Multicenter evaluation of the NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 v1.1 assay for the quantitative detection of HIV-1 RNA in plasma

The Development of a Standardized Quality Assessment Material to Support Xpert® HIV-1 Viral Load Testing for ART Monitoring in South Africa

The tiered laboratory framework for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) viral load monitoring accommodates a range of HIV viral load testing platforms, with quality assessment critical to ensure quality patient testing. HIV plasma viral load testing is challenged by the instability of viral RNA. An approach using an RNA stabilizing buffer is described for the Xpert^® HIV-1 Viral Load (Cepheid) assay and was tested in remote laboratories in South Africa. Plasma panels with known HIV viral titres were prepared in PrimeStore molecular transport medium for per-module verification and per-instrument external quality assessment. The panels were transported at ambient temperatures to 13 testing laboratories during 2017 and 2018, tested according to standard procedures and uploaded to a web portal for analysis. A total of 275 quality assessment specimens (57 verification panels and two EQA cycles) were tested. All participating laboratories met study verification criteria (n = 171 specimens) with an overall concordance correlation coefficient (ρ_c) of 0.997 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.996 to 0.998) and a mean bias of −0.019 log copies per milliliter (cp/mL) (95% CI: −0.044 to 0.063). The overall EQA ρ_c (n = 104 specimens) was 0.999 (95% CI: 0.998 to 0.999), with a mean bias of 0.03 log cp/mL (95% CI: 0.02 to 0.05). These panels are suitable for use in quality monitoring of Xpert^® HIV-1 VL and are applicable to laboratories in remote settings.

Ten years of external quality assessment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA quantification

Viral load testing is an essential parameter in guiding antiretroviral therapy for individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). An external quality assessment scheme for the molecular quantification of HIV-1 RNA was introduced by the United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Service for Microbiology in 2000. Specimen pairs of freeze-dried plasma were distributed to a median of 141 participants three times a year. The aim of this study was to analyze the quantification of HIV-1 RNA results between 2000 and 2010. Overall variability, measured by the standard deviations of all viral load results for each specimen, was below 0.5 log copy/ml (n = 48). When we compared assay results, the medians of the viral load by assay were within a range of 0.25 to 1.08 log copies/ml, with the lowest median values being consistently reported with the Siemens branched-chain DNA assay. The spread of participant results and, hence, differences between assay medians were greater when quantifying non-B subtypes. Laboratories were scored on the proximity of their reported log difference for the specimen pair to the median log difference reported by all laboratories. The overall level of performance with the HIV-1 RNA specimens over the past 10 years has been consistently good, with more than 90% of the participants reporting in the accepted range (median difference, ±0.5 log unit). Future distributions may result in tightening the acceptance levels of quantification and the use of more challenging specimens, including a variety of subtypes, with developments focusing on maintaining the clinical relevance and educational value of the scheme.

Generation of HIV-1 and Internal Control Transcripts as Standards for an In-House Quantitative Competitive RT-PCR Assay to Determine HIV-1 Viral Load

Human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) viral load is useful for monitoring disease progression in HIV-infected individuals. We generated RNA standards of HIV-1 and internal control (IC) by in vitro transcription and evaluated its performance in a quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assay. HIV-1 and IC standards were obtained at high RNA concentrations, without DNA contamination. When these transcripts were included as standards in a qRT-PCR assay, it was obtained a good accuracy (±0.5 log(10) unit of the expected results) in the quantification of the HIV-1 RNA international standard and controls. The lower limit detection achieved using these standards was 511.0 IU/mL. A high correlation (r = 0.925) was obtained between the in-house qRT-PCR assay and the NucliSens easyQ HIV-1 test (bioMerieux) for HIV-1 RNA quantitation with clinical samples (N = 14). HIV-1 and IC RNA transcripts, generated in this study, proved to be useful as standards in an in-house qRT-PCR assay for determination of HIV-1 viral load.

Current challenges to viral load testing in the context of emerging genetic diversity of HIV-1

INTRODUCTION

One of the major characteristics of HIV-1 is its extreme genetic diversity. A key factor in assessing the sensitivity of a molecular-based assay measuring HIV-1 RNA viral load (VL) in plasma is its ability to detect/quantify all (or most of) relevant HIV-1 genetic subtype/recombinant forms accurately.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of the current commercially available quantitative real-time assays (the Abbott RealTime HIV-1, Roche TaqMan HIV-1 versions 1.0 and 2.0, BioMérieux Nuclisens EasyQ HIV-1, Siemens VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 1.0 kinetic PCR, and Biocentric Generic HIV Viral Load assays). For each assay, studies from 2005 to 2010 assessing the impact of HIV-1 genetic diversity on the reliability of HIV-1 RNA quantification are described.

EXPERT OPINION

In light of HIV-1 genetic diversity, a general recommendation to favor one test over the other cannot categorically be made. Larger field evaluations of HIV-1 RNA assays should be conducted in areas where HIV-1 genetic diversity is the highest. The large-scale implementation of HIV-1 VL testing is urgently required in the developing world to change HIV infection from a likely death sentence into a manageable chronic infection, as done in Northern countries.

Performance of NucliSens HIV-1 EasyQ Version 2.0 compared with six commercially available quantitative nucleic acid assays for detection of HIV-1 in China

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Six HIV-1 viral load assays have been widely used in China. These include the Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor Version 1.5 ('Amplicor'), Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 test Version 1.0 ('CAP/CTM'), Versant HIV-1 RNA Version 3.0 (branched DNA [bDNA]-based assay; 'Versant bDNA'), Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay ('Abbott RealTime'), NucliSens HIV-1 QT (nucleic acid sequence-based amplification assay; 'NucliSens NASBA'), and NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 Version 1.1 ('EasyQ V1.1'). Recently, an updated version of EasyQ V1.1, NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 Version 2.0 ('EasyQ V2.0') was introduced into China. It is important to evaluate the impact of HIV-1 genotypes on the updated assay compared with the other commercial available assays in China.

METHODS

A total of 175 plasma samples with different HIV-1 clades prevalent in China were collected from treatment-naïve patients. The viral loads of those samples were determined with the seven HIV-1 viral load assays, and the quantitative differences between them were evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, EasyQ V2.0 exhibited a significant correlation (R = 0.769-0.850, p ≤ 0.001) and high agreement (94.77-97.13%, using the Bland-Altman model) with the other six assays. Although no significant differences between EasyQ V2.0 and the other six assays were observed when quantifying clade B' samples, there were statistically significant differences between EasyQ V2.0 and the Amplicor, Versant bDNA, and Abbott RealTime assays when quantifying clade BC samples, and between EasyQ V2.0 and the Versant bDNA and Abbott RealTime assays when quantifying clade AE samples. For clade BC samples, the quantitative differences between EasyQ V2.0 and the Amplicor, Versant bDNA, and Abbott RealTime assays exceeded 0.5 log(10) IU/mL in approximately 50% of samples and exceeded 1 log(10) IU/mL in approximately 15% of samples. For clade AE samples, the quantitative differences between EasyQ V2.0 and the CAP/CTM, Versant bDNA, and Abbott RealTime assays exceeded 0.5 log(10) IU/mL in approximately 50% of samples, and the differences between EasyQ V2.0 and CAP/CTM exceeded 1 log(10) IU/mL in approximately 15% of samples.

CONCLUSION

Genotypes may affect the quantification of HIV-1 RNA, especially in clade BC samples with respect to EasyQ V2.0 and the Amplicor, Versant bDNA, or Abbott RealTime assays, and in clade AE samples with respect to EasyQ V2.0 and the Versant bDNA or Abbott RealTime assays. It is therefore strongly suggested that, where possible, the HIV-1 viral load in infected patients be quantified at follow-up by the same version of the same assay that was used initially.

HIV-1 load comparison using four commercial real-time assays

The HIV-1 RNA viral load is commonly used for the monitoring of disease progression and antiretroviral treatment of HIV-1-infected patients. Since the misestimating of values could lead to inappropriate therapeutical management, the comparative performances, especially the ability to span the genetic diversity of HIV-1, of available automated real-time assays need to be evaluated. We conducted a prospective study with 74 consenting patients enrolled between March 2007 and November 2008. A blood sample was obtained at the time of diagnosis of HIV seropositivity and blindly tested for HIV-1 RNA by at least 4 commercial tests: the Abbott m2000 RealTime HIV-1, bioMérieux NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1, version 1.2 (v1.2), and Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan (CAP/CTM) v1.0 and v2.0 assays. The means of difference were null between CAP/CTM v2.0 and Abbott for CRF02_AG subtypes but positive in favor of CAP/CTM v2.0 for genotype B and negative in favor of NucliSens for all genotypes. The standard deviation (SD) of difference ranged from 0.3 to 0.59, depending on the considered couples of assays. Reliabilities of these four tests, appreciated by the standard deviation of difference between the measurement and the estimated "true" viral load and by the coefficient of reliability, were significantly different (P < 10(-4)) among each other. Significant differences were also observed within each group of HIV-1 genotype. The global disparity was higher for CRF02_AG than for B subtypes. This study indicates a risk of viral load misestimating or discrepancies between techniques, depending on the HIV-1 subtype, and speaks in favor of using the same assay for the monitoring of HIV-1-infected patients.

Lack of correlation between three commercial platforms for the evaluation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) viral load at the clinically critical lower limit of quantification

BACKGROUND

Concordance in plasma HIV-1 viral load quantification at the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) is crucial for current commercial assays.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the performance of three commercial viral load assays and carry out a correlation study with the Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 test, the Roche Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 MONITOR test, and the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay.

STUDY DESIGN

Assay agreement was analyzed using linear regression and Bland-Altman plots. Concordance near the clinically critical LLOQ was measured by Cohen's kappa statistics. Intra-assay precision was assessed, and assay reproducibility was measured at 50copies/mL across all three platforms.

RESULTS

While good overall correlation was observed between the assays (r≥0.93), quantitative differences exceeded 0.5log(10)copies/mL among paired results in 3.7 to 8.3% of specimens. The degree of concordance between the assays near the LLOQ was unsatisfactory, with Cohen's kappa ranging from 0.14 to 0.38. The intra-assay precision of the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay ranged from 0.04 to 0.15 (SD log(10)) and 1.34% to 8.37% (CV). Reproducibility at 50copies/mL for RealTime HIV-1, TaqMan, and Amplicor was 10.05, 11.04 and 5.07 (% CV), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although good correlation was observed between the assays across their linear range, their concordance at the clinically critical LLOQ was poor. The accurate quantification of low-level viremia remains elusive, and the lack of correlation of these assays presents a challenge to the interpretation of such results and in the clinical management of HIV-infected patients.

Advances in developing HIV-1 viral load assays for resource-limited settings

Commercial HIV-1 RNA viral load assays have been routinely used in developed countries to monitor antiretroviral treatment (ART). However, these assays require expensive equipment and reagents, well-trained operators, and established laboratory infrastructure. These requirements restrict their use in resource-limited settings where people are most afflicted with the HIV-1 epidemic. Inexpensive alternatives such as the Ultrasensitive p24 assay, the reverse transcriptase (RT) assay and in-house reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) have been developed. However, they are still time-consuming, technologically complex and inappropriate for decentralized laboratories as point-of-care (POC) tests. Recent advances in microfluidics and nanotechnology offer new strategies to develop low-cost, rapid, robust and simple HIV-1 viral load monitoring systems. We review state-of-the-art technologies used for HIV-1 viral load monitoring in both developed and developing settings. Emerging approaches based on microfluidics and nanotechnology, which have potential to be integrated into POC HIV-1 viral load assays, are also discussed.

Molecular methods for evaluation of virological status of nonhuman primates challenged with simian immunodeficiency or simian-human immunodeficiency viruses

Nonhuman primates represent a robust model to evaluate preclinical efficacy of HIV-1 vaccine and therapeutic strategies. Plasma and tissue viral RNA as well as tissue proviral DNA load are key parameters in assessing efficacy of vaccines and therapeutics against simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) or simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) challenge. To quantitate SIV RNA in plasma and tissues, an isothermal nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) method using real-time detection of amplified RNA with molecular beacons was developed. This assay has accuracy and reproducibility over seven orders of magnitude and has advantages over the electrochemiluminescence-based NASBA assay described previously, both in terms of higher throughput and sensitivity. Reproducibility and accuracy were also demonstrated for a TaqMan real-time PCR assay for quantitating proviral DNA load in PBMCs and lymphoid tissues. In infected macaques, the level of plasma viremia correlated with the tissue viral RNA but not always with proviral DNA loads. Further, animals with undetectable levels of viral RNA in plasma and proviral DNA in tissues, showed no sign of seroconversion and activation of Gag-specific CD8+ or CD4+ T cells in peripheral blood. These results suggest that simultaneous application of real-time NASBA and PCR assays provides quantitative evaluation of challenge outcome in macaques.

Evaluation of the Abbott m2000rt RealTime HIV-1 assay with manual sample preparation compared with the ROCHE COBAS AmpliPrep/AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR v1.5 using specimens from East Africa

The performance of the Abbott m2000rt RealTime HIV-1 assay (RealTime HIV-1) with manual sample preparation was compared against the ROCHE COBAS AmpliPrep/AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR Test v1.5 (CAP/CA HIV-1) using samples collected from 100 donors infected with HIV and 20 donors not infected with HIV in northern Tanzania where HIV-1 subtypes A, C, D, and their recombinant forms predominate. The RealTime HIV-1 appeared to have more within-run variability at high HIV-1 RNA concentrations, but total assay variability over the dynamic range tested was within the manufacturer's claim of <0.3 SD copies/mL. Accuracy studies showed 100% concordance for positive and negative values. When continuous values were examined, CAP/CA HIV-1 yielded higher values than the RealTime HIV-1 at higher nominal HIV-1 RNA concentrations. The RealTime HIV-1 assay showed excellent linearity between 2.5 and 7.0 log copies/mL. Of negative samples, 100% showed negative results, and >95% of samples with nominal concentrations of 40 copies/mL were detected at > or = 40 copies/mL by RealTime HIV-1. Manual sample preparation may contribute to higher total assay variability. This study suggests that the Abbott m2000rt RealTime HIV-1 assay with manual sample preparation is an acceptable and feasible alternative to the conventional ROCHE COBAS AmpliPrep/AMLICOR HIV-1 Monitor v1.5 assay and that the RealTime HIV-1 assay performs well on samples from East Africa.

Update on HIV viral-load assays: new technologies and testing in resource-limited settings

Assessment of viral load is one of the best predictors of clinical progression, as well as the main parameter to assess treatment response in HIV-positive patients. Reproducible and sensitive assays based on real-time PCR technology have been developed to quantify HIV in the bloodstream of infected persons. Recent improvements have allowed reliable measurements of viremia in non-B subtypes. Testing of samples other than serum or plasma has been challenging, but is particularly important for developing countries.

Evaluation of the Abbott m2000 RealTime human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) assay for HIV load monitoring in South Africa compared to the Roche Cobas AmpliPrep-Cobas Amplicor, Roche Cobas AmpliPrep-Cobas TaqMan HIV-1, and BioMerieux NucliSENS EasyQ HIV-1 assays

The implementation of antiretroviral therapy demands the need for increased access to viral load (VL) monitoring. Newer real-time VL testing technologies are faster and have larger dynamic ranges and fully automated extraction to benefit higher throughputs in resource-poor environments. The Abbott RealTime human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) assay was evaluated as a new option for testing for HIV-1 subtype C in South Africa, and its performance was compared to the performance of existing assays (the Cobas AmpliPrep-Cobas TaqMan HIV-1, version 1, assay; the AmpliPrep-Cobas Monitor standard HIV-1 assay; and the NucliSENS EasyQ-EasyMag HIV-1 assay) in a high-throughput laboratory. The total precision of the RealTime HIV-1 assay was acceptable over all viral load ranges. This assay compared most favorably with the Cobas AmpliPrep-Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 assay (R(2) = 0.904), with a low standard deviation of difference being detected (0.323 copies/ml). The bias against comparator assays ranged from -0.001 copies/ml to -0.228 copies/ml. Variability in the reporting of VLs for a 20-member subtype panel compared to the variability of other assays was noted with subtypes G and CRF02-AG. The RealTime HIV-1 assay can test 93 samples per day with minimal manual preparation, less staff, and the minimization of contamination through automation. This assay is suitable for HIV-1 subtype C VL quantification in South Africa.

Evaluation of the NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 v1.1 and RealTime HIV-1 kits for quantitation of HIV-1 RNA in plasma

Human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) RNA viral load is an important biomarker to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of antiretroviral drugs and to monitor disease progression in HIV-infected individuals. We compared HIV-1 RNA quantitation between two different kits, the NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 v1.1 (EasyQ, bioMérieux) and RealTime HIV-1 (RealTime, Abbott), using HIV-1 RNA quality control (QC) materials, cell-cultivated viruses, and the plasma samples of 104 patients with HIV. Correlation between the two kits for HIV RNA-1 quantitation with clinical samples was high (R=0.91). Based on results obtained with quality control standards, the reproducibility of the RealTime kit was higher than the EasyQ kit: the viral load value and coefficient of variation of each kit was 4.11+/-0.136 and 3.3% for EasyQ and 3.55+/-0.042 and 1.2% for RealTime, respectively (P<0.002). This is the first comparative analysis of the detection limit and reproducibility of two different quantitation kits using clinical plasma samples from Korean HIV-1-infected patients. It will serve a useful reference to determine correction values for each HIV-1 RNA quantitation kits and to choose an appropriate assay kit for each laboratory.

Correlation between human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA measurements obtained with dried blood spots and those obtained with plasma by use of Nuclisens EasyQ HIV-1 and Abbott RealTime HIV load tests

The plasma human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA load is used in the clinical routine for the monitoring of HIV infection and the patient's response to antiretroviral therapy. Other body fluids or dried blood spots (DBS) can be used, however, to assess the level of viremia. The use of DBS may be especially helpful for the monitoring of HIV-infected patients in resource-poor settings, where access to adequate laboratory facilities is often difficult. However, the correlation between the HIV RNA levels in plasma and those in DBSs has not been well established. Paired plasma and DBS samples obtained from HIV type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients were tested for HIV RNA copy numbers by using two different commercial assays, the Nuclisens EasyQ HIV-1 (version 1.1) test (the Nuclisens test; Biomerieux) and the m2000rt RealTime HIV test (the m2000rt test; Abbott). Nucleic acid extraction was performed manually by using either the Nuclisens isolation kit (which uses the Boom methodology) or the m2000rt sample preparation kit (an iron particle-based method). A total of 103 paired plasma and DBS samples were tested. Viral load results were obtained for 97 (94.2%) samples with the Nuclisens isolation kit and 81 (78.6%) samples with the m2000rt kit. The overall correlation between the RNA loads in plasma and DBS was good, although better results were obtained by the Nuclisens test (R(2) = 0.87, P < 0.001) than by the m2000rt test (R(2) = 0.70, P < 0.001). While the specificities were excellent and similar for both the Nuclisens and the m2000rt tests (97.1% and 100%, respectively), the sensitivity was greater by the Nuclisens test than by the m2000rt test (75.8% and 56.6%, respectively). Overall, the viral loads in DBS tended to be lower than those in plasma, with mean differences of 0.3 log unit (standard deviation, 0.5 log unit) and 0.76 log unit (standard deviation, 0.8 log unit) for the Nuclisens and the m2000rt tests, respectively. The levels of agreement between the measurements in plasma and DBS were assessed by using the Bland-Altman plot for each assay. The Nuclisens test gave results within its defined limits (-0.65 to 1.26) for 95.9% of the samples, while the m2000rt test gave results within its limits (-0.83 to 2.33) for 100% of the samples. In summary, the HIV-1 load can accurately be quantified by testing DBS by either the Nuclisens or the m2000rt test, although the Nuclisens test may outperform the m2000rt test when nucleic acids are extracted manually.

Development of the 1st International Reference Panel for HIV-1 RNA genotypes for use in nucleic acid-based techniques

Twenty-eight laboratories from 16 countries participated in a collaborative study to evaluate an HIV-1 RNA Genotype Reference Panel for use with nucleic acid-based tests (NAT). The Reference Panel consisted of 11 coded samples representing different HIV-1 genotypes (subtypes A-D, AE, F, G, AA-GH, groups N and O) as well as a negative diluent control. Each laboratory assayed the eleven panel members concurrently with the 1st International Standard for HIV-1 RNA (NIBSC Code 97/656) on at least three separate occasions and the data collated and analysed at NIBSC. Twenty-nine sets of data from NAT were received, 19 from quantitative and 10 from qualitative assays, with six different commercial assays and five "in-house" assays represented. The results showed that viruses from subtypes A-D and recombinant virus AE [CRF01_AE] were detected consistently, but that some assays had difficulty with the detection and quantification of viruses from subtypes F and G, a mixed recombinant virus AA-GH and a representative of group N. Furthermore, most assays failed to detect the group O representative. The study illustrated the limitations of some molecular assays particularly in detection of certain non-B genotypes which are important viruses in the global AIDS pandemic and illustrated the value of a well-characterised genotype panel. The panel has been established by the World Health Organisation's Expert Committee on Biological Standardisation as the 1st International Reference Panel HIV-1 RNA Genotypes (code 01/466).

Performance of three commercial viral load assays, Versant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA bDNA v3.0, Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1, and NucliSens HIV-1 EasyQ v1.2, testing HIV-1 non-B subtypes and recombinant variants

Monitoring antiretroviral therapy requires that human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) viremia assays are applicable to all distinct variants. This study evaluates the performance of three commercial viral load assays-Versant HIV-1 RNA bDNA v3.0, Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1, and NucliSens HIV-1 EasyQ v1.2-in testing 83 plasma specimens from patients carrying HIV-1 non-B subtypes and recombinants previously defined by phylogenetic analysis of the pol gene. All 28 specimens from patients under treatment presented viremia values below the detection limit with the three methods. In the remaining 55 specimens from naive individuals viremia could not be detected in 32.7, 20, and 14.6% using the NucliSens, Versant, or TaqMan tests, respectively, suggesting potential viral load underestimation of some samples by all techniques. Only 32 (58.2%) samples from naive subjects were quantified by the three methods; the NucliSens test provided the highest HIV RNA values (mean, 4.87 log copies/ml), and the Versant test provided the lowest (mean, 4.16 log copies/ml). Viremia differences of greater than 1 log were seen in 8 (14.5%) of 55 specimens, occurring in 10.9, 7.3, and 5.4%, respectively, of the specimens in comparisons of Versant versus NucliSens, Versant versus TaqMan, and TaqMan versus NucliSens. Differences greater than 0.5 log, considered significant for clinicians, occurred in 45.5, 27.3, and 29% when the same assays were compared. Some HIV-1 strains, such as subtype G and CRF02_AG, showed more discrepancies in distinct quantification methods than others. In summary, an adequate design of primers and probes is needed for optimal quantitation of plasma HIV-RNA in non-B subtypes. Our data emphasize the need to use the same method for monitoring patients on therapy and also the convenience of HIV-1 subtyping.

Performance of the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay for quantification of HIV-1 clades prevalent in China

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay for measuring viral loads of the prevalent HIV-1 clades in China.

STUDY DESIGN

Serially diluted samples, as well as 521 clinical samples from 213 untreated HIV-1-infected individuals, 56 HIV-1-infected patients receiving ART, 60 HCV- and 57 HBV-infected patients and 135 healthy blood donors, were tested with RealTime and EasyQ.

RESULTS

Both assays exhibited linearity coefficients of >0.98. RealTime and EasyQt detected HIV-1 RNA in 87.36% and 86.99% of 269 HIV-1-seropositive samples, respectively. The correlation coefficients between the two assays for quantifying HIV-1 clades B', BC and AE were 0.884, 0.813 and 0.881, respectively, and the mean differences between the two assays for clades B', BC and AE were -0.087, 0.314 and 0.559 log(10)IU/mL, respectively. The correlation coefficient between the two assays for measuring samples from patients receiving ART was 0.945 (mean difference, 0.085 log(10)IU/mL). No false-positive samples were found among the 60 HCV-infected patients, 57 HBV-infected patients and 135 healthy blood donors.

CONCLUSIONS

The Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay shows good linearity and specificity. ART drugs and HIV-1 clades B' and BC do not affect the performance of the assay. Based on the comparison data, [corrected] clade AE may be more [corrected] readily detected by using this method [corrected]

A RealTime HIV-1 viral load assay for automated quantitation of HIV-1 RNA in genetically diverse group M subtypes A–H, group O and group N samples

The Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay is an automated test for monitoring HIV-1 viral load in plasma samples. The assay uses reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technology with homogeneous real-time fluorescent detection. Automated sample preparation is performed on the m2000sp instrument where RNA is isolated using magnetic microparticle technology and dispensed to a PCR tray together with the amplification reagents. The PCR tray is then transferred to the Abbott m2000rt instrument for amplification and real-time detection. The assay utilizes two distinct sets of primers and probes for HIV-1 and for internal control (IC). The IC is processed along with each sample to control for sample recovery and inhibition. The HIV-1 primer and probe sequences are targeted to the integrase (IN) region of the polymerase (pol) gene. Due to the selection of a highly conserved target region and a novel, mismatch tolerant probe design, the assay can quantitate HIV-1 group M subtypes A-H, group O, and group N isolates. The assay provides high reproducibility and a wide dynamic range, allowing quantitation from 40 copies to 10 million copies of HIV-1 RNA per milliliter of plasma. HIV-1 RNA concentrations detected with 95% probability were 25copies/mL with 1.0mL of plasma, 39copies/mL with 0.6mL of plasma, 65copies/mL with 0.5mL of plasma, and 119copies/mL with 0.2mL of plasma.

Potential of a simplified p24 assay for early diagnosis of infant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection in Haiti

With global efforts to scale up the prevention of mother-to-child transmission services and pediatric antiretroviral therapy, there is an urgent need to introduce a simple, low-cost infant human immunodeficiency virus test in the field. We postulated that the p24 antigen capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay could be simplified by eliminating signal amplification without compromising diagnostic accuracy.

Human Polycomb group EED protein negatively affects HIV-1 assembly and release

Background

The human EED protein, a member of the superfamily of Polycomb group (PcG) proteins with WD-40 repeats, has been found to interact with three HIV-1 components, namely the structural Gag matrix protein (MA), the integrase enzyme (IN) and the Nef protein. The aim of the present study was to analyze the possible biological role of EED in HIV-1 replication, using the HIV-1-based vector HIV-Luc and EED protein expressed by DNA transfection of 293T cells.

Results

During the early phase of HIV-1 infection, a slight negative effect on virus infectivity occurred in EED-expressing cells, which appeared to be dependent on EED-MA interaction. At late times post infection, EED caused an important reduction of virus production, from 20- to 25-fold as determined by CAp24 immunoassay, to 10- to 80-fold based on genomic RNA levels, and this decrease was not due to a reduction of Gag protein synthesis. Coexpression of WTNef, or the non-N-myristoylated mutant NefG2A, restored virus yields to levels obtained in the absence of exogenous EED protein. This effect was not observed with mutant NefΔ57 mimicking the Nef core, or with the lipid raft-retargeted fusion protein LAT-Nef. LAT_AA-Nef, a mutant defective in the lipid raft addressing function, had the same anti-EED effect as WTNef. Cell fractionation and confocal imaging showed that, in the absence of Nef, EED mainly localized in membrane domains different from the lipid rafts. Upon co-expression with WTNef, NefG2A or LAT_AA-Nef, but not with NefΔ57 or LAT-Nef, EED was found to relocate into an insoluble fraction along with Nef protein. Electron microscopy of HIV-Luc producer cells overexpressing EED showed significant less virus budding at the cell surface compared to control cells, and ectopic assembly and clustering of nuclear pore complexes within the cytoplasm.

Conclusion

Our data suggested that EED exerted an antiviral activity at the late stage of HIV-1 replication, which included genomic RNA packaging and virus assembly, resulting possibly from a mistrafficking of viral genomic RNA (gRNA) or gRNA/Gag complex. Nef reversed the EED negative effect on virus production, a function which required the integrity of the Nef N-terminal domain, but not its N-myristoyl group. The antagonistic effect of Nef correlated with a cellular redistribution of both EED and Nef.

Evaluation of performance across the dynamic range of the Abbott RealTime™ HIV-1 assay as compared to VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 3.0 and AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR v1.5 using serial dilutions of 39 group M and O viruses

Performance of the Abbott m2000 instrument system and the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay was evaluated using a panel of 37 group M (subtypes A-D, F, G, CRF01_AE, CRF02_AG and unique recombinant forms) and 2 group O virus isolates. Testing was performed on 273 sample dilutions and compared to VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 3.0 (bDNA) and AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR v1.5 (Monitor v1.5) test results. RealTime HIV-1, bDNA, and Monitor v1.5 tests quantified 87%, 78%, and 81% of samples, respectively. RealTime HIV-1 detected an additional 31 samples at < 40 copies/mL. For group M, RealTime HIV-1 dilution profiles and viral loads were highly correlated with bDNA and Monitor v1.5 values; 87% and 89% of values were within 0.5 log(10) copies/mL. In contrast, the group O viruses were not detected by Monitor v1.5 and were substantially underquantified by approximately 2 log(10) copies/mL in bDNA relative to the RealTime HIV-1 assay. Sequence analysis revealed that RealTime HIV-1 primer/probe binding sites are highly conserved and exhibit fewer nucleotide mismatches relative to Monitor v1.5. The automated m2000 system and RealTime HIV-1 assay offer the advantages of efficient sample processing and throughput with reduced "hands-on" time while providing improved sensitivity, expanded dynamic range and reliable quantification of genetically diverse HIV-1 strains.

A novel internally controlled real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay for HIV-1 RNA targeting the pol integrase genomic region

Given the worldwide increasing spread of HIV-1 genetic variants, it is mandatory that assays used for nucleic acid testing for HIV-1 detect all existing groups and subtypes of HIV-1. In this report the development and evaluation of a quantitative real-time HIV-1 RT-PCR assay that targets a conserved region within the pol integrase domain is described. As an internal control reaction, endogenous glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase transcripts were detected in a multiplex configuration. The detection limit (95% cut-off value) was determined by probit analysis and calculated as 281 IU/ml of HIV-1 RNA. Within-run and between-run coefficients of variation were below 15 and 27%, respectively, indicating high reproducibility. The described assay detected all tested HIV-1 isolates representing groups M, O and N. Within group M, quantitative test results correlated well with viral loads as determined by the automated Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay. Based on the testing of 1206 confirmed HIV-1 RNA negative blood donor samples, assay specificity was found to be 100%. The rate of inhibition was 0.37%. The described HIV-1 real-time RT-PCR was validated according to regulatory guidelines and is applicable to the screening of blood donors as well as the determination of HIV-1 viral load.

Evaluation of the performance of the automated NucliSENS easyMAG and EasyQ systems versus the Roche AmpliPrep-AMPLICOR combination for high-throughput monitoring of human immunodeficiency virus load

This study presents the data of an evaluation of the automated Nuclisens easyMAG and EasyQ systems versus the Roche AmpliPrep-AMPLICOR combination for testing of high-volume human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) load. This represents a follow-up of a previous study investigating the performance of the real-time Nuclisens assay using the semiautomated NucliSENS miniMAG extraction procedure. Three hundred eighteen patient samples were analyzed using both methods. The easyMAG-EasyQ HIV type 1 system has a higher sensitivity and broader dynamic range than the Cobas AmpliPrep-AMPLICOR system when the standard Roche assay is used alone, 25 to 3,000,000 IU/ml versus 400 to 750,000 HIV RNA copies/ml, respectively. There was significant correlation between the assays (0.93; P < 0.0001), with good accuracy (percent similarity mean mu = 96%), good precision (percent similarity standard deviation = 4.97%), and overall good agreement with a low percent similarity coefficient of variation of 5.17 to 6.11%. Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the AMPLICOR assay generated higher values than the EasyQ combination, with 95% of results within clinically acceptable limits. The throughput of samples was greatly improved using the easyMAG-EasyQ system, allowing 144 samples to be processed within 6 h. The potential for contamination has been dramatically reduced using the automated extraction system. Additional negative controls have been added to the kit to monitor for contamination based on the South African experience. This assay thus presents a real option for monitoring HIV load assays in high-volume testing environments.

Evaluation of NucliSens EasyQ™ HIV-1 assay for quantification of HIV-1 subtypes prevalent in South-east Asia

BACKGROUND

Monitoring anti-retroviral therapy requires that viral load assays for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) be applicable to diverse HIV-1 subtypes.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 assay for quantitation of common HIV-1 subtypes prevalent in South-east Asia.

STUDY DESIGN

One hundred and nineteen plasma samples collected in Hong Kong and Cambodia were used to compare the performance of NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 and COBAS Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor version 1.5 assays. Viral RNA extracted from the NucliSens MiniMAG was also used for HIV-1 subtyping.

RESULTS

Performance of NucliSens EasyQ correlated well with COBAS Amplicor (r=0.777, p<0.001) and the small mean difference (0.0462log(10)IU/mL) obtained in the Bland and Altman model indicated good agreement between two assays. The NucliSens EasyQ assay demonstrated a 95% sensitivity at 500IU/mL and 100% specificity. Reproducibility of this assay was within log(10)2-4IU/mL and had a coefficient of variation between 2.3% and 10.4%. Among the 109 specimens included in the analysis, HIV-1 subtyping identified 64 CRF01_AE, 38 subtype B, 3 subtype C, 3 CRF07_BC and 1 subtype G viruses.

CONCLUSIONS

Performance of NucliSens EasyQ was comparable to COBAS Amplicor for HIV-1 viral load monitoring. RNA extracts from NucliSens MiniMAG could be used for HIV-1 viral load monitoring, subtyping and drug resistance mutations detection. Our findings highlight the versatility of both NucliSens EasyQ and COBAS Amplicor in monitoring prevalent subtypes and rare circulating recombinant forms (CRFs) in the South-east Asia region.

Quantitative detection of plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 2 subtype A RNA by the Nuclisens EasyQ Assay (version 1.1)

No commercial viral load assay has yet been approved for use for measurement of human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) RNA levels in plasma. We assessed the performance of the NucliSens EasyQ (version 1.1) assay (EasyQ; bioMérieux, Boxtel, The Netherlands) to quantify HIV-2 viremia. A viral stock was prepared from an HIV-2 (subtype A)-infected patient. Culture supernatant was subjected to viral particle counting by electron microscopy. Serial dilutions of the viral stock were made in HIV-negative plasma and were used to test EasyQ for its sensitivity, linearity, and reproducibility. RNA was quantified by the NucliSens EasyQ (version 1.1) assay. Plasma samples from 75 HIV-2-infected patients were further tested. EasyQ was able to quantify HIV-2 RNA in a reproducible manner. Overall, estimates of the number of HIV-2 RNA copies/ml obtained with EasyQ were lower than those obtained by electron microscopy; however, the differences were always less than 0.7 log (mean, 0.55 +/- 0.19 log(10)). The assay showed good linearity (r(2) = 0.964; P < 0.0001). The agreement between both measures was assessed by use of a Bland-Altman plot; the narrow limits (0.158 to 0.952), defined as the mean difference +/- 2 standard deviations, indicated good agreement. The reproducibility was also good, since the between-run coefficients of variation were 1.49, 3.60, and 12.25% for samples containing 6.30, 4.30, and 2.30 log(10) HIV-2 RNA copies/ml, respectively. HIV-2 RNA was detected in 34 of 75 (45%) plasma specimens (mean, 2.72 log RNA copies/ml; range, 1.74 to 4.11 log RNA copies/ml); the rest of the specimens were considered to have undetectable viremia. A negative correlation was found between the number of HIV-2 RNA copies/ml and CD4 counts. In summary, EasyQ was shown to be reliable for the measurement of plasma HIV-2 subtype A RNA levels and may be a feasible tool for routine clinical monitoring of HIV-2 subtype A-infected patients.

Comparison of the LCx human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA quantitative, RealTime HIV, and COBAS AmpliPrep-COBAS TaqMan assays for quantitation of HIV type 1 RNA in plasma

The LCx human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA Quantitative, RealTime HIV, and COBAS AmpliPrep-COBAS TaqMan assays for HIV type 1 (HIV-1) were compared for their abilities to quantitate HIV-1 RNA in plasma. High degrees of correlation and agreement were observed between the assays. Differences in HIV-1 RNA levels according to HIV-1 subtypes did not reach statistical significance.

Performance of the automated Abbott RealTime™ HIV-1 assay on a genetically diverse panel of specimens from London: Comparison to VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 3.0, AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR v1.5, and LCx® HIV RNA Quantitative assays

Automated RNA extraction and quantitation of HIV-1 by real-time PCR offer potential advantages of efficient sample processing, improved sensitivity, expanded dynamic range and reduced contamination risk. In this study, plasma was collected from 100 HIV-1 infected patients visiting The Courtyard Clinic of St. George's Hospital in London, United Kingdom (UK). Viral loads measured using the automated Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay (m2000sp sample preparation and m2000rt amplification and detection instruments) were compared to results obtained with Versant HIV-1 RNA 3.0 (bDNA), AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR v1.5 (Monitor v1.5) and LCx HIV RNA Quantitative (LCx HIV) assays. Based on gag p24, pol integrase, and env gp41 sequences, the panel included 26 subtype A, 20 B, 27 C, 10 D, 1 CRF01_AE, 3 CRF02_AG and 13 recombinant viruses. RealTime HIV-1, bDNA, Monitor v1.5 and LCx HIV quantitated 82, 74, 82, and 83% of samples, respectively, with 82, 71, 69 and 80 of the 100 samples measured within the dynamic ranges. Viral loads were highly correlated with 99% of values within 1 log(10) copies/ml between tests. The automated m2000 system and RealTime HIV-1 assay can increase laboratory throughput, enhance overall efficiency and reduce operator-associated errors while providing reliable quantitation of genetically diverse strains of HIV-1.

Evaluation of a real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification assay using molecular beacons for detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1

We evaluated the performance characteristics of a new, real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) assay that incorporates molecular beacon technology for detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). The quantitative results were comparable to those obtained with three leading commercially available assays. The analytical sensitivity was 37 IU/ml. The NASBA assay detected clinically relevant recombinant viruses and all group M HIV-1 subtypes.

Comparison of the COBAS TAQMAN™ HIV-1 HPS with VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 3.0 Assay (bDNA) for plasma RNA quantitation in different HIV-1 subtypes

Quantitation of HIV-1 RNA levels in plasma has an undisputed prognostic value and is extremely important for evaluating response to antiretroviral therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the real-time PCR COBAS TaqMan 48 analyser, comparing it to the existing VERSANT 3.0 (bDNA) for HIV-1 RNA quantitation in plasma of individuals infected with different HIV-1 subtypes (104 blood samples). A positive linear correlation between the two tests (r2 = 0.88) was found. Quantitation by the COBAS TaqMan assay was approximately 0.32log10 higher than by bDNA. The relationship between the two assays was similar within all subtypes with a Deming regression of <1 and <0 for the Bland-Altman plots. Overall, no significant differences were found in plasma viral load quantitation in different HIV-1 subtypes between both assays; therefore these assays are suitable for viral load quantitation of highly genetically diverse HIV-1 plasma samples.

Performance of the automated Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay on a genetically diverse panel of specimens from Brazil

The combination of automated sample preparation and real-time RT-PCR for measurement of HIV-1 viral load has the potential to significantly enhance throughput, reduce operator-associated error, and increase assay sensitivity and dynamic range. In this study, RNA was extracted from the plasma of 91 HIV-1 seropositive Brazilian blood donors using the Abbott m2000sp automated sample preparation system. Viral loads measured using the RealTime HIV-1 (RealTime HIV-1) assay and the Abbott m2000rt instrument were compared to values obtained in the LCx HIV RNA quantitative assay. Subtype was determined for 89 of 91 specimens by sequence/phylogenetic analysis of three genomic regions: gag p24, pol integrase, and env gp41. The panel included 69 subtype B, 1 C, 2 F, and 17 recombinant strains. Eighty-seven specimens were quantified by both assays. Two specimens were quantified only in RealTime HIV-1. Two additional specimens below the detection limit of both assays were also negative on PCR amplification. Viral load results were highly correlated, and good agreement was observed between assays with 90% of values within 0.5 log(10)copies/ml. The RealTime HIV-1 assay and m2000 system offer the advantages of automation while providing reliable quantification of diverse HIV strains.

Comparative performance of the Amplicor HIV-1 monitor assay versus NucliSens EasyQ in HIV subtype C-infected patients

In facing global programs for treating HIV-infected patients in the developing countries, there is a real need for viral load assays that are accurate for the local subtypes. The present study was designed to evaluate viral load measurements using the newer version of the NASBA assay in subtype C-infected patients. The performances of this new version, a real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification HIV-1 assay (NucliSens EasyQ), were compared to Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor Assay version 1.5 in 79 samples of subtype C-infected patients originating from Ethiopia. Twenty HIV-1 subtype B-infected patients served as a control group. Blood samples from patients in both groups were tested by both assays. The results were compared by a paired, two-tailed Student's t-test. The disparity between the results of the two viral load assays was highly significant in subtype C samples (P = 0.005), such that in the vast majority, higher values of viral load were obtained by the Amplicor assay. However, no differences between the two assays were found in subtype B samples (P = 0.77). CD4 measurements were available for 78 samples of subtype C-infected patients. Of these, a CD4-to-viral load discrepancy (CD4 <or= 200, viral load <or=5,000 IU/ml) was found in 11.5% of the samples when using the EasyQ assay, compared with 5.1% of the samples using the Amplicor assay. In conclusion, the performance of the NucliSens EasyQ assay was inferior to that of the Amplicor assay in assessing viral load levels in subtype C-infected patients. This difference may have a significant bearing on patient care.