Impacts of low-level liming on soil respiration and forage production in a fertilized upland grassland in Central France

Acidification of previously limed upland pastures - An overlooked flood risk factor?

In low-lying land, the impact of agriculture on flooding has focussed on soil compaction, whilst in the uplands there has been more interest in the influence of afforestation. The potential effect of acidification of previously limed upland grassland soils on this risk has been overlooked. The marginal economics of upland farms has led to inadequate lime application on these grasslands. In Wales, UK, agronomic improvement of upland acid grasslands with liming was widespread in the last century. The extent and topographical distribution of this land use in Wales was estimated and these characteristics were mapped in four catchments studied in more detail. Then 41 sites on improved pastures within the catchments were sampled, where lime had not been applied for periods of between two and 30 years; unimproved acid pastures adjacent to five of these sites were also sampled. Soil pH, organic matter, infiltration rates and earthworm populations were recorded. Grasslands at risk of acidification without maintenance liming were estimated to cover almost 20 % of upland Wales. The majority of these grasslands were located on steeper slopes (gradients >7^o) where any reduction in infiltration would promote surface runoff and limit rainwater retention. The extent of these pastures varied markedly between the four study catchments. There was a 6-fold reduction in infiltration rates between high and low pH soils, and this trend was correlated with reductions in anecic earthworm abundance. The vertical burrows of these earthworms are important for infiltration and no such earthworms were present in the most acidic soils. Recently limed soils had infiltration rates similar to those of unimproved acid pastures. Soil acidification has the potential to exacerbate flood risk but further research is needed to assess the extent of any impact. Modelling of catchment specific flood risk should include the extent of upland soil acidification as an additional land use factor.

Does liming grasslands increase biomass productivity without causing detrimental impacts on net greenhouse gas emissions?

Soil acidification has negative impacts on grass biomass production and the potential of grasslands to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Through a global review of research on liming of grasslands, the objective of this paper was to assess the impacts of liming on soil pH, grass biomass production and total net GHG exchange (nitrous oxide (N₂O), methane (CH₄) and net carbon dioxide (CO₂)). We collected 57 studies carried out at 88 sites and covering different countries and climatic zones. All of the studies examined showed that liming either reduced or had no effects on the emissions of two potent greenhouse gases (N₂O and CH₄). Though liming of grasslands can increase net CO₂ emissions, the impact on total net GHG emission is minimal due to the higher global warming potential, over a 100-year period, of N₂O and CH₄ compared to that of CO₂. Liming grassland delivers many potential advantages, which justify its wider adoption. It significantly ameliorates soil acidity, increases grass productivity, reduces fertiliser requirement and increases species richness. To realise the maximum benefit of liming grassland, we suggest that acidic soils should be moderately limed within the context of specific climates, soils and management.

Sustainable soil use and management: An interdisciplinary and systematic approach

Soil is a key component of Earth's critical zone. It provides essential services for agricultural production, plant growth, animal habitation, biodiversity, carbon sequestration and environmental quality, which are crucial for achieving the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, soil degradation has occurred in many places throughout the world due to factors such as soil pollution, erosion, salinization, and acidification. In order to achieve the SDGs by the target date of 2030, soils may need to be used and managed in a manner that is more sustainable than is currently practiced. Here we show that research in the field of sustainable soil use and management should prioritize the multifunctional value of soil health and address interdisciplinary linkages with major issues such as biodiversity and climate change. As soil is the largest terrestrial carbon pool, as well as a significant contributor of greenhouse gases, much progress can be made toward curtailing the climate crisis by sustainable soil management practices. One identified option is to increase soil organic carbon levels, especially with recalcitrant forms of carbon (e.g., biochar application). In general, soil health is primarily determined by the actions of the farming community. Therefore, information management and knowledge sharing are necessary to improve the sustainable behavior of practitioners and end-users. Scientists and policy makers are important actors in this social learning process, not only to disseminate evidence-based scientific knowledge, but also in generating new knowledge in close collaboration with farmers. While governmental funding for soil data collection has been generally decreasing, newly available 5G telecommunications, big data and machine learning based data collection and analytical tools are maturing. Interdisciplinary studies that incorporate such advances may lead to the formation of innovative sustainable soil use and management strategies that are aimed toward optimizing soil health and achieving the SDGs.