Use of a semi-automated, robotic radioimmunoassay to measure cAMP generated by activation of DP-, EP2-, and IP-prostaglandin receptors in human ocular and other cell types

Discovery to Launch of Anti-allergy (Emadine; Patanol/Pataday/Pazeo) and Anti-glaucoma (Travatan; Simbrinza) Ocular Drugs, and Generation of Novel Pharmacological Tools Such as AL-8810

The eye and eyesight are exquistly designed and are precious, and yet we often take them for granted. Good vision is critical for our long-term survival and for humanity's enduring progress. Unfortunately, since ocular diseases do not culminate in life-and-death scenarios, awareness of the plight of millions of people suffering from such eye ailments is not publicized as other diseases. However, losing eyesight or falling victim to visual impairment is a frightening outlook for most people. Glaucoma, a collection of chronic optic neuropathies, of which the most prevalent form, primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), is the second leading cause of irreversible blindness. POAG currently afflicts >70 million people worldwide and is an insidious, progressive, silent thief of sight that is asymptomatic. On the other hand, allergic conjunctivitis (AC), and the associated rhinitis ("hay-fever"), frequently victimizes a huge number of people worldwide, especially during seasonal changes. While not life-threatening, sufferers of AC soon learn the value of drugs to treat their signs and symptoms of AC as they desire rapid relief to overcome the ocular itching/pain, redness, and tearing AC causes. Herein, I will describe the collective efforts of many researchers whose industrious, diligent, and dedicated team work resulted in the discovery, biochemical/pharmacological characterization, development and eventual launch of drugs to treat AC (e.g., olopatadine [Patanol/Pataday/Pazeo] and emedastine [Emedine]), and for treating ocular hypertension and POAG (e.g., travoprost [Travatan ] and Simbrinza). This represents a personal perspective.

Prostaglandin FP receptor antagonists: discovery, pharmacological characterization and therapeutic utility

In contrast to the availability of potent and selective antagonists of several prostaglandin receptor types (including DP₁ , DP₂ , EP and TP receptors), there has been a paucity of well-characterized, selective FP receptor antagonists. The earliest ones included dimethyl amide and dimethyl amine derivatives of PGF_2α , but these have failed to gain prominence. The fluorinated PGF_2α analogues, AL-8810 and AL-3138, were subsequently discovered as competitive and non-competitive FP receptor antagonists respectively. Non-prostanoid structures, such as the thiazolidinone AS604872, the D-amino acid-based oligopeptide PDC31 and its peptidomimic analogue PDC113.824 came next, but the latter two are allosteric inhibitors of FP receptor signalling. AL-8810 has a sub-micromolar in vitro potency and ≥2 log unit selectivity against most other PG receptors when tested in several cell- and tissue-based functional assays. Additionally, AL-8810 has demonstrated therapeutic efficacy as an FP receptor antagonist in animal models of stroke, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, allodynia and endometriosis. Consequently, it appears that AL-8810 has become the FP receptor antagonist of choice. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Eicosanoids 35 years from the 1982 Nobel: where are we now? To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v176.8/issuetoc.

iDrugs and iDevices Discovery Research: Preclinical Assays, Techniques, and Animal Model Studies for Ocular Hypotensives and Neuroprotectants

Discovery ophthalmic research is centered around delineating the molecular and cellular basis of ocular diseases and finding and exploiting molecular and genetic pathways associated with them. From such studies it is possible to determine suitable intervention points to address the disease process and hopefully to discover therapeutics to treat them. An investigational new drug (IND) filing for a new small-molecule drug, peptide, antibody, genetic treatment, or a device with global health authorities requires a number of preclinical studies to provide necessary safety and efficacy data. Specific regulatory elements needed for such IND-enabling studies are beyond the scope of this article. However, to enhance the overall data packages for such entities and permit high-quality foundation-building publications for medical affairs, additional research and development studies are always desirable. This review aims to provide examples of some target localization/verification, ocular drug discovery processes, and mechanistic and portfolio-enhancing exploratory investigations for candidate drugs and devices for the treatment of ocular hypertension and glaucomatous optic neuropathy (neurodegeneration of retinal ganglion cells and their axons). Examples of compound screening assays, use of various technologies and techniques, deployment of animal models, and data obtained from such studies are also presented.

Prostanoid Receptor Antagonist Effects on Intraocular Pressure, Supported by Ocular Biodisposition Experiments

PURPOSE

Since all prostanoid receptors affect intraocular pressure (IOP) and endogenous prostanoids are found in ocular tissues, the pressor effects of prostanoid antagonists were comprehensively evaluated. The absence of effects of most of these antagonists was not entirely anticipated. To ensure no false-negative results, ocular biodisposition studies were conducted.

METHODS

Monkeys with laser-induced ocular hypertension were used to study antagonist effects on IOP. Ocular biodisposition of each antagonist was assessed in rabbits, with LC/MS/MS analyses of tissue extracts and blood.

RESULTS

EP₁, EP₂, EP₃, EP₄, FP, IP, and TP prostanoid receptor antagonists did not affect IOP, even at a high 1% dose. These studies were followed by ocular biodisposition studies. Striking differences in ocular tissue bioavailability were observed, which were independent of solubility. Only the EP₁ antagonist SC-51322 failed to penetrate sufficiently to be bioavailable in the aqueous humor and ciliary body/iris. This obliged testing an alternative EP₁ antagonist, namely ONO-8713, to reliably conclude that an EP₁ antagonist does not alter IOP.

CONCLUSIONS

These antagonist studies provided no evidence for individual endogenous prostanoids exerting a meaningful role in regulating IOP. They do reaffirm the critical importance of studying ocular bioavailability for confirming negative data. Large differences among the antagonists in anterior segment and even ocular surface tissue biodisposition were observed in rabbits. It appears from these monkey studies, supported by rabbit ocular bioavailability data, that an absence of drug effect in the eye cannot be adequately substantiated without determination of ocular pharmacokinetics.

Intracellular signaling in human iridial fibroblasts and iridial melanocytes in response to prostaglandins, endothelin, isoproterenol, and other pharmacological agents

PURPOSE

The receptor-coupled signal transduction systems present in isolated human iridial fibroblasts (HIF) and in human iridial melanocytes (HIM) were investigated. Cell responsiveness to numerous prostaglandins (PGs), and other compounds of interest, was profiled in order to better understand their involvement in the iridial hyper-pigmentation process observed during treatment of elevated intraocular pressure with FP-receptor against PG analogs.

METHODS

[(3)H]-inositol phosphates ([(3)H]-IPs) generated in the cells were measured by ion-exchange chromatography followed by liquid scintillation spectroscopy. cAMP generated in the cells was quantified using an enzyme immunoassay.

RESULTS

HIF cells exhibited a robust phosphoinositide (PI) hydrolysis response to FP-class PG analogs, such as cloprostenol (potency, EC(50) = 2.4 ± 0.5 nM, n = 5), fluprostenol (EC(50) = 5.3 ± 0.6 nM, n = 3), PGF(2α) (EC(50) = 54 ± 18 nM, n = 5), and latanoprost acid (EC(50) = 121 ± 17 nM, n = 4). Other PGs exhibited the following potencies (EC(50)) for stimulating [(3)H]-IPs accumulation in HIF cells: PGD(2) EC(50) = 327 ± 195 nM, n =3; PGE(2) EC(50) = 550 ± 50 nM, n = 3; and two TP-receptor agonists (I-BOP, EC(50) = 23 ± 8 nM, n = 3; U-46619 EC(50) = 1.1 ± 0.4 µM, n = 3). Endothelin-1 (ET-1) and histamine increased [(3)H]-IPs production in HIF and HIM cells. HIM cells exhibited minimal PI turnover response to cloprostenol, latanoprost acid, latanoprost, PGF(2α), PGE(2), and histamine, but there were robust responses to ET-1 (EC(50) = 4.6 nM, n = 2) and an ET(B)-receptor agonist (BQ-3020, EC(50) = 5 nM, n = 2) that were blocked by an ET(B)-antagonist (BQ-788, IC(50) = 21 ± 6 nM, n = 3). In the adenylyl cyclase activation assay, numerous PGs (1 and 10 µM) stimulated cAMP production in HIF cells yielding the following rank order of efficacy: PGI(2) > PGE(2) > misoprostil > isoproterenol = BW245C > PGD(2) = PGF(2α) = fluprostenol. In HIM cells, PGE(2) (EC(50) = 1.3 ± 0.3 nM) and isoproterenol (β-agonist; EC(50) = 89 ± 13 nM) potently and efficaciously stimulated cAMP production and ICI-118851 (β(2)-antagonist) attenuated the effects of isoproterenol. However, latanoprost acid, latanoprost, ET-1, and BW245C (DP-receptor agonist) were relatively less efficacious than isoproterenol and PGE(2) in HIM cells at stimulating cAMP production.

CONCLUSIONS

These studies have shown that while HIF cells express FP prostaglandin and histamine receptors coupled to phospholipase C to produce [(3)H]-IPs, the HIM cells lack such functionally active FP-receptors. In contrast, HIF and HIM cells express functional ET-1 receptors coupled to [(3)H]-IPs production and both cell-types respond to PGE(2), BW245C, and isoproterenol by generating cAMP. It is concluded that human iridial fibroblasts and melanocytes respond differently to PGs and histamine, but in the same manner to ET-1, isoproterenol and BW245C. This may have relevance to the intercellular communication within the iris relative to the melanogenic processes.

Preclinical Pharmacology of AL-12182, a New Ocular Hypotensive 11-Oxa Prostaglandin Analog

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine selected in vivo ocular properties of AL-12182 (5,6-dihydro-4,5-didehydro-11-deoxy-11-oxa-16-(3-chlorophenoxy)-omega-tetranor-PGF(2alpha) isopropyl ester) and the in vitro profile of its free acid, AL-12180.

METHODS

Previously documented radioligand binding and functional assays involving human ciliary muscle cells (h-CM), human trabecular meshwork (h-TM) and other cells, and porcine ocular arteries were utilized. For in vivo procedures, we utilized rabbits, cats, and nonhuman primates to measure hyperemia, pupil diameter, and intraocular pressure (IOP), respectively.

RESULTS

AL-12180 exhibited the highest affinity for the FP-receptor (K(i) = 143 +/- 36 nM) and much lower affinity for DP-, EP(3)-, IP-, and TP-receptors, and for several nonprostanoid receptors, enzymes, neurotransmitter uptake sites, ion channels, and other regulatory sites. AL-12180 activated phospholipase C-mediated phosphoinositide hydrolysis (potency, EC(50) = 13.7-42.7 nM) through the FP-receptor in a variety of cells, such as h-CM, h-TM cells, human embryonic kidney cells expressing the cloned human ciliary body FP-receptor (HEK-FP), mouse 3T3 cells, and rat vascular smooth muscle cells. AL-8810, an FP-antagonist, blocked the effects of AL-12180 in h-CM cells (IC(50) = 8.7 microM). AL-12180 also stimulated the mobilization of intracellular Ca(2+) ([Ca(2+)](i)) in h-TM cells (EC(50) = 111 +/- 36 nM), h-CM cells (EC(50) = 11 nM), and in host cells expressing the cloned human ciliary body FP-receptor (EC(50) = 5.9 +/- 3.1 nM). AL-12180 lacked significant agonist activity at DP-, EP(2)-, EP(4)-, IP-, and TP-receptors in cell-based assays. However, AL-12180 contracted porcine central retinal and short posterior ciliary arteries in vitro with micromolar potencies that appeared to involve TP-receptor activation. in vivo, AL-12182 elicited dose-related hyperemia in the rabbit eye, miosis in the cat eye, and ocular hypotension in the nonhuman primate eye.

CONCLUSIONS

AL-12180 is a relatively potent and selective FP-receptor agonist whose isopropyl ester prodrug (AL-12182) lowers IOP by as much as 40% following topical ocular dosing in a laser-induced nonhuman primate model of ocular hypertension.

Molecular pharmacology of the DP/EP2 class prostaglandin AL-6598 and quantitative autoradiographic visualization of DP and EP2 receptor sites in human eyes

DP-class prostaglandins and prostaglandin analogs (collectively, prostaglandins or PGs) such as PGD2, BW245C, ZK110841, and ZK118182, lower intraocular pressure (IOP) in animal models of ocular hypertension. A new analog of ZK118182 (AL-6556; 13,14-dihydro-ZK118182) was synthesized, and the isopropyl ester of AL-6556 (AL-6598) was shown recently to lower IOP in the ocular hypertensive cynomolgus monkey model of glaucoma and in human subjects. AL-6556 and AL-6598 had an affinity (Ki) of 2.66-4.43 microM for DP receptors but a much lower affinity (K(i)s = 38-103 microM) for EP3, FP, IP, and TP receptors (n = 3-5). In addition, AL-6556 and AL-6598 exhibited K(i)s > 100 microM for 19 nonprostanoid receptors. Both PGs stimulated cAMP production (EC50 = 1.07 +/- 0.1 microM and EC50 = 2.64 +/- 0.84 microM; n = 3) by way of DP receptors in embryonic bovine tracheal fibroblasts. While AL-6556 and AL-6598 were partial agonists (EC(50)s = 0.47-0.69 microM; E(max) = 35%-46%) at EP2 receptors in human nonpigmented epithelial cells, neither had any agonist activity at EP4, IP, or FP receptors. The DP antagonist, BWA868C, effectively antagonized the effects of AL-6556 with a high potency (IC50 = 22.8 +/- 3.9 nM; n = 3). DP receptors radiolabeled with [3H]BWA868C on human eye sections by quantitative autoradiography were highly concentrated in the ciliary process (CP), longitudinal (LCM) and circular (CCM) ciliary muscles, and iris with much lower specific binding in the cornea (CN), lens (LNS), and retina (RET). EP2 receptors labeled with [3H]PGE2 were concentrated in the LCM, CM, RET, and iris. In conclusion, AL-6598 and AL-6556 are relatively DP-receptor-selective PGs with full agonist activity at the DP and partial agonist activity at the EP2 receptor. The IOP-lowering activities of these compounds may involve both the inflow and outflow mechanisms, as DP and EP2 receptors were visualized in human ocular tissues involved in such aqueous humor dynamics.

Functional pharmacology of human prostanoid EP2 and EP4 receptors

Prostanoid EP(2) and EP(4) receptor-mediated responses are difficult to distinguish pharmacologically because of the lack of potent, selective antagonists. We describe systematic agonist fingerprints for recombinant human prostanoid EP(2) and EP(4) receptors expressed in CHO and HEK293 cells, respectively. The rank orders of potency of endogenous prostaglandins were: prostanoid EP(2) receptors: prostaglandin E(2)>>prostaglandin D(2)=prostaglandin F(2alpha)>prostaglandin I(2); prostanoid EP(4) receptors: prostaglandin E(2)>>prostaglandin I(2)>prostaglandin D(2)=prostaglandin F(2alpha). Butaprost free acid (9-oxo-11alpha,16R-dihydroxy-17-cyclobutyl-prost-13E-en-1-oic acid) behaved as a highly selective partial agonist at prostanoid EP(2) receptors while butaprost methyl ester elicited small, low potency responses. The prostanoid EP(1) and EP(3) receptor agonists misoprostol (9-oxo-11alpha,16-dihydroxy-16-methyl-prost-13E-en-1-oic acid, methyl ester), sulprostone (N-(methylsulphonyl)-9-oxo-11alpha,15R-dihydroxy-16-phenoxy-17,18,19,20-tetranor-prosta-5Z,13E-dien-1-amide), and GR63799X ([1R-[1alpha(Z),2beta(R*),3alpha]-(-)-4-benzoylamino)phenyl-7-[3-hydroxy-3-phenoxy-propoxy)-5-oxocyclopentyl]-4-heptenoate), and the prostanoid DP receptor agonist BW245C ((4S)-(3-[(3R,S)-3-cyclohexyl-3-hydropropyl]-2,5-dioxo)-4-imidazolidineheptanoic acid), activated both prostanoid EP(2) and EP(4) receptors. Prostaglandin I(2), iloprost (6,9alpha-methylene-11alpha,15S-dihydroxy-16-methyl-prosta-5E,13E-dien-18-yn-1-oic acid, trometamol salt) and cicaprost (5-[(E)-(1S, 5S, 6S, 7R)-7-hydroxy-6-[(3S, 4S)-3-hydroxy-4-methylnona-1,6-diinyl]-bicyclo[3.3.0]octan-3-yliden]-3-oxapentanoic acid; ZK96480) were full agonists at prostanoid EP(4) receptors. Key differentiating agonists are: butaprost FA, 16,16-dimethyl-prostaglandin E(2), 19-(R)-hydroxy prostaglandin E(2), misoprostol, BW245C, prostaglandin F(2alpha) and prostaglandin D(2).

Identification and characterization of the ocular hypotensive efficacy of travoprost, a potent and selective FP prostaglandin receptor agonist, and AL-6598, a DP prostaglandin receptor agonist

The structure-activity studies that led to the identification of travoprost, a highly selective and potent FP prostaglandin analog, and AL-6598, a DP prostaglandin analog, are detailed. In both series, the 1-alcohol analogs are very effective and are thought to be acting as prodrugs for the biologically active carboxylic acids. The efficacy of amide prodrugs depends on the degree of substitution and the size of the substituents. Selected compounds are profiled in vitro and in vivo preclinically. Clinical studies show that travoprost 0.004% (isopropyl ester) provided intraocular pressure control superior to timolol 0.5% when used as monotherapy in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. In clinical studies, AL-6598 0.01% provided a sustained intraocular pressure reduction with q.d. application; b.i.d. provided greater intraocular pressure control. The acute and, apparently, conjunctival hyperemia associated with topical ocular AL-6598 can be attenuated while maintaining intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy by formulating with brimonidine.

Preclinical efficacy of travoprost, a potent and selective FP prostaglandin receptor agonist

Travoprost is the isopropyl ester prodrug of a high affinity, selective FP prostaglandin full receptor agonist. In contrast to travoprost acid's high affinity and efficacy at the FP receptor, there is only sub-micromolar affinity for the DP, EP1, EP3, EP4, IP, and TP receptors. Travoprost produced a lower incidence of ocular irritation than PGF20 isopropyl ester at a dose of 1 microg in the New Zealand albino (NZA) rabbit. Topical ocular application of travoprost produced a marked miotic effect in cats following doses of 0.01, 0.03 and 0.1 microg. In the ocular hypertensive monkey, b.i.d. application of 0.1 and 0.3 microg of travoprost afforded peak reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) of 22.7% and 28.6%, respectively. Topical application of travoprost was well tolerated in rabbits, cats and monkeys, causing no ocular irritation or discomfort at doses up to 1 microg. Travoprost is a promising ocular hypotensive prostaglandin FP derivative that has the ocular hypotensive efficacy of PGF2alpha isopropyl ester but with less severe ocular side effects.

Functional pharmacological evidence for EP2 and EP4 prostanoid receptors in immortalized human trabecular meshwork and non-pigmented ciliary epithelial cells

The aim of these studies was to characterize the molecular pharmacology of the prostanoid receptors positively coupled to stimulation of adenylyl cyclase activity in immortalized human trabecular meshwork (TM-3) cells and to compare these results with that of the receptors in immortalized human nonpigmented epithelial (NPE) cells. In general, the TM-3 and NPE cells showed a similar profile with respect to their responses to various prostaglandin (PG) receptor agonists. The rank order of potency (EC50; means +/- SEM) for these compounds in the TM-3 cells was: PGE2 (124 +/- 21 nM) > 13,14-dihydro-PGE1 (430 +/- 110 nM) = PGE1 (522 +/- 345 nM) > 11-deoxy-PGE1 (1063 +/- 118 nM) = 16,16-dimethyl-PGE2 (1776 +/- 460 nM) = butaprost (1920 +/- 527 nM) >> PGD2 = PGI2 = PGF2alpha (n = 3 - 12). While the agonist profile indicated the presence of EP2 receptors, the effects of the EP4 receptor antagonists suggested the additional expression of EP4 receptors in both of these cells. Thus, the EP4 receptor antagonist, AH23848B, at a concentration of 30 microM, caused a dextral shift in the PGE2 concentration-response curves in both TM-3 and NPE cells coupled with a 20-28% decrease in the maximal response of PGE2, indicating apparent noncompetitive antagonism profiles. The antagonist potency of AH23848B in these cells was: Kb = 38.4 +/- 14.8 microM and 23.5 +/- 4.5 microM; -log Kb = 4.7. The other EP4 receptor antagonist, AH22921 (-log Kb = 4.1 - 4.7), was weaker than AH23848B. Taken together, these pharmacological studies have shown than TM-3 and NPE cells apparently contain functional EP2 and EP4 prostanoid receptors positively coupled to adenylyl cyclase.

AL-3138 antagonizes FP prostanoid receptor-mediated inositol phosphates generation: comparison with some purported FP antagonists

The aim of this study was to pharmacologically characterize the antagonist properties of a novel prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2alpha) analogue (11-deoxy-16-fluoro PGF2alpha; AL-3138) using a variety of second-messenger assays of prostaglandin receptor subtypes. A detailed comparison was made between AL-3138 and some purported FP receptor antagonists such as PGF2alpha dimethylamine, PGF2alpha dimethylamide, glibenclamide and phloretin using the FP receptor-mediated phosphoinositide turnover assay in A7r5 rat thoracic aorta smooth muscle cells and mouse Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts. The potency and efficacy of AL-3138 as an FP receptor agonist were: EC50 = 72.2 +/- 17.9 nM (Emax = 37%) (n = 3) in A7r5 cells and EC50 = 20.5 +/- 2.8 nM (Emax = 33%) (n = 5) in 3T3 cells. Being a partial agonist, the antagonist potency of AL-3138 against fluprostenol in A7r5 cells was determined to be: Ki = 296 +/- 17 nM (n = 3) and Kb = 182 +/- 44 nM (n = 5) (-log Kb = 6.79 +/- 0.1). AL-3138 exhibited very minimal or no antagonistic effects at EP2, EP4, DP and TP prostaglandin receptors. Both PGF2alpha dimethylamide and PGF2alpha dimethylamine were inactive as FP receptor antagonists, whereas phloretin and glibenclamide were very weak and had -log Kb values of 5.28 +/- 0.09 (n = 3) and 3.58 +/- 0.32 (n = 3), respectively. However, phloretin antagonized functional responses of EP2 and DP prostanoid receptors, and also the V1-vasopressin receptor. AL-3138 competed for [3H]PGF2alpha binding to FP receptors with a relatively high affinity (IC50high = 312 +/- 95 nM) matching its functional antagonist potency. In conclusion, AL-3138 is a more potent and selective FP receptor antagonist than glibenclamide, phloretin, PGF2alpha dimethylamide and PGF2alpha dimethylamine and is therefore a unique and novel pharmacological tool to help characterize FP receptor-mediated functions.

Pharmacology and autoradiography of human DP prostanoid receptors using [(3)H]-BWA868C, a DP receptor-selective antagonist radioligand

1. A potent and highly selective DP prostanoid receptor antagonist radioligand, [(3)H]-cyclohexyl-N-BWA868C (3-benzyl-5-(6-carboxyhexyl)-1-(2-cyclohexyl-2-hydroxyethyl-amino) hydantoin, ([(3)H]-BWA868C)), has been generated for receptor binding and autoradiographic studies. 2. Specific [(3)H]-BWA868C binding to human platelet membranes achieved equilibrium within 60 min at 23 degrees C and constituted up to 95% of the total binding. The association (K(+1)) and dissociation (K(-1)) rate constants of binding were 0.758+/-0.064 min(-1), mmol and 0.0042+/-0.0002 min(-1), respectively, yielding dissociation constants (K(D)s) of 5.66+/-0. 44 nM (n=4). 3. Specific [(3)H]-BWA868C bound to DP receptors with a high affinity (K(D)=1.45+/-0.01 nM, n=3) and to a finite, saturable number of binding sites (B(max)=21.1+/-0.6 nmol g(-1) wet weight). 4. DP receptor class prostanoids (e.g. ZK118182, BW245C, BWA868C, PGD(2)) exhibited high (nanomolar) affinities for [(3)H]-BWA868C binding, while prostanoids selective for EP, FP, IP and TP receptors showed a low (micromolar) affinity. 5. Specific DP receptor binding sites were autoradiographically localized on the ciliary epithelium/process, longitudinal and circular ciliary muscles, retinal choroid and iris in human eye sections using [(3)H]-BWA868C. While [(3)H]-PGD(2) yielded similar quantitative distribution of DP receptors as [(3)H]-BWA868C, the level of non-specific binding observed with [(3)H]-PGD(2) was significantly greater than that observed with [(3)H]-BWA868C. 6. It is concluded that [(3)H]-BWA868C is a high-affinity and very specific DP receptor radioligand capable of selectively labelling the DP receptor. [(3)H]-BWA868C may prove useful for future homogenate-based and autoradiographic studies on the DP receptor.

Pharmacological characterization of [(3)H]-prostaglandin E(2) binding to the cloned human EP(4) prostanoid receptor

Prostaglandin (PG) E(2) (PGE(2)) is a potent prostanoid derived from arachidonic which can interact with EP(1), EP(2), EP(3) and EP(4) prostanoid receptor subtypes. Recombinant human EP(4) receptors expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK-293) cells were evaluated for their binding characteristics using [(3)H]-PGE(2) and a broad panel of natural and synthetic prostanoids in order to define their pharmacological properties. [(3)H]-PGE(2) binding was optimal in 2-[N-Morpholino]ethanesulphonic acid (MES) buffer (pH 6.0) yielding 98+/-0.7% specific binding. The receptor displayed high affinity (K(d)=0.72+/-0.12 nM; n=3) for [(3)H]-PGE(2) and interacted with a saturable number of binding sites (B(max)=6.21+/-0.84 pmol mg(-1) protein). In competition studies, PGE(2) (K(i)=0.75+/-0.03 nM; n=12) and PGE(1) (K(i)=1.45+/-0.24 nM; n=3) displayed high affinities, as did two derivatives of PGE(1), namely 11-deoxy-PGE(1) (K(i)=1.36+/-0.34 nM) and 13,14-dihydro-PGE(1) (K(i)=3.07+/-0.29 nM). Interestingly, synthetic DP receptor-specific agonists such as BW245C (K(i)=64.7+/-1.0 nM; n=3) and ZK118182 (K(i)=425+/-42 nM; n=4), and the purported EP(3) receptor-specific ligand enprostil (K(i)=43.1+/-4.4 nM), also displayed high affinity for the EP(4) receptor. Two known EP(4) receptor antagonists were weak inhibitors of [(3)H]-PGE(2) binding akin to their known functional potencies, thus: AH23848 (K(i)=2690+/-232 nM); AH22921 (K(i)=31,800+/-4090 nM). These studies have provided a detailed pharmacological characterization of the recombinant human EP(4) receptor expressed in HEK-293 cells.

Endogenous EP4 prostaglandin receptors coupled positively to adenylyl cyclase in Chinese hamster ovary cells: pharmacological characterization

The purpose of these studies was to investigate the pharmacology of E-series and selected prostaglandins of other classes on adenylyl cyclase activity in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing an endogenous prostanoid receptor and to compare these responses with those from immortalized human non-pigmented ciliary epithelial (NPE) cells containing the EP2 receptor. 11-deoxy-PGE2 was the most potent of the 16 prostanoid agonists tested for stimulating cAMP formation with a potency (EC50) value of 26 +/- 6 nM in the CHO cells. The endogenous ligand, PGE2, exhibited potencies of 40 +/- 7 nM (n = 24) in the CHO cells and 67 +/- 9 nM (n = 46) in the NPE cells. The EP2 receptor agonist, butaprost, produced an EC50 value of 212 +/- 58 nM (n = 4) in the NPE cells while being inactive (EC50 > 10,000 nM, n = 6) in the CHO cells. The EP4 receptor selective antagonists, AH22921 and AH23848B, at a concentration of 30 microM, caused a 2.2 +/- 0.5 (n = 4) and 8.2 +/- 2.7 (n = 4) fold rightward shift in the PGE2 concentration-response curves in the CHO cells, yielding apparent pKb values of 4.6 +/- 0.6 and 5.3 +/- 0.2 (n = 4), respectively. AH22921 and AH23848B were non-competitive antagonists at the CHO cell EP4 receptor, but did not shift the PGE2 concentration-response curves in the NPE cells containing the EP2 receptor. These studies have characterized the functional prostaglandin receptors in CHO cells pharmacologically and shown them to be consistent with the EP4 subtype.