Free-breathing non-contrast-enhanced flow-independent MR angiography using magnetization-prepared 3D non-balanced dual-echo Dixon method: A feasibility study at 3 Tesla

Flow independent black blood imaging with a large FOV from the neck to the aortic arch: A feasibility study at 3 tesla

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility of obtaining black-blood imaging with a large FOV from the neck to the aortic arch at 3 T using a newly modified Relaxation-Enhanced Angiography without Contrast and Triggering for Black-Blood Imaging (REACT-BB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

REACT-BB provides black-blood images by adjusting the inversion time (TI) in REACT to the null point of blood. The optimal TI for REACT-BB was investigated in 10 healthy volunteers with TI varied from 200 ms to 1400 ms. Contrast ratios were calculated between muscle and three branch arteries of the aortic arch. Additionally, a comparison between REACT-BB and MPRAGE involved evaluating the depiction of high-intensity plaques in 222 patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack. Measurements included plaque-to-muscle signal intensity ratios (PMR), plaque volumes, and carotid artery stenosis rates in 60 patients with high-intensity plaques in carotid arteries.

RESULTS

REACT-BB with TI = 850 ms produced the black-blood image with the best contrast between blood and background tissues. REACT-BB outperformed MPRAGE in depicting high-intensity plaques in the aortic arch (55.4% vs 45.5%) and exhibited superior overall image quality in visual assessment (3.31 ± 0.70 vs 2.89 ± 0.73; p < 0.05). Although the PMR of REACT-BB was significantly lower than MPRAGE (2.227 ± 0.601 vs 2.285 ± 0.662; P < 0.05), a strong positive correlation existed between REACT-BB and MPRAGE (ρ = 0.935; P < 0.05), and all high-intensity plaques that MPRAGE detected were clearly detected by REACT-BB.

CONCLUSION

REACT-BB provides black-blood images with uniformly suppressed fat and blood signals over a large FOV from the neck to the aortic arch with comparable or better high-signal plaque depiction than MPRAGE.

Highly compressed SENSE accelerated relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering (REACT) for fast non-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the neck: Clinical evaluation in patients with acute ischemic stroke at 3 tesla

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Long acquisition times limit the feasibility of established non-contrast-enhanced MRA (non-CE-MRA) techniques. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a highly accelerated flow-independent sequence (Relaxation-Enhanced Angiography without Contrast and Triggering [REACT]) for imaging of the extracranial arteries in acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Compressed SENSE (CS) accelerated (factor 7) 3D isotropic REACT (fixed scan time: 01:22 min, reconstructed voxel size 0.625 × 0.625 × 0.75 mm3) and CE-MRA (CS factor 6, scan time: 1:08 min, reconstructed voxel size 0.5 mm3) were acquired in 76 AIS patients (69.4 ± 14.3 years, 33 females) at 3 Tesla. Two radiologists assessed scans for the presence of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis and stated their diagnostic confidence using a 5-point scale (5 = excellent). Vessel quality of cervical arteries as well as the impact of artifacts and image noise were scored on 5-point scales (5 = excellent/none). Apparent signal- and contrast-to-noise ratios (aSNR/aCNR) were measured for the common carotid artery (CCA) and ICA (C1-segment).

RESULTS

REACT provided a sensitivity of 88.5% and specificity of 100% for clinically relevant (≥50%) ICA stenosis with substantial concordance to CE-MRA regarding stenosis grading (Cohen's kappa 0.778) and similar diagnostic confidence (REACT: mean 4.5 ± 0.4 vs. CE-MRA: 4.5 ± 0.6; P = 0.674). Presence of artifacts (3.6 ± 0.5 vs. 3.5 ± 0.7; P = 0.985) and vessel quality (all segments: 3.6 ± 0.7 vs. 3.8 ± 0.7; P = 0.004) were comparable between both techniques with REACT showing higher scores at the CCA (4.3 ± 0.6 vs. 3.8 ± 0.9; P < 0.001) and CE-MRA at V2- (3.3 ± 0.5 vs. 3.9 ± 0.8; P < 0.001) and V3-segments (3.3 ± 0.5 vs. 4.0 ± 0.8; P < 0.001). For all vessels, REACT showed a lower impact of image noise (3.8 ± 0.6 vs. 3.6 ± 0.7; P = 0.024) while yielding higher aSNR (52.5 ± 15.1 vs. 37.9 ± 12.5; P < 0.001) and aCNR (49.4 ± 15.0 vs. 34.7 ± 12.3; P < 0.001) for all vessels combined.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute ischemic stroke, highly accelerated REACT provides an accurate detection of ICA stenosis with vessel quality and scan time comparable to CE-MRA.

Non-contrast free-breathing 2D CINE compressed SENSE T1-TFE cardiovascular MRI at 3T in sedated young children for assessment of congenital heart disease

Cardiac MRI is a crucial tool for assessing congenital heart disease (CHD). However, its application remains challenging in young children when performed at 3T. The aim of this retrospective single center study was to compare a non-contrast free-breathing 2D CINE T1-weighted TFE-sequence with compressed sensing (FB 2D CINE CS T1-TFE) with 3D imaging for diagnostic accuracy of CHD, image quality, and vessel diameter measurements in sedated young children. FB 2D CINE CS T1-TFE was compared with a 3D non-contrast whole-heart sequence (3D WH) and 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography (3D CE-MRA) at 3T in 37 CHD patients (20♂, 1.5±1.4 years). Two radiologists independently assessed image quality, type of CHD, and diagnostic confidence. Diameters and measures of contrast and sharpness of the aorta and pulmonary vessels were determined. A non-parametric multi-factorial approach was used to estimate diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of CHD. Linear mixed models were calculated to compare contrast and vessel sharpness. Krippendorff's alpha was determined to quantify vessel diameter agreement. FB 2D CINE CS T1-TFE was rated superior regarding image quality, diagnostic confidence, and diagnostic sensitivity for both intra- and extracardiac pathologies compared to 3D WH and 3D CE-MRA (all p<0.05). FB 2D CINE CS T1-TFE showed superior contrast and vessel sharpness (p<0.001) resulting in the highest proportion of measurable vessels (740/740; 100%), compared to 3D WH (530/620; 85.5%) and 3D CE-MRA (540/560; 96.4%). Regarding vessel diameter measurements, FB 2D CINE CS T1-TFE revealed the closest inter-reader agreement (Krippendorff's alpha: 0.94-0.96; 3D WH: 0.78-0.94; 3D CE-MRA: 0.76-0.93). FB 2D CINE CS T1-TFE demonstrates robustness at 3T and delivers high-quality diagnostic results to assess CHD in sedated young children. Its ability to function without contrast injection and respiratory compensation enhances ease of use and could encourage widespread adoption in clinical practice.

Cardiothoracic Magnetic Resonance Angiography

Catheter-based angiography is regarded as the clinical reference imaging technique for vessel imaging; however, it is invasive and is currently used for intervention or physiologic measurements. Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with gadolinium-based contrast agents can be performed as a three-dimensional (3D) MRA or as a time resolved 3D (4D) MRA without physiologic synchronization, in which case cardiac and respiratory motion may blur the edges of the vessels and cardiac chambers. Ferumoxytol has recently been a popular contrast agent for MRA in patients with chronic renal failure. Noncontrast 3D MRA with ECG gating and respiratory navigation are safe and accurate noninvasive cross-sectional imaging techniques for the visualization of great vessels of the heart and coronary arteries in a variety of cardiovascular disorders including complex congenital heart diseases. Noncontrast flow dependent MRA techniques such as time of flight, phase contrast, and black-blood MRA techniques can be used as complementary or primary techniques. Here we review both conventional and relatively new contrast enhanced and non-contrast enhanced MRA techniques including ferumoxytol enhanced MRA, and bright-blood and water-fat separation based noncontrast 3D MRA techniques.

Current Imaging Strategies in Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

 An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is defined as a localized dilatation of the abdominal aorta of ≥ 3 cm. With a prevalence of 4-8 %, AAA is one of the most common vascular diseases in Western society. Radiological imaging is an elementary component in the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment planning of AAA patients.

METHOD

 This is a narrative review article on preoperative imaging strategies of AAA, incorporating expert opinions based on the current literature and standard-of-care practices from our own center. Examples are provided to illustrate clinical cases from our institution.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

 Radiological imaging plays a pivotal role in the initial diagnosis and monitoring of patients with AAA. Ultrasound is the mainstay imaging modality for AAA screening and surveillance. Contrast-enhanced CT angiography is currently considered the gold standard for preoperative imaging and image-based treatment planning in AAA repair. New non-contrast MR angiography techniques are robustly applicable and allow precise determination of aortic diameters, which is of critical importance, particularly with regard to current diameter-based surgical treatment guidelines. 3D imaging with multiplanar reformation and automatic centerline positioning enables more accurate assessment of the maximum aortic diameter. Modern imaging techniques such as 4D flow MRI have the potential to further improve individualized risk stratification in patients with AAA.

KEY POINTS

  · Ultrasound is the mainstay imaging modality for AAA screening and monitoring. · Contrast-enhanced CT angiography is the gold standard for preoperative imaging in AAA repair. · Non-contrast MR angiography allows for accurate monitoring of aortic diameters in AAA patients. · Measurement of aortic diameters is more accurate with 3D-CT/MRI compared to ultrasound. · Research seeks new quantitative imaging biomarkers for AAA risk stratification, e. g., using 4D flow MRI.

The feasibility of relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering for preprocedural planning of transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Background

Cardiovascular MRI is advantageous in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) planning. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of comprehensive non-contrast MRI [relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering (REACT)] combined with a three-dimensional whole-heart MRI protocol for preprocedural planning of TAVI vs. computed tomography angiography (CTA).

Methods

Thirty patients with severe aortic stenosis were prospectively enrolled. The anatomical properties of the aortic root anatomy, including the perimeter and area of the virtual aortic valve annulus and coronary heights, were determined from 3D whole-heart MRI and cardiac CTA (CCTA) images, respectively. The diameters of the aorta (thoracic and abdominal aorta) and iliofemoral arteries were measured from REACT and aortic CTA (ACTA) images, respectively. A paired t-test was used to compare these two modalities. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess cardiovascular MRI and CTA measurements. Transcatheter heart valve (THV) sizing was performed based on CCTA measurements and compared with 3D whole-heart MRI measurements. The extent of annular calcification on 3D whole-heart MRI images was evaluated by a four-point grading scale and compared with CCTA data.

Results

All 30 patients completed CTA and cardiovascular MRI examinations, with the TAVI procedure being administered in 25 patients. The mean acquisition time of the comprehensive MRI protocol was 18 ± 3.2 min. There were no significant differences between ACTA and REACT data in regard to the diameters of aortic and iliofemoral arteries, including the ascending thoracic aorta (37 ± 4.6 mm vs. 37.7 ± 5.2 mm, p = 0.085), descending thoracic aorta (24.3 ± 2.8 mm vs. 24.3 ± 2.8 mm, p = 0.832), abdominal aorta (20.9 ± 2.5 mm vs. 20.8 ± 2.5 mm, p = 0.602), bilateral common iliac arteries (right: 8.36 ± 1.44 mm vs. 8.42 ± 1.27 mm, p = 0.590; left: 8.61 ± 1.71 mm vs. 8.86 ± 1.46 mm, p = 0.050), and bilateral femoral arteries (right: 6.77 ± 1.06 mm vs. 6.87 ± 1.00 mm, p = 0.157; left: 6.75 ± 1.02 mm vs. 6.90 ± 0.80 mm, p = 0.142). Both modalities showed similar aortic valve morphology and semi-quantitative valve calcification (all, p's > 0.05). Overall agreement for implanted THV was found in all 25 (100%) patients assessed with both modalities.

Conclusion

REACT combined with 3D whole-heart MRI enables reliable measurements of aortic root anatomy, annular calcification, and aorta and iliofemoral access in patients under evaluation for TAVI.

Thoracic aorta diameters in Marfan patients: Intraindividual comparison of 3D modified relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering (REACT) with transthoracic echocardiography

OBJECTIVE

To compare the measurement of aortic diameters using a novel flow-independent MR-Angiography (3D modified Relaxation-Enhanced Angiography without Contrast and Triggering (modified REACT)) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective, single-center analysis included 46 examinations of 32 MFS patients (mean age 37.5 ± 11.3 years, 17 women, no prior aortic surgery) who received TTE and 3D modified REACT (ECG- and respiratory-triggering, Compressed SENSE factor 9 for acceleration of image acquisition) of the thoracic aorta. Aortic diameters (sinus of Valsalva (SV), sinotubular junction (STJ), and ascending aorta (AoA)) were independently measured by two cardiologists in TTE (leading-edge) and two radiologists in modified REACT (inner-edge, using multiplanar reconstruction). Intraclass correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman analyses, and Pearson's correlation (r) were used to assess agreement between observers and methods.

RESULTS

Interobserver correlation at the SV, STJ, and AoA were excellent for both, TTE (ICC = 0.95-0.98) and modified REACT (ICC = 0.99-1.00). There was no significant difference between TTE and modified REACT for diameters measured at the SV (39.24 ± 3.24 mm vs. 39.63 ± 3.76 mm; p = 0.26; r = 0.78) and the STJ (35.16 ± 4.47 mm vs. 35.37 ± 4.74 mm; p = 0.552; r = 0.87). AoA diameters determined by TTE were larger than in modified REACT (34.29 ± 5.31 mm vs. 30.65 ± 5.64 mm; p < 0.01; r = 0.74). The mean scan time of modified REACT was 05:06 min ± 02:47 min, depending on the patient's breathing frequency and heart rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Both TTE and modified REACT showed a strong correlation for all aortic levels; however, at the AoA, diameters were larger using TTE, mostly due to the limited field of view of the latter with measurements being closer to the aortic valve. Given the excellent interobserver correlation and the strong agreement with TTE, modified REACT represents an attractive method to depict the thoracic aorta in MFS patients.

Simultaneous Highly Efficient Contrast-Free Lumen and Vessel Wall MR Imaging for Anatomical Assessment of Aortic Disease

BACKGROUND

Bright-blood lumen and black-blood vessel wall imaging are required for the comprehensive assessment of aortic disease. These images are usually acquired separately, resulting in long examinations and potential misregistration between images.

PURPOSE

To characterize the performance of an accelerated and respiratory motion-compensated three-dimensional (3D) cardiac MRI technique for simultaneous contrast-free aortic lumen and vessel wall imaging with an interleaved T2 and inversion recovery prepared sequence (iT2Prep-BOOST).

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

A total of 30 consecutive patients with aortopathy referred for a clinically indicated cardiac MRI examination (9 females, mean age ± standard deviation: 32 ± 12 years).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

1.5-T; bright-blood MR angiography (diaphragmatic navigator-gated T2-prepared 3D balanced steady-state free precession [bSSFP], T2Prep-bSSFP), breath-held black-blood two-dimensional (2D) half acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE), and 3D bSSFP iT2Prep-BOOST.

ASSESSMENT

iT2Prep-BOOST bright-blood images were compared to T2prep-bSSFP images in terms of aortic vessel dimensions, lumen-to-myocardium contrast ratio (CR), and image quality (diagnostic confidence, vessel sharpness and presence of artifacts, assessed by three cardiologists on a 4-point scale, 1: nondiagnostic to 4: excellent). The iT2Prep-BOOST black-blood images were compared to 2D HASTE images for quantification of wall thickness. A visual comparison between computed tomography (CT) and iT2Prep-BOOST was performed in a patient with chronic aortic dissection.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Paired t-tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Bright-blood iT2Prep-BOOST resulted in significantly improved image quality (mean ± standard deviation 3.8 ± 0.5 vs. 3.3 ± 0.8) and CR (2.9 ± 0.8 vs. 1.8 ± 0.5) compared with T2Prep-bSSFP, with a shorter scan time (7.8 ± 1.7 minutes vs. 12.9 ± 3.4 minutes) while providing a complementary 3D black-blood image. Aortic lumen diameter and vessel wall thickness measurements in bright-blood and black-blood images were in good agreement with T2Prep-bSSFP and HASTE images (<0.02 cm and <0.005 cm bias, respectively) and good intrareader (ICC > 0.96) and interreader (ICC > 0.94) agreement was observed for all measurements.

DATA CONCLUSION

iT2Prep-BOOST might enable time-efficient simultaneous bright- and black-blood aortic imaging, with improved image quality compared to T2Prep-bSSFP and HASTE imaging, and comparable measurements for aortic wall and lumen dimensions.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

2.

TECHNICAL EFFICACY

Stage 2.

Respiratory-Triggered Flow-Independent Noncontrast Non-ECG-Gated MRV (REACT) Versus CE-MRV for Central Venous Evaluation in Children and Young Adults: A Six-Reader Study

BACKGROUND. Contrast-enhanced MRI is commonly used to evaluate thoracic central venous patency in children and young adults. A flow-independent noncontrast non-ECG-gated 3D MRA-MR venography (MRV) technique described in 2019 as "relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering (REACT)" may facilitate such evaluation. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to compare image quality, diagnostic confidence, and interreader agreement between respiratory-triggered REACT and 3D Dixon-based contrast-enhanced MRV (CE-MRV) for evaluating thoracic central venous patency in children and young adults. METHODS. This retrospective study included 42 consecutive children and young adults who underwent MRI of the neck and chest to evaluate central venous patency between August 2019 and January 2021 (median age, 5.2 years; IQR, 1.4-15.1 years; 22 female patients and 20 male patients). Examinations included respiratory-triggered REACT and navigator-gated CE-MRV sequences based on the institution's standard-of-care protocol. Six pediatric radiologists from four different institutions independently reviewed REACT and CE-MRV sequences; they assessed overall image quality (scale, 1-5; 5 = excellent), diagnostic confidence (scale, 1-5; 5 = extremely confident), and presence of clinically relevant artifact(s). Readers classified seven major central vessels as normal or abnormal (e.g., narrowing, thrombosis, or occlusion). Analysis used Wilcoxon signed rank and McNemar tests and Fleiss kappa coefficients. RESULTS. The distribution of overall image quality scores was higher (p = .02) for REACT than for CE-MRV for one reader (both sequences: median score, 5). Image quality scores were not significantly different between the sequences for the remaining five readers (all p > .05). Diagnostic confidence scores and frequency of clinically relevant artifact(s) were not significantly different between sequences for any reader (all p > .05). Interreader agreement for vessel classification as normal or abnormal was similar between sequences for all seven vessels (REACT: κ = 0.37-0.81; CE-MRV: κ = 0.34-0.81). Pooling readers and vessels, 65.4% of vessels were normal by both sequences; 18.7%, abnormal by both sequences; 9.8%, abnormal by REACT only; and 6.1%, abnormal by CE-MRV only. CONCLUSION. Respiratory-triggered REACT, in comparison with CE-MRV, showed no significant difference in image quality (aside from for one of six readers), diagnostic confidence, or frequency of artifact(s), with similar interreader agreement for vessel classification as normal or abnormal. CLINICAL IMPACT. High-resolution 3D MRV performed without IV contrast material can be used to assess central venous patency in children and young adults.

Free-breathing pseudo-golden-angle bSSFP cine cardiac MRI for biventricular functional assessment in congenital heart disease

PURPOSE

To compare standard breath-hold (BH) cine imaging to a radial pseudo-golden-angle free-breathing (FB) technique in congenital heart disease (CHD).

METHODS

In this prospective study, short-axis and 4-chamber BH and FB cardiac MRI sequences of 25 participants with CHD acquired at 1.5 Tesla, were quantitatively compared regarding ventricular volumes, function, interventricular septum thickness (IVSD), apparent signal to noise ratio (aSNR), and estimated contrast to noise ratio (eCNR). For qualitative comparison, three image quality criteria (contrast, endocardial edge definition, and artefacts) were rated on a 5-point Likert scale (5: excellent, 1: non-diagnostic). Paired t-Test was used for group comparisons, Bland-Altman analysis for agreement between techniques. Inter-reader agreement was compared using intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

IVSD (BH 7.4 ± 2.1 mm vs FB 7.4 ± 1.9 mm, p =.71), biventricular ejection fraction (left ventricle [LV]: 56.4 ± 10.8% vs 56.1 ± 9.3%, p =.83; right ventricle [RV]: 49.5 ± 8.6% vs 49.7 ± 10.1%, p =.83), and biventricular end diastolic volume (LV: 176.3 ± 63.9 ml vs 173.9 ± 64.9 ml, p =.90; RV: 185.4 ± 63.8 ml vs 189.6 ± 66.6 ml, p =.34) were comparable. Mean measurement time for FB short-axis sequences was 8.1 ± 1.3 compared to 4.4 ± 1.3 min for BH (p <.001). Subjective image quality between sequences was deemed comparable, (4.6 ± 0.6 vs 4.5 ± 0.6, p =.26, for 4-chamber views) with a significant difference regarding short-axis views (4.9 ± 0.3 vs 4.5 ± 0.6, p =.008). aSNR was similar (BH 25.8 ± 11.2 vs FB 22.2 ± 9.5, p =.24), while eCNR was higher for BH (89.1 ± 36.1 vs 68.5 ± 32.1, p =.03).

CONCLUSION

FB sequences yielded comparable results to BH regarding image quality, biventricular volumetry, and function, though measurement times were longer. The FB sequence described might be clinically valuable when BHs are insufficiently performed.

Non-contrast free-breathing 3D cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography using REACT (relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast) compared to contrast-enhanced steady-state magnetic resonance angiography in complex pediatric congenital heart disease at 3T

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the great vessels in young children with complex congenital heart disease (CHD) using non-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography (CMRA) based on three-dimensional relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast (REACT) in comparison to contrast-enhanced steady-state CMRA.

METHODS

In this retrospective study from April to July 2021, respiratory- and electrocardiogram-gated native REACT CMRA was compared to contrast-enhanced single-phase steady-state CMRA in children with CHD who underwent CMRA at 3T under deep sedation. Vascular assessment included image quality (1 = non-diagnostic, 5 = excellent), vessel diameter, and diagnostic findings. For statistical analysis, paired t-test, Pearson correlation, Bland-Altman analysis, Wilcoxon test, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were applied.

RESULTS

Thirty-six young children with complex CHD (median 4 years, interquartile range, 2-5; 20 males) were included. Native REACT CMRA was obtained successfully in all patients (mean scan time: 4:22 ± 1:44 min). For all vessels assessed, diameters correlated strongly between both methods (Pearson r = 0.99; bias = 0.04 ± 0.61 mm) with high interobserver reproducibility (ICC: 0.99 for both CMRAs). Native REACT CMRA demonstrated comparable overall image quality to contrast-enhanced CMRA (3.9 ± 1.0 vs. 3.8 ± 0.9, P = 0.018). With REACT CMRA, better image quality was obtained at the ascending aorta (4.8 ± 0.5 vs. 4.3 ± 0.8, P < 0.001), coronary roots (e.g., left: 4.1 ± 1.0 vs. 3.3 ± 1.1, P = 0.001), and inferior vena cava (4.6 ± 0.5 vs. 3.2 ± 0.8, P < 0.001). In all patients, additional vascular findings were assessed equally with native REACT CMRA and the contrast-enhanced reference standard (n = 6).

CONCLUSION

In young children with complex CHD, REACT CMRA can provide gadolinium-free high image quality, accurate vascular measurements, and equivalent diagnostic quality compared to standard contrast-enhanced CMRA.

Pediatric magnetic resonance angiography: to contrast or not to contrast

Magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and MR venography imaging with contrast and non-contrast techniques are widely used for pediatric vascular imaging. However, as with any MRI examination, imaging the pediatric population can be challenging because of patient motion, which sometimes requires sedation. There are multiple benefits of non-contrast MR angiographic techniques, including the ability to repeat sequences if motion is present, the decreased need for sedation, and avoidance of potential risks associated with gadolinium administration and radiation exposure. Thus, MR angiography is an attractive alternative to CT or conventional catheter-based angiography in pediatric populations. Contrast-enhanced MR angiographic techniques have the advantage of increased signal to noise. Blood pool imaging allows long imaging times that result in high-spatial-resolution imaging, and thus high-quality diagnostic images. This article outlines the technique details, indications, benefits and downsides of non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced MR angiographic techniques to assist in protocol decision-making.

Three-dimensional multicontrast blood imaging with a single acquisition: Simultaneous non-contrast-enhanced MRA and vessel wall imaging in the thoracic aorta

PURPOSE

To evaluate MRA and vessel wall imaging (VWI) image quality in the thoracic aorta using a novel method named BRIDGE (bright and dark blood images with multishot gradient-echo EPI).

METHODS

The BRIDGE method consists of 3D multishot gradient-echo EPI acquisition using pulse gating, navigator gating, and magnetization preparation with a T₂ -preparation pulse and a nonselective inversion-recovery pulse. The BRIDGE and conventional methods (noncontrast MRA based on 3D turbo-field-echo [TFE] and VWI based on 3D turbo spin echo with variable refocusing flip angle [VRFA-TSE]) were performed in 10 healthy volunteers and 10 patients. The SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and sharpness in the thoracic aorta were compared for MRA evaluation. The values of SNR_lumen , SNR_wall , CNR_wall-lumen , contrast ratio (CR)_lumen-muscle , coefficient of variation, sharpness, lumen area, and wall area in the thoracic aorta were compared for VWI evaluation. Two radiologists independently performed qualitative image-analysis assessments.

RESULTS

When MRA and VWI were acquired, the acquisition time was 26.6% to 27.8% shorter with BRIDGE than the conventional method. In the MRA evaluation, BRIDGE and TFE methods were comparable. In the VWI evaluation, BRIDGE was superior to the VRFA-TSE method in blood suppression and evaluation of the ascending aorta. Because the blood signal suppression of BRIDGE is based on the T₁ value of blood, the blood signal can be suppressed more uniformly than with the VRFA-TSE method, regardless of age, blood flow velocity, or vascular anatomy.

CONCLUSION

The BRIDGE method can provide both MRA, to assess vascular anatomy and luminal changes, and VWI, to assess the vessel wall and detect vulnerable plaques, in a single scan.

Imaging of the extracranial internal carotid artery in acute ischemic stroke: assessment of stenosis, plaques, and image quality using relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering (REACT)

BACKGROUND

In stroke magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) is the clinical standard to depict extracranial arteries but native MRA techniques are of increased interest to facilitate clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to assess the detection of extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis and plaques as well as the image quality of cervical carotid arteries between a novel flow-independent relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering (REACT) sequence and CE-MRA in acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center study, 105 consecutive patients (65.27±18.74 years, 63 males) were included, who received a standard stroke protocol at 3T in clinical routine including Compressed SENSE (CS) accelerated (factor 4) 3D isotropic REACT (fixed scan time: 02:46 min) and CS accelerated (factor 6) 3D isotropic CE-MRA. Three radiologists independently assessed scans for the presence of extracranial ICA stenosis and plaques (including hyper-/hypointense signal) with concomitant diagnostic confidence using 3-point scales (3= excellent). Vessel quality, artifacts, and image noise of extracranial carotid arteries were subjectively scored on 5-point scales (5= excellent/none). Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical comparison.

RESULTS

Considering CE-MRA as the standard of reference, REACT provided a sensitivity of 89.8% and specificity of 95.2% for any and of 93.5% and 95.8% for clinically relevant (≥50%) extracranial ICA stenosis and yielded a to CE-MRA comparable diagnostic confidence [mean ± standard deviation (SD), median (interquartile range): 2.8±0.5, 3 (3-3) vs. 2.7±0.5, 3 (2-3), P=0.03]. Using REACT, readers detected more plaques overall (n=57.3 vs. 47.7, P<0.001) and plaques of hyperintense signal (n=12.3 vs. 5.7, P=0.02) with higher diagnostic confidence [2.8±0.5, 3 (3-3) vs. 2.6±0.7, 3 (2-3), P<0.001] than CE-MRA. After analyzing a total of 1,260 segments, the vessel quality of all segments combined [4.61±0.66 vs. 4.58±0.68, 5 (4-5) vs. 5 (4-5), P=0.0299] and artifacts [4.51±0.70 vs. 4.44±0.73, 5 (4-5) vs. 5 (4-5), P>0.05] were comparable between the sequences with REACT showing a lower image noise [4.43±0.67 vs. 4.25±0.71, 5 (4-5) vs. 4 (4-5), P<0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

Without the use of gadolinium-based contrast agents or triggering, REACT provides a high sensitivity and specificity for extracranial ICA stenosis and a potential improved depiction of adjacent plaques while yielding to CE-MRA comparable vessel quality in a large patient cohort with AIS.

Neonatal body magnetic resonance imaging: preparation, performance and optimization

Performing and optimizing MRI of the chest, abdomen and pelvis in neonates and young infants can be challenging. This is a result of several factors, including patient size, desire to avoid or minimize sedation/general anesthesia, and the relative rarity of these examinations. However, with proper preparation and protocol optimization, high-quality diagnostic images can be acquired that can aid in diagnosis and patient management. In addition, numerous special considerations arise when performing body MRI in neonates compared to older pediatric patients. This review article provides an update on the performance and optimization of MRI of the body in neonates and infants. Furthermore, the authors present common indications for neonatal body MRI and discuss the use of intravenous gadolinium-based contrast agents in this vulnerable patient population.

[Non-electrocardiogram-gated and Non-contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Lower Limb Arteries Using Three-dimensional Multishot T1-weighted Fast-field Echo-Echo Planar Imaging]

We performed a non-electrocardiogram-gated and non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the lower limb arteries using three-dimensional multishot T₁-weighted fast-field echo-echo planar imaging (3D multishot T₁-FFE-EPI), and it was optimized the protocol. The image distortion for the change in the EPI factor was calculated using 3.0 T-MRI and MRI phantom. We also calculated the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the femoral artery with a change in the flip angle on images of 8 healthy volunteers. Furthermore, the optimal EPI factor was determined from the SNR of the femoral artery and the contrast ratio between the femoral artery and the adductor magnus. Two radiological technologists performed a retrospective visual assessment of the pelvis, thigh, and leg of 10 patients who underwent lower limb non-contrast-enhanced MRA and contrast-enhanced tomography angiography (CTA). The optimum flip angle and EPI factor were 25° and 3, respectively. In the visual assessment of clinical cases, there was no significant difference between the non-contrast-enhanced MRA and contrast-enhanced CTA in the pelvis and the leg (p=0.52 and p=0.88, respectively). In the thigh, non-contrast-enhanced MRA was significantly higher (p=0.02), namely, the ability to visualize the lower limb arteries was not much difference between this method and contrast-enhanced CTA. Our method without electrocardiogram gated and contrast medium is expected for screening tests or detailed examinations.

Non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography/venography techniques: what are my options?

Non-contrast magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and MR venography techniques are gaining popularity for vascular imaging because they are faster, more forgiving and less costly compared with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Non-contrast MR angiography also avoids gadolinium deposition, which is especially important in imaging children. Non-contrast MR angiography has an array of specific applications for numerous clinical indications. This review summarizes the non-contrast MR angiography methods and their relative advantages and disadvantages. The paper also guides the reader on which technique to consider when determining the optimal imaging modality for each individual patient.

Non-contrast mDixon MR angiography of the neck: Comparison with time-of-flight MR angiography in normal subjects

We investigated the feasibility of non-contrast three-dimensional modified Dixon (mDixon) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) to evaluate the carotid artery.We studied 30 normal patients who underwent non-contrast mDixon and conventional time-of-flight (TOF) MRA of the neck with a clinical 3T MR scanner. Carotid artery signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio were compared between mDixon-MRA and TOF-MRA. Two readers independently evaluated vessel sharpness, image contrast, and overall image quality using a 4-point scale.SNR was significantly higher on mDixon-MRA than TOF-MRA (P < .01). There was no significant difference in contrast-to-noise ratio. The visual score for vessel sharpness was significantly higher on mDixon-MRA than TOF-MRA (P < .01), whereas the score for contrast was significantly higher on TOF-MRA (P < .01).Although non-contrast three-dimensional mDixon-MRA showed lower visual contrast than conventional TOF-MRA, it provided images with significantly higher SNR and better vessel sharpness than TOF-MRA.

Free-breathing non-contrast flow-independent cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography using cardiac gated, magnetization-prepared 3D Dixon method: assessment of thoracic vasculature in congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

To evaluate a non-contrast respiratory- and electrocardiogram-gated 3D cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography (CMRA) based on magnetization-prepared Dixon method (relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering, REACT) for the assessment of the thoracic vasculature in congenital heart disease (CHD) patients.

METHODS

70 patients with CHD (mean 28 years, range: 10-65 years) were retrospectively identified in this single-center study. REACT-CMRA was applied with respiratory- and cardiac-gating. Image quality (IQ) of REACT-CMRA was compared to standard non-gated multi-phase first-pass-CMRA and respiratory- and electrocardiogram-gated steady-state-CMRA. IQ of different vessels of interest (ascending aorta, left pulmonary artery, left superior pulmonary vein, right coronary ostium, coronary sinus) was independently assessed by two readers on a five-point Likert scale. Measurements of vessel diameters were performed in predefined anatomic landmarks (ascending aorta, left pulmonary artery, left superior pulmonary vein). Both readers assessed artifacts and vascular abnormalities. Friedman test, chi-squared test, and Bland-Altman method were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Overall IQ score of REACT-CMRA was higher compared to first-pass-CMRA (3.5 ± 0.4 vs. 2.7 ± 0.4, P < 0.001) and did not differ from steady-state-CMRA (3.5 ± 0.4 vs. 3.5 ± 0.6, P = 0.99). Non-diagnostic IQ of the defined vessels of interest was observed less frequently on REACT-CMRA (1.7 %) compared to steady-state- (4.3 %, P = 0.046) or first-pass-CMRA (20.9 %, P < 0.001). Close agreements in vessel diameter measurements were observed between REACT-CMRA and steady-state-CMRA (e.g. ascending aorta, bias: 0.38 ± 1.0 mm, 95 % limits of agreement (LOA): - 1.62-2.38 mm). REACT-CMRA showed high intra- (bias: 0.04 ± 1.0 mm, 95 % LOA: - 1.9-2.0 mm) and interobserver (bias: 0.20 ± 1.1 mm, 95 % LOA: - 2.0-2.4 mm) agreements regarding vessel diameter measurements. Fat-water separation artifacts were observed in 11/70 (16 %) patients on REACT-CMRA but did not limit diagnostic utility. Six vascular abnormalities were detected on REACT-CMRA that were not seen on standard contrast-enhanced CMRA.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-contrast-enhanced cardiac-gated REACT-CMRA offers a high diagnostic quality for assessment of the thoracic vasculature in CHD patients.

Intraindividual comparison of 1.5 T and 3 T non-contrast MR angiography for monitoring of aortic root diameters in Marfan patients

BACKGROUND

Reproducible aortic diameter measurements are crucial for assessment of aortic growth and aneurysm formation in patients with Marfan syndrome. The objective of this study was to perform an intraindividual comparison of aortic measurements at 1.5 T and 3 T using non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in pre-surgical and post-surgical Marfan patients.

METHODS

Forty consecutive Marfan patients were retrospectively evaluated by ECG-gated 2D balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) MRA at 1.5 T and 3 T after 363 ± 58 days. 24 patients were before and 16 patients after aortic root surgery. Two readers independently measured aortic diameters at seven aortic levels and rated the image quality/image artifacts (1 = poor/severe, 4 = excellent/none). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal intensity slopes between aortic lumen and vessel walls were semiautomatically determined.

RESULTS

In pre-surgical Marfan patients, interobserver agreement of aortic root diameter measurements was significantly higher at 3 T compared to 1.5 T (p < 0.05). In post-surgical Marfan patients, image quality and artifacts were significantly worse at 3 T compared to 1.5 T (p < 0.05). CNR was higher at 3 T compared to 1.5 T at all aortic levels. Significantly steeper slopes of signal intensity curves were observed at 3 T at all aortic levels (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In pre-surgical Marfan patients, non-contrast MRA provides higher reproducibility of aortic diameter measurements at 3 T compared to 1.5 T. In post-surgical Marfan patients, metallic implants result in significantly worse imaging artifacts and reduced image quality at 3 T compared to 1.5 T. Therefore, we propose to monitor the thoracic aorta with non-contrast MRA at 3 T in pre-surgical Marfan patients and at 1.5 T in post-surgical Marfan patients.

Relaxation-Enhanced Angiography without Contrast and Triggering (REACT) for pelvic MR venography in comparison to balanced gradient-echo and T2-weighted spin-echo techniques

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the imaging capabilities of the REACT pulse sequence in pelvic venous vessels compared to conventional non-contrast pulse sequences.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In addition to routine MRI venography, non-contrast enhanced REACT pulse sequence was performed in 4 healthy volunteers and 21 patients with suspected or known deep venous thrombosis and post thrombotic syndrome. Acquired images were independently interpreted by two MRI radiologists. The sequence performance was subjectively evaluated on a four-point scale regarding the delineation of small peripheral, midsize and large proximal venous vessels, the imaging of vascular pathologies, and the degradation due to artifacts. To evaluate statistical differences in diagnostic accuracy Friedman's test with Dunn's correction was used.

RESULTS

REACT depicted the peripheral veins superior to bTFE and T2-TSE with an average score of 3.39 compared to 2.33 in bTFE and 1.77 in T2-TSE. In midsize vessels REACT performed significantly better than T2-TSE (1.94) and bTFE (2.68) with a score of 3.64. For the large proximal vessels REACT (3.39), bTFE (3.33) and T2-TSE (3.56) performed equally without statistical difference. Visibility of venous pathologies was found to be equal between REACT (3.62), bTFE (3.51) and T2-TSE (3.52). The image degradation due to artifacts was rated best in T2-TSE (3.56), followed by REACT (3.39) and bTFE (3.33).

CONCLUSIONS

REACT is a promising tool for the visualization of the pelvic venous system using magnetic resonance imaging.

Relaxation-Enhanced Angiography Without Contrast and Triggering (REACT) for Fast Imaging of Extracranial Arteries in Acute Ischemic Stroke at 3 T

Purpose

To evaluate a novel flow-independent 3D isotropic REACT sequence compared with CE-MRA for the imaging of extracranial arteries in acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 35 patients who underwent a stroke protocol at 3 T including REACT (fixed scan time: 2:46 min) and CE-MRA of the extracranial arteries. Three radiologists evaluated scans regarding vessel delineation, signal, and contrast and assessed overall image noise and artifacts using 5-point scales (5: excellent delineation/no artifacts). Apparent signal- and contrast-to-noise ratios (aSNR/aCNR) were measured for the common carotid artery (CCA), internal carotid artery (ICA, C1 segment), and vertebral artery (V2 segment). Two radiologists graded the degree of proximal ICA stenosis.

Results

Compared to REACT, CE-MRA showed better delineation for the CCA and ICA (C1 and C2 segments) (median 5, range 2–5 vs. 4, range 3–5; P < 0.05). For the ICA (C1 and C2 segments), REACT provided a higher signal (5, range 3–5; P < 0.05/4.5, range 3–5; P > 0.05 vs. 4, range 2–5) and contrast (5, range 3–5 vs. 4, range 2–5; P > 0.05) than CE-MRA. The remaining segments of the blood-supplying vessels showed equal medians. There was no significant difference regarding artifacts, whereas REACT provided significantly lower image noise (4, range 3–5 vs. 4 range 2–5; P < 0.05) with a higher aSNR (P < 0.05) and aCNR (P < 0.05) for all vessels combined. For clinically relevant (≥50%) ICA stenosis, REACT achieved a detection sensitivity of 93.75% and a specificity of 100%.

Conclusion

Given its fast acquisition, comparable image quality to CE-MRA and high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of ICA stenosis, REACT was proven to be a clinically applicable method to assess extracranial arteries in AIS.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00062-020-00963-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Comparison of a novel Compressed SENSE accelerated 3D modified relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering with CE-MRA in imaging of the thoracic aorta

To compare a novel Compressed SENSE accelerated ECG- and respiratory-triggered flow-independent 3D isotropic Relaxation-Enhanced Angiography without Contrast and Triggering (modified REACT) with standard non-ECG-triggered 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) for imaging of the thoracic aorta in patients with connective tissue diseases (CTD) or other aortic diseases using manual and semiautomatic measurement approaches. This retrospective, single-center analysis of 30 patients (June–December 2018) was conducted by two radiologists, who independently measured aortic diameters on modified REACT and CE-MRA using manual (Multiplanar-Reconstruction) and semiautomatic (Advanced Vessel Analysis) measurement tools on seven levels (inner edge): Aortic annulus and sinus, sinotubular junction, mid- and high-ascending aorta, aortic isthmus, and descending aorta. Bland–Altman analysis was conducted to evaluate differences between the mean values of aortic width and ICCs were calculated to assess interobserver agreement. For each level, image quality was evaluated on a four-point scale in consensus with Wilcoxon matched-pair test used to evaluate for differences between both MRA techniques. Additionally, evaluation time for each measurement technique was noted, which was compared applying one-way ANOVA. When comparing both imaging and measurement methods, CE-MRA (mean difference 0.24 ± 0.27 mm) and the AVA-tool (− 0.21 ± 0.15 mm) yielded higher differences compared to modified REACT (− 0.11 ± 0.11 mm) and the MPR-tool (0.07 ± 0.21 mm) for all measurement levels combined without yielding clinical significance. There was an excellent interobserver agreement between modified REACT and CE-MRA using both tools of measurement (ICC > 0.9). Modified REACT (average acquisition time 06:34 ± 01:36 min) provided better image quality from aortic annulus to mid-ascending aorta (p < 0.05), whereas at distal measurement levels, no significant differences were noted. Regarding time requirement, no statistical significance was found between both measurement techniques (p = 0.08). As a novel non-CE-MRA technique, modified REACT allows for fast imaging of the thoracic aorta with higher image quality in the proximal aorta than CE-MRA enabling a reliable measurement of vessel dimensions without the need for contrast agent. Thus, it represents a clinically suitable alternative for patients requiring repetitive imaging. Manual and semiautomatic measurement approaches provided comparable results without significant difference in time need.

REACT - A novel flow-independent non-gated non-contrast MR angiography technique using magnetization-prepared 3D non-balanced dual-echo dixon method: Preliminary clinical experience

Flow-independent relaxation-based non-contrast MR angiography techniques yield good signal-to-noise ratio and high blood-tissue contrast, complementing non-contrast flow-dependent and contrast-enhanced MR angiography techniques in the assessment of vascular disorders. However, these techniques often suffer from imaging artifacts at high magnetic field strengths or across large fields-of-view. Relaxation-Enhanced Angiography without Contrast and Triggering (REACT) is a recently introduced flow-independent non-gated non-contrast three-dimensional MR angiography technique that has been developed to mitigate some of these issues. We present our initial experience with the clinical applications of REACT in imaging disorders of the central and peripheral vascular systems.

Imaging of the pulmonary vasculature in congenital heart disease without gadolinium contrast: Intraindividual comparison of a novel Compressed SENSE accelerated 3D modified REACT with 4D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography

BACKGROUND

Patients with Congenital heart disease (CHD) require repetitive imaging of the pulmonary vasculature throughout their life. In this study, we compared a novel Compressed SENSE accelerated (factor 9) electrocardiogram (ECG)- and respiratory-triggered 3D modified Relaxation-Enhanced Angiography without Contrast and Triggering (modified REACT-non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (modified REACT-non-CE-MRA)) with standard non-ECG-triggered time-resolved 4D CE-MRA for imaging of the pulmonary arteries and veins in patients with CHD.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis of 25 patients (June 2018-April 2019) with known or suspected CHD was independently conducted by two radiologists executing measurements on modified REACT-non-CE-MRA and 4D CE-MRA on seven dedicated points (inner edge): Main pulmonary artery (MPA), right and left pulmonary artery, right superior and inferior pulmonary vein, left superior (LSPV) and inferior pulmonary vein. Image quality for arteries and veins was evaluated on a four-point scale in consensus.

RESULTS

Twenty-three of the 25 included patients presented a CHD. There was a high interobserver agreement for both methods of imaging at the pulmonary arteries (ICC ≥ 0.96); at the pulmonary veins, modified REACT-non-CE-MRA showed a slightly higher agreement, pronounced at LSPV (ICC 0.946 vs. 0.895). Measurements in 4D CE-MRA showed higher diameter values compared to modified REACT-non-CE-MRA, at the pulmonary arteries reaching significant difference (e.g. MPA: mean 0.408 mm, p = 0.002). Modified REACT-non-CE-MRA (average acquisition time 07:01 ± 02:44 min) showed significant better image quality than 4D CE-MRA at the pulmonary arteries (3.84 vs. 3.32, p < 0.001) and veins (3.32 vs. 2.72, p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Compressed SENSE accelerated (factor 9) ECG- and respiratory-triggered 3D modified REACT-non-CE-MRA allows for reliable and fast imaging of the pulmonary arteries and veins with higher image quality and slightly higher interobserver agreement than 4D CE-MRA without contrast agent and associated disadvantages. Therefore, it represents a clinically suitable technique for patients requiring repetitive imaging of the pulmonary vasculature, e.g. patients with CHD.