The role of chemotherapy in the nonsurgical management of malignant neuroendocrine tumours

Immunotherapy for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs): a 2021 update

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a group of heterogeneous malignancies, arising from the neuroendocrine system. These neoplasms are divided into two distinct groups, the low-proliferating, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and the highly-proliferating, poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). Recent data demonstrate that the incidence of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms, GEP-NETs and GEP-NECs, has increased exponentially over the last three decades. Although surgical resection is considered the best treatment modality, patients with GEP-NETs often present with advanced disease at diagnosis associated with a 5-year survival rate of 57% for well-differentiated tumors, and only 5.2% for small-cell tumors. Immunotherapy is a novel treatment approach, which has demonstrated effective and promising therapeutic results against several types of cancers. In the present study, we review the current ongoing clinical trials and to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy in GEP-NENs. Furthermore, we analyze the importance of tumor genetic profiling and its clinical implications in immunotherapy response.

Multiple roles of glyoxalase 1-mediated suppression of methylglyoxal glycation in cancer biology-Involvement in tumour suppression, tumour growth, multidrug resistance and target for chemotherapy

Glyoxalase 1 (Glo1) is part of the glyoxalase system in the cytoplasm of all human cells. It catalyses the glutathione-dependent removal of the endogenous reactive dicarbonyl metabolite, methylglyoxal (MG). MG is formed mainly as a side product of anaerobic glycolysis. It modifies protein and DNA to form mainly hydroimidazolone MG-H1 and imidazopurinone MGdG adducts, respectively. Abnormal accumulation of MG, dicarbonyl stress, increases adduct levels which may induce apoptosis and replication catastrophe. In the non-malignant state, Glo1 is a tumour suppressor protein and small molecule inducers of Glo1 expression may find use in cancer prevention. Increased Glo1 expression is permissive for growth of tumours with high glycolytic activity and is thereby a biomarker of tumour growth. High Glo1 expression is a cause of multi-drug resistance. It is produced by over-activation of the Nrf2 pathway and GLO1 amplification. Glo1 inhibitors are antitumour agents, inducing apoptosis and necrosis, and anoikis. Tumour stem cells and tumours with high flux of MG formation and Glo1 expression are sensitive to Glo1 inhibitor therapy. It is likely that MG-induced cell death contributes to the mechanism of action of current antitumour agents. Common refractory tumours have high prevalence of Glo1 overexpression for which Glo1 inhibitors may improve therapy.

Somatostatin receptor based imaging and radionuclide therapy

Somatostatin (SST) receptors (SSTRs) belong to the typical 7-transmembrane domain family of G-protein-coupled receptors. Five distinct subtypes (termed SSTR1-5) have been identified, with SSTR2 showing the highest affinity for natural SST and synthetic SST analogs. Most neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have high expression levels of SSTRs, which opens the possibility for tumor imaging and therapy with radiolabeled SST analogs. A number of tracers have been developed for the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of NETs with impressive results, which facilitates the applications of human SSTR subtype 2 (hSSTr2) reporter gene based imaging and therapy in SSTR negative or weakly positive tumors to provide a novel approach for the management of tumors. The hSSTr2 gene can act as not only a reporter gene for in vivo imaging, but also a therapeutic gene for local radionuclide therapy. Even a second therapeutic gene can be transfected into the same tumor cells together with hSSTr2 reporter gene to obtain a synergistic therapeutic effect. However, additional preclinical and especially translational and clinical researches are needed to confirm the value of hSSTr2 reporter gene based imaging and therapy in tumors.

Gastroenteropancreatic endocrine tumors

Gastroenteropancreatic endocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are relatively uncommon; comprising approximately 0.5% of all human cancers. Although they often exhibit relatively indolent clinical courses, GEP-NETs have the potential for lethal progression. Due to their scarcity and various technical challenges, GEP-NETs have been understudied. As a consequence, we have few diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarkers for these tumors. Early detection and surgical removal is currently the only reliable curative treatment for GEP-NET patients; many of whom, unfortunately, present with advanced disease. Here, we review the genetics and epigenetics of GEP-NETs. The last few years have witnessed unprecedented technological advances in these fields, and their application to GEP-NETS has already led to important new information on the molecular abnormalities underlying them. As outlined here, we expect that "omics" studies will provide us with new diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, inform the development of improved pre-clinical models, and identify novel therapeutic targets for GEP-NET patients.

Sequelae and survivorship in patients treated with (131)I-MIBG therapy

Background:

¹³¹I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (¹³¹I-MIBG) has been in therapeutic use since 1980s. Newer treatment modalities are emerging for neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) and chromaffin cell tumours (CCTs), but many of these do not yet have adequate long-term follow-up to determine their longer term efficacy and sequelae.

Methods:

Fifty-eight patients with metastatic NETs and CCTs who had received ¹³¹I-MIBG therapy between 2000 and 2011 were analysed. Survival and any long-term haematological or renal sequelae were investigated.

Results:

In the NET group, the overall median survival and median survival following the diagnosis of metastatic disease was 124 months. The median survival following the commencement of ¹³¹I-MIBG was 66 months. For the CCT group, median survival had not been reached. The 5-year survival from diagnosis and following the diagnosis of metastatic disease was 67% and 67.5% for NETs and CCTs, respectively. The 5-year survival following the commencement of ¹³¹I-MIBG therapy was 68%. Thirty-two patients had long-term haematological sequelae: 5 of these 32 patients developed haematological malignancies. Two patients developed a mild deterioration in renal function.

Conclusion:

Long follow up of ¹³¹I-MIBG therapy reveals a noteable rate of bone marrow toxicities and malignancy and long term review of all patients receiving radionuclide therapies is recommended.

Early experience with (68)Ga-DOTATATE preparation

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a rare form of cancer. NETs frequently express cell membrane-specific peptide receptors, such as somatostatin receptors (SSTRs). Radiolabeled peptides bind to SSTR and provide in vivo histopathological information for diagnostic purposes. (68)Ga-DOTATATE has higher sensitivity for low-grade tumors and greater avidity to well-differentiated NETs than (18)F-FDG, being superior to (111)In-DTPA-octreotide and (18)F-DOPA in evaluation of well-differentiated metastatic NETs. The feasibility of (68)Ga-DOTATATE application in routine clinical practice for PET imaging of NETs was determined in a limited number of known cases (n = 6). (68)Ga-DOTATATE scan could detect all known sites of NETs and in one case previously unknown peritoneal metastasis. Early regulatory consideration is important for routine clinical use.

Treatment options for unresectable neuroendocrine liver metastases

Hepatic metastases develop in 85% of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Radical surgery, which involves resection of the primary and liver metastases, is the mainstay of treatment, with 60-70% 5-year survival and 35% 10-year survival rates. However, less than 15% of neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NETLMs) are resectable, owing either to multifocality or the inability to preserve sufficient parenchyma following resection. This article deals with the therapeutic modalities available for nonresectable liver metastases, and the therapeutic options available for management of nonresectable NETLMs are discussed. Targeted therapies for NETLMs include hepatic artery embolization, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, radiolabeled/drug-eluting microspheres, radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation and phenol injection. Hepatic artery embolization/transcatheter arterial chemoembolization is associated with 75-100% symptom relief and an objective tumor response varying from 33 to 80%. Other modalities, such as biotherapy, peptide receptor therapy and chemotherapy, target both the primary and metastatic disease. Their effects on NETLMs as a subgroup have not been evaluated. Various therapeutic options are available for the treatment of unresectable NETLMs. Most offer significant symptomatic relief, with only a few comparative studies showing survival benefit. Most of the available evidence is based on retrospective and prospective case series rather than randomized controlled trials. Well-designed studies on existing treatment modalities and the search for newer therapeutic options are required.

A multimodal approach to the management of neuroendocrine tumour liver metastases

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are often indolent malignancies that commonly present with metastatic disease in the liver. Surgical, locoregional, and systemic treatment modalities are reviewed. A multidisciplinary approach to patient care is suggested to ensure all therapeutic options explored.

Biological characteristics and treatment outcomes of metastatic or recurrent neuroendocrine tumors: tumor grade and metastatic site are important for treatment strategy

Background

Studies about the biology, treatment pattern, and treatment outcome of metastatic/recurrent neuroendocrine tumor (NET) have been few.

Methods

We enrolled patients with metastatic/recurrent NET diagnosed between January 1996 and July 2007 and retrospectively analyzed.

Results

A total of 103 patients were evaluated. Twenty-six patients (25.2%) had pancreatic NET, 27 (26.2%) had gastrointestinal NET, 2 (1.9%) had lung NET, 28 (27.2%) had NET from other sites, and 20 (19.4%) had NET from unknown origin. The liver was the most common metastatic site (68.9%). Thirty-four patients had grade 1 disease, 1 (1.0%) had grade 2 disease, 15 (14.6%) had grade 3 disease, 9 (8.7%) had large cell disease, and 7 (6.8%) had small cell disease.

Sixty-six patients received systemic treatment (interferon, somatostatin analogues or chemotherapy), 64 patients received local treatment (TACE, radiofrequency ablation, metastasectomy, etc.). Thirty-six patients received both systemic and local treatments.

Median overall survival (OS) was 29.0 months (95% confidence interval, 25.0-33.0) in the103 patients. OS was significantly influenced by grade (p = .001). OS was 43.0, 23.0, and 29.0 months in patients who received local treatment only, systemic treatment only, and both treatments, respectively (p = .245). The median time-to-progression (TTP) was 6.0 months. Overall response rate was 34.0% and disease-control rate was 64.2%. TTP was influenced by the presence of liver metastasis (p = .011).

Conclusions

OS of metastatic/recurrent NET was different according to tumor grade. TTP was different according to metastasis site. Therefore, development of optimal treatment strategy based on the characteristics of NET is warranted.

Multimodal management of neuroendocrine liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The incidence of neuroendocrine tumours (NET) has increased over the past three decades. Hepatic metastases which occur in up to 75% of NET patients significantly worsen their prognosis. New imaging techniques with increasing sensitivity enabling tumour detection at an early stage have been developed. The treatment encompasses a panel of surgical and non-surgical modalities.

METHODS

This article reviews the published literature related to management of hepatic neuroendocrine metastases.

RESULTS

Abdominal computer tomography, magnetic resonance tomography and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy are widely accepted imaging modalities. Hepatic resection is the only potentially curative treatment. Liver transplantation is justified in highly selected patients. Liver-directed interventional techniques and locally ablative measures offer effective palliation. Promising novel therapeutic options offering targeted approaches are under evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastases still needs to be standardized. Management in centres of expertise should be strongly encouraged in order to enable a multidisciplinary approach and personalized treatment. Development of molecular prognostic factors to select treatment according to patient risk should be attempted.

Function and expression of somatostatin receptors of the endocrine pancreas

Somatostatin (SST) regulates multiple biological processes via five genetically distinct, G-protein coupled receptors. Clinical interest in therapy for neuroendocrine and metabolic disorders has resulted in the development of new tools for exploring the function of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs). The development of highly SSTR-selective agonists and antagonists, animal models with the deletion of individual SSTRs, as well as SSTR-specific antibodies have all been utilized in delineating SSTR functions. In the pancreas, SST is a potent regulator of insulin and glucagon secretion. Indeed, the inappropriate regulation of pancreatic A- and B-cell function in metabolic diseases provides an impetus to evaluate the SSTRs as therapeutic targets. By combining the results obtained from molecular biology, pharmacology and immunochemical studies the current review provides a summary of important recent developments which have extended our knowledge of SST actions in the endocrine pancreas.

Surgical treatment of a rare primary renal carcinoid tumor with liver metastasis

Background

Carcinoid tumors are characteristically low grade malignant neoplasms with neuroendocrine differentiation that arise in various body sites, most commonly the lung and gastrointestinal tract, but less frequently the kidneys, breasts, ovaries, testes, prostate and other locations. We report a case of a carcinoid of renal origin with synchronous single liver metastases on radiological studies.

Case presentation

A 45 year-old patient who presented with abdominal pain was found on CT scan to have lesions in the right ovary, right kidney, and left hepatic lobe. CA-125, CEA, and CA 19-9 were within normal limits, as were preoperative liver function tests and renal function. Biopsy of the liver mass demonstrated metastatic neuroendocrine tumor. At laparotomy, the patient underwent total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, radical right nephrectomy with lymphadenectomy, and left hepatectomy. Pathology evaluation reported a right ovarian borderline serous tumor, well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma of the kidney (carcinoid) with 2 positive retroperitoneal lymph nodes, and a single liver metastasis. Immunohistochemistry revealed that this lesion was positive for synaptophysin and CD56, but negative for chromogranin as well as CD10, CD7, and CD20, consistent with a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor. She is doing well one year after her initial surgery, with no evidence of tumor recurrence.

Conclusion

Early surgical intervention, together with careful surveillance and follow-up, can achieve successful long-term outcomes in patients with this rare malignancy.

Comparison of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET and 111In-DTPAOC (Octreoscan) SPECT in patients with neuroendocrine tumours

PURPOSE

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) can be imaged with scintigraphy using radiolabelled somatostatin analogues. The aim of our study was to compare the value of (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET and (111)In-DTPAOC SPECT (Octreoscan) in the detection of NET manifestations.

METHODS

Twenty-seven NET patients were prospectively examined. (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET and (111)In-DTPAOC SPECT were performed using standard techniques. Treatment was not applied in between. Mean and maximum standardised uptake values (SUVs) were calculated for PET findings. Tumour/non-tumour ratios were calculated for SPECT findings. Findings were compared by a region-by-region analysis and verified with histopathology, CT and MRI within 21 days.

RESULTS

SUVs of positive lesions on (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET ranged from 0.7 to 29.3 (mean SUV) and from 0.9 to 34.4 (maximum SUV). Tumour/non-tumour ratios on (111)In-DTPAOC SPECT ranged from 1.8 to 7.3. In imaging lung and skeletal manifestations, (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET was more efficient than (111)In-DTPAOC SPECT. All discrepant lung findings and 77.8% of discrepant osseous findings were verified as true positive PET interpretations. In regional comparison of liver and brain, (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET and (111)In-DTPAOC SPECT were identical. In lymph nodes, the pancreas and the gastro-intestinal system, different values of the two techniques were not indicated in regional analyses. In a single patient, surgical interventions were changed on the basis of (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET findings.

CONCLUSION

(68)Ga-DOTATOC PET is superior to (111)In-DTPAOC SPECT in the detection of NET manifestations in the lung and skeleton and similar for the detection of NET manifestations in the liver and brain. (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET is advantageous in guiding the clinical management.

Pediatric paraganglioma: an early manifestation of an adult disease secondary to germline mutations

BACKGROUND

Paraganglioma (PGL) and phaeochromocytoma (PCC) are chemotherapy and radiation-resistant neuroendocrine tumors that arise from sympathetic tissue, and rarely occur in children. PCC may be associated with predisposing (germline) conditions like the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2; OMIM 164761), von Hippel-Lindau syndrome (VHL; OMIM 193300), and rarely neurofibromatosis type 1 syndrome (NF1; OMIM 162200) and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1; OMIM 131100). PGL, on the other hand, may be related to predisposing germline conditions like the familial PGL syndrome and the NF1 syndrome. In adult studies, one of the highest predisposing factors for germline mutation among patients presenting apparently sporadic PCC/PGL was their age at presentation. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of germline mutations among the rare patients presenting with sporadic PGL during childhood.

PROCEDURE

In this study, we report the genetic analysis for predisposing conditions for the only three PGL cases retrospectively identified at our pediatric institution in the last 20 years.

RESULTS

None had NF1 clinical associated lesions. Mutation screening of genes associated to VHL (VHL), MEN (RET), and familial PGL (SDH-B, -C, and -D) showed that all cases had germline deletions in the SDHB gene. We report a novel mutation, c.778 del C. Importantly, several non-symptomatic relatives were found to be carriers, thus ensuring them a clinical follow-up.

CONCLUSION

According to our findings, PGL presenting during childhood represents an early manifestation of an adult disease caused by predisposing germline mutations. These results underline the importance of genetic studies in pediatric PGLs.

Repeated [131I]metaiodobenzylguanidine therapy in two patients with malignant pheochromocytoma

CONTEXT

Approximately 10% of pheochromocytomas are malignant with a 5-yr survival rate of less than 40%. Promising results have been published on single high-dosage [131I]metaiodobenzylguanidine ([131I]MIBG) treatment for malignant pheochromocytoma. We present our experience with multiple intermediate-dosage [131I]MIBG therapy instead of single high-dosage therapy.

SETTING AND PATIENTS

The study took place at University Medical Centers and included two patients (one male, 36 yr of age, and one female, 43 yr of age) with widely spread metastatic pheochromocytoma and bad prognosis because of liver and lung metastases.

INTERVENTIONS

Instead of a single high dosage, these two patients were treated with multiple intermediate dosages of [131I]MIBG. The first patient received 37 GBq (1 Ci) [131I]MIBG in five sessions [7400 MBq (200 mCi) each; interval range, 2-11 months]; the second patient received 66.6 GBq (1.8 Ci) [131I]MIBG in 12 sessions [5550 MBq (150 mCi) each; interval range, 2-14 months].

OUTCOME MEASURES

We measured efficacy, toxicity, and survival.

RESULTS

Both patients had a complete symptomatic response and a partial tumor volume response. The first patient had a partial biochemical response, the second a complete biochemical response. In both cases, toxicity has been confined to nausea during treatment. Hematological toxicity was minimal, and both patients stayed euthyroid. The survival (so far) of these patients was 5 yr (clinical case 1) and 16 yr (clinical case 2) after initial diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated intermediate-dosage [131I]MIBG treatment appears to be a reliable and well-tolerated radionuclide therapy and might be a useful adjunct in patients with malignant pheochromocytoma, providing longstanding palliation and prolonged survival.

K40E: a novel succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)B mutation causing familial phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma

OBJECTIVE

Germline mutations in succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)B, SDHC and SDHD, encoding three of the four subunits of mitochondrial complex II, have been implicated in the tumourigenesis of familial paragangliomas and phaeochromocytomas. Twenty-three SDHB mutations have been identified to date.

PATIENTS

We present a novel missense SDHB exon 2 mutation (c.118 A > G; K40E) identified in an Australian family. The proband was diagnosed with phaeochromocytoma at an early age following an unexpected hypertensive crisis and was found to be SDHB mutation-positive. Subsequent genetic screening of 26 family members has identified 17 mutation-positive relatives. In addition to the proband, four mutation positive relatives were found to have clinical symptoms or a lesion and/or catecholamine excess after the identification of the mutation led to further evaluation. Both the proband and an uncle have required surgical removal of a tumour.

CONCLUSIONS

This family indicates the importance of germline screening of first-degree relatives when a patient presents with an apparently sporadic extra adrenal phaeochromocytoma at a young age or whenever a patient with a nonsecretory paraganglioma is found.

The diagnosis and medical management of advanced neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) constitute a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that originate from endocrine glands such as the pituitary, the parathyroids, and the (neuroendocrine) adrenal, as well as endocrine islets within glandular tissue (thyroid or pancreatic) and cells dispersed between exocrine cells, such as endocrine cells of the digestive (gastroenteropancreatic) and respiratory tracts. Conventionally, NETs may present with a wide variety of functional or nonfunctional endocrine syndromes and may be familial and have other associated tumors. Assessment of specific or general tumor markers offers high sensitivity in establishing the diagnosis and can also have prognostic significance. Imaging modalities include endoscopic ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, and particularly, scintigraphy with somatostatin analogs and metaiodobenzylguanidine. Successful treatment of disseminated NETs requires a multimodal approach; radical tumor surgery may be curative but is rarely possible. Well-differentiated and slow-growing gastroenteropancreatic tumors should be treated with somatostatin analogs or alpha-interferon, with chemotherapy being reserved for poorly differentiated and progressive tumors. Therapy with radionuclides may be used for tumors exhibiting uptake to a diagnostic scan, either after surgery to eradicate microscopic residual disease or later if conventional treatment or biotherapy fails. Maintenance of the quality of life should be a priority, particularly because patients with disseminated disease may experience prolonged survival.

Treatment of advanced neuroendocrine tumours using combination chemotherapy with lomustine and 5-fluorouracil

OBJECTIVE

Combination chemotherapy with the two agents streptozotocin (SZT), which is a nitrosurea, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), an alkylating agent, has a long-established role in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours; however, it is often accompanied by considerable toxicity, and it has not been assessed in a comparative manner with other current chemotherapy regimens. In order to assess the therapeutic response and adverse effects using an alternative nitrosurea, lomustine (CCNU), which has a different side-effect profile, in combination with 5-FU, we have reviewed all patients with neuroendocrine tumours who received this form of treatment in our department.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of the case notes of patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours who received treatment with the combination of CCNU and 5-FU, and who were followed up according to a defined protocol in a given time frame.

PATIENTS

Thirty-one patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours (18 with carcinoid tumours, five islet-cell tumours, five chromaffin-cell tumours and three medullary carcinoma of the thyroid) treated with the combination of CCNU and 5-FU, and when necessary additional therapy, over a 22-year period, were included in this analysis.

MEASUREMENTS

The symptomatic, hormonal and tumoural responses before and after chemotherapy with the combination of CCNU and 5-FU over a median follow-up duration of 25 months (range 9-348 months) were recorded. Of the 31 patients (16 males; median age 52 years, range 20-86 years), eight (four males; median age 61 years, range 30-74 years) were treated with the combination of CCNU and 5-FU alone (Group 1), whereas the other 23 patients (12 males; median age 47 years, range 20-86 years) received additional therapy with other chemotherapeutic regimens, somatostatin analogues, alpha-interferon or radiolabelled meta-iodobenzylguanidine (131I-MIBG) therapy (Group 2).

RESULTS

A total of 121 therapeutic cycles was administered (mean 3.9, range 1-14 cycles). None of the patients obtained a complete tumour response. A partial tumour response (not a complete but a 50% or greater reduction of all measurable tumour) was seen in six out of the 29 patients (21%) (four out of eight in Group 1 and two out of 21 in Group 2, respectively). There was no tumour progression in eight out of the 29 patients (27.5%) (one out of eight in Group 1 and seven out of 21 in Group 2, respectively). The median survival over the period of the study was 48 months (95% confidence interval, CI, 22-74 months). The overall 5-year survival rate was 42% (95% CI, 17-67%) for all patients and 50% (95% CI, 18-83%) for the carcinoid group alone, according to Kaplan-Meier analysis. A complete or partial symptomatic response was obtained in 12 out of 27 (44%) patients who presented with symptoms (four out of eight in Group 1 and eight out 19 in Group 2, respectively) and a complete or partial hormonal response in eight out of 19 patients (42.1%) who presented with hormonally active disease (two out of four in Group 1 and six out of 15 in Group 2, respectively). Nine out of the 15 (60%) patients with carcinoid tumours who presented with symptoms obtained a symptomatic response, five out of 10 patients (50%) a hormonal response, and four out of 16 (25%) patients a partial tumoural response, respectively. The combination of CCNU and 5-FU was safe and well tolerated. Serious side-effects necessitating the termination of CCNU and 5-FU were seen only in two patients, and mainly consisted of reversible bone marrow suppression. No chemotherapy-related death was recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy with CCNU and 5-FU, either alone or in combination with other therapeutic modalities, produces considerable symptomatic and hormonal improvement and moderate tumour regression/stabilization according to currently accepted WHO criteria, particularly in patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours with minimal adverse effects. However, long-term survival was still relatively poor. It may therefore be a valuable additional therapl was still relatively poor. It may therefore be a valuable additional therapeutic option, particularly for well-differentiated carcinoid and islet-cell tumours, but mainly reserved for when there is no response or progression of the disease after currently available first-line treatment with somatostatin analogues or radiopharmaceuticals.