HER2-low-positive breast cancer: evolution from primary tumor to residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment

The intricate dance of tumor evolution: Exploring immune escape, tumor migration, drug resistance, and treatment strategies

Recent research has unveiled fascinating insights into the intricate mechanisms governing tumor evolution. These studies have illuminated how tumors adapt and proliferate by exploiting various factors, including immune evasion, resistance to therapeutic drugs, genetic mutations, and their ability to adapt to different environments. Furthermore, investigations into tumor heterogeneity and chromosomal aberrations have revealed the profound complexity that underlies the evolution of cancer. Emerging findings have also underscored the role of viral influences in the development and progression of cancer, introducing an additional layer of complexity to the field of oncology. Tumor evolution is a dynamic and complex process influenced by various factors, including immune evasion, drug resistance, tumor heterogeneity, and viral influences. Understanding these elements is indispensable for developing more effective treatments and advancing cancer therapies. A holistic approach to studying and addressing tumor evolution is crucial in the ongoing battle against cancer. The main goal of this comprehensive review is to explore the intricate relationship between tumor evolution and critical aspects of cancer biology. By delving into this complex interplay, we aim to provide a profound understanding of how tumors evolve, adapt, and respond to treatment strategies. This review underscores the pivotal importance of comprehending tumor evolution in shaping effective approaches to cancer treatment.

Evolution of HER2 expression between pre-treatment biopsy and residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

We have previously found that HER2 expression is dynamic, and can change from the primary breast tumor to matched recurrences. With this work, we aimed to assess the dynamics of HER2 during neoadjuvant treatment.(NAT).

METHODS

We reviewed HER2 expression in pre- and post-treatment samples from consecutive patients with early-stage breast cancer that received NAT and underwent surgery at Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center between 01/2016-08/2022. The primary outcome was evolution of HER2 expression from pre- to post-NAT specimens in patients with residual disease.

RESULTS

Among 1613 patients receiving NAT, 1080 had residual disease at surgery. A total of 319 patients (29.5%) experienced a change in HER2 expression (HER2 0 vs. HER2-low vs. HER2-positive) from the pre-treatment sample to residual disease, with roughly equal distribution between decreased (50.5%) and increased HER2 expression (49.5%). Similar rates of change in HER2 expression were observed with anthracycline-based (31.8%) or taxane/platinum-based regimens (32.4%). Patients with HER2-0 or HER2-low tumors at diagnosis were likelier to experience a change in HER2 expression post-NAT compared to HER2-positive (32.3% vs. 21.3%, p < 0.001). Changes in HER2 expression post-NAT were prognostic among patients with HER2-positive tumors at diagnosis (3-year recurrence-free survival for change vs. no change: 71.6% vs. 89.6%, p = 0.006) but not among those with HER2-negative tumors at diagnosis (3-year recurrence-free survival for change vs. no change: 79.3% vs. 81.1%, p = 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 30% of patients with early-stage breast cancer showed a change in HER2 expression after NAT. Changes in HER2 expression post-NAT were only prognostic in the setting of HER2-positive tumors becoming HER2-negative at surgery.

Do HER2-Low Tumors Have a Distinct Clinicopathologic Phenotype?

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer subtypes, distinguished by hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status, have different clinicopathologic features. With recognition of the clinical relevance of HER2-low, there is debate as to whether this is a distinct subtype. Our study aimed to determine whether HER2-low breast cancers have specific clinicopathologic features that differ from those of HER2-negative and HER2-positive cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 11,072 patients undergoing upfront surgery from 1998 to 2010 were identified from a single-institution prospectively maintained database. HER2 status was classified by immunohistochemistry (IHC)/fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as HER2 negative (41.2%), HER2 low (45%; IHC 1+ or 2+ with negative FISH), and HER2 positive (13.7%), and stratified by HR status. Univariate (UVA) and multivariable multinomial logistic regression analysis (MVA) were performed to determine associations among variables and subtypes.

RESULTS

Compared with HER2-negative tumors, HER2 low was associated with lymphovascular invasion [odds ratio (OR) 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-1.36; p = 0.003], multifocality (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.12-1.42; p < 0.001), nodal micrometastasis (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.31; p = 0.024), and lower rates of ≥ 3 positive nodes (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.90, p = 0.001). When stratified by HR expression, in both HR-positive and HR-negative tumors, age and multifocality were associated with HER2 low on UVA. On MVA, no variables were independently associated with both HR-negative and HR-positive/HER2-low tumors compared with HER2-negative tumors. In contrast, HER2-positive tumors, regardless of HR status, were associated with multifocality and an extensive intraductal component.

CONCLUSION

Clinicopathologic features of HER2-low tumors appear to be primarily related to HR status. Our findings do not support the characterization of HER2 low as a separate subtype.

Effect of HER2-low expression on neoadjuvant efficacy in operable breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of HER2-low expression (HER2-low) and HER2-zero expression (HER2-0) on the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and survival of patients following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients were followed up. Patients were divided into HER2-0 (immunohistochemistry (IHC) score of 0 (IHC0)) and HER2-low (IHC1+ or IHC2+/in situ hybridization non-amplified (ISH-)) groups according to the IHC detection of puncture tissues. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the clinical characteristics, pCR rate and DFS were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were 24 (27.9%) cases with HER2-0 and 62 (72.1%) cases with HER2-low. Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) patients accounted for 77.4% of the HER2-low group, which was higher than 70.8% in the HER2-0 group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.524). There were statistical differences in the pT and pN stages between HER2-low and HER2-0 subgroups in the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) group after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The HER2-low subgroup had an earlier T stage (p = 0.009), and the ratio of N0 to N1 in the HER2-low and HER2-0 subgroups was 92.9% and 71.4%, respectively (p = 0.037). The Ki-67 index and median PR value were significantly lower in the HER2-low group after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.002, p = 0.018). The HER2 IHC score was altered in the HER2-low group, and the HER-2 (2+) score changed significantly (p = 0.002). Seventy-eight patients with complete immunohistochemical data were analyzed. The discordance rate of the IHC score of HER2 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 38.5%, and eight patients with HER2-low showed HER2-0 status, with a discordance rate of 10.3%. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, The pCR rate was significantly lower in the HER2-low group compared with that in the HER2-0 group (4.8% vs. 8.3%; p = 0.914), but the recurrence and metastasis rates were lower in the HER2-low group (9.7% vs. 20.8%; p = 0.165). There were no differences in DFS between the two groups at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months (p = 0.076; p = 0.518; p = 0.245; p = 0.406). The subgroup analysis demonstrated no significant difference in DFS between HER2-low and HER2-0 subgroups in the HR + and TNBC groups (p = 0.141, p = 0.637).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study indicates that HER2-low has no significant effect on neoadjuvant efficacy in operable breast cancer. There were no statistical differences in clinical characteristics, pCR rate, and DFS between the HER2-low and the HER2-0 groups. There was no evidence that a HER2-low status constitutes a unique biological subtype, suggesting that more clinical data might be needed to verify these observations.

Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Low Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: An Opportunity for Targeted Systemic Therapies in a High-Need Patient Population

PURPOSE

Trastuzumab deruxtecan is a new treatment option for patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer (BC). Although HER2-low status has been characterized in early and advanced BC, it has yet to be fully characterized in brain metastases (BrM).

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery for BC BrM at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and for whom HER2 status was available on resected BrM were studied. Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status were assessed on the basis of ASCO/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines. HER2-zero was defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 0; HER2-low was defined as IHC 1+ or IHC 2+ with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-negative status. HER2-positive (HER2+) was defined as IHC 3+ or IHC 2+ with positive FISH. Clinicopathologic features were recorded. We also assessed the prognostic association between extent of HER2 expression and (1) brain-specific progression-free survival (bsPFS), as well as (2) overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

In this retrospective cohort of 102 patients with resected BC BrM, 53% (n = 54) were HER2+, 29.4% (n = 30) were HER2-low, and 17.6% (n = 18) had HER2-zero status. Among BrM that were triple-negative on the basis of ASCO/CAP guidelines, 63.6% (n = 14/22) were reclassified as being HER2-low. Sixty percent (n = 15/25) of BrM that were hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) were reclassified as being HER2-low. In total, 51 patients had matched primary breast and BrM tissue available; results of HER2 status when categorized as HER2-zero, HER2-low, and HER2+ were concordant in 82.3% (n = 42/51) of cases (Cohen's kappa, 0.58; P = .07). There was no significant association between HER2-zero, HER2-low, and HER2+ status in BrM and either bsPFS or OS.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with surgically resected BrM, a high proportion of those with metastatic triple-negative BC and HR+/HER2- disease have HER2-low BrM with potential to benefit from HER2-targeted therapy.

The Clinicopathological and Prognostic Significance of HER2-Low Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis Between HER2-Low and HER2-Zero Subtypes

BACKGROUND

HER2-low breast cancer (BC) is a newly defined subset of HER2-negative BC. However, it is still uncertain whether HER2-low BC can be categorized as a distinct biological/clinical subgroup with any prognostic significance.

METHODS

Invasive BC cases (n = 10,215) with Stage I-III were retrospectively analyzed to determine the HER2 status. The HER2 status was then divided into 3 groups: HER2-0, HER2-low, and HER2-positive.

RESULTS

The HER2 status was classified as HER2-0 in 1,227 cases (12.0%), HER2-low in 7,209 cases (70.6%), and HER2-positive in 1779 cases (17.4%). HER2-low cases had more positive nodes and were significantly associated with positive ER/PgR, lower nuclear grade, and lower Ki-67 index. HER2-0 had the lowest OS rate in the primary cases and after recurrence. HER2-0 in the node positive group had the lowest OS and was significantly different from HER2-low in the same group. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate for NAC was lowest in the HER2-low group. The DFS after NAC was significantly better in all the pCR cases, regardless of the HER2 status. However, the DFS was significantly lower in the HER2-low non-pCR cases.

CONCLUSION

HER2-low accounted for 70% of the cases and correlated with favorable biological markers. The HER2-low group had a significantly better OS than the HER2-0 group. However, the response to NAC was low in the HER2-low group, and this group had the poorest prognosis among all the non-pCR cases. These findings indicate that HER2-low may have a different biology and prognosis and therefore should be classified as a new entity.

Discrimination between HER2-overexpressing, -low-expressing, and -zero-expressing statuses in breast cancer using multiparametric MRI-based radiomics

OBJECTIVES

To explore the performance of multiparametric MRI-based radiomics in discriminating different human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expressing statuses (i.e., HER2-overexpressing, HER2-low-expressing, and HER2-zero-expressing) in breast cancer.

METHODS

A total of 771 breast cancer patients from two institutions were retrospectively studied. Five-hundred-eighty-one patients from Institution I were divided into a training dataset (n1 = 407) and an independent validation dataset (n1 = 174); 190 patients from Institution II formed the external validation dataset. All patients were categorized into HER2-overexpressing, HER2-low-expressing, and HER2-zero-expressing groups based on pathologic examination. Multiparametric (including T2-weighted imaging with fat suppression [T2WI-FS], diffusion-weighted imaging [DWI], apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC], and dynamic contrast-enhanced [DCE]) MRI-based radiomics features were extracted and then selected from the training dataset using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Three predictive models to discriminate HER2-overexpressing vs. others, HER2-low expressing vs. others, and HER2-zero-expressing vs. others were developed based on the selected features. The model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Eleven radiomics features from DWI, ADC, and DCE; one radiomics feature from DWI; and 17 radiomics features from DWI, ADC, and DCE were selected to build three predictive models, respectively. In training, independent validation, and external validation datasets, radiomics models achieved AUCs of 0.809, 0.737, and 0.725 in differentiating HER2-overexpressing from others; 0.779, 0.778, and 0.782 in differentiating HER2-low-expressing from others; and 0.889, 0.867, and 0.813 in differentiating HER2-zero-expressing from others, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics model may preoperatively predict HER2 statuses in breast cancer patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The MRI-based radiomics models could be used to noninvasively identify the new three-classification of HER2 expressing status in breast cancer, which is helpful to the decision-making for HER2-target therapies.

KEY POINTS

• Detecting HER2-overexpressing, HER2-low-expressing, and HER2-zero-expressing status in breast cancer patients is crucial for determining candidates for anti-HER2 therapy. • Radiomics features from multiparametric MRI significantly differed among HER2-overexpressing, HER2-low expressing, and HER2-zero-expressing breast cancers. • Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics could preoperatively evaluate three different HER2-expressing statuses and help to determine potential candidates for anti-HER2 therapy in breast cancer patients.

Clinicopathological characteristics and value of HER2-low expression evolution in breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics and value of HER2-low expression evolution in breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

METHODS

Patients with HER2 negative breast cancer receiving NAC from January 2017 to December 2020 were enrolled in this study. The clinicopathological characteristics, response to NAC, evolution of HER2 and prognostic value were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

410 patients were included. The proportion of HR positive disease in HER2-low cases was higher than in HER2-zero population (75.8 % vs. 65.8 %, P = 0.040). No statistical significant difference in pCR rate was observed between HER2-low and HER2-zero patients (33.8 % vs. 39.3 %, P = 0.290) when pCR was defined as ypTis/0ypN0. Exploratory analysis revealed that the pCR rate of HER2-low cases was significantly lower than HER2-zero patients in the entire population (19.8 % vs. 33.3 %, P = 0.004) and HR positive population (12.6 % vs. 29.9 %, P = 0.001) when pCR was defined as ypT0ypN0. The evolution rate of HER2 expression after NAC was 31.0 % in HER2-zero patients and 24.7 % in HER2-low patients. Compared with patients with HR positive disease, patients with TNBC had higher evolution rate of HER2 expression after NAC (37.7 % vs. 23.6 %). Significant association was observed between HER2 evolution with histology type and Ki-67 index in HER2-zero patients and with lymph node involvement, HR status and Ki-67 index in HER2-low patients. Prognostic impact of HER2 evolution was not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

HR positive and HR negative HER2-low breast cancer exhibit different clinicopathological features, response to NAC and HER2 evolution after treatment.

HER2 categorical changes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A study of 192 matched breast cancers with the inclusion of HER2-Low category

Understanding the changes of HER2 expression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer (BC) is more important than ever, since it may allow more patients to access the effective therapeutic drugs targeting HER2-low BC. 192 matched pre- and post-NAC BCs were analyzed. HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) was re-evaluated with consensus according to the current ASCO/CAP guidelines. Tumors were categorized into HER2-0 (IHC0+), HER2-low (IHC1+ or IHC2+/ISH-) and HER2-positive (IHC3+ or IHC2+/ISH+) subgroups. 55 (28.6 %) patients achieved pathologic complete response (pCR). HER2-low BC accounted for 75/192 (39.1 %) baseline tumors, and 48/133 (36.1 %) residual tumors. In the non-pCR cohort, 53 (39.9 %) patients had HER2 categorical change after NAC, most commonly converting from HER2-low to HER2-0 (20.3 %, n = 27). Among patients with residual tumor, 25.6 % (11/43) of patients with baseline HER2-0 expression experienced a categorical change to HER2-low after NAC, significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the hormone receptor (HR) positive (9/23, 39.1 %) compared to the HR negative tumors (10 %, 2/20). Exploratory analysis failed to reveal a statistically significant difference in disease free survival and overall survival in non-pCR patients with or without HER2 change. Our results suggest that a substantial number of patients may experience HER2 categorical change after NAC, supporting re-testing of HER2 status in post-NAC residual tumors. Retesting HER2 status may be particularly important for evaluating post-NAC HER2-low status, in order to better assess which patients will more likely benefit from therapeutic drugs targeting HER2-low BC.

Characterisation of luminal and triple-negative breast cancer with HER2 Low protein expression

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer (BC) expressing low levels of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2 Low) is an emerging category that needs further refining. This study aims to provide a comprehensive clinico-pathological and molecular profile of HER2 Low BC including response to therapy and patient outcome in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings.

METHODS

Two different independent and well-characterised BC cohorts were included. Nottingham cohort (A) (n = 5744) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) BC cohort (B) (n = 854). The clinical, molecular, biological and immunological profile of HER2 Low BC was investigated. Transcriptomic and pathway enrichment analyses were performed on the TCGA BC cohort and validated through next-generation sequencing in a subset of Nottingham cases.

RESULTS

Ninety percent of HER2 Low tumours were hormone receptor (HR) positive (HR+), enriched with luminal intrinsic molecular subtype, lacking significant expression of HER2 oncogenic signalling genes and of favourable clinical behaviour compared to HER2 negative (HER2-) BC. In HR+ BC, no significant prognostic differences were detected between HER2 Low and HER2- tumours. However, in HR- BC, HER2 Low tumours were less aggressive with longer patient survival. Transcriptomic data showed that the majority of HR- /HER2 Low tumours were of luminal androgen receptor (LAR) intrinsic subtype, enriched with T-helper lymphocytes, activated dendritic cells and tumour associated neutrophils, while most HR-/HER2- tumours were basal-like, enriched with tumour associated macrophages.

CONCLUSION

HER2 Low BC is mainly driven by HR signalling in HR+ tumours. HR-/HER2 Low tumours tend to be enriched with LAR genes with a unique immune profile.

Pathological complete response rate and clinical outcome after neoadjuvant therapy of HER2-low breast cancer: A National Cancer Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

The interest in breast cancer with low HER2 expression as a distinct subtype is increasing. We aimed to explore the differences between HER2-low and HER2-zero breast cancer in their prognosis and rate of pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to select patients with breast cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy from 2004 to 2017. Logistic regression model was constructed for analysis of pCR. Cox proportional hazards regression model and Kaplan-Meier method were used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 41500 breast cancer patients were included, among which 14814 (35.7%) had HER2-zero tumors and 26686 (64.3%) had HER2-low. HER2-low tumors were more commonly HR-positive in comparison with HER2-zero (66.3% versus 47.1%, P < 0.001). A lower rate of pCR was observed in HER2-low tumors than in HER2-zero tumors after neoadjuvant therapy in the total cohort (OR = 0.90; 95% CI [0.86-0.95]; P < 0.001) and in the subset of HR-positive (OR = 0.87; 95% CI [0.81-0.94]; P < 0.001). Patients with HER2-low tumors had a significantly superior survival than those with HER2-zero tumors (HR = 0.90; 95% CI [0.86-0.94]; P < 0.001), regardless of the HR status. Additionally, a marginal survival difference was also observed between HER2 IHC1+ and HER2 IHC2+/ISH-negative (HR = 0.91; 95% CI [0.85-0.97]; P = 0.003) cohorts.

CONCLUSION

HER2-low tumors are a clinically relevant breast cancer subtype that is distinct from HER2-zero tumors. These findings may provide clues to appropriate therapeutic strategies for this subtype in the future.

Clinicopathological characteristics, evolution, treatment pattern and outcomes of hormone-receptor-positive/HER2-low metastatic breast cancer

Objective

Despite the promising efficacy of the novel antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan in treating Hormone Receptor (HoR)-positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-low metastatic breast cancer (MBC), its categorization as a distinct entity remains disputed, as does the divergence in its endocrine and chemotherapy outcomes. This study aimed to elucidate the clinical characteristics, primary/metastatic lesion HER2 expression, and treatment outcomes of HoR-positive/HER2-low patients.

Methods

We included HoR-positive/HER2-negative MBC patients who underwent 1st and 2nd line endocrine treatment from July 2010 to October 2022 at the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, comparing the clinical pathological characteristics, HER2 expression in primary/metastatic lesions, treatment, and therapeutic effects of the HER2-low and HER2-zero groups.

Results

Among the 458 HoR-positive/HER2-negative MBC patients, 54.37% (249/458) were HER2-low. The HER2-low group and the HER2-zero group had similar clinical pathological characteristics and similar progression-free survival (PFS) of 1st and 2nd line endocrine treatment (median PFS: 8.05 months vs 10.12 months, p=0.114, HR 1.257, 95% CI 0.771 to 1.028). The PFS of the HER2-low and HER2-zero groups was also similar, treated with different endocrine drugs (including aromatase inhibitors, tamoxifen/toremifene, fulvestrant, palbociclib, and everolimus). However, the HER2-low group had significantly shorter PFS during 1st and 2nd line chemotherapy compared to the HER2-zero group (median PFS: 8.64 vs 9.03 months, p=0.027, HR 0.841, 95% CI 0.721-0.980). Additionally, 41.18% (63/153) of patients exhibited a change in HER2 expression between primary and metastatic lesions. Notably, patients whose HER2 status changed from zero to low expression had significantly prolonged PFS during chemotherapy compared to those who maintained low HER2 expression (median PFS: 14.29 vs 11.27 months, p=0.048, HR 0.597, 95% CI 0.358-0.996).

Conclusion

In HoR-positive MBC, patients with low and zero HER2 expression have similar clinical characteristics and respond similarly to endocrine treatment, but the chemotherapy effect is worse in the HER2-low patients. Moreover, the transformation of HER2 status from primary to metastatic lesions may have potential influence on chemotherapy outcomes. Therefore, the expression and heterogeneity of HER2 should be considered in clinical decisions.

The trichotomy of HER2 expression confers new insights into the understanding and managing for breast cancer stratified by HER2 status

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a tyrosine kinase receptor that plays a carcinogenic role in breast cancer (BC) through gene amplification, mutation, or overexpression. Traditional methods of HER2 detection were divided into positive (immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+/fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) amplification) and negative (IHC 2+/FISH-, IHC 1+, IHC 0) according to the dichotomy method. Anti-HER2-targeted therapies, such as trastuzumab and pertuzumab, have significantly improved the prognosis of HER2-positive patients. However, up to 75% to 85% of patients remain HER2-negative. In recent years, with the rapid development of molecular biology, gene detection technology, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, researchers have actively explored the clinicopathological characteristics, molecular biological characteristics, treatment methods, and HER2 detection methods of HER2-low/zero breast cancer. With the clinical efficacy of new anti-HER2 targeted drugs, accurate classification of breast cancer is very important for the treatment choice. Therefore, the following review summarizes the necessity of developing HER2 detection methods, and the clinicopathological and drug treatment characteristics of patients with HER2-low/zero, to light the dawn of the treatment of breast cancer patients with HER2-low/zero expression.

Prognostic Value of the Evolution of HER2-Low Expression after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low advanced breast cancer can benefit from trastuzumab deruxtecan. Given the unclear prognostic characteristics of HER2-low breast cancer, we investigated the prognostic characteristics of HER2-low expression from primary tumor to residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data of HER2-negative patients receiving NACT at our center were collected. Pathological complete response (pCR) rate were compared between HER2-0 and HER2-low patients. The evolution of HER2 expression from primary tumor to residual disease and its impact on disease-free survival (DFS) were examined.

RESULTS

Of the 690 patients, 494 patients had HER2-low status, of which 72.3% were hormone receptor (HR)-positive (p < 0.001). The pCR rates of HER2-low and HER2-0 patients (14.2% vs. 23.0%) showed no difference in multivariate analysis regardless of HR status. No association was observed between DFS and HER2 status. Of the 564 non-pCR patients, 57 (10.1%) changed to HER2-positive, and 64 of the 150 patients (42.7%) with HER2-0 tumors changed to HER2-low. HER2-low (p=0.004) and HR-positive (p=0.010) tumors before NACT were prone to HER2 gain. HER2 gain patients had a better DFS compared with HER2-negative maintained patients (87.9% vs. 79.5%, p=0.048), and the DFS of targeted therapy group was better than that of no targeted therapy group (92.4% vs. 66.7%, p=0.016).

CONCLUSION

Although HER2-low did not affect the pCR rate and DFS, significant evolution of HER2-low expression after NACT creates opportunities for targeted therapy including trastuzumab.

HER2 status as a potential predictive biomarker for ovarian clear cell carcinoma

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is a subtype of ovarian carcinoma characterized by unique biological features and highly malignant characteristics including low chemosensitivity. Therefore, new therapeutic targets are needed. These could include the downstream pathways of receptor tyrosine kinases, especially the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Our main objective was to characterize the HER2 status using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and FISH on 118 OCCCs, also considering the novel paradigm of HER2-zero and HER2-low status. Other aims included determination of the association between HER2 status and survival, HER2 gene DNA and RNA NGS analysis, HER2 gene expression analysis, and correlation between IHC and gene expression in HER2-zero and HER2-low cases. Cases with HER2 overexpression/amplification accounted for 5.1% (6/118), with additional 3% harbouring HER2 gene mutation. The remaining 112 (94.9%) cases were HER2-negative. Of these, 75% were classified as HER2-zero and 25% as HER2-low. This percentage of HER2 aberrations is significant concerning their possible therapeutic influence. Cases from the HER2-zero group showed significantly better survival. Although this relationship lost statistical significance in multivariate analysis, the results have potential therapeutic significance. HER2 gene expression analysis showed a significant correlation with HER2 IHC status in the entire cohort (HER2-positive vs. HER2-negative), while in the cohort of only HER2-negative cases, the results did not reach statistical significance, suggesting that gene expression analysis would not be suitable to confirm the subdivision into HER2-low and HER2-zero. Our results also emphasize the need for standardized HER2 testing in OCCC to determine the best predictor of clinical response.

Clinical Guidance on the Monitoring and Management of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd)-Related Adverse Events: Insights from an Asia-Pacific Multidisciplinary Panel

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd)-an antibody-drug conjugate targeting the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-improved outcomes of patients with HER2-positive and HER2-low metastatic breast cancer. Guidance on monitoring and managing T-DXd-related adverse events (AEs) is an emerging unmet need as translating clinical trial experience into real-world practice may be difficult due to practical and cultural considerations and differences in health care infrastructure. Thus, 13 experts including oncologists, pulmonologists and a radiologist from the Asia-Pacific region gathered to provide recommendations for T-DXd-related AE monitoring and management by using the latest evidence from the DESTINY-Breast trials, our own clinical trial experience and loco-regional health care considerations. While subgroup analysis of Asian (excluding Japanese) versus overall population in the DESTINY-Breast03 uncovered no major differences in the AE profile, we concluded that proactive monitoring and management are essential in maximising the benefits with T-DXd. As interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis is a serious AE, patients should undergo regular computed tomography scans, but the frequency may have to account for the median time of ILD/pneumonitis onset and access. Trastuzumab deruxtecan appears to be a highly emetic regimen, and prophylaxis with serotonin receptor antagonists and dexamethasone (with or without neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist) should be considered. Health care professionals should be vigilant for treatable causes of fatigue, and patients should be encouraged to use support groups and practice low-intensity exercises. To increase treatment acceptance, patients should be made aware of alopecia risk prior to starting T-DXd. Detailed monitoring and management recommendations for T-DXd-related AEs are discussed further.

Pathological complete response, category change, and prognostic significance of HER2-low breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant treatment: a multicenter analysis of 2489 cases

BACKGROUND

HER2-low breast cancers (BC) show a good response to novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in advanced setting. Nevertheless, little is known about the response, category change, and prognosis of HER2-low BC receiving neoadjuvant treatment (NAT).

METHODS

Consecutive invasive BC patients who underwent ≥ 4 cycles of NAT and surgery from January 2009 to December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. HER2-low was defined as IHC 1+ or 2+ and FISH negative. Concordance rates of HER2 and other biomarkers were analyzed by Kappa test. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to assess the recurrence-free interval (RFI) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 2489 patients were included, of whom 1023 (41.1%) had HER2-low tumors. HER2-low patients had a higher ER positivity rate than HER2-0 patients (78.5% vs. 63.6%, P < 0.001), and a similar breast pathological complete response (pCR) rate (20.6% vs. 21.8%, P = 0.617). Among non-pCR cases, 39.5% of HER2-0 tumors changed to HER2-low, and 14.3% of HER2-low tumors changed to HER2-0 after NAT. Low concordance rates of HER2-low status were found in both ER-positive (Kappa = 0.368) and ER-negative (Kappa = 0.444) patients. Primary HER2-low patients had a significantly better RFI than HER2-0 patients (P = 0.014), especially among ER-positive subset (P = 0.016). Moreover, HER2-low category change was associated with RFI in ER-positive subset (adjusted P = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with HER2-0 patients, HER2-low patients had a high proportion of ER-positive tumor and a similar pCR rate, which were related with better prognosis, especially in residual cases after NAT. A remarkable instability of HER2-low status was found between the primary and residual tumor, indicating re-testing HER2 status after NAT in the new era of anti-HER2 ADCs therapy.

The dynamics of HER2-low expression during breast cancer progression

PURPOSE

Low HER2 expression is emerging as an actionable target for the treatment of breast cancer (BC) with the antibody drug conjugate Trastuzumab deruxtecan. The aim of the study was to characterize the dynamics of HER2 expression during BC progression.

METHODS

We evaluated the evolution of HER2 expression in 171 paired primary and metastatic BCs (pBCs/mBCs) by including the HER2-low category.

RESULTS

The proportions of HER2-low cases were 25.7% in pBCs and 23.4% in mBCs, respectively, while those of HER2-0 cases were 35.1% and 42.7%, respectively. The overall conversion rate between HER2-0 and HER2-low was 31.7%. HER2-low switching to HER2-0 was more frequent than the reverse (43.2% vs. 23.3%; P = 0.03). Two (3.3%) and 9 (20.5%) cases of pBCs with a HER2-0 and a HER2-low status, respectively, were converted to HER2-positive mBCs. In contrast, 10 (14.9%) HER2-positive pBCs were converted to HER2-0 and an identical number to HER2-low mBCs, respectively, significantly higher than that when compared to the HER2-0 to HER2-positive (P = 0.03), but not HER2-low to HER2-positive conversion. No significant difference was found when comparing the conversion rates among the common organs of relapse. Of the 17 patients with multiorgan metastases, 41.2% had discordance among the different sites of relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2-low BCs constitute a heterogeneous group of tumors. Low HER2 expression is dynamic, with significant discordance between primary tumors and advanced disease as well as the distant sites of relapse. Repeat biomarker studies from advanced disease are warranted in making appropriate treatment plans in the pursuit of precision medicine.

Prognostic implications of HER2 changes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-zero and HER2-low breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The transition of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in HER2-low breast cancer has not been thoroughly evaluated. Here, we evaluated the HER2 transition among HER2-zero and HER2-low breast cancer cases post-NAC and its impact on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We included 1288 patients with HER2-low or zero breast cancer who underwent NAC and surgery between 2014 and 2018 and had paired pre- and post-therapeutic HER2 status results.

RESULTS

Among patients who were HER2-zero pre-NAC (n = 650), 68% and 29% were HER2-zero and HER2-low, respectively, post-NAC. Among patients who were HER2-low pre-NAC (n = 638), 32% of patients showed HER2 changes (low to zero), and 59% of patients had a constant HER2-low status post-NAC. Patients with constant HER2-low or transitions from HER2-low to zero had a higher proportion of hormone receptor positivity (84% and 79%) than those with changes from HER2-zero to low (77%) or with constant HER2-zero (56%), respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that patients with oestrogen receptor positivity had a higher probability of gaining HER2-low expression than those with oestrogen receptor negativity (odds ratio 2.48). No significant differences were observed in terms of overall survival or disease-free survival between patients with and without HER2-changes according to their hormone receptor status, except in the post-therapeutic HER2-low, hormone receptor-negativity subset.

CONCLUSION

Temporal heterogeneity of HER2-low expression is observed in substantial numbers of post-NAC breast cancer patients. Clinical outcomes show no significant associations, except in the post-therapeutic HER2-low, hormone receptor negativity subset. The prognostic implications of HER2 transition in HER2-low breast cancer require further investigation.

Peptides Targeting HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Cells and Applications in Tumor Imaging and Delivery of Chemotherapeutics

Breast cancer represents the most common cancer type and one of the major leading causes of death in the female worldwide population. Overexpression of HER2, a transmembrane glycoprotein related to the epidermal growth factor receptor, results in a biologically and clinically aggressive breast cancer subtype. It is also the primary driver for tumor detection and progression and, in addition to being an important prognostic factor in women diagnosed with breast cancer, HER2 is a widely known therapeutic target for drug development. The aim of this review is to provide an updated overview of the main approaches for the diagnosis and treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer proposed in the literature over the past decade. We focused on the different targeting strategies involving antibodies and peptides that have been explored with their relative outcomes and current limitations that need to be improved. The review also encompasses a discussion on targeted peptides acting as probes for molecular imaging. By using different types of HER2-targeting strategies, nanotechnology promises to overcome some of the current clinical challenges by developing novel HER2-guided nanosystems suitable as powerful tools in breast cancer imaging, targeting, and therapy.

Oncotype Dx Score, HER2 Low Expression, and Clinical Outcomes in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

The interaction between HER2-low expression, oncotype recurrence score (RS), and their influence on the prognosis of HR+/HER2- breast cancer (BC) is not very well studied.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with resectable HER2-low and HER2-zero BC from the National Cancer Database. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the association of RS with the clinical outcomes in HR+/HER2- BC was analyzed as an exploratory endpoint.

RESULTS

The distribution of RS was comparable between HER2-low and HER2-zero groups; however, the RSs of HER2-low tumors were more likely to be 16-25. Women with HER2-low tumors had longer 5-year OS than women with HER2-zero tumors in the HR-negative (84.3% vs. 83.9%; p < 0.001, HR: 0.87 (0.84-0.90), p < 0.001) but not in the HR-positive group (94.0% vs. 94.0%; p = 0.38, HR: 0.97 (0.95-0.99), p = 0.01). The survival advantage was observed in patients who received adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p-interaction (chemo vs. no chemo) < 0.001). Among those who received adjuvant chemotherapy in the group with higher RSs (26-100), those with HER2-low BC had higher 5-year OS than HER2-zero BC.

CONCLUSIONS

Resectable HER2-low BC had a better prognosis than HER2-zero BC. Among those who received adjuvant chemotherapy in the higher oncotype RS group, those with HER2-low tumors had better survival.

Effect of HER2-low-positive status on neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcome of breast cancer: a 10-year dual-center retrospective study

Various novel HER2-targeted antibody-conjugated drugs (ADCs) have shown satisfactory antitumor activity in HER2-low-positive breast cancer (BC). It is urgent to clarify whether HER2-low-positive tumors have unique biological behavior and should be considered a new molecular subtype. We screened eligible BC patients and collected relevant information at the First Hospital of Jilin University and the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from January 2010 to December 2020. A total of 1027 patients were included in our study cohort, and 66.0% (678/1027) had HER2-low-positive tumors. Compared to HER2-zero patients, HER2-low-positive patients tended to have more lymph node metastasis, a larger proportion of hormone receptor (HR)-positive tumors, and a lower proliferation rate (Ki-67). The pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of HER2-low-positive patients was lower than that of HER2-zero patients (19.3% vs 26.1%), especially in the HR-positive subgroup (12.00% vs 20.29%). However, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that HER2 status was not an independent factor for predicting pCR. HER2-low-positive patients had a higher overall survival (OS) rate in the HR-positive subgroup. The Cox regression model analysis suggested that HER2-low-positive status did not statistically significantly affect the survival outcomes, regardless of disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.308) or OS (P=0.066). In conclusion, HER2-low-positive tumors have unique clinical and pathological characteristics, with a lower pCR rate in the HR-positive subgroup and better survival in the HR-negative subgroup compared to HER2-zero tumors. However, the effect of HER2-low-positive status on pCR or survival outcomes was not statistically significant.

ESMO expert consensus statements (ECS) on the definition, diagnosis, and management of HER2-low breast cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer has recently emerged as a targetable subset of breast tumors, based on the evidence from clinical trials of novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates. This evolution has raised several biological and clinical questions, warranting the establishment of consensus to optimally treat patients with HER2-low breast tumors. Between 2022 and 2023, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a virtual consensus-building process focused on HER2-low breast cancer. The consensus included a multidisciplinary panel of 32 leading experts in the management of breast cancer from nine different countries. The aim of the consensus was to develop statements on topics that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline. The main topics identified for discussion were (i) biology of HER2-low breast cancer; (ii) pathologic diagnosis of HER2-low breast cancer; (iii) clinical management of HER2-low metastatic breast cancer; and (iv) clinical trial design for HER2-low breast cancer. The expert panel was divided into four working groups to address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above. A review of the relevant scientific literature was conducted in advance. Consensus statements were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This article presents the developed statements, including findings from the expert panel discussions, expert opinion, and a summary of evidence supporting each statement.

Prognostic value of HER2-low status in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low expression in breast cancer has been recently identified as a new therapeutic target. However, it is unclear if HER2-low status has an independent impact on prognosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature research was carried out to identify studies comparing survival outcomes of patients affected by HER2-low versus HER2-zero breast cancer. Using random-effects models, pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the metastatic setting as well as disease-free survival (DFS), OS and pathological complete response (pCR) in the early setting. Subgroup analyses by hormone receptor (HoR) status were carried out. The study protocol is registered on PROSPERO (n.CRD42023390777).

RESULTS

Among 1916 identified records, 42 studies including 1 797 175 patients were eligible. In the early setting, HER2-low status was associated with significant improved DFS (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.92, P < 0.001) and OS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.95, P < 0.001) when compared to HER2-zero status. Improved OS was observed for both HoR-positive and HoR-negative HER2-low populations, while DFS improvement was observed only in the HoR-positive subgroup. HER2-low status was significantly associated with a lower rate of pCR as compared to HER2-zero status both in the overall population (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.88, P = 0.001) and in the HoR-positive subgroup (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.90, P = 0.001). In the metastatic setting, patients with HER2-low breast cancers showed better OS when compared with those with HER2-zero tumours in the overall population (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.98, P = 0.008), regardless of HoR status. No significant PFS differences were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with HER2-zero status, HER2-low status appears to be associated with a slightly increased OS both in the advanced and early settings, regardless of HoR expression. In the early setting, HER2-low tumours seem to be associated to lower pCR rates, especially if HoR-positive.

Intra-patient and inter-metastasis heterogeneity of HER2-low status in metastatic breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have shown important efficacy in HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Criteria for receiving ADCs are based on a single assay on the primary tumour or a small metastatic biopsy. We assessed the intra-patient inter-metastasis heterogeneity of HER2-low status in HER2-negative mBC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included samples of 10 patients (7 ER-positive and 3 ER-negative) donated in the context of our post-mortem tissue donation program UPTIDER. Excisional post-mortem biopsies of 257 metastases and 8 breast tumours underwent central HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC), alongside 41 pre-mortem primary or metastatic samples. They were classified as HER2-zero, HER2-low (HER2-1+ or HER2-2+, in situ hybridisation [ISH] negative) or HER2-positive (HER2-3+ or HER2-2+, ISH-positive) following ASCO/CAP guidelines 2018. HER2-zero was further subdivided into HER2-undetected (no staining) and HER2-ultralow (faint staining in ≤10% of tumour cells).

RESULTS

Median post-mortem interval was 2.5 h. In 8/10 patients, HER2-low and HER2-zero metastases co-existed, with the proportion of HER2-low lesions ranging from 5% to 89%. A total of 32% of metastases currently classified as HER2-zero were HER2-ultralow. Intra-organ inter-metastasis heterogeneity of HER2-scores was observed in the liver in 3/6 patients. Patients with primary ER-positive disease had a higher proportion of HER2-low metastases as compared to ER-negative disease (46% versus 8%, respectively). At the metastasis level, higher percentages of ER-expressing cells were observed in HER2-low or -ultralow as compared to HER2-undetected metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Important intra-patient inter-metastasis heterogeneity of HER2-low status exists. This questions the validity of HER2-low in its current form as a theranostic marker.

The Effect of HER2-Low Status on Pathological Complete Response and Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

This meta-analysis conducted a comprehensive analysis of research investigating the correlation between HER2 expression levels and treatment outcomes in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. We systematically searched major databases for studies published up to January 01, 2023. The data from various studies examined the relationship between HER2-zero and HER2-low tumors in terms of pathological complete response (pCR) rates, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) outcomes. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by the number of events were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method to analyze pCR. The hazard ratio and 95% CI were calculated using the inverse variance method for DFS and OS. In all comparisons, I² was 0% and no heterogeneity was detected. A total of 12 retrospective studies involving 4094 patients were included. Thirty-six percent of the patients were in the HER2-low group. All 12 studies were included in the pooled analysis for pCR, and there was no difference between HER2-zero and HER2-low (40% vs. 38%, respectively; pooled OR:1.01 95% CI 0.88-1.16; I²: 0%). Four studies were included in the pooled analysis for DFS and 3 in the OS analysis. DFS and OS were significantly better in the HER2-low group (pooled hazard ratio: 0.67 for DFS, 0.64 for OS). There was no difference between HER2-low and HER2-zero in terms of pCR in early-stage TNBC. However, HER2-low was found to be associated with prolonged DFS and OS. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023391002.

Can Patients with HER2-Low Breast Cancer Benefit from Anti-HER2 Therapies? A Review

Breast cancer (BC) poses a severe threat to the health of women worldwide. Currently, different therapeutic regimens are used for BC according to the pathological classification of HER2-positive or HER2-negative. Clinical reports of HER2-low expression indicate that the condition is HER2-negative, which was ineligible for HER2-targeted therapy. In contrast to HER2-zero tumors, however, HER2-low BC is a heterogeneous disease with unique genetic characteristics, prognoses, and different therapeutic responses. Clinical efficacy has been demonstrated by numerous potent and innovative anti-HER2 medications, particularly antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Certain ADCs, including T-DXd, have demonstrated good efficacy in some trials either used alone or in conjunction with other medications. To enhance outcomes in individuals with HER2-low BC, immunotherapy and other treatments are frequently combined with HER2-targeted therapy. There are also alternative strategies that target both HER2 and HER3 or other antigenic sites. We hope more individuals with HER2-low BC will benefit from more precise treatment regimens in the future. This article provides a review of existing research and clinical trials.

HER2-Low Breast Cancer: a New Subtype?

OPINION STATEMENT

Breast cancer (BC) guidelines subdivide the disease into three main groups, namely hormone receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative, HER2-positive, and triple-negative BC (TNBC). The natural history of the HER2-positive subtype has changed since the introduction of HER-targeted therapies, which demonstrated benefit only in case of HER2 overexpression (IHC, score 3+) or gene amplification. Such observation may depend on direct drug inhibition of HER2 downstream signaling, which is needed for survival and proliferation in HER2-addicted BC. Clinically focused categories cannot comprehensively describe biology, as almost half of the currently defined HER2-negative BCs show some degree of IHC expression and have been recently renamed as HER2-low. Why? As technological breakthroughs enable the synthesis of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), target antigens may be viewed not only as a biological switch to be turned on-off by targeted drugs but also as an anchor for ADC docking and tethering. As trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has already proven in the clinical trial DESTINY-Breast04, even fewer HER2 available receptors on cancer cells may be sufficient for a clinical benefit. So, for HR-negative HER2-low subtype (~40% of TNBCs), though only 58 patients had been enrolled in DESTINY-Breast04, the observed benefit, together with the dismal prognosis of TNBC, warrants the use of T-DXd. Notably, another topoisomerase-based ADC, sacituzumab govitecan, has already been granted approval for pretreated TNBC (ASCENT). As no head-to-head comparison has been performed, the choice relies on regulatory approvals at the time of patient assessment, critical appraisal of available evidence, and careful evaluation of possible cross-resistance with sequential use of ADCs. As for HR-positive HER2-low disease (~60% of HR-positive tumors), DESTINY-Breast04 provides solid evidence for T-DXd prioritization in either second or third treatment lines. Although the remarkable activity observed in this setting favorably compares with outcomes observed in treatment-naive patients, the ongoing DESTINY-Breast06 will clarify the role of T-DXd in this population.

Comparison of HER2-zero and HER2-low in terms of clinicopathological factors and survival in early-stage breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The prognostic differences between HER2-zero and HER2-low breast cancer (BC) remain unclear. Purpose of this meta-analysis is to investigate the differences between HER2-low and HER2-zero in terms of clinicopathological factors and survival outcomes in early-stage BC.

METHODS

We searched major databases and congress proceedings until November 1, 2022 to identify studies comparing HER2-zero and HER2-low in early-stage BC. HER2-zero immunohistochemically (IHC) was defined as score 0, while HER2-low was defined as IHC 1+ or 2+/in situ hybridization negative.

RESULT

A total of 23 retrospective studies involving 636,535 patients were included. HER2-low rate was 67.5% in the hormone receptor (HR)-positive group, while this rate was 48.6% in the HR-negative group. In the analysis of clinicopathological factors by HR status, the proportion of premenopausal patients within the HR-positive group was greater in the HER2-zero arm (66.5% vs 61.8%), whereas grade 3 tumors (74.2% vs 71.5%), patients younger than 50 years of age (47.3% vs 39.6%), and T3-T4 tumors (7.7% vs 6.3%) within the HR-negative group was higher in the HER2-zero arm. In both the HR-positive and HR-negative groups, the HER2-low arm showed significantly improved results for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The hazard ratios for DFS and OS in the HR-positive group were 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.94) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.78-0.96), respectively. In the HR-negative group, the hazard ratios for DFS and OS were 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.97) and 0.86 (95% CI 0.84-0.89), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In early-stage BC, HER2-low is associated with better DFS and OS compared to HER2-zero, regardless of HR status.

Conversion of ER and HER2 status after neoadjuvant therapy in Chinese breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Few studies have focused on converting ER-low-positive and HER2-low status following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). We aimed to assess the evolution in ER and HER2 status after NAT in breast cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our study included 481 patients with residual invasive breast cancer after NAT. ER and HER2 status were assessed in the primary tumor and residual disease, and associations between ER and HER2 conversion and clinicopathological factors were explored.

RESULTS

In primary tumors, 305 (63.4%) cases were ER-positive (including 36 cases of ER-low-positive), 176 (36.6%) were ER-negative. In residual disease, ER status changed in 76 (15.8%) cases, of which 69 cases switched from positive to negative. ER-low-positive tumors (31/36) were the most likely to change. In primary tumors, 140 (29.1%) tumors were HER2-positive, and 341 (70.9%) were HER2-negative (including 209 cases of HER2-low and 132 cases of HER2-zero). In residual disease, 25 (5.2%) cases had HER2 conversion between positive and negative. Considering HER2-low status, 113 (23.5%) cases had HER2 conversion, mostly driven by cases switching either to or from HER2-low. ER conversion had a positive correlation with pretreatment ER status (r = 0.25; P = .00). There was a positive correlation between HER2 conversion and HER2-targeted therapy (r = 0.18; P = .00).

CONCLUSION

Conversion of ER and HER2 status was observed in some breast cancer patients after NAT. Both ER-low-positive and HER2-low tumors showed high instability from the primary tumor to residual disease. ER and HER2 status should be retested in residual disease for further treatment decisions, especially in ER-low-positive and HER2-low breast cancer.

Discordance of HER2-Low between Primary Tumors and Matched Distant Metastases in Breast Cancer

We examined differences in HER2 expression between primary tumors and distant metastases, particularly within the HER2-negative primary breast cancer cohort (HER2-low and HER2-zero). The retrospective study included 191 consecutive paired samples of primary breast cancer and distant metastases diagnosed between 1995 and 2019. HER2-negative samples were divided into HER2-zero (immunohistochemistry [IHC] score 0) and HER2-low (IHC score 1+ or 2+/in situ hybridization [ISH]-negative). The main objective was to analyze the discordance rate between matched primary and metastatic samples, focusing on the site of distant metastasis, molecular subtype, and de novo metastatic breast cancer. The relationship was determined by cross-tabulation and calculation of Cohen's Kappa coefficient. The final study cohort included 148 paired samples. The largest proportion in the HER2-negative cohort was HER2-low [primary tumor 61.4% (n = 78), metastatic samples 73.5% (n = 86)]. The discordance rate between the HER2 status of primary tumors and corresponding distant metastases was 49.6% (n = 63) (Kappa -0.003, 95%CI -0.15-0.15). Development of a HER2-low phenotype occurred most frequently (n = 52, 40.9%), mostly with a switch from HER2-zero to HER2-low (n = 34, 26.8%). Relevant HER2 discordance rates were observed between different metastatic sites and molecular subtypes. Primary metastatic breast cancer had a significantly lower HER2 discordance rate than secondary metastatic breast cancer [30.2% (Kappa 0.48, 95%CI 0.27-0.69) versus 50.5% (Kappa 0.14, 95% CI -0.03-0.32)]. This highlights the importance of evaluating potentially therapy-relevant discordance rates between a primary tumor and corresponding distant metastases.

The HER2-low revolution in breast oncology: steps forward and emerging challenges

Approximately half of breast cancers (BCs), historically categorized as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, have low expression of HER2 defined as an immunohistochemical (IHC) score of 1+ or 2+ with negative in situ hybridization. Retrospective evidence suggest that HER2-low BC does not represent a distinct subtype from a biological and prognostic perspective. Nonetheless, it currently constitutes an essential biomarker to guide treatment selection and its introduction has led to reconsidering the binary classification of HER2 status according to which only patients with HER2-positive BC were thought to derive benefit from anti-HER2 therapies. Trastuzumab deruxtecan has recently been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with HER2-low metastatic BC based on the results of the DESTINY-Breast04 phase III trial, and other antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting HER2 are showing promising results. Treatment paradigms for both triple-negative and hormone receptor-positive BCs exhibiting HER2-low expression are thus rapidly evolving. Given its therapeutic implications, it is essential to accurately recognize the level of HER2 expression, and the development of more sensitive and reliable methods for HER2 testing and scoring is warranted, especially since the minimum threshold of HER2 expression required for T-DXd efficacy is currently under investigation. Given the signs of activity of T-DXd even in patients with HER2-0 (IHC 0) disease, an evolution in the way we define HER2-low is anticipated. Considering the expansion of the therapeutic armamentarium for BC patients, with several ADCs approaching the clinic, research efforts are needed to clarify whether the expression level of targets can enrich for responders to a given ADC as well as to understand mechanisms of resistance with the goal of optimizing the sequencing of ADCs.

Biology and Treatment of HER2-Low Breast Cancer

Current guidelines recommend a dichotomous classification of HER2 as either positive or negative, to guide clinicians in treatment decisions. Until now, only patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) had been demonstrated to derive clinical benefit from anti-HER2 therapies. However, novel ADCs have recently emerged, with activity in the large population of patients with HER2-low-expressing BC. Although it remains unclear whether HER2-low BC represents a distinct entity, given the therapeutic implication its crucial to accurately distinguish HER2-low from HER2-0 BC. Efforts are needed to standardize HER2 testing in BC and to introduce more sensitive assays to better discriminate HER2 levels.

The role of HER2 as a therapeutic biomarker in gynaecological malignancy: potential for use beyond uterine serous carcinoma

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in carcinomas of the breast, stomach and colon. In 2018, clinical trial data confirmed the prognostic and predictive role of HER2 in uterine serous carcinoma, with a demonstrated survival benefit from combined chemotherapy and anti-HER2 targeted therapy in patients with advanced or recurrent disease. Approximately one-third of uterine serous carcinomas demonstrate HER2 protein overexpression and/or gene amplification and HER2 immunohistochemistry, supplemented by in situ hybridisation in equivocal cases, is fast becoming a reflex ancillary test at time of diagnosis. The potential role of HER2 in gynaecological tumours other than uterine serous carcinoma is yet to be firmly established. With the advent of personalised medicine, routine tumour sequencing and pursuit of targeted therapies, this is a field currently under active investigation. Emerging data suggest triaging endometrial carcinomas for HER2 analysis based on molecular classification may be superior to histotype-based testing, with copy-number high/p53 mutant tumours enriched for HER2 overexpression or amplification. Accordingly, many carcinosarcomas and a subset of clear cell and high-grade endometrioid carcinomas may be eligible for HER2 targeted therapy, although any clinical benefit in this context is currently undefined. For ovarian carcinomas, combined data support the role of HER2 as a prognostic biomarker, however its use as a therapeutic target is yet to be elucidated through clinical trials. In the cervix, reported rates of HER2 overexpression vary and are generally low, and currently there is insufficient evidence to justify routine HER2 testing in this context. Limited data suggest HER2 holds promise as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in vulvar Paget disease. Future clinical trials, with pathologist input to develop and refine site-specific scoring criteria, are required to establish what role HER2 might play more broadly in gynaecological cancer care.

Treatment options for patients with human epidermal growth factor 2-positive breast cancer brain metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Many systemic treatment options are available for patients with human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer brain metastases. However, it is unclear which pharmacological treatment option is the most beneficial.

Methods

We searched databases, such as PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, and conference abstracts according to keywords. We extracted progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) data, and overall response rate (ORR) from randomized controlled trials and single-arm studies of HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastasis treatment for meta-analysis and analyzed different drug-related adverse events (AEs).

Results

Three randomized controlled trials and seven single-arm clinical studies with 731 patients with HER2-positive brain metastases from breast cancer involving at least seven drugs were included. In randomized controlled trials, our results showed that trastuzumab deruxtecan significantly improved PFS and OS in patients and was superior to other drug regimens. In the single-arm study, the ORR was more pronounced for the trastuzumab deruxtecan and pyrotinib plus capecitabine regimens (ORR, 73.33%; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 44.90%-92.21%; ORR, 74.58%; 95% CI, 61.56%-85.02%, respectively). We found that the main AEs of antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) were nausea and fatigue, while the main AE of small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) drugs and large monoclonal antibodies was diarrhea.

Conclusions

Trastuzumab deruxtecan was shown to be the most significant in improving survival in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases in network meta-analysis, and in single-arm study, patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan and pyrotinib plus capecitabine regimen had the highest ORR. The main AEs associated with ADC, large monoclonal antibodies, and TKI drugs were nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea, respectively.

Current Biological, Pathological and Clinical Landscape of HER2-Low Breast Cancer

HER2-low breast cancer (BC) is a newly defined subset of HER2-negative BC that has HER2 immunohistochemical (IHC) score of 1+ or score of 2+/in situ hybridization (ISH) negative phenotype. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated significant clinical benefits of novel HER2 directing antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in treating this group of tumors. Trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-Dxd), a HER2-directing ADC was recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as the first targeted therapy to treat HER2-low BC. However, HER2-low BC is still not well characterized clinically and pathologically. This review aims to update the current biological, pathological and clinical landscape of HER2-low BC based on the English literature published in the past two years and to propose the future directions on clinical management, pathology practice, and translational research in this subset of BC. We hope it would help better understand the tumor biology of HER2-low BC and the current efforts for identifying and treating this newly recognized targetable group of BC.

Efficacy evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-low expression breast cancer: A real-world retrospective study

Background

To characterize the clinicopathological features and evaluate the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) efficacy of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer.

Methods

A total of 905 breast cancer patients who received 4 cycles of thrice-weekly standard NACT in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were retrospectively enrolled, including 685 cases with HER2-low expression and 220 cases with HER2-negative expression. Clinicopathological features were compared between patients with HER2-negative and HER2-low expression. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to find the independent factors of achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) after NACT.

Results

There were significant differences in stage_N (P = 0.014), histological grade (P = 0.001), estrogen receptor (ER) status (P < 0.001), progesterone receptor (PgR) status (P < 0.001), NACT regimens (P = 0.032) and NACT efficacy (P = 0.037) between patients with HER2-negative and HER2-low expression breast cancer. In subgroup analysis, histological grade (P = 0.032), ER (P = 0.002), Ki-67 (P < 0.001) and HER2 status (P = 0.025) were independent predictors of achieving a pCR in ER-positive breast cancer. And the nomogram for pCR in ER-positive breast cancer showed great discriminatory ability with an AUC of 0.795. The calibration curve also showed that the predictive ability of the nomogram was a good fit to actual observations. Then, in the analysis of ER-negative breast cancer, only stage_N (P = 0.001) and Ki-67 (P = 0.018) were independent influencing factors of achieving a pCR in ER-negative breast cancer.

Conclusion

HER2-low breast cancer was a different disease from HER2-negative breast cancer in clinicopathological features. Moreover, the NACT efficacy of HER2-low breast cancer patients was poorer.

PIK3CA mutations in breast cancer with low HER2 / neu expression

Introduction. Disturbances in the PI3K-dependent (PI3K – phosphoinositide 3‑kinase) cascade are characteristic of all types of breast cancer. In particular, 30–40 % of patients with advanced / metastatic hormone-positive HER2‑negative (HER2 – human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) breast cancer carry PIK3CA mutations in tumor cells. The detection of these mutations in patients with hormone-positive HER2‑negative breast cancer is of great clinical importance, since they are a predictor of tumor sensitivity to the PI3K inhibitor alpelisib. According to the HER2 / neu protein expression status, all patients with hormone-positive HER2‑negative breast cancer can be divided into two groups – with low expression of HER2 / neu (scores 0, 1+ or 2+ per immunohistochemical analysis and negative result of in situ hybridization) and with a complete lack of expression of this protein.Aim. To establish whether there are differences in the nature and prevalence of PIK3CA mutations in patients in these two groups.Materials and methods. The study was carried out on 32 breast cancer samples with a luminal HER2‑negative immunophenotype, which were divided into two groups – with low HER2 / neu expression (n = 15) and with a complete absence of HER2 / neu expression (n = 17). PIK3CA mutations were determined using the commercially available cobas PIK3CA MutationTest kit (Roche, Switzerland) by real-time polymerase chain reaction on paraffin block material (tissue biopsy).Results. Mutations of the PIK3CA gene were detected in 37.5 % of cases, of which p.E542K mutation was detected in 2 cases; p.E545X – in 3, p.H1047X – in 6 and p.N345K – in 1. Analysis of the mutational status of both groups revealed statistically significant differences in the quantitative distribution of PIK3CA mutations. The frequency of PIK3CA mutations was significantly higher in tumors with low expression of HER2 / neu (p = 0.0268). Thus, characteristic genetic changes have been identified for a group of patients with HER2‑low breast cancer. These changes are potential targets for therapy, which is important for clinical practice, as it opens up new therapeutic possibilities for breast cancer patients with low HER2 / neu expression.

HER2-Low Status Is Not Accurate in Breast Cancer Core Needle Biopsy Samples: An Analysis of 5610 Consecutive Patients

Background: HER2-Low status is found in approximately half of breast cancer patients and shows potential benefits from novel antibody−drug conjugates (ADCs). Data on the accuracy of HER2-Low status between core needle biopsy (CNB) and surgical excision specimen (SES) samples are lacking. We aimed to investigate the accuracy of HER2-Low status diagnosis between CNB and SES samples. Methods: Consecutive early-stage breast cancer patients who underwent surgery from January 2009 to March 2022 with paired CNB and SES samples were retrospectively reviewed. HER2-Low was defined as IHC 1+ or IHC2+ and FISH-negative. Concordance rates were analyzed by the Kappa test. Further clinicopathological characteristics were compared among different HER2 status and their changes. Results: A total of 5610 patients were included, of whom 3209 (57.2%) and 3320 (59.2%) had HER2-Low status in CNB and SES samples, respectively. The concordance rate of HER2 status in the whole population was 82.37% (Kappa = 0.684, p < 0.001), and was 76.87% in the HER2-Negative patients (Kappa = 0.372, p < 0.001). Among 1066 HER2-0 cases by CNB, 530 patients were classified as HER2-Low tumors. On the contrary, in 3209 patients with HER2-Low tumor by CNB, 387 were scored as HER2-0 on the SES samples. ER-negative or Ki67 high expression tumor by CNB had a high concordance rate of HER2-Low status. Conclusions: A relatively low concordance rate was found when evaluating HER2-Low status between CNB and SES samples in HER2-Negative breast cancer patients, indicating the necessity of retesting HER2 low status at surgery, which may guide further therapy in the era of anti-HER2 ADCs.

Pathological complete response rate and disease-free survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-low and HER2-0 breast cancers

BACKGROUND

Half of HER2-negative breast cancers (BC) show HER2-low expression. The strong efficacy of recent anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) in HER2-low tumours has risen the interest of HER2-low as a proper BC subtype. Chemosensitivity and prognosis of this subtype are not clear when compared to HER2-0 tumours. We investigated the pathological complete response (pCR) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates in BC patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for HER2-low or HER2-0 tumours.

METHODS

Data were collected from the Institut Paoli-Calmettes database. HER2-low tumours were defined by HER2 IHC score of 1+ or 2+ with negative FISH, and HER2-0 by IHC score of 0. Clinicopathological characteristics, pCR (defined as [ypT0/ypTis] and [pN0sn or ypN0]) and DFS rates were compared between the two cohorts.

RESULTS

From Jan/2005 to Jun/2021, 1111 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were evaluable. The incidence of HER2-low was 41%, including 63% of hormone receptor (HR)-positive and 37% of HR-negative tumours (p < 0.001). In the whole population, the pCR rate was lower in HER2-low (23%) versus HER2-0 (30%) tumours (p = 0.013), but this association was lost in multivariate analysis. In HR-positive patients, HER2-low negatively impacted pCR rates when compared to HER2-0 (10% vs. 16%, p = 0.046), but not in HR-negatives (46% vs. 42%), and this result was maintained in multivariate analysis. No correlation existed between DFS and HER2-status.

CONCLUSION

HER2-low is associated with HR positivity. HER2 status did not impact pCR in HR-negative patients, whereas HER2-low was associated with lower pCR rate in HR-positive patients.

HER2-low breast cancers: Current insights and future directions

In light of the significant clinical benefits of novel HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugates in advanced HER2-low expressing breast cancers in recent phases I and III clinical trials, particularly trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-Dxd), the new "HER2-low" category in breast cancers (breast cancer with a HER2 IHC score of 1+, or 2+ without gene amplification) has gained increasing attention. In the past year, "HER2-low" breast cancers have been under active investigation by both oncologists and pathologists. In this current review, we update the recent cutting-edge research on HER2-low breast cancers, with a focus on the biology of HER2-low breast cancers, the issues on the identification of HER2-low breast cancers by immunohistochemistry in current practice of pathology, and the future directions in this emerging category in breast cancers.