Good Engraftment but Quality and Donor Concerns for Cryopreserved Hemopoietic Progenitor Cell Products Collected During the COVID-19 Pandemic

The Impact of Cryopreservation on Hematopoietic Stem Cell Engraftment and Post-transplant Outcome During the COVID-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND/AIM

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the current management of allotransplanted patients in whom fresh hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) were replaced by cryopreserved ones. The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy and safety of cryopreserved HSCs when compared with the fresh ones.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 254 allogeneic stem cell transplantations (HSCT) procedures performed between 2020-2021 included the following donors: matched related (MRD; n=68), matched unrelated (MUD; n=148) and haploidentical (HID; n=38). 50% of patients (non-cryo group) received fresh grafts, whereas the remaining patients (cryo group) were transplanted with cryopreserved cells.

RESULTS

No differences in terms of median days to neutrophil [MRD/MUD/HID cryo- and non-cryo groups: 17 vs. 16 (p=0.27), 19 vs. 18 (p=0.83), 22 vs. 22 (p=0.83) days, respectively] and platelet [MRD/MUD/HID cryo- and non-cryo groups: 14 vs. 14 (p=0.25), 17 vs. 17 (p=0.33), 21 vs. 19 (p=0.36) days, respectively] engraftments were demonstrated. Among MUD graft recipients, platelet engraftment rates were 81% in the cryo- and 96% in the non-cryo group (p=0.01). OS rates were comparable at 1 year after HSCT between MRD/MUD/HID cryo- and non-cryo groups: 53% vs. 60% (p=0.54), 60% vs. 66% (p=0.5), 50% vs. 41% (p=0.56), respectively.

CONCLUSION

During the COVID-19 pandemic, cryopreserved HSCs did not have a negative impact on median engraftment time and OS when compared to fresh HSCs. In the MUD group, platelet engraftment rate was lower in cryopreserved HSC recipients.

Pros and Cons of Cryopreserving Allogeneic Stem Cell Products

The COVID-19 pandemic has precipitously changed the practice of transplanting fresh allografts. The safety measures adopted during the pandemic prompted the near-universal graft cryopreservation. However, the influence of cryopreserving allogeneic grafts on long-term transplant outcomes has emerged only in the most recent literature. In this review, the basic principles of cell cryopreservation are revised and the effects of cryopreservation on the different graft components are carefully reexamined. Finally, a literature revision on studies comparing transplant outcomes in patients receiving cryopreserved and fresh grafts is illustrated.

Clinical impact of cryopreservation of allogeneic hematopoietic cell grafts during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic

At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the National Marrow Donor Program mandated the cryopreservation of hematopoietic cell grafts from volunteer unrelated donors because of numerous patient and donor safety concerns and logistical hurdles. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research outcomes database, we report the impact of cryopreservation on overall survival (OS) and other outcomes within 1 year after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We analyzed 1543 recipients of cryopreserved allografts receiving HCT at US centers during the first 6 months of the pandemic and compared them with 2499 recipients of fresh allografts during a 6-month period in 2019. On multivariable regression analysis, we observed no difference in the OS (P = .09), nonrelapse mortality (P = .89), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), or GVHD- and relapse-free survival (P = .58) in recipients of cryopreserved vs fresh allografts. Disease-free survival (DFS) was lower in the cryopreserved allograft recipients (P = .006) because of a higher risk of relapse (P = .01) compared with the fresh allograft recipients. Primary graft failure was higher (P = .01), and the risk of chronic GVHD was lower (P = .001) with cryopreservation compared with fresh grafts. In conclusion, although there was no negative impact of cryopreservation on OS, relapse was higher, and DFS was lower than that with no cryopreservation. Fresh grafts are recommended as the pandemic-related logistical hurdles resolve. Cryopreservation should be considered an option for patients when fresh grafts are not feasible.

Cryopreservation of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Products During COVID-19 Pandemic: Graft Characterization and Engraftment Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered the deployment of unfamiliar measures to safeguard successful allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Among these measures, cryopreservation offered logistical benefits that could outlast the pandemic, including graft availability and timely clinical service. The purpose of this study was to evaluate graft quality and hematopoietic reconstitution in patients transplanted with cryopreserved allogeneic stem cell products during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

We evaluated 44 patients who underwent allo-HCT using cryopreserved grafts consisting of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) apheresis (A) and bone marrow (BM) products at Mount Sinai Hospital. Comparative analyses of 37 grafts infused fresh during the one-year period preceding the pandemic were performed. Assessment of cellular therapy products included total nucleated cell and CD34+ cell enumeration, viability, and post-thaw recovery. The primary clinical endpoint was the evaluation of engraftment (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] and platelet count) and donor chimerism (presence of CD33+ and CD3+ donor cells) at day +30 and +100 post-transplant. Adverse events related to cell infusion were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were comparable between the fresh and cryopreserved groups with 2 exceptions in the HPC-A cohort: the number of patients in the cryopreserved group that received haploidentical grafts was 6 times that in the fresh group, and the number of patients in the fresh group with a Karnofsky performance score >90 was double that in the cryopreserved group. The quality of HPC-A and HPC-BM products was not affected by cryopreservation, and all grafts met the release criteria for infusion. The pandemic did not affect the time between collection and cryopreservation (median, 24 hours) and time in storage (median, 15 days). Median time to ANC recovery was significantly delayed in recipients of cryopreserved HPC-A (15 vs 11 days, P = .0121), and there was a trend toward delayed platelet engraftment (24 vs 19 days, P = .0712). The delay in ANC and platelet recovery was not observed when only matched graft recipients were compared. Cryopreservation did not affect the ability of HPC-BM grafts to engraft and reconstitute hematopoiesis, and there was no difference in the rates of ANC and platelet recovery. Achievement of donor CD3/CD33 chimerism was not affected by cryopreservation of either HPC-A or HPC-BM products. Graft failure was observed in only 1 case, a recipient of cryopreserved HPC-BM. Three recipients of cryopreserved HPC-A grafts died before ANC engraftment from infectious complications. Remarkably, 22% of our studied population had myelofibrosis, and almost half received cryopreserved HPC-A grafts with no graft failure observed. Finally, patients receiving cryopreserved grafts were at a higher risk of infusion-related adverse events than those receiving fresh grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

Cryopreservation of allogeneic grafts results in adequate product quality with minimal impact on short-term clinical outcomes, except for an increased risk of infusion-related adverse events. Cryopreservation is a safe option in terms of graft quality and hematopoietic reconstitution with logistical benefits, but additional data are needed to determine long-term outcomes and assess whether this is a suitable strategy for at-risk patients.

Variable recovery of cryopreserved hematopoietic stem cells and leukocyte subpopulations in leukapheresis products

INTRODUCTION

Due to the expansion of cell therapy using not only haematopoietic stem cells (HSC) but also other leukocyte subpopulations, the loss of these cells in cryopreserved apheresis products needs to be evaluated. Various factors that could negatively affect post-thaw recovery, such as leukapheresis product characteristics, storage time and cryopreservation protocols have been identified.

METHODS

The post-thaw recovery of HSCs, lymphocytes, NK cells and monocytes, as well as the factors that could adversely affect it were analysed in autologous and allogeneic leukapheresis products.

RESULTS

The lowest post-thaw recovery was observed in autologous and allogeneic CD34+ cells, with the median of 73.7% and 68.1%, respectively. In leukocyte subpopulation, the lowest post-thaw recovery was observed for CD14+ cells, both autologous and allogeneic. The highest post-thaw recovery was observed for CD3+/CD8+ cells in autologous, and for CD19+ cells in allogeneic samples. The statistically significant difference was observed between autologous and allogeneic PBSC products for CD3+ cell recovery (P = 0.031) and CD3+/CD8+ cell recovery (P = 0.009). The evaluation of factors that could adversely affect the post-thaw recovery in autologous samples showed weak negative correlations between platelet concentration and CD3+ recovery, as well as between storage time and CD3+CD8+ recovery. In allogeneic samples, a strong negative correlation was observed only between the percentage of granulocytes and CD3+, CD3+/CD8+ and CD3+/CD4+ cell recoveries.

CONCLUSION

Since various post-thaw recoveries of leukocyte subpopulations were observed, the cell therapy manufacturing centers should evaluate how their cryopreservation method and other factors affect the recovery of cell population of interest in their settings.

Secondary Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 19 Pandemic on Patients and the Cellular Therapy Healthcare Ecosystem

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has significantly impacted global health and healthcare delivery systems. To characterize the secondary effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and mitigation strategies used in the delivery of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) care, we performed a comprehensive literature search encompassing changes in specific donor collection, processing practices, patient outcomes, and patient-related concerns specific to HSCT and HSCT-related healthcare delivery. In this review, we summarize the available literature on the secondary impacts the COVID-19 pandemic on the fields of HSCT and cellular therapy. The COVID-19 pandemic has had numerous secondary impacts on patients undergoing HSCT and the healthcare delivery systems involved in providing complex care to HSCT recipients. Institutions must identify these influences on outcomes and adjust accordingly to maintain and improve outcomes for the transplantation and cellular therapy community.

Zelltherapie in den Zeiten von SARS-CoV-2

Ein breites Spektrum von Disruptionen, aber auch blitzschnelle Innovationen, hat die SARS-CoV-2 Pandemie gebracht. Dieser Übersichtsartikel betrachtet die Pandemie aus der Warte der Zelltherapie; konkret werden vier Aspekte untersucht: Wie unterscheiden sich die Risiken von Zelltherapie-Patienten mit SARS-CoV-2 Infektion und COVID von denen der Allgemeinbevölkerung? Sind Empfänger von Zelltherapien, hier speziell autologe und allogene Stammzelltransplantationsempfänger sowie Empfänger von CAR-T-Zell-Präparaten, klinisch relevant durch SARS-CoV-2 Vakzine immunisierbar? Welche Auswirkungen hat die Pandemie mit Spenderausfallrisiko und Zusammenbruch von Supply Chains auf die Versorgung mit Zelltherapeutika? Gibt es Zelltherapeutika, die bei schwerem COVID therapeutisch nutzbringend eingesetzt werden können? In aller Kürze, das erwartete massiv erhöhte Risiko von Zelltherapie-Patienten, im Infektionsfall einen schweren Verlauf zu erleiden oder zu sterben, wurde bestätigt. Die Vakzine induziert jedoch bei vielen dieser Patienten humorale und zelluläre Immunität, wenn auch weniger zuverlässig als bei Gesunden. Dank kreativer Lösungen gelang es, die Versorgung mit Zelltherapeutika im Wesentlichen uneingeschränkt aufrecht zu erhalten. SARS-CoV-2-spezifische T-Zell-Präparate für den adoptiven Immuntransfer wurden entwickelt, eine therapeutische Konstellation diese anzuwenden ergab sich jedoch nicht. Therapiestudien mit mesenchymalen Stromazellen beim schweren COVID laufen weltweit; die Frage der Wirksamkeit bleibt zurzeit offen, bei jedoch substanziellem Optimismus in der Szene. Einige der Erkenntnisse und Innovationen aus der SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie können möglicherweise verallgemeinert werden und so auf die Zeit nach ihrem Ende langfristig nachwirken.

Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant services in Australia and New Zealand in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: A report from Australia and New Zealand Transplant and Cellular Therapies

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused major disruption to health systems, with allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) services a particularly vulnerable area. Ongoing provision of alloHCT has required dynamic responses at national and local levels. In Australia and New Zealand (ANZ), a high reliance on unrelated donors from overseas registries has posed an additional challenge.

AIMS

To describe the impact of COVID-19 on alloHCT services in ANZ in the first year of the pandemic.

METHODS

Data from the national alloHCT recipient and unrelated donor registries was extracted for a 2-year time frame. Comparisons were made between a pre-pandemic period of 1st March 2019 to 29th February 2020 and the corresponding dates during the pandemic, 1st March 2020 to 28th February 2021.

RESULTS

There was a 13% decrease in the number of allogeneic transplants, a reversal of steady increases in previous years, with the largest decrease in unrelated donor transplants. Local donors supplied a greater proportion of unrelated stem cell products. With a switch to universal cryopreservation, the time from request of a product to infusion increased by a median of 25.5 days for overseas products and 14 days for local products. There was a significant increase in the number of products collected but not used.

CONCLUSIONS

A strong public health response and coordinated transplant community activities allowed for safe provision of alloHCT in ANZ, however our data suggests that the timely delivery of allogeneic transplants was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Continued dedicated efforts are required to minimise further impacts. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Leukocytapheresis variables and transit time for allogeneic cryopreserved hpc: better safe than sorry

Cryopreservation was recommended to ensure continuity in allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) transplantation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Several groups have shown no impact on clinical outcomes for patients who underwent HPC transplantation with cryopreserved products during the first months of this pandemic. However, concerns about quality control attributes after cryopreservation have been raised. We investigated, in 155 allogeneic peripheral blood cryopreserved HPC, leukocytapheresis characteristics influencing viable CD34⁺ and CD3⁺ cells, and CFU-GM recoveries after thawing. Collection characteristics such as volume, nucleated cells (NC)/mL and hematocrit correlated with viable CD34⁺ and CD3⁺ cells recoveries after thawing in univariate analysis but only CD3⁺ cells remained statistically significant in multivariate analysis (r2 = 0.376; P = < 0.001). Additionally, transit time also showed correlation with viable CD34⁺ (r2 = 0.186), CD3⁺ (r2 = 0.376) and CFU-GM recoveries (r2 = 0.212) in multivariate analysis. Thus, diluting leukocytapheresis below 200 × 10⁶ NC/mL, avoiding red cells contamination above 2%, cryopreserving below 250 × 10⁶ NC/mL and minimizing transit time below 36 h, prevented poor viable CD34⁺ and CD3⁺ cells, and CFU-GM recoveries. In summary, optimizing leukocytapheresis practices and minimizing transportation time may better preserve the quality attributes of HPC when cryopreservation is indicated.

Effect of Cryopreservation in Unrelated Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Update from the Japan Marrow Donor Program

During the COVID-19 pandemic, donor grafts are frequently cryopreserved to ensure that a graft is available before starting a conditioning regimen. However, there have been conflicting reports on the effect of cryopreservation on transplantation outcomes. Also, the impact of cryopreservation may differ in bone marrow (BM) transplantation (BMT) and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation (PBSCT). In this retrospective study, we analyzed the clinical data of both cryopreserved unrelated BMTs (n = 235) and PBSCTs (n = 118) and compared these with data from a large control cohort without cryopreservation including 4133 BMTs and 720 PBSCTs. Among the patients with cryopreserved grafts, 10 BMT recipients (4.3%) and 3 PBSCT recipients (2.5%) did not achieve neutrophil engraftment after transplantation, including 4 of the former and all 3 of the latter who died early before engraftment. In a multivariate analysis, cryopreservation was not associated with neutrophil engraftment in BMT but significantly delayed neutrophil engraftment in PBSCT (hazard ratio [HR], .82; 95% confidence interval [CI], .69 to .97; P = .023). There was an interaction with borderline significance between cryopreservation and the stem cell source (P = .067). Platelet engraftment was delayed by cryopreservation after both BMT and PBSCT. Only 2 cryopreserved grafts (<1%) were unused during the study period. The cryopreservation of unrelated donor BM and PBSC grafts is associated with a slight delay in neutrophil and platelet engraftment but an acceptable rate of graft failure. PBSC grafts may be more sensitive to cryopreservation than BM grafts. Cryopreservation is a reasonable option during COVID-19 pandemic, provided that the apheresis and transplantation centers are adept at cryopreservation.

© 2022 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Impact of Cryopreservation and Freeze-Thawing on Therapeutic Properties of Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells and Other Common Cellular Therapeutics

Purpose of Review

Cryopreservation and its associated freezing and thawing procedures–short “freeze-thawing”–are among the final steps in economically viable manufacturing and clinical application of diverse cellular therapeutics. Translation from preclinical proof-of-concept studies to larger clinical trials has indicated that these processes may potentially present an Achilles heel to optimal cell product safety and particularly efficacy in clinical trials and routine use.

Recent Findings

We review the current state of the literature on how cryopreservation of cellular therapies has evolved and how the application of this technique to different cell types is interlinked with their ability to engraft and function upon transfer in vivo, in particular for hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), their progeny, and therapeutic cell products derived thereof. We also discuss pros and cons how this may differ for non-hematopoietic mesenchymal stromal/stem cell (MSC) therapeutics. We present different avenues that may be crucial for cell therapy optimization, both, for hematopoietic (e.g., effector, regulatory, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T and NK cell based products) and for non-hematopoietic products, such as MSCs and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), to achieve optimal viability, recovery, effective cell dose, and functionality of the cryorecovered cells.

Summary

Targeted research into optimizing the cryopreservation and freeze-thawing routines and the adjunct manufacturing process design may provide crucial advantages to increase both the safety and efficacy of cellular therapeutics in clinical use and to enable effective market deployment strategies to become economically viable and sustainable medicines.