screening in the previous three years was independently associated with younger age (AOR, 1.59; P = 0.004), strong family history of breast cancer (AOR, 3.84; P = 0.027), higher perceived personal risk for breast cancer (AOR, 3.47; P = 0.004), and increased concern about radiation associated with screening examinations (AOR, 3.31; P = 0.006). CONCLUSION Women with dense breasts who had discussed breast density with a doctor were more likely to report undergoing annual screening mammography, while younger women and women with a strong family history of breast cancer, higher perceived personal risk for breast cancer, or greater concern about radiation were more likely to report recently undergoing supplemental screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew M Miller
- University of Virginia Health System, Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Ramapriya Ganti
- University of Virginia Health System, Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Kathy Repich
- University of Virginia Health System, Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - James T Patrie
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Roger T Anderson
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Jennifer A Harvey
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Imaging Sciences, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yamamuro M, Asai Y, Hashimoto N, Yasuda N, Kimura H, Yamada T, Nemoto M, Kimura Y, Handa H, Yoshida H, Abe K, Tada M, Habe H, Nagaoka T, Nin S, Ishii K, Kondo Y. Utility of U-Net for the objective segmentation of the fibroglandular tissue region on clinical digital mammograms. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2022; 8. [PMID: 35728581 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac7ada] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
This study investigates the equivalence or compatibility between U-Net and visual segmentations of fibroglandular tissue regions by mammography experts for calculating the breast density and mean glandular dose (MGD). A total of 703 mediolateral oblique-view mammograms were used for segmentation. Two region types were set as the ground truth (determined visually): (1) one type included only the region where fibroglandular tissue was identifiable (called the 'dense region'); (2) the other type included the region where the fibroglandular tissue may have existed in the past, provided that apparent adipose-only parts, such as the retromammary space, are excluded (the 'diffuse region'). U-Net was trained to segment the fibroglandular tissue region with an adaptive moment estimation optimiser, five-fold cross-validated with 400 training and 100 validation mammograms, and tested with 203 mammograms. The breast density and MGD were calculated using the van Engeland and Dance formulas, respectively, and compared between U-Net and the ground truth with the Dice similarity coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. Dice similarity coefficients between U-Net and the ground truth were 0.895 and 0.939 for the dense and diffuse regions, respectively. In the Bland-Altman analysis, no proportional or fixed errors were discovered in either the dense or diffuse region for breast density, whereas a slight proportional error was discovered in both regions for the MGD (the slopes of the regression lines were -0.0299 and -0.0443 for the dense and diffuse regions, respectively). Consequently, the U-Net and ground truth were deemed equivalent (interchangeable) for breast density and compatible (interchangeable following four simple arithmetic operations) for MGD. U-Net-based segmentation of the fibroglandular tissue region was satisfactory for both regions, providing reliable segmentation for breast density and MGD calculations. U-Net will be useful in developing a reliable individualised screening-mammography programme, instead of relying on the visual judgement of mammography experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mika Yamamuro
- Radiology Center, Kindai University Hospital, 377-2, Ono-higashi, Osaka-sayama, Osaka 589-8511, Japan.,Graduate School of Health Sciences, Niigata University, 2-746, Asahimachidori, Chuouku, Niigata 951-8518, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Asai
- Radiology Center, Kindai University Hospital, 377-2, Ono-higashi, Osaka-sayama, Osaka 589-8511, Japan
| | - Naomi Hashimoto
- Radiology Center, Kindai University Hospital, 377-2, Ono-higashi, Osaka-sayama, Osaka 589-8511, Japan
| | - Nao Yasuda
- Radiology Center, Kindai University Hospital, 377-2, Ono-higashi, Osaka-sayama, Osaka 589-8511, Japan
| | - Hiorto Kimura
- Radiology Center, Kindai University Hospital, 377-2, Ono-higashi, Osaka-sayama, Osaka 589-8511, Japan
| | - Takahiro Yamada
- Division of Positron Emission Tomography Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, Kindai University, 377-2, Ono-higashi, Osaka-sayama, Osaka 589-8511, Japan
| | - Mitsutaka Nemoto
- Department of Computational Systems Biology, Kindai University Faculty of Biology-Oriented Science and Technology, 930, Nishimitani, Kinokawa, Wakayama 649-6433, Japan
| | - Yuichi Kimura
- Department of Computational Systems Biology, Kindai University Faculty of Biology-Oriented Science and Technology, 930, Nishimitani, Kinokawa, Wakayama 649-6433, Japan
| | - Hisashi Handa
- Department of Informatics, Kindai University Faculty of Science and Engineering, 3-4-1, Kowakae, Higashi-osaka, Osaka 577-8502, Japan
| | - Hisashi Yoshida
- Department of Computational Systems Biology, Kindai University Faculty of Biology-Oriented Science and Technology, 930, Nishimitani, Kinokawa, Wakayama 649-6433, Japan
| | - Koji Abe
- Department of Informatics, Kindai University Faculty of Science and Engineering, 3-4-1, Kowakae, Higashi-osaka, Osaka 577-8502, Japan
| | - Masahiro Tada
- Department of Informatics, Kindai University Faculty of Science and Engineering, 3-4-1, Kowakae, Higashi-osaka, Osaka 577-8502, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Habe
- Department of Informatics, Kindai University Faculty of Science and Engineering, 3-4-1, Kowakae, Higashi-osaka, Osaka 577-8502, Japan
| | - Takashi Nagaoka
- Department of Computational Systems Biology, Kindai University Faculty of Biology-Oriented Science and Technology, 930, Nishimitani, Kinokawa, Wakayama 649-6433, Japan
| | - Seiun Nin
- Department of Radiology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2, Ono-higashi, Osaka-sayama, Osaka 589-8511, Japan
| | - Kazunari Ishii
- Department of Radiology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2, Ono-higashi, Osaka-sayama, Osaka 589-8511, Japan
| | - Yohan Kondo
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Niigata University, 2-746, Asahimachidori, Chuouku, Niigata 951-8518, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Miller MM, Repich K, Patrie JT, Anderson RT, Harvey JA. Patient Characteristics Associated With Patient-Reported Deterrents to Adjunct Breast Cancer Screening of Patients With Dense Breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021;:1-11. [PMID: 33147054 DOI: 10.2214/AJR.20.24516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND. The success of adjunct breast cancer screening of women with dense breasts can be enhanced by identifying and addressing patient concerns regarding adjunct screening modalities. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to identify patient characteristics associated with patient-reported concerns about adjunct breast cancer screening to facilitate the development of a more effective screening model for women with dense breasts. METHODS. Patients with dense breasts completed surveys between March 2017 and February 2018 regarding factors that might deter them from adjunct screening and about which of three hypothetical screening examinations they might prefer. Additional patient data were extracted from medical records, and socioeconomic data were imputed from federal census data. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify associations between patient characteristics and patient attitudes toward adjunct screening. RESULTS. Surveys were completed by 508 women (median age, 59.0 years) with dense breasts. Lower confidence in the sensitivity of mammography of dense breasts was independently associated with lesser concern about adjunct screening examination time (1 divided by adjusted odds ratio [1/AOR], 0.55 [95% CI, 0.34-0.89]), additional imaging that could result (1/AOR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.31-0.85]), and greater preference for a more sensitive hypothetical screening examination (1/AOR, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.20-2.86]). Concern about examination cost, the most commonly cited deterrent to adjunct screening (66.9%), was independently associated with younger age (1/AOR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.01-2.08]) but not with imputed socioeconomic variables or other tested variables. Younger age was also associated with lesser concern about pain (1/AOR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.48-0.99]), additional imaging that could result (1/AOR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.31-0.76]), and IV contrast administration (1/AOR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.37-0.83]). CONCLUSION. Younger age and lower confidence in the sensitivity of mammography among women with dense breasts are independently associated with lesser patient concern about common deterrents to adjunct breast cancer screening. Younger age is independently associated with greater concern about the cost of undergoing adjunct breast cancer screening. CLINICAL IMPACT. Concerns about adjunct screening may be reduced by educating patients about the lower sensitivity of mammography of dense breasts and by finding ways to address or mitigate the financial and daily-life impact of adjunct screening, especially for younger patients.
Collapse
|
9
|
Manning M, O'Neill S, Purrington K. Physicians' perceptions of breast density notification laws and appropriate patient follow-up. Breast J 2021; 27:586-594. [PMID: 33991030 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.14240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Breast density notification laws have been adopted in the absence of consistent guidelines for post-notification follow-up. This can lead to inconsistent and potentially deficient management of women's health due to inconsistent physician practices. We examined physicians' knowledge and practices regarding follow-up for patients who receive density notifications. Physicians who referred patients to a Michigan hospital network for screening mammograms were recruited to participate in survey study; 105 (29.8%) responded. The survey assessed physicians' demographics, knowledge, and awareness of breast density and breast cancer risk and of density notification laws, and perceptions of appropriate follow-up behaviors for their patients who received density notifications. Most physicians (75%) knew about the notification law, and they were generally comfortable responding to breast density questions and deciding on follow-up. Most indicated that additional breast imaging (68.0%), followed by assessing breast cancer risk (24.7%) were appropriate follow-up responses. Physicians who performed breast cancer risk assessments, and who were more comfortable with breast density questions and follow-up decision making, were more likely to propose additional imaging. Male physicians were less likely to propose assessing breast cancer risk, and less likely to propose clinical and/or breast self-examinations. Divergence between practice and guidelines when it comes to supplemental breast cancer screening, coupled with density notification language that promotes additional screening in the absence of consistent evidence, remains concerning. Improved understanding of how density notification recipients and their physicians make decisions about supplemental screening is warranted to ensure that breast cancer risk is properly considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Manning
- Department of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Suzanne O'Neill
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Kristen Purrington
- Department of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Huang S, Houssami N, Brennan M, Nickel B. The impact of mandatory mammographic breast density notification on supplemental screening practice in the United States: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 187:11-30. [PMID: 33774734 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06203-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Dense breast tissue is an independent risk factor for breast cancer and lowers the sensitivity of screening mammography. Supplemental screening with ultrasound or MRI improves breast cancer detection rate but has potential harms. Breast density notification (BDN) legislation has been introduced in the United States (US) and its impact on supplemental screening practice is unclear. This study systematically reviewed current evidence to explore the impact of BDN on supplemental screening practice in the US. METHODS Medline, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and the Cinhal Library databases were searched (2009-August 2020). Studies were assessed for eligibility, data were extracted and summarised, and study quality was evaluated. RESULTS Evidence from the included studies (n = 14) predominantly showed that BDN legislation increased the overall utilisation of supplemental screening by 0.5-143%. This effect was amplified if the notification included a follow-up telephone call informing women about additional screening benefits, and if the state's law mandated insurance cover for supplemental screening. Likelihood of supplemental screening was also influenced by history of breast biopsy and family history of breast cancer, race, age, socioeconomic status, density category, and physician's specialty and region. Some studies reported increases in biopsy rate (up to 4%) and cancer detection rate (up to 11%) after implementation of BDN legislation. CONCLUSION BDN leads to increased use of supplemental screening. This has implications for women and the health system. These findings can help inform current and future screening programs, where breast density notification is currently implemented or being considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuangqin Huang
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nehmat Houssami
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Meagan Brennan
- School of Medicine Sydney, University of Notre Dame Australia, Oxford St, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
- Westmead Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Brooke Nickel
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wernli KJ, Bowles EA, Knerr S, Leppig KA, Ehrlich K, Gao H, Schwartz MD, O’Neill SC. Characteristics Associated with Participation in ENGAGED 2 - A Web-based Breast Cancer Risk Communication and Decision Support Trial. Perm J 2020; 24:1-4. [PMID: 33482952 PMCID: PMC7849258 DOI: 10.7812/tpp/19.205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated demographic and clinical characteristics associated with participation in a clinical trial testing the efficacy of an online tool to support breast cancer risk communication and decision support for risk mitigation to determine the generalizability of trial results. METHODS Eligible women were members of Kaiser Permanente Washington aged 40-69 years with a recent normal screening mammogram, heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts and a calculated risk of > 1.67% based on the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium 5-year breast cancer risk model. Trial outcomes were chemoprevention and breast magnetic resonance imaging by 12-months post-baseline. Women were recruited via mail with phone follow-up using plain language materials notifying them of their density status and higher than average breast cancer risk. Multivariable logistic regression calculated independent odds ratios (ORs) for associations between demographic and clinical characteristics with trial participation. RESULTS Of 2,569 eligible women contacted, 995 (38.7%) participated. Women with some college (OR = 1.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-2.96) or college degree (OR = 3.35, 95% CI 2.29-4.90) were more likely to participate than high school-educated women. Race/ethnicity also was associated with participation (African-American OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.87; Asian OR = 0.22, 95% CI 0.12-0.41). Multivariate adjusted ORs for family history of breast/ovarian cancer were not associated with trial participation. DISCUSSION Use of plain language and potential access to a website providing personal breast cancer risk information and education were insufficient in achieving representative participation in a breast cancer prevention trial. Additional methods of targeting and tailoring, potentially facilitated by clinical and community outreach, are needed to facilitate equitable engagement for all women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen J Wernli
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Erin A Bowles
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | - Kelly Ehrlich
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Hongyuan Gao
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Marc D Schwartz
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Suzanne C O’Neill
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mahorter SS, Knerr S, Bowles EJA, Wernli KJ, Gao H, Schwartz MD, O'Neill SC. Prior breast density awareness, knowledge, and communication in a health system-embedded behavioral intervention trial. Cancer 2020; 126:1614-1621. [PMID: 31977078 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2019] [Revised: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast density is an important breast cancer risk factor and a focus of recent national and state health policy efforts. This article describes breast density awareness, knowledge, and communication among participants in a health system-embedded trial with clinically elevated breast cancer risk 1 year before state-mandated density disclosure. METHODS Trial participants' demographics and prior health history were ascertained from electronic health records. The proportions of women reporting prior breast density awareness, knowledge of density's masking effect, and communication with a provider about their own breast density were calculated using baseline interview data collected from 2017 to 2018. Multiple logistic regression was used to estimate associations between women's characteristics and density awareness, knowledge, and communication. RESULTS Although the overwhelming majority of participants had heard of breast density (91%) and were aware of breast density's masking effect (87%), only 60% had ever discussed their breast density with a provider. Annual mammography screening was associated with prior breast density awareness (odds ratio [OR], 2.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-6.81), knowledge (OR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.20-6.66), and communication (OR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.34-6.16) compared with an infrequent or unknown screening interval. Receipt of breast biopsy was also associated with prior knowledge (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.04-2.45) and communication (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.00-1.85). CONCLUSIONS Breast density awareness and knowledge are high among insured women participating in clinical research, even in the absence of mandated density disclosure. Patient-provider communication about personal density status is less common, particularly among women with fewer interactions with breast health specialists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siobhan S Mahorter
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sarah Knerr
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Karen J Wernli
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Hongyuan Gao
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Marc D Schwartz
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Suzanne C O'Neill
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Manning M, Lucas T, Davis SN, Valdimarsdottir HB, Thompson H. Editor's Choice: Deliberative and non-deliberative effects of descriptive and injunctive norms on cancer screening behaviors among African Americans. Psychol Health 2020; 35:774-94. [PMID: 31747816 DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2019.1691725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Objective: Two longitudinal studies examined whether effects of subjective norms on secondary cancer prevention behaviors were stronger and more likely to non-deliberative (i.e., partially independent of behavioral intentions) for African Americans (AAs) compared to European Americans (EAs), and whether the effects were moderated by racial identity. Design: Study 1 examined between-race differences in predictors of physician communication following receipt of notifications about breast density. Study 2 examined predictors of prostate cancer screening among AA men who had not been previously screened.Main Outcome Measures: Participants' injunctive and descriptive normative perceptions; racial identity (Study 2); self-reported physician communication (Study 1) and PSA testing (Study 2) behaviors at follow up. Results: In Study 1, subjective norms were significantly associated with behaviors for AAs, but not for EAs. Moreover, there were significant non-deliberative effects of norms for AAs. In Study 2, there was further evidence of non-deliberative effects of subjective norms for AAs. Non-deliberative effects of descriptive norms were stronger for AAs who more strongly identified with their racial group. Conclusion: Subjective norms, effects of which are non-deliberative and heightened by racial identity, may be a uniquely robust predictor of secondary cancer prevention behaviors for AAs. Implications for targeted screening interventions are discussed.
Collapse
|