Safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery in patients with advanced fibrosis

Surgical risk stratification in patients with cirrhosis

Individuals with cirrhosis experience higher morbidity and mortality rates than the general population, irrespective of the type or scope of surgery. This increased risk is attributed to adverse effects of liver disease, encompassing coagulation dysfunction, altered metabolism of anesthesia and sedatives, immunologic dysfunction, hemorrhage related to varices, malnutrition and frailty, impaired wound healing, as well as diminished portal blood flow, overall hepatic circulation, and hepatic oxygen supply during surgical procedures. Therefore, a frequent clinical dilemma is whether surgical interventions should be pursued in patients with cirrhosis. Several risk scores are widely used to aid in the decision-making process, each with specific advantages and limitations. This review aims to discuss the preoperative risk factors in patients with cirrhosis, describe and compare surgical risk assessment models used in everyday practice, provide insights into the surgical risk according to the type of surgery and present recommendations for optimizing those with cirrhosis for surgical procedures. As the primary focus is on currently available risk models, the review describes the predictive value of each model, highlighting its specific advantages and limitations. Furthermore, for models that do not account for the type of surgical procedure to be performed, the review suggests incorporating both patient-related and surgery-related risks into the decision-making process. Finally, we provide an algorithm for the preoperative assessment of patients with cirrhosis before elective surgery as well as guidance perioperative management.

Safety outcomes of bariatric surgery in patients with advanced organ disease: the ONWARD study: a prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Increasing numbers of patients with advanced organ disease are being considered for bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS). There is no prospective study on the safety of BMS in these patients. This study aimed to capture outcomes for patients with advanced cardiac, renal, or liver disease undergoing BMS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a multinational, prospective cohort study on the safety of elective BMS in adults (≥18 years) with advanced disease of the heart, liver, or kidney.

RESULTS

Data on 177 patients with advanced diseases of heart, liver, or kidney were submitted by 75 centres in 33 countries. Mean age and BMI was 48.56±11.23 years and 45.55±7.35 kg/m 2 , respectively. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy was performed in 124 patients (70%). The 30-day morbidity and mortality were 15.9% ( n =28) and 1.1% ( n =2), respectively. Thirty-day morbidity was 16.4%, 11.7%, 20.5%, and 50.0% in patients with advanced heart ( n =11/61), liver ( n =8/68), kidney ( n =9/44), and multi-organ disease ( n =2/4), respectively. Cardiac patients with left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal to 35% and New York Heart Association classification 3 or 4, liver patients with model for end-stage liver disease score greater than or equal to 12, and patients with advanced renal disease not on dialysis were at increased risk of complications. Comparison with a propensity score-matched cohort found advanced disease of the heart, liver, or kidney to be significantly associated with higher 30-day morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Patients with advanced organ disease are at increased risk of 30-day morbidity following BMS. This prospective study quantifies that risk and identifies patients at the highest risk.

PRO: Should patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis fibrosis undergo bariatric surgery as primary treatment?

Content available: Audio Recording.

American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Primary Care and Endocrinology Clinical Settings: Co-Sponsored by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD)

OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) to endocrinologists, primary care clinicians, health care professionals, and other stakeholders.

METHODS

The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology conducted literature searches for relevant articles published from January 1, 2010, to November 15, 2021. A task force of medical experts developed evidence-based guideline recommendations based on a review of clinical evidence, expertise, and informal consensus, according to established American Association of Clinical Endocrinology protocol for guideline development.

RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

This guideline includes 34 evidence-based clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and management of persons with NAFLD and/or NASH and contains 385 citations that inform the evidence base.

CONCLUSION

NAFLD is a major public health problem that will only worsen in the future, as it is closely linked to the epidemics of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Given this link, endocrinologists and primary care physicians are in an ideal position to identify persons at risk on to prevent the development of cirrhosis and comorbidities. While no U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved medications to treat NAFLD are currently available, management can include lifestyle changes that promote an energy deficit leading to weight loss; consideration of weight loss medications, particularly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists; and bariatric surgery, for persons who have obesity, as well as some diabetes medications, such as pioglitazone and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, for those with type 2 diabetes mellitus and NASH. Management should also promote cardiometabolic health and reduce the increased cardiovascular risk associated with this complex disease.

The metabolic and liver-related outcomes of bariatric surgery in adult patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease at high risk of liver fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become the most common cause of chronic liver disease, with a prevalence estimated to between 20% and 30% of the general population and approximately 70% of stage 2 obese people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with normal liver enzymes.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the metabolic and liver-related outcomes of bariatric surgery among patients with insulin-treated T2D and NAFLD who are at high risk of liver fibrosis.

SETTING

More than 600 locations within the United Kingdom.

METHODS

The study comprises a retrospective cohort comparison of patients with NAFLD and a fibrosis 4 (Fib-4) score > 1.45 who received a bariatric intervention versus comparable patients who received no bariatric intervention. Metabolic outcomes (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1C] level, weight, body mass index [BMI], and Fib-4 score) and composite liver-related outcomes (cirrhosis, portal hypertension, liver failure, and hepatoma) were compared between groups over a period of 5 years. The outcomes were adjusted for baseline and time-varying covariates.

RESULTS

The study sample included 4108 patients, 45 of whom underwent bariatric surgery. The mean age at baseline was 62.4 ± 12.4 years; 43.8% of patients were female; the mean weight was 89.5 ± 20.8 kg; the mean BMI was 31.7 ± 7.6 kg/m²; and the mean HbA1C level was 68.4 ± 16.7 mmol/mol. In addition, the median Fib-4 score was 2.3 (interquartile range, 1.7-4.2). During the 5 years during which follow-up outcomes were recorded, the weight and BMI reductions were significantly lowered compared with baseline in the bariatric surgery group. Similarly, the HbA1C levels were lower in the bariatric surgery group, with statistically significant differences observed in the first and second postintervention years (bariatric surgery versus non-bariatric surgery patient levels at 1 year, 63.1 mmol/mol versus 68.1 mmol/mol, respectively [P = .042], and at 2 years, 62.7 mmol/mol versus 68.1 mmol/mol, respectively [P = .028]). No significant difference was observed between groups in the proportion of patients with liver fibrosis or the likelihood of developing composite liver disease during the follow-up period (bariatric surgery group, 8.9%; non-bariatric surgery group, 4.7%; X² = 1.75; P = .18).

CONCLUSION

Bariatric surgery amongst patients with insulin-treated T2D with NAFLD who were at high risk of liver fibrosis was associated with significant improvements in metabolic outcomes. No significant adverse effects were observed with regards to liver-related outcomes.

Improving Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery in Patients With Cirrhosis in the United States: A Nationwide Assessment

INTRODUCTION

With increasing burden of obesity and liver disease in the United States, a better understanding of bariatric surgery in context of cirrhosis is needed. We described trends of hospital-based outcomes of bariatric surgery among cirrhotics and determined effect of volume status and type of surgery on these outcomes.

METHODS

In this population-based study, admissions for bariatric surgery were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample using International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes from 2004 to 2016 and grouped by cirrhosis status, type of bariatric surgery, and center volume. In-hospital mortality, complications, and their trends were compared between these groups using weighted counts, odds ratios [ORs], and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 1,679,828 admissions for bariatric surgery, 9,802 (0.58%) had cirrhosis. Cirrhosis admissions were more likely to be in white men, had higher Elixhauser Index, and higher in-hospital complications rates including death (1.81% vs 0.17%), acute kidney injury (4.5% vs 1.2%), bleeding (2.9% vs 1.1%), and operative complications (2% vs 0.6%) (P < 0.001 for all) compared to those without cirrhosis. Overtime, restrictive surgeries have grown in number (12%-71%) and complications rates have trended down in both groups. Cirrhotics undergoing bariatric surgery at low-volume centers (<50 procedures per year) and nonrestrictive surgery had a higher inpatient mortality rate (adjusted OR 4.50, 95% confidence interval 3.14-6.45, adjusted OR 4.00, 95% confidence interval 2.68-5.97, respectively).

DISCUSSION

Contemporary data indicate that among admissions for bariatric surgery, there is a shift to restrictive-type surgeries with an improvement in-hospital complications and mortality. However, patients with cirrhosis especially those at low-volume centers have significantly higher risk of worse outcomes (see Visual abstract, Supplementary Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/AJG/B648).

Obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: From pathophysiology to therapeutics

The obesity epidemic is closely associated with the rising prevalence and severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): obesity has been linked not only with simple steatosis (SS), but also with advanced disease, i.e., nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), NASH-related cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. As a consequence, apart from increasing all-cause mortality, obesity seems to increase liver-specific mortality in NAFLD patients. Given the lack of approved pharmacological interventions for NAFLD, targeting obesity is a rational option for its management. As the first step, lifestyle modification (diet and exercise) is recommended, although it is difficult to achieve and sustain. When the first step fails, adding pharmacotherapy is recommended. Several anti-obesity medications have been investigated in NAFLD (e.g., orlistat, glucagon-like peptide-1 analogs), other anti-obesity medications have not been investigated (e.g., lorcaserin, phentermine hydrochloric, phentermine/topiramate and naltrexone/bupropion), whereas some medications with weight-lowering efficacy have not been approved for obesity (e.g., sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, farnesoid X receptor ligands). If the combination of lifestyle modification and pharmacotherapy also fails, then bariatric surgery should be considered in selected morbidly obese individuals. This review summarizes best evidence linking obesity with NAFLD and presents related therapeutic options.

Childhood and Adolescent Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Is It Different from Adults?

Paediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease in childhood and adolescence. Although the condition is similar in many ways to NAFLD in adults, there are important differences in predisposition, presentation, differential diagnosis and potentially also in optimal management. Antenatal and early childhood exposures and the particular vulnerabilities to environmental influences in a growing child, present unique opportunities for intervention and modification of risk. The prevalence of significant fibrosis on biopsy in preadolescent children in the context of NAFLD should not be ignored, but the relevance of this fibrosis to long-term outcome is as yet unknown. The approach to children and adolescents with suspected NAFLD needs to include an assessment of risk factors in addition to exclusion of alternative or coexisting liver diseases. Liver biopsy is indicated for younger children and for those without clear predisposing factors leading to metabolic syndrome, also for those in whom significant fibrosis is suspected. The histology in children and adolescents differs from adults in whom type 2 NAFLD may be more prevalent, which is associated in turn with more significant fibrosis. Management in children and adolescents needs to focus on lifestyle intervention, which when weight loss is achieved, demonstrates excellent results in terms of resolution of disease. Appropriate intervention in childhood and adolescence may prove instrumental in avoiding the need for later transplantation while also decreasing all-cause mortality in these at-risk individuals.

Considerations for bariatric surgery in patients with cirrhosis

With the ever increasing global obesity pandemic, clinical burden from obesity related complications are anticipated in parallel. Bariatric surgery, a treatment approved for weight loss in morbidly obese patients, has reported to be associated with good outcomes, such as reversal of type two diabetes mellitus and reducing all-cause mortality on a long term basis. However, complications from bariatric surgery have similarly been reported. In particular, with the onslaught of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) epidemic, in associated with obesity and metabolic syndrome, there is increasing prevalence of NAFLD related liver cirrhosis, which potentially connotes more risk of specific complications for surgery. Bariatric surgeons may encounter, either expectedly or unexpectedly, patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and NASH related cirrhosis more frequently. As such, the issues and considerations surrounding their medical care/surgery warrant careful deliberation to ensure the best outcomes. These considerations include severity of cirrhosis, liver synthetic function, portal hypertension and the impact of surgical factors. This review explores these considerations comprehensively and emphasizes the best approach to managing cirrhotic patients in the context of bariatric surgery.

Comparison of Early Morbidity and Mortality Between Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass in High-Risk Patients for Liver Disease: Analysis of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

INTRODUCTION

Chronic liver disease is prevalent in obese patients presenting for bariatric surgery and is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality (M&M). There are no comparative studies on the safety of different types of bariatric operations in this subset of patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to compare the 30-day postoperative M&M between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-Y-gastric bypass (LRYGB) in the subset of patients with a model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score ≥ 8.

METHODS

Data for LSG and LRYGB were extracted from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database from years 2012 and 2013. MELD score was calculated using serum creatinine, bilirubin, INR, and sodium. Postoperative M&M were assessed in patients with a score ≥ 8 and compared for the type of operation. This was followed by analysis for MELD subcategories. Multiple logistic regression was performed to adjust for confounders.

RESULTS

Out of 34,169, 9.8% of cases had MELD ≥ 8 and were included. Primary endpoint, 30-day M&M, was significantly lower post-LSG (9.5%) compared to LRYGB (14.7%); [AOR = 0.66(0.53, 0.83)]. Superficial wound infection, prolonged hospital stay, and unplanned readmission were more common in LRYGB. M&M post-LRYGB (30.6%) was significantly higher than LSG (15.7%) among MELD15-19 subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSION

LRYGB is associated with a higher postoperative risk than LSG in patients with MELD ≥ 8. The difference in postoperative complications between procedures was magnified with higher MELD. This suggests that LSG might be a safer option in morbidly obese patients with higher MELD scores, especially above 15.