The validity of ultrasonographic scanning as screening method for abdominal aortic aneurysm

Narrative Review of Risk Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture Based on Biomechanics-Related Morphology

CLINICAL IMPACT

Studies have shown that the biomechanical indicators based on multi-scale models are more effective in accurately assessing the rupture risk of AAA. To meet the need for clinical monitoring and rapid decision making, the typical morphological parameters associated with AAA rupture and their relationships with the mechanical environment have been summarized, which provide a reference for clinical preoperative risk assessment of AAA.

Routine Abdominal Aortic Examination During Echocardiographic Studies Detects Significant Numbers of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Should be a Part of Routine Echocardiographic Examinations

BACKGROUND

Early detection and follow-up of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are important and can be lifesaving. The goal of this study was to evaluate if routine abdominal aorta screenings during echocardiograms can be helpful in detecting asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm.

METHODS

We retrospective studied consecutive patients who were sent for outpatient routine echocardiograms for various clinical reasons in 2015-2017 until we reached a total of 1000 patients. Starting from the subcostal and then proceeding to the abdomen, a long-axis screening of the abdominal aorta was attempted on all of the patients after the echocardiogram was completed. No patient preparation was given. Imaging began from the subcostal view and proceeded caudally with images obtained every 1-2 cm. Measurement of the aortic diameter was performed from the longitudinal plane using the leading-edge-to-leading-edge method.

RESULTS

The age range was 33-96 years with a median age of 72.4. A total of 273 (27.3%) patients did not have an appropriate window to evaluate AAA. Among the remaining 727 screenings, 18 (2.4%) had dilatation of abdominal aorta or AAA. The dilatation and aneurysms ranged between 2.5 and 4.5 cm in size. Abnormal aortic diameters were as follows: 5 (27.7%) were between 2.5 and 2.9 cm, 6 (33.3%) between 3 and 3.4 cm, 1 (5.5%) between 3.5 and 3.9, 5 (27.7%) between 4.0 and 4.4 cm, and 1 (5.5%) between 4.5 and 4.9 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

Performing routine abdominal aortic examinations during routine echocardiographic exams can detect a significant amount of abdominal aortic aneurysm which can be lifesaving. We suggest adding abdominal aortic assessment to routine echocardiographic examination.

Carotid and Renal Vascular Disease

This article review covers carotid artery disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm, and atherosclerotic renal artery disease. It overviews each condition's clinical presentation, diagnosis, medical management, and interventional approach. Carotid artery disease is characterized by hemispheric and neuropsychological manifestations, which can help detect this condition. Screening for carotid artery stenosis is recommended in high-risk individuals and can be performed using different methods, with carotid duplex ultrasonography being the preferred option. Carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting are indicated based on specific criteria and patient characteristics. An abdominal aortic aneurysm is often asymptomatic, but abdominal, back, or flank pain may sometimes be present. Ultrasonography is an effective method for screening and monitoring abdominal aortic aneurysms, with high sensitivity and specificity. Smoking cessation is a crucial intervention for preventing further enlargement of small aortic aneurysms. Repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is recommended based on the aneurysm size, growth rate, and the presence of symptoms. Endovascular repair is preferred when suitable anatomy is present. Atherosclerotic renal artery disease is associated with resistant hypertension, renal failure, and occasionally pulmonary edema. Doppler ultrasonography is a valuable diagnostic tool for detecting it, while the renal resistive index provides additional insights into disease severity and treatment response. Revascularization is not routinely recommended for atherosclerotic renal artery disease, but it may be considered in specific cases, such as renal arterial fibromuscular dysplasia or unexplained congestive heart failure.

Association between the non-HDL-cholesterol to HDL- cholesterol ratio and abdominal aortic aneurysm from a Chinese screening program

BACKGROUND

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) can result in high mortality upon rupture but are usually undiagnosed because of the absence of symptoms in the early stage. Ultrasound screening is regarded as an impactful way to prevent the AAA-related death but cannot be performed efficiently; therefore, a target population, especially in Asia, for this procedure is lacking. Additionally, although dyslipidaemia and atherosclerosis are associated with AAA. However, it remains undetermined whether the non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio (NHHR) is associated with AAA. Therefore, this study was aimed at examining whether NHHR is associated with AAA.

METHOD

A total of 9559 participants who underwent AAA screening at Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital and through screening in two communities in Dongguan, from June 2019 to June 2021 joined in this screening program. The diagnosis of AAA was confirmed by the ultrasound examination of the abdominal aorta rather than any known or suspected AAA. Clinical and laboratory data of participants were collected. The participants were separated into a normal group and an AAA group according to the abdominal aortic status. To eliminate confounding factors, a propensity score matching (PSM) approach was utilized. The independent relationship between NHHR and AAA was assessed through the utilization of multivariable logistic regression analysis. In addition, internal consistency was evaluated through subgroup analysis, which controlled for significant risk factors.

RESULTS

Of all the participants, 219 (2.29%) participants were diagnosed with AAA. A significant elevation in NHHR was identified in the AAA group when contrasted with that in the normal group (P < 0.001). As demonstrated by the results of the multivariable logistic regression analysis, AAA was independently associated with NHHR before (odds ratio [OR], 1.440, P < 0.001) and after PSM (OR, 1.515, P < 0.001). Significant extension was observed in the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) of NHHR compared to those of single lipid parameters before and after PSM. An accordant association between NHHR and AAA in different subgroups was demonstrated by subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSION

In the Chinese population, there is an independent association between NHHR and AAA. NHHR might be propitious to distinguish individuals with high risk of AAA.

Editor's Choice - Comparison of the Reproducibility of Ultrasound Calliper Placement Methods in Abdominal Aortic Diameter Measurements: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies

OBJECTIVE

To assess which ultrasound (US) method of maximum anteroposterior (AP) abdominal aortic diameter measurement can be considered most reproducible.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched (PROSPERO ID: 276694). Eligible studies reported intra- and or interobserver agreement according to Bland-Altman analysis (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) for abdominal aortic diameter AP US evaluations with an outer to outer (OTO), inner to inner (ITI), and or leading edge to leading edge (LELE) calliper placement.

REVIEW METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies statement was followed. The QUADAS-2 tool and QUADAS-C extension were used for risk of bias assessment and the GRADE framework to rate the certainty of evidence. Pooled estimates (fixed effects meta-analysis, after a test of homogeneity of means) for each US method were compared with pairwise one sided t tests. Sensitivity analyses (for studies published in 2010 or later) and meta-regression were also performed.

RESULTS

21 studies were included in the qualitative analysis. Twelve were eligible for quantitative analysis. Studies showed heterogeneity in the US model and transducer used, sex of participants, and observer professions, expertise, and training. Included studies shared a common mean for each US method (OTO: p = 1.0, ITI: p = 1.0, and LELE: p = 1.0). A pooled estimate of interobserver reproducibility for each US method was obtained, combining the mean ± SD (Bland-Altman analysis) from each study: OTO: 0.182 ± 0.440; ITI: 0.170 ± 0.554; and LELE: 0.437 ± 0.419. There were no statistically significant differences between the methods (OTO vs. ITI: p = .52, OTO vs. LELE: p = .069, ITI vs. LELE: p = .17). Considering studies published in 2010 and later, the pooled estimate for LELE was the smallest, without statistically significant differences between the methods. Despite the low risk of bias, the certainty of the evidence for both meta-analysed outcomes remained low.

CONCLUSION

The interobserver reproducibility for OTO and ITI was 2.5 times smaller (indicating better reproducibility) than LELE; however, without statistically significant differences between the methods and low GRADE evidence certainty. Additional data are needed to validate these findings, while inherent differences between the methods need to be emphasised.

Automatic segmentation of abdominal aortic aneurysms from CT angiography using a context-aware cascaded U-Net

We delineate abdominal aortic aneurysms, including lumen and intraluminal thrombosis (ILT), from contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA) data in 70 patients with complete automation. A novel context-aware cascaded U-Net configuration enables automated image segmentation. Notably, auto-context structure, in conjunction with dilated convolutions, anisotropic context module, hierarchical supervision, and a multi-class loss function, are proposed to improve the delineation of ILT in an unbalanced, low-contrast multi-class labeling problem. A quantitative analysis shows that the automated image segmentation produces comparable results with trained human users (e.g., DICE scores of 0.945 and 0.804 for lumen and ILT, respectively). Resultant morphological metrics (e.g., volume, surface area, etc.) are highly correlated to those parameters generated by trained human users. In conclusion, the proposed automated multi-class image segmentation tool has the potential to be further developed as a translational software tool that can be used to improve the clinical management of AAAs.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm growth rates are not correlated to body surface area in screened men

BACKGROUND

Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in 65-year-old males reduces aneurysm related mortality. Infrarenal aortic diameter (IAD) has been shown to correlate to body surface area (BSA) which could influence diagnostic criteria for AAA. This study investigates whether AAA growth rates are also dependent on BSA, as that might have potential effects on surveillance of small AAAs.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, single center cohort study of 301 men with screening detected AAA between 2010-2017 with surveillance to 2021. AAA growth rates were analyzed in relation to the subject's BSA, smoking habits, and diabetic disease using a linear mixed-effects model. All men were offered smoking cessation program, optimized medical treatment, and advice on physical activity.

RESULTS

The screening program included 28,784 men. Of the 22,819 (79%) attending the examinations, 374 men (1.6%) were found to have an AAA out of which 301 men had undergone two or more examinations during surveillance and were included with a median follow-up of 1846 days (IQR: 1 399). Mean unadjusted AAA growth rate was 1.60 mm/year (95% CI: 1.41-1.80). Diabetes mellitus had a statistically significant negative impact, smoking had a statistically significant positive impact on AAA growth rates whereas no correlation between AAA growth rate and BSA could be found.

CONCLUSIONS

Body surface area could not be found to have a statistically significant correlation to AAA growth rates. The impact of smoking and diabetes on AAA growth rates remains similar to previously reported.

Circulating Extracellular Vesicles: Their Role in Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) Undergoing EndoVascular Aortic Repair (EVAR)

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a frequent aortic disease. If the diameter of the aorta is larger than 5 cm, an open surgical repair (OSR) or an endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) are recommended. To prevent possible complications (i.e., endoleaks), EVAR-treated patients need to be monitored for 5 years following the intervention, using computed tomography angiography (CTA). However, this radiological method involves high radiation exposure in terms of CTA/year. In such a context, the study of peripheral-blood-circulating extracellular vesicles (pbcEVs) has great potential to identify biomarkers for EVAR complications. We analyzed several phenotypes of pbcEVs using polychromatic flow cytometry in 22 patients with AAA eligible for EVAR. From each enrolled patient, peripheral blood samples were collected at AAA diagnosis, and after 1, 6, and 12 months following EVAR implantation, i.e. during the diagnostic follow-up protocol. Patients developing an endoleak displayed a significant decrease in activated-platelet-derived EVs between the baseline condition and 6 months after EVAR intervention. Furthermore, we also observed, that 1 month after EVAR implantation, patients developing an endoleak showed higher concentrations of activated-endothelial-derived EVs than patients who did not develop one, suggesting their great potential as a noninvasive and specific biomarker for early identification of EVAR complications.

NADPH Oxidases in Aortic Aneurysms

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are a progressive dilation of the infrarenal aorta and are characterized by inflammatory cell infiltration, smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation, and degradation of the extracellular matrix. Oxidative stress and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been shown to play roles in inflammatory cell infiltration, and smooth muscle cell migration and apoptosis in AAAs. In this review, we discuss the principles of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase (NADPH oxidase/NOX) signaling and activation. We also discuss the effects of some of the major mediators of NOX signaling in AAAs. Separately, we also discuss the influence of genetic or pharmacologic inhibitors of NADPH oxidases on experimental pre-clinical AAAs. Experimental evidence suggests that NADPH oxidases may be a promising future therapeutic target for developing pharmacologic treatment strategies for halting AAA progression or rupture prevention in the management of clinical AAAs.

Genetic and Pharmacological Disruption of Interleukin-1α Leads to Augmented Murine Aortic Aneurysm

BACKGROUND

Interleukin-1 (IL-1) signaling has an established role as a cytokine signaling pathway important for progression of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). While the IL-1β ligand and IL-1R1 have been previously investigated, the role of the IL-1α ligand in AAAs remains unknown. In this study, we sought to examine the role of IL-1α in AAAs using genetic and pharmacologic approaches.

METHODS

Eight-week-old wild-type (WT) or IL-1α knock-out (KO) male and female mice (n = 10-16/group) underwent experimental AAA and were harvested 14 days following surgery to assess AAA size and characteristics. In separate studies, 8-week-old WT mice were treated with an inhibitor to IL-1α during AAA formation and harvested 14 days following surgery. Finally, WT and IL-1α KO mice were administered Anakinra, an IL-R1 inhibitor, during AAA formation to determine the effect of inhibiting IL-1R1 when IL-1α is knocked out.

RESULTS

Male and female IL-1α KO mice had larger AAAs compared to WT AAAs (male: 153% vs. 89.2%, P = 0.0001; female: 86.6% vs. 63.5%, P = 0.02). IL-1α KO mice had greater elastin breakage (P = 0.01), increased levels of macrophage staining (P = 0.0045), and greater pro-metallo proteinase 2 (P = 0.02). Pharmacologic inhibition of WT male mice with an IL-1α neutralizing antibody resulted in larger AAAs (133.1% vs. 77.0%, P < 0.001). Finally, treatment of IL-1α KO male mice with Anakinra decreased AAA formation compared with vehicle control AAAs (Anakinra + IL-1α KO: 47.7% vs. WT: 147.1%; P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

IL-1α disruption using either genetic or pharmacologic approaches worsens AAAs.

[Abdominal aortic aneurysm ultrasound screening in men with risk factors in Primary Care]

OBJECTIVE

to describe the implantation of ultrasound screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) in our healthcare district in men from 65 to 79 years of age who have had an identifiable risk factor for developing AAA, such as smoking or a history thereof, hypertension, family history of aneurysms, aneurysms in other locations and clinical atherosclerosis, acute myocardial infarction, intermittent claudication, or stroke. Analyse the performance of said screening.

SETTING

Primary Care.

PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS

656 patients were screened, representing 40% of the target population of 1,658 patients. The remaining part of the target population could not be screened because of the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. 608 ultrasound examinations were performed.

MAIN MEASUREMENTS

coverage of the screening programme, prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms, prevalence of smoking and other risk factors in patients with/without aneurysms.

RESULTS

19 patients with ectatic aorta (25-29mm) and 11 with abdominal aortic aneurysms (1.81%) were found. 5 were active smokers (45%, compared to 20% in the entire sample) and 6 were former smokers. None of the aneurysm patients were non-smokers. 7 of them were hypertensive.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of aneurysms in our sample was 2.6%, which was lower than expected. The wide use of ultrasound and its progressive generalisation in the Primary Care setting should lead to a decrease in the number of undiagnosed AAA.

AAA Revisited: A Comprehensive Review of Risk Factors, Management, and Hallmarks of Pathogenesis

Despite declining incidence and mortality rates in many countries, the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) continues to represent a life-threatening cardiovascular condition with an overall prevalence of about 2-3% in the industrialized world. While the risk of AAA development is considerably higher for men of advanced age with a history of smoking, screening programs serve to detect the often asymptomatic condition and prevent aortic rupture with an associated death rate of up to 80%. This review summarizes the current knowledge on identified risk factors, the multifactorial process of pathogenesis, as well as the latest advances in medical treatment and surgical repair to provide a perspective for AAA management.

Diseases of the Aorta and Kidney Disease: Conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an independent risk factor for the development of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), as well as for cardiovascular and renal events and all-cause mortality following surgery for AAA or thoracic aortic dissection. In addition, the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) after any aortic surgery is particularly high, and this AKI per se is independently associated with future cardiovascular events and mortality. On the other hand, both development of AKI after surgery and the long-term evolution of kidney function differ significantly depending on the type of AAA intervention (open surgery vs. the various subtypes of endovascular repair). Current knowledge regarding AAA in the general population may not be always applicable to CKD patients, as they have a high prevalence of co-morbid conditions and an elevated risk for periprocedural complications. This summary of a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Controversies Conference group discussion reviews the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of Diseases of the Aorta in CKD and identifies knowledge gaps, areas of controversy, and priorities for future research.

Central and peripheral arterial diseases in chronic kidney disease: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects about 10% of all populations worldwide, with about 2 million people requiring dialysis. Although patients with CKD are at high risk of cardiovascular disease and events, they are often underrepresented or excluded in clinical trials, leading to important knowledge gaps about how to treat these patients. KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) convened the fourth clinical Controversies Conference on the heart, kidney and vasculature in Dublin, Ireland, in February 2020, entitled Central and Peripheral Arterial Diseases in Chronic Kidney Disease. A global panel of multidisciplinary experts from the fields of nephrology, cardiology, neurology, surgery, radiology, vascular biology, epidemiology, and health economics attended. The objective was to identify key issues related to the optimal detection, management, and treatment of cerebrovascular diseases, central aortic disease, renovascular disease, and peripheral artery disease in the setting of CKD. This report outlines the common pathophysiology of these vascular processes in the setting of CKD, describes best practices for their diagnosis and management, summarizes areas of uncertainty, addresses ongoing controversial issues, and proposes a research agenda to address key gaps in knowledge that, when addressed, could improve patient care and outcomes.

Risk reduction and pharmacological strategies to prevent progression of aortic aneurysms

INTRODUCTION

While size thresholds exist to determine when aortic aneurysms warrant surgical intervention, there is no consensus on how best to treat this disease before aneurysms reach the threshold for intervention. Since a landmark study in 1994 first suggested ß-blockers may be useful in preventing aortic aneurysm growth, there has been a surge in research investigating different pharmacologic therapies for aortic aneurysms - with very mixed results.

AREAS COVERED

We have reviewed the existing literature on medical therapies used for thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms in humans. These include ß-blockers, angiotensin II receptor blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors as well as miscellaneous drugs such as tetracyclines, macrolides, statins, and anti-platelet medications.

EXPERT OPINION

While multiple classes of drugs have been explored for risk reduction in aneurysm disease, with few exceptions results have been disappointing with an abundance of contradictory findings. The vast majority of studies have been done in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms or thoracic aortic aneurysm patients with Marfan Syndrome. There exists a striking gap in the literature when it comes to pharmacologic management of non-Marfan Syndrome patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms. Given the differences in pathogenesis, this is an important future direction for aortic aneurysm research.

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for hospitalists and general internists

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is currently implemented in various medical fields by clinicians for the bedside examination of patients. Evidence supports the fact that adding an ultrasound technology in daily practice (hand-held ultrasound device), called by some 'stethoscope of the future', improves patient care and allows an earlier diagnosis in a hospital setting. In this article, we reviewed the historical evolution of the use of ultrasound in medicine and the possibilities of using POCUS for hospitalists and general internists based on the existing scientific literature.

Three-dimensional ultrasound is a reliable alternative in endovascular aortic repair surveillance

OBJECTIVE

Three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) has already demonstrated improved reproducibility with a high degree of agreement (intermodality variability), reproducibility (interoperator variability), and repeatability (intraoperator variability) compared with conventional two-dimensional ultrasound (2D-US) when estimating the maximum diameter of native abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). The aim of the present study was, in a clinical, multicenter setting, to evaluate the accuracy of 3D-US with aneurysm model quantification software (3D-US abdominal aortic aneurysm [AAA] model) for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) sac diameter assessment vs that of computed tomography angiography (CTA) and 2D-US.

METHODS

A total of 182 patients who had undergone EVAR from April 2016 to December 2017 and were compliant with a standardized EVAR surveillance program were enrolled from five different vascular centers (Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, Netherlands; L'hospital de la Timone, Paris, France; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; and The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio) in four countries. All image acquisitions were performed at the local sites (ie, 2D-US, 3D-US, CTA). Only the 2D-US and CTA readings were performed both locally and centrally. All images were read centrally by the US and CTA core laboratory. Anonymized image data were read in a randomized and blinded manner.

RESULTS

The sample used to estimate the accuracy of the 3D-US AAA model and 2D-US included 164 patients and 177 patients, respectively. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the mean difference between CTA and 3D-US was -2.43 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], -5.20 to 0.14; P = .07) with a lower and upper limit of agreement of -8.9 mm (95% CI, -9.3 to -8.4) and 2.7 mm (95% CI, 2.3-3.2), respectively. For 2D-US and CTA, the mean difference was -3.62 mm (95% CI, -6.14 to -1.10; P = .002), with a lower and upper limit of agreement of -10.3 mm (95% CI, -10.8 to -9.8) and 2.5 mm (95% CI, 2-2.9), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3D-US AAA model showed no significant difference compared with CTA for measuring the anteroposterior diameter, indicating less bias for 3D-US compared with 2D-US. Thus, 3D-US with AAA model software is a viable modality for anteroposterior diameter assessment for surveillance after EVAR.

The reproducibility of measuring maximum abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter from ultrasound images

Background

Accurate repeat assessment of the diameter of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is important. This study investigated the reproducibility of different methods of measuring AAA diameter from ultrasound images.

Methods

Fifty AAA patients were assessed by ultrasound. Maximum AAA diameter was measured independently by three trained observers on two separate occasions using a standardised protocol. Five diameters were measured from each scan, three in the anterior–posterior (AP) and two in the transverse (TV) plane, including inner-to-inner (ITI), outer-to-outer (OTO) and leading edge-to-leading edge (LETLE). Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility were reported as reproducibility coefficients. Statistical comparison of methods was performed using linear mixed effects models.

Results

Intra-observer reproducibility coefficients (AP LETLE 2.2 mm; AP ITI 2.4 mm; AP OTO 2.6 mm) were smaller than inter-observer reproducibility coefficients (AP LETLE 4.6 mm: AP ITI 4.5; and AP OTO 4.8 mm). There was no statistically significant difference in intra-observer reproducibility of three types of measurements performed in the AP plane. Measurements obtained in the TV plane had statistically significant worse intra-observer reproducibility than those performed in the AP plane.

Conclusions

This study suggests that the comparison of maximum AAA diameter between repeat images is most reproducibly performed by a single trained observer measuring diameters in the AP plane.

The Effect of Patient Oral Intake Status on Abdominal Aortic Ultrasound Visualization

BACKGROUND

The standard abdominal aortic duplex ultrasound protocol requires fasting for 8-12 hours prior to examination in attempt to reduce bowel gas and improve visualization. Such practice results in frequent testing delays and patient non-compliance. The aim of this study was to determine whether fasting improves visualization of the abdominal aorta in patients undergoing duplex ultrasound or influences diagnostic properties.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind imaging trail at a single institution. Ninety patients were randomized to one of three dietary groups, including NPO, clear liquids or control (regular diet). Diagnostic ultrasound examinations were performed by accredited Registered Vascular Technologists who remained blinded to the patients' diet. Sonographers commented on the presence of limited visualization in the study based on their ability to accurately measure aortic diameter. Examination results were randomly assigned to interpreting physicians who were also blinded to the patients' diet. Following interpretation, the reading physician was asked to comment whether they had sufficient information for a conclusive diagnostic interpretation.

RESULTS

All ultrasound studies were deemed diagnostic by the interpreting physician regardless of the patients' dietary status. Limited visualization was reported in 19 of the 90 study patients (21.1%) with no significant difference existing between the dietary groups (P = 0.344). The NPO group contained the most patients with studies deemed to have limited visualization.

CONCLUSION

Oral intake status did not affect visualization of the abdominal aorta or the rate of diagnostic studies in patients undergoing DUS at a single center. These results suggest that dietary restrictions prior to DUS evaluation of the abdominal aorta is unnecessary.

Full-Volume Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms by 3-D Ultrasound and Magnetic Tracking

Volume assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) using 3-D ultrasound (US) is an innovative technique reporting good agreement with computed tomography angiography. One major limitation of the current 3-D US technique is a limited field of view, allowing full AAA acquisition in only 60% of patients. This study presents two new US acquisition protocols using magnetic field tracking, providing an "extended field of view" (XFoV-2-D and XFoV-3-D) with the aim of including both the aortic bifurcation and neck for full-volume assessment, and compares these methods with the current standard 3-D US protocol and with computed tomography angiography. A total of 20 AAA patients were included and underwent the current standard 3-D US protocol and the two novel 3-D US "extended field of view" protocols. Four patients were excluded from further analysis because of low image quality, leaving 16 patients eligible for analysis. Full AAA volume was achieved in 8 patients (50%) using the standard 3-D US protocol, in 11 patients (69%) with the XFoV-2-D protocol and in 13 patients (81%) with the XFoV-3-D protocol. In conclusion, this article describes two new and feasible US protocols applicable for full-AAA-volume estimation in most patients and should initiate further research into the added value of full volume in AAA surveillance.

Screening cardiovascular patients for aortic aneurysms (SCAN) - high prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms in coronary heart disease patients requiring intervention

Background: Since the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) in Europe has declined to about 2.5%, general screening programs of elderly men are being called into question. On the other hand, other vascular diseases (e.g. coronary heart disease, CHD) are associated with a higher prevalence of AAA. This might have an impact on future targeted AAA screening programs. This study aimed to reevaluate the current prevalence of AAA in male patients with CHD, in order to assess whether CHD patients should be offered a targeted AAA ultrasound screening program. Patients and methods: The SCAN (Screening Cardiovascular Patients for Aortic Aneurysms) study prospectively evaluated the AAA prevalence in 1000 consecutive male CHD patients (70.1 ± 11.2 years) requiring any coronary intervention at an university hospital. All patients received transverse and longitudinal ultrasound scans of the abdominal aorta. Aortic diameter was assessed using the outer-to-outer measurement-technique. Primary endpoint was the prevalence of AAA. Secondary outcomes included stratification in 1-, 2-, or 3-vessel CHD. Results: AAA was detected in 85 patients (median diameter 38 mm, range 30-80 mm), corresponding to an overall prevalence of 8.5%. AAA prevalence was significantly associated with CHD severity: 5.6% in 1-vessel, 7.1% in 2-vessel, and 10.8% in 3-vessel CHD (P = 0.037). The multivariable analysis showed, that age per 10 years increase (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.9, P = 0.001) and hyperlipidemia (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.8, P = 0.003) were significantly associated with an AAA. The likelihood to be diagnosed with an AAA was significantly lower in non-smokers (OR 0.24, 95% CI, P < 0.001). Conclusions: This study confirms that CHD requiring any type of coronary intervention is strongly associated with AAA in male patients. AAA prevalence increases with CHD severity. Since the AAA prevalence is still significantly higher than in the general population, targeted ultrasound screening should be considered for all CHD patients.

Surgery for small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND

An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an abnormal ballooning of the major abdominal artery. Some AAAs present as emergencies and require surgery; others remain asymptomatic. Treatment of asymptomatic AAAs depends on many factors, but the size of the aneurysm is important, as risk of rupture increases with aneurysm size. Large asymptomatic AAAs (greater than 5.5 cm in diameter) are usually repaired surgically; very small AAAs (less than 4.0 cm diameter) are monitored with ultrasonography. Debate continues over the roles of early repair versus surveillance with repair on subsequent enlargement in people with asymptomatic AAAs of 4.0 cm to 5.5 cm diameter. This is the fourth update of the review first published in 1999.

OBJECTIVES

To compare mortality and costs, as well as quality of life and aneurysm rupture as secondary outcomes, following early surgical repair versus routine ultrasound surveillance in people with asymptomatic AAAs between 4.0 cm and 5.5 cm in diameter.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, two other databases, and two trials registers to 10 July 2019. We handsearched conference proceedings and checked reference lists of relevant studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials where people with asymptomatic AAAs of 4.0 cm to 5.5 cm were randomly allocated to early repair or imaging-based surveillance at least every six months. Outcomes had to include mortality or survival.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently extracted data, which were cross-checked by other team members. Outcomes were mortality, costs, quality of life, and aneurysm rupture. For mortality, we estimated risk ratios (RR) (endovascular aneurysm repair only), hazard ratios (HR) (open repair only), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on Mantel-Haenszel Chi² statistics at one and six years (open repair only) following randomisation.

MAIN RESULTS

We found no new studies for this update. Four trials with 3314 participants fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Two trials compared early open repair with surveillance and two trials compared early endovascular repair (EVAR) with surveillance. We used GRADE to access the certainty of the evidence for mortality and cost, which ranged from high to low. We downgraded the certainty in the evidence from high to moderate and low due to risk of bias concerns and imprecision (some outcomes were only reported by one study). All four trials showed an early survival benefit in the surveillance group (due to 30-day operative mortality with repair) but no evidence of differences in long-term survival. One study compared early open repair with surveillance with an adjusted HR of 0.88 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.02, mean follow-up 10 years; HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.54, mean follow-up 4.9 years). Pooled analysis of participant-level data from the two trials comparing early open repair with surveillance (maximum follow-up seven to eight years) showed no evidence of a difference in survival (propensity score-adjusted HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.18; 2226 participants; high-certainty evidence). This lack of treatment effect did not vary to three years by AAA diameter (P = 0.39), participant age (P = 0.61), or for women (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.11). Two studies compared EVAR with surveillance and there was no evidence of a survival benefit for early EVAR at 12 months (RR 1.92, 95% CI 0.73 to 5.06; 846 participants; low-certainty evidence). Two trials reported costs. The mean UK health service costs per participant over the first 18 months after randomisation were higher in the open repair surgery than the surveillance group (GBP 4978 in the repair group versus GBP 3914 in the surveillance group; mean difference (MD) GBP 1064, 95% CI 796 to 1332; 1090 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There was a similar difference after 12 years. The mean USA hospital costs for participants at six months after randomisation were higher in the EVAR group than in the surveillance group (USD 33,471 with repair versus USD 5520 with surveillance; MD USD 27,951, 95% CI 25,156 to 30,746; 614 participants; low-certainty evidence). After four years, there was no evidence of a difference in total medical costs between groups (USD 48,669 with repair versus USD 46,112 with surveillance; MD USD 2557, 95% CI -8043 to 13,156; 614 participants; low-certainty evidence). All studies reported quality of life but used different assessment measurements and results were conflicting. All four studies reported aneurysm rupture. There were very few ruptures reported in the trials of EVAR versus surveillance up to three years. In the trials of open surgery versus surveillance, there were ruptures to at least six years and there were more ruptures in the surveillance group, but most of these ruptures occurred in aneurysms that had exceeded the threshold for surgical repair.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There was no evidence of an advantage to early repair for small AAA (4.0 cm to 5.5 cm), regardless of whether open repair or EVAR is used and, at least for open repair, regardless of patient age and AAA diameter. Thus, neither early open nor early EVAR of small AAAs is supported by currently available evidence. Long-term data from the two trials investigating EVAR are not available, so, we can only draw firm conclusions regarding outcomes after the first few years for open repair. Research regarding the risks related to and management of small AAAs in ethnic minorities and women is urgently needed, as data regarding these populations are lacking.

Aortic aneurysm screening using duplex ultrasound: Choosing wisely who to examine

The noninvasive vascular laboratory plays a critical role in screening patients at risk for development of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). One-time duplex ultrasound screening reduces aneurysm-related mortality due to rupture and is cost-effective. Population screening based on AAA risk factors is recommended, as it allows for proactive, elective repair of aneurysms at risk for rupture, and surveillance of smaller aneurysms for enlargement. Utilization of societal screening guidelines, such as those published by the Society for Vascular Surgery, can be employed by vascular laboratories to justify individual patient screening, aid primary care physicians to refer patients for testing, and encourage integrated medical health care systems to build prompts in patient electronic health records to ensure compliance with a AAA screening program. Risk factors for developing AAA, that is, age older than 65 years, male sex, family history, and a smoking history of >100 cigarettes, should be used to recommend patient screening, including for women and other elderly (older than 75 years) patients who fall outside of professional societal guidelines.

Survival, Prevalence, Progression and Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Results from Three Randomised Controlled Screening Trials Over Three Decades

Aim

The prevalence and mortality of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) has been reported to decline. The aim of this study is to compare survival, prevalence, and repair rate of AAA in Denmark in the 1990s, the 2000s and the 2010s – and to examine any change in factors known to influence the prevalence.

Methods

Baseline status and up to 5-year outcomes of 34,079 general population men aged 65–74 were obtained from three RCTs; the Viborg study (1994–1998, n=4,860), the Viborg Vascular (VIVA) trial (2008–2011, n=18,748), and the Danish Cardiovascular (DANCAVAS) trial (2015–2018, n=10,471). After the millennium (VIVA and DANCAVAS) men with AAA were further offered low dose aspirin and statins. Follow-up data were not available for the DANCAVAS trial yet.

Results

Across the three decades, the AAA prevalence was 3.8% (Reference), 3.3% (p<0.001) and 4.2% (p=0.882), the proportion of smokers were 62%, 42% and 34% (p<0.001) amongst men with AAA, but AAA risk associations with smoking increased during the decades suggesting increased tobacco consumption of smokers. In addition, the proportions of attenders with ischemic heart disease or stroke increased significantly. The aneurysmal progression rate in the 1990s was 2.90 vs 2.98 mm/year in the 2000s (p=0.91). The need for preventive AAA repair increased insignificantly in the 2000s (Age adj. HR= 1.29, 95% C.I.: 0.95; 1.71, p=0.10), and mortality of men with screen-detected AAA was lower in the 2000s compared to the 1990s (Age-adj. HR= 0.28, 95% C.I.: 0.22; 0.36, p<0.001).

Conclusion

The Danish prevalence of AAA today compares to the nineties. Unchanged aneurysmal progression rates combined with improved survival of men at risk of AAA leave them in longer time to develop an AAA, be diagnosed and to need later aneurysmal repair or experience rupture.

Clinical Trial Registrations

Viborg study: No possibility of registration in the nineties. VIVA: NCT00662480, URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00662480, DANCAVAS: ISRCTN12157806, URL: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12157806.

Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

IMPORTANCE

An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is typically defined as aortic enlargement with a diameter of 3.0 cm or larger. The prevalence of AAA has declined over the past 2 decades among screened men 65 years or older in various European countries. The current prevalence of AAA in the United States is unclear because of the low uptake of screening. Most AAAs are asymptomatic until they rupture. Although the risk for rupture varies greatly by aneurysm size, the associated risk for death with rupture is as high as 81%.

OBJECTIVE

To update its 2014 recommendation, the USPSTF commissioned a review of the evidence on the effectiveness of 1-time and repeated screening for AAA, the associated harms of screening, and the benefits and harms of available treatments for small AAAs (3.0-5.4 cm in diameter) identified through screening.

POPULATION

This recommendation applies to asymptomatic adults 50 years or older. However, the randomized trial evidence focuses almost entirely on men aged 65 to 75 years.

EVIDENCE ASSESSMENT

Based on a review of the evidence, the USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for AAA in men aged 65 to 75 years who have ever smoked is of moderate net benefit. The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for AAA in men aged 65 to 75 years who have never smoked is of small net benefit. The USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient to determine the net benefit of screening for AAA in women aged 65 to 75 years who have ever smoked or have a family history of AAA. The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that the harms of screening for AAA in women aged 65 to 75 years who have never smoked and have no family history of AAA outweigh the benefits.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The USPSTF recommends 1-time screening for AAA with ultrasonography in men aged 65 to 75 years who have ever smoked. (B recommendation) The USPSTF recommends that clinicians selectively offer screening for AAA with ultrasonography in men aged 65 to 75 years who have never smoked rather than routinely screening all men in this group. (C recommendation) The USPSTF recommends against routine screening for AAA with ultrasonography in women who have never smoked and have no family history of AAA. (D recommendation) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for AAA with ultrasonography in women aged 65 to 75 years who have ever smoked or have a family history of AAA. (I statement).

Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm and associated lower extremity artery aneurysm in men hospitalized for suspected or known cardiopulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

AAA is a disease affecting predominantly male patients ≥65 years and its dreaded complications such as rupture led to population-based screening programs as preventive measure. Nonetheless, the supposed prevalence may have been overestimated, so that targeted screening of high risk populations may be more effective. This study was performed to evaluate the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) of an inpatient high-risk cohort and to estimate the co-prevalence of lower extremity arterial aneurysms.

METHODS

Participants: 566 male inpatients, ≥ 65 years of age, hospitalized for suspected or known cardiopulmonary disease. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Maximal infrarenal aortic diameters using abdominal ultrasound (leading edge to leading edge method). Upon detection of an AAA (diameter ≥ 30 mm), the lower extremity arteries were examined with regard to associated aneurysms.

RESULTS

In 40 of 566 patients (7.1%) AAAs were detectable. Fourteen patients (2.5%) had a first diagnosis of AAA, none of which was large (> 55 mm), the remaining 26 patients were either already diagnosed (14 patients, 2.5%) or previously repaired (12 patients, 2.1%). The three most common main diagnoses at discharge were acute coronary syndrome (43.3%), congestive heart failure (32.2%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (12%). The cohort showed a distinct cardiovascular risk profile comprising arterial hypertension (82.9%), diabetes mellitus (44.4%), and a history of smoking (57.6%). In multivariate analysis, three-vessel coronary artery disease (Odds ratio (OR): 4.5, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.3-8.9, p <  0.0001) and history of smoking (OR: 3.7, CI: 1.6-8.6, p <  0.01) were positively associated with AAA, while diabetes mellitus (OR: 0.5, CI: 0.2-0.9, p = 0.0295) showed a negative association with AAA. Among the subjects with AAA, we found two large iliac and two large popliteal aneurysms.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound screening in male inpatients, hospitalized for suspected or known cardiopulmonary disease, revealed a high AAA prevalence in comparison to the present epidemiological screening programs. There was a moderate proportion of newly-screen detected AAA and additional screening of the lower extremity arteries yielded some associated aneurysms with indication for possible intervention.

Dysregulation of microRNAs and target genes networks in human abdominal aortic aneurysm tissues

BACKGROUND

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a pathological enlargement of infrarenal aorta close to the aortic bifurcation, and it is an important cause of mortality in the elderly. Therefore, the biomarker identification for early diagnosis is of great interest for clinical benefit. It is known that microRNAs (miRNAs) have important roles via target genes regulation in many diseases. This study aimed to identify miRNAs and their target genes involved in the pathogenesis of AAA.

METHODS

Tissue samples were obtained from patients who underwent AAA surgery and from organ donors (control group). Quantitative PCR Array was applied to assess 84 genes and 384 miRNAs aiming to identify differentially expressed targets (AAA n = 6, control n = 6), followed by validation in a new cohort (AAA n = 18, control n = 6) by regular qPCR. The functional interaction between validated miRNAs and target genes was performed by the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software.

RESULTS

The screening cohort assessed by PCR array identified 10 genes and 59 miRNAs differentially expressed (≥2-fold change, p<0.05). Among these, IPA identified 5 genes and 9 miRNAs with paired interaction. ALOX5, PTGIS, CX3CL1 genes, and miR-193a-3p, 125b-5p, 150-5p maintained a statistical significance in the validation cohort. IPA analysis based on the validated genes and miRNAs revealed that eicosanoid and metalloproteinase/TIMP synthesis are potentially involved in AAA.

CONCLUSION

Paired interactions of differentially expressed ALOX5, PTGIS, CX3CL1 genes, and miR-193b-3p, 125b-5p, 150-5p revealed a potentially significant role of the eicosanoid synthesis and metalloproteinase/TIMP pathways in the AAA pathogenesis.

Can Osteopathic Medical Students Accurately Measure Abdominal Aortic Dimensions Using Handheld Ultrasonography Devices in the Primary Care Setting?

Context

The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends a 1-time ultrasonography (US) screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) to reduce AAA-specific mortality in men aged 65 to 75 years who have ever smoked. A 2015 study concluded that less than 50% of at-risk primary care patients are screened for AAA. To increase screening rates, it would be beneficial to train other health care professionals in accurately measuring abdominal aortic dimensions.

Objective

To determine whether osteopathic medical students can use handheld US machines to measure abdominal aortic diameters as accurately as an experienced US technologist.

Methods

Three osteopathic medical students underwent 8 hours of US training with a board-certified radiologist to measure abdominal aortic dimensions using a handheld US device. After the training, students independently conducted AAA US screenings at a clinic on participants meeting USPSTF AAA screening criteria. Transverse and anteroposterior measurements were taken at 3 sites: celiac axis, inferior to the renal arteries, and superior to the iliac bifurcation. A US technologist then measured the participants’ aortic diameters in the radiology department at another facility. The measurements from both reports were then compared using a 2-sample t test.

Results

The aortic diameter was measured in 16 participants with a mean (SD) body mass index of 26.7 (3.6). The mean (SD) difference between novice and expert measurement of the abdominal aorta was −0.15 (0.23) cm. No statistically significant difference was found between the US measurements completed by students and a US technologist (t=−1.38, P=.09). None of the participants met the criteria for AAA (>3.0 cm), with the largest abdominal aorta scanned by experts measuring 2.86 cm.

Conclusion

When properly trained, osteopathic medical students can accurately measure abdominal aortic diameters using a handheld US device. Training more medical students in ultrasonography would offer increased screening opportunities and possibly reduce AAA-related mortality. Further studies are needed to assess the ability of osteopathic medical students to accurately measure AAAs, as no participants in this study met the criteria for AAA.

Focus on echovascular imaging assessment of arterial disease: complement to the ESC guidelines (PARTIM 1) in collaboration with the Working Group on Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases

The main goal of the present document is to provide a set of practical recommendations for ultrasound imagers who are interested in artery diseases or for physicians who intend to undertake vascular procedures. This is the first part of the work. It is dedicated to general principles of ultrasonography, cervicoencephalic, subclavian, aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries, abdominal aorta, and popliteal aneurysms. It also discusses miscellaneous items such as medial arterial calcinosis, arterial embolism, arteritis, arterial stents and bypasses, false aneurysms, aortic dissection, popliteal entrapment syndrome, and iliac endofibrosis.

Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: current practice, challenges and controversies

The UK screening programme began in 2009, and has now been expanded around the UK. Long-term follow-up of the original cohorts continues to demonstrate significant benefits for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)-related and all-cause mortality , and results from the first 5 years of the formal screening programme have demonstrated similar success. Ultrasound scanning is an effective and safe screening tool for the detection of AAA, although a variety of measurement protocols are employed internationally. Key challenges for the future of the programme relate to declining incidence of screen detected aneurysms.  Recent publications have demonstrated a UK incidence of only 1.34%, compared to 4.9-7.2% of men invited for screening in the original trials. Work into increasing engagement amongst the target group, and expanding screening to siblings and women is underway to address this issue. This review describes the evidence behind the screening programme, its justification in addressing AAA as a significant health problem and discusses some of the potential developments in the future.

Preliminary analysis of proteome alterations in non-aneurysmal, internal mammary artery tissue from patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms

Objective

The pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) involves a disturbed balance of breakdown and buildup of arterial proteins. We envision that individuals with AAA carry generalized arterial protein alterations either because of effects of genetically or environmental AAA risk factors or because of compensatory changes due to signaling molecules released from the affected aneurysmal tissue.

Approach

Protein extraction and quantitative proteome analysis by LC-MS/MS (liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry) was done on individual samples from the internal mammary artery from 11 individuals with AAA and 33 sex- and age-matched controls without AAA. Samples were selected from a biobank of leftover internal mammary arterial tissue gathered at coronary by-pass operations.

Results

We identified and quantitated 877 proteins, of which 44 were differentially expressed between the two groups (nominal p-values without correction for multiple testing). Some proteins related to the extracellular matrix displayed altered concentrations in the AAA group, particularly among elastin-related molecules [elastin, microfibrillar-associated protein 4 (MFAP4), lysyl oxidase]. In addition, several histones e.g. (e.g. HIST1H1E, HIST1H2BB) and other vascular cell proteins (e.g. versican, type VI collagen) were altered.

Conclusions

Our results support the notion that generalized alterations occur in the arterial tree in patients with AAA. Elastin-related proteins and histones seem to be part of such changes, however these preliminary results require replication in an independent set of specimens and validation by functional studies.

Automatic Classification of Ultrasound Screening Examinations of the Abdominal Aorta

Our work facilitates the identification of veterans who may be at risk for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) based on the 2007 mandate to screen all veteran patients that meet the screening criteria. The main research objective is to automatically index three clinical conditions: pertinent negative AAA, pertinent positive AAA, and visually unacceptable image exams. We developed and evaluated a ConText-based algorithm with the GATE (General Architecture for Text Engineering) development system to automatically classify 1402 ultrasound radiology reports for AAA screening. Using the results from JAPE (Java Annotation Pattern Engine) transducer rules, we developed a feature vector to classify the radiology reports with a decision table classifier. We found that ConText performed optimally on precision and recall for pertinent negative (0.99 (0.98-0.99), 0.99 (0.99-1.00)) and pertinent positive AAA detection (0.98 (0.95-1.00), 0.97 (0.92-1.00)), and respectably for determination of non-diagnostic image studies (0.85 (0.77-0.91), 0.96 (0.91-0.99)). In addition, our algorithm can determine the AAA size measurements for further characterization of abnormality. We developed and evaluated a regular expression based algorithm using GATE for determining the three contextual conditions: pertinent negative, pertinent positive, and non-diagnostic from radiology reports obtained for evaluating the presence or absence of abdominal aortic aneurysm. ConText performed very well at identifying the contextual features. Our study also discovered contextual trigger terms to detect sub-standard ultrasound image quality. Limitations of performance included unknown dictionary terms, complex sentences, and vague findings that were difficult to classify and properly code.

The UK EndoVascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) randomised controlled trials: long-term follow-up and cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

Short-term survival benefits of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) compared with open repair (OR) of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms have been shown in randomised trials, but this early survival benefit is soon lost. Survival benefit of EVAR was unclear at follow-up to 10 years.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the long-term efficacy of EVAR against OR in patients deemed fit and suitable for both procedures (EVAR trial 1; EVAR-1); and against no intervention in patients unfit for OR (EVAR trial 2; EVAR-2). To appraise the long-term significance of type II endoleak and define criteria for intervention.

DESIGN

Two national, multicentre randomised controlled trials: EVAR-1 and EVAR-2.

SETTING

Patients were recruited from 37 hospitals in the UK between 1 September 1999 and 31 August 2004.

PARTICIPANTS

Men and women aged ≥ 60 years with an aneurysm of ≥ 5.5 cm (as identified by computed tomography scanning), anatomically suitable and fit for OR were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to either EVAR (n = 626) or OR (n = 626) in EVAR-1 using computer-generated sequences at the trial hub. Patients considered unfit were randomly assigned to EVAR (n = 197) or no intervention (n = 207) in EVAR-2. There was no blinding.

INTERVENTIONS

EVAR, OR or no intervention.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary end points were total and aneurysm-related mortality until mid-2015 for both trials. Secondary outcomes for EVAR-1 were reinterventions, costs and cost-effectiveness.

RESULTS

In EVAR-1, over a mean of 12.7 years (standard deviation 1.5 years; maximum 15.8 years), we recorded 9.3 deaths per 100 person-years in the EVAR group and 8.9 deaths per 100 person-years in the OR group [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97 to 1.27; p = 0.14]. At 0-6 months after randomisation, patients in the EVAR group had a lower mortality (adjusted HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.02 for total mortality; HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.93 for aneurysm-related mortality; p = 0.031), but beyond 8 years of follow-up patients in the OR group had a significantly lower mortality (adjusted HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.56, p = 0.048 for total mortality; HR 5.82, 95% CI 1.64 to 20.65, p = 0.0064 for aneurysm-related mortality). The increased aneurysm-related mortality in the EVAR group after 8 years was mainly attributable to secondary aneurysm sac rupture, with increased cancer mortality also observed in the EVAR group. Overall, aneurysm reintervention rates were higher in the EVAR group than in the OR group, 4.1 and 1.7 per 100 person-years, respectively (p < 0.001), with reinterventions occurring throughout follow-up. The mean difference in costs over 14 years was £3798 (95% CI £2338 to £5258). Economic modelling based on the outcomes of the EVAR-1 trial showed that the cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained over the patient's lifetime exceeds conventional thresholds used in the UK. In EVAR-2, patients died at the same rate in both groups, but there was suggestion of lower aneurysm mortality in those who actually underwent EVAR. Type II endoleak itself is not associated with a higher rate of mortality.

LIMITATIONS

Devices used were implanted between 1999 and 2004. Newer devices might have better results. Later follow-up imaging declined, particularly for OR patients. Methodology to capture reinterventions changed mainly to record linkage through the Hospital Episode Statistics administrative data set from 2009.

CONCLUSIONS

EVAR has an early survival benefit but an inferior late survival benefit compared with OR, which needs to be addressed by lifelong surveillance of EVAR and reintervention if necessary. EVAR does not prolong life in patients unfit for OR. Type II endoleak alone is relatively benign.

FUTURE WORK

To find easier ways to monitor sac expansion to trigger timely reintervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN55703451.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and the results will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 22, No. 5. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

ApoA-I/HDL-C levels are inversely associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm progression

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) evolution is unpredictable, and there is no therapy except surgery for patients with an aortic size > 5 cm (large AAA). We aimed to identify new potential biomarkers that could facilitate prognosis and treatment of patients with AAA. A differential quantitative proteomic analysis of plasma proteins was performed in AAA patients at different stages of evolution [small AAA (aortic size=3�5cm) vs large AAA] using iTRAQ labelling, highthroughput nano-LC-MS/MS and a novel multi-layered statistical model. Among the proteins identified, ApoA-I was decreased in patients with large AAA compared to those with small AAA. These results were validated by ELISA on plasma samples from small (n=90) and large AAA (n=26) patients (150 ± 3 vs 133 ± 5 mg/dl, respectively, p< 0.001). ApoA-I levels strongly correlated with HDL-Cholesterol (HDL-C) concentration (r=0.9, p< 0.001) and showed a negative correlation with aortic size (r=-0.4, p< 0.01) and thrombus volume (r=-0.3, p< 0.01), which remained significant after adjusting for traditional risk factors. In a prospective study, HDL-C independently predicted aneurysmal growth rate in multiple linear regression analysis (n=122, p=0.008) and was inversely associated with need for surgical repair (Adjusted hazard ratio: 0.18, 95 % confidence interval: 0.04�0.74, p=0.018). In a nation-wide Danish registry, we found lower mean HDL-C concentration in large AAA patients (n=6,560) compared with patients with aorto-iliac occlusive disease (n=23,496) (0.89 ± 2.99 vs 1.59 ± 5.74 mmol/l, p< 0.001). Finally, reduced mean aortic AAA diameter was observed in AngII-infused mice treated with ApoA-I mimetic peptide compared with saline-injected controls. In conclusion, ApoAI/ HDL-C systemic levels are negatively associated with AAA evolution. Therapies targeting HDL functionality could halt AAA formation.

Serum High-Sensitive C-Reactive Protein Level and CRP Genetic Polymorphisms Are Associated with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

BACKGROUND

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) development involves an inflammatory process with a potential genetic background. C-reactive protein (CRP) is an acute phase protein and was elevated in patients with AAA. The aim of this study was to investigate the association among serum high-sensitive CRP (hsCRP) concentration, its CRP genetic polymorphisms, and AAA.

METHODS

Serum hsCRP concentrations and abdominal aorta diameters were measured, and correlation analysis between them was performed in 155 unrelated participants with AAA and 310 non-AAA controls. Tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the CRP gene (rs1417938, rs1130864, rs1205, rs1800947) were identified via HapMap. Stratification analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of SNPs on the concentration of serum hsCRP. The association between 4 SNPs and AAA was assessed by unconditional logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Elevated serum hsCRP level was found to be an independent risk factor for AAA (odds ratio [OR] = 3.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.45, 6.23) after adjustment for confounding factors. Concentrations of serum hsCRP were significant different (P = 0.01) in 4 subgroups derived from participants with abdominal aorta diameter <20 mm, 20-29 mm, 30-54 mm, and ≥55 mm. Stratification analysis revealed there was significant high frequency of elevated hsCRP levels in subjects carrying rs1205-CC genotype compared with those carrying rs1205-TT or CT genotypes (P = 0.004, OR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.30, 4.11), suggesting that the genotype CC of rs1205 was associated with higher serum hsCRP levels. However, the frequency of rs1205-CC in AAA patients (15.3%) was similar to control subjects (17.6%), and we could not confirm rs1205-CC was the genetic risk factor of AAA (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.69, 2.01). Moreover, we found another CRP polymorphism rs1417938-TT had a significantly higher likelihood of AAA than the AT genotype (OR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.06, 4.03) for the first time, indicating there was perhaps a role for rs14117938-T polymorphism that correlates with AAA.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum hsCRP may be related to the presence of AAA and abdominal aorta diameter. Genetic polymorphisms in CRP gene could influence the concentration of serum hsCRP and the likelihood of AAA, but the causal relationship between AAA and CRP should be demonstrated further.

Impending aortic aneurysm rupture - a case report and review of the warning signs

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) may present with subtle clinical findings. Recognition of the imaging features of an impending rupture is key for timely diagnosis. This report reviews the classic computed tomography findings of impending AAA rupture and presents a recent case which illustrates the key features.

Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: The Effects of Age and Social Deprivation on Screening Uptake, Prevalence and Attendance at Follow-Up in the MASS Trial

Objectives/setting:

The effectiveness of screening programmes may be improved by knowledge of factors affecting screening uptake, disease prevalence and attendance for follow-up. Data from the Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) are used to examine the influences of age and social deprivation in the context of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).

Methods:

In the MASS trial, a population-based sample of 34,000 men aged 65 to 74 received an invitation to screening. The associations of attendance at screening with age, social deprivation and season of the year when invited to attend were investigated using logistic regression analysis. Similar analyses were performed for AAA prevalence and attendance at recall scans.

Results:

Compared with men aged 65–69, those aged 70–74 were less likely to attend screening (79% vs 81 %), had increased prevalence of AAA (6% vs 4%) and were less likely to attend for followup (79% vs 84%). Compared with those in the least deprived quartile, those in the most deprived quartile also were less likely to attend (75% vs 85%), had increased prevalence (6% vs 4%) and were less likely to attend for follow-up (80% vs 83%). Season showed no significant association with attendance at initial screening.

Conclusions:

Higher age and social deprivation are associated with both poorer attendance at screening and follow-up, and having an AAA. This highlights the importance of promoting screening programmes, particularly to the more deprived populations.

Calculating when elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair improves survival for individual patients: development of the Aneurysm Repair Decision Aid and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair aims to prevent premature death from AAA rupture. Elective repair is currently recommended when AAA diameter reaches 5.5 cm (men) and 5.0 cm (women). Applying population-based indications may not be appropriate for individual patient decisions, as the optimal indication is likely to differ between patients based on age and comorbidities.

OBJECTIVE

To develop an Aneurysm Repair Decision Aid (ARDA) to indicate when elective AAA repair optimises survival for individual patients and to assess the cost-effectiveness and associated uncertainty of elective repair at the aneurysm diameter recommended by the ARDA compared with current practice.

DATA SOURCES

The UK Vascular Governance North West and National Vascular Database provided individual patient data to develop predictive models for perioperative mortality and survival. Data from published literature were used to model AAA growth and risk of rupture. The cost-effectiveness analysis used data from published literature and from local and national databases.

METHODS

A combination of systematic review methods and clinical registries were used to provide data to populate models and inform the structure of the ARDA. Discrete event simulation (DES) was used to model the patient journey from diagnosis to death and synthesised data were used to estimate patient outcomes and costs for elective repair at alternative aneurysm diameters. Eight patient clinical scenarios (vignettes) were used as exemplars. The DES structure was validated by clinical and statistical experts. The economic evaluation estimated costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) from the NHS, social care provider and patient perspective over a lifetime horizon. Cost-effectiveness acceptability analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses explored uncertainty in the data and the value for money of ARDA-based decisions. The ARDA outcome measures include perioperative mortality risk, annual risk of rupture, 1-, 5- and 10-year survival, postoperative long-term survival, median life expectancy and predicted time to current threshold for aneurysm repair. The primary economic measure was the ICER using the QALY as the measure of health benefit.

RESULTS

The analysis demonstrated it is feasible to build and run a complex clinical decision aid using DES. The model results support current guidelines for most vignettes but suggest that earlier repair may be effective in younger, fitter patients and ongoing surveillance may be effective in elderly patients with comorbidities. The model adds information to support decisions for patients with aneurysms outside current indications. The economic evaluation suggests that using the ARDA compared with current guidelines could be cost-effective but there is a high level of uncertainty.

LIMITATIONS

Lack of high-quality long-term data to populate all sections of the model meant that there is high uncertainty about the long-term clinical and economic consequences of repair. Modelling assumptions were necessary and the developed survival models require external validation.

CONCLUSIONS

The ARDA provides detailed information on the potential consequences of AAA repair or a decision not to repair that may be helpful to vascular surgeons and their patients in reaching informed decisions. Further research is required to reduce uncertainty about key data, including reintervention following AAA repair, and assess the acceptability and feasibility of the ARDA for use in routine clinical practice.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Reproducibility of the SPI-US protocol for ultrasound diameter measurements of the Posterior Circumflex Humeral Artery and Deep Brachial Artery: an inter-rater reliability study

OBJECTIVES

Elite overhead athletes are at risk of posterior circumflex humeral artery (PCHA) degeneration, aneurysm formation and thrombosis. Identification of the proximal PCHA and the nearby originating deep brachial artery (DBA) can be a challenge, even among experienced sonographers. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy and precision of a newly designed standardized ultrasound (US) protocol (SPI-US) for assessment of the PCHA and DBA.

METHODS

Two experienced sonographers determined diameters of the PCHA and DBA using the SPI-US protocol. Inter-observer agreement was evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), Bland-Altman (BA) analysis, and variance component (VARCOMP) analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-three healthy volunteers participated. The ICC for diameter measurement of the PCHA and DBA were 0.70 (95 %CI 0.50-0.83) and 0.60 (95 %CI 0.30-0.80), respectively. The SEM for the PCHA and DBA was 0.32 mm and 0.29 mm and MDC was 0.90 mm and 0.80 mm, respectively. The BA and VARCOMP analyses showed no systematic and only marginal sonographer bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The SPI-US protocol is accurate and precise for PCHA and DBA diameter assessment in cases where they originate from the axillary artery. PCHA and DBA diameter measurements are sonographer-independent using the SPI-US-protocol.

KEY POINTS

• PCHA & DBA diameter assessment is accurate and reliable using the SPI-US protocol • PCHA & DBA diameter measurements are sonographer-independent using the SPI-US protocol • The SPI-US protocol minimal detectable change is 0.90 mm for PCHA diameter measurement • This minimal detectable change enables detection of PCHA aneurysms • First step towards international periodic surveillance of athletes at risk of PCHA-injury.