• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
  • Find an Author
Download
For: Cicero S, Skentou C, Souka A, To MS, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length at 22-24 weeks of gestation: comparison of transvaginal and transperineal-translabial ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;17:335-340. [PMID: 11339192 DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00345.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Krief D, Foulon A, Tondreau A, Diouf M, Sergent F, Gondry J, Chevreau J. Transperineal ultrasound in routine uterine cervix measurement. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023;307:387-393. [PMID: 35318500 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06521-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
2
Stern V, Jones GL, Senbeto S, Anumba D. The acceptability of cervical electrical impedance spectroscopy within a multi-modal preterm birth screening package: a mixed methods study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022;22:959. [PMID: 36550429 PMCID: PMC9783720 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-05202-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]  Open
3
Pisacreta E, Mannella P. Molecular and endocrine mechanisms involved in preterm birth. Gynecol Endocrinol 2022;38:368-378. [PMID: 35319334 DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2022.2053519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]  Open
4
Lim KI, Butt K, Nevo O, Crane JM. Guideline No. 401: Sonographic Cervical Length in Singleton Pregnancies: Techniques and Clinical Applications. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2021;42:1394-1413.e1. [PMID: 33189242 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
5
Lim KI, Butt K, Nevo O, Crane JM. Directive clinique no 401 : Mesure échographique de la longueur du col en cas de grossesse monofœtale : Techniques et applications cliniques. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2020;42:1414-1436.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2020.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
6
Oliver ER, Maturen KE, Feldstein VA, Poder L, Shipp TD, Simpson L, Strachowski LM, Sussman BL, Weber TM, Winter T, Glanc P. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Assessment of Gravid Cervix. J Am Coll Radiol 2020;17:S26-S35. [PMID: 32370970 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.01.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
7
Tsakiridis I, Dagklis T, Mamopoulos A, Gerede A, Athanasiadis A. Cervical length at 31-34 weeks of gestation: transvaginal vs. transperineal ultrasonographic approach. J Perinat Med 2019;47:817-821. [PMID: 31421047 DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2019-0139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
8
Songserm V, Komwilaisak R, Saksiriwuttho P, Kongwattanakul K. Transperineal versus transvaginal sonographic measurements of cervical length in pregnant women between 16 and 24 weeks of gestation. J Clin Ultrasound 2019;47:389-393. [PMID: 31245845 DOI: 10.1002/jcu.22640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2018] [Revised: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 08/24/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
9
Usman S, Barton H, Wilhelm-Benartzi C, Lees CC. Ultrasound is better tolerated than vaginal examination in and before labour. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2019;59:362-366. [PMID: 30024022 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
10
David AL, Soe A. Extreme prematurity and perinatal management. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.1111/tog.12475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
11
Lim K, Butt K, Crane JM. No. 257-Ultrasonographic Cervical Length Assessment in Predicting Preterm Birth in Singleton Pregnancies. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2018;40:e151-e164. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
12
Lim K, Butt K, Crane JM. Archivée: No 257-Recours à l'évaluation échographique de la longueur cervicale pour prédire l'accouchement préterme dans le cadre de grossesses monofœtales. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2018;40:e165-e180. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
13
Rodó C, Arévalo S, Lewi L, Couck I, Hollwitz B, Hecher K, Carreras E. Arabin cervical pessary for prevention of preterm birth in cases of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome treated by fetoscopic LASER coagulation: the PECEP LASER randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017;17:256. [PMID: 28764674 PMCID: PMC5540345 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1435-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2015] [Accepted: 07/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]  Open
14
Esin S, Yirci B, Yalvac S, Kandemir O. Use of translabial three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound for cervical assessment before labor induction. J Perinat Med 2017;45:559-564. [PMID: 27977408 DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2016-0206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2016] [Accepted: 09/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
15
Stamilio D, Carlson LM. Transabdominal ultrasound is appropriate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;215:739-743.e1. [PMID: 27888999 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2016] [Accepted: 07/07/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
16
Mohamed Abd Naby Awad ESEB, El-Zaher Karko TA, Abdel Dayem TM, El-Agwany AS. Comparison between different methods of sonographic cervical length assessment during pregnancy. Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal 2016;6:134-137. [DOI: 10.1097/01.ebx.0000488775.30829.64] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
17
Wye D, Woo J, Mein B, Magotti R, Martin A, Benzie R. Transperineal use of a pocket-sized ultrasound machine vs conventional transvaginal ultrasound: a blinded comparison of cervical length in pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;48:535-536. [PMID: 26776078 DOI: 10.1002/uog.15861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2015] [Revised: 01/07/2016] [Accepted: 01/08/2016] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
18
Madsen AMA. Sonographic Methods of Evaluating Cervical Length: A Literature Review. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography 2016. [DOI: 10.1177/8756479303019003004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
19
Navarro-briceño Y, Reyna-villasmil E, Mejia-montilla J, Reyna-villasmil N, Torres-cepeda D, Santos-bolívar J, Fernández-ramírez A. Longitud cervical en el segundo trimestre por ecografía transperineal para la predicción de parto pretérmino. Perinatología y Reproducción Humana 2016;30:63-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rprh.2016.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]  Open
20
Orzechowski KM, Boelig RC, Berghella V. Cervical Length Screening in Asymptomatic Women at High Risk and Low Risk for Spontaneous Preterm Birth. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2016;59:241-51. [DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
21
Dimassi K, Hammami A, Bennani S, Halouani A, Triki A, Gara MF. Use of transperineal sonography during preterm labor. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2016;36:748-753. [DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2016.1154513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
22
Woo JSL, Magotti R, Benzie R. A futuristic vision of pocket ultrasound machines: watch this space. Australas J Ultrasound Med 2015;17:110-112. [PMID: 28191219 PMCID: PMC5024944 DOI: 10.1002/j.2205-0140.2014.tb00025.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]  Open
23
O'Hara S, Zelesco M, Sun Z. A comparison of ultrasonic measurement techniques for the maternal cervix in the second trimester. Australas J Ultrasound Med 2015;18:118-123. [PMID: 28191253 PMCID: PMC5024964 DOI: 10.1002/j.2205-0140.2015.tb00211.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]  Open
24
O'Hara S, Zelesco M, Sun Z, Lee E. The maternal cervix: Why, when and how? Sonography 2015. [DOI: 10.1002/sono.12035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
25
Usman S, Lees C. Benefits and pitfalls of the use of intrapartum ultrasound. Australas J Ultrasound Med 2015;18:53-59. [PMID: 28191241 PMCID: PMC5024966 DOI: 10.1002/j.2205-0140.2015.tb00042.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]  Open
26
Kagan KO, Sonek J. How to measure cervical length. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;45:358-62. [PMID: 25632014 DOI: 10.1002/uog.14742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2014] [Revised: 10/14/2014] [Accepted: 10/21/2014] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
27
Podrasky AE, Javitt MC, Glanc P, Dubinsky T, Harisinghani MG, Harris RD, Khati NJ, Mitchell DG, Pandharipande PV, Pannu HK, Shipp TD, Siegel CL, Simpson L, Wall DJ, Wong-You-Cheong JJ, Zelop CM. ACR appropriateness Criteria® second and third trimester bleeding. Ultrasound Q 2013;29:293-301. [PMID: 24263752 DOI: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
28
Gauthier T, Marin B, Garuchet-bigot A, Kanoun D, Catalan C, Caly H, Eyraud J, Aubard Y. Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasound cervical length measurement and preterm labor. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014;290:465-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s00404-014-3229-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2013] [Accepted: 03/24/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
29
O'Hara S, Zelesco M, Sun Z. Cervical length for predicting preterm birth and a comparison of ultrasonic measurement techniques. Australas J Ultrasound Med 2013;16:124-134. [PMID: 28191186 PMCID: PMC5029998 DOI: 10.1002/j.2205-0140.2013.tb00100.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]  Open
30
Guimarães Filho HA, Araujo Júnior E, Pires CR, Nardozza LM, Moron AF. Short cervix syndrome: current knowledge from etiology to the control. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013;287:621-8. [PMID: 23389247 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-013-2740-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2012] [Accepted: 01/22/2013] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
31
Retzke JD, Sonek JD, Lehmann J, Yazdi B, Kagan KO. Comparison of three methods of cervical measurement in the first trimester: single-line, two-line, and tracing. Prenat Diagn 2013;33:262-8. [DOI: 10.1002/pd.4056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
32
Olson-Chen C, Hackney DN. Ultrasound for Cervical Length. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cult.2012.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
33
Atalabi OM, Morhason-Bello IO, Adekanmi AJ, Marinho AO, Adedokun BO, Kalejaiye AO, Sogo K, Gbadamosi SA. Transvaginal ultrasonography: a survey of the acceptability and its predictors among a native African women population. Int J Womens Health 2012;4:1-6. [PMID: 22312194 PMCID: PMC3271809 DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s23533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]  Open
34
Antsaklis A, Daskalakis G. Ultrasonic measurements of the cervix and preterm labor. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011. [DOI: 10.3109/14722240400004669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
35
Lim K, Butt K, Crane JM. SOGC Clinical Practice Guideline. Ultrasonographic cervical length assessment in predicting preterm birth in singleton pregnancies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2011;33:486-499. [PMID: 21639971 DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34884-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
36
Lau WL, Cho LY, Leung WC. Intrapartum translabial ultrasound demonstration of face presentation during first stage of labor. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2011;37:1868-71. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01650.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
37
Taylor BK. Sonographic Assessment of Cervical Length and the Risk of Preterm Birth. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2011;40:617-31. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01284.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]  Open
38
Goya M, Pratcorona L, Higueras T, Perez-Hoyos S, Carreras E, Cabero L. Sonographic cervical length measurement in pregnant women with a cervical pessary. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38:205-209. [PMID: 21305638 DOI: 10.1002/uog.8960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/26/2011] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
39
Ierullo AM, Fernandez S, Palacio M, Gratacos E, Hernandez-Andrade E. Cervical blood perfusion assessed using power Doppler-derived estimation of fractional moving blood volume: a reproducibility study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38:57-61. [PMID: 21584885 DOI: 10.1002/uog.8974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/11/2011] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
40
Lim K, Butt K, Crane JM, Morin L, Bly S, Butt K, Cargill Y, Davies G, Denis N, Lim K, Ouellet A, Salem S, Senikas V, Ehman W, Biringer A, Gagnon A, Graves L, Hey J, Konkin J, Léger F, Marshall C, Gagnon R, Hudon L, Basso M, Bos H, Crane JM, Davies G, Delisle MF, Menticoglou S, Mundle W, Ouellet A, Pressey T, Pylypjuk C, Roggensack A, Sanderson F. Recours à l’évaluation échographique de la longueur cervicale pour prédire l’accouchement préterme dans le cadre de grossesses monofœtales. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34885-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
41
Kayem G, Maillard F, Popowski T, Haddad B, Sentilhes L. Mesure de la longueur du col de l’utérus par voie endovaginale : technique et principales applications. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010;39:267-75. [PMID: 20381982 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2010.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2009] [Revised: 02/22/2010] [Accepted: 03/02/2010] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
42
Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Stoutenbeek P, Visser GHA. Methods of sonographic cervical length measurement in pregnancy: A review of the literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2009;19:755-62. [PMID: 17190685 DOI: 10.1080/14767050600852601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
43
Towner D, Boe N, Lou K, Gilbert WM. Cervical length measurements in pregnancy are longer when measured with three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2009. [DOI: 10.1080/jmf.16.3.167.170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
44
Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Stoutenbeek P, Visser GHA. Transperineal versus transvaginal sonographic cervical length measurement in second- and third-trimester pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;32:657-662. [PMID: 18816491 DOI: 10.1002/uog.4093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
45
Saul LL, Kurtzman JT, Hagemann C, Ghamsary M, Wing DA. Is transabdominal sonography of the cervix after voiding a reliable method of cervical length assessment? J Ultrasound Med 2008;27:1305-1311. [PMID: 18716140 DOI: 10.7863/jum.2008.27.9.1305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
46
Chandiramani M, Shennan AH. PREMATURE CERVICAL CHANGE AND THE USE OF CERVICAL CERCLAGE. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007;18:25-52. [DOI: 10.1017/s0965539507001878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
47
Arabin B, Roos C, Kollen B, van Eyck J. Comparison of transvaginal sonography in recumbent and standing maternal positions to predict spontaneous preterm birth in singleton and twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:377-86. [PMID: 16514620 DOI: 10.1002/uog.2694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
48
Sevrukov AB, Bland JM, Kondos GT. Serial electron beam CT measurements of coronary artery calcium: Has your patient's calcium score actually changed? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;185:1546-53. [PMID: 16304011 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.04.1589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
49
Ozdemir I, Demirci F, Yucel O. Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix at each trimester in normal pregnant women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;45:191-4. [PMID: 15904442 DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.2005.00378.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
50
Shennan A, Jones B. The cervix and prematurity: aetiology, prediction and prevention. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2004;9:471-9. [PMID: 15691785 DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2004.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
PrevPage 1 of 2 12Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA