SMARCA4 and Other SWItch/Sucrose NonFermentable Family Genomic Alterations in NSCLC: Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Outcomes to Immune Checkpoint Inhibition

SMARCA4 alterations in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

A mutation in the SMARCA4 gene which encodes BRG1, a common catalytic subunit of switch/sucrose non-fermentable chromatin-remodelling complexes, plays a vital role in carcinogenesis. SMARCA4 mutations are present in approximately 10% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), making it a crucial gene in NSCLC, but with varying prognostic associations. To explore this, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prognostic significance of SMARCA4 mutations in NSCLC.

METHODS

Electronic database search was performed from inception to December 2022. Study characteristics and prognostic data were extracted from each eligible study. Depending on heterogeneity, pooled HR and 95% CI were derived using the random-effects or fixed-effects models.

RESULTS

8 studies (11 cohorts) enrolling 8371 patients were eligible for inclusion. Data on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were available from 8 (10 cohorts) and 1 (3 cohorts) studies, respectively. Comparing SMARCA4-mutated NSCLC patients with SMARCA4-wild-type NSCLC patients, the summary HRs for OS and PFS were 1.49 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.87; I2=84%) and 3.97 (95% CI 1.32 to 11.92; I2=79%), respectively. The results from the trim-and-fill method for publication bias and sensitivity analysis were inconsistent with the primary analyses. Three studies reported NSCLC prognosis for category I and II mutations separately; category I was significantly associated with OS.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that SMARCA4 mutation negatively affects NSCLC OS and PFS. The prognostic effects of SMARCA4-co-occurring mutations and the predictive role of SMARCA4 mutation status in immunotherapy require further exploration.

Genomic and Immunophenotypic Landscape of Acquired Resistance to PD-(L)1 Blockade in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have extended survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), acquired resistance (AR) to ICI frequently develops after an initial benefit. However, the mechanisms of AR to ICI in NSCLC are largely unknown.

METHODS

Comprehensive tumor genomic profiling, machine learning-based assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, multiplexed immunofluorescence, and/or HLA-I immunohistochemistry (IHC) were performed on matched pre- and post-ICI tumor biopsies from patients with NSCLC treated with ICI at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute who developed AR to ICI. Two additional cohorts of patients with intervening chemotherapy or targeted therapies between biopsies were included as controls.

RESULTS

We performed comprehensive genomic profiling and immunophenotypic characterization on samples from 82 patients with NSCLC and matched pre- and post-ICI biopsies and compared findings with a control cohort of patients with non-ICI intervening therapies between biopsies (chemotherapy, N = 32; targeted therapies, N = 89; both, N = 17). Putative resistance mutations were identified in 27.8% of immunotherapy-treated cases and included acquired loss-of-function mutations in STK11, B2M, APC, MTOR, KEAP1, and JAK1/2; these acquired alterations were not observed in the control groups. Immunophenotyping of matched pre- and post-ICI samples demonstrated significant decreases in intratumoral lymphocytes, CD3e+ and CD8a+ T cells, and PD-L1-PD1 engagement, as well as increased distance between tumor cells and CD8+PD-1+ T cells. There was a significant decrease in HLA class I expression in the immunotherapy cohort at the time of AR compared with the chemotherapy (P = .005) and the targeted therapy (P = .01) cohorts.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the genomic and immunophenotypic heterogeneity of ICI resistance in NSCLC, which will need to be considered when developing novel therapeutic strategies aimed at overcoming resistance.

Chromatin Remodelers Are Regulators of the Tumor Immune Microenvironment

Immune checkpoint inhibitors show remarkable responses in a wide range of cancers, yet patients develop adaptive resistance. This necessitates the identification of alternate therapies that synergize with immunotherapies. Epigenetic modifiers are potent mediators of tumor-intrinsic mechanisms and have been shown to regulate immune response genes, making them prime targets for therapeutic combinations with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Some success has been observed in early clinical studies that combined immunotherapy with agents targeting DNA methylation and histone modification; however, less is known about chromatin remodeler-targeted therapies. Here, we provide a discussion on the regulation of tumor immunogenicity by the chromatin remodeling SWI/SNF complex through multiple mechanisms associated with immunotherapy response that broadly include IFN signaling, DNA damage, mismatch repair, regulation of oncogenic programs, and polycomb-repressive complex antagonism. Context-dependent targeting of SWI/SNF subunits can elicit opportunities for synthetic lethality and reduce T-cell exhaustion. In summary, alongside the significance of SWI/SNF subunits in predicting immunotherapy outcomes, their ability to modulate the tumor immune landscape offers opportunities for therapeutic intervention.

Multi-omics and artificial intelligence predict clinical outcomes of immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients

In recent years, various types of immunotherapy, particularly the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed cell death 1 or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), have revolutionized the management and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer. PD-L1 is frequently used as a biomarker for predicting the likely benefit of immunotherapy for patients. However, some patients receiving immunotherapy have high response rates despite having low levels of PD-L1. Therefore, the identification of this group of patients is extremely important to improve prognosis. The tumor microenvironment contains tumor, stromal, and infiltrating immune cells with its composition differing significantly within tumors, between tumors, and between individuals. The omics approach aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of each patient through high-throughput extracted features, promising a more comprehensive characterization of this complex ecosystem. However, features identified by high-throughput methods are complex and present analytical challenges to clinicians and data scientists. It is thus feasible that artificial intelligence could assist in the identification of features that are beyond human discernment as well as in the performance of repetitive tasks. In this paper, we review the prediction of immunotherapy efficacy by different biomarkers (genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, microbiomic, and radiomic), together with the use of artificial intelligence and the challenges and future directions of these fields.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in SMARCA4-deficient and TP53 mutant undifferentiated lung cancer

The present study was conducted to characterize the clinicopathologic characteristics, immunohistochemical staining results, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) efficacy in patients with SMARCA4-deficient/TP53 mutant lung cancer. Patients diagnosed with advanced or metastatic undifferentiated lung cancer harboring SMARCA4-deficient and TP53 mutations, however, without targetable sensitive mutations were retrieved from the electronic medical record system. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the baseline characteristics and clinical features including age, gender, eastern cooperative oncology group performance status, disease stage, smoking status, chief complaint, site of the primary mass, tumor size, gross type, symptoms, local invasion, and metastatic sizes. Immunological markers and potential drive genes were detected by immunohistochemical staining and next generation sequencing. Efficacy and safety profile of ICIs in included patients was evaluated with progression-free survival and overall survival. Between January 2019 and September 2022, there were 4 patients included within the inclusion criteria in the present study. Biomarkers including CK, CK7, and integrase interactor 1 were detected positive, however, other immunological markers including CK20, CD56, P63, P40, NapsinA, TTF-1, CgA, Syn, BRG1, or PD-L1 were detected negative among them. Results of next generation sequencing panel were failed to discover any targetable sensitive mutations. A total of 4 mutation types of TP53, including p.C141Y, p.S240G, p.E339X (terminator acquired), and p.L130F detected for the patients, respectively. Microsatellite stability status, as well as low tumor mutation burden was identified among all the patients. Median progression-free survival for ICIs as first line treatment and median overall survival were 3.25 months (range from 1.3 to 6.8 months), and 6.0 months (range from 2.7 to 9.6 months), respectively. Our results indicated that advanced lung cancer patients harboring co-occurring SMARCA4-deficient/TP53 mutations might respond to ICIs treatment, though within negative programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression or low tumor mutation burden. However, hyperprogressive disease by ICIs may also happen for such patients. The mutation types of TP53 might play a role during the exposure of ICIs, however, need further identification in basic experiments.

SMARCA4 deficiency and mutations are frequent in large cell lung carcinoma and are prognostically significant

SMARCA4 mutation has emerged as a marker of poor prognosis in lung cancer and has potential predictive value in cancer treatment, but recommendations for which patients require its investigation are lacking. We comprehensively studied SMARCA4 alterations and the clinicopathological significance in a large cohort of immunohistochemically-subtyped non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A total of 1416 patients was studied for the presence of SMARCA4 deficiency by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Thereafter, comprehensive sequencing of tumours was performed for 397 of these patients to study the mutational spectrum of SWI/SNF and SMARCA4 aberrations. IHC evidence of SMARCA4 deficiency was found in 2.9% of NSCLC. Of the sequenced tumours, 38.3% showed aberration in SWI/SNF complex, and 9.3% had SMARCA4 mutations. Strikingly, SMARCA4 aberrations were much more prevalent in large cell carcinoma (LCC) than other histological tumour subtypes. SMARCA4-deficient and SMARCA4-mutated tumours accounted for 40.5% and 51.4% of all LCC, respectively. Multivariable analyses confirmed SMARCA4 mutation was an independent prognostic factor in lung cancer. The immunophenotype of a subset of these tumours frequently showed TTF1 negativity and HepPAR1 positivity. SMARCA4 mutation or its deficiency was associated with positive smoking history and poor prognosis. It also demonstrated mutual exclusion with EGFR mutation. Taken together, the high incidence of SMARCA4 aberrations in LCC may indicate its diagnostic and prognostic value. Our study established the necessity of SMARCA4 IHC in the identification of SMARCA4-aberrant tumours, and this may be of particular importance in LCC and tumours without known driver events.

Unveiling the role of KRAS in tumor immune microenvironment

Kirsten rats sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS), the first discovered human oncogene, has long been recognized as "undruggable". KRAS mutations frequently occur in multiple human cancers including non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC), colorectal cancer(CRC) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC), functioning as a "molecule switch" determining the activation of various oncogenic signaling pathways. Except for its intrinsic pro-tumorigenic role, KRAS alteration also exhibits an unique immune signature characterized by elevated PD-L1 level and high tumor mutational burden(TMB). KRAS mutation shape an immune suppressive microenvironment by impeding effective T cells infiltration and recruiting suppressive immune cells including myeloid-derived suppressor cells(MDSCs), regulatory T cells(Tregs), cancer associated fibroblasts(CAFs). In immune checkpoint inhibitor(ICI) era, NSCLC patients with mutated KRAS tend to be more responsive to ICI than patients with intact KRAS. The hallmark for KRAS mutation is the existence of multiple kinds of co-mutations. Different types of co-alterations have distinct tumor microenvironment(TME) signatures and responses to ICI. TP53 co-mutation possess a "hot" TME and achieve higher response to immunotherapy while other loss of function mutation correlated with a "colder" TME and a poor outcome to ICI-based therapy. The groundbreaking discovery of KRAS G12C inhibitors significantly improved outcomes for this KRAS subtype even though efficacy was limited to NSCLC patients. KRAS G12C inhibitors also restore the suppressive TME, creating an opportunity for combinations with ICI. However, an inevitable challenge to KRAS inhibitors is drug resistance. Promising combination strategies such as combination with SHP2 is an approach deserve further exploration because of their immune modulatory effect.

Clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes of advanced SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumors

PURPOSE

SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumors, characterized by distinct clinicopathological, morphological, immunohistochemical, and genetic features, differ significantly from conventional non-small-cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs). This group encompasses both SMARCA4-deficient NSCLCs (SMARCA4-NSCLCs) and SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumors (SMARCA4-UTs). The efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors in treating SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumors remains uncertain.

METHODS

Medical records of 36 patients diagnosed with stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumors were analyzed. We assessed the clinical, pathological, and genetic features of these patients through immunohistochemistry (IHC) and a 68-gene panel next-generation sequencing (NGS). We compared the differences between SMARCA4-NSCLCs and SMARCA4-UTs, and evaluated the impact of chemotherapy and immunotherapy on patient outcomes.

RESULTS

The majority of patients with SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumors were heavy-smoking males, averaging 64.6 years in age. IHC predominantly showed weak or negative staining for markers such as TTF-1, CK5/6, p40, synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and CD56, which are often associated with adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and neuroendocrine tumors. The most common genetic mutations identified via NGS included TP53, CDKN2A, KRAS, STK11, NF1, and PTEN. No significant overall survival (OS) difference was observed between SMARCA4-NSCLCs and SMARCA4-UTs (p = 0.366). The median OS for patients treated with chemotherapy (n = 9) was 447 days, while the median OS for patients undergoing PD-1-inhibitor-based therapy (n = 16) was not reached (p = 0.105).

CONCLUSION

SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumors exhibit distinct characteristics from conventional NSCLCs, and PD-1 inhibitors show promise in treating advanced SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumors.

Prognostic and predictive impact of molecular tumor burden index in non-small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have limited predictive performance. In this study we aimed to investigate the feasibility of molecular tumor burden index (mTBI) in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a predictor for immunotherapy in patients with NSCLC.

METHODS

From February 2017 to November 2020, pretreatment and on-treatment (3~6 weeks after first cycle of immunotherapy) dynamic plasma ctDNA samples from NSCLC patients receiving immune monotherapy or combination therapy were analyzed by targeted capture sequencing of 1021 genes. PyClone was used to infer the mTBI. The impact of pretreatment mTBI on survival outcomes was verified in the POPLAR/OAK trials.

RESULTS

We found that patients without detectable baseline ctDNA had better survival outcomes (median overall survival [OS]: not reached vs. 12.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.15; p = 0.035]). RB1 and SMARCA4 mutations were remarkably associated with worse survival outcomes. Furthermore, lower pretreatment mTBI was associated with superior OS (median: not reached vs. 8.1 months; HR, 0.22; p = 0.024) and PFS (median: 32.9 vs. 5.4 months; HR, 0.35; p = 0.045), but not objective response, which was validated in the POPLAR/OAK cohort, suggesting that baseline mTBI was a prognostic factor for NSCLC immunotherapy. Early dynamic changes of mTBI (ΔmTBI) significantly distinguished responsive patients, and patients with mTBI decrease to more than 68% at the final tumor evaluation had longer OS (median: 38.2 vs. 4.0 months; HR, 0.18; p = 0.017) and PFS (median: not reached vs. 2.3 months; HR, 0.24; p = 0.030).

CONCLUSION

ΔmTBI had a good sensitivity to identify potential beneficial patients based on the best effect CT scans, demonstrating that mTBI dynamics were predictive of benefit from immune checkpoint blockade.

SMARCB1/INI1-deficient intrathoracic neoplasm with rhabdoid/plasmacytoid cytomorphology in a patient with plasma cell myeloma: A case report

SMARCB1 (INI1) is one of the switch/sucrose nonfermentable (SWI/SNF) complexes whose loss is associated with several tumors. SMARCB1 (INI1)-deficient intrathoracic neoplasms are extremely rare and known to be highly malignant and lethal. This report presents the case of a patient diagnosed with SMARCB1 (INI1)-deficient intrathoracic neoplasm during chemotherapy for plasma cell myeloma. A 77-year-old male patient complained of cough, bloody sputum, and fever with an enlarged right lung mass and pleural effusion. His cytological examination revealed undifferentiated epithelioid and rhabdoid/plasmacytoid cells with bi- or multinucleation, vacuolization, mitosis, and pleomorphism. However, it was difficult to distinguish the relapse of plasma cell myeloma as atypical plasmacytoid cells were detected. Immunohistochemically, the neoplastic cells showed a loss of SMARCB1 (INI1) expression in the cell block of pleural fluid and in the right lung of the autopsy specimen. Further, the patient was diagnosed with SMARCB1 (INI1)-deficient intrathoracic neoplasm of the right lung based on histological and autopsy findings. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of cytomorphology in a SMARCB1 (INI1)-deficient intrathoracic neoplasm.

To be, or not to be: the dilemma of immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer harboring various driver mutations

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is one of primary cancer type with high incidence and mortality, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cncer. For advanced lung cancer, traditional chemotherapy and targeted therapy become difficult to solve the dilemma of further progress. In recent years, with the clinical application of immunotherapy, the therapeutic strategy of lung cancer has changed dramatically. At present, immunotherapy has shown conspicuous efficacy in NSCLC patients with high expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and high tumor mutational burden (TMB). The discovery of driver mutations brings delightful hope for targeted cancer therapy. However, it remains controversial whether immunotherapy can be used in NSCLC patients with these specific driver mutations.

METHOD

This article summarized the latest research progresses of immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC. We paid close attention to the relevance of various driver mutations and immunotherapy in NSCLC patients, and summarized the predictive effects of several driver mutations and immunotherapy.

RESULTS

The mutations of KRAS, KRAS+TP53, EPHA (especially EPHA5), ZFHX3, ZFHX3+TP53, NOTCH, BRAF and LRP1B+FAT3 have potential to be used as biomarkers to predict the positive effectiveness of immunotherapy. ZFHX3, ZFHX3+TP53, STKII/LKB1+KEAP1+SMARCA4+PBRM1 mutations in LUAD patients get more positive effect in immunotherapy. While the mutations of EGFR, KEAP1, STKII/LKB1+KRAS, EML4-ALK, MET exon 14 skipping mutation, PBRM1, STKII/LKB1+KEAP1+SMARCA4+PBRM1, ERBB2, PIK3CA and RET often indicate poor benefit from immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Many gene mutations have been shown to be associated with immunotherapy efficacy. Gene mutations should be combined with PD-L1, TMB, etc. to predict the effect of immunotherapy.

Integrase Interactor 1 (INI1) Deficiency in a Lung Cancer Patient Presents Nonresponse to Immunotherapy and Tazemetostat: A Case Report

Integrase interactor 1 (INI1)-deficient lung cancer is extremely rare, often with poor prognosis, and lacks effective treatment. Previous studies have reported the efficacy of immunotherapy and enhancer of the zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) inhibitor tazemetostat in various types of INI1-deficient tumors, such as sarcomas. However, the effectiveness of these treatments in INI1-deficient lung cancer has not yet been verified. We hereby report a case of a patient who was diagnosed with advanced squamous lung cancer with INI1 deficiency and received chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and tazemetostat treatments successively. The patient showed optimal response in the initial chemotherapy combined with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) immunotherapy, made rapid progress in the subsequent stage of maintenance immunotherapy, and showed nonresponse to tazemetostat. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of a lung cancer patient with INI1 deficiency who received tazemetostat treatment.

Impact of TMB/PD-L1 expression and pneumonitis on chemoradiation and durvalumab response in stage III NSCLC

Although concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) and durvalumab consolidation has become a standard treatment for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), clinicopathologic and genomic factors associated with its efficacy remain poorly characterized. Here, in a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study of 328 patients treated with CRT and durvalumab, we identify that very high PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) expression ( ≥ 90%) and increased tumor mutational burden (TMB) are independently associated with prolonged disease control. Additionally, we identify the impact of pneumonitis and its timing on disease outcomes among patients who discontinue durvalumab: compared to patients who experienced early-onset pneumonitis ( < 3 months) leading to durvalumab discontinuation, patients with late-onset pneumonitis had a significantly longer PFS (12.7 months vs not reached; HR 0.24 [95% CI, 0.10 to 0.58]; P = 0.001) and overall survival (37.2 months vs not reached; HR 0.26 [95% CI, 0.09 to 0.79]; P = 0.017). These findings suggest that opportunities exist to improve outcomes in patients with lower PD-L1 and TMB levels, and those at highest risk for pneumonitis.

Comutations and KRASG12C Inhibitor Efficacy in Advanced NSCLC

Molecular modifiers of KRASG12C inhibitor (KRASG12Ci) efficacy in advanced KRASG12C-mutant NSCLC are poorly defined. In a large unbiased clinicogenomic analysis of 424 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we identified and validated coalterations in KEAP1, SMARCA4, and CDKN2A as major independent determinants of inferior clinical outcomes with KRASG12Ci monotherapy. Collectively, comutations in these three tumor suppressor genes segregated patients into distinct prognostic subgroups and captured ∼50% of those with early disease progression (progression-free survival ≤3 months) with KRASG12Ci. Pathway-level integration of less prevalent coalterations in functionally related genes nominated PI3K/AKT/MTOR pathway and additional baseline RAS gene alterations, including amplifications, as candidate drivers of inferior outcomes with KRASG12Ci, and revealed a possible association between defective DNA damage response/repair and improved KRASG12Ci efficacy. Our findings propose a framework for patient stratification and clinical outcome prediction in KRASG12C-mutant NSCLC that can inform rational selection and appropriate tailoring of emerging combination therapies.

SIGNIFICANCE

In this work, we identify co-occurring genomic alterations in KEAP1, SMARCA4, and CDKN2A as independent determinants of poor clinical outcomes with KRASG12Ci monotherapy in advanced NSCLC, and we propose a framework for patient stratification and treatment personalization based on the comutational status of individual tumors. See related commentary by Heng et al., p. 1513. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1501.

Dysregulation of SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodelers in NSCLC: Its Influence on Cancer Therapies including Immunotherapy

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Molecularly targeted therapeutics and immunotherapy revolutionized the clinical care of NSCLC patients. However, not all NSCLC patients harbor molecular targets (e.g., mutated EGFR), and only a subset benefits from immunotherapy. Moreover, we are lacking reliable biomarkers for immunotherapy, although PD-L1 expression has been mainly used for guiding front-line therapeutic options. Alterations of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeler occur commonly in patients with NSCLC. This subset of NSCLC tumors tends to be undifferentiated and presents high heterogeneity in histology, and it shows a dismal prognosis because of poor response to the current standard therapies. Catalytic subunits SMARCA4/A2 and DNA binding subunits ARID1A/ARID1B/ARID2 as well as PBRM1 were identified to be the most commonly mutated subunits of SWI/SNF complexes in NSCLC. Mechanistically, alteration of these SWI/SNF subunits contributes to the tumorigenesis of NSCLC through compromising the function of critical tumor suppressor genes, enhancing oncogenic activity as well as impaired DNA repair capacity related to genomic instability. Several vulnerabilities of NSCLCS with altered SWI/SNF subunits were detected and evaluated clinically using EZH2 inhibitors, PROTACs of mutual synthetic lethal paralogs of the SWI/SNF subunits as well as PARP inhibitors. The response of NSCLC tumors with an alteration of SWI/SNF to ICIs might be confounded by the coexistence of mutations in genes capable of influencing patients' response to ICIs. High heterogenicity in the tumor with SWI/SNF deficiency might also be responsible for the seemingly conflicting results of ICI treatment of NSCLC patients with alterations of SWI/SNF. In addition, an alteration of each different SWI/SNF subunit might have a unique impact on the response of NSCLC with deficient SWI/SNF subunits. Prospective studies are required to evaluate how the alterations of the SWI/SNF in the subset of NSCLC patients impact the response to ICI treatment. Finally, it is worthwhile to point out that combining inhibitors of other chromatin modulators with ICIs has been proven to be effective for the treatment of NSCLC with deficient SWI/SNF chromatin remodelers.

Clinicopathologic and Genomic Factors Impacting Efficacy of First-Line Chemoimmunotherapy in Advanced NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

Although programmed cell death protein 1 and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy has become a mainstay of first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC, factors associated with efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) are not well characterized.

METHODS

In this multicenter retrospective analysis, clinicopathologic and genomic data were collected from patients with advanced NSCLC (lacking sensitizing genomic alterations in EGFR and ALK) and evaluated with clinical outcomes to first-line CIT.

RESULTS

Among 1285 patients treated with CIT, a worsening performance status and increasing derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in the blood were associated with a significantly reduced objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS). With increasing PD-L1 tumor proportion scores of less than 1%, 1% to 49%, 50% to 89%, and greater than or equal to 90%, there was a progressive improvement in ORR (32.7% versus 37.5% versus 51.6% versus 61.7%, p < 0.001), mPFS (5.0 versus 6.1 versus 6.8 versus 13.0 mo, p < 0.001), and generally mOS (12.9 versus 14.6 versus 34.7 versus 23.1 mo, p = 0.009), respectively. Of 789 NSCLCs with comprehensive genomic data, NSCLCs with a tumor mutational burden (TMB) greater than or equal to the 90th percentile had an improved ORR (53.5% versus 36.4%, p = 0.004), mPFS (10.8 versus 5.5 mo, p < 0.001), and mOS (29.2 versus 13.1 mo, p < 0.001), compared with those with a TMB less than the 90th percentile. In all-comers with nonsquamous NSCLC, the presence of an STK11, KEAP1, or SMARCA4 mutation was associated with significantly worse ORR, mPFS, and mOS to CIT (all p < 0.05); this was also observed in the KRAS-mutant subgroup of NSCLCs with co-occurring mutations in STK11, KEAP1, or SMARCA4 (all p < 0.05). In KRAS wild-type NSCLC, KEAP1 and SMARCA4 mutations were associated with a significantly shorter mPFS and mOS to CIT (all p < 0.05), but STK11 mutation status had no significant impact on mPFS (p = 0.16) or mOS (p = 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

In advanced NSCLC, better patient performance status, low derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, increasing PD-L1 expression, a very high TMB, and STK11/KEAP1/SMARCA4 wild-type status are associated with improved clinical outcomes to first-line CIT.

Case Report: Nintedanib for immune-related pneumonitis triggered by anti-PD-1 treatment in a patient with SMARCA4-mutant NSCLC: a case report

SMARCA4-mutant lung cancer accounts for approximately 10% of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), has few effective treatments, and has been associated with a poor prognosis. Our case report describes a 73-year-old man who was diagnosed with SMARCA4-mutant advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Routine driver gene mutation screening was negative, and tumor tissue immunohistochemistry analysis showed the absence of the BRG1 protein (encoded by SMARCA4). In addition to the standard chemotherapy regimens, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors were administered. After three cycles of combination therapy, the focus of the primary lung tumor shrunk evidently, but radiological interstitial abnormalities emerged in the basal and subpleural areas of the bilateral lungs. The patient's clinical condition deteriorated and he was diagnosed with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-associated pneumonia. Thus, the combination regimen was discontinued, corticosteroid therapy was administered according to guidelines, and nintedanib was added, given that interstitial abnormalities were observed on chest computed tomography (CT). Following the above treatment, the patient's condition improved, the standard chemotherapy regimen was restarted, and nintedanib treatment was maintained. The patient's clinical condition continued to improve, and follow-up CT showed significant resolution of the interstitial abnormalities and stabilization of the primary tumor lesion. In summary, we report the case of a patient with SMARCA4-mutant NSCLC, which is generally considered to be associated with a poor prognosis owing to a lack of effective treatments. The patient responded favorably to initial combination therapy with ICIs, although he subsequently developed immune-related adverse events. We also found that nintedanib, a multitargeted anti-fibrotic agent, was beneficial for the treatment of immune-related lung injury and showed potential anti-tumor effects.

SWI/SNF-deficient Malignancies: Optimal Candidates for Immune-oncological Therapy?

Inactivation of different subunits of the SWItch/sucrose nonfermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex has emerged as one of the most frequent genetic pathways driving a variety of neoplasms of diverse histogenesis, originating in different organs. With few exceptions, most SWI/SNF-deficient malignancies pursue a highly aggressive clinical course resulting in widespread disease dissemination either at or soon after diagnosis, ultimately causing patients' death soon after diagnosis, despite the apparently curative treatment intention. To date, no satisfactorily effective systemic chemotherapy has been established for treating these diseases. This disappointing finding underlines the urgent need for an effective systemic therapy that would enable sufficient intermediate to long-term disease control. Recently, SWI/SNF-deficiency has increasingly emerged as pivotal in cancer immunogenicity and hence a promising biomarker predicting response to immune-checkpoint inhibition therapy utilizing several recently established drugs. This review summarizes the most recent literature on this topic with emphasis on the entities that most likely represent suitable candidates for immune therapy.

Promising efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy for thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor

PURPOSE

Thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor (SD-UT) is a highly aggressive disease that is nosologically related to but distinct from SMARCA4-deficient non-small cell lung cancer (SD-NSCLC). No standard treatment guidelines were established for SD-UT. This research explored the efficacy of different treatments in SD-UT, and the prognostic, clinicopathologic and genomic difference between SD-UT and SD-NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Information of 25 SD-UT and 22 SD-NSCLC patients diagnosed and treated in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center from January, 2017 to September, 2022 was analyzed.

RESULTS

SD-UT was similar to SD-NSCLC in characteristics of onset age, male prevalence, heavy smoking history and metastatic pattern. SD-UT showed a rapid relapse pattern after radical therapy. For Stage IV SD-UT patients, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus chemotherapy significantly improved median progression-free survival (PFS) compared to traditional chemotherapy as first-line treatment (26.8 vs. 2.73 months, p = 0.0437), while objective response rates of two arms were comparable (71.4% vs. 66.7%). No significant survival differences were observed between SD-UT and SD-NSCLC under similar treatment settings. SD-UT or SD-NSCLC patients receiving ICI in the first line had significantly prolonged OS than those with ICI in the latter lines or without ICI treatment throughout clinical courses. Genetic study found frequent SMARCA4, TP53 and LRP1B mutations in SD-UT.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest series to date to compare the efficacy of ICI-based treatment to chemotherapy and document frequent mutations of LRP1B in SD-UT. ICI plus chemotherapy is an effective strategy for Stage IV SD-UT.

Mutant-allele dispersion correlates with prognosis risk in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Intra-tumor heterogeneity (ITH) contributes to lung cancer progression and resistance to therapy. To evaluate ITH and determine whether it may be employed as a predictive biomarker of prognosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we used a novel algorithm called mutant-allele dispersion (MAD).

METHODS

In the study, 103 patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled. Using a panel of 425 cancer-related genes, next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on tumor specimens that had been collected. From NGS data, we derived MAD values, and we next looked into their relationships with clinical variables and different mutation subtypes.

RESULTS

The median MAD among 103 NSCLC patients was 0.73. EGFR mutation, tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy cycles were all substantially correlated with the MAD score. In patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), correlation analysis revealed that the MAD score was substantially linked with Notch pathway mutation (P = 0.021). A significant relationship between high MAD and shorter progression-free survival (PFS) was found (HR = 2.004, 95%CI 1.269-3.163, P = 0.003). In patients with advanced NSCLC, histological type (P = 0.004), SMARCA4 mutation (P = 0.038), and LRP1B mutation (P = 0.006) were all independently associated with prognosis. The disease control rate was considerably greater in the low MAD group compared to the high MAD group in 19 LUAD patients receiving immunotherapy (92.9% vs. 40%, P = 0.037). TKI-PFS was longer in 37 patients with low MAD who received first-line TKI therapy (P = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggested that MAD is a practical and simple algorithm for assessing ITH, and populations with high MAD values are more likely to have EGFR mutations. MAD can be used as a potential biomarker to predict not only the prognosis of NSCLC but also the efficacy of immunotherapy and TKI therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Two Cases of SMARCA4-Deficient Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with Improved Performance Status (PS) after Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs)

SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable (SWI/SNF)-related, matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily A, member 4 (SMARCA4) mutations are commonly reported in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are associated with a poor prognosis. There is insufficient evidence regarding the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in SMARCA4-deficient NSCLC patients with poor performance status (PS). We report two cases of advanced SMARCA4-deficient NSCLC treated with ICIs, in which marked regression of the tumor and improved general condition of the patients were achieved.

KRAS-Mutant Lung Cancer: Targeting Molecular and Immunologic Pathways, Therapeutic Advantages and Restrictions

RAS mutations are among the most common oncogenic mutations in human cancers. Among RAS mutations, KRAS has the highest frequency and is present in almost 30% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Lung cancer is the number one cause of mortality among cancers as a consequence of outrageous aggressiveness and late diagnosis. High mortality rates have been the reason behind numerous investigations and clinical trials to discover proper therapeutic agents targeting KRAS. These approaches include the following: direct KRAS targeting; synthetic lethality partner inhibitors; targeting of KRAS membrane association and associated metabolic rewiring; autophagy inhibitors; downstream inhibitors; and immunotherapies and other immune-modalities such as modulating inflammatory signaling transcription factors (e.g., STAT3). The majority of these have unfortunately encountered limited therapeutic outcomes due to multiple restrictive mechanisms including the presence of co-mutations. In this review we plan to summarize the past and most recent therapies under investigation, along with their therapeutic success rate and potential restrictions. This will provide useful information to improve the design of novel agents for treatment of this deadly disease.

Multi-omics analysis unravels the underlying mechanisms of poor prognosis and differential therapeutic responses of solid predominant lung adenocarcinoma

Background

Solid predominant adenocarcinoma (SPA) has been reported to be a subtype with poor prognosis and unsatisfactory response to chemotherapy and targeted therapy in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown and the suitability of immunotherapy for SPA has not been investigated.

Methods

We conducted a multi-omics analysis of 1078 untreated LUAD patients with clinicopathologic, genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data from both public and internal cohorts to determine the underlying mechanisms of poor prognosis and differential therapeutic responses of SPA and to investigate the potential of immunotherapy for SPA. The suitability of immunotherapy for SPA was further confirmed in a cohort of LUAD patients who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy in our center.

Results

Along with its aggressive clinicopathologic behaviors, SPA had significantly higher tumor mutation burden (TMB) and number of pathways altered, lower TTF-1 and Napsin-A expression, higher proliferation score and a more immunoresistant microenvironment than non-solid predominant adenocarcinoma (Non-SPA), accounting for its worse prognosis. Additionally, SPA had significantly lower frequency of therapeutically targetable driver mutations and higher frequency of EGFR/TP53 co-mutation which was related to resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, indicating a lower potential for targeted therapy. Meanwhile, SPA was enriched for molecular features associated with poor response to chemotherapy (higher chemoresistence signature score, lower chemotherapy response signature score, hypoxic microenvironment, and higher frequency of TP53 mutation). Instead, muti-omics profiling revealed that SPA had stronger immunogenicity and was enriched for positive biomarkers for immunotherapy (higher TMB and T cell receptor diversity; higher PD-L1 expression and more immune cell infiltration; higher frequency of gene mutations predicting efficacious immunotherapy, and elevated expression of immunotherapy-related gene signatures). Furthermore, in the cohort of LUAD patients who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy, SPA had higher pathological regression rates than Non-SPA and patients with major pathological response were enriched in SPA, confirming that SPA was more prone to respond to immunotherapy.

Conclusions

Compared with Non-SPA, SPA was enriched for molecular features associated with poor prognosis, unsatisfactory response to chemotherapy and targeted therapy, and good response to immunotherapy, indicating more suitability for immunotherapy while less suitability for chemotherapy and targeted therapy.

SMARCA4: Current status and future perspectives in non-small-cell lung cancer

SMARCA4, also known as transcription activator, is an ATP-dependent catalytic subunit of SWI/SNF (SWItch/Sucrose NonFermentable) chromatin-remodeling complexes that participates in the regulation of chromatin structure and gene expression by supplying energy. As a tumor suppressor that has aberrant expression in ∼10% of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), SMARCA4 possesses many biological functions, including regulating gene expression, differentiation and transcription. Furthermore, NSCLC patients with SMARCA4 alterations have a weak response to conventional chemotherapy and poor prognosis. Therefore, the mechanisms of SMARCA4 in NSCLC development urgently need to be explored to identify novel biomarkers and precise therapeutic strategies for this subtype. This review systematically describes the biological functions of SMARCA4 and its role in NSCLC development, metastasis, functional epigenetics and potential therapeutic approaches for NSCLCs with SMARCA4 alterations. Additionally, this paper explores the relationship and regulatory mechanisms shared by SMARCA4 and its mutually exclusive catalytic subunit SMARCA2. We aim to provide innovative treatment strategies and improve clinical outcomes for NSCLC patients with SMARCA4 alterations.

Genomic and immunogenomic analysis of three prognostic signature genes in LUAD

BACKGROUND

Searching for immunotherapy-related markers is an important research content to screen for target populations suitable for immunotherapy. Prognosis-related genes in early stage lung cancer may also affect the tumor immune microenvironment, which in turn affects immunotherapy.

RESULTS

We analyzed the differential genes affecting lung cancer patients receiving immunotherapy through the Cancer Treatment Response gene signature DataBase (CTR-DB), and set a threshold to obtain a total of 176 differential genes between response and non-response to immunotherapy. Functional enrichment analysis found that these differential genes were mainly involved in immune regulation-related pathways. The early-stage lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) prognostic model was constructed through the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) database, and three target genes (MMP12, NFE2, HOXC8) were screened to calculate the risk score of early-stage LUAD. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve indicated that the model had good prognostic value, and the validation set (GSE50081, GSE11969 and GSE42127) from the gene expression omnibus (GEO) analysis indicated that the model had good stability, and the risk score was correlated with immune infiltrations to varying degrees. Multi-type survival analysis and immune infiltration analysis revealed that the transcriptome, methylation and the copy number variation (CNV) levels of the three genes were correlated with patient prognosis and some tumor microenvironment (TME) components. Drug sensitivity analysis found that the three genes may affect some anti-tumor drugs. The mRNA expression of immune checkpoint-related genes showed significant differences between the high and low group of the three genes, and there may be a mutual regulatory network between immune checkpoint-related genes and target genes. Tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) analysis found that three genes were associated with immunotherapy response and maybe the potential predictors to immunotherapy, consistent with the CTR-DB database analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

From the perspective of data mining, this study suggests that MMP12, NFE2, and HOXC8 may be involved in tumor immune regulation and affect immunotherapy. They are expected to become markers of immunotherapy and are worthy of further experimental research.

SWI/SNF complex gene variations are associated with a higher tumor mutational burden and a better response to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment: a pan-cancer analysis of next-generation sequencing data corresponding to 4591 cases

Background

Genes related to the SWItch/sucrose nonfermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex are frequently mutated across cancers. SWI/SNF-mutant tumors are vulnerable to synthetic lethal inhibitors. However, the landscape of SWI/SNF mutations and their associations with tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI) status, and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have not been elucidated in large real-world Chinese patient cohorts.

Methods

The mutational rates and variation types of six SWI/SNF complex genes (ARID1A, ARID1B, ARID2, SMARCA4, SMARCB1, and PBRM1) were analyzed retrospectively by integrating next-generation sequencing data of 4591 cases covering 18 cancer types. Thereafter, characteristics of SWI/SNF mutations were depicted and the TMB and MSI status and therapeutic effects of ICIs in the SWI/SNF-mutant and SWI/SNF-non-mutant groups were compared.

Results

SWI/SNF mutations were observed in 21.8% of tumors. Endometrial (54.1%), gallbladder and biliary tract (43.4%), and gastric (33.9%) cancers exhibited remarkably higher SWI/SNF mutational rates than other malignancies. Further, ARID1A was the most frequently mutated SWI/SNF gene, and ARID1A D1850fs was identified as relatively crucial. The TMB value, TMB-high (TMB-H), and MSI-high (MSI-H) proportions corresponding to SWI/SNF-mutant cancers were significantly higher than those corresponding to SWI/SNF-non-mutant cancers (25.8 vs. 5.6 mutations/Mb, 44.3% vs. 10.3%, and 16.0% vs. 0.9%, respectively; all p  < 0.0001). Furthermore, these indices were even higher for tumors with co-mutations of SWI/SNF genes and MLL2/3. Regarding immunotherapeutic effects, patients with SWI/SNF variations showed significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) rates than their SWI/SNF-non-mutant counterparts (hazard ratio [HR], 0.56 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.44–0.72]; p < 0.0001), and PBRM1 mutations were associated with relatively better ICI treatment outcomes than the other SWI/SNF gene mutations (HR, 0.21 [95% CI 0.12–0.37]; p = 0.0007). Additionally, patients in the SWI/SNF-mutant + TMB-H (HR, 0.48 [95% CI 0.37–0.54]; p  < 0.0001) cohorts had longer PFS rates than those in the SWI/SNF-non-mutant + TMB-low cohort.

Conclusions

SWI/SNF complex genes are frequently mutated and are closely associated with TMB-H status, MSI-H status, and superior ICI treatment response in several cancers, such as colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer. These findings emphasize the necessity and importance of molecular-level detection and interpretation of SWI/SNF complex mutations.

Correlations of switch/sucrose nonfermentable complex mutations with clinical outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The switch/sucrose nonfermentable complex mutations (SWI/SNF-mut) are common in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the association of SWI/SNF-mut with the clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), particularly of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), has not been established.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data of patients at Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Patients with advanced NSCLC who received programmed cell death protein-1 or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-[L]1) inhibitors were included in cohort 1 and those with EGFR mutations (EGFR-mutant) received EGFR-TKIs monotherapy were included in cohort 2. Two reported Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) cohorts received immunotherapy alone used as the validation for cohort 1. We analyzed the relationship between SWI/SNF alterations and clinical outcomes in each cohort.

RESULTS

In total, 1162 patients were included, of which 230 patients (19.8%) were identified as SWI/SNF-mut with the most common genetic alterations being ARID1A (33.4%) and SMARCA4 (28.3%). In cohort 1 (n = 146), patients with co-mutations of SWI/SNF and Kirsten rat sarcoma oncogene (KRAS) (SWI/SNFmutKRASmut, n = 18) had significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) (8.6 m vs. 1.9 m; hazard ratio [HR],  0.31; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.11-0.83; p = 0.032) to PD-(L)1 inhibitors monotherapy, which was consistent with the MSKCC cohorts (not reach [NR] vs. 6.3 m; HR, 0.36, 95% CI, 0.15-0.82; p = 0.016). In cohort 2 (n = 205), ARID1A-mut (n = 16) was associated with improved PFS after EGFR-TKIs (20.6 m vs. 11.2 m; HR, 0.47, 95% CI, 0.27-0.94; p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

In advanced NSCLC, patients with SWI/SNFmutKRASmut seem to benefit more from ICIs. Furthermore, ARID1A-mut may provide a protective effect to EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutant patients. However, this is a retrospective single-institution analysis that requires further validation by large prospective studies.

Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Outcomes for Patients With KRAS G12D-Mutant NSCLC

Introduction

Co-occurring mutations in KRAS-mutant NSCLC are associated with discrete biological properties and modulate therapeutic susceptibilities. As G12D-specific inhibitors are expected to enter the clinic, we sought to investigate the characteristics and outcomes of patients with KRAS G12D-mutant NSCLC.

Methods

This was a retrospective single-institution study. Patients with NSCLC and KRAS G12D mutations detected by the Massachusetts General Hospital SNaPshot next-generation sequencing assay were identified. Clinical and pathologic characteristics were collected by chart review.

Results

A total of 107 patients with KRAS G12D-mutant NSCLC were identified. Most patients were former smokers (80, 74.8%) and had tumors with adenocarcinoma pathologic subtype (93, 86.9%). Among 56 patients evaluated for programmed death-ligand 1 expression, tumor proportion score was less than 50% in 43 (76.8%). Concomitant mutations were identified in STK11 (17 of 107, 15.9%), KEAP1 (10 of 58, 17.2%), TP53 (36 of 107, 33.6%), and SMARCA4 (11 of 107, 10.3%). Among 57 patients treated with first-line therapy, patients with STK11 co-mutations had shorter progression-free survival (1.2 mo, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6–2.9 versus 4.1 mo, 95% CI: 2.5–6.0, p = 0.0235) and overall survival (4.3 mo, 95% CI: 1.2–10.6 versus 17.9 mo, 95% CI: 8.6–31.1, p = 0.0018) compared with wild type. Patients with KEAP1 co-mutations had shorter overall survival (4.6 mo, 95% CI: 1.2–10.6 versus 17.9 mo, 95% CI: 7.1–30.1, p = 0.0125) than those without. TP53 co-mutations exerted no influence on survival.

Conclusions

Co-occurring mutations were common in patients with KRAS G12D-mutant NSCLC. STK11 and KEAP1 co-mutations were associated with worse clinical outcomes, whereas co-occurring TP53 did not affect survival.

Molecular Biology and Therapeutic Perspectives for K-Ras Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) the most common alterations are identified in the Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) gene, accounting for approximately 30% of cases in Caucasian patients. The majority of mutations are located in exon 2, with the c.34G > T (p.G12C) change being the most prevalent. The clinical relevance of KRAS mutations in NSCLC was not recognized until a few years ago. What is now emerging is a dual key role played by KRAS mutations in the management of NSCLC patients. First, recent data report that KRAS-mutant lung AC patients generally have poorer overall survival (OS). Second, a KRAS inhibitor specifically targeting the c.34G > T (p.G12C) variant, Sotorasib, has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and by the European Medicines Agency. Another KRAS inhibitor targeting c.34G > T (p.G12C), Adagrasib, is currently being reviewed by the FDA for accelerated approval. From the description of the biology of KRAS-mutant NSCLC, the present review will focus on the clinical aspects of KRAS mutations in NSCLC, in particular on the emerging efficacy data of Sotorasib and other KRAS inhibitors, including mechanisms of resistance. Finally, the interaction between KRAS mutations and immune checkpoint inhibitors will be discussed.

A m6A methyltransferase-mediated immune signature determines prognosis, immune landscape and immunotherapy efficacy in patients with lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

As the most abundant modification in mRNA, the N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A) RNA modification is involved in the occurrence and development of various tumors. However, the underlying functions of this alteration in the immune microenvironment of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remain unknown.

METHODS

We identified m⁶A-mediated immune genes by performing a correlation analysis. Next, a m⁶A-mediated immune model was constructed using multiple machine learning algorithms, including univariate, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and multivariate Cox regression analyses. The potential of this model to predict the immune landscapes, drug sensitivities, and immunotherapy responses of different LUAD risk groups was studied.

RESULTS

A m⁶A-mediated immune model containing 13 m⁶A-mediated immune genes was established and found to be an independent predictor of survival time. The prognosis of low-risk patients was significantly better than that of high-risk patients. These two risk groups displayed different immune environments, genomic backgrounds, chemotherapy responses and immunotherapy response tendencies. The low- and high-risk groups strongly corresponded to the immune-hot and immune-cold phenotypes, respectively. The low-risk group was more enriched in immune-related biological processes, and the high-risk group was more enriched in proliferation-related biological processes. Furthermore, low-risk patients responded better to immunotherapy based on the results obtained from the tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) algorithm and subclass mapping algorithm using five external independent immunotherapy cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the m⁶A modification participates in regulating the tumor microenvironment. The m⁶A-mediated immune model may be useful to predict the immunotherapy responses and outcomes of patients with LUAD.

Prevalence of SWI/SNF genomic alterations in cancer and association with the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The association between SWI/SNF genomic alterations and responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains conflicting. This meta-analysis was performed to systematically assess the impact of SWI/SNF genomic alterations on response to ICIs in cancer.

METHODS

Relevant studies were searched in multiple databases updated to April 29, 2021. Outcomes of interest included prevalence of SWI/SNF alterations, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and time to treatment failure (TTF). For survival data, the hazard ratio (HR) was adopted, and the effect size was described as 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

15 studies involving 10,849 patients were included, with the overall frequency of 18.5% in SWI/SNF alterations. Across different cancer types, the mutational frequency of PBRM1 (32.0%) was the highest, followed by ARID1A (18.1%), SMARCA4 (15.6%), SMARCA2 (10.3%), ARID2 (8.1%), SMARCC2 (6.4%) and SMARCB1 (5.0%). Overall analysis showed that SWI/SNF alterations were not associated with improved OS (HR: 0.822, 95 %CI: 0.583-1.158, p = 0.262), PFS (HR: 0.608, 95 %CI: 0.434-1.067, p = 0.094) and TTF (HR: 0.923, 95 %CI: 0.757-1.125, p = 0.427) in patients treated with ICIs. In subgroup analysis, PBRM1 mutations were observed to be linked with improved OS (HR: 0.650, 95 %CI: 0.440-0.960, p = 0.030), PFS (HR: 0.539, 95 %CI: 0.314-0.926, p = 0.025) and TTF (HR: 0.490, 95 %CI: 0.271-0.885, p = 0.018) in RCC patients receiving ICIs.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall prevalence of SWI/SNF alterations was 18.5% across different cancer types. Except for PBRM1 mutations in RCC, SWI/SNF alterations may be uncorrelated with improved clinical outcomes in cancer.

KRAS-G12D mutation drives immune suppression and the primary resistance of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1 have demonstrated potency towards treating patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), the potential association between Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) oncogene substitutions and the efficacy of ICIs remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to find point mutations in the KRAS gene resistant to ICIs and elucidate resistance mechanism.

METHODS

The association between KRAS variant status and the efficacy of ICIs was explored with a clinical cohort (n = 74), and confirmed with a mouse model. In addition, the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of KRAS-mutant NSCLC, such as CD8⁺ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and PD-L1 level, was investigated. Cell lines expressing classic KRAS substitutions were used to explore signaling pathway activation involved in the formation of TIME. Furthermore, interventions that improved TIME were developed to increase responsiveness to ICIs.

RESULTS

We observed the inferior efficacy of ICIs in KRAS-G12D-mutant NSCLC. Based upon transcriptome data and immunostaining results from KRAS-mutant NSCLC, KRAS-G12D point mutation negatively correlated with PD-L1 level and secretion of chemokines CXCL10/CXCL11 that led to a decrease in CD8⁺ TILs, which in turn yielded an immunosuppressive TIME. The analysis of cell lines overexpressing classic KRAS substitutions further revealed that KRAS-G12D mutation suppressed PD-L1 level via the P70S6K/PI3K/AKT axis and reduced CXCL10/CXCL11 levels by down-regulating high mobility group protein A2 (HMGA2) level. Notably, paclitaxel, a chemotherapeutic agent, upregulated HMGA2 level, and in turn, stimulated the secretion of CXCL10/CXCL11. Moreover, PD-L1 blockade combined with paclitaxel significantly suppressed tumor growth compared with PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy in a mouse model with KRAS-G12D-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. Further analyses revealed that the combined treatment significantly enhanced the recruitment of CD8⁺ TILs via the up-regulation of CXCL10/CXCL11 levels. Results of clinical study also revealed the superior efficacy of chemo-immunotherapy in patients with KRAS-G12D-mutant NSCLC compared with ICI monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study elucidated the molecular mechanism by which KRAS-G12D mutation drives immunosuppression and enhances resistance of ICIs in NSCLC. Importantly, our findings demonstrate that ICIs in combination with chemotherapy may be more effective in patients with KRAS-G12D-mutant NSCLC.

The Interplay of Four Main Pathways Recomposes Immune Landscape in Primary and Metastatic Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Background

The four major pathways in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) including chromatin remodeling, DNA damage repair, activation of mTOR signaling, and telomere maintenance were mediated by some critical molecules and constituted critical processes of regulation in cancer-causing processes. However, the interplay and potential role of these pathway-related molecules in the tumor microenvironment of the primary and metastatic site remained unknown.

Methods

We systematically evaluated the mRNA expression of 34 molecules associated with the four pathways in 227 GEP−NEN samples from 5 datasets. We assigned the samples into two expression patterns of pathway-related molecules by an unsupervised clustering method. Subsequently, we explored the specific cell-related molecules, especially immune and stromal cells using the WGCNA method, based on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) responsible for the different patterns of pathway-related molecules, which provided a new method to qualify the pathway-related subtypes of individual tumors, then the PC_Score and PI_Score scoring systems were also constructed using obtained specific cell-related molecules. Furthermore, we performed the association of pathway-related subtypes with characteristics of immune landscape in primary and metastatic GEP-NENs.

Results

We demonstrated that the specific pathway-related molecules (SMARCA4, MLH1, TSC1, ATRX, and ATR) were associated with cytolytic activity. Then we identified the two distinct patterns of pathway-related molecules, which were characteristic with a significantly distinct immune landscape. Using WGCNA, we also identified the fibroblast-related molecules, including ASPN, COL10A1, COL3A1, EDNRA, MYL9, PRELP, RAB31, SPARC, and THBS2, and immune-related molecules including CASP1, CCL5, CTSS, CYBRD1, PMP22, and TFEC. Based on these specific markers, we identified four distinct pathway-related subtypes, characterized by immune and fibrotic enriched (I/FE), immune enriched (IE), fibrotic enriched (FE), and immune and fibrotic desert (I/FD), of which I/FE was characteristic with the highest PC_Score and PI_Score whereas I/FD presents the opposite trend. I/FE was positively correlated with immune landscape of T-cell activation and immunosuppression. Furthermore, the I/FE marked GEP-NENs with increased immune activation scores (T-cell costimulation, MHC I presentation, and APC costimulation). Importantly, the four distinct pathway-related subtypes were not conserved in different tumor sites, because I/FE was lacking in the liver metastatic site even though IE, FE, and I/FD also could be observed in the metastatic site.

Conclusions

This study was the first to perform a comprehensive analysis of the four major pathways in GEP-NENs. We demonstrated the potential function of these pathway-related molecules in immune landscapes. Our findings indicated that the primary and metastatic GEP-NENs had distinct antitumor phenotypes. This work highlighted the interplay and potential clinical utility of these pathway-related molecules in GEP-NENs.

Limited role of KRAS mutation in guiding immunotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

The success of sotorasib (AMG-510) and adagrasib (MRTX-849) has resolved the problem of non-availability of drugs for patients with KRAS_G12C-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer. However, more research is required before these drugs can be introduced as a first-line treatment for those patients, and there are no available drugs for other non-G12C-mutated patients so far; therefore, immunotherapy remains the optimal first-line treatment in this situation. The role of KRAS in affecting the response to immunotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer has not been fully elucidated. The purpose of this review was to summarize the impact of KRAS mutations, a highly heterogeneous group, on immunotherapy to provide clinicians and researchers with relevant information that can help guide decision-making.

Fusion-positive non-small cell lung carcinoma: Biological principles, clinical practice, and diagnostic implications

Based on superior efficacy and tolerability, targeted therapy is currently preferred over chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy for actionable gene fusions that occur in late-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Consequently, current clinical practice guidelines mandate testing for ALK, ROS1, NTRK, and RET gene fusions in all patients with newly diagnosed advanced non-squamous NSCLC (NS-NSCLC). Gene fusions can be detected using different approaches, but today RNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) or combined DNA/RNA NGS is the method of choice. The discovery of other gene fusions (involving, eg, NRG1, NUT, FGFR1, FGFR2, MET, BRAF, EGFR, SMARC fusions) and their partners has increased progressively in recent years, leading to the development of new and promising therapies and mandating the development and implementation of comprehensive detection methods. The purpose of this review is to focus on recent data concerning the main gene fusions identified in NSCLC, followed by the discussion of major challenges in this domain.

Characterization With KRAS Mutant Is a Critical Determinant in Immunotherapy and Other Multiple Therapies for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a frequent type of cancer, which is mainly characterized clinically by high aggressiveness and high mortality. KRAS oncoprotein is the most common molecular protein detected in NSCLC, accounting for 25% of all oncogenic mutations. Constitutive activation of the KRAS oncoprotein triggers an intracellular cascade in cancer cells, leading to uncontrolled cell proliferation of cancer cells and aberrant cell survival states. The results of multiple clinical trials have shown that different KRAS mutation subtypes exhibit different sensitivities to different chemotherapy regimens. Meanwhile, anti-angiogenic drugs have shown differential efficacy for different subtypes of KRAS mutated lung cancer. It was explored to find if the specificity of the KRAS mutation subtype would affect PD-L1 expression, so immunotherapy would be of potential clinical value for the treatment of some types of KRAS mutations. It was discovered that the specificity of the KRAS mutation affected PD-L1, which opened up immunotherapy as a potential clinical treatment option. After several breakthrough studies, the preliminary test data of many early clinical trials showed that it is possible to directly inhibit KRAS G12C mutation, which has been proved to be a targeted treatment that is suitable for about 10%-12% of patients with advanced NSCLC, having a significant impact on the prolongation of their survival and the improvement of their quality of life. This article reviews the latest progress of treatments for NSCLC with KRAS mutation, in order to gain insight into the biological diversity of lung cancer cells and their potential clinical implications, thereby enabling individualized treatment for patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC.

Biomarkers of response to checkpoint inhibitors beyond PD-L1 in lung cancer

Immunotherapy, including use of checkpoint inhibitors against PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4, forms the backbone of oncologic management for the majority of non-small cell lung carcinoma patients. However, response to these therapies varies widely, from patients who have complete resolution of metastatic disease and long-term remission, to those who rapidly progress and succumb to their cancer despite use of the newest checkpoint inhibitors. While PD-L1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry serves as the principle predictive biomarker for immunotherapy response, neither the sensitivity nor the specificity of this approach is optimal, and clinical PD-L1 testing is plagued by concerns around result reproducibility and confusion born from the proliferation of different companion diagnostic assays. At the same time, insights into tumor and host immune-specific factors that inform both prognosis and response prediction are beginning to define better immunotherapy biomarkers. Beyond immune checkpoint expression status, common themes in analyses of immunotherapy response prediction include cancer neoantigen production, the state of the antigen presentation pathway in both tumor and antigen presenting cells, the admixture of effector and suppressor immune cells in the tumor microenvironment, and the genomic drivers and comutations that can influence the all of these variables. This review will address the state of PD-L1 testing in lung cancer, the role for tumor mutation burden as a predictive biomarker, the evolving status of human leukocyte antigen/major histocompatibility complex expression as a marker of antigen presentation, approaches to tumor immune cell quantitation including by multiplex immunofluorescence, and the importance of tumor genomic profiling to ascertain oncogenic driver (EGFR, ALK, KRAS, MET, etc.) and co-mutation (STK11, KEAP1, SMARCA4) status.

STK11/LKB1 Modulation of the Immune Response in Lung Cancer: From Biology to Therapeutic Impact

The STK11/LKB1 gene codes for liver kinase B1 (STK11/LKB1), a highly conserved serine/threonine kinase involved in many energy-related cellular processes. The canonical tumor-suppressive role for STK11/LKB1 involves the activation of AMPK-related kinases, a master regulator of cell survival during stress conditions. In pre-clinical models, inactivation of STK11/LKB1 leads to the progression of lung cancer with the acquisition of metastatic properties. Moreover, preclinical and clinical data have shown that inactivation of STK11/LKB1 is associated with an inert tumor immune microenvironment, with a reduced density of infiltrating cytotoxic CD8⁺ T lymphocytes, a lower expression of PD-(L)1, and a neutrophil-enriched tumor microenvironment. In this review, we first describe the biological function of STK11/LKB1 and the role of its inactivation in cancer cells. We report descriptive epidemiology, co-occurring genomic alterations, and prognostic impact for lung cancer patients. Finally, we discuss recent data based on pre-clinical models and lung cancer cohorts analyzing the results of STK11/LKB1 alterations on the immune system and response or resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Perspectives and Issues in the Assessment of SMARCA4 Deficiency in the Management of Lung Cancer Patients

Lung cancers are ranked third among the cancer incidence in France in the year 2020, with adenocarcinomas being the commonest sub-type out of ~85% of non-small cell lung carcinomas. The constant evolution of molecular genotyping, which is used for the management of lung adenocarcinomas, has led to the current focus on tumor suppressor genes, specifically the loss of function mutation in the SMARCA4 gene. SMARCA4-deficient adenocarcinomas are preponderant in younger aged male smokers with a predominant solid morphology. The importance of identifying SMARCA4-deficient adenocarcinomas has gained interest for lung cancer management due to its aggressive behavior at diagnosis with vascular invasion and metastasis to the pleura seen upon presentation in most cases. These patients have poor clinical outcome with short overall survival rates, regardless of the stage of disease. The detection of SMARCA4 deficiency is possible in most pathology labs with the advent of sensitive and specific immunohistochemical antibodies. The gene mutations can be detected together with other established lung cancer molecular markers based on the current next generation sequencing panels. Sequencing will also allow the identification of associated gene mutations, notably KRAS, KEAP1, and STK11, which have an impact on the overall survival and progression-free survival of the patients. Predictive data on the treatment with anti-PD-L1 are currently uncertain in this high tumor mutational burden cancer, which warrants more groundwork. Identification of target drugs is also still in pre-clinical testing. Thus, it is paramount to identify the SMARCA4-deficient adenocarcinoma, as it carries worse repercussions on patient survival, despite having an exceptionally low prevalence. Herein, we discuss the pathophysiology of SMARCA4, the clinicopathological consequences, and different detection methods, highlighting the perspectives and challenges in the assessment of SMARCA4 deficiency for the management of non-small cell lung cancer patients. This is imperative, as the contemporary shift on identifying biomarkers associated with tumor suppressor genes such as SMARCA4 are trending; hence, awareness of pathologists and clinicians is needed for the SMARCA4-dNSCLC entity with close follow-up on new management strategies to overcome the poor possibilities of survival in such patients.

Recent updates in thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor

Germline inactivating mutations in SMARCA4 (SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily A, member 4) gene encoding for BRG1 (Brahma related gene-1) are the molecular drivers in small cell carcinoma of ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) and in malignant rhabdoid tumors (MRT) that occur in the context of rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome-type 2. Somatic SMARCA4 mutations and/or loss of BRG1 have been identified in a variety of adult-onset epithelial and mesenchymal neoplasms. Among thoracic tumors, these include subsets of smoking-related non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and a relatively rare, newly recognised tumor entity: thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor (SMARCA4-UT). Less than 100 cases of SMARCA4-UT have been reported to date. They present as large compressive and infiltrative mediastinal, lung and/or pleural masses in middle-aged male smokers. They are undifferentiated tumors composed of sheets of small/epithelioid and/or rhabdoid tumor cells variably expressing epithelial markers and consistently showing loss of BRG1 and the closely related protein, Brahma (BRM). Frequent expression of stem cell markers (SOX2, CD34, SALL4) is noted. Despite gene expression profiles similar to MRTs and SCCOHT, they show striking genomic overlap with SMARCA4-mutant NSCLC with frequent TP53, STK11, KEAP1, and KRAS mutations, high tumor mutation burden (TMB), and presence of smoking related molecular signatures in tumor cells. SMARCA4-UT show uniformly poor survival and are irresponsive to conventional therapies. Immunotherapy responses are variable but promising, although PDL1 expression appears to be of poor predictive value. Drugs exploiting genetic and epigenetic mechanisms of SMARCA4 antagonism hold promise for future targeted therapies.