Prognostic value of congestive heart failure history in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions

A review of the conservative versus invasive management of ischemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Heart failure is increasing in terms of prevalence, morbidity, and mortality rates. Clinical trials and studies are focusing on heart failure as it is the destiny end-stage for several cardiovascular disorders. Recently, medical therapy has dramatically progressed with novel classes of medicines providing better quality of life and survival outcomes. However, heart failure remains a heavy impactful factor on societies and populations. Current guidelines from the American and European cardiac societies are not uniform with respect to the class and level of treatment recommendations for coronary artery disease patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. The discrepancy among international recommendations, stemming from the lack of evidence from adequately powered randomized trials, challenges physicians in choosing the optimal strategy. Hybrid therapy including optimal medical therapy with revascularization strategies are commonly used for the management of ischemic heart failure. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) has proved its efficacy on improving long term outcome and prognosis while no large randomized clinical trials for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are still available. Regardless of the lack of data and recommendations, the trends of performing PCI in ischemic heart failure prevailed over CABG whereas lesion complexity, chronic total occlusion and complete revascularization achievement are limiting factors. Lastly, regenerative medicine seems a promising approach for advanced heart failure enhancing cardiomyocytes proliferation, reverse remodeling, scar size reduction and cardiac function restoration.

Mortality rate after coronary revascularization in heart failure patients with coronary artery disease

AIMS

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a common cause of heart failure (HF). It remains unclear who, when and why to direct towards coronary revascularization. The outcomes of coronary revascularization in HF patients are still a matter of debate nowadays. This study aims to evaluate the effect of revascularization strategy on all-cause of death in the context of ischaemic HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An observational cohort was conducted on 692 consecutive patients who underwent coronary angiography at the University Hospital of Toulouse between January 2018 and December 2021 for either a recent diagnosis of HF or a decompensated chronic HF, and in whom coronary angiograms showed at least 50% obstructive coronary lesion. The study population was divided into two groups according to the performance or not of a coronary revascularization procedure. The living status (alive or dead) of each of the study's participants was observed by April 2022. Seventy-three per cent of the study population underwent coronary revascularization either by percutaneous coronary intervention (66.6%) or coronary artery bypass grafting (6.2%). Baseline characteristics including age, sex and cardiovascular risk factors did not differ between the invasive and conservative groups, respectively. Death occurred in 162 study participants resulting in an all-cause mortality rate of 23.5%; 26.7% of observed deaths have occurred in the conservative group versus 22.2% in the invasive group (P = 0.208). No difference in survival outcomes has been observed over a mean follow-up period of 2.5 years (P = 0.140) even after stratification by HF categories (P = 0.132) or revascularization modalities (P = 0.366).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from the present study showed comparable all-cause mortality rates between groups. Coronary revascularization does not modify short-term survival outcomes in HF patients compared with optimal medical therapy alone outside the setting of acute coronary syndrome.

Independent and cumulative association of clinical and morphological heart failure with long-term outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is a risk factor for adverse post-procedural outcome after revascularization; however, it is unclear how left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and clinical HF symptoms affect percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes. We investigated the characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients with clinical HF or LVSD after PCI.

METHODS

This was a Japanese multicenter registry study of adult patients receiving PCI. Among 4689 consecutive patients who underwent PCI at 15 hospitals from January 2009 to December 2012, we analyzed 2634 (56.2%) with documented left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). They were divided into four groups based on clinical HF (symptoms or HF hospitalization) and LVEF [≥35% and <35% (HF due to LVSD)]. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), comprising all-cause death, acute coronary syndrome, HF hospitalization, performance of coronary artery bypass grafting, and stroke within 2 years after the initial PCI.

RESULTS

Our findings revealed 354 patients (13.4%) with HF (clinical HF, n = 173, 48.9%; LVSD, n = 132, 37.3%; both, n = 49; 13.8%). The incidence of MACE was higher in patients with clinical HF or LVSD, and was largely due to higher non-cardiac death and HF hospitalization. After adjustment, clinical HF (hazard ratio 2.16, 95% confidence interval; 1.49-3.14) and lower LVEF (per 10%, hazard ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval; 0.81-0.99) were independently associated with higher MACE risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical HF and LVSD were independently associated with adverse long-term clinical outcomes, particularly with non-cardiac death and HF readmission, in patients treated with PCI.

Impact of Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease on 1-Year Mortality in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Purpose:

To determine the impact of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) on clinical outcomes in patients treated with percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).

Methods and Results:

Symptomatic PAD was identified in 1969 (18.9%) of 10440 consecutive patients undergoing PCI. Patients with PAD were older, more frequently female, and had smaller body surface area and more atherosclerotic risk factors, chronic renal insufficiency, and heart failure. Patients with PAD had lower rates of procedural success (94.2% versus 96.2%, p<0.0001) and higher rates of in-hospital complications, including all-cause mortality (2.1% versus 1.1%, p=0.0002), cardiac death (1.5% versus 0.7%, p=0.0009), urgent coronary artery bypass grafting (1.9% versus 1.2%, p=0.01), recurrent ischemia (5.6% versus 2.8%, p<0.0001), re-PCI to the target lesion (2.4% versus 1.1%, p<0.0001), stroke (0.6% versus 0.3%, p=0.0344), transient ischemic attack (0.4% versus 0.1%, p=0.01), femoral hematoma (10.3% versus 8.5%, p=0.01), retroperitoneal hematoma (0.8% versus 0.3%, p=0.009), limb ischemia (3.0% versus 0.7%, p<0.0001), gastrointestinal bleeding (1.9% versus 0.9%, p<0.0001), and blood transfusion (10.1% versus 5.2%, p<0.0001). At 1-year follow-up, patients with PAD had a higher mortality rate (13.6% versus 5.2%, p<0.0001), a higher rate of myocardial infarction (8.3% versus 6.5%, p=0.008), and also more target lesion (21.2% versus 19.8%, p=0.02) or target vessel revascularization (24.6% versus 21.2%, p=0.002). By multivariate analysis, PAD was an independent predictor of 1-year mortality (odds ratio 1.71, 95% confidence interval 1.42 to 2.07, p<0.0001).

Conclusions:

Nearly a fifth of patients undergoing PCI have symptomatic PAD. The presence of PAD is associated with lower rates of procedural success, higher rates of in-hospital and 1-year adverse events, and is independently associated with increased 1-year mortality.

PPAR Gamma Expression Levels during Development of Heart Failure in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease after Coronary Artery Bypass-Grafting

Genetic research has elucidated molecular mechanisms of heart failure (HF). Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) seem to be important in etiology of HF. The aim of study was to find the correlation between PPARγ expression during development of HF in patients and coronary artery disease (CAD) after coronary artery bypass-grafting (CABG). Methods and Results. We followed up 157 patients (mean age 63) with CAD without clinical, laboratory, or echo parameters of HF who underwent CABG. Clinical and laboratory status were assessed before CABG and at 1, 12, and 24 months. During CABG slices of aorta (Ao) and LV were collected for genetic research. HF was defined as LVEF <40% or NT-proBNP >400 pg/mL or 6MWT <400 m. Patients were divided into 2 groups: with and without HF. PPARγ expression in Ao and LV was not increased in both groups at 2-year follow-up. Sensitivity of PPARγ expression in Ao above 1.1075 in detection of HF was 20.5% (AUC 0.531, 95% CI 0.442–0.619). Positive predictive value (Ppv) was 85.7%. Sensitivity and specificity of PPARγ expression in the LV in detection of HF were 58% and 92.9%, respectively (AUC 0.540, 95% CI 0.452–0.626). Ppv was 73.2%. Conclusion. PPARγ expression in Ao and LV was comparable and should not be used as predictive factor for development of HF in patients with CAD after CABG.

Prevalence and 1-year prognosis of transient heart failure following coronary revascularization

The occurrence of heart failure during the whole pre-discharge course of coronary revascularization, as far as its influence on subsequent prognosis, is poorly understood. The present study examined the effect of transient heart failure (THF) developing in the acute and rehabilitative phase on survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients in the Italian survey on cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention after cardiac revascularization (ICAROS) were analyzed for THF, the latter being defined either as signs and symptoms consistent with decompensation or cardiogenic shock. ICAROS was a prospective, multicenter registry of 1,262 consecutive patients discharged from 62 cardiac rehabilitation (CR) facilities, providing data on risk factors, lifestyle habits, drug treatments, and major cardiovascular events (MACE) during a 1-year follow-up. Records were linked to the official website of the Italian Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (GICR-IACPR). The overall prevalence of pre-discharge THF was 7.6%, with 69.8% of cases in acute wards, 22.9% during CR, and 7.3% in both settings. THF affected more frequently patients with chronic cardiac condition (42.7 vs. 30.6%; p < 0.05), age ≥75 years (33.3 vs. 23.1%; p < 0.005), COPD (19.8 vs. 12.3%; p < 0.05), and chronic kidney disease (17.7 vs. 7%; p < 0.001). After discharge, THF patients showed good maintenance rates of RAAS modulators (90.6%) and beta-blockers (83.3%), while statin therapy significantly decreased from 81.3 to 64.6% (p < 0.05). The pursuit of secondary prevention targets, as far as self-reported drug adherence, was not different among groups. Patients with THF had increased 1-year mortality (8.3 vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001). Moreover, THF independently predicted adverse outcome with OR for recurrent events (mainly further episodes of decompensation) of 2.4 (CI 1.4-4.3). Patients who experienced THF after coronary revascularization had increased post-discharge mortality and cardiovascular events. Hemodynamic instability, rather than recurrent myocardial ischemia, seems to be linked with worse prognosis.

Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Imaging in Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most prevalent form of cardiovascular disease affecting about 13 million Americans, while more than one million percutaneous transluminal intervention (PCI) procedures are performed annually in the USA. The relative high occurrence of restenosis, despite stent implementation, seems to be the primary limitation of PCI. Over the last decades, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), has proven an invaluable tool for the diagnosis of CAD and patients’ risk stratification, providing useful information regarding the decision about revascularization and is well suited to assess patients after intervention. Information gained from post-intervention MPI is crucial to differentiate patients with angina from those with exo-cardiac chest pain syndromes, to assess peri-intervention myocardial damage, to predict-detect restenosis after PCI, to detect CAD progression in non-revascularized vessels, to evaluate the effects of intervention if required for occupational reasons and to evaluate patients’ long-term prognosis. On the other hand, chest pain and exercise electrocardiography are largely unhelpful in identifying patients at risk after PCI.

Although there are enough published data demonstrating the value of myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging in patients after PCI, there is still debate on whether or not these tests should be performed routinely.

Cost effectiveness of intensive lipid-lowering treatment for patients with congestive heart failure and coronary heart disease in the US

BACKGROUND

A recent study found fewer hospitalizations for congestive heart failure (CHF) patients receiving high-dose versus low-dose statin therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the cost effectiveness of high-dose versus low-dose statin therapy in CHF patients.

METHODS

Two scenarios (literature-based [base-case scenario] vs trial-based post-event mortality [alternative scenario]) assessed the cost effectiveness of atorvastatin 80 mg/day (A80) versus atorvastatin 10 mg/day (A10) in patients with both CHF and coronary heart disease (CHD) [CHF/CHD], using a lifetime Markov model. The model predicts treatment-specific probabilities of major and minor cardiovascular events and death, based on clinical trial data. The quality of life and costs were literature based. Measures included costs per life-year saved (LYS) and QALY gained. Health consequences and costs were discounted at 3.0% annually. Analyses were conducted from the payer perspective and valued in $US, year 2006-7 values.

RESULTS

Literature-based mortality estimates (base case) increased life-years and QALYs for A80 compared with A10 (incremental cost-effectiveness ratios [ICERs]: $US9600 per LYS; $US13 600 per QALY). At a willingness to pay of $US100 000 per QALY, A80 was cost effective in 80% of simulations. A10 dominated A80 when using trial-based mortality estimates (alternative scenario). At a willingness to pay of $US100 000 per QALY, A80 was cost effective in 48% of simulations.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive A80 treatment may be cost effective versus A10 in cardiovascular prevention in CHF/CHD patients in the US, due to projected gains in life expectancy and health-related quality of life. However, the results are highly sensitive to assumptions about the mortality rate in the model. When using the mortality rate observed in the trial, A10 dominates A80.

Impact of left ventricular dysfunction on hospital mortality among patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention

Many patients with systolic dysfunction undergo elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) despite the unknown risk and limited data supporting its use. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the association between the severity of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and hospital mortality in patients who undergo elective PCI. A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients who underwent elective PCI in New York State in 1998 and 1999. Patients were stratified into 5 groups on the basis of their LV ejection fractions (EFs) before PCI (>55%, 46% to 55%, 36% to 45%, 26% to 35%, and < or =25%). Comparisons of demographic, procedural, and outcome variables were performed, and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to evaluate the relation between the EF and hospital mortality. Among 55,709 patients who underwent elective PCI, EFs < or =25%, 26% to 35% and 36% to 45% were present in 3.4%, 7.6%, and 17.4%, respectively. Hospital mortality was 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.6%, 1.2%, and 2.7% in the groups with EFs >55%, 46% to 55%, 36% to 45%, 26% to 35%, and < or =25%, respectively (p <0.001). After multivariate adjustment, an increased risk for hospital mortality was significant for EF groups of 36% to 45% (OR 1.56, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.30), 26% to 35% (OR 2.17, 95% confidence interval 1.42 to 3.31), and < or =25% (OR 3.85, 95% confidence interval 2.46 to 6.01) compared with EF >55%, respectively. In conclusion, this analysis demonstrates that elective PCI is commonly performed in patients with reduced EFs, and the risk for hospital mortality increases as the EF decreases. For patients who undergo elective PCI, an EF < or =45% is associated with higher adjusted hospital mortality. Whether elective PCI in patients with low EFs reduces morbidity and/or mortality over medical therapy alone is unknown.

Effects of heart failure and diabetes mellitus on long-term mortality after coronary revascularization (from the BARI Trial)

This study evaluated the effect of heart failure (HF) and ejection fraction (EF) at baseline on long-term cardiac mortality in patients undergoing coronary revascularization and investigated the effect of diabetes mellitus (DM) on mortality. We evaluated long-term outcomes of patients without HF, HF and a preserved EF, and HF and a decreased EF who underwent revascularization with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft surgery after enrollment in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) trial. Ten years after initial revascularization, cumulative rates of freedom from cardiac death were 90% in patients without HF, 75% in patients with HF and a preserved EF, and 59% in patients with HF and a decreased EF (p <0.001, 3-way comparison). In diabetic patients with HF and a preserved EF, there was a significant increase in cardiac mortality compared with patients without HF (p <0.001); however, this relation was not seen in patients without DM. In conclusion, patients with HF and a preserved EF have increased mortality over 10 years compared with those without HF. Only in patients with DM did HF with preserved EF confer additional risk.

Excimer laser in myocardial infarction: a comparison between STEMI patients with established Q-wave versus patients with non-STEMI (non-Q)

Patients sustaining acute myocardial infarction (AMI) often require urgent percutaneous revascularization within the first 24 h from onset of the infarction due to continuous ischemia and hemodynamic instability. Upon arrival to the cardiac catheterization, the electrocardiogram of AMI patients may exhibit acute ST-elevation (STEMI) with or without accompanying Q-wave or depression of the ST segment (non-STEMI or non-Q-wave infarction). Data comparing acute outcome of device application in patients presenting for urgent revascularization with established Q-wave myocardial infarction (QWMI) versus those with non-STEMI (NQMI) are sparse. Excimer laser is a revascularization modality applied for debulking of atherosclerotic plaque and vaporization of associated thrombus in the setting of AMI. One hundred fifty-one AMI patients with continuous chest pain and ischemia who enrolled into a multicenter study and underwent urgent revascularization were divided for the purpose of a retrospective analysis into two groups. One group presented with established electrocardiographic Q-wave, whereas the other had ST-depression (NQMI). In comparison with the NQMI group, the QWMI patients had a higher incidence of failed thrombolytic therapy (17% vs 3, p = 0.006), cardiogenic shock (20 vs 6%, p = 0.01), left anterior descending as a culprit infarct-related vessel (46 vs 14%, p < 0.0001), a higher incidence of TIMI 0 flow (48 vs 24%, p = 0.04), a heavier thrombus burden (grade 4 TIMI thrombus, 58 vs 23%; p = 0.0001), and higher CPK (1272 +/- 2180 vs 404 +/- 577, p = 0.001) and troponin levels (62 +/- 95 vs 14 +/- 48, p = 0.0003). Both groups underwent laser angioplasty and stenting for relief of continuous chest pain and ischemia within 24 h of infarction onset. Quantitative coronary arteriography in an independent core laboratory measured similar improvement in baseline minimal luminal diameter and percent diameter stenosis by application of laser energy in both groups. Among the QWMI patients, a significantly higher acute gain was recorded with the laser treatment in lesions containing a large/extensive thrombus burden as compared with lesions containing only a small clot burden (1.2 +/- 0.7 vs 0.8 +/- 0.5, p = 0.01). Such a phenomenon was not detected among the NQMI patients (1.0 +/- 0.5 vs 0.8 +/- 0.6, p=ns). Baseline TIMI flow grade (0.9 +/- 1.0 for QWMI vs 1.5 +/- 1.2 for NQMI, p = 0.0001) increased with laser emission to 2.8 +/- 0.5 and subsequently reached a final level of TIMI 3 in both groups. In comparison with the QWMI patients, there was a trend toward a reduced rate of major adverse coronary events among the NQMI patients (12% QWMI vs 4% NQMI, p = 0.09). Significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics, extent of myocardial damage, location of infarct related vessel, thrombus burden, and TIMI flow exist between QWMI and NQMI patients who require urgent intervention. However, application of excimer laser results in similar high procedural success and low complication rates in both groups. Maximal acute laser gain is achieved among QWMI patients whose lesions are laden with a heavy thrombus burden.

Revascularization in Heart Failure: The Role of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Despite being technically challenging and carrying a higher periprocedural risk, the performance of revascularization in patients who have heart failure of ischemic origin can provide substantial clinical benefits. Although several studies have demonstrated a benefit of the performance of coronary artery bypass grafting over percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among patients who have depressed ejection fraction undergoing revascularization, most of these studies were conducted during the balloon angioplasty era and before the widespread use of drug-eluting stents that have dramatically reduced the need for repeat revascularization among patients undergoing PCI. The use of lower profile intra-aortic balloon catheters and other novel cardiac support devices may extend the use of PCI and lower rates of periprocedural complications among this high-risk population.

A history of heart failure predicts arrhythmia treatment efficacy: data from the Antiarrythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) study

BACKGROUND

In survivors of life-threatening ventricular tachycardia (VT), a history of CHF (HxCHF) before the VT episode may provide different prognostic information than their measured left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

METHODS

We evaluated outcomes from patients in the AVID study. Patients were included in the study if they presented with ventricular fibrillation, VT with syncope or VT with hemodynamic compromise, and LVEF < or = 40%. Treatment options included implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD), usually amiodarone.

RESULTS

As expected, a HxCHF is associated with an increased and high risk of arrhythmic and nonarrhythmic death. However, an interaction was observed between arrhythmia treatment (ICD or AAD) and HxCHF status: the survival advantage with an ICD, as compared with AAD therapy, is largely restricted to HxCHF patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The ICD is no better than AAD therapy in preventing arrhythmic death in patients with no HxCHF. In this data set, a HxCHF is somewhat more accurate in predicting prognosis and the response to therapy than a reduced LVEF.

The impact of ejection fraction on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with congestive heart failure: an analysis of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry and Dynamic Registry

BACKGROUND

Patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) have higher rates of adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A comprehensive analysis of outcomes in patients with CHF in the current era has not been done. We studied the outcomes of patients with CHF who underwent PCI in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) and Dynamic registries.

METHODS

We evaluated demographic and angiographic characteristics and the clinical outcomes of patients with CHF in the Dynamic Registry and the PTCA Registry, excluding patients with acute myocardial infarction. In the Dynamic Registry, patients with CHF (n = 503) were compared with patients without CHF (n = 4194), and patients with CHF with a preserved ejection fraction (EF) (n = 134) were compared with patients with CHF who have a reduced EF (n = 199). The patients with CHF in the 1997 through 2001 Dynamic Registry (n = 236) were then similarly compared with patients with CHF in the earlier PTCA Registry (n = 117).

RESULTS

In the Dynamic Registry, compared with patients without CHF, patients with CHF had a higher-risk clinical and angiographic profile, and a higher mortality rate both inhospital (2.6% vs 0.4%, P < or = .001) and at 1 year (13.1% vs 3.0%, P < .001). Patients with reduced EF had higher inhospital mortality rates and a trend toward higher mortality at 1 year. The patients with CHF in the Dynamic Registry compared with those in the PTCA Registry had a higher risk profile yet had significantly higher procedural success rates and improved clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although CHF remains a strong predictor of adverse outcomes after PCI, significant improvement seen in the past decade is likely related to improved procedural techniques and improved medical therapy.

Comparison of effectiveness of excimer laser angioplasty in patients with acute coronary syndromes in those with versus those without normal left ventricular function

Depressed left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) adversely affects procedural outcome during percutaneous coronary revascularization. This study examined the acute results, effectiveness, and safety of excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) in patients with acute coronary ischemic syndromes whose LVEF was depressed (<40%) versus those with preserved LVEF. One hundred patients with acute coronary syndromes (51 with unstable angina and 49 with acute myocardial infarction) underwent ELCA. Twenty-five patients (group 1) (29 lesions; 72% thrombotic) had decreased LVEF (mean 28 +/- 6%) and 75 patients (group 2) (81 lesions; 60% thrombotic) had preserved LVEF (mean 53 +/- 8%). Group 1 had a higher incidence of 3-vessel disease, Q-wave acute myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, diabetes, and hypertension. High laser success (87% group 1 vs 93% group 2, p = NS) and procedural success (93% group 1 vs 98% group 2, p = NS) were achieved in both groups. Minimal luminal diameter in group 1 increased from 0.7 +/- 0.5 to 1.4 +/- 0.5 mm after the laser procedure and finally to 3.0 +/- 0.4 mm; in group 2, minimal luminal diameter increased from 0.7 +/- 0.4 to 1.3 +/- 0.5 mm after the procedure to a final of 3.0 +/- 0.5 mm. The laser energy vaporized 75% of thrombus burden from the target lesion in group 1 versus 79% in group 2 (p = NS). Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow in group 1 increased from 1.4 +/- 1.2 to 2.7 +/- 0.7 by laser and finally to 2.9 +/- 0.3, and in group 2 from 2.0 +/- 1.0 to 2.8 +/- 0.6 after the laser procedure to a final of 2.9 +/- 0.4. There were no deaths, emergency bypass surgeries, strokes, or acute vessel closures in either group. Thus, ELCA is a safe and feasible revascularization modality for patients with acute coronary syndromes whose LVEF is depressed. The laser energy vaporizes a large thrombus burden from the treated plaque. Angiographic intracoronary thrombus does not adversely affect device and procedural success in these select patients.

Role of target vessel size and body surface area on outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions in women

BACKGROUND

Women have higher mortality rates than men after coronary angioplasty. Differences in target vessel size may partially account for these differences. We set out to explore the effects of sex, body surface area (BSA), and target coronary vessel size on clinical outcomes after angioplasty.

METHODS

Data from 5 interventional trials and 1 registry were pooled for analysis (n = 3982).

RESULTS

Compared with men, women undergoing angioplasty were older, had lower weights and BSA, more coronary risk factors, and slightly smaller target coronary vessel size (as assessed by reference vessel diameter). The correlation between target vessel size and BSA was poor (r = 0.13). At 6 months, women had higher mortality rates (1.7% vs 0.8%, P =.03) but similar rates of myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization. On univariate analysis, advanced age, smaller BSA, and female sex were associated with increased mortality, but target vessel size was not. Advanced age was the only significant multivariate predictor of mortality. Target vessel size and diabetes were independent predictors of repeat revascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

Women have higher unadjusted 6-month mortality rates after angioplasty, owing largely to their more advanced age at the time of intervention. Smaller target vessel size is associated with increased risk of restenosis and repeat revascularization; however, it does not appear to be a predictor for downstream mortality. As such, the fact that women have smaller vessels does not account for their higher 6-month mortality after coronary angioplasty.

Achieving optimal results with standard balloon angioplasty: can baseline and angiographic variables predict stent-like outcomes?

OBJECTIVES

To predict which patients might not require stent implantation, we identified clinical and angiographic characteristics associated with repeat revascularization after standard balloon angioplasty.

BACKGROUND

Stents reduce the risk of repeat revascularization but are costly and may lead to in-stent restenosis, which remains difficult to treat. Identification of patients at low risk for repeat revascularization may allow clinicians to reserve stents for patients most likely to benefit.

METHODS

Data from five interventional trials (5,146 patients) were pooled for analysis. We identified patients with optimal angiographic results (final diameter stenosis < or =30% and no dissection) after balloon angioplasty and determined the multivariable predictors of repeat revascularization.

RESULTS

Optimal angiographic results were achieved in 18% of patients after angioplasty. The repeat revascularization rate at six months was lower for patients with optimal results (20% vs. 26%, p < 0.001) but still higher than observed in stent trials. Independent predictors of repeat revascularization were female gender (odds ratio [OR] 1.67, p = 0.01), lesion length > or =10 mm (OR 1.62, p = 0.03) and proximal left anterior descending coronary artery lesions (OR 1.62, p = 0.03). For the 8% of patients with optimal angiographic results and none of these risk factors, the repeat revascularization and target vessel revascularization rates were 14% and 8% respectively, similar to rates after stent implantation. Cost analysis estimated that $78 million per year might be saved in the U.S. with a provisional stenting strategy using these criteria compared with elective stenting.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of baseline characteristics and angiographic results can be used to identify a small group of patients at very low risk for repeat revascularization after balloon angioplasty. Provisional stenting for these low risk patients could substantially reduce costs without compromising clinical outcomes.

Interventional therapy in heart failure management

The incidence and prevalence of congestive heart failure are rapidly increasing because of the progressive decrease in age-adjusted mortality rates for coronary artery disease and hypertensive heart disease, together with the progressive aging of the US population. Despite great advances in maximal medical therapy, most patients with symptomatic congestive heart failure can expect functional impairment, interludes of worsening symptomatology, and a shortened life span. Thus, it is appropriate to ask whether the interventional revolution that is under way for the management of ischemic cardiovascular disease can be applied with benefit to the management of congestive heart failure. The use of interventional therapies for the treatment of elderly patients with congestive heart failure caused by coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease, or renal vascular disease is addressed.

Baseline clinical and angiographic variables associated with long-term outcome after successful intracoronary stent implantation

Although randomized studies have demonstrated improved outcomes with stents over balloon angioplasty in straightforward coronary narrowings in low-risk patients, this advantage is less clear for complex lesions and high-risk patients. This study was designed to identify clinical and angiographic variables that are associated with long-term outcome after stent implantation. We identified 1,709 patients undergoing successful stent placement without in-hospital major adverse events. We analyzed clinical, lesional, and procedural variables to determine their correlation with outcome. Mean duration of follow-up was 1.6 +/- 1.4 years. Cox proportional-hazards models and stepwise methods were used to assess which covariates were potentially related to each end point. The occurrence of death/myocardial infarction (MI) was associated with any history of congestive heart failure (relative risk [RR] 3.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.3 to 4.7, p <0.0001), procedure within 24 hours of MI (RR 2.3, CI 1.3 to 4.1, p = 0.0048), vein graft intervention (RR 1.8, CI 1.3 to 2.6, p = 0.0007), and prior MI (RR 1.8, CI 1.2 to 2.6, p = 0.004). Repeat revascularization was associated with multivessel stent placement (RR 1.8, CI 1.2 to 2.8, p = 0.006) and stent for abrupt closure (RR 1.7, CF 1.1 to 2.7, p = 0.03), but was less frequent with de novo lesions and right coronary artery lesions (RR 0.6, CI 0.5 to 0.8, p = 0.0007, and RR 0.8, CI 0.6 to 1.0, p = 0.05, respectively). The cumulative end point of death/MI/repeat revascularization was associated with congestive heart failure (RR 1.7, CI 1.3 to 2.2, p <0.0001), multivessel stent placement (RR 1.6, Cl 1.1 to 2.3, p = 0.03), warfarin therapy (RR 1.4, CI 1.2 to 1.8, p = 0.001), and procedure within 24 hours of MI (RR 1.5, CI 1.1 to 2.1, p = 0.02), but was less frequent with complete revascularization and right coronary artery intervention (RR 0.8, CI 0.7 to 0.99, p = 0.04, and RR 0.7, CI 0.6 to 0.9, p = 0.009, respectively). Thus, this study demonstrates that there are readily identifiable characteristics in patients treated successfully with stents that are associated with long-term outcome.